JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haney, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Konisky, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haney, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Konisky, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28453-28458, October 1, 1999


Analysis of Thermal Stabilizing Interactions in Mesophilic and Thermophilic Adenylate Kinases from the Genus Methanococcus*

Paul J. HaneyDagger , Mark Stees, and Jordan Konisky§

From the Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Adenylate kinases (ADKs) from four closely related methanogenic members of the Archaea (the mesophile Methanococcus voltae (MVO), the thermopile Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus (MTH), and the extreme thermopiles Methanococcus igneus (MIG) and Methanococcus jannaschii (MJA)) were characterized for their resistance to thermal denaturation. Despite possessing between 68 and 81% sequence identity, the methanococcal ADKs significantly differed in their stability against thermal denaturation, with melting points ranging from 69 to 103 °C. The high sequence identity between these organisms allowed regions of the MVO and MJA ADKs to be exchanged, producing chimeric ADKs with significantly altered thermal stability. Up to a 20 °C increase or decrease in stability was achieved for chimeric ADKs, whereas 88% of the original protein sequence was maintained. Based on our previous structural modeling studies, we conclude that cooperative interactions within the hydrophobic protein core play an integral role in determining the differences in structural stability observed between the methanococcal ADKs. From comparisons of the effects of temperature on protein unfolding and optimal enzymatic activity, we also conclude that thermostability and enzymatic temperature optima are influenced differently by molecular modifications and thus that the protein flexibility required for activity and stability, respectively, is not unconditionally linked within the methanococcal ADKs.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

There has recently been a drastic increase in the isolation and investigation of microorganisms living under conditions of extreme temperature, pH, or salinity (1). Of particular interest have been studies to delineate those strategies by which hyperthermophiles grow and flourish in natural environments that approach and even exceed 100 °C. This research has focused mainly on the enzymes isolated from these hyperthermophilic organisms and their intrinsic ability to function and remain stable at or near the optimal growth temperature of the organism (2-5).

Although our understanding of protein stability is currently limited, it is apparent that enzymes use different combinations of subtle intramolecular interactions for functional adaptation to high temperatures. These interactions may include hydrogen bonding (3, 6, 7), ionic interactions (8-12), the burying of hydrophobic residues (13-17), minimization of covalent modifications (18, 19), the stabilization of helices (20-23), reduced chain flexibility (24-27), and the stability of oligomeric interactions (28, 29) (for reviews, see Refs. 7, 30, and 31).

Despite numerous comparative studies of proteins from mesophilic and thermophilic organisms, the structural strategies employed in proteins to function in a particular thermal environment have not been fully identified. The interpretation of comparative studies has been limited for several reasons. On the one hand, the net free energy of stabilization of proteins is quite small, and minor changes in structure can significantly affect stability (32, 33); yet numerous changes can be introduced into most proteins with little effect on overall structure or stability (34-36). Thus, thermoadaptive features are often masked by a background of evolutionary sequence divergence, making interpretation of structural differences difficult. Clearly, comparing sets of enzymes from organisms that are phylogenetically related best minimizes the uncertainty in this kind of approach.

Members of the archaeal genus Methanococcus offer an opportunity to compare thermophilic and mesophilic enzyme homologs that share substantial sequence identity (2). We have previously isolated, sequenced, and modeled the structures of the adenylate kinases (ADKs)1 from the mesophilic Methanococcus voltae (MVO), the moderately thermophilic Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus (MTH), and the extremely thermophilic Methanococcus igneus (MIG) and Methanococcus jannaschii (MJA) (37-39). These enzymes share between 68 and 81% sequence identity, yet their temperature optima for enzymatic activity are 37, 68, 80, and 83 °C respectively.

In this study, the wild-type methanococcal ADKs and a series of chimeric ADKs were expressed in Escherichia coli and subsequently analyzed for structural stability versus thermal inactivation and denaturation. Our results lead to two major conclusions: 1) the composition of the terminal regions of the methanococcal ADKs makes a major contribution to their thermal stability and optimal temperature for activity; and 2) the temperature for optimal activity and the thermal stability of the methanococcal ADKs are influenced differently by sequence modifications.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Generation of Chimeric Enzymes-- The methanococcal ADKs contain substantial regions of sequence homology (see Fig. 2). This allowed the generation of hybrid enzymes using the polymerase chain reaction to amplify and then link regions of the MVO and MJA adkA genes (see Olsen et al. (40) and Yon and Fried (41) for a description of this method). The methanococcal adkA genes, cloned into the pET11b vector (Novagen), were used as the target DNA for all polymerase chain reaction amplifications. Amplifications were performed using Vent polymerase and primers homologous to the lac operator, T7 terminator, and conserved regions between MVO and MJA adkA genes (nucleotides 100-119 and 457-477). Site-specific mutagenesis was subsequently performed using mismatched primers in polymerase chain reactions. Polymerase chain reaction fragments coding for chimeric enzymes were cloned into pET11b for expression in E. coli. Each protein-coding region was subsequently sequenced in both directions.

Overexpression and Purification of Chimeric and Wild-type ADKs-- E. coli cells (BL21(DE3)) harboring plasmids directing synthesis of wild-type and chimeric ADKs were grown to an absorbance of 0.6 at 600 nm in the presence of 100 mg/liter ampicillin and then induced with 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside. The cultures were incubated for an additional 2-3 h before harvesting by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended and then ruptured by passage through a French press before clarification by centrifugation. Cell extracts containing thermophilic ADKs were heated at 70 °C for 30 min to denature the E. coli proteins, which were then removed by centrifugation at 303,000 × g for 1 h. ADKs were purified from the supernatant by affinity chromatography on a Cibacron blue column (Sigma) as described previously (37).

Enzyme Assay-- All assays are performed at a final ADK concentration of ~0.0001 mg/ml. For each experiment, ADK was added to a mixture containing 1.0 mM glucose, 0.4 mM NADP+, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.7). Assay solutions were preheated at the desired temperature for at least 4 min before the reaction was started by the addition of ADP (2.5 mM final concentration). Assay solutions were incubated for 3 min before stopping the reactions. For thermal stable ADKs such as MJA, J160V, V36J, VJV, and JVJ, reactions were stopped by rapid cooling in an ice bath. No appreciable activity was observed for these ADKs below 20 °C. Reactions containing mesophilic ADKs were stopped by the addition of perchloric acid (6% final concentration), followed by neutralization and precipitation with KOH and KHCO3 (0.09 and 0.41 M final concentrations, respectively). The thermophilic methanococcal ADKs could not be acid-denatured. Final ATP levels were measured using an ATP-dependent reduction of NADP+ to NADPH involving hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. This reaction was allowed to proceed to completion at 4 °C (~5 min) and then analyzed for absorbance changes at 340 nm. Assays were repeated several times.

Circular Dichroism-- The CD spectra were measured on a Jasco J-720 spectrophotometer (Japan Spectroscopic Co., Ltd.) at protein concentrations of 0.25-0.35 mg/ml in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH. 8.0) and an optical path length of 1 mm.

Thermal Denaturation-- Thermal denaturation curves were obtained by monitoring changes in ellipticity at 222 nm as temperature was increased at a rate of 1.5-3 °C/min. All proteins examined in this study denatured irreversibly at elevated temperatures, preventing direct determination of Tm. Therefore, the midpoint of rapid denaturation was used to estimate the melting point (Tm) ± 0.5 °C. Long exposure of the ADKs to temperatures below that where rapid denaturation occurred resulted in gradual denaturation and aggregation of the protein. Fast heating rates and high starting temperatures were therefore required to estimate the denaturation midpoints. The spectrum of completely denatured ADK lacked any significant absorption between 190 and 250 nm.

Guanidinium Cl Denaturation-- For chemical denaturation, each protein (0.3 mg/ml) was equilibrated at 25 °C in phosphate buffer containing varying concentrations of GdmCl for a minimum of 40 min prior to measurements. Protein denaturation was monitored by change in CD measurements at 222 nm. Each protein reversibly unfolded in the presence of GdmCl in a single cooperative manner. For the extremely thermophilic MJA, V32J, and J160V ADKs, thermal denaturation incorporating varying GdmCl concentrations was performed under conditions identical to those described above. Despite the presence of GdmCl, thermal denaturation remained largely irreversible.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Construction of Chimeric ADKs-- We utilized a set of chimeric adenylate kinase enzymes that combine structural regions of the mesophilic M. voltae (MVO) and hyperthermophilic M. jannaschii (MJA) ADKs to identify structural features that determine the overall thermal stability and temperature activity optimum. The high degree of sequence identity and similarity between the MVO (designated V) and MJA (designated J) ADKs facilitated the generation of chimeric ADKs. For this study, the 36-residue amino-terminal region or the 32-residue carboxyl-terminal region was exchanged to produce chimeras J36V, V36J, V160J, and J160V. Thus, J36V differs from MVO only by the 13 nonconserved residues donated by the MJA N-terminal fragment. Similarly, V36J differs from MJA only by the 13 nonconserved residues donated by the MVO N-terminal fragment. Chimeras formed by the exchange of C-terminal fragments differed from the native enzyme by the 11 nonconserved residues that accompanied fragment exchange. Chimeras with both terminal regions exchanged were also constructed (JVJ and VJV) (Figs. 1 and 2). Overall, chimeras JVJ and VJV retain 88% sequence identity to the recipient ADK and have 80% identity to the ADK that donated the two ends.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Description and properties of native and chimeric adenylate kinases. Chimeras containing a single linkage point are designated according to the position of the last nonconserved residue in the linkage area (J36V represents MJA sequence through residue 36 followed by the remaining MVO sequence). Double chimeras contain the same linkage points as the single chimeras and are named according to the order of sequence fragments (JVJ represents MJA through residue 36, MVO through residue 160, and MJA residues 161-192). Chimeras containing site-specific mutations designate the residues mutated and the region in which they occur. Each Tm was rounded to the nearest 0.5 °C with an approximate error of ±0.5 °C. Asterisks indicate melting points estimated from extrapolations of data from thermal denaturation experiments carried out in the presence of GdmCl.


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Amino acid sequences of the ADKs of MVO (upper row; GenBankTM/EBI accession number U39879) and MJA (lower row; GenBankTM/EBI accession number U39882). Nonconserved residues are in boldface. The terminal regions used in the construction of chimeras have been separated from the main sequences. Sites of mutations are designated by asterisks. The secondary structures predicted from modeling experiments are indicated with E designating beta -sheets and H designating alpha -helices.

These exchanges resulted in the creation of fully functional chimeric enzymes with dramatically altered thermal properties (see below). To characterize the stabilizing interactions within specific regions of the protein, mutations were also introduced into the chimeric proteins JVJ and VJV. These mutations were introduced in pairs so as to increase the chances of identifying potentially small changes in thermostability (see Figs. 1 and 2 for a detailed description of the constructs). Analysis of the circular dichroism spectrum between 190 and 300 nm for each of the chimeras indicated that the chimeric enzymes were identical to the MVO and MJA ADKs in overall secondary structure composition. The effects sequence differences between the MVO and MJA ADKs have on thermal stability and enzymatic activity were assessed by examining the temperature optimum and temperature-dependent denaturation profile for each native and chimeric ADK.

Thermostability-- Thermal denaturation midpoints were determined by monitoring changes in secondary structure content as monitored by CD analysis at 222 nm. As can be seen, native MVO and MTH ADKs denatured irreversibly with midpoints of 69 and 86 °C, respectively (Figs. 3 and 4). However, for the extremely thermophilic MIG and MJA ADKs, rapid unfolding was not achieved within the temperature range limitation of the assay, indicating melting midpoints in excess of 95 °C. To estimate the Tm of the MJA ADK, we monitored denaturation in the presence of increasing amounts of GdmCl and estimated the Tm at zero GdmCl by extrapolation (Fig. 3). Using this method, the melting point of the MJA ADK was estimated to be between 102 and 105 °C, ~34 °C higher than that of the MVO ADK. The validity of this approach was verified by our finding that it accurately predicts the experimentally determined melting point of the MTH ADK in the absence of denaturant. For chimeras V36J and J160V, the addition of GdmCl was also necessary to estimate a Tm (Fig. 3).


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effect of GdmCl on the midpoints of thermal denaturation and linear extrapolation to estimate the stability of extremely thermostable ADKs. The midpoint of denaturation for VJV in the absence of GdmCl is indicated by the arrow. MIG was not purified in sufficient quantities to allow multiple repetitions of this experiment. However, initial trials behaved similarly compared with MJA (data not shown).

The thermal denaturation profiles for the 13 chimeric ADKs are shown in Fig. 4. The addition of either terminal region of the MJA enzyme to the MVO enzyme led to chimeras (J36V and V160J) that manifested only a 4-5 °C increase in thermal stability compared with MVO (Fig. 4A). In contrast, chimera JVJ, which contained both N- and C-terminal regions donated by MJA, displayed a thermal stability that was 20 °C higher than for MVO (Fig. 4A). A similar but opposite trend was seen for the replacement of the MJA termini with the corresponding regions of the mesophilic MVO ADK. Whereas the Tm of VJV was 20 °C less than that of the highly thermophilic MJA, the Tm values of V36J and J160V were only ~5 and 7 °C lower than that of MJA (Figs. 3 and 4B). Additional changes in JVJ and VJV by the introduction of site-specific exchanges at several residue positions (see Fig. 1 for details) led to varying changes in thermal stability, ranging from a 1 °C increase in stability to a 10 °C decrease in stability (Figs. 1 and 4 (A and B)).


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Thermal stability of MVO (A) and MJA (B) ADKs and derived chimeras. Curves represent the percent ADK folded based on measurements of secondary structure according to changes in CD ellipticity at 222 nm. The melting points of MJA, V36J, and J160V were estimated by extrapolation; their Tm values are indicated by the arrows in B. Curves are representative of several experiments.

Examination of the thermal denaturation profiles reveals complex transitions in which the major steep and, presumably, cooperative transition is most often preceded by a less steep and variable transition that occurs at lower temperature. Although it is possible that these results reflect a transition between two states and an even more complex set of transitions, the irreversible nature of ADK thermal denaturation does not allow a detailed and conclusive interpretation of the CD profiles.

Temperature Optimum-- The exchange of the terminal regions between the MVO and MJA ADKs altered the optimal temperature of each enzyme in a direction that reflected the temperature optimum of the enzyme that donated the terminal region. The temperature optima of chimeras J36V, V160J, and JVJ were 8, 16, and 23 °C higher than that of the MVO enzyme (37 °C) (Fig. 5A). In comparison, chimeras V36J, J160V, and VJV had temperature optima that were 11, 8, and 13 °C, respectively, below that of the MJA enzyme (83 °C) (Fig. 5B). The alteration of JVJ and VJV by the introduction of several additional mutations (see Fig. 1) did not alter the temperature optima of the chimeras. Each of the chimeras displayed a specific activity similar to that of the native enzymes, with the exception of JVJ182,185, which had significantly reduced activity levels (data not shown).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Temperature profiles for the activity of MVO (A) and MJA (B) and derived chimeric ADKs. Curves are the average of three or greater independent experiments.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Despite 68% amino acid sequence identity, the temperature optima and thermal melting points of the MVO and MJA ADKs were found to be separated by 45 and 34 °C, respectively. The production and examination of several chimeric enzymes containing regions of these mesophilic and thermophilic ADKs have identified a set of structural modifications responsible, in large part, for the mesophilic and thermophilic nature of the MVO and MJA ADKs.

Whereas the replacement of the 36-residue N-terminal region of MVO with the homologous region derived from MJA to form chimeras J36V and V36J or the replacement of the 32-residue C-terminal region of MVO with the homologous region derived from MJA to form V160J and J160V led to single-substitution chimeras that displayed a modest alteration in temperature stability (±4-7 °C), the replacement of both regions to form JVJ and VJV created chimeras that denatured at a temperature that differed by 20 °C from the native enzymes. These results indicate that the terminal regions cooperate to confer thermal stability to the methanococcal ADKs. Although it is possible that our results reflect a direct interaction between N- and C-terminal regions, a consideration of our results within the context of our previous modeling studies (39) leads us to favor an explanation based on interactions of the terminal regions with the protein core (see below).

Based on the structural models for the methanococcal ADKs, we predict interactions between three amphipathic alpha -helices (residues 143-165, 180-192, and 16-26) and three beta -strands (residues 5-9, 170-173, and 34-37) derived from the exchanged terminal regions with two additional beta -strands (residues 87-90 and 117-121) (Fig. 6). Together, these regions of secondary structure form a substantial portion of the hydrophobic core. The majority of the residues that compose this region are conserved between the mesophilic MVO and thermophilic MJA ADK sequences. There remain a relatively small number of nonconserved residues to influence the thermal integrity of the core area (Fig. 6). A majority of the nonconserved residues are hydrophobic and are located in close proximity to each other. Ordered by proximity, these residues are 8 (Val in MVO/Ile in MJA), 19 (Ser/Thr), 24 (Met/Ile), 36 (Met/Ile), 87 (Val/Ile), and 88 (Ala/Val); 19 (Ser/Val), 32 (Val/Ile), and 188 (Thr/Ile); and 9 (Thr/Val), 117 (Leu/Ile), 120 (Val/Ile), and 173 (Val/Ile). We suggest that it is these residues that are involved in the cooperative interactions that determine enzyme stability by significantly altering hydrophobic packing and water accessibility to the core. This would be consistent with previous sequence analyses from which we concluded that the volume of branched chain hydrophobic amino acid residues play a structural role in conferring thermal stability to the methanococcal proteins (2, 39).


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Modeled structure of the MJA hydrophobic core. A, the regions involved in the construction of chimeras are indicated as follows: blue for the amino-terminal regions, gray for the carboxyl-terminal regions, and brown for the non-terminal regions. Fragments are numbered sequentially from the amino terminus, where the label is at the carboxyl-terminal end of the fragment. B, residues within the core region are color-coded according to physical characteristics: yellow = nonpolar, green = polar, blue = basic, and red = acidic. C, shown are the locations of nonconserved amino acid residues.

Mutational analysis in which we introduced pairs of amino acids within chimeras JVJ and VJV further revealed the importance of the hydrophobic core in determining the overall protein stability of the methanococcal ADKs. J32,36VJ, which was generated from JVJ by the introduction of Val and Met at positions 32 and 36, respectively, exhibited a 6.5 °C decrease in temperature stability compared with JVJ (Val and Met reside at positions 32 and 36, respectively, in MVO). In contrast, the stability of V32,36JV, in which Val-32 and Met-36 were both replaced by introduction of Ile (present at positions 32 and 36 in MJA) was not significantly different from that of VJV.

The results of these changes can be understood by consideration of our previously modeled structures for the methanococcal ADKs (39). This study suggested that residue 32 interacts with residue 19 in the N-terminal region of the protein and residue 188 in the C-terminal region (Fig. 6). These correspond to the interaction of Ile-32 with Val-19 and Ile-188 in MJA and to the interaction of Val-32 with Ser-19 and Thr-188 in MVO. Additionally, residue 36 was predicted to partially interact with residues 20 and 24 (Ile with Thr and Ile in MJA; Met with Ser and Met in MVO). The stabilizing influence of these hydrophobic interactions would not be operative in MVO since MVO Ser-19 and Thr-188 would not participate in stabilizing hydrophobic interactions. Thus, the change from Ile-32 and Ile-36 present in JVJ to Val-32 and Met-32 in J32,36VJ would lead to a disruption in the hydrophobic interactions normally occurring in the MJA ADK and thus explain the reduced stability observed for J32,36VJ. In contrast, the substitution of Val-32 and Met-36 in VJV with Ile-32 and Ile-36 to create V32,36JV would not be expected to lead to a change in thermal stability since the hydrophobic associations are already absent.

The effects of amino acid exchanges introduced into chimera JV117,120J further demonstrate the sensitivity of ADK stability to core modifications. It might have been expected that the highly conservative Leu-to-Ile and Val-to-Leu changes introduced into JVJ to generate JV117,120J would not have had a significant effect on thermal stability, yet a dramatic 10 °C loss in stability was observed. In accordance with our structural model, we believe that the introduction of Ile-117 and Ile-120 to form JV117,120J in combination with the neighboring Ile-119 and Ile-173 significantly increased the side chain volume near the peptide backbone at the beta -carbons, leading to thermal destabilization due to suboptimal packing caused by steric interference. Although we fully appreciate the speculative nature of these interpretations, our results strongly suggest that cooperative interactions and packing within this core region are very important determinants for thermal stability.

Although our thermal denaturation studies on chimeric ADKs clearly demonstrate the importance of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions in determining the overall stability of the methanococcal ADKs, analysis of enzymatic temperature optima indicates that these structural features contribute to catalytic activity and overall protein stability differently. The properties of chimera V160J and the effects of site-specific mutagenesis on chimeras JVJ and VJV best exemplify a partial separation between interactions influencing stability and activity. Whereas construction of chimera V160J resulted in an ~16 °C increase in temperature optima (Fig. 5A), overall thermostability was only changed slightly (+5 °C) (Fig. 4A). Similarly, mutations to chimeras JVJ and VJV had a variety of effects on stability, but failed to have any influence on temperature optima (Fig. 1). These differing results suggest that the temperature optima for enzymatic activity of these ADKs are not determined by the overall flexibility/stability of the protein. This conclusion is consistent with previous studies that have suggested that the active-site region of the enzyme is more flexible than the molecule as a whole (42).

In the course of binding substrates, adenylate kinases undergo two large domain shifts: the first when the protein closes over bound AMP and the second when the large lid domain closes over the active site upon ATP binding in a proposed hinge-like movement between rigid bodies (43-46). Based on our previous modeling studies and assuming a similar substrate binding scheme for the methanococcal ADKs, the terminal regions that we exchanged to construct the MVO/MJA chimeras would not be directly involved in the large domain movements that occur during the substrate-binding cycle. However, they do contain regions that our modeling studies predict would to be in close proximity to the proposed hinge sites (39). The results of this study suggest that the temperature optimum for activity of adenylate kinases may be more dependent on the mechanics of conformational movements and substrate binding than the protein's overall flexibility/stability. This can be seen in the ~10 °C lower temperature optimum of JVJ compared with VJV (60 versus 70 °C, respectively) despite its greater thermal stability (Tm = 85 versus 82.5 °C).

Although our studies demonstrate that the N- and C-terminal regions of the methanococcal ADKs play a major role in determining overall thermal stability and enzymatic activity, it is apparent that additional mutational studies and a complete structural analysis are required to delineate the full range of structural features that confer structural and functional integrity at elevated temperature. These detailed studies are currently underway.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The experiments and analyses of the circular dichroism data were performed at the Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics at the University of Illinois. Automated DNA sequencing was carried out at the Genetic Engineering Facility of the University of Illinois Biotechnology Center.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by Research Grant DOE DE-FG02-84ER13241. Work performed at the Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics was supported jointly by the Division of Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health and the University of Illinois.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Mayo Foundation, 1-135 Medical Sciences Bldg., Rochester, MN 55905.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 7700. Tel.: 713-527-4820; Fax: 713-737-5759; E-mail: konisky@rice.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ADKs, adenylate kinases; GdmCl, guanidinium Cl.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Adams, M. W. W., and Kelly, R. (1995) Chem. Eng. News 73, 32-42
2. Haney, P. J., Badger, J. H., Buldak, G. L., Woese, C. R., and Olsen, G. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3578-3583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Vogt, G., Woell, S., and Argos, P. (1997) J. Mol. Biol. 269, 631-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Querol, E., Perez-Pons, J., and Mozo-Villarias, A. (1996) Protein Eng. 9, 265-271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Bohm, G., and Jaenicke, R. (1994) Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 43, 97-106[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Paupit, R. A., Karlsson, R., Picot, D., Jenkins, J., Niklaus-Reimer, A., and Jansonius, J. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 199, 525-537[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Vogt, G., and Argos, P. (1997) Protein Folding 2, S40-S46
8. Anderson, D. E., Becktel, W. J., and Dahlquist, F. W. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 2403-2308[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Yip, K. S. P., Stillman, T. J., Britton, K. L., Artymiuk, P. J., Baker, P. J., Sedelnikova, S. E., Engel, P. C., Pasquo, A., Chiaraluce, R., Consalvi, V., Scandurra, R., and Rice, D. W. (1995) Structure 3, 1147-1158[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Tomazic, S. J., and Klibanov, A. M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 3092-2096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Szilagyi, A., and Zavodszky, P. (1995) Protein Eng. 8, 779-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Perutz, M. F., and Raidt, H. (1975) Nature 255, 256-259[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Pace, C. N. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 226, 29-35[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Britton, K. L., Baker, P. J., Borges, K. M. M., Engel, P. C., Pasquo, A., Rice, D. M., Robb, F. T., Scandurra, R., Stillman, T. J., and Yip, K. S. P. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 229, 688-695[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ikai, A. (1980) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 88, 1895-1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Shortle, D., Stites, W. E., and Meeker, A. K. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 8033-8041[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Privalov, P. L., and Gill, S. J. (1988) Adv. Protein Chem. 39, 191-232[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Tomazic, S. J., and Klibanov, A. M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 3086-3091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Ahern, T. J., and Klibanov, A. M. (1985) Science 228, 1280-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Nicholson, H., Becktel, W. J., and Matthews, B. W. (1988) Nature 336, 651-655[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Richardson, J., and Richardson, D. (1988) Science 240, 1648-1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Serrano, L., Sanco, J., Hirshberg, M., and Fersht, A. R. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 227, 544-559[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. O'Neil, K. T., and Degrado, W. F. (1990) Science 250, 646-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Menendez-Arias, L., and Argos, P. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 206, 397-406[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Matthews, B. W., Nicholson, H., and Becktel, W. J. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 6663-6667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Suzuki, Y., Oishi, K., Nakano, H., and Nagayama, T. (1987) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 26, 546-551[CrossRef]
27. Suzuki, Y. (1989) Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 65, 146-148
28. Kelly, C. A., Nishiyama, M., Ohnishi, Y., Beppu, T., and Birktoft, J. J. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 3913-3922[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Kirino, H., Aoki, M., Aoshima, M., Hayashi, Y., Ohba, M., Yamagishi, A., Wakagi, T., and Oshima, T. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 220, 275-281[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Pace, C. N., Shirley, B. A., Mcnutt, M., and Gajiwala, K. (1996) FASEB J. 10, 75-83[Abstract]
31. Dill, K. A. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 7133-7155[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Pace, C. N. (1990) Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 14-17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Creighton, T. E. (1990) Biochem. J. 270, 1-16[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Bowie, J. U., Reidhaar-Olsen, J., Lim, W., and Sauer, R. (1990) Science 247, 1306-1310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Heinz, D. W., Baase, W., and Matthews, B. W. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3751-3755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Russell, R., and Barton, G. (1994) J. Mol. Biol. 244, 332-350[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Rusnak, P., Haney, P., and Konisky, J. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 2977-2981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Ferber, D. M., Haney, P. J., Berk, H., Lynn, D., and Konisky, J. (1997) Gene (Amst.) 185, 239-244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Haney, P., Konisky, J., Koretke, K. K., Luthey-Schulten, Z., and Wolynes, P. G. (1997) Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 28, 117-130[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Olsen, O., Borriss, R., Simon, O., and Thomsen, K. K. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 225, 177-185[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Yon, J., and Fried, M. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 4895[Free Full Text]
42. Zhang, Y. L., Zhou, J. M., and Tsou, C. L. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1164, 61-67[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Gerstein, M., Shulz, G. E., and Chothia, C. (1993) J. Mol. Biol. 229, 494-501[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Diederichs, K., and Schultz, G. E. (1991) J. Mol. Biol. 217, 541-549[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Dreusicke, D., Karplus, P. A., and Schulz, G. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 199, 359-371[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Muller, C. W., and Schulz, G. E. (1992) J. Mol. Biol. 224, 159-177[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Bae and G. N. Phillips Jr.
Roles of static and dynamic domains in stability and catalysis of adenylate kinase
PNAS, February 14, 2006; 103(7): 2132 - 2137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. G. Patteson, N. Trivedi, and T. C. Stadtman
Methanococcus vannielii selenium-binding protein (SeBP): Chemical reactivity of recombinant SeBP produced in Escherichia coli
PNAS, August 23, 2005; 102(34): 12029 - 12034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Gu, D. M. Gordon, B. Amutha, and D. Pain
A GTP:AMP Phosphotransferase, Adk2p, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: ROLE OF THE C TERMINUS IN PROTEIN FOLDING/STABILIZATION, THERMAL TOLERANCE, AND ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 18604 - 18609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J BiochemHome page
S. Nishikori, K. Shiraki, M. Okanojo, T. Imanaka, and M. Takagi
Equilibrium and Kinetic Stability of a Hyperthermophilic Protein, O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase under Various Extreme Conditions
J. Biochem., October 1, 2004; 136(4): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. A. McCloskey, D. E. Graham, S. Zhou, P. F. Crain, M. Ibba, J. Konisky, D. Soll, and G. J. Olsen
Post-transcriptional modification in archaeal tRNAs: identities and phylogenetic relations of nucleotides from mesophilic and hyperthermophilic Methanococcales
Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2001; 29(22): 4699 - 4706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Bacteriol.Home page
A. Markaryan, O. Zaborina, V. Punj, and A. M. Chakrabarty
Adenylate Kinase as a Virulence Factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2001; 183(11): 3345 - 3352.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
C. Vieille and G. J. Zeikus
Hyperthermophilic Enzymes: Sources, Uses, and Molecular Mechanisms for Thermostability
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2001; 65(1): 1 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haney, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Konisky, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haney, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Konisky, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.