J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27702-27710, September 24, 1999
Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-activating Polypeptides Directly
Stimulate Sympathetic Neuron Neuropeptide Y Release through
PAC1 Receptor Isoform Activation of Specific Intracellular
Signaling Pathways*
Karen M.
Braas and
Victor
May
From the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of
Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405
 |
ABSTRACT |
Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating
polypeptides (PACAP) have potent regulatory and neurotrophic activities
on superior cervical ganglion (SCG) sympathetic neurons with
pharmacological profiles consistent for the PACAP-selective
PAC1 receptor. Multiple PAC1 receptor
isoforms are suggested to determine differential peptide potency and
receptor coupling to multiple intracellular signaling pathways. The
current studies examined rat SCG PAC1 receptor splice
variant expression and coupling to intracellular signaling pathways
mediating PACAP-stimulated peptide release. PAC1 receptor
mRNA was localized in over 90% of SCG neurons, which correlated
with the cells expressing receptor protein. The neurons expressed the
PAC1(short)HOP1 receptor but not
VIP/PACAP-nonselective VPAC1 receptors; low
VPAC2 receptor mRNA levels were restricted to
ganglionic nonneuronal cells. PACAP27 and PACAP38 potently and
efficaciously stimulated both cAMP and inositol phosphate production;
inhibition of phospholipase C augmented PACAP-stimulated cAMP
production, but inhibition of adenylyl cyclase did not alter stimulated
inositol phosphate production. Phospholipase C inhibition blunted
neuron peptide release, suggesting that the phosphatidylinositol pathway was a prominent component of the secretory response. These studies demonstrate preferential sympathetic neuron expression of
PACAP-selective receptor variants contributing to regulation of
autonomic function.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The identification of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating
polypeptide (PACAP)1 and
vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/PACAP receptors has broadened our
understanding of the mechanisms underlying the regulatory and
neurotrophic roles of this family of peptides. The PACAP precursor molecule is tissue-specifically posttranslationally processed to two
biologically active
-amidated products, PACAP38
(pro-PACAP-(131-168)) and PACAP27 (pro-PACAP-(131-157)) (1-5), which
share amino acid homology with VIP. In the nervous system, PACAP
induces neuronal calcium flux, facilitates membrane depolarization, and
increases spike frequency (6-8,
10).2 PACAP peptides also
enhance neuroblast survival, proliferation, differentiation, and
neurite outgrowth and prevent neuronal apoptosis upon growth factor or
stimulus withdrawal and ischemic insult (11-16).
The cloning of cDNAs for three putative seven-transmembrane
G-protein-coupled receptors for VIP and PACAP demonstrated receptor subtype diversity and functional heterogeneity (17-25). The
PACAP-selective PAC1 receptor demonstrates high affinity
for only PACAP38 and PACAP27 and is coupled to multiple intracellular
signaling cascades. The VPAC1 and VPAC2
receptors, in contrast, exhibit approximate equal high affinity for the
PACAP38, PACAP27, and VIP peptides and are coupled to adenylyl cyclase.
Multiple PAC1 receptor isoforms result from the alternative
splicing of two exons in the amino-terminal extracellular domain and/or
two (HIP and HOP) exons in the third cytoplasmic loop (19, 23, 24, 26).
Cell-specific expression of PAC1 receptor splice variants
determines differential peptide potency and distinct patterns of
adenylyl cyclase and phospholipase C stimulation by PACAP38 and PACAP27
(23).
Recent studies have suggested that PACAP peptides may be physiological
regulators of sympathetic neuron function. PACAP has been identified in
pericellular fiber networks enveloping SCG postganglionic neurons, and
sympathetic preganglionic neurons in the spinal cord projecting to the
SCG express PACAP (27-29). We demonstrated previously that PACAP
peptides are potent and efficacious regulators of SCG neuron
transmitter and peptide production, secretion, and mRNA with
pharmacological profiles congruous for the PACAP-selective
PAC1 receptor (30, 31). Similarly, PACAP peptides
selectively and potently stimulate sympathetic neuroblast mitogenesis,
neuritogenesis, and survival and sympathetic neuron depolarization and
membrane excitability (10, 30, 32).2 Accordingly,
PAC1 receptor mRNA has been demonstrated in the rat SCG
(30, 31, 33). The cellular targets of PACAP and the mechanisms
underlying PACAP sympathetic actions, however, have remained unclear.
To further evaluate the mechanisms mediating sympathetic neuron
responses to PACAP, the present studies investigated SCG neuron
expression of specific PAC1 receptor molecular forms and
determined whether PACAP-stimulated receptor activation of specific
second messenger pathways modulates peptide secretion. The analyses
demonstrate the preferential expression of specific PACAP-selective
receptor isoforms coupled to multiple intracellular signaling pathways
in sympathetic neurons; PAC1 receptor stimulation of
phospholipase C is a prominent component of SCG neuron neuropeptide Y
(NPY) release.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Animals--
Adult male (225-250 g) and pregnant female
Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were obtained from Charles River
Canada; all animal procedures were approved by the University of
Vermont IACUC. Animals were decapitated, and SCG were removed and
frozen. Neonatal (postnatal day 1) rat ganglia were obtained from mixed
sex litters.
Cell Culture--
Primary neuronal SCG cultures were prepared as
described previously (30, 34). Neonatal rat SCG enzymatically dispersed to produce a pooled population of cells were plated at a density of
1.5 × 104 neurons/cm2, treated with
cytosine
-D-arabinofuranoside to eliminate nonneuronal cells, and maintained in defined complete serum-free medium containing 50 ng/ml nerve growth factor (34). For specific experiments, to obtain
neuronal and nonneuronal cell populations, the SCG cells were preplated
for 3 h; the neuronal cells were dislodged by agitation, recovered, and cultured in serum-free defined medium with mitotic inhibitors and nerve growth factor as described above. The remaining adherent cells were cultured as nonneuronal cells.
PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified
Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 nutrient medium supplemented with 10%
NuSerum and 5% fetal bovine serum. AtT-20/D16v mouse corticotrope
cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's
F-12 nutrient medium containing 10% NuSerum, 10% fetal bovine serum,
and 10% horse serum (35).
In Situ Hybridization Histochemistry--
Adult male rat SCG
cyrosections (20 µm) were processed for in situ
hybridization histochemistry as described previously (36-38), using a
riboprobe to the carboxyl-terminal intracellular domain of the
PAC1 receptor, which did not discriminate among the
transcript splice variants. A 449-base pair fragment of the
PAC1 receptor cDNA synthesized from rat brain
hypothalamus was amplified using the primer templates PACAPR5 and
PACAPR6 (Table I). The product was
gel-purified and ligated into the EcoRV site of pBluescript II KS
cloning vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The
nucleotide sequence of the insert was verified by automated fluorescent
dideoxy dye terminator sequencing. Radiolabeled antisense and sense
riboprobes were synthesized using [35S]dCTP and T7 or T3
DNA polymerase, respectively; hybridization with sense riboprobes
failed to produce detectable signals (data not shown).
Immunocytochemistry--
Cultured sympathetic neurons on Aclar
plastic (39) and cryosections of adult male rat SCG were
immunocytochemically stained to localize the PAC1 receptor
protein using a modification of the protocol described previously (10,
40). The neurons and sections were incubated for 24 h at 4 °C
with 1:2000 affinity-purified rabbit anti-PAC1 receptor
antiserum ERIQ, produced against amino acid residues Glu35
to Cys53 of the amino-terminal extracellular domain.
PAC1 receptor immunoreactivity was localized by incubation
of the tissue with 1:500 indocarbocyanine (Cy3)-labeled donkey
anti-rabbit IgG.
To identify the population of sympathetic neurons containing NPY that
coexpressed the PACAP-selective receptor, neurons were incubated with
1:2000 rabbit anti-PAC1 receptor and 1:400 guinea pig
anti-NPY (41); sites of antibody binding were localized using 1:500
Cy3-labeled donkey anti-rabbit IgG and 1:500 fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled goat anti-guinea pig IgG, and the subpopulation of neurons containing NPY that coexpressed the PACAP-selective receptor
was determined (34, 35, 38). No staining was observed with omission of
primary or secondary antisera, incubation with preimmune serum, or
absorption of the primary antiserum with immunogen or antigen (data not
shown). Immunocytochemically stained samples were viewed by
fluorescence microscopy using a Leica DMRB microscope equipped with a
Cy3 filter set (Chroma, Brattleboro, VT) or imaged using a Bio-Rad MRC
1000 confocal scanning laser system.
cAMP Production--
Primary cultured SCG neurons were incubated
with PACAP38, PACAP27, or VIP in defined serum-free medium containing
50 µM RO20-1724 (Calbiochem). Cultures were extracted in
absolute ethanol containing 100 µM RO20-1724 and
processed for cAMP radioimmunoassay using the Biotrak nonacetylation
protocol with 125I-cAMP and Amerlex-M magnetic separation
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Assay midpoints were approximately 10 fmol.
Inositol Phosphate Production--
Total inositol phosphates
were quantitated as described previously (42). SCG neurons were
cultured in defined medium containing 0.32 µM
myo-[3H]inositol (19 Ci/mmol, NEN Life Science
Products). After 48 h, the cultures were treated with 10 mM LiCl and PACAP38, PACAP27, or VIP. Following phase
separation of the methanol/chloroform extract, inositol phosphates in
the aqueous phase were separated from free inositol by ion exchange
chromatography (AG 1-X8 resin, formate form; Bio-Rad).
Peptide Level Analysis--
Secreted NPY was evaluated using
double antibody radioimmunoassays as described previously (30, 34, 38).
Conditioned medium from individual sympathetic neuron cultures (3 × 104 cells/well) was assayed using 1:9000 rabbit anti-NPY
(RIN7180; Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont, CA) and 125I-NPY
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Messenger RNA Analysis--
Total RNA prepared using RNA STAT-60
total RNA/mRNA isolation reagent (Tel-Test "B"; Friendswood,
TX), was used to synthesize first strand cDNA using SuperScript II
reverse transcriptase and oligo(dT) primers with the SuperScript
Preamplification System (Life Technologies, Inc.) as described
previously (29, 30, 35, 37, 38). Amplification with AmpliTaq
DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) using the AmpliWax PCR
gem-facilitated hot start (30) was conducted using oligonucleotide
primers specific for the identification of PAC1 receptor
splice variants in the third cytoplasmic loop or amino-terminal domain
or for VPAC1 or VPAC2 receptors (Table I).
Complementary DNA synthesis in the absence of either RNA or reverse
transcriptase or amplification without template, primers, or DNA
polymerase failed to yield products (data not shown).
The identities of the amplified products were established by diagnostic
restriction endonuclease analysis (43). Verification of HIP or HOP
alternative splice variant expression was performed using
sequence-specific hybridization as reported previously (38) with
the synthetic antisense internal HIP-specific
(5'-GTCTGAGGGCACAGGCAGGGGGTCCTCTCGGGTTTTCTT-3') or HOP-specific
(5'-TGACATCTTGCAAGAGTGCTGCTGAGCCCGCTGTGGCTT-3') probes
end-labeled with [32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase
to equal specific activities. Blots were apposed to autoradiographic
film or analyzed by storage phosphor imaging.
 |
RESULTS |
Principal Postganglionic Sympathetic Neurons Express
PAC1 Receptor mRNA and Protein--
Neuroanatomical,
pharmacological, and electrophysiological studies have implicated PACAP
peptides among the physiological regulators of sympathetic neuron
function (10, 27-30).2 The presence of PACAP-selective
PAC1 receptor expression in the cellular elements of the
rat SCG was investigated morphologically. Using a riboprobe that did
not discriminate the PAC1 receptor transcript splice
variants, hybridization was restricted to SCG principal neurons (Fig.
1A); almost all of the neurons
were labeled. PAC1 receptor immunoreactivity directly
paralleled the morphological localization of the receptor transcripts;
nearly all of the sympathetic neurons exhibited PAC1
receptor staining (Fig. 1B). PC12 cells (Fig.
1F), which express PACAP-selective receptor mRNA and
respond potently to PACAP, but not VIP (11), also stained, whereas no staining was observed in AtT-20/D16v cells (data not shown), which are
regulated by both PACAP and VIP but express VPAC2 receptor transcripts (35).

View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
PAC1 receptor
(PAC1R) mRNA and protein are highly expressed in
SCG sympathetic neurons. Cryosections of intact SCG were
hybridized with radiolabeled antisense PAC1 receptor
riboprobe for dark field in situ hybridization
histochemistry (A) or immunocytochemically processed with
PAC1 receptor antiserum (B).
PAC1 receptor immunofluorescence stained neuronal
plasma membrane in SCG cultures (C) and PC12
pheochromocytoma cells (F); the cellular membrane
distribution of PAC1 receptors in cultured SCG neurons was
evident by confocal microscopy (D). E, dual
labeling of SCG cultures for PAC1 receptors (Cy3;
red) and NPY (fluorescein isothiocyanate; green)
for confocal microscopy. Bar, 125 µm (A and
B), 50 µm (C and F), and 25 µm
(D and E). *, nucleus; arrow, neurite;
arrowhead, membrane.
|
|
The cellular sites of the PAC1 receptor protein in the
postganglionic neurons of the SCG were evaluated using purified primary cultured sympathetic neurons, which exhibited punctate PAC1
receptor immunoreactivity localized predominantly to the soma (Fig.
1C). The cellular distribution of the PACAP-selective
receptor protein, examined by fluorescent confocal microscopy, was over
the plasma membrane often in patches that may represent receptor
clusters (Fig. 1D).
Postganglionic sympathetic SCG neurons are catecholaminergic but are
heterogenous with respect to neuropeptide expression. To demonstrate
that the subpopulation of SCG neurons synthesizing NPY has the
capability to selectively respond to PACAP, the neurons were dually
labeled. Approximately 60% of SCG neurons expressed NPY
immunoreactivity; all of the NPY-positive neurons coexpressed PAC1 receptor immunoreactivity (Fig. 1E),
implicating PACAP among prominent physiological regulators of
sympathetic postganglionic neuron NPY expression.
SCG Neurons Predominantly Express the HOP Isoform of the
PAC1 Receptor--
To define the signaling mechanisms
underlying PACAP-elicited responses in sympathetic neurons, the
molecular forms of PAC1 receptor mRNA were
characterized. Multiple PAC1 receptor transcript isoforms
that differ in either the amino-terminal extracellular region and/or
the third intracellular cytoplasmic loop domain are synthesized in a
tissue-specific manner by alternative splicing events (Fig.
2). Alternative HIP and/or HOP exon usage
in the PAC1 receptor mRNA encoding the third
cytoplasmic loop was examined by reverse transcription-PCR, and
amplification of cDNA from adult and neonatal rat SCG identified
predominant expression of the one-exon isoform of the PAC1
receptor mRNA (Fig. 3). Products corresponding to PAC1 receptor transcripts with neither
cassette or with both cassettes represented relatively minor receptor
species. Similar to the intact ganglia, purified principal sympathetic neurons maintained in vitro without extrinsic signals
expressed predominantly the PAC1 receptor transcript with
one cassette.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Putative topology of the rat PAC1
receptor variant amino acid residues. The PAC1
receptor transcript encodes a putative seven-transmembrane
G-protein-coupled receptor. Alternative splicing in the region encoding
the amino-terminal extracellular domain and third cytoplasmic loop
generates multiple isoforms of the PACAP-selective PAC1
receptor. The presence or absence of two 84-base pair exons in the
region encoding the third cytoplasmic loop produces receptor variants
with the 28-amino acid residue HIP (light gray) and/or HOP
(black) cassettes. Alternative splicing of exons 4 (21 nucleotides) and 5 (42 nucleotides) encodes a 21-residue fragment
(dark gray) in the extracellular domain of the receptor,
producing either the short or very short
isoforms. Data are adapted from Refs. 23 and 44.
|
|

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
SCG express PAC1 receptor third
cytoplasmic loop alternative splice variants. Complementary DNA
templates were reverse transcribed from individual adult and neonatal
rat SCG and primary sympathetic neuron culture total RNA. The region
spanning the alternative splice site for the HIP and HOP exons within
the third cytoplasmic loop was amplified using oligonucleotide primers
PACAPR1 and PACAPR2 (top; Table I). Six third cytoplasmic
loop isoform fragments containing neither, one, or both the HIP and HOP
exon cassettes with the indicated sizes can be potentially amplified
using these primers (left panel). The
PAC1 receptor transcript schematic diagram (top)
is based on the rat sequence (Ref. 23; GenBank accession number
Z23272). Dark gray, short region containing exons
4 and 5; light gray, HIP exon cassette; black,
HOP exon; thick line, region amplified using PACAPR1 and
PACAPR2.
|
|
Since HIP versus HOP isoforms of the PAC1
receptor could not be distinguished solely by PCR product size, the
identity of the major SCG PAC1 receptor splice variant
resulting from alternative exon usage in the region encoding the third
cytoplasmic loop was determined by amplified cDNA sequence-specific
hybridization with exon-specific oligonucleotide probes and diagnostic
restriction endonuclease analysis. Hybridizations with the HOP-specific
oligonucleotide identified one major band, corresponding to the
384/387-nucleotide-amplified product with the HOP cassette insert (Fig.
4A); longer exposures revealed
the expression of the much less abundant PAC1 receptor mRNA containing both HIP and HOP exons. Hybridization with the HIP-specific oligonucleotide probe was revealed only after long autoradiogram exposures. Since the two probes were comparable in size,
G/C content, and specific activity, this suggested that the mRNA
expression for the one-cassette PAC1-HIP receptor isoform was much lower than that for the HOP receptor; storage phosphor imaging
analyses of the sequence-specific hybridization blots confirmed this
relative receptor mRNA expression. Consistent with this finding,
the 384/387-nucleotide products were not digested by the HIP
exon-specific AvaII restriction enzyme; cleavage with BlpI at a recognition sequence common to HOP1 and HOP2
digested the PCR product to apparent completion (Fig. 4B),
suggesting that virtually all of the PAC1 receptors in the
SCG neurons represented the HOP isoform. The HOP1 and HOP2 receptor
variants result from alternative usage of two consecutive consensus
splice acceptor sites at the 5'-end of the HOP exon, and the presence
of the three upstream nucleotides in the HOP1 isoform generates a
recognition site for the restriction enzyme PvuII. Digestion
with PvuII yielded a predominant 328-nucleotide fragment
(Fig. 4B), indicating primary expression of the HOP1
receptor transcript variant; the residual uncleaved material most
likely represented the HOP2 isoform. Parallel reverse transcription-PCR
of SCG cDNA using primers specific for either HIP or HOP cassettes
generated amplified products congruous with the predominant expression
of PAC1-HOP receptor transcripts (data not shown).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The alternatively spliced third cytoplasmic
loop PAC1 receptor isoform containing one cassette is
primarily the HOP1 variant. A, the PAC1
receptor products amplified from adult SCG cDNA using the
oligonucleotide primers PACAPR1 and PACAPR2 were hybridized with either
HIP or HOP exon-specific internal radiolabeled oligonucleotide probes;
the blots were apposed to film for 2 h (short exposure,
upper autoradiograms) or 44 h (long
exposure, lower autoradiograms). B,
the 384/387-amplified nucleotide products were isolated for diagnostic
restriction endonuclease digestion using isoform-specific enzymes.
Control represents the undigested amplified 384/387-base pair product.
The receptor mRNA schematic diagram is described in the legend to
Fig. 3.
|
|
SCG Neuronal PAC1 Receptors Represent the Short
Variant--
Alternative splicing of both exon 4 (21 nucleotides) and
exon 5 (42 nucleotides) produces PAC1 receptor variants
with the presence or absence of a 21-amino acid insert in the
amino-terminal extracellular domain (26, 44). The short and
very short variants were suggested to modulate PACAP27 and
PACAP38 PAC1 receptor binding and potency in stimulating
phospholipase C activity. Accordingly, SCG neuron expression of
PAC1 receptor mRNA amino-terminal extracellular domain
splice variants was investigated. Reverse transcription-PCR suggested
that the sympathetic neurons expressed predominantly the
PAC1(short) receptor transcript variant
containing both exons 4 and 5 encoding the 21 amino acid insert in the
amino terminus (Fig. 5). Restriction
analyses of the 413-nucleotide material using the exon-specific enzymes
yielded cleavage patterns expected for the region of the
PAC1 receptor cDNA containing the 63-nucleotide insert,
whereas the transcript variant in guinea pig SCG contains only exon
5.3 Cleavage with
endonucleases with unique recognition sequences in the other exons
verified that all of the DNA segments in the fragment were represented
(data not shown).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
SCG PAC1 receptor variants result
from alternative splicing within the amino-terminal extracellular
domain and represent the short isoform. Total RNA
from individual adult and neonatal SCG and sympathetic neuron cultures
was reverse transcribed, and the cDNA was amplified using the
primers PACAPR3 and PACAPR4, which flank the amino-terminal
extracellular domain alternative splice site (top; Table I)
and can produce fragments of the indicated sizes with both
(short) or neither (very short) exons 4 and 5 (left). The amplified product was recovered from the agarose
gels for diagnostic restriction analyses with exon 4- and 5-specific
enzymes, FokI and Tsp509I, respectively. The
PAC1 receptor mRNA schematic diagram is described in
the legend to Fig. 3. The numbers in the diagrams
for the restriction enzyme cleavage sites refer to the exons
represented in the amplified product (44). Thick line,
region amplified using PACAPR3 and PACAPR4.
|
|
PAC1 Receptor Transcripts Are Preferentially Expressed
in SCG Postganglionic Neurons--
Pharmacologically, SCG neurons
appeared to express predominantly the PACAP-selective receptor rather
than either of the VIP/PACAP nonselective receptor subtypes (10,
30).2 In contrast to the PAC1 receptor,
amplification of SCG cDNA templates with primers specific for
either the VPAC1 or VPAC2 receptors did not
reveal significant expression of either receptor mRNA in the intact
SCG (Fig. 6A). Amplification
with VPAC1 receptor primers, which yielded the predicted
product from liver cDNA (data not shown), did not produce amplified
fragments from SCG cDNA templates. SCG expression of
VPAC2 receptor mRNA was very low compared with that of
the PAC1 receptor. To establish the cell type expressing
the VPAC2 receptor, purified SCG neuron and nonneuronal cell cultures were prepared by differential plating. The pure postganglionic neurons demonstrated only PAC1 receptor
transcript expression, which correlated well with in situ
hybridization and immunocytochemical studies (28, 45); the nonneuronal
cell cultures, in contrast, appeared to express only VPAC2
receptor mRNA (Fig. 6B).

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
SCG postganglionic neurons express
PAC1 receptors but neither of the nonselective
VIP/PACAP receptors. A, total RNA from individual adult
SCG was reversed transcribed, and the cDNA templates were amplified
using oligonucleotide primers specific for the PAC1,
VPAC1, or VPAC2 receptors (Table I).
B, total RNA (2 µg) from highly enriched SCG neuronal and
nonneuronal cells produced by differential plating were amplified using
primers for PAC1 and VPAC2 to identify the
cellular sources of these receptor types. Representative of data from
three separate experiments.
|
|
PACAP27 and PACAP38 Are Potent and Efficacious Activators of SCG
Neuronal cAMP and Inositol Phosphate Production--
Distinct
PAC1 receptor isoforms have been postulated to be
differentially coupled to adenylyl cyclase and/or phospholipase C (23,
26). Based on previous transfection studies, activation of
PAC1(short)HOP1 receptors in SCG neurons by both
molecular forms of PACAP were anticipated to elicit nearly equal high
potencies in cAMP production, whereas PACAP38 was expected to be orders of magnitude more potent than PACAP27 in stimulating inositol phosphate
production. VIP was not expected to potently stimulate intracellular
signaling pathways. Unexpectedly, the patterns of SCG neuron
PAC1(short)HOP receptor activation of second
messengers differed from those previously observed for this particular
receptor variant. Both PACAP27 and PACAP38 potently and efficaciously
stimulated sympathetic neuron cAMP production. The potency of PACAP38
was approximately 10-fold greater than PACAP27; half-maximal
stimulation of cAMP production with PACAP38 was observed at 0.3 nM, and the half-maximal effect with PACAP27 was 3 nM (Fig. 7A).
However, PACAP27 appeared more efficacious than PACAP38 in stimulating cAMP production; the maximal level of PACAP27-stimulated SCG cAMP production was approximately 1.4-fold greater than that for PACAP38. As
predicted by expression of the PACAP-selective receptor type, VIP was
over 1000-fold less potent than the PACAP peptides in adenylyl cyclase
activation.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
PACAP27 and PACAP38 potently and
efficaciously stimulate sympathetic neuron cAMP and inositol phosphate
production. A, cultured SCG neurons (3.0 × 104 neurons/well) were incubated in defined medium
containing 50 µM RO20-1724 and 10 11 to
10 6 M PACAP27 ( ), PACAP38 ( ), or VIP
( ) and were extracted for cAMP radioimmunoassay. B,
sympathetic neurons were incubated in defined medium containing 0.32 µM myo-[3H]inositol for 24 h; treated with 10 11 to 10 6 M
PACAP27 ( ), PACAP38 ( ), or VIP ( ) in the presence of 10 mM LiCl; and analyzed for inositol phosphate production.
Data represent the mean cAMP or inositol phosphate production ± S.E. (n = 4-10 samples assayed in duplicate or
triplicate); error bars not evident are within the symbols.
Data are representative of three or four independent experiments.
|
|
While previous reports suggested that only PACAP38 potently stimulated
phospholipase C, both PACAP27 and PACAP38 potently stimulated inositol
phosphate production in sympathetic neurons with identical half-maximal
effects of 0.5 nM peptide (Fig. 7B). Similar to
the stimulation of SCG cAMP production, PACAP27 appeared more
efficacious than PACAP38 in phospholipase C activation. As expected for
PACAP-selective receptor activation of intracellular signaling
pathways, micromolar concentrations of VIP were also required to
stimulate inositol phosphate production.
Inhibition of Phospholipase C Augments PACAP-stimulated cAMP
Production--
To study the activation and potential interactions of
these two intracellular signaling pathways in response to PACAP
receptor activation, the PACAP receptor-mediated stimulation of second messenger production was investigated in the presence of adenylyl cyclase and/or phospholipase C inhibitors. Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase with 9-(tetrahydro-2'-furyl)adenine (SQ22536)
(Calbiochem-Novabiochem; Ref. 46) decreased cAMP production to
approximately 60% of PACAP-stimulated levels (p < 0.001; Fig. 8A, black bars).
Similar homologous phospholipase C inhibition with the aminosteroid
1-[6-((17
-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5-(10)-triene-17-yl)amino)hexyl]-1H-pyrrole-2,5,-dione (U73122) (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) decreased basal and PACAP27- or
PACAP38-stimulated sympathetic neuron inositol phosphate production nearly 50% (p < 0.001; Fig. 8B, dark gray
bars), in agreement with inhibitor effects reported in other
systems (47-50).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Inhibition of phospholipase C attenuates
PACAP-stimulated inositol phosphate production and potentiates cAMP
production. Sympathetic neurons were incubated as described for
Fig. 7 with defined medium containing vehicle or 100 nM
PACAP27 or PACAP38, in the absence or presence of vehicle (white
bar) or maximal effective concentration, 10 µM, of
the inhibitor SQ22536 (black bar), U73122 (dark gray
bar), or SQ22536 plus U73122 (light gray bar). Data
represent the mean cAMP (A) or inositol phosphate
(B) production ± S.E. (n = 4 assayed
in duplicate or triplicate). Data are representative of 6-8
independent experiments.
|
|
In heterologous inhibitor studies, treatment of the neurons with the
adenylyl cyclase inhibitor SQ22536 did not alter either basal or
PACAP-stimulated inositol phosphate production (Fig. 8B, black
bars); SQ22536, furthermore, did not alter the ability of the
phospholipase C inhibitor U73122 to diminish inositol phosphate levels
(light gray bars). In contrast, U73122 inhibition of
phospholipase C not only failed to attenuate, but potentiated, PACAP
peptide-stimulated cAMP production; SCG cAMP levels elicited by PACAP38
and PACAP27 in the presence of U73122 were increased 150% compared
with either peptide alone (p < 0.001; Fig.
8A, dark gray bars). These results suggest that
SCG PAC1(short)HOP1 receptor activation of these two signaling pathways resulted from distinct G-protein interactions, but furthermore, activation of the phosphatidylinositol pathway may be
a means of modulating the intracellular rise in SCG cAMP levels
following PACAP activation.
Sympathetic Neuron PACAP-stimulated NPY Release Is Reduced by
Phospholipase C Inhibition--
The contributions of the cAMP and
phosphatidylinositol pathways to SCG neuropeptide release were examined
under identical conditions to those used for the analysis of
PAC1 receptor coupling to intracellular signaling cascades.
Incubation of primary cultured SCG neurons with 100 nM
PACAP27 or PACAP38 potently and efficaciously stimulated NPY release
approximately 10-fold compared with basal levels (p < 0.001; Fig. 9, open bars). NPY
release was increased from 24 fmol of NPY/104 cells in
control neurons to 220 fmol of NPY/104 cells and 260 fmol
of NPY/104 cells with PACAP27 and PACAP38 treatment,
respectively. Basal NPY secretion was not affected by cAMP or
phosphatidylinositol pathway inhibitors. The pattern of
PACAP-stimulated NPY release under the inhibitor paradigm, however,
paralleled the inositol phosphate production profile. Inhibition of
adenylyl cyclase activity with SQ22536 failed to diminish the
PACAP-induced increase in neuron NPY release (Fig. 9, black
bars). In contrast, U73122 attenuated PACAP-stimulated NPY
secretion commensurate with decreased inositol phosphate production
(p < 0.001; dark gray bars). The decreased receptor-mediated peptide release produced by U73122 was not altered by
SQ22536 (light gray bars), suggesting that the
PACAP-stimulated NPY secretion was regulated predominantly by the
phosphatidylinositol signaling pathway.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Sympathetic neuron PACAP-stimulated NPY
secretion is regulated by the phospholipase C signaling pathway.
Primary cultured SCG neurons were incubated as described for Fig. 7
with defined medium containing vehicle or 100 nM PACAP27 or
PACAP38; neurons under these conditions were treated with vehicle
(white bar) or a 10 µM concentration of the
inhibitor SQ22536 (black bar), U73122 (dark gray
bar), or SQ22536 plus U73122 (light gray bar), and the
conditioned medium was analyzed for NPY immunoreactivity. Data
represent the mean NPY released ± S.E. (n = 4 assayed in triplicate).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present studies demonstrate that SCG postganglionic neurons
express predominantly the PAC1(short)HOP1
receptor splice variant coupled to both adenylyl cyclase and
phospholipase C. Moreover, coupling of this receptor isoform to
inositol phosphate production contributes to PACAP-stimulated
sympathetic neuron NPY release. Unlike many tissues that express not
only multiple PAC1 receptor isoforms, but also
VPAC1 and/or VPAC2 receptors (17, 18, 23, 25,
51), our studies demonstrated high SCG sympathetic postganglionic
neuron expression of only the PAC1(short)HOP1 receptor splice variant. In contrast, we identified low levels of
VPAC2 receptor mRNA in SCG nonneuronal cells, whereas
we and others reported that VPAC1 receptor mRNA is not
expressed in the SCG (45). Thus, PACAP and VIP have different cellular
targets in the SCG, resulting in potentially important functional
differences. PACAP27, PACAP38, and VIP not only modulate neuron
functions but also nervous system nonneuronal cell cytokines and growth
factors (52-57). The high potencies of the PACAP peptides at both
PAC1 and VPAC2 receptors suggest that these
peptides may possess regulatory functions on both neuronal and
nonneuronal cells in the SCG, while the roles of VIP are predicted to
be restricted to nonneuronal cell VPAC2 receptor
activation. Under conditions that result in increased sympathetic
neuron PACAP and/or VIP expression, such as neuronal injury (58, 59),
activation of specific receptor subtypes on SCG neuronal and
nonneuronal cells may contribute to the neuronal repair response.
PAC1 receptor activation of both adenylyl cyclase and
phospholipase C is characteristic of the group III family of
G-protein-coupled receptors (44, 60). Alternative usage of the HIP
and/or HOP exons in the region of the PAC1 receptor
transcript encoding the third cytoplasmic loop, a region important for
receptor-G-protein interaction, has been suggested to determine
receptor signaling pathway activation selectivity (23, 26, 33).
Furthermore, expression of variants differing in the presence
(short) or absence (very short) of exons 4 and 5 in the amino-terminal extracellular domain has been suggested to
modulate PACAP27 and PACAP38 binding and discriminate peptide potency
in second messenger production (26). The corresponding amino-terminal
region in the VPAC1 receptor contains essential amino acids
defining the VIP binding domain (61-63). Identification of the
PAC1 receptor isoforms expressed by SCG neurons and the
physiological coupling of these receptors to intracellular signaling
pathways was therefore fundamental to understanding the mechanisms of
sympathetic neuron responses to PACAP.
In contrast to most nervous tissues, which express prevalently the
PAC1(short) receptor transcript variant with
neither HIP nor HOP exons (23, 33), SCG neurons express predominantly the PAC1(short)HOP1 receptor isoform. PACAP27
and PACAP38 demonstrated comparable high potency in augmenting cAMP
levels in transfected LLCPK1 cells expressing the
PAC1(short)HOP receptor, but PACAP27 was at
least 100-fold less potent than PACAP38 in stimulating inositol
phosphate production; moreover, PACAP38 stimulated intracellular inositol phosphate ~40-fold less potently than cAMP (23, 26). Similar
patterns of second messenger activation were demonstrated in adrenal
medullary chromaffin or PC12 pheochromocytoma cells (11, 64, 65). By
contrast, PACAP-mediated second messenger responses in SCG neurons
through the PAC1(short)HOP1 receptor were unique
in that both PACAP27 and PACAP38 exhibited high potency in stimulating
cAMP and inositol phosphate production. In accord with the pattern of
activation predicted for the HOP variant (23), both peptides potently
stimulated cellular adenylyl cyclase; unexpectedly, PACAP38 was
~10-fold more potent than PACAP27. Importantly, in departure from
these reports, PACAP27 and PACAP38 demonstrated equal subnanomolar high
potencies in augmenting inositol phosphate production in sympathetic
neurons. In addition, the concentration dependence of PACAP-induced
inositol phosphate production was characteristic of the
PAC1(very short) receptor (26) but was unanticipated for the PAC1(short) variant
expressed by SCG postganglionic neurons. These results implied that
alternative splicing of the amino-terminal putative peptide binding
domain may not represent the only or major determinant of PACAP27
potency in phospholipase C stimulation and suggested that other
factors, such as receptor density or expression of specific cell
signaling components, may ultimately dictate the cellular responses
(60).
Coupling of one receptor to multiple intracellular signaling
cascades poses complex issues related to signal integration, and
studies have shown multiple potential points of intersection among
different signaling pathways. For example, agonist-stimulated increased
IP3 production also has been shown to enhance cAMP
formation by a calcium-calmodulin-dependent mechanism (66,
67). Contrary to expectation, inhibition of phospholipase C augmented
PACAP-mediated cAMP production. Several phosphodiesterase isoforms
exhibit serine/threonine kinase-dependent activities, and
decreased protein kinase C activity following phospholipase C
inhibition may diminish phosphodiesterase activities, resulting in an
apparent elevation in cellular cAMP levels (68, 69). Alternatively,
expression of specific adenylyl cyclase isoforms by SCG neurons may be
important. AC9, prevalent in many neuronal tissues, is inhibited by
intracellular calcium (70), and decreased calcium mobilization
following phospholipase C inhibition could result in sustained AC9
activity and enhanced cAMP production. The phosphorylation state of
adenylyl cyclase or PAC1 receptors following phospholipase
C inhibition may also affect total cellular cAMP production. Whether
any of these mechanisms underlie the observed interactions between
PACAP-mediated second messenger products remains to be investigated.
We demonstrated previously that direct activation of either the cAMP or
inositol phosphate signaling pathways stimulates sympathetic neuron
transmitter and peptide secretion (34); consequently, PACAP stimulation
of PAC1(short)HOP1 receptor-mediated
neurosecretion (30) was predicted to represent a synergistic response
of the two signaling cascades. Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase did not affect sympathetic neuron PACAP-mediated NPY release; by contrast, phosphatidylinositol signaling, presumably through inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate-mediated intracellular calcium release, appeared to
represent the predominant means of PACAP-stimulated sympathetic
neurosecretion. Similarly, U73122 attenuated tachykinin-stimulated
adrenal gland corticosteroid and aldosterone secretion and
endothelin-1- and GnRH-induced luteinizing hormone release from
gonadotropes (49, 50). PACAP, primarily through
PAC1(very short) receptors, also stimulates
release of acetylcholine from cardiac ganglia parasympathetic neurons
amplifying cardiac ganglia parasympathetic inhibition, but the
intracellular signaling mechanisms coupled to these receptor-mediated
events are unknown (40, 71). PACAP peptides also appear to be
noncholinergic secretagogues of adrenal medullary cell peptides and
catecholamines (65, 72, 73). Activation of chromaffin cell
PAC1HOP1 receptors stimulates cAMP and inositol phosphate
production; however, the contributions of these signaling pathways to
release remains unclear (9, 74-77).
In summary, molecular characterization has shown that SCG sympathetic
postganglionic neurons express predominantly the
PAC1(short)HOP1 receptor isoform. Atypically,
PACAP27 and PACAP38 binding to this sympathetic neuron receptor variant
results in potent and efficacious stimulation of both adenylyl cyclase
and phospholipase C activities; activation of the latter appears to be
a prominent component to the neuronal secretory response. In the
VIP/PACAP family of peptides, these studies demonstrate the specific
and preferential actions of PACAP and PAC1 receptors in
sympathetic autonomic physiology.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Susan A. Harakall and Peter Durda
for expert technical assistance, Matthew Beaudet for the in
situ hybridization histochemistry, and Eric Gauthier for
immunocytochemistry studies and confocal microscopy. We are grateful to
Dr. Story Landis for the guinea pig NPY antiserum.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HD-27468 (to V. M. and K. M. B.) and NS-01636 (to V. M.) and American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid 94015540 (to K. M. B.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Anatomy and
Neurobiology, Given Health Science Bldg., College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405. Tel.: 802-656-0398; Fax:
802-656-8704; E-mail: vmay@zoo.uvm.edu.
2
M. M. Beaudet, R. L. Parsons, K. M. Braas, and V. May, submitted for publication.
3
K. M. Braas, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PACAP, pituitary
adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide(s);
SCG, superior cervical
ganglion;
VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide;
NPY, neuropeptide Y;
Cy3, indocarbocyanine;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
bp, base pair(s).
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Miyata, A.,
Jiang, L.,
Dahl, R. D.,
Kitada, C.,
Kubo, K.,
Fujino, M.,
Minamino, M.,
and Arimura, A.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
170,
643-648[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Miyata, A.,
Arimura, A.,
Dahl, R. D.,
Minamino, N.,
Uehara, A.,
Jiang, L.,
Culler, M. D.,
and Coy, D. H.
(1989)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
164,
567-574[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Ogi, K.,
Kimura, C.,
Onda, H.,
Arimura, A.,
and Fujino, M.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
173,
1271-1279[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Arimura, A,
Somogyvari-Vigh, A.,
Miyata, A.,
Mizuno, K.,
Coy, D. H.,
and Kitada, C.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
2787-2789[Abstract]
|
| 5.
|
Arimura, A.
(1992)
Regul. Pept.
37,
287-303[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Tatsuno, I.,
Yada, T.,
Vigh, S.,
Hidaka, H.,
and Arimura, A.
(1992)
Endocrinology
131,
73-81[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Tanaka, K.,
Shibuya, I.,
Nagamoto, T.,
Yamashita, H.,
and Kanno, T.
(1996)
Endocrinology
137,
956-966[Abstract]
|
| 8.
|
Lai, C. C.,
Wu, S. Y.,
Lin, H. H.,
and Dun, N. J.
(1997)
Brain Res.
748,
189-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Przywara, D. A.,
Guo, X.,
Angelilli, M. L.,
Wakade, T. D.,
and Wakade, A. R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10545-10550[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
May, V.,
Beaudet, M. M.,
Parsons, R. L.,
Hardwick, J. C.,
Gauthier, E. A.,
Durda, J. A.,
and Braas, K. M.
(1998)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
865,
164-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Deutsch, P. J.,
and Sun, Y.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
5108-5113[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Arimura, A.,
Somogyvari-Vigh, A.,
Weill, C.,
Fiore, R. C.,
Tatsuno, I.,
Bay, V.,
and Brenneman, D. E.
(1994)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
739,
228-243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Banks, W. A.,
Uchida, D.,
Arimura, A.,
Somogyvari-Vigh, A.,
and Shioda, S.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
805,
270-277[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Cavallaro, S.,
Copani, A.,
D'Agata, V.,
Musco, S.,
Petralia, S.,
Ventra, C.,
Stivala, F.,
Travali, S.,
and Canonico, P. L.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
50,
60-66[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Lu, N.,
and DiCicco-Bloom, E.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
3357-3362[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Villalba, M.,
Bockaert, J.,
and Journot, L.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
83-90[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Ishihara, T.,
Shigemoto, R.,
Mori, K.,
Takahashi, K.,
and Nagata, S.
(1992)
Neuron
8,
811-819[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Hashimoto, H.,
Ishihara, T.,
Shigemoto, R.,
Mori, K.,
and Nagata, S.
(1993)
Neuron
11,
333-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Hosoya, M.,
Onda, H.,
Ogi, K.,
Masuda, Y.,
Miyamoto, Y.,
Ohtaki, T.,
Okazaki, H.,
Arimura, A.,
and Fujino, M.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
194,
133-143[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Lutz, E. M.,
Sheward, W. J.,
West, K. M.,
Morrow, J. A.,
Fink, G.,
and Harmar, A. J.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
334,
3-8[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Morrow, J. A.,
Lutz, E. M.,
West, K. M.,
Fink, G.,
and Hamar, A. J.
(1993)
FEBS Lett.
329,
99-105[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Pisegna, J. R.,
and Wank, S. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6345-6349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Spengler, D.,
Waeber, C.,
Pantaloni, C.,
Holsboer, F.,
Bockaert, J.,
Seeburg, P. H.,
and Journot, L.
(1993)
Nature
365,
170-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Svoboda, M.,
Tastenoy, M.,
Ciccarelli, E.,
Stievenart, M.,
and Christophe, J.
(1993)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
195,
881-888[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Inagaki, N.,
Yoshida, H.,
Mizuta, M.,
Mizuno, N.,
Fujii, Y.,
Gonoi, T.,
Miyazaki, J.,
and Seino, S.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2679-2683[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Pantaloni, C.,
Brabet, P.,
Bilanges, B.,
Dumuis, A.,
Houssami, S.,
Spengler, D.,
Bockaert, J.,
and Journot, L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22146-22151[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Sundler, F.,
Ekblad, E.,
Hannibal, J.,
Moller, K.,
Zhang, Y. Z.,
Mulder, H.,
Elsas, T.,
Grunditz, T.,
Danielsen, N.,
Fahrenkrug, J.,
and Uddman, R.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
805,
410-426[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Moller, K.,
Reimer, M.,
Hannibal, J.,
Fahrenkrug, J.,
Sundler, F.,
and Kanje, M.
(1997)
Brain Res.
775,
156-165[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Beaudet, M. M.,
Braas, K. M.,
and May, V.
(1998)
J. Neurobiol.
36,
325-336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
May, V.,
and Braas, K. M.
(1995)
J. Neurochem.
65,
978-987[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Braas, K. M.,
and May, V.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
805,
204-216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
DiCicco-Bloom, E.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
805,
244-258[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Lu, N.,
Zhou, R.,
and DiCicco-Bloom, E.
(1998)
J. Neurosci. Res.
53,
651-662[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
May, V.,
Brandenburg, C. A.,
and Braas, K. M.
(1995)
J. Neurosci.
15,
4580-4591[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Braas, K. M.,
Brandenburg, C. A.,
and May, V.
(1994)
Endocrinology
134,
186-195[Abstract]
|
| 36.
|
Braas, K. M.,
Harakall, S. A.,
Ouafik,
L'H,
Eipper, B. A.,
and May, V.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
2778-2788[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Braas, K. M.,
Hendley, E. D.,
and May, V.
(1994)
Endocrinology
134,
196-205[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Brandenburg, C. A.,
May, V.,
and Braas, K. M.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
4045-4055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Kleitman, N.,
Wood, P. M.,
and Bunge, R. P.
(1991)
in
Culturing Nerve Cells
(Banker, G.
, and Goslin, K., eds)
, pp. 335-377, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
|
| 40.
|
Braas, K. M.,
May, V.,
Harakall, S. A.,
Hardwick, J. C.,
and Parsons, R. L.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
9766-9779[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Henion, P. D.,
and Landis, S. C.
(1990)
J. Neurosci.
10,
2886-2896[Abstract]
|
| 42.
|
Braas, K. M.,
Manning, D. C.,
Perry, D. C.,
and Snyder, S. H.
(1988)
Br. J. Pharmacol.
94,
3-5[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Rawlings, S. R.,
Piuz, I.,
Schlegel, W.,
Bockaert, J.,
and Journot, L.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
2088-2098[Abstract]
|
| 44.
|
Chatterjee, T. K.,
Liu, X.,
Davission, R. L.,
and Fisher, R. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12122-12131[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Nogi, H.,
Hashimoto, H.,
Hagihara, N.,
Shimada, S.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Matsuda, T.,
Tohyama, M.,
and Baba, A.
(1997)
Neurosci. Lett.
227,
37-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Sugita, S.,
Baxter, D. A.,
and Byrne, J. H.
(1997)
J. Neurosci.
17,
7237-7244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Thompson, A. K.,
Mostafapour, S. P.,
Denlinger, L. C.,
Bleasdale, J. E.,
and Fisher, S. K.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23856-23862[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Shi, W. X.,
and Bunney, B. S.
(1992)
J. Neurosci.
12,
2433-2438[Abstract]
|
| 49.
|
Zheng, L.,
Paik, W. Y.,
Cesnjaj, M.,
Balla, T.,
Tomic, M.,
Catt, K. J.,
and Stojilkovic, S. S.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
1079-1088[Abstract]
|
| 50.
|
Kodjo, M. K.,
Leboulenger, F.,
Conlon, J. M.,
and Vaudry, H.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
4535-4542[Abstract]
|
| 51.
|
Harmar, T.,
and Lutz, E.
(1994)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
15,
97-99[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Gottschall, P. E.,
Tatsuno, I.,
and Arimura, A.
(1994)
Brain Res.
637,
197-203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 53.
|
Gozes, I.,
and Brenneman, D. E.
(1996)
Mol. Neurosci.
7,
235-244
|
| 54.
|
Festoff, B. W.,
Nelson, P. G.,
and Brenneman, D. E.
(1996)
J. Neurobiol.
30,
255-266[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 55.
|
Tatsuno, I.,
Morio, H.,
Tanaka, T.,
Uchida, D.,
Hirai, A.,
Tamura, Y.,
and Saito, Y.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
805,
482-488[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Brenneman, D. E.,
Hill, J. M.,
Gozes, I.,
and Phillips, T. M.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
805,
280-287[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Brenneman, D. E.,
Phillips, T. M.,
Festoff, B. W.,
and Gozes, I.
(1997)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
814,
167-173[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 58.
|
Klimaschewski, L.,
Hauser, C.,
and Heym, C.
(1996)
Neuroreport
7,
2797-2801[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Moller, K.,
Reimer, M.,
Ekblad, E.,
Hannibal, J.,
Fahrenkrug, J.,
Kanje, M.,
and Sundler, F.
(1997)
Brain Res.
775,
166-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 60.
|
Milligan, G.
(1993)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
14,
239-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Cao, Y. J.,
Gimpl, G.,
and Fahrenholz, F.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
212,
673-680[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Couvineau, A.,
Gaudin, P.,
Maoret, J. J.,
Rouyer-Fessard, C.,
Nicole, P.,
and Laburthe, M.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
206,
246-252[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Gaudin, P.,
Couvineau, A.,
Maoret, J. J.,
Rouyer-Fessard, C.,
and Laburthe, M.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
211,
901-908[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 64.
|
Rawlings, S. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
101,
C5-C9[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 65.
|
Isobe, K.,
Nakai, T.,
and Takuwa, Y.
(1993)
Endocrinology
132,
1757-1765[Abstract]
|
| 66.
|
Graness, A.,
Adomeit, A.,
Ludwig, B.,
Muller, W. D.,
Kaufmann, R.,
and Liebmann, C.
(1997)
Biochem. J.
327,
147-154
|
| 67.
|
Zhang, J.,
Sato, M.,
Duzic, E.,
Kubalak, S. W.,
Lanier, S. M.,
and Webb, J. G.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
H971-H980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 68.
< |