![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 40, 28645-28651, October 1, 1999
From the Surgical Oncology Research Laboratories, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2696
The expression of the growth
arrest- and DNA damage-inducible
genes, GADD45 and GADD153/CHOP
(C/EBP-homologous protein), as well
as GRP78 (glucose-regulated
protein of 78 kDa) was examined in several
human breast cell lines subjected to acute glutamine (GLN) deprivation.
GLN deprivation caused rapid elevation of GADD45 and
GADD153/CHOP mRNA levels in cells that were
highly dependent upon GLN for growth and viability. Both
GADD mRNAs were rapidly elevated up to several
hundred-fold. In contrast, GRP78 expression was elevated by
no more than 4-fold by GLN deprivation. The magnitude of
GADD up-regulation roughly correlated with the extent of
GLN dependence of each cell line. The levels of all three mRNAs
were responsive to alterations of ambient GLN content in a
physiologically relevant concentration range that corresponded to the
affinities of cellular GLN transporters. Provision of GLN-derived
metabolites partially inhibited the induction of GADD
expression in GLN-deprived cells. Nuclear run-on assays and mRNA
decay studies suggested that the primary mechanism leading to increased
GADD mRNA levels was not transcriptional, but rather
that GADD45 and GADD153/CHOP expression were up-regulated in response to GLN deprivation via marked
stabilization of these mRNAs. These results suggest that the
expression of GADD genes contributes to growth arrest
and/or protection from metabolic damage during GLN-poor conditions.
GADD45 (growth arrest and
DNA damage-inducible gene) is a p53-responsive
gene encoding a protein that interacts with p21/WAF1/CIP1 as well as
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (1-3). GADD153 encodes a
C/EBP-homologous protein that binds to C/EBP isoforms, and these
heterodimers bind novel DNA recognition sites (4, 5). Expression of
GADD genes is induced by medium depletion and by genotoxic
agents that cause DNA damage (6-9). Exogenous expression of
GADD45 or GADD153 can cause antiproliferative
effects (4, 10-12). GADD45 may inhibit cell proliferation
by a mechanism involving its association with p21/WAF1/CIP1 (1, 3).
Expression of both GADD45 and p21/WAF1/CIP1 are up-regulated
by wild-type p53, and these proteins may play a causal role in the
mechanism of growth repression by this tumor suppressor (2, 13-15).
GADD153 expression is induced by genotoxins and inhibitors
that block protein glycosylation and/or induce stress in the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1
and may play a causal role in the induction of cell death following ER
stress (16). Expression of exogenous GADD153 causes
apoptosis in myoblastic leukemia cells (12), and endogeneous
GADD153 expression has recently been linked to both leukemia
cell apoptosis following etoposide treatment (17) and renal apoptosis
following tumicamycin treatment (18).
GRP78 (glucose-regulated
protein of 78 kDa or BiP) is a molecular
chaperonin that aids in the synthesis and folding of glycoproteins in
the ER (19). GRP78 expression is induced by glucose
deprivation or any treatment that causes the accumulation of unfolded
or malfolded proteins in the ER (20, 21). In fact, many treatments that lead to GRP78 expression (inhibition of protein
glycosylation, glucose deprivation, and hypoxia) also induce
GADD153 expression (16, 22, 23).
Recently, it was shown that essential amino acid deprivation induced
GADD153 expression by both transcriptional and
post-transcriptional mechanisms (24). In addition, GADD153
promoter activity was induced by starvation for both essential and
nonessential amino acids (24). In contrast, little is known of what
effects nutrient availability has on GADD45 expression. The
amino acid GLN is a key regulator of cellular proliferation and
survival, but there is no information regarding the mechanism by which
GLN exerts this effect. In an attempt to gain insight into this
phenomenon, we examined the expression of GADD45,
GADD153, and GRP78 in subconfluent cultures of
human breast cell lines subjected to acute GLN deprivation. The data
presented here demonstrate that both GADD153 and
GADD45 expression is controlled by GLN availability
primarily through mRNA stabilization. Thus, GLN elicits a distinct
molecular response, destabilization of GADD mRNAs. This
response was particularly pronounced for GADD45 mRNA.
Moreover, in a series of human breast cell lines, there is a direct
correlation between the response of GADD mRNA expression
to GLN deprivation and the GLN dependence of proliferation. The results
suggest that the antiproliferative response to GLN starvation may
involve induction of GADD45 and/or GADD153
expression by a mechanism that includes stabilization of this mRNA.
This represents the first report of a potential molecular mechanism for
the antiproliferative effects of glutamine deprivation.
Materials--
All tissue culture media and medium supplements
were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. Amino acids and all
biochemicals were obtained from Sigma or Fisher. HBL100, T47D, MB175,
HS578Bst, SKBR3, and BT483 cells were purchased from the American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA). An additional description of these cell lines was published previously (25). TSE cells were established from a primary ductal breast carcinoma and kindly provided
by Dr. Simon Powell (Massachusetts General Hospital, Radiation
Oncology, Boston, MA). TSE.06 cells were obtained by adaptation of TSE
cells to low GLN conditions. Tissue culture plasticware was purchased
from Falcon (Becton Dickinson Labware, Franklin Lakes, NJ), except for
24-well tissue culture plates, which were purchased from Costar Corp.
(Cambridge, MA). CulturPlatesTM, UniFilterTM plates, and the TopCount
microplate scintillation counter were obtained from Packard Instrument
Company (Meriden, CT). L-Glutamic acid assay kits were
purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Cell Culture--
Human cell lines were grown in
75-cm2 T-flasks at 37 °C under a humidified atmosphere
of 5% CO2, 95% air. All of the cells, except TSE.06, were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented
with 4 mM L-GLN, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 0.25 µg/ml
amphotericin B, and 10 µg/ml bovine insulin (complete DMEM). To
obtain TSE.06 cells, TSE cells were serially passaged in T-75 flasks in
medium containing dialyzed fetal bovine serum and progressively lower GLN concentrations. At each passage, confluent flasks were harvested, and half of the cells were seeded into a flask containing medium with a
GLN concentration half that in the preceding culture. After approximately 4 months, cells growing in a GLN concentration of 0.06 mM were obtained and named TSE.06 cells. These cells were maintained in medium containing dialyzed fetal bovine serum and 0.06 mM L-GLN. For GLN deprivation and
concentration-response experiments, cells were plated at various
dilutions in 10-cm tissue culture dishes with complete DMEM and allowed
to plate overnight (TSE, HBL100, T47D, and TSE.06) or for approximately
42 h (SKR3 and BT483) before being rinsed twice with GLN-free
medium (identical to complete DMEM, except supplemented with 10%
dialyzed fetal bovine serum and no GLN) and fed with GLN-free media
containing amino acids or drugs as described in the figure legends.
Plating dilutions ranged from 1:3 (HBL100) to 1:6 (TSE) and were chosen to obtain cultures that were between 30 and 40% confluent at the initiation of GLN deprivation. SKBR3 and BT483 were allowed to plate
for longer periods because they exhibit relatively slow attachment,
spreading, and growth rates.
Cell Proliferation Assays--
Subconfluent cells growing in
complete DMEM were harvested, counted, and diluted in GLN-free medium.
Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at approximately 4 × 104 cells/well (HBL100) or 1 × 104
cells/well (TSE) and allowed to attach overnight in GLN-free medium.
The next day, equal volumes of GLN-free media supplemented with 2×
concentrations of GLN were then added to wells so that the final GLN
concentrations were between 0 and 4 mM. At the times indicated after feeding, relative cell densities were determined using
the colorimetric tetrazolium-salt
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
proliferation assay (26, 27). Absorbance values (A) were
calculated from OD values measured using a 550-nm wavelength filter
with a 650-nm reference filter (A = A550 nm Northern Blotting--
Total RNA was isolated by the one-step
acid-phenol guanidinium procedure (28) utilizing RNA-Stat60TM Reagent
(TelTest) according to the manufacturer's protocol followed by an
additional acid-phenol, phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol, chloroform
extraction and ethanol precipitation in the presence of sodium acetate.
Northern blotting was performed as described previously (29) using
cDNAs corresponding to human GADD45 (dbEST 602435),
GADD153 (dbEST 298470), GRP78 (HAEAC89, ATCC) and
GAPDH (pHcGAP, ATCC) as templates to generate 32P-labeled
probes with a random-prime labeling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Autoradiographic images were quantified using a laser densitometer
(Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).
RNA Stability Assays--
TSE cells were seeded in 100-mm plates
at a 1:6 dilution in complete DMEM and allowed to plate overnight (18 h). These cultures were then rinsed twice with GLN-free medium, fed
with GLN-free medium, and incubated for 19 h before being fed with
GLN-free media supplemented with 0 or 4 mM GLN and with or
without 5 µg/ml actinomycin D or with and without 100 µM
5,6-dichloro-1-b-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole (DRB).
Actinomycin D was added from a 5 mg/ml stock in absolute ethanol, and
ethanol carrier (0.1% final concentration by volume) was added to
control cultures. DRB was added from 100 mM stock in
Me2SO and Me2SO carrier (0.1% final
concentration by volume) was added to control cultures. At various
times after feeding, cultures were harvested and total RNA isolated as
described for Northern blotting.
Transcription Assay--
Nuclear run-on assays were performed
using a modification of published methods (30) employing RNeasyTM total
RNA extraction kits (Qiagen) to isolate nuclear RNA after in
vitro transcription and ExpressHybTM hybridization solution
(CLONTECH) for capture reactions. For in
vitro transcription reactions, 2-3 × 107 nuclei
were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C in transcription buffer (30)
containing 250 µCi of [ HBL100 and TSE Cells Are Highly Dependent upon Ambient GLN for
Growth and Viability--
Previous work from our laboratory examined
the effect of medium GLN concentration on the growth and death of a
series of human cell lines (25). For all these cell lines,
proliferation and ultimate cell density were dependent on ambient GLN
concentration. Increased initial GLN concentrations supported
faster growth rates and higher ultimate densities. The cell lines TSE
and HBL100 demonstrated the greatest dependence upon GLN for growth and
viability. Growth and death curves of TSE and HBL100 cells are shown in
Fig. 1. Exponentially growing cells were
seeded at low density in GLN-free medium, allowed to attach overnight,
and then fed with media containing various concentrations of GLN to
obtain final GLN concentrations between 0 and 4 mM. Within
1 day after feeding with GLN, cell densities began to increase in a
GLN-dependent fashion. For HBL100 and TSE cells, GLN
concentrations of 2.0 and 1.0 mM, respectively, were
required to support maximal growth. The results shown are in keeping
with the results of previous work, which determined that 0.8 and 0.6 mM GLN was required to support half-maximal growth rates of
HBL100 and TSE cells, respectively (25). GLN deprivation caused the
gradual death of these cells over the course of 5 days, as exhibited by
a decline in 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide absorbance and cell confluence, as well as the appearance of
detached cells and debris.
GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA Levels Are Rapidly and Dramatically
Induced during GLN Starvation of HBL100 and TSE Cells--
Because TSE
and HBL100 cells exhibited pronounced GLN dependence for growth and
viability, these two cell lines were chosen to examine the induction of
mRNAs corresponding to several stress response genes by acute GLN
deprivation. Subconfluent cells were rinsed and fed with GLN-free
medium, and the levels of GADD45, GADD153, and
GRP78 mRNAs were determined in attached cells after 0 and 45 min and 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of GLN deprivation (Fig. 2). GAPDH mRNA levels were also
determined and used as a normalization factor to correct for RNA
loading and transfer variations between samples. GLN deprivation caused
a rapid and dramatic induction of both GADD mRNAs and a
consistent, but lesser, induction of GRP78 mRNA.
GADD mRNAs were appreciably elevated within 1.5 h of GLN starvation. In the case of HBL100 cells, the GAPDH
mRNA-normalized level of GADD45 mRNA reached a
maximum of 20-fold over the initial level at 12 h, and the level
of GADD153 mRNA reached a maximum of 12-fold above the
initial level at 6 h. In contrast, the GRP78 mRNA
level peaked at only 1.8-fold greater than the initial level at 6 h. GAPDH mRNA levels were not consistently affected by GLN deprivation.
In TSE cells, GADD mRNAs were also discernibly
elevated within 1.5 h of GLN starvation. In contrast to HBL100
cells, the level of all three mRNAs increased linearly with time in
TSE cells, apparently not reaching maximum levels. At 24 h,
GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA was increased by
approximately 160- and 180-fold over the initial levels, respectively.
GRP78 mRNA reached only 3.5-fold the initial level at
24 h. In contrast to HBL100 cells, the apparent level of GAPDH
mRNA in TSE declined in a roughly linear fashion to approximately
31% of the initial value. Because of this, the increases in normalized
GADD and GRP78 mRNA levels may overestimate the true induction of expression. Nonetheless, GLN deprivation caused
the levels GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA to
increase by at least 50- and 55-fold, respectively. Rinsing HBL100 or
TSE cells with GLN-free medium and then feeding with medium containing
a normal amount of GLN (4 mM) did not cause an
observable induction of GADD mRNAs (see below, and data
not shown).
GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78 mRNA Levels Are Inversely Related to
Ambient GLN Concentration and Coincide with GLN Dependence of
Growth--
To determine the dose response of induction of these
stress-response mRNAs, subconfluent HBL100 and TSE cells were
rinsed with GLN-free medium and fed with media containing serial
dilutions of GLN from 4.0 to 0.06 mM. At 24 h after
feeding, levels of GADD45, GADD153, and
GRP78 mRNAs were determined and normalized to GAPDH mRNA levels. Media containing reduced concentrations GLN elicited a
dramatic increase of both GADD mRNA levels and a small
induction of GRP78 mRNA (Fig.
3). In the case of HBL100 cells, the
GAPDH mRNA-normalized level of GADD45 mRNA was
increased to a maximum of approximately 40-fold compared with the level
in cells incubated with 4.0 mM GLN, and the level of
GADD153 was increased to a maximum of approximately 20-fold.
For both GADD mRNAs, maximum levels were observed in
cells incubated with 0.5 mM GLN. Lower GLN concentrations actually caused a slight decrease of these mRNA levels from the maximum at 0.5 mM GLN. In contrast, GRP78
mRNA level was increased by a maximum of only 1.2-fold at 0.5 mM GLN. Interpolation of results suggested that
half-maximal induction of these mRNAs occurs between 1.0 and 0.5 mM GLN. GAPDH mRNA levels were not consistently affected by GLN concentration.
In TSE cells, GADD45 mRNA induction was greatest,
approximately 500-fold the level in 4 mM GLN-fed cells, at
the lowest concentration of GLN (0.06 mM). The level of
GADD153 mRNA also was greatest, approximately 270-fold,
at 0.06 mM GLN. GRP78 mRNA levels were increased by a maximum of only 4-fold at 0.06 mM GLN.
Interpolation of the results suggested that half-maximal inductions of
these mRNAs occurs between 0.5 and 0.25 mM GLN. In
contrast to HBL100 cells, GAPDH mRNA levels were affected by GLN
deprivation. The apparent level of GAPDH mRNA in TSE cells was
reduced in cultures fed with media containing less than 1.0 mM GLN, declining to approximately 38% of the level in 4 mM cells at 0.06 mM. Again, the increases in
normalized GADD and GRP78 mRNA levels may
therefore overestimate the true induction of expression, but GLN
deprivation did cause the levels of GADD45 and
GADD153 mRNA to increase by at least 190- and 100-fold, respectively.
It should be noted that rinsing of TSE or HBL100 cell with GLN-free
medium and then feeding with GLN-replete medium did not cause any
appreciable accumulation of GADD45, GADD153, or
GRP78 mRNAs after 24 h. In addition, time course
experiments were performed that examined the kinetics of induction for
GADD45 and GADD153 mRNAs in TSE cells fed
with media containing various GLN concentrations after being rinsed
with GLN-free medium, and no transient induction of GADD
mRNA levels was observed in cells fed with GLN-replete medium (data
not shown).
Induction of GADD45 and GADD153 Levels Correlates with the GLN
Dependence Exhibited by Several Human Breast Cell Lines--
In a
previous report, we characterized the GLN dependence and the GLN
transporter characteristics for a series of human breast carcinoma cell
lines (25). A direct correlation was found between two parameters: the
GLN ED50 for growth and the Km for GLN
of the System ASC transporter. These represent the concentration of GLN
required for half-maximal growth of each cell line and the
concentration of GLN at which each cell line's transporter is able to
transport GLN at a half-maximal rate, respectively. The induction of
GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78 by GLN
deprivation was examined in several of these cell lines, including
HBL100 and TSE cells as well as a derivative of TSE cells that was
gradually adapted to growth in medium containing a low GLN
concentration (0.06 mM), TSE.06 cells. These experiments
were conducted in a fashion similar to those described above. Values
for GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA inductions were
obtained by quantitative Northern blotting of RNA obtained from cells
subjected to GLN dose-response experiments and GLN deprivation time
course experiments. In dose-response experiments, cells were incubated
for 24 h in media containing 4, 1, 0.25, 0.06, and 0 mM GLN. In time course experiments, cells were fed with
GLN-free medium and incubated for 0, 0.75, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, 12, and
24 h (TSE and HBL100) or for 0, 3.0, 6.0, 12, and 24 h (all
others). The results of this analysis are shown in Table
I. Human breast cell lines that are less
GLN-sensitive exhibited inductions of GADD45 and
GADD153 mRNA levels by GLN deprivation that were less
pronounced and occurred at lower GLN concentrations than the inductions
in TSE or HBL100 cells. In addition, TSE cells adapted to grow in
medium containing only 0.06 mM GLN (TSE.06 cells) no longer
exhibited a striking response to GLN deprivation.
Transcription of GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78 Genes Is Increased by
No More than 2-5-Fold by GLN Deprivation--
The large increase in
GADD45 and GADD153 expression caused by GLN
deprivation could be attributed to increased transcription rates,
increased mRNA stability, or a combination of these mechanisms. In
order to test the effect of GLN upon gene transcription, subconfluent TSE cells were rinsed and fed with GLN-free medium with or without the
addition of 4 mM GLN, and nuclei were isolated 3 h
after feeding. Capture membranes were hybridized with equal activities
of purified RNA labeled during in vitro, run-on
transcription with nuclei from GLN-deprived and GLN-fed cells. A
representative experiment is shown in Fig.
4. Compared with GAPDH, the amount of
radioactively labeled transcripts captured by immobilized
GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78 cDNAs
was relatively small. When the RNA was derived from nuclei of
GLN-deprived cells, the amount of radioactivity captured by the GAPDH
cDNA was slightly reduced, whereas that captured by
GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78 cDNAs
was increased by 4-, 3-, and 2-fold, respectively. This analysis was
repeated three times with similar results. The estimated increases in
GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78
transcription by GLN deprivation varied but were always within
2-5-fold. This analysis suggested that GLN deprivation causes
up-regulation of GADD45, GADD153, and
GRP78 transcription. However, the marked increase in
GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA levels observed
cannot be fully attributed to this mechanism. In contrast, the increase
of GRP78 mRNA levels may be due to this mechanism alone.
GLN Causes Rapid Degradation of GADD45 and GADD153
mRNA--
In order to determine whether GLN may affect the
stability of GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA, the
decline of GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA levels in
GLN-starved cells was examined following GLN repletion and/or the
addition of two inhibitors of transcription, actinomycin D and DRB. In
separate experiments, subconfluent TSE cells were starved for GLN
overnight (approximately 18 h) to bring about the accumulation of
high GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA levels. In the first experiment, GLN-deprived cells were then fed with GLN-free medium
to which 0 or 4 mM GLN was added and 5 µg/ml actinomycin D or 0.1% ethanol carrier. At the various times after feeding, relative mRNA levels were calculated by comparison of
GAPDH-normalized values with the level observed in cells at time 0 (Fig. 5A). GLN repletion
elicited a rapid decline in GADD45 and GADD153
mRNA contents that was not greatly affected by actinomycin D. Half-lives of mRNA species were estimated by least-squares analysis
of ln(GAPDH-normalized mRNA levels) versus time,
obtaining a decay constant from the slope of the linear portion of each
curve. After feeding with GLN, GADD45 mRNA levels
decayed with apparent half-lives of 45 and 29 min with and without
actinomycin D, respectively. Likewise, GADD153 mRNA
levels in GLN-fed cells decayed with apparent half-lives of 36 and 26 min with and without actinomycin D, respectively.
In contrast, when cells were fed with GLN-free medium,
GADD45 mRNA levels were maintained both in the absence
and presence of actinomycin D. In fact, except for the 8-h sample,
GAPDH-normalized GADD45 mRNA levels seemed to increase
slightly after feeding with GLN-free medium containing actinomycin D. This indicates that the decay rate of GADD45 mRNA was
similar to that of GAPDH mRNA. In these cells, GAPDH mRNA
half-life was estimated to be approximately 13 h. Comparing this
figure to the half-life of GADD45 mRNA observed in the
presence of GLN (45 min), it can be estimated that the decay of
GADD45 mRNA was accelerated approximately 17-fold by ambient GLN. GADD153 mRNA levels were also maintained
after feeding cells with GLN-free medium and ethanol carrier. When
actinomycin D was included, the apparent half-life of
GADD153 mRNA was 2.8 h. This contrasts with a
half-life of 36 min observed in the presence of GLN and actinomycin D. Thus, the GADD153 mRNA half-life was accelerated
approximately 5-fold by ambient GLN. In contrast, in the presence of
actinomycin D, the decay of GRP78 mRNA accelerated by
less than 2-fold by ambient GLN. The apparent half-life of GRP78 mRNA was 9.2 h in GLN-free medium and
4.8 h in the presence of GLN. This comparison, together with the
expression of GRP78 mRNA observed in the ethanol control
cultures, suggests that the effect of GLN upon GRP78
mRNA expression is equally attributable to transcriptional and
post-transcriptional mechanisms.
Nearly identical results were obtained when this experimental procedure
was repeated using DRB, rather than actinomycin D, to block
transcription (Fig. 5B). This experiment confirmed the rapid
decay of GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA levels in
cells fed with 4 mM GLN (and treated with 01%
Me2SO carrier). In this case, GADD45 and
GADD153 mRNA levels as well as GRP78 levels
continued to increase for 8, 4, and 24 h after refeeding the cells
with GLN-free medium with Me2SO carrier. The reason for
this is not apparent, for the cells were starved for GLN for
approximately 18 h prior to refeeding. DRB effectively inhibited
the further increase in these mRNA levels in continuously
GLN-starved cells. After feeding with 4 mM GLN, GADD45 mRNA levels decayed with apparent half-lives of
53 and 26 min with and without DRB, respectively. Likewise,
GADD153 mRNA levels in GLN-fed cells decayed with
apparent half-lives of 38 and 28 min with and without DRB,
respectively. Feeding with GLN and Me2SO carrier caused
GRP78 mRNA levels to transiently increase and then
decrease to approximately 40% of the level at time 0. In the presence
of 4 mM GLN and DRB, GRP78 mRNA decayed with
an apparent half-life of 3.6 h. When cells were refed with
GLN-free medium and DRB, the GADD45 mRNA levels were
maintained and slightly increased relative to GAPDH mRNA levels.
Again, this indicated that the decay rate of GADD45 mRNA
was similar to that of GAPDH mRNA. In these cells, GAPDH mRNA
half-life was estimated to be approximately 11 h. Comparing this
value to the half-life of GADD45 mRNA in the presence of
4 mM GLN and DRB (53 min), it can be estimated that GLN
feeding caused an approximately 12-fold increase in the GADD45 mRNA decay rate. In the presence of DRB,
GADD153 mRNA decayed with an apparent half-life of
2.3 h when cells were refed with GLN-free medium. By comparison
with the figure obtained in the presence of GLN and DRB (38 min), it is
apparent that GLN caused an approximate 4-fold increase in the
GADD153 decay rate. Under GLN-free conditions and DRB,
GRP78 mRNA decayed with an apparent half-life of 6 h, which was approximately 65% greater than the half-life obtained in
the presence of ambient GLN. Thus, all the findings obtained
using actinomycin D to block transcription were confirmed by the use of
DRB.
The data presented here describe a rapid and pronounced response
to GLN starvation; namely, the induction of GADD45 and
GADD153 mRNA expression. This response was particularly
acute in two human breast cell lines (HBL100 and TSE), which exhibit
relatively high rates of GLN utilization and extreme dependence upon
GLN for growth and viability (25). HBL100 cells were originally
obtained from a mother's milk shortly after giving birth (31). This
cell line is considered to be untransformed but can become tumorigenic
during extensive in vitro culturing (32). TSE cells were
derived from the tumor of a ductal adenocarcinoma patient. TSE cells
exhibit an epitheliod morphology and form tumors in athymic nude mice (data not shown). The induction of GADD45 and
GADD153 mRNA expression was lesser in breast cell lines
that are less GLN-dependent. In general, the half-maximal
inductions roughly coincided with GLN dependences for growth and GLN
transporter affinities (Table I). This suggests that this response
coincides with diminished GLN influx or, conceivably, a lack of GLN
transporter occupancy. However, the results with TSE.06 cells suggest
that transporter affinity does not determine the GLN concentration at
which the response is half-maximal. TSE.06 cells exhibit very little
GLN-dependence for growth but retain a GLN-transporter affinity that is
not very different from that of the highly GLN-dependent
parental TSE cells. The Km of the ASC GLN
transporter expressed by TSE.06 cells was determined to be 0.19 mM, whereas that of the parental TSE cells is 0.39 mM. In contrast, adaptation to growth in low-GLN medium caused the GLN ED50 for growth to be reduced
by 10-fold in TSE.06 cells compared with parental TSE cells.
Consequently, the half-maximal induction of GADD45 and
GADD153 expression in TSE.06 cells was observed at
approximately 0.06 mM GLN (Table I). By comparison with TSE
cells, the induction of GADD mRNA expression by TSE.06
cells might be expected to be half-maximal at 0.3 or 0.4 mM
if the GLN transporter affinity determined this response. In addition,
the extent of GADD mRNA inductions are reduced by more
than 1 order of magnitude in TSE.06 cells compared with the parent line.
Whether the up-regulation of GADD45 and/or
GADD153 plays any causal role in the growth arrest of cell
death that results when HBL100 and TSE cells are deprived of GLN has
yet to be tested. There are indications that these GADD45
and C/EBP-homologous proteins possess directly antiproliferative or
apoptotic functions. Several previous studies have implicated
GADD45 expression in the mechanism of growth arrest
triggered by p53 expression (2, 10, 13-15). GADD153
expression has also been implicated in growth arrest and apoptosis (4,
11, 12). Conversely, GADD45 and/or GADD153 could
possess functions analogous to traditional stress-response genes,
serving to protect cells from stress-induced damage and/or aiding the
recovery of normal cellular functions following stress. Indeed, growth
arrest could itself serve as a protective mechanism, by conserving
energy and halting DNA synthesis in a time of glutamine scarcity.
The effect of GLN deprivation on the expression of another
stress-response gene, GRP78, was also examined. In contrast
to GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA, GRP78
mRNA levels were increased only marginally in GLN-starved cells.
This was surprising, given that many genotoxic agents that induce
GADD153 expression have comparable effects on
GRP78 expression (23, 33, 34). In particular, GADD153 and GRP78 are expressed in response to
agents that interfere with glycoprotein expression, an observation that
led to the conclusion that both genes respond primarily to ER
stress (16). Moreover, exogenous expression of GRP78/BiP
depressed the induction of GADD153 expression in response to
several agents that cause ER stress as well as methyl methanesulfonate,
an agent thought to induce GADD153 expression by causing DNA
damage (16).
GADD153 expression is induced by deprivation of cells with
several amino acids. Marten et al. (35) demonstrated the
induction of GADD153 mRNA levels in rat hepatoma cells
by deprivation of phenylalanine, methionine, leucine, and tryptophan.
In these cells, tryptophan deprivation caused the greatest induction,
which was approximately 40-fold. Bruhat et al. (24)
demonstrated that leucine starvation caused a 30-fold up-regulation of
GADD153 expression in HeLa, HepG2, and Caco-2 cells. These
authors also demonstrated that deprivation of several amino acids
caused GADD153 promoter activity to be increased by up to
8-fold in reporter-transfected HeLa cells. GLN deprivation caused
GADD153 promoter activity to be increased by approximately
3-fold. This is consistent with the run-on transcription results (Fig.
4), which demonstrated that GLN increased transcription of the
GADD153 gene in TSE cells by a similar amount. Likewise,
GADD45 and GRP78 transcription were increased by
4- and 2-fold, respectively. Thus the marked increase in
GADD45 and GADD153 mRNA levels could not be
solely attributed to increased gene transcription rates.
An examination of the decay of GADD45 and GADD153
mRNA in TSE cells suggested that GLN caused a rapid destabilization
of these two transcripts (Fig. 5). The level of these mRNAs
declined rapidly after GLN repletion, regardless of actinomycin D or
DRB treatment. However, these mRNAs decayed relatively slowly when
cells were fed with GLN-free media containing inhibitors of
transcription. The effect of GLN upon mRNA decay rate was most
pronounced for GADD45. The decay of this mRNA was
accelerated by 12- and 17-fold by GLN. GLN had a lesser, but still
pronounced, effect on GADD153 mRNA decay, accelerating
its decay by 4- and 5-fold. GLN had a lesser effect on GRP78
mRNA decay, increasing its decay by less than 2-fold. Thus, the
increases in GADD45, GADD153, and
GRP78 mRNA levels produced by GLN deprivation can be
attributed to both increases in gene transcription rates and decreases
in mRNA decay rates. In the case of GADD153 and
GADD45, mRNA stabilization is the predominant cause of
elevated mRNA levels. This is particularly true for
GADD45 mRNA, which is dramatically stabilized in
GLN-deprived cells.
Thus, the most striking effect of GLN deprivation observed in these
cells is the pronounced inhibition of GADD45 mRNA decay. Computer analysis of the 3'-UTR of human GADD45 mRNA
sequence shows that this message can assume a complex secondary
configuration, which includes several stem-loop structures (data not
shown). GADD45 mRNA stability may be affected by the
activity of an RNA-binding protein, which interacts with one of these
structures within the 3'-UTR of this mRNA. Several unstable
mRNAs contain a sequence element known as an AU-rich element (ARE),
which when bound by an ARE binding factor (AUF1) causes rapid
degradation of these mRNAs (36). AREs contain multiple copies of
the sequence AUUUA, and two groups have determined that the consensus
ARE is composed of the sequence UUAUUUAUU (37, 38). One copy of this
element is only weakly destabilizing, but two or more repeats of this element cause pronounced destabilization. It should be noted that the
3'-UTR of GADD45 mRNA is relatively AU rich (68%).
GADD45 does contain two AUUUA sequences in its 3'-UTR at
bases 1060 and 1278. However, neither of these match the nine-base
consensus; the upstream element is UAAUUUAGA, and the downstream
element is UUAUUUAUG. Thus, GADD45 contains only a single
"ARE-like" element. We have not found any other known RPB
recognition sequence element in the GADD45 cDNA sequence.
The mechanism(s) by which GLN depletion and subsequent cellular
stresses induce the transcription of and stabilize mRNAs for the
growth arrest genes GADD45, GADD153, and
GRP78 mRNAs remains to be determined. It is conceivable
that completely separate mechanisms underlie these effects.
Nonetheless, the antiproliferative nature of GADD45 and
GADD153 suggests that the rapidly and dramatically up-regulated expression of these genes represents a potential molecular
basis for the long observed yet poorly understood GLN dependence of
mammalian cells in culture. Alternatively, the genes may serve to
protect cells from the detrimental effects of GLN deprivation.
We acknowledge the technical contributions of
Edward Beherens and Raymond J. Lustig as well as the valuable editorial
input of Julianne Wattles and Dr. Barrie P. Bode.
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant P30-DK40561 (Clinical Nutrition Research Center at Harvard
Pilot Feasibility Grant to S. F. A.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
GLN, glutamine;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
DRB, 5,6-dichloro-1-b-D-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole;
UTR, untranslated region;
ARE, AU-rich element.
Glutamine Deprivation Induces the Expression of
GADD45 and GADD153 Primarily by mRNA
Stabilization*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
A650 nm).
-32P]UTP. Following chromatin
disruption with high salt buffer, DNase treatment, and isopropyl
alcohol precipitation, RNA was resuspended in 0.1% SDS, diluted with
lysis buffer RTL (Qiagen), and then purified using the RNeasyTM total
RNA extraction kit, following the manufacturer's instructions.
Transcripts were captured by linearized and denatured plasmids
(described above for Northern blotting) immobilized on nylon membranes
at 2 µg/slot. Capture membranes were blocked for 15-30 min in
ExpressHybTM hybridization solution at 65 °C and then contacted with
1 × 107 cpm/ml of purified in vitro
labeled RNA diluted in ExpressHybTM hybridization solution for 30 h at 65 °C. After extensive washing at 65 °C with 1× SSC
containing 0.1% SDS, membranes were treated with 50 µg/ml RNase A
(Qiagen) for 30 min at room temperature and then washed at room
temperature with 1× SSC containing 0.1% SDS. Captured transcripts
were detected by contacting membranes to hypersensitive x-ray film
(ReflectionTM, NEN Life Science Products), and autoradiographic images
were quantified using a laser densitometer (Molecular Dynamics).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Glutamine-dependent growth and
viability of the human breast cell lines HBL100 and TSE. Cells
were seeded in 96-well plates at approximately 4 × 104 cells/well (HBL100) or 1 × 104
cells/well (TSE) in GLN-free medium and allowed to attach overnight.
Equal volumes of media were then added to wells so that the final GLN
concentrations were between 0 and 4 mM. At the times
indicated after feeding, relative cell densities were quantified using
a colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium
bromide (MTT) proliferation assay as described under
"Experimental Procedures." Concentrations of GLN were as follows: 0 mM (
), 0.25 mM (
), 0.5 mM
(
), 1.0 mM (
), 2.0 mM (
), and 4.0 mM (
).

View larger version (84K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Induction of GADD45,
GADD153, and GRP78 mRNA
expression by GLN starvation. Cells were seeded in medium
containing 4 mM GLN, allowed to plate overnight, and then
rinsed and fed with GLN-free medium. At the indicated times after
feeding, total RNA was isolated from cells, equal amounts of total RNA
were electrophoresed (10 µg/lane), and Northern blotting was
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures," utilizing
cDNA-derived probes for specific genes as indicated.

View larger version (88K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Response of GADD45,
GADD153, and GRP78 mRNA
expression to various media GLN concentrations. Cells were seeded
in medium containing 4 mM GLN, allowed to plate overnight,
and then rinsed with GLN-free medium and fed with media containing
serial dilutions of GLN. At 24 h after feeding, total RNA was
isolated from cells, equal amounts of total RNA were electrophoresed
(10 µg/lane), and Northern blotting was performed utilizing
cDNA-derived probes for the genes indicated. Concentrations of GLN
were as follows. Lane 1, 4 mM; lane 2, 2 mM; lane 3, 1 mM; lane 4, 0.5 mM;
lane 5, 0.25 mM; lane 6, 0.125 mM; lane 7, 0.06 mM GLN.
Comparison of GADD45 and GADD153 induction by GLN deprivation in human
breast cell lines with varying GLN sensitivities

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effect of GLN deprivation on
GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78 transcription rates. TSE cells were plated in 4 mM GLN-containing medium overnight and then rinsed and fed
with medium containing 0 or 4 mM GLN. Three hours after
feeding, cells were harvested, and nuclei were isolated and
cryopreserved. Transcription from nuclei (2 × 107)
was continued for 30 min at 30 °C in the presence of
[32P]UTP. Capture membranes were prepared by binding 2 µg each of linearized and denatured plasmids containing the cDNA
inserts indicated in an array as follows: GADD45 in the
upper left position, with
GADD153 and GRP78 below; GAPDH in the
upper right position with pBS
below that (pBS represents pBluescript SK+). Two
identical capture membranes (shown side by side) were hybridized for 42 h with equal activities
(2 × 107 cpm) of purified RNA from cells incubated
with (+) and without (
) GLN, followed by washing, RNase treatment,
and autoradiography.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Effect of GLN on
GADD45, GADD153, and GRP78 mRNA decay. Subconfluent TSE cells were starved for GLN
for 19 h and then fed with GLN-free medium to which 0 or 4 mM GLN was added, which contained an inhibitor of
transcription or carrier alone. A, 5 µg/ml actinomycin D
(ActD) was added to inhibit transcription, and 0.1% ethanol
carrier (EtOH) was added to control cultures. B,
100 µM DRB was added to inhibit transcription, and 0.1%
Me2SO (DMSO) was added to control cultures. At
the indicated times after feeding, total RNA was isolated, and
quantitative Northern blotting was performed. Relative mRNA levels
were calculated by comparison of GAPDH-normalized values with the level
observed in cells at time 0.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Present address:
University of New Mexico, Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine, Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Basic Sciences Bldg. 249, Albuquerque, NM 87131-5221. Tel.: 505-272-3333; E-mail:
SFAbcouwer@salud.unm.edu.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Smith, M. L.,
Chen, I. T.,
Zhan, Q.,
Bae, I.,
Chen, C. Y.,
Gilmer, T. M.,
Kastan, M. B.,
O'Connor, P. M.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1994)
Science
266,
1376-1380 2.
Kastan, M. B.,
Zhan, Q.,
el-Deiry, W. S.,
Carrier, F.,
Jacks, T.,
Walsh, W. V.,
Plunkett, B. S.,
Vogelstein, B.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1992)
Cell
71,
587-597[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Kearsey, J. M.,
Coates, P. J.,
Prescott, A. R.,
Warbrick, E.,
and Hall, P. A.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
1675-1683[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Barone, M. V.,
Crozat, A.,
Tabaee, A.,
Philipson, L.,
and Ron, D.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
453-464 5.
Ubeda, M.,
Wang, X. Z.,
Zinszner, H.,
Wu, I.,
Habener, J. F.,
and Ron, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1479-1489[Abstract]
6.
Jackman, J.,
Alamo, I., Jr.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
5656-5662 7.
Delmastro, D. A.,
Li, J.,
Vaisman, A.,
Solle, M.,
and Chaney, S. G.
(1997)
Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.
39,
245-253[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Jeong, J. K.,
Stevens, J. L.,
Lau, S. S.,
and Monks, T. J.
(1996)
Mol. Pharmacol.
50,
592-598[Abstract]
9.
Luethy, J. D.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
5-10 10.
Zhan, Q.,
Lord, K. A.,
Alamo, I., Jr.,
Hollander, M. C.,
Carrier, F.,
Ron, D.,
Kohn, K. W.,
Hoffman, B.,
Liebermann, D. A.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2361-2371 11.
Chen, C.,
Nussenzweig, A.,
Guo, M.,
Kim, D.,
Li, G. C.,
and Ling, C. C.
(1996)
Oncogene
13,
1659-1665[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Matsumoto, M.,
Minami, M.,
Takeda, K.,
Sakao, Y.,
and Akira, S.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
395,
143-147[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Landesman, Y.,
Bringold, F.,
Milne, D. D.,
and Meek, D. W.
(1997)
Cell Signal.
9,
291-298[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Zhan, Q.,
Bae, I.,
Kastan, M. B.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
2755-2760 15.
Carrier, F.,
Smith, M. L.,
Bae, I.,
Kilpatrick, K. E.,
Lansing, T. J.,
Chen, C. Y.,
Engelstein, M.,
Friend, S. H.,
Henner, W. D.,
Gilmer, T. M.,
Kastan, M. B.,
and Fornace, A. J., Jr.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32672-32677 16.
Wang, X. Z.,
Lawson, B.,
Brewer, J. W.,
Zinszner, H.,
Sanjay, A.,
Mi, L. J.,
Boorstein, R.,
Kreibich, G.,
Hendershot, L. M.,
and Ron, D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4273-4280[Abstract]
17.
Eymin, B.,
Dubrez, L.,
Allouche, M.,
and Solary, E.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
686-695 18.
Zinszner, H.,
Kuroda, M.,
Wang, X.-Z.,
Batchvarova, N.,
Lightfoot, R. T.,
Remotti, H.,
Stevens, J. L.,
and Ron, D.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
982-995 19.
Little, E.,
Ramakrishnan, M.,
Roy, B.,
Gazit, G.,
and Lee, A. S.
(1994)
Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expr.
4,
1-18[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
20.
Wooden, S. K.,
Li, L. J.,
Navarro, D.,
Qadri, I.,
Pereira, L.,
and Lee, A. S.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5612-5623 21.
Kozutsumi, Y.,
Segal, M.,
Normington, K.,
Gething, M. J.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1988)
Nature
332,
462-464[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Carlson, S. G.,
Fawcett, T. W.,
Bartlett, J. D.,
Bernier, M.,
and Holbrook, N. J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4736-4744 23.
Price, B. D.,
and Calderwood, S. K.
(1992)
Cancer Res
52,
3814-3817 24.
Bruhat, A.,
Jousse, C.,
Wang, X. Z.,
Ron, D.,
Ferrara, M.,
and Fafournoux, P.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17588-17593 25.
Collins, C. L.,
Wasa, M.,
Souba, W. W.,
and Abcouwer, S. F.
(1998)
J. Cell. Physiol.
176,
166-178[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Green, L. M.,
Reade, J. L.,
and Ware, C. F.
(1984)
J. Immunol. Methods
70,
257-268[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Mosmann, T.
(1983)
J. Immunol. Methods
65,
55-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Chomcynski, P.,
and Sacchis, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Abcouwer, S. F.,
Lukaszewicz, G. C.,
and Souba, W. W.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
L141-L151 30.
Greenberg, M. E.,
and Bender, T. P.
(1996)
in
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
(Ausubel, F. M., ed), Vol. 1
, pp. 4.10.1-4.10.17, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York
31.
Gaffney, E.,
Polanowski, F. P.,
Blackburn, S. E.,
and Lambiase, J. P.
(1976)
Cell Tissue Res.
172,
269-279[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Dhaliwal, M. K.,
Giovanella, B. C.,
and Pathak, S.
(1990)
Anticancer Res.
10,
113-118[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Outinen, P. A.,
Sood, S. K.,
Liaw, P. C.,
Sarge, K. D.,
Maeda, N.,
Hirsh, J.,
Ribau, J.,
Podor, T. J.,
Weitz, J. I.,
and Austin, R. C.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
332,
213-221
34.
Halleck, M. M.,
Holbrook, N. J.,
Skinner, J.,
Liu, H.,
and Stevens, J. L.
(1997)
Cell Stress Chaperones
2,
31-40[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Marten, N. W.,
Burke, E. J.,
Hayden, J. M.,
and Straus, D. S.
(1994)
FASEB J.
8,
538-544[Abstract]
36.
DeMaria, C. T.,
and Brewer, G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12179-12184 37.
Lagnado, C. A.,
Brown, C. Y.,
and Goodall, G. J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
7984-7995 38.
Zubiaga, A. M.,
Belasco, J. G.,
and Greenberg, M. E.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2219-2230[Abstract]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Watford Glutamine Metabolism and Function in Relation to Proline Synthesis and the Safety of Glutamine and Proline Supplementation J. Nutr., October 1, 2008; 138(10): 2003S - 2007S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Sic. L. Chan, D. Liu, G. A. Kyriazis, P. Bagsiyao, X. Ouyang, and M. P. Mattson Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein-4 Regulates Calcium Homeostasis and Sensitivity to Store Depletion-induced Apoptosis in Neural Cells J. Biol. Chem., December 8, 2006; 281(49): 37391 - 37403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Reinert, L. M. Oberle, S. A. Wek, P. Bunpo, X. P. Wang, I. Mileva, L. O. Goodwin, C. J. Aldrich, D. L. Durden, M. A. McNurlan, et al. Role of Glutamine Depletion in Directing Tissue-specific Nutrient Stress Responses to L-Asparaginase J. Biol. Chem., October 20, 2006; 281(42): 31222 - 31233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, D. Bhatia, H. Xia, V. Castranova, X. Shi, and F. Chen Nucleolin links to arsenic-induced stabilization of GADD45{alpha} mRNA Nucleic Acids Res., January 18, 2006; 34(2): 485 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Roybal, L. A. Hunsaker, O. Barbash, D. L. V. Jagt, and S. F. Abcouwer The Oxidative Stressor Arsenite Activates Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor mRNA Transcription by an ATF4-dependent Mechanism J. Biol. Chem., May 27, 2005; 280(21): 20331 - 20339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Scott and G. Loo Curcumin-induced GADD153 gene up-regulation in human colon cancer cells Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2155 - 2164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Bobrovnikova-Marjon, P. L. Marjon, O. Barbash, D. L. Vander Jagt, and S. F. Abcouwer Expression of Angiogenic Factors Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Interleukin-8/CXCL8 Is Highly Responsive to Ambient Glutamine Availability: Role of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B and Activating Protein-1 Cancer Res., July 15, 2004; 64(14): 4858 - 4869. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Roybal, S. Yang, C.-W. Sun, D. Hurtado, D. L. Vander Jagt, T. M. Townes, and S. F. Abcouwer Homocysteine Increases the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor by a Mechanism Involving Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Transcription Factor ATF4 J. Biol. Chem., April 9, 2004; 279(15): 14844 - 14852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|