|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27807-27814, September 24, 1999
From the We have constructed tetracycline-responsive
dhfr minigenes and transferred them to a Chinese hamster
ovary cell DHFR-deficient deletion mutant to obtained cells in which
dhfr transcription can be repressed by tetracycline
(tet-off). DHFR mRNA half-life measured after the repression of
transcription by tetracycline in these transfectants is about 1.5 h, which is significantly shorter than previously reported. In
addition, we observed that DHFR mRNA is less stable in
serum-starved cells than in exponentially growing cells. Given that the
dhfr gene contains multiple polyadenylation sites, we
analyzed the role of polyadenylation site usage on the stability of the
resultant mRNA molecules. We found that DHFR mRNA is more
stable when a strong polyadenylation site is used. Finally, we have
observed that the relative lengths of the poly(A) tails for the
different DHFR mRNA species correlated with their relative
stability in growing versus resting cells.
Dihydrofolate reductase
(dhfr)1 is a
housekeeping gene encoding an enzyme required for the de
novo biosynthesis of glycine, the purine ring, and thymidylate.
DHFR expression is regulated in the cell cycle at the level of
transcription (1-3), and there is evidence for post-transcriptional
regulation during growth phase transitions (4-6). It is clear that
regulated variations in mRNA stability can produce dramatic changes
in mRNA levels without modification in the rate of gene
transcription. For DHFR mRNA, the observed increase in
dhfr transcription during the transition from Go
to exponential growth is not sufficient to account for the increase of
the mRNA levels under the same conditions (7). For this reason, we
have examined the role of mRNA stability as a contributor to the
relatively low levels of DHFR mRNA seen in resting cells. Toward
this end, we have taken advantage of the tetracycline-responsive
promoter developed by Gossen and Bujard (8). The
tetracycline-responsive system allows for selective inhibition of
transcription of the gene under the control of the responsive promoter
without affecting the transcription machinery of the cell. Given that
the hamster dhfr gene contains multiple polyadenylation
sites (9) and that differential polyadenylation (pA) can affect the
cell growth regulation of DHFR mRNA (5), we have analyzed the role
of polyadenylation site usage in the stability of the resultant
mRNA molecules. Using tetracycline-responsive dhfr
minigenes, we have determined that DHFR mRNA half-life is significantly shorter than previously reported, that DHFR mRNA stability varies according to polyadenylation site usage, and that this
mRNA is less stable in serum-starved cells.
Cell Culture--
Conditions for the monolayer culture of CHO
cells have been previously described (10). CHO-K1, DG44 (10), and G7
cells (11) were grown in Ham's F-12 medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (Atlanta Biologicals) and were
maintained at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2-containing atmosphere.
For starvation experiments, 1000 cells were seeded in 35-mm diameter
dishes in Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 0.2% fetal calf serum
(Life Technologies, Inc.) and incubated for 7 days.
Plasmid Construction--
The starting construct, plasmid
pDCH1P11, was constructed by cloning the
SmaI-HindIII fragment from hamster minigene
pDCH2 (12), into the SmaI-HindIII sites of the
cloning vector pSP72 (Promega). pDCH1P11 contains approximately 400 bp
of the promoter region in the dhfr 5'-flank, the DHFR coding
sequence including intron 1 as a sole intron, and the first
polyadenylation site of the dhfr gene. To construct
dhfr minigenes under the control of a modulatable promoter,
we used the tetracycline-responsive system described by Gossen and
Bujard (8). In this system, a hybrid phage-VP16 transcriptional
activator (the tetracycline-responsive transactivator (tTA)), encoded
by pUHD15-1 activates transcription of the gene of interest under the
control of a chimeric promoter (provided by the vector pUHD10-3),
consisting of basal elements of the cytomegalovirus early promoter
preceded by operator sequences of the tetracycline resistance gene. In
the presence of tetracycline, tTA cannot bind DNA, and the
transcription of the subcloned gene is turned off (tet-off).
The following dhfr minigenes were constructed.
(a) pUD1S contained a 1626-bp
AvrII-HindIII fragment from pDCH1P11 cloned into the XbaI site of vector pUHD10-3. By cutting with
AvrII, which falls in the 5'-UTR of dhfr, the
major transcriptional start of the dhfr gene is excluded.
(b) pUD1 lacked the SV40 late polyadenylation sequence
contributed by pUHD10-3. pUD1 was constructed by digesting pUD1S with
SphI and NarI to remove the region containing the
SV40 polyadenylation sequence from the vector, and the protruding ends were blunted with T4 DNA polymerase prior to the ligation. The first
dhfr polyadenylation site (pA1) is retained in pUD1.
(c) pUDD1, containing the major transcriptional start site
from the hamster dhfr gene promoter. pUD1 was digested with
EcoRI to remove a 447-bp fragment extending from the
EcoRI site in the polycloning region of the vector to the
beginning of dhfr exon 2. A 509-bp fragment from
dhfr minigene pDCH1P11 was PCR-amplified using a 5' primer
of a modified sequence to produce an EcoRI site just upstream of the major transcriptional start of dhfr (5'
DEcoRI, 5'-CGGGCGAATTCAATTTCGCG-3') and a 3' primer from a
sequence in dhfr exon 2, located downstream of the
EcoRI site (3'DEx2, 5'-CACCACCAGTAAGAAACCTTCATG-3'). After
digestion of the PCR fragment with EcoRI, the 472-bp product was cloned between the EcoRI sites of pUD1. pUDD1 contains
the dhfr promoter region/transcriptional start site and the
first dhfr polyadenylation site (pA1). (d)
pUDD123 contained all three hamster dhfr polyadenylation
sites. pUDD1 was digested with BamHI and HindIII
to remove the sequence containing the first polyadenylation site from
dhfr. A 1.4-kilobase pair fragment containing the three polyadenylation sites from dhfr was PCR-amplified from
plasmid pMG2 as template (13) using Pwo thermostable
polymerase with proofreading activity. The 5' primer was a sequence
containing the BamHI site upstream of the first
polyadenylation site (pA1) (5'-GAACCTGGGATCCTGTGCAT-3'), and the 3'
primer was a modified sequence containing a HindIII site
downstream of the third dhfr polyadenylation site (pA3)
(5'-GGCTCTAAGGGTAAGCTTACTACTGTTG-3'). After digestion of the PCR
fragment with BamHI and HindIII, the digested
sequence was cloned between the BamHI and HindIII
sites of pUDD1.
Transfection--
Two micrograms of the tetracycline-controlled
transactivator (tTA) plasmid pUHD15-1 (8) were cotransfected with 0.4 µg of plasmid BPVNeo (14) into dhfr
Permanent transfectants of dhfr minigenes were obtained by
transfecting 0.3, 1, and 3 µg of each construct into DG44-tTA cells by the calcium phosphate method. DHFR selection was performed in Ham's
F-12 medium without hypoxanthine supplemented with 7% dialyzed calf
serum for 8 days. Several well isolated colonies were then picked using
cloning rings. For each construct, nine individual clones (three for
each amount of DNA used in the transfection) were analyzed by RT-PCR to
determine DHFR mRNA levels in the absence of tetracycline or after
24 h of treatment with a 1 µg/ml concentration of the
antibiotic. The transfectant clone of each construct that exhibited a
substantial tetracycline response and a high level of DHFR mRNA
expression was chosen for further studies.
mRNA Analysis by RT-PCR--
mRNA levels were determined
by quantitative RT-PCR using total cell lysates as the starting
material for the RT reaction. 5000 cells were plated in 35-mm diameter
dishes in Ham's F-12 medium; 15 h later, the cells were treated
with tetracycline (1 µg/ml) for different periods of time. After the
treatments, the cells were harvested simultaneously by trypsinization,
washed once with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and resuspended in
11.25 µl of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water. The samples were
heated at 80 °C for 5 min and chilled on ice, and the remaining components of the RT reaction were added. cDNA was synthesized in a
20-µl reaction mixture containing 125 ng of random hexamers (Promega), 10 mM dithiothreitol, 20 units of RNasin
(Promega), 0.5 mM dNTPs (Promega), 4 µl of 5× RT buffer,
and 200 units of Superscript RNase H
PCR was typically carried out as described (7) using 2 units of
Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) for each reaction and
[
PCR was performed for 22 cycles after 1-min denaturation at 94 °C;
each cycle consisted of denaturation at 92 °C for 30 s, primer
annealing at 59 °C for 75 s, and primer extension at 72 °C
for 110 s. Five µl of each PCR sample were electrophoresed in a
5% polyacrylamide gel. The gels were dried, and the radioactive bands
were quantified using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.,
Sunnyvale, CA).
Northern Blot Analysis--
Total RNA was extracted from the
different clones using the UltraspecTM RNA reagent
(Biotecx) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Twenty
µg of total RNA were run in 0.8% formaldehyde-agarose gels and
transferred to a Zeta-Probe GT blotting membrane (Bio-Rad) using 50 mM NaOH as transfer solution. The blot was hybridized with
a DNA probe spanning 859 bp from 199 bp upstream of the first polyadenylation site (pA1) to 162 bp downstream of the second polyadenylation site (pA2) of the hamster dhfr gene,
generated by PCR. The PCR product was gel-purified, and 25 ng were
32P-labeled using the Prime-a-Gene system (Promega). The
hybridization was performed in a solution containing 5× saline/sodium
phosphate/EDTA, 5× Denhardt's reagent, 50% formamide, 0.1% SDS, 5%
dextran sulfate, 100 µg of sonicated herring sperm DNA/ml, and 2 × 106 cpm/ml probe at 42 °C overnight. The blots were
washed once in 2× SSC plus 0.1% SDS and once in 1× SSC plus 0.1%
SDS at 65 °C for 30 min each and dried and exposed to x-ray film.
Poly(A) Length Analysis--
Poly(A) length analysis of the
different mRNA species was performed by RT-PCR following the method
of Sallés and Strickland (16) with modifications. Two µg of
total RNA from each clone were used in the RT reaction with 1 µg of
primer of an arbitrary sequence followed by oligo(dT)12.
The RNA and the primer were heated at 80 °C for 5 min, cooled to
room temperature (0.5 °C/min), and then placed at 4 °C. The
remaining components of the RT reaction were then added, and cDNA
was synthesized in a 20-µl reaction mixture containing 10 mM dithiothreitol, 20 units of RNasin (Promega), 0.5 mM dNTPs (Promega), 4 µl of 5× RT buffer, and 200 units
of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Life
Technologies, Inc.). The RT reaction was performed for 5 min at
4 °C, 5 min at room temperature, 5 min at 37 °C, and 45 min at
42 °C. Five µl of the RT reaction were then used in the PCR, which
was performed with a 5' primer upstream of either the pA1, pA2, or pA3
site of the dhfr gene and the arbitrary sequence of the RT
primer as 3' primer. PCR was carried out as described above for 30 cycles, and the PCR products were electrophoresed and visualized by
autoradiography. The length of the poly(A) tails was determined from
the length of the smear of the PCR products.
The primer used in the RT reaction was
5'-GCGAGCTCCGCGGCCGCGT12-3', and the different primers used
in the PCR reaction were as follows: 5'-TAGAGAGGGATAGTTAGGAAGATG-3'
upstream of dhfr pA1; 5'-CTCCTTAGAGATGGGAGCAG-3' upstream of
dhfr pA2 and SV40 pA; 5'-GCTGCTGTGAGCTTGGTGAGT-3' upstream
of dhfr pA3; and 5'-GCGAGCTCCGCGGCCGCG-3' as the reverse primer.
Establishment of DHFR Stable Transfectants Responsive to
Tetracycline--
To study the stability of DHFR mRNA, we
constructed several versions of dhfr minigenes under the
control of a tetracycline-responsive promoter, which is a chimeric
promoter consisting of several copies of tet operator
sequences from Escherichia coli and the minimal immediate
early promoter of human cytomegalovirus (8). The initial step was to
establish stable transfectants that produced the tTA in dhfr
Actinomycin D Stabilizes DHFR mRNA--
All of the
dhfr constructs contain the complete protein coding sequence
for DHFR interrupted by the 300-nt dhfr intron 1 as the only
intron; they differ at their 5' and/or their 3' ends. The first
construct transfected in DG44-tTA cells was pUD1S, which contains the
first of the three dhfr polyadenylation sites followed by an
SV40 late polyadenylation site. After selection for DHFR activity in
medium lacking hypoxanthine, eight individual clones were analyzed for
their responsiveness to tetracycline inhibition. All of the clones
analyzed were sensitive to tetracycline inhibition (Fig.
1A); clone A3-5 showed the
greatest reduction (70-fold) in DHFR mRNA levels and was selected
for further studies. The determination of mRNA levels was always
performed by RT-PCR directly from cell lysates immediately after each
treatment. That this determination is quantitative is shown in Fig.
1B. In this experiment, an increasing number of cells from
clone A3-5 were subjected to RT-PCR, and the DHFR mRNA levels were
determined by the ratio between the DHFR and APRT radioactive signals,
the APRT mRNA being used as an internal endogenous gene control.
The correlation coefficient between the number of cells plated and the
level of DHFR mRNA detected was 0.98.
We proceeded to determine the half-life of DHFR mRNA for clone A3-5
in exponentially growing cells. We performed time course experiments by
determining the remaining DHFR mRNA levels in cells treated with 1 µg/ml of tetracycline for different periods of time. After the
addition of tetracycline, DHFR mRNA decayed with exponential
kinetics over the next 6 h with a half-life of 124 min (Fig.
2). APRT mRNA levels, used as an
internal control in the RT-PCR, were not affected by the tetracycline
treatment. The half-life of DHFR mRNA from pUD1S was also estimated
from the time required to achieve a new steady-state level after
induction. The half-life of this process after a 2-h lag time was about
2 h in agreement with the decay rate following deinduction (data not shown).
The DHFR mRNA half-life in clone A3-5 represented a decay rate
about 4 times greater than that measured for the endogenous gene in CHO
UA21 cells in the presence of actinomycin D (17). We repeated these
measurements of the decay rate of endogenous DHFR mRNA in CHO cells
in the presence of actinomycin D using our RT-PCR methodology. The DHFR
mRNA half-life was 8.5 h (Fig. 3) in agreement with the previous
determination in CHO UA21 cells by Northern blot analysis. That
difference between the tetracycline and the actinomycin D experiments
could be due to the modifications in the 5'-UTR and 3'-UTR in the pUD1S
minigene with respect to the endogenous gene or to the method used to
inhibit transcription. Actinomycin D treatment has been reported to
stabilize specific mRNAs against normal degradation (18, 19). We
therefore measured the decay rate of the DHFR mRNA encoded by the
tetracycline-responsive minigene in the presence of actinomycin D. As
shown in Fig. 3, actinomycin D stabilized DHFR mRNA in clone A3-5,
yielding a half-life of over 11 h, a value 5-fold greater than the
half-life determined using tetracycline.
In the course of measuring mRNA decay rates in the presence of
actinomycin D, we noted that DHFR mRNA produced by a
dhfr minigene was less stable than that produced by the
endogenous gene (Fig. 3). G-7 cells are CHO transfectants carrying the
dhfr minigene pDCH1P (11), which is driven by the
dhfr promoter but contains only the first of the three
dhfr polyadenylation sites (9). The half-life of DHFR
mRNA in G-7 cells using actinomycin D was 2.6 h (Fig. 3)
versus 8.5 for the endogenous gene in CHO cells. This result
suggested that the different stability in actinomycin D of the
endogenous DHFR mRNA and the mRNA in G-7 cells could reside in
the different 3' ends of the mRNA molecules. The greater DHFR
mRNA half-life determined for clone A3-5 using actinomycin D could
be due to the presence of the SV40 polyadenylation signal included as
part of the original vector.
An SV40 Polyadenylation Site Stabilizes DHFR mRNA--
To test
the possibility that differences in polyadenylation site usage could be
involved in DHFR mRNA stability, we eliminated the sequence that
includes the SV40 polyadenylation site in pUD1S. We transfected this
new construct, pUD1, that maintained only the first polyadenylation
site from the dhfr gene, into the DG44-tTA pool. Following
the same methodology as with clone A3-5, clone B1-4 was chosen, since
it gave the highest response to tetracycline inhibition of
dhfr gene expression (100-fold). Time course experiments after the addition of tetracycline were performed to determine DHFR
mRNA half-life in this clone. As shown in Fig.
4, clone B1-4 exhibited a DHFR mRNA
half-life of 50 min, compared with 124 min when the SV40
polyadenylation site was present. Thus, deletion of the SV40
polyadenylation site caused a decrease by half in stability of DHFR
mRNA.
The transcriptional start of the dhfr gene was absent in
these tetracycline-responsive minigenes (clones A3-5 and B1-4). With the idea that sequences in the 5'-UTR could affect mRNA stability, we constructed a third minigene that contained the major
transcriptional start from the hamster dhfr gene in addition
to the first polyadenylation site. This minigene, pUDD1, was
transfected into the DG44-tTA pool, and clone C3-1, with the highest
response to tetracycline inhibition (54-fold), was chosen to determine
DHFR mRNA stability. DHFR mRNA half-life was 39 min in
clone C3-1, close to the value of 50 min produced by pUD1 in clone B1-4
(data not shown). Thus, DHFR mRNA was not stabilized by inclusion
of 5'-UTR sequences.
dhfr Polyadenylation Sites 2 and 3 Stabilize the mRNA--
The
endogenous CHO dhfr gene contains three polyadenylation
sites (9) that could be affecting the stability of the resulting mRNA molecules. For this reason, we constructed a fourth minigene, pUDD123, that contains the sequence corresponding to the three polyadenylation sites (pA1, pA2, and pA3) from the hamster
dhfr gene (as well as the dhfr 5'-UTR). This new
construct was transfected into the DG44-tTA pool, and clone D3-3, with
a 37-fold tetracycline deinduction, was chosen to determine DHFR
mRNA stability. As shown in Fig. 5,
the DHFR mRNA half-life for this clone was 94 min. The restoration
of the three polyadenylation sites from the endogenous dhfr
gene increased DHFR mRNA half-life 2-fold with respect to the
transfectants containing only the first dhfr polyadenylation sites (39- and 50-min half-lives).
Polyadenylation Site Usage in the Different Clones--
To
determine the different polyadenylated DHFR mRNAs species generated
by each tetracycline-responsive construct, we performed Northern blot
analysis of total RNA from the selected clones. As a size reference, we
used total RNA from MK42, an amplified CHO cell line that carries
multiple copies of the endogenous dhfr gene (20) and
produces the three species of DHFR mRNA molecules corresponding to
the three different polyadenylation sites present (9, 13).
As shown in Fig. 6, DHFR mRNA
molecules in clone A3-5 used the SV40 polyadenylation site provided by
the vector. There was no evidence of the use of dhfr pA1,
which lies upstream of the SV40 site in pUD1S (see diagram
in Fig. 2). When the SV40 site was deleted, which is the case for
clones B1-4 and C3-1, the DHFR mRNA produced corresponded to the
use of pA1 from the dhfr gene still present in these
constructs. In clone D3-3, which included all three dhfr
polyadenylation sites, the detected mRNA species corresponded to
those present in MK42 cells. Thus, the mRNA molecules for each
minigene corresponded to the sizes expected from the known
polyadenylation sites present in the constructs. These results suggested that the observed differences in DHFR mRNA stability were
probably due to the different polyadenylation sites used.
Cell Growth Regulation of DHFR mRNA Stability--
To
determine whether DHFR mRNA stability was affected by the cell
growth phase, we analyzed DHFR mRNA half-life for the different constructs in serum-starved cells. Cells from the different clones were
maintained in Ham's F-12 medium supplemented with 0.2% fetal calf
serum for 7 days; resting cells produced in this way maintained their
viability and resume growth synchronously upon serum addition (7). The
resting cells were then treated with tetracycline for different periods
of time to determine the mRNA half-life (Fig. 7). For clone A3-5
(pUD1S, containing pA1 and the SV40 site), the inhibition of DHFR
transcription by tetracycline in starved cells was delayed for a period
of 2 h (Fig. 7A). DHFR
mRNA half-life was determined in the region of the plot
corresponding to the exponential decay, obtaining a value of 60 min.
This represents a 2-fold reduction in DHFR mRNA half-life as
compared with exponentially growing cells (124-min half-life). For
clones B1-4 and C3-1 (containing pA1 only), the DHFR mRNA
half-lives in starved cells were 50 min and 37 min, respectively (Fig.
8, B and C), not
different from the DHFR mRNA half-life in exponentially growing
cells (half-lives of 50 min and 39 min, respectively). In starved cells
of clone D3-3 (containing pA1, pA2, and pA3), the half-life was 65 min (Fig. 7D) versus 94 min in exponentially growing
cells. These results suggested that the presence of a strong
polyadenylation site, such as the SV40 polyadenylation site or the
second and/or third polyadenylation sites from the dhfr gene
conferred cell growth regulation on DHFR mRNA.
Poly(A) Length of DHFR mRNA in Exponentially Growing and
Starved Cells--
Deadenylation of mRNA often precedes
degradation (21, 22); thus, we might expect to see a correlation
between the average length of the poly(A) tail and the mRNA
half-life. To determine the poly(A) length in DHFR mRNA, a method
based on RT-PCR was used (16). The RT reaction was performed using a
primer with two parts: a 3' oligo(dT) sequence that can initiate
polymerization along the length of the poly(A) tail and a 5' arbitrary
sequence to be used for subsequent PCR. The PCR was carried out with a 5' primer specific for DHFR and a 3' primer corresponding to the arbitrary sequence of the RT primer. Under these conditions, using different 5' primers upstream of the different polyadenylation sites,
the length of the smear of the amplified products indicates the length
of the poly(A) tail in each case. We analyzed the poly(A) length for
polyadenylation sites in RNA molecules from exponentially growing cells
and starved cells. For the construct pUD1S (clone A3-5), the poly(A)
tail at the SV40 polyadenylation site was 120 nt in exponentially
growing cells and was reduced to 40 nt in starved cells (Fig.
8B). Using construct pUDD123 (clone D3-3), the poly(A)2 tail
was 60 nt in exponentially growing cells and 15 nt in starved cells
(Fig. 8B); and the poly(A)3 tail was 145 nt in exponentially
growing cells and 35 nt in starved cells (Fig. 8C). In the
case of constructs pUD1 and pUDD1 (clones B1-4 and C3-1), containing
only pA1, the poly(A) tails were 65 and 60 nt, respectively, in
exponentially growing cells, and they remained practically unchanged in
starved cells (Fig. 8A). Thus, molecules polyadenylated at
dhfr sites 2 and 3 and the SV40 site are longer in
exponentially growing cells compared with starved cells; the same
molecules are also more stable in exponentially growing cells (Figs. 2
and 6 versus Fig. 7). In contrast, molecules polyadenylated at dhfr site 1 were of the same length in exponentially
growing cells and starved cells, and their degradation rates were the same in these two conditions (Figs. 4, 5, and 7).
Our experimental approach to the measurement of RNA stability made
use of some methodologies that have not yet been widely applied in the
measurement of mRNA stability and that confer some advantages.
First, we used tetracycline-responsive minigenes, such that
transcription of the target gene was specifically inhibited upon the
addition of tetracycline to the transfectant cells. This method has an
advantage over the use of treatments that stop all cellular
transcription, since it has been known for some time that general
transcriptional inhibitors such as actinomycin D can affect mRNA
stability (Refs. 18 and 19 and references therein). Indeed, we show
here that actinomycin D treatment extends the half-life of DHFR
mRNA more than 5-fold (Fig. 3). Second, our quantitative RT-PCR
assay was performed directly on cell lysates upon completion of each
culture incubation. This elimination of an RNA extraction step made it
simpler to make multiple measurements and probably reduced the
variability associated with differential extraction efficiency. The
reproducibility of this assay is indicated not only in the
reconstruction experiment shown in Fig. 1 but also in the near
constancy of the control APRT mRNA levels seen in Figs. 2-6.
Finally, we measured the stability of these transgene transcripts in
permanent transfectants rather than by transient transfection. In the
latter case, there is the possibility that tens of thousands of gene
copies per cell will produce enough transcripts to overload the RNA
degradation machinery of a cell. This danger is avoided in the cloned
permanent transfectants we used, which represent homogeneous
populations carrying modest numbers of gene copies.
One conclusion reached here was that DHFR mRNA is more short lived
than previously thought, with a half-life of about 1.5 h in
exponentially growing cells. Previous experiments performed using
actinomycin D had yielded values from 8 to 16 h depending on the
cell line used (17, 24). As mentioned above, these results can be
ascribed to mRNA stabilization by the treatment. Other experiments
found half-lives of 6-16 h using in vivo pulse-chase radioactive labeling in dhfr-amplified cells (6, 23, 24). The long labeling times used in most of these experiments may have
precluded the detection of molecules with half-lives of 1 h.
Alternatively, differences in the experimental systems may underlie the
apparent discrepancy.
A second conclusion from this work is that DHFR mRNA is less stable
in resting cells than in growing cells and that this growth-related difference is dependent on the polyadenylation site used. Kaufman and
Sharp (5) have previously reported that the addition of an SV40 late
polyadenylation site to a dhfr minigene conferred cell
growth regulation on dhfr gene expression in transfected mouse cells, as measured by DHFR protein expression. The relatively stronger SV40 site and dhfr polyadenylation site 2 (Fig. 6)
conferred stability in growing cells, while the relatively weaker
polyadenylation site 1 did not. Usually, the 3' end of the genes has
been linked to mRNA turnover, i.e. RNA being
destabilized by the presence of AU-rich elements in this region (26).
The 1500-nt DHFR 3'-UTR contains 19 regions of 10 nt or more with at
least a 90% AU content and two canonical AUUUA sequences. However,
since the mRNA polyadenylated at site 1 is the least stable
species, it appears that most of the 3'-UTR is stabilizing rather than
destabilizing DHFR mRNA. The additional 3'-UTR sequence could be
acting by binding sequence-specific stabilizing factors (27) or by
providing stable secondary structures.
It is interesting to note that the introduction of a strong
polyadenylation site downstream of an apparently weak one results in
the much less frequent use of the weak upstream site (Fig. 6).
Apparently, once a downstream site is used an upstream site can no
longer be used. This situation is consistent with a coupling between
transcription and polyadenylation, an idea supported by the recent
finding that RNA polymerase II is required for polyadenylation (28-30). This interpretation implies that when a single weak site is
the only one present, the many transcripts that bypass it never become
polyadenylated and are presumably rapidly degraded.
Northern blot analysis of transfectant cells carrying a dhfr
minigene with all three of the natural polyadenylation sites (pUDD123)
showed that polyadenylation site 2 was used predominantly. In contrast,
in transcripts of the endogenous dhfr gene, site 3 is most
often used, and site 2 is least often used. Transfection per
se does not explain this discrepancy, since transfectants carrying
a complete 25-kilobase pair genomic version of the dhfr gene
faithfully reproduced the polyadenylation pattern of the endogenous
gene (12). Thus, the difference is likely to reside in the structure of
the minigene compared with the genomic gene, namely the lack of introns
2-5 in the minigene. Nesic et al. (31) found that sequences
within the last intron of the human triosephosphate isomerase gene were
necessary for efficient 3' end formation at the unique polyadenylation
site in that transcript. In the case of the dhfr minigene,
many intron sequences are absent; the sole remaining intron 1 may not
contain such activating sequences, or they may be too far upstream
(e.g. the only 3' splice site has four exons interposed).
The dhfr case is more complicated, since there are multiple
polyadenylation sites that apparently respond differently to the
absence of intron sequences in the minigene. From the intensity of the
signals in the Northern blots and the RT-PCR analyses, it appears that
dhfr polyadenylation site 2 and the SV40 polyadenylation
site are used quite efficiently despite the lack of introns 2-5.
Poly(A) length can be a determinant of mRNA stability; a shortening
of the poly(A) tail is often the first step in mRNA degradation for
eukaryotic mRNAs (Ref. 25 and references therein). Contrary cases
have also been reported: mRNA degradation without concomitant poly(A) shortening (32) and mRNA stability despite extensive deadenylation (33). We found that the relative lengths of the poly(A)
tails for the different DHFR mRNA species correlated with their
relative stability in growing versus resting cells.
Poly(A) tail shortening of the DHFR mRNA occurred in resting cells
in dhfr transcripts polyadenylated at the SV40 site or at
dhfr polyadenylation sites 2 and 3. Transcripts in these
cells also have lower stability in this serum-starved condition. On the
other hand, for constructs that contain the first dhfr site as the only polyadenylation site, the short poly(A) length remains unchanged despite the cell growth phase, and the low DHFR mRNA stability is similarly unaffected by the growth conditions. These results suggest that polyadenylation site usage plays a role in the
stability and regulation of the resultant DHFR mRNA molecules.
Serum-starved cells exhibit a low rate of dhfr transcription
compared with growing cells, but this rate is not low enough to account
for the even lower relative steady-state levels of DHFR mRNA (7).
The rather rapid turnover of DHFR mRNA in resting cells revealed
here, i.e. a half-life of approximately 60 min, helps
explain this difference. Upon growth stimulation, there is an increase
in both the transcription rate of the gene and the stability of the
mRNA, resulting in an increase in the mRNA levels for DHFR as
cells prepare for ensuing DNA synthesis.
We thank Dr. H. Bujard for providing the
pUDH15-1 and pUDH10-3 plasmids.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM-22529 (to L. A. C.), Grant SAF99-0120 from the
Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Technologia, and Grant
SGR1998-33 from the Commissionat per Universitats i Recerca (to
C. J. C.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the Spanish
Ministry of Education. Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, Div. IV,
School of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.
The abbreviations used are:
dhfr and
DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
tet, tetracycline;
pA, polyadenylation site;
RT, reverse
transcriptase;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
APRT, adenine
phosphoribosyl transferase;
UTR, untranslated region;
bp, base pair(s);
nt, nucleotide(s).
Effect of Differential Polyadenylation and Cell Growth Phase on
Dihydrofolate Reductase mRNA Stability*
§,
Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia
University, New York, New York 10027 and the ¶ Department of
Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Barcelona,
08028 Barcelona, Spain
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
CHO
DG44 cells (10) by the calcium phosphate method (15) using calf thymus
DNA (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as carrier. After 14 days of selection
for G418 resistance (400 µg of the active compound per ml of medium;
Life Technologies, Inc.), the surviving colonies were pooled and used
as recipient cells (DG44-tTA) for transfection with the
tetracycline-responsive dhfr minigenes.
reverse
transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). The reaction mixture was
incubated at 37 °C for 60 min. Five µl of the cDNA mixture
were used directly for PCR amplification.
-32P]dATP to label the PCR product. The primers used
were as follows: 5'-AAGAACGGAGACCTTCCCT-3' (5'DEx1) in exon 1 or 5'-
CGCCAAACTTGGGGGAAGCA-3' (Operon I) in the 5'-UTR in combination with
5'- AGTATCTGAAGTTTAAATAT-3' (3'DEx6PA) in exon 6 for DHFR mRNA and
5'-GCATGGCGGCAAGATCGACT-3' (A5'Ex2) in exon 2 and 5'-
TCACACACTCCACCACCTCA-3' (A3'Ex5A) in exon 5 for APRT mRNA, used as
an internal control.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
CHO DG44 cells. After transfection of DG44 cells
with plasmid pUHD15-1, encoding tTA, selection with G418 was applied,
and the surviving colonies were pooled. This pool (DG44-tTA) was the
recipient in transfections with tetracycline-modulatable dhfr
minigenes. In the absence of tetracycline, the hybrid transactivator
will specifically stimulate transcription of the promoters containing tet operator sequences. In the presence of the antibiotic,
tTA will be unable to bind to the promoter sequences, disabling the transcription of the gene under the control of this promoter. Transfectants that received the tetracycline-responsive dhfr
minigenes were selected for DHFR activity in medium lacking
hypoxanthine as well as tetracycline and subsequently individual clones
(usually nine) were culled. To test for responsiveness to tetracycline inhibition, DHFR mRNA levels in the individual clones were analyzed after growth in the absence or in the presence of 1 µg/ml
tetracycline for 24 h. This analysis was performed by quantitative
RT-PCR using cell lysates as the starting material. In all cases, the
clone showing the highest effectiveness of tetracycline regulation of dhfr gene expression was chosen for the determination of
DHFR mRNA half-life in exponentially growing and serum-starved cells.

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Responsiveness to tetracycline inhibition and
quantitation of DHFR mRNA by RT-PCR. A, effect of
tetracycline inhibition on DHFR mRNA levels in individual clones
transfected with pUD1S. Eight clones selected upon transfection with
three different amounts (0.3, 1, and 3 µg) of pUD1S DNA were analyzed
for their responsiveness to tetracycline inhibition. Each clone was
subjected to 24 h of tetracycline inhibition as described under
"Materials and Methods." As an internal control of the RT-PCRs,
APRT mRNA was analyzed along with DHFR mRNA in the same
reaction tube. After gel electrophoresis, the radioactive bands
corresponding to the PCR products were quantified by PhosphorImager
analysis. For each clone analyzed, the DHFR mRNA levels either in
the absence (left bars of each pair) or in the
presence of tetracycline (right bars) were
plotted. Results are expressed as the percentage of the highest DHFR
mRNA level found in the absence of tetracycline, corresponding to
clone A3-1. B, quantitation of DHFR mRNA by RT-PCR. The
indicated numbers of A3-5 cells (dhfr+) were
mixed with DG44 cells (dhfr
) to reach a
constant number of 10,000 cells that were plated in 35-mm diameter
dishes. After 15 h, cells were harvested by trypsinization, and
the cells lysates were subjected to RT-PCR. After gel electrophoresis,
the radioactive bands corresponding to the PCR products were quantified
by PhosphorImager analysis. The values corresponding to the DHFR bands
were divided by those for the APRT bands. These ratios were plotted
versus the number of A3-5 cells plated. A linear relationship
(r = 0.98) was obtained.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Stability of DHFR mRNA encoded by pUD1S
in exponentially growing A3-5 cells. A3-5 cells (5000) were plated
in 35-mm diameter dishes; after overnight incubation, the cultures were
treated with tetracycline (1 µg/ml) for the indicated times. Cells
were then harvested by trypsinization and lysed by incubation at
80 °C. The cell lysates were subjected to RT-PCR, and the PCR
products were separated by gel electrophoresis. The radioactive bands
were quantified by PhosphorImager analysis, and the DHFR values were
normalized using the signal from endogenous APRT mRNA. The
structure of the construct used (pUD1S) is shown at the top.
The quantification of the results is plotted in the lower panel. Results are expressed as the percentage of DHFR
mRNA remaining in relation to the control in the absence of
tetracycline. The DHFR mRNA half-life was calculated from the
exponential curve fit calculated with Cricket Graph III.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Determination of DHFR mRNA stability
using actinomycin D. Inocula of 5000 cells of A3-5
(open circles), CHO-K1 (filled circles), and G-7 (open squares) cells
were plated in 35-mm diameter dishes and treated after overnight
incubation with actinomycin D (5 µg/ml) to stop transcription for the
indicated times. RT-PCR was performed to determine DHFR mRNA levels
using cells lysates as the starting material as described under
"Materials and Methods." The radioactive PCR products were
quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. The signals from APRT mRNA,
which is relatively stable under these conditions (16-h half-life; Ref.
19) were used to normalize DHFR mRNA values. DHFR mRNA
half-lives were calculated as in Fig. 2.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Stability of DHFR mRNA encoded by pUD1 in
clone B1-4. DHFR mRNA levels after tetracycline addition were
determined in exponentially growing cells by RT-PCR as described under
"Materials and Methods." The structure of the pUD1 minigene is
shown at the top. Quantification was performed by
PhosphorImager analysis, and the results are plotted in the
lower panel. Other conditions are as in Fig.
2.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Stability of DHFR mRNA encoded by pUDD123
in clone D3-3. DHFR mRNA levels after the tetracycline
addition were determined in exponentially growing cells by RT-PCR as
described under "Materials and Methods." The structure of the
pUDD123 minigene is shown at the top. Other conditions are
as in Fig. 2.

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Northern blot analysis of RNA from cells
transfected with the different tetracycline-responsive dhfr minigenes. 20 µg of total RNA from the different
tetracycline-responsive clones and from MK42 cells bearing amplified
copies of the endogenous dhfr gene were electrophoresed in
formaldehyde-agarose gels and subjected to Northern blot analysis as
described under "Materials and Methods." The probe corresponded to
an 859-bp sequence of the hamster dhfr gene spanning the
region from upstream of the first polyadenylation site (pA1) to
downstream of the second polyadenylation site (pA2). The positions of
the different DHFR mRNA species are indicated by arrows.
Lane A, clone A3-5; lane B,
clone B1-4; lane C, clone C3-1; lane D, clone D3-3; lane E, amplified cell line
MK42.

View larger version (8K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Stability of DHFR mRNA in serum-starved
cells. Inocula of 1000 cells of the four transfectant clones were
plated in 35-mm diameter dishes in F-12 medium supplemented with 0.2%
fetal calf serum for 7 days. The cells were then treated with
tetracycline (1 µg/ml) for the indicated times. After the
tetracycline incubation, cells were harvested by trypsinization and
lysed, and DHFR mRNA levels were determined by RT-PCR, as described
under "Materials and Methods." A, clone A3-5;
B, clone B1-4; C, clone C3-1; D, clone
D3-3. The PCR products were quantified by PhosphorImager analysis, and
the DHFR values were normalized using the APRT signal. The half-life
values were calculated as in Fig. 2.

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Poly(A) length of DHFR mRNA in
exponentially growing versus starved cells.
A, 2 µg of total RNA from clones B1-4 and C3-1,
corresponding to constructs pUD1 and pUDD1, respectively, either from
exponentially growing cells (E) or from starved cells
(S), were subjected to RT-PCR using an oligo(dT)-containing
RT primer as described under "Materials and Methods." The PCR was
performed with a 5' primer upstream of the first dhfr
polyadenylation site (pA1). The amplified products were visualized by
autoradiography after gel electrophoresis. The length of the poly(A)
tails was determined from the length of the smears, as indicated by
vertical lines. The bottom of the
smear is indicated by an arrow. Lane MK42, poly(A) tail length for exponentially growing MK42
cells. Lane M, 32P-end-labeled
molecular weight markers
X174/HinfI. B, 2 µg
of total RNA from clones A3-5 and D3-3, corresponding to constructs
pUD1S and pUDD123, respectively, either from exponentially growing
cells (E) or from starved cells (S), were
subjected to RT-PCR using a 5' primer upstream of the second
dhfr polyadenylation site (pA2). C, 2 µg of
total RNA from clone D3-3, corresponding to construct pUDD123, either
from exponentially growing cells (E) or from starved cells
(S), were subjected to RT-PCR using a 5' primer upstream of
the third dhfr polyadenylation site (pA3).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biological Sciences, Fairchild Life Sciences Center, Columbia
University, New York, NY 10027. Tel.: 212-854-4645; Fax: 212-531-0425;
E-mail: lac2@columbia.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Santiago, C.,
Collins, M.,
and Johnson, L. F.
(1984)
J. Cell. Physiol.
118,
79-86[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Farnham, P. J.,
and Schimke, R. T.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
7675-7680 3.
Farnham, P. J.,
and Schimke, R. T.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
365-371 4.
Leys, E. J.,
and Kellems, R. E.
(1981)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
1,
961-971 5.
Kaufman, R. J.,
and Sharp, P. A.
(1983)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
3,
1598-1608 6.
Leys, E. J.,
Crouse, G. F.,
and Kellems, R. E.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
99,
180-187 7.
Noé, V.,
Chen, C.,
Alemany, C.,
Nicolás, M.,
Caragol, I.,
Chasin, L. A.,
and Ciudad, C. J.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
249,
13-20[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Gossen, M.,
and Bujard, H.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5547-5551 9.
Carothers, A. M.,
Urlaub, G.,
Ellis, N.,
and Chasin, L. A.
(1983)
Nucleic Acids Res.
11,
1997-2012 10.
Urlaub, G.,
Mitchell, P. J.,
Kas, E.,
Funanage, V. L.,
Myoda, T. T.,
and Hamlin, J. L.
(1986)
Somat. Cell Mol. Genet.
12,
555-566[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Ciudad, C. J.,
Urlaub, G.,
and Chasin, L. A.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
16274-16282 12.
Venolia, L.,
Urlaub, G.,
and Chasin, L. A.
(1987)
Somat. Cell Genet.
13,
491-504
13.
Mitchell, P. J.,
Carothers, A. D.,
Han, J. H.,
Harding, J. D.,
Kas, E.,
Venolia, L.,
and Chasin, L. A.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
425-440 14.
Lusky, M.,
and Botchan, M. R.
(1984)
Cell
36,
391-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Wigler, M.,
Pellicer, A.,
Silverstein, S.,
Axel, R.,
Urlaub, G.,
and Chasin, L. A.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
1373-1376 16.
Sallés, F. J.,
and Strickland, S.
(1995)
PCR Methods Appl.
4,
317-321[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Urlaub, G.,
Mitchell, P. J.,
Ciudad, C. J.,
and Chasin, L. A.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
2868-2880 18.
Chen, C-Y. A.,
Xu, N.,
and Shyu, A-B.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
5777-5788[Abstract]
19.
Kessler, O.,
and Chasin, L. A.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4426-4435[Abstract]
20.
Noé, V.,
Alemany, C.,
and Ciudad, C. J.
(1995)
Anal. Biochem.
224,
600-603[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Shyu, A. B.,
Belasco, J. G.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1991)
Genes Dev.
5,
221-231 22.
Decker, C. J.,
and Parker, R.
(1994)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
19,
336-340[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Hendrickson, S. L.,
Wu, J-S. R.,
and Johnson, L. F.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
5140-5144 24.
Yang, H.,
Hussain, A.,
and Melera, P. W.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
163,
185-191[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Ross, J.
(1995)
Microbiological Rev.
59,
423-450 26.
Chen, C.-Y. A.,
and Shyu, A-B.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
465-470[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Fan, X. C.,
and Steitz, J. A.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
3448-3460[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Hirose, Y.,
and Manley, J. L.
(1998)
Nature
395,
93-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
McCracken, S.,
Fong, N.,
Yankulov, K.,
Ballantyne, S.,
Pan, G.,
Greenblatt, J.,
Patterson, S. D.,
Wickens, M.,
and Bentley, D. L.
(1997)
Nature
385,
357-361[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Dantonel, J. C.,
Murthy, K. G.,
Manley, J. L.,
and Tora, L.
(1997)
Nature
389,
399-402[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Nesic, D.,
Zhang, J.,
and Maquat, L. E.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
488-496[Abstract]
32.
Xu, N.,
Chen, C.-Y. A.,
and Shyu, A-B.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4611-4621[Abstract]
33.
Voeltz, G. K.,
and Steitz, J. A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7537-7545
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Seal, R. Temperley, J. Wilusz, R. N. Lightowlers, and Z. M. A. Chrzanowska-Lightowlers Serum-deprivation stimulates cap-binding by PARN at the expense of eIF4E, consistent with the observed decrease in mRNA stability Nucleic Acids Res., January 14, 2005; 33(1): 376 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang, S. Ringquist, A. H. Cho, G. Rondeau, and J. Welsh High-throughput polyribosome fractionation Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2004; 32(10): e79 - e79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Noe, S. MacKenzie, and C. J. Ciudad An Intron Is Required for Dihydrofolate Reductase Protein Stability J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2003; 278(40): 38292 - 38300. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Liu, A. Gucwa, M. L. Stover, E. Buck, A. Lichtler, and D. Rowe Analysis of inhibitory action of modified U1 snRNAs on target gene expression: discrimination of two RNA targets differing by a 1 bp mismatch Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2002; 30(11): 2329 - 2339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Chang, S. Illenye, and N. H. Heintz Cooperation of E2F-p130 and Sp1-pRb Complexes in Repression of the Chinese Hamster dhfr Gene Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2001; 21(4): 1121 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sun and L. A. Chasin Multiple Splicing Defects in an Intronic False Exon Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6414 - 6425. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. Detich, S. Ramchandani, and M. Szyf A Conserved 3'-Untranslated Element Mediates Growth Regulation of DNA Methyltransferase 1 and Inhibits Its Transforming Activity J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 24881 - 24890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||