JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zolkiewski, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zolkiewski, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28083-28086, October 1, 1999

COMMUNICATION
ClpB Cooperates with DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE in Suppressing Protein Aggregation
A NOVEL MULTI-CHAPERONE SYSTEM FROM ESCHERICHIA COLI*

Michal ZolkiewskiDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

ClpB is a heat-shock protein from Escherichia coli with an unknown function. We studied a possible molecular chaperone activity of ClpB in vitro. Firefly luciferase was denatured in urea and then diluted into the refolding buffer (in the presence of 5 mM ATP and 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). Spontaneous reactivation of luciferase was very weak (less than 0.02% of the native activity) because of extensive aggregation. Conventional chaperone systems (GroEL/GroES and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE) or ClpB alone did not reactivate luciferase under those conditions. However, ClpB together with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE greatly enhanced the luciferase activity regain (up to 57% of native activity) by suppressing luciferase aggregation. This coordinated function of ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE required ATP hydrolysis, although the ClpB ATPase was not activated by native or denatured luciferase. When the chaperones were added to the luciferase refolding solutions after 5-25 min of refolding, ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE recovered the luciferase activity from preformed aggregates. Thus, we have identified a novel multi-chaperone system from E. coli, which is analogous to the Hsp104/Ssa1/Ydj1 system from yeast. ClpB is the only known bacterial Hsp100 protein capable of cooperating with other heat-shock proteins in suppressing and reversing protein aggregation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Clp ATPases (also referred to as Hsp100 proteins) are involved in protein degradation and disaggregation in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (1, 2). In Escherichia coli, the Clp family consists of several closely related protein-activated ATPases that associate with peptidase subunits to form ATP-dependent protease complexes. Among the identified members of the Clp family, ClpA and ClpX interact with and stimulate ClpP peptidase, whereas ClpY combines with a different peptidase, ClpQ (2). ClpB, despite a 42% sequence identity and 64% sequence similarity with ClpA (3), does not support protein degradation by Clp peptidases (4).

ClpA and ClpX have chaperone-like activities in vitro, which suggests that their role in complexes with ClpP is to bind improperly folded or partially aggregated protein substrates and to deliver substrates to the peptidase. ClpX protects the bacteriophage lambda O protein from thermally induced aggregation (5). ClpA converts inactive dimers of RepA into active monomers (6). Unlike ClpA, ClpB does not disassemble RepA dimers (6). A yeast homolog of ClpA and ClpB, Hsp104, resolubilizes heat-induced protein aggregates in yeast cells (7). This activity requires a cooperation between Hsp104 and two other yeast heat-shock proteins: Ydj1 (Hsp40) and Ssa1 (Hsp70) (8). Interestingly, DnaK, an E. coli homolog of Ssa1, does not support protein disaggregation by Hsp104 and Ydj1 (8). Thus, it has not been known if protein disaggregating chaperone systems, similar to that found in yeast, exist in prokaryotes.

Among E. coli Clp ATPases, ClpB is the most inadequately characterized, and its possible functional role and potential protein substrates are unknown. ClpB is essential for survival of E. coli cells at high temperatures (9, 10), which suggests that ClpB may play a major role in the bacterial stress-response machinery. In this study, we tested whether purified ClpB has a molecular chaperone activity in vitro. We studied the refolding of firefly luciferase under the conditions of intense aggregation that could not be prevented by the conventional E. coli chaperones (GroEL/GroES or DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE). We found that there is a close similarity between the chaperone activities of ClpB and Hsp104. Like Hsp104, ClpB cooperates with another group of chaperones (DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE) to suppress and reverse aggregation of a protein substrate. Thus, we have identified a novel highly efficient multi-chaperone system in E. coli.

While this article was in review, Motohashi et al. (11) reported identification of a chaperone system consisting of the ClpB, DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE homologs from Thermus thermophilus. Those results, as well as ours, indicate that a functional cooperation between Hsp100, Hsp70, and Hsp40 families occurs not only in eukaryotes but also in prokaryotes.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proteins-- ClpB was overexpressed in E. coli and purified according to the procedure used to obtain ClpA (12) with small modifications (23). ClpB stock solution was prepared by dialysis against 50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 0.2 M KCl, 10% glycerol, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT.1 Concentration of ClpB was measured using the calculated absorption coefficient A280 = 0.38 cm2/mg (13). ClpB, like other Hsp100 proteins, forms hexamers (522 kDa) in the presence of ATP (23). Thus, concentrations throughout this paper are given for ClpB hexamers.

Recombinant firefly luciferase (61 kDa) was purchased from Promega (Madison, Wisconsin). Other E. coli chaperones (DnaK, 69 kDa; DnaJ, 41 kDa; GrpE, 24 kDa; GroEL, 14-mer, 802 kDa; GroES, heptamer, 72 kDa) were obtained from StressGen Biotechnologies (Victoria, BC, Canada). Concentrations of luciferase and chaperone stock solutions were determined by the suppliers. Bovine serum albumin was from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA), and kappa -casein was from Sigma.

Unfolding and Refolding of Luciferase-- Luciferase (15 mg/ml) was diluted 100-fold into the denaturation buffer (30 mM Hepes, pH 7.65, 60 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT) containing 7 M urea and incubated for 30-45 min at room temperature.

For refolding, the denatured luciferase was rapidly diluted 100-fold into the renaturation buffer (30 mM Hepes, pH 7.65, 120 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA).

Luciferase Activity Determination-- Luciferase assay system was purchased from Promega. Luciferase samples were diluted with the buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 and 1 mg/ml BSA to stabilize luciferase activity at very low concentrations. After adding 1 µl of luciferase to 50 µl of assay solution in a small tube, the tube was placed in an empty scintillation vial, and the luminescence was measured over 2 min with a Beckman LS 3801 scintillation counter. The scintillation counter was calibrated with samples of native luciferase of known concentration. With appropriate dilutions, the above method gave accurate results down to ~0.1 pg of active luciferase per assay.

Western Blotting-- Refolding solutions containing luciferase were electrophoresed in a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel in the presence of SDS and electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The blot was incubated with 0.2 µg/ml anti-luciferase antibody (Sigma) for 1 h, then with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Promega), and was visualized using a chemiluminescence detection kit (Pierce). The band intensity was integrated using Scion Image software (Scion Corp., Frederick, MD).

ClpB ATPase Activity Determination-- The rate of ATP hydrolysis by ClpB was determined in 50 µl of the assay solution (100 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA, in some experiments supplemented with other proteins (see Table II)) containing 0.9 µg of ClpB. After 15 min incubation at 37 °C, the inorganic phosphate concentration was determined using the method of Hess and Derr (14) with modifications (15). All ATPase assays were performed in duplicates or triplicates.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Firefly luciferase has been often used as a substrate in studies on chaperone function because of its tendency to aggregate after heat-shock (5, 6, 16). However, the most pronounced aggregation of luciferase occurs during refolding from the completely denatured state after chemical denaturation (8). Aggregates formed from completely unfolded proteins are a model system for the formation of inclusion bodies that occurs during overexpression of proteins in vivo (17).

Fig. 1 shows the reactivation of luciferase during refolding after denaturation in urea.2 Under these experimental conditions, very low luciferase activity was recovered from the refolding reaction in the absence of chaperones (less than 0.02% of the native control, see Table I below). When ClpB or DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE were included in the refolding solution, no luciferase reactivation was observed (Fig. 1, Table I). However, when ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE were present together in the refolding solution, a strong enhancement of the luciferase renaturation was found.


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE induce reactivation of luciferase. Unfolded luciferase was diluted at room temperature into the buffer containing ClpB (open squares), DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (open circles), ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ (filled squares), and ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (filled circles). Luciferase activity was measured in aliquots withdrawn from the refolding solution. Protein concentrations were: 25 nM luciferase, 0.33 µM ClpB (hexamer), 1.0 µM DnaK, 1.0 µM DnaJ, and 1.2 µM GrpE.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Reactivation yield of luciferase in the absence and presence of ClpB and other E. coli chaperones
Unfolded luciferase was diluted to 25 nM into the buffer (30 mM Hepes/KOH, pH 7.65, 120 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP (or ATPgamma S, see the table), 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA) containing chaperones specified in the table. The activity of luciferase was assayed after 160 min of refolding at room temperature. Protein concentrations are given for ClpB hexamer, GroEL 14-mer, and GroES heptamer.

The reactivation of luciferase by ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE was slow at room temperature, and no activity plateau was observed after more than 3 h of refolding (Fig. 1). The rate of luciferase reactivation with ClpB, DnaK, and DnaJ was lower than the rate observed when GrpE was also included (Fig. 1). There was a "lag phase" of ~40 min, during which the luciferase activity regain was very low even in the presence of ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE. This suggests that luciferase may undergo repetitive cycles of binding to different chaperones before being released to solution in an active form.

To test whether the low efficiency of luciferase renaturation correlates with its high aggregation propensity, we evaluated the relative amounts of soluble and insoluble luciferase in the reactions with and without ClpB. After 3 h of refolding with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, ~60% of luciferase was in the form of large aggregates that could be removed by centrifugation (Fig. 2). However, such luciferase aggregates were not found when ClpB was included in the refolding reaction with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE. This indicates that the chaperone-induced reactivation of luciferase, as shown in Fig. 1, is a result of suppression of the aggregation of luciferase.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE inhibit aggregation of luciferase. Unfolded luciferase was diluted into 60 µl of the buffer containing either DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (K/J/E) or ClpB with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (ClpB + K/J/E). Native luciferase diluted into the refolding buffer without chaperones was used as the control. After 3-h incubation at room temperature, the samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min. Aliquots of the supernatants and of the corresponding total solutions (before centrifugation) were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblot using anti-luciferase antibody. The fractions of luciferase remaining in the supernatants were obtained by evaluating the relative intensity of the luciferase bands using an image analysis software. Protein concentrations were: 25 nM luciferase, 1.3 µM ClpB (hexamer), 1.0 µM DnaK, 1.0 µM DnaJ, 1.2 µM GrpE.

Table I contains the luciferase refolding yields obtained in the presence of different sets of molecular chaperones after 160 min of refolding. The well known E. coli chaperone systems (DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE and GroEL/GroES) that suppress aggregation of many protein substrates (18) are unable to increase the yield of reactivation of luciferase under the conditions used in this study (less that 0.02% of the native activity, see Table I). ClpB alone, or together with GroEL/GroES, did not increase the luciferase reactivation yield. For the significant reactivation of luciferase, it is required that ClpB is included together with DnaK and DnaJ. With 0.33 µM ClpB, 1 µM DnaK, and 1 µM DnaJ, the luciferase reactivation after 160 min increased ~10-fold, as compared with the reactivation without chaperones (Table I). Further reactivation increase (up to ~80-fold) was found when 1 µM GrpE was included together with ClpB, DnaK, and DnaJ. Thus, GrpE increases the reactivation rate but is not required for the luciferase reactivation (Table I and Fig. 1). However, both DnaK and DnaJ must be present, in addition to ClpB, to achieve luciferase reactivation. Very low luciferase activity was recovered (0.02% of the native control activity) when either DnaK or DnaJ were not included in the refolding solution (Table I).

Among the chaperones that reactivate luciferase, ClpB and DnaK have ATPase activity (4, 19). We found that ATP hydrolysis is required for the function of ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE because no luciferase reactivation was observed when a nonhydrolyzable analog, ATPgamma S, was substituted for ATP in the refolding buffer (Table I).

The ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE-induced luciferase reactivation strongly depended on the concentration of ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE (Table I). The luciferase reactivation yield increased ~10-fold when the concentrations of DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE increased from 0.5 to 1 µM, and the reactivation yield increased ~36-fold when the ClpB concentration increased from 0.33 to 1.3 µM. In these studies, the concentrations of chaperones were ~10-50-fold higher than the concentration of luciferase. The chaperone concentration-dependent reactivation yields suggest that the efficiency of interchaperone interactions may be a critical limiting factor in the reactivation of luciferase by the ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE system.

Next, we tested whether the multi-chaperone system (ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE) is capable of rescuing luciferase from preformed aggregates. It has been observed before that luciferase could be reactivated by the yeast chaperones (Hsp104, Ssa1, Ydj1) after aggregating for 30 min at 0 °C (8). We found that large luciferase aggregates, which could be removed by centrifugation, were formed within 5 min after initialization of refolding at 0 °C without chaperones (see Fig. 3). ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE added after 5 min of refolding were able, however, to recover active luciferase from large aggregates (compare the open and filled bars in Fig. 3). After ~15 min of refolding, the size and/or amount of aggregates increased to the extent that some of them became irretrievable by the chaperones. However, ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE were able to partially reactivate luciferase even after 25 min of refolding.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   ClpB and DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE reactivate previously aggregated luciferase. Unfolded luciferase was diluted to 25 nM into ice-cold buffer, which did not contain chaperones. ClpB (1.2 µM), DnaK (1.0 µM), DnaJ (1.0 µM), and GrpE (1.0 µM) were added after 5, 15, or 25 min of refolding. The reactions were subsequently shifted to room temperature, and luciferase activity was determined after 160 min (open bars). In parallel, 20-µl aliquots were collected from the refolding reaction without chaperones after <1, 10, and 20 min of refolding and centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were withdrawn, supplemented with ClpB, DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE (at the above concentrations) and shifted to room temperature. Luciferase activity was determined after 160 min (filled bars).

ClpB is a protein-activated ATPase (4), which suggests that ATP hydrolysis and the binding of a protein substrate to ClpB may be functionally coupled. We measured the rate of ATP hydrolysis by ClpB in the presence of other proteins (Table II). As observed also by previous investigators (4), the ClpB ATPase activity increased ~13-fold in the presence of casein, a highly heterogeneous and aggregated protein (20). The ClpB ATPase activation by casein was only ~4-fold when casein had been denatured in 8 M urea and then diluted into the assay buffer (Table II). No ATPase activation was observed, however, in the presence of either native or denatured luciferase. It is known that DnaJ and GrpE efficiently stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK (19). We found that DnaJ and GrpE did not affect the ATPase activity of ClpB (Table II). These data suggest that the ClpB ATPase activity may not be stimulated during the luciferase refolding assays in Figs. 1-3.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
ATP hydrolysis by ClpB in the presence of other proteins
ATPase activity has been measured by incubating 9 µg of ClpB in the assay buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mg/ml BSA) for 15 min at 37 °C in the presence of other proteins listed in the table.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Current models of the function of molecular chaperones are focused on their ability to prevent aggregation of protein substrates by binding to partially folded aggregation-prone protein conformations (18). Although some chaperones can rescue misfolded proteins from early reversible pre-aggregation stages, they are unable to reverse protein aggregation after it occurs (21). Yeast chaperones, Hsp104, Ssa1, and Ydj1, have been the first discovered example of a cellular machinery capable of resolubilizing aggregated proteins and recovering protein activity from large aggregates (8). It is also an example of functional cooperation between chaperones from different heat-shock families.

Our studies identified ClpB as a member of a highly efficient molecular chaperone system in E. coli. ClpB, together with DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE, suppresses aggregation of luciferase (Figs. 1 and 2). At this time, we do not know if the above chaperones bind partially folded conformations of luciferase before it aggregates. However, our data indicate that the ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE system is capable of reactivating luciferase after severe aggregation (Fig. 3). Because Clp ATPases and DnaJ are unstable in low ionic-strength buffers (12, 22), we used 0.12 M KCl in the luciferase refolding solution, which drastically increased aggregation of luciferase and decreased the spontaneous recovery of the luciferase activity (see Table I), as compared with the refolding conditions used in previous studies (8). Neither GroEL/GroES nor DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE chaperone systems could prevent aggregation of luciferase under these conditions (Table I). However, the ClpB/DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE system increased the luciferase reactivation yield up to ~3,000-fold (Table I).

The present studies extend the pioneer work of Lindquist and co-workers (1, 7, 8) on the function of Hsp104 in yeast into prokaryotic stress-response systems and confirm that Hsp100 proteins may be the most potent aggregation suppressants known to date. Also, our studies show previously unrecognized capabilities of the well studied E. coli chaperones: DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. It has been found before that, under the conditions of less severe aggregation of luciferase than those employed in this study, DnaJ binds denatured luciferase and targets it to DnaK, which prevents luciferase aggregation (16). GrpE participates in dissociating the luciferase-DnaK/DnaJ complex. We do not know, at present, which of these chaperones interact with ClpB and how the luciferase substrate is shuttled between ClpB and DnaJ/DnaK/GrpE. To understand the mechanism of refolding reactions described in this study, it will be essential to characterize interactions of ClpB with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE and to identify the sequence of substrate binding and substrate remodeling steps taking place in this chaperone system.

ClpB may not be the only Clp ATPase capable of cooperating with other E. coli chaperones in suppressing protein aggregation. However, although ClpA protects luciferase from heat-inactivation, it does not affect the yield of luciferase reactivation by DnaK and DnaJ (6). Because ClpB has not been implicated in protein degradation processes in E. coli, overexpression of ClpB, possibly together with DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, may be potentially useful in preventing protein aggregation and improving recovery of recombinant proteins.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I thank Dr. Michael R. Maurizi for help in purifying ClpB. This is contribution 99-482-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Grant EPS-9550487 and matching funds from the state of Kansas.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry, 104 Willard Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506. Tel.: 785-532-3083; Fax: 785-532-7278; E-mail: michalz@ksu.edu.

2 We found that 0.1 M guanidinium hydrochloride inhibits ~50% of the basal ATPase activity of ClpB (not shown). However, the ClpB ATPase activity is not inhibited by urea (see Table II).

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: DTT, dithiothreitol; ATPgamma S, adenosine 5'-O-(thiotriphosphate); BSA, bovine serum albumin.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Schirmer, E. C., Glover, J. R., Singer, M. A., and Lindquist, S. (1996) Trends Biochem. Sci. 21, 289-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Gottesman, S., Wickner, S., and Maurizi, M. R. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 815-823[Free Full Text]
3. Gottesman, S., Squires, C., Pichersky, E., Carrington, M., Hobbs, M., Mattick, J. S., Dalrymple, B., Kuramitsu, H., Shiroza, T., Foster, T., Clark, W. P., Ross, B., Squires, C. L., and Maurizi, M. R. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 3513-3517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Woo, K. M., Kim, K. I., Goldberg, A. L., Ha, D. B., and Chung, C. H. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20429-20434[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Wawrzynow, A., Wojtkowiak, D., Marszalek, J., Banecki, B., Jonsen, M., Graves, B., Georgopoulos, C., and Zylicz, M. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 1867-1877[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Wickner, S., Gottesman, S., Skowyra, D., Hoskins, J., McKenney, K., and Maurizi, M. R. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 12218-12222[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Parsell, D. A., Kowal, A. S., Singer, M. A., and Lindquist, S. (1994) Nature 372, 475-478[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Glover, J. R., and Lindquist, S. (1998) Cell 94, 73-82[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Squires, C. L., Pedersen, S., Ross, B. M., and Squires, C. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 4254-4262[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Thomas, J. G., and Baneyx, F. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, 5165-5172[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Motohashi, K., Watanabe, Y., Yohda, M., and Yoshida, M. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 7184-7189[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Maurizi, M. R., Thompson, M. W., Singh, S. K., and Kim, S. H. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 244, 314-331[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Pace, C. N., Vajdos, F., Fee, L., Grimsley, G., and Gray, Y. (1995) Protein Sci. 4, 2411-2423[Abstract]
14. Hess, H. H., and Derr, J. E. (1975) Anal. Biochem. 63, 607-613[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Lanzetta, P. A., Alvarez, L. J., Reinach, P. S., and Candia, O. A. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 100, 95-97[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Schroder, H., Langer, T., Hartl, F. U., and Bukau, B. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4137-4144[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Fink, A. L. (1998) Folding Des. 3, R9-R23[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Buchner, J. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 10-19[Abstract]
19. Liberek, K., Marszalek, J., Ang, D., Georgopoulos, C., and Zylicz, M. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 2874-2878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Farrell, H. M., Jr., Wickham, E. D., and Groves, M. L. (1998) J. Dairy Sci. 81, 2974-2984[Abstract]
21. Ranson, N. A., Dunster, N. J., Burston, S. G., and Clarke, A. R. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 250, 581-586[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Zylicz, M., Yamamoto, T., McKittrick, N., Sell, S., and Georgopoulos, C. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 7591-7598[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Zolkiewski, M., Kessel, M., Ginsburg, A., and Maurizi, M. R. (1999) Protein Sci., in press


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
T. R. Kannan, O. Musatovova, P. Gowda, and J. B. Baseman
Characterization of a Unique ClpB Protein of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Its Impact on Growth
Infect. Immun., November 1, 2008; 76(11): 5082 - 5092.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
C.-J. Shih and M.-C. Lai
Analysis of the AAA+ chaperone clpB gene and stress-response expression in the halophilic methanogenic archaeon Methanohalophilus portucalensis
Microbiology, August 1, 2007; 153(8): 2572 - 2583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. M. Doyle, J. R. Hoskins, and S. Wickner
Inaugural Article: Collaboration between the ClpB AAA+ remodeling protein and the DnaK chaperone system
PNAS, July 3, 2007; 104(27): 11138 - 11144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. M. Stanne, E. Pojidaeva, F. I. Andersson, and A. K. Clarke
Distinctive Types of ATP-dependent Clp Proteases in Cyanobacteria
J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14394 - 14402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
S. Sugimoto, H. Yoshida, Y. Mizunoe, K. Tsuruno, J. Nakayama, and K. Sonomoto
Structural and Functional Conversion of Molecular Chaperone ClpB from the Gram-Positive Halophilic Lactic Acid Bacterium Tetragenococcus halophilus Mediated by ATP and Stress
J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2006; 188(23): 8070 - 8078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. Dominguez-Ferreras, R. Perez-Arnedo, A. Becker, J. Olivares, M. J. Soto, and J. Sanjuan
Transcriptome Profiling Reveals the Importance of Plasmid pSymB for Osmoadaptation of Sinorhizobium meliloti
J. Bacteriol., November 1, 2006; 188(21): 7617 - 7625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
I. C. Gunesekere, C. M. Kahler, D. R. Powell, L. A. S. Snyder, N. J. Saunders, J. I. Rood, and J. K. Davies
Comparison of the RpoH-Dependent Regulon and General Stress Response in Neisseria gonorrhoeae
J. Bacteriol., July 1, 2006; 188(13): 4769 - 4776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Zietkiewicz, A. Lewandowska, P. Stocki, and K. Liberek
Hsp70 Chaperone Machine Remodels Protein Aggregates at the Initial Step of Hsp70-Hsp100-dependent Disaggregation
J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7022 - 7029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. I. Andersson, R. Blakytny, J. Kirstein, K. Turgay, B. Bukau, A. Mogk, and A. K. Clarke
Cyanobacterial ClpC/HSP100 Protein Displays Intrinsic Chaperone Activity
J. Biol. Chem., March 3, 2006; 281(9): 5468 - 5475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Beinker, S. Schlee, R. Auvula, and J. Reinstein
Biochemical Coupling of the Two Nucleotide Binding Domains of ClpB: COVALENT LINKAGE IS NOT A PREREQUISITE FOR CHAPERONE ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem., November 11, 2005; 280(45): 37965 - 37973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. E. Barnett, M. Nagy, S. Kedzierska, and M. Zolkiewski
The Amino-terminal Domain of ClpB Supports Binding to Strongly Aggregated Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., October 14, 2005; 280(41): 34940 - 34945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
B. M. Burton and T. A. Baker
Remodeling protein complexes: Insights from the AAA+ unfoldase ClpX and Mu transposase
Protein Sci., August 1, 2005; 14(8): 1945 - 1954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-h. Watanabe, M. Takano, and M. Yoshida
ATP Binding to Nucleotide Binding Domain (NBD)1 of the ClpB Chaperone Induces Motion of the Long Coiled-coil, Stabilizes the Hexamer, and Activates NBD2
J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24562 - 24567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Park, Y. M. Rho, O.-j. Koh, S. W. Ahn, I. S. Seong, J.-J. Song, O. Bang, J. H. Seol, J. Wang, S. H. Eom, et al.
Role of the GYVG Pore Motif of HslU ATPase in Protein Unfolding and Translocation for Degradation by HslV Peptidase
J. Biol. Chem., June 17, 2005; 280(24): 22892 - 22898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Piszczek, J. Rozycki, S. K. Singh, A. Ginsburg, and M. R. Maurizi
The Molecular Chaperone, ClpA, Has a Single High Affinity Peptide Binding Site per Hexamer
J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12221 - 12230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Matuszewska, D. Kuczynska-Wisnik, E. Laskowska, and K. Liberek
The Small Heat Shock Protein IbpA of Escherichia coli Cooperates with IbpB in Stabilization of Thermally Aggregated Proteins in a Disaggregation Competent State
J. Biol. Chem., April 1, 2005; 280(13): 12292 - 12298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant CellHome page
U. Lee, C. Wie, M. Escobar, B. Williams, S.-W. Hong, and E. Vierling
Genetic Analysis Reveals Domain Interactions of Arabidopsis Hsp100/ClpB and Cooperation with the Small Heat Shock Protein Chaperone System
PLANT CELL, February 1, 2005; 17(2): 559 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
N. Tanaka, Y. Tani, H. Hattori, T. Tada, and S. Kunugi
Interaction of the N-terminal domain of Escherichia coli heat-shock protein ClpB and protein aggregates during chaperone activity
Protein Sci., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 3214 - 3221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Zietkiewicz, J. Krzewska, and K. Liberek
Successive and Synergistic Action of the Hsp70 and Hsp100 Chaperones in Protein Disaggregation
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 2004; 279(43): 44376 - 44383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
E. C. Schirmer, O. R. Homann, A. S. Kowal, and S. Lindquist
Dominant Gain-of-Function Mutations in Hsp104p Reveal Crucial Roles for the Middle Region
Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2004; 15(5): 2061 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-h. Watanabe and M. Yoshida
Trigonal DnaK-DnaJ Complex Versus Free DnaK and DnaJ: HEAT STRESS CONVERTS THE FORMER TO THE LATTER, AND ONLY THE LATTER CAN DO DISAGGREGATION IN COOPERATION WITH ClpB
J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 15723 - 15727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Protein Sci.Home page
V. Akoev, E. P. Gogol, M. E. Barnett, and M. Zolkiewski
Nucleotide-induced switch in oligomerization of the AAA+ ATPase ClpB
Protein Sci., March 1, 2004; 13(3): 567 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
E. Laskowska, J. Bohdanowicz, D. Kuczynska-Wisnik, E. Matuszewska, S. Kedzierska, and A. Taylor
Aggregation of heat-shock-denatured, endogenous proteins and distribution of the IbpA/B and Fda marker-proteins in Escherichia coli WT and grpE280 cells
Microbiology, January 1, 2004; 150(1): 247 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Yamada-Inagawa, T. Okuno, K. Karata, K. Yamanaka, and T. Ogura
Conserved Pore Residues in the AAA Protease FtsH Are Important for Proteolysis and Its Coupling to ATP Hydrolysis
J. Biol. Chem., December 12, 2003; 278(50): 50182 - 50187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Weibezahn, C. Schlieker, B. Bukau, and A. Mogk
Characterization of a Trap Mutant of the AAA+ Chaperone ClpB
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2003; 278(35): 32608 - 32617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Mogk, C. Schlieker, K. L. Friedrich, H.-J. Schonfeld, E. Vierling, and B. Bukau
Refolding of Substrates Bound to Small Hsps Relies on a Disaggregation Reaction Mediated Most Efficiently by ClpB/DnaK
J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2003; 278(33): 31033 - 31042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S.-W. Hong, U. Lee, and E. Vierling
Arabidopsis hot Mutants Define Multiple Functions Required for Acclimation to High Temperatures
Plant Physiology, June 1, 2003; 132(2): 757 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Mogk, C. Schlieker, C. Strub, W. Rist, J. Weibezahn, and B. Bukau
Roles of Individual Domains and Conserved Motifs of the AAA+ Chaperone ClpB in Oligomerization, ATP Hydrolysis, and Chaperone Activity
J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 17615 - 17624.
[Abstract]