![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 28026-28034, September 24, 1999
,From the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Tennessee, Memphis, Tennessee 38163
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allantoin pathway gene expression in
Saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to two different
environmental stimuli. The expression of these genes is induced in the
presence of allantoin or its degradative metabolites and repressed when
a good nitrogen source (e.g. asparagine or glutamine) is
provided. Three types of cis-acting sites and trans-acting factors are
required for allantoin pathway gene transcription as follows: (i)
UASNTR element associated with the
transcriptional activators Gln3p and Gat1p, (ii)
URSGATA element associated with the repressor
Dal80p, and (iii) UISALL element associated
with the Dal82 and Dal81 proteins required for
inducer-dependent transcription. Most of the work leading
to the above conclusions has employed inducer-independent allantoin
pathway genes (e.g. DAL5 and DAL3).
The purpose of this work is to extend our understanding of these
elements and their roles to inducible allantoin pathway genes using the
DAL7 (encoding malate synthase) as a model. We show that
eight distinct cis-acting sites participate in the process as follows:
a newly identified GC-rich element, two UASNTR,
two UISALL, and three
URSGATA elements. The two GATA-containing
UASNTR elements are coincident with two of the
three GATA sequences that make up the URSGATA
elements. The remaining URSGATA GATA sequence, however, is not a UASNTR element but appears to
function only in repression. The data provide insights into how these
cis- and trans-acting factors function together to accomplish the
regulated expression of the DAL7 gene that is observed
in vivo.
Inducible nitrogen catabolic genes in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae respond to at least two different types of signals. One
is a dominant, general signal that monitors the overall nitrogen supply
of the cell. The availability of readily transported and metabolized
nitrogen sources result in high nitrogen catabolite repression
(NCR)1 (1, 2). Alternatively,
low concentrations of good nitrogen sources or the presence of only
slowly transported and/or metabolized nitrogen sources in the
environment of cells results in low NCR. Genes encoding proteins
involved in the transport and metabolism of poor nitrogen sources are
NCR-responsive, i.e. they are expressed at low levels under
conditions of high NCR and at higher levels under conditions of low
NCR; the latter is also referred to occasionally as derepression (1,
2). The second signal is pathway-specific and derives from the presence
of a particular nitrogen source (e.g. allantoin or one of
its metabolites) (3). Responses to these two physiological signals are
integrated at transcription resulting in fine regulation of catabolic
gene expression that ranges from high to low as needed to exploit most
effectively the prevailing environmental nitrogen supplies for the
needs of the cell.
Allantoin catabolic pathway gene expression has been a useful
model with which to study the nature of nitrogen regulatory signals and
the cell's detection of and response to them (see Ref. 4 for a
comprehensive review of the allantoin pathway literature; shorter
literature reviews covering contributions from the range of
investigators in the field of yeast GATA factors and nitrogen
regulation per se appear in the introductions of Refs. 5 and
6). These studies identified three types of cis-acting elements and
trans-acting factors associated with allantoin pathway genes (7). The
cis-acting element mediating NCR-sensitive transcriptional activation
is UASNTR (UAS
Nitrogen-Regulated) (9,
10), consisting of two separated dodecanucleotides each with the
sequence GATAA at its core (10). UASNTR has been
shown to be both necessary and sufficient for NCR-sensitive
DAL gene transcription (11); Gln3p and Gat1p are required
for this transcription (12). The Magasanik group (13, 14) reported that
antibody against a Gln3p peptide containing the GATA family zinc finger motif precipitated a synthetic DNA fragment containing seven repeats of
a 32-bp GLN1 promoter fragment containing a GATA sequence
from crude extract; this led them to suggest that Gln3p bound to GATA sequences. Their observation was consistent with the finding that the
deduced Gln3p sequence contains a zinc finger motif homologous to the
mammalian GATA-binding family of transcription factors (15). By using
electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), direct binding of Gln3p
to UASNTR sequences has been demonstrated (16,
17). Multiple UASNTR homologous sequences are
situated upstream of all allantoin pathway genes, and these sequences
have been shown to account for NCR-sensitive,
Gln3p-dependent expression of the inducer-independent
DAL5 and DAL3 genes (8, 10, 11, 18, 38).
The cis-acting element mediating inducer responsiveness of the
allantoin pathway genes is the dodecanucleotide element,
UISALL (Upstream
Induction Sequence) (7, 19). The inducer to
which proteins associated with the UISALL
respond is the last intermediate of the allantoin pathway, allophanate,
or its non-metabolized analogue, oxalurate (20). The
allophanate-inducible DAL genes contain one or two copies of
UISALL (7, 21). The DAL81/DURL/UGA35 and DAL82/DURM gene products are required for this inducer
responsiveness (22-25). Dal82p has been shown to be the
UISALL DNA-binding protein whose binding to DNA
is independent of inducer (21). Whereas Dal82p appears to be a
pathway-specific regulatory element, Dal81p functions more broadly,
being required for induced expression of the UGA
( A third type of cis-acting element and cognate transcription factor
down-regulate DAL gene expression; they are
URSGATA and Dal80p, respectively (28, 29). The
DAL80 locus was first identified genetically (28). Mutations
in this gene increase allantoin pathway-inducible gene expression in
the absence of inducer to the same level observed in a wild type strain
grown with inducer. This observation led to the suggestion that Dal80p
functions to reduce inducible gene expression when inducer is absent
(28). Dal80p was subsequently found to perform a similar function for the inducible UGA genes (33, 34). However, Dal80p also
down-regulates inducer-independent DAL gene expression
2-20-fold (18), suggesting a more general physiological function than
simply maintaining inducible gene expression at low levels. Gln3p and
Dal80p were proposed to be opposing regulators of most NCR-sensitive
nitrogen catabolic genes (30). This proposal has been subsequently
supported by data from other laboratories (31). The deduced amino acid sequence of Dal80p contains a zinc finger motif homologous to the one
in Gln3p (32, 34). Prompted to test the implication of this homology,
we demonstrated Dal80p to be a DNA-binding protein whose optimal
binding site, URSGATA, consists of two
GATAAG-containing sequences separated 15-35 bp, oriented tail-to-tail
or head-to-tail (29). The requirement of two GATA-containing sequences
in a Dal80p-binding site correlates with the fact that Dal80p molecules have been recently shown to dimerize via a leucine zipper motif in
their C-terminal domains using two-hybrid assays (35). The structural
similarity of UASNTR and
URSGATA sites led to the suggestion that
Dal80p-binding sites might be Gln3p-binding sites as well (18). This
suggestion was supported by the demonstration that the GATA sequences
of the UGA4 and DAL3 UASNTRs that
bind Gln3p also bind Dal80p (18). The fact that Gln3p can bind to a
single GATA sequence while Dal80p cannot explains why some genes, such as DAL5, are Gln3p-dependent but largely immune
from regulation by Dal80p (4).
The bulk of our understanding of allantoin pathway gene regulation and
the role played by Dal80p down-regulating Gln3p transcriptional activation has been derived from studies with inducer-independent genes
such as DAL5 and DAL3 (4). Our objective here is
to extend these studies to the inducible allantoin pathway genes whose
expression is not only NCR-sensitive like that of DAL5 and
DAL3, and Dal80p-regulated like that of DAL3, but
also inducer-responsive. The inducible DAL7 gene is the one
we investigated. The results obtained delineate which of the many DAL7
upstream sequences that are homologous to known transcription factor
binding sites actually participate in DAL7 expression. They further
identify a cis-acting site not previously known to mediate allantoin
pathway gene transcription and suggest a crude picture of how Dal80p,
Gln3p, and Dal82p might work together to regulate
inducer-dependent DAL7 expression.
Strains and Media--
The strains used in this work are listed
in Table I. When correlating data from
this and other work, it is important to recognize that the fold
induction (induced level divided by the basal level of activity) for
and Dal80p regulation of DAL7 expression is highly strain-dependent. It ranges from as much as 20-30-fold in
strains such as RH218 (7) to as little as 2-4-fold in the case of
strains derived from
Transformation and
Statistics of the Plasmid Constructions--
The heterologous expression plasmids
used in Figs. 2-4 were constructed using double-stranded, synthetic
oligonucleotides (the coordinates are indicated) that were extended by
the addition of five bases of the SalI and EagI
restriction endonuclease sites to their 5' and 3' termini,
respectively. These synthetic fragments were then cloned into plasmid
pNG 15 (10) digested with the same enzymes. All constructs were
sequenced before being used.
The native DAL7 promoter fragments used in Figs. 9 and 10
were created using PCR-based methods and cloned into the
BamHI site of plasmid pVAN2 (Fig.
1) which generated plasmid pRR352, the wild type parent plasmid. Plasmid pVAN2 was derived from plasmid pHP41
(37) and does not contain any of the CYC1 promoter
sequences. The method of creating mutations in the promoter region
involved using mutagenic primers during PCR. The heat-stable DNA
polymerase used in these reactions was PWO polymerase from Roche
Molecular Biochemicals. Reaction conditions were standard and described by the manufacturer. All of the PCR-generated DNA fragments were cloned
into the BamHI site of plasmid pUC18. This vector was chosen to facilitate cloning and DNA sequencing of the fragments. The sequences of all of the PCR-generated DNA fragments were determined prior to being used. The mutations introduced into the promoter fragments are listed in Table II. The
mutant fragments were identical to the wild type parent except at the
positions listed; those positions carried the indicated substitution
mutations.
EMSAs--
EMSAs were performed as described earlier (29)
including preparation of the double-stranded oligonucleotides,
Klenow-mediated fill in reactions to generate
[32P]dCTP-labeled probes, preparation of the Dal80p
extracts, binding reactions, and electrophoresis. All oligonucleotides
contained SalI and EagI overhangs at their 5' and
3' ends, respectively, to provide targets for the fill-in reactions and
the ability to clone the fragments. In cases where a particular GATA
sequence was mutated, the wild type sequence starting with the
5'-guanosine of the GATA was changed to a MunI restriction
site. For example, if the wild type sequence was 5'-GATAAG-3' (or
5'GATAGT-3"), it was converted to the sequence 5'-CAATTG-3'. (See Table
III for the mutated bases and their
coordinates in the DNA fragments used in the EMSAs.) DNA fragments
DAL3-5, containing the three clustered GATAs from the DAL3
gene, and DAL3-35, a synthetic fragment containing two GATA elements
in tail-to-tail orientation, have been described in detail elsewhere
(29).
Upsteam Activation Sequences That Mediate DAL7
Transcription--
Previous experiments identified two types of
positively acting DAL7 elements that participate in physiologically
relevant heterologous reporter gene expression,
UASNTR and UISALL (7). However, these studies were unable to address adequately how these cis-acting elements and the trans-acting proteins associated with them
cooperate to mediate inducer-dependent, Dalp80-regulated DAL7 expression. The inadequacy derived, in part, from a
lack of knowledge about the biochemical function of Dal80p and clear identification of which of the cis-active element homologous sequences actually participated in DAL7 expression (7). When early 5' deletion data (derived from a DAL7-lacZ fusion plasmid (7)) are analyzed from the perspective of sequences homologous to those of
known cis-acting elements, there are instances in which single deletions potentially removed more than one cis-acting element. The
region between positions
To characterize further the regions most responsible for
DAL7 expression, we cloned a synthetic fragment, containing
sequences from
When the above data and those published earlier (7) are considered
together, the only region of plasmid pJD68 not analyzed is between
positions
We next analyzed the potential cis-acting sites in plasmid pJD68 using
point mutations that did not otherwise alter the number of bases or
spacing of putative elements relative to the heterologous TATA elements
and mRNA start sites. As shown in Fig.
3, these mutations decreased reporter
gene expression in cells growing in glucose/proline medium 2-60-fold.
A more modest result (13-fold maximum) was observed with
glucose/asparagine medium. Mutation of the 5'
UISALL element (plasmid pJD152) decreased
reporter gene expression about 2.5-fold, which is similar to the 4-fold
decrease observed in Fig. 2. When the 5'-most UASNTR
homologous sequence was mutated, lacZ expression decreased
about 2-fold (plasmid pJD156). Mutation of the GC-rich element (plasmid
pJD92) has already been described, but it is worth noting that of all
the mutations examined in Fig. 3, it was the one with the strongest
effect, decreasing expression more than 50-fold. Mutation of the 3'
UISALL decreased lacZ expression
nearly 11-fold (plasmid pJD153). Similarly, mutation of the 3'
UASNTR decreased expression over 20-fold
(plasmid pJD155). The combined roles of the
UISALL elements were central to expression since
mutating both of them reduced reporter gene expression 30-35-fold (plasmid pJD154). It is important to note that these data demonstrate that UISALL plays a significant role in basal level as well
as induced expression since no inducer was present in these
experiments. Furthermore, mutating the 3' UISALL
and UASNTR elements resulted in 4-10-fold less
reporter activity than mutating the homologous 5' elements (compare
plasmids pJD155, pJD153, pJD156, and pJD152).
Up to 5-fold less activity was observed with each of the mutant
plasmids when asparagine was provided in place of proline as the
nitrogen source (Fig. 3), indicating that reporter gene expression
supported by plasmid pJD68 and its derivatives was NCR-sensitive.
However, this NCR sensitivity was less than that observed when the
intact gene (39) or a DAL7-lacZ fusion plasmid were analyzed
(7); the earlier work was performed with strains that are different
from the ones used here. Occurrences of the lowest NCR sensitivities
(plasmids pJD92, pJD155, and pJD154) were coincident with those in
which there was the least activity with proline as nitrogen source. In
this regard, plasmids pJD92 and pJD154 generated a puzzling result. The
UASNTR element has been demonstrated by several
laboratories to be the one upon which NCR sensitivity depends (7, 18,
19). Therefore, one would a priori have expected that
expression supported by plasmids pJD92 and pJD154 to be as
NCR-sensitive as wild type plasmid pJD68, or more so because (i) their
UASNTR elements are intact and (ii) elements supporting
NCR-insensitive expression have been inactivated by mutation thereby
decreasing their contribution to the overall results (Fig. 3). We
cannot presently determine whether this lack of NCR sensitivity derived
from a requirement of functional UISALL and
GC-rich elements for the UASNTR elements to
carry out their normal function or, alternatively, that the mutant
constructs in plasmids pJD92 and pJD154 supported insufficient
expression to obtain a meaningful result. We tend to favor the latter explanation.
Next we compared reporter gene expression supported by the collection
of plasmids used in Fig. 3 in wild type and gln3
In sum, the data presented above suggest that at least five putative
cis-acting elements participate in gene transcription supported by
plasmid pJD68. Two observations, however, were unexpected. (i) These
constructs supported lacZ expression that was less
inducer-responsive than that supported by the entire DAL7
promoter (7); this derived from the elevated basal levels of activity
in the constructs. (ii) The high basal level activity was largely
dependent upon the GC-rich element. This is best seen when comparing
the results with plasmids pJD68 and pJD92 (Fig. 3). Although mutating
the GC-rich element dramatically decreased the overall levels of
transcription, that which remained was far more inducer-responsive
(Fig. 2).
Dal80p-binding Sites Upstream of DAL7--
Dal80p has been shown
to play a pivotal role in allophanate/oxalurate-induced allantoin
pathway gene expression. This is evidenced by the observation that
dal80 mutants exhibit a similar high level of DAL
expression in the absence of inducer as when the wild type is assayed
with inducer present (28). Searching for cis-acting sites required for
Dal80p-regulated expression using the approach described in Figs. 2-4
is ill-advised because Dal80p binds to some of the same sequences as
the transcriptional activator, Gln3p (18). Therefore, each deletion and
substitution mutation would potentially generate two changes as
follows: transcriptional activation and repression would both decrease.
We avoided this complication by using an EMSA rather than comparing
reporter gene expression in wild type and dal80 mutant
strains. To identify Dal80p-binding site(s) upstream of
DAL7, we synthesized several large DNA fragments containing
promoter sequences previously shown to participate in control of
DAL7 expression (Ref. 7 and Figs. 2-4 of present work) and
used them as competitors for binding of a well characterized DNA probe
(DAL3-5) containing a Dal80p-binding site. As shown in the upper
panel of Fig. 5, fragment
DAL7-3 (nucleotides
The DAL7-2 and DAL7-1 fragments each contained three GATA sequences,
two contiguous GATAs (schematic at the top of Fig. 5, elements D and E) at one end of each fragment and
a single GATA at the other (elements C or F).
Based on earlier work defining the Dal80p-binding site (24), we
predicted that the two GATA sequences at the 3' end of DNA fragment
DAL7-2, or the 5' end of fragment DAL7-1 (Fig. 5, elements D
and E) would perhaps be too close to one another to function
as a strong Dal80p-binding site. If this were true, we hypothesized
that either one or both of them, in combination with a single GATA
sequence at the opposite end of the fragment, formed the Dal80p sites
observed with the DAL7-2 and DAL7-1 fragments. To test this, we
prepared variants of the DAL7-1 and DAL7-2 fragments in which each of
the three GATA sequences was mutated; these fragments were then tested
as competitors of the DAL3-5 DNA fragment for Dal80p binding (Figs. 7 and 8).
As shown in Fig. 7, fragment DAL7-8 (containing elements C
and D) and DAL7-9 (containing elements D and E)
were both competitors of the DAL3-5 fragment for Dal80p binding, with
DAL7-9 being somewhat better than DAL7-8 (Fig. 7, upper
panel, compare lanes A-G with G-M). The
effectiveness of fragments DAL7-9 and DAL7-8 as competitors correlates
with data from the DAL3 gene demonstrating that two GATA
sequences oriented tail-to-tail bind Dal80p better than a head-to-tail
orientation (29). We also expected that DNA fragment DAL7-10 would
compete less well than fragment DAL7-9 because the GATA sequences it
contained were only 8 bp apart (elements D and E, oriented
tail-to-tail); this was confirmed experimentally (Fig. 7, compare data
with DNA fragments, DAL7-8, 7-9, and 7-10). A smaller DNA fragment, containing only the closely spaced GATAs (elements D and E), behaved similarly to fragment DAL7-10
(DAL7-11, Fig. 7, lower panel, lanes G-M).
We next assayed the GATA sequences contained on DNA fragment DAL7-1;
recall that fragment DAL7-1 was a less effective competitor than
fragment DAL7-2 (Fig. 5). In contrast to the data obtained with mutant
alleles of fragment DAL7-2, the only DAL7-1 mutant allele that retained
high effectiveness as a DAL3-5 competitor was the one in which the
isolated 3'-GATA (element F) was mutated (Fig. 8,
lower panel, lanes G-M, fragment DAL7-7). Mutation of either of the two closely spaced GATA sequences (elements D
or E) significantly decreased the ability of the mutant
fragments to act as effective competitors (Fig. 8, upper panel,
lanes G-M, and lower panel, lanes A-G).
The DAL7-7 and DAL7-1 fragments were similar competitors of the DAL3-5
fragment for binding to Dal80p (compare Fig. 8, lower panel,
lanes G-M with Fig. 5, lower panel, lanes
G-M). In other words, the closely spaced GATA sequences that were in common with fragment DAL7-2 (elements D and
E) were more effective competitors than either of them
paired with the isolated GATAG at the 3' end of fragment DAL7-1
(element F) and accounted for the overall ability of
fragment DAL7-1 to serve as competitor. Whereas this observation might
seem somewhat at odds with data derived from assaying fragment DAL7-2,
the effectiveness of a Dal80p-binding site is determined not only by
spacing and orientation of the GATAs but also by their specific
sequences. Although the GATA sequences of DNA fragment DAL7-1 possess
acceptable orientations and spacings, one of the two GATAs possesses
the sequence GATAG. Together, these data identify the GATA elements C Effects of Promoter Mutations in the Context of a Complete DAL7
Promoter--
The data described above in combination with earlier
studies (7) yield a reasonably consistent picture of the cis-acting elements functioning in DAL7 expression. However, none of
the mutations used in any of the DAL7 studies has ever been
analyzed in the context of an intact DAL7 promoter. Although
the contribution of cis-acting elements contained on small promoter
fragments to the overall lacZ expression supported in a
heterologous expression vector can be determined with certainty, their
relation(s) to DAL7 expression in situ cannot be
as confidently deduced. This problem was addressed by systematically
mutating the putative cis-acting elements in an intact, wild type
DAL7 promoter (Fig. 9). In
each case, substitution mutations were used to ensure that the relative
positions of the remaining promoter elements were not otherwise
altered. Furthermore, the plasmids were CEN-based to
eliminate conceivable "dose response" or transcription factor "titration" effects. Mutation of the 5'-most GATA sequence (plasmid pRR373) resulted in 25% less transcription in the presence of inducer
compared with wild type (Fig. 9, plasmid pRR373
versus plasmid pRR352) but also doubled basal
level expression. Overall, the effects of this mutation were relatively
modest and consistent with observations made in Fig. 3. Mutation of the
5'-most UISALL element decreased induced
expression 5-fold, uninduced expression 3-fold, and the inducer
response from about 20- to 13-fold (plasmid pRR374 versus
plasmid pRR352). These data correlate with those in Figs. 2 and 3,
demonstrating that this element participates in DAL7
expression. Although inducer responsiveness is decreased in this mutant
plasmid, it is still present, arguing that a single UIS element is
sufficient to elicit this physiological response, albeit at a more
modest level than when two UISALL elements are present.
Mutation of the next GATA sequence (plasmid pRR375) yielded an
unexpected result (Fig. 9). Based on data derived from the isolated
promoter fragments (plasmids pJD68 and pJD156,
Fig. 3), one would have expected mutation of this element to have a
negative effect on reporter gene expression. However, in the context of the entire DAL7 promoter, it did not appear to participate
in transcription (Fig. 9, plasmid pRR375)). A similar
surprise was observed in the case of GC-rich element. We had concluded
from data derived with isolated fragments that this element played a
central role in transcription, because it was the one that generated the most drastic decreases in transcription when mutated
(plasmids pJD68 and pJD92, Figs. 2 and 3).
Mutating the element in an otherwise intact promoter, however,
decreased induced expression by only half (Fig. 9, plasmid
pRR371); one can conclude that it is a participant in
DAL7 transcription but probably not the central one. The
elements downstream of the GC-rich element that are most important to
DAL7 expression are the UISALL and
UASNTR elements at positions
Previous experiments did not evaluate the function of either of the two
contiguous GATA sequences oriented in opposite directions. Since early
5' deletions extending to position
Finally, we compared transcription supported by each of the above
plasmids in wild type and dal80 mutant strains with proline as nitrogen source (Fig. 10). Reporter
gene transcription supported by all but two of the plasmids increased
2-5-fold when DAL80 was disrupted. The two plasmids that
lost their ability to respond were pRR380 and pRR371. In plasmid pRR380
the GATA sequence at position The data presented above document the participation of eight
cis-acting elements in the regulated expression of DAL7
(Fig. 11). Transcriptional activation
depends upon a GC-rich element, two UISALL, and
two GATA-containing UASNTR elements. Transcriptional repression (i.e. Dal80p-binding), on the other hand, depends
upon three URSGATA elements; two of the three
GATA sequences associated with the URSGATA
elements are also common to the DAL7
UASNTRs.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-aminobutyrate catabolic pathway) and AGP1 (tryptophan uptake) genes as well as those of the allantoin pathway (26, 27).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1278b.2 The source(s) of
these differences are not known. The media used in this work were
all standard formulations.
Yeast strains used in this work
-Galactosidase Assay--
Transformation
of S. cerevisiae and the procedures used to assay
-galactosidase have been described earlier (36). The cultures were
grown (2% glucose, 0.17% YNB (Difco), and 0.1% of the indicated nitrogen source) for 16-24 h to a cell density of
A600 nm = 0.4 to 0.8 as measured on a Zeiss,
Gilford, or Spectronic Genesys 5 spectrophotometer. After the desired
cell density was reached, 10-ml samples were harvested and assayed
(36).
-galactosidase measurements and their associated
error (normally 5-10%) have been analyzed in detail (36). In this
regard, it is important to emphasize that data (absolute values) in
Fig. 2 cannot be quantitatively compared with those in Figs. 3 or 4
even though some of the same plasmids were used. This limitation
derives from the use of different spectrophotometers and different
strains; the spectrophotometers mentioned above, as is true for all
spectrophotometers, differ significantly in their light scattering
characteristics. These differences can range up to 2-fold depending
upon the density of the sample. Although it is inappropriate to compare
the absolute values between separate figures, critical comparisons of
values contained within a figure and the patterns of regulation
observed from one experiment (figure) to another are justified
(36).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The plasmid used for cloning wild type and
mutant alleles of the native DAL7 promoter fused in
frame to the lacZ gene.
Coordinates of the mutated bases in plasmids containing full-length
DAL7 promoter fragments fused in frame with lacZ
Coordinates of DNA fragments used in the EMSAs
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
290 and
221, relative to the ATG, is not
only an area where our information is incomplete but also one in which
existing deletions have the greatest effect upon expression (7).
320 to
199, into a heterologous expression vector
(plasmid pJD98, see "Experimental Procedures"); sequential 5'
deletions were then used to delineate the cis-acting elements (Fig.
2). The first two deletions, to
300 and
266, had little effect upon
-galactosidase production (Fig. 2,
plasmids pJD98, pJD95, and pJD68).
This argues that the UASNTR homologous sequence
between positions
281 and
286 (5'-ATTATC-3') does not demonstrably
function as a UAS element in this fragment. However, deletion of the
next 12 bases (to position
254) decreased reporter gene expression 3-4-fold in the presence or absence of inducer (plasmid pJD72). This
region contained a sequence homologous to UISALL
and has been shown to bind Dal82p (21). These results argue that
this UISALL sequence participates in reporter
gene expression.

View larger version (24K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Heterologous reporter gene expression
supported by wild type and mutant DAL7 promoter
fragments. The synthetic oligonucleotide fragments indicated in
the figure were cloned into expression vector pNG15 (10). The resulting
plasmids were then transformed into wild type strain M1682-19b.
Following growth to a cell density of A600 = 0.4 to 0.8 in yeast nitrogen base (1.7 g/liter; Difco) medium containing
0.1% proline and 2% glucose as sole nitrogen and carbon sources,
respectively the cultures were harvested for enzyme assays. Inducer,
oxalurate, was provided at a final concentration of 25 mM
(PRO+). Data from plasmid pJD68 were duplicated in the
lower part of the figure to facilitate its comparison with
that from plasmid pJD92.
244 and
230. To remedy this, we synthesized a mutant form
of plasmid pJD68 in which a GC-rich sequence, 5'-CCGCGG-3', at
positions
240 to
235 was mutated. This particular sequence was
chosen because it is a GC-rich inverted repeat, both characteristics of
multiple transcription factor binding sites. This alteration affected
reporter gene expression in two ways (Fig. 2, compare plasmids
pJD68 and pJD92). First, basal and induced levels of
-galactosidase production decrease 110- and 12-fold, respectively. Second, inducer responsiveness increases 10-fold relative to the wild
type; there is a 2-fold response with plasmid pJD68 and 20-fold with
plasmid pJD92 (PRO+ level divided by the PRO level).

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Expression of wild type and mutant
DAL7 promoter fragments (synthetic oligonucleotides)
cloned into heterologous expression vector plasmid pNG15. Wild
type sequences of the various cis-acting elements appear as
capital letters in the figure and those of the mutant
alleles in lowercase letters. Transformants of parent strain
M1682-19b was grown and
-galactosidase assayed as described in Fig.
2.
mutant strains (Fig. 4).
-Aminobutyric acid
was used as the nitrogen source in this experiment because even though
proline is the nitrogen source (among those we normally use) generating
the least NCR, gln3 mutant strains grow very poorly when
provided with proline (13). Therefore, note that all values derived
from cells growing with
-aminobutyric acid as nitrogen source were
2-4-fold lower than with proline (compare Figs. 3 and 4). The Gln3p
dependence of reporter gene expression was about 5-fold for most
constructs (Fig. 4). Plasmids pJD156 and pJD155, both of which contain
mutations in the UASNTR elements, on the other
hand, yielded opposite results. The Gln3p dependence of plasmid pJD156
increased approximately 2-fold relative to wild type, whereas that of
plasmid pJD155 decreased by about the same amount. The source of this
behavior has not been identified, although the effect may be due to the
participation of Gat1p in transcription supported by one or both of the
UASNTR sites.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Expression of wild type and mutant
DAL7 promoter fragments described in Fig. 3
in wild type (TCY1) and gln3
(RR91)
strains growing in minimal YNB medium containing 2% glucose and
0.1%
-aminobutyric acid
(GABA) as sole carbon and nitrogen sources.
Plasmids and assay conditions were as described in Fig. 3.
292 to
214) was ineffective as a
competitor of DAL3-5 DNA for Dal80p binding, indicating the absence of
a strong Dal80p-binding site (Fig. 5, upper panel, lanes
G-M); DNA fragment DAL3-35 (29) was used as a positive control
(upper panel, lanes A-G). Although the orientation and
spacing of the GATA sequences on the DAL7-3 fragment appeared suitable
for Dal80p binding (tail-to-tail, 31 bp apart), the 3'-GATA possessed
the sequence GATAG. In contrast, DNA fragment DAL7-2 (nucleotides
239
to
156) was an effective competitor of DAL3-5 DNA for Dal80p binding
(Fig. 5, lower panel, lanes A-G). DNA fragment DAL7-1
(nucleotides
183 to
122) was also able to compete with DAL3-5 DNA
for Dal80p binding but less well than the DAL7-2 fragment (lower
panel, lanes G-M). DNA fragment DAL7-4 (nucleotides
265 to
196) was an ineffective competitor of DAL3-35 DNA for Dal80p binding
(Fig. 6, lanes G-M); DNA
fragment DAL3-3 (29) was used as the positive control (lanes
A-G). The result with fragment DAL7-4 was not unexpected because
only one of the sequences contained GATAA (the other was GATAG) and
they are oriented head-to-head.

View larger version (69K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Competition EMSAs between DNA fragments
derived from the DAL7 promoter and a standard
radioactive DAL3 fragment for Dal80p binding. The
top portion of the figure is a schematic representation of
the DAL7 promoter that includes the fragments (with end
points indicated relative to the ATG) that were used as competitors.
The radioactive probe was DNA fragment DAL3-5, containing a well
characterized Dal80p-binding site (29). Lanes E
A and
I
M contained increasing amounts of the unlabeled
oligonucleotide as indicated above the autoradiogram.
Lanes F and H have no added unlabeled competitor,
and lane G has no protein extract added to the reaction
mixture. Specific Dal80p-DNA complexes are indicated by
arrows.

View larger version (81K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Competition EMSAs between fragments derived
from the DAL3 and DAL7 promoters for
Dal80p binding. Reaction conditions and lane designations are the
same as those in Fig. 5. The radioactive probe (DNA fragment DAL3-35)
and the unlabeled competitor, DNA fragment (DAL3-3) have been described
elsewhere (29).

View larger version (82K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Competition EMSAs between DNA fragment DAL3-5
and mutant fragments derived from the DAL7-2 fragment for Dal80p
binding. Reactions conditions and lane designations were as
described in Fig. 6. The top portion of the figure diagrams
the DAL7 promoter and the oligonucleotide fragments used in
the experiment. × indicates the mutated elements (see Table
III).

View larger version (79K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Competition EMSAs between DNA fragment DAL3-5
and mutant DNA fragments derived from the DAL7-1 fragment for Dal80p
binding. All parameters were as described in Fig. 7.
D, C
E, and D
E (Fig. 8) as Dal80p-binding sites,
URSGATAs, upstream of DAL7.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Expression of wild type and promoter mutant
alleles of a DAL7-lacZ fusion plasmid, containing a
native DAL7 promoter. Plasmids were transformed
into wild type strain TCY1 and grown to a cell density of
A600 = 0.4-0.8 in YNB with 2% glucose and
0.1% proline as sole carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively.
Oxalurate was added, where indicated (PRO+), to a final
concentration of 25 mM. Boxes containing
arrows indicate GATA sequences homologous to
UASNTR and URSGATA
elements; the direction of the arrow indicates the
orientation of the sequence. UIS and GC designate
UISALL and GC-rich elements, respectively. The
maps are drawn approximately to scale. Filled boxes
containing white letters or symbols indicate
mutant alleles of the designated element (see Table II). Coordinates
above the map are relative to the ATG of the coding
sequence.
228 to
217 and
208 to
204. Mutation of either element decreased basal and induced
expression 4-8-fold (Fig. 9, plasmids pRR376 and
pRR380). As in the case when the 5'
UISALL element was mutated, the remaining
lacZ expression in the 3' uisall
mutant is inducible (Fig. 9, plasmid pRR376).
205 no longer supported gene
expression (7), the priority of studying these elements was low.
However, since both GATAs participated in Dal80p binding, we tested
each for their participation in transcriptional activation. Mutation of
the 5'-most of these GATA sequences (corresponds to element
D in Figs. 4-8) decreased uninduced and induced expression levels
3-6-fold (Fig. 9, plasmid pRR377). Mutation of the 3'-most of these GATA sequences, however, was largely without effect
(plasmid pRR372). Therefore, the 3'-most of these GATA
sequences (element E in Figs. 4-8) participates
predominantly in Dal80p binding rather than transcriptional activation.
208 to
204 was mutated; this is the
UASNTR that was most important to the expression
of DAL7 (Fig. 9). Plasmid pRR371, on the other hand, carried
a mutation of the GC-rich sequence. The loss of one of the two
UASNTR GATA sequences that participate in gene expression
can be reasonably suggested to account for the data in plasmid pRR380.
Similar reasoning cannot be used in the case of results derived with
plasmid pRR371. However, it is important to note that reporter gene
expression supported by plasmids pRR371 and pRR380 was below or barely
above the background level observed in the parent vector, plasmid
pVAN2.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Expression of wild type and promoter mutant
alleles of a DAL7-lacZ fusion plasmid, containing a
native DAL7 promoter. Plasmids were transformed
into wild type (TCY1) and dal80 mutant (TCY17) strains. The
experiment was conducted as described in Fig. 9.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 11.
Schematic representation of the DAL7
promoter showing the elements that participate in regulated
DAL7 gene expression. Distances between the
various sequences are indicated in A and are discussed in
the text.
Some of the proteins associated with the three types of cis-acting elements have been identified as follows: UISALL elements bind Dal82p (21), which is required for induction of allantoin pathway gene expression (22, 40). The GATA-containing UASNTR elements bind Gln3p and are also thought to bind Gat1p as well (12, 14, 16, 42). Although Gat1p-binding remains to be experimentally demonstrated, the protein contains a GATA-binding zinc finger motif similar to the one in Gln3p (12, 36, 43, 44), and both proteins are known to be transcriptional activators through which NCR operates (16). We speculate that the role of the UISALL-Dal82p complex may be to facilitate, or stabilize, Gln3p and/or Gat1p binding. Supporting this idea is the observation that a UISALL site placed close to a UASNTR site, containing point mutations in it, will suppress those mutations (19); suppression requires Dal82p but not Dal81p or inducer. Whether this interaction is at the level of a Gln3p-Dal82p complex or further along the pathway of preinitiation complex formation is not known at present. It is interesting, however, that the distance between the functional 5' UISALL and UASNTR elements is the same as between the 3' UISALL and UASNTR elements (Fig. 11).
It should be noted that UISALL and Dal82p do not appear to be unique in their ability to function synergistically with Gln3p and/or Gat1p; the GC-rich element and the protein(s) presumed to be associated with it also appear to function in this capacity. Similar relationships have been observed between the UASNTR and the Rap1p and Abf1p sites in the CAR1 promoter (36), the GATA element and the Put3p site of the PUT1 promoter (45), and the UASNTR and Abf1p sites of CAR2 promoter.3
Finally, we turn to the URSGATA elements that
bind Dal80p, the repressor protein responsible for maintaining
inducible DAL gene expression at low basal levels in the absence of
inducer, and for down-regulating those genes (e.g.
DAL3) whose expression is not inducer-dependent.
Only three of six possible DAL7 GATA sequences appear to
participate in Dal80p binding. Although the two 5'-most GATAs (Fig. 11,
elements A and B) possess the appropriate orientation and spacing, they did not demonstrably bind Dal80p; the 3'
of these two GATAs possess the sequence GATAG. Binding of Dal80p to the
two GATAs at positions B and C did not occur because they are oriented
head-to-head. DAL80p, on the other hand, does bind to the three GATA
sequences at positions C, D, and E (Fig. 11). To the extent that the
ability of a DNA fragment to serve as an effective competitor in an
EMSA is a reflection of its binding affinity, Dal80p binding to these
sites is, in order of decreasing affinity, C
E, C
D, and D
E (Fig.
11). We found earlier that a tail-to-tail orientation was the most
favorable for Dal80p binding (29), a conclusion that correlates with
the present data. It also makes sense that the D
E-binding site is the
weakest site because the spacing is at the limit of the requirements
determined in the DAL3 work (29). Finally, Dal80p binding to
the D
F and E
F element pairs does not occur even though the
orientation and spacing requirements are met, presumably because the F
element does not possess the sequence GATAA but GATAG. Although
participating as a Dal80p-binding site, the E element does not
demonstrably function in transcriptional activation. To our knowledge,
this is the first example of a GATA sequence that possesses this characteristic.
This work identifies a new cis-acting participant in DAL7 expression, the GC-rich sequence. Whereas this element plays an important role in transcription supported by the DAL7 promoter fragment contained in plasmid pJD68, its role appears somewhat less prominent or masked when assayed in the context of the intact DAL7 promoter. Earlier results may be consistent with the suggestion that the GC-rich sequence participates in gene expression in that the footprint covering the UISALL sequence extends to the GC-rich sequence as well (Fig. 4 and see Ref. 19). We are not, however, suggesting that available data point to the existence of an interaction between proteins associated with the GC-rich and UISALL elements. Detailed analysis of the CAR1 gene (encoding arginase) also identified a positively acting GC-rich sequence similar to the one identified here (36). Whether these sequences represent the same cis-acting element or are just coincidentally similar sequences is not clear.
A model describing how the above cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors accomplish regulated expression of DAL and perhaps other inducible nitrogen catabolic genes was proposed some time ago (7, 36, 46). According to this model, NCR-sensitive, inducer-independent transcriptional activation is mediated by UASNTR, Gln3p, and the homologous Gat1p. Dal80p limits the interaction of GATA-containing UASNTR elements with Gln3p by competing with it for binding to the GATA elements. We speculate that, when it is possible to perform the experiments, the same will be found to be true for Gat1p binding. In other words, the positively acting Gln3p/GAT1p contribution to DAL gene transcription is balanced by the negative action of Dal80p; the metaphor of a see-saw was used in the original formulation of this model (7, 36, 46). The implication is that the effect of Dal80p impeding Gln3p and/or Gat1p binding is greater than its facilitation by Dal82p in the absence of inducer, and hence the DAL genes are expressed at only basal levels. Dal82p and Dal81p, associated with the cis-acting element UISALL, shift the balance in the direction of elevated expression in an inducer-dependent manner (7). This hypothesis makes the prediction that gene expression should be influenced by the intracellular levels of both Dal80p and Gln3p/Gat1p. Recent evidence has shown this to occur.4
This model of inducer-independent transcriptional repression acting in opposition to inducer-independent activation, with the balance being shifted by inducer-dependent transcriptional activation, has also been proposed to account for NCR-sensitive, inducer-dependent regulation of the CAR genes (36, 46). Although the cis- and trans-acting elements are different in the case of the CAR genes, their operation follows the same formal model as the allantoin pathway genes (36). Published studies of the NCR-sensitive, inducible UGA genes similarly fit this perspective (30).
Finally, GATA sequences situated contiguously head-to-tail or tail-to-tail are a rather common feature of NCR-sensitive gene promoters that respond to Dal80p regulation. In addition to DAL7, such contiguous GATAs are found in many promoters, e.g. DAL3, DUR1,2, DUR3, UGA4, CAN1, GAP1, and MEP2. They are rarely found in NCR-sensitive genes that are not Dal80p-regulated (e.g. DAL5). These correlations and this work suggest that this array of contiguous GATA sequences is responsible for Dal80p regulation of Gln3p/Gat1p in the cases where it exists. In this regard, as more nitrogen catabolic promoters are dissected in detail, it will be interesting to assess how widely GATA sequences that participate in Dal80p binding but not transcriptional activation occur, as is the case for the E element in Fig. 11.
In a technical context, this work has pointed out one of the
limitations of heterologous expression vector systems in identifying promoter elements and analyzing their functions. We identified three
instances in which the characteristics of a potential cis-acting site
carried on a cloned promoter fragment are quite different than when the
same site is contained within an intact promoter. For example,
transcription supported by the promoter fragment carried in plasmid
pJD68 appears less NCR-sensitive than when the entire promoter is
assayed (10). This behavior may be explained by suggesting that (i) the
GC-rich element is responsible for a greater proportion of the
transcription supported by plasmid pJD68 than by an intact promoter,
and (ii) the GC-rich mediated transcription is not NCR-sensitive. An
analogous situation occurs when assessing the contribution of the
GC-rich element to gene expression. When the GC-rich element is carried
on plasmid pJD68, it is the major contributor to transcriptional
activation. In contrast, this element seems to play a more limited role
when present in the native promoter. Finally, the
UASNTR-homologous GATA sequence at positions
249 to
245
(element B) appears to contribute to reporter gene transcription
supported by plasmid pJD156 in that
-galactosidase decreased 53%
when it was mutated (Fig. 4, plasmid pJD156). However, when
the sequence was mutated in an otherwise native DAL7 promoter, a much
more modest effect was observed (Fig. 9, plasmid
pRR375).
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank members of the UT Yeast Group who read this manuscript and offered suggestions for its improvement. Oligonucleotides used in these studies were prepared by the UT Molecular Resource Center.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by Public Health Service Grant GM-35642 from the National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases,
NIAID, National Institutes of Health, 6700-B Rockledge Dr., MSC 7630, Bethesda, MD 20892-7630. E-mail: jdaugherty@nih.gov.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 901-448-6175; Fax: 901-448-8462; E-mail: tcooper@utmem.edu.
2 J. Daugherty and T. G. Cooper, unpublished observations).
3 H.-D. Park, R. Rai, S. Scott, R. Dorrington, and T. G. Cooper, manuscript in preparation.
4 T. Cunningham and T. G. Cooper, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: NCR, nitrogen catabolite repression; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; bp, base pair; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Cooper, T. G. (1982) in The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Metabolism and Gene Expression (Strathern, J. N. , Jones, E. W. , and Broach, J., eds) , pp. 39-99, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 2. | Wiame, J.-M., Grenson, M., and Arst, H. (1985) Adv. Microb. Physiol. 26, 1-87[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Cooper, T. G.,
and Lawther, R. P.
(1973)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
70,
2340-2344 |
| 4. | Cooper, T. G. (1996) in Mycota (Brambl, R. , and Marzluf, G., eds) , pp. 139-169, Springer-Verlag, Berlin |
| 5. |
Coffman, J. A.,
Rai, R.,
Loprete, D. M.,
Cunningham, T.,
Svetlov, V.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
3416-3429 |
| 6. |
Svetlov, V.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1997)
J. Bacteriol.
179,
7644-7652 |
| 7. |
Yoo, H. S.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
3231-3243 |
| 8. |
Rai, R.,
Genbauffe, F. S.,
Sumrada, R. A.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
602-608 |
| 9. |
Miller, S. M.,
and Magasanik, B.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
6229-6247 |
| 10. |
Bysani, N.,
Daugherty, J. R.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
4977-4982 |
| 11. |
Cooper, T. G.,
Rai, R.,
and Yoo, H.-S.
(1989)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
9,
5440-5444 |
| 12. | Coffman, J. A., Rai, R., Cunningham, T., Svetlov, V., and Cooper, T. G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 847-858[Abstract] |
| 13. |
Mitchell, A. P.,
and Magasanik, B.
(1984)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4,
2758-2766 |
| 14. |
Minehart, P. L.,
and Magasanik, B.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
6216-6228 |
| 15. |
Omichinski, J. G.,
Close, G. M.,
Schaad, O.,
Felsenfeld, G.,
Trainor, C.,
Appella, E.,
Stahl, S. J.,
and Gronenborn, A. M.
(1993)
Science
261,
438-446 |
| 16. |
Cunningham, T. S.,
Svetlov, V.,
Rai, R.,
Smart, W.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
3470-3479 |
| 17. |
Blinder, D.,
and Magasanik, B.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
4190-4193 |
| 18. |
Cunningham, T. S.,
Dorrington, R. A.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
4718-4725 |
| 19. |
Van Vuuren, H. J. J.,
Daugherty, J. R.,
Rai, R.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
7186-7195 |
| 20. |
Sumrada, R.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1974)
J. Bacteriol.
117,
1240-1247 |
| 21. |
Dorrington, R. A.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3777-3784 |
| 22. | Jacobs, E., Dubois, E., Hennaut, C., and Wiame, J.-M. (1981) Curr. Genet. 4, 13-18 |
| 23. | Jacobs, E., Dubois, E., and Wiame, J.-M. (1985) Curr. Genet. 9, 333-339[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. | Coornaert, D., Vissers, S., and Andre, B. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 97, 163-171[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. |
Turoscy, V.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1982)
J. Bacteriol.
151,
1237-1246 |
| 26. | Vissers, S., Andre, B., Muyldermans, F., and Grenson, M. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 187, 611-616[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. |
Iraqui, I.,
Vissers, S.,
Bernard, F.,
Ol de Craene, J.,
Boles, E.,
Urrestarazu, A.,
and Andre, B.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
989-1001 |
| 28. |
Chisholm, G.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
1088-1095 |
| 29. |
Cunningham, T. S.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
5851-5861 |
| 30. |
Daugherty, J. R.,
Rai, R.,
ElBerry, H. M.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
64-73 |
| 31. |
Andre, B.,
Talibi, D.,
Boudekou, S. S.,
Hein, C.,
Vissers, S.,
and Coornaert, D.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
558-564 |
| 32. |
Cunningham, T. S.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
6205-6215 |
| 33. | Vissers, S., Andre, B., Muyldermans, F., and Grenson, M. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 181, 357-361[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Coornaert, D., Vissers, S., Andre, B., and Grenson, M. (1992) Curr. Genet. 21, 301-307[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Svetlov, V. V.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5682-5688 |
| 36. | Smart, W. C., Coffman, J. A., and Cooper, T. G. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5876-5887[Abstract] |
| 37. |
Park, H.-D.,
Luche, R. M.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1909-1915 |
| 38. |
Rai, R.,
Genbauffe, F. S.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
3521-3524 |
| 39. | Yoo, H.-S., and Cooper, T. G. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 104, 55-62[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Olive, M.,
Daugherty, J. R.,
and Cooper, T. G.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
255-261 |
| 41. | Deleted in proof |
| 42. | Blinder, D., and Magasanik, B. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 4190-4193 |
| 43. |
Coffman, J. A.,
Rai, R.,
and Cooper, T. T.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
6910-6918 |
| 44. | Stanbrough, M., and Magasanik, B. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 9450-9454 |