![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27956-27962, September 24, 1999
From the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Children's Hospital and
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical
School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
The nonreceptor tyrosine kinase c-Abl is tightly
regulated in vivo, but the mechanisms that normally repress
its activity are not well understood. We find that a construct encoding
the first two Src homology 3 (SH3) domains of the Src homology 2/SH3 adaptor protein Nck can activate c-Abl in human 293T cells. A myristoylated Nck SH3 domain construct, which is expected to localize to membranes, potently activated Abl when expressed at low levels. An
unmyristoylated Nck SH3 domain construct, which localizes to the
cytosol and nucleus, also activated Abl but only at high levels of
expression. Activation by both myristoylated and unmyristoylated Nck
constructs required the C terminus of Abl; a C-terminally truncated
form of Abl was not activated, although this construct could still be
activated by deletion of its SH3 domain. Activation did not require the
major binding sites in the Abl C terminus for Nck SH3 domains, however,
suggesting that the mechanism of activation does not require direct
binding to the C terminus. Activation of c-Abl by Nck SH3 domains
provides a robust experimental system for analyzing the mechanisms that
normally repress Abl activity and how that normal regulation can be perturbed.
The nonreceptor tyrosine kinase c-Abl has been extensively
studied, yet its regulation and mechanism of activation are poorly understood. Originally identified as the transforming gene of Abelson
murine leukemia virus (1), Abl has also been implicated in human
leukemia via a specific chromosomal translocation that generates a
fusion protein containing c-Abl and N-terminal sequences derived from a
second locus, Bcr (2, 3). Overexpressed c-Abl is catalytically
inactive, nontransforming, localized predominantly in the nucleus, and
lacks detectable tyrosine phosphorylation; on the contrary, various
mutant forms of Abl have increased kinase activity, can transform
fibroblasts and hematopoietic cells, are highly
tyrosine-phosphorylated, and are localized predominantly in the cytosol
and on membranes (for review see Ref. 4). This dramatic difference in
biological activity suggests that c-Abl is tightly regulated in
vivo.
The nonreceptor tyrosine kinases whose regulation is best understood
are the members of the Src family. Src and its relatives are regulated
by a C-terminal tyrosine residue that, when phosphorylated, can bind in
cis to the SH21 domain of the
kinase, effectively locking it in an inactive form (for review see Ref.
5). This inactive or "closed" conformation is stabilized by
interaction of the SH3 domain of Src with a linker region between its
SH2 and kinase domains (6, 7). When the regulatory tyrosine is
dephosphorylated, the closed conformation is unstable, the kinase
domain is unleashed, and Src exhibits full kinase activity. Binding of
a high-affinity ligand to the Src SH3 domain can also destabilize the
closed conformation by displacing the intramolecular SH3-linker
interaction (8).
Because c-Abl closely resembles c-Src in domain structure (with the
exception of the long C-terminal extension that defines the Abl family
of kinases) it is reasonable to suppose that it is regulated in a
similar fashion. However, several pieces of evidence suggest that this
is not the case. Under most conditions c-Abl is not detectably
phosphorylated on tyrosine, inconsistent with an intramolecular
SH2-phosphotyrosine interaction (9-11). Instead, the SH3 domain of
c-Abl appears to play a more critical role in regulation, because
mutations in the SH3 domain potently activate the transforming activity
of c-Abl (11-13). A recent study (14) suggests that the negative
regulation of Abl might be dominated by an intramolecular SH3-linker
interaction similar to that seen in the Src structure. However,
purified WT c-Abl kinase prepared from baculovirus has identical
specific activity to an SH3-deleted, activated Abl mutant, inconsistent
with intramolecular interactions being entirely responsible for
negative regulation (15).2 It
has been proposed that Abl is regulated at least in part by a
titratable SH3-binding cellular inhibitor (9), and several candidate
inhibitors have been identified (16-19).
The activity of endogenous c-Abl has been shown to be regulated by
several different conditions and factors, most notably DNA damage
(20-23), integrin-mediated adhesion (24, 25), and the cell cycle (26,
27). Although these studies have shed some light on the potential
in vivo role of c-Abl, the low expression level of
endogenous Abl and modest levels of activation (typically 2-4-fold)
have made it difficult to study the mechanism of regulation. Toward
this end, a robust system in which the activation of overexpressed c-Abl and its mutants can be experimentally manipulated would be
extremely useful.
Among the large number of proteins and factors that have been shown to
interact with c-Abl are the SH2/SH3 adaptor proteins Grb2, Crk, and
Nck, which bind via their SH3 domains to proline-rich sites in the Abl
C terminus (28, 29). The role of these adaptors is not firmly
established, but binding of the Crk adaptor has been shown to affect
the processivity of Abl toward some substrates, presumably by forming a
tight complex via its SH2 domain with those substrates when they are
phosphorylated (30). The Nck adaptor consists of three SH3 domains and
one SH2 domain (31). Its SH2 domain binds a variety of phosphorylated
proteins such as receptor tyrosine kinases, IRS-1, and focal adhesion
components (32-35). Nck is itself tyrosine-phosphorylated in response
to many stimuli (33, 36, 37) and contains a conserved potential SH3-binding site,3 hence many
possible interactions can be mediated by Nck.
Although the interaction between Abl and Nck was suggested several
years ago (29), recent data have led to new insights into their
relationship. The Xenopus Arg protein (which is highly related to Abl) (38) emerged from a screen of Xenopus
proteins that bind specifically to the first two SH3 domains of Nck,
and microinjection data suggest that Abl and Arg are effectors for the
ability of Nck mutants to induce mesoderm patterning defects in early
embryos.4 Other
Xenopus experiments demonstrated that localization of the first two SH3 domains of Nck to membranes (mimicking the relocalization of full-length Nck to sites of tyrosine phosphorylation on the membrane) induced strong mesoderm patterning effects (39). Here we
report that expression of Nck SH3 domains can activate Abl in human
293T cells. These experiments establish a model system that will
facilitate delineation of the mechanisms that underlie the regulation
of Abl.
Construction of Abl and Nck Mutants--
All Abl genes are
derived from mouse type IV c-Abl (12, 40) and were generated by
polymerase chain reaction as described previously (15). The c-Abl
construct that we use here encodes authentic WT c-Abl and does not
include linkers 5' to the SH3 domain or 3' to the SH2 domain as in
earlier versions (15). The "SF" and "SG" constructs both encode
a stop codon following Arg-532 (immediately C-terminal to the catalytic
domain). The Abl
The generation of constructs expressing myristoylated and
unmyristoylated Nck SH3 domains has been described (39, 43). The Nck
"PA" mutant was generated by polymerase chain reaction and contains
a point mutation that changes proline 84 to alanine, eliminating the
conserved potential SH3-binding site. All Nck constructs are derived
from human Nck (31), tagged with the influenza virus HA epitope at
their C termini, and expressed in the pEBB mammalian expression
vector (39).
Mammalian Cell Transfection and Protein
Characterization--
Transfection of 293T cells was by the calcium
phosphate method as described (44). Cells were lysed 24-48 h
post-transfection in 1 ml of kinase lysis buffer (25 mM
Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1%
Triton X-100, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM Activation of Abl by Nck SH3 Domains--
Our previous results
indicated that c-Abl interacts with the first two SH3 domains of Nck,
suggesting that Nck might affect Abl activity by changing its
localization or binding partners. Nck has the potential to bind via its
SH2 domain to tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (for example in focal
adhesions), and thereby serve to relocalize Abl in response to
extracellular signals. Most tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins are
associated with membranes, so we reasoned that fusion of the two
N-terminal SH3 domains of Nck to a membrane targeting signal (the Src
myristoylation sequence) might mimic endogenous signals and thus
modulate Abl activity. We therefore tested whether a myristoylated form
of the first two SH3 domains of Nck (Myr 1+2) or the unmyristoylated
form (1+2) (depicted in Fig. 1) could affect the activity of overexpressed c-Abl in transiently transfected 293T cells. Preliminary experiments suggested that effects of Nck SH3
domains might be concentration-dependent, so a wide range of plasmid amounts (from 25 ng to 8 µg) was tested for each Nck construct. The in vivo activity of Abl was assayed
indirectly by the presence of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in total
cell extracts.
Both myristoylated and unmyristoylated SH3-1+2 induced a dramatic
increase in cellular phosphotyrosine, not only in Abl itself but also
in a variety of other cellular proteins (Fig.
2). Autophosphorylation of c-Abl has
historically been used as a read-out for Abl activation (9, 11), and
immunoprecipitation experiments showed that the major
tyrosine-phosphorylated protein in transfected cell lysates of
approximately 150-kDa molecular mass was Abl itself (data not shown).
These results indicate that Nck SH3 domains can activate the normally
repressed c-Abl kinase. A myristoylated SH3-1+2 construct in which the
binding activity of the two SH3 domains was ablated by site-directed
mutation did not activate Abl (data not shown), indicating that ligand
binding is required.
Although both Myr 1+2 and the unmyristoylated version activated Abl,
the concentration dependence of the two was very different. In the case
of Myr 1+2, maximal activation was achieved with 100-250 ng and
quickly tapered off at increasing concentrations (Fig. 2). At these
higher concentrations of Myr 1+2, a decrease in the total amount of Abl
was usually observed, suggesting feedback regulation at the level of
protein synthesis or degradation. Activation by the unmyristoylated 1+2
occurred only with very high amounts, typically requiring 10-50-fold
more plasmid than the myristoylated version to activate to a comparable
level (Fig. 2).
The concentration-dependent activation of Abl was highly
reproducible, although the amount of Nck plasmid required for maximal activation and the absolute level of Abl activation varied somewhat from experiment to experiment, most likely because of differences in
transfection efficiency. The Nck 1+2 constructs were themselves tyrosine-phosphorylated, with the extent of phosphorylation correlating with Abl activity (data not shown). In similar co-transfection experiments, we also observed activation of the Abl-related kinase Arg-1B (38) by both myristoylated and unmyristoylated SH3-1+2 (data
not shown). As expected from the increase in in vivo Abl activity, there was a modest increase in the in vitro kinase
activity of Abl immunoprecipitated from lysates of cells expressing low amounts of Myr 1+2 or high amounts of 1+2 compared with those expressing Abl alone (data not shown). When Nck SH3-1+2 constructs were transfected alone we did not observe significant increases in
total cell phosphotyrosine or in the tyrosine phosphorylation or
in vitro kinase activity of endogenous Abl; activation of
endogenous Abl in these experiments would be difficult to detect,
however, because of background from untransfected cells.
Effect of Nck SH3 Domains on Abl Mutants--
To gain insight into
the mechanism of activation, the domains of Abl necessary for
activation by either myristoylated or unmyristoylated SH3-1+2 were
investigated. The Abl constructs tested are depicted in Fig. 1. SF-Abl
encodes a c-Abl protein that is truncated immediately C-terminal to the
catalytic domain and is therefore lacking the known adaptor-binding
sites in addition to a variety of other protein-binding sites and the
nuclear localization and nuclear export signals (4, 28, 29, 46, 47).
G-Abl is an SH3-deleted form of c-Abl, which has previously been shown
to be constitutively active in vivo and transforming (15),
and SG-Abl is a form of G-Abl containing the identical C-terminal
truncation to SF-Abl. SG-Abl is transforming in fibroblasts (though
focus formation is decreased approximately 10-fold relative to
full-length G-Abl), whereas SF-Abl is nontransforming, indicating that
C-terminal truncation does not abrogate the SH3-mediated repression of
Abl activity.2
As shown in Fig. 3, neither Myr 1+2 nor
1+2 had a significant effect on the levels of tyrosine phosphorylation
induced by SF-Abl, G-Abl, or SG-Abl over a wide range of
concentrations. The phosphotyrosine levels in the SF-Abl blot remain
steady and equivalent to the negative control, whereas under identical
conditions WT c-Abl was clearly activated (Fig. 3A, compare
lanes 3 and 7). The lack of activation of the SF
mutant demonstrates that the C terminus contains sequences required for
activation by Nck SH3 domains. As expected, tyrosine phosphorylation
levels in cells expressing the transforming mutants G-Abl and SG-Abl
were high relative to controls; they were not significantly affected,
however, by the presence of Myr 1+2 or 1+2. A slight increase in
phosphotyrosine in cells expressing Nck SH3 domains and G-Abl or SG-Abl
was occasionally observed (Fig. 3, B and C), but
this was modest and inconsistent unlike the robust activation seen in
the case of WT c-Abl. The inability of Nck SH3 domains to further
enhance the activity of mutagenically activated Abl suggests that its
effects are not because of some general mechanism affecting
phosphotyrosine metabolism, such as inhibition of phosphatase activity
in the cell. It can also be seen that Nck SH3 domains elevate the
in vivo activity of c-Abl to a level comparable with that of
transforming mutants such as G-Abl (Fig. 3B, compare
lanes 3 and 4).
Role of SH3-binding Sites in Abl C Terminus--
The lack of
activation of the C-terminally truncated SF-Abl mutant suggested that
direct interaction between the Nck SH3 domains and the Abl C terminus
might be involved in activation. Immediately following the catalytic
region of c-Abl is a proline-rich region that has been previously shown
to contain binding sites for the Crk, Grb2, and Nck SH3 domains
(28-30). We have also demonstrated that this region contains the major
binding sites for Nck SH3-1+2 in vitro.4 We
therefore generated a construct (Abl
Because this result suggested that direct association of Nck SH3
domains with the Abl C terminus might not be required for activation,
we considered other possible modes of interaction between Myr-1+2 and
Abl. We noted that there is a potential type I SH3-binding site
KRKPS(V/M)P located between SH3-1 and SH3-2 that is conserved in
human, mouse, and Xenopus Nck.3 We reasoned that
interaction between the Abl SH3 domain and this site could potentially
relieve the inhibition of Abl and explain activation by the Nck
constructs. To test this model we transfected 293T cells with a mutant
Myr 1+2 in which one of the conserved prolines of the putative
SH3-binding site was mutated to alanine (Myr 1+2 PA mutant). This
mutation is expected to render this site unable to bind SH3 domains
(48). As shown in Fig. 4, the PA mutant activated both c-Abl and the
Abl
The results shown in Figs. 4 and 5 suggest that activation of c-Abl by
Myr 1+2 cannot be explained simply by binding to the C terminus of
c-Abl and relocalizing it to membranes. We confirmed this by
constructing a myristoylated Crk SH3 domain. c-Abl binds the Crk SH3
domain with higher affinity than to the Nck SH3 domains (29)2; therefore a myristoylated Crk SH3 construct should
activate c-Abl at least as well as the Nck Myr 1+2 construct if binding and relocalization were sufficient for activation. To the contrary, we
found that although the Crk SH3 construct slightly activated c-Abl, the
extent of activation was minimal when compared with Myr 1+2 or even to
a myristoylated construct encoding the SH3-2 of Nck in the absence of
SH3-1 (data not shown).
Implications--
Our results demonstrate that overexpression of
Nck SH3 domains can potently activate the tyrosine kinase activity of
the Abl kinase in transfected cells. The observation that Myr 1+2 could activate Abl was suggestive because this construct has the potential to
relocalize Abl, and others have shown that a fraction of endogenous Abl
translocates from the nucleus to focal adhesions upon integrin engagement, concomitant with its activation (24, 25). To our surprise,
however, we found that the major Nck SH3-binding sites in the Abl C
terminus were not required for activation. Although we cannot rule out
other cryptic SH3-binding sites in the C terminus that are able to
partially compensate for the loss of the major Nck SH3-binding sites,
the observation that the Abl
We were also surprised to find that the unmyristoylated 1+2 construct
(which is largely nuclear in
localization5) could activate
Abl, albeit at much higher levels of expression. This implies that
increased membrane localization cannot explain activation of Abl by
Nck, although membrane localization of the Nck SH3 domains clearly
facilitates activation. One possibility that we considered was that the
conserved potential SH3-binding site in Nck might engage the Abl SH3
domain and relieve inhibition, because activation of the Src family
kinases has been observed using ligands that bind their SH3 domain (8,
49). However, mutation of this putative SH3-binding site did not affect
activation of Abl by Myr 1+2 (Fig. 4).
Several possible mechanisms must be considered in trying to understand
Nck-mediated activation of Abl. One intriguing possibility is that the
action of Nck SH3 domains is indirect, the result of perturbation of
signaling pathways that ultimately impinge on Abl activation. Little is
known about specific stimuli that can activate c-Abl in
vivo, and activation by Nck could provide important insights in
this regard. Another possibility is that the Nck SH3 domains bind to
and sequester an endogenous inhibitor of c-Abl that normally binds to
the Abl SH3 domain (9). Such a mechanism would be more likely to
explain the activation by large amounts of unmyristoylated 1+2; it is
less likely to explain activation by Myr 1+2, given the small amounts
of plasmid required for maximal activation. It is also possible that
the Nck SH3 domains bind directly to the SH2-kinase domain linker of
c-Abl, preventing inhibitory intramolecular interactions with the Abl
SH3. If this were the case, then the much higher potency of the Myr 1+2
construct would imply that the membrane-associated pool of Abl is more
susceptible to activation, or that membrane localization leads to
higher local concentrations of Nck SH3 domains with respect to a pool
of Abl that is also localized on the membrane.
Because no single mechanism is entirely consistent with all of our
experimental results, it must be kept in mind that multiple mechanisms
could be involved. In this regard, our results using the C-terminally
truncated Abl mutants SF and SG are quite informative (Fig. 3,
A and C). The only difference between these two
constructs is the presence or absence of the Abl SH3 domain, which is
known to play a role in inhibiting kinase activity. The phosphotyrosine levels seen in the SG-Abl blot (Fig. 3C) and the
transforming activity of this mutant indicate that it is activated, and
imply that SF-Abl could also be activated if the inhibitory effects of
its intact SH3 domain were disrupted. The observation that SF-Abl is
not activated by Myr 1+2 or 1+2 argues against any mechanism that only
involves disruption of SH3-mediated repression. These results could be
reconciled, however, if activation involves both a high local
concentration of Nck SH3 domains with respect to Abl, plus a specific
subcellular localization or protein interaction that is conferred by
the C terminus. More specific Abl mutants will resolve the role of the
C terminus in activation.
Regardless of the specific mechanism(s), Nck-mediated activation
provides an excellent experimental system to study the parameters governing Abl activity in vivo. It is robust and highly
reproducible and allows analysis of mutants of both Abl and Nck.
Further experiments will surely reveal the details of regulation and
provide insights into methods for rationally modulating the activity of
Abl in human disease.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, Children's Hospital and Dept. of Microbiology and
Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, 320 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-355-7915; Fax: 617-355-3506; E-mail: bmayer@rascal.med.harvard.edu.
2
B. J. Mayer, unpublished results.
3
B. J.Mayer and T. Akiyama, unpublished observation.
4
C. Adler, T. Akiyama, J. M. Smith, and
B. J. Mayer, manuscript in preparation.
5
J. M. Smith and B. J. Mayer,
unpublished observation.
The abbreviations used are:
SH2, Src homology
domain 2;
SH3, Src homology domain 3;
WT, wild type;
HA, hemagglutinin.
Activation of the Abl Tyrosine Kinase in Vivo by Src
Homology 3 Domains from the Src Homology 2/Src Homology 3 Adaptor
Nck*
,
, and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Pro mutant was generated by two-step polymerase
chain reaction mutagenesis and contains a deletion (amino acids
536-645) encompassing the proline-rich adaptor binding region as well
as the major nuclear localization signal (41). All Abl clones are
expressed via Moloney murine leukemia virus-derived retroviral vectors
pGDN (15) or pBPN (a derivative of pBABE-puro) (42).
-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10%
glycerol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 20 µl/ml aprotinin solution (Sigma)). The protein content of lysates was
determined by Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). Immunoblotting of whole cell
lysates was as described (15). The following antibodies were used: for
Abl, monoclonals 8E9 (PharMingen International) and 24-21 (kindly
provided by A. Pendergast); monoclonal HA11 to detect Nck constructs
(Berkeley Antibody Co.); monoclonal antibodies 4G10 (Upstate
Biochemical, Inc.) and PY20(45) for anti-phosphotyrosine blotting. For
immunoprecipitation, lysate from one-tenth of a 10-cm dish was
pre-cleared with protein A-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), then incubated on ice with 1 µg of anti-Abl antibody K12
(Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Immune complexes were collected on
protein A beads, washed three times in lysis buffer, and analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting as above.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Abl and Nck constructs. Derivatives of
Abl and Nck used in this study are depicted diagrammatically to scale.
Domain structure is indicated; black boxes denote SH3
domains, wavy lines denote myristoylation signal,
Pro indicates proline-rich-binding sites for adaptor SH3
domains. Sites of deletion or point mutation constructed in various
mutants are indicated by arrows.

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Activation of c-Abl by Nck SH3 domains.
4 µg of plasmid expressing WT c-Abl was transfected into 293T
cells along with various amounts of plasmid expressing the Nck SH3
constructs 1+2 or Myr 1+2 as indicated. Left panels, Nck
derivatives were transfected at 0.25-8 µg/plate; right
panels, 0.01-0.25 µg/plate (independent experiment). Lysates
were prepared 1 day post-transfection and equal amounts of protein
separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred
to filters, and probed with monoclonal antiphosphotyrosine
antibody 4G10 (top), monoclonal anti-Abl antibody 8E9
(middle), or monoclonal anti-HA antibody HA11 to detect Nck
(bottom). Approximate positions of pre-stained molecular weight markers
are indicated on the right. Arrowheads indicate position of
c-Abl.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Activation of Abl by Nck SH3 domains requires
Abl C terminus. 4 µg of plasmid expressing Abl mutants was
co-transfected with various amounts of Nck 1+2 or Myr 1+2 plasmid as
indicated. Immunoblots of lysates from transfected cells were probed to
detect tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins (top), Abl
(middle), and Nck derivatives (bottom). Abl
mutants are depicted in Fig. 1. Panel A, SF-Abl; panel
B, G-Abl; panel C, SG-Abl. Approximate positions of
pre-stained molecular weight markers are indicated on the right.
Arrowheads indicate position of c-Abl and Abl mutants.
Pro) to address whether the high
affinity binding site for Nck SH3 domains is necessary to mediate Abl
activation (Fig. 1). Plasmids encoding c-Abl and the Abl
Pro mutant
were co-transfected with increasing amounts of Myr 1+2, and activity
was assayed by immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine antibodies as
above. Surprisingly, Abl
Pro was activated by Myr 1+2 to a similar
extent and with similar concentration dependence as WT c-Abl (Fig.
4). A more precise mutant that eliminates
the high-affinity Nck-binding site but does not affect the Crk-binding site or major nuclear localization signal was also activated to a
similar extent (data not shown). Although activation levels of either
c-Abl or Abl
Pro were similar, the association of Myr 1+2 with
Abl
Pro was much weaker than with WT c-Abl as detected by
co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 5).

View larger version (53K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Activation of Abl does not require the major
Nck SH3-binding site on Abl or the putative SH3-binding site on
Nck. 4 µg of plasmid expressing WT Abl or Abl
Pro mutant was
transfected with various amount of plasmid expressing Myr 1+2 or the
Myr 1+2 PA mutant as indicated. Lysates were prepared and immunoblots
probed for phosphotyrosine, Abl, and Nck as in Figs. 2 and 3.
Approximate positions of pre-stained molecular weight markers are
indicated on the right. Arrowheads indicate position of
c-Abl and Abl
Pro.

View larger version (42K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Immunoprecipitation of Abl and Nck
constructs. 4 µg of plasmid expressing WT Abl or Abl
Pro
mutant was transfected with 1.6 µg of plasmid expressing Myr 1+2 or
the Myr 1+2 PA mutant. 100 µl of lysate was immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of polyclonal anti-Abl antibody K12. Immunoprecipitates were
separated on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to
filters, and probed with either monoclonal anti-Abl antibody 8E9
(top) or anti-HA to detect Nck (bottom).
Arrowhead indicates position of Myr 1+2 and Myr 1+2 PA.
Upper band in the Nck blot is nonspecific.
Pro mutant to a similar extent as WT Myr 1+2, and the PA mutation
had no effect on coprecipitation of Abl and Myr-1+2 (Fig. 5). This
demonstrates that the putative SH3-binding site in Nck is not required
for activation.
Pro mutant (lacking the major
SH3-binding sites) co-precipitated with Myr-1+2 much more poorly than
WT Abl suggests this is not the case.
![]()
FOOTNOTES
These authors contributed equally to this work.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Goff, S. P.,
Gilboa, E.,
Witte, O. N.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1980)
Cell
22,
777-785[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Shtivelman, E.,
Lifshitz, B.,
Gale, R. P.,
and Canaani, E.
(1985)
Nature
315,
550-554[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Mes-Masson, A.-M.,
McLaughlin, J.,
Daley, G. Q.,
Paskind, M.,
and Witte, O. N.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
9768-9772 4.
Raitano, A. B.,
Whang, Y. E.,
and Sawyers, C. L.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1333,
F201-F216[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Cooper, J. A.,
and Howell, B.
(1993)
Cell
73,
1051-1054[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Xu, W.,
Harrison, S. C.,
and Eck, M. J.
(1997)
Nature
385,
595-602[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Sicheri, F.,
Moarefi, I.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1997)
Nature
385,
602-609[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Moarefi, I.,
LeFevre-Bernt, M.,
Sicheri, F.,
Huse, M.,
Lee, C.-H.,
Kuriyan, J.,
and Miller, W. T.
(1997)
Nature
385,
650-653[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Pendergast, A. M.,
Muller, A. J.,
Havlik, M. H.,
Clark, R.,
McCormick, F.,
and Witte, O. N.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
5927-5931 10.
Ponticelli, A. S.,
Whitlock, C. A.,
Rosenberg, N.,
and Witte, O. N.
(1982)
Cell
29,
953-960[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Franz, W. M.,
Berger, P.,
and Wang, J. Y. J.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
137-147[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Jackson, P.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
EMBO J.
8,
449-456[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Van Etten, R. A.,
Debnath, J.,
Zhou, H.,
and Casasnovas, J. M.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
1977-1988[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Barilá, D.,
and Superti-Furga, G.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
18,
280-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Mayer, B. J.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2883-2894 16.
Zhu, J.,
and Shore, S. K.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
7054-7062[Abstract]
17.
Wen, S.-T.,
and Van Etten, R. A.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
2456-2467 18.
Dai, Z.,
and Pendergast, A. M.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2569-2582 19.
Shi, Y.,
Alin, K.,
and Goff, S. P.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2583-2597 20.
Liu, Z.-G.,
Baskaran, R.,
Lea-Chou, E. T.,
Wood, L. D.,
Chen, Y.,
Karin, M.,
and Wang, J. Y. J.
(1996)
Nature
384,
273-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Baskaran, R.,
Wood, L. D.,
Whitaker, L. L.,
Canman, C. E.,
Morgan, S. E.,
Xu, Y.,
Barlow, C.,
Baltimore, D.,
Wynshaw-Boris, A.,
Kastan, M. B.,
and Wang, J. Y. J.
(1997)
Nature
287,
516-519[CrossRef]
22.
Kharbanda, S.,
Ren, R.,
Pandey, P.,
Shafman, T. D.,
Feller, S. M.,
Weichselbaum, R. R.,
and Kufe, D. W.
(1995)
Nature
376,
785-788[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Kharbanda, S.,
Pandey, P.,
Jin, S.,
Inoue, S.,
Bharti, A.,
Yuan, Z. M.,
Weichselbaum, R.,
Weaver, D.,
and Kufe, D.
(1997)
Nature
386,
732-735[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Lewis, J. M.,
Baskaran, R.,
Taagepera, S.,
Schwartz, M. A.,
and Wang, J. Y. J.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
15174-15179 25.
Lewis, J. M.,
and Schwartz, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
14225-14230 26.
Welch, P. J.,
and Wang, J. Y.
(1993)
Cell
75,
779-790[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Welch, P. J.,
and Wang, J. Y.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
5542-5551[Abstract]
28.
Feller, S. M.,
Knudsen, B.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2341-2351[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Ren, R.,
Ye, Z.-S.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
783-795 30.
Mayer, B. J.,
Hirai, H.,
and Sakai, R.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
296-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Lehman, J. M.,
Riethmuller, G.,
and Johnson, J. P.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
1048 32.
Lee, C.-H.,
Li, W.,
Nishimura, R.,
Zhou, M.,
Batzer, A. G.,
Myers, J.,
White, M. F.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Skolnik, E. Y.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11713-11717 33.
Li, W.,
Hu, E.,
Skolnik, E. Y.,
Ullrich, A.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5824-5833 34.
Park, J. W.,
Ma, M.,
Ruedi, J. M.,
Smith, R. M.,
and Babior, B. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17327-17332 35.
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
Broome, M. A.,
and Hunter, T.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
1702-1713[Abstract]
36.
Park, D.,
and Rhee, S. G.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5816-5823 37.
Meisenhelder, J.,
and Hunter, T.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5843-5856 38.
Kruh, G. D.,
Perego, R.,
Miki, T.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5802-5806 39.
Tanaka, M.,
Lu, W.,
Gupta, R.,
and Mayer, B. J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4493-4498 40.
Ben-Neriah, Y.,
Bernards, A.,
Paskind, M.,
Daley, G. Q.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1986)
Cell
44,
577-586[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Van Etten, R. A.,
Jackson, P.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1989)
Cell
58,
669-678[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Morgenstern, J. P.,
and Land, H.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
3587-3596 43.
Lu, W.,
Katz, S.,
Gupta, R.,
and Mayer, B. J.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
85-94[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Tanaka, M.,
Gupta, R.,
and Mayer, B. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
6829-6837[Abstract]
45.
Glenney, J. R.,
Zokas, L.,
and Kamps, M. P.
(1988)
J. Immunol. Methods
109,
277-285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Wen, S.-T.,
Jackson, P. K.,
and Van Etten, R. A.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
1583-1595[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Taagepera, S.,
McDonald, D.,
Loeb, J. E.,
Whittaker, L. L.,
McElroy, A. K.,
Wang, J. Y. J.,
and Hope, T. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7457-7462 48.
Mayer, B. J.,
and Eck, M. J.
(1995)
Curr. Biol.
5,
364-367[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Alexandropoulos, K.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1341-1355
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Antoku, K. Saksela, G. M. Rivera, and B. J. Mayer A crucial role in cell spreading for the interaction of Abl PxxP motifs with Crk and Nck adaptors J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2008; 121(18): 3071 - 3082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Woodring, T. Hunter, and J. Y. J. Wang Mitotic Phosphorylation Rescues Abl from F-actin-mediated Inhibition J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10318 - 10325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Swimm, B. Bommarius, Y. Li, D. Cheng, P. Reeves, M. Sherman, D. Veach, W. Bornmann, and D. Kalman Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Use Redundant Tyrosine Kinases to Form Actin Pedestals Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2004; 15(8): 3520 - 3529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Lin, Z.-Y. Park, D. Lin, A. A. Brahmbhatt, M.-C. Rio, J. R. Yates III, and R. L. Klemke Regulation of cell migration and survival by focal adhesion targeting of Lasp-1 J. Cell Biol., May 10, 2004; 165(3): 421 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Lim, S. H. Kim, J. G. Jung, J.-K. Kim, and W. K. Song Regulation of SPIN90 Phosphorylation and Interaction with Nck by ERK and Cell Adhesion J. Biol. Chem., December 26, 2003; 278(52): 52116 - 52123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Master, J. Tran, A. Bishnoi, S. H. Chen, J. M. L. Ebos, P. Van Slyke, R. S. Kerbel, and D. J. Dumont Dok-R Binds c-Abl and Regulates Abl Kinase Activity and Mediates Cytoskeletal Reorganization J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 30170 - 30179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Woodring, T. Hunter, and J. Y. J. Wang Regulation of F-actin-dependent processes by the Abl family of tyrosine kinases J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2003; 116(13): 2613 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Warren, D. S. Griffin, C. Mainville, and N. Rosenberg The Extreme Carboxyl Terminus of v-Abl Is Required for Lymphoid Cell Transformation by Abelson Virus J. Virol., April 15, 2003; 77(8): 4617 - 4625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Jahn, P. Seipel, S. Coutinho, C. Miething, C. Peschel, and J. Duyster Grb4/Nckbeta Acts as a Nuclear Repressor of v-Abl-induced Transcription from c-jun/c-fos Promoter Elements J. Biol. Chem., November 9, 2001; 276(46): 43419 - 43427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chen, H. She, A. Kim, D. T. Woodley, and W. Li Nckbeta Adapter Regulates Actin Polymerization in NIH 3T3 Fibroblasts in Response to Platelet-Derived Growth Factor bb Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2000; 20(21): 7867 - 7880. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. Warren, A. J. Heilpern, K. Berg, and N. Rosenberg The Carboxyl Terminus of v-Abl Protein Can Augment SH2 Domain Function J. Virol., May 15, 2000; 74(10): 4495 - 4504. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Brasher and R. A. Van Etten c-Abl Has High Intrinsic Tyrosine Kinase Activity That Is Stimulated by Mutation of the Src Homology 3 Domain and by Autophosphorylation at Two Distinct Regulatory Tyrosines J. Biol. Chem., November 3, 2000; 275(45): 35631 - 35637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Adler, T. Miyoshi-Akiyama, L. M. Aleman, M. Tanaka, J. M. Smith, and B. J. Mayer Abl Family Kinases and Cbl Cooperate with the Nck Adaptor to Modulate Xenopus Development J. Biol. Chem., November 10, 2000; 275(46): 36472 - 36478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Woodring, T. Hunter, and J. Y. J. Wang Inhibition of c-Abl Tyrosine Kinase Activity by Filamentous Actin J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2001; 276(29): 27104 - 27110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rohatgi, P. Nollau, H.-Y. H. Ho, M. W. Kirschner, and B. J. Mayer Nck and Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate Synergistically Activate Actin Polymerization through the N-WASP-Arp2/3 Pathway J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2001; 276(28): 26448 - 26452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||