JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, J.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29075-29080, October 8, 1999


Zinc Finger of Replication Protein A, a Non-DNA Binding Element, Regulates Its DNA Binding Activity through Redox*

Jang-Su Park, Mu Wang, Su-Jung Park, and Suk-Hee LeeDagger

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, the Indiana University Cancer Center and Walther Oncology Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Eukaryotic replication protein A (RPA) is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein with multiple functions in DNA replication, repair, and genetic recombination. RPA contains an evolutionarily conserved 4-cysteine-type zinc finger motif (X3CX2-4CX12-15CX2C) that has a potential role in regulation of DNA replication and repair (Dong, J., Park, J-S., and Lee, S-H. (1999) Biochem. J. 337, 311-317 and Lin, Y.-L., Shivji, M. K. K., Chen, C., Kolodner, R., Wood, R. D., and Dutta, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1453-1461), even though the zinc finger itself is not essential for its DNA binding activity (Kim, D. K., Stigger, E., and Lee, S.-H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15124-15129). Here, we show that RPA single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding activity is regulated by reduction-oxidation (redox) through its zinc finger domain. RPA-ssDNA interaction was stimulated 10-fold by the reducing agent, dithiothreitol (DTT), whereas treatment of RPA with oxidizing agent, diazene dicarboxylic acid bis[N,N-dimethylamide] (diamide), significantly reduced this interaction. The effect of diamide was reversed by the addition of excess DTT, suggesting that RPA ssDNA binding activity is regulated by redox. Redox regulation of RPA-ssDNA interaction was more effective in the presence of 0.2 M NaCl or higher. Cellular redox factor, thioredoxin, was able to replace DTT in stimulation of RPA DNA binding activity, suggesting that redox protein may be involved in RPA modulation in vivo. In contrast to wild-type RPA, zinc finger mutant (cysteine to alanine mutation at amino acid 486) did not require DTT for its ssDNA binding activity and is not affected by redox. Together, these results suggest a novel function for a putative zinc finger in the regulation of RPA DNA binding activity through cellular redox.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The replication protein A (RPA1; also known as human single-stranded DNA-binding protein) is a three-subunit complex (70-, 34-, and 11-kDa; p70, p34, and p11, respectively) essential for DNA replication, nucleotide excision repair, and genetic recombination (54). In simian virus 40 (SV40) replication, RPA mediates unwinding of replication origin in the presence of SV40 T-antigen and topoisomerase I/II. During replication, it interacts with SV40 T-antigen and DNA polymerase alpha -primase (pol alpha -primase) complex (6, 7), which is necessary for the initiation of SV40 DNA replication (7-9). RPA is also involved in the elongation phase of DNA replication, because it stimulates pol alpha , pol delta , and pol epsilon  activity on a primed template DNA (10, 11).

In nucleotide excision repair, RPA interacts with several key repair proteins, Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) group A-complementing protein, XPA (12-15), XPG (13), and XPF-excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (16). RPA stabilizes the XPA-damaged DNA complex through the interaction with XPA, which appears to be essential for DNA repair (14, 17). RPA itself can interact with UV-damaged DNA (18); however, the physiological relevance of RPA-damaged DNA interaction in DNA repair is not clear. RPA is also involved in the later stage of nucleotide excision repair, gap-filling reaction, in collaboration with proliferating cell nuclear antigen, replication factor-C, and pol delta  (or pol epsilon ) (19). In homologous recombination, RPA physically interacts with Rad51 and Rad52, which appears to be essential for initiation of recombination (20-24).

The large subunit of RPA, p70, has multiple functional domains, including pol alpha  stimulation, ssDNA binding, and a conserved zinc finger domain with 4-cysteine type (3, 5, 25). The ssDNA binding domain of RPA resides in the middle of p70 (3-5), and the structural analysis revealed that this domain consists of two homologous subdomains in tandem position (26). The DNA binding domain but not the polymerase stimulation domain is essential for the function of RPA in replication (27). Both yeast RPA and human RPA share a highly conserved putative metal binding domain of the 4-cysteine type (X3CX2-4CX12-15CX2C) toward the C terminus (amino acids 478-503) (28, 29) of p70. Zinc finger domain in several DNA-binding proteins such as SP1 transcription factors and adenovirus DNA-binding protein plays a key role in the interaction with DNA (30-32). Deletion analysis indicated that the zinc finger domain of RPA, unlike others, is not essential for its ssDNA binding activity (2, 4, 27). However, mutation at the zinc finger domain differentially affected its function in replication and nucleotide excision repair (1, 2), suggesting a possible role for zinc finger domain in regulation.

In mammalian cells, DNA damage or heat shock induces inhibition of replication that can be efficiently reversed by the addition of human RPA (33, 34), suggesting a role for RPA in regulation of DNA replication in response to environmental stress. It is not clear how RPA is involved in stress-induced replication arrest; however, an observation with severe combined immunodeficient mice cells (35) argues that RPA phosphorylation by ionizing radiation correlates with its reduced ssDNA binding activity, suggesting a possible role of RPA phosphorylation in stress-induced replication arrest. In contrast, an in vitro experiment with hyperphosphorylated form of RPA demonstrated that DNA replication and repair activities were not affected by RPA p34 phosphorylation (36).

In this study, we found that RPA ssDNA binding activity is regulated through its zinc finger domain via reduction-oxidation (redox), one of the major regulatory mechanisms in response to environmental stress. A possible role for zinc finger domain in redox regulation is discussed below.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Proteins and Chemicals-- Thioredoxin, N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), and diamide (diazene dicarboxylic acid bis[N,N-dimethylamide]) were obtained from Sigma, and DTT was purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.

Preparation of Wild-type and Mutant RPA-- RPA was prepared according to the procedure described previously (37) with slight modifications. Briefly, lysates were prepared from insect cells (Sf-9) coinfected with recombinant baculoviruses encoding wild-type p11, wild-type p34, and either wild-type or mutant p70. After adjusting the salt concentration to 0.5 M NaCl, lysates were loaded onto a ssDNA cellulose column equilibrated with buffer A (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10% glycerol, 0.02% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.1 µg/ml leupeptin, and 0.2 µg/ml antipain) containing 0.5 M NaCl. The column was successively washed with 20 column volumes of the buffer A containing 0.5 M NaCl and 0.8 M NaCl. The proteins were eluted with buffer A containing 2.0 M NaCl, 40% ethylene glycol. The eluted fractions were diluted 5-fold with buffer A and loaded onto an Affi-Gel Blue (Bio-Rad) column that was equilibrated with buffer A containing 0.5 M NaCl. After washing the column with buffer A containing 0.5 M NaCl and 0.8 M NaCl, proteins were eluted with buffer containing 2.5 M NaCl, 40% ethylene glycol. The RPA-containing fractions were pooled and dialyzed against buffer A containing 50 mM NaCl and further purified on a Q-Sepharose column with a linear salt gradient (50 mM to 0.4 M NaCl). All purification procedures were carried out at 4 °C, and during purification, RPA was monitored by immunoblotting using anti-p70 and -p34 antibodies (37). The fractions with at least 90% purity by Coomassie staining were collected and stored at -80 °C until use.

RPA-ssDNA Binding Assay-- Oligo(dT)50 was 5'-end-labeled with [gamma -32P]ATP (ICN) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) based on the manufacturer's instructions. The indicated amount of wild-type or mutant RPA was incubated with 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50 at room temperature for 15 min in the reaction mixtures (30 µl) containing 50 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.8), 10 mM MgCl2, poly(dI·dC) (0.2 µg), bovine serum albumin (0.2 µg/µl), and indicated amounts of DTT or NaCl. Protein-DNA complexes were analyzed using 5% polyacrylamide gels in 1 × Tris borate EDTA (acrylamide:bisacrylamide = 79:1). The gels were dried and exposed to x-ray films (Eastman Kodak Co). The bands of interest were excised from the gels and measured for radioactivity using a Beckman Scintillation Counter LS 6500.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

RPA ssDNA Binding Activity Is Regulated by Redox-- In an effort to understand the regulatory function of RPA, we examined whether RPA ssDNA binding activity is affected by redox. For this, RPA was preincubated with various amounts of DTT and examined for its interaction with oligo(dT)50 in the presence of 200 mM NaCl. RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay on polyacrylamide gel under equilibrium conditions (Fig. 1a and data not shown). A very low RPA-DNA complex was formed in the absence of DTT, which was stimulated up to 10-fold by the addition of DTT (Fig. 1a). To examine redox regulation further, RPA was treated with the oxidizing agent diamide in the presence of 0.4 mM DTT. The addition of increasing amounts of diamide gradually decreased the formation of RPA-DNA complex (Fig. 1b). The inhibitory effect of diamide (3.2 mM) on RPA-DNA interaction was reversed by DTT only when added more than the stoichiometric amounts (Fig. 1c; lanes 7-8). These results strongly suggest that RPA ssDNA binding activity is regulated by redox potential.


View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1.   RPA DNA binding activity is stimulated by a reducing agent, DTT (panel a), but is inhibited by the oxidizing agent, diamide (panel b). a, Wild-type recombinant human RPA (20 ng) was preincubated with 0 mM (lane 2), 0.02 mM (lane 3), 0.2 mM (lane 4), 2 mM (lane 5), and 20 mM DTT (lane 6), and then 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50 was added and allowed to incubate for 15 min at room temperature. No RPA was included in lane 1. The RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by 5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (acrylamide:bisacrylamide = 79:1). For quantitation, regions of RPA-DNA complex shown in the figure were excised and measured for radioactivity. b, RPA (20 ng) was preincubated with 0.4 mM DTT and increasing amounts of diamide (0, 0.4, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 10 mM diamide in lanes 2-7, respectively). Lane 1 contained no RPA. The RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by the procedure described in panel a. The inhibitory effect of diamide on RPA ssDNA binding activity is reversed by the addition of excess DTT (panel c). c, RPA (20 ng) was preincubated with 3.2 mM diamide and increasing amounts of DTT (0, 0.4, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, and 8.0 mM DTT in lanes 3-8, respectively). Lane 1 contained no RPA, and lane 2 contained 0.4 mM DTT but no diamide.

Effect of Reducing Agents on RPA-ssDNA Interaction-- We then examined how redox potential affects RPA DNA binding affinity. In the absence of DTT, RPA ssDNA binding activity was sensitive to NaCl, whereas under reducing conditions (1 mM DTT), RPA formed a stable complex with ssDNA even in the presence of 1.0 M NaCl (Fig. 2a). This result suggests that redox affects RPA ssDNA binding affinity such that RPA-ssDNA interaction was significantly enhanced under reducing conditions. Thioredoxin and redox factor-1 (ref-1; also known as apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease) have previously been shown to mediate redox regulation of nuclear proteins such as transcription factor, activator protein-1, and glucocorticoid receptor (38, 39). As part of an effort to identify a cellular factor(s) involved in redox regulation of RPA, we also examined whether RPA DNA binding activity can be modulated by thioredoxin, a ubiquitous redox enzyme involved in the formation of reversible disulfide bonds (40). Incubation of RPA with thioredoxin stimulated RPA-ssDNA complex under conditions where RPA itself or with the buffer (without thioredoxin) showed no DNA binding activity (Fig. 2b), suggesting that RPA DNA binding activity may be regulated by a redox protein in vivo.


View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2.   Effect of reducing agents on RPA ssDNA binding activity. a, titration of NaCl on RPA ssDNA binding activity in the presence and absence of DTT. Wild-type RPA (20 ng) was treated with 0 mM (lanes 2-8) or 1 mM DTT (lanes 9-15) for 15 min at room temperature before incubation for 15 min with 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50 in the presence of 0 mM (lanes 2 and 9), 25 mM (lanes 3 and 10), 50 mM (lanes 4 and 11), 100 mM (lanes 5 and 12), 200 mM (lanes 6 and 13), 500 mM (lanes 7 and 14), or 1000 mM (lanes 8 and 15) of NaCl. After the reactions, the RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by the procedure described in Fig. 1a. b, effect of redox protein, thioredoxin, on RPA DNA binding activity. Wild-type RPA (20 ng) was incubated with an increasing amount (2 and 4 µl) of DTT-containing buffer (20 mM Hepes-KOH, pH 7.8, 50 µM DTT, 60 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 5% glycerol) (lanes 3 and 4, respectively) or the same buffer containing 75 ng (lane 5) or 150 ng (lanes 6 and 7) of thioredoxin. Lane 8 contained 2 mM DTT instead of thioredoxin. After 15 min at room temperature, 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50 was added to the reactions mixtures and subsequently analyzed for RPA-DNA complex as described in Fig. 1a.

RPA DNA Binding Activity Is Inhibited by a Sulfhydryl Group Modifying Agent, NEM-- Cellular redox plays a key role in modulating DNA binding activity of several transcription factors, such as Fos-Jun (41), CCAAT-binding factor (also known as NF-Y) (42), p53 (43), and Pax 8 (44). Mutational analysis of these proteins indicated that cysteine residues are involved in redox regulation (38, 42, 44). RPA ssDNA binding activity was sensitive to diamide (Fig. 1b), a chemical that catalyzes the oxidation of free sulfhydryl groups (45), suggesting a possible involvement of cysteine residues in the redox-dependent DNA binding activity of RPA. We therefore examined whether RPA ssDNA binding activity is sensitive to NEM, which alkylates the free sulfhydryl group (Fig. 3). NEM treatment completely abolished RPA ssDNA binding activity (Fig. 3, lanes 5-7), whereas RPA DNA binding activity was not affected by NEM when added after DTT, suggesting that the effect of NEM on RPA DNA binding activity is due to the alkylation of sulfhydryl group (Fig. 3, lanes 8-10). The inhibitory effect of NEM on RPA ssDNA binding activity strongly indicates that cysteine residues are involved in the redox regulation of RPA DNA binding activity.


View larger version (97K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3.   Inhibition of RPA DNA binding activity by a sulfhydryl group modifying agent, N-ethylmaleimide. Where indicated, 10 ng (lanes 2, 5, and 8), 20 ng (lanes 3, 6, and 9), or 40 ng (lanes 4, 7, and 10) of RPA was used. Various amounts of RPA were treated with either 2 mM DTT (lanes 2-4), 5 mM NEM (lanes 5-7), or 50 mM DTT followed by 5 mM NEM (lanes 8-10) before incubation with 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50. The RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by gel mobility shift assay as described in Fig. 1a.

Involvement of Zinc Finger Cysteine(s) in Redox Regulation of RPA-- RPA p70 contains an evolutionarily conserved 4-cysteine-type zinc finger domain at amino acids 478-503 (28). Even though previous studies showed that the zinc finger domain is not essential for DNA binding activity of RPA (3-5), it is possible that RPA DNA binding domain is subjected to regulation by the zinc finger. We therefore examined whether the cysteine residues of the zinc finger domain are involved in redox regulation of its ssDNA binding activity. In contrast to wild-type RPA, zinc finger mutant-4 (ZFM-4; Cys to Ala mutation at amino acids 481, 486, 500, and 503) formed a stable complex with ssDNA even under nonreducing conditions, and the addition of DTT had no effect on its DNA binding activity (Fig. 4a). Two other zinc finger mutants, ZFM-1 (Cys to Ala at amino acid 486) and ZFM-2 (Cys to Ala mutation at 481 and 486), also formed a very stable complex with ssDNA in the absence of DTT, which was not affected by DTT (Fig. 4b). To further examine redox regulation of zinc finger domain, wild-type RPA and ZFM-4 were treated with the oxidizing agent, H2O2, in the presence of 0.4 mM DTT (Fig. 4c). The addition of increasing amounts of H2O2 significantly reduced the RPA-DNA complex, whereas zinc finger mutant (ZFM-4) (1) was much less affected by H2O2 treatment (Fig. 4c). These results strongly suggest that the zinc finger is involved in the redox regulation of RPA ssDNA binding activity and that the cysteine residues of p70, in particular cysteine 486, are essential for this regulation.


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4.   Cysteine residue(s) of zinc finger is involved in redox regulation of RPA DNA binding activity. a, comparison between wild-type (W.T.) RPA and zinc finger mutant (ZFM-4) for ssDNA binding activity in the presence of varying concentrations of DTT. Twenty ng of either wild-type RPA (lanes 2-6) or ZFM-4 (lanes 7-11) were pretreated with 0 mM (lanes 2 and 7), 0.02 mM (lanes 3 and 8), 0.2 mM (lanes 4 and 9), 2 mM (lanes 5 and 10), and 20 mM (lanes 6 and 11) DTT and further incubated for 15 min at room temperature after the addition of 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50. The RPA-DNA complex was analyzed as described in Fig. 1a. b, effect of DTT on ssDNA binding activity of the zinc finger mutant. Twenty ng of ZFM-1 (lanes 2-4) or ZFM-2 (lanes 5-7) was pretreated with 0 mM (lanes 2 and 5), 0.2 mM (lanes 3 and 6), and 2 mM (lanes 4 and 7) of DTT and, after the addition of 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50, their DNA binding activity was analyzed. c, twenty ng of either wild-type RPA (lanes 2-7) or ZFM-4 (lanes 8-11) were pretreated with 0 mM (lanes 2 and 8), 0.2 mM (lane 3), 0.5 mM (lanes 4 and 9), 1 mM (lanes 5 and 10), 2 mM (lanes 6 and 11), and 5 mM (lane 7) H2O2 in the presence of 0.4 mM DTT. Lane 1 contained no RPA. After 15 min at room temperature, 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50 was added to the reaction mixtures, and the RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by the procedure described in Fig. 1a.

Zn(II) Is Necessary for Redox Regulation of ssDNA Binding Activity-- If RPA is a Zn(II) metalloprotein and Zn(II) is bound to the 4-cysteine complex, the presence of Zn(II) would be able to protect these cysteines from oxidation. To test this, we examined whether a strong divalent cation chelator, o-phenanthroline, affects RPA ssDNA binding activity in response to redox change. The addition of o-phenanthroline abolished the stimulatory effect of DTT on RPA ssDNA binding activity (Fig. 5a), suggesting a positive role for Zn(II) in redox regulation of RPA. In contrast, p-phenanthroline, a nonchelating agent, had no effect on the stimulation of RPA ssDNA binding activity (data not shown). To investigate this further, we compared wt-RPA and zinc finger mutant (ZFM4; Cys to Ala mutations at 481, 486, 500, and 503) for their ssDNA binding activity in the presence of o-phenanthroline. The ssDNA binding activity of wt-RPA was sensitive to o-phenanthroline in the presence of DTT, whereas ZFM4 was not affected at all by this chelating agent (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of o-phenanthroline on RPA ssDNA binding was reversed by the addition of Zn(II), indicating that the inhibitory effect of o-phenanthroline on RPA ssDNA binding is due to chelation of Zn(II) (Fig. 5c). Together, these results strongly suggest that Zn(II) is involved in supporting the model for the role of zinc finger domain in redox regulation (Fig. 6b).


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5.   Effect of Zn(II) chelating agent, o-phenanthroline, on RPA ssDNA binding activity. a, increasing amounts of wt-RPA (5, 10, 15, and 20 ng, respectively) (lanes 2-13) were pretreated with 0 mM DTT (lanes 2-5), 1.0 mM DTT (lanes 6-9), or 1.0 mM of DTT and o-phenanthroline (lanes 10-13) and further incubated for 15 min at room temperature after the addition of 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50. No RPA was included in lane 1. The RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by 5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (acrylamide:bisacrylamide = 79:1). b, Zn(II)-chelating agent, o-phenanthroline, inhibited wt-RPA ssDNA binding activity but not that of zinc finger mutant (ZFM4). Twenty ng of either wt-RPA (lanes 2-3) or ZFM4 (lanes 4-5) were pretreated with 1 mM DTT (lanes 2-5) or 1.0 mM o-phenanthroline (lanes 3 and 5). No RPA was included in lane 1. c, reversal of inhibitory effect of o-phenanthroline on RPA ssDNA binding activity by Zn(II). Twenty ng of wt-RPA (lanes 2-4) was pretreated with 1.0 mM DTT (lanes 2-4), 1.0 mM o-phenanthroline (lanes 3-4), or 1.0 mM of Zn(II) (lane 4) and further incubated for 15 min. After the addition of 100 fmol of 5'-32P-labeled oligo(dT)50, RPA-DNA complex was analyzed by 5% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. No RPA was included in lane 1.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6.   A proposed model for redox-mediated change in zinc finger structure and regulation of RPA DNA binding activity. a, zinc finger domain (X3CX2-4CX12-15CX2C) of eukaryotic RPA. Conserved amino acids are indicated in bold-type (cysteines), boxed (hydrophobic residues), and underlines (charged residues). b, a stable zinc finger structure is formed under reducing condition. Under oxidizing condition, Zn(II) is released from the zinc finger structure, which induces the formation of disulfide bond(s) between cysteine residues, including 486. The open bar indicates the RPA DNA binding domain. Xenopus l, Xenopus laevis; S. pombe, Schizosaccharomyces pombe; S. cerevisiae, Saccharoymces cerevisiae; C. elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans; C. fasciculata, Crithidia fasciculata.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Zinc fingers are not only autonomously folding structural elements but also are the DNA binding component for many sequence-specific DNA binding proteins and nuclear hormone receptors (46). A number of zinc finger proteins have been identified in which their DNA binding activity is regulated by redox, although the role of the zinc finger in this regulation is not clear (47-49). In this study, we found that RPA ssDNA binding activity is regulated by redox through the cysteines in a putative zinc finger domain.

The 4-cysteine type zinc finger is evolutionarily conserved among eukaryotic RPA and contains highly conserved hydrophobic and charged amino acids that may be important for the formation of zinc finger structure (Fig. 6a). The 4-cysteine zinc finger contains Zn(II), which tetrahedrally coordinates four cysteine residues (50). Under reducing conditions, the zinc finger structure is favorably formed, and Zn(II), buried in the interior, stabilizes the module by binding 4 cysteines (Fig. 6b). This zinc finger structure protects cysteine 486 (and other cysteine residues) from being engaged in the formation of disulfide bond(s). Under nonreducing (or oxidized) conditions, however, oxidation of Zn(II)-thiolate bond induces the releases of Zn(II) from the zinc finger (51), which promotes the formation of disulfide bonds between the cysteine 486 and other cysteine (Fig. 6b). It is reasonable to assume that one disulfide bond is formed between cysteine 486 and the other cysteine, because the Cys to Ala mutation at amino acid 486 was sufficient enough to make it redox-insensitive (Fig. 6b). In fact, our study on the reactivity of cysteine residues to 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) indicated that two zinc finger-derived cysteines are lost on oxidation (data not shown), supporting a model that a single disulfide bond is formed in the zinc finger domain. Disulfide bonds may be formed between cysteine 486 and the other cysteine in the zinc finger region, which induces a structural change that interferes with the DNA binding domain of p70 (Fig. 6b). Alternatively, a disulfide bond may be formed between cysteine 486 and the other cysteine outside of the zinc finger, which leads to the alteration of protein conformation that affects RPA DNA binding activity. To understand the role of zinc finger further, a direct measurement of the actual release of Zn(II) from RPA upon oxidation by atomic absorption or by spectrophotometric measurement using 4-(2-pyridylazo)resorcinol needs to be done once we have enough RPA.

In T4 bacteriophage, removal of the intrinsic Zn(II) ion in its single-stranded DNA-binding protein (T4 gene 32) resulted in facile oxidation of the cysteine, which significantly decreased ssDNA binding activity (52). In T4 gene 32, models for the oxidized and metal-free protein are essentially inactive while reduced, and fully metal-bound forms are active in ssDNA binding (52, 53). However, the substitutional mutation of metal binding cysteine to serine in T4 gene 32 was essentially inactive in ssDNA binding (52), whereas a zinc finger mutation of human RPA (single-stranded DNA-binding protein) made it redox-insensitive without affecting its ssDNA binding activity (Fig. 4). These results suggest that Zn(II) binding cysteine(s) of T4 gene 32 is an essential element for its ssDNA binding, but that of human RPA functions as a regulatory element.

Redox regulation of RPA likely occurs in vivo because RPA is involved in replication arrest in response to environmental stress (33, 34).2 Even though the formation of disulfide bond is favorable under oxidized conditions, it is still possible that cysteine 486 exists another oxidized form in vivo. For example, involvement of the glutathione/glutathione disulfide redox pair, an important cellular defense against oxidative stress (55), is considered a possibility. Another example of oxidative signaling is S-nitrosylation of cysteine residues in p21ras oncogene by nitric oxide (56), even though it is unclear whether this is a reversible intercellular-signaling scheme.

Zinc finger proteins are one of the largest classes of DNA-binding proteins and are the major targets for redox regulation since they all contain cysteine residues as part of the metal binding finger structure, which are essential for DNA binding activity (46). Cysteine residues have been identified in several non-zinc finger transcription factors as involved in redox regulation of their DNA binding activity (42, 57). However, it is not clear whether the zinc finger itself is directly involved in redox regulation simply because the zinc finger is an essential DNA binding component and any mutation at a cysteine residue (of zinc finger) will irreversibly inactivate DNA binding activity. Unlike these zinc finger proteins, the RPA zinc finger is not a DNA binding component and has a little or no effect on its DNA binding activity (1, 3-5), which makes it an excellent model to study the role of redox in regulation of zinc finger protein. We conclude from this study that the RPA zinc finger has a role in regulating its DNA binding activity through redox change, which may be involved in regulation of DNA metabolism in response to various environmental stress.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. M. Kelley and D. Giedroc for the suggestions during the course of experiments, Dr. D. Ohannesian for critical reading of the manuscript, and E-J. Oh for the art work.

    FOOTNOTES

* This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM52358, Council for Tobacco Research United States of America Grant 4317, and a grant from the Indiana University Cancer Center.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202. Tel.: 317-278-3464; Fax: 317-274-4686; E-mail: slee@iupui.edu.

2 J-S. Park, M. Wang, and S-H. Lee, unpublished data.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: RPA, replication protein A; DTT, dithiothreitol; diamide, diazene dicarboxylic acid bis[N,N-dimethylamide]; NEM, N-ethylmaleimide; ZFM, zinc finger mutant; pol alpha -primase, polymerase alpha -primase; XP, Xeroderma pigmentosum; ssDNA, single-stranded DNA; wt, wild type.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Dong, J., Park, J-S., and Lee, S-H. (1999) Biochem. J. 337, 311-317
2. Lin, Y.-L., Shivji, M. K. K., Chen, C., Kolodner, R., Wood, R. D., and Dutta, A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1453-1461[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Kim, D.-K., Stigger, E., and Lee, S.-H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15124-15129[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Gomes, X. V., Henricksen, L. A., and Wold, M. S. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 5586-5595[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Lin, Y.-L., Chen, C., Keshav, K. F., Winchester, E., and Dutta, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 17190[Abstract/Free Full Text]-
6. Dornreiter, I., Erdile, L. F., Gilbert, I. U., von Winkler, D., Kelly, T. J., and Fanning, E. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 769-776[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Lee, S.-H., and Kim, D.-K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12801-12807[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Collins, K. L., and Kelly, T. J. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2108-2115[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Melendy, T., and Stillman, B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 3389-3395[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Kenny, M. K., Lee, S.-H., and Hurwitz, J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9757-9761[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Lee, S.-H., Pan, Z.-Q., Kwong, A. D., Burgers, P. M. J., and Hurwitz, J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22707-22717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Matsuda, T., Saijo, M., Kuraoka, I., Kobayashi, T., Nakatsu, Y., Nagai, A., Enjoji, T., Masutani, C., Sugasawa, K., Hanaoka, F., Yasui, A., and Tanaka, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4152-4157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. He, Z., Henricksen, L. A., Wold, M. S., and Ingles, C. J. (1995) Nature 374, 566-569[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Li, L., Lu, X., Peterson, C. A., and Legerski, R. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5396-5402[Abstract]
15. Lee, S.-H., Kim, D.-K., and Drissi, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 21800-21806[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Matsunaga, T., Park, C.-H., Bessho, T., Mu, D., and Sancar, A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11047-11050[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Stigger, E., Drissi, R., and Lee, S.-H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 9337-9343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Burns, J. L., Guzder, S. N., Sung, P., Prakash, S., and Prakash, L. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 11607-11610[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Aboussekhra, A., Biggerstaff, M., Shivji, M. K., Vilpo, J. A., Moncollin, V., Podust, V. N., Protic, M., Hubscher, U., Egly, J. M., and Wood, R. D. (1995) Cell 80, 859-868[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Park, M. S., Ludwig, D. L., Stigger, E., and Lee, S.-H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 18996-19000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. New, J. H., Sugiyama, T., Zaitseva, E., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1998) Nature 391, 407-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Hays, S. L., Firmenich, A. A., Massey, P., Banerjee, R., and Berg, P. (1998) Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4400-4406[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Sugiyama, T., New, J. H., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 6049-6054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Shen, Z., Cloud, K. G., Chen, D. J., and Park, M. S. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 148-152[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Gomes, X. V., and Wold, M. S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 4534-4543[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Bochkarev, A., Pfuetzner, R. A., Edwards, A. M., and Frappier, L. (1997) Nature 385, 176-181[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Kim, D.-K., Stigger, E., and Lee, S.-H. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15124-15129
28. Erdile, L. F., Heyer, W.-D., Kolodner, R., and Kelly, T. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 12090-12098[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Ishiai, M., Sanchez, J. P., Amin, A. A., Murakami, Y., and Hurwitz, J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 20868-20878[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Pan, T., and Coleman, J. E. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 2077-2081[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Eagle, P. A., and Klessig, D. F. (1992) Virology 187, 777-782[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Narayan, V. A., Kriwacki, R. W., and Carradona, J. P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7801-7809[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Carty, M. P., Zernik-Kobak, M., McGrath, S., and Dixon, K. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 2114-2123[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Wang, Y., Perrault, A. R., and Iliakis, G. (1998) Radiat. Res. 149, 284-293[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Fried, L. M., Koumenis, C., Peterson, S. R., Green, S. L., van Zijl, P., Allalunis-Turner, J., Chen, D. J., Fishel, R., Giaccia, A. J., Brown, J. M., and Kirchgessner, C. U. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13825-13830[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Pan, Z. Q., Park, C. H., Amin, A. A., Hurwitz, J., and Sancar, A. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 4636-4640[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Stigger, E., Dean, F. B., Hurwitz, J., and Lee, S.-H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 579-583[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Xanthoudakis, S., and Curran, T. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 653-665[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
39. Grippo, J. F., Holmgren, A., and Pratt, W. B. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 93-97[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Holmgren, A. (1985) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 54, 237-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Abate, C., Patel, L., Rauscher III, F. J., and Curran, T. (1990) Science 249, 1157-1161[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Nakshatri, H., Bhat-Nakshatri, P., and Currie, R. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28784-28791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Jayaraman, L., Murthy, K. G. K., Zhu, C., Curran, T., Xanthoudakis, S., and Curran, T. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 558-570[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Tell, G., Scaloni, A., Pellizzari, L., Formisano, S., Pucillo, C., and Damante, G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 25062-25072[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Kosower, N. S., and Kosower, E. M. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 143, 264-270[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Clarke, N. D., and Berg, J. M. (1998) Science 282, 2018-2022[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Hutchison, K. A., Matic, G., Meshinchi, S., Bresnick, E. H., and Pratt, W. B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 10505-10509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Gowen, L. C., Avrutskaya, A. V., Latour, A. M., Koller, B. H., and Leadon, S. A. (1998) Science 281, 1009-1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Wu, X., Bishopric, N. H., Discher, D. J., Murphy, B. J., and Webster, K. A. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1035-1046[Abstract]
50. Luisi, B. F., Xu, W. X., Otwinowski, Z., Freedman, L. P., Yamamoto, K. R., and Sigler, P. B. (1991) Nature 352, 497-505[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Casadevall, M., and Sarkar, B. (1998) J. Inorg. Biochem. 71, 147-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Giedroc, D. P., Qiu, H., Khan, R., King, G. C., and Chen, K. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 765-774[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
53. Qiu, H., Kodadek, T., and Giedroc, D. P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2773-2781[Abstract/Free Full Text]
54. Wold, M. (1997) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66, 61-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Thomas, J. A., Poland, B., and Honzatko, R. (1995) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 319, 1-9[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. Lander, H. M., Milbank, A. J., Tauras, J. M., Hajjar, D. P., Hempastead, B. L., Schwartz, G. D., Kraemer, R. T., Mirza, U. A., Chait, B. T., Campbell, B. S., and Quilliam, L. A. (1996) Nature 381, 380-381[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
57. Xanthoudakis, S., Miao, G., Wang, F., Pan, Y. C., and Curran, T. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 3323-3335[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Sela, N. Yaffe, and J. Shlomai
Enzymatic Mechanism Controls Redox-mediated Protein-DNA Interactions at the Replication Origin of Kinetoplast DNA Minicircles
J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2008; 283(46): 32034 - 32044.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. D. Beck, S.-J. Park, Y.-J. Lee, Y. Roman, R. A. Hromas, and S.-H. Lee
Human Pso4 Is a Metnase (SETMAR)-binding Partner That Regulates Metnase Function in DNA Repair
J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2008; 283(14): 9023 - 9030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Bacteriol.Home page
Y. Lin, J. B. Robbins, E. K. D. Nyannor, Y.-H. Chen, and I. K. O. Cann
A CCCH Zinc Finger Conserved in a Replication Protein A Homolog Found in Diverse Euryarchaeotes
J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2005; 187(23): 7881 - 7889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-J. Park, S. L. M. Ciccone, B. D. Beck, B. Hwang, B. Freie, D. W. Clapp, and S.-H. Lee
Oxidative Stress/Damage Induces Multimerization and Interaction of Fanconi Anemia Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., July 16, 2004; 279(29): 30053 - 30059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eukaryot CellHome page
I. Onn, N. Milman-Shtepel, and J. Shlomai
Redox Potential Regulates Binding of Universal Minicircle Sequence Binding Protein at the Kinetoplast DNA Replication Origin
Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2004; 3(2): 277 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Kurek, Y. Kawagoe, D. Jacob-Wilk, M. Doblin, and D. Delmer
Dimerization of cotton fiber cellulose synthase catalytic subunits occurs via oxidation of the zinc-binding domains
PNAS, August 20, 2002; 99(17): 11109 - 11114.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Virol.Home page
I. Cuesta, X. Geng, A. Asenjo, and N. Villanueva
Structural Phosphoprotein M2-1 of the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Is an RNA Binding Protein
J. Virol., November 1, 2000; 74(21): 9858 - 9867.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 JCBHome page
S. Homburg, L. Visochek, N. Moran, F. Dantzer, E. Priel, E. Asculai, D. Schwartz, V. Rotter, N. Dekel, and M. Cohen-Armon
A Fast Signal-induced Activation of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase: A Novel Downstream Target of Phospholipase C
J. Cell Biol., July 24, 2000; 150(2): 293 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Bochkareva, S. Korolev, and A. Bochkarev
The Role for Zinc in Replication Protein A
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2000; 275(35): 27332 - 27338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. T. Knapp and E. Klann
Superoxide-induced Stimulation of Protein Kinase C via Thiol Modification and Modulation of Zinc Content
J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2000; 275(31): 24136 - 24145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
U. Jakob, M. Eser, and J. C. A. Bardwell
Redox Switch of Hsp33 Has a Novel Zinc-binding Motif
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2000; 275(49): 38302 - 38310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted