![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 27997-28002, September 24, 1999
From Retroviral Gag protein is sufficient to produce
Gag virus-like particles when expressed in higher eukaryotic cells.
Here we describe the in vitro assembly reaction of human
immunodeficiency virus Gag protein, which consists of two sequential
steps showing the optimal conditions for each reaction. Following
expression and purification, Gag protein lacking only the C-terminal p6
domain was present as a monomer (50 kDa) by velocity sedimentation
analysis. Initial assembly of the Gag protein to 60 S intermediates
occurred by dialysis at 4 °C in low salt at neutral to alkaline pH.
However, higher order of assembly required incubation at 37 °C and
was facilitated by the addition of Mg2+. Prolonged
incubation under these conditions produced complete assembly (600 S),
equivalent to Gag virus-like particles obtained from Gag-expressing
cells. Neither form disassembled by treatment with nonionic detergent,
suggesting that correct assembly might occur in vitro.
Electron microscopic observation confirmed that the 600 S assembly
products were spherical particles similar to authentic immature human
immunodeficiency virus particles. The latter assembly stage but not the
former was accelerated by the addition of RNA although not inhibited by
RNaseA treatment. These results suggest that Gag protein alone
assembles in vitro, but that additional RNA facilitates the
assembly reaction.
The main structural component of human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)1particle, Gag, is
encoded by the gag gene and is the sole protein required for
formation of Gag virus-like particles (VLPs), analogous to the immature
form of authentic HIV. Accordingly, expression of Gag protein alone by
recombinant viruses or by transfection of expression plasmids leads to
simultanous assembly and budding of Gag VLPs from the cell surface
(1-4). This process is thought to consist of several steps: N-terminal
myristoylation of Gag protein followed by targeting to the plasma
membrane and self-assembly of Gag protein underneath the plasma
membrane to form Gag VLPs and budding (1, 5, 6). Although the
N-terminal myristoylation is essential for Gag targeting to the plasma
membrane (1, 7, 8), assembly of the Gag protein itself appears not to
require the myristoylation, since nonmyristoylated Gag protein
co-assembles with myristoylated Gag protein and is found in budded Gag
VLPs (4, 9, 10). Furthermore, expression of Gag protein in Escherichia coli, which lacks
N-myristoyltransferase activity (11), yields Gag VLP-like
structures inside the cells (12) despite the lack of Gag myristoylation.
HIV Gag protein consists of four distinct domains, the N-terminal
matrix (MA, p17), the central capsid (CA, p24), the nucleocapsid (NC,
p7), and the C-terminal p6 domain (13), each of which is produced by
processing of Gag protein during or soon after virus particle budding
(14, 15). HIV particles just after budding are spherial but,
concomitant with Gag processing, are transformed to particles
containing conical cores. The Gag regions responsible for virus
particle assembly have been extensively studied by amino acid deletion
and substitution experiments, and evidence has accumulated to suggest
that the C-terminal third of the CA domain, including the p2 peptide,
which is located at CA/NC junction, is essential (16-19). In contrast,
most of NC and the entire p6 domain are dispensable for Gag VLP
formation (1-3, 20), although the NC domain contains a crucial
determinant for packaging of viral genomic RNA (21-25). Data on the
requirement of the MA domain for assembly have been apparently
conflicting. Recent studies have shown that deletion of the entire
globular domain of MA does not abolish virus particle formation (5, 26,
27), yet the globular domain plays a key role for trimerization of MA
as well as MA-CA, suggesting the contribution of MA to authentic Gag
assembly (28, 29).
In contrast to these in vivo analyses, in vitro
assembly of retroviral Gag protein was originally reported for
Mason-Pfizer monkey virus, showing a spherical structure following
renaturation of partially purified Gag protein (30), but the optimal
conditions for the assembly reaction were not studied. Recently, the
in vitro assembly giving rise to long tubular rather than
spherical structures has been reported using the individual Gag domains
such as CA and CA-NC (31, 32). Morphological conversion of the assembly products from tubes to spheres was observed when several amino acids of
MA were fused onto the N terminus of the CA domain (12, 33), but
unfortunately this construct was devoid of the globular domain of MA
and the p2 region. More recently, the in vitro assembly of
Gag protein including these domains has been carried out, showing spherical particles (34). However, the conditions for the in vitro assembly reaction appeared not to be optimized, as the
in vitro assembled particles were much smaller than
authentic HIV particles. To understand the authentic Gag assembly
reaction, it is necessary to establish an efficient in vitro
assembly reaction with Gag protein including all the necessary domains
and determine the requirements for the assembly reaction to produce
spherical particles that more closely mimic authentic HIV. Here, using
Gag protein lacking only the C-terminal p6 domain, we describe an in vitro assembly reaction that is composed of two
sequential steps: formation of 60 S assembly intermediate and complete
assembly to 600 S equivalent to authentic Gag VLPs.
Materials--
E. coli expression vector pTrcHisA was
purchased from Invitrogen and metal chelate resin (HisBind Resin) from
Novagen. A high molecular weight calibration kit was purchased from
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, and prestained protein molecular weight
markers (low range) were from Bio-Rad. Calf liver RNA and
anti-polyhistidine mouse monoclonal antibody were obtained from Sigma.
Anti-HIV-1 CA mouse monoclonal antibody was provided by Dr. H. Holmes
(Medical Research Council AIDS reagent repository, National Institute
for Biological Standards and Control, Hertz, UK), and 80 S ribosome was
kindly supplied by Dr. K. Mizumoto (Kitasato University, Japan). Other
reagents, unless otherwise specified, were commercially available of
analytical grade.
DNA Construction--
The HIV-1 gag gene encoding the
Gag region essential for virus particle formation (MA-CA-p2-NC) with
the sequence encoding additional six histidine residues at the C
terminus was amplified by polymerase chain reaction with
5'-CGCGCCATGGGTGCGAGAGCGTCAGT-3' and
5'-CGCGGAATTCTCAATGATGATGATGATGATGATTAGCCTGTCTCTCAGT -3'
(underlines in the sequence encode six histidine residues). The
polymerase chain reaction fragment was digested with NcoI
and EcoRI and cloned into E. coli expression
vector pTrcHisA (Invitrogen).
Protein Expression and Purification--
An overnight culture of
transformed E. coli cells was inoculated at 1:20 and grown
for 2 h at 37 °C. After 1 h of induction with 1 mM isopropyl- In Vitro Assembly Reaction--
Following chromatography, eluted
protein solution was initially adjusted with EDTA to a final
concentration of 2 mM (to chelate Ni2+) and
then dialyzed overnight at 4 °C against 20 mM Tris (pH
8.6 adjusted at room temperature), 100 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) unless
otherwise indicated. In some experiments, calf liver RNA or RNaseA
(Sigma) was added before dialysis. For higher order or complete
assembly, the dialyzed protein was incubated in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 at 37 °C for 1 or 3 h unless
otherwise indicated (see text and legends for Figs. 3, 4, and 5).
Purification of HIV Gag VLP--
HIV Gag VLP was purified from a
culture media of Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9)
cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus containing HIV-1
gag gene, as described previously (10). Briefly, the Gag VLP
was pelleted through a 30% (w/v) sucrose cushions and then purified by
centrifugation in a 20-60% (w/v) sucrose gradient spun at 4 °C at
147,000 × g overnight. The purified Gag VLP was
treated with 0.5% Triton X-100 at 4 °C for 30 min.
Velocity Sedimentation Analysis--
Protein was applied onto a
15-30% (v/v) glycerol gradient including 20 mM Tris (pH
8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM
EDTA and sedimented at 4 °C at 220,000 × g for
20 h. For higher order assembly, protein sample (multimerized Gag
protein) and Gag VLP were applied onto 20-70% (w/v) sucrose gradients
in phosphate-buffered saline and sedimented at 4 °C at 120,000 × g for 2 h. After centrifugation, the gradients were
fractionated by 200 µl from the bottom to the top. A high molecular
weight calibration kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and 80 S ribosome
were used for molecular weight markers for sedimentation analysis.
Protein Detection--
Protein sample was analyzed by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on 14% acrylamide. After
electrophoresis, protein in a gel was either directly detected by
Coomassie Brilliant Blue or silver staining or was subjected to Western
blotting (35) using anti-HIV-1 CA or anti-polyhistidine monoclonal
antibody (Sigma) and anti-mouse IgG alkaline phosphatase conjugate
(Cappel). The immunocomplexes were visualized using nitro blue
tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (Bio-Rad).
Electron Microscopic Examination--
The procedure for
microscopic examination was described previously (36). In
vitro assembly products were collected through a 30% (w/v)
sucrose cushion and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 50 mM
cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) at 4 °C for 2 h. After post-fixation with 1% osmium tetroxide in 50 mM cacodylate buffer (pH
7.2) at 4 °C for 1 h, the pellets were embedded in epoxy resin.
Ultrathin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate
and examined with an electron microscope (Hitachi H-800).
Purification of HIV Gag Protein--
To obtain purified HIV Gag
protein, the HIV-1 gag gene with the additional sequence
encoding six histidine residues at the C terminus was cloned into
pTrcHisA vector and expressed in E. coli cells. After 1 h of isopropyl- Initial Assembly--
Purified monomeric Gag protein (as above)
was used as the starting material for in vitro assembly
experiments. The Gag protein solution was initially adjusted to 2 mM EDTA and dialyzed overnight at 4 °C against 20 mM Tris (pH 8.6 adjusted at room temperature), 100 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT
to remove any excess concentration of imidazole. When the dialyzed Gag
protein was subjected to velocity sedimentation analysis on a 20-70%
(w/v) sucrose gradient, most of the Gag protein sedimented faster than
the Gag protein before dialysis (compare Fig.
2, A and B) and had
a calculated S value of 60 S when compared with 80 S ribosomes. This
indicates that monomeric Gag protein assembles to 60 S by dialysis
under these conditions. In general, protein-protein interaction is
stimulated in the presence of Mg2+, yet further assembly of
Gag to greater than 60 S did not occur by dialysis in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 at 4 °C (Fig. 2C).
Assembly to the 60 S occurred in dialysis buffer of neutral to alkaline pH at low salt concentration but failed at acidic pH or at high salt
concentration (Table I). The optimized
conditions for the reaction were similar to those under which HIV
CA-p2-NC protein was originally reported to be assembled in
vitro, depending on additional RNA to form tubular structures (31,
32). To examine the involvement of RNA in our assembly reactions, the
Gag protein was dialyzed in the presence of RNaseA, or additional RNA
and analyzed similarly. No significant differences were observed in the
sedimentation profiles, indicating that RNA was not involved in the Gag
assembly reaction to 60S (Fig. 2, D and E). These
observations suggest that Gag protein alone was simultaneously
multimerized to 60 S at 4 °C at a high level of efficiency when in
neutral to alkaline pH at low salt concentration.
Higher Order of Assembly to Complete Assembly--
To explore a
possibility that further assembly of Gag protein is facilitated at
higher temperatures, the dialyzed Gag protein was incubated in the
presence of 5 mM MgCl2 at 37 °C for 1 h
and analyzed by velocity sedimentation on a sucrose gradient. More than
75% of the total Gag protein (quantitated by NIH image software) was
detected at a broad range with calculated S values of 150-350 S,
suggesting that a higher order of assembly in various degrees of
multimerization occurred under these conditions, although a small
fraction of the Gag protein remained at 60 S (Fig.
3A). However, when the
dialyzed Gag protein was incubated in the absence of MgCl2
but similarly at 37 °C for 1 h, the shift from the 60 S
position was much less efficient than observed after incubation with
MgCl2, suggesting that the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2 facilitated the assembly reaction at 37 °C (Fig.
3B). In contrast, when the Gag protein was incubated at
30 °C with or without MgCl2, the sedimentation profile
was essentially similar to that before incubation, showing that no
further assembly occurred at 30 °C (Fig. 3C). Taken
together, these results suggest that higher order of Gag assembly
proceeds at 37 °C but not at 30 °C and is facilitated by the
presence of MgCl2.
Since it has been reported that one Gag VLP contains 1000-2000
molecules of Gag proteins and sediments at 600 S (20), the assembly
state observed under the conditions reported here still appeared
insufficient for complete assembly. However, when the incubation time
for the reaction was prolonged to 3 h, the sedimentation profile
was shifted to that of Gag VLP, suggesting that Gag assembly might
proceed to completion within 3 h under these conditions, although
a small fraction of the Gag protein was still observed at 60 S (Fig.
4A). The proportion of Gag
remaining at 60 S in the complete reaction was similar to that observed
in the partial assembly reaction, suggesting that the Gag molecules
that fail to assemble to 150-350 S by 1 h reaction never
participate in the higher order of assembly, presumably due to denature
during dialysis. Gag VLP and immature authentic HIV particles are not dissociated by treatment with nonionic detergents such as Triton X-100
and Nonidet P-40 (37, 38). Accordingly, the detergent treatment was
applied to the in vitro assembly product of 600 S as a
general measure to examine whether the correct assembly of Gag protein
occurred in vitro. The in vitro assembly product of 600 S was not dissociated by treatment with 0.5% Triton X-100 (Fig.
4B), similar to the stability of Gag VLP in the presence of
the detergent (Fig. 4C), suggesting a parallel nature
between the Gag proteins assembled in vitro and in
vivo.
Acceleration of Complete Assembly by Addition of
RNA--
Retroviral genomic RNA is incorporated during Gag assembly by
binding to the NC domain, and recent evidence suggests that the Gag
constructs containing the NC domain assemble by the addition of RNA,
which acts, presumably, as a scaffold (31, 32, 34). Although the
initial assembly we observed following dialysis was independent of RNA,
it is possible that the higher order or complete assembly occurred by
virtue of trace amounts of RNA that might have been contaminated in the
Gag protein preparations. To investigate this possibility, RNaseA was
added to the Gag protein before or after dialysis, the mixture was
incubated in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 at
37 °C for 3 h, conditions under which assembly to 600 S was
normally observed using the Gag protein solution. Sedimentation analysis showed that the assembly to 600 S also occurred under these
conditions (Fig. 5A),
suggesting that RNA is not required for the complete assembly of Gag
protein. However, when RNA was added to the Gag protein and the mixture
was incubated in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 at
37 °C but only for 1 h, conditions under which Gag protein
alone does not assemble up to 600 S, the sedimentation profile was
shifted to that of the complete assembly product of 600 S (Fig.
5B). This finding indicates that the addition of RNA accelerates the assembly reaction from the 60 S to 600 S forms of Gag.
Together, these results suggest that Gag protein alone assembles to 600 S in vitro but that the addition of RNA accelerates the
higher order of assembly.
Microscopic Examination of Complete Assembly Product--
Electron
microscopic examination was carried out to confirm the defined
structure of the in vitro assembly product of 600 S. Almost
spherical (Fig. 6A) but often
faceted particles (Fig. 6B) were observed by ultrathin
section transmission electron microscopy. The particles were hollow
surrounded by double-ring structures, with an average diameter of 80 nm. When compared with immature HIV Gag VLPs (Fig. 6C),
these features suggest the structure of the in vitro
assembly products is similar to that of authentic immature HIV.
In vitro assembly of HIV Gag protein was initially
observed when a CA-p2-NC protein fragment was dialyzed at 4 °C under
low salt conditions at pH 8, although the assembly efficiency was very
low (31). Recent studies on in vitro assembly have been carried out using CA-p2-NC, CA, and CA fused with several amino acids
of or entire MA (12, 32-34). In these studies, the conditions used for
assembly varied, since protein-protein interaction depends on salt
concentration, pH, and temperature, which themselves influence protein
conformation. We described the in vitro assembly of nearly full-length HIV Gag protein (MA-CA-p2-NC), devoid of only the C-terminal p6 domain, showing the optimal condition for formation of a
spherical particle with a double-ring structure, similar to authentic
immature HIV particles. In parallel, the assembly efficiency of the Gag
protein was semiquantitated by velocity sedimentation analysis and
estimated that approximately 77% of the total Gag protein finally
assembled to 600 S under the optimized condition. The assembly reaction
appeared to be composed of two steps, both of which proceeded at low
ionic strength at neutral to alkaline pH but failed at high salt or at
acidic pH (Table I). The optimal salt concentration differed from that
in the recent studies in which CA-driving assembly was observed (at
0.5-1 M salt), although the optimal pH range (neutral to
alkaline) was consistent with those studies (32). It is plausible that
the presence of the entire MA domain on the Gag protein used in our experiment resulted in the preference for the low salt condition, since
a previous report has shown that MA-driving trimerization was sensitive
to salt concentration (29).
Electron microscopic analysis of previous CA-driving assembly
reactions has revealed that both CA and CA-p2-NC formed tubular or
conial structures in vitro, which represent conical cores of mature HIV particles (32, 33). The formation of spherical structures
were observed when the CA domain was extended at the N terminus by a
small portion of MA (12, 33), although the in vitro assembly
of this construct is also presumably driven by the CA domain, as it
occurred at high ionic strength. In contrast, our Gag assembly
reactions appeared not to be CA-driven as they occurred under low salt
condition, but produced a spherical particle. A similar finding has
been reported by Campbell and Rein (34). From these data, we speculate
that whichever domain of Gag could trigger for Gag assembly, a final
shape of Gag assembly products depends on whether the MA domain (or
even a small portion of MA) is present within Gag constructs used for
assembly reactions. This interpretation is supported by a recent
proposal that creation of the intermolecular salt bridge at the C
terminus of CA domain occurs after cleavage of the MA/CA junction and
redirects Gag assembly from spheres to cones (33).
It is well known that protein-protein interaction is stimulated by
factors such as temperature and Mg2+ ion concentration. In
our experiment, the initial assembly to 60 S intermediates occurred
only by dialysis at 4 °C, but the higher order of assembly to 600 S
required incubation at 37 °C in the presence of Mg2+.
This indicates that the higher Gag assembly state requires more stimulating factors. However, it is possible that a higher
concentration of Gag protein for assembly reaction could compensate for
these requirements, as it is reported that those factors had little effect on the yield of assembly product when a high concentration of CA
protein was used (32).
Retroviral genomic or even non-cognate RNA is incorporated into
assembling Gag VLPs via the zinc finger motifs located in the NC
domain. Recent studies on in vitro assembly reactions with CA-p2-NC suggest that RNA serves as a scaffold that effectively concentrates the protein in the microenvironment (31), although the
protein has also been reported to assemble in the absence of RNA but
only at a high concentration of salt or protein (32). Recent in
vitro assembly reaction with the nearly full-length Gag protein,
which was carried out at room temperature, was completely dependent on
additional RNA (34), but in contrast, RNA was not absolutely required
for our in vitro assembly reaction at 37 °C (Fig. 5).
Since the Gag assembly from 60 S to 600 S was not inhibited by RNaseA
treatment but was accelerated by addition of RNA, we suggest that RNA
requirement for Gag assembly reaction is reduced by incubation at
higher temperature. We believe that the in vitro assembly of
the nearly full-length Gag protein described here with RNA to form a
spherical particle requires an understanding of the physiological
situation of authentic Gag assembly in vivo, because Gag
VLPs are produced from various eukaryotic cells including insect cells
cultured at 27-28 °C; in the latter cell case, RNA may be used as
an essential scaffold.
We thank Dr. K. Mizumoto (School of
Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Japan) for experimental
suggestions and supply of 80 S ribosomes.
*
This work was supported by grants from Ministry of Health
and Welfare of Japan and from Ciba-Geigy Foundation for the Promotion of Sciences.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-3444-6161;
Fax: 81-3-5791-6120; E-mail: ymorikawa@kitasato.or.jp.
The abbreviations used are:
HIV, human
immunodeficiency virus;
VLP, virus-like particle;
MA, matrix;
CA, capsid: NC, nucleocapsid;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
In Vitro Assembly of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Type 1 Gag Protein*
§,
The Kitasato Institute, Shirokane 5-9-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8642, Japan and ¶ Department of
Microbiology, Osaka Medical College, Daigaku-cho 2-7, Takatsuki,
Osaka 569-8686, Japan
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, the
E. coli cells were immediately chilled and harvested by
centrifugation at 4 °C at 8,000 × g for 15 min. The
cells were resuspended in binding buffer (20 mM Tris (pH
7.9), 150 mM NaCl, and 10 mM imidazole), sonicated at 4 °C for 5 min, and then lyzed by addition of Nonidet P-40 to a final concentration of 0.2%. After centrifugation at 4 °C
at 15,000 × g for 30 min, the supernatant was
subjected to metal chelate chromatography (Novagen). After washes with
25 volumes of binding buffer and with 20 volumes of wash buffer (20 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 150 mM NaCl, and 60 mM imidazole), bound protein was eluted with 5 volumes of
elute buffer (20 mM Tris (pH 7.9), 150 mM NaCl,
and 1 M imidazole).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactopyranoside induction at
37 °C, the expressed Gag protein was purified by metal chelate chromatography. When the full-length gag gene was used,
expressed Gag protein was accompanied with some degradation (data not
shown). As expression of Gag protein lacking the C-terminal p6 domain showed no degradation (Fig. 1), this
construct was used in the present study. Although the concentration of
the Gag protein was below 1 mg/ml (Fig. 1A, a),
the protein was 95% pure when detected by silver staining (Fig.
1B, lower). Identification of the Gag protein was
confirmed by Western blotting with anti-HIV-1 CA monoclonal antibody
(Fig. 1A, b) and also with anti-polyhistidine
monoclonal antibody (Fig. 1A, c). When the
purified Gag protein was sedimented on a 15-30% (v/v) glycerol
gradient directly after purification and compared with molecular weight
markers sedimented in parallel, it was detected in a monomeric form (50 kDa) (Fig. 1B).

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Purified Gag protein with additional six
histidine residues at the C terminus. After 1 h of induction
at 37 °C, expressed Gag protein was purified from E. coli
cells by metal chelate chromatography (Novagen) according to the
manufacturer's protocol, except that salt concentration was reduced to
150 mM. Panel A, protein staining with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue (a) and immunoblots probed with anti-HIV-1 CA
(b) and with anti-polyhistidine monoclonal antibodies
(c) following SDS-PAGE. Lane M,
prestained molecular weight markers (Bio-Rad); lane 1, purified Gag protein. Panel B, the Gag protein
directly sedimented on a 15-30% (v/v) glycerol gradient at 4 °C at
220,000 × g for 20 h. Fractions were collected
from the bottom to the top (left to right) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Upper, sedimentation markers (high molecular weight
calibration kit, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) stained with Coomassie
Brilliant Blue; lower, Gag protein detected by silver
staining.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Initial assembly of Gag protein by dialysis
at 4 °C. Purified Gag protein was dialyzed against 20 mM Tris (pH 8.6 adjusted at room temperature), 100 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, and 1 mM DTT
and subjected to velocity sedimentation analysis on 20-70% (w/v)
sucrose gradients at 4 °C at 120,000 × g for 2 h. The gradient fractions from the bottom to the top (left to right)
were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and then subjected either to silver staining
(panels A, B, and C) or to Western
blotting using anti-HIV-1 CA monoclonal antibody (panels D
and E). Panels: A, before dialysis;
B, post dialysis; C, dialyzed in the presence of
5 mM MgCl2; D, dialyzed in the
presence of 10 µg/ml RNaseA; E, dialyzed in the presence
of calf liver RNA at a concentration of 3% of the Gag protein.
Lane M, prestained molecular mass markers (BioRad).
Effect of pH and salt concentration on assembly reactions
,
failed; ND, not done.

View larger version (65K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Requirements for higher order of assembly of
Gag protein. Dialyzed Gag protein was incubated for 1 h with
combinations of incubation temperatures and concentrations of
MgCl2. Sedimentation on 20-70% (w/v) sucrose gradients
were carried out as described in the legend for Fig. 2. The gradient
fractions from the bottom to the top (left to right) were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining. Panels: A,
incubated at 37 °C in the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2; B, incubated at 37 °C in the absence
of MgCl2; C, incubated at 30 °C in the
presence of 5 mM MgCl2. Lane M,
prestained molecular mass markers (BioRad).

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Complete assembly of Gag protein and
detergent treatment after the assembly reaction. Dialyzed Gag
protein was incubated in the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2 at 37 °C for 3 h (panel A) and
then treated with 0.5% Triton X-100 at 4 °C for 30 min (panel
B). Gag VLPs purified from the supernatant of Gag-expressing
Sf9 cells were treated with 0.5% Triton X-100 similarly
(panel C). Sedimentation conditions on 20-70% (w/v)
sucrose gradients were described in the legend for Fig. 2. The gradient
fractions from the bottom to the top (left to right) were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE and subjected either to silver staining (panels A
and B) or to Western blotting using anti-HIV-1 CA monoclonal
antibody (panel C). Lane M, prestained molecular
mass markers (BioRad).

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of the presence of RNA or RNaseA on
complete assembly of Gag protein. Dialyzed Gag protein was
incubated with 5 mM MgCl2 at 37 °C either in
the presence of 10 µg/ml RNaseA for 3 h (panel A) or
in the presence of calf liver RNA for 1 h (panel B).
Sedimentation conditions on 20-70% (w/v) sucrose gradients were
described in the legend for Fig. 2. The gradient fractions from the
bottom to the top (left to right) were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by
Western blotting using anti-HIV-1 CA monoclonal antibody. Lane
M, prestained molecular mass markers (BioRad).

View larger version (50K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Electron microscopy of completely assembled
Gag proteins. Dialyzed Gag protein was incubated in the presence
of 5 mM MgCl2 and calf liver RNA at 37 °C
for 1 h and pelleted through a 30% sucrose cushion. The pellets
were observed by ultrathin section electron microscopy.
Panels: A and B, in vitro
assembly products of 600 S; C, Gag VLPs prepared as
described in the legend for Fig. 4C. Scale bars
represent 100 nm.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Gheysen, D.,
Jacobs, E.,
de Foresta, F.,
Thiriart, C.,
Francotte, M.,
Thines, D.,
and De Wilde, M.
(1989)
Cell
59,
103-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Hoshikawa, N.,
Kojima, A.,
Yasuda, A.,
Takayashiki, E.,
Masuko, S.,
Chiba, J.,
Sata, T.,
and Kurata, T.
(1991)
J. Gen. Virol.
72,
2509-2517 3.
Jowett, J. B.,
Hockley, D. J.,
Nermut, M. V.,
and Jones, I. M.
(1992)
J. Gen. Virol.
73,
3079-3086 4.
Smith, A. J.,
Srinivasakumar, N.,
Hammarskjold, M. L.,
and Rekosh, D.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
2266-2275 5.
Facke, M.,
Janetzko, A.,
Shoeman, R. L.,
and Krausslich, H. G.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
4972-4980 6.
Krausslich, H. G.,
and Welker, R.
(1996)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
214,
25-63[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Gottlinger, H. G.,
Sodroski, J. G.,
and Haseltine, W. A.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
5781-5785 8.
Bryant, M.,
and Ratner, L.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
523-527 9.
Park, J.,
and Morrow, C. D.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
6304-6313 10.
Morikawa, Y.,
Hinata, S.,
Tomoda, H.,
Goto, T.,
Nakai, M.,
Aizawa, C.,
Tanaka, H.,
and Omura, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
2868-2873 11.
Duronio, R. J.,
Jackson-Machelski, E.,
Heuckeroth, R. O.,
Olins, P. O.,
Devine, C. S.,
Yonemoto, W.,
Slice, L. W.,
Taylor, S. S.,
and Gordon, J. I.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
1506-1510 12.
Gross, I.,
Hohenberg, H.,
Huckhagel, C.,
and Krausslich, H. G.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
4798-4810 13.
Mervis, R. J.,
Ahmad, N.,
Lillehoj, E. P.,
Raum, M. G.,
Salazar, F. H.,
Chan, H. W.,
and Venkatesan, S.
(1988)
J. Virol.
62,
3993-4002 14.
Kaplan, A. H.,
Manchester, M.,
and Swanstrom, R.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
6782-6786 15.
Vogt, V. M.
(1996)
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
214,
95-131[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Dorfman, T.,
Bukovsky, A.,
Ohagen, A.,
Hoglund, S.,
and Gottlinger, H. G.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
8180-8187 17.
Mammano, F.,
Ohagen, A.,
Hoglund, S.,
and Gottlinger, H. G.
(1994)
J. Virol.
68,
4927-4936 18.
Reicin, A. S.,
Paik, S.,
Berkowitz, R. D.,
Luban, J.,
Lowy, I.,
and Goff, S. P.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
642-650[Abstract]
19.
Zhang, W. H.,
Hockley, D. J.,
Nermut, M. V.,
Morikawa, Y.,
and Jones, I. M.
(1996)
J. Gen. Virol.
77,
743-751 20.
Royer, M.,
Hong, S. S.,
Gay, B.,
Cerutti, M.,
and Boulanger, P.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
3230-3235 21.
Berkowitz, R. D.,
Luban, J.,
and Goff, S. P.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
7190-7200 22.
Gorelick, R. J.,
Chabot, D. J.,
Rein, A.,
Henderson, L. E.,
and Arthur, L. O.
(1993)
J. Virol.
67,
4027-4036 23.
Sakaguchi, K.,
Zambrano, N.,
Baldwin, E. T.,
Shapiro, B. A.,
Erickson, J. W.,
Omichinski, J. G.,
Clore, G. M.,
Gronenborn, A. M.,
and Appella, E.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5219-5223 24.
Dannull, J.,
Surovoy, A.,
Jung, G.,
and Moelling, K.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
1525-1533[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Schmalzbauer, E.,
Strack, B.,
Dannull, J.,
Guehmann, S.,
and Moelling, K.
(1996)
J. Virol.
70,
771-777[Abstract]
26.
Yu, X.,
Yuan, X.,
Matsuda, Z.,
Lee, T. H.,
and Essex, M.
(1992)
J. Virol.
66,
4966-4971 27.
Wang, C. T.,
Lai, H. Y.,
and Li, J. J.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
7950-7959 28.
Hill, C. P.,
Worthylake, D.,
Bancroft, D. P.,
Christensen, A. M.,
and Sundquist, W. I.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
3099-3104 29.
Morikawa, Y.,
Zhang, W. H.,
Hockley, D. J.,
Nermut, M. V.,
and Jones, I. M.
(1998)
J. Virol.
72,
7659-7663 30.
Klikova, M.,
Rhee, S. S.,
Hunter, E.,
and Ruml, T.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
1093-1098[Abstract]
31.
Campbell, S.,
and Vogt, V. M.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
6487-6497[Abstract]
32.
Gross, I.,
Hohenberg, H.,
and Krausslich, H. G.
(1997)
Eur. J. Biochem.
249,
592-600[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
von Schwedler, U. K.,
Stemmler, T. L.,
Klishko, V. Y.,
Li, S.,
Albertine, K. H.,
Davis, D. R.,
and Sundquist, W. I.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1555-1568[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Campbell, S.,
and Rein, A.
(1999)
J. Virol.
73,
2270-2279 35.
Towbin, H.,
Staehelin, T.,
and Gordon, J.
(1979)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
76,
4350-4354 36.
Goto, T.,
Ikuta, K.,
Zhang, J. J.,
Morita, C.,
Sano, K.,
Komatsu, M.,
Fujita, H.,
Kato, S.,
and Nakai, M.
(1990)
Arch. Virol.
111,
87-101[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Rose, J. R.,
Babe, L. M.,
and Craik, C. S.
(1995)
J. Virol.
69,
2751-2758[Abstract]
38.
Stewart, L.,
Schatz, G.,
and Vogt, V. M.
(1990)
J. Virol.
64,
5076-5092
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Morikawa, T. Goto, D. Yasuoka, F. Momose, and T. Matano Defect of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Gag Assembly in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Virol., September 15, 2007; 81(18): 9911 - 9921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ivanov, O. V. Tsodikov, J. Kasanov, T. Ellenberger, G. Wagner, and T. Collins Domain-swapped dimerization of the HIV-1 capsid C-terminal domain PNAS, March 13, 2007; 104(11): 4353 - 4358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ulbrich, S. Haubova, M. V. Nermut, E. Hunter, M. Rumlova, and T. Ruml Distinct Roles for Nucleic Acid in In Vitro Assembly of Purified Mason-Pfizer Monkey Virus CANC Proteins J. Virol., July 15, 2006; 80(14): 7089 - 7099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mark-Danieli, N. Laham, M. Kenan-Eichler, A. Castiel, D. Melamed, M. Landau, N. M. Bouvier, M. J. Evans, and E. Bacharach Single Point Mutations in the Zinc Finger Motifs of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleocapsid Alter RNA Binding Specificities of the Gag Protein and Enhance Packaging and Infectivity J. Virol., June 15, 2005; 79(12): 7756 - 7767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-K. Lee, K. Nagashima, and W.-S. Hu Cooperative Effect of Gag Proteins p12 and Capsid during Early Events of Murine Leukemia Virus Replication J. Virol., April 1, 2005; 79(7): 4159 - 4169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Morikawa, T. Goto, and F. Momose Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Assembly through Assembly Intermediates J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 31964 - 31972. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. M. Ma and V. M. Vogt Nucleic Acid Binding-Induced Gag Dimerization in the Assembly of Rous Sarcoma Virus Particles In Vitro J. Virol., January 1, 2004; 78(1): 52 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Johnson, H. M. Scobie, Y. M. Ma, and V. M. Vogt Nucleic Acid-Independent Retrovirus Assembly Can Be Driven by Dimerization J. Virol., October 17, 2002; 76(22): 11177 - 11185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. M. Ma and V. M. Vogt Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Protein-Oligonucleotide Interaction Suggests a Critical Role for Protein Dimer Formation in Assembly J. Virol., May 3, 2002; 76(11): 5452 - 5462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Shehu-Xhilaga, M. Hill, J. A. Marshall, J. Kappes, S. M. Crowe, and J. Mak The Conformation of the Mature Dimeric Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 RNA Genome Requires Packaging of Pol Protein J. Virol., March 27, 2002; 76(9): 4331 - 4340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Hill, C. W. Hooker, D. Harrich, S. M. Crowe, and J. Mak Gag-Pol Supplied in trans Is Efficiently Packaged and Supports Viral Function in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 J. Virol., August 1, 2001; 75(15): 6835 - 6840. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tritel and M. D. Resh The Late Stage of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Assembly Is an Energy-Dependent Process J. Virol., June 15, 2001; 75(12): 5473 - 5481. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F. Yu, S. M. Joshi, Y. M. Ma, R. L. Kingston, M. N. Simon, and V. M. Vogt Characterization of Rous Sarcoma Virus Gag Particles Assembled In Vitro J. Virol., March 15, 2001; 75(6): 2753 - 2764. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Jewell and L. M. Mansky In the beginning: genome recognition, RNA encapsidation and the initiation of complex retrovirus assembly J. Gen. Virol., August 1, 2000; 81(8): 1889 - 1899. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. Tritel and M. D. Resh Kinetic Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Assembly Reveals the Presence of Sequential Intermediates J. Virol., July 1, 2000; 74(13): 5845 - 5855. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||