|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27674-27681, September 24, 1999
The RING Finger Motif of Photomorphogenic Repressor COP1
Specifically Interacts with the RING-H2 Motif of a Novel
Arabidopsis Protein*
Keiko U.
Torii §¶,
Chatanika D.
Stoop-Myer §,
Haruko
Okamoto ,
Joseph E.
Coleman ,
Minami
Matsui**, and
Xing Wang
Deng 
From the Department of Molecular, Cellular, and
Developmental Biology and the Department of Molecular
Biophysics and Biochemistry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
06520-8104
 |
ABSTRACT |
The constitutive photomorphogenic 1 (COP1)
protein of Arabidopsis functions as a molecular switch for
the seedling developmental fates: photomorphogenesis under light
conditions and skotomorphogenesis in darkness. The COP1 protein
contains a cysteine-rich zinc-binding RING finger motif found in
diverse groups of regulatory proteins. To understand the role of the
COP1 RING finger in mediating protein-protein interaction, we have
performed a yeast two-hybrid screen and isolated a novel protein with a
RING-H2 motif, a variant type of the RING finger. This protein,
designated COP1 Interacting Protein
8 (CIP8), is encoded by a single copy gene and localized to cytosol in
a transient assay. In addition to the RING-H2 motif, the predicted protein has a C4 zinc finger, an acidic region, a glycine-rich cluster,
and a serine-rich cluster. The COP1 RING finger and the CIP8 RING-H2
domains are sufficient for their interaction with each other both
in vitro and in yeast, whereas neither motif displayed significant self-association. Moreover, site-directed mutagenesis studies demonstrated that the expected zinc-binding ligands of the RING
finger and RING-H2 fingers are essential for their interaction. Our
findings indicate that the RING finger motif, in this case, serves as
autonomous protein-protein interaction domain. The allele specific
effect of cop1 mutations on the CIP8 protein accumulation in seedlings indicates that its stability in vivo is
dependent on the COP1 protein.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Zinc ions provide structural integrity to many regulatory
proteins, most often through cysteine and histidine ligands that form a
tetrahedral geometry. The RING finger motif is a cysteine-rich zinc-binding domain defined by the consensus sequence:
CX2CX(9-39)CX(1-3)HX(2-3)CX2CX(4-48)CX2C (C3HC4). A unique feature of this motif is that
the consensus residues coordinate two zinc ions in a "cross-braced"
fashion (1, 2). Thus, the RING finger forms one integrated structural unit, rather than forming two tandem zinc finger modules. Proteins containing RING finger domains are found in viruses and all eukaryotes, including yeast, plants, and animals. They have diverse cellular functions, including oncogenesis, viral gene expression, signal transduction, peroxisome biogenesis, DNA repair and recombination, and
membrane vesicle sorting (2). The RING finger motif has been shown in
many cases to play a role in mediating protein-protein interactions.
However, the precise role of the RING finger, as well as specific
interactive target motifs of the RING finger, have yet to be clearly defined.
The Arabidopsis
COP11 protein serves as a
repressor of photomorphogenesis. In the dark, the COP1 protein
localizes to the nucleus and represses photomorphogenesis by inhibiting
transcription factors that promote light-inducible gene expression
(3-5). Light stimuli abrogate the nuclear localization of COP1 and
allows seedlings to pursue photomorphogenic development (6). COP1
contains an N-terminal RING finger motif (7, 8), which has been
demonstrated to bind two zinc ions (9). The RING finger motif is
followed by a coiled-coil motif, which is common among a subgroup of
RING finger proteins (10) and a WD40 repeat domain in the C-terminal half. Our previous domain-deletion analysis of COP1 suggested that the
RING finger domain had a supportive role in the self-association and
light-regulated nucleocytoplasmic partitioning of COP1 (11).
In an effort to understand the function of the COP1 RING finger domain,
we have performed a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify interacting
proteins. Our analysis uncovered a novel protein, named CIP8
(COP1 interacting protein 8), with
a RING-H2 module, a variant type of the RING finger with the fourth
cysteine ligand substituted by a histidine. Mutational analysis
revealed that the COP1 RING finger and the CIP8 RING-H2 finger are both
necessary and sufficient for mediating this protein-protein
interaction. The fact that CIP8 protein accumulation was compromised
specifically in severe cop1 mutants indicates that COP1
plays a role in regulating CIP8 protein level.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials and Growth Conditions--
The yeast strain EGY48-0
(12, 13) was used for yeast two-hybrid analysis. Arabidopsis
thaliana wild type and cop1-4 mutants are in Columbia
(Col) background and cop1-5 mutant is in Wassilewskijce background. All other cop1 alleles and fus
mutants are in Landsberg erecta background (8). The plant
growth conditions were described previously (8).
Yeast Two-hybrid Screen and Protein Analysis--
A yeast
two-hybrid screen was performed using an Arabidopsis
light-grown seedling cDNA library cloned into the vector pJG4-5 (kindly provided by Dr. Hong Zhang of Texas Tech University). All
procedures were conducted as described previously (12, 13). Briefly,
yeast strain EGY48-0 harboring pEG-N282 (bait) and pSH18-34 (reporter) was transformed with the cDNA library, and primary transformant cells grown on glucose/complete minimal medium-Ura-His-Trp were collected. In the first screen, colonies surviving on
galactose/raffinose/complete minimal medium-Ura-His-Trp-Leu were
recovered. In the secondary screen, Leu autotroph colonies were plated
on both glucose/X-gal/complete minimal medium-Ura-His-Trp and
galactose/raffinose/X-gal/complete minimal medium-Ura-His-Trp plates to
test for the galactose-specific -galactosidase activity. Plasmid DNA
was isolated from positive yeast clones by alkaline-lysis method and
was subsequently transformed into the Escherichia coli
strain, DH5 . Colonies harboring the cDNA library plasmids were
identified by colony hybridization using 32P-radiolabeled
activation domain fragments (340-base pair HindIII fragment
of pJG4-5) as a probe. Purified plasmids, together with pEG-N282 and
pSH18-34, were re-transformed into "virgin" yeast strain EGY48-0
to confirm the interaction. Quantitative -galactosidase activity
assay was performed according to McNellis et al. (14).
To extract yeast total proteins, yeast cells in a liquid culture
(galactose/raffinose/complete minimal media-Ura-His-Trp) at
A600 = 0.6-0.8 was harvested. After
brief centrifugation, SDS-PAGE buffer was added to the pellets. The
samples were rapidly freeze-thawed using liquid nitrogen, boiled for 5 min, separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, and subjected to protein gel blot
analysis using anti-LexA polyclonal antibodies. The detailed procedure
has been described previously (11, 14).
Plasmid Construction and cDNA Library
Screening--
Construction of yeast expression plasmids harboring
mutated forms of COP1 was described elsewhere (11, 14). pJG-BD4, an original clone of CIP8 isolated by interaction screen, was digested with EcoRI/HindIII and ligated into pBluescriptII
SK+ (Stratagene) that was digested with the same enzymes. The resulting
plasmid, pBS-BD4, was digested with EcoRI/XhoI
and inserted into properly digested pEG202 and pJG4-5 vectors (12, 13)
to generate pEG-BD4 and pJG-BD4, respectively. To isolate the
full-length cDNA clones, Arabidopsis size-selected
seedling cDNA libraries were screened using the fragment of pBS-BD4
released by EcoRI/XhoI digestion as a probe.
Phage clones were converted into plasmid forms according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Stratagene) and sequenced.
Site-directed Mutagenesis--
The RING finger domains of COP1
and CIP8 were mutated by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method. To
mutagenize the RING-H2 motif of CIP8, a fragment was amplified with a
combination of primers T3 and BD4-2x3x.3 (5'-CAT GCC ATG GCA CAA TAG
CAT CTC CAG CGT AAC AAG CTC CAG CCG GTA ACT TCT TACC-3'), digested with NcoI and EcoRI, and inserted into the
EcoRI/NcoI cleaved pSK-BD4. The resulting
plasmid, designated pSK-BD42x3x, replaces Cys-275, His-277, His-280,
and Cys-283 with alanines without changing any other amino acids. An
EcoRI/XhoI fragment of pSK-BD42x3x was excised and inserted into pJG4-5 to generate pJG-BD42x3x.
The RING finger of COP1 was mutated in the following steps. First, PCR
was performed with pKS-RING (11) as a template using primers T7 and
RING2x-3 (5' GGG GTA CCC GCT AGC ACC AGC AGC CGT GAG GAA AGC ATC 3').
The amplified fragment was cleaved with NcoI and
KpnI and ligated to pKSm to generate pKS-RINGmnt. Another fragment was amplified from pKS-RING with primers T3 and RING3x-5 (5'
CTA GCT AGC TTC GCC TAT ATG GCT ATC ATC ACA CAT CTT AG 3'), cut with
NheI and KpnI, and inserted into pKS-RINGmnt to
generate pKS-RING2x-3x. This plasmid encodes a mutated RING finger
domain that replaces Cys-67, His-69, Cys-72, and Cys-75 with alanines. A synthetic NheI site was introduced at the position that
corresponds to position +205 from the starting codon of the COP1
sequence (8). The created NheI site replaces His-69 with Ala
but does not alter other amino acids. The EcoRI fragment of
pKS-RING2x3x was inserted into pJG4-5 to generate pJG-RING2x3x. All
clones were confirmed by sequencing analysis.
DNA and RNA Gel Blot Analysis--
The total DNA and RNA were
isolated from Arabidopsis seedlings according to our
previous procedures (7). The Southern blot analysis was according to a
standard procedure (7) and washed under stringent conditions (0.1×
SSPE (saline/sodium phosphate/EDTA); 0.2% SDS at 60 °C). We could
not detect any extra bands when washing was performed under less
stringent conditions (2× SSPE; 0.2% SDS at 50 °C; data not shown).
The RNA blot analysis was based on a published procedure (14) except
that the longest CIP8 cDNA clone was used as probe.
CIP8 Antibodies Production and Western Analysis--
To generate
antibodies against CIP8, pBS-BD4, which contains C-terminal 92 amino
acids of CIP8, was cloned into pET23a (Novagen) using BamHI
and XhoI sites. The resulting construct, pET-BD4, was
transformed into E. coli strain BL21/DE3-pLysS. Recombinant protein was induced by 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside at 37 °C for
2 h. The recombinant CIP8 protein was fractionated by preparative
SDS-PAGE, excised from the gel, electro-eluted, dialyzed against
phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4), and injected to rabbits. To
affinity purify anti-CIP8 polyclonal antibodies, a recombinant maltose
binding protein (MBP)-CIP8-His fusion protein was produced from a
modified pMal-c vector (New England Biolabs). Six copies of the
histidine codon were added after the multicloning site in the pMal-c
vector by ligating overlapping oligomers into the
SalI/HindIII sites
(5'-GTCGACCACCACCACCACCACCACTGAA-3' and 5'-AAGCTTTCA
GTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGT-3'). The full-length CIP8 cDNA was then
amplified using PCR with primers, which added a BamHI site
to the 5' end and a SalI site to the 3' end
(5'-ATTAATGGATCCATGTCCGAT-3' and NSM37 5'-TCCTCCGTCGACGTAACGAGAAGT-3')
and ligated into the pMalHis vector, creating pMalCIP8His. The clones
were verified by sequencing. The plasmid was transformed into E. coli strain BL21 and induced by 1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside at 37 °C for
4 h. The recombinant MBP-CIP8-His protein was purified using
amylose resin (New England Biolabs) followed by a nickel column
(Novagen), and subsequently coupled to an
N-hydroxysuccinimide-activated affinity column (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's instruction. The
MBP-CIP8-His-coupled column was used to affinity purify anti-CIP8
antibodies as described previously (15).
For protein analysis, 6-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown
in continuous light or dark were harvested in liquid nitrogen and
ground with a mortar and pestle. Grinding buffer (400 mM
sucrose, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 2.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride)
was added, and the extract was spun in the microcentrifuge for 10 min.
After protein concentration analysis, an equal volume of 4× SDS sample
buffer was added to the protein extracts. The samples were boiled for
10 min, spun in a microcentrifuge for 10 min, and 15 µg of total
protein/sample was separated by SDS-PAGE. The protein gel immunoblot
analysis followed a previously described procedure (14) except that the
affinity-purified CIP8 antibodies were used at 1:300 dilution.
In VitroBinding Assay--
Recombinant MBP fusion proteins with
the RING finger (amino acids 22-117) of COP1 (MCOP1RF) or the RING-H2
finger domain (amino acids 243-334, CIP8RF) of CIP8 were purified to
near homogeneity from E. coli. The CIP8RF protein was
incubated in binding buffer (20 mM phosphate, pH 6.0, 100 mM NaCl, 50 µM ZnCl2, 8%
glycerol, and 1 mM -mercaptoethanol) alone, or with
either MBPCOP1RF or MBP, for 2 h at 4 °C. All recombinant
proteins were present at 1 µM concentrations. Amylose
beads (New England Biolabs), which had been preincubated with 1 mg/ml
bovine serum albumin, were added and allowed to incubate for 30 min.
The beads were washed extensively with binding buffer. SDS loading
buffer was added to the beads, and the samples were boiled and
separated by SDS-PAGE. The proteins in the gel were visualized by
silver staining.
Cellular Localization Studies--
For cell localization study,
the full-length CIP8 coding region (1,005 base pairs from start codon
to stop codon) was amplified using primers containing a
BamHI site on the 5'end and XbaI site on the
3'end (5' primer, 5'-ggatccatgtccgatgctccg-3'; 3'primer, 5'-tctagatcagtaacgagaagttg-3'). After proper digestion to create the
sticking ends, the DNA fragment was ligated to the pRTL2-GUS/NIa vector
(11, 16) digested with BglII and XbaI to remove
NIa fragment. The resulting in frame fusion of CIP8 to the GUS report construct (pRTL2-GUS/CIP8) was confirmed by sequence analysis. The
control plasmids for COP1 and NIa fusions to GUS, and GUS alone, were
described previously (6). The transient onion bombardment and GUS
staining are according to a published procedure (6, 11). The bombarded
cells were either kept in darkness or exposed to continuous white light
for 2 days at 22 °C before the GUS activity staining.
 |
RESULTS |
Isolation of CIP8 by the Yeast Two-hybrid System--
The
expression of the N-terminal 282 amino acid (N282) fragment of COP1,
which possesses the RING finger and the -helical coiled-coil domain,
resulted in a dominant-negative effect on light-regulated
Arabidopsis seedling development (14). To identify the
possible interactive partners, the N282 fragment fused with the LexA
DNA binding domain (LexA-N282) was used as a bait to screen a
light-grown Arabidopsis seedling cDNA library fused to a
synthetic activation domain in yeast (Fig.
1A). An estimated 1 × 107 Ura+ His+ Trp+ transformants were replated for the
screen and 437 colonies that survived on Leu plates were recovered.
Secondary screening based on a blue/white selection on X-gal plate
identified 168 blue colonies, of which 25 clones displayed galactose
specificity or prey-protein-dependent -galactosidase
activity. Subsequent DNA analysis revealed that these 25 clones were
represented by four distinct cDNAs. Purified plasmids were
transformed into yeast strain EGY48-0 harboring the reporter plasmid
pSH18-34 and either pLexA-N282 or pLexA-bicoid, a negative control, to
test the specificity. Three of the four cDNAs displayed specific
interaction to the LexA-N282 protein (data not shown). Sequencing
analysis of the three classes of cDNAs revealed that one of them
codes for a partial 92-amino acid fragment largely consisting of a
RING-H2 motif, a variant type of the RING finger (Fig. 1A).
This clone was designated CIP8. Because it exhibited strong and
specific interaction to the COP1 RING finger, it was further
characterized.

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The RING finger domain of COP1 interacts with
CIP8 in the yeast two-hybrid system. A, diagrams of the
three main protein forms used for the analysis. COP1 (8) and N282 (14)
are shown with the locations of the RING finger (RING),
coiled-coil (Coil), and WD-40 repeats (WD-40)
highlighted. The 92-amino acid C-terminal fragment of CIP8, which has
been isolated by an interactive screen, was shown with a RING-H2 motif
highlighted. Numbers correspond to the amino acid residues at the
beginning and ending of each motif as well as the last amino acid of
each construct. B, interaction of the COP1 domain deletion
series with CIP8. In the first five pairs (rows 1-5), the CIP8 fragment fused with LexA DNA-binding domain
(closed box) was used as a bait (Bait) to test
against different prey (Prey): row 1,
full-length COP1; row 2, N282; row 3, RING (11); and row 4, N RING (11)
fused to a synthetic activation domain (closed box); or
row 5, activation domain only. In the last four pairs
(rows 6-9), the interaction assays with a
reciprocal combination of the constructs were shown. The
domain-deletion clones of COP1, namely N RING (row 6), N282 (row 7), N Coil (11)
(row 8), and RING (amino acids 39-103)
(row 9) were fused with LexA and used as baits to
test interaction with the CIP8 fragment fused to the activation domain
(AD). For unknown reasons, LexA-COP1 could not be stably
expressed in yeast and thus is missing in this panel. The graph on the
right indicates the relative LacZ reporter activity in yeast cells
corresponding to combinations of bait and prey constructs presented in
each row. For each pairwise combination, at least ten individual
transformants were used to measure the LacZ activity. Error bars
represent the standard deviations.
|
|
CIP8 Interacts Specifically with the RING Finger Domain of
COP1--
We first determined whether the CIP8 fragment interacts with
a full-length COP1 (Fig. 1A). The CIP8-COP1 interaction was
significant, but reduced by about 3-fold compared with the CIP8-N282
interaction (Fig. 1B, lanes 1 and 2).
To identify the COP1 domain responsible for the interaction with CIP8,
a deletion analysis of the COP1-N282 fragment was carried out in the
yeast two-hybrid system. Deletion of the RING finger region abolished
the interaction, whereas in contrast, elimination of the coiled-coil
region (Coil) and sequence flanking the RING finger domain
resulted in stronger interaction based on the -galactosidase
activity (Fig. 1B). Thus, the COP1 RING finger domain
per se (amino acids 39-103) is sufficient for interaction
with CIP8. The surrounding sequence, including the coiled-coil region
domain, seems to attenuate the interaction. Similar trends were
observed when a reciprocal combination of the bait and the prey were
tested (Fig. 1B, lanes 6-9). It should be noted
that the protein gel immunoblot analysis using anti-LexA antibodies did
not reveal any significant differences in expression levels of the
truncated COP1 constructs (data not shown). This eliminates the
possibility that the different activities in the yeast two-hybrid assay
were caused by changed expression levels of the proteins.
CIP8 RING-H2 and COP1 RING Motifs Are Sufficient to Confer Direct
Interaction in Vitro--
To confirm that the CIP8 RING-H2 and COP1
RING finger domains interact directly, a recombinant fusion protein
between the maltose binding protein and the RING finger motif of COP1
(MCOP1RF) was produced and purified. It was then used to test for the
ability to bind to the RING-H2 domain-containing protein (CIP8RF)
encoded by the partial CIP8 cDNA in vitro (see
"Experimental Procedures"). As shown in Fig.
2, the amylose beads (preincubated with 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin) were able to pull down CIP8RF in the
presence of MCOP1RF (lane 3). However, the same beads
incubated without other proteins (Fig. 2, lane 1) or with
maltose binding protein alone (Fig. 2, lane 2) were unable
to pull down CIP8RF. Thus the CIP8 RING-H2 and COP1 RING motifs
interact directly in vitro.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
The RING finger of COP1 interacts directly
with the RING H2 finger of CIP8 in vitro. The
purified recombinant RING H2 finger domain protein of CIP8 was
incubated in a binding buffer (see "Experimental Procedures") for
2 h at 4 °C alone as a negative control (lane 1),
and with either maltose-binding protein (lane 2) or the
maltose-binding protein fused with the RING finger of COP1 (MCOP1RF,
lane 3). Amylose beads, which were preincubated with 1 mg/ml
bovine serum albumin, were added and allowed to incubate for 30 min.
The beads were washed extensively with binding buffer, resuspended in
SDS loading buffer, boiled, and loaded onto a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel. The arrows on the right indicate the positions of MBP,
MCOP1RF, and MBB-CIP8RF on the silver-stained gel.
|
|
CIP8 Is a Novel RING-H2 Finger Protein with Another C4 Zinc-binding
Domain and a Highly Negative Charged Region--
Because the CIP8
RING-H2 fragment isolated by the yeast two-hybrid screen was clearly
missing the 5' portion of the gene, we screened an
Arabidopsis cDNA library to recover the full-length clone. Approximately 7 × 106 plaques were screened
with 32P-labeled CIP8 RING-H2 fragment as a probe, and 13 positive clones were isolated. The longest clone (clone 13b) contained
1,266 nucleotides. Further rounds of 5' rapid amplification of cDNA
ends PCR (Stratagene) from the mRNA recovered another 18 nucleotides 5' upstream of the longest cDNA clone. The entire 1,284 nucleotides encode a single open reading frame of 334 amino acids.
Comparison of the cDNA with the Arabidopsis genomic DNA
sequence recently available in the GenBank TM data base
(accession number AB019236) revealed that the CIP8 gene does
not have any intron. Our predicted CIP8 cDNA open
reading frame is likely full-length, because an in-frame stop codon is present 63 nucleotides upstream of the predicted translational start
codon. The predicted CIP8 protein has several characteristic domains:
an N-terminal motif similar to the zinc-binding GATA finger
(C4); a highly acidic region; a glycine cluster immediately before the RING-H2 finger; and a serine-rich cluster at the C terminus
(Fig. 3A). The original
cDNA clone isolated from the two-hybrid screen only contained amino
acids 243-334, encompassing the RING-H2 motif and the
C-terminal serine-rich region.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Sequence analysis of CIP8. A,
the complete cDNA nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences of
CIP8. The arrow indicates the starting position of the
original CIP8 fragment isolated from the yeast two-hybrid screen. The
consensus metal-binding ligands in the predicted N-terminal C4
zinc-binding domain and C-terminal RING-H2 domain are highlighted with
open circles. The RING-H2 domain is also
underlined. Glycine-rich are double underlined
and serine/threonine-rich regions are indicated by a dotted
line. The acidic domains are boxed. The
GenBankTM accession number for the CIP8 cDNA is
AF162150. B, amino acid sequence alignment of the conserved
RING-H2 domains from CIP8 and other representative proteins. Amino
acids are shown using the one-letter code. Open boxes
indicate amino acid residues identical to those of CIP8. The positions
of eight predicted metal-binding ligands are marked by an asterisk (*)
at the top. See text for reference to each sequence.
|
|
A sequence homology search (17) revealed over 40 Arabidopsis
expressed sequence tags and hypothetical proteins that possess RING-H2
domains with significant sequence similarity to the CIP8 RING-H2. As
shown in Fig. 3B, six of those motifs (accession numbers AC004521-g3128178, AB015472, AC003000-g2642154, AC002409-g2623297, AC004473-g3249088, and AL022223-g2982466) are aligned with the RING-H2
of CIP8. This indicates that Arabidopsis has a large number
of proteins containing the RING-H2 motif. This is consistent with the
finding that the nearly complete sequence of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome contains 98 RING finger or RING-H2 proteins (18). Using degenerate PCR, Jensen et al. (19) identified many
RING-H2 proteins and suggested that they are more prevalent than the
original RING finger motif in Arabidopsis. All of the
Arabidopsis genes listed in Fig. 3B possess the
RING-H2 domain in the C-terminal half of the gene products. This
feature also applies to several representative RING-H2 proteins from
animals including the Drosophila Goliath (M97204; Ref. 20),
mouse Praja1 protein (U06944; Ref. 21), and rat
neurodegeneration-associated protein (D32249; Ref. 22) (Fig.
3B). The amino acid alignment revealed strictly conserved spacing both at site I (between C2 and C3) and site II (between C6 and
C7) (Fig. 3B). In addition, amino acid sequences between C6
and C7 are highly conserved with the invariable PWL residues in all
Arabidopsis RING-H2 motifs (Fig. 3B). CIP8 displayed no extensive sequence homologies with any known or hypothetical proteins beyond the RING-H2 domain.
The Integrity of the COP1 RING Finger and CIP8 RING-H2 Finger Is
Necessary for Their Interaction--
To rule out the possibility that
the observed interaction between the COP1 RING finger and the CIP8
RING-H2 interaction is due to a general affinity within this group of
zinc-binding domains, the self-association of the COP1 RING finger
(amino acids 22-117) and CIP8 RING-H2 (amino acids 243-334) domains
were examined. As shown in Fig.
4A, the interaction between
COP1 RING finger and CIP8 RING-H2 domain is very strong, whereas the
self-association in either COP1 RING-finger or CIP8 RING-H2, if any, is
close to the background level of detection.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The zinc-binding capacity of the COP1 RING
finger and the CIP8 RING-H2 domains are necessary for their interaction
in yeast. A, the C-terminal CIP8 fragment (row 1)
and the COP1 RING domain (row 2) were tested for
self-association. Rows 3-6, mutational analysis of the RING
and RING-H2 domains. RING and CIP8 represent constructs with intact
RING and RING-H2 domains, and RINGmt and CIP8mt represent that of
mutated versions (see panel B). The Bait and Prey constructs
represent those indicated protein domains fused to the LexA DNA-binding
domain and a synthetic activation domain, respectively. The graph on
the right indicates the relative LacZ reporter activity in yeast cells
corresponding to combinations of bait and prey constructs presented in
each row. For each pairwise combination, at least ten individual
transformants were used to measure the LacZ activity. B, the
COP1 RING and the CIP8 RING-H2 domains. Among the eight proposed
metal-coordinating residues, four amino acids (Cys-67, His-69, Cys-72,
and Cys-75 for COP1 and Cys-275, His-277, His-280, and Cys-283 for
CIP8) were mutated to alanines and are highlighted in capital
letters. The rest of the conserved ligand residues are
underlined. C, protein gel immunoblot analysis of
yeast transformants used in the two-hybrid analysis in panel
A (rows 3-6). Equal numbers of yeast cells at mid to
late log phase were loaded in each lane, and immunoblotting was
performed using anti-LexA antibodies. Molecular mass markers are
indicated in kilodaltons (kDa) on the left.
|
|
To confirm that it is the zinc-binding RING finger motif per
se, and not the remaining flanking amino acids, that is
responsible for mediating the COP1-CIP8 interaction, specific mutations
were introduced to remove the predicted zinc-coordinating ligands and their effect on protein-protein interaction was analyzed. The RING
finger is known to form a cross-brace topology, with the first and the
third pairs of ligands forming one zinc-binding site and the second and
the fourth pairs forming the other (1). We first substituted Cys-67,
His-69, Cys-72, and Cys-75 of the COP1 RING finger fragment (amino
acids 22-117) with alanines (Fig. 4B). These mutations
destroy the second and the third pairs of the metal binding ligands.
Thus the mutated COP1 RING finger should not be able to bind any zinc
ion, thereby perturbing the overall structural integrity. As shown in
Fig. 3A, disruption of the COP1 RING finger domain
completely abolished its ability to interact with CIP8 in the yeast
two-hybrid assay. The RING-H2 finger domain of CIP8 was then similarly
mutated. Likewise, a substitution of Cys-275, His-277, His-280, and
Cys-283 of the CIP8 RING-H2 finger with alanines completely abolished
the ability to interact with the COP1 RING finger domain (Fig.
4B).
To exclude the possibility that the loss of the interaction in yeast
two-hybrid assays may be due to instability or low expression levels of
the mutated proteins, the mutant protein level was analyzed by protein
gel immunoblot. Total proteins were extracted from yeast transformants
used for the -galactosidase activity assay, and the fusion proteins
of LexA-RING, LexA-RINGmt, LexA-CIP8, and LexA-CIP8m were detected
using anti-LexA antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4C, both the
LexA-RING and LexA-RINGmt fusion proteins were detected as a single
band with the apparent molecular mass of 36 kDa, whereas LexA-CIP8 and
LexA-CIP8m fusion proteins are present as a doublet. Disruption of the
RING-H2 domain had no effect on the accumulation of LexA-CIP8 at all,
whereas the disruption of the COP1 RING finger domain resulted in a
slight decrease in the amount of fusion protein (Fig. 4C).
However, it is unlikely that this decrease will account for the over
100-fold difference in -galactosidase activity (Fig. 4A).
Therefore, we conclude that the structural integrity of both the COP1
RING and the CIP8 RING-H2 domains is required for the COP1-CIP8 interaction.
CIP8 Is a Single Copy Gene Whose mRNA Level Is not
Significantly Light-regulated--
To further characterize the
CIP8 gene, genomic DNA gel blot analysis was used to
determine its gene copy number. The genomic and cDNA sequence
revealed that the CIP8 coding region contains single
EcoRI and SacI sites but neither XbaI
nor XhoI sites. As expected (Fig.
5), when the full-length CIP8 cDNA
was used as probe in the DNA gel blot, digestion of
Arabidopsis genomic DNA with EcoRI and
SacI resulted in two bands, whereas digestion with XbaI and XhoI resulted in single band. The bands
match the expected size from the available genomic CIP8 sequence,
indicating that CIP8 is a single copy gene.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
DNA and RNA blot analyses of CIP8.
A, DNA gel blot analysis of CIP8. About 1 µm total DNA was
used for each lane. The DNA was digested with the indicated restriction
enzymes to completion and subjected to blot analysis with the
full-length CIP8 cDNA as a probe. The relative positions of size
markers (in kilobases (kb)) are indicated on the left.
B, RNA gel blot analysis of CIP8. RNA levels of CIP8
in 6-day-old light-grown (L) and dark-grown (D)
seedlings of the wild type (ecoptype Columbia; WT) and
cop1-4 mutants were examined. Equal amounts of total RNA
(20 µg) were loaded in each lane. The membrane was re-probed
with the 18 S rRNA probe to confirm equal loading.
|
|
The expression of CIP8 in Arabidopsis seedlings
was examined by the RNA gel blot analysis. A single band of
approximately 1.4 kilobases was observed both in light- and dark-grown
seedlings. The mRNA size is in agreement with the cDNA length
of 1,288 nucleotides, considering that 100 to 200 nucleotides of
poly(A) are commonly added to plant mRNAs. The level of the
CIP8 transcripts were approximately equal in both light- and
dark-grown wild type seedlings (Fig. 5B). To examine the
possible effect of COP1 on CIP8 expression, the
CIP8 mRNA levels in representative weak
(cop1-4) and null (cop1-8) alleles were
examined. Similar results were obtained for both alleles, and that of
cop1-4 blot is shown in Fig. 5B. Both
cop1 mutations led to slightly elevated CIP8 mRNA levels in the dark-grown mutant seedlings, suggesting that COP1 may play a
minor role in regulating CIP8 mRNA accumulation.
CIP8 Protein Accumulation Is Affected by Specific cop1 Mutant
Alleles--
The protein accumulation pattern of CIP8 in light- and
dark-grown wild type and cop/det/fus
mutant seedlings were examined by immunoblot analysis using
affinity-purified antibodies against CIP8 (see "Experimental
Procedures"). As shown in Fig.
6A, light-grown seedlings
appear to have approximately 2-fold higher level of the CIP8 protein in
wild type seedlings. This difference is not due to unequal loading,
because no change in the level of the proteasome subunit AtS6A in the
same samples was observed. Interestingly, severe cop1
mutations (cop1-5, cop1-8, and
cop1-9) negatively affect the accumulation of CIP8 in both
light- and dark-grown seedlings, whereas the weak cop1-4
mutation has no effect on CIP8 accumulation. The reduction of CIP8
protein level is specific for severe cop1 mutations, because
none of the other severe cop/det/fus mutants, whose phenotype is indistinguishable from that of the severe
cop1 mutant alleles, show any reduction (Fig.
6B). In addition, the accumulation of the AtS6A protein was
unaltered in the other cop/det/fus
mutants (data not shown). Because both weak and null alleles seem to
accumulate similar levels of CIP8 mRNA levels (Fig. 5B
and data not shown), our results suggest that the stability of CIP8
requires at least some degree of COP1 function.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
The CIP8 protein accumulation is responsive
to light and diminished in severe cop1 mutants.
A, the upper panel shows a protein immunoblot for
CIP8 using extracts from 6-day-old seedlings of wild type (lanes
1 and 2), cop1-5 (lanes 3 and
4), cop1-4 (lanes 5 and
6), cop1-8 (lanes 7 and
8), and cop1-9 (lanes 9 and
10). Lanes 1, 3, 5,
7, and 9 are from seedlings grown in continuous
white light, whereas lanes 2, 4, 6,
8, and 10 are from seedlings grown in complete
darkness. 20 µg of total protein was loaded in each lane. The
bottom panel is an identical blot probed with an antibody
against AtS6A, a member of the Arabidopsis proteasome
complex as a loading control. B, CIP8 is accumulated in
other photomorphogenic mutants whose phenotype is similar to that of
the cop1 severe mutants. In all lanes, 15 µg of total
protein was loaded from 6-day-old light-grown (lanes 1,
3, 5, 7, and 9) and
dark-grown (lanes 2, 4, 6,
8, and 10) seedlings. Mutants shown are
fus2 (lanes 1 and 2), fus4
(lanes 3 and 4), fus9 (lanes
5 and 6), cop9 (lanes 7 and
8), and cop10 (lanes 9 and
10). Note that fus2, fus9, and
cop10 mutations also diminished the light and dark
difference of CIP8 protein levels.
|
|
CIP8 Protein Is Cytosol Localized in Onion Epidermal Cells after
Transient Expression--
To reveal its cellular localization and
possible light regulation, a GUS-CIP8 fusion protein construct was
generated and transiently expressed in onion epidermal cells through
particle bombardment. As shown in Fig. 7,
A and B, GUS-CIP8 has a typical cytosolic localization pattern in both light and dark conditions, similar to that
of the GUS protein alone (Fig. 7, G and H). As
expected, GUS-COP1 exhibited a light-regulated nuclear localization
(Fig. 7, C and D) and GUS-NIa exhibited a
constitutive nuclear localization (Fig. 7, E and
F) under the same assay conditions. Therefore, CIP8 is
likely a cytosolic protein.

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
The CIP8 protein localized in cytosol.
Onion cells were bombarded with plasmids encoding GUS-CIP8
(A and B), GUS-COP1 (C and D), GUS-NIa
(E and F), or GUS (G and
H), incubated in darkness (A, C,
E, G) or in the light (B,
D, F, H) for 2 days. The upper portion
in each panel shows GUS staining, and the lower portion shows the
corresponding 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining. The scale bar
(H) represents 100 µm and applies to all panels. The
positions of nuclei were marked by arrows.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The RING Finger Motif as Protein-Protein Interaction
Domain--
This study clearly demonstrated a role of the COP1 RING
finger as an autonomous protein-protein interaction module. In the case
of COP1, this RING-finger specifically interacts with the RING-H2
domain of CIP8. It has been shown that the COP1 RING finger domain
binds two zinc ions (9). Here we demonstrated that abolishing the
zinc-binding capability of the COP1 RING finger domain via specific
point mutations that change the consensus metal-coordinating residues
results in a loss of its ability to interact with the RING-H2 domain of
CIP8. Likewise, reciprocal mutations in the RING-H2 motif of CIP8 also
resulted in a loss of its ability to interact with the COP1 RING finger
domain. In addition, an analysis of the interaction between purified
protein fragments containing these domains indicates that the RING
finger modules interact directly. Our data clearly support the
conclusion that the zinc-binding motifs are necessary and sufficient
for the observed interaction. In addition, it implies that the tertiary
structure of the respective domains as a result of zinc binding is
essential for the protein-protein interaction.
Our finding adds to the accumulating evidence that the RING finger
types of zinc-binding motifs are protein-protein interaction modules
(23). For instance, yeast two-hybrid screens using an N-terminal
fragment encompassing the RING finger domain of the breast/ovarian
cancer susceptibility gene product (BRCA1) as a bait recovered a novel
RING finger protein BARD1 (24) and a novel ubiquitin hydrolase BAP1
(25). In both cases, a tumorigenic mutation that replaces a
metal-coordinating ligand of the BRCA1 RING finger with a glycine
abolished the BRCA1-BARD1 and BRCA1-BAP1 interactions (24, 25). A
Drosophila dosage compensation gene product, MSL2, contains
an N-terminal RING finger (26). MSL2 forms a tight protein complex with
two other dosage compensation gene products, MSL1 and MSL3. The intact
RING finger domain of MSL2 was shown to be critical for the MSL2-MSL1
interaction in yeast (27). Furthermore, the yeast Ste5 protein, a
"scaffold" for the pheromone response pathway, contains a RING-H2
domain. Mutations in the Ste5 RING-H2 domain disrupted the Ste5-Ste4
interaction, which is a prerequisite for oligomerization of Ste5 (28).
However, it is not clear in either of those cases whether the RING
finger domains are sufficient for mediating the observed
protein-protein interaction, nor is it clear which domain in the
respective interaction partners are responsible for the interaction.
In some cases, the RING finger-containing domains appear to associate
with another RING finger-containing protein, thus implying a
possibility of it serving as either homo- or heterodimerization motifs.
A homodimerization domain of the recombination-activating protein
(RAG1) encompasses the RING finger (29, 30). Recently, BRCA1 N-terminal
region encompassing the RING finger was shown to homodimerize in
solution (31). However, in both cases, the protein-protein interaction
seems to require sequences or motifs in addition to the RING finger
domain. For instance, formation of a stable dimerization interface
between the RAG1 RING finger domains requires an adjacent
C2H2 zinc finger (29). In the case of BRCA1,
progressive truncations of the C-terminal sequence flanking the
RING-finger domain gradually diminished the interaction with1 BARD1
(24). A recent report indicated that a domain encompassing the RING
finger of the mouse oncogenic protein, Bmi-1, heterodimerizes with the
RING finger domain of dinG/RING1B in yeast (32). However, the
C-terminal flanking sequence of Bmi-1 (53 amino acids) and dinG (74 amino acids) in addition to the RING finger modules are essential for
the protein-protein interactions (32). The COP1-CIP8 interaction
reported here is strictly heterodimeric, because neither domain
displayed significant self-association in vitro or in yeast (data not shown). In contrast to the other cases, a removal of the
C-terminal flanking sequence of the COP1 RING finger resulted in a
marked increase of its interaction with CIP8 (Fig. 1B).
Therefore the interaction surface most likely resides within the COP1
RING finger domain. Likewise, the original CIP8 fragments isolated by
our yeast two-hybrid screen retains only ten extra amino acids N-terminal to the first cysteine ligand residual of the RING-H2 domain.
Therefore, the rest of the N-terminal region of CIP8 is clearly not
required for mediating the observed strong interaction with COP1.
However, a possible supporting role of the additional 37 amino acids
C-terminal to the RING-H2 in CIP8 cannot be ruled out at this point. No
recognizable structure feature was found in this C-terminal region
except relative richness in serine residues.
A data base search revealed an amazing number of predicted RING-H2
proteins with unknown functions in Arabidopsis. Recently, many more RING-H2 proteins have been identified using degenerate PCR.
The abundance of these RING-finger motifs in comparison with the
original motif suggests that the RING-H2 may be the more prevalent variant in Arabidopsis (19). Alignment of these RING-H2
domains reveals a high degree of conservation within this subfamily in contrast to the variance found in the RING finger superfamily. The
variability in spacing, from 9 to 39 between C2 and C3, and from 4 to
48 between C6 and C7, is believed to reflect a functional diversity
among RING finger domains (2). Although it cannot be ruled out that the
uniformity of the RING-H2 family could reflect a statistical bias, this
similarity may extend to their structure and ultimately their function.
However, a preliminary experiment in the yeast two-hybrid system
revealed that the COP1 RING finger domain does not interact with the
RING-H2 domain in an Arabidopsis expressed sequence tag
clone (accession number ATTS2447) that exhibited the strongest
similarity to CIP8 RING-H2 domain (data now shown). Hence, despite the
prevalence of RING-H2 motif in Arabidopsis and its high
conservation among members, COP1 shows a specificity for the RING-H2 of
CIP8.
A Possible Role of CIP8 in COP1-mediated Light Regulation of
Arabidopsis Development--
The effect of COP1 on the CIP8 expression
would support a physiological role of the observed CIP8 and COP1
interaction. First, the CIP8 mRNA seems to be slightly
elevated in the dark-grown cop1 mutant seedlings. This would
imply a role for COP1 in repressing CIP8 expression in darkness. It has
been reported at least in another case (5) that COP1 regulates the
expression of its interactive partner, CIP7. Second, the severe
cop1 mutants accumulated a greatly reduced amount of CIP8
protein. The reduction of CIP8 protein is clearly not a result of a
reduction of CIP8 mRNA levels or a general reduction of
cellular proteins (see Figs. 5B and 6A). Further,
the reduction of CIP8 is not a consequence of the associated seedling
lethality, considering that other photomorphogenic mutants with similar
severity and phenotype did not exhibit any reduction of the CIP8
protein (Fig. 6B). Although this indicates that the
accumulation of CIP8 is dependent on the structural integrity of COP1,
additional studies will be necessary to reveal the exact nature of this
possible in vivo role of CIP8 in COP1-mediated development
regulation. Our initial attempts to co-immunoprecipitate CIP8 and COP1
were not successful due to the quality of the respective antibodies.
Future research, such as isolation of an Arabidopsis knock-out mutant of CIP8 or modulating CIP8 levels by overexpression and antisense strategies, may provide new insights in understanding a
role of COP1 RING-CIP8 RING-H2 interaction in Arabidopsis
photomorphogenic development.
Our functional dissection of the COP1 protein implied a supportive role
for the COP1 RING finger in self-association and light-responsive nucleocytoplasmic partition (11, 33). Considering the fact that the
RING finger motif of COP1 is a specific protein-protein interactive
motif for RING-H2 motif of CIP8, it may achieve a functional role by
its interaction with target proteins, such as CIP8. Previous studies
(4, 6) have established that COP1 is enriched in the nucleus in
darkness and that light triggered a nuclear depletion. Because CIP8 is
likely localized in cytosol, one hypothesis might be that it plays a
role in regulating COP1 cellular localization in response to light. It
is feasible that CIP8, together with another cytosolic COP1 interactive
partner CIP1 (34), may interact with RING finger and coiled-coil motifs of COP1 and regulate the nuclear localization signal or cytosolic localization signal activity of COP1.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Drs. Roger Brent and Erica Golemis
for providing yeast strains, plasmids, and anti-LexA antibodies; Drs.
Hong Zhang, Sumie Ishiguro, Kiyotaka Okada, and Arabidopsis
Biological Resource Center for generously providing
Arabidopsis cDNA libraries; and Drs. Chritian Hardtke
and Magnus Holm for commenting on the manuscript. K.U.T. acknowledges
The support of Dr. Steven Clark during the preparation of this
manuscript is acknowledged by K. U. Torii.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM47850 (to X. W. D.), DK09070 (to J. E. C.), and Human Frontier Science Program Grant RG0043/97 (to M. M. and X. W. D.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF162150.
§
These authors contributed equally to this work.
¶
Recipient of the Postdoctoral Fellowship for Research Abroad
from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. Current address:
Dept. of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048.
**
Current address: Laboratory for Photoperception and Signal
Transduction, Frontier Research Program, RIKEN, Saitama 351-01, Japan.

Recipient of the National Science Foundation Presidential
Faculty Fellow Award. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept.
of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University,
P.O. Box 208104, 165 Prospect St., OML 301, New Haven, CT 06520-8104. Tel.: 203-432-8908; Fax: 203-432-3854; E-mail: xingwang.deng@
yale.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
COP1, constitutive
photomorphogenic 1 protein;
CIP8, COP1 interacting protein
8;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
PCR, polymerase chain
reaction;
MBP, maltose-binding protein;
GUS, -glucuronidase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Borden, K. L. B.,
and Freemont, P. S.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
6,
395-401[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Saurin, A. J.,
Borden, K. L. B.,
Boddy, M. N.,
and Freemont, P. S.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
208-214[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Oyama, T.,
Shimula, Y.,
and Okada, K.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2983-2995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Ang, L.-H.,
Chattoadhyay, S.,
Wei, N.,
Oyama, T.,
Okada, K.,
Batshauer, A.,
and Deng, X.-W.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
213-222[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Yamamoto, Y. Y.,
Matsui, M.,
Ang, L. H.,
and Deng, X. W.
(1998)
Plant Cell
10,
1083-1094[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
von Arnim, A. G.,
and Deng, X.-W.
(1994)
Cell
79,
1035-1045[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Deng, X.-W.,
Matsui, M.,
Wei, N.,
Wagner, D.,
Chu, A. M.,
Feldmann, K. A.,
and Quail, P. H.
(1992)
Cell
71,
791-801[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
McNellis, T. W.,
von Arnim, A. G.,
Araki, T.,
Komeda, Y.,
Miséra, S.,
and Deng, X.-W.
(1994)
Plant Cell
6,
478-500
|
| 9.
|
von Arnim, A. G.,
and Deng, X.-W.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19626-19631[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Reddy, B. A.,
Etkin, L. D.,
and Freemont, P. S.
(1992)
Trends Biochem. Sci
17,
344-345[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Torii, K. U.,
McNellis, T. W.,
and Deng, X.-W.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5577-5587[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Gyuris, J.,
Golemis, E.,
Chertkov, H.,
and Brent, R.
(1993)
Cell
75,
791-803[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Golemis, E. A.,
and Khazak, V.
(1997)
Methods Mol. Biol.
63,
197-218[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
McNellis, T. W.,
Torii, K. U.,
and Deng, X.-W.
(1996)
Plant Cell
8,
1491-1503[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Staub, J. M.,
Wei, N.,
and Deng, X. W.
(1996)
Plant Cell
8,
2047-2056[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Restrepo, M. A.,
Freed, D. D.,
and Carrington, J. C.
(1990)
Plant Cell
2,
987-998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Altschul, S.,
Madden, T.,
Schäffer, A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Clarke, N. D.,
and Berg, J. M.
(1998)
Science
282,
2018-2022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Jensen, R. B.,
Jensen, K. L.,
Jespersen, H. M.,
and Skriver, K.
(1998)
FEBS Lett.
436,
283-287[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Bouchard, M. L.,
and Côté, S.
(1993)
Gene
125,
205-209[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Mishra, L.,
Tully, R. E.,
Monga, S. P. S., Yu, P.,
Cai, T.,
Makalowski, W.,
Mezey, E.,
Pavan, W. J.,
and Mishra, B.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
2361-2368[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Nakayama, M.,
Miyake, T.,
Gahara, Y.,
Ohara, O.,
and Kitamura, T.
(1995)
J. Neurosci.
15,
5238-5248[Abstract]
|
| 23.
|
Tanimura, S.,
Ohtsuka, S.,
Mitsui, K.,
Shirouzu, K.,
Yoshimura, A.,
and Ohtsubo, M.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
447,
5-9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Wu, L. C.,
Wang, Z. W.,
Tsan, J. T.,
Spillman, M. A.,
Phung, A.,
Xu, X. L.,
Yang, M.-C. W.,
Hwang, L.-Y.,
Bowcock, A. M.,
and Baer, R.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
14,
430-440[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Jensen, D. E.,
Proctor, M.,
Marquis, S. T.,
Gardner, H. P.,
Ha, S. I.,
Chodosh, L. A.,
Ishov, A. M.,
Tommerup, N.,
Vissing, H.,
Sekido, Y.,
Minna, J.,
Borodovsky, A.,
Schultz, D. C.,
Wilkinson, K. D.,
Maul, G. G.,
Barlev, N.,
Berger, S. L.,
Prendergast, G. C.,
and Rauscher, F. J.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1097-1112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Zhou, S.,
Yang, Y.,
Scott, M.,
Pannuti, A.,
Fehr, K.,
Eisen, A.,
Koonin, E.,
Fouts, D.,
Wrightsman, R.,
Manning, J.,
and Jucchesi, J.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2884-2895[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Copps, K.,
Richman, R.,
Lyman, L. M.,
Chang, K. A.,
Rampersad-Ammons, J.,
and Kuroda, M. I.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
5409-5417[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Inouye, C.,
Dhillon, N.,
and Thorner, J.
(1997)
Science
278,
103-106[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Rodgers, K. K.,
Bu, Z.,
Fleming, K. G.,
Schatz, D. G.,
Engelman, D. M.,
and Coleman, J. E.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
260,
70-84[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Bellon, S. F.,
Rodgers, K. K.,
Schatz, D. G.,
Coleman, J. E.,
and Steitz, T. A.
(1997)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4,
586-591[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Brzovic, P.,
Meza, J.,
King, M.-C.,
and Klevit, R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7795-7799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Hemenway, C. S.,
Halligan, B. W.,
and Levy, L. S.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
2541-2547[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Stacey, M. G.,
Hicks, S. N.,
and von Arnim, A. G.
(1999)
Plant Cell
11,
349-364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Matsui, M.,
Stoop, C. D.,
von Arnim, A. G.,
Wei, N.,
and Deng, X. W.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Aci. U. S. A.
92,
4239-4243[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Barrero, M. J. Talbot, R. G. White, J. V. Jacobsen, and F. Gubler
Anatomical and Transcriptomic Studies of the Coleorhiza Reveal the Importance of This Tissue in Regulating Dormancy in Barley
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2009;
150(2):
1006 - 1021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Wang, H. K. Chua, A. A. R. A. Gusti, F. He, B. Fenner, I. Manopo, H. Wang, and J. Kwang
RING-H2 Protein WSSV249 from White Spot Syndrome Virus Sequesters a Shrimp Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme, PvUbc, for Viral Pathogenesis
J. Virol.,
July 15, 2005;
79(14):
8764 - 8772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Dahiya, D. Milioni, B. Wells, N. Stacey, K. Roberts, and M. C. McCann
A RING Domain Gene Is Expressed in Different Cell Types of Leaf Trace, Stem, and Juvenile Bundles in the Stem Vascular System of Zinnia
Plant Physiology,
July 1, 2005;
138(3):
1383 - 1395.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Ramonell, M. Berrocal-Lobo, S. Koh, J. Wan, H. Edwards, G. Stacey, and S. Somerville
Loss-of-Function Mutations in Chitin Responsive Genes Show Increased Susceptibility to the Powdery Mildew Pathogen Erysiphe cichoracearum
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2005;
138(2):
1027 - 1036.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. E. Wertz, K. M. O'Rourke, Z. Zhang, D. Dornan, D. Arnott, R. J. Deshaies, and V. M. Dixit
Human De-Etiolated-1 Regulates c-Jun by Assembling a CUL4A Ubiquitin Ligase
Science,
February 27, 2004;
303(5662):
1371 - 1374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Saijo, J. A. Sullivan, H. Wang, J. Yang, Y. Shen, V. Rubio, L. Ma, U. Hoecker, and X. W. Deng
The COP1-SPA1 interaction defines a critical step in phytochrome A-mediated regulation of HY5 activity
Genes & Dev.,
November 1, 2003;
17(21):
2642 - 2647.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Kurek, Y. Kawagoe, D. Jacob-Wilk, M. Doblin, and D. Delmer
Dimerization of cotton fiber cellulose synthase catalytic subunits occurs via oxidation of the zinc-binding domains
PNAS,
August 20, 2002;
99(17):
11109 - 11114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Holm, L.-G. Ma, L.-J. Qu, and X.-W. Deng
Two interacting bZIP proteins are direct targets of COP1-mediated control of light-dependent gene expression in Arabidopsis
Genes & Dev.,
May 15, 2002;
16(10):
1247 - 1259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Yang, J. He, X. Lin, Q. Li, D. Pan, X. Zhang, and X. Xu
Complete Genome Sequence of the Shrimp White Spot Bacilliform Virus
J. Virol.,
December 1, 2001;
75(23):
11811 - 11820.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Okamoto, M. Matsui, and X. W. Deng
Overexpression of the Heterotrimeric G-Protein {{alpha}}-Subunit Enhances Phytochrome-Mediated Inhibition of Hypocotyl Elongation in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
July 1, 2001;
13(7):
1639 - 1652.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. A. Eckardt
From Darkness into Light: Factors Controlling Photomorphogenesis
PLANT CELL,
February 1, 2001;
13(2):
219 - 221.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N Matsuda, T Suzuki, K Tanaka, and A Nakano
Rma1, a novel type of RING finger protein conserved from Arabidopsis to human, is a membrane-bound ubiquitin ligase
J. Cell Sci.,
January 5, 2001;
114(10):
1949 - 1957.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Hardtke and X.-W. Deng
The Cell Biology of the COP/DET/FUS Proteins. Regulating Proteolysis in Photomorphogenesis and Beyond?
Plant Physiology,
December 1, 2000;
124(4):
1548 - 1557.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Halbach, N. Scheer, and W. Werr
Transcriptional activation by the PHD finger is inhibited through an adjacent leucine zipper that binds 14-3-3 proteins
Nucleic Acids Res.,
September 15, 2000;
28(18):
3542 - 3550.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Fang, J. P. Jensen, R. L. Ludwig, K. H. Vousden, and A. M. Weissman
Mdm2 Is a RING Finger-dependent Ubiquitin Protein Ligase for Itself and p53
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 17, 2000;
275(12):
8945 - 8951.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Kanaya, K. Watanabe, N. Nakajima, K. Okada, and Y. Shimura
Zinc Release from the CH2C6 Zinc Finger Domain of FILAMENTOUS FLOWER Protein from Arabidopsis thaliana Induces Self-assembly
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 2, 2001;
276(10):
7383 - 7390.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Ardley, N. G. S. Tan, S. A. Rose, A. F. Markham, and P. A. Robinson
Features of the Parkin/Ariadne-like Ubiquitin Ligase, HHARI, That Regulate Its Interaction with the Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzyme, UbcH7
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 25, 2001;
276(22):
19640 - 19647.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|