![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 28042-28049, September 24, 1999
From the Cancer Research Campaign Cell Transformation Group,
Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institute, University of
Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
Conformational stability of the p53 protein is an
absolute necessity for its physiological function as a tumor
suppressor. Recent in vitro studies have shown that
wild-type p53 is a highly temperature-sensitive protein at the
structural and functional levels. Upon heat treatment at 37 °C, p53
loses its wild-type (PAb1620+) conformation and its ability
to bind DNA, but can be stabilized by different classes of ligands. To
further investigate the thermal instability of p53, we isolated p53
mutants resistant to heat denaturation. For this purpose, we applied a
recently developed random mutagenesis technique called DNA shuffling
and screened for p53 variants that could retain reactivity to the
native conformation-specific anti-p53 antibody PAb1620 upon thermal
treatment. After three rounds of mutagenesis and screening, mutants
were isolated with the desired phenotype. The isolated mutants were
translated in vitro in either Escherichia coli
or rabbit reticulocyte lysate and characterized biochemically.
Mutational analysis identified 20 amino acid residues in the core
domain of p53 (amino acids 101-120) responsible for the thermostable
phenotype. Furthermore, the thermostable mutants could partially
protect the PAb1620+ conformation of tumor-derived p53
mutants from thermal unfolding, providing a novel approach for
restoration of wild-type structure and possibly function to a subset of
p53 mutants in tumor cells.
Activation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein appears to be an
integrating mechanism in response to cellular stresses such as DNA
damage and oxidative stress (1-3). This leads to activation of growth
arrest or apoptotic pathways (4, 5), conferring maintenance of genomic
stability (6, 7). Three separate functional domains at p53 have been
identified. In the N terminus (amino acids 1-43) lies the
transcriptional transactivation activity of the protein (8-11),
whereas amino acids 100-290 form a protease-resistant hydrophobic core
that is responsible for the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity (12,
13). The C terminus is composed of an oligomerization domain (amino
acids 319-360) and a region that negatively regulates the
sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of p53 (14-16).
Point mutations in the p53 gene have been identified in 50% of human
tumors, indicating that p53 inactivation is an important step in tumor
progression (17-19). The majority of these mutations (>90%) cluster
in the central core domain of the protein and are responsible for the
loss of the biological activity of p53 (20, 21). More specifically,
these mutations involve either residues that make direct contact with
DNA ("contact mutants") or residues that provide structural
stability and proper positioning of the DNA contact residues
("structural mutants"). Examples of contact mutants include Arg-248
and Arg-273, and those of structural mutants include Arg-175, Gly-245,
Arg-249, and Arg-282 (22).
Interestingly, many of the point mutations identified in the core
domain of p53 produce a change in the global conformation of the
protein, which can be monitored by a set of anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies. More specifically, PAb1620 (human and mouse p53-specific) (23) and PAb246 (mouse p53-specific) (24) recognize the wild-type native conformation of p53, but fail to react with most mutants found
in tumors. These mutants react with PAb240 (25), which recognizes
denatured, but not wild-type, p53. The definition of distinct p53
conformers is simplistic, however, since it appears that p53 is a
dynamic protein, adopting different conformations in vitro
and in vivo. In support of this statement, Milner and Medcalf (26) demonstrated that formation of hetero-oligomers of
wild-type and mutant p53 proteins could drive the conformation of the
wild-type protein into a mutant state. Furthermore, upon binding to
DNA, p53 appears to switch from a
PAb1620+/PAb240 In vitro studies on purified wild-type p53 have shown that
the native conformation of the protein is very temperature-sensitive. Incubation of p53 at physiological temperatures (37 °C) causes an
irreversible transition from PAb1620+ to
PAb1620 To further investigate the implications of the thermosensitive
phenotype of p53 regarding its biological function, we created p53
mutants able to resist temperature-dependent unfolding. For this purpose, we applied a random polymerase chain reaction
(PCR)1-based mutagenesis
technique called DNA shuffling (31, 32) and selected for p53 mutants
that could resist temperature-dependent loss of PAb1620
reactivity. DNA shuffling involves random fragmentation of
PCR-amplified related genes, followed by reassembly in a primerless PCR. Therefore, beneficial mutations existing in different genes can be
united by homologous recombination in the same gene, mimicking the
process by which proteins evolve in nature. Selected genes can then be
pooled and used as a template for a new round of recombination and
selection. DNA shuffling has been successfully applied for the
molecular evolution of single gene products with enhanced activity
(33), improved protein folding (34), or altered substrate specificity
(35).
After three rounds of DNA shuffling, we isolated p53 mutants that
retain PAb1620 reactivity at temperatures where wild-type p53 is
completely unreactive. Sequencing and mutational analysis of the
selected mutant identified a region of 20 amino acid residues in the
core domain of p53 (amino acids 101-120) that is responsible for the
observed thermostable phenotype. Furthermore, the thermostable mutants
can partially protect the PAb1620+ conformation of
tumor-derived p53 mutants from thermal unfolding, providing a novel
approach to reactivate or enhance wild-type p53 activity in tumor cells.
Antibodies--
Anti-human p53 monoclonal antibodies were used
in two-site ELISA or immunoprecipitations. DO-1 interacts with amino
acids 20-25 (36); PAb1801 interacts with amino acids 46-55 (37); PAb240 recognizes an epitope in the core of p53 (amino acids 213-217) (38); and PAb421 reacts within the C terminus of p53 (amino acids
371-380) (36).
DNA Shuffling--
The cDNA encoding wild-type human p53
(1.2 kilobases) was obtained by PCR from human p53 pT7-7 (39) with
SfiI (GGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCATGGAGGAGCCGCAGTCAGA) and
NotI (GCGGCCGCGTCTGAGTCAGGCCCTTCTGT) primers and purified from a 1% low-melting-point agarose gel using the Wizard PCR prep DNA
purification system (Promega). 2-3 µg of the purified PCR product
was digested with 0.15 units of DNase I (Sigma) for 10 min at room
temperature in 100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 1 mM MgCl2. The reaction was stopped by addition
of 1 mM EDTA and 0.1% SDS and incubation at 65 °C for
10 min. Fragments of 100-300 base pairs were purified from a 2%
low-melting-point agarose gel using the QIAEX II gel extraction kit
(QIAGEN Inc.). The purified fragments were resuspended in a primerless
25-µl PCR (0.2 mM each dNTP, 2.2 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl
(pH 8.8), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 2.5 units of AmpliTaq (Perkin-Elmer))
at 20-30 ng/µl. A PCR program of 94 °C for 2 min and 40 cycles of
94 °C for 40 s, 53 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for
40 s was followed in a Perkin-Elmer DNA thermal cycler. The
product of this reaction was diluted 40-fold in a 50-µl PCR (0.2 mM each dNTP, 2.2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 0.1% Triton
X-100, and 5 units of AmpliTaq) with the inclusion of
SfiI/NotI primers at 0.2 pmol/µl, followed by a
PCR program of 94 °C for 3 min and 25 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min,
50 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min. The correctly sized band
(1.2 kilobases) was purified and digested with
SfiI/NotI enzymes before being cloned into the
pCANTAB5E phagemid vector. The in vitro recombined p53
library was transformed into HB2151 cells, plated on LB plates
containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 2% glucose, and grown overnight
at 30 °C.
Screening Procedure--
For each round of DNA shuffling,
~10,000 colonies transformed with the mutated p53 library were
blotted on nitrocellulose filters, and protein expression was induced
overnight at room temperature on LB plates containing 100 µg/ml
ampicillin and 1 mM
isopropyl- Immunochemical Selection--
After heat treatment, the filters
were blocked in PBST containing 5% (w/w) Marvel (PBSTM) for 2 h
and probed with PAb1620 at 2.5 µg/ml in PBSTM for 1 h before
incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG
(Dako D314) diluted 1:1000 in PBSTM for 1 h. Color development was
performed by placing the filters in 10 ml of alkaline phosphatase
buffer containing 44 µl of nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (75 mg/ml
in 70% dimethylformamide) and 33 µl of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
phosphate p-toluidine salt (50 mg/ml in dimethylformamide)
and incubating for 7 min. All steps were carried out at room
temperature, and the filters were washed twice for 15 min with PBST
between each incubation step. For the first and second rounds, the 30 colonies from the master plates corresponding to the strongest signals
were selected, pooled, and used as a template for a PCR of a new cycle
of recombination and selection. After the third round, the best mutant
was further characterized.
Bacterial Expression--
The mutant cDNA after the third
round of selection was subcloned into the pT7-7 prokaryotic expression
vector and transformed into BL21(DE3) bacteria. Protein expression and
purification on a heparin-Sepharose column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
were performed as described (14), and samples were used in
thermostability experiments. Equal amounts of protein were incubated at
different temperatures for various periods of time. After heat
treatment, the samples were transferred on ice, and serial dilutions
were prepared for two-site ELISA as described below.
In Vitro Transcription/Translation and
Immunoprecipitations--
Wild-type human p53 and p53 mutants were
translated in vitro using the TnT®-coupled
reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). 1 µg of p53 pT7-7 plasmids was
used in 50-µl reactions together with 350 µCi of [35S]methionine, and translation was performed at
30 °C for 90 min according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Further protein synthesis was blocked by adding cycloheximide at 100 µg/ml, and aliquots were used in thermostability experiments as
described above. After heat treatment, the samples were transferred on
ice and immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of PAb1620 in 100 µl of
immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA (pH 8), 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 2 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) for 2 h on ice. The samples were
then incubated with 20 µl of protein G beads for 45 min at 4 °C
and washed three times with 200 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer. The
35S-labeled immunoprecipitates were separated by 12%
SDS-PAGE, and the gel was dried and exposed to x-ray film.
Two-site ELISA--
96-well flat-bottomed plates (Falcon 3912)
were coated with 50 µl/well of purified anti-p53 monoclonal
antibodies at 5 µg/ml in 0.1 M
CO3/HCO3 (pH 9) at 4 °C overnight. The wells
were blocked for 2 h with 200 µl of PBSTM before adding 50 µl/well of p53 samples mixed in a 1:1 ratio with PBSTM for 2 h.
Detection of p53 was performed by adding 50 µl/well of anti-p53
rabbit polyclonal serum CM-1 (1:1000 in PBSTM for 1 h), followed
by a 1-h incubation with 50 µl/well of horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated swine anti-rabbit IgG (Dako P217; 1:1000 in
PBSTM), and visualizing with 50 µl/well of
TMB/H2O2 substrate
(3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine; Sigma T 2885). All steps were carried
out at room temperature, and the plates were washed four times with 200 µl of PBST between each incubation step. For each protein
concentration, duplicates were performed, and each experiment was
repeated three times. S.D. values were derived from arithmetic means.
Mutagenesis--
Deletion mutants were created using the
mutagenesis method described by Imai et al. (40). The
sequences of the mutants were confirmed by automated sequencing
performed in an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer.
Acquisition of Mutants That Can Resist Temperature
Denaturation--
DNA shuffling was used to randomly mutagenize the
human p53 cDNA and to select for mutants that retain the wild-type
native conformation at temperatures where wild-type p53 becomes
unfolded. For this purpose, we used, as a screening probe, the anti-p53 monoclonal antibody PAb1620, which is specific for the wild-type folded
form of p53. The mutated p53 library was transformed into bacteria, and
protein expression was induced on nitrocellulose filters. After cell
lysis, the filters were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in the first
round of mutagenesis and screening and at 42 °C in the second and
third rounds, before being probed with PAb1620 for the identification
of clones expressing thermostable p53. Fig.
1 shows filters from all three rounds of
shuffling and screening. Wild-type human p53 was used as a control in
each round, and it failed to be recognized by PAb1620 after only a
15-min incubation of the filters at 37 °C, whereas there was a clear reactivity in untreated filters.
After the third cycle, we isolated single clones expressing p53
detected by PAb1620 after heat treatment. The strongest positive mutant
protein (TR p53) was expressed initially in bacteria and purified
through a 5-ml heparin-Sepharose column as described by Hupp et
al. (14). Purified p53 mutant protein was then analyzed by
two-site ELISA for epitope availability. A panel of anti-p53 monoclonal
antibodies was used to capture p53, and antibody-associated p53 protein
was then detected by the anti-p53 rabbit polyclonal serum CM-1 (Fig.
2, A and B). The
DO-1 and PAb421 monoclonal antibodies recognize linear epitopes at the
N and C termini, respectively, whereas PAb240 recognizes a linear
epitope in the core domain of p53 that is cryptic in the wild-type
folded core of the protein, but exposed only in point-mutated or
denatured p53 (see "Experimental Procedures" and Fig.
2A). It appears that the isolated mutant protein displays
decreased basal reactivity toward PAb1620 compared with wild-type p53,
whereas it displayed very similar reactivity to all the other anti-p53
antibodies used (Fig. 2C). We then addressed the question of
the effect of temperature on epitope availability. Equal amounts of
purified wild-type and TR p53 proteins were incubated at different
temperatures for varying periods of time as described under
"Experimental Procedures" before being serially diluted and added
to ELISA wells precoated with anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies. As shown
in Fig. 3, whereas there was no effect of
temperature on the epitopes recognized by DO-1 and PAb421 (Fig. 3,
A and B) for either wild-type p53 or the TR
mutant, we observed profound differences in the reactivity toward the
conformation-dependent antibodies, PAb1620 and PAb240 (Fig.
3, C and D). Heat treatment resulted in the
gradual loss of PAb1620 recognition of wild-type p53, consistent with
previous reports demonstrating that p53 is a thermosensitive protein
(28). The TR mutant, however, displayed a different phenotype;
temperature stress resulted in a reproducible 30-40% increase in
PAb1620 reactivity, with a concurrent 30% decrease in the PAb240
epitope availability. Maximum resistance to
temperature-dependent unfolding was achieved at 42 °C
since further increase in temperature up to 60 °C resulted in a
progressive loss of the PAb1620-reactive epitope (data not shown).
Reticulocyte Transcription/Translation--
We then used the
in vitro transcription/translation reticulocyte lysate
system to investigate the thermostability of the isolated mutant in an
alternative eukaryotic expression system. Wild-type human p53 and the
TR mutant were expressed as described under "Experimental
Procedures" at 30 °C for 90 min, and further transcription was
inhibited by addition of cycloheximide. Equal amounts of protein were
subjected to thermal treatment as described above and then immunoprecipitated with PAb1620. Fig.
4A shows that the amount of
wild-type p53 recognized by PAb1620 progressively decreased after heat
treatment, whereas an increasing amount of TR mutant p53 was
immunoprecipitated by PAb1620, consistent with the thermostable phenotype observed using bacterially expressed protein in the ELISA.
Reticulocyte lysates have recently been shown to contain Mdm2-like
proteins, present in p53·DNA complexes (41). Mdm2-p53 interaction
appears to be crucial for the stability of p53 in cells since Mdm2 can
target p53 for rapid degradation (42-44). We were interested to see
whether there was p53 proteolysis in our heat treatment experiments,
which could lead to decreased protein levels. Fig. 4B shows
that heat treatment did not affect the overall protein levels of either
wild-type or TR mutant p53. Therefore, the temperature-induced decrease
in PAb1620 reactivity of wild-type p53 must be due to conformational
changes and loss of native structure, which were resisted by TR mutant
p53. The biochemical behavior of the thermostable mutant was consistent in both expression systems, i.e. decreased PAb1620
reactivity that is resistant to heat treatment. An interesting
observation that arose from these experiments is that the isolated
thermostable mutant has a much faster rate of migration compared with
wild-type p53 on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4, A and B). The
explanation for this phenomenon lies in the sequence of the TR mutant
described below.
Sequencing and Mutational Analysis Identify a Region of 20 Amino
Acid Residues Responsible for the Observed Phenotype--
Sequencing
of the isolated TR mutant after the third cycle revealed 14 point
mutations throughout the p53 cDNA sequence resulting in 12 amino
acid substitutions. Interestingly, there were also three nucleotide
deletions at positions 179, 196, and 359 of the p53 cDNA sequence.
During translation of the TR mutant, the coding sequence is out of
frame after the first two deletions, but is back in frame after the
third deletion. Therefore, the amino acid sequence from positions 60 to
120 has been replaced by a non-p53 peptide encoded by an alternative
reading frame. The mutant is therefore one amino acid residue smaller
than wild-type p53, which nevertheless creates a dramatic change in the
migration on SDS-PAGE. We carried out mutational analysis to identify
the region in the TR mutant responsible for the observed phenotype. For
this purpose, we recombined different parts of the mutant cDNA onto
a wild-type background. Fig. 5 shows the
derived mutants and their phenotype, designated either as + or
It appears that the region between amino acids 60 and 120 is
responsible for the thermostable phenotype (mutant 6AB/3). We then
created deletions in this region, which demonstrated that deletion of
20 amino acid residues (positions 101-120) in the core of p53 (mutant
6b) was necessary and sufficient for the original thermostable
phenotype we observed. This phenomenon is specific for this particular
region of p53 since deletion of 20 amino acid residues at the
C-terminal end of the core domain of p53 (amino acids 281-300) created
a mutant with wild-type thermosensitive properties (mutant 8b).
Conformation-stabilizing Factors of p53 Have No Effect on the
Thermostable Mutant--
It has been previously shown that N-terminal
anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies can protect wild-type p53 from
temperature-dependent unfolding (28, 29). We were
interested to see whether such factors could further stabilize the
thermostable mutant. Equal amounts of heparin-Sepharose-purified
wild-type p53 and mutant 6b (Fig. 5) were incubated for 20 min on ice
with the N-terminal anti-p53 antibodies DO-1 and PAb1801. As a control,
we also used the C terminus-recognizing antibody PAb421, which was
shown to have DNA-binding activating properties, but no stabilizing
effect on p53. The samples were then subjected to thermal treatment and analyzed in a two-site ELISA for PAb1620 recognition as described above. As shown in Fig. 6, none of the
antibodies used had any further stabilizing effect on the thermostable
mutant, whereas wild-type p53 could be protected by N-terminal, but not
C-terminal, antibodies as previously reported (28).
The Thermostable Mutant Confers Conformational Stability to the p53
His-175 Mutant--
Structural point mutations in p53 appear to
destabilize the global conformation of the protein, which results in
abrogation of the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of p53. These
mutants exist predominantly in the
PAb1620
Translation at 30 °C for 90 min was stopped by addition of
cycloheximide; aliquots were subjected to thermal treatment as described above; and samples were immunoprecipitated with PAb1620. As
shown in Fig. 7, p53 His-175 could adopt
the PAb1620+ conformation when expressed at 30 °C, but
was very temperature-sensitive since incubation at 37 °C for 20 min
completely abolished reactivity to PAb1620. However, upon cotranslation
with the thermostable mutant 6AB/3, oligomers containing His-175 could
be immunoprecipitated by PAb1620 even after incubation at 42 °C for
45 min (Fig. 7, lanes 1-5).
Conformation-dependent anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies
have been extensively used for the discrimination of alternate p53
conformations with different biological activities. PAb1620 and PAb246
interact with the wild-type native structure of p53, but fail to
recognize a subset of p53 mutants found in tumors. These mutants have
lost sequence-specific DNA-binding activity and interact with PAb240, which recognizes denatured, but not wild-type, p53.
Previous studies have demonstrated that p53 is a temperature-sensitive
protein at the structural and functional levels. Incubation of p53 at
physiological temperatures results in an irreversible loss of the
wild-type PAb1620+ conformation and sequence-specific
DNA-binding activity (28). In this study, our goal was to create p53
variants that could retain the wild-type native conformation at high
temperatures. After three rounds of DNA shuffling and screening, we
isolated mutants that could resist temperature-dependent
loss of PAb1620 reactivity. Thermostability experiments on the
strongest positive mutant protein (TR p53) expressed in two different
systems confirmed the thermostable phenotype. Incubation of the TR
mutant at a range of temperatures from 37 to 42 °C for varying
periods of time did not reduce its recognition by PAb1620. Instead, we
observed a gradual increase in the fraction of protein reactive to
PAb1620, which was accompanied by a reproducible decrease in PAb240
reactivity, the antibody that targets a cryptic epitope in the core of
p53, exposed in denatured protein and in several tumor-derived p53 mutants. Furthermore, anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies (DO-1, PAb1801) that can protect p53 from temperature-dependent unfolding
(28, 29) had no further stabilizing effect on our thermostable mutants.
The thermostability profile of wild-type p53 in these experiments was
consistent with a previous report, i.e. gradual
temperature-dependent decrease in PAb1620 reactivity (28). The
same study has demonstrated that heat treatment of wild-type p53 leads
to protein aggregates that have lost reactivity both to PAb1620 and
PAb240 (PAb1620 Temperature-sensitive p53 mutants that have been identified in many
human tumors display a very different phenotype. The conformation of
these mutants, for example, human Ala-143 (45) and murine Val-135
(46), appear to be flexible and very temperature-sensitive. At the
permissive temperature (32.5 °C), these mutants adopt a wild-type
conformation (PAb1620+/PAb240 Sequencing of the isolated clone revealed 14 point mutations that
produced 12 amino acid substitutions. We also identified three
nucleotide deletions that effectively replaced the p53 amino acid
sequence 60-120 with a non-p53 peptide. Such mutational mechanisms have already been observed due to DNA shuffling (47) and, in our case,
created a mutant protein that was one amino acid residue shorter than
wild-type p53. Despite their almost identical sizes, the isolated
mutant has a much faster rate of migration on SDS-PAGE than wild-type
p53. Anomalous migration of p53 deletion mutants has already been
reported (48), and it is believed that the proline-rich region in p53
may retain some structure on SDS-containing gels affecting migration.
Even more strikingly, a sequence polymorphism found in the human p53
gene that results in either a proline or arginine at residue 72 (within
the proline-rich region) also affects migration of the protein on
SDS-PAGE (49) and may affect protein degradation (50). Mutational
analysis of the isolated p53 mutant revealed the region responsible for
the thermostable phenotype. Deletion of 20 amino acid residues in the
core domain of p53 (residues 101-120) was necessary and sufficient to
create the original mutant phenotype.
Recently, an initial characterization of the epitope for PAb1620 has
been achieved by the use of phage-displayed random amino acid peptides
by Ravera et al. (51). A sequence comparison of the selected
PAb1620-interacting peptides and p53 revealed that the PAb1620 epitope
is composed of two regions, residues 106-114 and 146-156. However,
the authors did not exclude the possibility that other p53 residues
could interact with PAb1620, but were not selected by the particular
panning effort. One of the regions in p53 identified as part of the
PAb1620 epitope (amino acids 106-114) is deleted in our derived
thermostable mutants (mutant 6b, amino acids 101-120) (Fig. 5), which
may explain the decreased basal reactivity of the mutants toward
PAb1620 as compared with wild-type p53.
During the biochemical characterization of the thermostable mutant, we
explored the ability of p53 to oligomerize in tetramers and asked
whether the conformation of tumor-derived structural p53 mutants could
be protected from temperature unfolding upon formation of
hetero-oligomers with the thermostable mutant. Indeed, the wild-type
(PAb1620+) conformation of p53 His-175, one of the most
common structural p53 mutants found in tumors, is protected from
temperature denaturation upon coexpression with our thermostable mutant.
Restoration of wild-type p53 activity in tumor cells is a desirable
goal in anticancer therapy (52-54). One approach is to reintroduce
wild-type p53, perhaps by gene therapy (55); alternatively, one could
restore the wild-type function to endogenous mutant p53. In the second
case, antibodies or peptides that interfere with the C-terminal
regulatory domain of p53 may succeed in relieving the negative
regulation of p53 DNA-binding activity (14, 56-58). Another approach
toward this goal has been recently suggested, whereby, using a yeast
genetic approach, second site mutations have been identified that
suppress the effects of common p53 cancer mutations (59). Similarly,
the increased thermosensitivity displayed by a subset of tumor-derived
mutants may also be a target for the restoration of wild-type function
to mutant p53 molecules. Hence, small molecules or evolution of
thermostable p53 variants that could increase the stability of the
folded state of these mutants could provide a route for rescuing the
native conformation and possibly the wild-type function of certain p53
mutants in tumor cells.
We are grateful to K. Ball, C. Blattner, R. Fahraeus, S. Lain, C. Midgley, M. Scott, and C. Stephen for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.
We also thank A. Sparks for providing anti-p53 antibodies.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Gibb Fellow of the Cancer Research Campaign. To whom correspondence
should be addressed. Tel.: 1382-344920; Fax: 1382-224117; E-mail:
dplane@bad.dundee.ac.uk.
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
Molecular Evolution of the Thermosensitive PAb1620 Epitope of
Human p53 by DNA Shuffling*
and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
to a
PAb1620
/PAb240+ conformation (27). Since
these two conformations of p53 dictate the biological status of the
protein, one could suggest that the balance between these two alternate
states might determine the biological activity of p53 in cells.
Identification of the mechanisms that govern this equilibrium could
provide new insights into p53 structure/function.
conformation and loss of the ability of p53 to
act as a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. However,
p53-interacting proteins such as human HSP70, Escherichia
coli DnaK, or N-terminal antibodies (DO-1, PAb1801) can protect
p53 from temperature-induced denaturation, stabilizing to a certain
degree the PAb1620+ conformation of the protein (28).
Similar studies have been performed on tumor-derived p53 mutants, which
appear to be even less thermostable than wild-type p53, but again,
N-terminal anti-p53 antibodies can partially protect these mutants from
temperature-induced unfolding (29). Recently, a more quantitative
approach regarding the stability of p53 has been performed using
differential scanning calorimetry, where the core domains of wild-type
p53 and several tumor-derived p53 mutants were subjected to
urea-mediated denaturation (30). The results of this study demonstrated
that the core domain of p53 is of moderate thermodynamic stability,
with all the tested mutant core domains being less stable than the wild
type. All these observations provide evidence that p53 is a
thermosensitive flexible protein switching between alternate
conformations that can be modulated by different classes of ligands. A
subset of the p53 mutations found in tumors destabilize the folded
state of the protein, affecting the normal biological function of p53.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactopyranoside. At this stage, the
master plates were kept at 4 °C until further use. Bacterial lysis
was performed by incubating the colony blot filters in PBS, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room
temperature. Under these lysis conditions, the PAb1620+
conformation of expressed p53 was detectable. The filters were then
washed twice for 15 min with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) to
remove the cell debris. Subsequently, the filters were subjected to
heat treatment: incubation for 15 min at 37 °C in the first round of
DNA shuffling and selection and at 42 °C in the second and third rounds.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Filters from the three rounds of DNA
shuffling and screening. Protein expression was induced overnight
at room temperature, and filters were heat-treated at different
temperatures for 15 min. Identification of clones expressing
thermostable p53 was performed by probing the filters with
PAb1620.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
A, epitope analysis of anti-human p53
monoclonal antibodies; B, schematic representation of p53
two-site ELISA; C, epitope analysis of the isolated
thermostable mutant (TR p53;
) compared with wild-type p53 (
).
Equal amounts of bacterially expressed/heparin-Sepharose-purified TR
mutant and wild-type human p53 (100 ng) were added to ELISA wells
precoated with anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies (5 µg/ml). Binding of
p53 to antibodies was detected by the anti-p53 polyclonal antibody
CM-1. Shown are the means ± S.D. of three independent experiments
(two wells/condition).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of temperature on epitope availability
for the TR mutant and wild-type p53. A two-site ELISA was used to
monitor the effect of temperature on linear (A and
B) and conformational (C and D)
epitopes of the TR mutant and wild-type human p53. Equal amounts of
protein (200 ng) were incubated at different temperatures for varying
periods of time. The samples were cooled on ice, and serial dilutions
were prepared and added to ELISA wells precoated with anti-p53
monoclonal antibodies. As before, detection of p53-antibody interaction
was performed with the anti-p53 polyclonal antibody CM-1. Shown are the
means ± S.D. of three independent experiments (two
wells/condition).
, 4 °C;
, 37 °C for 20 min;
, 37 °C
for 45 min;
, 42 °C for 45 min.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
A, resistance to temperature-induced
denaturation of the TR mutant expressed in reticulocyte lysates. TR
mutant and wild-type human p53 proteins were expressed using the
in vitro transcription/translation reticulocyte lysate
system. Further translation was inhibited by cycloheximide, and equal
amounts of protein were subjected to heat treatment before
immunoprecipitation with 1 µg of PAb1620. The 35S-labeled
immunoprecipitates were then analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. Lanes
1-5 represent the effect of temperature on PAb1620 reactivity for
wild-type p53, and lanes 6-10 for the TR mutant.
B, temperature treatment does not affect the total protein
levels. After heat stress, 5 µl of each sample was separated by 12%
SDS-PAGE. Lanes 1-4 demonstrate the protein levels of
35S-labeled wild-type p53, and lanes 5-8 the
levels of TR mutant.
depending on whether they behave as the thermostable TR mutant (+) or
as wild-type thermosensitive p53 (
). The classifying criterion was
resistance to temperature-dependent loss of PAb1620
reactivity.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Mutational analysis to identify the region
responsible for the observed phenotype. Sequencing of the isolated
mutant p53 gene after the third round revealed 14 point mutations and
three nucleotide deletions. Different mutants were derived from the
original by introducing various regions of the mutant gene onto the
wild-type background (mutants VB7HP, 12C, and 6AB/3). In-frame 20-amino
acid deletions (mutants 2b, 4b, 6b, and 8b) identified residues
101-120 in the core domain of p53 responsible for the thermostable
phenotype. All mutants were classified either as + (TR thermostable
phenotype) or
(wild-type thermosensitive phenotype) by
determining their reactivity toward PAb1620 after heat treatment in
two-site ELISA.

View larger version (79K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effect of p53 conformation-stabilizing
factors on the thermostable mutant. Equal amounts of bacterially
expressed/heparin-Sepharose-purified mutant 6b (lower panel)
and wild-type human p53 protein (upper panel) (100 ng) were
incubated on ice for 20 min with 500 ng of DO-1 (
), PAb1801 (
),
or PAb421 (
). The samples were incubated at different temperatures
for varying periods of time, cooled on ice, and added to ELISA wells
precoated with PAb1620. Detection of p53-PAb1620 interaction was
performed with the anti-p53 polyclonal antibody CM-1. Shown are the
means ± S.D. of three independent measurements (two
wells/condition). Control incubations with no antibody are also
indicated (white boxes with widely spaced dots).
/PAb240+ conformation, but this again
can be influenced by the temperature at which translation of these
mutants occurs. Hence, if translation occurs at subphysiological
temperatures (30 °C), these mutants can adopt the wild-type
(PAb1620+) conformation. Therefore, the prediction is that
the conformation of these mutants could be stabilized in the wild-type
state upon formation of hetero-oligomers with a thermostable mutant. To
explore this possibility, we cotranslated one of the most common
tumor-derived p53 structural mutants, His-175, with our thermostable
mutant in the reticulocyte lysate expression system. The thermostable mutant used in these experiments was 6AB/3 (Fig. 5), which has the
region between amino acids 60 and 120 replaced by the non-p53 peptide
and is able to form hetero-oligomers, as analyzed in cotranslation experiments with murine p53 (data not shown). We chose this particular mutant, as it displays an anomalous migration on SDS-PAGE, which facilitates the distinction between different mutant p53 molecules.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
The thermostable mutant confers
conformational stability on the p53 His-175 mutant. p53 His-175
mutant protein was either expressed alone (0.5 µg of His-175 pT7-7
plasmid + 0.5 µg of vector; lanes 6-10) or coexpressed
with the thermostable mutant 6AB/3 (0.5 µg of each plasmid;
lanes 1-5) in reticulocyte lysates. As a control, mutant
6AB/3 was translated alone (0.5 µg of 6AB/3 pT7-7 plasmid + 0.5 µg
of vector; lanes 11-15). Equal amounts of protein were
subjected to heat treatment before immunoprecipitation with 1 µg of
PAb1620. The 35S-labeled immunoprecipitates were separated
by 12% SDS-PAGE.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/PAb240
). Therefore, it is
possible that heat treatment causes unfolding of wild-type p53 (loss of
PAb1620 reactivity), which will finally lead to aggregates passing
through the unfolded state (PAb240+) as an intermediate
step. This could explain why the PAb240 reactivity of wild-type p53
remains overall unchanged after heat treatment. Interaction with linear
epitope-recognizing anti-p53 antibodies such as DO-1 and PAb421 was not
affected in our thermostability experiments.
) and are able
to mediate transcription transactivation. At the restrictive
temperature (37.5 °C), the conformation is switched to a mutant
state (PAb1620
/PAb240+), and transcriptional
activation function is greatly reduced or abolished. Therefore, the
thermostable mutant isolated in this study displays a
"temperature-resistant" phenotype, where temperature stress drives
the balance toward the wild-type PAb1620+ conformation
(Fig. 8).

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Effect of temperature on the conformation of
the thermostable (temperature-resistant) and temperature-sensitive
mutants.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Supported by a grant from Novartis.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Kastan, M. B.,
Onyekwere, O.,
Sidransky, D.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Craig, R. W.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
6304-6311[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Kastan, M. B.,
Zhan, Q.,
el Deiry, W. S.,
Carrier, F.,
Jacks, T.,
Walsh, W. V.,
Plunkett, B. S.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1992)
Cell
71,
587-597[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Hall, P. A.,
Meek, D.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1996)
J. Pathol.
180,
1-5[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Levine, A. J.
(1997)
Cell
88,
323-331[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Ko, L. J.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1054-1072 6.
Lane, D. P.
(1992)
Nature
358,
15-16[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Lane, D. P.
(1993)
Nature
362,
786-787[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Fields, S.,
and Jang, S. K.
(1990)
Science
249,
1046-1049 9.
Raycroft, L.,
Wu, H. Y.,
and Lozano, G.
(1990)
Science
249,
1049-1051 10.
Scharer, E.,
and Iggo, R.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1539-1545 11.
Unger, T.,
Nau, M. M.,
Segal, S.,
and Minna, J. D.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
1383-1390[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Bargonetti, J.,
Manfredi, J. J.,
Chen, X.,
Marshak, D. R.,
and Prives, C.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2565-2574 13.
Wang, Y.,
Schwedes, J. F.,
Parks, D.,
Mann, K.,
and Tegtmeyer, P.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2157-2165[Abstract]
14.
Hupp, T. R.,
Meek, D. W.,
Midgley, C. A.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1992)
Cell
71,
875-886[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Halazonetis, T. D.,
and Kandil, A. N.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
5057-5064[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Wang, Y.,
and Prives, C.
(1995)
Nature
376,
88-91[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Hollstein, M.,
Sidransky, D.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Harris, C. C.
(1991)
Science
253,
49-53 18.
Hollstein, M.,
Marion, M. J.,
Lehman, T.,
Welsh, J.,
Harris, C. C.,
Martel Planche, G.,
Kusters, I.,
and Montesano, R.
(1994)
Carcinogenesis (Lond.)
15,
1-3 19.
Nigro, J. M.,
Baker, S. J.,
Preisinger, A. C.,
Jessup, J. M.,
Hostetter, R.,
Cleary, K.,
Bigner, S. H.,
Davidson, N.,
Baylin, S.,
Devilee, P.,
Glover, T.,
Collins, F. S.,
Weston, A.,
Modali, R.,
Harris, C. C.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1989)
Nature
342,
705-708[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Pavletich, N. P.,
Chambers, K. A.,
and Pabo, C. O.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2556-2564 21.
Cho, Y.,
Gorina, S.,
Jeffrey, P. D.,
and Pavletich, N. P.
(1994)
Science
265,
346-355 22.
Arrowsmith, C. H.,
and Morin, P.
(1996)
Oncogene
12,
1379-1385[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Milner, J.,
Cook, A.,
and Sheldon, M.
(1987)
Oncogene
1,
453-455[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Yewdell, J. W.,
Gannon, J. V.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1986)
J. Virol.
59,
444-452 25.
Gannon, J. V.,
Greaves, R.,
Iggo, R.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
1595-1602[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Milner, J.,
and Medcalf, E. A.
(1991)
Cell
65,
765-774[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Halazonetis, T. D.,
Davis, L. J.,
and Kandil, A. N.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
1021-1028[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Hansen, S.,
Hupp, T. R.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3917-3924 29.
Friedlander, P.,
Legros, Y.,
Soussi, T.,
and Prives, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25468-25478 30.
Bullock, A. N.,
Henckel, J.,
DeDecker, B. S.,
Johnson, C. M.,
Nikolova, P. V.,
Proctor, M. R.,
Lane, D. P.,
and Fersht, A. R.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
14338-14342 31.
Stemmer, W. P. C.
(1994)
Nature
370,
389-391[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Matsumura, I.,
and Ellington, A. D.
(1996)
Nat. Biotechnol.
14,
366-366[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Stemmer, W. P. C.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
10747-10751 34.
Crameri, A.,
Whitehorn, E. A.,
Tate, E.,
and Stemmer, W. P. C.
(1996)
Nature Biotechnol.
14,
315-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Zhang, J. H.,
Dawes, G.,
and Stemmer, W. P. C.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4504-4509 36.
Stephen, C. W.,
Helminen, P.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
248,
58-78[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Banks, L.,
Matlashewski, G.,
and Crawford, L.
(1986)
Eur. J. Biochem.
159,
529-534[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Stephen, C. W.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
225,
577-583[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Midgley, C. A.,
Fisher, C. J.,
Bartek, J.,
Vojtesek, B.,
Lane, D.,
and Barnes, D. M.
(1992)
J. Cell. Sci.
101,
183-189 40.
Imai, Y.,
Matsushima, Y.,
Sugimura, T.,
and Terada, M.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
2785 41.
Hall, A. R.,
and Milner, J.
(1997)
Oncogene
14,
1371-1376[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
42.
Haupt, Y.,
Maya, R.,
Kazaz, A.,
and Oren, M.
(1997)
Nature
387,
296-299[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
43.
Kubbutat, M. H. G.,
Jones, S. N.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1997)
Nature
387,
299-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Bottger, A.,
Bottger, V.,
Sparks, A.,
Liu, W. L.,
Howard, S. F.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
860-869[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
45.
Zhang, W.,
Guo, X. Y.,
Hu, G. Y.,
Liu, W. B.,
Shay, J. W.,
and Deisseroth, A. B.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
2535-2544[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
46.
Milner, J.,
and Medcalf, E. A.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
216,
481-484[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
47.
Crameri, A.,
Dawes, G.,
Rodriguez, E.,
Silver, S.,
and Stemmer, W. P. C.
(1997)
Nature Biotechnol.
15,
436-438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
48.
Hansen, S.,
Lane, D. P.,
and Midgley, C. A.
(1998)
J. Mol. Biol.
275,
575-588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
49.
Matlashewski, G. J.,
Tuck, S.,
Pim, D.,
Lamb, P.,
Schneider, J.,
and Crawford, L. V.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
961-963 50.
Storey, A.,
Thomas, M.,
Kalita, A.,
Harwood, C.,
Gardiol, D.,
Mantovani, F.,
Breuer, J.,
Leigh, I. M.,
Matlashewski, G.,
and Banks, L.
(1998)
Nature
393,
229-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
51.
Ravera, M. W.,
Carcamo, J.,
Brissette, R.,
AlamMoghe, A.,
Dedova, O.,
Cheng, W.,
Hsiao, K. C.,
Klebanov, D.,
Shen, H.,
Tang, P.,
Blume, A.,
and Mandecki, W.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
1993-1999[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
52.
Fisher, D. E.
(1994)
Cell
78,
539-542[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
53.
Lowe, S. W.,
Bodis, S.,
McClatchey, A.,
Remington, L.,
Ruley, H. E.,
Fisher, D. E.,
Housman, D. E.,
and Jacks, T.
(1994)
Science
266,
807-810 54.
Harris, C. C.
(1996)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
88,
1442-1455 55.
Roth, J. A.,
Nguyen, D.,
Lawrence, D. D.,
Kemp, B. L.,
Carrasco, C. H.,
Ferson, D. Z.,
Hong, W. K.,
Komaki, R.,
Lee, J. J.,
Nesbitt, J. C.,
Pisters, K. M. W.,
Putnam, J. B.,
Schea, R.,
Shin, D. M.,
Walsh, G. L.,
Dolormente, M. M.,
Han, C. I.,
Martin, F. D.,
Yen, N.,
Xu, K.,
Stephens, L. C.,
McDonnell, T. J.,
Mukhopadhyay, T.,
and Cai, D.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
985-991[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
56.
Hupp, T. R.,
Sparks, A.,
and Lane, D. P.
(1995)
Cell
83,
237-245[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
57.
Abarzua, P.,
Losardo, J. E.,
Gubler, M. L.,
Spathis, R.,
Lu, Y. A.,
Felix, A.,
and Neri, A.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
2477-2482[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
58.
Selivanova, G.,
Iotsova, V.,
Okan, I.,
Fritsche, M.,
Strom, M.,
Groner, B.,
Grafstrom, R. C.,
and Wiman, K. G.
(1997)
Nat. Med.
3,
632-638[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
59.
Brachmann, R. K., Yu, K. X.,
Eby, Y.,
Pavletich, N. P.,
and Boeke, J. D.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
1847-1859[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Muret, M. Yacoub, P. Terrier, F. Drusch, A. Laplanche, C. Gaudin, C. Richon, C. Le Pechoux, A. Le Cesne, F. J. Lejeune, et al. p53 status correlates with histopathological response in patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated using isolated limb perfusion with TNF-{alpha} and melphalan Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 793 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yuan, I. Kurek, J. English, and R. Keenan Laboratory-Directed Protein Evolution Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2005; 69(3): 373 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Hao and A. Berry A thermostable variant of fructose bisphosphate aldolase constructed by directed evolution also shows increased stability in organic solvents Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 2004; 17(9): 689 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kunichika, Y. Hashimoto, and T. Imoto Robustness of hen lysozyme monitored by random mutations Protein Eng. Des. Sel., October 1, 2002; 15(10): 805 - 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shimizu, L. R. Burch, A. J. Smith, D. Dornan, M. Wallace, K. L. Ball, a |