|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28083-28086, October 1, 1999
COMMUNICATION
ClpB Cooperates with DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE in Suppressing Protein
Aggregation
A NOVEL MULTI-CHAPERONE SYSTEM FROM ESCHERICHIA
COLI*
Michal
Zolkiewski
From the Department of Biochemistry, Kansas State University,
Manhattan, Kansas 66506
 |
ABSTRACT |
ClpB is a heat-shock protein from
Escherichia coli with an unknown function. We studied a
possible molecular chaperone activity of ClpB in vitro.
Firefly luciferase was denatured in urea and then diluted into the
refolding buffer (in the presence of 5 mM ATP and 0.1 mg/ml
bovine serum albumin). Spontaneous reactivation of luciferase was very
weak (less than 0.02% of the native activity) because of extensive
aggregation. Conventional chaperone systems (GroEL/GroES and
DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE) or ClpB alone did not reactivate luciferase under those
conditions. However, ClpB together with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE greatly enhanced
the luciferase activity regain (up to 57% of native activity) by
suppressing luciferase aggregation. This coordinated function of ClpB
and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE required ATP hydrolysis, although the ClpB ATPase
was not activated by native or denatured luciferase. When the
chaperones were added to the luciferase refolding solutions after 5-25
min of refolding, ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE recovered the luciferase
activity from preformed aggregates. Thus, we have identified a
novel multi-chaperone system from E. coli, which is
analogous to the Hsp104/Ssa1/Ydj1 system from yeast. ClpB is the only
known bacterial Hsp100 protein capable of cooperating with other
heat-shock proteins in suppressing and reversing protein aggregation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Clp ATPases (also referred to as Hsp100 proteins) are involved in
protein degradation and disaggregation in both prokaryotic and
eukaryotic cells (1, 2). In Escherichia coli, the Clp family
consists of several closely related protein-activated ATPases that associate with peptidase subunits to form
ATP-dependent protease complexes. Among the identified
members of the Clp family, ClpA and ClpX interact with and stimulate
ClpP peptidase, whereas ClpY combines with a different peptidase, ClpQ
(2). ClpB, despite a 42% sequence identity and 64% sequence
similarity with ClpA (3), does not support protein degradation by Clp
peptidases (4).
ClpA and ClpX have chaperone-like activities in vitro, which
suggests that their role in complexes with ClpP is to bind improperly folded or partially aggregated protein substrates and to deliver substrates to the peptidase. ClpX protects the bacteriophage O protein from thermally induced aggregation (5). ClpA converts inactive
dimers of RepA into active monomers (6). Unlike ClpA, ClpB does not
disassemble RepA dimers (6). A yeast homolog of ClpA and ClpB, Hsp104,
resolubilizes heat-induced protein aggregates in yeast cells (7). This
activity requires a cooperation between Hsp104 and two other yeast
heat-shock proteins: Ydj1 (Hsp40) and Ssa1 (Hsp70) (8). Interestingly,
DnaK, an E. coli homolog of Ssa1, does not support protein
disaggregation by Hsp104 and Ydj1 (8). Thus, it has not been known if
protein disaggregating chaperone systems, similar to that found in
yeast, exist in prokaryotes.
Among E. coli Clp ATPases, ClpB is the most inadequately
characterized, and its possible functional role and potential protein substrates are unknown. ClpB is essential for survival of E. coli cells at high temperatures (9, 10), which suggests that ClpB may play a major role in the bacterial stress-response machinery. In
this study, we tested whether purified ClpB has a molecular chaperone
activity in vitro. We studied the refolding of firefly luciferase under the conditions of intense aggregation that could not
be prevented by the conventional E. coli chaperones
(GroEL/GroES or DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE). We found that there is a close
similarity between the chaperone activities of ClpB and Hsp104. Like
Hsp104, ClpB cooperates with another group of chaperones (DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE) to suppress and reverse aggregation of a protein substrate. Thus, we have identified a novel highly efficient multi-chaperone system in E. coli.
While this article was in review, Motohashi et al. (11)
reported identification of a chaperone system consisting of the ClpB,
DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE homologs from Thermus thermophilus. Those results, as well as ours, indicate that a functional cooperation between Hsp100, Hsp70, and Hsp40 families occurs not only in eukaryotes but also in prokaryotes.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Proteins--
ClpB was overexpressed in E. coli and
purified according to the procedure used to obtain ClpA (12) with small
modifications (23). ClpB stock solution was prepared by dialysis
against 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 0.2 M KCl, 10%
glycerol, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT.1
Concentration of ClpB was measured using the calculated absorption coefficient A280 = 0.38 cm2/mg (13).
ClpB, like other Hsp100 proteins, forms hexamers (522 kDa) in the
presence of ATP (23). Thus, concentrations throughout this paper are
given for ClpB hexamers.
Recombinant firefly luciferase (61 kDa) was purchased from Promega
(Madison, Wisconsin). Other E. coli chaperones (DnaK, 69 kDa; DnaJ, 41 kDa; GrpE, 24 kDa; GroEL, 14-mer, 802 kDa; GroES, heptamer, 72 kDa) were obtained from StressGen Biotechnologies (Victoria, BC, Canada). Concentrations of luciferase and chaperone stock solutions were determined by the suppliers. Bovine serum albumin
was from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), and -casein was from Sigma.
Unfolding and Refolding of Luciferase--
Luciferase (15 mg/ml)
was diluted 100-fold into the denaturation buffer (30 mM
Hepes, pH 7.65, 60 mM KCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT)
containing 7 M urea and incubated for 30-45 min at room temperature.
For refolding, the denatured luciferase was rapidly diluted 100-fold
into the renaturation buffer (30 mM Hepes, pH 7.65, 120 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA).
Luciferase Activity Determination--
Luciferase assay system
was purchased from Promega. Luciferase samples were diluted with the
buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 and 1 mg/ml BSA to stabilize
luciferase activity at very low concentrations. After adding 1 µl of
luciferase to 50 µl of assay solution in a small tube, the tube was
placed in an empty scintillation vial, and the luminescence was
measured over 2 min with a Beckman LS 3801 scintillation counter. The
scintillation counter was calibrated with samples of native luciferase
of known concentration. With appropriate dilutions, the above method
gave accurate results down to ~0.1 pg of active luciferase per assay.
Western Blotting--
Refolding solutions containing luciferase
were electrophoresed in a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel in the presence of
SDS and electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was
incubated with 0.2 µg/ml anti-luciferase antibody (Sigma) for 1 h, then with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase
(Promega), and was visualized using a chemiluminescence detection kit
(Pierce). The band intensity was integrated using Scion Image software
(Scion Corp., Frederick, MD).
ClpB ATPase Activity Determination--
The rate of ATP
hydrolysis by ClpB was determined in 50 µl of the assay solution (100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, in some experiments supplemented with other proteins (see
Table II)) containing 0.9 µg of ClpB. After 15 min incubation at
37 °C, the inorganic phosphate concentration was determined using
the method of Hess and Derr (14) with modifications (15). All ATPase
assays were performed in duplicates or triplicates.
 |
RESULTS |
Firefly luciferase has been often used as a substrate in studies
on chaperone function because of its tendency to aggregate after
heat-shock (5, 6, 16). However, the most pronounced aggregation of
luciferase occurs during refolding from the completely denatured state
after chemical denaturation (8). Aggregates formed from completely
unfolded proteins are a model system for the formation of inclusion
bodies that occurs during overexpression of proteins in vivo
(17).
Fig. 1 shows the reactivation of
luciferase during refolding after denaturation in
urea.2 Under these
experimental conditions, very low luciferase activity was recovered
from the refolding reaction in the absence of chaperones (less than
0.02% of the native control, see Table I
below). When ClpB or DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE were included in the refolding
solution, no luciferase reactivation was observed (Fig. 1, Table I).
However, when ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE were present together in the
refolding solution, a strong enhancement of the luciferase renaturation was found.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE induce reactivation
of luciferase. Unfolded luciferase was diluted at room temperature
into the buffer containing ClpB (open squares),
DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (open circles), ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ
(filled squares), and ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (filled
circles). Luciferase activity was measured in aliquots withdrawn
from the refolding solution. Protein concentrations were: 25 nM luciferase, 0.33 µM ClpB (hexamer), 1.0 µM DnaK, 1.0 µM DnaJ, and 1.2 µM GrpE.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Reactivation yield of luciferase in the absence and presence of
ClpB and other E. coli chaperones
Unfolded luciferase was diluted to 25 nM into the buffer
(30 mM Hepes/KOH, pH 7.65, 120 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP (or ATP S, see the
table), 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA)
containing chaperones specified in the table. The activity of
luciferase was assayed after 160 min of refolding at room temperature.
Protein concentrations are given for ClpB hexamer, GroEL 14-mer, and
GroES heptamer.
|
|
The reactivation of luciferase by ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE was slow at
room temperature, and no activity plateau was observed after more than
3 h of refolding (Fig. 1). The rate of luciferase reactivation
with ClpB, DnaK, and DnaJ was lower than the rate observed when GrpE
was also included (Fig. 1). There was a "lag phase" of ~40 min,
during which the luciferase activity regain was very low even in the
presence of ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE. This suggests that luciferase may
undergo repetitive cycles of binding to different chaperones before
being released to solution in an active form.
To test whether the low efficiency of luciferase renaturation
correlates with its high aggregation propensity, we evaluated the
relative amounts of soluble and insoluble luciferase in the reactions
with and without ClpB. After 3 h of refolding with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, ~60% of luciferase was in the form of large aggregates that could be
removed by centrifugation (Fig. 2).
However, such luciferase aggregates were not found when ClpB was
included in the refolding reaction with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE. This indicates
that the chaperone-induced reactivation of luciferase, as shown in Fig.
1, is a result of suppression of the aggregation of luciferase.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE inhibit aggregation
of luciferase. Unfolded luciferase was diluted into 60 µl of the
buffer containing either DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE
(K/J/E) or ClpB with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE
(ClpB + K/J/E). Native
luciferase diluted into the refolding buffer without chaperones was
used as the control. After 3-h incubation at room temperature, the
samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min.
Aliquots of the supernatants and of the corresponding total solutions
(before centrifugation) were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and immunoblot using anti-luciferase antibody. The
fractions of luciferase remaining in the supernatants were obtained by
evaluating the relative intensity of the luciferase bands using an
image analysis software. Protein concentrations were: 25 nM
luciferase, 1.3 µM ClpB (hexamer), 1.0 µM
DnaK, 1.0 µM DnaJ, 1.2 µM GrpE.
|
|
Table I contains the luciferase refolding yields obtained in the
presence of different sets of molecular chaperones after 160 min of
refolding. The well known E. coli chaperone systems (DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE and GroEL/GroES) that suppress aggregation of many
protein substrates (18) are unable to increase the yield of
reactivation of luciferase under the conditions used in this study
(less that 0.02% of the native activity, see Table I). ClpB alone, or
together with GroEL/GroES, did not increase the luciferase reactivation
yield. For the significant reactivation of luciferase, it is required
that ClpB is included together with DnaK and DnaJ. With 0.33 µM ClpB, 1 µM DnaK, and 1 µM
DnaJ, the luciferase reactivation after 160 min increased ~10-fold,
as compared with the reactivation without chaperones (Table I). Further
reactivation increase (up to ~80-fold) was found when 1 µM GrpE was included together with ClpB, DnaK, and DnaJ.
Thus, GrpE increases the reactivation rate but is not required for the
luciferase reactivation (Table I and Fig. 1). However, both DnaK and
DnaJ must be present, in addition to ClpB, to achieve luciferase
reactivation. Very low luciferase activity was recovered (0.02% of the
native control activity) when either DnaK or DnaJ were not included in
the refolding solution (Table I).
Among the chaperones that reactivate luciferase, ClpB and DnaK have
ATPase activity (4, 19). We found that ATP hydrolysis is required for
the function of ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE because no luciferase reactivation
was observed when a nonhydrolyzable analog, ATP S, was substituted
for ATP in the refolding buffer (Table I).
The ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE-induced luciferase reactivation strongly
depended on the concentration of ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (Table I). The
luciferase reactivation yield increased ~10-fold when the
concentrations of DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE increased from 0.5 to 1 µM, and the reactivation yield increased ~36-fold when
the ClpB concentration increased from 0.33 to 1.3 µM. In
these studies, the concentrations of chaperones were ~10-50-fold
higher than the concentration of luciferase. The chaperone
concentration-dependent reactivation yields suggest that
the efficiency of interchaperone interactions may be a critical
limiting factor in the reactivation of luciferase by the
ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE system.
Next, we tested whether the multi-chaperone system
(ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE) is capable of rescuing luciferase from preformed aggregates. It has been observed before that luciferase could be
reactivated by the yeast chaperones (Hsp104, Ssa1, Ydj1) after aggregating for 30 min at 0 °C (8). We found that large luciferase aggregates, which could be removed by centrifugation, were formed within 5 min after initialization of refolding at 0 °C without chaperones (see Fig. 3). ClpB and
DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE added after 5 min of refolding were able, however, to
recover active luciferase from large aggregates (compare the
open and filled bars in Fig. 3). After ~15 min
of refolding, the size and/or amount of aggregates increased to the
extent that some of them became irretrievable by the chaperones.
However, ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE were able to partially reactivate
luciferase even after 25 min of refolding.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE reactivate previously
aggregated luciferase. Unfolded luciferase was diluted to 25 nM into ice-cold buffer, which did not contain chaperones.
ClpB (1.2 µM), DnaK (1.0 µM), DnaJ (1.0 µM), and GrpE (1.0 µM) were added after 5, 15, or 25 min of refolding. The reactions were subsequently shifted to
room temperature, and luciferase activity was determined after 160 min
(open bars). In parallel, 20-µl aliquots were collected
from the refolding reaction without chaperones after <1, 10, and 20 min of refolding and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were withdrawn, supplemented with ClpB,
DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE (at the above concentrations) and shifted to room
temperature. Luciferase activity was determined after 160 min
(filled bars).
|
|
ClpB is a protein-activated ATPase (4), which suggests that ATP
hydrolysis and the binding of a protein substrate to ClpB may be
functionally coupled. We measured the rate of ATP hydrolysis by ClpB in
the presence of other proteins (Table
II). As observed also by previous
investigators (4), the ClpB ATPase activity increased ~13-fold in the
presence of casein, a highly heterogeneous and aggregated protein (20).
The ClpB ATPase activation by casein was only ~4-fold when casein had
been denatured in 8 M urea and then diluted into the assay
buffer (Table II). No ATPase activation was observed, however, in the
presence of either native or denatured luciferase. It is known that
DnaJ and GrpE efficiently stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK (19).
We found that DnaJ and GrpE did not affect the ATPase activity of ClpB
(Table II). These data suggest that the ClpB ATPase activity may not be
stimulated during the luciferase refolding assays in Figs. 1-3.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
ATP hydrolysis by ClpB in the presence of other proteins
ATPase activity has been measured by incubating 9 µg of ClpB in the
assay buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM
MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA) for 15 min at 37 °C in the
presence of other proteins listed in the table.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Current models of the function of molecular chaperones are focused
on their ability to prevent aggregation of protein substrates by
binding to partially folded aggregation-prone protein conformations (18). Although some chaperones can rescue misfolded proteins from early
reversible pre-aggregation stages, they are unable to reverse protein
aggregation after it occurs (21). Yeast chaperones, Hsp104, Ssa1, and
Ydj1, have been the first discovered example of a cellular machinery
capable of resolubilizing aggregated proteins and recovering protein
activity from large aggregates (8). It is also an example of functional
cooperation between chaperones from different heat-shock families.
Our studies identified ClpB as a member of a highly efficient molecular
chaperone system in E. coli. ClpB, together with DnaK, DnaJ,
and GrpE, suppresses aggregation of luciferase (Figs. 1 and 2). At this
time, we do not know if the above chaperones bind partially folded
conformations of luciferase before it aggregates. However, our data
indicate that the ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE system is capable of reactivating
luciferase after severe aggregation (Fig. 3). Because Clp ATPases and
DnaJ are unstable in low ionic-strength buffers (12, 22), we used 0.12 M KCl in the luciferase refolding solution, which
drastically increased aggregation of luciferase and decreased the
spontaneous recovery of the luciferase activity (see Table I), as
compared with the refolding conditions used in previous studies (8).
Neither GroEL/GroES nor DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE chaperone systems could prevent
aggregation of luciferase under these conditions (Table I). However,
the ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE system increased the luciferase reactivation
yield up to ~3,000-fold (Table I).
The present studies extend the pioneer work of Lindquist and co-workers
(1, 7, 8) on the function of Hsp104 in yeast into prokaryotic
stress-response systems and confirm that Hsp100 proteins may be the
most potent aggregation suppressants known to date. Also, our studies
show previously unrecognized capabilities of the well studied E. coli chaperones: DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. It has been found before
that, under the conditions of less severe aggregation of luciferase
than those employed in this study, DnaJ binds denatured luciferase and
targets it to DnaK, which prevents luciferase aggregation (16). GrpE
participates in dissociating the luciferase-DnaK/DnaJ complex. We do
not know, at present, which of these chaperones interact with ClpB and
how the luciferase substrate is shuttled between ClpB and
DnaJ/DnaK/GrpE. To understand the mechanism of refolding reactions
described in this study, it will be essential to characterize
interactions of ClpB with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE and to identify the sequence
of substrate binding and substrate remodeling steps taking place in
this chaperone system.
ClpB may not be the only Clp ATPase capable of cooperating with other
E. coli chaperones in suppressing protein aggregation. However, although ClpA protects luciferase from heat-inactivation, it
does not affect the yield of luciferase reactivation by DnaK and DnaJ
(6). Because ClpB has not been implicated in protein degradation
processes in E. coli, overexpression of ClpB, possibly together with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, may be potentially useful in preventing protein aggregation and improving recovery of recombinant proteins.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
I thank Dr. Michael R. Maurizi for help in
purifying ClpB. This is contribution 99-482-J from the Kansas
Agricultural Experiment Station.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation
Grant EPS-9550487 and matching funds from the state of Kansas.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry,
104 Willard Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506. Tel.:
785-532-3083; Fax: 785-532-7278; E-mail: michalz@ksu.edu.
2
We found that 0.1 M guanidinium
hydrochloride inhibits ~50% of the basal ATPase activity of ClpB
(not shown). However, the ClpB ATPase activity is not inhibited by urea
(see Table II).
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
DTT, dithiothreitol;
ATP S, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate);
BSA, bovine
serum albumin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Schirmer, E. C.,
Glover, J. R.,
Singer, M. A.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1996)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
21,
289-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Gottesman, S.,
Wickner, S.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
815-823[Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Gottesman, S.,
Squires, C.,
Pichersky, E.,
Carrington, M.,
Hobbs, M.,
Mattick, J. S.,
Dalrymple, B.,
Kuramitsu, H.,
Shiroza, T.,
Foster, T.,
Clark, W. P.,
Ross, B.,
Squires, C. L.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
3513-3517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Woo, K. M.,
Kim, K. I.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
Ha, D. B.,
and Chung, C. H.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
20429-20434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Wawrzynow, A.,
Wojtkowiak, D.,
Marszalek, J.,
Banecki, B.,
Jonsen, M.,
Graves, B.,
Georgopoulos, C.,
and Zylicz, M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1867-1877[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Wickner, S.,
Gottesman, S.,
Skowyra, D.,
Hoskins, J.,
McKenney, K.,
and Maurizi, M. R.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12218-12222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Parsell, D. A.,
Kowal, A. S.,
Singer, M. A.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1994)
Nature
372,
475-478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Glover, J. R.,
and Lindquist, S.
(1998)
Cell
94,
73-82[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Squires, C. L.,
Pedersen, S.,
Ross, B. M.,
and Squires, C.
(1991)
J. Bacteriol.
173,
4254-4262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Thomas, J. G.,
and Baneyx, F.
(1998)
J. Bacteriol.
180,
5165-5172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Motohashi, K.,
Watanabe, Y.,
Yohda, M.,
and Yoshida, M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7184-7189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Maurizi, M. R.,
Thompson, M. W.,
Singh, S. K.,
and Kim, S. H.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
244,
314-331[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Pace, C. N.,
Vajdos, F.,
Fee, L.,
Grimsley, G.,
and Gray, Y.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
2411-2423[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Hess, H. H.,
and Derr, J. E.
(1975)
Anal. Biochem.
63,
607-613[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Lanzetta, P. A.,
Alvarez, L. J.,
Reinach, P. S.,
and Candia, O. A.
(1979)
Anal. Biochem.
100,
95-97[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Schroder, H.,
Langer, T.,
Hartl, F. U.,
and Bukau, B.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
4137-4144[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Fink, A. L.
(1998)
Folding Des.
3,
R9-R23[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Buchner, J.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
10-19[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Liberek, K.,
Marszalek, J.,
Ang, D.,
Georgopoulos, C.,
and Zylicz, M.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2874-2878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Farrell, H. M., Jr.,
Wickham, E. D.,
and Groves, M. L.
(1998)
J. Dairy Sci.
81,
2974-2984[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Ranson, N. A.,
Dunster, N. J.,
Burston, S. G.,
and Clarke, A. R.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
250,
581-586[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Zylicz, M.,
Yamamoto, T.,
McKittrick, N.,
Sell, S.,
and Georgopoulos, C.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
7591-7598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
| Zolkiewski, M., Kessel, M., Ginsburg, A., and Maurizi, M. R. (1999) Protein Sci., in press
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. R. Kannan, O. Musatovova, P. Gowda, and J. B. Baseman
Characterization of a Unique ClpB Protein of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Its Impact on Growth
Infect. Immun.,
November 1, 2008;
76(11):
5082 - 5092.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-J. Shih and M.-C. Lai
Analysis of the AAA+ chaperone clpB gene and stress-response expression in the halophilic methanogenic archaeon Methanohalophilus portucalensis
Microbiology,
August 1, 2007;
153(8):
2572 - 2583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Doyle, J. R. Hoskins, and S. Wickner
Inaugural Article: Collaboration between the ClpB AAA+ remodeling protein and the DnaK chaperone system
PNAS,
July 3, 2007;
104(27):
11138 - 11144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Stanne, E. Pojidaeva, F. I. Andersson, and A. K. Clarke
Distinctive Types of ATP-dependent Clp Proteases in Cyanobacteria
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 11, 2007;
282(19):
14394 - 14402.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Sugimoto, H. Yoshida, Y. Mizunoe, K. Tsuruno, J. Nakayama, and K. Sonomoto
Structural and Functional Conversion of Molecular Chaperone ClpB from the Gram-Positive Halophilic Lactic Acid Bacterium Tetragenococcus halophilus Mediated by ATP and Stress
J. Bacteriol.,
December 1, 2006;
188(23):
8070 - 8078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dominguez-Ferreras, R. Perez-Arnedo, A. Becker, J. Olivares, M. J. Soto, and J. Sanjuan
Transcriptome Profiling Reveals the Importance of Plasmid pSymB for Osmoadaptation of Sinorhizobium meliloti
J. Bacteriol.,
November 1, 2006;
188(21):
7617 - 7625.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. C. Gunesekere, C. M. Kahler, D. R. Powell, L. A. S. Snyder, N. J. Saunders, J. I. Rood, and J. K. Davies
Comparison of the RpoH-Dependent Regulon and General Stress Response in Neisseria gonorrhoeae
J. Bacteriol.,
July 1, 2006;
188(13):
4769 - 4776.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zietkiewicz, A. Lewandowska, P. Stocki, and K. Liberek
Hsp70 Chaperone Machine Remodels Protein Aggregates at the Initial Step of Hsp70-Hsp100-dependent Disaggregation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 17, 2006;
281(11):
7022 - 7029.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. I. Andersson, R. Blakytny, J. Kirstein, K. Turgay, B. Bukau, A. Mogk, and A. K. Clarke
Cyanobacterial ClpC/HSP100 Protein Displays Intrinsic Chaperone Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 3, 2006;
281(9):
5468 - 5475.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Beinker, S. Schlee, R. Auvula, and J. Reinstein
Biochemical Coupling of the Two Nucleotide Binding Domains of ClpB: COVALENT LINKAGE IS NOT A PREREQUISITE FOR CHAPERONE ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 11, 2005;
280(45):
37965 - 37973.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Barnett, M. Nagy, S. Kedzierska, and M. Zolkiewski
The Amino-terminal Domain of ClpB Supports Binding to Strongly Aggregated Proteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 14, 2005;
280(41):
34940 - 34945.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-h. Watanabe, M. Takano, and M. Yoshida
ATP Binding to Nucleotide Binding Domain (NBD)1 of the ClpB Chaperone Induces Motion of the Long Coiled-coil, Stabilizes the Hexamer, and Activates NBD2
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 1, 2005;
280(26):
24562 - 24567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Park, Y. M. Rho, O.-j. Koh, S. W. Ahn, I. S. Seong, J.-J. Song, O. Bang, J. H. Seol, J. Wang, S. H. Eom, et al.
Role of the GYVG Pore Motif of HslU ATPase in Protein Unfolding and Translocation for Degradation by HslV Peptidase
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 17, 2005;
280(24):
22892 - 22898.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Piszczek, J. Rozycki, S. K. Singh, A. Ginsburg, and M. R. Maurizi
The Molecular Chaperone, ClpA, Has a Single High Affinity Peptide Binding Site per Hexamer
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
12221 - 12230.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Matuszewska, D. Kuczynska-Wisnik, E. Laskowska, and K. Liberek
The Small Heat Shock Protein IbpA of Escherichia coli Cooperates with IbpB in Stabilization of Thermally Aggregated Proteins in a Disaggregation Competent State
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 1, 2005;
280(13):
12292 - 12298.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Lee, C. Wie, M. Escobar, B. Williams, S.-W. Hong, and E. Vierling
Genetic Analysis Reveals Domain Interactions of Arabidopsis Hsp100/ClpB and Cooperation with the Small Heat Shock Protein Chaperone System
PLANT CELL,
February 1, 2005;
17(2):
559 - 571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Zietkiewicz, J. Krzewska, and K. Liberek
Successive and Synergistic Action of the Hsp70 and Hsp100 Chaperones in Protein Disaggregation
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 22, 2004;
279(43):
44376 - 44383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. C. Schirmer, O. R. Homann, A. S. Kowal, and S. Lindquist
Dominant Gain-of-Function Mutations in Hsp104p Reveal Crucial Roles for the Middle Region
Mol. Biol. Cell,
May 1, 2004;
15(5):
2061 - 2072.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-h. Watanabe and M. Yoshida
Trigonal DnaK-DnaJ Complex Versus Free DnaK and DnaJ: HEAT STRESS CONVERTS THE FORMER TO THE LATTER, AND ONLY THE LATTER CAN DO DISAGGREGATION IN COOPERATION WITH ClpB
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 16, 2004;
279(16):
15723 - 15727.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Laskowska, J. Bohdanowicz, D. Kuczynska-Wisnik, E. Matuszewska, S. Kedzierska, and A. Taylor
Aggregation of heat-shock-denatured, endogenous proteins and distribution of the IbpA/B and Fda marker-proteins in Escherichia coli WT and grpE280 cells
Microbiology,
January 1, 2004;
150(1):
247 - 259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Yamada-Inagawa, T. Okuno, K. Karata, K. Yamanaka, and T. Ogura
Conserved Pore Residues in the AAA Protease FtsH Are Important for Proteolysis and Its Coupling to ATP Hydrolysis
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 12, 2003;
278(50):
50182 - 50187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Weibezahn, C. Schlieker, B. Bukau, and A. Mogk
Characterization of a Trap Mutant of the AAA+ Chaperone ClpB
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 2003;
278(35):
32608 - 32617.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mogk, C. Schlieker, K. L. Friedrich, H.-J. Schonfeld, E. Vierling, and B. Bukau
Refolding of Substrates Bound to Small Hsps Relies on a Disaggregation Reaction Mediated Most Efficiently by ClpB/DnaK
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 15, 2003;
278(33):
31033 - 31042.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-W. Hong, U. Lee, and E. Vierling
Arabidopsis hot Mutants Define Multiple Functions Required for Acclimation to High Temperatures
Plant Physiology,
June 1, 2003;
132(2):
757 - 767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Mogk, C. Schlieker, C. Strub, W. Rist, J. Weibezahn, and B. Bukau
Roles of Individual Domains and Conserved Motifs of the AAA+ Chaperone ClpB in Oligomerization, ATP Hydrolysis, and Chaperone Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 9, 2003;
278(20):
17615 - 17624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Schlothauer, A. Mogk, D. A. Dougan, B. Bukau, and K. Turgay
MecA, an adaptor protein necessary for ClpC chaperone activity
PNAS,
March 4, 2003;
100(5):
2306 - 2311.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Beinker, S. Schlee, Y. Groemping, R. Seidel, and J. Reinstein
The N Terminus of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus Is Not Essential for the Chaperone Activity
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 27, 2002;
277(49):
47160 - 47166.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Rottgers, N. Zufall, B. Guiard, and W. Voos
The ClpB Homolog Hsp78 Is Required for the Efficient Degradation of Proteins in the Mitochondrial Matrix
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2002;
277(48):
45829 - 45837.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. R. Sastry, K. Korotkov, Y. Brodsky, and F. Baneyx
Hsp31, the Escherichia coli yedU Gene Product, Is a Molecular Chaperone Whose Activity Is Inhibited by ATP at High Temperatures
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2002;
277(48):
46026 - 46034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. C. Giese and E. Vierling
Changes in Oligomerization Are Essential for the Chaperone Activity of a Small Heat Shock Protein in Vivo and in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2002;
277(48):
46310 - 46318.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. R. Gallie, D. Fortner, J. Peng, and D. Puthoff
ATP-dependent Hexameric Assembly of the Heat Shock Protein Hsp101 Involves Multiple Interaction Domains and a Functional C-proximal Nucleotide-binding Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 11, 2002;
277(42):
39617 - 39626.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Rajagopal, N. Sudarsan, and K. W. Nickerson
Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Hypersensitivity of clpP and clpB Mutants of Escherichia coli
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
August 1, 2002;
68(8):
4117 - 4121.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Germaniuk, K. Liberek, and J. Marszalek
A Bichaperone (Hsp70-Hsp78) System Restores Mitochondrial DNA Synthesis following Thermal Inactivation of Mip1p Polymerase
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 26, 2002;
277(31):
27801 - 27808.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Konieczny and K. Liberek
Cooperative Action of Escherichia coli ClpB Protein and DnaK Chaperone in the Activation of a Replication Initiation Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 17, 2002;
277(21):
18483 - 18488.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Hattendorf and S. L. Lindquist
Analysis of the AAA sensor-2 motif in the C-terminal ATPase domain of Hsp104 with a site-specific fluorescent probe of nucleotide binding
PNAS,
February 20, 2002;
(2002)
261693199.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-h. Watanabe, K. Motohashi, and M. Yoshida
Roles of the Two ATP Binding Sites of ClpB from Thermus thermophilus
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 15, 2002;
277(8):
5804 - 5809.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Winter, P. Klappa, R. B. Freedman, H. Lilie, and R. Rudolph
Catalytic Activity and Chaperone Function of Human Protein-disulfide Isomerase Are Required for the Efficient Refolding of Proinsulin
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2002;
277(1):
310 - 317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Ekaza, J. Teyssier, S. Ouahrani-Bettache, J.-P. Liautard, and S. Köhler
Characterization of Brucella suis clpB and clpAB Mutants and Participation of the Genes in Stress Responses
J. Bacteriol.,
April 15, 2001;
183(8):
2677 - 2681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. K. Clarke and M.-J. Eriksson
The Truncated Form of the Bacterial Heat Shock Protein ClpB/HSP100 Contributes to Development of Thermotolerance in the Cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. Strain PCC 7942
J. Bacteriol.,
December 15, 2000;
182(24):
7092 - 7096.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Hoskins, S. K. Singh, M. R. Maurizi, and S. Wickner
Protein binding and unfolding by the chaperone ClpA and degradation by the protease ClpAP
PNAS,
August 1, 2000;
97(16):
8892 - 8897.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-h. Watanabe, K. Motohashi, H. Taguchi, and M. Yoshida
Heat-inactivated Proteins Managed by DnaKJ-GrpE-ClpB Chaperones Are Released as a Chaperonin-recognizable Non-native Form
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 21, 2000;
275(17):
12388 - 12392.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-W. Hong and E. Vierling
Mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana defective in the acquisition of tolerance to high temperature stress
PNAS,
April 11, 2000;
97(8):
4392 - 4397.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Queitsch, S.-W. Hong, E. Vierling, and S. Lindquist
Heat Shock Protein 101 Plays a Crucial Role in Thermotolerance in Arabidopsis
PLANT CELL,
April 1, 2000;
12(4):
479 - 492.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Wickner, M. R. Maurizi, and S. Gottesman
Posttranslational Quality Control: Folding, Refolding, and Degrading Proteins
Science,
December 3, 1999;
286(5446):
1888 - 1893.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Diamant, A. P. Ben-Zvi, B. Bukau, and P. Goloubinoff
Size-dependent Disaggregation of Stable Protein Aggregates by the DnaK Chaperone Machinery
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 7, 2000;
275(28):
21107 - 21113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Barnett, A. Zolkiewska, and M. Zolkiewski
Structure and Activity of ClpB from Escherichia coli. ROLE OF THE AMINO- AND CARBOXYL-TERMINAL DOMAINS
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 2000;
275(48):
37565 - 37571.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Hoskins, S.-Y. Kim, and S. Wickner
Substrate Recognition by the ClpA Chaperone Component of ClpAP Protease
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 3, 2000;
275(45):
35361 - 35367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Guzman-Verri, E. Chaves-Olarte, F. Garcia, S. Arvidson, and E. Moreno
In Vivo Proteolytic Degradation of the Escherichia coli Acyltransferase HlyC
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 11, 2001;
276(20):
16660 - 16666.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Hattendorf and S. L. Lindquist
Analysis of the AAA sensor-2 motif in the C-terminal ATPase domain of Hsp104 with a site-specific fluorescent probe of nucleotide binding
PNAS,
March 5, 2002;
99(5):
2732 - 2737.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|