![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28096-28105, October 1, 1999
From the Centre de Génétique Moléculaire,
CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
We report here the characterization and the
molecular analysis of the two high affinity permeases that mediate the
transport of S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) and
S-methylmethionine (SMM) across the plasma membrane of
yeast cells. Mutant cells unable to use AdoMet as a sulfur source were
first isolated and demonstrated to lack high affinity AdoMet transport
capacities. Functional complementation cloning allowed us to identify
the corresponding gene (SAM3), which encodes an integral
membrane protein comprising 12 putative membrane spanning regions and
belonging to the amino acid permease family. Among amino acid permease
members, the closest relative of Sam3p is encoded by the
YLL061w open reading frame. Disruption of
YLL061w was shown to specifically lead to cells unable to
use SMM as a sulfur source. Accordingly, transport assays demonstrated
that YLL061w disruption mutation impaired the high affinity
SMM permease, and YLL061w was therefore renamed
MMP1. Further study of sam3 Among the wide diversity of naturally occurring metabolites that
contain a sulfur atom, few are sulfonium salts. In fact, only
four sulfonium metabolites have been reported to exist in living
organisms. These are S-adenosylmethionine
(AdoMet),1
S-methylmethionine (SMM), and their two derivatives,
decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine and
dimethylsulfoniopropionate, respectively (Fig. 1A). The
unique property that actually defines these sulfonium compounds is the
presence of a trivalent sulfur atom. As a consequence of the electron
deficiency at the sulfur pole, the carbon-sulfur bonds that are present
in sulfonium compounds are highly susceptible to nucleophilic
displacement reactions. The way by which such a chemical reactivity was
recruited by living organisms to establish their intermediary
metabolism is strikingly exemplified by AdoMet, which is involved in a
large set of remarkably versatile reactions. Indeed, all the chemical
moieties linked to the sulfur atom of AdoMet can be transferred, with
or without modification, to a large number of acceptor molecules.
AdoMet serves as donor of its methyl group in the majority of the
transmethylation reactions resulting in protein, nucleic acid, lipid,
and soluble metabolites modifications. AdoMet further functions as
donor of an amino group during the biosynthesis of biotin (1), as donor
of a carboxyaminopropyl group for nucleotide modifications, and also as
donor of an adenosine group during the synthesis of queuine, a modified
base present in some tRNAs from Eschericha coli (2). In
addition, AdoMet is the immediate precursor of the sulfonium
decarboxylated S-adenosylmethionine, which in turn
constitutes the obligate precursor for the biosynthesis of polyamines,
spermine, and spermidine (3). The metabolism of SMM was less
extensively characterized than that of AdoMet. SMM was first identified
as a constituent of cabbage leaves in 1954 (4). Since then, this
sulfonium compound has been found in a large number of plants (see Ref.
5 and references therein). Biosynthesis of this compound in plants was
shown to result from the S-methylation of methionine by
AdoMet (6), and to date, only two enzymes have been found to utilize
SMM in plants: SMM-homocysteine S-methyltransferase, which
catalyzes the transfer of a methyl group to homocysteine, yielding two
methionine molecules, and SMM hydrolase, which cleaves SMM to
dimethylsulfide and homoserine (5). Despite these studies, no
physiological role could be attributed to SMM until it was shown to be
the precursor of the biosynthesis of dimethylsulfoniopropionate. This
sulfonium compound is accumulated by many marine algae and by the
angiosperms Wollastonia biflora and Spartina
alterniflora (see Ref. 7 and references therein).
Dimethylsulfoniopropionate has been shown to function as an
osmoprotectant for bacteria (8, 9), and the accumulation of
dimethylsulfoniopropionate to high levels in the cytoplasm of algal
cells and in W. biflora chloroplasts supports the idea that
it functions also in plants as an osmoprotectant (10-12).
Despite the wide occurrence of these sulfonium compounds in metabolic
processes, little attention has been paid to the mechanisms responsible
for their transport across biological membranes. A mutation impairing
AdoMet transport in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was
described several years ago (13), but it was without subsequent
molecular characterization. To address this point, we devised a
specific genetic screen in S. cerevisiae aimed to
specifically describe the genetic determinants of AdoMet transport in
yeast. This allowed us to identify the high affinity AdoMet permease
and, furthermore, led to the characterization of a second system
capable of transporting AdoMet but with a low affinity. In addition,
the work presented here led to the molecular identification of a new
permease, capable of specifically transporting SMM, which we show to be
used by S. cerevisiae as an efficient sulfur source.
Strains, Media, and Microbiological Techniques--
The yeast
strains used in this work are listed in Table
I. Classical yeast genetic methods and
media (YNB and YPG) were used as described in Sherman et al.
(14). The B medium is a minimal medium devoid of sulfur atom (15).
Unlabeled S-adenosylmethionine (chloride salt),
S-methylmethionine, S-adenosylhomocysteine, and S-adenosylethionine were purchased from Sigma.
S-adenosyl-L-[14CH3]methionine
(56 mCi/mmol) and [35S]methionine (1000 Ci/mmol) were
obtained from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech.
To screen for strains unable to use AdoMet as sulfur source, the strain
C112 (met25::HIS3) was mutagenized with nitrous
acid to 30-40% survival. After mutagenesis, the cells were grown for 6 h in B medium in the presence of 0.5 mM AdoMet,
followed by a 2-h incubation in the presence of nystatin as described
by Fink (16). The nystatin treatment was used to counterselect cells capable of growing in the presence of AdoMet. This treatment led to
0.6% surviving cells, which were plated on B medium containing 0.2 mM L-methionine as sulfur source. The resulting
colonies were then replicated and tested for their capacity to grow in
the presence of AdoMet as sulfur source. Among 1000 colonies, 2 were
found to be unable to use AdoMet as a sulfur source.
Biochemical Methods--
L-[35S]SMM
was synthesized by treating L-[35S]methionine
with 250 mM methanol in 6 N HCl at 110 °C
for 4 h (17). The reaction mixture was then evaporated under
vacuum, and the resulting material was dissolved in 0.5 ml of distilled
water and evaporated under vacuum. The resulting material was then
dissolved in distilled water in order to obtain a 20 mM
solution of L-[35S]SMM. The radiochemical
purity was checked by TLC on cellulose developed in butanol:acetic
acid:H2O (12:30:50). The SMM zone was located by
autoradiography. The radiochemical purity of [35S]SMM was
at least 95%, the main impurity being methionine. The radiochemical
purity of [14CH3]AdoMet was checked also by
TLC chromatography developed in the same solvent, and the AdoMet zone
was located by autoradiography. No impurity could be detected. The
purity of nonradioactive AdoMet was also checked. The main impurity
revealed by ninhydrine was homoserine. In this case, the other impurity
found in AdoMet is 5'-deoxy-5'-methylthioadenosine, which is not
transported by yeast cells (18). The assay for AdoMet uptake was
performed at 28 °C on exponential phase cells
(A650 = 1) grown in YNB minimal medium
complemented to meet the auxotrophic requirements of the strain.
Labeled AdoMet (about 2000 cpm/nmol) was added to a final concentration
of 0.05 mM for the assays of the high affinity AdoMet permease and to a final concentration of 0.5 mM for the
assays of the low affinity AdoMet transport. Samples were taken each minute for 4 min and filtered through a glass fiber filter. Each filter
was washed three times with 10 ml of cold distilled water and counted
in a scintillation counter. It was verified that uptake was linear
during 4 min. The assay for SMM uptake was performed as AdoMet uptake.
Labeled L-[35S]SMM (about 2.104
cpm/nmol) was added to a final concentration of 0.01 mM for
the assay of the high affinity permease and to 0.1 mM for
the assay of the low affinity permease.
For kinetic analysis of AdoMet transport, the concentration
range of AdoMet was from 2 µM to 1 mM. The
uptake was linear for at least 3 min even at the lowest AdoMet
concentration (2 µM). For kinetic analysis of SMM
transport, the concentration range was from 0.2 µM to 0.1 mM. It appears that the simple Michaelis-Menten equation
can give an adequate description of transport processes. However, the
uptake being measured on whole cells, the Vmax
and the Km values cannot have the same meaning as in
the case of an enzymatic reaction. We have thus referred to the
apparent Km and Vmax
calculated from double reciprocal plots as KT and
Jmax.
DNA Manipulations and Plasmid Constructions--
The shuttle
vectors pEMBLYe23, pUC19, and pSK were used in subcloning and
integrating experiments (19). The S. cerevisiae genomic
library that allowed the cloning of the SAM3 gene was constructed by inserting the product of a partial HindIII
digest of DNA from strain X2180-1A in the HindIII site of
plasmid pEMBLYe23.
The ORF called YLL061w (MMP1, see "Results")
has been identified on chromosome XII of S. cerevisiae. To
inactivate this gene, the YLL061w region was synthesized by
polymerase chain reaction from chromosomal DNA using synthetic primers.
The N-terminal primer was complementary to the coding strand between
positions
The construction of disrupted alleles followed the strategy of
Rothstein (20). To disrupt SAM3, the
SacI-EcoRI fragment of pSAM3-1 was inserted in
plasmid pSK, yielding plasmid pSAM3-2. The
BglII-HpaI fragment of the SAM3 region
of plasmid pSAM3-2 was removed and replaced by a 1.1-kilobase pair
fragment bearing the URA3 gene. The resulting plasmid was
digested by EcoRI and SacI and used to transform
strains W303-1B to uracil prototrophy. One of the transformants was
called CD192. The disruption was verified in strain CD192 by Southern
blotting (see "Results"). To disrupt YLL061w, the
XbaI-HpaI fragment of pYLL061 was removed and
replaced by a fragment bearing the TRP1 gene. The resulting plasmid was digested by KpnI, then treated by the
Bal31 exonuclease for 5 min and then digested by
PstI. The resulting fragment was purified and used to
transform strains W303-1A and CD192 to tryptophan prototrophy. The
disruption was verified by Southern analysis (not shown).
Isolation of a Mutation Impairing AdoMet Uptake--
Unlike
enteric bacteria or other fungi, such as Neurospora crassa
or Aspergillus nidulans, the yeast S. cerevisiae
possesses a nearly complete set of enzyme activities, allowing its
growth in the presence of a large number of both inorganic and organic sulfur sources. Accordingly, a mutant strain unable to assimilate sulfate is capable of growing in the presence of either methionine, cysteine, or AdoMet (21). In the latter case, as shown in Fig. 1B, methionine synthesis from
exogenous added AdoMet could be reached through either the methyl cycle
(with the intermediary formation of adenosylhomocysteine and
homocysteine) or the methylthioadenosine recycling pathway (21). This
metabolic redundancy thus suggested that the use of a
met25
The parent met25
To further substantiate the hypothesis that the isolated mutation
really impaired the AdoMet transport system, the D201 mutant strain was
crossed to a wild-type strain, and the phenotype of a MET25,
sam3 resulting spore was studied. Growth assays were performed using a specific medium (B medium) devoid of sulfur atoms. In
contrast to congenic MET25, SAM3 cells, the
MET25, sam3 mutated cells were unable to use
AdoMet as a sulfur source when this compound was added to a final
concentration of 0.1 mM. As expected, sam3 cells
are fully competent for growing in the presence of methionine as a
sulfur source (not shown).
Cloning of the SAM3 Gene--
To clone the SAM3 gene,
we used the inability of sam3 mutated cells to grow in the
presence of 0.1 mM AdoMet on B medium. Strain CC821-14A
(ura3, sam3) was transformed by a pEMBLYe23-based yeast genomic library, and transformed cells capable of growing in the
absence of uracil and in the presence of AdoMet were directly selected
on B medium. Among 8 × 105 transformants, four
strains were selected. Plasmid DNA was recovered from these colonies
and used to retransform the strain CC821-14A. Only one plasmid led to
uracil prototroph transformants being able to use AdoMet as sulfur
source. This plasmid harbored a 2.8-kilobase pair insert (Fig.
2A), and determination of the
sequence of its extremities revealed that it corresponds to a fragment
of the left arm of chromosome XVI. Sequence analysis revealed that this fragment contains only one long open reading frame (YPL274w)
with the potential to encode a protein of 587 amino acids.
To confirm that the YPL274w ORF indeed corresponds to the
SAM3 gene, the isolated fragment was cloned in the
integrative vector pEMBLYi22 bearing the URA3 marker and
targeted to its corresponding genomic locus within chromosome XVI of
the W303-1B strain (ura3). A strain containing the
integrated construct was then crossed with a sam3,
ura3 double mutant strain, and the resulting diploid was
sporulated. Analysis of the progeny (24 tetrads) showed that in all
tetrads, the two uracil auxotroph spores were unable to use AdoMet as
sulfur source, in contrast to the uracil prototroph spores that
were able to use AdoMet. This experiment thus demonstrated that the
YPL274w ORF does correspond to the SAM3 gene.
To gain further information on the function of its encoded product, the
SAM3 gene was disrupted by the one-step gene disruption method as described under "Experimental Procedures." Correct
integration events were verified by Southern analysis (Fig.
2B). Growth characteristics of the sam3 AdoMet Transport Is Mediated by Two Permeases in S. cerevisiae--
The first genetic and kinetic data concerning AdoMet
transport in S. cerevisiae were mainly obtained by Spence
and co-workers (23, 24). These authors reported that AdoMet is
transported across the plasma membrane by a single transport system.
However, when we examined the kinetics of AdoMet uptake in a wild-type strain (W303-1A) using a large range of radioactive AdoMet
concentrations, we obtained results that appeared not to be compatible
with a model involving a single transport component. As shown in Fig. 4A, the double reciprocal plot
of AdoMet uptake in the wild-type W303-1A strain is clearly biphasic,
therefore suggesting that AdoMet uptake is mediated by more than one
permease. The results fit if we assume the existence of two permeases
exhibiting different kinetic parameters, one being a high affinity
AdoMet permease (KT = 3.3 × 10
To obtain further evidence that Sam3p is indeed the high affinity
AdoMet permease, the two strains CC899-2D (sam3) and W303-1A (SAM3) were transformed by a multicopy plasmid bearing the
SAM3 gene. For each strain, two resulting transformants were
assayed for AdoMet permease activity, using AdoMet at 0.05 mM to specifically measure the activity of the high
affinity permease (Table II). In both
cases, the two transformants exhibited the same specific activity,
which was 2-3-fold higher than that of the untransformed parental
strain W303-1A. As expected, under these assay conditions, the
untransformed strain CC899-2D (sam3) displayed no AdoMet
permease activity. All these results therefore proved that the
SAM3 gene does encode the high affinity AdoMet permease in
S. cerevisiae cells.
The High Affinity AdoMet Permease Belongs to the Amino Acid
Permease Family--
The Sam3 protein deduced from the nucleotide
sequence of its corresponding gene has a molecular weight of 64,350 and
a calculated isoelectric point of 8.1. The hydropathy profile analysis
was performed using programs in the TopPred2 software. The results suggested that the Sam3 protein contains 12 transmembrane spanning regions. A search against the protein data bases using the BLAST program revealed that, surprisingly, the Sam3 protein is related to the
amino acid permease (AAP) family of yeast. The AAP family is composed,
in addition to Sam3p, of 17 transmembrane proteins that are all closely
related proteins and that all seem to contain 12 transmembrane spanning
regions. Owing to both biochemical and genetic studies, the function of
11 members of this family has been established (for review, see Ref.
25). In each case, these proteins were shown to transport amino acids,
across the plasma membrane. It was therefore postulated that the
remaining 7 proteins with unknown function of this family should be
also amino acid permeases. The identification of the Sam3 protein
reported here clearly demonstrates that it is not the case.
Among the members of the AAP family, the protein exhibiting the closest
resemblance to Sam3p is the product of the YLLO61w ORF, a
gene discovered on chromosome XII by the systematic sequencing of the
yeast genome. To date, a function has not been associated to this gene.
Sam3p and the product of the YLL061w ORF are highly related
proteins. As shown in Fig. 5, the two
proteins share 419 identical residues (71%) and 77 conservative
replacements (13%). Hydropathy analysis of the
YLLO61w-encoded product suggests that this protein contains
12 transmembrane domains that are superimposable on those of Sam3p.
Identification of the High Affinity S-Methylmethionine
Permease--
Given the high degree of similarities exhibited by the
SAM3- and YLLO61w-encoded products, it was
tempting to postulate that the low affinity AdoMet permease would be
specified by the latter gene. To directly assess such a hypothesis, the
YLL061w ORF was cloned by polymerase chain reaction
amplification and the corresponding chromosomal locus was disrupted in
wild-type cells as well as in sam3
We next reasoned that such a resemblance between two proteins could
possibly reflect a specificity for closely related compounds. As stated
in the introduction section, among AdoMet analogs, one of the closest
is the other natural sulfonium compound, SMM. To our knowledge, it has
never been reported that yeast cells are able to grow in the presence
of SMM used as a sole sulfur source, although the presence of an
SMM-homocysteine methyl transferase activity was attested in yeast
extracts (26). We first demonstrated that wild-type yeast cells are
indeed capable of growing when 0.1 mM of DL-SMM
was added as sole sulfur source to the B medium (Fig.
6). Next, we examined the growth of cells
disrupted for the yll061w locus on the same medium. As shown
in Fig. 6, disruption of the YLLO61w ORF severely impairs
the growth of the cells in the presence of 0.1 mM of
DL-SMM as sulfur source. This effect was specific for SMM,
as we have already demonstrated (Fig. 3) that the presence of the
yll061w disruption mutation is without effect on the growth
of yeast cells in the presence of either L-methionine or
AdoMet used as sulfur sources. In addition, it was verified that yeast
cells bearing the yll061w deletion could also use sulfate,
homocysteine, and cysteine as sulfur sources (not shown). Taken
together, the phenotype of the yll061w disrupted cells and
the close resemblance exhibited by the high affinity AdoMet permease
and the YLL061w-encoded product strongly suggested that this
gene could specify an SMM permease of yeast.
To ascertain this hypothesis, we next wanted to examine the kinetics of
SMM transport in wild-type as well as in various mutant strains. To do
that, [35S]SMM was synthesized according to Gage et
al. (17), and the purity of the resulting radioactive compound was
checked by thin layer chromatography (see under "Experimental
Procedures"). SMM transport in wild-type yeast cells was assayed with
SMM concentrations ranging from 0.4 µM to 0.1 mM. The results obtained (Fig.
7A) suggested that, as for
AdoMet, SMM uptake is mediated by two permeases with different kinetic
characteristics, one exhibiting a high affinity for SMM and the other
being a low affinity permease (KT = 2.5 × 10 Substrate Specificity of the High Affinity AdoMet and SMM
Permeases--
First analyses of AdoMet transport in S. cerevisiae had underscored the narrow substrate specificity of
this system (23, 24). As we demonstrated that yeast cells actually
possess two AdoMet permeases, these results could be questioned. The
analysis of the specificity of the AdoMet high affinity permease
appeared to be further necessary because the SAM3 as well as
the MMP1-encoded high affinity permeases belong to the
family of amino acid permeases, several members of which have been
shown to display large substrate specificity.
We thus assayed AdoMet and SMM uptake specificity in wild-type cells in
the presence of various sulfur compounds and amino acids using
substrate concentrations such that we could specifically measure the
activity of the high affinity permeases only. As reported in Table
V, the obtained results demonstrate that
the high affinity AdoMet permease appears to be a rather specific
enzyme. Among AdoMet analogs, S-adenosylethionine (which
contains an ethyl group in place of the methyl group of AdoMet) is the
most potent inhibitor of the high affinity AdoMet permease, whereas
S-adenosylhomocysteine (the demethylated AdoMet
analogue), sinefungin (a synthetic analogue of
S-adenosylhomocysteine), and SMM are less effective
inhibitors. In contrast, the presence of other organic sulfur
compounds, such as methionine, homocysteine, or cysteine, was without
effect on the high affinity AdoMet uptake. Because Sam3p belongs to the AAP family of transporters, we tested AdoMet transport in the presence
of each amino acid. These assays revealed that the two aromatic amino
acids, tryptophan and tyrosine, inhibit the high affinity AdoMet
permease, the latter less efficiently. As also reported in Table V, the
high affinity SMM permease is very specific, being only slightly
inhibited by methionine and phenylalanine and to a lesser extent by
cysteine, AdoMet, and arginine.
Low Affinity Transport of AdoMet and SMM Is a Facilitated Diffusion
Mechanism--
Results reported above demonstrated that AdoMet and SMM
transport in cells devoid of the high affinity AdoMet permease
(sam3
Carrier-mediated facilitated diffusion mechanism has been shown to
mediate hexose uptake in yeast and was also reported to be responsible
for the low affinity transport of urea (28-30). Because this type of
transport is expected to be insensitive to metabolic inhibitors (27),
AdoMet and SMM uptake was assayed in wild-type and mutant cells in the
presence of sodium azide. As shown in Table
VI, transport by the low affinity AdoMet
and SMM permeases is insensitive to 1 mM sodium azide. In
addition, we examined the kinetics of SMM transport in wild-type cells
(strain W303-1A) in the presence of 1 mM sodium azide (Fig.
8A). The results show that
under these conditions, only the low affinity permease is detected, the
high affinity SMM permease activity being completely inhibited by the
metabolic inhibitor. These results suggested that both AdoMet and SMM
high affinity permeases are active transport components, as expected
from their homology to the AAP family members, whereas, in contrast,
both low affinity AdoMet and SMM transport could be carrier-mediated
facilitated diffusion. The next question we wanted to address is the
possibility that the low affinity AdoMet transport and the low affinity
SMM transport could be mediated by the same uptake system. In the
absence of the genetic characterization of both AdoMet and SMM low
affinity permeases, a clear response could not be given. However,
cross-inhibition experiments were performed that showed that inhibition
of the low affinity AdoMet permease by SMM and of the low affinity SMM permease by AdoMet appear to be competitive (Fig. 8, B and
C). This could be an indication that the two low affinity
permeases are identical.
A highly specific genetic screen allowed us to isolate, in
S. cerevisiae, a mutation impairing AdoMet transport across
the plasma membrane. The isolated mutation defined a new genetic locus, which was called SAM3. The kinetic study of AdoMet uptake by
wild-type as well as sam3-disrupted cells led to the
conclusion that the AdoMet transport system was dual. Indeed, contrary
to what was originally reported, kinetics of the uptake of AdoMet was
compatible with the action of two different permeases that differ by
their substrate affinity as well as by their transport capacity.
Kinetic assays further demonstrated that the isolated sam3
mutation specifically impairs the high affinity AdoMet permease.
Accordingly, sam3 The genetic characterization of the sam3 mutation allowed us
to clone the corresponding gene, which corresponds to the
YPL274w ORF of chromosome XVI. The Sam3 protein appears to
be an integral membrane protein comprising 12 transmembrane spanning
segments. As reviewed by André (25), embedded membrane proteins
participating in transport processes in yeast can be classified into
several protein families according to their sequence similarities. In most cases, such established families include membrane proteins ensuring the transport of related solute compounds. For instance, at
the outset of this study, most of the known amino acid permeases belonged to one family of highly related proteins called the AAP family. A notable exception to this rule was provided by the recent discovery of the proteins responsible for the uptake of methionine. This sulfur amino acid is indeed transported through three different permeases (in addition to the general amino acid permease), two of
which, at least, are unrelated to the members of the AAP family. As the
chemical structure of AdoMet is formed by the addition of a molecule of
methionine to an adenosine group, a simple evolutionary hypothesis
would have been to relate the AdoMet permeases to the proteins ensuring
the transport of one or the other compound. The sequence analysis of
the SAM3-encoded product revealed that it is not the case,
the Sam3 protein being structurally related to the members of the AAP
family (Fig. 9). Moreover, no sequence homology could be detected between Sam3p and the identified yeast purine transporters. To our knowledge, the identification of Sam3p is
the first report of a protein belonging to the AAP family that does not
transport one of the 20 common amino acids. This result underscores
once more the absolute necessity of assessing, by the means of
biochemistry and genetic studies, the enzymatic functions that have
been predicted on the basis of sequence homologies uncovered by
alignment algorithms. It must be noted that in the case of the yeast
proteins embedded within the plasma membrane, such a methodological
requirement was already demonstrated by the example of the inorganic
phosphate transporter (encoded by the PHO84 gene), the
sequence of which is very closely related to those of the hexose
transporters (31).
We were able to identify as a SMM permease the transmembrane protein
encoded by the YLL061w ORF, a close sequence homolog of
Sam3p, which shares with sam3p an overall sequence similarity greater
than 85%. Up to now, SMM uptake and fate in S. cerevisiae had not been studied, although the presence of a SMM-homocysteine methyltransferase activity was evidenced in yeast lysates (26). In the
present work, we have brought evidence that SMM is a sulfur source able
to promote growth of S. cerevisiae cells and that it is
transported in the yeast cells by two permeases, one with a high
affinity and the other exhibiting a low affinity for SMM. It appears
that the high affinity SMM permease is a specific permease, being
inhibited only by methionine, AdoMet, cysteine, and phenylalanine. Therefore, our study points out that the three aromatic amino acids are
able to interfere with the uptake of the two sulfonium metabolites:
phenylalanine inhibiting SMM uptake, tryptophan and tyrosine inhibiting
the AdoMet uptake.
The low affinity AdoMet and SMM permeases identified by our kinetic
studies do not display the characteristics of active transports, both
being insensitive to a metabolic inhibitor. However, they are saturable
processes, so the participation of carrier proteins is probable. This
identifies the two low affinity transport systems described here as
facilitated diffusion. Whether AdoMet and SMM low affinity permeases
are the same transport system is unknown. Competitive cross inhibitions
could be an indication of the presence of only one facilitated
diffusion system, but genetic evidence is needed to ascertain this point.
Recent work on sulfate and methionine uptake has shown that these
sulfur compounds are transported by two and three transport systems
(32, 33), respectively; the systems differ in their affinity for the
substrate, in their transport capacity, and in their specificity. The
results reported here show that AdoMet and SMM are two other sulfur
compounds, each of which is also transported by two transport systems
with different characteristics. This is probably a means for yeast
cells to satisfy their growth requirements by the ability to capture
various sulfur compounds whatever the external conditions.
We thank Denise Henry for skillful technical assistance.
*
This work was supported by the CNRS.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-1-69-82-32-33;
Fax: 33-1-69-82-43-72; E-mail: thomas@cgm.cnrs-gif.fr.
The abbreviations used are:
AdoMet, S-adenosylmethionine;
AAP, amino acid permease;
SMM, S-methylmethionine;
ORF, open reading frame.
Transport of Sulfonium Compounds
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE S-ADENOSYLMETHIONINE AND
S-METHYLMETHIONINE PERMEASES FROM THE YEAST
SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
and
mmp1
mutant cells showed that in addition to high
affinity permeases, both sulfonium compounds are transported into yeast
cells by low affinity transport systems that appear to be
carrier-facilitated diffusion.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Yeast strains
507 and
479 with respect to the ATG codon. The C-terminal
primer was complementary to the noncoding strand between positions 523 and 546 with respect to the stop codon. Amplifications were performed using the Taq DNA polymerase (Appligène). The
amplification products were digested by PstI (
469 before
the ATG codon) and StuI (459 after the stop codon) and
cloned into plasmid pUC19 digested by SmaI and
PstI, yielding plasmid pYLL061.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
strain as a parent strain in a screen for mutants
capable of growing in the presence of methionine but not in the
presence of AdoMet should mainly identify the components of the AdoMet
uptake system.

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, the natural sulfonium compounds.
B, S-adenosylmethionine metabolism in S. cerevisiae and the met25
block.
was mutagenized by nitrous acid, and a
nystatin enrichment-based protocol was used to counterselect strains capable of growing in the presence of AdoMet as a methionine source (see under "Experimental Procedures"). After 1000 survival cells were plated on methionine-containing medium, they were replicated and
tested for their capacity to grow in the presence of AdoMet. This
genetic screen allowed the isolation of two strains unable to grow in
the presence of AdoMet but able to grow in the presence of either
methionine, homocysteine, or cysteine. The two mutant strains (D162 and
D201) were then crossed with a met25 mutated strain. The
resulting diploids were sporulated, and the analysis of the progeny
revealed that in both cases, the incapacity to grow in the presence of
AdoMet segregates as a monogenic trait. Complementation assays,
furthermore, showed that the mutations present in the two mutant
strains D162 and D201 affected the same genetic locus. According to the
genetic nomenclature of yeast, this locus was called sam3
rather than samp3, the original term used by Spence
(22).

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
The SAM3 region.
A, physical map of the SAM3 region. B,
Southern blot analysis of SAM3 gene disruption. Lane
1, SacI-EcoRV digest of genomic DNA
extracted from strain W303-1A; lane 2, SacI-EcoRV digest of genomic DNA extracted from
strain CD192. The filter was probed with the
SacI-EcoRV fragment of SAM3. The
arrows indicate the two fragments expected from
EcoRV cleavage within the URA3 gene.
mutant
strain were determined. As expected, this strain is unable to grow in
the presence of 0.1 mM AdoMet used as the sulfur source,
whereas it is still capable of growing in the presence of 0.1 mM L-Met. However, when a higher amount of AdoMet (1 mM) was added to the B medium, the
sam3
mutant strain was able to grow (Fig.
3). This result prompted us to determine the kinetic parameters of AdoMet uptake in yeast cells.

View larger version (100K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Growth of different mutants on AdoMet.
The strains were grown on minimal B medium containing 0.1 mM L-methionine or 0.1 or 1 mM
AdoMet as the sole sulfur sources.
6
M; Jmax = 5.3 nmol of AdoMet
transported/min/mg of dry weight (see under "Experimental
Procedures" for the definition of KT and
Jmax)) and the second, a low affinity AdoMet
permease (KT = 1.6 × 10
4
M; Jmax = 15 nmol of AdoMet
transported/min/mg of dry weight) (in this second case, it must be
noted that the kinetic parameters are not accurately determined due to
the presence of the high affinity permease). The values obtained for
the high affinity AdoMet permease are close to those reported for
AdoMet uptake by Spence et al. (13) in their first analysis
of AdoMet transport in yeast. Next, we determined the kinetic
parameters of AdoMet uptake in cells that do not express the Sam3
protein. In contrast to what was observed with its congenic parental
strain, the kinetic data of AdoMet uptake in the sam3
mutant cells led to a linear double reciprocal plot showing that in
these cells, the AdoMet uptake is mediated by a unique transport
system. The calculated kinetic parameters (KT = 2.5 × 10
4 M;
Jmax = 21 nmol of AdoMet transported/min/mg of
dry weight) (Fig. 4B) are very close to those determined for
the low affinity component of the wild-type cells. These results
therefore confirmed that in yeast, AdoMet uptake is actually mediated
by two different transport system of high and low affinity, the former
being encoded by the SAM3 gene.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Kinetic analysis of AdoMet uptake in
SAM3 and sam3
cells. A, strain W303-1A (SAM3);
B, strain CD192 (sam3
). AdoMet uptake was
measured as described under "Experimental Procedures." The
incubations were for 3 min. The AdoMet concentrations were from 0.002 to 1 mM. The data were analyzed in two sets: for the high
affinity, 0.002-0.1 mM, and for the low affinity, 0.06-1
mM.
The presence of plasmid pSAM3-1 increases the activity of the high
affinity AdoMet permease

View larger version (81K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Alignment of the Sam3 and Yll061
proteins. The two proteins were aligned using the Clustal V
program (34). =, identical amino acids;
, conservative replacements.
The 12 putative membrane spanning domains are boxed.
cells (see under
"Experimental Procedures"). The growth behavior of the two
resulting strains, CD203
(yll061w::TRP1) and CD204
(yll061w::TRP1,
sam3::URA3) was analyzed. As shown in
Fig. 3, in the presence of AdoMet used as sulfur source, the growth of
both strains did not differ from that of their respective parental strains. In a second approach, we measured the kinetic parameters of
AdoMet uptake in both mutant cells. As reported in Table
III, the disruption of the
YLL061w ORF was without effect on AdoMet transport: the
kinetics of AdoMet uptake was the same in the absence or in the
presence of the yll061w::TRP1 mutation, in both
the SAM3 and the sam3::URA3 cells.
Therefore, despite the high sequence similarity displayed by
YLL061w-encoded product and the high affinity AdoMet
permease, the former protein appears not to be involved in AdoMet
uptake and thus does not correspond to the low affinity AdoMet
permease.
Kinetic analysis of AdoMet uptake in different mutants

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Disruption of YLL061w impairs use of S-methylmethionine as sole sulfur
source. The strains were grown on minimal B medium containing 0.1 mM L-methionine or 0.1 mM
DL-SMM as the sole sulfur sources.
6 and 8 × 10
5 M and
Jmax = 1.5 and 6.6 nmol/min/mg of dry weight,
respectively). Moreover, when SMM uptake was assayed in cells that bear
a disruption mutation of the yll061w locus (strains CD203
and CD204), the resulting kinetic data clearly led to a linear double
reciprocal plot showing that in mutant cells, SMM uptake is mediated by
a unique transport system that corresponds to the low affinity SMM
permease seen in wild-type cells (Fig. 7B and Table
IV). This was sustained by the fact that
yll061w mutants cells are capable of growing, although more
slowly than their parental strains, when the concentration of
DL-SMM used as sulfur source was raised to 2 mM
(not shown). Taken together, all these results both confirm the
existence of two SMM permeases in yeast and demonstrate that
YLLO61w encodes the high affinity SMM permease. Therefore,
the YLL061w ORF was named MMP1 (for
methylmethionine permease) according to the standard yeast genetic
nomenclature.

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Kinetic analysis of
S-methylmethionine uptake in strains W303-1A
(YLL061w) (A) and CD203
(yll061w) (B). L-SMM
uptake was measured as described under "Experimental Procedures."
The incubations were for 3 min. The L-SMM concentrations
were from 0.0001 to 0.02 mM for the high affinity and from
0.001 to 0.1 mM for the low affinity permease.
Kinetic analysis of S-methylmethionine uptake in different mutants
Specificity of AdoMet and SMM uptake by the high affinity permeases
mutant) and the high affinity SMM permease
(mmp1
mutant), respectively, are saturable processes with
respect to substrate concentration (see the determination of kinetic
constants of AdoMet uptake (Fig. 4) and SMM uptake (Fig. 7)). However,
the growth of the sam3
mutant cells on a high
concentration of AdoMet (1 mM) appears to be poor (Fig. 3),
although the concentration used was expected to satisfy the kinetic
requirements of the low affinity permease. This was a first indication
that the intracellular concentration reached is not sufficient for
optimal growth, probably due to the inability of the low affinity
permeases to concentrate AdoMet intracellularly. In addition, at the
concentrations used to assay the low affinity transport in strains
lacking the high affinity permeases, AdoMet and SMM uptake is rapid,
reaching equilibrium in less than 1 min. These properties have been
described for uptake by facilitated diffusion (27).
Sensitivity of the low affinity AdoMet and SMM permeases to an
inhibitor of energy metabolism

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
A, kinetic analysis of SMM transport in
wild-type cells in the presence of 1 mM sodium azide.
B, kinetic analysis of the inhibition of AdoMet low affinity
uptake.
, AdoMet uptake;
, AdoMet uptake in the presence of 10 mM SMM. C, kinetic analysis of the inhibition of
SMM low affinity uptake.
, SMM uptake;
, SMM uptake in the
presence of AdoMet 5 mM.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
cells were shown to be unable to grow
in the presence of 0.1 mM AdoMet. Substrate specificity of
the high affinity AdoMet permease was studied by competition
experiments. It appears to be a highly specific transport system, being
competitively inhibited by only closely related AdoMet analogs, such as
S-adenosylethionine. These results therefore suggest that
both the carboxyaminopropyl group and the adenosine group of AdoMet are
recognized by the AdoMet permease, a conclusion already reached during
the original analysis of AdoMet transport (24). However, it must be
noted that the unrelated amino acids tryptophan and tyrosine inhibit
AdoMet transport.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Phylogenic tree of the yeast amino acid,
AdoMet, and purine permeases as obtained using the Darwin program
(35). Gap1, general amino acid permease;
Can1, arginine permease; Hip1, histidine
permease; Put4, proline permease; Lyp1, lysine
permease; Gnp1, glutamine permease; Dip5,
glutamate and aspartate permease; Bap2, leucine, valine, and
isoleucine permease; Pap1, low affinity branched amino acid
permease; Tat1, tyrosine and tryptophan permease;
Tat2, tryptophan permease; Mup1, high affinity
methionine permease; Mup3, very low affinity methionine
permease; Fcy2, purine and cytosine permease (25);
Sam3, high affinity AdoMet permease; mmp1, high
affinity SMM permease.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Supported by a thesis fellowship from the Ministère de la
Recherche et de l'Enseignement Supérieur.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Stoner, G. L.,
and Eisenberg, M. A.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
4029-4036 2.
Slany, R. K.,
Bosl, M.,
Crain, P. F.,
and Kersten, H.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
7811-7817[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Balasundaram, D.,
Xie, Q. W.,
Tabor, C. W.,
and Tabor, H.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
6407-6409 4.
McRorie, R. A.,
Sutherland, G. L.,
Lewis, M. S.,
Barton, A. D.,
Glazener, M. R.,
and Shive, W.
(1954)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
76,
115-118[CrossRef]
5.
Mudd, S. H.,
and Datko, A. H.
(1990)
Plant Physiol.
93,
623-630 6.
Greene, R. C.,
and Davis, N. B.
(1960)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
43,
360-362[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Kocsis, M. G.,
Nolte, K. D.,
Rhodes, D.,
Shen, T.-L.,
Gage, D. A.,
and Hanson, A. D.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
117,
273-281 8.
Jebbar, M.,
Talibart, R.,
Bernard, T.,
and Blanco, C.
(1994)
Microbiology
140,
2415-2422[Abstract]
9.
Lever, M.,
Peddie, B. A.,
and Chambers, S. T.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1291,
189-194[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Dickson, D. M. J.,
Wyn Jones, R. G.,
and Davenport, J.
(1980)
Planta
150,
158-165[CrossRef]
11.
Dickson, D. M. J.,
and Kirst, G. O.
(1986)
Planta
167,
536-543[CrossRef]
12.
Trossat, C.,
Rathinasabapathi, B.,
Weretilnyk, E. A.,
Shen, T.-L.,
Huang, Z.-H.,
and Hanson, A. D.
(1998)
Plant Physiol.
116,
165-171 13.
Spence, K. D.,
Ferro, A. J.,
and Petrotta-Simpson, T. F.
(1977)
in
The Biochemistry of Adenosylmethionine
(Salvatore, F.
, Borek, E.
, Zappia, V.
, Williams-Ashman, H. G.
, and Schlenk, F., eds)
, pp. 77-82, Columbia University Press, New York
14.
Sherman, F., Fink, G. R., and Hicks, J. B.
(eds)
(1979)
Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Manual
, pp. 9-12, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 61-64
15.
Cherest, H.,
and Surdin-Kerjan, Y.
(1992)
Genetics
130,
51-58[Abstract]
16.
Fink, G. R.
(1970)
Methods Enzymol.
17,
59-78
17.
Gage, D. A.,
Rhodes, D.,
Nolte, K. D.,
Hicks, W. A.,
Leustek, T.,
Cooper, A. J.,
and Hanson, A. D.
(1997)
Nature
387,
891-894[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Cone, M. C.,
Marchitto, K.,
Zehfus, B.,
and Ferro, A. J.
(1982)
J. Bacteriol.
151,
510-515 19.
Baldari, C.,
and Cesarini, G.
(1985)
Gene
35,
27-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Rothstein, R. J.
(1983)
Methods Enzymol.
101,
202-211[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Thomas, D.,
and Surdin-Kerjan, Y.
(1997)
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
61,
503-532[Abstract]
22.
Spence, K. D.
(1971)
J. Bacteriol.
106,
325-330 23.
Murphy, J. T.,
and Spence, K. D.
(1972)
J. Bacteriol.
109,
499-504 24.
Petrotta-Simpson, T. F.,
Talmadge, J. E.,
and Spence, K. D.
(1975)
J. Bacteriol.
123,
516-522 25.
André, B.
(1995)
Yeast
11,
1575-1611[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Shapiro, S. K.,
Yphantis, D. A.,
and Almenas, A.
(1964)
J. Biol. Chem.
239,
1551-1556 27.
Cooper, T. G.
(1982)
in
Transport in Saccharomycas cerevisiae. The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces. Metabolism and Gene Expression
(Strathern, J. N.
, Jones, E. W.
, and Broach, J. R., eds)
, pp. 399-461, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
28.
Lang, J. M.,
and Cirillo, V. P.
(1987)
J. Bacteriol.
169,
2932-2937 29.
Lagunas, R.
(1993)
FEMS Microbiol. Rev.
10,
229-242[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Sumrada, R.,
Gorski, M.,
and Cooper, T.
(1976)
J. Bacteriol.
125,
1048-1056 31.
Bisson, L. F.,
Coons, D. M.,
Kruckeberg, A. L.,
and Lewis, D. A.
(1993)
Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol.
28,
259-308[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Cherest, H.,
Davidian, J.-C.,
Thomas, D.,
Benes, V.,
Ansorge, W.,
and Surdin-Kerjan, Y.
(1997)
Genetics
145,
627-635[Abstract]
33.
Isnard, A. D.,
Thomas, D.,
and Surdin-Kerjan, Y.
(1996)
J. Mol. Biol.
262,
473-484[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Higgins, D. G.
(1994)
Methods Mol. Biol.
25,
307-318[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Gonnet, G. H.,
Cohen, M. A.,
and Benner, S. A.
(1992)
Science
256,
1443-1445
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Zheng, S. Shuman, and B. Schwer Sinefungin resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae arising from sam3 mutations that inactivate the AdoMet transporter or from increased expression of AdoMet synthase plus mRNA cap guanine-N7 methyltransferase Nucleic Acids Res., November 29, 2007; 35(20): 6895 - 6903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Uemura, K. Kashiwagi, and K. Igarashi Polyamine Uptake by DUR3 and SAM3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Chem., March 9, 2007; 282(10): 7733 - 7741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bouvier, N. Linka, J.-C. Isner, J. Mutterer, A. P.M. Weber, and B. Camara Arabidopsis SAMT1 Defines a Plastid Transporter Regulating Plastid Biogenesis and Plant Development PLANT CELL, November 1, 2006; 18(11): 3088 - 3105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Porras-Yaku |