JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strumberg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pommier, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strumberg, D.
Right arrow Articles by Pommier, Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28246-28255, October 1, 1999


Molecular Analysis of Yeast and Human Type II Topoisomerases
ENZYME-DNA AND DRUG INTERACTIONS*

Dirk StrumbergDagger , John L. Nitiss§, Jiaowang Dong§, Kurt W. Kohn, and Yves Pommierparallel

From the Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Division of Basic Sciences, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4255 and the § Department of Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The DNA sequence selectivity of topoisomerase II (top2)-DNA cleavage complexes was examined for the human (top2alpha ), yeast, and Escherichia coli (i.e. gyrase) enzymes in the absence or presence of anticancer or antibacterial drugs. Species-specific differences were observed for calcium-promoted DNA cleavage. Similarities and differences in DNA cleavage patterns and nucleic acid sequence preferences were also observed between the human, yeast, and E. coli top2 enzymes in the presence of the non-intercalators fluoroquinolone CP-115,953, etoposide, and azatoxin and the intercalators amsacrine and mitoxantrone. Additional base preferences were generally observed for the yeast when compared with the human top2alpha enzyme. Preferences in the immediate flanks of the top2-mediated DNA cleavage sites are, however, consistent with the drug stacking model for both enzymes. We also analyzed and compared homologous mutations in yeast and human top2, i.e. Ser740 right-arrow Trp and Ser763 right-arrow Trp, respectively. Both mutations decreased the reversibility of the etoposide-stabilized cleavage sites and produced consistent base sequence preference changes. These data demonstrate similarities and differences between human and yeast top2 enzymes. They also indicate that the structure of the enzyme/DNA interface plays a key role in determining the specificity of top2 poisons and cleavage sites for both the intercalating and non-intercalating drugs.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

DNA topoisomerases are enzymes that catalyze changes in the topology of DNA via a mechanism involving the transient breakage and rejoining of phosphodiester bonds in the DNA backbone (1, 2). Studies in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have demonstrated the importance of topoisomerases in transcription, DNA replication, and chromosome segregation. The type II topoisomerases (top2)1 make transient DNA double-strand breaks and change the linking number of DNA in steps of two. They play key roles in DNA metabolism and chromosome structure and are essential in eukaryotic cells (2, 3). In order to maintain the integrity of the cleaved DNA during this process, the top2 enzymes form a proteinaceous bridge that spans the DNA break. This bridge is anchored by covalent phosphotyrosyl bonds established between each of the active site tyrosine residues of the homodimeric enzyme and the 5'-DNA termini of the newly created DNA double-strand break (2). Under physiological conditions, these covalent top2-DNA complexes (referred to as cleavage or cleavable complexes) are normally short lived intermediates in the catalytic cycle of the enzyme.

Beyond its vital cellular functions, top2 is the primary cytotoxic target for some of the most active drugs for the treatment of human cancers (4-8). Top2 inhibitors can be divided into two groups, top2 catalytic inhibitors and top2 poisons (8). Top2 catalytic inhibitors do not stabilize DNA cleavage complexes. Bisdioxopiperazines (ICRF 159, 187 (dexrazoxane), and 193) belong to this category (9). Top2 poisons inhibit the enzyme by increasing the steady-state levels of DNA cleavage complexes (8, 10, 11). Hence they convert top2 into a physiological toxin that creates DNA double-strand breaks in the genome of treated cells (5, 8, 10, 12). Top2 poisons can be further subdivided into two groups as follows: the DNA intercalators that include doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, amsacrine, ellipticines/olivacines, and the non-intercalators whose main representatives are the demethylepipodophyllotoxins etoposide (VP-16) and teniposide (VM-26), the quinolones among which CP-115,953 acts as a dual eukaryotic and prokaryotic top2 poison (13, 14), and some azatoxin derivatives (15).

Although top2 cleaves DNA at preferred sequences, little is known regarding the mechanism by which the enzyme selects its sites of action. Recent studies with etoposide suggested that etoposide interacts with top2 rather than with the DNA (7). On the other hand, studies with a photoactivated amsacrine derivative and with bisantrene/amsacrine congeners indicated that for these agents, drug-DNA interactions are critical for the formation of top2-DNA cleavage complexes (16, 17). Analyses of drug-induced top2 cleavages revealed drug-specific base preferences in the immediate vicinity of the cleavage sites. In the case of amsacrine, A at position +1 was preferred, whereas in the case of etoposide, teniposide, mitoxantrone, and quinolones the highest preference is for C at position -1 (see diagram in Fig. 3). From these results, it has been proposed that drugs bind at the enzyme-DNA interface and form a ternary complex with top2 and the DNA. This model has been referred to as the drug stacking model (8, 18) or position poison model (19, 20).

Yeast is a powerful model system to study topoisomerase inhibitors (3, 21, 22). However, no detailed comparison has been reported for DNA cleavage complexes formed by the yeast and the human top2 enzymes. Furthermore, since detailed fundamental information is available for the yeast enzyme (2, 23), but not for the human enzymes, direct comparison of the human and yeast proteins is useful for a structural understanding of the human enzymes as a drug target. Yeast top2 is also a potential target for antifungal treatment, and structural differences between the yeast and human top2 may allow selective targeting of the yeast top2 over its human counterpart. In this way, a clear and detailed comparison between yeast and human top2 is warranted and necessary. Since mutation of a conserved serine residue (Ser740 right-arrow Trp) in yeast top2 was recently reported to alter both enzyme-DNA and drug interactions (24), the homologous mutation (Ser763 right-arrow Trp) in human top2alpha was analyzed in this study.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Materials, Chemicals, and Enzymes-- Etoposide (VP16) was obtained from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Amsacrine and mitoxantrone were from the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch (NCI, Bethesda, MD). Azatoxin and its derivatives were provided by Dr. T. Macdonald, Department of Chemistry of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA (15). CP-115,953 was the gift of Drs. P. R. McGuirk and T. D. Gootz of Pfizer. Drug stock solutions were made in dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) at 10 mM. Further dilutions were made in distilled water immediately before use. Human c-MYC inserted into pBR322, restriction enzymes, T4 polynucleotide kinase, polyacrylamide/bisacrylamide, and Taq DNA polymerase were purchased from Lofstrand Laboratories (Gaithersburg, MD), Life Technologies, Inc., New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA), or Qiagen Inc. (Valencia, CA). [gamma -32P]ATP was purchased from NEN Life Science Products. PCR oligonucleotide primers were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc.

Preparation of End-labeled DNA Fragments by PCR-- Three sets of labeled DNA fragments were prepared from the human c-MYC gene by PCR. A 254-base pair DNA fragment from the first intron was prepared between positions 3035 and 3288, with numbers referring to GenBankTM genomic positions using oligonucleotides 5'-GTAATCCAGAACTGGATCGG-3' for the upper strand and 5'-ATGCGGTCCCTACTCCAAGG-3' for the lower strand (annealing temperature 56 °C). A 401-base pair DNA fragment from the junction between the first intron and first exon was prepared between positions 2671 and 3072 using oligonucleotides 5'-TGCCGCATCCACGAAACTTT-3' for the upper strand and 5'-TTGACAAGTCACTTTACCCC-3' for the lower strand (annealing temperature 60 °C). A 480-base pair fragment from the first exon containing promoters P1 and P2 was prepared between positions 2265 and 2745 using the oligonucleotides 5'-GATCCTCTCTCGCTAATCTCCGCCC-3' for the upper strand and 5'-TCCTTGCTCGGGTGTTGTAAGTTCC-3' for the lower strand (annealing temperature 70 °C). A 213-base pair fragment from the human c-JUN gene was prepared between positions 5'-TGTTGACAGCGGCGGAAAGCAGS-3' for the upper strand and 5'-CGTCCTTCTTCTCTTGCGTGGCTCT-3' for the lower strand (annealing temperature 64 °C). Single end labeling of these DNA fragments was obtained by 5'-end labeling of the specific primer oligonucleotide. Ten picomoles of DNA was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with 10 units of T4 polynucleotide kinase and 10 pM [gamma -32P]ATP (100 µCi) in kinase buffer (70 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 0, 1 M KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). Reactions were stopped by heat denaturation at 70 °C for 15 min. After purification using Sephadex G-25 columns (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), the labeled oligonucleotides were used for PCR. Approximately 0.1 µg of the c-MYC DNA that had been restricted by SmaI and PvuII (fragment 2265-2745) and XhoI and XbaI (fragment 2671-3072 and fragment 3035-3288) was used as template for the PCR. Ten picomoles of each oligonucleotide primer, one of them being 5'-labeled, was used in 22 temperature cycle reactions (each cycle with 94 °C for 1 min, annealing for 1 min, and 72 °C for 2 min). The last extension was for 10 min. DNA was purified using PCR Select-II columns (5 Prime right-arrow 3 Prime, Inc., Boulder, CO).

Overexpression and Purification of Yeast and Human Topoisomerase II-- Wild-type yeast and human top2, Ser740 right-arrow Trp, and Ser763 right-arrow Trp proteins were overexpressed using YEpTOP2-PGAL1 or YEptop2-S*W-PGAL1 using yeast strain JEL1t1- (25) and purified to homogeneity as described previously (26). The detailed procedure has been described elsewhere (27).

Topoisomerase II-induced DNA Cleavage Reactions-- DNA fragments (5-10 × 104 dpm/reaction) were equilibrated with or without drug in 1% Me2SO, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM ATP, and 15 µg/ml bovine serum albumin for 5 min before addition of 8 units (80 ng) of purified top2 in 10-µl final reaction volume. Unless otherwise indicated, reactions were for 30 min at 37 °C. Reactions were stopped by adding 1% SDS (v/v) and further digested with proteinase K (0.4 mg/ml final concentration for 30 min at 55 °C). Calcium-promoted DNA cleavage was performed in the same buffer with 5 mM CaCl2 instead of MgCl2 (24).

Electrophoresis and Base Preference Analysis-- For DNA sequence analysis, samples were precipitated with ethanol and resuspended in 5 µl of loading buffer (80% formamide, 10 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, 0, 1% xylene cyanol, and 0.1% bromphenol blue). Samples were heated to 95 °C for 5 min and thereafter loaded onto DNA sequencing gels (7% polyacrylamide, 19:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide) containing 7 M urea in 1× Tris borate/EDTA buffer. Electrophoresis was performed at 2500 V (60 watts) for 2-3 h. The gels were dried on Whatman No. 3MM paper sheets and visualized using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and ImageQuant software. The determination of preferred bases around top2 cleavage sites was done as described previously (28-30).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Calcium-promoted DNA Cleavages Differ between Human, Yeast, and Bacteria Top2 Enzymes-- The calcium-promoted, drug-independent DNA cleavage sites induced by yeast and human wild-type top2 and by E. coli gyrase (i.e. in bacterial type II topoisomerase) (31, 32) were mapped on the upper strand of the c-MYC first intron fragment (Fig. 1). Even in the presence of magnesium, differences in the cleavage sites could be observed. When magnesium was replaced by calcium, higher levels of DNA cleavage were seen in the yeast protein. DNA cleavage sites common to both proteins were seen in the presence of Ca2+. However, there were also major differences in the intensity of cleavage at other sites. Although a number of DNA cleavage sites in yeast were also found in gyrase, e.g. at positions 3227, 3221, 3064, the majority of cleavage sites were specific for either protein. These results suggest that human, yeast, and bacterial top2 are different regarding Ca2+-promoted DNA cleavage in the absence of a top2 drug.


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Effect of Ca2+ on the DNA cleavage patterns of yeast, human, and bacterial top2 enzymes. A 254-base pair DNA fragment from the human c-MYC first intron was prepared by PCR between positions 3035 and 3288. The upper strand was 5'-end-labeled with 32P. Top2 reactions were performed at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 or 5 mM CaCl2 as indicated and stopped by adding EDTA and SDS (25 mM and 1% final concentrations, respectively). Purine ladder was obtained after formic acid reaction. h WT, human wild-type top2alpha ; y WT, yeast wild-type top2; Gyrase, wild-type gyrase from E. coli. Numbers correspond to genomic positions of the nucleotide covalently linked to top2.

Cleavage Sites Induced by Yeast and Human Top2 in the Presence of Drugs-- To investigate further possible differences between yeast and human top2 DNA cleavage patterns, we compared the drug-induced cleavage sites (Fig. 2). Several cleavage sites induced by etoposide were much stronger with the yeast enzyme, for example in Fig. 2, panel A, at positions 2816, 2842, 2901, and 2962, and in Fig. 2, panel B, at positions 3171 and 3167. Conversely, some etoposide-induced sites were stronger with the human than with the yeast enzyme, e.g. in Fig. 2, panel A, at position 2880 and in Fig. 2, panel B, at positions 3260, 3252, 3223, 3187, 3149, and 3084. 


View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   DNA cleavage patterns induced in yeast and human top2 enzymes by non-intercalating and intercalating drugs. DNA fragments from the junction between the c-MYC first intron and first exon between positions 2671 and 3072 (panel A) and from the c-MYC first intron (panel B) were prepared by PCR using one primer labeled with 32P at the 5' terminus. Panel A, labeling of the lower DNA strand at position 3072. Panel B, labeling of the upper DNA strand at position 3035. Drugs are indicated above each lane. Concentrations used were as follows: etoposide, 100 µM; CP-115,953, 100 µM; ciprofloxacin, 100 µM; amsacrine, 200 µM; mitoxantrone, 1 µM; and 11beta (4"-nitroanilino)azatoxin, 100 µM. Purine ladder was obtained after formic acid reaction. Control, no top2, no drug treatment. Numbers correspond to genomic positions of the nucleotide covalently linked to top2. y WT, yeast wild-type enzyme; h WT, human wild-type enzyme.

In the case of CP-115,953, human top2alpha caused greater cleavage than the yeast enzyme at several sites (in Fig. 2, panel A, at positions 2842, 2880, 2901, and 2996, and in Fig. 2, panel B, at positions 3187, 3149, and 3084). In the case of the gyrase-specific quinolone ciprofloxacin, yeast top2 showed minimal cleavage induction at position 3144 (Fig. 2, panel B).

With amsacrine, human top2alpha cleaved more extensively than yeast top2 (in Fig. 2, panel A, at positions 2842, 2912, 2962, and 3008 and in Fig. 2, panel B, at positions 3064, 3081, 3084, 3091, and 3118). At some sites (e.g. positions 3144, 3121, and 2974), however, cleavage was stronger with the yeast enzyme. Similarly, several changes in cleavage sites induced by mitoxantrone were seen. The azatoxin-derivative 11beta (4"-nitroanilino)azatoxin (15) (Fig. 2, panel A) was markedly more active against the human top2alpha than the yeast top2 in the DNA fragment examined. Taken together, these results show different DNA cleavage patterns for yeast and human top2 in the presence of both intercalating and non-intercalating drugs.

Different Base Preferences of Amsacrine- and Mitoxantrone-stabilized Cleavage Complexes for the Yeast and Human Top2-- Because the yeast and human top2 enzymes presented different cleavage activity in the presence of drugs, we compared the DNA base preferences for both proteins in the presence of etoposide, amsacrine, mitoxantrone, and CP-115,953 (Figs. 3-6 and Tables I and II). Cleavage sites for the three c-MYC DNA fragments and the c-JUN fragment (see "Experimental Procedures") were analyzed for both DNA strands.


View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Probability of the observed base frequency deviations at top2 cleavage sites for the human and yeast wild-type enzymes in the presence of etoposide. Drug concentration was 100 µM. Position 0 corresponds to the cleavage site. The panels present the probability of the observed base frequency deviations from expectation for the indicated enzyme. In the y axis, P is the probability of observing that deviation or more, either as excess (above base line) or deficiency (negative values below base line) relative to the expected frequency of each individual base (29). Cleavage sites for the human (panel A) and the yeast (panel B) wild-type enzymes were analyzed. Drug concentration was 100 µM. A schematic representation of a top2 cleavage complex is shown between panels A and B. The top2 covalent linkage to the 5'-DNA termini is shown as a circle at the +1 position.

For yeast and human proteins, etoposide preferentially stabilized sites with C at position -1 (C-1) (Fig. 3 and Table I). This result agrees well with previous analyses (18, 29). Preference on the opposite strand showed a complementary (although slightly weaker) preference for G at position +5. Thus, the different cleavage patterns for yeast and human top2 in the presence of etoposide were not associated with detectably altered base preferences.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Base distribution at each position of etoposide-, amsacrine-, and mitoxantrone-induced DNA cleavage sites
Underlined numbers represent base frequencies significantly (p < 0.001) greater or lower than expected.

In the presence of amsacrine (Fig. 4 and Table I), the human enzyme showed a clear preference for A+1 (47 of 64 sites) and a complementary (although weaker) preference for T+4 (28 of 64 sites), which conforms with earlier studies (29, 33, 34). The yeast protein also demonstrated a strong preference for A+1 (29 of 61 sites) but an additional preference for T at position -1 (32 of 61 sites) as well as the complementary A at position +5 (28 of 61 sites), which was not seen in the human enzyme.


View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Probability of the observed base frequency deviations at top2 cleavage sites for the human and yeast wild-type enzymes in the presence of amsacrine (AMSA). Position 0 corresponds to the cleavage site. The panels present the probability of the observed base frequency deviations from expectation for the indicated enzyme. Cleavage sites for the human (panel A) and the yeast (panel B) wild-type enzymes were analyzed. Drug concentration was 200 µM. yWT, yeast wild-type enzyme; hWT, human wild-type enzyme.

In case of mitoxantrone (Fig. 5 and Table I), the consensus sequence for the preferred mitoxantrone intercalation site (5'-AC(A/G)) (35) was reflected by a preference for A+1 in yeast top2 (38 of 110 sites) and human top2alpha (38 of 106 sites). The preference of C at position +2 did not reach significance for either protein, and position +3 did not show any preference. The human enzyme showed a strong preference for C-1 (62 of 106 sites). This preference for C-1 was also seen in the yeast protein, although less strong (60 of 110 sites). Besides the yeast protein revealed an additional preference of T at position -1 (40 of 110 sites) that was not apparent in the human top2alpha . In addition to differences in the base preferences for the positions flanking the cleavage sites, the proteins also showed individual preferences at positions -3 and +8 for the human top2alpha and at positions -9 and +6 for the yeast top2. Thus, our data show significant differences in base sequence preferences between human and yeast top2 enzymes in the presence of amsacrine and mitoxantrone. In the case of etoposide, no significant difference in base preference was observed despite clear differences in observed DNA cleavage patterns.


View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Probability of the observed base frequency deviations at top2 cleavage sites for the human and yeast wild-type enzymes in the presence of mitoxantrone. Position 0 corresponds to the cleavage site. The panels present the probability of the observed base frequency deviations from expectation for the indicated enzyme. Cleavage sites for the human (panel A) and the yeast (panel B) wild-type enzymes were analyzed. Drug concentration was 1 µM. yWT, yeast wild-type enzyme; hWT, human wild-type enzyme.

Different Base Preferences for Yeast, Human, and E. coli Top2 in the Presence of CP-115,953-- In the presence of the fluoroquinolone CP-115,953 (Fig. 6 and Table II), the human protein preferred cleavage sites with C-1 (44 of 79 sites), A+1 (38 of 79 sites), and (more weakly) A-2 (29 of 79 sites). These results are consistent with other reports (33, 36). Complementary preferences for T+4 and G+5 were also observed. The yeast top2 showed additional preferences for T-1 (C-1 and T-1, 49 of 65 sites) and for G+1 (A+1 and G+1, 54 of 65 sites). There was no clear preference at position -2 for the yeast protein. Interestingly, gyrase showed the T-1 and G+1 preferences observed for yeast top2 (41 and 50 of 107 sites, respectively). These preferences are in agreement with previous reports obtained with a different fluoroquinolone (37). Thus, it appears that the base preferences for the CP-115,953-induced sites in gyrase are more similar to the yeast than to the human top2alpha .


View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Analysis of base preferences at top2 cleavage sites for the human, yeast, and bacterial wild-type enzymes in the presence of CP-115,953. (100 µM). Position 0 corresponds to the cleavage site. Panels A---C, probability of the observed base frequency deviations from expectation. Cleavage sites for the human (panel A), the yeast (panel B), and the E. coli (panel C) wild-type enzymes were analyzed. yWT, yeast wild-type enzyme; hWT, human wild-type enzyme.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Base distribution at each position of CP-115,953-induced DNA cleavage sites
Underlined numbers represent base frequencies significantly (p < 0.001) greater or lower than expected.

Homologous Mutations of Conserved Serine Residues Alter the Enzyme-DNA and Drug Interactions for Both Yeast and Human Top2-- We recently reported that mutation of Ser740 right-arrow Trp in yeast top2 affects both DNA and drug interactions (24). To analyze the effect of the homologous mutation in human top2alpha (Ser763 right-arrow Trp), we compared the calcium-promoted DNA cleavages for both mutant proteins (Fig. 7). Even in the absence of drug (in the presence of Mg2+), both mutants presented different cleavage patterns compared with the corresponding wild-type proteins. When magnesium was replaced by calcium, higher levels of DNA cleavage were only seen in the yeast proteins, i.e. in the wild-type enzyme and in top2S740W. New DNA cleavage sites common to both of the mutant proteins were seen in the presence of Mg2+ and Ca2+, although there were considerable differences in cleavage intensity. Most of the DNA cleavage sites in the upper and lower strands were staggered by 4 base pairs with a 5'-overhang, as expected for concerted top2-induced double-strand cleavage (see Fig. 3) (2, 8, 11).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Homologous mutations in yeast top2 and human top2alpha alter the calcium-promoted DNA cleavages. A 254-base pair DNA fragment from the first c-MYC intron was prepared. Panel A, labeling of the upper DNA strand at position 3035. Panel B, labeling of the lower DNA strand at position 3288. Top2 reactions were performed at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 or 5 mM CaCl2 as indicated and stopped by adding EDTA and SDS (25 mM and 1% final concentrations, respectively). Purine ladders were obtained after formic acid reaction. y WT, yeast wild-type top2; h WT, human wild-type top2alpha ; y S740W, yeast top2S740W; h S763W, human top2alpha S763W. Double-headed arrows correspond to DNA cleavage sites with a 4-base pair stagger that represent potential DNA double-strand breaks.

Since the Ser740 right-arrow Trp mutation in yeast affects the DNA cleavage patterns induced by both intercalating and non-intercalating drugs (24) and confers partial resistance to fluoroquinolones and collateral hypersensitivity to etoposide (38), we compared the drug-induced DNA cleavage sites for the human top2alpha S763W protein to the corresponding wild-type human top2alpha (Fig. 8). Several cleavage sites induced in the presence of CP-115,953 were markedly reduced in the top2alpha S763W (at positions 2842, 2883, 2901, 2908, 2912, and 2959). On the other hand, the human top2alpha S763W caused increased cleavage at specific sites in the presence of etoposide (at positions 2771, 2784, 2816, 2901, and 2996), compared with the human wild-type top2alpha . Reduced cleavage in the presence of etoposide was detected at other sites (for instance at 2974). Multiple changes were also observed in cleavage sites induced in the presence of amsacrine and mitoxantrone (Fig. 8). Taken together, these results show that both mutations, yeast top2S740W and human top2alpha S763W, alter DNA cleavage in the absence or presence of top2 poisons.


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Ser763 right-arrow Trp mutation in human top2alpha alters DNA cleavage patterns induced by various top2 inhibitors in the human c-MYC gene. A DNA fragment from the junction between the c-MYC first intron and first exon between positions 2671 and 3072 was labeled at the lower DNA strand at position 3072 with 32P. Drugs are indicated above each lane. Concentrations used were as follows: etoposide, 100 µM; CP-115,953, 100 µM; amsacrine, 200 µM; and mitoxantrone, 1 µM. Purine ladder was obtained after formic acid reaction. Control, no top2, no drug treatment. Numbers correspond to genomic positions of the nucleotide covalently linked to top2. H WT, human wild-type top2alpha ; h S763W, human top2alpha S763W.

Same Base Preference Alterations of the Etoposide-stabilized Cleavage Sites for the Yeast Mutant Top2S740W and the Human Mutant Top2alpha S763W-- As described above, the yeast top2S740W and the human top2alpha S763W are hypersensitive to etoposide. Since the Ser740 right-arrow Trp mutation affects the DNA base preference of yeast top2 in the presence of this drug (24), it was therefore of interest to examine the effect of homologous mutation in the human protein. Cleavage sites for three c-MYC DNA fragments and one c-JUN fragment (see "Experimental Procedures") were analyzed for both DNA strands (Fig. 9 and Table III). As already shown for the human and yeast wild-type top2 enzymes (see above), both yeast top2S740W and human top2alpha S763W demonstrated a strong preference for C-1 in combination with the complementary (although slightly weaker) preference for G+5. Human top2alpha S763W and yeast top2S740W extended the cleavage site preferences to include the C-2 and G+6 positions. It is remarkable that this relaxation of recognition position occurred in the same way in both the human and the yeast enzymes (Fig. 9) (24). A chi 2 test indicated that the combination of the C-1 and C-2 preference in yeast top2S740W as well as in human top2alpha S763W was not significantly more frequent than having C-1 or C-2 alone (data not shown). Thus, the novel C-2 base preference in both mutant proteins is independent of the C-1 preference. These data suggest a change in the protein-DNA interaction resulting from the homologous mutations Ser740 right-arrow Trp in yeast and Ser763 right-arrow Trp in human top2alpha , leading to an extension of the base preference to C-2 in the presence of etoposide.


View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Probability of the observed base frequency deviations at top2 cleavage sites for yeast top2S740W and human top2alpha S763W in the presence of etoposide. Reactions were performed in the presence of etoposide (100 µM). Panels A and B, position 0 corresponds to the cleavage site. Probability of the observed base frequency deviations from expectation. y, yeast; h, human.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table III
Base distribution of DNA cleavage sites for top2S740W or top2S763W in the presence of etoposide
Underlined numbers represent base frequencies significantly (p < 0.001) greater or lower than expected.

Since we demonstrated that the Ser740 right-arrow Trp in yeast and the Ser763 right-arrow Trp mutation in human top2alpha increased sensitivity to etoposide and changed the base preferences in the same way, we tested whether human top2alpha S763W and yeast top2S740W enhanced DNA cleavage by etoposide at the same positions. Fig. 10 shows that a number of cleavage sites were enhanced for both mutant proteins (at positions 3252, 3091, 2996, 2959 and to lesser extent at positions 3141 and 3073). In addition, reduced cleavage for both mutants was observed at positions 2974 and 3121. Several sites, however, showed differences between human top2alpha S763W and yeast top2S740W, e.g. at positions 3026, 3020, 2901, and 2816. In particular, cleavage at position 3175 was enhanced for yeast top2S740W but markedly reduced for human top2alpha S763W. Thus, human top2alpha S763W and yeast top2S740W preserve, at least partially, the differences described above between human and yeast protein-DNA interactions.


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 10.   Comparison of yeast top2S740W- and human top2alpha S763W-induced DNA cleavage sites in the presence of etoposide. DNA fragments were the same as described for Fig. 2. Reactions were performed in the presence of etoposide (100 µM). y S740W, yeast top2S740W; h S763W, human top2alpha S763W; WT, wild type.

Base Preference of Etoposide-induced, Heat-stable Cleavage Complexes Induced by Human Top2alpha S763W-- We recently reported that cleavage complexes mediated by yeast top2S740W in the presence of etoposide have enhanced stability (24, 38). The effect of the Ser763 right-arrow Trp mutation on the stability of human top2alpha -DNA cleavage complexes was determined by examining the heat reversibility of the ternary complexes formed with drug, protein, and DNA. Cleavage reactions were carried out with the human top2alpha or top2alpha S763W for 30 min at 37 °C, after which reaction mixtures were heated to 65 °C for various times prior to the addition of SDS. Fig. 11 shows that most of the etoposide-stabilized cleavage sites were readily reversible for the wild-type protein. In contrast, a number of cleavage sites induced by the human top2alpha S763W showed slow reversal (positions 3091, 3207, 3223, 3238, 3124, 3183, etc.) or no detectable reversal after incubation at 65 °C for 20 min (positions 3167, 3171, 3252, 3170, 3174, 3210, etc.). Enhanced heat stability of the DNA cleavage sites induced by human top2alpha S763W was also observed in other c-MYC DNA fragments (data not shown). Enhanced heat stability was also observed with the human wild-type top2alpha at certain sites (positions 3252, 3175, 3194, 3178, etc.). However, the stability was considerably less than for the human top2alpha S763W protein. As already shown for yeast top2S740W (24), cleavage sites with slow reversibility exhibited highly significant preferences for C-1 in combination with less strong C-2 preference in human top2alpha S763W, whereas rapidly reversible cleavage sites did not show any preferences at positions -1 and -2 (data not shown). Hence, both mutations Ser740 right-arrow Trp in yeast and Ser763 right-arrow Trp in human top2alpha similarly alter the DNA recognition of the corresponding enzyme, markedly affect the interaction with inhibitors, and enhance the stability of the top2 cleavage complexes in the presence of etoposide.


View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 11.   Cleavage complexes stabilized by etoposide with human top2alpha S763W exhibit enhanced heat stability. A 254-base pair DNA fragment from the first c-MYC intron was prepared. Panel A, labeling of the upper DNA strand at position 3035. Panel B, labeling of the lower DNA strand at position 3288. Top2 reactions were performed at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of etoposide (100 µM). The reactions were then incubated at 65 °C for the indicated times prior to the addition of SDS and proteinase K. Top2, no drug treatment; Control, no top2, no drug treatment. Numbers correspond to genomic positions of the nucleotide covalently linked to top2. h WT, human wild-type top2alpha ; h S763W, human top2alpha S763W. Connected arrowheads correspond to DNA cleavage sites with a 4-base pair stagger that represent potential DNA double-strand breaks.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The DNA sequence preference of drugs that target DNA top2 has been widely investigated (34). Early studies showed that topoisomerase-targeting drugs influence the sequence specificity of DNA cleavage by top2 compared with sites of DNA cleavage in the absence of drugs (28, 29, 39). Not surprisingly, drugs that bind DNA in the absence of enzyme most commonly resulted in cleavage specificities that differed from that seen with the enzyme in the absence of drug. Nonetheless, the cleavage specificity induced by intercalating drugs frequently differed from that expected, based on the binding of drugs to DNA in the absence of enzyme.

A key issue in understanding the mechanism of action of top2-targeting drugs is the determination of where drugs bind in the covalent complex. Important clues can be obtained from the DNA sequence of cleavage sites induced by intercalating drugs. For example, the intercalator amsacrine with human top2alpha exhibited the strongest preference at the +1 base (29). Recent biochemical studies by Kreuzer and colleagues (17) using a photoreactive amsacrine analog demonstrated reactivity only with the -1 and +1 bases, in agreement with the results suggested from the DNA cleavage pattern.

Only recently have investigators begun to compare the effects of different enzymes on DNA cleavage specificities with the same top2 poison. This problem is of particular interest because mammalian cells express two different top2 isoforms, alpha  and beta  (2). A recent study compared recombinant forms of human alpha  and beta  and found similar cleavage specificities for teniposide and the anthracycline 4-demethoxy-3'-deamino-3'-hydroxy-4'-epidoxorubicin (40). The cleavage specificity was also found to be the same for mouse top2.

Yeast has been commonly used to analyze topoisomerase functions and to study the biochemistry and molecular biology of topoisomerase inhibitors (2, 3, 22). Of particular importance is the determination of two different structures of the breakage/rejoining domains of the enzyme by x-ray crystallography (41, 42). A model for the binding of top2 to DNA has been proposed (43). Although details of specific protein:nucleic acid contacts will require a solution of the structure of the protein bound to DNA, the model is consistent with the notion that residues in the helix-turn-helix domain play key roles in interacting with DNA near the cleavage site and that this domain is also close to sites where top2-targeting drugs interact with DNA (24).

Results reported here showed strong similarities between yeast top2 and recombinant human top2alpha in the cleavage site preferences for several agents. However, several intriguing differences were noted. Interestingly, the non-intercalating agent etoposide showed clear similarities. Both human and yeast top2 have a strong preference for a C at the -1 position, along with a complementary preference for G at the +5 position. In addition, yeast and human enzymes with homologous mutations in the helix-turn-helix domain (Ser740 right-arrow Trp and Ser763 right-arrow Trp for yeast and human, respectively) showed the same change in cleavage specificity, a preference for a C at -2 (and G at +6) that is independent of the base at the -1 position. This result is consistent with an etoposide-binding site that is well conserved between the two enzymes.

Clerocidin is a top2 poison that has an action that is analogous to the Ser740 right-arrow Trp mutant of yeast top2 and the Ser763 right-arrow Trp mutant of human top2alpha . Clerocidin generated heat- and salt-stable covalent complexes with human top2alpha (44) and also heat-stable complexes with yeast top2.2 The sequence preference for clerocidin with human top2alpha was G at position -1 (45), suggesting that interactions between the -1 base and drug may be an important determinant of the stability of covalent complexes.

The helix-turn-helix domain is also important in drug action with the non-intercalating fluoroquinolones. It is well established that amino acids around Ser83 of gyrA are the principal site of resistance mutations to fluoroquinolones in E. coli (32, 46). Biochemical results also suggested the presence of a quinolone-binding site in the vicinity of Ser83 (47). Resistance to quinolones has also been observed in yeast mutants with changes in this region (38, 48). Interestingly, we detected differences between yeast top2 and human top2alpha in DNA cleavage specificity induced by the fluoroquinolone CP-115,953. For all three topoisomerases examined, there were clear sequence preferences at both the -1 and +1 bases. The specificities for all three enzymes were somewhat different, but in each case the specificities at the -1 and +1 positions were pyrimidine and purine, respectively. As was the case for etoposide, complementary preferences, in this case at positions +4 and +5, were also seen.

The most extensive differences between yeast and human top2alpha in cleavage pattern specificities were observed with drugs that intercalate in DNA. For human top2alpha , a preference for A at the +1 position was observed, along with a complementary T+4 preference as previously reported (18, 29). A statistically significant preference at the -1 position was not observed. By contrast, yeast showed a clear preference for T at the -1 position, along with A at +1. Thus, unlike the human enzyme, there is a clear preference with the yeast enzyme at both positions -1 and +1. This result demonstrates that different drugs cannot be categorized just on the DNA sequence preference around the cleavage site.

The differences between human top2alpha and yeast top2 seen with the intercalating drug mitoxantrone are more complicated. Both the human and yeast enzymes exhibited preferences at both -1 and +1 positions, but other preferences were also seen, such as A at position -3 with the human enzyme and C at position +6 with the yeast enzyme. One factor that may contribute to this more complicated pattern is the strong inhibition of cleavage seen at high mitoxantrone concentrations (49-51). Perhaps the complex pattern that arises for both enzymes may be due in part to the ability of mitoxantrone to inhibit cleavage in a sequence-dependent manner.

A recent model has attempted to explain the similar sequence preferences of different top2 poisons by suggesting that drugs that have a common sequence preference share a common pharmacophore (52). In this model, a top2 poison is modeled as consisting of two "modules," one that mediates DNA binding, e.g. which intercalates in DNA, and a second module that interacts with the enzyme. By this model, sequence specificity would be determined mainly by the DNA binding module, whereas the potency of the drug would also depend on the second module. The results presented here demonstrate that the same topoisomerase poison with the same DNA substrate exhibits different sequence specificities with different top2 enzymes. Thus, our results require a modification of the model. For example, enzyme binding, DNA cleavage, and strand separation of the 4-base overlap between sites of cleavage may lead to a reorientation of the drug interacting with DNA (or enzyme), and the reorientation may affect the ability of the drug to prevent religation. Such reorientation seems particularly plausible for a drug molecule like amsacrine that intercalates between the -1 and +1 bases. The reorientation may involve specific contacts between the drug and the enzyme, and these contacts may be different for the yeast and human top2 enzymes.

Recent results from Osheroff and colleagues (19, 53) have stressed the importance of the enzyme in determining cleavage site specificity with non-intercalating top2 poisons. The results described here indicate that the enzyme plays a very important role in the cleavage specificity of intercalating top2 poisons as well. Since intercalators bind DNA with a distinct sequence preference, part of the base sequence specificity of top2 poisoning by these agents depends on drug-DNA interactions. The results presented here highlight the importance of interactions of all three components of the trapped covalent complex with protein, DNA, and drug.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. M. Gellert for providing us with DNA gyrase. We also thank Dr. T. Macdonald, Department of Chemistry of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, and Drs. P. R. McGuirk and T. D. Gootz, Pfizer, for sending us topoisomerase II inhibitors.

    FOOTNOTES

* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant Str 527/1-1, Bonn, Germany.

Supported by NCI Grants CA52814 and CA21765 from the National Institutes of Health and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Bldg. 37, Rm. 5D02, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-4255. Fax: 301-402-0752; E-mail: pommier@nih.gov.

2 J. L. Nitiss, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: top2, topoisomerase II; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Cozzarelli, N. C., and Wang, J. C. (eds) (1990) DNA Topology and Its Biological Effects , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
2. Wang, J. C. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 65, 635-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Nitiss, J. L. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 63-81[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Corbett, A. H., and Osheroff, N. (1993) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 6, 585-597[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Chen, A. Y., and Liu, L. F. (1994) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 34, 191-218[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Beck, W. T., Danks, M. K., Wolverton, J. S., Kim, R., and Chen, M. (1993) Adv. Enzyme Regul. 33, 113-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Kingma, P. S., Burden, D. A., and Osheroff, N. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 3457-3461[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Pommier, Y. (1997) in Cancer Therapeutics: Experimental and Clinical Agents (Teicher, B. A., ed) , pp. 153-174, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
9. Hasinoff, B. B., Hellmann, K., Herman, E. H., and Ferrans, V. J. (1998) Curr. Med. Chem. 5, 1-28[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Froelich-Ammon, S. J., and Osheroff, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21429-21432[Free Full Text]
11. Liu, L. (1994) DNA Topoisomerases: Topoisomerase-targeting Drugs , Academic Press, New York
12. Pommier, Y., Leteurtre, F., Fesen, M., Fujimori, A., Bertrand, R., Solary, E., Kohlhagen, G., and Kohn, K. W. (1994) Cancer Invest. 12, 530-542[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Robinson, M. J., Martin, B. A., Gootz, T. D., McGuirk, P. R., and Osheroff, N. (1992) Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36, 751-756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Maxwell, A. (1992) J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30, 409-414[Free Full Text]
15. Leteurtre, F., Sackett, D. L., Madalengoitia, J., Kohlhagen, G., MacDonald, T., Hamel, E., Paull, K. D., and Pommier, Y. (1995) Biochem. Pharmacol. 49, 1283-1290[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Sissi, C., Bolgan, L., Moro, S., Zagotto, G., Bailly, C., Menta, E., Capranico, G., and Palumbo, M. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 1036-1045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Freudenreich, C. H., and Kreuzer, K. N. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 11007-11011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Capranico, G., and Binaschi, M. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 185-194[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Burden, D. A., and Osheroff, N. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 139-154[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Kingma, P. S., and Osheroff, N. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 1148-1155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Nitiss, J. L., Rose, A., Sykes, K. C., Harris, J., and Zhou, J. (1996) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 803, 32-43[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Reid, R. J., Benedetti, P., and Bjornsti, M. A. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1400, 289-300[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Berger, J. (1998) Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 8, 26-32[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Strumberg, D., Nitiss, J. L., Rose, A., Nicklaus, M. C., and Pommier, Y. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7292-7301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Lindsley, J. E., and Wang, J. C. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 10485-10489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Worland, S. T., and Wang, J. C. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 4412-4416[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Elsea, S. H., Hsiung, Y., Nitiss, J. L., and Osheroff, N. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1913-1920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Capranico, G., Zunino, F., Kohn, K. W., and Pommier, Y. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 562-569[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Pommier, Y., Capranico, G., Orr, A., and Kohn, K. W. (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 5973-5980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Tanizawa, A., Kohn, K. W., and Pommier, Y. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 5157-5166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Osheroff, N., and Zechiedrich, E. L. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 4303-4309[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Kampranis, S. C., and Maxwell, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22606-22614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Spitzner, J. R., Chung, I. K., Gootz, T. D., McGuirk, P. R., and Muller, M. T. (1995) Mol. Pharmacol. 48, 238-249[Abstract]
34. Capranico, G., Guano, F., Moro, S., Zagotto, G., Sissi, C., Gatto, B., Zunino, F., Menta, E., and Palumbo, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12732-12739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Panousis, C., and Phillips, D. R. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1342-1345[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Capranico, G., Binaschi, M., Borgnetto, M. E., Zunino, F., and Palumbo, M. (1997) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 18, 323-329[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Fisher, L. M., Mizuuchi, K., O'Dea, M. H., Ohmori, H., and Gellert, M. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 4165-4169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Hsiung, Y., Elsea, S. H., Osheroff, N., and Nitiss, J. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20359-20364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Leteurtre, F., Kohlhagen, G., and Pommier, Y. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 203, 1259-1267[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Cornarotti, M., Tinelli, S., Willmore, E., Zunino, F., Fisher, L. M., Austin, C. A., and Capranico, G. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 50, 1463-1471[Abstract]
41. Berger, J. M., Gamblin, S. J., Harrison, S. C., and Wang, J. C. (1996) Nature 379, 225-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Fass, D., Bogden, C. E., and Berger, J. M. (1999) Nat. Struct. Biol. 6, 322-326[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Liu, Q., and Wang, J. C. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 20252-20260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Kawada, S., Yamashita, Y., Fujii, N., and Nakano, H. (1991) Cancer Res. 51, 2922-2925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Binaschi, M., Zagotto, G., Palumbo, M., Zunino, F., Farinosi, R., and C