![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28491-28496, October 1, 1999
From the Bcl3, an I The activation protein-1
(AP-1)1 transcription factors
are immediate early response genes involved in a diverse set of
transcriptional regulatory processes, including activation of genes
critical for cell proliferation (reviewed in 1). The AP-1 complex
consists of a heterodimer of a Fos family member and a Jun family
member. This complex binds the consensus DNA sequence (TGAGTCA) (termed AP-1 sites) found in a variety of promoters. The Fos family contains four proteins (c-Fos, Fos-B, Fra-1, and Fra-2), while the Jun family is
composed of three (c-Jun, Jun-B, and Jun-D). Fos and Jun are members of
the basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family of sequence-specific dimeric
DNA-binding proteins (2). The C-terminal half of the bZIP domain is
amphipathic, containing a heptad repeat of leucines that is critical
for the dimerization of bZIP proteins. The N-terminal half of the long
bipartite Transcription coactivators bridge transcription factors and the
components of the basal transcriptional apparatus (3). In particular,
the functionally conserved proteins CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300
have been shown to be essential for the activation of transcription by
a large number of regulated transcription factors, including AP-1 (4).
Similarly, it was recently shown that steroid receptor coactivator-1
(SRC-1) (5), originally isolated as a transcription coactivator of
nuclear receptors, also stimulates transactivation by many different
transcription factors such as NF- Bcl3 belongs to a family of I In this report, Bcl3 is shown to function as a novel transcription
coactivator of AP-1, either alone or in conjunction with transcription
integrators SRC-1 and CBP/p300. The C-terminal 158 residues of Bcl3
were mapped as an interaction interface with specific subregions of
c-Jun, c-Fos, CBP/p300, and SRC-1. Importantly, microinjection of Bcl3
expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells significantly enhanced
expression of c-jun, one of the major cellular target genes
of AP-1, as well as DNA synthesis, consistent with the mitogenic
function of AP-1. Thus, Bcl3 may directly regulate the tumorigenesis
processes in vivo.
Plasmids--
LexA, B42, T7, or glutathione
S-transferase (GST) vectors to express various Bcl3 and
SRC-1 proteins were as recently described (6-9, 26). GST fusion
constructs to express CBP1, CBP2, CBP3, CBP4, and CBP5 were kind gifts
of Dr. Chris Glass (University of California, San Diego). Polymerase
chain reaction-amplified fragments of Bcl Yeast Two-hybrid Tests--
For the yeast two-hybrid tests,
plasmids encoding LexA fusions and B42 fusions were co-transformed into
Saccharomyces cerevisiae EGY48 strain (29), containing the
lacZ reporter plasmid, SH/18-34. Plate and liquid assays of
lacZ expression were carried out as described (29).
GST Pull-down Assays--
The GST fusions or GST alone were
expressed in Escherichia coli, bound to
glutathione-Sepahrose-4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and
incubated with labeled proteins expressed by in vitro
translation using the TNT-coupled transcription-translation system,
with conditions as described by the manufacturer (Promega, Madison,
WI). Specifically, bound proteins were eluted from beads with 40 mM reduced glutathione in 50 mM Tris (pH 8.0)
and analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and
autoradiography as described (29).
Co-immunoprecipitation--
Nuclear extracts were prepared from
HeLa cells cotransfected with expression vectors for c-Jun and
HA-tagged Bcl3 as described (29). These extracts were subjected to
Western analyses with c-Jun antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.,
Santa Cruz, CA) or immunoprecipitation with a monoclonal antibody
against HA (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) followed by Western analyses
with c-Jun antibody.
Cell Culture and Transfections--
CV1 or HeLa cells were grown
in 24-well plates with medium supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped
serum for 24 h and transfected with expression vectors and a
reporter gene, as indicated. After 12 h, cells were washed and
refed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10%
charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum either in the presence or absence
of the indicated amount of TPA. Cells were harvested 24 h later,
and luciferase activity was assayed as described (29), and the results
were normalized to the lacZ expression.
Immunofluorescence--
Rat-1 fibroblast cells were
microinjected with pcDNA3 or Bcl3 expression vector (25 µg/ml),
followed by indirect immunostaining with anti-c-Jun or anti-BrdUrd
antibody and fluorescein isothiocyanate/rhodamine-conjugated antibodies
as described previously (30). The image was photographed with Zeiss
AxioplanII microscope equipped with a PIXERA camera.
Bcl3 Binds to the bLZ Domains of c-Jun and c-Fos--
A series of
deletion mutants for Bcl3 are schematically shown in Fig.
1A. A Gal4 fusion to the
full-length Bcl3 or the Bcl3 residues 1-157 (i.e. Bcl Bcl3 Coactivates the AP-1 Transactivation--
To assess the
functional consequences of these interactions, Bcl3 was cotransfected
into HeLa or CV1 cells along with a reporter construct controlled by
TRE. Either TPA treatment or co-expression of c-Fos was previously
shown to efficiently activate transactivation of this reporter
construct (31). Increasing amounts of cotransfected Bcl3 enhanced the
TPA- or c-Fos-induced transactivation in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3, A and
C). In contrast, cotransfection of Bcl3 did not affect the
basal level of transactivation, the transcriptional activity of
Gal4-VP16 (as assessed using the Gal4-Luc reporter construct), or the
lacZ expression of the transfection indicator construct
pRSV- Bcl3 Functionally Interacts with Transcriptional Integrators SRC-1
and CBP/p300--
Bcl3 was recently shown to interact with RXR and
stimulate its transactivation in synergy with SRC-1 (26). Consistent
with these results, we found that SRC-1 directly interacts with Bcl3. In yeast, the Bcl3 interaction regions include SRC-A (the SRC-1 residues 1-361), SRC-D (the SRC-1 residues 759-1141), and SRC-E (the
SRC-1 residues 1101-1441) (Table I). The C-terminal subregion of CBP
(4) was also found to interact with Bcl3 (i.e. CBP-C, the
CBP residues 1868-2441). In contrast, Bcl3 was not able to interact
with the N-terminal nuclear receptor binding domain and the C-terminal
SRC-1 binding domain of p300 (i.e. p300N and p300C, respectively). Similar results were also obtained with Bcl
Cotransfection of SRC-1 or p300 alone stimulated the
c-Fos-dependent transactivation, as previously shown (7,
32). In addition, co-expression of Bcl3 further stimulated the SRC-1- or p300-enhanced, c-Fos-dependent transactivation (Fig.
4B). These results clearly demonstrate that Bcl3 can
coactivate the AP-1 transactivation in cooperation with SRC-1 and p300.
Bcl3 Enhances c-Jun Expression and DNA Synthesis--
Next, we
have tested whether this Bcl3-mediated coactivation of the AP-1
transactivation affects expression levels of c-Jun in vivo,
which contains upstream AP-1 binding sites (33). As shown in Fig.
5A, microinjection of
Bcl3-expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells (30) led to
increased expressions of c-Jun protein, as assessed by immunostaining
with anti-c-Jun antibody. Since AP-1 is a strong mitogenic factor, the
putative effects of the Bcl3-mediated AP-1 coactivation were also
examined with regard to proliferation potentials. To our surprise,
microinjection of Bcl3 expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells
enhanced the cellular DNA synthesis activities, as shown by stimulated BrdUrd incorporation (Fig. 5B) and thymidine incorporation
(results not shown). In contrast, microinjection of pcDNA3 affected
neither c-Jun expression nor DNA synthesis. A relatively high basal
level of c-Jun expression as well as DNA synthesis was observed under the experimental conditions we employed, resulting in low-fold increases upon Bcl3 expressions (i.e. only approximately
2.5-fold increase in both cases). However, it was interesting to note
that immunostainings for both c-Jun expression and DNA synthesis became dramatically intensified in quality as cells expressed Bcl3 (Fig. 5).
From these results, we concluded that Bcl3 stimulates the AP-1
transactivation in vivo and enhances proliferation potential of cells.
Bcl3 exhibits properties consistent with its potential role as a
transcription coactivator, bridging transcription factors to the basal
transcription machinery. First, Bcl3 directly interacts with target
transcription factors, including p50/p52 homodimers (23, 24), RXR (26),
and AP-1 (Table I and Figs. 1 and 2). Second, Bcl3 physically
associates with general transcription factors such as TFIIB, TBP, and
TFIIA (26). Third, Bcl3 functionally interacts with transcription
integrators SRC-1 and CBP/p300 (Table I and Fig. 4) and contains an
autonomous transactivation function (Ref. 26 and Fig. 1).
The AP-1 interaction interface was localized to the region from Bcl3
residue 289 to the C terminus (Table I and Fig. 1). Since Bcl3 Cross-communications between distinct signaling pathways that lead to
combinatorial controls are becoming a common theme in the area of
transcriptional regulations and could involve a complex array of
different mechanisms. Competition for a limiting amount of common
transcription coactivators could serve as an important mechanism, for
instance. Bcl3 targets at least three different transcription factors,
AP-1, RXR, and the NF- In conclusion, we have shown that Bcl3 enhances proliferation as a
novel transcription coactivator of the mitogenic transcription factor
AP-1. Consistent with our results, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin were recently shown to
markedly enhance Bcl3 expression in association with stimulation of
proliferation (38). Similarly, transgenic mice overexpressing Bcl3
developed normally but showed splenomegaly and accumulation of mature B
cells in lymph nodes, bone marrow, and peritoneal cavity (39). These
results, along with ours, strongly suggest that Bcl3 should be directly
involved with the tumorigenesis processes in a subset of B cell chronic
lymphocytic leukemias, in which Bcl3 is recurrently translocated and
highly expressed. Thus, further studies of Bcl3 should provide
important insights into transcriptional regulatory mechanisms as well
as the tumorigenesis processes.
We thank Drs. Chris Glass and Yong-Kuen Jung
for plasmids.
*
This work was supported by the National Creative Research
Initiatives of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2
S.-Y. Na and J. W. Lee, unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
AP-1, activating
protein-1;
bZIP, basic leucine zipper;
CBP, CREB-binding protein;
SRC-1, steroid receptor coactivator-1;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
RXR, retinoid X receptor;
HA, hemagglutinin;
TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate;
BrdUrd, bromodeoxyuridine;
TRE, TPA-responsive element.
Bcl3, an I
B Protein, Stimulates Activating Protein-1
Transactivation and Cellular Proliferation*
,
,
Department of Biology, ¶ Center for
Ligand and Transcription, and ** Hormone Research Center,
Chonnam National University, Kwangju 500-757, South Korea and the
§ College of Pharmacy, Pusan National University,
Pusan 609-735, South Korea
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
B protein, was originally isolated
as a putative proto-oncogene in a subset of B cell chronic lymphocytic
leukemias. Bcl3 was subsequently shown to associate tightly with and
transactivate the NF
B p50 or p52 homodimer. Herein, we show that
Bcl3 stimulates the activating protein-1 (AP-1) transactivation, either
alone or in conjunction with transcription integrators steroid receptor coactivator-1 and CREB-binding protein/p300. The C-terminal 158 residues of Bcl3 exhibited an autonomous transactivation function and
interacted with specific subregions of the AP-1 components c-Jun and
c-Fos, CREB-binding protein/p300, and steroid receptor coactivator-1,
as demonstrated by the yeast and mammalian two-hybrid tests as well as
glutathione S-transferase pull-down assays. In addition,
anti-HA antibody co-precipitated c-Jun from HeLa cells co-expressing
c-Jun and HA-tagged Bcl3, consistent with the idea that Bcl3 directly
associates with AP-1 in vivo. Furthermore, microinjection
of Bcl3 expression vector into Rat-1 fibroblast cells significantly
enhanced DNA synthesis and expression of c-jun, one of the
cellular target genes of AP-1. These results suggest that Bcl3 may
directly participate in the tumorigenesis processes as a novel
transcription coactivator of the mitogenic transcription factor AP-1
in vivo.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-helix is the basic region that is critical for
sequence-specific DNA binding.
B (6), AP-1 (7), SRF (8), p53 (9), CREB and signal transducers and activators of transcription (10). Based
on this rather broad spectrum of action, SRC-1 and CBP/p300 were named
transcription integrators. Interestingly, SRC-1 (11) and its homologue
ACTR (12), along with CBP and p300 (13, 14), were recently shown to
contain histone acetyltransferase activities themselves and associate
with yet another histone acetyltransferase protein p/CAF (15). In
contrast, it was shown that SMRT (16) and N-CoR (17), nuclear receptor
corepressors, form complexes with Sin3 and histone deacetylase proteins
(18, 19). From these results, chromatin remodeling through histone
acetylation-deacetylation was suggested to play an important role in
transcription cofactor-mediated transcriptional regulation.
B proteins that also include I
B
,
I
B
, I
B
, p105, and p100 (reviewed in Ref. 20). These proteins have been shown to modulate transactivation by NF-
B, which
is important for the inducible expression of a wide variety of cellular
and viral genes (reviewed in Ref. 21). Bcl3 was originally isolated as
a gene, which was recurrently translocated into the immunoglobulin
locus and highly expressed in a subset of B cell chronic lymphocytic
leukemias (22). However, it is currently uncertain whether the
translocated and overexpressed Bcl3 directly contributes to the
development of this disease. Bcl3 was shown to be a nuclear protein and
associate tightly with p50 or p52 homodimers in cells (23, 24). The
tethering of Bcl3 to DNA via the p50/p52 homodimers allowed Bcl3 to
transactivate directly, while p50/p52 homodimers alone were inert (23,
24). Recently, mice with a targeted disruption in Bcl3 were shown to have immunological defects similar to but distinct from that observed in the p50(
/
) mice, suggesting that Bcl3 could function
independently of p50 in vivo (25). Indeed, we have recently
shown that Bcl3 can function as a novel transcription coactivator of
retinoid X receptor (RXR) (26). RXR belongs to a family of
ligand-dependent transcriptional regulatory proteins that
function by binding to specific DNA sequences named hormone response
elements in the promoters of target genes (reviewed in Ref. 27). This
unexpected diversity of transcription factors regulated by Bcl3 led us
to examine whether Bcl3 can modulate other transcription factors, particularly those involved with cellular proliferation, including AP-1.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C1, Bcl
C2, Bcl
C3,
Bcl
1, Bcl
2, and Bcl
3 were subcloned into
EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the Gal4 fusion vector pCMXGal4/N (28). Polymerase chain reaction-amplified fragments
of various c-Jun and c-Fos constructs were subcloned into
EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the Gal4 fusion
vector pCMXGal4/N (28), the VP16 fusion vector pCMXVP16 (28), the B42
fusion vector pJG4-5 (29), and the GST fusion vector pGEX4T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), along with the CMV/T7 vector pcDNA3
(Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Polymerase chain reaction-amplified
fragments of p300N (the p300 residues 1-117), p300C (the p300 residues
2041-2157), and CBP-C (the CBP residues 1868-2441) were subcloned
into EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites of the B42
fusion vector pJG4-5 (29). The expression vectors for Bcl3, c-Fos,
c-Jun, p300, and SRC-1; the transfection indicator construct
pRSV-
-gal; the AP-1-responsive reporter construct TRE-Luc; and the
Gal4-responsive reporter construct Gal4-Luc were as described
previously (7, 8, 26). A polymerase chain reaction-amplified
full-length Bcl3 containing EcoRI-XhoI restriction sites was subcloned into EcoRI-XhoI
restriction sites of the HA-tagging vector pcDNA3-HA, a kind gift
from Dr. Yong-Kuen Jung (KJIST, South Korea), to express HA-tagged Bcl3
(HA-Bcl3).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1)
showed consistently lower transactivation potential than the basal
activity directed by Gal4-DNA binding domain alone (i.e.
Gal4/N) in CV1 cells. These results suggested that the full-length Bcl3
or Bcl
1 contained a transcriptionally repressive domain (Fig.
1B). However, this repression of the basal activity was not
observed with a mutant form of Bcl3 that lacks the N-terminal 157 residues of Bcl3 (i.e. Bcl
2). Interestingly, Bcl
3 that
consists of the Bcl3 residues 289-446 exhibited an autonomous
transactivation function. Overall, these results suggest the presence
of two independent repressor domains in the N-terminal and central
regions of Bcl3 (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 1-157 and 156-289,
respectively) as well as a cryptic autonomous transactivation domain at
the C terminus (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 289-446).
Co-expression of VP16/c-Jun or VP16/c-Fos further enhanced the
transactivation mediated by Gal4/Bcl
3 but not Gal4/Bcl
1,
indicating that the C-terminal region of Bcl3 (i.e. the Bcl3
residues 289-446) constitutes the interaction interface with c-Jun and
c-Fos. Interestingly, the transactivation mediated by Gal4 fusions to
Bcl3 and Bcl
2, although it contained this C-terminal interaction
interface, was not stimulated by co-expression of either of these VP16
fusion proteins. This might have been caused by the N-terminal and
central repressive domains of Bcl3, which may actively prohibit the
function of transactivation domain VP16 and thus preclude detection of the interactions with Bcl3 and Bcl
2. A series of deletion mutants for c-Jun and c-Fos are schematically shown in Fig.
2A. In yeast, the full-length
Bcl3, Bcl
2, and Bcl
3 but not Bcl
1 were found to specifically
interact with c-Jun, Jun
3, c-Fos, and Fos
2 but not with Jun
1,
Jun
2, Fos
1, and Fos
3 (Table I).
These interactions were also confirmed in in vitro
experiments, in which various GST fusion proteins were expressed,
purified, and tested for interaction with an in vitro
translated Bcl3. Consistent with the yeast results, Bcl3 specifically
interacted with GST fusions to c-Jun, Jun
3, c-Fos, and Fos
2 but
not with GST alone or GST fusions to Jun
1, Jun
2, Fos
1, and
Fos
3 (Fig. 2B). From these results, we concluded that the
C-terminal region of Bcl3 binds to the c-Jun residues 238-334 and the
c-Fos residues 115-271, each containing the previously described bZIP
domain (2). The association of Bcl3 and c-Jun was also confirmed
in vivo, as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation experiments
in which c-Jun was co-precipitated with HA-monoclonal antibody from
cells co-expressing c-Jun and HA-Bcl3 but not from cells expressing
c-Jun alone (Fig. 2C). Similarly, HA-Bcl3 bound glutathione-Sepahrose-4B beads from cells co-expressing GST-c-Jun but
not GST alone.2

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
A, schematic representation of various
Bcl3 constructs. Ankyrin repeats of Bcl3 are stippled.
Numbers represent amino acids of Bcl3 included in each
construct. B, CV1 cells were transfected with 100 ng of
lacZ expression vector and vectors expressing various Gal4
and VP16 fusion proteins along with 100 ng of a reporter gene Gal4-Luc
(28), as indicated. Normalized luciferase expressions from triplicate
samples are presented relative to the lacZ expressions, and
the S.D. values are less than 5%. The representative results of three
independent experiments are shown here.

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Interactions of Bcl3 with c-Jun and
c-Fos. A, schematic representation of various c-Jun and
c-Fos constructs. Basic leucine zipper domains are indicated as
bLZ (2). Numbers represent amino acids of c-Jun
and c-Fos included in each construct. The Bcl3 interaction function is
indicated as
(interaction negative) and + (interaction
positive). B, Bcl3 proteins labeled with
[35S]methionine by in vitro translation were
incubated with glutathione beads containing identical amounts of GST
alone or GST fusions to c-Jun, Jun
1, Jun
2, Jun
3, c-Fos,
Fos
1, Fos
2, and Fos
3. Beads were washed, and specifically
bound material was eluted with reduced glutathione and resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Approximately 10% of the
labeled proteins used in the binding reactions were loaded as input.
C, HeLa cells were cotransfected with expression vectors for
c-Jun and HA-Bcl3, as indicated. Nuclear extracts made from these
cotransfected cells were immunoprecipitated with a monoclonal HA
antibody and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,
followed by immunoblotting with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against
c-Jun. Input lanes contained approximately 30%
of the nuclear extracts used in immunoprecipitation reactions.
Interactions of Bcl3 with c-Jun/c-Fos, SRC-1, and CBP/p300 in Yeast
-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal),
and reproducible results were obtained using colonies from a separate
transformation. +++, strongly blue colonies after 2 days of incubation;
++, light blue colonies after 2 days of incubation; +, light blue
colonies after more than 2 days of incubation;
, white colonies.
-gal in the presence or absence of TPA (results not shown).
Interestingly, mutant Bcl3 constructs deleted for the C-terminal
regions (i.e. Bcl3
C1, Bcl3
C2, and Bcl3
C3) (Fig. 3B) were as effective as the wild type Bcl3 in coactivating
the AP-1 transactivation (Fig. 3C). In contrast, Bcl
1,
Bcl
2, and Bcl
3 were inert, indicating that the Bcl3 residues
1-365 are essential for the AP-1 coactivation (Fig. 3C).
Overall, these results indicate that Bcl3 is a novel transcription
coactivator of AP-1 and may sensitize cells to better respond to TPA
in vivo.

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effects of Bcl3 cotransfection on the
transcriptional activities of AP-1. HeLa (A) and CV1
(C) cells were transfected with 100 ng of lacZ
expression vector, a reporter gene TRE-Luc (31), and increasing amounts
of expression vector encoding various Bcl3 constructs, either in the
presence or absence of TPA (A) or 50 ng of c-Fos
(C), as indicated. Normalized luciferase expressions from
triplicate samples are presented relative to the lacZ
expressions, and the S.D. values are less than 5%. The representative
results of three independent experiments are shown here. B,
schematic representation of various C-terminal deletion constructs of
Bcl3. Ankyrin repeats of Bcl3 are stippled.
Numbers represent amino acids of Bcl3 included in each
construct.
3, except
that the interaction with SRC-A was not detected, suggesting that the
interaction with SRC-A should involve the N-terminal region of Bcl3
(i.e. the Bcl3 residues 1-289). Unexpectedly, however, these interactions were not evident with Bcl
2 in yeast. These interactions were also examined in in vitro experiments, in
which various GST fusion proteins were expressed, purified, and tested for interaction with an in vitro translated Bcl3 or SRC-1
proteins (Fig. 4A). In
contrast to the original observation made in the yeast two-hybrid tests
(Table I), the CBP-Bcl3 interactions involved more than the C terminus
of CBP. The full-length Bcl3 specifically interacted with CBP-1, CBP-3,
CBP-4, and CBP-5 but not with CBP-2, whereas Bcl
1 interacted only
with CBP-1 and CBP-3. The CBP interaction profile of Bcl
3 was
similar to that of the full-length Bcl3 (results not shown). Consistent
with the yeast results, however, Bcl3 specifically interacted with the
full-length SRC-1, SRC-A, SRC-D, and SRC-E but not with SRC-B and SRC-C
(Fig. 4A). Overall, these results, along with the yeast
two-hybrid data, indicate that Bcl3 binds to specific subregions of
SRC-1 and CBP/p300.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Functional Interactions of Bcl3 with CBP and
SRC-1. A, Bcl3, Bcl
1, or various SRC-1 proteins
labeled with [35S]methionine by in vitro
translation were incubated with glutathione beads containing identical
amounts of GST alone or GST fusions to CBP-1 (the CBP residues 1-450),
CBP-2 (the CBP residues 451-1009), CBP-3 (the CBP residues
1069-1459), CBP-4 (the CBP residues 1459-1891), CBP-5 (the CBP
residues 1891-2441), and Bcl3. Beads were washed, and specifically
bound material was eluted with reduced glutathione and resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Approximately 10% of the
labeled proteins used in the binding reactions were loaded as inputs.
B, CV1 cells were transfected with 100 ng of lacZ
expression vector and expression vector encoding Bcl3, SRC-1, or p300,
either in the presence or absence of 50 ng of c-Fos, along with a
reporter gene TRE-Luc (31), as indicated. Normalized luciferase
expressions from triplicate samples are presented relative to the
lacZ expressions, and the S.D. values are less than 5%. The
representative results of three independent experiments are shown
here.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Bcl3 stimulates c-jun expression
and DNA synthesis. Rat-1 fibroblast cells were rendered quiescent
by serum starvation for 24 h and microinjected with pcDNA3 or
expression vector encoding Bcl3 (25 µg/ml), followed by
indirect immunostaining with control anti-rat IgG, anti-c-Jun antibody
(A), or anti-BrdUrd antibody (B), along with
fluorescein isothiocyanate/rhodamine-conjugated
antibodies as described previously (30). Green cells
indicate microinjected cells, whereas red cells indicate
either expression of c-Jun (A) or incorporation of BrdUrd
(B). The image was photographed with a Zeiss
AxioplanII microscope equipped with a PIXERA camera. The percentage of
cells that were immunostained for c-Jun (A) or BrdUrd
(B) is counted against the total number of cells, as
indicated. Experiments were performed at least three times, with >200
cells injected; error bars, ±2 × S.E.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
C3
(i.e. the Bcl3 residues 1-365) suffices to coactivate the
AP-1 transactivation, the AP-1 interaction interface may localize to
the Bcl3 residues 289-365, which include the Bcl3 ankyrin repeats 6 and 7 (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, the autonomous
transactivation function of Bcl3 was previously mapped to the Bcl3
residues 156-289 in yeast (26), whereas it was localized to the
C-terminal region of Bcl3 (i.e. the Bcl3 residues 289-446)
in mammalian cells (Fig. 1B). This discrepancy is likely to
have reflected some fundamental differences between yeast and mammalian
transcription machinery. The autonomous transactivation functions of
Bcl3 (particularly in mammalian cells) as well as the Bcl3-mediated
coactivation of AP-1 transactivation may involve recruitment of other
essential transcription coactivators such as CBP/p300 and SRC-1.
Consistent with this notion, Bcl3 was shown to functionally cooperate
with SRC-1 and CBP/p300 to coactivate the AP-1 transactivation (Fig. 4). Finally, it is interesting to note that Bcl3 contains a numerous number of putative phosphorylation sites, including TPA-responsive MAP
kinase sites (for a review, see Ref. 34). There is an exciting possibility that signal-dependent modification of Bcl3 such
as phosphorylation may play an important role in stimulating the AP-1 transactivation.
B p50/p52 homodimers. Therefore, Bcl3 may be
involved with the mutually antagonistic interactions between RXR and
either NF-
B (35) or AP-1 (for a review, see Ref. 36). Regarding the
proliferative function of ectopically expressed Bcl3 (Fig. 5), it is
interesting to note that AP-1 and NF-
B are known to be
proproliferative (1, 37). In addition, overexpressed Bcl3 may also
oppose the antiproliferative action of retinoids, by relieving the
retinoid/RXR-mediated inhibition of AP-1 and NF-
B. These
possibilities are currently under investigation.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
Supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Public Health
and Welfare of Korea.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Ligand
and Transcription, Chonnam National University Kwangju 500-757, South
Korea. Tel.: 82-62-530-0910; Fax: 82-62-530-0772; E-mail: jlee@chonnam.chonnam.ac.kr.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Herschman, H. R.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
60,
281-319[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Baxevanis, A.,
and Vinson, C. R.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
3,
278-285[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Horwitz, K. B.,
Jackson, T. A.,
Bain, D. L.,
Richer, J. K.,
Takimoto, G. S.,
and Tung, L.
(1996)
Mol. Endocrinol.
10,
1167-1177[Abstract]
4.
Goldman, P. S.,
Tran, V. K.,
and Goodman, R. H.
(1997)
Rec. Prog. Horm. Res.
52,
103-119
5.
Onate, S. A.,
Tsai, S. Y.,
Tsai, M. J.,
and O'Malley, B. W.
(1995)
Science
270,
1354-1357 6.
Na, S.-Y.,
Lee, S. -K.,
Han, S. -J.,
Choi, H.-S.,
Im, S. Y.,
and Lee, J. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
10831-10834 7.
Lee, S.-K.,
Kim, H.-J.,
Na, S.-Y.,
Kim, T. S.,
Choi, H.-S.,
Im, S. Y.,
and Lee, J. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16651-16654 8.
Kim, H.-J.,
Kim, J. H.,
and Lee, J. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28564-28567 9.
Lee, S.-K., Kim, H.-J., Kim, J.-W., and Lee, J. W. (1999)
Mol. Endocrinol., in press
10.
Korzus, E.,
Torchia, J.,
Rose, D. W.,
Xu, L.,
Kurokawa, R.,
McInerney, E. M.,
Mullen, T. M.,
Glass, C. K.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1998)
Science
279,
703-707 11.
Spencer, T. E.,
Jenster, G.,
Burcin, M. M.,
Allis, C. D.,
Zhou, J.,
Mizzen, C. A.,
McKenna, N. J.,
Onate, S. A.,
Tsai, S. Y.,
Tsai, M. J.,
and O'Malley, B. W.
(1997)
Nature
389,
194-198[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Chen, H.,
Lin, R. J.,
Schiltz, R. L.,
Chakravarti, D.,
Nash, A.,
Nagy, L.,
Privalsky, M. L.,
Nakatani, Y.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1997)
Cell
90,
569-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Bannister, A. J.,
and Kouzarides, T.
(1996)
Nature
384,
641-643[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Schiltz, R. L.,
Russanova, V.,
Howard, B. H.,
and Nakatani, Y.
(1996)
Cell
87,
953-959[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Yang, X.-J.,
Ogryzko, V. V.,
Nishikawa, J.,
Howard, B. H.,
and Nakatani, Y.
(1996)
Nature
382,
319-324[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Horlein, A. J.,
Naar, A. M.,
Heinzel, T.,
Torchia, J.,
Gloss, B.,
Kurokawa, R.,
Ryan, A.,
Kamei, Y.,
Soderstrom, M.,
Glass, C. K.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1995)
Nature
377,
397-404[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Chen, J. D.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1995)
Nature
377,
454-457[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
Heinzel, T.,
Lavinsky, R. M.,
Mullen, T. M.,
Soderstrom, M.,
Laherty, C. D.,
Torchia, J.,
Yang, W. M.,
Brard, G.,
Ngo, S. D.,
Davie, J. R.,
Seto, E.,
Eisenman, R. N.,
Rose, D. W.,
Glass, C. K.,
and Rosenfeld, M. G.
(1997)
Nature
387,
43-48[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Nagy, L.,
Kao, H. -Y.,
Chakravarti, D.,
Lin, R. J.,
Hassig, C. A.,
Ayer, D. E.,
Schreiber, S. L.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1997)
Cell
89,
373-380[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Gilmore, T. D.,
and Morin, P. J.
(1993)
Trends Genet.
9,
427-433[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Baldwin, A. S.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14,
649-681[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
McKeithan, T. W.,
Takimoto, G. S.,
Ohno, H.,
Bjorling, V. S.,
Morgan, R.,
Hecht, B. K.,
Dube, I.,
Sandberg, A. A.,
and Rowley, J. D.
(1997)
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
20,
64-72[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Fujita, T.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Liou, H. C.,
Scott, M. L.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1354-1363 24.
Bours, V.,
Franzoso, G.,
Azarenko, V.,
Park, S.,
Kanno, T.,
Brown, K.,
and Siebenlist, U.
(1993)
Cell
72,
729-739[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Schwarz, E. M.,
Krimpenfort, P.,
Berns, A.,
and Verma, I. M.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
187-197 26.
Na, S. -Y.,
Choi, H. -S.,
Kim, J. W.,
Na, D. S.,
and Lee, J. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
30933-30938 27.
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
Thummel, C.,
Beato, M.,
Herrlich, P.,
Schutz, G.,
Umesono, K.,
Blumberg, B.,
Kastner, P.,
Mark, M.,
Chambon, P.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1995)
Cell
83,
835-839[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Forman, B. M.,
Umesono, K.,
Chen, J.,
and Evans, R. M.
(1995)
Cell
81,
541-550[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1995)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, Greens Associates, New York
30.
Jhun, B. H.,
Rose, D. W.,
Seely, B. L.,
Rameh, L.,
Cantley, L.,
Saltiel, A. R.,
and Olefsky, J. M.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
7466-7475 31.
Choi, H. -S.,
and Moore, D. D.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
1596-1602[Abstract]
32.
Bannister, A. J.,
and Kouzarides, T.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
4758-4762[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Karin, M.,
Liu,
Zg,
and Zandi, E.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
240-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Whitmarsh, A. J.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
23,
481-485[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Na, S. -Y.,
Kang, B. Y.,
Chung, S. W.,
Han, S.-J.,
Ma, X.,
Trinchieri, G.,
Im, S.-Y.,
Lee, J. W.,
and Kim, T. S.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
7674-7680 36.
Pfahl, M.
(1993)
Skin Pharmacol.
6,
8-16
37.
Rogers, M. B.
(1997)
Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.
35,
1-46[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Zhang, M. Y.,
Harhaj, E. W.,
Bell, L.,
Sun, S. C.,
and Miller, B. A.
(1998)
Blood
92,
1225-1234 39.
Ong, S. T.,
Hackbarth, M. L.,
Degenstein, L. C.,
Baunoch, D. A.,
Anastasi, J.,
and McKeithan, T. W.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
2333-2343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Y. Kim, O. G. Park, J. W. Lee, and Y. C. Lee One- plus Two-hybrid System, a Novel Yeast Genetic Selection for Specific Missense Mutations Disrupting Protein/Protein Interactions Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2007; 6(10): 1727 - 1740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Jamaluddin, S. Choudhary, S. Wang, A. Casola, R. Huda, R. P. Garofalo, S. Ray, and A. R. Brasier Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Inducible BCL-3 Expression Antagonizes the STAT/IRF and NF-{kappa}B Signaling Pathways by Inducing Histone Deacetylase 1 Recruitment to the Interleukin-8 Promoter J. Virol., December 15, 2005; 79(24): 15302 - 15313. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mathas, K. Johrens, S. Joos, A. Lietz, F. Hummel, M. Janz, F. Jundt, I. Anagnostopoulos, K. Bommert, P. Lichter, et al. Elevated NF-{kappa}B p50 complex formation and Bcl-3 expression in classical Hodgkin, anaplastic large-cell, and other peripheral T-cell lymphomas Blood, December 15, 2005; 106(13): 4287 - 4293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Oakley, J. Mann, S. Nailard, D. E. Smart, N. Mungalsingh, C. Constandinou, S. Ali, S. J. Wilson, H. Millward-Sadler, J. P. Iredale, et al. Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B1 (p50) Limits the Inflammatory and Fibrogenic Responses to Chronic Injury Am. J. Pathol., March 1, 2005; 166(3): 695 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. C. Pratt, T. E. Bishop, D. White, G. Yasvinski, M. Menard, M. Y. Niu, and R. Clarke Estrogen Withdrawal-Induced NF-{kappa}B Activity and Bcl-3 Expression in Breast Cancer Cells: Roles in Growth and Hormone Independence Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2003; 23(19): 6887 - 6900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Watanabe, S. Wachi, and T. Fujita Identification and Characterization of BCL-3-binding Protein: IMPLICATIONS FOR TRANSCRIPTION AND DNA REPAIR OR RECOMBINATION J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 26102 - 26110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rocha, A. M. Martin, D. W. Meek, and N. D. Perkins p53 Represses Cyclin D1 Transcription through Down Regulation of Bcl-3 and Inducing Increased Association of the p52 NF-{kappa}B Subunit with Histone Deacetylase 1 Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2003; 23(13): 4713 - 4727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Muta, S. Yamazaki, A. Eto, M. Motoyama, and K. Takeshige I{kappa}B-{zeta}, a new anti-inflammatory nuclear protein induced by lipopolysaccharide, is a negative regulator for nuclear factor-{kappa}B Innate Immunity, June 1, 2003; 9(3): 187 - 191. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. U. Mysorekar, M. A. Mulvey, S. J. Hultgren, and J. I. Gordon Molecular Regulation of Urothelial Renewal and Host Defenses during Infection with Uropathogenic Escherichia coli J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2002; 277(9): 7412 - 7419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Westerheide, M. W. Mayo, V. Anest, J. L. Hanson, and A. S. Baldwin Jr. The Putative Oncoprotein Bcl-3 Induces Cyclin D1 To Stimulate G1 Transition Mol. Cell. Biol., December 15, 2001; 21(24): 8428 - 8436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-K. Lee, J.-H. Kim, Y. C. Lee, J. Cheong, and J. W. Lee Silencing Mediator of Retinoic Acid and Thyroid Hormone Receptors, as a Novel Transcriptional Corepressor Molecule of Activating Protein-1, Nuclear Factor-kappa B, and Serum Response Factor J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2000; 275(17): 12470 - 12474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Haruta, A. Kato, and K. Todokoro Isolation of a Novel Interleukin-1-inducible Nuclear Protein Bearing Ankyrin-repeat Motifs J. Biol. Chem., April 13, 2001; 276(16): 12485 - 12488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Feng, Y. Jiang, P. Meltzer, and P. M. Yen Transgenic Targeting of a Dominant Negative Corepressor to Liver Blocks Basal Repression by Thyroid Hormone Receptor and Increases Cell Proliferation J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 15066 - 15072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yamazaki, T. Muta, and K. Takeshige A Novel Ikappa B Protein, Ikappa B-zeta , Induced by Proinflammatory Stimuli, Negatively Regulates Nuclear Factor-kappa B in the Nuclei J. Biol. Chem., July 13, 2001; 276(29): 27657 - 27662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||