JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, P. C. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Weitz, J. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liaw, P. C. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Weitz, J. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27597-27604, September 24, 1999


Comparison of Heparin- and Dermatan Sulfate-mediated Catalysis of Thrombin Inactivation by Heparin Cofactor II*

Patricia C. Y. LiawDagger , Richard C. Austin, James C. Fredenburgh, Alan R. Stafford, and Jeffrey I. Weitz§

From the Department of Medicine, McMaster University and the Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C3 Canada

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Heparin and dermatan sulfate activate heparin cofactor II (HCII) comparably, presumably by liberating the amino terminus of HCII to bind to exosite I of thrombin. To explore this model of activation, we systematically substituted basic residues in the glycosaminoglycan-binding domain of HCII with neutral amino acids and measured the rates of thrombin inactivation by the mutants. Mutant D, with changes at Arg184, Lys185, Arg189, Arg192, Arg193, demonstrated a ~130-fold increased rate of thrombin inactivation that was unaffected by the presence of glycosaminoglycans. The increased rate reflects displacement of the amino terminus of mutant D because (a) mutant D inactivates gamma -thrombin at a 65-fold slower rate than alpha -thrombin, (b) hirudin-(54-65) decreases the rate of thrombin inactivation, and (c) deletion of the amino terminus of mutant D reduces the rate of thrombin inactivation ~100-fold. We also examined the contribution of glycosaminoglycan-mediated bridging of thrombin to HCII to the inhibitory process. Whereas activation of HCII by heparin was chain-length dependent, stimulation by dermatan sulfate was not, suggesting that dermatan sulfate does not utilize a template mechanism to accelerate the inhibitory process. Fluorescence spectroscopy revealed that dermatan sulfate evokes greater conformational changes in HCII than heparin, suggesting that dermatan sulfate stimulates HCII by producing more effective displacement of the amino terminus.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Heparin cofactor II (HCII),1 a serpin found in human plasma at a concentration of 1.2 µM, selectively inactivates thrombin in a reaction that is accelerated >1000-fold by glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) such as heparin, dermatan sulfate, and heparan sulfate (1). A second serpin, antithrombin (AT), also inactivates thrombin but differs from HCII in four important ways. First, whereas HCII only inactivates thrombin, AT inactivates other coagulation enzymes including factors Xa and IXa (2). Second, the high affinity interaction of heparin with AT is mediated by a unique pentasaccharide sequence found only in a subpopulation of heparin molecules (3-5). In contrast, heparin does not possess a high affinity sequence for HCII (6). Furthermore, dermatan sulfate (DS), a GAG found in the extracellular matrix of connective tissue (7, 8), activates HCII, but has no effect on AT (1). Third, the uncatalyzed rate of thrombin inactivation by AT is about 10-fold faster than that for HCII, probably reflecting differences in the amino acid residue at their P-1 position, with AT containing an Arg residue and HCII a Leu (9). Fourth, HCII possesses a unique 75-amino acid domain at its amino terminus that binds to thrombin exosite I, an interaction analogous to the binding of the carboxyl terminus of hirudin to exosite I (1).

Although the uncatalyzed rate of thrombin inactivation by HCII is slower than that for AT, in the presence of heparin or DS, HCII inactivates thrombin at a rate similar to that at which AT inactivates thrombin when heparin is present (1, 10). The current model to explain GAG-mediated catalysis of HCII inactivation of thrombin suggests that binding of polyanionic GAGs to the electropositive GAG-binding domain on HCII disrupts the intramolecular ionic interaction between the amino-terminal acidic domain of HCII and basic residues in the GAG-binding domain (11-13). Once the amino terminus of HCII is no longer conformationally restrained, the region encompassing residues 54-75 (14) interacts with exosite I on thrombin, thereby facilitating enzyme-inhibitor complex formation.

Release of the amino-terminal domain upon GAG binding to HCII is believed to account for most, but not all, of the stimulatory effect of heparin or DS. Studies with exosite II variants of thrombin with reduced heparin affinity suggest that some acceleration in the rate of thrombin inactivation results from simultaneous binding of heparin to exosite II on thrombin and the GAG-binding domain on HCII (13, 15). In this way, heparin acts as a template for surface approximation of enzyme and inhibitor, analogous to its role in catalysis of AT-mediated inactivation of thrombin (16). Whether DS also serves a template function is unclear. In addition to inducing conformational changes in the amino-terminal domain of HCII, DS also may evoke allosteric changes in the reactive site loop or elsewhere because it produces a 3-fold increase in the rate of thrombin inactivation by an HCII variant lacking the amino-terminal domain (12).

The current model of thrombin inactivation by HCII reveals three potential modes of GAG-mediated activation: displacement of the amino terminus of HCII, thereby freeing it to interact with thrombin exosite I; bridging of exosite II of thrombin to HCII; and induction of conformational changes at the reactive site loop of HCII. To examine the relative importance of each of these mechanisms and to explore the possibility that heparin and DS have different modes of action, we first eliminated the GAG dependence of the HCII inactivation reaction by substituting basic residues in the GAG-binding domain of HCII with neutral amino acids. By measuring the rates of thrombin inactivation by these HCII mutants, we determined the importance of binding of the amino-terminal domain of HCII to exosite 1 on thrombin in isolation from other GAG-induced effects. To examine the contribution of GAG-mediated bridging of HCII to exosite II on thrombin, we compared the effect of high and low molecular weight heparin and DS fractions on the rates of thrombin inactivation by HCII. Finally, to explore the possibility that GAGs elicit conformational changes at the reactive site loop of HCII, we measured the effect of heparin and DS on the rate of thrombin inactivation by an HCII variant lacking the amino-terminal domain.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials-- Oligonucleotides were synthesized by the Institute for Molecular Biology and Biotechnology at McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. Human HCII and AT, isolated from plasma by affinity chromatography, and monospecific polyclonal IgG against human HCII and human AT were from Affinity Biologicals Inc. (Hamilton, ON). Polybrene was obtained from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI). Heparin, hirudin-(54-65), anti-sheep IgG alkaline phosphatase, 5-(dimethylamino)naphthalene-1-sulfonyl (DNS)-Cl, and the thrombin-directed substrate, N-p-tosyl-Gly-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide were from Sigma. Heparin-Sepharose CL-6B resin, deoxynucleotides, restriction enzymes, and RNAguard ribonuclease inhibitor were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Human alpha - and gamma -thrombin, factor Xa, factor IXa, factor XIa, and size-restricted heparin fragments of 18, 9, 6, and 4 kDa, prepared by gel filtration of heparin depolymerized by base-induced eliminative cleavage, were from Enzyme Research Laboratories (ERL) (South Bend, IN). To address the possibility that the depolymerization process destroys specific structural motifs on the heparin chains, size-restricted heparin fractions of similar molecular weights were also prepared by gel filtering unfractionated heparin, as described by Cosmi et al. (17). The recombinant thrombin mutant with Arg93, Arg97, and Arg101 substituted with Ala (RA-thrombin) (18) was generously provided by Dr. Charles Esmon (Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Oklahoma City, OK). Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, Geneticin, and Superscript RNase H reverse transcriptase were from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). Fetal bovine serum was obtained from HyClone Laboratories Inc. (Logan, UT). DS was obtained from Mediolanum Farmaceutici (Milan, Italy). Desmin, a 5.6-kDa low molecular weight DS fraction obtained by limited depolymerization (19), was generously provided by Dr. Giancarlo Agnelli (Universita di Perugia, Perugia, Italy). By subjecting desmin to gel filtration (17), defined molecular mass fractions of 3.7, 4.5, and 5.5 kDa were obtained. A baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell line was generously provided by Dr. William Sheffield (McMaster University, Hamilton). HD22 (previously designated 60-18[29] (20)), a 29-nucleotide single-stranded DNA aptamer that interacts with exosite II on thrombin, was kindly provided by Dr. Hayes Dougan (TRIUMF Meson Facility, Vancouver, BC). All other chemicals were of the highest grade commercially available.

DNA Construction and Mutagenesis-- Human HCII cDNA was cloned from HepG2 cells by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Briefly, total RNA was isolated from HepG2 liver cells using the RNeasy total RNA kit (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth, CA) and reverse transcribed using primer A (5'-AAGGCACTTCAGACACCTAGACCTCCA-3') which hybridizes to the 3'-untranslated region of HCII cDNA (21). Reverse transcription was done by first heating 1 µg of total RNA and 50 ng of primer A for 10 min at 70 oC and then placing the mixture on ice. The volume was brought to 20 µl by adding 4 µl of 5 × reverse transcriptase buffer (Life Technologies, Inc.), 2 µl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM of each deoxynucleotide, 37.5 units of RNAguard ribonuclease inhibitor, and 200 units of Superscript RNase H reverse transcriptase. cDNA synthesis was performed at 42 oC for 60 min. The reaction mixture was then heated to 75 oC for 10 min and chilled on ice. HCII cDNA was polymerase chain reaction amplified using primer A and primer B (5'-AGCTCCGCCAAAATGAAACACTCATTAAACGCA-3') which hybridizes to the 5'-untranslated region of HCII cDNA (21). The polymerase chain reaction product was purified on a 1% agarose gel, digested with EcoRV, and initially subcloned into the EcoRV site of pBluescript (KS) (Stratagene Ltd., La Jolla, CA). HCII cDNA was then cloned in the forward orientation into the EcoRI site of the phagemid vector pALTER-1 (Promega, Madison, WI). In vitro mutagenesis to generate and select oligonucleotide-directed mutants was performed using single-stranded phagemid DNA as described by the supplier. Double-stranded sequencing, using dideoxy chain termination (22) and Sequenase 2.0 (U. S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland, OH), was used to verify the sequence of the HCII cDNA (21) and the authenticity of the mutations.

Stable Expression of Wild-type and Variant Forms of HCII in BHK Cells-- cDNAs encoding the wild-type and variant forms of HCII were cloned into the EcoRI site of the eukaryotic expression vector pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). In the resulting plasmid, the expression of HCII cDNA is under the control of the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter. Transfection of BHK cells was performed in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium using Qiagen-purified pcDNA3.1 constructs employing the SuperFect transfection reagent for 3 h as described by the supplier (Qiagen). The medium was then changed to Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 1 mg/ml Geneticin. After 2 weeks of selection, in which the medium was changed every 3 days, drug-resistant colonies were isolated and levels of recombinant protein expression were determined by immunoblotting with sheep anti-HCII antibody. Clones secreting the highest level of recombinant protein were seeded into roller bottles and cultured in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium.

Recombinant Protein Purification-- Sheep anti-HCII antibody was coupled to cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose 4B matrix as described by Cuatrecasas (23). All subsequent steps were done at room temperature. The conditioned medium of the transfected BHK cells was applied to anti-HCII resin pre-equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4 (TBS). The column was washed with 5 column volumes of 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.8 M NaCl, pH 7.4, followed by 5 column volumes of 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.05 M NaCl, pH 7.4. Bound protein was eluted with Gentle Ag/Ab Elution Buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL), dialyzed at 4 oC overnight against two changes of 500 ml of TBS, and then concentrated using a Centriprep-30 ultrafiltration apparatus (Amicon, Inc., Beverly MA). Protein concentration was measured using epsilon 2800.1% = 0.91 (Enzyme Research Labs) and protein purity was determined by SDS-PAGE analysis (24).

Rates of Thrombin Inactivation by Wild-type and Variant HCII-- The second-order rate constants (k2) for inactivation of thrombin by the various HCII variants were determined under pseudo first-order conditions (16) in the absence or presence of 3 µM GAGs. In a multiwell plate, 10-µl aliquots of thrombin, gamma -thrombin, or RA-thrombin (final concentration 2-4 nM) were incubated for varying intervals with 25-500 nM HCII or variant suspended in 10 µl of TBS containing 0.6% polyethylene glycol-8000 (TBSP). To ensure pseudo first-order conditions, inhibitor to enzyme ratios were greater than 5:1. When used, heparin or DS was present at 3 µM. All reactions were terminated by the addition of 200 µM chromogenic substrate (N-p-tosyl-Gly-Pro-Arg-p-nitroanilide) in 200 µl of TBSP containing 10 mg/ml Polybrene. Residual thrombin activity was calculated by measuring absorbance at 405 nm for 5 min using a Molecular Devices plate reader. The pseudo first-order rate constants (k1) for thrombin inactivation were determined by fitting the data to the equation, k1·ln([P]o/[P]t), where [P]o is initial thrombin activity and [P]t is thrombin activity at time t (16). The second-order rate constant, k2, was then calculated by dividing k1 by the HCII concentration.

Heparin-Sepharose Affinity Chromatography-- Heparin-Sepharose affinity chromatography was used to compare the binding of the HCII variants to heparin. 0.2 ml of purified HCII, at a concentration of 10 µg/ml, was batch adsorbed with 0.2 ml of heparin-Sepharose resin for 1 h at 4 oC. Adsorbed proteins were eluted in a stepwise fashion with 1 ml of 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 0.1% polyethylene glycol 8000 containing NaCl in concentrations ranging from 30 mM to 1 M. Aliquots from the flow-through and eluates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with sheep anti-HCII antibody. Protein elution profiles were obtained by laser densitometry scans of immunoblots using the UltroScanTM XL laser densitometer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The density of HCII in each fraction was expressed as a percentage of the total HCII density in the complete elution profile.

Fluorescence Spectroscopy Studies of Interactions between HCII and Heparin or DS-- Binding of GAGs to HCII was quantified by monitoring fluorescence intensity changes of DNS-HCII when titrated with heparin or DS (25). DNS-HCII was prepared by reacting HCII with a 2-fold molar excess of DNS-Cl in 0.1 M Na2HPO4, pH 8.0, as described (25). DNS-HCII had activity similar to that of native plasma HCII (pHCII) as assessed by measuring the second-order rate constants for thrombin inactivation both in the absence and presence of GAGs. Fluorescence studies were performed on 2 ml of 50 nM DNS-HCII in a 1 × 1-cm quartz cuvette using a Perkin-Elmer LS50B luminescence spectrometer. The temperature of the cuvette was maintained at 23 °C with a circulating water bath connected to the cell holder and the sample was stirred continuously with a magnetic stirrer. Excitation and emission wavelengths were set to 335 and 520 nm, respectively, with excitation and emission slit widths of 15 and 20 nm, respectively, and an emission filter of 430 nm. After readings were taken of DNS-HCII alone (Io), known quantities of either heparin or DS were then added to the cuvette and while stirring, the change in fluorescence was monitored (I). Kd values were calculated by plotting I/Io versus GAG concentration. The parameters Kd and alpha  were calculated by nonlinear regression using the equation, I/Io = (1 + ((Kd + [GAG])/[DNS-HCII)-((1 + ((Kd + [GAG])/[DNS-HCII]))2 - (4 × [GAG]/[DNS-HCII]))0.5) × (alpha /2) + 1, where alpha  is the maximum fluorescence change and assuming a stoichiometry of 1 (26).

The association of pHCII with heparin or DS also was monitored by the GAG-dependent intrinsic fluorescence intensity change of HCII. Fluorescence of 2 ml of 1 µM pHCII was monitored with excitation and emission wavelengths set to 280 and 340 nm, respectively, excitation and emission slit widths set to 6 nm, and an emission filter of 290 nm. Known quantities of either heparin or DS were then added to the cuvette and the change in fluorescence was monitored. The Kd values were calculated by plotting I/Io versus GAG concentration, as described above.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Purification of HCII Variants-- Human HCII is a 480-amino acid, single-chain glycoprotein with a molecular mass of ~66 kDa (27). The functional domains of HCII and the amino acid sequence of its GAG-binding domain are shown schematically in Fig. 1. The GAG-binding domain of HCII has been identified by sequence homology with AT and by analysis of natural (28) and recombinant (11, 29, 30) variants of HCII. In this study, wild-type (wt) human HCII cDNA was cloned from HepG2 cells and site-directed mutagenesis was used to generate recombinant HCII molecules with Arg184, Lys185, Arg189, and Arg192 replaced with Gln, and Arg193 with Asn, neutral residues previously shown to reduce the affinity of HCII for heparin-Sepharose (11). The recombinant HCII (rHCII) variants, denoted Mut A, B, C, and D, possess 2, 4, or 5 mutations and are listed in Table I. In addition, the 74 amino-terminal residues were deleted from wild-type (wt-del74) and Mut D (Mut D-del74) HCII. Sequence analysis was used to verify the authenticity of the wild-type (21) and mutated sequences. cDNAs encoding the wild-type and variant forms of HCII were expressed in BHK cells. The apparent molecular masses of the recombinant proteins, as determined by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis, are consistent with their predicted molecular masses (data not shown).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Schematic diagram of the functional domains of HCII. The relative positions of the acidic domain (residues 54-75), the GAG-binding domain (residues 173-193), and the reactive center (Leu444-Ser445) are shown in the top portion of the diagram. The amino acid residues in the GAG-binding domain are shown in the bottom portion. The arrows identify the 5 basic residues within the GAG-binding domain that have been mutated to Gln or Asn in various combinations.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Summary of the HCII variants used in this study and their elution from heparin-Sepharose

Heparin-Sepharose Affinity Chromatography of GAG-binding Domain Variants-- To compare the heparin binding properties of wt-rHCII with the rHCII variants, the proteins were subjected to heparin-Sepharose affinity chromatography and eluted with increasing concentrations of NaCl. As shown in Table I, both pHCII and wt-rHCII are retained on the heparin-Sepharose column at NaCl concentrations up to 180 mM. Mutation of positively charged residues at positions 184 and 185 (Mut A) or at positions 192 and 193 (Mut B) reduces the NaCl concentration necessary for elution to 130 and 150 mM, respectively. Mutation of positively charged residues at positions 184, 185, 192, and 193 (Mut C) or at positions 184, 185, 189, 192, and 193 (Mut D) in the GAG-binding domain further reduces the NaCl concentration needed for elution to 100 mM.

Since the amino-terminal acidic domain of HCII is believed to bind intramolecularly to the basic GAG-binding domain, deletion of the 74-residue amino-terminal acidic (del74) domain should unmask the GAG-binding domain, thereby increasing the binding of HCII to heparin. This concept is supported by the observation that the NaCl concentration required to elute wt-rHCII-del74 is 3.8-fold higher than that needed for wt-rHCII (700 and 180 mM NaCl, respectively; Table I). In contrast, to elute Mut D-del74, which not only lacks the amino-terminal acidic domain but also has mutations in the GAG-binding domain, only a 1.4-fold higher NaCl concentrations is needed (250 mM). These findings corroborate previous results that the heparin-binding domain is unmasked upon deletion of the amino-terminal 74 residues (12). However, since Mut D-del74 is retained on the heparin-Sepharose column at higher concentrations of NaCl than is wt-rHCII, it is possible that additional residues may be involved in heparin binding. A potential candidate is Lys173, a residue that has been shown to contribute to binding of heparin, but not DS (31).

Thrombin Inactivation by HCII GAG-binding Domain Variants-- The second-order rate constants for the inactivation of thrombin by the affinity-purified HCII mutants were determined in the absence or presence of 3 µM heparin or DS under pseudo first-order conditions (Fig. 2). This concentration of heparin and DS was chosen because, in preliminary studies, it produced maximal stimulation of thrombin inactivation by pHCII (data not shown). Mut A and B did not display elevated rates of thrombin inactivation in the absence of GAG, likely reflecting only partial disruption of the GAG-binding domain. Our results with Mut A and Mut B differ from those of Ragg et al. (11) in which their double point mutants exhibited slightly enhanced levels of thrombin inhibitory activity in the absence of GAGs as analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gels. This may reflect differences in the expression systems because we used BHK cells whereas Ragg and colleagues (11) used COS cells. Alternatively, endogenous GAGs may account for the increased activities reported by Ragg et al. (11) because their recombinant HCII variants were obtained directly from conditioned media without subsequent purification steps. In contrast, in the current study, mutants were isolated by immunoaffinity chromatography. When this step was omitted, we also detected increased thrombin inhibitory activity in some instances.


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Second-order rate constants for the inactivation of thrombin by HCII variants. The second-order rate constants for the inactivation of thrombin by 40 nM HCII or variant were determined under pseudo first-order conditions in the absence (black bars) or presence of 3 µM heparin (gray bars) or DS (white bars). The bars represent the mean, while the lines above the bars reflect the S.E of the mean of three determinations.

The rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut A is not increased by heparin or DS addition. In contrast, the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut B increases 470-fold (from 5.1 × 104 M-1 min-1 to 2.4 × 107 M-1 min-1) in the presence of heparin, but only 5-fold in the presence of DS (from 5.1 × 104 M-1 min-1 to 2.4 × 105 M-1 min-1). These findings are consistent with various reports and highlight the observations that Arg192 and Arg193 are key contributors to DS, but not heparin, binding to HCII, whereas Arg184 and Lys185 are important for the binding of both heparin and DS (11, 30). The observation that, in the absence of GAGs, Mut A and B inactivate thrombin at rates similar to those of wt-HCII and pHCII indicates that limited mutation in the GAG-binding domain is insufficient to release the amino-terminal domain from its intramolecular interactions. Consequently, we focused on the variants with more extensive mutations.

The rates of thrombin inactivation by Mut C and Mut D in the absence of GAG are 6.2 × 106 M-1 min-1 and 6.0 × 106 M-1 min-1, respectively, values that are about 140-fold higher than those of pHCII and wt-rHCII (3.9 × 104 M-1 min-1 and 4.6 × 104 M-1 min-1, respectively). Neither heparin nor DS addition significantly increases the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut C or Mut D. By contrast, the rates of thrombin inactivation by pHCII and wt-rHCII increase 2000-4000-fold in the presence of these GAGs. Although Mut C and Mut D displayed similar rates of thrombin inactivation and binding to heparin-Sepharose, Mut D was selected for detailed analysis because it also has Arg189 mutated to Gln and this residue has been proposed to contribute to GAG binding (31).

Substrate Specificity of Mut D-- Based on immunoblot analyses, Mut D forms SDS-stable complexes with thrombin both in the absence and presence of heparin or DS (not shown). In contrast, under the same conditions, pHCII and wt-rHCII only form enzyme-inhibitor complexes in the presence of either GAG. Mut D retains its selectivity for thrombin, and like pHCII and wt-rHCII, does not form complexes with factors IXa, Xa, or XIa.

Elucidation of the Mechanism of Action of Mut D-- To determine whether the increased thrombin inhibitory activity of Mut D in the absence of GAGs reflects interaction of its amino-terminal acidic domain with exosite I on thrombin, two sets of experiments were performed. First, we compared the rates at which Mut D inactivates gamma -thrombin, a proteolytic derivative of thrombin lacking exosite I, and RA-thrombin, a recombinant thrombin variant containing three point mutations in exosite II that result in a 20-fold decrease in heparin affinity (18). We chose these thrombin variants because previous studies with gamma -thrombin and RA-thrombin have demonstrated a strict requirement for binding of pHCII to exosite I, but not exosite II, on thrombin, even in the presence of GAG (Fig. 3A) (12, 15, 32, 33). As shown in Fig. 3B, Mut D inactivates gamma -thrombin at a 66-fold slower rate than thrombin (6.8 × 104 M-1 min-1 versus 6.5 × 106 M-1 min-1, respectively). In contrast, the rate of inactivation of RA-thrombin by Mut D is similar to that of thrombin. Second, we examined the effect of hirudin-(54-65) on the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut D. This peptide interacts with exosite I of thrombin (34) and it has been shown previously to slow the rate of thrombin inactivation by pHCII in the presence of GAGs (12). The addition of 20 µM hirudin-(54-65) produces a 33-fold decrease in the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut D (from 6.5 × 106 to 4.3 × 104 M-1 min-1). These results highlight the importance of thrombin exosite I in mediating the increased thrombin inhibitory activity of Mut D. 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Second-order rate constants for the inactivation of thrombin variants by pHCII with heparin or by Mut D. The second-order rate constants for the inactivation of alpha -thrombin (IIa), RA-IIa, gamma -thrombin (gamma -IIa), or thrombin in the presence of 20 µM hirudin-(54-65) (IIa+hir-54-65) by pHCII in the presence of 3 µM heparin (panel A) or by Mut D (panel B) were determined under pseudo first-order conditions. The bars represent the mean, while the lines above the bars reflect the S.E. of the mean of at least three determinations.

To demonstrate that the increased basal rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut D reflects release of its amino-terminal acidic domain from intramolecular interactions, we examined the ability of Mut D-del74, a variant of Mut D that lacks the amino-terminal acidic domain, to inactivate thrombin in the absence and presence of GAGs. As shown in Fig. 2, the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut D-del74 is 109-fold lower than that for Mut D (5.5 × 104 M-1 min-1 and 6.5 × 106 M-1 min-1, respectively). Like Mut D, neither heparin nor DS increases the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut D-del74. In contrast, heparin produces a 5-fold (from 8.8 × 104 M-1 min-1 to 4.7 × 105 M-1 min-1) increase in the rate of thrombin inactivation by wt-del74 rHCII, which possesses an intact GAG-binding domain. Unlike heparin, DS has no effect on the rate of thrombin inactivation by wt-del74 rHCII (Fig. 2), even when the DS concentration is increased from 3 to 30 µM (data not shown).

Contribution of the Template Mechanism to the GAG-catalyzed Inhibitory Process-- To assess the importance of GAG-mediated bridging of HCII to thrombin, we examined the rates of thrombin inactivation as a function of heparin or DS chain length. As shown in Table II, heparin fractions of 9 and 18 kDa (which correspond to approximately 30 and 60 saccharide units, respectively) increase the rate of thrombin inactivation by pHCII, wt-rHCII, and wt-del74 to a greater extent than heparin fractions of 6 kDa or less (i.e. 20 saccharide units or fewer). Similar results were obtained regardless of whether the heparin fragments were prepared by gel filtration of depolymerized or unfractionated heparin. In contrast, DS, which has a mean molecular mass of 20 kDa, and desmin, with a mean molecular mass of 5.6 kDa, increase the rates of thrombin inactivation by pHCII to a similar extent. Likewise, lower molecular weight fractions of desmin (mean molecular masses of 3.7, 4.5, and 5.5 kDa) also increase the rate of thrombin inactivation by pHCII to a similar extent (Fig. 4). In contrast, neither DS (Fig. 2) nor desmin (not shown) increases the rate of thrombin inactivation by wt-del74 rHCII. Our finding with heparin fractions confirm previous reports that the minimum molecular mass of heparin required for catalysis via the template mechanism is between 6 and 9 kDa (6, 35). The data with DS suggest that GAG-mediated bridging does not play a role in DS-mediated catalysis of thrombin inactivation by HCII.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Effect of heparin fractions of varying molecular weight on second-order rate constants for thrombin inactivation by HCII variants


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Effect of GAG chain length on thrombin inactivation by pHCII. The second-order rate constant for the inactivation of 4 nM thrombin by 40 nM pHCII was determined under pseudo first-order conditions in the absence or presence of 3 µM DS- or heparin-derived GAGs (closed and open symbols, respectively). The closed circles () represent specific molecular mass fractions obtained by gel filtration chromatography of desmin (5.6 kDa, black-square). Results for dermatan sulfate are also shown (black-triangle). The open circles (open circle ) represent gel filtration fractions of standard heparin (18 kDa, Delta ). Each point represents the mean of at least two determinations and the bars represent the S.E. of the mean.

We also examined the ability of HD22, a single-stranded DNA aptamer that binds exosite II of thrombin (20), to compromise the GAG-catalyzed inhibitory process. In confirmation of its specificity for exosite II, thrombin-bound FITC-HD22 (Kd of 10 nM) is displaced by DS or heparin (data not shown). HD22 produces a concentration-dependent, 10-fold reduction in the rate of thrombin inactivation by HCII in the presence of 120 nM heparin (Ki of 6 nM) (Fig. 5). In contrast, the aptamer has no effect on the rate of inactivation in the presence of either 1 µM (Fig. 5) or 3 µM (not shown) DS. These findings support the concept that, unlike heparin, DS does not serve a template function.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effect of exosite II directed DNA aptamer on DS- and heparin-catalyzed inactivation of thrombin by pHCII. The rates of inactivation of 10 nM thrombin by 100 nM pHCII in the presence of 2 µg/ml heparin () or 20 µg/ml DS (open circle ) were determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of the HD22 aptamer. The data represent the mean of two determinations and the bars signify the S.E.

Effect of GAG Binding on the Conformation of HCII-- To explore the possibility that DS and heparin evoke distinct structural changes in HCII, we labeled pHCII with DNS-Cl, a sensitive probe of protein conformation (36). As shown in Fig. 5A, titration of DNS-pHCII with DS results in a 6% decrease in fluorescence intensity, an indication of an increase in solvent hydrophilicity around the fluorophore. In contrast, when DNS-pHCII is titrated with heparin, there is only a minor 1% decrease in the fluorescence intensity. Based on nonlinear regression analysis of the binding curve, DS binds to HCII with a Kd value of 5.1 µM.

We also compared the fluorescence emission of tryptophan residues in HCII in the presence of GAGs with that in their absence (Fig. 5B). DS addition to 1 µM pHCII results in a decrease in protein fluorescence, with a maximum decrease of 13% at DS concentrations of >= 150 µM. As observed for DNS-HCII, heparin at concentrations up to 250 µM failed to significantly change the fluorescence intensity of pHCII. Based on analysis of these results, DS binds to pHCII with a Kd of 25.3 µM. Although these findings do not identify which of the four tryptophan residues are responsive to DS binding, nor the nature of the conformational changes, they are consistent with the hypothesis that the allosterically transmitted conformational changes evoked by DS and heparin binding are distinct. The discrepancy of the Kd values for DS obtained by these two analyses may reflect the different conditions under which the experiments were performed or the fact that different reporter groups were monitored.

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The current model of the mechanism of action of HCII suggests that the amino-terminal acidic domain, which is freed from intramolecular interactions upon GAG binding, interacts with exosite I on thrombin (1). The essential role of the amino-terminal domain of HCII in the inhibitory process has been revealed through deletion or mutation of this region (11, 12). Although previous work has identified individual residues constituting the GAG-binding domain (11, 28, 30), in this study we attempted to neutralize the GAG-binding domain with the aim of rendering HCII GAG independent. We have demonstrated that charge negation at residues 184, 185, 189, 192, and 193 (Mut D) enables HCII to react over 100 times more efficiently with thrombin, without the participation of a GAG.

Although interaction of the amino-terminal domain of HCII with exosite I on thrombin is considered to be the requisite step in the inactivation reaction, by analogy to other serpins GAGs may also bridge the inhibitor to the enzyme or induce conformational changes in the reactive site loop of the inhibitor. To address these possibilities, we used low molecular weight fractions of heparin and DS to examine the extent to which GAG-mediated bridging of HCII to thrombin contributes to the inhibitory process. We also used fluorescence studies to determine whether heparin and DS evoke distinct structural changes when they bind to HCII. Because our studies address different aspects of the mechanism of action of HCII, each will be discussed individually.

Role of Amino-terminal Domain-- Three lines of evidence suggest that the increased thrombin inhibitory activity of Mut D reflects release of the amino-terminal acidic domain from intramolecular interactions, enabling the domain to bind to thrombin exosite I. First, in the absence of GAGs, Mut D exhibits a 140-fold elevated rate of inactivation of thrombin, but only a 2-fold increase with gamma -thrombin, a trypsinized derivative of thrombin that lacks exosite I. Since gamma -thrombin displays normal reactivity with AT (32) but not Mut D, the possibility that the mutations introduced into Mut D conformationally activates its reactive site loop can be eliminated. That exosite II does not contribute to the elevated activity of Mut D is demonstrated by its comparable rates of inactivation of native thrombin and RA-thrombin, a thrombin variant with three point mutations in exosite II that endow it with a 20-fold lower affinity for heparin (18). Second, the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut D is decreased in the presence of hirudin-(54-65), an analogue of the carboxyl terminus of hirudin that binds exosite I of thrombin (34). Previous studies have shown that this peptide reduces the rate of inactivation of thrombin by pHCII, but not by AT, revealing its specificity for exosite I (12, 33). Third, deletion of the amino-terminal domain of Mut D (Mut D-del74) reduces its rate of inactivation of thrombin to that exhibited by pHCII with native thrombin in the absence of GAG or by Mut D with gamma -thrombin. Furthermore, the extent of stimulation of wt-del74 by heparin or DS is over 200-fold less than that of wt-rHCII. These studies, therefore, provide independent confirmation that the amino-terminal domain makes a significant contribution to the inhibitory mechanism of HCII. Moreover, they indicate that release of the amino-terminal domain alone is insufficient to fully promote inactivation of thrombin by HCII, suggesting that GAG binding to HCII may stimulate its inhibitory activity through additional mechanisms.

Role of Heparin Bridging-- Numerous studies have demonstrated a dose-dependent reduction in the maximal rate of thrombin inactivation at high concentrations of heparin, consistent with a template mechanism whereby heparin bridges thrombin to HCII (32, 33, 37, 38). Notably, a deletion mutant lacking the ability to bind to exosite I via the amino-terminal domain (wt-del71) displays a biphasic heparin stimulation response (12). Our studies, however, suggest that heparin bridging makes a relatively minor contribution to the overall catalysis of the thrombin inhibitory reaction provided by heparin. This is revealed by the demonstration that thrombin inactivation by wt-del74 is stimulated by heparin only 6-fold and by the finding that the exosite II-binding aptamer reduces the magnitude of heparin catalysis by only 10-fold. In contrast, DS does not serve a template role since it does not stimulate wt-del74-mediated inactivation of thrombin and DS catalysis of HCII is not affected by the exosite II aptamer.

Further support for a template mechanism involving heparin is the observation that the minimal heparin chain length required for catalysis of inactivation by wt-del74 is between 20 and 30 saccharide units (which corresponds to a molecular mass between 6 and 9 kDa), a chain-length requirement comparable to that observed for pHCII (Fig. 4, Table II). These findings are consistent with the results of other investigators who demonstrated that only heparin chains comprised of 24 or more saccharide units produce maximal catalysis of thrombin inactivation by HCII (6, 35).

The mutations introduced into the GAG-binding domain of Mut D reduce its affinity for heparin so that GAG-mediated templating cannot occur. Consequently, we postulate that the 140-fold increase in the basal rate at which Mut D inactivates thrombin reflects displacement of the amino terminus of HCII similar to that induced by the binding of shorter heparin chains to native HCII. In support of this concept, the rate of thrombin inactivation by Mut D in the absence of GAG is only 2.8-fold slower than the rate at which wt-rHCII inactivates thrombin in the presence of a 6-kDa heparin fraction (6.0 × 106 M-1 min-1 and 1.7 × 107 M-1 min-1, respectively), a heparin chain that is too short to bridge HCII to thrombin.

Allosteric Effects-- In contrast to heparin, DS appears to accelerate thrombin inactivation by HCII exclusively through induction of allosteric changes in the amino-terminal acidic domain because (a) low molecular weight DS fractions increase the rate of thrombin inactivation by pHCII to the same extent as unfractionated DS (Fig. 4), and (b) unfractionated DS, comprised of more than 30 saccharide units, does not increase the rate of thrombin inactivation by wt-del74 rHCII (Fig. 2). Whereas unfractionated DS, desmin, and low molecular weight fractions of desmin increase the rate of thrombin inactivation by pHCII > 1000-fold, Mut D inactivates thrombin at a rate only 130-fold greater than the basal rate of thrombin inactivation by pHCII. These observations raise the possibility that the allosteric changes induced by the binding of unfractionated and low molecular weight DS to HCII are more extensive than those produced by heparin or by the mutations introduced into the GAG-binding domains of Mut D. This concept is supported by the observation that a reactive site HCII variant with a Leu444 right-arrow Arg mutation is stimulated by DS to a greater extent than by heparin (15, 39). Further support comes from our findings that the heparin- and DS-binding sites on HCII are not identical. Mutation of Arg192 and Arg193 to Gln and Asn, respectively (Mut B), decreases the stimulatory activity of DS, but has little effect on heparin's ability to accelerate thrombin inactivation (Fig. 2). In contrast, substitution of Arg184 and Lys185 with Gln residues (Mut A) abolishes the ability of both GAGs to enhance thrombin inactivation.

The results of fluorescence spectroscopy studies (Fig. 6) support the concept that heparin and DS induce different conformational changes upon binding to HCII. When DNS-pHCII is titrated with DS or heparin, the changes in extrinsic fluorescence evoked by DS are greater than those produced by heparin. Likewise, when intrinsic fluorescence is monitored, titration with DS also produces greater changes than titration with heparin. These findings are consistent with our hypothesis that the conformational changes in the amino terminus evoked by DS optimize its interaction with exosite I on thrombin to a greater extent than those induced by heparin. Differences in the allosteric changes in the amino-terminal acidic domain induced by unfractionated or low molecular weight DS relative to heparin may reflect the more extensive contacts that the former GAGs make with HCII.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Analyses of binding of DS and heparin to HCII measured by fluorescence. The DNS fluorescence intensity of 44 nM DNS-pHCII (panel A) or the intrinsic fluorescence of 1 µM pHCII (panel B) were determined during titration with increasing concentrations of DS () or heparin (open circle ). I/Io is plotted versus GAG concentration, where I is the fluorescence intensity at a given GAG concentration and Io is the initial fluorescence intensity. The Kd values were determined by nonlinear regression analysis the data (line).

The fact that neither DS nor desmin accelerates thrombin inactivation by wt-del74 rHCII makes it unlikely that these GAGs induce major conformational changes at the reactive center of HCII that render the Leu444-Ser445 peptide bond a more favorable site for thrombin cleavage. Therefore, GAG-induced conformational activation of the reactive site loop, while contributing significantly to the inactivation of factor Xa by AT (40), may serve a lesser role with HCII. This is corroborated by reports that heparin produces little stimulation in the rate of inactivation of gamma -thrombin (32, 33) or chymotrypsin (41) by HCII. Furthermore, because conversion of Leu444 to Arg makes HCII 100-fold more efficient at inactivating thrombin (15, 39), it is possible that the reactive site loop of HCII is in a more accessible conformation than that of AT. These observations suggest that displacement of the amino-terminal domain is the predominant mechanism by which HCII is allosterically activated by GAGs.

The results of this study advance our knowledge in a number of important ways. First, we have identified the residues in HCII that physically impair the ability of its amino terminus to ligate exosite I on thrombin in the absence of GAGs. Charge negation of these residues eliminates the GAG dependence for thrombin inactivation, presumably by releasing the amino terminus from intramolecular ionic bonds. Second, we explored the extent to which heparin and DS utilize the allosteric and template mechanisms in the catalysis of enzyme-inhibitor complex formation. Our findings suggest that DS activates HCII exclusively through release of the amino terminus. In contrast, whereas most of the stimulatory effect of heparin is mediated by the amino terminus of HCII, heparin also serves a template function by simultaneously interacting with the GAG-binding domain of HCII and exosite II on thrombin. Third, release of the amino-terminal domain of HCII, through charge neutralization at residues 184, 185, 189, 192, and 193, is insufficient to fully stimulate inactivation of thrombin. These findings raise the possibility that there are additional intramolecular interactions that constrain the amino terminus. One candidate is Arg200, since its mutation to Glu increases the rate of thrombin inactivation 5-fold even though it resides outside of the GAG-binding domain (37). In addition, GAG binding to HCII may not only release the amino terminus, but may also alter its conformation or that of the reactive site loop thereby optimizing the interaction of HCII with thrombin.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We acknowledge Dr. Charles Esmon for critical reading of the manuscript and for many helpful discussions, and Janice Rischke for high performance liquid chromatography analyses.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid from the Medical Research Council of Canada and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Recipient of a Research Traineeship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

§ Recipient of a Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Hamilton Civic Hospitals Research Centre, 711 Concession St., Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C3 Canada. Tel.: 905-574-8550; Fax: 905-575-2646; E-mail: jweitz@thrombosis.hhscr.org.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HCII, heparin cofactor II; serpin, serine protease inhibitor; AT, antithrombin; wt-rHCII, wild-type recombinant HCII; pHCII, human plasma-derived HCII; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; RA-thrombin, recombinant thrombin mutant with Arg93, Arg97, and Arg101 changed to Ala; gamma -thrombin, a proteolytic derivative of thrombin lacking exosite I; DS, dermatan sulfate; hirudin-(54-65), a synthetic analogue of the carboxyl terminus of hirudin that interacts with thrombin exosite I; DNS, 5-[dimethylamino]naphthalene-1-sulfonyl; BHK, baby hamster kidney; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Tollefsen, D. M. (1995) Thromb. Haemostasis 74, 1209-1214[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Rosenberg, R. D. (1987) in Haemostasis and Thrombosis: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice (Colman, R. W. , Hirsh, J. , Marder, V. J. , and Salzman, E. W., eds) , pp. 1373-1382, J. B. Lippincott, Philadelphia
3. Lindahl, U., Backstrom, G., Thunberg, L., and Leder, I. G. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 6651-6557
4. Casu, B., Oreste, P., Torri, G., Zoppetti, G., Choay, J., Lormeau, J. C., Petitou, M., and Sina, P. (1981) Biochem. J. 197, 599-609[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Choay, J., Petitou, M., Lormeau, J. C., Sihay, P., Casu, B., and Gatti, G. (1983) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 116, 492-499[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Sie, P., Petitou, M., Lormeau, J. C., Dupouy, D., Boneu, B., and Choay, J. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 966, 188-195[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Rosenberg, L. C., Choi, H. U., Tang, L. H., Johnson, T. L., Pal, S., Webber, C., Reiner, A., and Poole, A. R. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 6304-6313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Choi, H. U., Johnson, T. L., Pal, S., Tang, L. H., Rosenberg, L., and Neame, P. J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 2876-2884[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Griffith, M. J., Noyes, C. M., Tyndall, J. A., and Church, F. C. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 6777-6782[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Olson, S. T., and Björk, I. (1994) Semin. Thromb. Hemostasis 20, 373-409[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Ragg, H., Ulshofer, T., and Gerewitz, J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 5211-5218[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Van Deerlin, V. M. D., and Tollefsen, D. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 20223-20231[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Sheehan, J. P., Tollefsen, D. M., and Sadler, J. E. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 32747-32751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Hortin, G. L., Tollefsen, D. M., and Benutto, B. M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13979-13982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Ciaccia, A. V., Willemze, A. J., and Church, F. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 888-893[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Olson, S. T., Björk, I., and Shore, J. D. (1993) Methods Enzymol. 222, 525-560[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Cosmi, B., Fredenburgh, J. C., Rischke, J., Hirsh, J., Young, E., and Weitz, J. I. (1997) Circulation 95, 118-124[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Ye, J., Rezaie, A. R., and Esmon, C. T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17965-17970[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Harenberg, J., Jeschek, M., Acker, M., Malsch, R., Huhle, G., and Heene, D. L. (1996) Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis 7, 49-56[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Tasset, D. M., Kubik, M. F., and Steiner, W. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 272, 688-698[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Blinder, M. A., Marasa, J. C., Reynolds, C. H., Deaven, L. L., and Tollefsen, D. M. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 752-759[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) in Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Sambrook, J. , Fritsch, E. F. , and Maniatis, T., eds) , pp. 13.1-13.102, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
23. Cuatrecasas, P. (1970) J. Biol. Chem. 245, 3059-3065[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Weitz, J., Young, E., Johnston, M., Stafford, A. R., Fredenburgh, J. C., and Hirsh, J. (1999) Circulation 99, 682-689[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Fredenburgh, J. C., Stafford, A. R., and Weitz, J. I. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 25493-25499[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Tollefsen, D. M., Majerus, D. W., and Blank, M. K. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 2162-2169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Blinder, M. A., Andersson, T. R., Abildgaard, U., and Tollefsen, D. M. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 5128-5133[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Ragg, H., Ulshofer, T., and Gerewitz, J. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 22386-22391[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Blinder, M. A., and Tollefsen, D. M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 286-291[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Whinna, H. C., Blinder, M. A., Szewczyk, M., Tollefsen, D. M., and Church, F. C. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 8129-8135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Becker, D. L., Fredenburgh, J. C., Stafford, A. R., and Weitz, J. I. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 6226-6233[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Rogers, S. J., Pratt, C. W., Whinna, H. C., and Church, F. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 3613-3617[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Rydel, T. J., Tulinsky, A., Bode, W., and Huber, R. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 221, 583-601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Bray, B., Lane, D. A., Freyssinet, J. M., Pejler, G., and Lindahl, U. (1989) Biochem. J. 262, 225-232[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Nesheim, M. E., Prendergast, F. G., and Mann, K. G. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 996-1003[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Ciaccia, A. V., Monroe, D. M., and Church, F. C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 14074-14079[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Myles, T., Church, F. C., Whinna, H. C., Monard, D., and Stone, S. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 31203-31208[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Han, J. H., Van Deerlin, V. M., and Tollefsen, D. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 8243-8249[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Rezaie, A. R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16824-16827[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Church, F. C., Noyes, C. M., and Griffith, M. J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 6431-6434[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. O'Keeffe, S. T. Olson, N. Gasiunas, J. Gallagher, T. P. Baglin, and J. A. Huntington
The Heparin Binding Properties of Heparin Cofactor II Suggest an Antithrombin-like Activation Mechanism
J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 2004; 279(48): 50267 - 50273.