JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xirodimas, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xirodimas, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lane, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 39, 28042-28049, September 24, 1999


Molecular Evolution of the Thermosensitive PAb1620 Epitope of Human p53 by DNA Shuffling*

Dimitris P. XirodimasDagger and David P. Lane§

From the Cancer Research Campaign Cell Transformation Group, Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Conformational stability of the p53 protein is an absolute necessity for its physiological function as a tumor suppressor. Recent in vitro studies have shown that wild-type p53 is a highly temperature-sensitive protein at the structural and functional levels. Upon heat treatment at 37 °C, p53 loses its wild-type (PAb1620+) conformation and its ability to bind DNA, but can be stabilized by different classes of ligands. To further investigate the thermal instability of p53, we isolated p53 mutants resistant to heat denaturation. For this purpose, we applied a recently developed random mutagenesis technique called DNA shuffling and screened for p53 variants that could retain reactivity to the native conformation-specific anti-p53 antibody PAb1620 upon thermal treatment. After three rounds of mutagenesis and screening, mutants were isolated with the desired phenotype. The isolated mutants were translated in vitro in either Escherichia coli or rabbit reticulocyte lysate and characterized biochemically. Mutational analysis identified 20 amino acid residues in the core domain of p53 (amino acids 101-120) responsible for the thermostable phenotype. Furthermore, the thermostable mutants could partially protect the PAb1620+ conformation of tumor-derived p53 mutants from thermal unfolding, providing a novel approach for restoration of wild-type structure and possibly function to a subset of p53 mutants in tumor cells.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Activation of the p53 tumor suppressor protein appears to be an integrating mechanism in response to cellular stresses such as DNA damage and oxidative stress (1-3). This leads to activation of growth arrest or apoptotic pathways (4, 5), conferring maintenance of genomic stability (6, 7). Three separate functional domains at p53 have been identified. In the N terminus (amino acids 1-43) lies the transcriptional transactivation activity of the protein (8-11), whereas amino acids 100-290 form a protease-resistant hydrophobic core that is responsible for the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity (12, 13). The C terminus is composed of an oligomerization domain (amino acids 319-360) and a region that negatively regulates the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of p53 (14-16).

Point mutations in the p53 gene have been identified in 50% of human tumors, indicating that p53 inactivation is an important step in tumor progression (17-19). The majority of these mutations (>90%) cluster in the central core domain of the protein and are responsible for the loss of the biological activity of p53 (20, 21). More specifically, these mutations involve either residues that make direct contact with DNA ("contact mutants") or residues that provide structural stability and proper positioning of the DNA contact residues ("structural mutants"). Examples of contact mutants include Arg-248 and Arg-273, and those of structural mutants include Arg-175, Gly-245, Arg-249, and Arg-282 (22).

Interestingly, many of the point mutations identified in the core domain of p53 produce a change in the global conformation of the protein, which can be monitored by a set of anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies. More specifically, PAb1620 (human and mouse p53-specific) (23) and PAb246 (mouse p53-specific) (24) recognize the wild-type native conformation of p53, but fail to react with most mutants found in tumors. These mutants react with PAb240 (25), which recognizes denatured, but not wild-type, p53. The definition of distinct p53 conformers is simplistic, however, since it appears that p53 is a dynamic protein, adopting different conformations in vitro and in vivo. In support of this statement, Milner and Medcalf (26) demonstrated that formation of hetero-oligomers of wild-type and mutant p53 proteins could drive the conformation of the wild-type protein into a mutant state. Furthermore, upon binding to DNA, p53 appears to switch from a PAb1620+/PAb240- to a PAb1620-/PAb240+ conformation (27). Since these two conformations of p53 dictate the biological status of the protein, one could suggest that the balance between these two alternate states might determine the biological activity of p53 in cells. Identification of the mechanisms that govern this equilibrium could provide new insights into p53 structure/function.

In vitro studies on purified wild-type p53 have shown that the native conformation of the protein is very temperature-sensitive. Incubation of p53 at physiological temperatures (37 °C) causes an irreversible transition from PAb1620+ to PAb1620- conformation and loss of the ability of p53 to act as a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. However, p53-interacting proteins such as human HSP70, Escherichia coli DnaK, or N-terminal antibodies (DO-1, PAb1801) can protect p53 from temperature-induced denaturation, stabilizing to a certain degree the PAb1620+ conformation of the protein (28). Similar studies have been performed on tumor-derived p53 mutants, which appear to be even less thermostable than wild-type p53, but again, N-terminal anti-p53 antibodies can partially protect these mutants from temperature-induced unfolding (29). Recently, a more quantitative approach regarding the stability of p53 has been performed using differential scanning calorimetry, where the core domains of wild-type p53 and several tumor-derived p53 mutants were subjected to urea-mediated denaturation (30). The results of this study demonstrated that the core domain of p53 is of moderate thermodynamic stability, with all the tested mutant core domains being less stable than the wild type. All these observations provide evidence that p53 is a thermosensitive flexible protein switching between alternate conformations that can be modulated by different classes of ligands. A subset of the p53 mutations found in tumors destabilize the folded state of the protein, affecting the normal biological function of p53.

To further investigate the implications of the thermosensitive phenotype of p53 regarding its biological function, we created p53 mutants able to resist temperature-dependent unfolding. For this purpose, we applied a random polymerase chain reaction (PCR)1-based mutagenesis technique called DNA shuffling (31, 32) and selected for p53 mutants that could resist temperature-dependent loss of PAb1620 reactivity. DNA shuffling involves random fragmentation of PCR-amplified related genes, followed by reassembly in a primerless PCR. Therefore, beneficial mutations existing in different genes can be united by homologous recombination in the same gene, mimicking the process by which proteins evolve in nature. Selected genes can then be pooled and used as a template for a new round of recombination and selection. DNA shuffling has been successfully applied for the molecular evolution of single gene products with enhanced activity (33), improved protein folding (34), or altered substrate specificity (35).

After three rounds of DNA shuffling, we isolated p53 mutants that retain PAb1620 reactivity at temperatures where wild-type p53 is completely unreactive. Sequencing and mutational analysis of the selected mutant identified a region of 20 amino acid residues in the core domain of p53 (amino acids 101-120) that is responsible for the observed thermostable phenotype. Furthermore, the thermostable mutants can partially protect the PAb1620+ conformation of tumor-derived p53 mutants from thermal unfolding, providing a novel approach to reactivate or enhance wild-type p53 activity in tumor cells.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Antibodies-- Anti-human p53 monoclonal antibodies were used in two-site ELISA or immunoprecipitations. DO-1 interacts with amino acids 20-25 (36); PAb1801 interacts with amino acids 46-55 (37); PAb240 recognizes an epitope in the core of p53 (amino acids 213-217) (38); and PAb421 reacts within the C terminus of p53 (amino acids 371-380) (36).

DNA Shuffling-- The cDNA encoding wild-type human p53 (1.2 kilobases) was obtained by PCR from human p53 pT7-7 (39) with SfiI (GGCCCAGCCGGCCATGGCCATGGAGGAGCCGCAGTCAGA) and NotI (GCGGCCGCGTCTGAGTCAGGCCCTTCTGT) primers and purified from a 1% low-melting-point agarose gel using the Wizard PCR prep DNA purification system (Promega). 2-3 µg of the purified PCR product was digested with 0.15 units of DNase I (Sigma) for 10 min at room temperature in 100 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) and 1 mM MgCl2. The reaction was stopped by addition of 1 mM EDTA and 0.1% SDS and incubation at 65 °C for 10 min. Fragments of 100-300 base pairs were purified from a 2% low-melting-point agarose gel using the QIAEX II gel extraction kit (QIAGEN Inc.). The purified fragments were resuspended in a primerless 25-µl PCR (0.2 mM each dNTP, 2.2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 2.5 units of AmpliTaq (Perkin-Elmer)) at 20-30 ng/µl. A PCR program of 94 °C for 2 min and 40 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 53 °C for 40 s, and 72 °C for 40 s was followed in a Perkin-Elmer DNA thermal cycler. The product of this reaction was diluted 40-fold in a 50-µl PCR (0.2 mM each dNTP, 2.2 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 0.1% Triton X-100, and 5 units of AmpliTaq) with the inclusion of SfiI/NotI primers at 0.2 pmol/µl, followed by a PCR program of 94 °C for 3 min and 25 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min. The correctly sized band (1.2 kilobases) was purified and digested with SfiI/NotI enzymes before being cloned into the pCANTAB5E phagemid vector. The in vitro recombined p53 library was transformed into HB2151 cells, plated on LB plates containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 2% glucose, and grown overnight at 30 °C.

Screening Procedure-- For each round of DNA shuffling, ~10,000 colonies transformed with the mutated p53 library were blotted on nitrocellulose filters, and protein expression was induced overnight at room temperature on LB plates containing 100 µg/ml ampicillin and 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside. At this stage, the master plates were kept at 4 °C until further use. Bacterial lysis was performed by incubating the colony blot filters in PBS, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at room temperature. Under these lysis conditions, the PAb1620+ conformation of expressed p53 was detectable. The filters were then washed twice for 15 min with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (PBST) to remove the cell debris. Subsequently, the filters were subjected to heat treatment: incubation for 15 min at 37 °C in the first round of DNA shuffling and selection and at 42 °C in the second and third rounds.

Immunochemical Selection-- After heat treatment, the filters were blocked in PBST containing 5% (w/w) Marvel (PBSTM) for 2 h and probed with PAb1620 at 2.5 µg/ml in PBSTM for 1 h before incubation with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Dako D314) diluted 1:1000 in PBSTM for 1 h. Color development was performed by placing the filters in 10 ml of alkaline phosphatase buffer containing 44 µl of nitro blue tetrazolium chloride (75 mg/ml in 70% dimethylformamide) and 33 µl of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate p-toluidine salt (50 mg/ml in dimethylformamide) and incubating for 7 min. All steps were carried out at room temperature, and the filters were washed twice for 15 min with PBST between each incubation step. For the first and second rounds, the 30 colonies from the master plates corresponding to the strongest signals were selected, pooled, and used as a template for a PCR of a new cycle of recombination and selection. After the third round, the best mutant was further characterized.

Bacterial Expression-- The mutant cDNA after the third round of selection was subcloned into the pT7-7 prokaryotic expression vector and transformed into BL21(DE3) bacteria. Protein expression and purification on a heparin-Sepharose column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) were performed as described (14), and samples were used in thermostability experiments. Equal amounts of protein were incubated at different temperatures for various periods of time. After heat treatment, the samples were transferred on ice, and serial dilutions were prepared for two-site ELISA as described below.

In Vitro Transcription/Translation and Immunoprecipitations-- Wild-type human p53 and p53 mutants were translated in vitro using the TnT®-coupled reticulocyte lysate system (Promega). 1 µg of p53 pT7-7 plasmids was used in 50-µl reactions together with 350 µCi of [35S]methionine, and translation was performed at 30 °C for 90 min according to the manufacturer's instructions. Further protein synthesis was blocked by adding cycloheximide at 100 µg/ml, and aliquots were used in thermostability experiments as described above. After heat treatment, the samples were transferred on ice and immunoprecipitated with 1 µg of PAb1620 in 100 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA (pH 8), 1% Nonidet P-40, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) for 2 h on ice. The samples were then incubated with 20 µl of protein G beads for 45 min at 4 °C and washed three times with 200 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer. The 35S-labeled immunoprecipitates were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE, and the gel was dried and exposed to x-ray film.

Two-site ELISA-- 96-well flat-bottomed plates (Falcon 3912) were coated with 50 µl/well of purified anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies at 5 µg/ml in 0.1 M CO3/HCO3 (pH 9) at 4 °C overnight. The wells were blocked for 2 h with 200 µl of PBSTM before adding 50 µl/well of p53 samples mixed in a 1:1 ratio with PBSTM for 2 h. Detection of p53 was performed by adding 50 µl/well of anti-p53 rabbit polyclonal serum CM-1 (1:1000 in PBSTM for 1 h), followed by a 1-h incubation with 50 µl/well of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated swine anti-rabbit IgG (Dako P217; 1:1000 in PBSTM), and visualizing with 50 µl/well of TMB/H2O2 substrate (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine; Sigma T 2885). All steps were carried out at room temperature, and the plates were washed four times with 200 µl of PBST between each incubation step. For each protein concentration, duplicates were performed, and each experiment was repeated three times. S.D. values were derived from arithmetic means.

Mutagenesis-- Deletion mutants were created using the mutagenesis method described by Imai et al. (40). The sequences of the mutants were confirmed by automated sequencing performed in an ABI Prism 377 DNA sequencer.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Acquisition of Mutants That Can Resist Temperature Denaturation-- DNA shuffling was used to randomly mutagenize the human p53 cDNA and to select for mutants that retain the wild-type native conformation at temperatures where wild-type p53 becomes unfolded. For this purpose, we used, as a screening probe, the anti-p53 monoclonal antibody PAb1620, which is specific for the wild-type folded form of p53. The mutated p53 library was transformed into bacteria, and protein expression was induced on nitrocellulose filters. After cell lysis, the filters were incubated for 15 min at 37 °C in the first round of mutagenesis and screening and at 42 °C in the second and third rounds, before being probed with PAb1620 for the identification of clones expressing thermostable p53. Fig. 1 shows filters from all three rounds of shuffling and screening. Wild-type human p53 was used as a control in each round, and it failed to be recognized by PAb1620 after only a 15-min incubation of the filters at 37 °C, whereas there was a clear reactivity in untreated filters.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Filters from the three rounds of DNA shuffling and screening. Protein expression was induced overnight at room temperature, and filters were heat-treated at different temperatures for 15 min. Identification of clones expressing thermostable p53 was performed by probing the filters with PAb1620.

After the third cycle, we isolated single clones expressing p53 detected by PAb1620 after heat treatment. The strongest positive mutant protein (TR p53) was expressed initially in bacteria and purified through a 5-ml heparin-Sepharose column as described by Hupp et al. (14). Purified p53 mutant protein was then analyzed by two-site ELISA for epitope availability. A panel of anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies was used to capture p53, and antibody-associated p53 protein was then detected by the anti-p53 rabbit polyclonal serum CM-1 (Fig. 2, A and B). The DO-1 and PAb421 monoclonal antibodies recognize linear epitopes at the N and C termini, respectively, whereas PAb240 recognizes a linear epitope in the core domain of p53 that is cryptic in the wild-type folded core of the protein, but exposed only in point-mutated or denatured p53 (see "Experimental Procedures" and Fig. 2A). It appears that the isolated mutant protein displays decreased basal reactivity toward PAb1620 compared with wild-type p53, whereas it displayed very similar reactivity to all the other anti-p53 antibodies used (Fig. 2C). We then addressed the question of the effect of temperature on epitope availability. Equal amounts of purified wild-type and TR p53 proteins were incubated at different temperatures for varying periods of time as described under "Experimental Procedures" before being serially diluted and added to ELISA wells precoated with anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies. As shown in Fig. 3, whereas there was no effect of temperature on the epitopes recognized by DO-1 and PAb421 (Fig. 3, A and B) for either wild-type p53 or the TR mutant, we observed profound differences in the reactivity toward the conformation-dependent antibodies, PAb1620 and PAb240 (Fig. 3, C and D). Heat treatment resulted in the gradual loss of PAb1620 recognition of wild-type p53, consistent with previous reports demonstrating that p53 is a thermosensitive protein (28). The TR mutant, however, displayed a different phenotype; temperature stress resulted in a reproducible 30-40% increase in PAb1620 reactivity, with a concurrent 30% decrease in the PAb240 epitope availability. Maximum resistance to temperature-dependent unfolding was achieved at 42 °C since further increase in temperature up to 60 °C resulted in a progressive loss of the PAb1620-reactive epitope (data not shown).


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   A, epitope analysis of anti-human p53 monoclonal antibodies; B, schematic representation of p53 two-site ELISA; C, epitope analysis of the isolated thermostable mutant (TR p53; ) compared with wild-type p53 (). Equal amounts of bacterially expressed/heparin-Sepharose-purified TR mutant and wild-type human p53 (100 ng) were added to ELISA wells precoated with anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies (5 µg/ml). Binding of p53 to antibodies was detected by the anti-p53 polyclonal antibody CM-1. Shown are the means ± S.D. of three independent experiments (two wells/condition).


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of temperature on epitope availability for the TR mutant and wild-type p53. A two-site ELISA was used to monitor the effect of temperature on linear (A and B) and conformational (C and D) epitopes of the TR mutant and wild-type human p53. Equal amounts of protein (200 ng) were incubated at different temperatures for varying periods of time. The samples were cooled on ice, and serial dilutions were prepared and added to ELISA wells precoated with anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies. As before, detection of p53-antibody interaction was performed with the anti-p53 polyclonal antibody CM-1. Shown are the means ± S.D. of three independent experiments (two wells/condition). , 4 °C; diamond , 37 °C for 20 min; open circle , 37 °C for 45 min; triangle , 42 °C for 45 min.

Reticulocyte Transcription/Translation-- We then used the in vitro transcription/translation reticulocyte lysate system to investigate the thermostability of the isolated mutant in an alternative eukaryotic expression system. Wild-type human p53 and the TR mutant were expressed as described under "Experimental Procedures" at 30 °C for 90 min, and further transcription was inhibited by addition of cycloheximide. Equal amounts of protein were subjected to thermal treatment as described above and then immunoprecipitated with PAb1620. Fig. 4A shows that the amount of wild-type p53 recognized by PAb1620 progressively decreased after heat treatment, whereas an increasing amount of TR mutant p53 was immunoprecipitated by PAb1620, consistent with the thermostable phenotype observed using bacterially expressed protein in the ELISA.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   A, resistance to temperature-induced denaturation of the TR mutant expressed in reticulocyte lysates. TR mutant and wild-type human p53 proteins were expressed using the in vitro transcription/translation reticulocyte lysate system. Further translation was inhibited by cycloheximide, and equal amounts of protein were subjected to heat treatment before immunoprecipitation with 1 µg of PAb1620. The 35S-labeled immunoprecipitates were then analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE. Lanes 1-5 represent the effect of temperature on PAb1620 reactivity for wild-type p53, and lanes 6-10 for the TR mutant. B, temperature treatment does not affect the total protein levels. After heat stress, 5 µl of each sample was separated by 12% SDS-PAGE. Lanes 1-4 demonstrate the protein levels of 35S-labeled wild-type p53, and lanes 5-8 the levels of TR mutant.

Reticulocyte lysates have recently been shown to contain Mdm2-like proteins, present in p53·DNA complexes (41). Mdm2-p53 interaction appears to be crucial for the stability of p53 in cells since Mdm2 can target p53 for rapid degradation (42-44). We were interested to see whether there was p53 proteolysis in our heat treatment experiments, which could lead to decreased protein levels. Fig. 4B shows that heat treatment did not affect the overall protein levels of either wild-type or TR mutant p53. Therefore, the temperature-induced decrease in PAb1620 reactivity of wild-type p53 must be due to conformational changes and loss of native structure, which were resisted by TR mutant p53. The biochemical behavior of the thermostable mutant was consistent in both expression systems, i.e. decreased PAb1620 reactivity that is resistant to heat treatment. An interesting observation that arose from these experiments is that the isolated thermostable mutant has a much faster rate of migration compared with wild-type p53 on SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4, A and B). The explanation for this phenomenon lies in the sequence of the TR mutant described below.

Sequencing and Mutational Analysis Identify a Region of 20 Amino Acid Residues Responsible for the Observed Phenotype-- Sequencing of the isolated TR mutant after the third cycle revealed 14 point mutations throughout the p53 cDNA sequence resulting in 12 amino acid substitutions. Interestingly, there were also three nucleotide deletions at positions 179, 196, and 359 of the p53 cDNA sequence. During translation of the TR mutant, the coding sequence is out of frame after the first two deletions, but is back in frame after the third deletion. Therefore, the amino acid sequence from positions 60 to 120 has been replaced by a non-p53 peptide encoded by an alternative reading frame. The mutant is therefore one amino acid residue smaller than wild-type p53, which nevertheless creates a dramatic change in the migration on SDS-PAGE. We carried out mutational analysis to identify the region in the TR mutant responsible for the observed phenotype. For this purpose, we recombined different parts of the mutant cDNA onto a wild-type background. Fig. 5 shows the derived mutants and their phenotype, designated either as + or - depending on whether they behave as the thermostable TR mutant (+) or as wild-type thermosensitive p53 (-). The classifying criterion was resistance to temperature-dependent loss of PAb1620 reactivity.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Mutational analysis to identify the region responsible for the observed phenotype. Sequencing of the isolated mutant p53 gene after the third round revealed 14 point mutations and three nucleotide deletions. Different mutants were derived from the original by introducing various regions of the mutant gene onto the wild-type background (mutants VB7HP, 12C, and 6AB/3). In-frame 20-amino acid deletions (mutants 2b, 4b, 6b, and 8b) identified residues 101-120 in the core domain of p53 responsible for the thermostable phenotype. All mutants were classified either as + (TR thermostable phenotype) or - (wild-type thermosensitive phenotype) by determining their reactivity toward PAb1620 after heat treatment in two-site ELISA.

It appears that the region between amino acids 60 and 120 is responsible for the thermostable phenotype (mutant 6AB/3). We then created deletions in this region, which demonstrated that deletion of 20 amino acid residues (positions 101-120) in the core of p53 (mutant 6b) was necessary and sufficient for the original thermostable phenotype we observed. This phenomenon is specific for this particular region of p53 since deletion of 20 amino acid residues at the C-terminal end of the core domain of p53 (amino acids 281-300) created a mutant with wild-type thermosensitive properties (mutant 8b).

Conformation-stabilizing Factors of p53 Have No Effect on the Thermostable Mutant-- It has been previously shown that N-terminal anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies can protect wild-type p53 from temperature-dependent unfolding (28, 29). We were interested to see whether such factors could further stabilize the thermostable mutant. Equal amounts of heparin-Sepharose-purified wild-type p53 and mutant 6b (Fig. 5) were incubated for 20 min on ice with the N-terminal anti-p53 antibodies DO-1 and PAb1801. As a control, we also used the C terminus-recognizing antibody PAb421, which was shown to have DNA-binding activating properties, but no stabilizing effect on p53. The samples were then subjected to thermal treatment and analyzed in a two-site ELISA for PAb1620 recognition as described above. As shown in Fig. 6, none of the antibodies used had any further stabilizing effect on the thermostable mutant, whereas wild-type p53 could be protected by N-terminal, but not C-terminal, antibodies as previously reported (28).


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of p53 conformation-stabilizing factors on the thermostable mutant. Equal amounts of bacterially expressed/heparin-Sepharose-purified mutant 6b (lower panel) and wild-type human p53 protein (upper panel) (100 ng) were incubated on ice for 20 min with 500 ng of DO-1 (), PAb1801 (), or PAb421 (). The samples were incubated at different temperatures for varying periods of time, cooled on ice, and added to ELISA wells precoated with PAb1620. Detection of p53-PAb1620 interaction was performed with the anti-p53 polyclonal antibody CM-1. Shown are the means ± S.D. of three independent measurements (two wells/condition). Control incubations with no antibody are also indicated (white boxes with widely spaced dots).

The Thermostable Mutant Confers Conformational Stability to the p53 His-175 Mutant-- Structural point mutations in p53 appear to destabilize the global conformation of the protein, which results in abrogation of the sequence-specific DNA-binding activity of p53. These mutants exist predominantly in the PAb1620-/PAb240+ conformation, but this again can be influenced by the temperature at which translation of these mutants occurs. Hence, if translation occurs at subphysiological temperatures (30 °C), these mutants can adopt the wild-type (PAb1620+) conformation. Therefore, the prediction is that the conformation of these mutants could be stabilized in the wild-type state upon formation of hetero-oligomers with a thermostable mutant. To explore this possibility, we cotranslated one of the most common tumor-derived p53 structural mutants, His-175, with our thermostable mutant in the reticulocyte lysate expression system. The thermostable mutant used in these experiments was 6AB/3 (Fig. 5), which has the region between amino acids 60 and 120 replaced by the non-p53 peptide and is able to form hetero-oligomers, as analyzed in cotranslation experiments with murine p53 (data not shown). We chose this particular mutant, as it displays an anomalous migration on SDS-PAGE, which facilitates the distinction between different mutant p53 molecules.

Translation at 30 °C for 90 min was stopped by addition of cycloheximide; aliquots were subjected to thermal treatment as described above; and samples were immunoprecipitated with PAb1620. As shown in Fig. 7, p53 His-175 could adopt the PAb1620+ conformation when expressed at 30 °C, but was very temperature-sensitive since incubation at 37 °C for 20 min completely abolished reactivity to PAb1620. However, upon cotranslation with the thermostable mutant 6AB/3, oligomers containing His-175 could be immunoprecipitated by PAb1620 even after incubation at 42 °C for 45 min (Fig. 7, lanes 1-5).


View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   The thermostable mutant confers conformational stability on the p53 His-175 mutant. p53 His-175 mutant protein was either expressed alone (0.5 µg of His-175 pT7-7 plasmid + 0.5 µg of vector; lanes 6-10) or coexpressed with the thermostable mutant 6AB/3 (0.5 µg of each plasmid; lanes 1-5) in reticulocyte lysates. As a control, mutant 6AB/3 was translated alone (0.5 µg of 6AB/3 pT7-7 plasmid + 0.5 µg of vector; lanes 11-15). Equal amounts of protein were subjected to heat treatment before immunoprecipitation with 1 µg of PAb1620. The 35S-labeled immunoprecipitates were separated by 12% SDS-PAGE.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Conformation-dependent anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies have been extensively used for the discrimination of alternate p53 conformations with different biological activities. PAb1620 and PAb246 interact with the wild-type native structure of p53, but fail to recognize a subset of p53 mutants found in tumors. These mutants have lost sequence-specific DNA-binding activity and interact with PAb240, which recognizes denatured, but not wild-type, p53.

Previous studies have demonstrated that p53 is a temperature-sensitive protein at the structural and functional levels. Incubation of p53 at physiological temperatures results in an irreversible loss of the wild-type PAb1620+ conformation and sequence-specific DNA-binding activity (28). In this study, our goal was to create p53 variants that could retain the wild-type native conformation at high temperatures. After three rounds of DNA shuffling and screening, we isolated mutants that could resist temperature-dependent loss of PAb1620 reactivity. Thermostability experiments on the strongest positive mutant protein (TR p53) expressed in two different systems confirmed the thermostable phenotype. Incubation of the TR mutant at a range of temperatures from 37 to 42 °C for varying periods of time did not reduce its recognition by PAb1620. Instead, we observed a gradual increase in the fraction of protein reactive to PAb1620, which was accompanied by a reproducible decrease in PAb240 reactivity, the antibody that targets a cryptic epitope in the core of p53, exposed in denatured protein and in several tumor-derived p53 mutants. Furthermore, anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies (DO-1, PAb1801) that can protect p53 from temperature-dependent unfolding (28, 29) had no further stabilizing effect on our thermostable mutants.

The thermostability profile of wild-type p53 in these experiments was consistent with a previous report, i.e. gradual temperature-dependent decrease in PAb1620 reactivity (28). The same study has demonstrated that heat treatment of wild-type p53 leads to protein aggregates that have lost reactivity both to PAb1620 and PAb240 (PAb1620-/PAb240-). Therefore, it is possible that heat treatment causes unfolding of wild-type p53 (loss of PAb1620 reactivity), which will finally lead to aggregates passing through the unfolded state (PAb240+) as an intermediate step. This could explain why the PAb240 reactivity of wild-type p53 remains overall unchanged after heat treatment. Interaction with linear epitope-recognizing anti-p53 antibodies such as DO-1 and PAb421 was not affected in our thermostability experiments.

Temperature-sensitive p53 mutants that have been identified in many human tumors display a very different phenotype. The conformation of these mutants, for example, human Ala-143 (45) and murine Val-135 (46), appear to be flexible and very temperature-sensitive. At the permissive temperature (32.5 °C), these mutants adopt a wild-type conformation (PAb1620+/PAb240-) and are able to mediate transcription transactivation. At the restrictive temperature (37.5 °C), the conformation is switched to a mutant state (PAb1620-/PAb240+), and transcriptional activation function is greatly reduced or abolished. Therefore, the thermostable mutant isolated in this study displays a "temperature-resistant" phenotype, where temperature stress drives the balance toward the wild-type PAb1620+ conformation (Fig. 8).


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Effect of temperature on the conformation of the thermostable (temperature-resistant) and temperature-sensitive mutants.

Sequencing of the isolated clone revealed 14 point mutations that produced 12 amino acid substitutions. We also identified three nucleotide deletions that effectively replaced the p53 amino acid sequence 60-120 with a non-p53 peptide. Such mutational mechanisms have already been observed due to DNA shuffling (47) and, in our case, created a mutant protein that was one amino acid residue shorter than wild-type p53. Despite their almost identical sizes, the isolated mutant has a much faster rate of migration on SDS-PAGE than wild-type p53. Anomalous migration of p53 deletion mutants has already been reported (48), and it is believed that the proline-rich region in p53 may retain some structure on SDS-containing gels affecting migration. Even more strikingly, a sequence polymorphism found in the human p53 gene that results in either a proline or arginine at residue 72 (within the proline-rich region) also affects migration of the protein on SDS-PAGE (49) and may affect protein degradation (50). Mutational analysis of the isolated p53 mutant revealed the region responsible for the thermostable phenotype. Deletion of 20 amino acid residues in the core domain of p53 (residues 101-120) was necessary and sufficient to create the original mutant phenotype.

Recently, an initial characterization of the epitope for PAb1620 has been achieved by the use of phage-displayed random amino acid peptides by Ravera et al. (51). A sequence comparison of the selected PAb1620-interacting peptides and p53 revealed that the PAb1620 epitope is composed of two regions, residues 106-114 and 146-156. However, the authors did not exclude the possibility that other p53 residues could interact with PAb1620, but were not selected by the particular panning effort. One of the regions in p53 identified as part of the PAb1620 epitope (amino acids 106-114) is deleted in our derived thermostable mutants (mutant 6b, amino acids 101-120) (Fig. 5), which may explain the decreased basal reactivity of the mutants toward PAb1620 as compared with wild-type p53.

During the biochemical characterization of the thermostable mutant, we explored the ability of p53 to oligomerize in tetramers and asked whether the conformation of tumor-derived structural p53 mutants could be protected from temperature unfolding upon formation of hetero-oligomers with the thermostable mutant. Indeed, the wild-type (PAb1620+) conformation of p53 His-175, one of the most common structural p53 mutants found in tumors, is protected from temperature denaturation upon coexpression with our thermostable mutant.

Restoration of wild-type p53 activity in tumor cells is a desirable goal in anticancer therapy (52-54). One approach is to reintroduce wild-type p53, perhaps by gene therapy (55); alternatively, one could restore the wild-type function to endogenous mutant p53. In the second case, antibodies or peptides that interfere with the C-terminal regulatory domain of p53 may succeed in relieving the negative regulation of p53 DNA-binding activity (14, 56-58). Another approach toward this goal has been recently suggested, whereby, using a yeast genetic approach, second site mutations have been identified that suppress the effects of common p53 cancer mutations (59). Similarly, the increased thermosensitivity displayed by a subset of tumor-derived mutants may also be a target for the restoration of wild-type function to mutant p53 molecules. Hence, small molecules or evolution of thermostable p53 variants that could increase the stability of the folded state of these mutants could provide a route for rescuing the native conformation and possibly the wild-type function of certain p53 mutants in tumor cells.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to K. Ball, C. Blattner, R. Fahraeus, S. Lain, C. Midgley, M. Scott, and C. Stephen for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank A. Sparks for providing anti-p53 antibodies.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by a grant from Novartis.

§ Gibb Fellow of the Cancer Research Campaign. To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 1382-344920; Fax: 1382-224117; E-mail: dplane@bad.dundee.ac.uk.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Kastan, M. B., Onyekwere, O., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., and Craig, R. W. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 6304-6311[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Kastan, M. B., Zhan, Q., el Deiry, W. S., Carrier, F., Jacks, T., Walsh, W. V., Plunkett, B. S., Vogelstein, B., and Fornace, A. J., Jr. (1992) Cell 71, 587-597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Hall, P. A., Meek, D., and Lane, D. P. (1996) J. Pathol. 180, 1-5[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Levine, A. J. (1997) Cell 88, 323-331[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Ko, L. J., and Prives, C. (1996) Genes Dev. 10, 1054-1072[Free Full Text]
6. Lane, D. P. (1992) Nature 358, 15-16[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Lane, D. P. (1993) Nature 362, 786-787[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Fields, S., and Jang, S. K. (1990) Science 249, 1046-1049[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Raycroft, L., Wu, H. Y., and Lozano, G. (1990) Science 249, 1049-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Scharer, E., and Iggo, R. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1539-1545[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Unger, T., Nau, M. M., Segal, S., and Minna, J. D. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 1383-1390[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Bargonetti, J., Manfredi, J. J., Chen, X., Marshak, D. R., and Prives, C. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2565-2574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Wang, Y., Schwedes, J. F., Parks, D., Mann, K., and Tegtmeyer, P. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2157-2165[Abstract]
14. Hupp, T. R., Meek, D. W., Midgley, C. A., and Lane, D. P. (1992) Cell 71, 875-886[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Halazonetis, T. D., and Kandil, A. N. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 5057-5064[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Wang, Y., and Prives, C. (1995) Nature 376, 88-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., and Harris, C. C. (1991) Science 253, 49-53[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Hollstein, M., Marion, M. J., Lehman, T., Welsh, J., Harris, C. C., Martel Planche, G., Kusters, I., and Montesano, R. (1994) Carcinogenesis (Lond.) 15, 1-3[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Nigro, J. M., Baker, S. J., Preisinger, A. C., Jessup, J. M., Hostetter, R., Cleary, K., Bigner, S. H., Davidson, N., Baylin, S., Devilee, P., Glover, T., Collins, F. S., Weston, A., Modali, R., Harris, C. C., and Vogelstein, B. (1989) Nature 342, 705-708[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Pavletich, N. P., Chambers, K. A., and Pabo, C. O. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 2556-2564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Cho, Y., Gorina, S., Jeffrey, P. D., and Pavletich, N. P. (1994) Science 265, 346-355[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Arrowsmith, C. H., and Morin, P. (1996) Oncogene 12, 1379-1385[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Milner, J., Cook, A., and Sheldon, M. (1987) Oncogene 1, 453-455[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Yewdell, J. W., Gannon, J. V., and Lane, D. P. (1986) J. Virol. 59, 444-452[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Gannon, J. V., Greaves, R., Iggo, R., and Lane, D. P. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 1595-1602[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Milner, J., and Medcalf, E. A. (1991) Cell 65, 765-774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Halazonetis, T. D., Davis, L. J., and Kandil, A. N. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 1021-1028[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Hansen, S., Hupp, T. R., and Lane, D. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 3917-3924[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Friedlander, P., Legros, Y., Soussi, T., and Prives, C. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 25468-25478[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Bullock, A. N., Henckel, J., DeDecker, B. S., Johnson, C. M., Nikolova, P. V., Proctor, M. R., Lane, D. P., and Fersht, A. R. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 14338-14342[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Stemmer, W. P. C. (1994) Nature 370, 389-391[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Matsumura, I., and Ellington, A. D. (1996) Nat. Biotechnol. 14, 366-366[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Stemmer, W. P. C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 10747-10751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Crameri, A., Whitehorn, E. A., Tate, E., and Stemmer, W. P. C. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14, 315-319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Zhang, J. H., Dawes, G., and Stemmer, W. P. C. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 4504-4509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Stephen, C. W., Helminen, P., and Lane, D. P. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 248, 58-78[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Banks, L., Matlashewski, G., and Crawford, L. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 159, 529-534[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Stephen, C. W., and Lane, D. P. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 225, 577-583[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Midgley, C. A., Fisher, C. J., Bartek, J., Vojtesek, B., Lane, D., and Barnes, D. M. (1992) J. Cell. Sci. 101, 183-189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Imai, Y., Matsushima, Y., Sugimura, T., and Terada, M. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2785[Free Full Text]
41. Hall, A. R., and Milner, J. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1371-1376[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Kubbutat, M. H. G., Jones, S. N., and Vousden, K. H. (1997) Nature 387, 299-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Bottger, A., Bottger, V., Sparks, A., Liu, W. L., Howard, S. F., and Lane, D. P. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 860-869[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Zhang, W., Guo, X. Y., Hu, G. Y., Liu, W. B., Shay, J. W., and Deisseroth, A. B. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2535-2544[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Milner, J., and Medcalf, E. A. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 216, 481-484[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
47. Crameri, A., Dawes, G., Rodriguez, E., Silver, S., and Stemmer, W. P. C. (1997) Nature Biotechnol. 15, 436-438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
48. Hansen, S., Lane, D. P., and Midgley, C. A. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 275, 575-588[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Matlashewski, G. J., Tuck, S., Pim, D., Lamb, P., Schneider, J., and Crawford, L. V. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 961-963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Storey, A., Thomas, M., Kalita, A., Harwood, C., Gardiol, D., Mantovani, F., Breuer, J., Leigh, I. M., Matlashewski, G., and Banks, L. (1998) Nature 393, 229-234[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Ravera, M. W., Carcamo, J., Brissette, R., AlamMoghe, A., Dedova, O., Cheng, W., Hsiao, K. C., Klebanov, D., Shen, H., Tang, P., Blume, A., and Mandecki, W. (1998) Oncogene 16, 1993-1999[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Fisher, D. E. (1994) Cell 78, 539-542[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Lowe, S. W., Bodis, S., McClatchey, A., Remington, L., Ruley, H. E., Fisher, D. E., Housman, D. E., and Jacks, T. (1994) Science 266, 807-810[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Harris, C. C. (1996) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 88, 1442-1455[Abstract/Free Full Text]
55. Roth, J. A., Nguyen, D., Lawrence, D. D., Kemp, B. L., Carrasco, C. H., Ferson, D. Z., Hong, W. K., Komaki, R., Lee, J. J., Nesbitt, J. C., Pisters, K. M. W., Putnam, J. B., Schea, R., Shin, D. M., Walsh, G. L., Dolormente, M. M., Han, C. I., Martin, F. D., Yen, N., Xu, K., Stephens, L. C., McDonnell, T. J., Mukhopadhyay, T., and Cai, D. (1996) Nat. Med. 2, 985-991[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Hupp, T. R., Sparks, A., and Lane, D. P. (1995) Cell 83, 237-245[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Abarzua, P., Losardo, J. E., Gubler, M. L., Spathis, R., Lu, Y. A., Felix, A., and Neri, A. (1996) Oncogene 13, 2477-2482[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. Selivanova, G., Iotsova, V., Okan, I., Fritsche, M., Strom, M., Groner, B., Grafstrom, R. C., and Wiman, K. G. (1997) Nat. Med. 3, 632-638[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
59. Brachmann, R. K., Yu, K. X., Eby, Y., Pavletich, N. P., and Boeke, J. D. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1847-1859[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. Muret, M. Yacoub, P. Terrier, F. Drusch, A. Laplanche, C. Gaudin, C. Richon, C. Le Pechoux, A. Le Cesne, F. J. Lejeune, et al.
p53 status correlates with histopathological response in patients with soft tissue sarcomas treated using isolated limb perfusion with TNF-{alpha} and melphalan
Ann. Onc., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 793 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
L. Yuan, I. Kurek, J. English, and R. Keenan
Laboratory-Directed Protein Evolution
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., September 1, 2005; 69(3): 373 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
J. Hao and A. Berry
A thermostable variant of fructose bisphosphate aldolase constructed by directed evolution also shows increased stability in organic solvents
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., September 1, 2004; 17(9): 689 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Eng Des SelHome page
K. Kunichika, Y. Hashimoto, and T. Imoto
Robustness of hen lysozyme monitored by random mutations
Protein Eng. Des. Sel., October 1, 2002; 15(10): 805 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Shimizu, L. R. Burch, A. J. Smith, D. Dornan, M. Wallace, K. L. Ball, a