|
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28453-28458, October 1, 1999
Analysis of Thermal Stabilizing Interactions in Mesophilic and
Thermophilic Adenylate Kinases from the Genus
Methanococcus*
Paul J.
Haney ,
Mark
Stees, and
Jordan
Konisky§
From the Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois,
Urbana, Illinois 61801
 |
ABSTRACT |
Adenylate kinases (ADKs) from four closely
related methanogenic members of the Archaea (the mesophile
Methanococcus voltae (MVO), the thermopile
Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus (MTH), and the extreme
thermopiles Methanococcus igneus (MIG) and
Methanococcus jannaschii (MJA)) were characterized for
their resistance to thermal denaturation. Despite possessing between 68 and 81% sequence identity, the methanococcal ADKs significantly
differed in their stability against thermal denaturation, with melting
points ranging from 69 to 103 °C. The high sequence identity between
these organisms allowed regions of the MVO and MJA ADKs to be
exchanged, producing chimeric ADKs with significantly altered thermal
stability. Up to a 20 °C increase or decrease in stability was
achieved for chimeric ADKs, whereas 88% of the original protein
sequence was maintained. Based on our previous structural modeling
studies, we conclude that cooperative interactions within the
hydrophobic protein core play an integral role in determining the
differences in structural stability observed between the methanococcal
ADKs. From comparisons of the effects of temperature on protein
unfolding and optimal enzymatic activity, we also conclude that
thermostability and enzymatic temperature optima are influenced
differently by molecular modifications and thus that the protein
flexibility required for activity and stability, respectively, is not
unconditionally linked within the methanococcal ADKs.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
There has recently been a drastic increase in the isolation and
investigation of microorganisms living under conditions of extreme
temperature, pH, or salinity (1). Of particular interest have been
studies to delineate those strategies by which hyperthermophiles grow
and flourish in natural environments that approach and even exceed
100 °C. This research has focused mainly on the enzymes isolated
from these hyperthermophilic organisms and their intrinsic ability to
function and remain stable at or near the optimal growth temperature of
the organism (2-5).
Although our understanding of protein stability is currently limited,
it is apparent that enzymes use different combinations of subtle
intramolecular interactions for functional adaptation to high
temperatures. These interactions may include hydrogen bonding (3, 6,
7), ionic interactions (8-12), the burying of hydrophobic residues
(13-17), minimization of covalent modifications (18, 19), the
stabilization of helices (20-23), reduced chain flexibility (24-27),
and the stability of oligomeric interactions (28, 29) (for reviews, see
Refs. 7, 30, and 31).
Despite numerous comparative studies of proteins from mesophilic and
thermophilic organisms, the structural strategies employed in proteins
to function in a particular thermal environment have not been fully
identified. The interpretation of comparative studies has been limited
for several reasons. On the one hand, the net free energy of
stabilization of proteins is quite small, and minor changes in
structure can significantly affect stability (32, 33); yet numerous
changes can be introduced into most proteins with little effect on
overall structure or stability (34-36). Thus, thermoadaptive features
are often masked by a background of evolutionary sequence divergence,
making interpretation of structural differences difficult. Clearly,
comparing sets of enzymes from organisms that are phylogenetically
related best minimizes the uncertainty in this kind of approach.
Members of the archaeal genus Methanococcus offer an
opportunity to compare thermophilic and mesophilic enzyme homologs that share substantial sequence identity (2). We have previously isolated,
sequenced, and modeled the structures of the adenylate kinases
(ADKs)1 from the mesophilic
Methanococcus voltae (MVO), the moderately thermophilic Methanococcus thermolithotrophicus
(MTH), and the extremely thermophilic Methanococcus
igneus (MIG) and Methanococcus jannaschii (MJA)
(37-39). These enzymes share between 68 and 81% sequence identity,
yet their temperature optima for enzymatic activity are 37, 68, 80, and
83 °C respectively.
In this study, the wild-type methanococcal ADKs and a series of
chimeric ADKs were expressed in Escherichia coli and
subsequently analyzed for structural stability versus
thermal inactivation and denaturation. Our results lead to two major
conclusions: 1) the composition of the terminal regions of the
methanococcal ADKs makes a major contribution to their thermal
stability and optimal temperature for activity; and 2) the temperature
for optimal activity and the thermal stability of the methanococcal
ADKs are influenced differently by sequence modifications.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Generation of Chimeric Enzymes--
The methanococcal ADKs
contain substantial regions of sequence homology (see Fig. 2). This
allowed the generation of hybrid enzymes using the polymerase chain
reaction to amplify and then link regions of the MVO and MJA
adkA genes (see Olsen et al. (40) and Yon and
Fried (41) for a description of this method). The methanococcal
adkA genes, cloned into the pET11b vector (Novagen), were
used as the target DNA for all polymerase chain reaction amplifications. Amplifications were performed using Vent
polymerase and primers homologous to the lac operator, T7
terminator, and conserved regions between MVO and MJA adkA
genes (nucleotides 100-119 and 457-477). Site-specific mutagenesis
was subsequently performed using mismatched primers in polymerase chain
reactions. Polymerase chain reaction fragments coding for chimeric
enzymes were cloned into pET11b for expression in E. coli.
Each protein-coding region was subsequently sequenced in both directions.
Overexpression and Purification of Chimeric and Wild-type
ADKs--
E. coli cells (BL21(DE3)) harboring
plasmids directing synthesis of wild-type and chimeric ADKs were grown
to an absorbance of 0.6 at 600 nm in the presence of 100 mg/liter
ampicillin and then induced with 1 mM
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside. The cultures were
incubated for an additional 2-3 h before harvesting by centrifugation.
Cells were resuspended and then ruptured by passage through a French
press before clarification by centrifugation. Cell extracts containing
thermophilic ADKs were heated at 70 °C for 30 min to denature the
E. coli proteins, which were then removed by centrifugation
at 303,000 × g for 1 h. ADKs were purified from the
supernatant by affinity chromatography on a Cibacron blue column
(Sigma) as described previously (37).
Enzyme Assay--
All assays are performed at a final ADK
concentration of ~0.0001 mg/ml. For each experiment, ADK was added to
a mixture containing 1.0 mM glucose, 0.4 mM
NADP+, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM
MgCl2, and 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.7). Assay
solutions were preheated at the desired temperature for at least 4 min
before the reaction was started by the addition of ADP (2.5 mM final concentration). Assay solutions were incubated for
3 min before stopping the reactions. For thermal stable ADKs such as
MJA, J160V, V36J, VJV, and JVJ, reactions were stopped by rapid cooling
in an ice bath. No appreciable activity was observed for these ADKs below 20 °C. Reactions containing mesophilic ADKs were stopped by
the addition of perchloric acid (6% final concentration), followed by
neutralization and precipitation with KOH and KHCO3 (0.09 and 0.41 M final concentrations, respectively). The
thermophilic methanococcal ADKs could not be acid-denatured. Final ATP
levels were measured using an ATP-dependent reduction of
NADP+ to NADPH involving hexokinase and glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase. This reaction was allowed to proceed to completion at
4 °C (~5 min) and then analyzed for absorbance changes at 340 nm.
Assays were repeated several times.
Circular Dichroism--
The CD spectra were measured on a Jasco
J-720 spectrophotometer (Japan Spectroscopic Co., Ltd.) at protein
concentrations of 0.25-0.35 mg/ml in 10 mM phosphate
buffer (pH. 8.0) and an optical path length of 1 mm.
Thermal Denaturation--
Thermal denaturation curves were
obtained by monitoring changes in ellipticity at 222 nm as temperature
was increased at a rate of 1.5-3 °C/min. All proteins examined in
this study denatured irreversibly at elevated temperatures, preventing
direct determination of Tm. Therefore, the midpoint
of rapid denaturation was used to estimate the melting point
(Tm) ± 0.5 °C. Long exposure of the ADKs to
temperatures below that where rapid denaturation occurred resulted in
gradual denaturation and aggregation of the protein. Fast heating rates
and high starting temperatures were therefore required to estimate the
denaturation midpoints. The spectrum of completely denatured ADK lacked
any significant absorption between 190 and 250 nm.
Guanidinium Cl Denaturation--
For chemical denaturation, each
protein (0.3 mg/ml) was equilibrated at 25 °C in phosphate buffer
containing varying concentrations of GdmCl for a minimum of 40 min
prior to measurements. Protein denaturation was monitored by change in
CD measurements at 222 nm. Each protein reversibly unfolded in the
presence of GdmCl in a single cooperative manner. For the extremely
thermophilic MJA, V32J, and J160V ADKs, thermal denaturation
incorporating varying GdmCl concentrations was performed under
conditions identical to those described above. Despite the presence of
GdmCl, thermal denaturation remained largely irreversible.
 |
RESULTS |
Construction of Chimeric ADKs--
We utilized a set of chimeric
adenylate kinase enzymes that combine structural regions of the
mesophilic M. voltae (MVO) and hyperthermophilic M. jannaschii (MJA) ADKs to identify structural features that
determine the overall thermal stability and temperature activity
optimum. The high degree of sequence identity and similarity between
the MVO (designated V) and MJA (designated J) ADKs facilitated the
generation of chimeric ADKs. For this study, the 36-residue amino-terminal region or the 32-residue carboxyl-terminal region was
exchanged to produce chimeras J36V, V36J, V160J, and J160V. Thus, J36V
differs from MVO only by the 13 nonconserved residues donated by the
MJA N-terminal fragment. Similarly, V36J differs from MJA only by the
13 nonconserved residues donated by the MVO N-terminal fragment.
Chimeras formed by the exchange of C-terminal fragments differed from
the native enzyme by the 11 nonconserved residues that accompanied
fragment exchange. Chimeras with both terminal regions exchanged were
also constructed (JVJ and VJV) (Figs. 1
and 2). Overall, chimeras JVJ and VJV
retain 88% sequence identity to the recipient ADK and have 80%
identity to the ADK that donated the two ends.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Description and properties of native and
chimeric adenylate kinases. Chimeras containing a single linkage
point are designated according to the position of the last nonconserved
residue in the linkage area (J36V represents MJA sequence through
residue 36 followed by the remaining MVO sequence). Double chimeras
contain the same linkage points as the single chimeras and are named
according to the order of sequence fragments (JVJ represents MJA
through residue 36, MVO through residue 160, and MJA residues
161-192). Chimeras containing site-specific mutations designate the
residues mutated and the region in which they occur. Each
Tm was rounded to the nearest 0.5 °C with an
approximate error of ±0.5 °C. Asterisks indicate melting
points estimated from extrapolations of data from thermal denaturation
experiments carried out in the presence of GdmCl.
|
|

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Amino acid sequences of the ADKs of MVO
(upper row; GenBankTM/EBI accession number
U39879) and MJA (lower row; GenBankTM/EBI
accession number U39882). Nonconserved residues are in
boldface. The terminal regions used in the construction of
chimeras have been separated from the main sequences. Sites of
mutations are designated by asterisks. The secondary
structures predicted from modeling experiments are indicated with
E designating -sheets and H designating
-helices.
|
|
These exchanges resulted in the creation of fully functional chimeric
enzymes with dramatically altered thermal properties (see below). To
characterize the stabilizing interactions within specific regions of
the protein, mutations were also introduced into the chimeric proteins
JVJ and VJV. These mutations were introduced in pairs so as to increase
the chances of identifying potentially small changes in thermostability
(see Figs. 1 and 2 for a detailed description of the constructs).
Analysis of the circular dichroism spectrum between 190 and 300 nm for
each of the chimeras indicated that the chimeric enzymes were identical
to the MVO and MJA ADKs in overall secondary structure composition. The
effects sequence differences between the MVO and MJA ADKs have on
thermal stability and enzymatic activity were assessed by examining the
temperature optimum and temperature-dependent denaturation
profile for each native and chimeric ADK.
Thermostability--
Thermal denaturation midpoints were
determined by monitoring changes in secondary structure content as
monitored by CD analysis at 222 nm. As can be seen, native MVO and MTH
ADKs denatured irreversibly with midpoints of 69 and 86 °C,
respectively (Figs. 3 and 4). However,
for the extremely thermophilic MIG and MJA ADKs, rapid unfolding was
not achieved within the temperature range limitation of the assay,
indicating melting midpoints in excess of 95 °C. To estimate the
Tm of the MJA ADK, we monitored denaturation in the
presence of increasing amounts of GdmCl and estimated the Tm at zero GdmCl by extrapolation (Fig. 3). Using
this method, the melting point of the MJA ADK was estimated to be
between 102 and 105 °C, ~34 °C higher than that of the MVO ADK.
The validity of this approach was verified by our finding that it
accurately predicts the experimentally determined melting point of the
MTH ADK in the absence of denaturant. For chimeras V36J and J160V, the
addition of GdmCl was also necessary to estimate a
Tm (Fig. 3).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of GdmCl on the midpoints of thermal
denaturation and linear extrapolation to estimate the stability of
extremely thermostable ADKs. The midpoint of denaturation for VJV
in the absence of GdmCl is indicated by the arrow. MIG was
not purified in sufficient quantities to allow multiple repetitions of
this experiment. However, initial trials behaved similarly compared
with MJA (data not shown).
|
|
The thermal denaturation profiles for the 13 chimeric ADKs are shown in
Fig. 4. The addition of either terminal
region of the MJA enzyme to the MVO enzyme led to chimeras (J36V and
V160J) that manifested only a 4-5 °C increase in thermal stability
compared with MVO (Fig. 4A). In contrast, chimera JVJ, which
contained both N- and C-terminal regions donated by MJA, displayed a
thermal stability that was 20 °C higher than for MVO (Fig.
4A). A similar but opposite trend was seen for the
replacement of the MJA termini with the corresponding regions of the
mesophilic MVO ADK. Whereas the Tm of VJV was
20 °C less than that of the highly thermophilic MJA, the
Tm values of V36J and J160V were only ~5 and
7 °C lower than that of MJA (Figs. 3 and 4B). Additional changes in JVJ and VJV by the introduction of site-specific exchanges at several residue positions (see Fig. 1 for details) led to varying changes in thermal stability, ranging from a 1 °C increase in stability to a 10 °C decrease in stability (Figs. 1 and 4
(A and B)).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Thermal stability of MVO (A)
and MJA (B) ADKs and derived chimeras. Curves
represent the percent ADK folded based on measurements of secondary
structure according to changes in CD ellipticity at 222 nm. The melting
points of MJA, V36J, and J160V were estimated by extrapolation; their
Tm values are indicated by the arrows in
B. Curves are representative of several experiments.
|
|
Examination of the thermal denaturation profiles reveals complex
transitions in which the major steep and, presumably, cooperative transition is most often preceded by a less steep and variable transition that occurs at lower temperature. Although it is possible that these results reflect a transition between two states and an even
more complex set of transitions, the irreversible nature of ADK thermal
denaturation does not allow a detailed and conclusive interpretation of
the CD profiles.
Temperature Optimum--
The exchange of the terminal regions
between the MVO and MJA ADKs altered the optimal temperature of each
enzyme in a direction that reflected the temperature optimum of the
enzyme that donated the terminal region. The temperature optima of
chimeras J36V, V160J, and JVJ were 8, 16, and 23 °C higher than that
of the MVO enzyme (37 °C) (Fig.
5A). In comparison, chimeras
V36J, J160V, and VJV had temperature optima that were 11, 8, and
13 °C, respectively, below that of the MJA enzyme (83 °C) (Fig.
5B). The alteration of JVJ and VJV by the introduction of
several additional mutations (see Fig. 1) did not alter the temperature
optima of the chimeras. Each of the chimeras displayed a specific
activity similar to that of the native enzymes, with the exception of
JVJ182,185, which had significantly reduced activity levels (data not
shown).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Temperature profiles for the activity of MVO
(A) and MJA (B) and derived chimeric
ADKs. Curves are the average of three or greater independent
experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Despite 68% amino acid sequence identity, the temperature optima
and thermal melting points of the MVO and MJA ADKs were found to be
separated by 45 and 34 °C, respectively. The production and
examination of several chimeric enzymes containing regions of these
mesophilic and thermophilic ADKs have identified a set of structural
modifications responsible, in large part, for the mesophilic and
thermophilic nature of the MVO and MJA ADKs.
Whereas the replacement of the 36-residue N-terminal region of MVO with
the homologous region derived from MJA to form chimeras J36V and V36J
or the replacement of the 32-residue C-terminal region of MVO with the
homologous region derived from MJA to form V160J and J160V led to
single-substitution chimeras that displayed a modest alteration in
temperature stability (±4-7 °C), the replacement of both regions
to form JVJ and VJV created chimeras that denatured at a temperature
that differed by 20 °C from the native enzymes. These results
indicate that the terminal regions cooperate to confer thermal
stability to the methanococcal ADKs. Although it is possible that our
results reflect a direct interaction between N- and C-terminal regions,
a consideration of our results within the context of our previous
modeling studies (39) leads us to favor an explanation based on
interactions of the terminal regions with the protein core (see below).
Based on the structural models for the methanococcal ADKs, we predict
interactions between three amphipathic -helices (residues 143-165,
180-192, and 16-26) and three -strands (residues 5-9, 170-173,
and 34-37) derived from the exchanged terminal regions with two
additional -strands (residues 87-90 and 117-121) (Fig. 6). Together, these regions of secondary
structure form a substantial portion of the hydrophobic core. The
majority of the residues that compose this region are conserved between
the mesophilic MVO and thermophilic MJA ADK sequences. There remain a
relatively small number of nonconserved residues to influence the
thermal integrity of the core area (Fig. 6). A majority of the
nonconserved residues are hydrophobic and are located in close
proximity to each other. Ordered by proximity, these residues are 8 (Val in MVO/Ile in MJA), 19 (Ser/Thr), 24 (Met/Ile), 36 (Met/Ile), 87 (Val/Ile), and 88 (Ala/Val); 19 (Ser/Val), 32 (Val/Ile), and 188 (Thr/Ile); and 9 (Thr/Val), 117 (Leu/Ile), 120 (Val/Ile), and 173 (Val/Ile). We suggest that it is these residues that are involved in
the cooperative interactions that determine enzyme stability by
significantly altering hydrophobic packing and water accessibility to
the core. This would be consistent with previous sequence analyses from
which we concluded that the volume of branched chain hydrophobic amino
acid residues play a structural role in conferring thermal stability to
the methanococcal proteins (2, 39).

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Modeled structure of the MJA hydrophobic
core. A, the regions involved in the construction of
chimeras are indicated as follows: blue for the
amino-terminal regions, gray for the carboxyl-terminal
regions, and brown for the non-terminal regions. Fragments
are numbered sequentially from the amino terminus, where the label is
at the carboxyl-terminal end of the fragment. B, residues
within the core region are color-coded according to physical
characteristics: yellow = nonpolar,
green = polar, blue = basic, and
red = acidic. C, shown are the locations of
nonconserved amino acid residues.
|
|
Mutational analysis in which we introduced pairs of amino acids within
chimeras JVJ and VJV further revealed the importance of the hydrophobic
core in determining the overall protein stability of the methanococcal
ADKs. J32,36VJ, which was generated from JVJ by the introduction of Val
and Met at positions 32 and 36, respectively, exhibited a 6.5 °C
decrease in temperature stability compared with JVJ (Val and Met reside
at positions 32 and 36, respectively, in MVO). In contrast, the
stability of V32,36JV, in which Val-32 and Met-36 were both replaced by
introduction of Ile (present at positions 32 and 36 in MJA) was not
significantly different from that of VJV.
The results of these changes can be understood by consideration of our
previously modeled structures for the methanococcal ADKs (39). This
study suggested that residue 32 interacts with residue 19 in the
N-terminal region of the protein and residue 188 in the C-terminal
region (Fig. 6). These correspond to the interaction of Ile-32 with
Val-19 and Ile-188 in MJA and to the interaction of Val-32 with Ser-19
and Thr-188 in MVO. Additionally, residue 36 was predicted to partially
interact with residues 20 and 24 (Ile with Thr and Ile in MJA; Met with
Ser and Met in MVO). The stabilizing influence of these hydrophobic
interactions would not be operative in MVO since MVO Ser-19 and Thr-188
would not participate in stabilizing hydrophobic interactions. Thus,
the change from Ile-32 and Ile-36 present in JVJ to Val-32 and Met-32 in J32,36VJ would lead to a disruption in the hydrophobic interactions normally occurring in the MJA ADK and thus explain the reduced stability observed for J32,36VJ. In contrast, the substitution of
Val-32 and Met-36 in VJV with Ile-32 and Ile-36 to create V32,36JV would not be expected to lead to a change in thermal stability since
the hydrophobic associations are already absent.
The effects of amino acid exchanges introduced into chimera JV117,120J
further demonstrate the sensitivity of ADK stability to core
modifications. It might have been expected that the highly conservative
Leu-to-Ile and Val-to-Leu changes introduced into JVJ to generate
JV117,120J would not have had a significant effect on thermal
stability, yet a dramatic 10 °C loss in stability was observed. In
accordance with our structural model, we believe that the introduction
of Ile-117 and Ile-120 to form JV117,120J in combination with the
neighboring Ile-119 and Ile-173 significantly increased the side chain
volume near the peptide backbone at the -carbons, leading to thermal
destabilization due to suboptimal packing caused by steric
interference. Although we fully appreciate the speculative nature of
these interpretations, our results strongly suggest that cooperative
interactions and packing within this core region are very important
determinants for thermal stability.
Although our thermal denaturation studies on chimeric ADKs clearly
demonstrate the importance of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions
in determining the overall stability of the methanococcal ADKs,
analysis of enzymatic temperature optima indicates that these
structural features contribute to catalytic activity and overall
protein stability differently. The properties of chimera V160J and the
effects of site-specific mutagenesis on chimeras JVJ and VJV best
exemplify a partial separation between interactions influencing
stability and activity. Whereas construction of chimera V160J resulted
in an ~16 °C increase in temperature optima (Fig. 5A),
overall thermostability was only changed slightly (+5 °C) (Fig.
4A). Similarly, mutations to chimeras JVJ and VJV had a variety of effects on stability, but failed to have any influence on
temperature optima (Fig. 1). These differing results suggest that the
temperature optima for enzymatic activity of these ADKs are not
determined by the overall flexibility/stability of the protein. This
conclusion is consistent with previous studies that have suggested that
the active-site region of the enzyme is more flexible than the molecule
as a whole (42).
In the course of binding substrates, adenylate kinases undergo two
large domain shifts: the first when the protein closes over bound AMP
and the second when the large lid domain closes over the active site
upon ATP binding in a proposed hinge-like movement between rigid bodies
(43-46). Based on our previous modeling studies and assuming a similar
substrate binding scheme for the methanococcal ADKs, the terminal
regions that we exchanged to construct the MVO/MJA chimeras would not
be directly involved in the large domain movements that occur during
the substrate-binding cycle. However, they do contain regions that our
modeling studies predict would to be in close proximity to the proposed
hinge sites (39). The results of this study suggest that the
temperature optimum for activity of adenylate kinases may be more
dependent on the mechanics of conformational movements and substrate
binding than the protein's overall flexibility/stability. This can be seen in the ~10 °C lower temperature optimum of JVJ compared with VJV (60 versus 70 °C, respectively) despite its greater
thermal stability (Tm = 85 versus
82.5 °C).
Although our studies demonstrate that the N- and C-terminal regions of
the methanococcal ADKs play a major role in determining overall thermal
stability and enzymatic activity, it is apparent that additional
mutational studies and a complete structural analysis are required to
delineate the full range of structural features that confer structural
and functional integrity at elevated temperature. These detailed
studies are currently underway.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
The experiments and analyses of the circular
dichroism data were performed at the Laboratory for Fluorescence
Dynamics at the University of Illinois. Automated DNA sequencing was
carried out at the Genetic Engineering Facility of the University of
Illinois Biotechnology Center.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by Research Grant DOE
DE-FG02-84ER13241. Work performed at the Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics was supported jointly by the Division of Research Resources of
the National Institutes of Health and the University of Illinois.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Mayo Foundation, 1-135 Medical Sciences Bldg.,
Rochester, MN 55905.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry
and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 7700. Tel.: 713-527-4820; Fax: 713-737-5759; E-mail: konisky@rice.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ADKs, adenylate
kinases;
GdmCl, guanidinium Cl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adams, M. W. W.,
and Kelly, R.
(1995)
Chem. Eng. News
73,
32-42
|
| 2.
|
Haney, P. J.,
Badger, J. H.,
Buldak, G. L.,
Woese, C. R.,
and Olsen, G. J.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3578-3583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Vogt, G.,
Woell, S.,
and Argos, P.
(1997)
J. Mol. Biol.
269,
631-643[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Querol, E.,
Perez-Pons, J.,
and Mozo-Villarias, A.
(1996)
Protein Eng.
9,
265-271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Bohm, G.,
and Jaenicke, R.
(1994)
Int. J. Pept. Protein Res.
43,
97-106[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Paupit, R. A.,
Karlsson, R.,
Picot, D.,
Jenkins, J.,
Niklaus-Reimer, A.,
and Jansonius, J.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
199,
525-537[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Vogt, G.,
and Argos, P.
(1997)
Protein Folding
2,
S40-S46
|
| 8.
|
Anderson, D. E.,
Becktel, W. J.,
and Dahlquist, F. W.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
2403-2308[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Yip, K. S. P.,
Stillman, T. J.,
Britton, K. L.,
Artymiuk, P. J.,
Baker, P. J.,
Sedelnikova, S. E.,
Engel, P. C.,
Pasquo, A.,
Chiaraluce, R.,
Consalvi, V.,
Scandurra, R.,
and Rice, D. W.
(1995)
Structure
3,
1147-1158[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Tomazic, S. J.,
and Klibanov, A. M.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
3092-2096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Szilagyi, A.,
and Zavodszky, P.
(1995)
Protein Eng.
8,
779-789[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Perutz, M. F.,
and Raidt, H.
(1975)
Nature
255,
256-259[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Pace, C. N.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
226,
29-35[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Britton, K. L.,
Baker, P. J.,
Borges, K. M. M.,
Engel, P. C.,
Pasquo, A.,
Rice, D. M.,
Robb, F. T.,
Scandurra, R.,
Stillman, T. J.,
and Yip, K. S. P.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
229,
688-695[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Ikai, A.
(1980)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
88,
1895-1898[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Shortle, D.,
Stites, W. E.,
and Meeker, A. K.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
8033-8041[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Privalov, P. L.,
and Gill, S. J.
(1988)
Adv. Protein Chem.
39,
191-232[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Tomazic, S. J.,
and Klibanov, A. M.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
3086-3091[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Ahern, T. J.,
and Klibanov, A. M.
(1985)
Science
228,
1280-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Nicholson, H.,
Becktel, W. J.,
and Matthews, B. W.
(1988)
Nature
336,
651-655[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Richardson, J.,
and Richardson, D.
(1988)
Science
240,
1648-1652[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Serrano, L.,
Sanco, J.,
Hirshberg, M.,
and Fersht, A. R.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
227,
544-559[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
O'Neil, K. T.,
and Degrado, W. F.
(1990)
Science
250,
646-651[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Menendez-Arias, L.,
and Argos, P.
(1989)
J. Mol. Biol.
206,
397-406[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Matthews, B. W.,
Nicholson, H.,
and Becktel, W. J.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
6663-6667[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Suzuki, Y.,
Oishi, K.,
Nakano, H.,
and Nagayama, T.
(1987)
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
26,
546-551[CrossRef]
|
| 27.
|
Suzuki, Y.
(1989)
Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci.
65,
146-148
|
| 28.
|
Kelly, C. A.,
Nishiyama, M.,
Ohnishi, Y.,
Beppu, T.,
and Birktoft, J. J.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
3913-3922[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Kirino, H.,
Aoki, M.,
Aoshima, M.,
Hayashi, Y.,
Ohba, M.,
Yamagishi, A.,
Wakagi, T.,
and Oshima, T.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
220,
275-281[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Pace, C. N.,
Shirley, B. A.,
Mcnutt, M.,
and Gajiwala, K.
(1996)
FASEB J.
10,
75-83[Abstract]
|
| 31.
|
Dill, K. A.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
7133-7155[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Pace, C. N.
(1990)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
15,
14-17[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Creighton, T. E.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
270,
1-16[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Bowie, J. U.,
Reidhaar-Olsen, J.,
Lim, W.,
and Sauer, R.
(1990)
Science
247,
1306-1310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 35.
|
Heinz, D. W.,
Baase, W.,
and Matthews, B. W.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
3751-3755[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Russell, R.,
and Barton, G.
(1994)
J. Mol. Biol.
244,
332-350[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Rusnak, P.,
Haney, P.,
and Konisky, J.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
2977-2981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Ferber, D. M.,
Haney, P. J.,
Berk, H.,
Lynn, D.,
and Konisky, J.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
185,
239-244[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Haney, P.,
Konisky, J.,
Koretke, K. K.,
Luthey-Schulten, Z.,
and Wolynes, P. G.
(1997)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
28,
117-130[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Olsen, O.,
Borriss, R.,
Simon, O.,
and Thomsen, K. K.
(1991)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
225,
177-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Yon, J.,
and Fried, M.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
4895[Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Zhang, Y. L.,
Zhou, J. M.,
and Tsou, C. L.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1164,
61-67[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Gerstein, M.,
Shulz, G. E.,
and Chothia, C.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
229,
494-501[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Diederichs, K.,
and Schultz, G. E.
(1991)
J. Mol. Biol.
217,
541-549[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Dreusicke, D.,
Karplus, P. A.,
and Schulz, G.
(1988)
J. Mol. Biol.
199,
359-371[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Muller, C. W.,
and Schulz, G. E.
(1992)
J. Mol. Biol.
224,
159-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Bae and G. N. Phillips Jr.
Roles of static and dynamic domains in stability and catalysis of adenylate kinase
PNAS,
February 14, 2006;
103(7):
2132 - 2137.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. G. Patteson, N. Trivedi, and T. C. Stadtman
Methanococcus vannielii selenium-binding protein (SeBP): Chemical reactivity of recombinant SeBP produced in Escherichia coli
PNAS,
August 23, 2005;
102(34):
12029 - 12034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Gu, D. M. Gordon, B. Amutha, and D. Pain
A GTP:AMP Phosphotransferase, Adk2p, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: ROLE OF THE C TERMINUS IN PROTEIN FOLDING/STABILIZATION, THERMAL TOLERANCE, AND ENZYMATIC ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 13, 2005;
280(19):
18604 - 18609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Nishikori, K. Shiraki, M. Okanojo, T. Imanaka, and M. Takagi
Equilibrium and Kinetic Stability of a Hyperthermophilic Protein, O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase under Various Extreme Conditions
J. Biochem.,
October 1, 2004;
136(4):
503 - 508.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. A. McCloskey, D. E. Graham, S. Zhou, P. F. Crain, M. Ibba, J. Konisky, D. Soll, and G. J. Olsen
Post-transcriptional modification in archaeal tRNAs: identities and phylogenetic relations of nucleotides from mesophilic and hyperthermophilic Methanococcales
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 15, 2001;
29(22):
4699 - 4706.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Markaryan, O. Zaborina, V. Punj, and A. M. Chakrabarty
Adenylate Kinase as a Virulence Factor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
J. Bacteriol.,
June 1, 2001;
183(11):
3345 - 3352.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Vieille and G. J. Zeikus
Hyperthermophilic Enzymes: Sources, Uses, and Molecular Mechanisms for Thermostability
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
March 1, 2001;
65(1):
1 - 43.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|