![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27562-27566, September 24, 1999
13 Stimulates Rho-dependent
Activation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter*
,From the Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, CURE, Digestive Diseases Research Center, and Molecular Biology Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) gene expression is
rapidly increased by cytokines, tumor promoters, and growth factors and
is markedly enhanced in various cancer cells. Here, we examine the
regulation of COX-2 promoter activity by Prostaglandins play a pivotal role in a broad range of
physiological and pathological processes including inflammation, pain transmission, maintenance of gastrointestinal integrity, and
progression of colorectal cancer (1-3). The rate-limiting enzymes for
production of prostaglandins are cyclooxygenases
(COX)1 type 1 and 2 (4-6).
COX-1 is constitutively expressed in nearly all cells, whereas COX-2
expression is induced as an immediate-early gene in response to
pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor promoters, and growth factors
(7-10). COX-2 is overexpressed in cancers of the colon, stomach, and
breast (11-14), and chronic inhibition of COX activity has been
associated with chemopreventive effects on colon cancer (15).
Consequently, the identification of the pathways and regulatory
elements that lead to COX-2 expression are the subject of major interest.
An increase in the rate of COX-2 gene transcription is mediated by
several cis-acting promoter elements that respond to multiple signal
transduction pathways (8, 16-21). Platelet-derived growth factor,
serum, and v-src promote COX-2 expression through Ras-mediated increases in c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase and extracellular signal-related kinase pathways in NIH 3T3 cells (22-24). Agonists that signal through
cAMP induce COX-2 expression through the cAMP response element binding
transcription factor (25). These pathways converge onto a common
regulatory region, the ATF/cAMP response element located between The ubiquitously expressed G Here, we examined whether the G Cell Line and Expression Vectors--
NIH 3T3 cells were
obtained from the American Type Tissue Collection (ATTC, Manassas, VA).
All tissue culture reagents were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.
The reporter plasmid, pTIS-10s encodes the luciferase cDNA under
the control of the murine COX-2 promoter ( Cell Culture, Transfection, and Luciferase Assay--
NIH 3T3
cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% calf serum, 10 mM Hepes, glutamine, penicillin, and streptomycin. The cells were plated onto 60-mm dishes
(Nunc, Napierville, IL) at a density of 105/plate. The next
day, a transfection mixture was prepared by adding 1.5 µg of the
reporter plasmid into 150 µl of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
with a combination of pcDNA-3 and the appropriate expression vector
(totaling 1.0 µg). After a 20-min incubation after the addition of
SuperFect (5 µl, Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA), the transfection mixture
was combined with 1.0 ml of fresh medium and placed onto the cells in
60-mm plates. The cells were incubated for 2 days, and then the media
was replaced with low serum media (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
with 0.1% calf serum and 0.1% bovine serum albumin). The next day,
the cells were harvested with or without treatment with inhibitor (5 h), which in preliminary experiments was determined to be the optimal
time for detection of changes in luciferase expression.
Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed with
luciferase assay buffer (400 µl, Promega, Madison, WI). The cell
particulate was removed by brief centrifugation, and the protein
concentration was measured using a protein assay Kit (Bio-Rad).
Luciferase assays were performed using a Turner TD20/20 luminometer,
with 90 µl of luciferase reaction mix (Promega, Madison, WI) mixed
with 20 µl of protein extract. The relative light units (RLU) were
normalized for the amount of protein in each extract, and the results
were reported as relative changes in luciferase activity with a
relative fold increase of 1.0, signifying no change. The data was
reported as the mean value ± S.E. from two or more sets of
transfections that were done in triplicate.
Agonists and Inhibitors--
Cytochalasin D, forskolin, and
genistein were purchased from Calbiochem. AlCl3 and NaF
were purchased from Sigma. Gastrin-releasing peptide was purchased from
Bachem (Torrance, CA), and epidermal growth factor was purchased from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
Phalloidin Staining and Immunoblotting Assays--
NIH 3T3 cells
were grown on poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips. The
cells were incubated with and without cytochalasin D (2 µM, 30 min) before exposure to media containing 20% calf serum. After 10 min, the cells were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in
phosphate-buffered saline at room temperature for 10 min. The cells
were treated with rhodamine-phalloidin (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR)
according to manufacturer's protocol. The fluorescent image was
acquired by a Spot-2 CCD camera attached to a Zeiss Axioskop microscope
using a rhodamine filter set (Chroma #41002c).
NIH cells were serum-starved overnight before a 1-h incubation with or
without genistein (50 µM). The cells were harvested 10 min after exposure to epidermal growth factor (50 ng/ml). Proteins were
separated by size using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then
electrotransferred onto nitrocellulose. The immobilized proteins were
screened using anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (4G10, Upstate
Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) and ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
G
Signaling by G
To determine whether the effects of G Transcriptional Activation of the COX-2 Promoter by
G
The Clostridium botulinum C3 toxin, which specifically
ADP-ribosylates Rho at residue 41 and impairs its function (46), was
used to test whether activation of the COX-2 promoter by
G Transcriptional Activation of the COX-2 Promoter by
G
We next wanted to determine the specificity of C3 toxin effects on
small GTPase-dependent activation of the COX-2 promoter. We
confirmed that in our experimental system, the constitutive active V12
forms of both Ras and Rac induced the COX-2 promoter (Fig.
4C). In contrast to RhoQ63L, expression of C3 toxin did not
inhibit the relative luciferase induction by RasV12, RacV12, or v-src.
This demonstrates selective inhibition of Rho by C3 toxin. There was a
slight increase in the relative luciferase induction by RasV12, RacV12,
v-src, and forskolin in cells expressing C3 toxin. This could be
attributed to a lower basal level of luciferase activity in cells
expressing C3 toxin. This supports an earlier proposal that NIH 3T3
cells have an elevated basal level of Rho activity (48).
Next, we determined whether agonist binding to the GRP receptor, which
induces COX-2 mRNA and COX-2 (26), leads to activation of the COX-2
promoter via the G Dissociation of Rho-dependent Stress Fiber Formation,
Tyrosine Phosphorylation, and COX-2 Transcriptional
Activation--
Rho mediates multiple signaling pathways including
gene expression, tyrosine phosphorylation, and stress fiber formation
(49). Expression of either G Concluding Remarks--
COX-2 is a prostaglandin endoperoxide
synthase that is dramatically induced by multiple extracellular stimuli
and oncogene products (7-10). Given the pivotal role of inducible
prostaglandin production in many normal and abnormal processes, the
transcriptional regulation of COX-2 expression is the subject of
intense interest. Our results demonstrate for the first time that
mutationally activated or aluminum fluoride-stimulated
G
Activated G
Increasing evidence indicates that overexpression of COX-2 contributes
to the development of a variety of human cancers (1). It is also known
that constitutively activated G
subunits of heterotrimeric
G proteins in NIH 3T3 cells. Using a transient transfection assay with
a reporter vector in which the murine COX-2 promoter drives the production of luciferase and expression vectors encoding for
subunits of G-proteins, we show that overexpression of wild type and
constitutively active G
13 and G
q
induced transcription from the COX-2 promoter. The highest level of
induced luciferase activity (5.8-fold) occurred in cells expressing the
constitutively active G
13(Q226L). We also show that
expression of a constitutively active mutant of Rho (RhoQ63L) also
induced transcription from the COX-2 promoter. Co-expression of
Clostridium botulinum C3 toxin specifically blocked
induction of the COX-2 promoter by either G
13Q226L or
RhoQ63L but did not prevent the activation of this promoter by Ras,
Rac, v-src, or forskolin. We conclude that G
13 signals
through a Rho-dependent pathway leading to activation of
the COX-2 promoter. This pathway is not inhibited by either cytochalasin D, which disrupts actin filament organization, or genistein, a broad spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor, indicating a
bifurcation of the signaling pathway used by G
13/Rho to
induce COX-2 expression from that used to induce stress fiber formation and tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
56
and
48 of the murine COX-2 promoter (22). Recent studies have shown
that COX-2 expression also is induced by activation of the seven
transmembrane domain receptor for bombesin (26), which interacts with
both of the Gq and G12 families of heterotrimeric G-proteins (27). Given that protein kinase C activation
induces COX-2 expression (28), it is likely that G
q,
which couples to phospholipase C and thereby to the production of
inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, which mobilizes Ca2+ from
internal stores, and diacylglycerol, which activates protein kinase C
(29), contributes to COX-2 transcriptional activation. In contrast, the
role of G
12/13 in COX-2 expression was unknown.
12/13 (30) has been
implicated in cell migration, proliferation, and transformation
(31-33). Expression of the constitutively activated mutant of
G
13Q226L transforms NIH 3T3 cells and induces Egr-1 and
c-Fos expression from serum response elements through the
transcriptional activation of serum response factor (34). Expression of
constitutively activated G
12/13 also stimulates stress
fiber formation, focal adhesion assembly, and cytochalasin-sensitive
tyrosine phosphorylation of the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase
p125FAK and the adapter proteins
p130CAS and paxillin (35, 36). The small
G-protein Rho plays a critical role in many biological responses
induced by G
12/13 (37, 38), and recent studies have
shown that the Rho-activating guanine nucleotide exchange factor,
pGEF115, is linked to G
13 (39, 40), thus providing a
defined signaling pathway from G
13 to Rho.
13/Rho pathway leads to
transcriptional activation of COX-2. Our results show that mutationally activated or aluminum fluoride-stimulated G
13 induces
activation of the COX-2 promoter through a Rho-dependent
pathway. COX-2 expression by G
13/Rho can be dissociated
from stress fiber formation, focal adhesion assembly, and tyrosine
phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins, indicating a bifurcation of
the signaling pathway used by G
13/Rho to induce COX-2
expression from that used to induce actin cytoskeleton reorganization.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
371/+70). The murine
G
12 and G
13 cDNAs including the
constitutively active mutants G
12Q229L and
G
13Q226L in pcDNA-1 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) were
gifts from H. Bourne (University of California, San Francisco, CA). The
murine G
q cDNA and mutant G
qQ209L in
pcDNA-1 were obtained from ATTC. The rat gastrin- releasing peptide
receptor expression vector, prGRPR, is described in Slice et
al. (41). Expression vectors for Rho, RhoQ63L, Ras, dominant
negative Ras, RasV12, Rac, dominant negative Rac, and RacV12 in
pcDNA-3 were provided by D. Chang (University of California, Los
Angeles, CA). The expression vector for v-src was provided by H. Herschman (University of California, Los Angeles, CA). pcDNA-3 was
purchased from Invitrogen. R. Treisman (Imperial Cancer Research Fund,
London) provided the plasmids pEF-LacZ and pEF-C3.
![]()
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
13 Induces COX-2 Promoter Activity--
To
determine whether G
13 can regulate COX-2 expression, NIH
3T3 cells were co-transfected with a reporter plasmid in which the
production of luciferase is driven by the COX-2 promoter (
371 to +70)
and expression vectors encoding wild type G
13 or
constitutively activated G
13(G
13Q226L).
As shown in Fig. 1A,
expression of G
13Q226L induced a marked
concentration-dependent increase in COX-2 promoter
activity. The maximal increase in relative luciferase activity was
5.8-fold in cells transfected with 0.25 µg of plasmid compared with
control cells transfected with pcDNA-3. Expression of wild type
G
13 also induced higher levels of luciferase activity with a maximal relative increase of 2.9-fold that was achieved in cells
transfected with 0.25 µg of plasmid. The relative high activity of
the wild type G
13 could be due to the low level of GTPase activity of this G
subunit (42, 43). The results presented in
Fig. 1A show for the first time that G
13
signaling leads to activation of the COX-2 promoter.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
G
13
induces luciferase expression in transfected NIH 3T3 cells.
A, cells were co-transfected with reporter (1.5 µg) and
increasing amounts of expression vectors encoding wild type or Q226L
G
13 (QL mutant) with pcDNA-3 (total DNA
was 2.5 µg in all transfections). After 2 days, the cells were
serum-starved overnight before harvesting. B, cells were
co-transfected with reporter vector, pcDNA-3, and either the
expression vector (0.25 µg) encoding the wild type cDNA for
q or the constitutively active
qQ209L
(total DNA was 2.5 µg for each transfection). The cells were
serum-starved overnight before harvesting.
q activates protein kinase C via
phospholipase C
, and it is known that direct protein kinase C
stimulation by phorbol esters induces COX-2 expression in NIH 3T3 cells
(26, 28). Consequently, we tested the effects of wild type and
constitutively activated G
q on COX-2 promoter-mediated
gene transcription. Using the same conditions (0.25 µg of expression
vector) that were employed for maximal G
13-induced
transcriptional activation of COX-2, expression of
G
qQ209L resulted in a 3.2-fold relative increase in
luciferase activity (Fig. 1B).
13Q226L arose from
long term activation of signaling pathways leading to secretion of autocrine factors or altered expression of G
13
regulators, we examined G
13 signaling in an acutely
regulated system. Aluminum fluoride activates heterotrimeric G-proteins
by its ability to mimic the
-phosphoryl group of GTP when associated
with GDP-bound
-subunits (44, 45). We co-transfected NIH cells with
wild type G
13 and with the reporter plasmid, and after
72 h, the cells were exposed to 2.5 µM aluminum
fluoride for 5 h (Fig.
2A). Treatment with aluminum
fluoride significantly increased luciferase activity in cells
overexpressing wild type G
13. In contrast, aluminum fluoride induced luciferase activity only slightly in cells transfected with the COX-2 promoter reporter vector and a control vector
(i.e. in the absence of G
13 overexpression).
Furthermore, conditioned media collected from cells overexpressing
either G
13 (wild type or QL mutant) or G
q
(wild type or QL mutant) did not induce any significant increase in
luciferase activity (Fig. 2B) when added to cells
transfected with the COX-2 promoter reporter vector. The results shown
in Fig. 2 indicate that the activation of the COX-2 promoter by the
subunit of heterotrimeric G proteins is not caused by the release of
autocrine factors during the course of the experiments.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Direct induction of luciferase by
G
13 in transfected NIH 3T3 cells.
A, cells were co-transfected with reporter vector and
pcDNA-3 or the expression vector encoding G
13 (0.125 µg). This lower amount of expression vector for G
13
was chosen to decrease the basal level of luciferase activity. The
cells were serum-starved overnight and then stimulated with
AlF4
(2.5 µM, 5 h).
The cells were washed and lysed, and luciferase activity measured.
B, cells were transfected with reporter vector (1.5 µg),
pcDNA-3 (control), and expression vectors (0.25 µg) encoding
G
q (wild type and Q206L) or G
13 (wild
type and Q226L) (total DNA was 2.5 µg). The conditioned media was
collected after 3 days. New NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with
reporter vector and pcDNA-3. The cells were serum-starved overnight
2 days after transfection and then incubated with the conditioned media
for 5 h.
13 Is Rho-dependent--
Recent evidence
has shown that the small G-protein Rho mediates some of the biological
effects induced by G
13 (37, 38). To test whether
activation of the COX-2 promoter involves a Rho-signaling pathway,
cells were co-transfected with the COX-2 promoter and either
pcDNA-3 (control) or expression vectors encoding wild type or
constitutively active Rho (RhoQ63L). The results presented in Fig.
3A show for the first time
that cells overexpressing RhoQ63L exhibit a 3-fold relative increase in
luciferase activity compared with either control cells or cells
overexpressing wild type Rho. The results indicate that Rho activation
is a potential pathway leading to COX-2 transcriptional activation.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
G
13
induces luciferase expression in transfected NIH 3T3 cells by a
Rho-dependent pathway. A, cells were
co-transfected with reporter vector (1.5 µg) and expression vectors
(0.25 µg) encoding wild type Rho or constitutively active RhoQ63L
(Rho QL). Control cells were co-transfected with
pcDNA-3. The cells were serum-starved overnight before harvesting.
B, NIH 3T3 cells were co-transfected with reporter vector
(1.5 µg), pcDNA-3 (control), expression vectors encoding RhoQ63L
(0.25 µg) or G
13Q226L (0.125 µg), pEF-LacZ (0.25 µg, untreated), and pEF-C3 (0.25 µg, C3 toxin). The total amount of
DNA in each transfection was 2.5 µg. The cells that were treated with
forskolin were co-transfected with reporter vector and pcDNA-3.
Cells were serum-starved overnight, and the appropriate cells were
stimulated with forskolin (10 µM, 5 h). All the
cells were harvested 72 h after transfection.
13 proceeds through a Rho-dependent
pathway. Expression of C3 toxin blocked the increase in the level of
luciferase activity produced in cells expressing either the RhoQ63L or
G
13Q226L (Fig. 3B). In contrast, C3 toxin did
not prevent the increase in luciferase activity induced by treatment
with forskolin, which stimulates COX-2 promoter activity via cAMP.
These results indicate that Rho mediates COX-2 promoter activation by
G
13.
13 Is Ras- and Rac-Independent--
Previous studies
have shown that the COX-2 promoter is induced by constitutively active
Ras and Rac (22-24). Furthermore, it has been reported that
G
13Q226L requires functional Rac to stimulate Na+/H+ antiport activity (47). Therefore, we
examined whether Ras or Rac are required for COX-2 promoter activation
by G
13 or Rho. Expression of Ras and Rac or dominant
negative forms of Ras, RasDN, and Rac, RacDN did not affect the level
of activation of the COX-2 promoter by G
13Q226L (Fig.
4A). As a positive control, we
confirmed that expression of RasDN and RacDN significantly reduced
v-src-dependent activation of the COX-2 promoter (Fig.
4B). These results indicate that induction of the COX-2
promoter by G
13Q226L is not dependent on Ras or Rac
signaling pathways.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
G
13
induces luciferase expression in transfected NIH 3T3 cells through
Ras/Rac-independent pathways. A, cells were
co-transfected with reporter vector (1.5 µg), expression vector
(0.125 µg) encoding G
13Q226L, and expression vectors
(0.25 µg) encoding wild type (wt) Ras and Rac or dominant
negative (DN) mutants of Ras and Rac. Control cells were
co-transfected with pcDNA-3. B, cells were
co-transfected with reporter vector (1.5 µg), pcDNA-3 (control),
expression vectors encoding v-src (0.125 µg), or dominant negative
mutants of Ras and Rac (0.25 µg). C, cells were
co-transfected with reporter vector (1.5 µg), pcDNA-3 (control),
expression vectors encoding v-src (0.125 µg), constitutively active
mutants (V12) of Ras and Rac (0.25 µg), and C3 toxin (0.25 µg).
D, cells were co-transfected with reporter vector (1.5 µg), expression vector (0.5 µg) encoding GRP receptor, pEF-C3 (0.25 µg), and pcDNA-3. All the cells were transfected with a total of
2.5 µg of DNA. All the cells were serum-starved overnight before
harvesting 72 h after transfection.
13/Rho pathway. NIH 3T3 cells were
co-transfected with the reporter plasmid and an expression vector
containing the GRP receptor cDNA. The cells were challenged with
GRP for 5 h and then assayed for luciferase activity. GRP induced
luciferase activity over 4-fold compared with unchallenged cells (Fig.
4D). Cells not transfected with the GRP receptor expression vector did not respond to GRP (data not shown). Expression of C3 toxin
strikingly inhibited GRP-dependent induction of luciferase activity. These results indicate that GRP, through the GRP receptor, induces COX-2 promoter activity primarily through a
G
13/Rho-dependent pathway.
13Q226L or RhoQ63L
stimulates the formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesion
contacts leading to the tyrosine phosphorylation of the nonreceptor
tyrosine kinase p125FAK and of the adapter proteins
paxillin and p130CAS (35, 50-53). We examined
if activation of the COX-2 promoter by G
13 or Rho is
dependent on actin cytoskeleton remodeling and/or tyrosine
phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins. Treatment of NIH 3T3 cells
with cytochalasin D under conditions that disrupted actin stress
fibers, as shown by phalloidin staining (Fig.
5C), did not prevent the
activation of the COX-2 promoter by G
13Q226L (Fig.
5A). To determine whether activation of the COX-2 promoter by G
13 was through a tyrosine
kinase-dependent pathway, cells were treated with
increasing concentrations of the broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase
inhibitor, genistein. Inhibition of tyrosine kinase activity did not
prevent activation of the COX-2 promoter by G
13Q226L (Fig. 5B). In fact, the relative luciferase activity levels
increased in the cultures exposed to higher doses of genistein (50 µM). This high dose of genistein inhibited epidermal
growth factor-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation (Fig. 5D).
The results obtained with both genistein and cytochalasin D suggest
that activation of the COX-2 promoter by G
13 is not
dependent on tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins.

View larger version (38K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
G
13
induction of luciferase is not inhibited by cytochalasin D or
genistein. A, NIH 3T3 cells were co-transfected with
reporter vector (1.5 µg) and either the expression vector encoding
G
13(Q226L (QL)) (0.125 µg) or pcDNA-3
(control) (total DNA was 2.5 µg). The cells were serum-starved
overnight and then incubated for 5 h with cytochalasin D (2.0 µM). The cells were washed and lysed, and the luciferase
activity was measured. B, NIH 3T3 cells were co-transfected
with reporter vector (1.5 µg), and either the expression vector
encoding G
13(Q226L) (0.125 µg) or pcDNA-3
(control) (total DNA was 2.5 µg). The cells were serum-starved
overnight and then treated with increasing concentrations of genistein
for 5 h before harvesting. C, NIH 3T3 cells were grown
on coverslips and serum-starved overnight. The appropriate cells were
treated with cytochalasin D (2 µM) 30 min before
induction with media containing 20% calf serum. After 10 min, the
cells were fixed and stained with rhodamine-phalloidin. D,
serum-starved NIH 3T3 cells were incubated with and without genistein
(50 µM) for 1 h. The indicated cells were treated
with epidermal growth factor (EGF, 50 ng/ml, 10 min). A
Western blot was done on the cellular proteins using an
anti-phosphotyrosine antibody.
13 induces the activation of the COX-2 promoter. These
findings identify a novel regulatory mechanism leading to COX-2
promoter activation and raise the possibility that COX-2 induction is a
downstream event in G
13 signaling.
13 induces a variety of biological responses
including stimulation of Na+/H+ antiport
activity, stress fiber and focal adhesion formation, and tyrosine
phosphorylation of focal adhesion proteins through Rho (35, 47,
50-53). This is consistent with the recent observation that expression
of constitutively active G
13 increases the level of
active Rho (Rho-GTP) (54). Here, we report for the first time that
expression of constitutively activated Rho induces activation of the
COX-2 promoter. Furthermore, our results also show that inactivation of
Rho by C. botulinum C3 toxin selectively blocks induction of
COX-2 promoter activity by G
13, Rho, and by the GRP
receptor. Neither Ras or Rac is downstream of G
13 nor is Rho downstream of Ras or Rac in the pathway(s) leading to COX-2 promoter activation. In addition, signaling to the COX-2 promoter by
G
13/Rho can be dissociated from both cytoskeletal
reorganization and tyrosine phosphorylation pathways. Taken together,
the findings presented here indicate that the G
13-Rho
pathway provides a novel mechanism leading to COX-2 promoter activation.
13 can act as a potent
oncogene (31-33) and that Rho function is necessary for transformation
(55). In addition, constitutive or autocrine stimulation of
heptahelical receptors that couple to G
13 and Rho are
also implicated in tumorogenesis (56, 57). Our results identifying a
novel link between G
13, Rho, and COX-2 suggest that this
pathway may contribute to tumor development in at least some cell
types, a proposition that warrants further experimental work.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. Henry R. Bourne for the kind
gifts of the expression constructs for G12-Q229L and G13-Q226L, Dr.
David Chang for the Rho, Rac, and Ras expression vectors, and Dr.
Richard Treisman for the kind gifts of the expression constructs for C3 and
-galactosidase.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK35740, DK17294 (to J. H. W.), and DK55003 (to E. R.) and Veterans Administration Merit Review and CURE Center grants.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Please address
correspondence to: Dept. of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Warren
Hall 11-151, 900 Veteran Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1786. Tel.:
310-206-0909; Fax: 310-794-5332; E-mail:
lslice@med1.medsch.ucla.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: COX, cyclooxygenase; G-protein, heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein; GRP, gastrin-releasing peptide.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
DuBois, R. N.,
Abramson, S. B.,
Crofford, L.,
Gupta, R. A.,
Simon, L. S.,
Van De Putte, L. B.,
and Lipsky, P. E.
(1998)
FASEB J.
12,
1063-1073 |
| 2. |
Boolbol, S. K.,
Dannenberg, A. J.,
Chadburn, A.,
Martucci, C.,
Guo, X. J.,
Ramonetti, J. T.,
Abreu-Goris, M.,
Newmark, H. L.,
Lipkin, M. L.,
DeCosse, J. J.,
and Bertagnolli, M. M.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
2556-2560 |
| 3. | Anderson, G. D., Hauser, S. D., McGarity, K. L., Bremer, M. E., Isakson, P. C., and Gregory, S. A. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 97, 2672-2679[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Smith, W. L., and Dewitt, D. L. (1996) Adv. Immunol. 62, 167-215[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Herschman, H. R. (1996) Biochim Biophys Acta 1299, 125-140[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Crofford, L. J. (1997) J. Rheumatol. 24 Suppl. 49, 15-19 |
| 7. | DeWitt, D. L., Kraemer, S. A., and Meade, E. A. (1991) Adv. Prostaglandin Thromboxane Leukotriene Res. 21, 65-68 |
| 8. |
DuBois, R. N.,
Tsujii, M.,
Bishop, P.,
Awad, J. A.,
Makita, K.,
and Lanahan, A.
(1994)
Am. J. Physiol.
266,
G822-G827 |
| 9. |
Fletcher, B. S.,
Kujubu, D. A.,
Perrin, D. M.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4338-4344 |
| 10. |
Fletcher, B. S.,
Lim, R. W.,
Varnum, B. C.,
Kujubu, D. A.,
Koski, R. A.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
14511-14518 |
| 11. |
Tsujii, M.,
Kawano, S.,
and DuBois, R. N.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3336-3340 |
| 12. | Tsuji, S., Kawano, S., Sawaoka, H., Takei, Y., Kobayashi, I., Nagano, K., Fusamoto, H., and Kamada, T. (1996) Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent. Fatty Acids 55, 179-183[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Subbaramaiah, K.,
Telang, N.,
Ramonetti, J. T.,
Araki, R.,
DeVito, B.,
Weksler, B. B.,
and Dannenberg, A. J.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
4424-4429 |
| 14. |
Ristimaki, A.,
Honkanen, N.,
Jankala, H.,
Sipponen, P.,
and Harkonen, M.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
1276-1280 |
| 15. |
Ligumsky, M.,
Grossman, M. I.,
and Kauffman, G. L., Jr.
(1982)
Am. J. Physiol.
242,
G337-G341 |
| 16. | Feng, L., Sun, W., Xia, Y., Tang, W. W., Chanmugam, P., Soyoola, E., Wilson, C. B., and Hwang, D. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 307, 361-368[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Yamamoto, K., Arakawa, T., Taketani, Y., Takahashi, Y., Hayashi, Y., Ueda, N., Yamamoto, S., and Kumegawa, M. (1997) Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 407, 185-189[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Yamamoto, K.,
Arakawa, T.,
Ueda, N.,
and Yamamoto, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
31315-31320 |
| 19. |
Kim, Y.,
and Fischer, S. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27686-27694 |
| 20. |
Dean, J. L. E.,
Brook, M.,
Clark, A. R.,
and Saklatvala, J.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
264-269 |
| 21. |
Morris, J. K.,
and Richards, J. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16633-16643 |
| 22. |
Xie, W.,
Fletcher, B. S.,
Andersen, R. D.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6531-6539 |
| 23. |
Xie, W.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27622-27628 |
| 24. |
Xie, W.,
and Herschman, H. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31742-31748 |
| 25. | Miller, C., Zhang, M., He, Y., Zhao, J., Pelletier, J. P., Martel-Pelletier, J., and Di Battista, J. A. (1998) J. Cell. Biochem. 69, 392-413[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | Hecht, J. R., Duque, J., Reddy, S. T., Herschman, H. R., Walsh, J. H., and Slice, L. W. (1997) Prostaglandins 54, 757-768[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Rozengurt, E. (1998) J. Cell. Physiol. 177, 507-517[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Herschman, H. R., Kujubu, D. A., Fletcher, B. S., Ma, Q., Varnum, B. C., Gilbert, R. S., and Reddy, S. T. (1994) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 47, 113-148[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Exton, J. H. (1996) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36, 481-509[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. |
Strathmann, M. P.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
5582-5586 |
| 31. | Xu, N., Voyno-Yasenetskaya, T., and Gutkind, J. S. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201, 603-609[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Xu, N.,
Bradley, L.,
Ambdukar, I.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6741-6745 |
| 33. |
Lyons, J.,
Landis, C. A.,
Harsh, G.,
Vallar, L.,
Grunewald, K.,
Feichtinger, H.,
Duh, Q. Y.,
Clark, O. H.,
Kawasaki, E.,
Bourne, H. R.,
et al..
(1990)
Science
249,
655-659 |
| 34. | Vara Prasad, M. V., Shore, S. K., and Dhanasekaran, N. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2425-2429[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Needham, L. K.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14626-14632 |
| 36. |
Buhl, A. M.,
Johnson, N. L.,
Dhanasekaran, N.,
and Johnson, G. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24631-24634 |
| 37. |
Fromm, C.,
Coso, O. A.,
Montaner, S.,
Xu, N.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
10098-100103 |
| 38. |
Collins, L. R.,
Minden, A.,
Karin, M.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
17349-17353 |
| 39. |
Hart, M. J.,
Sharma, S.,
elMasry, N.,
Qiu, R.-G.,
McCabe, P.,
Polakis, P.,
and Bollag, G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25452-25458 |
| 40. |
Mao, J.,
Yuan, H.,
Xie, W.,
and Wu, D.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12973-12976 |
| 41. |
Slice, L. W.,
Wong, H. C.,
Sternini, C.,
Grady, E. F.,
Bunnett, N. W.,
and Walsh, J. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21755-21761 |
| 42. |
Singer, W. D.,
Miller, R. T.,
and Sternweis, P. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19796-19802 |
| 43. |
Macrez-Lepretre, N.,
Kalkbrenner, F.,
Morel, J. L.,
Schultz, G.,
and Mironneau, J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10095-10102 |
| 44. |
Wu, D. Q.,
Lee, C. H.,
Rhee, S. G.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1811-1817 |
| 45. |
Plonk, S. G.,
Park, S.-K.,
and Exton, J. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4823-4826 |
| 46. | Hill, C. S., Wynne, J., and Treisman, R. (1995) Cell 81, 1159-1170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. |
Wadsworth, S. J.,
Gebauer, G.,
van Rossum, G. D.,
and Dhanasekaran, N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
28829-28832 |
| 48. |
Hotchin, N. A.,
and Hall, A.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
1857-1865 |
| 49. |
Seasholtz, T. M.,
Majumdar, M.,
and Brown, J. H.
(1999)
Mol. Pharmacol.
55,
949-956 |
| 50. | Ridley, A. J., and Hall, A. (1992) Cell 70, 389-399[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 51. | Nobes, C. D., and Hall, A. (1995) Cell 81, 53-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. | Narumiya, S., Ishizaki, T., and Watanabe, N. (1997) FEBS Lett. 410, 68-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. | Rankin, S., Morii, N., Narumiya, S., and Rozengurt, E. (1994) FEBS Lett. 354, 315-319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 54. |
Gohla, A.,
Harhammer, R.,
and Schultz, G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4653-4659 |
| 55. | Prendergast, G. C., Khosravi-Far, R., Solski, P. A., Kurzawa, H., Lebowitz, P. F., and Der, C. J. (1995) Oncogene 10, 2289-2296[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 56. | Rozengurt, E. (1999) Curr. Opin. Oncol. 11, 116-122[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 57. | Ferris, H. A., Carroll, R. E., Rasenick, M. M., and Benya, R. V. (1997) J. Clin. Invest. 100, 2530-2537[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. C. Azim, H. Cao, X. Gao, M. Joo, A. B. Malik, R. B. van Breemen, R. T. Sadikot, G. Park, and J. W. Christman Regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by small GTPase Rac2 in bone marrow macrophages Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): L668 - L673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Ki, M. J. Choi, C. H. Lee, and S. G. Kim G{alpha}12 Specifically Regulates COX-2 Induction by Sphingosine 1-Phosphate: ROLE FOR JNK-DEPENDENT UBIQUITINATION AND DEGRADATION OF I{kappa}B{alpha} J. Biol. Chem., January 19, 2007; 282(3): 1938 - 1947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Rey, S. H. Young, J. Yuan, L. Slice, and E. Rozengurt Amino Acid-stimulated Ca2+ Oscillations Produced by the Ca2+-sensing Receptor Are Mediated by a Phospholipase C/Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate-independent Pathway That Requires G12, Rho, Filamin-A, and the Actin Cytoskeleton J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 22875 - 22882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W. Slice, T. Chiu, and E. Rozengurt Angiotensin II and Epidermal Growth Factor Induce Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Intestinal Epithelial Cells through Small GTPases Using Distinct Signaling Pathways J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1582 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sinnett-Smith, E. Zhukova, N. Hsieh, X. Jiang, and E. Rozengurt Protein Kinase D Potentiates DNA Synthesis Induced by Gq-coupled Receptors by Increasing the Duration of ERK Signaling in Swiss 3T3 Cells J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 16883 - 16893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Benitah, P. F. Valeron, and J. C. Lacal ROCK and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-dependent Activation of Cyclooxygenase-2 by Rho GTPases: Effects on Tumor Growth and Therapeutic Consequences Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2003; 14(7): 3041 - 3054. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yuan, L. W. Slice, J. Gu, and E. Rozengurt Cooperation of Gq, Gi, and G12/13 in Protein Kinase D Activation and Phosphorylation Induced by Lysophosphatidic Acid J. Biol. Chem., February 7, 2003; 278(7): 4882 - 4891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zervou, E. Karteris, E.W. Hillhouse, and R.W. Old Steroids mediate the expression of cytoplasmic and membrane-linked components in human myometrial cells Mol. Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 8(7): 597 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Degraeve, M. Bolla, S. Blaie, C. Creminon, I. Quere, P. Boquet, S. Levy-Toledano, J. Bertoglio, and A. Habib Modulation of COX-2 Expression by Statins in Human Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells. INVOLVEMENT OF GERANYLGERANYLATED PROTEINS J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2001; 276(50): 46849 - 46855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Thomas, Z. K. Ascott, D. Harmey, L. W. Slice, E. Rozengurt, and A. J. Lax Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor from Escherichia coli Induces RhoA-Dependent Expression of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Infect. Immun., November 1, 2001; 69(11): 6839 - 6845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yuan, L. W. Slice, and E. Rozengurt Activation of Protein Kinase D by Signaling through Rho and the alpha Subunit of the Heterotrimeric G Protein G13 J. Biol. Chem., October 12, 2001; 276(42): 38619 - 38627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Santiskulvong, J. Sinnett-Smith, and E. Rozengurt EGF receptor function is required in late G1 for cell cycle progression induced by bombesin and bradykinin Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): C886 - C898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Subbaramaiah, J. C. Hart, L. Norton, and A. J. Dannenberg Microtubule-interfering Agents Stimulate the Transcription of Cyclooxygenase-2. EVIDENCE FOR INVOLVEMENT OF ERK1/2 AND p38 MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE PATHWAYS J. Biol. Chem., May 12, 2000; 275(20): 14838 - 14845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sinnett-Smith, C. Santiskulvong, J. Duque, and E. Rozengurt [D-Arg1,D-Trp5,7,9,Leu11]Substance P Inhibits Bombesin-induced Mitogenic Signal Transduction Mediated by Both Gq and G12 in Swiss 3T3 Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 22, 2000; 275(39): 30644 - 30652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. MacKinnon, C. Waters, D. Jodrell, C. Haslett, and T. Sethi Bombesin and Substance P Analogues Differentially Regulate G-protein Coupling to the Bombesin Receptor. DIRECT EVIDENCE FOR BIASED AGONISM J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2001; 276(30): 28083 - 28091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||