![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 38, 27185-27190, September 17, 1999
From the Department of Molecular Microbiology, Howard Hughes
Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine,
St. Louis, Missouri 63110
The two-component system PmrA/PmrB of
Salmonella enterica controls expression of several loci
including those mediating modifications in the lipopolysaccharide that
result in polymyxin resistance. To gain insight in the regulation of
polymyxin resistance, we mapped the transcription start sites of the
PmrA-regulated genes pmrC, pmrG, pbgPE, and
ugd and identified a conserved sequence in the promoter
region of the first three genes. His-tagged PmrA protein could gel
shift DNA fragments containing the promoters of the pmrC,
pmrG, and pbgPE genes but not the
udg promoter. DNase I footprinting analysis of the
pmrC, pmrG, and pbgPE promoters indicate that phosphorylated as well as unphosphorylated PmrA bind to a
16-base pair imperfect inverted repeat sequence
(5'-TTAAKTTCTTAAKGTT-3'), which is found 40, 80, and 38 nucleotides
upstream from the transcription start sites of the pmrC,
pmrG, and pbgPE genes, respectively. Our data suggest
that a PmrA dimer activates transcription of the divergent
pmrG and pbgPE promoters by binding to a single site in the pmrG-pbgPE intergenic region and
that the ugd gene is regulated by the PmrA/PmrB system only indirectly.
To survive in different environments, bacteria modulate expression
of their genes often using two-component signal transduction systems
(1, 2). These systems typically consist of a sensor histidine kinase
and a response regulator. In general, sensor kinases contain conserved
carboxyl-terminal histidine residues that are autophosphorylated in the
presence of ATP (3). Most sensors are membrane-bound and transfer the
phosphate group to an aspartic acid residue in the amino terminus of
the response regulator. The phosphorylated response regulator usually
mediates control at the transcriptional level by binding to specific
DNA sequences.
The pmrA and pmrB genes of Salmonella
enterica serovar Typhimurium encode products with sequence
similarity to DNA binding response regulators and autophosphorylatable
histidine kinases, respectively (4). The pmrA locus is
required for resistance to polymyxin B and to other antimicrobial
compounds in Salmonella (5-7) and controls the production
of proteins that mediate the modification of the lipopolysaccharide
core and lipid A with ethanolamine and 4-aminoarabinose (8).
Transcription of PmrA-activated genes is induced in response to mild
acidic conditions (9) or during growth in a low extracellular magnesium
media in a process that requires the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system
(10, 11) (Fig. 1). Four PmrA-regulated
loci have been identified to date as follows: ugd, encoding
UDP-glucose dehydrogenase; the seven-gene operon pbgPE
(designated as the pmrF locus by Gunn et al.
(12)); pmrG; and the pmrCAB operon, indicating
that the pmrA is autoregulated (10, 11). The ugd
and pbgPE loci are required for polymyxin resistance A (12,
13), growth in low magnesium solid media (13), and the incorporation of
4-aminoarabinose into lipid A (12, 14). The PmrG protein is homologous
to Ais, an aluminum induced protein of Escherichia coli K-12
(12), but its biochemical function as well as that of the putative
membrane protein PmrC remain unknown. The pmrG gene is
located upstream and transcribed in the opposite orientation of the
pbgPE operon. Downstream of the pbgPE operon is
the pmrD gene, which may also be PmrA-regulated because when
present in a multicopy number plasmid, it confers polymyxin resistance
in a PmrA-dependent manner (15).
In this paper, we characterize the PmrA-regulated promoters in
Salmonella by determining the transcription start sites of four PmrA-regulated operons and identifying the DNA sequence to which
the PmrA protein binds. Our experiments define two classes of
PmrA-regulated genes as follows: those that are directly regulated by
the PmrA protein (pmrCAB, pmrG, and
pbgPE), and those that are regulated indirectly by the PmrA
protein (ugd).
Strains and Plasmids--
E. coli JM109 was used as
the host for the preparation of plasmid DNA. E. coli
BL21(DE3) served as the host for overexpression of the PmrA protein and
the cytoplasmic domain of the PmrB (PmrBc) protein. To overproduce the
PmrA protein, the chromosomal pmrA gene was
PCR1-amplified with primer
351 (5'-AAG GAT CCA GGA GAC TAA GCG-3') and six histidine tag (H6)
containing primer 438 (5'-TCC AAG CTT AGT GGT GGT GGT GGT GGT GGC TTT
CCT CAG TGG CAA CC-5'). The resulting 715-bp PCR product was digested
with BamHI and HindIII and cloned between the
BamHI and HindIII sites of
pUHE21-2lacIq to form pUHE-PmrA-H6. The
pmrA gene containing the six histidine codons was cut out of
pUHE-PmrA-H6 with NdeI and HindIII and ligated into pT7-7. The cytoplasmic domain of pmrB was amplified
with primer 988 (5'-AGA TAT ACA TAT GCA CCA CCA CCA CCA CCA CCG GCG TAT
TAC CCG TCC GCT-3') containing an initiation codon followed by a
six-histidine tag and primer 353 (5'-ACG AAG CTT ATG CCT TTT TCA-3').
The resulting 845-bp PCR product was digested with NdeI and
HindIII and ligated into plasmid pT7-7. The nucleotide sequence of the cloned PCR products was verified by sequencing both
strands. S. enterica serovar Typhimurium 14028s (16) was used for chromosomal DNA and RNA isolation.
RNA Isolation and Primer Extension--
Overnight cultures of
S. enterica serovar Typhimurium grown in N-minimal medium
(17), pH 7.7, with 10 mM MgCl2 were washed 3 times in N-minimal medium, pH 7.7, without MgCl2 and
diluted 1:50 into 50 ml of N-minimal medium, pH 7.7, containing either 10 µM or 10 mM MgCl2 or N-minimal
medium, pH 5.8, containing 10 mM MgCl2. Total
RNA was extracted from mid-exponential phase cultures (A600, 0.4-0.6) with Trizol (Life Technologies,
Inc.) according to the manufacturer's specifications. Primers used for
cDNA synthesis were 935 (5'-AGA CGG CAA TAT AAA AGG AA-3'), located
56 bp downstream of the pmrC start codon; 955 (5'-CAT TAA
CCT CTC AGG CAG AC-3'), situated 14 bp downstream of the start codon of
the first gene in the pbgPE operon; 1069 (5'-ATA AAG CGT AGG
GTA AAT GC-3'), located 5 bp downstream of the pmrG start
codon; and 1007 (5'-GCA ATA AGC AAA CCA TTA GA-3'), located 36 bp
downstream of the ugd initiation codon. The cDNA
synthesis was performed with 30 µg of total RNA, 2 pmol of primer
labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase, and [ Purification of the PmrA and PmrBc
Proteins--
Histidine-tagged PmrA and PmrBc proteins were expressed
in E. coli BL21(DE3) containing either plasmid pT7-PmrA-H6
(EG10067) or pT7-PmrBc-H6 (EG11751). Cells were grown in 500 ml of LB
broth at 30 °C to an A600 of 0.6. Then,
isopropyl-1-thio- Gel Mobility Shift Assays--
DNA fragments used for gel
mobility shift assay were amplified by the PCR using S. enterica serovar Typhimurium chromosomal DNA as a template. Prior
to the PCR, primers 935, 955, and 1007, which anneal to the coding
strand of pmrC, pbgPE, and ugd,
respectively, were labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and
[ Phosphorylation of PmrA by PmrBc--
The PmrBc-H6 or PmrA-H6
proteins were incubated at room temperature (RT) for 10 or 40 min,
respectively, with 50 µCi of [ DNase I Footprinting--
DNase I protection assays were done
for both DNA strands using the appropriate labeled primer. PmrA-H6
protein was incubated with phosphorylated or unphosphorylated PmrBc-H6
for 20 min at RT as described above, except that instead of
[ Dimerization of PmrA Protein--
His-tagged PmrA protein (2 µg) was resuspended in SDS sample buffer with or without
2-mercaptoethanol and electrophoresed on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel.
Mapping the Transcription Start Sites of PmrA-regulated
Genes--
To characterize the PmrA-regulated promoters, we determined
the transcription start sites of the PmrA-activated genes
pmrC, pmrG, pbgPE, and ugd. Expression
of PmrA-activated genes is promoted during growth in low magnesium
media in a process that requires the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system.
But transcription of PmrA-activated genes can also be induced by growth
in mild acidic conditions in a PhoP/PhoQ-independent manner mechanism
(9-11). To distinguish between PhoP/PhoQ-dependent and
-independent transcription of PmrA-activated genes, total RNA was
isolated from mid-exponential phase cultures of wild-type
Salmonella grown in N-minimal media with 10 µM
Mg2+, pH 7.7, or 10 mM Mg2+, pH
5.8, respectively (9). RNA was also isolated from bacteria grown in
N-minimal media, 10 mM Mg2+, pH 7.7, a
condition that does not promote expression of PmrA-activated genes.
A single primer extension product was obtained for the pmrC
promoter, corresponding to an A residue located 23 nucleotides upstream
of the pmrC start codon, with RNA isolated from bacteria grown under either inducing condition (Fig.
2). Single transcription start sites were
also detected for the pmrG and ugd promoters, corresponding to a G residue 104 bp upstream of the pmrG
start codon and to an A residue 122 bp upstream of the ugd
start codon (Fig. 2). In contrast, two major bands located 5 bp apart
were observed for the pbgPE promoter (Fig. 2). S1 mapping
experiments revealed that the top band, corresponding to an A residue
73 nucleotides upstream of the start codon of the pbgP1
gene, was the transcription start site (data not shown). The S1 mapping
experiments revealed the same transcription start sites (data now
shown) identified by primer extension for the pmrC,
pmrG, and ugd genes (Fig. 2). On the other hand,
no primer extension products were observed with RNA isolated from
bacteria grown at 10 mM Mg2+, pH 7.7 (Fig. 2),
consistent with previous results using lac gene fusions (9).
That identical transcription start sites were detected when expression
of PmrA-activated genes was induced by growth in low magnesium or by
mild acidification suggests that these signals act by modifying the
activity of the PmrA protein and argues against a model in which
different promoters are used in response to different signals.
We analyzed the DNA sequences 5' to the transcription start sites of
the pmrC, pmrG, pbgPE, and ugd genes
by comparing them to known promoter consensus sequences. The promoters
of theses PmrA-activated genes displayed similarity to E. coli The PmrA Protein Binds to the Promoter Regions of the pmrC, pmrG,
and pbgPE Genes--
To examine the ability of the PmrA protein to
bind the promoter regions of PmrA-activated genes, we first constructed
a derivative of the pmrA gene encoding a protein with six
histidine residues at its amino terminus, and we showed that a plasmid
encoding this pmrA derivative (pUHE-PmrA-H6) could restore
transcription of the pmrC, pbgPE,
pmrG, and ugd genes in a pmrA null
mutant (data not shown). The PmrA-H6 protein could gel shift a 300-bp
DNA fragment that included 215 bp upstream of the initiation codon of
pmrC, and a 341-bp DNA fragment that included the initiation
codons of the divergent pbgPE and pmrG genes
(Fig. 3). The amount of PmrA-H6 protein
needed for the gel shift of the pmrC and
pbgPE/pmrG DNA fragments was similar: gel shifts were seen
with 10 pmol of PmrA-H6 protein, and all of the input pmrC
and pbgPE/pmrG DNA was in the complexed state in the
presence of 250 pmol of protein. Band retardation was observed despite
the presence of a large excess (1,000-fold) of competing salmon sperm
DNA, suggesting that PmrA-H6 binds directly and specifically to the
pbgPE/pmrG and pmrC promoter regions. In
contrast, a 261-bp DNA fragment that includes 202 bp upstream of the
ugd start codon could not be gel-shifted by 250 pmol of
PmrA-H6 protein (Fig. 3), even when this protein was phosphorylated
(data not shown).
Autophosphorylation of the PmrB Protein and Phosphotransfer to the
PmrA Protein--
We purified the cytoplasmic domain of the PmrB
protein (PmrBc-H6) and investigated its ability to autophosphorylate in
the presence of ATP. The PmrBc-H6 protein was capable of efficient autophosphorylation (Fig. 4). Moreover,
it could serve as a phosphate donor for the PmrA-H6 protein. Rapid
phosphotransfer from the PmrBc-H6 to the PmrA-H6 protein was observed
(Fig. 4). The half-life for phosphorylated PmrBc-H6 was 10 min when
incubated with the PmrA-H6 protein in a 1:2 PmrBc-H6/PmrA-H6
stoichiometry. As expected, the PmrA-H6 protein alone showed no
evidence of phosphorylation when incubated with ATP (Fig. 4, lane
10).
Determination of the PmrA-binding Site--
To define
experimentally the DNA sequence that the PmrA protein recognizes, DNase
I footprinting analysis was performed on both the coding and non-coding
strands of the pmrC and pbgPE/pmrG promoter
fragments using both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated PmrA-H6
protein. In the pmrC promoter, the PmrA-H6 protein protected from nt The PmrA Protein Can Form Dimers--
The PmrA-H6 protein was
analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel with or without 2-mercaptoethanol in
the sample buffer. In the absence of 2-mercaptoethanol the PmrA-H6
protein runs as a 50-kDa species, consistent with the notion that this
protein can dimerize (Fig. 7). PmrA
harbors a single cysteine at position 27, which may be responsible for
disulfide bridge formation between two PmrA molecules. The dimer form
of PmrA may bind the inverted repeat in the promoter regions of
PmrA-activated genes to promote gene transcription.
The two-component system PmrA/PmrB controls transcription of the
pmrC, pmrG, pbgPE, and ugd genes (9,
12). Some of these genes encode products that mediate the modification
of the lipid A by the addition of 4-aminoarabinose, which makes the
microorganism 1,000-fold less susceptible to polymyxin B (12, 13). We
have defined the promoter region of the PmrA-regulated genes
pmrC, pmrG, pbgPE, and ugd genes. When
compared with known promoter consensus sequences (19), they showed weak
identity to the E. coli Transcription of PmrA-activated genes is induced in response to mild
acidic conditions (9) or by a low extracellular magnesium concentration
through interaction with the PhoP/PhoQ two-component system (10, 11).
Transcription products for the pmrC, pmrG, pbgPE,
and ugd genes were detected only under inducing conditions for the PmrA/PmrB two-component system. Moreover, the same
transcription start site was detected whether bacteria were grown in
low pH or in low extracellular magnesium. This indicates that the same promoter is used under different activating conditions (as supposed to
different promoters being activated in response to different signals).
A single retarded DNA-protein complex was detected for the
pmrC and the pbgPE/pmrG promoter fragments
indicating that these promoters contain only one PmrA-binding site.
This notion is further supported by our DNase I footprinting analysis
which showed that the PmrA-binding site is located around nt There is single PmrA-binding site in the
pbgPE-pmrG intergenic region, and this site is
closer to the pbgPE promoter than to the pmrG
promoter. A similar phenomenon has been described in the agr
locus of Staphylococcus aureus where two divergent promoters, P2 and P3, contain a single binding site for the regulatory protein SarA (26). The SarA location is closer to the P2 promoter, which is the most activated promoter. Further work will be required to
examine whether the pbgPE promoter is preferentially
activated relative to the pmrG promoter.
Phosphorylation of response regulators is believed to prevent the
activity of an inhibitory domain, allowing the amino terminus to
dimerize or oligomerize and the carboxyl terminus to bind to the target
DNA (27). However, like the PhoP protein of Bacillus subtilis, the PmrA protein dimerizes and binds to DNA regardless of its phosphorylation state (28). Several response regulators also
bind to their target promoters efficiently in their unphosphorylated form (29, 30), but others, such as NarL and ComA, bind to their target
genes only in phosphorylated form (31, 32). Yet, in all cases,
phosphorylation of response regulators affects binding to the target
promoters, often by increasing binding affinity such as in the case of
the OmpR and PhoB proteins (33, 34). A similar phenomenon is seen for
PmrA, where 2-4-fold less protein is needed for full DNase I
protection if phosphorylated PmrA protein is used instead of
unphosphorylated PmrA. The high binding affinity of the
unphosphorylated PmrA for its target DNA places PmrA in the same class
of response regulators as the PhoP protein of B. subtilis,
the UhpA protein of E. coli, and the BvgA protein of Bordetella pertussis (1). Phosphorylation of this class of response regulators appears to only change the conformation of these
proteins, resulting in transcription activation.
The PmrA protein exhibited specific binding to the pmrC and
pbgPE/pmrG promoter fragments. On the other hand, neither
phosphorylated nor unphosphorylated PmrA protein could bind to the
ugd promoter. This was surprising because genetic analysis
of strains harboring ugd::lac fusions demonstrated
that ugd transcription requires a functional pmrA
gene (9, 12). The ugd gene codes for UDP glucose
dehydrogenase which converts UDP-glucose into UDP-glucuronic acid, a
precursor in the biosynthesis of the exopolysaccharide colanic acid
(35). When grown at low temperature in defined media, the
ugd mutant is not mucoid presumably because it is unable to
synthesize colanic acid.2 On
the other hand, pmrA mutants are mucoid,2
implying that the ugd gene can be expressed independently of the PmrA protein. This suggests that the PmrA protein regulates transcription of the ugd gene only indirectly and that a
different regulator is likely to bind and activate transcription from
the ugd promoter. Thus, the ugd gene defines a
new class of PhoP/PhoQ-activated genes, a class that can be
transcriptionally induced by at least three signals as follows: growth
in low magnesium (in a process that requires both the PhoP/PhoQ and
PmrA/PmrB two-component systems), growth in mild acid media (in a
process that requires PmrA/PmrB but that is independent of PhoP/PhoQ),
and a yet undefined condition (in a process that is independent of both
PmrA/PmrB and PhoP/PhoQ).
Finally, we analyzed the genome of E. coli K-12 for the
presence of PmrA-binding sites and found such sequences in front of the
pmrC homologue yjdB, where it covers the inner
part of a 14-bp inverted repeat, and in the intergenic region of the
homologues of the pbgPE and pmrG genes. The
conservation of the binding sites in E. coli and
Salmonella is consistent with the high degree of sequence
identity that exists between the Salmonella PmrA protein and
its homologue in E. coli K-12 BasR (90% at the amino acid level) (36) and suggests that transcription activation of
PmrA-regulated genes will be highly similar in these enteric species.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant AI42236 (to E. A. G).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Associate Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. To
whom correspondence should be addressed: Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Dept. of Molecular
Microbiology, 660 South Euclid Ave., Campus Box 8230, St. Louis, MO
63110. Tel.: 314-362-3692; Fax: 314-747-8228; E-mail: groisman@borcim.wustl.edu.
2
M. M. S. M. Wösten and
E. A. Groisman, unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
H6, six-histidine tag;
bp, base pair(s);
RT, room
temperature;
nt, nucleotide(s).
Molecular Characterization of the PmrA Regulon*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The PmrA regulon of S. enterica. Transcription of PmrA-activated genes can be
induced by growth in low magnesium in a PhoP/PhoQ-dependent
fashion and by mild acidic conditions in a PhoP/PhoQ-independent
manner. Inducing conditions are believed to promote autophosphorylation
of the PmrB protein that can serve as a phosphate donor for the PmrA
protein. Phosphorylated PmrA activates its own operon
(pmrCAB), the seven-gene operon pbgPE (designated
as the pmrF locus by Gunn et al. (12)) and
pmrG by binding to their promoter regions. The
ugd gene is probably activated indirectly through a yet
unidentified factor.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP
and 50 units of SuperScriptTMII RnaseH
reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). The extension products
were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide, 7.5 M urea gel and compared with sequence ladders initiated
with primers 935, 955, 1069, or 1007.
-D-galactopyranoside was added to a
final concentration of 1 mM, and incubation was continued
for 4 h. Cells were harvested and suspended in 10 ml of buffer A
(50 mM NaH2PO4, pH 8.0; 300 mM NaCl, and 10 mM imidazole) and disrupted by
sonication. Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 15 min. Three ml of 50% nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid
was added to the supernatant and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C on a
rocking platform. The PmrA-H6 and PmrBc-H6 proteins were washed 4 times
with 10 ml of buffer A containing 50 mM imidazole. The
proteins were eluted with 4 ml of buffer A containing 250 mM imidazole.
-32P]ATP. The pmrC promoter region was
amplified using primer 454 (5'-TCG AAT TCG ATC ACC GCG CTG-3') and
labeled primer 935. The pbgPE/pmrG promoter region was
generated by PCR with primer 767 (5'-TCG CCG GAC GGG AGA AAG GC-3') and
labeled primer 955. The ugd promoter region was amplified
with primer 977 (5'-CGG GAT CCG GGC TTT TTT TTA TCT C-3') and labeled
primer 1007. Approximately 25 amol of labeled DNA and 0, 10, 20, 30, 50, 100, or 250 pmol of PmrA-H6 protein in a 100-µl volume were
incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The binding buffer used for
protein-DNA incubations was 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 50 µg/ml
bovine serum albumin, 2.5 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA, and 10% glycerol.
Samples (20 µl) were run on a 4% non-denaturing Tris glycine
polyacrylamide gel at 2 °C. After electrophoresis the gel was dried
and autoradiographed.
-32P]ATP in
phosphorylation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 75 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM dithiothreitol). Phosphorylation of PmrA-H6 was
accomplished by adding 0.5 pmol of autophosphorylated PmrBc-H6 to 1 pmol of PmrA in phosphorylation buffer. The reaction was stopped after
0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, or 40 min with SDS loading buffer. The
samples were run on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel.
-32P]ATP, ATP was used. Binding reactions with 0, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, or 128 pmol of PmrA-H6 protein and 25 amol of labeled
DNA were performed as described for the gel mobility shift assay. DNase I (Life Technologies, Inc.) (0.05 units) was added and incubated for 3 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by adding 10 µl of
25 mM EDTA. DNA fragments were purified with Wizard DNA cleanup system (Promega, Madison, WI) and resuspended in 30 µl of
H2O. Samples (6 µl) were analyzed by denaturing
polyacrylamide (6%) gel electrophoresis by comparison with a DNA
sequence ladder generated with the appropriate primer.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (96K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Mapping the transcription start sites of the
pmrC, pmrG, pbgPE, and ugd operons. Primer extension products were generated after
reverse transcriptase of total RNA isolated from mid-exponential phase
cells grown in N-minimal medium, pH 7.7, containing 10 mM
Mg2+ (lane 1), 10 µM
Mg2+ (lane 2), or N-minimal medium, pH 5.8, containing 10 mM Mg2+ (lane 3). The
primer extension products were run on a 6% sequencing gel against
dideoxy sequencing reactions primed with the same primer. The sequence
spanning the transcription start site is shown, and the transcription
start site is marked with an arrow.
70 promoters: the
10 regions of these
promoters contained three out of the six conserved nucleotides, and the
35 regions contained three or four of the six conserved nucleotides
(Fig. 6). The pmrG and pbgPE promoters also
contain an 18-bp A + T-rich sequence upstream of the
35 region known
as UP element (18).

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
The PmrA protein binds to the promoter region
of the pmrC and pbgPE/pmrG genes but
not to the ugd promoter region. The 300-bp
pmrC PCR fragment includes 215 bp of the region upstream of
the initiation codon of pmrC. The 341-bp
pbgPE/pmrG PCR fragment contains the complete
non-coding region between pbgPE and pmrG genes,
and the 261-bp ugd PCR fragment contains 202 bp of the
region upstream of the ugd gene. The concentration of
PmrA-H6 added to each reaction is indicated at the top of
each lane.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Phosphorylation of the PmrA protein by the
cytoplasmic domain of the PmrB protein in vitro.
Autophosphorylation of PmrBc-H6 (0.5 pmol) was accomplished by
incubation of PmrBc-H6 with [
-32P]ATP for 10 min at
RT. The PmrA protein was incubated for 40 min with
[
-32P]ATP. Time course of phosphotransfer from
32P-PmrBc (0.5 pmol) to PmrA (1 pmol) is indicated at the
bottom of the figure. The samples were run on a 15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and autophosphorylation and
phosphotransfer were visualized by autoradiography.
49 to
28 relative to the transcription start site and from
nt
57 to
31 in the non-coding strand of pmrC (Fig.
5). Thus, there was an overlap of 19 bp
between the two strands protected by the PmrA protein. In the
pbgPE/pmrG promoter region, the PmrA-H6 protein also
protected a single region of the coding (nt
46 to
26) and
non-coding strand (nt
54 to
27), overlapping a region of 20 bp
(Fig. 5). In addition, areas of hypersensitivity were observed flanking
portions of the protected sites. The location of the hypersensitive
site in the pbgPE coding strand was dependent on the
phosphorylated state of the PmrA-H6 protein. At high protein concentrations, phosphorylated and unphosphorylated PmrA-H6 protected the same region in the different promoters. On the other hand, at low
protein concentrations phosphorylated PmrA-H6 protected this region
better than unphosphorylated PmrA-H6. The protected sequences of the
pmrC, pmrG, and pbgPE promoters were
highly similar to one another (Fig. 6)
and allowed us to define the following PmrA binding sequence:
5'-TTAA(G/T)TTCTTAA(G/T)GTT-3', which includes an imperfect inverted
repeat (Fig. 6).

View larger version (119K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
DNase I footprinting analysis of the
pmrC and pbgPE/pmrG promoters.
Footprinting analysis of the pmrC and
pbgPE/pmrG promoter regions was performed on both
end-labeled coding and non-coding strands. The amount of phosphorylated
[P-PmrA] or unphosphorylated [PmrA] PmrA-H6 protein added to the
DNA fragments is indicated at the top of the figures.
Solid lines represent the PmrA-binding region. The position
of the binding was determined by comparison with sequence ladders,
obtained using the same labeled primer as was used for the probe. The
hypersensitive DNase I sites are indicated with
arrows.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
The promoter regions of the
ugd, pmrC, and pbgPE/pmrG genes. A hooked arrow indicates the transcription
start site. Brackets mark the DNase I-protected nucleotides
by PmrA-H6 of the coding and non-coding strands. Hypersensitive DNase I
sites are indicated by vertical arrows. Imperfect inverted
repeats are indicated with horizontal arrows. The proposed
10 and
35 regions are marked in bold, and the UP element
is marked with a line. Ambiguous codes used are:
K, G or T; M, A or C.

View larger version (69K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The PmrA protein is a dimer. Purified
His-tagged PmrA protein (2 µg) was analyzed on a 15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel with or without 2-mercaptoethanol and stained
with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Disulfide bridge formation may be
mediated by the single cysteine residue at position 27 of two PmrA
monomers.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
70 promoter consensus
sequence, which is typical for activator-dependent promoters (20, 21). PmrA belongs to the OmpR family of response regulators, which are generally transcribed by
70 RNA
polymerase (22). Activator proteins bind at various distances from weak
promoters to enhance binding or open complex formation by RNA
polymerase (23). In the absence of activator protein, RNA polymerase
forms open complexes poorly due to unfavorable interactions with the
35 and
10 elements of the promoter. The pmrG and
pbgPE promoters both contain a possible 18-bp UP element located at positions
52 and
66, respectively, relative to the transcription start site, which could be a target for the
carboxyl-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase
subunit. Binding of
this domain to target promoters can increase promoter activity
2-20-fold (18).
40,
38, or
80 of the transcription start sites of pmrC,
pbgPE, and pmrG genes, respectively. This location is
in agreement with the DNA-binding sites of other activators, which are
usually found between nt
30 and
80 with respect to the
transcription start site (24). The PmrA protein protected a 16-bp
sequence (5'-TTAAKTTCTTAAKGTT-3') from DNase I, partially covering the
potential
35 promoter region of the pmrC and
pbgPE promoters (Fig. 6). This sequence includes an
imperfect 9-bp inverted repeat, similar to the DNA-binding sites of
many prokaryotic regulators that consist of 5-10-bp inverted repeat
sequences (25). The dyad symmetry in the PmrA-binding sequence suggests
that the PmrA protein binds to these sites as a dimer, and consistent
with this notion we found that the PmrA protein can dimerize (Fig.
7).
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Research associate of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Hoch, J. A., and Silhavy, T. J.
(eds)
(1995)
Two-component Signal Transduction
, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
2.
Parkinson, J. S.,
and Kofoid, E. C.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
26,
71-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Stock, J. B.,
Ninfa, A. J.,
and Stock, A. M.
(1989)
Microbiol. Rev.
53,
450-490 4.
Roland, K. L.,
Martin, L. E.,
Esther, C. R.,
and Spitznagel, J. K.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
4154-4164 5.
Mäkelä, P. H.,
Sarvas, M.,
Calcagno, S.,
and Lounatmaa, K.
(1978)
FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
3,
323-326[CrossRef]
6.
Shafer, W. M.,
Casey, S. G.,
and Spitznagel, J. K.
(1984)
Infect. Immun.
43,
834-838 7.
Shafer, W. M.,
Martin, L. E.,
and Spitznagel, J. K.
(1984)
Infect. Immun.
53,
651-655
8.
Helander, I. M.,
Kilpeläinen, I.,
and Vaara, M.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
11,
481-487[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Soncini, F. C.,
and Groisman, E. A.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
6796-6801 10.
García-Véscovi, E.,
Soncini, F. C.,
and Groisman, E. A.
(1996)
Cell
84,
165-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Gunn, J. S.,
and Miller, S. I.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
6857-6864 12.
Gunn, J. S.,
Lim, K. B.,
Krueger, J.,
Kim, K.,
Guo, L.,
Hackett, M.,
and Miller, S. I.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
27,
1171-1182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Groisman, E. A.,
Kayser, J.,
and Soncini, F. C.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
7040-7045 14.
Baker, S. J.,
Gunn, J. S.,
and Morona, R.
(1999)
Microbiology
145,
367-378[Abstract]
15.
Roland, K. L.,
Esther, C. R.,
and Spitznagel, J. K.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
3589-3597 16.
Fields, P. I.,
Swanson, R. V.,
Haidaris, C. G.,
and Heffron, F.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
5189-5193 17.
Snavely, M. D.,
Gravina, S. A.,
Cheung, T.-B. T.,
Miller, C. G.,
and Maguire, M. E.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
824-829 18.
Ross, W.,
Gosink, K. K.,
Salomon, J.,
Igarashi, K.,
Zou, C.,
Ishihama, A.,
Severinov, K.,
and Gourse, R. L.
(1993)
Science
262,
1407-1413 19.
Wösten, M. M.
(1998)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
22,
127-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Raibaud, O.,
and Schwartz, M.
(1984)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
18,
173-206[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Kumar, A.,
Grimes, B.,
Fujita, N.,
Makino, K.,
Malloch, R. A.,
Hayward, R. S.,
and Ishihama, A.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
235,
405-413[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Hakenbeck, R.,
and Stock, J. B.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
273,
281-300[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Busby, S.,
and Ebright, R. H.
(1994)
Cell
79,
743-746[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Gralla, J. D.,
and Collado-Vides, J.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella, Cellular and Molecular Biology
(Neidhardt, F. C.
, Curtiss, R. I.
, Ingraham, J. L.
, Lin, E. C. C.
, Low, K. B.
, Magasanik, B.
, Reznikoff, W. S.
, Riley, M.
, Schaechter, M.
, and Umbarger, H. E., eds), 2nd Ed., Vol. 1
, pp. 1232-1245, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
25.
Schleif, R.
(1996)
in
Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology
(Neidhardt, F. C.
, Curtiss, R. I.
, Ingraham, J. L.
, Lin, E. C. C.
, Low, K. B.
, Magasanik, B.
, Reznikoff, W. S.
, Riley, M.
, Schaechter, M.
, and Umbarger, H. E., eds), 2nd Ed., Vol. 1
, pp. 1300-1309, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
26.
Chien, Y.,
and Cheung, A. L.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2645-2652 27.
Fiedler, U.,
and Weiss, V.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
3696-3705[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Liu, W.,
and Hulett, F. M.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
6302-6310 29.
Boucher, P. E.,
Murakami, K.,
Ishihama, A.,
and Stibitz, S.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
1755-1763 30.
Dahl, J. L.,
Wei, B.-Y.,
and Kadner, R. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1910-1919 31.
Roggiani, M.,
and Dubnau, D.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
3182-3187 32.
Walker, M. S.,
and DeMoss, J. A.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
14,
633-641[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Aiba, H.,
Nakasai, F.,
Mizushima, S.,
and Mizuno, T.
(1989)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
106,
5-7 34.
Makino, K.,
Shinagawa, H.,
Amemura, M.,
Kawamoto, T.,
Yamada, M.,
and Nakata, A.
(1989)
J. Mol. Biol.
210,
551-559[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Markovitz, A.
(1977)
in
Surface Carbohydrates of the Prokaryotic Cell
(Sutherland, I. W., ed), Vol. 1
, pp. 415-462, Academic Press, New York
36.
Blattner, F. R.,
Plunkett, I., G.,
Bloch, C. A.,
Perna, N. T.,
Burland, V.,
Riley, M.,
Collado-Vides, J.,
Glasner, J. D.,
Rode, C. K.,
Mayhew, G. F.,
Gregor, J.,
Davis, N. W.,
Kirkpatrick, H. A.,
Goeden, M. A.,
Rose, D. J.,
Mau, B.,
and Shao, Y.
(1997)
Science
277,
1453-1462
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Perez, T. Latifi, and E. A. Groisman Overcoming H-NS-mediated Transcriptional Silencing of Horizontally Acquired Genes by the PhoP and SlyA Proteins in Salmonella enterica J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2008; 283(16): 10773 - 10783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. King-Scott, E. Nowak, E. Mylonas, S. Panjikar, M. Roessle, D. I. Svergun, and P. A. Tucker The Structure of a Full-length Response Regulator from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a Stabilized Three-dimensional Domain-swapped, Activated State J. Biol. Chem., December 28, 2007; 282(52): 37717 - 37729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Mascher, J. D. Helmann, and G. Unden Stimulus Perception in Bacterial Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinases Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2006; 70(4): 910 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Lin, T.-Y. Huang, W.-C. Liang, and H.-L. Peng Homologous Response Regulators KvgA, KvhA and KvhR Regulate the Synthesis of Capsular Polysaccharide in Klebsiella pneumoniae CG43 in a Coordinated Manner J. Biochem., September 1, 2006; 140(3): 429 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Trent, C. M. Stead, A. X. Tran, and J. V. Hankins Invited review: Diversity of endotoxin and its impact on pathogenesis Innate Immunity, August 1, 2006; 12(4): 205 - 223. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Toro-Roman, T. Wu, and A. M. Stock A common dimerization interface in bacterial response regulators KdpE and TorR Protein Sci., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 3077 - 3088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Winfield, T. Latifi, and E. A. Groisman Transcriptional Regulation of the 4-Amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose Biosynthetic Genes in Yersinia pestis J. Biol. Chem., April 15, 2005; 280(15): 14765 - 14772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Shin and E. A. Groisman Signal-dependent Binding of the Response Regulators PhoP and PmrA to Their Target Promoters in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4089 - 4094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. J. Bennett and D. J. Clarke The pbgPE operon in Photorhabdus luminescens Is Required for Pathogenicity and Symbiosis J. Bacteriol., January 1, 2005; 187(1): 77 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marceau, F. Sebbane, F. Ewann, F. Collyn, B. Lindner, M. A. Campos, J.-A. Bengoechea, and M. Simonet The pmrF polymyxin-resistance operon of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis is upregulated by the PhoP-PhoQ two-component system but not by PmrA-PmrB, and is not required for virulence Microbiology, December 1, 2004; 150(12): 3947 - 3957. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kato and E. A. Groisman Connecting two-component regulatory systems by a protein that protects a response regulator from dephosphorylation by its cognate sensor Genes & Dev., September 15, 2004; 18(18): 2302 - 2313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Lee, F.-F. Hsu, J. Turk, and E. A. Groisman The PmrA-Regulated pmrC Gene Mediates Phosphoethanolamine Modification of Lipid A and Polymyxin Resistance in Salmonella enterica J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2004; 186(13): 4124 - 4133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Derzelle, E. Turlin, E. Duchaud, S. Pages, F. Kunst, A. Givaudan, and A. Danchin The PhoP-PhoQ Two-Component Regulatory System of Photorhabdus luminescens Is Essential for Virulence in Insects J. Bacteriol., March 1, 2004; 186(5): 1270 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Mouslim, T. Latifi, and E. A. Groisman Signal-dependent Requirement for the Co-activator Protein RcsA in Transcription of the RcsB-regulated ugd Gene J. Biol. Chem., December 12, 2003; 278(50): 50588 - 50595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. L. Robinson, T. Wu, and A. M. Stock Structural Analysis of the Domain Interface in DrrB, a Response Regulator of the OmpR/PhoB Subfamily J. Bacteriol., July 15, 2003; 185(14): 4186 - 4194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Kim, T. Killam, V. Sood, and M. G. Surette Swarm-Cell Differentiation in Salmonellaenterica Serovar Typhimurium Results in Elevated Resistance to Multiple Antibiotics J. Bacteriol., May 15, 2003; 185(10): 3111 - 3117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kato, T. Latifi, and E. A. Groisman Closing the loop: The PmrA/PmrB two-component system negatively controls expression of its posttranscriptional activator PmrD PNAS, April 15, 2003; 100(8): 4706 - 4711. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |