JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Na, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Na, S.-Y.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28491-28496, October 1, 1999


Bcl3, an Ikappa B Protein, Stimulates Activating Protein-1 Transactivation and Cellular Proliferation*

Soon-Young NaDagger , Ji-Eun Choi§, Han-Jong Kim, Byung Hak Jhun§parallel , Young-Chul Lee**, and Jae Woon Lee**Dagger Dagger

From the Dagger  Department of Biology,  Center for Ligand and Transcription, and ** Hormone Research Center, Chonnam National University, Kwangju 500-757, South Korea and the § College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University, Pusan 609-735, South Korea

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bcl3, an Ikappa B protein, was originally isolated as a putative proto-oncogene in a subset of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias. Bcl3 was subsequently shown to associate tightly with and transactivate the NFkappa B p50 or p52 homodimer. Herein, we show that Bcl3 stimulates the activating protein-1 (AP-1) transactivation, either alone or in conjunction with transcription integrators steroid receptor coactivator-1 and CREB-binding protein/p300. The C-terminal 158 residues of Bcl3 exhibited an autonomous transactivation function and interacted with specific subregions of the AP-1 components c-Jun and c-Fos, CREB-binding protein/p300, and steroid receptor coactivator-1, as demonstrated by the yeast and mammalian two-hybrid tests as well as glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays. In addition, anti-HA antibody co-precipitated c-Jun from HeLa cells co-expressing c-Jun and HA-tagged Bcl3, consistent with the idea that Bcl3 directly associates with AP-1 in vivo. Furthermore, microinjection of Bcl3 expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells significantly enhanced DNA synthesis and expression of c-jun, one of the cellular target genes of AP-1. These results suggest that Bcl3 may directly participate in the tumorigenesis processes as a novel transcription coactivator of the mitogenic transcription factor AP-1 in vivo.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The activation protein-1 (AP-1)1 transcription factors are immediate early response genes involved in a diverse set of transcriptional regulatory processes, including activation of genes critical for cell proliferation (reviewed in 1). The AP-1 complex consists of a heterodimer of a Fos family member and a Jun family member. This complex binds the consensus DNA sequence (TGAGTCA) (termed AP-1 sites) found in a variety of promoters. The Fos family contains four proteins (c-Fos, Fos-B, Fra-1, and Fra-2), while the Jun family is composed of three (c-Jun, Jun-B, and Jun-D). Fos and Jun are members of the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family of sequence-specific dimeric DNA-binding proteins (2). The C-terminal half of the bZIP domain is amphipathic, containing a heptad repeat of leucines that is critical for the dimerization of bZIP proteins. The N-terminal half of the long bipartite alpha -helix is the basic region that is critical for sequence-specific DNA binding.

Transcription coactivators bridge transcription factors and the components of the basal transcriptional apparatus (3). In particular, the functionally conserved proteins CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 have been shown to be essential for the activation of transcription by a large number of regulated transcription factors, including AP-1 (4). Similarly, it was recently shown that steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1) (5), originally isolated as a transcription coactivator of nuclear receptors, also stimulates transactivation by many different transcription factors such as NF-kappa B (6), AP-1 (7), SRF (8), p53 (9), CREB and signal transducers and activators of transcription (10). Based on this rather broad spectrum of action, SRC-1 and CBP/p300 were named transcription integrators. Interestingly, SRC-1 (11) and its homologue ACTR (12), along with CBP and p300 (13, 14), were recently shown to contain histone acetyltransferase activities themselves and associate with yet another histone acetyltransferase protein p/CAF (15). In contrast, it was shown that SMRT (16) and N-CoR (17), nuclear receptor corepressors, form complexes with Sin3 and histone deacetylase proteins (18, 19). From these results, chromatin remodeling through histone acetylation-deacetylation was suggested to play an important role in transcription cofactor-mediated transcriptional regulation.

Bcl3 belongs to a family of Ikappa B proteins that also include Ikappa Balpha , Ikappa Bbeta , Ikappa Bgamma , p105, and p100 (reviewed in Ref. 20). These proteins have been shown to modulate transactivation by NF-kappa B, which is important for the inducible expression of a wide variety of cellular and viral genes (reviewed in Ref. 21). Bcl3 was originally isolated as a gene, which was recurrently translocated into the immunoglobulin alpha  locus and highly expressed in a subset of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias (22). However, it is currently uncertain whether the translocated and overexpressed Bcl3 directly contributes to the development of this disease. Bcl3 was shown to be a nuclear protein and associate tightly with p50 or p52 homodimers in cells (23, 24). The tethering of Bcl3 to DNA via the p50/p52 homodimers allowed Bcl3 to transactivate directly, while p50/p52 homodimers alone were inert (23, 24). Recently, mice with a targeted disruption in Bcl3 were shown to have immunological defects similar to but distinct from that observed in the p50(-/-) mice, suggesting that Bcl3 could function independently of p50 in vivo (25). Indeed, we have recently shown that Bcl3 can function as a novel transcription coactivator of retinoid X receptor (RXR) (26). RXR belongs to a family of ligand-dependent transcriptional regulatory proteins that function by binding to specific DNA sequences named hormone response elements in the promoters of target genes (reviewed in Ref. 27). This unexpected diversity of transcription factors regulated by Bcl3 led us to examine whether Bcl3 can modulate other transcription factors, particularly those involved with cellular proliferation, including AP-1.

In this report, Bcl3 is shown to function as a novel transcription coactivator of AP-1, either alone or in conjunction with transcription integrators SRC-1 and CBP/p300. The C-terminal 158 residues of Bcl3 were mapped as an interaction interface with specific subregions of c-Jun, c-Fos, CBP/p300, and SRC-1. Importantly, microinjection of Bcl3 expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells significantly enhanced expression of c-jun, one of the major cellular target genes of AP-1, as well as DNA synthesis, consistent with the mitogenic function of AP-1. Thus, Bcl3 may directly regulate the tumorigenesis processes in vivo.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmids-- LexA, B42, T7, or glutathione S-transferase (GST) vectors to express various Bcl3 and SRC-1 proteins were as recently described (6-9, 26). GST fusion constructs to express CBP1, CBP2, CBP3, CBP4, and CBP5 were kind gifts of Dr. Chris Glass (University of California, San Diego). Polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments of BclDelta C1, BclDelta C2, BclDelta C3, BclDelta 1, BclDelta 2, and BclDelta 3 were subcloned into EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the Gal4 fusion vector pCMXGal4/N (28). Polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments of various c-Jun and c-Fos constructs were subcloned into EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the Gal4 fusion vector pCMXGal4/N (28), the VP16 fusion vector pCMXVP16 (28), the B42 fusion vector pJG4-5 (29), and the GST fusion vector pGEX4T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), along with the CMV/T7 vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments of p300N (the p300 residues 1-117), p300C (the p300 residues 2041-2157), and CBP-C (the CBP residues 1868-2441) were subcloned into EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the B42 fusion vector pJG4-5 (29). The expression vectors for Bcl3, c-Fos, c-Jun, p300, and SRC-1; the transfection indicator construct pRSV-beta -gal; the AP-1-responsive reporter construct TRE-Luc; and the Gal4-responsive reporter construct Gal4-Luc were as described previously (7, 8, 26). A polymerase chain reaction-amplified full-length Bcl3 containing EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites was subcloned into EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the HA-tagging vector pcDNA3-HA, a kind gift from Dr. Yong-Kuen Jung (KJIST, South Korea), to express HA-tagged Bcl3 (HA-Bcl3).

Yeast Two-hybrid Tests-- For the yeast two-hybrid tests, plasmids encoding LexA fusions and B42 fusions were co-transformed into Saccharomyces cerevisiae EGY48 strain (29), containing the lacZ reporter plasmid, SH/18-34. Plate and liquid assays of lacZ expression were carried out as described (29).

GST Pull-down Assays-- The GST fusions or GST alone were expressed in Escherichia coli, bound to glutathione-Sepahrose-4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and incubated with labeled proteins expressed by in vitro translation using the TNT-coupled transcription-translation system, with conditions as described by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison, WI). Specifically, bound proteins were eluted from beads with 40 mM reduced glutathione in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0) and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography as described (29).

Co-immunoprecipitation-- Nuclear extracts were prepared from HeLa cells cotransfected with expression vectors for c-Jun and HA-tagged Bcl3 as described (29). These extracts were subjected to Western analyses with c-Jun antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) or immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal antibody against HA (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) followed by Western analyses with c-Jun antibody.

Cell Culture and Transfections-- CV1 or HeLa cells were grown in 24-well plates with medium supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped serum for 24 h and transfected with expression vectors and a reporter gene, as indicated. After 12 h, cells were washed and refed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum either in the presence or absence of the indicated amount of TPA. Cells were harvested 24 h later, and luciferase activity was assayed as described (29), and the results were normalized to the lacZ expression.

Immunofluorescence-- Rat-1 fibroblast cells were microinjected with pcDNA3 or Bcl3 expression vector (25 µg/ml), followed by indirect immunostaining with anti-c-Jun or anti-BrdUrd antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate/rhodamine-conjugated antibodies as described previously (30). The image was photographed with Zeiss AxioplanII microscope equipped with a PIXERA camera.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bcl3 Binds to the bLZ Domains of c-Jun and c-Fos-- A series of deletion mutants for Bcl3 are schematically shown in Fig. 1A. A Gal4 fusion to the full-length Bcl3 or the Bcl3 residues 1-157 (i.e. BclDelta 1) showed consistently lower transactivation potential than the basal activity directed by Gal4-DNA binding domain alone (i.e. Gal4/N) in CV1 cells. These results suggested that the full-length Bcl3 or BclDelta 1 contained a transcriptionally repressive domain (Fig. 1B). However, this repression of the basal activity was not observed with a mutant form of Bcl3 that lacks the N-terminal 157 residues of Bcl3 (i.e. BclDelta 2). Interestingly, BclDelta 3 that consists of the Bcl3 residues 289-446 exhibited an autonomous transactivation function. Overall, these results suggest the presence of two independent repressor domains in the N-terminal and central regions of Bcl3 (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 1-157 and 156-289, respectively) as well as a cryptic autonomous transactivation domain at the C terminus (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 289-446). Co-expression of VP16/c-Jun or VP16/c-Fos further enhanced the transactivation mediated by Gal4/BclDelta 3 but not Gal4/BclDelta 1, indicating that the C-terminal region of Bcl3 (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 289-446) constitutes the interaction interface with c-Jun and c-Fos. Interestingly, the transactivation mediated by Gal4 fusions to Bcl3 and BclDelta 2, although it contained this C-terminal interaction interface, was not stimulated by co-expression of either of these VP16 fusion proteins. This might have been caused by the N-terminal and central repressive domains of Bcl3, which may actively prohibit the function of transactivation domain VP16 and thus preclude detection of the interactions with Bcl3 and BclDelta 2. A series of deletion mutants for c-Jun and c-Fos are schematically shown in Fig. 2A. In yeast, the full-length Bcl3, BclDelta 2, and BclDelta 3 but not BclDelta 1 were found to specifically interact with c-Jun, JunDelta 3, c-Fos, and FosDelta 2 but not with JunDelta 1, JunDelta 2, FosDelta 1, and FosDelta 3 (Table I). These interactions were also confirmed in in vitro experiments, in which various GST fusion proteins were expressed, purified, and tested for interaction with an in vitro translated Bcl3. Consistent with the yeast results, Bcl3 specifically interacted with GST fusions to c-Jun, JunDelta 3, c-Fos, and FosDelta 2 but not with GST alone or GST fusions to JunDelta 1, JunDelta 2, FosDelta 1, and FosDelta 3 (Fig. 2B). From these results, we concluded that the C-terminal region of Bcl3 binds to the c-Jun residues 238-334 and the c-Fos residues 115-271, each containing the previously described bZIP domain (2). The association of Bcl3 and c-Jun was also confirmed in vivo, as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation experiments in which c-Jun was co-precipitated with HA-monoclonal antibody from cells co-expressing c-Jun and HA-Bcl3 but not from cells expressing c-Jun alone (Fig. 2C). Similarly, HA-Bcl3 bound glutathione-Sepahrose-4B beads from cells co-expressing GST-c-Jun but not GST alone.2


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   A, schematic representation of various Bcl3 constructs. Ankyrin repeats of Bcl3 are stippled. Numbers represent amino acids of Bcl3 included in each construct. B, CV1 cells were transfected with 100 ng of lacZ expression vector and vectors expressing various Gal4 and VP16 fusion proteins along with 100 ng of a reporter gene Gal4-Luc (28), as indicated. Normalized luciferase expressions from triplicate samples are presented relative to the lacZ expressions, and the S.D. values are less than 5%. The representative results of three independent experiments are shown here.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Interactions of Bcl3 with c-Jun and c-Fos. A, schematic representation of various c-Jun and c-Fos constructs. Basic leucine zipper domains are indicated as bLZ (2). Numbers represent amino acids of c-Jun and c-Fos included in each construct. The Bcl3 interaction function is indicated as - (interaction negative) and + (interaction positive). B, Bcl3 proteins labeled with [35S]methionine by in vitro translation were incubated with glutathione beads containing identical amounts of GST alone or GST fusions to c-Jun, JunDelta 1, JunDelta 2, JunDelta 3, c-Fos, FosDelta 1, FosDelta 2, and FosDelta 3. Beads were washed, and specifically bound material was eluted with reduced glutathione and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Approximately 10% of the labeled proteins used in the binding reactions were loaded as input. C, HeLa cells were cotransfected with expression vectors for c-Jun and HA-Bcl3, as indicated. Nuclear extracts made from these cotransfected cells were immunoprecipitated with a monoclonal HA antibody and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against c-Jun. Input lanes contained approximately 30% of the nuclear extracts used in immunoprecipitation reactions.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Interactions of Bcl3 with c-Jun/c-Fos, SRC-1, and CBP/p300 in Yeast
The indicated B42 and LexA plasmids were transformed into a yeast strain containing an appropriate LacZ reporter gene (29). SRC-A, -B, -C, -D, and -E encode the SRC-1 residues 1-361, 361-568, 568-779, 759-1141, and 1101-1441, respectively, as previously described (6-9). CBP-C encodes the CBP residues 1868-2441, whereas p300N and p300C encode the p300 residues 1-117 and 2041-2157, respectively. At least six separate transformants from each transformation were transferred to indicator plates containing 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl beta -D-galactopyranoside (X-gal), and reproducible results were obtained using colonies from a separate transformation. +++, strongly blue colonies after 2 days of incubation; ++, light blue colonies after 2 days of incubation; +, light blue colonies after more than 2 days of incubation; -, white colonies.

Bcl3 Coactivates the AP-1 Transactivation-- To assess the functional consequences of these interactions, Bcl3 was cotransfected into HeLa or CV1 cells along with a reporter construct controlled by TRE. Either TPA treatment or co-expression of c-Fos was previously shown to efficiently activate transactivation of this reporter construct (31). Increasing amounts of cotransfected Bcl3 enhanced the TPA- or c-Fos-induced transactivation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3, A and C). In contrast, cotransfection of Bcl3 did not affect the basal level of transactivation, the transcriptional activity of Gal4-VP16 (as assessed using the Gal4-Luc reporter construct), or the lacZ expression of the transfection indicator construct pRSV-beta -gal in the presence or absence of TPA (results not shown). Interestingly, mutant Bcl3 constructs deleted for the C-terminal regions (i.e. Bcl3Delta C1, Bcl3Delta C2, and Bcl3Delta C3) (Fig. 3B) were as effective as the wild type Bcl3 in coactivating the AP-1 transactivation (Fig. 3C). In contrast, BclDelta 1, BclDelta 2, and BclDelta 3 were inert, indicating that the Bcl3 residues 1-365 are essential for the AP-1 coactivation (Fig. 3C). Overall, these results indicate that Bcl3 is a novel transcription coactivator of AP-1 and may sensitize cells to better respond to TPA in vivo.


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of Bcl3 cotransfection on the transcriptional activities of AP-1. HeLa (A) and CV1 (C) cells were transfected with 100 ng of lacZ expression vector, a reporter gene TRE-Luc (31), and increasing amounts of expression vector encoding various Bcl3 constructs, either in the presence or absence of TPA (A) or 50 ng of c-Fos (C), as indicated. Normalized luciferase expressions from triplicate samples are presented relative to the lacZ expressions, and the S.D. values are less than 5%. The representative results of three independent experiments are shown here. B, schematic representation of various C-terminal deletion constructs of Bcl3. Ankyrin repeats of Bcl3 are stippled. Numbers represent amino acids of Bcl3 included in each construct.

Bcl3 Functionally Interacts with Transcriptional Integrators SRC-1 and CBP/p300-- Bcl3 was recently shown to interact with RXR and stimulate its transactivation in synergy with SRC-1 (26). Consistent with these results, we found that SRC-1 directly interacts with Bcl3. In yeast, the Bcl3 interaction regions include SRC-A (the SRC-1 residues 1-361), SRC-D (the SRC-1 residues 759-1141), and SRC-E (the SRC-1 residues 1101-1441) (Table I). The C-terminal subregion of CBP (4) was also found to interact with Bcl3 (i.e. CBP-C, the CBP residues 1868-2441). In contrast, Bcl3 was not able to interact with the N-terminal nuclear receptor binding domain and the C-terminal SRC-1 binding domain of p300 (i.e. p300N and p300C, respectively). Similar results were also obtained with BclDelta 3, except that the interaction with SRC-A was not detected, suggesting that the interaction with SRC-A should involve the N-terminal region of Bcl3 (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 1-289). Unexpectedly, however, these interactions were not evident with BclDelta 2 in yeast. These interactions were also examined in in vitro experiments, in which various GST fusion proteins were expressed, purified, and tested for interaction with an in vitro translated Bcl3 or SRC-1 proteins (Fig. 4A). In contrast to the original observation made in the yeast two-hybrid tests (Table I), the CBP-Bcl3 interactions involved more than the C terminus of CBP. The full-length Bcl3 specifically interacted with CBP-1, CBP-3, CBP-4, and CBP-5 but not with CBP-2, whereas BclDelta 1 interacted only with CBP-1 and CBP-3. The CBP interaction profile of BclDelta 3 was similar to that of the full-length Bcl3 (results not shown). Consistent with the yeast results, however, Bcl3 specifically interacted with the full-length SRC-1, SRC-A, SRC-D, and SRC-E but not with SRC-B and SRC-C (Fig. 4A). Overall, these results, along with the yeast two-hybrid data, indicate that Bcl3 binds to specific subregions of SRC-1 and CBP/p300.


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Functional Interactions of Bcl3 with CBP and SRC-1. A, Bcl3, BclDelta 1, or various SRC-1 proteins labeled with [35S]methionine by in vitro translation were incubated with glutathione beads containing identical amounts of GST alone or GST fusions to CBP-1 (the CBP residues 1-450), CBP-2 (the CBP residues 451-1009), CBP-3 (the CBP residues 1069-1459), CBP-4 (the CBP residues 1459-1891), CBP-5 (the CBP residues 1891-2441), and Bcl3. Beads were washed, and specifically bound material was eluted with reduced glutathione and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Approximately 10% of the labeled proteins used in the binding reactions were loaded as inputs. B, CV1 cells were transfected with 100 ng of lacZ expression vector and expression vector encoding Bcl3, SRC-1, or p300, either in the presence or absence of 50 ng of c-Fos, along with a reporter gene TRE-Luc (31), as indicated. Normalized luciferase expressions from triplicate samples are presented relative to the lacZ expressions, and the S.D. values are less than 5%. The representative results of three independent experiments are shown here.

Cotransfection of SRC-1 or p300 alone stimulated the c-Fos-dependent transactivation, as previously shown (7, 32). In addition, co-expression of Bcl3 further stimulated the SRC-1- or p300-enhanced, c-Fos-dependent transactivation (Fig. 4B). These results clearly demonstrate that Bcl3 can coactivate the AP-1 transactivation in cooperation with SRC-1 and p300.

Bcl3 Enhances c-Jun Expression and DNA Synthesis-- Next, we have tested whether this Bcl3-mediated coactivation of the AP-1 transactivation affects expression levels of c-Jun in vivo, which contains upstream AP-1 binding sites (33). As shown in Fig. 5A, microinjection of Bcl3-expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells (30) led to increased expressions of c-Jun protein, as assessed by immunostaining with anti-c-Jun antibody. Since AP-1 is a strong mitogenic factor, the putative effects of the Bcl3-mediated AP-1 coactivation were also examined with regard to proliferation potentials. To our surprise, microinjection of Bcl3 expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells enhanced the cellular DNA synthesis activities, as shown by stimulated BrdUrd incorporation (Fig. 5B) and thymidine incorporation (results not shown). In contrast, microinjection of pcDNA3 affected neither c-Jun expression nor DNA synthesis. A relatively high basal level of c-Jun expression as well as DNA synthesis was observed under the experimental conditions we employed, resulting in low-fold increases upon Bcl3 expressions (i.e. only approximately 2.5-fold increase in both cases). However, it was interesting to note that immunostainings for both c-Jun expression and DNA synthesis became dramatically intensified in quality as cells expressed Bcl3 (Fig. 5). From these results, we concluded that Bcl3 stimulates the AP-1 transactivation in vivo and enhances proliferation potential of cells.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Bcl3 stimulates c-jun expression and DNA synthesis. Rat-1 fibroblast cells were rendered quiescent by serum starvation for 24 h and microinjected with pcDNA3 or expression vector encoding Bcl3 (25 µg/ml), followed by indirect immunostaining with control anti-rat IgG, anti-c-Jun antibody (A), or anti-BrdUrd antibody (B), along with fluorescein isothiocyanate/rhodamine-conjugated antibodies as described previously (30). Green cells indicate microinjected cells, whereas red cells indicate either expression of c-Jun (A) or incorporation of BrdUrd (B). The image was photographed with a Zeiss AxioplanII microscope equipped with a PIXERA camera. The percentage of cells that were immunostained for c-Jun (A) or BrdUrd (B) is counted against the total number of cells, as indicated. Experiments were performed at least three times, with >200 cells injected; error bars, ±2 × S.E.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Bcl3 exhibits properties consistent with its potential role as a transcription coactivator, bridging transcription factors to the basal transcription machinery. First, Bcl3 directly interacts with target transcription factors, including p50/p52 homodimers (23, 24), RXR (26), and AP-1 (Table I and Figs. 1 and 2). Second, Bcl3 physically associates with general transcription factors such as TFIIB, TBP, and TFIIA (26). Third, Bcl3 functionally interacts with transcription integrators SRC-1 and CBP/p300 (Table I and Fig. 4) and contains an autonomous transactivation function (Ref. 26 and Fig. 1).

The AP-1 interaction interface was localized to the region from Bcl3 residue 289 to the C terminus (Table I and Fig. 1). Since Bcl3Delta C3 (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 1-365) suffices to coactivate the AP-1 transactivation, the AP-1 interaction interface may localize to the Bcl3 residues 289-365, which include the Bcl3 ankyrin repeats 6 and 7 (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, the autonomous transactivation function of Bcl3 was previously mapped to the Bcl3 residues 156-289 in yeast (26), whereas it was localized to the C-terminal region of Bcl3 (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 289-446) in mammalian cells (Fig. 1B). This discrepancy is likely to have reflected some fundamental differences between yeast and mammalian transcription machinery. The autonomous transactivation functions of Bcl3 (particularly in mammalian cells) as well as the Bcl3-mediated coactivation of AP-1 transactivation may involve recruitment of other essential transcription coactivators such as CBP/p300 and SRC-1. Consistent with this notion, Bcl3 was shown to functionally cooperate with SRC-1 and CBP/p300 to coactivate the AP-1 transactivation (Fig. 4). Finally, it is interesting to note that Bcl3 contains a numerous number of putative phosphorylation sites, including TPA-responsive MAP kinase sites (for a review, see Ref. 34). There is an exciting possibility that signal-dependent modification of Bcl3 such as phosphorylation may play an important role in stimulating the AP-1 transactivation.

Cross-communications between distinct signaling pathways that lead to combinatorial controls are becoming a common theme in the area of transcriptional regulations and could involve a complex array of different mechanisms. Competition for a limiting amount of common transcription coactivators could serve as an important mechanism, for instance. Bcl3 targets at least three different transcription factors, AP-1, RXR, and the NF-kappa B p50/p52 homodimers. Therefore, Bcl3 may be involved with the mutually antagonistic interactions between RXR and either NF-kappa B (35) or AP-1 (for a review, see Ref. 36). Regarding the proliferative function of ectopically expressed Bcl3 (Fig. 5), it is interesting to note that AP-1 and NF-kappa B are known to be proproliferative (1, 37). In addition, overexpressed Bcl3 may also oppose the antiproliferative action of retinoids, by relieving the retinoid/RXR-mediated inhibition of AP-1 and NF-kappa B. These possibilities are currently under investigation.

In conclusion, we have shown that Bcl3 enhances proliferation as a novel transcription coactivator of the mitogenic transcription factor AP-1. Consistent with our results, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin were recently shown to markedly enhance Bcl3 expression in association with stimulation of proliferation (38). Similarly, transgenic mice overexpressing Bcl3 developed normally but showed splenomegaly and accumulation of mature B cells in lymph nodes, bone marrow, and peritoneal cavity (39). These results, along with ours, strongly suggest that Bcl3 should be directly involved with the tumorigenesis processes in a subset of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias, in which Bcl3 is recurrently translocated and highly expressed. Thus, further studies of Bcl3 should provide important insights into transcriptional regulatory mechanisms as well as the tumorigenesis processes.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. Chris Glass and Yong-Kuen Jung for plasmids.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by the National Creative Research Initiatives of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

parallel Supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Public Health and Welfare of Korea.

Dagger Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Ligand and Transcription, Chonnam National University Kwangju 500-757, South Korea. Tel.: 82-62-530-0910; Fax: 82-62-530-0772; E-mail: jlee@chonnam.chonnam.ac.kr.

2 S.-Y. Na and J. W. Lee, unpublished results.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AP-1, activating protein-1; bZIP, basic leucine zipper; CBP, CREB-binding protein; SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator-1; GST, glutathione S-transferase; RXR, retinoid X receptor; HA, hemagglutinin; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine; TRE, TPA-responsive element.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Herschman, H. R. (1991) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 60, 281-319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Baxevanis, A., and Vinson, C. R. (1993) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 3, 278-285[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Horwitz, K. B., Jackson, T. A., Bain, D. L., Richer, J. K., Takimoto, G. S., and Tung, L. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 1167-1177[Abstract]
4. Goldman, P. S., Tran, V. K., and Goodman, R. H. (1997) Rec. Prog. Horm. Res. 52, 103-119
5. Onate, S. A., Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M. J., and O'Malley, B. W. (1995) Science 270, 1354-1357[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Na, S.-Y., Lee, S. -K., Han, S. -J., Choi, H.-S., Im, S. Y., and Lee, J. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 10831-10834[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Lee, S.-K., Kim, H.-J., Na, S.-Y., Kim, T. S., Choi, H.-S., Im, S. Y., and Lee, J. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 16651-16654[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Kim, H.-J., Kim, J. H., and Lee, J. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28564-28567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Lee, S.-K., Kim, H.-J., Kim, J.-W., and Lee, J. W. (1999) Mol. Endocrinol., in press
10. Korzus, E., Torchia, J., Rose, D. W., Xu, L., Kurokawa, R., McInerney, E. M., Mullen, T. M., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1998) Science 279, 703-707[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Spencer, T. E., Jenster, G., Burcin, M. M., Allis, C. D., Zhou, J., Mizzen, C. A., McKenna, N. J., Onate, S. A., Tsai, S. Y., Tsai, M. J., and O'Malley, B. W. (1997) Nature 389, 194-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Chen, H., Lin, R. J., Schiltz, R. L., Chakravarti, D., Nash, A., Nagy, L., Privalsky, M. L., Nakatani, Y., and Evans, R. M. (1997) Cell 90, 569-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1996) Nature 384, 641-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Ogryzko, V. V., Schiltz, R. L., Russanova, V., Howard, B. H., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Cell 87, 953-959[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Yang, X.-J., Ogryzko, V. V., Nishikawa, J., Howard, B. H., and Nakatani, Y. (1996) Nature 382, 319-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Horlein, A. J., Naar, A. M., Heinzel, T., Torchia, J., Gloss, B., Kurokawa, R., Ryan, A., Kamei, Y., Soderstrom, M., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1995) Nature 377, 397-404[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Chen, J. D., and Evans, R. M. (1995) Nature 377, 454-457[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Heinzel, T., Lavinsky, R. M., Mullen, T. M., Soderstrom, M., Laherty, C. D., Torchia, J., Yang, W. M., Brard, G., Ngo, S. D., Davie, J. R., Seto, E., Eisenman, R. N., Rose, D. W., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1997) Nature 387, 43-48[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Nagy, L., Kao, H. -Y., Chakravarti, D., Lin, R. J., Hassig, C. A., Ayer, D. E., Schreiber, S. L., and Evans, R. M. (1997) Cell 89, 373-380[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Gilmore, T. D., and Morin, P. J. (1993) Trends Genet. 9, 427-433[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Baldwin, A. S. (1996) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14, 649-681[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. McKeithan, T. W., Takimoto, G. S., Ohno, H., Bjorling, V. S., Morgan, R., Hecht, B. K., Dube, I., Sandberg, A. A., and Rowley, J. D. (1997) Genes Chromosomes Cancer 20, 64-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Fujita, T., Nolan, G. P., Liou, H. C., Scott, M. L., and Baltimore, D. (1993) Genes Dev. 7, 1354-1363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Bours, V., Franzoso, G., Azarenko, V., Park, S., Kanno, T., Brown, K., and Siebenlist, U. (1993) Cell 72, 729-739[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Schwarz, E. M., Krimpenfort, P., Berns, A., and Verma, I. M. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 187-197[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Na, S. -Y., Choi, H. -S., Kim, J. W., Na, D. S., and Lee, J. W. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30933-30938[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Mangelsdorf, D. J., Thummel, C., Beato, M., Herrlich, P., Schutz, G., Umesono, K., Blumberg, B., Kastner, P., Mark, M., Chambon, P., and Evans, R. M. (1995) Cell 83, 835-839[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Forman, B. M., Umesono, K., Chen, J., and Evans, R. M. (1995) Cell 81, 541-550[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. (1995) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , Greens Associates, New York
30. Jhun, B. H., Rose, D. W., Seely, B. L., Rameh, L., Cantley, L., Saltiel, A. R., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7466-7475[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Choi, H. -S., and Moore, D. D. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1596-1602[Abstract]
32. Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4758-4762[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Karin, M., Liu, Zg, and Zandi, E. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 240-246[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Whitmarsh, A. J., and Davis, R. J. (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 481-485[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Na, S. -Y., Kang, B. Y., Chung, S. W., Han, S.-J., Ma, X., Trinchieri, G., Im, S.-Y., Lee, J. W., and Kim, T. S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7674-7680[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Pfahl, M. (1993) Skin Pharmacol. 6, 8-16
37. Rogers, M. B. (1997) Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 35, 1-46[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Zhang, M. Y., Harhaj, E. W., Bell, L., Sun, S. C., and Miller, B. A. (1998) Blood 92, 1225-1234[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Ong, S. T., Hackbarth, M. L., Degenstein, L. C., Baunoch, D. A., Anastasi, J., and McKeithan, T. W. (1998) Oncogene 16, 2333-2343[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. Y. Kim, O. G. Park, J. W. Lee, and Y. C. Lee
One- plus Two-hybrid System, a Novel Yeast Genetic Selection for Specific Missense Mutations Disrupting Protein/Protein Interactions
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2007; 6(10): 1727 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Jamaluddin, S. Choudhary, S. Wang, A. Casola, R. Huda, R. P. Garofalo, S. Ray, and A. R. Brasier
Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Inducible BCL-3 Expression Antagonizes the STAT/IRF and NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathways by Inducing Histone Deacetylase 1 Recruitment to the Interleukin-8 Promoter
J. Virol., December 15, 2005; 79(24): 15302 - 15313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
S. Mathas, K. Johrens, S. Joos, A. Lietz, F. Hummel, M. Janz, F. Jundt, I. Anagnostopoulos, K. Bommert, P. Lichter, et al.
Elevated NF-{kappa}B p50 complex formation and Bcl-3 expression in classical Hodgkin, anaplastic large-cell, and other peripheral T-cell lymphomas
Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4287 - 4293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
F. Oakley, J. Mann, S. Nailard, D. E. Smart, N. Mungalsingh, C. Constandinou, S. Ali, S. J. Wilson, H. Millward-Sadler, J. P. Iredale, et al.
Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B1 (p50) Limits the Inflammatory and Fibrogenic Responses to Chronic Injury
Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2005; 166(3): 695 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. A. C. Pratt, T. E. Bishop, D. White, G. Yasvinski, M. Menard, M. Y. Niu, and R. Clarke
Estrogen Withdrawal-Induced NF-{kappa}B Activity and Bcl-3 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells: Roles in Growth and Hormone Independence
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2003; 23(19): 6887 - 6900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Watanabe, S. Wachi, and T. Fujita
Identification and Characterization of BCL-3-binding Protein: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSCRIPTION AND DNA REPAIR OR RECOMBINATION
J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 26102 - 26110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Rocha, A. M. Martin, D. W. Meek, and N. D. Perkins
p53 Represses Cyclin D1 Transcription through Down Regulation of Bcl-3 and Inducing Increased Association of the p52 NF-{kappa}B Subunit with Histone Deacetylase 1
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2003; 23(13): 4713 - 4727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
T. Muta, S. Yamazaki, A. Eto, M. Motoyama, and K. Takeshige
I{kappa}B-{zeta}, a new anti-inflammatory nuclear protein induced by lipopolysaccharide, is a negative regulator for nuclear factor-{kappa}B
Innate Immunity, June 1, 2003; 9(3): 187 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. U. Mysorekar, M. A. Mulvey, S. J. Hultgren, and J. I. Gordon
Molecular Regulation of Urothelial Renewal and Host Defenses during Infection with Uropathogenic Escherichia coli
J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 7412 - 7419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. D. Westerheide, M. W. Mayo, V. Anest, J. L. Hanson, and A. S. Baldwin Jr.
The Putative Oncoprotein Bcl-3 Induces Cyclin D1 To Stimulate G1 Transition
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2001; 21(24): 8428 - 8436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-K. Lee, J.-H. Kim, Y. C. Lee, J. Cheong, and J. W. Lee
Silencing Mediator of Retinoic Acid and Thyroid Hormone Receptors, as a Novel Transcriptional Corepressor Molecule of Activating Protein-1, Nuclear Factor-kappa B, and Serum Response Factor
J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2000; 275(17): 12470 - 12474.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Haruta, A. Kato, and K. Todokoro
Isolation of a Novel Interleukin-1-inducible Nuclear Protein Bearing Ankyrin-repeat Motifs
J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2001; 276(16): 12485 - 12488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Feng, Y. Jiang, P. Meltzer, and P. M. Yen
Transgenic Targeting of a Dominant Negative Corepressor to Liver Blocks Basal Repression by Thyroid Hormone Receptor and Increases Cell Proliferation
J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 15066 - 15072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Yamazaki, T. Muta, and K. Takeshige
A Novel Ikappa B Protein, Ikappa B-zeta , Induced by Proinflammatory Stimuli, Negatively Regulates Nuclear Factor-kappa B in the Nuclei
J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2001; 276(29): 27657 - 27662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available