![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29196-29201, October 8, 1999
,
**,
,
,
¶¶
From the
Department of Oncology, Institute of Medical
Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan, the
§ Division of Neuroanatomy, Department of Neuroscience,
Biomedical Research Center, Osaka University Graduate School of
Medicine and Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology,
Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Osaka 565-0871, Japan, the
§§ Department of Radiation Biology and Medical
Genetics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka 565-0871, Japan, the
Hirohashi Cell Configuration Project, Exploratory
Research for Advanced Technology, Japan Science and Technology
Corporation, Tsukuba 300-2635, Japan, and the

Department of Molecular Neurobiology,
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Tsukuba,
Tsukuba 305-0006, Japan
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The focal adhesion kinase (FAK) protein-tyrosine
kinase plays important roles in cell adhesion in vertebrates. Using
polymerase chain reaction-based cloning strategy, we cloned a
Drosophila gene that is homologous to the vertebrate FAK
family of protein-tyrosine kinases. We designated this gene
Dfak56 and characterized its gene product. The overall
protein structure and deduced amino acid sequence of Dfak56 show
significant similarity to those of FAK and PYK2. Dfak56 has in
vitro autophosphorylation activity at tyrosine residues.
Expression of the Dfak56 mRNA and the protein was
observed in the central nervous system and the muscle-epidermis attachment site in the embryo, where Drosophila
position-specific integrins are localized. The results suggest that
like FAK in vertebrates, Dfak56 functions downstream of integrins.
Dfak56 was tyrosine-phosphorylated upon integrin-dependent
attachment of the cell to the extracellular matrix. We conclude that
the Dfak56 tyrosine kinase is involved in integrin-mediated cell
adhesion signaling and thus is a functional homolog of vertebrate
FAK.
Focal adhesion kinase
(FAK)1 is a member of a
growing family of non-receptor protein-tyrosine kinases (1) and was
originally identified as a putative substrate for the oncogenic
protein-tyrosine kinase pp60v-src (2). Accumulating
data, however, show that FAK tyrosine phosphorylation is induced upon
adhesion of cells to the extracellular matrix through the surface
integrin (3) and upon stimulation of cells by a variety of other
extracellular factors including those for receptor tyrosine kinases and
for G-protein-coupled receptors (4-6). FAK associates with multiple
cellular components including other focal adhesion-associated proteins
and signaling molecules (7-11). FAK is localized to focal adhesions
and is centrally implicated in the regulation of cell motility and
adhesion. PYK2, another member of the FAK family of protein-tyrosine
kinases (also named CAK The roles of FAK in development and cell adhesion are directly revealed
by gene targeting experiment (16, 17). Targeted disruption of the FAK
gene in mice results in early embryonic lethality. Cells from mutant
embryos have reduced mobility and increased number of focal adhesions,
suggesting that FAK is involved in the turnover of focal adhesion
contacts during cell migration. Disruption of the mouse
In Drosophila, study of cell adhesion was started by the
identification of position-specific (PS) antigens as homologs of vertebrate integrins (19). Several Drosophila genes encoding integrins have been identified, including myospheroid
(mys), multiple edematous wings (mew),
and inflated (if), which encode the
integrin In this study, we isolated the cDNA for the Drosophila
homolog of FAK. Characterization of the protein product strongly
suggested that Drosophila FAK is an important downstream
factor of integrin-mediated signaling pathways, as is mammalian
FAK.
Isolation of cDNA and Genomic DNA Clones--
Polymerase
chain reaction was performed using fully degenerate oligonucleotides
corresponding to the amino acid sequences HRDIAAR (for the forward
primer) and DVWAFG (for the reverse primer) as primers and
108 plaque-forming units of Drosophila embryo
cDNA library (a gift from T. Todo, Radiation Biology Center, Kyoto
University, Kyoto, Japan) as template. The amino acid sequences were
located in conserved motifs of the kinase domain and are unique for FAK
and PYK2. Amplified cDNAs (~200 base pairs) were subcloned into
the pBluescript vector (Stratagene) and sequenced with Thermosequenase
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Replicate filters from a
Drosophila embryo cDNA library were prehybridized for
3 h at 65 °C in 7% SDS and 0.5 M sodium phosphate
buffer (pH 8.0) containing 100 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA (Sigma) and
then hybridized to the 32P-labeled cDNA fragment for
16 h at 65 °C. After hybridization, the filters were washed
with 0.2× SSC and 0.1% SDS. Positive clones were isolated and
sequenced on both strands. Other molecular biological techniques were
performed as described previously (24). DNA and protein sequence
analyses were performed using Genetics Computer Group software packages
and ClustalW and BLAST programs employing the
DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank running at the Human Genome
Center of the University of Tokyo (Tokyo, Japan).
Southern and Northern Blotting--
Genomic DNA from wild-type
(Oregon-R strain) Drosophila melanogaster (1 µg/sample)
digested with suitable restriction enzymes was electrophoresed on 1.0%
agarose gel. mRNA samples from cultured cells and
Drosophila tissues were electrophoresed on
formaldehyde-containing 1.2% agarose gel. The fractionated RNAs were
then transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond, Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) and subjected to hybridization using full-length
Dfak56 cDNA and the 5'-portion (SacII
fragment, corresponding to nucleotides 1-2743) of the
Dfak56 cDNA as probes. Hybridizations were performed
employing the same procedure as that used for cDNA screening.
Cells and Antibodies--
Drosophila Schneider cells
(S2) and derivatives of their integrin-expressing cells were a gift
from D. L. Brower (Arizona University). BG2-c6 and 7E10 cells were
described previously (25, 26). The cells were cultured at 27 °C
under normal atmospheric conditions in Shields and Sang M3 medium
(Sigma) supplemented with 10% of fetal calf serum. Simian COS cells
were cultured at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum.
To generate rabbit anti-Dfak56 polyclonal antibodies, glutathione
S-transferase (GST)-Dfak56 was constructed by inserting the
cDNA fragment encoding amino acid residues 1-280 of the Dfak56 protein into the pGEX-2T expression vector (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Expression of the GST fusion proteins in Escherichia coli BL21 was induced with
isopropyl- In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry--
Whole-mount
in situ hybridization was conducted using
digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes as described previously (28). The
digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes (sense and antisense) were prepared by a
standard procedure with a digoxigenin-RNA labeling kit (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals) and full-length Dfak56 cDNA as a template.
Whole-mount immunohistochemistry was performed as described (29) using
rabbit anti-Dfak56 antibodies at 1:100 dilution. The secondary antibody
used was horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG
(Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc.) at 1:500 dilution.
Immunohistochemistry with cultured cells was performed as described
previously (30).
Western Blotting and Immunocomplex Kinase Assay--
Cells were
lysed in TNNE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 2 mM EDTA)
containing 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 50 units/ml
aprotinin, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10 mM NaF. Insoluble materials were removed by centrifugation. The lysates were separated by 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane
(Trans-Blot, Bio-Rad). The proteins reacted with anti-Dfak56 antibodies
were visualized with a chemiluminescence detection kit (Renaissance, NEN Life Science Products). For immunoprecipitation, the cell lysates
were precleared with protein A-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) for 1 h at 4 °C. After removing the beads, the lysates
were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with anti-Dfak56 antibodies and
protein-A Sepharose. The immune complex was washed several times with
TNNE buffer and then with kinase buffer (20 mM HEPES (pH
7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM
MnCl2). Following addition of [ cDNA Cloning and Sequence Analysis of a Drosophila Homolog of
Focal Adhesion Kinase--
To identify a Drosophila FAK
homolog of protein-tyrosine kinase, we used polymerase chain reaction
with degenerate oligonucleotide primers to amplify cDNAs from a
Drosophila embryo cDNA library. The sequences of the
degenerate primers corresponded to the amino acid sequences conserved
in both FAK and PYK2. Amplified cDNA fragments were subcloned into
plasmids and sequenced. We searched the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI
Data Bank against these sequences. A cDNA fragment was revealed to
contain a novel sequence with homology to FAK and PYK2. The cDNA
fragment was subsequently used to screen the same library. Four
cDNA clones of varying sizes were isolated, and the one containing the longest insert (4.3 kilobase pairs) was sequenced on both strands.
The complete nucleotide sequence of the cDNA predicted an open
reading frame of 1198 amino acids (Fig.
1A). The calculated molecular
mass of the predicted protein was 130 kDa. Since the cDNA
hybridized at 56A or 56B on the second chromosome, which was determined
by in situ hybridization with polytene chromosomes (data not
shown), we named the gene Dfak56.
The deduced amino acid sequence of the putative product of the
Dfak56 gene showed the presence of a protein kinase domain. Like FAK and PYK2, Dfak56 has large N- and C-terminal sequences flanking the kinase domain. Comparison of the amino acid sequence of
the Dfak56 kinase domain with the protein sequence data bases revealed
that the kinase domain of Dfak56 is most similar to that of FAK (59%
identity to human FAK) and PYK2 (52% identity to human PYK2) (Fig.
1B). The sequences of the N- and C-terminal regions are
relatively divergent. The amino acid sequence alignment of the kinase
domains of these proteins is shown in Fig. 1C. Unlike the
vertebrate counterparts, Dfak56 contains an additional 24-amino acid
sequence near the ATP-binding site of the kinase. In the C-terminal
regions, FAK and PYK2 have a conserved sequence of ~150 amino acid
residues. The sequence is called the focal adhesion targeting sequence
because it is essential for localization of FAK to focal adhesions
(32). Dfak56 also carries a focal adhesion targeting-like sequence
(~40% identity to human FAK) in the C-terminal region (Fig.
1B), suggesting that the focal adhesion targeting sequence
is conserved as a functional domain.
There are tyrosine phosphorylation sites within FAK that are conserved
in PYK2. A major autophosphorylation site (Y397AEI for
human FAK and Y402AEI for human PYK2) that mediates binding
to the SH2 domain of Src-like protein-tyrosine kinases is well
conserved in Dfak56 (Y430AEI). Another tyrosine
phosphorylation site (Y925ENV for FAK and
Y881LNV for PYK2) serves for binding of the GRB2 SH2
domain. Tyrosine 954 in Dfak56 is likely to correspond to this
phosphorylation site, although the sequence is slightly divergent
(Y954CAT). The C-terminal region of FAK has two
PXXP motifs, P712PKPSRP and
P874PKKPPRP, which can bind to the SH3 domain. These
sequences are highly conserved in PYK2, and only one of them
(P772PSKPSR, corresponding to P712PKPSRP of
FAK) is conserved in Dfak56. We conclude that Dfak56 is a
Drosophila homolog of vertebrate FAK family protein-tyrosine kinases. The sequence data did not reveal which kinase, FAK or PYK2, is
the counterpart of Dfak56.
Southern hybridization analysis strongly suggested that
Dfak56 is a single-copy gene of Drosophila (Fig.
2A). Moreover, under less
stringent washing conditions, no bands other than those for Dfak56 were found (data not shown). Therefore, we
tentatively concluded that Drosophila contains no close
relatives of Dfak56.
Temporal and Spatial Expression of Dfak56--
Northern
hybridization analysis of Drosophila
poly(A)+-selected RNAs from various developmental stages
(embryo, larva, pupa, and adult) and cell lines showed that two
mRNA species of ~5 and 6 kb hybridized with the Dfak56
cDNA probe (Fig. 2B). A short transcript of ~1.5 kb
was also detected in embryonic and larval RNA samples. This short
transcript did not hybridize to the cDNA probe corresponding to the
5'-portion (including the coding region N-terminal to the kinase
domain) of the Dfak56 mRNA, suggesting that this
transcript corresponds to the 3'-portion of the Dfak56 mRNA. The expression of a short transcript was also reported in the
case of the avian FAK gene (33).
To determine the spatial expression of the Dfak56 gene, we
performed whole-mount in situ hybridization with the
embryos. In stage 16 embryos, strong expression of the
Dfak56 mRNA was detected in the central nervous system
and the junction of muscle and epidermis (Fig.
3, A and B).
Immunohistochemical analysis also showed expression of the Dfak56
protein in the muscle attachment (Fig. 3C). A
cross-sectioned view of the immunostained image suggests that Dfak56 is
expressed predominantly in the epidermal cells, but less or not at
all in the muscular cells (Fig. 3D).
Subcellular Localization of Dfak56--
We examined the
subcellular localization of the Dfak56 protein using the
Drosophila neuronal cell line BG2-c6 (25). The BG2-c6 cells
expressed the Dfak56 mRNA (Fig. 2B). They
also expressed integrins, and formation of integrin clusters was
observed in cells with several focal adhesion proteins, including
p21-activated kinase and Kinase Activity of Dfak56--
We tested for protein kinase
activity and phosphorylation of Dfak56 with mutational analysis. By
site-directed mutagenesis, an amino acid substitution at residue 430 (tyrosine to phenylalanine) was introduced (Y430F mutant). This residue
corresponds to the major autophosphorylation site in vertebrate FAK
(tyrosine 397). We also substituted methionine for lysine at residue
513, a possible ATP-binding site essential for tyrosine kinase activity
(K513M mutant). The cDNAs for the wild-type Dfak56 protein and the
mutant proteins constructed in expression plasmids were then introduced in simian COS cells. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-Dfak56 antibodies, and the precipitates were subjected to in
vitro kinase assay.
Autophosphorylation of the Dfak56 protein was observed in the wild-type
protein and the Y430F mutant, but not in the K513M mutant (Fig.
5A). The Dfak56 kinase
activity observed was not attributable to co-immunoprecipitated kinases
because the lysine at residue 513 of Dfak56 was essential for the
kinase activity. Phosphoamino acid analysis of in vitro
phosphorylated Dfak56 detected phosphorylated tyrosine only (Fig.
5B), confirming that Dfak56 is a protein-tyrosine kinase.
Furthermore, the incorporated radioactivity of the phosphorylated Y430F
mutant was approximately half that of wild-type Dfak56 (Fig.
5A), suggesting that the tyrosine at residue 430 is a major
autophosphorylation site. This was confirmed by two-dimensional
phosphopeptide mapping of the wild-type and Y430F mutant proteins (Fig.
5C). A major spot in the peptide map of wild-type Dfak56
(arrow) was not observed in that of the Y430F mutant.
Phosphorylation of Dfak56 upon Cell Attachment to the Extracellular
Matrix--
Drosophila S2 cells and stable transfectants
(34) expressing Drosophila PS integrin chains of
We have identified a Drosophila homolog of vertebrate
focal adhesion kinase and termed it Dfak56. Dfak56 shares both sequence and structural homology with the vertebrate FAK family of
protein-tyrosine kinases (FAK and PYK2). We demonstrated that Dfak56 is
tyrosine-phosphorylated following integrin-dependent cell
attachment to the extracellular matrix. This property is the unique
functional feature that distinguishes FAK from PYK2. Thus, we conclude
that Dfak56 is a functional homolog of vertebrate FAK rather than PYK2.
However, tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK and PYK2 occurs in response to
a number of stimuli, and some of them overlap (stimuli for the
G-protein-coupled receptor, e.g. bradykinin) (35-37),
suggesting that the biochemical function of FAK and PYK2 is partly
interchangeable. Furthermore, the similarity of the kinase domains
between FAK and PYK2 (50-60% amino acid identity) is almost the same
as that between Dfak56 and FAK or PYK2. Therefore, we strongly suspect
that Drosophila has only one FAK-related gene and that the
ancestor gene duplicated and diverged in vertebrates during evolution.
In chicken embryonic fibroblasts, the FAK gene is alternatively
transcribed to generate another short mRNA that encodes a C-terminal portion of the FAK protein named FAK-related non-kinase (33). Ectopic expression of FAK-related non-kinase in fibroblasts blocks the formation of focal adhesions on fibronectin, acting as an
inhibitor of FAK (38). We observed a relatively short, 1.5-kb
transcript corresponding to the 3'-portion of the Dfak56 mRNA only in embryo and larva (Fig. 2B). This mRNA
might encode a FAK-related non-kinase-like protein. If so,
Dfak56-mediated cell adhesion processes may be regulated by the
expression of this FAK-related non-kinase-like protein in embryogenesis.
Dfak56 expression is mainly observed in the embryonic central nervous
system and the muscle attachment process. In muscle attachment, PS
integrins and tiggrin, the ligand for
One of the most effective strategies for the study of signal
transduction pathways is to identify novel upstream or downstream factors of the known players in the signaling cascade. The genetics of
Drosophila are suited for the large-scale screening to
isolate the suppressor or enhancer if a visible mutant of the
interested gene is available. Using this system, a number of the novel
molecules implicated in the receptor protein-tyrosine kinase-mediated
signal transduction pathways have been identified (45-47). In the
locus of the Dfak56 gene, polytene band 56A to 56B, we could
not find mutant alleles for the Dfak56 gene in the FlyBase
data base. However, if we could isolate the mutants of
Dfak56, the genetics of Drosophila would allow
analysis of the cell adhesion signaling, and the findings would relate
back to studies of higher organisms.
In conclusion, we cloned Dfak56, a Drosophila
homolog of the FAK gene, and characterized its product by determining
its expression, kinase activity, and signaling through
integrin-mediated cell attachment. Future genetic studies would
facilitate the analysis of the roles of FAK family proteins in
vivo.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
/CadTK/RAFTK) (12-15), is isolated from
mammals. The function of PYK2 seems to be different from that of FAK
because tyrosine phosphorylation of PYK2 is independent of cell
adhesion and is not localized to focal adhesions (13). Since calcium
ionophores stimulate PYK2 and chelation of extracellular calcium ion
abrogates tyrosine phosphorylation of PYK2 in response to various
stimuli, PYK2 is thought to be regulated by calcium (12, 14).
1 integrin subunit, one of the well known upstream
factors of FAK, also causes embryonic lethality in a very early stage
of development (18). However, because of the anomalous phenotypes,
further biological analysis of knockout mice remains difficult.
chain (
PS integrin) (20),
PS1 integrin (21), and
PS2 integrin (19),
respectively. Genetic analyses of these mutations demonstrate that
integrins are required for a wide variety of developmental processes,
including germ-band retraction, muscle attachment, and morphogenesis of
the wing and eye (22). Furthermore, genetic approaches to isolate the
genes encoding possible downstream molecules of integrins have been
performed (23).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactopyranoside, and the proteins
were purified with glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
as described previously (27). A New Zealand White rabbit was immunized
with the purified GST-Dfak56 fusion protein. Antiserum raised against
Dfak56 were purified using GST and the GST-Dfak56 protein bound to a
HiTrap NHS-activated affinity column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody 4G10 was purchased from
Transduction Laboratories, Inc.
-32P]ATP
(370 kBq, 110 TBq/mmol), the immunoprecipitates were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C and then separated by 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis. The gels were dried and subjected to autoradiography. Phosphoamino acid analysis of phosphorylated proteins and
two-dimensional analysis of tryptic phosphopeptides were performed as
described previously (31).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Sequence analysis of Dfak56.
A, deduced amino acid sequence of Dfak56. B,
schematic representation of the similarity to human FAK and PYK2
proteins. The percentages of amino acid (a.a.) identities
are indicated for the kinase domain and the focal adhesion targeting
(FAT) sequence of FAK and Dfak56. C, amino acid
sequence alignment of the kinase domain of the Dfak56 gene
product with those of the human FAK and PYK2 proteins. Amino acids
conserved among the three proteins are shaded. The
Dfak56 gene product has a unique insertion of 24 residues
near the ATP-binding site of the kinase (Lys513).

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Southern and Northern blot analyses of the
Dfak56 gene. A, Drosophila
adult genomic DNAs (1 µg each; Oregon-R strain) were digested by
restriction enzymes, blotted, and probed with Dfak56
cDNA. Standard molecular sizes are indicated in kilobase pairs.
B, poly(A)+-selected RNAs (5 µg each) from
Drosophila cell lines (BG2-c6, derived from the central
nervous system; and 7E10, derived from body fluid cells) and from
embryonic, larval, pupal, and adult (male and female) flies were
subjected to Northern blotting and probed with Dfak56
cDNA. Transcripts of ~5 and ~6 kb were observed in all samples,
and a short ~1.5-kb transcript was observed only in the embryo and
larva using full-length Dfak56 cDNA as a probe
(left panel). This short transcript was not detected with
the 5'-probe (right panel).

View larger version (99K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Expression of Dfak56 in Drosophila embryos. Whole-mount RNA in situ hybridization
(A and B) and immunohistochemistry (C
and D) were performed with stage 16 embryos. A
shows whole embryos, and B and C show magnified
views of the surface of the embryo. D shows a cross-section
of the embryo. e, epidermis; m, muscle cells.
Dfak56 is expressed at the muscle attachment sites
(arrowheads).
-actinin (30). Immunofluorescent staining
of the BG2-c6 cells with anti-Dfak56 antibodies produced a focal
adhesion-like pattern (Fig.
4A). The nucleus was also
stained with these antibodies. In some populations, the edges of the
cells were also stained. Staining with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody
produced a pattern that overlapped with that of anti-Dfak56 antibodies,
except for the nucleus (Fig. 4B). Staining with
anti-phosphotyrosine and anti-
PS integrin antibodies
(Fig. 4C) showed colocalization of tyrosine-phosphorylated
proteins with integrin. These data suggested that Dfak56 is a component
of focal adhesion in Drosophila.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Subcellular localization of Dfak56 by
immunofluorescence. BG2-c6 cells were grown on glass coverslips.
After fixation, the localization of the Dfak56 protein (A)
and phosphotyrosine (B) was visualized by
immunofluorescence. In C, the cells were stained for
phosphotyrosine (red) and for the
PS integrin
subunit (green), showing the colocalization of
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins and the
PS integrin
subunit.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Kinase activity of Dfak56. A,
cell lysates of 5 × 106 COS cells
(control; lane 1) and COS cells transfected with
wild-type Dfak56 (lane 2), the K513M mutant (lane
3), and the Y430F mutant (lane 4) were precipitated
with anti-Dfak56 antibodies, and washed immunoprecipitates were
subjected to in vitro kinase assay. To assess the level of
expression, 0.02 volumes of the lysates used for immunoprecipitation
were subjected to Western blotting and probed with the same antibodies.
Standard molecular masses are indicated in kilodaltons. B,
shown are the results from the phosphoamino acid analysis of the
phosphorylated Dfak56 protein. The autophosphorylated wild-type Dfak56
protein was extracted from the gel and hydrolyzed. The resulting
phosphoamino acids were subjected to two-dimensional electrophoresis at
pH 1.9/3.5 and autoradiographed. The positions of phosphoserine
(pS), phosphothreonine (pT), and phosphotyrosine
(pY) are indicated. C, shown are the results from
phosphopeptide mapping of the Dfak56 proteins. The autophosphorylated
wild-type and Y430F mutant Dfak56 proteins were extracted from the gel,
digested with trypsin, and subjected to two-dimensional phosphopeptide
mapping. Asterisks show the origin of electrophoresis.
PS1 and
PS (called PS1 cells) or
PS2 and
PS (called PS2 cells) were
cultured on plastic dishes. Among them, only PS2 cells could attach to
a plastic dish in serum-containing medium because of the
cross-reactivity of
PS2
PS integrin to vertebrate vitronectin and fibronectin (34). Using these cell lines,
the levels of phosphotyrosine in the Dfak56 protein were examined
following integrin-dependent cell attachment to the
extracellular matrix. As shown in Fig. 6,
the Dfak56 protein was tyrosine-phosphorylated in PS2 cells that
attached to the surface of the dish. This indicated that Dfak56 is
tyrosine-phosphorylated upon integrin-dependent cell
attachment to the extracellular matrix. Note that
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins of 50-60 kDa were associated with the
Dfak56 protein (Fig. 6). These phosphoproteins were also present in the
anti-Dfak56 precipitates of PS1 cells or suspended PS2 cells, but not
in precipitates of parental S2 cells. This suggests that the
interaction between Dfak56 and these phosphoproteins requires the
presence of integrins and is enhanced by cell attachment to the
extracellular matrix.

View larger version (56K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Dfak56
protein upon integrin-dependent cell attachment to the
extracellular matrix. S2 cells (106) and derivatives
of their transfectants were seeded on 6-cm plastic dishes and cultured
overnight. The next day, the suspended cells were shaken off and
corrected. The cells attached to the dish (only for PS2 cells) were
washed and lysed on the dish. The cell lysates (100 µg of protein)
were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Dfak56 antibodies,
subjected to Western blotting, and probed with anti-phosphotyrosine
antibody (pY). To assess the amount of Dfak56 protein in the
cell lysates, 10 µg of proteins were blotted and probed with
anti-Dfak56 antibodies. Standard molecular masses are indicated in
kilodaltons.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
PS2
PS integrin, are expressed. Mutants
defective for these proteins show improper formation of muscle
attachment, resulting in embryonic lethality (39, 40). In vertebrate
neurons, FAK is highly expressed and localized to a growth cone (41,
42), suggesting that FAK plays a role in neural development and axon
guidance. Recently, the role of integrins in axon guidance in
Drosophila was determined (43). Null mutations in either the
PS1 or
PS2 subunit gene caused widespread
axon pathfinding errors that could be rescued by supplying the
wild-type integrin subunit to the mutant nervous system. Another novel
integrin subunit gene, Volado, was identified to mediate
olfactory learning of Drosophila (44). These data suggest
that the integrin-mediated signal transduction pathway is important for
the function of the central nervous system. Given the similar
expression patterns and the close functional relation between integrins
and FAK in vertebrates, Dfak56 may also participate in neural functions
of Drosophila.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank T. Todo for the cDNA library and D. L. Brower for the integrin-expressing cell lines.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by a grant for advanced cancer research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence reported in this paper has been submitted to the DDBJ/GenBankTM/EBI Data Bank with accession number D88898.
¶ Present address: Dept. of Developmental Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-0801, Japan.
** Present address: Dept. of Biology, Fukuoka Dental College, Fukuoka 814-0193, Japan.
¶¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-3-5449-5301; Fax: 81-3-5449-5413; E-mail; tyamamot@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: FAK, focal adhesion kinase; PS, position-specific; GST, glutathione S-transferase; kb, kilobase(s).
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Hanks, S. K., and Polte, T. R. (1997) Bioessays 19, 137-145[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Schaller, M. D.,
Borgman, C. A.,
Cobb, B. S.,
Vines, R. R.,
Reynolds, A. B.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
5192-5196 |
| 3. | Guan, J. L. (1997) Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 29, 1085-1096[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Zachary, I.,
Sinnett-Smith, J.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
19031-19034 |
| 5. | Tippmer, S., Bossenmaier, B., and Haring, H. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 236, 953-959[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
Haimovich, B.,
Regan, C.,
DiFazio, L.,
Ginalis, E.,
Ji, P.,
Purohit, U.,
Rowley, R. B.,
Bolen, J.,
and Greco, R.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16332-16337 |
| 7. | Hildebrand, J. D., Schaller, M. D., and Parsons, J. T. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 637-647[Abstract] |
| 8. |
Tachibana, K.,
Sato, T.,
D'Avirro, N.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
1089-1099 |
| 9. | Schlaepfer, D. D., Hanks, S. K., Hunter, T., and van der Geer, P. (1994) Nature 372, 786-791[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Schlaepfer, D. D., Broome, M. A., and Hunter, T. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1702-1713[Abstract] |
| 11. | Tremblay, L., Hauck, W., Aprikian, A. G., Begin, L. R., Chapdelaine, A., and Chevalier, S. (1996) Int. J. Cancer 68, 164-171[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Lev, S., Moreno, H., Martinez, R., Canoll, P., Peles, E., Musacchio, J. M., Plowman, G. D., Rudy, B., and Schlessinger, J. (1995) Nature 376, 737-745[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Sasaki, H.,
Nagura, K.,
Ishino, M.,
Tobioka, H.,
Kotani, K.,
and Sasaki, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
21206-21219 |
| 14. |
Yu, H.,
Li, X.,
Marchetto, G. S.,
Dy, R.,
Hunter, D.,
Calvo, B.,
Dawson, T. L.,
Wilm, M.,
Anderegg, R. J.,
Graves, L. M.,
and Earp, H. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29993-29998 |
| 15. |
Avraham, S.,
London, R.,
Fu, Y.,
Ota, S.,
Hiregowdara, D.,
Li, J.,
Jiang, S.,
Pasztor, L. M.,
White, R. A.,
Groopman, J. E.,
and Avraham, H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27742-27751 |
| 16. | Ilic, D., Furuta, Y., Kanazawa, S., Takeda, N., Sobue, K., Nakatsuji, N., Nomura, S., Fujimoto, J., Okada, M., and Yamamoto, T. (1995) Nature 377, 539-544[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Furuta, Y., Ilic, D., Kanazawa, S., Takeda, N., Yamamoto, T., and Aizawa, S. (1995) Oncogene 11, 1989-1995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Stephens, L. E.,
Sutherland, A. E.,
Klimanskaya, I. V.,
Andrieux, A.,
Meneses, J.,
Pedersen, R. A.,
and Damsky, C. H.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1883-1895 |
| 19. | Bogaert, T., Brown, N., and Wilcox, M. (1987) Cell 51, 929-940[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. |
MacKrell, A. J.,
Blumberg, B.,
Haynes, S. R.,
and Fessler, J. H.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
2633-2637 |
| 21. | Wehrli, M., DiAntonio, A., Fearnley, I. M., Smith, R. J., and Wilcox, M. (1993) Mech. Dev. 43, 21-36[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Brower, D. L., Brabant, M. C., and Bunch, T. A. (1995) Immunol. Cell Biol. 73, 558-564[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Prout, M., Damania, Z., Soong, J., Fristrom, D., and Fristrom, J. W. (1997) Genetics 146, 275-285[Abstract] |
| 24. | Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 25. | Ui, K., Nishihara, S., Sakuma, M., Togashi, S., Ueda, R., Miyata, Y., and Miyake, T. (1994) In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 30, 209-216 |
| 26. | Fessler, L. I., Nelson, R. E., and Fessler, J. H. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 245, 271-294[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 31-40[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Tautz, D., and Pfeifle, C. (1989) Chromosoma (Berl.) 98, 81-85[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Patel, N. H. (1994) Methods Cell Biol. 44, 445-487[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Takagi, Y., Ui, T. K., Miyake, T., and Hirohashi, S. (1998) Neurosci. Lett. 244, 149-152[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. | Boyle, W. J., van der Geer, P., and Hunter, T. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 201, 110-149[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Hildebrand, J. D.,
Schaller, M. D.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
993-1005 |
| 33. |
Schaller, M. D.,
Borgman, C. A.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
785-791 |
| 34. | Bunch, T. A., and Brower, D. L. (1992) Development (Camb.) 116, 239-247[Abstract] |
| 35. | Tippmer, S., Bossenmaier, B., and Haring, H. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 236, 953-959 |
| 36. | Dikic, I., Tokiwa, G., Lev, S., Courtneidge, S. A., and Schlessinger, J. (1996) Nature 383, 547-550[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Slack, B. E.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7281-7286 |
| 38. | Richardson, A., and Parsons, T. (1996) Nature 380, 538-540[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Leptin, M., Bogaert, T., Lehmann, R., and Wilcox, M. (1989) Cell 56, 401-408[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Bunch, T. A., Graner, M. W., Fessler, L. I., Fessler, J. H., Schneider, K. D., Kerschen, A., Choy, L. P., Burgess, B. W., and Brower, D. L. (1998) Development (Camb.) 125, 1679-1689[Abstract] |
| 41. | Burgaya, F., Menegon, A., Menegoz, M., Valtorta, F., and Girault, J. A. (1995) Eur. J. Neurosci. 7, 1810-1821[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Stevens, G. R., Zhang, C., Berg, M. M., Lambert, M. P., Barber, K., Cantallops, I., Routtenberg, A., and Klein, W. L. (1996) J. Neurosci. Res. 46, 445-455[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Hoang, B.,
and Chiba, A.
(1998)
J. Neurosci.
18,
7847-7855 |
| 44. | Grotewiel, M. S., Beck, C. D., Wu, K. H., Zhu, X. R., and Davis, R. L. (1998) Nature 391, 455-460[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 45. | Perrimon, N. (1994) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6, 260-266[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. | Raabe, T., Riesgo, E. J., Liu, X., Bausenwein, B. S., Deak, P., Maroy, P., and Hafen, E. (1996) Cell 85, 911-920[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 47. | Therrien, M., Chang, H. C., Solomon, N. M., Karim, F. D., Wassarman, D. A., and Rubin, G. M. (1995) Cell 83, 879-888[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L.-L. Zhan, J. Tian, C. Liu, F. Ke, Y. Yang, C.-X. Li, Y.-H. Qian, and Q.-T. Zeng An Intron Loss of Dfak Gene in Species of the Drosophila melanogaster Subgroup and Phylogenetic Analysis J. Hered., February 28, 2008; (2008) esn006v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Murakami, D. Umetsu, Y. Maeyama, M. Sato, S. Yoshida, and T. Tabata Focal adhesion kinase controls morphogenesis of the Drosophila optic stalk Development, April 15, 2007; 134(8): 1539 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Pruijssers and M. R. Strand PTP-H2 and PTP-H3 from Microplitis demolitor Bracovirus Localize to Focal Adhesions and Are Antiphagocytic in Insect Immune Cells J. Virol., February 1, 2007; 81(3): 1209 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Grabbe, C. G. Zervas, T. Hunter, N. H. Brown, and R. H. Palmer Focal adhesion kinase is not required for integrin function or viability in Drosophila Development, December 1, 2004; 131(23): 5795 - 5805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Kawa, J. Fujimoto, T. Tezuka, T. Nakazawa, and T. Yamamoto Involvement of BREK, a serine/threonine kinase enriched in brain, in NGF signalling Genes Cells, March 1, 2004; 9(3): 219 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Fox, I. Rebay, and R. O. Hynes Expression of DFak56, a Drosophila homolog of vertebrate focal adhesion kinase, supports a role in cell migration in vivo PNAS, December 21, 1999; 96(26): 14978 - 14983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Palmer, L. I. Fessler, P. T. Edeen, S. J. Madigan, M. McKeown, and T. Hunter DFak56 Is a Novel Drosophila melanogaster Focal Adhesion Kinase J. Biol. Chem., December 10, 1999; 274(50): 35621 - 35629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Vial, H. Okazaki, and R. P. Siraganian The NH2-terminal Region of Focal Adhesion Kinase Reconstitutes High Affinity IgE Receptor-induced Secretion in Mast Cells J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2000; 275(36): 28269 - 28275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||