J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27963-27968, September 24, 1999
Metal-dependent Self-assembly of Protein Tubes
from Escherichia coli Glutamine Synthetase
Cu2+ EPR STUDIES OF THE LIGATION AND
STOICHIOMETRY OF INTERMOLECULAR METAL BINDING SITES*
Peter
Schurke
,
John C.
Freeman§,
Michael J.
Dabrowski
, and
William M.
Atkins
¶
From the
Department of Medicinal Chemistry,
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7610 and the
§ Departments of Chemistry and Biology, State University of
New York, Fredonia, New York 14063
 |
ABSTRACT |
Escherichia coli
glutamine synthetase (GS) is a dodecameric assembly of identical
subunits arranged as two back-to-back hexagonal rings. In the presence
of divalent metal ions, the dodecamers "stack" along their six-fold
axis of symmetry to yield elongated tubes. This self-assembly process
provides a useful model for probing metal-dependent
protein-protein interactions. However, no direct spectroscopic or
structural data have confirmed the identity of the ligands to the
shared metal ions in "stacked" GS. Here, 9-GHz Cu2+ EPR
studies have been used to probe the ligand structure and stoichiometry
of the metal binding sites. The wild type protein, with N-terminal
sequence
(His-4)-X3-(Met-8)-X3-(His-12),
exhibits a classic Cu2+-nitrogen spectrum, with
g
= 2.06 G, g
= 2.24 G, and A
= 19.3 × 10
3 cm
1. No
superhyperfine structure is observed. The H4C mutant affords a spectrum
that is the combination of two spectra at all stages of saturation. One
of the overlapping spectra is nearly identical to the spectrum of wild
type, and is due to His ligation. The second spectrum observed yields
g
= 2.28 and A
= 17.1 × 10
3 cm
1. The linewidth and tensor values of
the second component have been assigned to Cu2+-S ligation.
In contrast, the H12C mutant exhibits an EPR spectrum at low
Cu2+ occupancy that is very similar to the second set of
spectral features observed for H4C, and which is assigned to
Cu2+-S ligation. No Cu2+-His ligation is
apparent until the Cu2+/N-terminal helices ratio is >1.0.
At saturation, the g = 2.00-2.06 region of the spectrum is
essentially a mirror image of the spectrum obtained with H4C, and is
due to overlapping Cu2+-N and Cu2+-S EPR
spectra. The M8L and M8C mutants were also studied, in order to probe
the role of position 8 in the N-terminal helix. Spectral parameters of
these mutants are nearly identical to each other and to the wild type
spectrum at saturating Cu2+, suggesting that Met-8 does not
act as a direct metal ligand. Together, the results provide the first
direct evidence for a binuclear metal ion site between each N-terminal
helix pair at the GS-GS interface, with both His-4 and His-12 providing
metal ligands.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bacterial glutamine synthetases
(GSs)1 are complex
dodecameric aggregates arranged as two back-to-back hexameric rings of
identical subunits (Fig. 1, A and B; Refs. 1 and
2). The resulting oligomers provide a circular complex that is similar
to many other biologically assembled aggregates including GroEL, 20 S
proteasomes, light harvesting complexes, and others (3). In addition,
dodecameric GSs from some bacteria "stack" in the presence of
divalent metal ions to form hollow tubes with a hydrophilic channel
running through the self-assembled protein filaments (4-6). These
protein tubes further assemble into three- and seven-stranded cables
under some conditions, with specific lateral interactions between the
disc-shaped dodecamers (6). Although the biological role for these
processes has not been clearly defined, GS is a powerful model for
design of metal-dependent protein docking (7, 8), and in
principle, GS may represent a useful "scaffold" for fabrication of
linear arrays of chromophores, redox components, or inorganic metal
complexes, as suggested for other proteins, peptides, and DNA (9,
10).
The utility of GS, or any other protein, as a scaffold would be
maximized if the self-assembly process could be controlled, and if
biologically imposed structural constraints could be overcome. For
example, GS variants have been engineered that afford protein tubes
with "higher supramolecular order" than tubes obtained from wild
type E. coli GS, as a result of engineered heterospecific interactions between electrostatically complementary mutants (11). In
addition, we have explored in vitro methods for removing the biologically imposed symmetry of the GS dodecamer, which allow for
control over the length of GS tubes (12). Also, the solution conditions
that influence this metal-dependent protein-protein interaction have been previously characterized for wild type and site-directed mutants of E. coli GS, in order to understand
factors that control this process (8, 13), and the thermodynamics of
the reaction have been partially described (14). Together, these
results have yielded GS variants with novel self-assembly properties
and a useful structural model for the molecular mechanism of
recognition between GS dodecamers.
Each subunit within the dodecamer contains an N-terminal helix,
residues 1-14, with the helical axes approximately perpendicular to
the six-fold symmetry axis that runs through the center of the ring
structure (Fig. 1C). When two GS molecules are docked, helices are contributed from each dodecamer, forming six
interdodecameric "helix-dimers." Within the helices, His-4, Met-8,
and His-12 provide potential ligands to metal ions that "bridge"
these helix-dimers. On the basis of the previous characterization
and model peptides with the sequence of the N-terminal helices (15), a
model (Fig. 1D) that is
consistent with the available data suggests that each of the six
interdodecameric helix-dimer interactions provides a binuclear metal
site, in which one metal ion will bind in a linear bidentate mode
between the two His-4 side chains, and the second metal in a similar
geometry between the two His-12 side chains. Thus, at each GS-GS
interface, 12 metal ions are shared. In addition, the Met-8 side chains
may provide ligands to either or both metals. This is based on the
observation that the M8L mutant stacks poorly with all metal ions,
whereas the M8C mutant stacks efficiently with some metals and poorly
with others (13).

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A, view of a single GS dodecamer along
the six-fold axis of symmetry. The N-terminal helices are shown in
dark gray. B, view of a single GS
dodecamer perpendicular to the six-fold axis of symmetry. The
N-terminal helices are shown in dark gray.
C, alignment of six "helix dimers" about the six-fold
axis of symmetry at the interface between two dodecamers. Each subunit
within the dodecamer contributes an N-terminal helix that is one half
of each binuclear, intermolecular, metal binding site. Alternate
helices are contributed from one dodecamer (shown in light gray), while the remaining helices are contributed from the
second dodecamer (shown in darker gray).
D, proposed binuclear binding site responsible for
self-assembly of GS tubes. On each N-terminal helix, His-4, Met-8, and
His-12 side chains are oriented toward the helix-helix interface. His-4
and His-12 provide direct metal ligands, while Met-8 plays a role
indirectly in stabilizing the two sites. The Van der Waals radii of two
metal ions are shown between the two helices.
|
|
However, experimental approaches required to challenge this model have
been inapplicable or unsuccessful. An inherent problem with
site-directed mutagenesis, when not coupled to other experimental approaches, is the possibility that mutations that are remote from the
amino acid substitution cause structural changes, which indirectly
alter the function of interest. Therefore, the effects of mutation at
His-4, Met-8, or His-12 provide only indirect evidence for their roles
in the GS-GS stacking reaction. Optical spectroscopy of the metal
centers and magnetic relaxation techniques relying on nuclei in the
self-assembled GS tubes are hampered by the size and insolubility of
these complexes. Thus, direct evidence for the nature of the protein
ligands to the metals and the stoichiometry of the metal binding sites
has been elusive. In fact, no high resolution structural data for any
GS dodecamer-dodecamer complex have been reported.
In contrast to optical techniques and protein-based nuclear relaxation
methods, EPR provides a direct probe of metal environment that is not
dependent on aqueous solubility or isotropic character of the
supramolecular aggregate. Cu2+ was previously demonstrated
to be an efficient ion for directing the stacking reaction (8), but the
spectroscopic properties of this metal bound at the GS-GS interface
have not been exploited. Here, we employ Cu2+ EPR as a
probe of metal environment and binding stoichiometry of the
intermolecular binding sites that mediate GS stacking. The results
provide direct structural evidence in support of the binuclear nature
of the interhelical sites and provide significant refinement of the
previous model for dodecamer-dodecamer interactions of E. coli GS.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mutagenesis and Protein Purification--
Site-directed
mutagenesis and protein purification were as described previously (13),
with the following modifications: ZnSO4 precipitation,
acetone precipitation, and
(NH4)2SO4/acid precipitation steps
were omitted. Instead, after treatment with streptomycin sulfate, the
cellular lysate was chromatographed over Blue Sepharose CL-6B (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech), and eluted with 40 ml of 20 mM ADP. The
fractions were assayed by the
-glutamyl transferase assay and those
which showed greatest activity were pooled, concentrated, and poured
over a G-25 gel-filtration column (Sigma). The eluent was assayed for
activity by the
-glutamyl transferase assay, and fractions that
showed the greatest activity were pooled. Purity was assessed by
SDS-PAGE to be >95%.
MSOX Inactivation of GS--
Because GS is a metalloenzyme, the
possibility exists that adventitious Cu2+ could bind in the
active site, displacing the ions which are normally found there, and
interfering with the titration of the N-terminal binding sites. In
order to minimize this possible interference, Mg+2 ions
were bound into the active site using the pseudo-irreversible inhibitor
L-methionine sulfoximine (MSOX), as described previously (5, 16, 17). Stocks of 100 mM MSOX and 100 mM
Mg+2-ATP (both acquired from Sigma) were prepared in
deionized water. Purified GS was dialyzed against four 1-liter changes
of buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 100 mM KCl, 20 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM EDTA to remove Mn+2 from the active site,
replacing it with Mg+2. This was followed by four 1-liter
changes of buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.2), 100 mM KCl, and 10 mM MgCl2. Protein
solution containing >10 mg of GS was concentrated to 4.5 ml total
volume, after which 250 µl of MSOX and 250 µl of
Mg+2-ATP were added and the solution incubated for 1 h
at 37 °C. After incubation, the protein solution was dialyzed
against four 1-liter changes of buffer containing 50 mM
HEPES (pH 7.2), 100 mM KCl, and 10 mM
MgCl2.
Preparation of Samples for EPR Titrations--
The MSOX
inactivated GS solution was concentrated to 5.25 mg/ml protein, or
approximately 103 µM subunits (determined
spectroscopically). Individual stocks of Cu2+
(CH3COO
)2, ranging from 0 to 5 mM Cu2+ in 250 or 500 µM
increments, were prepared from a central stock of 0.1 M
cupric acetate. Aliquots of 6 µl of each Cu2+ stock were
added to 144 µl of GS protein, bringing the total volume to 150 µl
and the protein concentration to 5.1 mg/ml, or approximately 100 µM subunits. This resulted in a titration range from 0 to
200 µM Cu2+, or 0-2.0 eq of Cu2+
with respect to protein concentration. The samples were then placed in
EPR sample tubes and stored in the refrigerator at 4 °C overnight.
EPR Spectroscopy--
EPR spectroscopy was performed on a Bruker
EMX X-band spectrometer. The following parameters were utilized for all
spectroscopy: the frequency was 9.41 GHz, the power was 63.31 milliwatts, the modulation frequency was 100 kHz, the modulation
amplitude was 10 Gauss, the time constant was 40.96 ms, and the
conversion time was 163.84 ms. All spectra were recorded at 153 K,
using liquid nitrogen as coolant.
 |
RESULTS |
We have suggested previously, based on turbidity measurements,
that Cu2+ induces GS dodecamers to self-assemble into
extended tubes (8, 13). The self-assembly process was monitored by
light scattering and transmission EM. Shown here are representative
transmission EM micrographs of the wild type GS in the presence and
absence of 20 µM Cu2+ (Fig.
2). The EM micrographs clearly
demonstrate the Cu2+-dependent formation of GS
tubes under conditions similar to those used for the EPR experiments.
The EM experiments were performed at a 50-fold dilution with respect to
GS concentration. The higher protein concentration is required for the
EPR experiments, but this concentration affords undecipherable EM
images due to side-to-side aggregation of tubes. We assume that these
side-to-side interactions do not interfere with the EPR signals
characterized here. This assumption is supported by the data presented
below.

View larger version (185K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Transmission electron micrographs of wild
type GS in the presence and absence of Cu2+. In the
absence of metal ion (top), only the ring-shaped GS
dodecamers are observed. After addition of Cu2+ to a final
concentration of 10 µM, the dodecamers stack to form
extended tubes (bottom). After addition of Cu2+,
samples were incubated at room temperature for 20 min before mounting
and staining.
|
|
100 µM wild type GS was titrated with 0-2.0 eq of
Cu2+, with respect to protein concentration, in incremental
steps of 0.2 eq. This titration serves as a base line for the study of
the various site-directed mutations to this metal binding site. The
spectra of wild type GS (Fig. 3) is
consistent with classically observed powder spectra of nitrogen-bound
Cu2+ ions. The g
, A
, and
g
values observed are consistent with those observed for
histidine- or imidazole-ligated Cu2+ EPR standards
(18-20). A small contribution from another species of Cu2+
results in a perturbation of the spectrum, which is detectable at low
equivalencies of Cu2+ but is obscured by the
Cu2+-protein signal as the Cu2+ concentration
increases. Comparison to a reference spectrum of 100 µM
Cu2+ in 50 mM HEPES (data not shown) indicated
buffer-ligated Cu2+ to be the most likely source of this
minor interference.
Previously, it was suggested that Met-8 may play a role in the
stabilization of these two sites (13). In an effort to elucidate the
contribution from this residue, the M8C and M8L mutants were studied by
EPR. In principle, the M8C mutation places a strong ligand in the
vicinity of each of the proposed metal binding sites, and relieves some
steric crowding. However, the much shorter cysteine side chain may not
reach either Cu2+ center. The M8L mutation removes the
potential sulfur ligand from the vicinity of the two sites, and also
adds steric bulk, which may perturb the geometry or solvation of either
metal center. As mentioned previously, the M8C mutant was observed to
stack more efficiently than wild type with some metals and less well with others, while the M8L mutant stacked less well than wild type
regardless of the metal. In all cases, the M8C mutant was observed to
stack with a larger apparent rate constant than the M8L mutant under
similar reaction conditions. Interestingly, the g
,
A
, and g
parameters observed for the two
mutants were virtually identical, both to each other and to those
observed for wild type GS (Table I). The
most significant change observed was the marked difference in the
lineshapes of the two mutants when compared with each other and to wild
type. The small perturbation observed in the spectrum of wild type GS
is greatly exaggerated in the M8L mutant (Fig.
4, top), and completely absent
in the M8C mutant (Fig. 4, bottom). As a result of the
variance in Cu2+ buffer contribution, the linewidths of the
spectra from the three proteins also show a trend, beginning with the
narrow M8C spectra and widening as more contribution from buffer is
observed in the wild type and M8L spectra.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Top, 9-GHz EPR spectra of M8L GS in the
presence of 0.6, 1.0, and 2.0 eq of Cu2+/GS subunit.
Bottom, M8C GS in the presence of 0.6, 1.0, and 2.0 eq of
Cu2+/GS subunit.
|
|
In addition to studies in which we replaced individual metal ligands
with other ligand types, we have also studied an H4A mutant (data not
shown), in which the putative 4-site has been abolished. Similar to
wild type, a spectral signal arising from buffer-bound Cu2+
is observed at low concentrations of metal, but the spectrum of
protein-bound copper is readily observed at higher concentrations. The
Cu2+ EPR spectra of the H4A mutant was nearly identical to
those of the wild type enzyme, with the exception that the spectrum at 0.6 eq of Cu2+/subunit of H4A GS is less intense than that
observed for the wild type, indicating that less copper is bound.
Presumably, this reflects cooperativity of binding the two metal ions
when both His-4 and His-12 are present. For reasons which are not
clear, an analogous mutant H12L, intended to completely remove the
ligand at position 12, was expressed poorly. Therefore, we were unable to obtain sufficient quantities of this mutant to perform EPR. However,
other substitutions at position 4 and 12 were characterized.
H4C and H12C mutants were studied in order to determine whether His-4
and His-12 are ligands to the Cu2+ centers observed in the
Cu2+-GS spectrum, as proposed on the basis of previous work
(8, 13). We hypothesized that the substitution of cysteine for
histidine would afford a composite spectrum resulting from the ligation of Cu2+ in two binding sites. Importantly, EPR spectral
parameters for Cu2+-S sites are not readily available from
model compounds, due to the tendency of free thiols to reduce the
Cu2+ to Cu+. Similarly, Cu2+-S
sites in proteins are much less well characterized than
Cu2+-N sites. Therefore, it is not straightforward to
predict the spectral parameters to be expected for Cys-12 or Cys-4
ligation. In fact, a mutation-induced change in the spectrum would not
only provide strong evidence for Cys ligation at the GS-GS interface, but may also provide a useful spectroscopic benchmark for Cys-ligated Cu2+ sites in other proteins.
Titration of the H4C mutant resulted in a spectrum composed of two
overlapping signals (Fig. 5,
top). The double minimum in the g
region is
indicative of two distinct sites, as is the weak second set of
hyperfine lines. This composite of two distinct spectral centers is
apparent throughout the titration of the H4C mutant. The H12C mutant,
on the other hand, exhibited strikingly different behavior (Fig. 5,
bottom). At concentrations of metal below 1.0 eq/helix, only
one copper signal is observed, based on the presence of only one set of
hyperfine lines and only one minimum in the g
spectral
region. At approximately 1.0 eq/helix, however, the appearance of a
second minimum in the g
region and a second set of
hyperfine lines, accompanied by a shift in the g
value,
indicates the filling of a second, spectrally distinct site. The
appearance of a second set of spectral features upon substitution of
one ligand type for another in the mutant proteins provides the first
direct evidence for the identity of the ligands to Cu2+ and
to the stoichiometry of Cu2+ binding.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Top, 9-GHz EPR spectra of H4C GS in the
presence of 0.6, 1.0, and 2.0 eq of Cu2+/GS subunit.
Bottom, H12C GS in the presence of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 eq of
Cu2+/GS subunit.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Cu2+ EPR spectroscopy has been used to determine the
ligand identity and stoichiometry of the metal binding sites that are
generated when N-terminal helices from GS subunits in adjacent
dodecamers are juxtaposed in the stacked complex. Specifically, the
results provide direct spectroscopic evidence that His-4 and His-12
each provide ligands to the metal ions bound at the dodecamer-dodecamer interface. Furthermore, the results show that, although Met-8 does not
provide a direct metal ligand, it participates indirectly in the
relative stabilization of the two sites.
The behavior of the M8L and M8C mutants indicates a role for Met-8 in
the stabilization of the two metal binding sites. Through comparison of
these mutants to the wild type protein, a general trend may be
observed. A spectral feature in the wild type enzyme EPR spectrum (Fig.
3) is observed to be more prominent at low metal equivalency, but is
masked at high equivalency of metal. The position of this spectral
feature, centered at g = 2.03, corresponds exactly to the position
of a prominent line in the spectrum of a Cu2+-HEPES buffer
control. That this interference from buffer-bound copper should be more
evident at lower concentrations of metal is to be expected. This
interference is also observed in the spectra from the titration of the
M8L mutant (Fig. 4, top). However, in this case, the
magnitude of the contribution from buffer is much more pronounced at
all concentrations of copper than that found in the wild type spectrum
at equal concentrations. In the case of the M8C mutant, however (Fig.
4, bottom), the spectral feature around g = 2.03 is
absent at all concentrations of Cu2+. Importantly, the
g
, g
, and A
values for
the protein-derived ligands do not vary significantly as a result of
these mutations. This suggests that no metal-ligand bond is formed
between the side chain of the residue at position 8 and the
Cu2+ at either site. Rather, the only effect of mutation at
this site is a change in linewidth due to incorporation of varying
amounts of Cu2+-buffer signal, and we conclude that the
effect of mutation at position 8 of the N-terminal helix is limited to
an influence on the relative affinity of the two metal binding sites by
indirect processes. Unfortunately, EPR is a poor method for measuring
Kd values, so quantitative comparison of the binding
affinities for these and other mutants will require other methods.
Previously published work utilized an H4A mutant protein, in which one
of the two metal ligands has been eliminated (13). This mutants stacks
with apparent lower affinity for metal ions than wild type. Here, the
spectra from the Cu2+ EPR titration of H4A GS were
essentially identical those obtained with the wild type enzyme at
higher concentrations of metal, i.e. 1.0 eq/subunit or
greater. At 0.6 eq of Cu2+/subunit, however, the spectrum
of H4A GS exhibits the same lineshape as wild type, but is much less intense.
Because each of the putative metal binding sites in the N-terminal
helix utilize two histidine ligands, the spectra observed for the two
sites overlap to such a degree as to be essentially identical. However,
the substitution of cysteines for one or the other of the histidines at
the two binding sites was expected to yield spectra containing features
of two distinct binding sites.
The H4C mutant protein (Fig. 5, top) exhibits
Cu2+-binding behavior unlike the wild type enzyme, or any
of the position 8 mutants. At low equivalency of metal (0.2-0.6 eq of
Cu2+) the hyperfine region of the spectrum contains
approximately equal contributions from two populations of
Cu2+ centers. The g = 2.00 to g = 2.06 region of
the spectrum contains a nearly symmetrical double minimum and a local
maximum at g = 2.01. These results are most consistent with the
simultaneous ligation of Cu2+ by the cysteines at positions
4 and the histidyl side chains at positions 12 of the N-terminal
helices. At concentrations of Cu2+ larger than 0.6 eq,
however, one set of hyperfine lines (those corresponding to a
native-like Cu2+-His site) becomes dominant. This causes an
asymmetry in the g = 2.00-2.06 region of the spectrum, with the
upfield minimum becoming more intense and a migration of the local
maximum downfield to a value of g = 2.02. This behavior is due to
a greater spectral contribution at higher concentrations of
Cu2+ from the His site at positions 12 of the helix than
that of the Cys site at positions 4.
The H12C mutant protein provides the most striking evidence that there
are two independent metal binding sites in the N-terminal helix.
Furthermore, unlike the case of the H4C mutant, the two sites appear to
fill sequentially (Fig. 5, bottom). At concentrations below
1.0 eq of Cu2+, the spectrum of the copper-bound H12C
protein appears to be an almost homogeneous spectrum with one set of
hyperfine lines and one minimum in the g
region. A minor
perturbation due to a small amount of interference from
Cu2+-buffer complexes is observed at g = 2.03, as was
previously observed in the wild type titration. This single set of
spectral features most likely corresponds to the binding of a single
population of Cu2+ to the cysteines engineered into the
protein at positions 12 of the N-terminal helix. At approximately 1.0 eq of Cu2+, however, a second set of hyperfine lines begin
to appear, accompanied by a second minimum. With increasing
Cu2+, the second set of spectral features eventually
results in a local maximum at approximately g = 2.02. The addition
of a second population of bound copper also results in a very small but
significant upfield migration of the g
value. Whereas in
the case of the H4C mutant, where both sites are populated to some
extent at all concentrations of Cu2+ and as a result the
averaged g
value of the two sites does not significantly
vary, the gradual addition of a second population of bound copper with
a slightly different g
value results in the observed
change for the H12C mutant. These spectral changes correspond to the
binding of a second, spectrally distinct, population of
Cu2+ to the native histidines at positions 4 of the
N-terminal helices. This second observed set of spectral features,
however, do not attain the same magnitude as those of the features
observed below 1.0 eq of Cu2+. This result was also
observed in a titration with steps of 0.1 eq of Cu2+, and
the results were identical; the appearance of the second set of
spectral features begins at 1.0 eq of Cu2+, with the second
set never reaching the same intensity as the first.
On the basis of these results, we conclude that the N-terminal helix of
glutamine synthetase contains two distinct metal binding sites, at
positions 4 and 12 of the helices. These two sites do not appear to
interact electronically, as there is no evidence of anti-ferromagnetic
exchange between them. This is not surprising in light of the distance
between metal ions at these sites, ~13 Å, and the presence of
residues between them at position 8 of the helix, which do not directly
participate in metal binding. Furthermore, the results allow us to
suggest that the 12-site is preferred over the position 4-site in the
N-terminal metal binding region of GS. In both mutants where one of the
native histidines was replaced with cysteine, spectral features from a
Cu2+-His site and a Cu2+-Cys site are observed.
In the case of the H4C mutant, both sites appear to be nearly equally
populated at low equivalency of metal, but at intermediate to high
concentrations, the spectral features arising from copper bound to the
native histidines at the 12-site become dominant. In the case of the
H12C mutant, the difference is more striking: The Cys site at position
12 fills completely before the His site at position 4 is occupied by
Cu2+. In both cases, the spectral features derived from the
copper-filled 12-site are more intense than those arising from the
copper-filled 4-site. This observation leads us to suggest that the
12-site binds copper sufficiently tightly to yield full occupancy of
the site. In contrast, binding of copper at the 4-site may be
sufficiently lower in affinity to result in partial occupancy on the
EPR time scale at the highest Cu2+ concentrations used.
Notably, once an apparent maximum spectral intensity of the 4-site was
achieved, the spectral contribution from that site did not increase
with increasing concentration of metal ion. If partial occupancy is the
cause for the decreased intensity, then it must be due to rapid
exchange of the Cu2+-N or Cu2+-S at the 4-site
with bulk solvated Cu2+, rather than failure to saturate
the site. That is, binding of Cu2+ at the 4-site may be
sufficiently dynamic to account for decreased intensity.
A potential explanation for this behavior is apparent from a model for
the GS-GS complex based on the crystal structure of the S. typhimurium protein (Fig. 1). The spectra observed for these sites
by EPR are consistent with those of nitrogen bound copper ions
(18-21). In this case, histidines bind Cu2+ in a linear
bidentate arrangement, functioning as the dominant ligands, while
contacts to bulk water are presumed to provide the rest of the ligand
field, as there is no evidence of participation by other
protein-derived ligands. Because of this geometry, the conformations
adopted by the ligands at the 4 and 12 positions are critical to their
ability to bind metal. According to our model, the histidines at
position 12 are directed between the helices at an angle very close to
optimal for this type of binding. Hence, Cu2+ can bind at
the 12-site with a minimum of induced strain. The histidines at
position 4, however, are not so ideally positioned. Due to the helical
twist, the side chains of position 4 are directed to either side of the
plane defined by the two helical axes. As a result, alignment of these
two histidines to adopt ligand field geometry similar to that found at
position 12 incurs some strain, rendering the position 4-site a less
desirable ligand field. This model is consistent with our observation
that Cu2+-binding at position 12 is preferred relative to
position 4. Adding a further level of complexity to the model, however,
is the presence of glutamic acid residues in the immediate vicinity of
each of the two histidines. Residues Glu-3 and Glu-11 can adopt
conformations suitable for the formation of a hydrogen bond between the
carboxylate group of the glutamate and N
1 of the histidine imidazole
ring opposite the metal-binding N
2. This type of "off-side"
hydrogen bond has been implicated in the stabilization of
metal-imidazole bonds (22-24). In the case of GS, the formation of an
off-side hydrogen bond stabilizes the near-optimal metal binding
conformation of the His-12 ligands; however, the formation of a similar
interaction between Glu-3 and His-4 results in the stabilization of a
less ideal ligand field, as mentioned above. Thus, for the His-4 site, an intrahelical hydrogen bond may compete with the conformation of
His-4 required to form an interhelical metal binding site, and reduce
the apparent affinity for metal. Another potential distinction between
the two sites that might contribute to the observed difference in
binding behavior is the presence of a glutamate residue at position 13 which has no structural analogue at position 5. Although Glu-13 is not
situated well for hydrogen bonding to His-12, the presence of an
additional negatively charged residue in the vicinity of the 12-site
may contribute significantly to the difference in the electrostatic
attraction of the two sites toward metal cations. In addition to these
other factors, this contrast in electrostatics may be sufficient to
provide differential affinity for the two sites.
It is useful to keep in mind that the site under study is not
necessarily occupied by Cu2+ ions in the native state of
the protein, nor has it any catalytic or redox activity associated with
it. Rather, it is a unique intermolecular metal binding site which will
bind copper, or a variety of other metals. Because of this difference,
it would not be entirely unexpected that this site would not conform
completely to any classically described, native copper site type.
Nevertheless, a comparison of the findings to classically described
sites is appropriate. As mentioned above, the two sites in the
N-terminal helix of GS act independently of each other, and there is no
indication of anti-ferromagnetic exchange between them; therefore, a
type 3 site can be ruled out. Similarly, the absence of a strong blue color corresponding to a large absorption at ~600 nm or very narrow hyperfine splitting characteristic of the blue-copper proteins allows
us to rule out the type 1 site. Because the A
values for
these sites are all greater than 1.4 × 10
4
cm
1 and no absorbance at
= 600 nm is observed,
these copper centers are best classified as type 2 sites. Moreover, in
light of the paucity of well characterized Cu2+-S systems
resulting from their tendency to undergo redox reactions, our results
are of considerable interest as models for EPR parameters in proteins
with Cu2+-S bonds.
Most importantly, our results identify directly the metal-binding
ligands that are responsible for the "stacking" phenomenon observed
in E. coli glutamine synthetase. By replacing the native histidines that were previously reported as suspected ligands with
other potential ligands, we have generated spectra that are composites
of two distinct populations of bound copper. We have used these results
to demonstrate that there are two separate binding sites for metal on
the N-terminal helix, and that the site between positions 12 of a given
"helix dimer" is preferred over the site formed between positions
4, based on the spectral features observed. We have also shown that the
side chain at position 8 of the N-terminal helix does not directly
ligate to either metal ion.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant
MCB9305202, Whitaker Foundation Grant 93-0272, Petroleum Research Fund
Grant 31565, and in part by University of Washington Center Grant P30
ESO7033 from the NIEHS, National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Medicinal Chemistry, Box 357610, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7610. Tel.: 206-685-0379; Fax: 206-685-3252; E-mail:
winky@u.washington.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
GS, glutamine
synthetase;
EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance;
MSOX, L-methionine sulfoximine;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
EM, electron microscopy.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Valentine, R. C.,
Shapiro, B. M.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1966)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
116,
171-179
|
| 2.
|
Almassy, R. J.,
Janson, C. A.,
Hamlin, R.,
Xuong, N. H.,
and Eisenberg, D.
(1986)
Nature
323,
304-309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Antson, A. A.,
Dodson, E. J.,
and Dodson, G. G.
(1996)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol
6,
142-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Miller, R. E.,
Shelton, E.,
and Stadtman, E. R.
(1974)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
163,
155-171[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Maurizi, M. R.,
Kasprzyk, P. G.,
and Ginsburg, A.
(1986)
Biochemistry
25,
141-151[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Frey, T. G.,
Eisenberg, D.,
and Eiserling, F. A.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
3402-3406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Dabrowski, M. D,
and Atkins, W. M.
(1995)
Adv. Mater.
7,
1015-1017[CrossRef]
|
| 8.
|
Yanchunas, J., Jr.,
Dabrowski, M. J.,
Schurke, P.,
and Atkins, W. M.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
14949-14956[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Hartgerink, J. D.,
Granja, J. R.,
Milligan, R. A.,
and Ghadiri MR.
(1996)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
118,
43-50[CrossRef]
|
| 10.
|
Alivisatos, A. P.,
Johnson, K. P.,
Peng, X.,
Wilson, T. E.,
Loweth, C. J.,
Bruchez, M. P., Jr.,
and Schultz, P. G.
(1996)
Nature
382,
609-611[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Chen, J. P.,
Dabrowski, M. J.,
and Atkins, W. M.
(1997)
Protein Eng.
10,
1289-1294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Dabrowski, M. D.,
Chen, J. P.,
Shi, H. Q.,
Chen, W. C.,
and Atkins, W. M,.
(1998)
Chem. Biol.
5,
689-697[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Dabrowski, M. J.,
Yanchunas, J.,
Cader-Villafranca, B. M.,
Dietze, E. C.,
Schurke, P.,
and Atkins, W. M.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
14957-14964[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Atkins, W. M.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
14965-14973[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
| Schurke, P., Jochheim, C. M., Dabrowski, M. J., and Atkins,
W. M. (1996) Proceedings of the 34th Hanford Symposium on
Health and the Environment: From 3D Structure to Application,
October 23-26, 1996, Pasco, WA
|
| 16.
|
Hunt, J. B.,
and Ginsburg, A.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
590-594[Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Maurizi, M. R.,
and Ginsburg, A.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
4271-4278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Knowles, P. F.,
Marsh, D.,
and Rattle, H. W. E.
(1976)
Magnetic Resonance of Biomolecules
, John Wiley & Sons, New York:
|
| 19.
|
Vanngard, T.
(1972)
in
Biological Applications of Electron Spin Resonance
(Swartz, H. M.
, Bolton, J. R.
, and Borg, D. C., eds)
, pp. 411-447, Wiley-Interscience, New York
|
| 20.
|
Boas, J. F.,
Pilbrow, J. R.,
and Smith, T. D.
(1978)
in
Biological Magnetic Resonance
(Berliner, L. J.
, and Reuben, J., eds), Vol. 1
, pp. 277-342, Plenum Press, New York
|
| 21.
|
Bonander, N.,
Karlsson, B. G.,
and Vanngard, T.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
2429-2436[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Nakagawa, S.,
Umeyama, H.,
Kitaura, K.,
and Morokuma, K.
(1981)
Chem. Pharm. Bull.
29,
1-6
|
| 23.
|
McGrath, M. E.,
Haymore, B. L.,
Summers, N. L.,
Craik, C. S.,
and Fletterick, R. J.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
1914-1919[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Christianson, D. W.,
and Alexander, R. S.
(1990)
Nature
346,
225[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.