J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28246-28255, October 1, 1999
Molecular Analysis of Yeast and Human Type II Topoisomerases
ENZYME-DNA AND DRUG INTERACTIONS*
Dirk
Strumberg
,
John L.
Nitiss§¶,
Jiaowang
Dong§,
Kurt
W.
Kohn, and
Yves
Pommier
From the Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Division of Basic
Sciences, NCI, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4255 and the § Department of
Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital,
Memphis, Tennessee 38105
 |
ABSTRACT |
The DNA sequence selectivity of topoisomerase II
(top2)-DNA cleavage complexes was examined for the human (top2
),
yeast, and Escherichia coli (i.e. gyrase)
enzymes in the absence or presence of anticancer or antibacterial
drugs. Species-specific differences were observed for calcium-promoted
DNA cleavage. Similarities and differences in DNA cleavage patterns and
nucleic acid sequence preferences were also observed between the human,
yeast, and E. coli top2 enzymes in the presence of the
non-intercalators fluoroquinolone CP-115,953, etoposide, and azatoxin
and the intercalators amsacrine and mitoxantrone. Additional base
preferences were generally observed for the yeast when compared with
the human top2
enzyme. Preferences in the immediate flanks of the
top2-mediated DNA cleavage sites are, however, consistent with the drug
stacking model for both enzymes. We also analyzed and compared
homologous mutations in yeast and human top2, i.e.
Ser740
Trp and Ser763
Trp,
respectively. Both mutations decreased the reversibility of the
etoposide-stabilized cleavage sites and produced consistent base
sequence preference changes. These data demonstrate similarities and
differences between human and yeast top2 enzymes. They also indicate
that the structure of the enzyme/DNA interface plays a key role in
determining the specificity of top2 poisons and cleavage sites for both
the intercalating and non-intercalating drugs.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
DNA topoisomerases are enzymes that catalyze changes in the
topology of DNA via a mechanism involving the transient breakage and
rejoining of phosphodiester bonds in the DNA backbone (1, 2). Studies
in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have demonstrated the
importance of topoisomerases in transcription, DNA replication, and
chromosome segregation. The type II topoisomerases
(top2)1 make transient DNA
double-strand breaks and change the linking number of DNA in steps of
two. They play key roles in DNA metabolism and chromosome structure and
are essential in eukaryotic cells (2, 3). In order to maintain the
integrity of the cleaved DNA during this process, the top2 enzymes form
a proteinaceous bridge that spans the DNA break. This bridge is
anchored by covalent phosphotyrosyl bonds established between each of
the active site tyrosine residues of the homodimeric enzyme and the
5'-DNA termini of the newly created DNA double-strand break (2). Under
physiological conditions, these covalent top2-DNA complexes (referred
to as cleavage or cleavable complexes) are normally short lived
intermediates in the catalytic cycle of the enzyme.
Beyond its vital cellular functions, top2 is the primary cytotoxic
target for some of the most active drugs for the treatment of human
cancers (4-8). Top2 inhibitors can be divided into two groups, top2
catalytic inhibitors and top2 poisons (8). Top2 catalytic inhibitors do
not stabilize DNA cleavage complexes. Bisdioxopiperazines (ICRF 159, 187 (dexrazoxane), and 193) belong to this category (9). Top2 poisons
inhibit the enzyme by increasing the steady-state levels of DNA
cleavage complexes (8, 10, 11). Hence they convert top2 into a
physiological toxin that creates DNA double-strand breaks in the genome
of treated cells (5, 8, 10, 12). Top2 poisons can be further subdivided into two groups as follows: the DNA intercalators that include doxorubicin, mitoxantrone, amsacrine, ellipticines/olivacines, and the
non-intercalators whose main representatives are the
demethylepipodophyllotoxins etoposide (VP-16) and teniposide (VM-26),
the quinolones among which CP-115,953 acts as a dual eukaryotic and
prokaryotic top2 poison (13, 14), and some azatoxin derivatives
(15).
Although top2 cleaves DNA at preferred sequences, little is known
regarding the mechanism by which the enzyme selects its sites of
action. Recent studies with etoposide suggested that etoposide
interacts with top2 rather than with the DNA (7). On the other hand,
studies with a photoactivated amsacrine derivative and with
bisantrene/amsacrine congeners indicated that for these agents,
drug-DNA interactions are critical for the formation of top2-DNA
cleavage complexes (16, 17). Analyses of drug-induced top2 cleavages
revealed drug-specific base preferences in the immediate vicinity of
the cleavage sites. In the case of amsacrine, A at position +1 was
preferred, whereas in the case of etoposide, teniposide, mitoxantrone,
and quinolones the highest preference is for C at position
1 (see
diagram in Fig. 3). From these results, it has been proposed that drugs
bind at the enzyme-DNA interface and form a ternary complex with top2
and the DNA. This model has been referred to as the drug stacking model
(8, 18) or position poison model (19, 20).
Yeast is a powerful model system to study topoisomerase inhibitors (3,
21, 22). However, no detailed comparison has been reported for DNA
cleavage complexes formed by the yeast and the human top2 enzymes.
Furthermore, since detailed fundamental information is available for
the yeast enzyme (2, 23), but not for the human enzymes, direct
comparison of the human and yeast proteins is useful for a structural
understanding of the human enzymes as a drug target. Yeast top2 is also
a potential target for antifungal treatment, and structural differences
between the yeast and human top2 may allow selective targeting of the yeast top2 over its human counterpart. In this way, a clear and detailed comparison between yeast and human top2 is warranted and
necessary. Since mutation of a conserved serine residue
(Ser740
Trp) in yeast top2 was recently reported to
alter both enzyme-DNA and drug interactions (24), the homologous
mutation (Ser763
Trp) in human top2
was analyzed in
this study.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Materials, Chemicals, and Enzymes--
Etoposide (VP16) was
obtained from Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Amsacrine and mitoxantrone were
from the Drug Synthesis and Chemistry Branch (NCI, Bethesda, MD).
Azatoxin and its derivatives were provided by Dr. T. Macdonald,
Department of Chemistry of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA (15).
CP-115,953 was the gift of Drs. P. R. McGuirk and T. D. Gootz
of Pfizer. Drug stock solutions were made in dimethyl sulfoxide
(Me2SO) at 10 mM. Further dilutions were made
in distilled water immediately before use. Human c-MYC inserted into pBR322, restriction enzymes, T4 polynucleotide kinase, polyacrylamide/bisacrylamide, and Taq DNA polymerase were
purchased from Lofstrand Laboratories (Gaithersburg, MD), Life
Technologies, Inc., New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA), or Qiagen Inc.
(Valencia, CA). [
-32P]ATP was purchased from NEN Life
Science Products. PCR oligonucleotide primers were obtained from Life
Technologies, Inc.
Preparation of End-labeled DNA Fragments by PCR--
Three sets
of labeled DNA fragments were prepared from the human c-MYC
gene by PCR. A 254-base pair DNA fragment from the first intron was
prepared between positions 3035 and 3288, with numbers referring to
GenBankTM genomic positions using oligonucleotides
5'-GTAATCCAGAACTGGATCGG-3' for the upper strand and
5'-ATGCGGTCCCTACTCCAAGG-3' for the lower strand (annealing
temperature 56 °C). A 401-base pair DNA fragment from the junction
between the first intron and first exon was prepared between positions
2671 and 3072 using oligonucleotides 5'-TGCCGCATCCACGAAACTTT-3' for the
upper strand and 5'-TTGACAAGTCACTTTACCCC-3' for the lower strand
(annealing temperature 60 °C). A 480-base pair fragment from the
first exon containing promoters P1 and P2 was
prepared between positions 2265 and 2745 using the oligonucleotides 5'-GATCCTCTCTCGCTAATCTCCGCCC-3' for the upper strand and
5'-TCCTTGCTCGGGTGTTGTAAGTTCC-3' for the lower strand (annealing
temperature 70 °C). A 213-base pair fragment from the human
c-JUN gene was prepared between positions 5'-TGTTGACAGCGGCGGAAAGCAGS-3' for the upper strand and
5'-CGTCCTTCTTCTCTTGCGTGGCTCT-3' for the lower strand (annealing
temperature 64 °C). Single end labeling of these DNA fragments was
obtained by 5'-end labeling of the specific primer oligonucleotide. Ten
picomoles of DNA was incubated for 60 min at 37 °C with 10 units of
T4 polynucleotide kinase and 10 pM
[
-32P]ATP (100 µCi) in kinase buffer (70 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 0, 1 M KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and
0.5 mg/ml bovine serum albumin). Reactions were stopped by heat
denaturation at 70 °C for 15 min. After purification using Sephadex
G-25 columns (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), the labeled
oligonucleotides were used for PCR. Approximately 0.1 µg of the
c-MYC DNA that had been restricted by SmaI and
PvuII (fragment 2265-2745) and XhoI and XbaI (fragment 2671-3072 and fragment 3035-3288) was used
as template for the PCR. Ten picomoles of each oligonucleotide primer,
one of them being 5'-labeled, was used in 22 temperature cycle
reactions (each cycle with 94 °C for 1 min, annealing for 1 min, and
72 °C for 2 min). The last extension was for 10 min. DNA was
purified using PCR Select-II columns (5 Prime
3 Prime, Inc.,
Boulder, CO).
Overexpression and Purification of Yeast and Human Topoisomerase
II--
Wild-type yeast and human top2, Ser740
Trp,
and Ser763
Trp proteins were overexpressed using
YEpTOP2-PGAL1 or YEptop2-S*W-PGAL1 using yeast strain
JEL1t1
(25) and purified to homogeneity as described
previously (26). The detailed procedure has been described elsewhere
(27).
Topoisomerase II-induced DNA Cleavage Reactions--
DNA
fragments (5-10 × 104 dpm/reaction) were
equilibrated with or without drug in 1% Me2SO, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM Na2EDTA, 1 mM ATP, and 15 µg/ml bovine serum albumin for 5 min before addition of 8 units (80 ng) of purified top2 in 10-µl final reaction volume. Unless otherwise
indicated, reactions were for 30 min at 37 °C. Reactions were
stopped by adding 1% SDS (v/v) and further digested with proteinase K
(0.4 mg/ml final concentration for 30 min at 55 °C). Calcium-promoted DNA cleavage was performed in the same buffer with 5 mM CaCl2 instead of MgCl2 (24).
Electrophoresis and Base Preference Analysis--
For DNA
sequence analysis, samples were precipitated with ethanol and
resuspended in 5 µl of loading buffer (80% formamide, 10 mM NaOH, 1 mM EDTA, 0, 1% xylene cyanol, and
0.1% bromphenol blue). Samples were heated to 95 °C for 5 min and
thereafter loaded onto DNA sequencing gels (7% polyacrylamide, 19:1
acrylamide/bisacrylamide) containing 7 M urea in 1× Tris
borate/EDTA buffer. Electrophoresis was performed at 2500 V (60 watts)
for 2-3 h. The gels were dried on Whatman No. 3MM paper sheets and
visualized using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA)
and ImageQuant software. The determination of preferred bases around
top2 cleavage sites was done as described previously (28-30).
 |
RESULTS |
Calcium-promoted DNA Cleavages Differ between Human, Yeast, and
Bacteria Top2 Enzymes--
The calcium-promoted, drug-independent DNA
cleavage sites induced by yeast and human wild-type top2 and by
E. coli gyrase (i.e. in bacterial type II
topoisomerase) (31, 32) were mapped on the upper strand of the
c-MYC first intron fragment (Fig.
1). Even in the presence of magnesium,
differences in the cleavage sites could be observed. When magnesium was
replaced by calcium, higher levels of DNA cleavage were seen in the
yeast protein. DNA cleavage sites common to both proteins were seen in
the presence of Ca2+. However, there were also major
differences in the intensity of cleavage at other sites. Although a
number of DNA cleavage sites in yeast were also found in gyrase,
e.g. at positions 3227, 3221, 3064, the majority of cleavage
sites were specific for either protein. These results suggest that
human, yeast, and bacterial top2 are different regarding
Ca2+-promoted DNA cleavage in the absence of a top2
drug.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of Ca2+ on the DNA
cleavage patterns of yeast, human, and bacterial top2 enzymes. A
254-base pair DNA fragment from the human c-MYC first intron
was prepared by PCR between positions 3035 and 3288. The upper strand
was 5'-end-labeled with 32P. Top2 reactions were performed
at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2 or 5 mM CaCl2 as indicated
and stopped by adding EDTA and SDS (25 mM and 1% final
concentrations, respectively). Purine ladder was obtained after formic
acid reaction. h WT, human wild-type top2 ; y
WT, yeast wild-type top2; Gyrase, wild-type gyrase from
E. coli. Numbers correspond to genomic positions
of the nucleotide covalently linked to top2.
|
|
Cleavage Sites Induced by Yeast and Human Top2 in the Presence of
Drugs--
To investigate further possible differences between yeast
and human top2 DNA cleavage patterns, we compared the drug-induced cleavage sites (Fig. 2). Several cleavage
sites induced by etoposide were much stronger with the yeast enzyme,
for example in Fig. 2, panel A, at positions 2816, 2842, 2901, and 2962, and in Fig. 2, panel B, at positions 3171 and 3167. Conversely, some etoposide-induced sites were stronger with
the human than with the yeast enzyme, e.g. in Fig. 2,
panel A, at position 2880 and in Fig. 2, panel B,
at positions 3260, 3252, 3223, 3187, 3149, and 3084.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
DNA cleavage patterns induced in yeast and
human top2 enzymes by non-intercalating and intercalating drugs.
DNA fragments from the junction between the c-MYC first
intron and first exon between positions 2671 and 3072 (panel A) and from the c-MYC first intron (panel
B) were prepared by PCR using one primer labeled with
32P at the 5' terminus. Panel A, labeling of the
lower DNA strand at position 3072. Panel B, labeling of the
upper DNA strand at position 3035. Drugs are indicated above each
lane. Concentrations used were as follows: etoposide, 100 µM; CP-115,953, 100 µM; ciprofloxacin, 100 µM; amsacrine, 200 µM; mitoxantrone, 1 µM; and 11 (4"-nitroanilino)azatoxin, 100 µM. Purine ladder was obtained after formic acid
reaction. Control, no top2, no drug treatment.
Numbers correspond to genomic positions of the nucleotide
covalently linked to top2. y WT, yeast wild-type enzyme;
h WT, human wild-type enzyme.
|
|
In the case of CP-115,953, human top2
caused greater cleavage than
the yeast enzyme at several sites (in Fig. 2, panel A, at
positions 2842, 2880, 2901, and 2996, and in Fig. 2, panel B, at positions 3187, 3149, and 3084). In the case of the
gyrase-specific quinolone ciprofloxacin, yeast top2 showed minimal
cleavage induction at position 3144 (Fig. 2, panel
B).
With amsacrine, human top2
cleaved more extensively than yeast top2
(in Fig. 2, panel A, at positions 2842, 2912, 2962, and 3008 and in Fig. 2, panel B, at positions 3064, 3081, 3084, 3091, and 3118). At some sites (e.g. positions
3144, 3121, and 2974), however, cleavage was stronger with the yeast
enzyme. Similarly, several changes in cleavage sites induced by
mitoxantrone were seen. The azatoxin-derivative
11
(4"-nitroanilino)azatoxin (15) (Fig. 2, panel
A) was markedly more active against the human top2
than
the yeast top2 in the DNA fragment examined. Taken together, these
results show different DNA cleavage patterns for yeast and human top2
in the presence of both intercalating and non-intercalating drugs.
Different Base Preferences of Amsacrine- and
Mitoxantrone-stabilized Cleavage Complexes for the Yeast and Human
Top2--
Because the yeast and human top2 enzymes presented different
cleavage activity in the presence of drugs, we compared the DNA base
preferences for both proteins in the presence of etoposide, amsacrine,
mitoxantrone, and CP-115,953 (Figs. 3-6
and Tables I and II). Cleavage sites for the three c-MYC DNA
fragments and the c-JUN fragment (see "Experimental
Procedures") were analyzed for both DNA strands.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Probability of the observed base frequency
deviations at top2 cleavage sites for the human and yeast wild-type
enzymes in the presence of etoposide. Drug concentration was 100 µM. Position 0 corresponds to the cleavage site. The
panels present the probability of the observed base frequency
deviations from expectation for the indicated enzyme. In the
y axis, P is the probability of observing that
deviation or more, either as excess (above base line) or
deficiency (negative values below base line) relative to the
expected frequency of each individual base (29). Cleavage sites for the
human (panel A) and the yeast (panel B) wild-type
enzymes were analyzed. Drug concentration was 100 µM. A
schematic representation of a top2 cleavage complex is shown between
panels A and B. The top2 covalent linkage to the
5'-DNA termini is shown as a circle at the +1
position.
|
|
For yeast and human proteins, etoposide preferentially stabilized sites
with C at position
1 (C
1) (Fig. 3 and Table
I). This result agrees well with previous analyses (18, 29). Preference on the opposite strand showed a
complementary (although slightly weaker) preference for G at position
+5. Thus, the different cleavage patterns for yeast and human top2 in
the presence of etoposide were not associated with detectably altered
base preferences.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Base distribution at each position of etoposide-, amsacrine-, and
mitoxantrone-induced DNA cleavage sites
Underlined numbers represent base frequencies significantly
(p < 0.001) greater or lower than expected.
|
|
In the presence of amsacrine (Fig. 4 and
Table I), the human enzyme showed a clear preference for
A+1 (47 of 64 sites) and a complementary (although weaker)
preference for T+4 (28 of 64 sites), which conforms with
earlier studies (29, 33, 34). The yeast protein also demonstrated a
strong preference for A+1 (29 of 61 sites) but an
additional preference for T at position
1 (32 of 61 sites) as
well as the complementary A at position +5 (28 of 61 sites), which was
not seen in the human enzyme.

View larger version (90K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Probability of the observed base frequency
deviations at top2 cleavage sites for the human and yeast wild-type
enzymes in the presence of amsacrine (AMSA).
Position 0 corresponds to the cleavage site. The panels
present the probability of the observed base frequency deviations from
expectation for the indicated enzyme. Cleavage sites for the human
(panel A) and the yeast (panel B) wild-type
enzymes were analyzed. Drug concentration was 200 µM.
yWT, yeast wild-type enzyme; hWT, human wild-type
enzyme.
|
|
In case of mitoxantrone (Fig. 5 and Table
I), the consensus sequence for the preferred mitoxantrone intercalation
site (5'-AC(A/G)) (35) was reflected by a preference for
A+1 in yeast top2 (38 of 110 sites) and human top2
(38 of 106 sites). The preference of C at position +2 did not reach
significance for either protein, and position +3 did not show any
preference. The human enzyme showed a strong preference for
C
1 (62 of 106 sites). This preference for
C
1 was also seen in the yeast protein, although less
strong (60 of 110 sites). Besides the yeast protein revealed an
additional preference of T at position
1 (40 of 110 sites) that was
not apparent in the human top2
. In addition to differences in the base preferences for the positions flanking the cleavage sites, the
proteins also showed individual preferences at positions
3 and +8 for
the human top2
and at positions
9 and +6 for the yeast top2. Thus,
our data show significant differences in base sequence preferences
between human and yeast top2 enzymes in the presence of amsacrine and
mitoxantrone. In the case of etoposide, no significant difference in
base preference was observed despite clear differences in observed DNA
cleavage patterns.

View larger version (82K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Probability of the observed base frequency
deviations at top2 cleavage sites for the human and yeast wild-type
enzymes in the presence of mitoxantrone. Position 0 corresponds to
the cleavage site. The panels present the probability of the
observed base frequency deviations from expectation for the indicated
enzyme. Cleavage sites for the human (panel A) and the yeast
(panel B) wild-type enzymes were analyzed. Drug
concentration was 1 µM. yWT, yeast wild-type
enzyme; hWT, human wild-type enzyme.
|
|
Different Base Preferences for Yeast, Human, and E. coli Top2 in
the Presence of CP-115,953--
In the presence of the fluoroquinolone
CP-115,953 (Fig. 6 and Table
II), the human protein preferred cleavage
sites with C
1 (44 of 79 sites), A+1 (38 of 79 sites), and (more weakly) A
2 (29 of 79 sites). These
results are consistent with other reports (33, 36). Complementary
preferences for T+4 and G+5 were also observed.
The yeast top2 showed additional preferences for T
1
(C
1 and T
1, 49 of 65 sites) and for
G+1 (A+1 and G+1, 54 of 65 sites).
There was no clear preference at position
2 for the yeast protein.
Interestingly, gyrase showed the T
1 and G+1
preferences observed for yeast top2 (41 and 50 of 107 sites, respectively). These preferences are in agreement with previous reports
obtained with a different fluoroquinolone (37). Thus, it appears that
the base preferences for the CP-115,953-induced sites in gyrase are
more similar to the yeast than to the human top2
.

View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analysis of base preferences at top2 cleavage
sites for the human, yeast, and bacterial wild-type enzymes in the
presence of CP-115,953. (100 µM). Position 0 corresponds to the
cleavage site. Panels A C, probability of the observed base
frequency deviations from expectation. Cleavage sites for the human
(panel A), the yeast (panel B), and the
E. coli (panel C) wild-type enzymes
were analyzed. yWT, yeast wild-type enzyme; hWT,
human wild-type enzyme.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Base distribution at each position of CP-115,953-induced DNA cleavage
sites
Underlined numbers represent base frequencies significantly
(p < 0.001) greater or lower than expected.
|
|
Homologous Mutations of Conserved Serine Residues Alter the
Enzyme-DNA and Drug Interactions for Both Yeast and Human Top2--
We
recently reported that mutation of Ser740
Trp in yeast
top2 affects both DNA and drug interactions (24). To analyze the effect
of the homologous mutation in human top2
(Ser763
Trp), we compared the calcium-promoted DNA cleavages for both mutant
proteins (Fig. 7). Even in the absence of
drug (in the presence of Mg2+), both mutants presented
different cleavage patterns compared with the corresponding wild-type
proteins. When magnesium was replaced by calcium, higher levels of DNA
cleavage were only seen in the yeast proteins, i.e. in the
wild-type enzyme and in top2S740W. New DNA cleavage sites
common to both of the mutant proteins were seen in the presence of
Mg2+ and Ca2+, although there were considerable
differences in cleavage intensity. Most of the DNA cleavage sites
in the upper and lower strands were staggered by 4 base pairs with a
5'-overhang, as expected for concerted top2-induced double-strand
cleavage (see Fig. 3) (2, 8, 11).

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Homologous mutations in yeast top2 and human
top2 alter the calcium-promoted DNA
cleavages. A 254-base pair DNA fragment from the first
c-MYC intron was prepared. Panel A, labeling of
the upper DNA strand at position 3035. Panel B, labeling of
the lower DNA strand at position 3288. Top2 reactions were performed at
37 °C for 30 min in the presence of 5 mM
MgCl2 or 5 mM CaCl2 as indicated
and stopped by adding EDTA and SDS (25 mM and 1% final
concentrations, respectively). Purine ladders were obtained after
formic acid reaction. y WT, yeast wild-type top2; h
WT, human wild-type top2 ; y S740W, yeast
top2S740W; h S763W, human
top2 S763W. Double-headed arrows correspond to
DNA cleavage sites with a 4-base pair stagger that represent potential
DNA double-strand breaks.
|
|
Since the Ser740
Trp mutation in yeast affects the DNA
cleavage patterns induced by both intercalating and non-intercalating drugs (24) and confers partial resistance to fluoroquinolones and
collateral hypersensitivity to etoposide (38), we compared the
drug-induced DNA cleavage sites for the human top2
S763W
protein to the corresponding wild-type human top2
(Fig.
8). Several cleavage sites induced in the
presence of CP-115,953 were markedly reduced in the
top2
S763W (at positions 2842, 2883, 2901, 2908, 2912, and 2959). On the other hand, the human top2
S763W caused
increased cleavage at specific sites in the presence of etoposide (at
positions 2771, 2784, 2816, 2901, and 2996), compared with the human
wild-type top2
. Reduced cleavage in the presence of etoposide was
detected at other sites (for instance at 2974). Multiple changes were
also observed in cleavage sites induced in the presence of amsacrine
and mitoxantrone (Fig. 8). Taken together, these results show that both
mutations, yeast top2S740W and human
top2
S763W, alter DNA cleavage in the absence or presence
of top2 poisons.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Ser763 Trp mutation in human top2 alters DNA
cleavage patterns induced by various top2 inhibitors in the human
c-MYC gene. A DNA fragment from the junction
between the c-MYC first intron and first exon between
positions 2671 and 3072 was labeled at the lower DNA strand at position
3072 with 32P. Drugs are indicated above each
lane. Concentrations used were as follows: etoposide, 100 µM; CP-115,953, 100 µM; amsacrine, 200 µM; and mitoxantrone, 1 µM. Purine ladder
was obtained after formic acid reaction. Control, no top2,
no drug treatment. Numbers correspond to genomic positions
of the nucleotide covalently linked to top2. H WT, human
wild-type top2 ; h S763W, human
top2 S763W.
|
|
Same Base Preference Alterations of the Etoposide-stabilized
Cleavage Sites for the Yeast Mutant Top2S740W and the Human
Mutant Top2
S763W--
As described above, the yeast
top2S740W and the human top2
S763W are
hypersensitive to etoposide. Since the Ser740
Trp
mutation affects the DNA base preference of yeast top2 in the presence
of this drug (24), it was therefore of interest to examine the effect
of homologous mutation in the human protein. Cleavage sites for three
c-MYC DNA fragments and one c-JUN fragment (see
"Experimental Procedures") were analyzed for both DNA strands (Fig.
9 and Table
III). As already shown for the human and
yeast wild-type top2 enzymes (see above), both yeast
top2S740W and human top2
S763W demonstrated a
strong preference for C
1 in combination with the
complementary (although slightly weaker) preference for
G+5. Human top2
S763W and yeast
top2S740W extended the cleavage site preferences to include
the C
2 and G+6 positions. It is remarkable
that this relaxation of recognition position occurred in the same way
in both the human and the yeast enzymes (Fig. 9) (24). A
2 test indicated that the combination of the
C
1 and C
2 preference in yeast
top2S740W as well as in human top2
S763W was
not significantly more frequent than having C
1 or
C
2 alone (data not shown). Thus, the novel
C
2 base preference in both mutant proteins is independent
of the C
1 preference. These data suggest a change in the
protein-DNA interaction resulting from the homologous mutations
Ser740
Trp in yeast and Ser763
Trp in
human top2
, leading to an extension of the base preference to
C
2 in the presence of etoposide.

View larger version (78K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Probability of the observed base frequency
deviations at top2 cleavage sites for yeast top2S740W and
human top2 S763W in the presence of
etoposide. Reactions were performed in the presence of etoposide
(100 µM). Panels A and B, position
0 corresponds to the cleavage site. Probability of the observed base
frequency deviations from expectation. y, yeast;
h, human.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Base distribution of DNA cleavage sites for top2S740W or
top2S763W in the presence of etoposide
Underlined numbers represent base frequencies significantly
(p < 0.001) greater or lower than expected.
|
|
Since we demonstrated that the Ser740
Trp in yeast and
the Ser763
Trp mutation in human top2
increased
sensitivity to etoposide and changed the base preferences in the same
way, we tested whether human top2
S763W and yeast
top2S740W enhanced DNA cleavage by etoposide at the same
positions. Fig. 10 shows that a number
of cleavage sites were enhanced for both mutant proteins (at positions
3252, 3091, 2996, 2959 and to lesser extent at positions 3141 and
3073). In addition, reduced cleavage for both mutants was observed at
positions 2974 and 3121. Several sites, however, showed differences
between human top2
S763W and yeast top2S740W,
e.g. at positions 3026, 3020, 2901, and 2816. In particular, cleavage at position 3175 was enhanced for yeast top2S740W
but markedly reduced for human top2
S763W. Thus, human
top2
S763W and yeast top2S740W preserve, at
least partially, the differences described above between human and
yeast protein-DNA interactions.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Comparison of yeast top2S740W-
and human top2 S763W-induced DNA
cleavage sites in the presence of etoposide. DNA fragments were
the same as described for Fig. 2. Reactions were performed in the
presence of etoposide (100 µM). y S740W, yeast
top2S740W; h S763W, human
top2 S763W; WT, wild type.
|
|
Base Preference of Etoposide-induced, Heat-stable Cleavage
Complexes Induced by Human Top2
S763W--
We recently
reported that cleavage complexes mediated by yeast
top2S740W in the presence of etoposide have enhanced
stability (24, 38). The effect of the Ser763
Trp
mutation on the stability of human top2
-DNA cleavage complexes was
determined by examining the heat reversibility of the ternary complexes
formed with drug, protein, and DNA. Cleavage reactions were carried out
with the human top2
or top2
S763W for 30 min at
37 °C, after which reaction mixtures were heated to 65 °C for
various times prior to the addition of SDS. Fig. 11 shows that most of the
etoposide-stabilized cleavage sites were readily reversible for the
wild-type protein. In contrast, a number of cleavage sites induced by
the human top2
S763W showed slow reversal (positions
3091, 3207, 3223, 3238, 3124, 3183, etc.) or no detectable reversal
after incubation at 65 °C for 20 min (positions 3167, 3171, 3252, 3170, 3174, 3210, etc.). Enhanced heat stability of the DNA cleavage
sites induced by human top2
S763W was also observed in
other c-MYC DNA fragments (data not shown). Enhanced heat
stability was also observed with the human wild-type top2
at certain
sites (positions 3252, 3175, 3194, 3178, etc.). However, the stability
was considerably less than for the human top2
S763W
protein. As already shown for yeast top2S740W (24),
cleavage sites with slow reversibility exhibited highly significant
preferences for C
1 in combination with less strong
C
2 preference in human top2
S763W, whereas
rapidly reversible cleavage sites did not show any preferences at
positions
1 and
2 (data not shown). Hence, both mutations Ser740
Trp in yeast and Ser763
Trp in
human top2
similarly alter the DNA recognition of the corresponding
enzyme, markedly affect the interaction with inhibitors, and enhance
the stability of the top2 cleavage complexes in the presence of
etoposide.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Cleavage complexes stabilized by etoposide
with human top2 S763W exhibit
enhanced heat stability. A 254-base pair DNA fragment from the
first c-MYC intron was prepared. Panel A,
labeling of the upper DNA strand at position 3035. Panel B,
labeling of the lower DNA strand at position 3288. Top2 reactions were
performed at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of etoposide (100 µM). The reactions were then incubated at 65 °C for
the indicated times prior to the addition of SDS and proteinase K. Top2, no drug treatment; Control, no top2, no
drug treatment. Numbers correspond to genomic positions of
the nucleotide covalently linked to top2. h WT, human
wild-type top2 ; h S763W, human top2 S763W.
Connected arrowheads correspond to DNA cleavage sites with a
4-base pair stagger that represent potential DNA double-strand
breaks.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The DNA sequence preference of drugs that target DNA top2 has been
widely investigated (34). Early studies showed that
topoisomerase-targeting drugs influence the sequence specificity of DNA
cleavage by top2 compared with sites of DNA cleavage in the absence of
drugs (28, 29, 39). Not surprisingly, drugs that bind DNA in the
absence of enzyme most commonly resulted in cleavage specificities that differed from that seen with the enzyme in the absence of drug. Nonetheless, the cleavage specificity induced by intercalating drugs
frequently differed from that expected, based on the binding of drugs
to DNA in the absence of enzyme.
A key issue in understanding the mechanism of action of top2-targeting
drugs is the determination of where drugs bind in the covalent complex.
Important clues can be obtained from the DNA sequence of cleavage sites
induced by intercalating drugs. For example, the intercalator amsacrine
with human top2
exhibited the strongest preference at the +1 base
(29). Recent biochemical studies by Kreuzer and colleagues (17) using a
photoreactive amsacrine analog demonstrated reactivity only with the
1 and +1 bases, in agreement with the results suggested from the DNA cleavage pattern.
Only recently have investigators begun to compare the effects of
different enzymes on DNA cleavage specificities with the same top2
poison. This problem is of particular interest because mammalian cells
express two different top2 isoforms,
and
(2). A recent study
compared recombinant forms of human
and
and found similar
cleavage specificities for teniposide and the anthracycline 4-demethoxy-3'-deamino-3'-hydroxy-4'-epidoxorubicin (40). The cleavage
specificity was also found to be the same for mouse top2.
Yeast has been commonly used to analyze topoisomerase functions and to
study the biochemistry and molecular biology of topoisomerase inhibitors (2, 3, 22). Of particular importance is the determination of
two different structures of the breakage/rejoining domains of the
enzyme by x-ray crystallography (41, 42). A model for the binding of
top2 to DNA has been proposed (43). Although details of specific
protein:nucleic acid contacts will require a solution of the structure
of the protein bound to DNA, the model is consistent with the notion
that residues in the helix-turn-helix domain play key roles in
interacting with DNA near the cleavage site and that this domain is
also close to sites where top2-targeting drugs interact with DNA
(24).
Results reported here showed strong similarities between yeast top2 and
recombinant human top2
in the cleavage site preferences for several
agents. However, several intriguing differences were noted.
Interestingly, the non-intercalating agent etoposide showed clear
similarities. Both human and yeast top2 have a strong preference for a
C at the
1 position, along with a complementary preference for G at
the +5 position. In addition, yeast and human enzymes with homologous
mutations in the helix-turn-helix domain (Ser740
Trp
and Ser763
Trp for yeast and human, respectively)
showed the same change in cleavage specificity, a preference for a C at
2 (and G at +6) that is independent of the base at the
1 position.
This result is consistent with an etoposide-binding site that is well
conserved between the two enzymes.
Clerocidin is a top2 poison that has an action that is analogous to the
Ser740
Trp mutant of yeast top2 and the
Ser763
Trp mutant of human top2
. Clerocidin
generated heat- and salt-stable covalent complexes with human top2
(44) and also heat-stable complexes with yeast
top2.2 The sequence
preference for clerocidin with human top2
was G at position
1
(45), suggesting that interactions between the
1 base and drug may be
an important determinant of the stability of covalent complexes.
The helix-turn-helix domain is also important in drug action with the
non-intercalating fluoroquinolones. It is well established that amino
acids around Ser83 of gyrA are the principal
site of resistance mutations to fluoroquinolones in E. coli
(32, 46). Biochemical results also suggested the presence of a
quinolone-binding site in the vicinity of Ser83 (47).
Resistance to quinolones has also been observed in yeast mutants with
changes in this region (38, 48). Interestingly, we detected differences
between yeast top2 and human top2
in DNA cleavage specificity
induced by the fluoroquinolone CP-115,953. For all three topoisomerases
examined, there were clear sequence preferences at both the
1 and +1
bases. The specificities for all three enzymes were somewhat different,
but in each case the specificities at the
1 and +1 positions were
pyrimidine and purine, respectively. As was the case for etoposide,
complementary preferences, in this case at positions +4 and +5, were
also seen.
The most extensive differences between yeast and human top2
in
cleavage pattern specificities were observed with drugs that intercalate in DNA. For human top2
, a preference for A at the +1
position was observed, along with a complementary T+4
preference as previously reported (18, 29). A statistically significant
preference at the
1 position was not observed. By contrast, yeast
showed a clear preference for T at the
1 position, along with A at
+1. Thus, unlike the human enzyme, there is a clear preference with the
yeast enzyme at both positions
1 and +1. This result demonstrates
that different drugs cannot be categorized just on the DNA sequence
preference around the cleavage site.
The differences between human top2
and yeast top2 seen with the
intercalating drug mitoxantrone are more complicated. Both the human
and yeast enzymes exhibited preferences at both
1 and +1 positions,
but other preferences were also seen, such as A at position
3 with
the human enzyme and C at position +6 with the yeast enzyme. One factor
that may contribute to this more complicated pattern is the strong
inhibition of cleavage seen at high mitoxantrone concentrations
(49-51). Perhaps the complex pattern that arises for both enzymes may
be due in part to the ability of mitoxantrone to inhibit cleavage in a
sequence-dependent manner.
A recent model has attempted to explain the similar sequence
preferences of different top2 poisons by suggesting that drugs that
have a common sequence preference share a common pharmacophore (52). In
this model, a top2 poison is modeled as consisting of two
"modules," one that mediates DNA binding, e.g. which
intercalates in DNA, and a second module that interacts with the
enzyme. By this model, sequence specificity would be determined mainly
by the DNA binding module, whereas the potency of the drug would also
depend on the second module. The results presented here demonstrate that the same topoisomerase poison with the same DNA substrate exhibits
different sequence specificities with different top2 enzymes. Thus, our
results require a modification of the model. For example, enzyme
binding, DNA cleavage, and strand separation of the 4-base overlap
between sites of cleavage may lead to a reorientation of the drug
interacting with DNA (or enzyme), and the reorientation may affect the
ability of the drug to prevent religation. Such reorientation seems
particularly plausible for a drug molecule like amsacrine that
intercalates between the
1 and +1 bases. The reorientation may
involve specific contacts between the drug and the enzyme, and these
contacts may be different for the yeast and human top2 enzymes.
Recent results from Osheroff and colleagues (19, 53) have stressed the
importance of the enzyme in determining cleavage site specificity with
non-intercalating top2 poisons. The results described here indicate
that the enzyme plays a very important role in the cleavage specificity
of intercalating top2 poisons as well. Since intercalators bind DNA
with a distinct sequence preference, part of the base sequence
specificity of top2 poisoning by these agents depends on drug-DNA
interactions. The results presented here highlight the importance of
interactions of all three components of the trapped covalent complex
with protein, DNA, and drug.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. M. Gellert for providing us with
DNA gyrase. We also thank Dr. T. Macdonald, Department of Chemistry of
Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, and Drs. P. R. McGuirk and T. D. Gootz, Pfizer, for sending us topoisomerase II inhibitors.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant Str
527/1-1, Bonn, Germany.
¶
Supported by NCI Grants CA52814 and CA21765 from the National
Institutes of Health and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of
Molecular Pharmacology, Bldg. 37, Rm. 5D02, NIH, Bethesda, MD
20892-4255. Fax: 301-402-0752; E-mail: pommier@nih.gov.
2
J. L. Nitiss, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
top2, topoisomerase
II;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cozzarelli, N. C., and Wang, J. C.
(eds)
(1990)
DNA Topology and Its Biological Effects
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 2.
|
Wang, J. C.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
65,
635-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Nitiss, J. L.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1400,
63-81[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Corbett, A. H.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1993)
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
6,
585-597[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Chen, A. Y.,
and Liu, L. F.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
34,
191-218[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Beck, W. T.,
Danks, M. K.,
Wolverton, J. S.,
Kim, R.,
and Chen, M.
(1993)
Adv. Enzyme Regul.
33,
113-127[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Kingma, P. S.,
Burden, D. A.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1999)
Biochemistry
38,
3457-3461[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Pommier, Y.
(1997)
in
Cancer Therapeutics: Experimental and Clinical Agents
(Teicher, B. A., ed)
, pp. 153-174, Humana Press Inc., Totowa, NJ
|
| 9.
|
Hasinoff, B. B.,
Hellmann, K.,
Herman, E. H.,
and Ferrans, V. J.
(1998)
Curr. Med. Chem.
5,
1-28[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Froelich-Ammon, S. J.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21429-21432[Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Liu, L.
(1994)
DNA Topoisomerases: Topoisomerase-targeting Drugs
, Academic Press, New York
|
| 12.
|
Pommier, Y.,
Leteurtre, F.,
Fesen, M.,
Fujimori, A.,
Bertrand, R.,
Solary, E.,
Kohlhagen, G.,
and Kohn, K. W.
(1994)
Cancer Invest.
12,
530-542[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Robinson, M. J.,
Martin, B. A.,
Gootz, T. D.,
McGuirk, P. R.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1992)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36,
751-756[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Maxwell, A.
(1992)
J. Antimicrob. Chemother.
30,
409-414[Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Leteurtre, F.,
Sackett, D. L.,
Madalengoitia, J.,
Kohlhagen, G.,
MacDonald, T.,
Hamel, E.,
Paull, K. D.,
and Pommier, Y.
(1995)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
49,
1283-1290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Sissi, C.,
Bolgan, L.,
Moro, S.,
Zagotto, G.,
Bailly, C.,
Menta, E.,
Capranico, G.,
and Palumbo, M.
(1998)
Mol. Pharmacol.
54,
1036-1045[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Freudenreich, C. H.,
and Kreuzer, K. N.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11007-11011[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Capranico, G.,
and Binaschi, M.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1400,
185-194[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Burden, D. A.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1400,
139-154[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Kingma, P. S.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
1148-1155[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Nitiss, J. L.,
Rose, A.,
Sykes, K. C.,
Harris, J.,
and Zhou, J.
(1996)
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.
803,
32-43[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Reid, R. J.,
Benedetti, P.,
and Bjornsti, M. A.
(1998)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1400,
289-300[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Berger, J.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
8,
26-32[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Strumberg, D.,
Nitiss, J. L.,
Rose, A.,
Nicklaus, M. C.,
and Pommier, Y.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
7292-7301[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Lindsley, J. E.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10485-10489[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Worland, S. T.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
4412-4416[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Elsea, S. H.,
Hsiung, Y.,
Nitiss, J. L.,
and Osheroff, N.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1913-1920[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Capranico, G.,
Zunino, F.,
Kohn, K. W.,
and Pommier, Y.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
562-569[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Pommier, Y.,
Capranico, G.,
Orr, A.,
and Kohn, K. W.
(1991)
Nucleic Acids Res.
19,
5973-5980[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Tanizawa, A.,
Kohn, K. W.,
and Pommier, Y.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
5157-5166[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Osheroff, N.,
and Zechiedrich, E. L.
(1987)
Biochemistry
26,
4303-4309[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Kampranis, S. C.,
and Maxwell, A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
22606-22614[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Spitzner, J. R.,
Chung, I. K.,
Gootz, T. D.,
McGuirk, P. R.,
and Muller, M. T.
(1995)
Mol. Pharmacol.
48,
238-249[Abstract]
|
| 34.
|
Capranico, G.,
Guano, F.,
Moro, S.,
Zagotto, G.,
Sissi, C.,
Gatto, B.,
Zunino, F.,
Menta, E.,
and Palumbo, M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
12732-12739[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Panousis, C.,
and Phillips, D. R.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
1342-1345[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Capranico, G.,
Binaschi, M.,
Borgnetto, M. E.,
Zunino, F.,
and Palumbo, M.
(1997)
Trends Pharmacol. Sci.
18,
323-329[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Fisher, L. M.,
Mizuuchi, K.,
O'Dea, M. H.,
Ohmori, H.,
and Gellert, M.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
4165-4169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Hsiung, Y.,
Elsea, S. H.,
Osheroff, N.,
and Nitiss, J. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20359-20364[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Leteurtre, F.,
Kohlhagen, G.,
and Pommier, Y.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
203,
1259-1267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Cornarotti, M.,
Tinelli, S.,
Willmore, E.,
Zunino, F.,
Fisher, L. M.,
Austin, C. A.,
and Capranico, G.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
50,
1463-1471[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Berger, J. M.,
Gamblin, S. J.,
Harrison, S. C.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1996)
Nature
379,
225-232[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Fass, D.,
Bogden, C. E.,
and Berger, J. M.
(1999)
Nat. Struct. Biol.
6,
322-326[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Liu, Q.,
and Wang, J. C.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
20252-20260[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Kawada, S.,
Yamashita, Y.,
Fujii, N.,
and Nakano, H.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
2922-2925[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Binaschi, M.,
Zagotto, G.,
Palumbo, M.,
Zunino, F.,
Farinosi, R.,
and C |