JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bardelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Comoglio, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bardelli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Comoglio, P. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29274-29281, October 8, 1999


A Peptide Representing the Carboxyl-terminal Tail of the Met Receptor Inhibits Kinase Activity and Invasive Growth*

Alberto BardelliDagger , Paola Longati, Tracy A. Williams, Silvia Benvenuti, and Paolo M. Comoglio

From the Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC), University of Torino, School of Medicine, 10060, Candiolo, Italy

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Interaction of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) with its receptor, the Met tyrosine kinase, results in invasive growth, a genetic program essential to embryonic development and implicated in tumor metastasis. Met-mediated invasive growth requires autophosphorylation of the receptor on tyrosines located in the kinase activation loop (Tyr1234-Tyr1235) and in the carboxyl-terminal tail (Tyr1349-Tyr1356). We report that peptides derived from the Met receptor tail, but not from the activation loop, bind the receptor and inhibit the kinase activity in vitro. Cell delivery of the tail receptor peptide impairs HGF-dependent Met phosphorylation and downstream signaling. In normal and transformed epithelial cells, the tail receptor peptide inhibits HGF-mediated invasive growth, as measured by cell migration, invasiveness, and branched morphogenesis. The Met tail peptide inhibits the closely related Ron receptor but does not significantly affect the epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor activities. These experiments show that carboxyl-terminal sequences impair the catalytic properties of the Met receptor, thus suggesting that in the resting state the nonphosphorylated tail acts as an intramolecular modulator. Furthermore, they provide a strategy to selectively target the MET proto-oncogene by using small, cell-permeable, peptide derivatives.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The Met tyrosine kinase is a high affinity receptor for hepatocyte growth factor (HGF/scatter factor)1 (1, 2). Both Met and HGF are expressed in numerous tissues, although their expression is confined predominantly to cells of epithelial and mesenchymal origin, respectively. Signaling via this ligand-receptor pair triggers a unique biological program in target cells leading to "invasive cell growth." The latter results from the integration of multiple biological responses to HGF such as cell proliferation, survival, motility, invasion of extracellular matrices, and formation of tubular structures (branched morphogenesis) (3-6). During mouse development the coordinated control of the invasive growth program by the HGF/Met pair is essential, since knock-out experiments involving either the ligand or the receptor result in embryonic lethality due to defects in migration of myoblasts, implantation of placenta, and liver development (7-9).

c-MET was originally identified as the cellular counterpart of a transforming gene, TPR-MET, resulting from a chromosomal rearrangement (10, 11). A direct genetic link between MET and human cancer has been established by the identification of activating mutations in the c-MET gene in hereditary papillary renal carcinomas (12). Deregulated activation of the invasive growth phenotype by the MET oncogene confers invasive and metastatic properties to cancer cells (13, 14).

Binding of growth factors has been shown to induce receptor dimerization and is associated with autophosphorylation on tyrosine residues both within and outside the catalytic domain in the receptor dimer (15-17). Whereas the former are required for catalytic activity (catalytic tyrosines), the latter can serve as high affinity binding sites (docking tyrosines) for effector or adaptor molecules that recruit signal transducers to the receptor (18-20).

As for other tyrosine kinase receptors, activation of Met results in autophosphorylation of both "catalytic" and "docking" tyrosines. The major Met phosphorylation site is represented by tyrosines Tyr1234 and Tyr1235 (21). These are located within the activation loop of the kinase domain and are part of a three-tyrosine motif (Tyr1230, Tyr1234, and Tyr1235) conserved in other kinase receptors. Both Tyr1234 and Tyr1235 are essential for full activation of the enzyme (22). Upon phosphorylation of these residues, the enzymatic activity of the Met kinase is up-regulated in an autocatalytic fashion (21, 23).

When the Met receptor is activated, in addition to phosphorylation of the catalytic tyrosines, two other tyrosines (Tyr1349-Tyr1356) located in the carboxyl-terminal tail of the receptor become phosphorylated (24-26). These tyrosine residues mediate coupling of the receptor with several SH2-containing effectors, including the Grb2/SoS complex (25, 26), the p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (24), Stat-3 (27), and the multiadaptor protein Gab1 (28-30). Tyr1349 and Tyr1356 are strictly required for Met-mediated invasive growth. Substitution of both tyrosines with phenylalanine does not affect the receptor kinase activity but completely abolishes proliferation, motility, invasion, and tubulogenesis (26, 31-33).

Selective inhibition of tyrosine kinase receptors can be useful to study their activation mechanisms, to dissect their signaling pathways, and to interfere with their biological effects. A number of receptors (fibroblast growth factor receptor, Ret, epidermal growth factor receptor, Kit/Steel, Met) are directly involved in human diseases including cancer, skeletal, and other developmental disorders (34-37). Therefore, the development of molecules capable of selective inhibition of tyrosine kinase receptors has a number of potential applications.

In the current study we sought to identify peptides capable of blocking both the kinase activity and the biological properties of the Met receptor. Previous kinetic and crystallographic studies suggest that receptor tyrosine kinases (i.e. IR, fibroblast growth factor receptor) can be inhibited by sequences corresponding to autophosphorylation sites located in the kinase activation loop (38-40). In view of these observations we exploited the use of sequences derived from the activation loop to interfere with the biochemical and biological properties of the Met receptor. Unexpectedly, we found that activation loop peptides do not act as Met inhibitors. We reasoned that sequences containing autophosphorylation sites of the carboxyl-terminal tail could be an alternative approach to modulate receptor activity. Accordingly, we show that a tail peptide inhibited Met kinase activity in vitro, blocked ligand-dependent phosphorylation and signal transduction, and impaired Met-induced invasive growth in transformed epithelial cells. The Met tail peptide does not significantly affect the EGF, PDGF, or VEGF receptor activities, demonstrating that the inhibitory mechanism is selective. These data provide evidence that peptides containing carboxyl-terminal sequences can efficiently work as inhibitors of the Met tyrosine kinase, and suggest that in the resting state the carboxyl-terminal domain may act as an intramolecular modulator of this receptor.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Reagents, Peptides, Antibodies, and Cell Culture-- All reagents used were from Fluka (FlukaChemie AG) and Sigma. Reagents for SDS-PAGE were from Bio-Rad. HGF and macrophage-stimulating protein were obtained as described (52, 53). EGF and PDGF were from Sigma. VEGF was provided by Dr. Bussolino. Cell-permeable peptides derived from Met sequences in tandem with the Antennapedia sequence were obtained from Genosys Biotechnologies. Anti-phosphotyrosine, anti-Gab1, and anti-EGF receptor antibodies were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. Anti-Active MAP kinase antibody was obtained from Promega, anti-PDGF receptor was from Transduction Laboratories. Anti-VEGF was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-Met and anti-Ron antibodies were obtained as (53, 54). Anti-fluorescein antibody was from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. A549 cells were from ATCC. GTL16 and MLP-29 (mouse liver progenitor cells) have been previously described (47). Human endothelial cells cells were kindly provided by Dr. Bussolino. Cultures of mammalian cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium or RPMI supplemented with 10% serum (Sigma) (or 20% in the case of human endothelial cells cells) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, air.

Cell Delivery of Peptides-- 200 µg of each peptide were incubated in 0.01 M NH4HCO3, pH 9.0, at a final concentration of 200 µM in the presence of 100 µg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate (Sigma) for 3 h at room temperature. Efficiency of fluoresceination was verified by 22% SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-fluorescein antibodies. To assess cell permeability of peptides, fluoresceinated peptides were added to culture medium at a final concentration of 20 µM, and after 2 h, cells were fixed and examined by fluorescence microscopy. To calculate the intracellular concentration of Antennapedia peptides, cells were incubated with the Ant-Tyr1234-1235- and Ant-Tyr1349-1356-fluoresceinated peptides for 1 h, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed. Total lysates were analyzed by 22% SDS-PAGE. The presence of the fluoresceinated peptide in the lysate was revealed directly using the Fluorimager system (Molecular Dynamics). The concentration of the peptide was evaluated by comparison with lysates containing known amount of fluoresceinated peptide.

In Vitro Auto- and Substrate Phosphorylation-- The Met or the Tpr-Met tyrosine kinase were immunoprecipitated with anti-Met antibodies from GTL-16 or from transfected COS cells lysates in the absence of sodium orthovanadate to allow dephosphorylation. After extensive washing, immunoprecipitates were subjected to autophosphorylation in kinase buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM MgCl2) in the presence of 20 µM peptide, 10 µM cold ATP, and [gamma -32P]ATP (5 µCi/sample) for 20 min at 4 °C. The reaction was stopped by adding boiling Laemmli buffer, and samples were analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE. Gels were dried and exposed for autoradiography. In kinetic experiments, 5 µM myelin basic protein (Sigma) was also included in the reaction as a substrate together with increasing concentrations of peptides, 40 µM cold ATP, and [gamma -32P]ATP (5 µCi/sample). The reaction was performed at 4 °C for 25 min and stopped by adding Laemmli buffer. Samples were separated by 8-12% SDS-PAGE followed by analysis with the PhosphorImager STORM (Molecular Dynamics). The intensity of bands corresponding to phosphorylated Met and myelin basic protein was quantitated using the program ImageQuant (Molecular Dynamics).

In Vitro Interaction of Peptides with the Receptor-- A549 cells were lysed in EB buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100) including 1 mM sodium orthovanadate and protease inhibitors. Cell lysates were incubated with 20 µM peptide for 1 h; heparin-Sepharose was then added for 2 h to allow peptide binding to heparin. Samples were washed extensively with EB buffer including 1 M LiCl and analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-Met antibodies. Alternatively, peptides were coupled to Affi-Gel 10, an activated affinity support from Bio-Rad, by incubation in Me2SO for 4 h at 4 °C. 100 mM ethanolamine was added to block any other active groups, and interaction with the receptor was assayed as above. The binding of immobilized peptides with the Met catalytic domain was detected using lysates from Sf9 cells expressing the isolated Met kinase domain.

Cell Starvation and Treatment with Peptides-- A549 cells were starved in serum-free medium for 48 h; MLP-29 cells were maintained in 2% serum for 3 days and then starved for 16 h in serum-free medium; human endothelial cells cells were starved for 12 h in serum-free medium with the addition of 2% bovine serum albumin. After starvation, cells were treated with peptides at the indicated concentrations for the indicated time and stimulated with the appropriate factor (80 ng/ml HGF, 100 ng/ml macrophage-stimulating protein, 100 ng/ml EGF, 100 ng/ml PDGF, 20 ng/ml VEGF) for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were then lysed in EB buffer including sodium orthovanadate and protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitation was performed with the appropriate antibodies, and samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by Western immunoblotting as indicated. To evaluate MAP kinase phosphorylation, 100 µg of total lysates/sample were separated on a 12% polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-active MAP kinase antibodies.

Scatter Assay-- 3.5 × 103 cells/well (24 well cluster: Costar) were seeded in medium containing 2% serum. Cells were pretreated for 2 h with peptides at a final concentration of 20 µM and incubated with HGF (20 ng/ml) in the presence of peptides. After 12 h, cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde (11% in phosphate-buffered saline) and stained with crystal violet.

Invasion Assay-- 105 cells were seeded in medium containing 10% serum on the upper side of a porous polycarbonate membrane (8.0-µm pore size) coated with 1.2 mg/ml artificial basement membrane, Matrigel® (Collaborative Research, Waltham, MA) containing laminin, collagen type IV, proteoglycans, and growth factors. Cells were treated with 20 µM peptides for 2 h and incubated with 20 ng/ml HGF in the presence of peptides. After 24 h of incubation, cells on the upper side of the filters were mechanically removed. Cells that had invaded the Matrigel® and migrated to the lower side of the filter were fixed with glutaraldehyde (11% in phosphate-buffered saline) and stained with crystal violet. The crystal violet was solubilized with 10% acetic acid, and the concentration was evaluated as absorbance at 590 nm.

Tubulogenesis Assay-- Invasive growth in collagen was assessed in tridimensional collagen gels as described (47). 105 cells/ml were suspended on ice in gel solution containing eight parts type I collagen 2 mg/ml stock solution (G Collagen, Seromed), 1 part 10× Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, and 1 part Hepes, 0.5 M, pH 7.4. The cold mixture was placed into microtiter plate wells and allowed to polymerize for 15 min at 37 °C before adding 0.1 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 20% serum. Cells were cultured for 24-36 h until they formed spherical structures, then treated with 20 µM peptides for 2 h and incubated with 20 ng/ml HGF in the presence of peptides. Cells were cultured for 5 days and examined under a phase-contrast microscope.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Design of Cell-permeable Peptides Containing Met Autophosphorylation Sites-- Activation of the Met receptor results in autophosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues located both in the kinase activation loop (Tyr1234-Tyr1235) and in the carboxyl-terminal tail (Tyr1349-Tyr1356) (21, 25). A number of peptides were synthesized corresponding to the Met autophosphorylation sites (Fig. 1). All peptides contained the Antennapedia internalization domain at the amino terminus (41). This sequence has been shown to freely translocate across biological membranes with minimal cell toxicity (42). An unphosphorylable version of the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide was obtained by substituting the tyrosines with phenylalanine residues (Ant-Phe1349-1356). Two additional peptides were synthesized including the Antennapedia control peptide (Ant), a shorter version of the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide lacking tyrosine 1356 (Ant- Tyr1349), and a scrambled Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide (Ant-scrambled).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Cell-permeable peptides containing Met autophosphorylation sites. A, schematic representation of the functional domains of the Met tyrosine kinase receptor. The tyrosine kinase domain (KD) is indicated by a gray box. Tyr1234 and Tyr1235 are the catalytic tyrosines located in the activation loop (AL) of the kinase domain. Tyr1349-Tyr1356 are located in the carboxyl-terminal tail (CT) of the receptor and upon phosphorylation, generate docking sites for signal transducers. B, list of peptides corresponding to the Met autophosphorylation sites. Peptides were synthesized with an amino-terminal internalization sequence derived from the Antennapedia protein.

Peptides Containing Met Carboxyl-terminal Sequences Inhibit the Kinase Activity-- We investigated the possibility that peptides derived from the activation loop and the carboxyl-terminal tail could be used as inhibitors of the Met receptor. Peptides including Tyr1234-Tyr1235 and Tyr1349-Tyr1356 were compared for their ability to inhibit the receptor kinase activity in autophosphorylation assays performed in vitro. The Met receptor was immunopurified from GTL16 cells and incubated with [gamma -32P]ATP in the presence of increasing concentrations of the indicated peptide. We observed that the tail peptide efficiently inhibited Met autophosphorylation whereas the activation loop peptide had little effect (Fig. 2, panel A and B). To exclude a nonspecific effect of the tail peptide, either a scrambled Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide version or a truncated peptide lacking Tyr1356 was included in the experiments. These peptides had little effect on the kinase activity of the Met receptor, showing that inhibition by the tail peptide depends on its primary amino acid sequence. The effect of the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide could be due to ATP depletion (resulting from progressive peptide phosphorylation) or to direct inhibition of the kinase reaction (resulting from interaction of the peptide substrate with the catalytic active site). To test this, a nonphosphorylable peptide analogue was designed by replacing the tyrosine with phenylalanine residues unable to accept kinase-catalyzed phosphoryl transfer from ATP. The Phe-containing tail peptide inhibited Met autophosphorylation in vitro as efficiently as the parental Tyr counterpart, suggesting that direct binding to the active site could be responsible for the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 inhibitory potential (Fig. 2, panel A and B).


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Tail peptides inhibit Met kinase activity. A, Met receptor was immunoprecipitated from GTL16 cells, and immunocomplexes were subjected to in vitro kinase assay in the presence of the indicated peptides and [gamma -32P]ATP under conditions described under "Experimental Procedures." Autophosphorylated receptors were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. B, immunoprecipitated Met receptors were subjected to kinase assays in the presence of the indicated peptides and analyzed as in panel A. The inhibitory effect of the peptides was evaluated by measuring either receptor autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of the exogenous substrate myelin basic protein (MBP). After densitometric analysis, values were expressed as percentage of inhibition. black-diamond , Ant-Tyr1349-1356; black-square, Ant-Phe1349-1356; triangle , Ant-Tyr1234-1235; open circle , Ant-scramble; ×, Ant.

The effect of peptides on substrate phosphorylation was next measured using myelin basic protein. At low peptide concentrations, only the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 and the Phe1349-Phe1356-containing peptides inhibited the reaction. As expected, at higher concentrations the competitive effect of the Tyr1234-Tyr1235 derivative was also detected (Fig. 2, panel B).

These experiments show that peptides containing carboxyl-terminal sequences efficiently inhibit the Met kinase activity in vitro through a mechanism that does not rely on substrate competition.

Peptides Containing Met Carboxyl-terminal Sequences Bind the Receptor in Vitro-- The possibility that the carboxyl-terminal domain may interfere with the kinase activity by interacting directly with the kinase domain of the receptor was evaluated. Peptides were immobilized on heparin-Sepharose that has been shown previously to bind the Antennapedia moiety (43). Cell lysates containing the Met protein were incubated with the immobilized peptides, and the associated receptor was visualized by immunoblotting with anti-Met antibodies. Fig. 3 shows that the carboxyl-terminal peptides bind the Met receptor most likely by interacting with its catalytic region. To verify this hypothesis, we performed similar experiments using the isolated catalytic domain (amino acid 1044-1347) lacking the juxtamembrane domain and the carboxyl-terminal tail docking sites. The isolated Met kinase domain, containing a polyhistidine tag, is catalytically active and constitutively tyrosine-phosphorylated when expressed in Sf9 cells (data not shown). Immobilized tail peptides were incubated with lysates containing the catalytic domain. The associated kinase domain protein was visualized by immunoblotting with anti-Ptyr antibodies (Fig. 3, panel C). To further characterize the interaction mechanism, we performed the same experiment with tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides. The phosphorylated tail peptide interacts with the Met catalytic domain with a slightly increased efficiency when compared with its unphosphorylated counterpart (data not shown).


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Tail peptides bind the Met receptor in vitro. The indicated peptides were immobilized on heparin-Sepharose (A) or coupled to an agarose affinity support (Affi-Gel) (B) and incubated with lysates of GTL-16 cells. The amount of associated receptor was determined by Western blotting with anti-Met antibodies. Arrows indicate the position of the 145-kDa Met receptor beta -chain (p145Met). C, tail peptides coupled to heparin-Sepharose were incubated with lysate of Sf9 cells expressing the isolated Met kinase domain (p34Met-KD). The amount of associated Met-KD protein was determined by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.

Carboxyl-terminal Peptides Inhibit the Kinase Activity of Oncogenic Met Mutants-- Oncogenic forms of the Met receptor have been described including Tpr-Met and Met-PRC mutants. In Tpr-Met the extracellular domain of Met is replaced by Tpr sequences, which provide two strong dimerization motifs. Dimerization causes constitutive activation of the Tpr-Met kinase, which acquires transforming and metastatic properties (10, 11, 14, 44). Met-PRCM1250T and Met-PRCD1228H are Met variants identified in papillary renal carcinomas (PRC) in which critical residues located in the kinase domain are mutated (12). Tpr-Met and Met-PRC mutants were expressed in COS cells, and association experiments with immobilized tail peptides were performed as described in the previous paragraph. Both the Tpr-Met and Met-PRC mutants were found to interact with the immobilized peptides (data not shown). To evaluate the inhibitory potential of tail peptides on the mutant forms of Met, the corresponding proteins were immunopurified from transfected COS cells with anti-Met-specific antibodies. Peptides were then compared for their ability to inhibit the kinase activity in autophosphorylation assays performed in vitro in the presence of the indicated peptide (20 µM). We observed that the tail peptides inhibit the kinase activity of Met mutants (Fig. 4). These data suggest that the tail peptides could be used as inhibitors of the Met oncogenic potential.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Tail peptides inhibit the constitutively activated Tpr-Met and Met-PRC kinases. Met-PRC mutants (A) and Tpr-Met (B) were immunoprecipitated from transfected COS cells, and immunocomplexes were subjected to in vitro kinase assay (see Fig. 2) in the presence of the indicated peptides and [gamma -32P]ATP. Autophosphorylated receptors were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. Arrows indicate bands corresponding to Met-PRC (the precursor and the beta -chain) and to Tpr-Met (p65Tpr-Met). Ctr, control.

Efficient Cell Delivery of Met-derived Peptides Containing the Antennapedia Internalization Sequence-- To verify that the Antennapedia-containing peptides could efficiently translocate across the plasma membrane, peptides were labeled with fluorescein (see "Experimental Procedures"). When added to cell cultures, peptides were recovered in the intracellular compartment of epithelial cells after as little as 15 min of incubation (Fig. 5). The amount of internalized peptides increased with its concentration in the culture medium with saturation at 25 µM (data not shown). Peptides were detectable intracellularly for up to 16 h. No significant differences were detected among the internalization efficiency of the different peptides. To evaluate the delivery efficiency, two different peptides were added to the culture medium (final concentration 20 µM), and the intracellular peptide concentrations were calculated (see "Experimental Procedures"). The cytosolic peptide concentration was found to be in the micromolar range (10-20 µM), which is sufficient to achieve inhibition of the Met receptor kinase activity (see Fig. 2). The relatively high intracellular peptide concentration is similar to that of the peptides originally added to the culture medium. This can be explained considering that translocation of the peptides across the plasma-membrane occurs in the absence of a receptor (42). In this situation the peptides can diffuse freely across the membrane, and equilibrium can be reached.


View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Cellular internalization of the Antennapedia-Met peptides. Peptides were labeled at the amino terminus with fluorescein under conditions described under "Experimental Procedures." Labeling efficiency was verified by SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-fluorescein antibodies. Subconfluent monolayers of A549 cells were treated for 2 h with the indicated peptides (20 µM), washed, and analyzed by fluorescence microscopy. Ctr, control.

Carboxyl-terminal Peptides Impair HGF-dependent Met Autophosphorylation in Intact Cells-- The ability of the tail peptides to inhibit Met autophosphorylation in vitro suggests that they could also be used to impair ligand-dependent activation of the receptor in intact cells. To verify this hypothesis, Met-expressing epithelial cells were serum-starved and treated with the peptides before ligand stimulation. Cells were incubated with recombinant HGF, and the level of Met tyrosine phosphorylation was evaluated by immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 6, panel A). In agreement with the data obtained in vitro, both the Tyr and Phe versions of tail peptides efficiently blocked ligand-dependent Met autophosphorylation, whereas the activation loop peptide was ineffective. In addition, the scrambled and the truncated tail peptides had little effect on ligand-dependent Met phosphorylation, confirming the specificity of the inhibitory effect (Fig. 6, panel A). Dose-response experiments showed that the inhibitory potential was dependent on peptide concentration with almost complete inhibition observed at 20 µM (Fig. 6, panel B). The effect of the peptides was reversible as shown by recovery of HGF-dependent Met phosphorylation 16 h after treatment (Fig. 6, panel C).


View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Inhibition of ligand dependent Met phosphorylation by tail peptides. A, effect of peptides derived from the activation loop or the carboxyl-terminal tail on ligand-dependent Met phosphorylation. A549 cells were serum-starved for 3 days and treated with the indicated peptides at a final concentration of 20 µM. Two hours later cells were treated with recombinant HGF for 15' and then lysed. Met phosphorylation was evaluated by immunoprecipitation (IP) of the receptor with anti-Met antibodies followed by Western blotting with anti-pTyr antibodies. The identity of the phosphorylated protein was confirmed by reprobing the same blot with an anti-Met antibody. Ctr, control. B, dose-response activity of the Ant-Tyr1349-1356 peptide on ligand-dependent Met phosphorylation. Serum-starved A549 cells were treated with the tail peptide at the indicated concentrations and stimulated with HGF. Met phosphorylation was assessed as described in A. C, time course activity of the Ant- Tyr1349-1356 peptide on ligand-dependent Met phosphorylation. Serum-starved A549 cells were treated for 2 h with the tail peptide (20 µM). At the indicated time points, cells were stimulated with HGF, and Met phosphorylation was assessed as above. The arrows indicate the position of the Met receptor beta -chain (p145Met).

Met Tail Peptides Inhibit the Closely Related Ron Receptor but Do Not Significantly Affect the EGF, PDGF, or VEGF Receptor Activities-- The inhibitory effect of the Met tail peptide on ligand stimulation of other receptor tyrosine kinases was evaluated. We tested a highly homologous receptor such as Ron and other distant Met relatives such as the EGF, PDGF, and VEGF receptors. Cells expressing the receptor of interest were serum-starved, treated with the Met or control peptides, and stimulated with the appropriate ligand. The receptors were immunoprecipitated, and tyrosine phosphorylation was measured by immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the Met carboxyl-terminal peptides significantly impaired ligand stimulation of the Ron receptor, whereas they had either no or a minor effect on activation of the EGF and VEGF and PDGF receptors. These data show that the Met peptide acts through a mechanism that is similar for Met and Ron; furthermore they indicate that the inhibitory activity of the Met peptide is selective.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Effect of the tail Met peptide on ligand-dependent phosphorylation of different receptor tyrosine kinases. A, cell lines expressing different receptors were serum-starved, incubated with the indicated peptides (20 µM) for 2 h, and stimulated with the appropriate ligands as described under "Experimental Procedures." Phosphorylation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) was assessed in human epithelial cell (A549)-stimulated EGF. Phosphorylation of Ron, VEGF receptor (VEGFR), and PDGF receptor (PDGFR) was evaluated, respectively, in mouse liver progenitor cells (MLP-29) stimulated with macrophage-stimulating protein, in human endothelial cells stimulated with VEGF, and in mouse fibroblasts stimulated with PDGF. Phosphorylation was detected by immunoprecipitation with receptor-specific antibodies followed by Western blotting with anti-Tyr(P) antibodies. The PDGF receptor was immunoprecipitated with anti-Tyr(P) antibodies. The identity of the phosphorylated proteins was confirmed by Western blotting with specific antibodies. Ctr, control. G.F., growth factor. B, quantitative analysis of the Met peptide inhibitory activity is expressed as a percentage of inhibition compared with receptor phosphorylation in the absence of peptide.

Tail Peptides Inhibit Met-dependent Downstream Signaling-- The HGF/Met pair triggers invasive growth by activation of a cascade of downstream signaling events. After ligand phosphorylation Met binds and phosphorylates the multiadaptor protein Gab1, which in turn recruits and activates a number of SH2-containing effectors (28-30). The signal is then transmitted to the nucleus via activation of various pathways including the MAP kinase cascade (25). We assessed whether the peptides that impair Met kinase activity also inhibited receptor signaling. Panel A of Fig. 8 shows that in cells treated with the Tyr or the Phe version of the tail peptide, Met-dependent Gab1 phosphorylation is impaired. This is also the case for activation of the p42 MAP kinase as evaluated using activation specific antibodies (Fig. 8, panel B). These data show that in addition to blocking the Met kinase activity, tail peptides also interrupt downstream signaling initiated by the HGF/Met interaction.


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8.   Tail peptides inhibit Met-dependent phosphorylation of Gab1 and MAP kinase activation. A, effect of peptides derived from the activation loop or the carboxyl-terminal tail on Met-dependent Gab1 phosphorylation. A549 cells were serum-starved and incubated with the indicated peptides at a final concentration of 20 µM. Two h later cells were treated with recombinant HGF for 15 min and then lysed. Lysates were immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Gab1 antibodies and analyzed by Western immunoblotting with anti-Tyr(P) (pTyr) antibodies. The identity of the phosphorylated protein was confirmed by reprobing the same blot with anti-Gab1 antibodies. Arrows indicate the position of Gab1 protein (p110Gab1). B, effect of activation loop or tail peptides on Met-dependent MAP kinase activation. Total lysates from A549 cells treated as in panel A were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western immunoblotting with anti-active MAP kinase antibodies. Arrows indicate bands corresponding to the MAP kinase active forms p42ERK1 and p44ERK2. Ctr, control.

Tail Peptides Inhibit HGF-mediated Cell Migration, Invasiveness, and Branched Morphogenesis-- HGF/Met promote a highly integrated biological program leading to "invasive growth," which is characterized by cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of extracellular matrix (3, 4, 45). The most complex response of HGF/Met is morphogenesis, which requires the coordinated accomplishment of each of the aforementioned biological activities (46, 47). The effects of the peptides on HGF-mediated motility, invasion, and morphogenesis were assessed (Fig. 9). The effect on cell migration was evaluated on normal epithelial cells (MLP29) in a "scatter assay." Cells were pretreated with the peptides and stimulated with HGF. Dissociation and migration of cells (scattering) was then monitored. Both the Tyr and Phe versions of the tail peptide partially inhibited HGF/Met-mediated scattering, whereas the activation loop peptide was ineffective (Fig. 9, panel A). The partial inhibitory effect of peptides can be explained by previous data indicating that even low levels of Met activation are sufficient to induce scattering in epithelial cells. The effect of peptides on invasion was assessed by the Matrigel® invasion assay using epithelial transformed cells (A549) (Fig. 9, panels B and C). This kind of experiment evaluates the ability of HGF-stimulated cells to cross reconstituted basal membranes made of laminin, collagen type IV, and proteoglycans. The inhibitory effect was more pronounced than that previously observed in the scatter assay. This indicates that the level of kinase inhibition achieved by the tail peptide is sufficient to block Met-mediated invasiveness, whereas it results in partial inhibition of cell motility. To measure the effects of the peptides on morphogenesis, MLP-29 cells were grown in a tridimensional type-1 collagen matrix for 3 days. By this time spherical aggregates of cells were observed that, after HGF stimulation, differentiated and formed tubular-like structures (Fig. 9, panel D). In the presence of the tail peptides this response was dramatically impaired. As in the invasion assay, the activation loop peptide had no effect. We also found that the Phe version of the tail peptide inhibited morphogenesis more efficiently than its Tyr counterpart. This data correlates with the relative activities of the two peptides in blocking the Met kinase activity in vitro (cf. Fig. 2, panel B).


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9.   Tail peptides inhibit Met-mediated cell migration, invasion, and branched morphogenesis. A, the effect of Met peptides on HGF-induced cell migration was evaluated using the scatter assay. Liver progenitor cells (MLP29) were seeded on coverslips, treated with the indicated peptides (20 µM) for 2 h, and then stimulated with HGF. Cells were allow to migrate 12 h, fixed, and stained with crystal violet. Micrographs show representative cell fields. B, the effect of Met peptides on HGF-induced cell invasion was evaluated by the Matrigel® Transwell assay. This assay measures the ability of cells to invade reconstituted basal membranes made of laminin, collagen type IV, and proteoglycans (Matrigel®). Epithelial cells (A549) were seeded in the upper compartment, treated with the indicated peptides for 2 h, and then stimulated with HGF. After a 24-h incubation, cells that had crossed the Matrigel® and attached to the lower side of the filter were fixed and stained with crystal violet. Micrographs show representative cell fields. C, cell invasion was quantitated as described under "Experimental Procedures." Values are expressed as percentage of inhibition. D, the effect of peptides on HGF-induced branched morphogenesis was evaluated in a tridimensional network of collagen type I. MLP29 cells were seeded in collagen gels and grown until they formed spheric structures. Cells were treated with the indicated peptides (20 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with HGF. The morphogenic effects was detected 24 h after HGF treatment and was most evident after 72 h. Micrographs of representative fields were taken after 48-72 h. Ctr, control.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Tyrosine kinase receptors are involved in human diseases including cancer, metabolic disorders, and developmental defects (34-37). On the basis of their mechanism of action, there are at least two possible strategies to inhibit receptor tyrosine kinases. On one side the catalytic process can be targeted by developing inhibitors of the enzymatic activity. On the other, receptor coupling to signal transducers can be blocked using molecules that bind the SH2 domain of the effector proteins. The finding that multiple receptors are coupled to overlapping arrays of SH2 effectors makes it difficult to interfere with signaling by a single receptor without simultaneously affecting others.

In this work we sought to target the biochemical and biological properties of the Met receptor by interfering with the mechanism of receptor autophosphorylation. On the basis of previous crystallographic studies we initially used peptides containing autophosphorylation sites located in the activation loop (39, 40). Unexpectedly, the activation loop peptide did not block Met autophosphorylation, although it interfered with substrate phosphorylation at high concentrations. Molecular modeling of the Met cytoplasmic domain suggested that the tail could actually get in contact with the catalytic pocket (data not shown). We therefore exploited the possibility that tail sequences could modulate the kinase activity of the Met receptor. A tail-derived peptide blocked both auto and substrate phosphorylation of the Met receptor. Receptor tyrosine kinases preferentially phosphorylate tyrosine residues followed by a hydrophobic residue in the +3 position (48). The tyrosines located in the Met activation loop do not match the optimal consensus for phosphorylation. Conversely, tyrosines located in the carboxyl-terminal tail are predicted to be optimal substrates of the Met receptor. In agreement with this, we reported recently that Met preferentially phosphorylates peptides derived from the carboxyl-terminal tail compared with peptides derived from the activation loop (49). Substrate selectivity may therefore account for the differential effect on the Met kinase activity displayed by activation loop and tail peptides.

The inhibitory potential of the tail peptide requires the presence of a unique amino acid sequence (Ile-Gly-Glu-His-Tyr1349-Val-His-Val-Asn-Ala-Thr-Tyr1356-Val-Asn-Val-Lys-Cys-Val-Ala), because either a peptide truncated at tyrosine 1356 or a scramble version were inactive. The finding that a Phe1349-Phe1356 nonphosphorylable analogue also blocked the Met kinase activity suggested that the inhibitory mechanism relies on peptide binding to the active site rather then on ATP depletion. This was confirmed by experiments demonstrating the interaction of the immobilized tail peptide with the Met receptor.

The crystal structures of the insulin and fibroblast growth factor receptors indicate that, in the inactive state, the activation loop blocks the access of the substrate peptide to the catalytic site loop (39, 40). This situation may be different in Met. The inhibitory activity of peptides containing sequences from the Met carboxyl-terminal tail suggest that this region modulates the function of the receptor. One possibility is that, in the inactive receptor state, the tail interferes with access of the substrate to the catalytic pocket of the enzyme. Ligand-induced dimerization may unleash the kinase activity by releasing this autoinhibitory mechanism. Alternatively, the tail could impair receptor phosphorylation by interacting with another moiety of the catalytic domain. We are currently performing crystallographic studies to verify this hypothesis.

Interestingly the Met tail peptide also inhibited Ron, a Met-related receptor, but not the EGF, VEGF, and PDGF receptors. Among the receptor tyrosine kinases, Ron has the highest sequence homology with Met. In particular, the amino acid sequence surrounding the tail phosphorylation sites (Y-hydrophobic-X-hydrophobic-X3-Y-hydrophobic-X-hydrophobic) is conserved between Met and Ron (25). The finding that the inhibitory activity was restricted to receptors of the Met family implies a common mechanism. These experiments further indicate that intramolecular peptide sequences can be utilized to selectively target the catalytic properties of tyrosine kinase receptors.

The membrane internalization properties of the Antennapedia homeodomain were used to transduce the Met inhibitory peptides into epithelial cells. Once internalized, the tail peptide blocked both ligand-dependent autophosphorylation and downstream Met signaling. In particular, the peptides impaired Gab1 phosphorylation and MAP kinase activation. The effects were dose-dependent and reversible, confirming the specificity of the inhibitory process.

A number of biological assays were used to study whether peptides derived from the Met tail could interfere with HGF-induced invasive growth as measured by cell motility, invasion, and branched morphogenesis. Met-mediated invasion and tubulogenesis were severely impaired by the tail receptor peptide. Interestingly, motility was only partially affected, suggesting that a low level of receptor activation is sufficient to induce cell flattening and dissociation. This is in agreement with previous data showing that Met receptor mutants unable to promote invasion and tubulogenesis are still competent in inducing motility (31, 50, 51). Met-triggered invasive growth is required for embryonic development, whereas its inappropriate activation confers to cancer cells invasive and metastatic properties. Selective inhibitors of this process could be useful in understanding the HGF/Met biology and in targeting the invasive metastatic potential of Met-expressing cells. By demonstrating that tail sequences act as inhibitors of the Met tyrosine kinase, this study provides an approach to interfere with the biological effects triggered by the MET proto-oncogene.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are indebted to S. Toniol for the peptide inhibition experiments, L. Pugliese for molecular modeling the Met cytoplasmic domain, E. Wright for editing the manuscript, and A. Cignetto for the excellent secretarial help. We are grateful to E. Medico and P. Gual for critical reading of the manuscript. The excellent technical assistance of G. Petruccelli and R. Albano is acknowledged.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by research grants from the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) and from the Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Foundation for Advanced Scientific Research.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address. To whom correspondence should be addressed: The Johns Hopkins University-School of Medicine Oncology Center, 424 N. Bond St., Baltimore, MD 21231.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; EGF, epidermal growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PRC, papillary renal carcinomas.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Bottaro, D. P., Rubin, J. S., Faletto, D. L., Chan, A. M., Kmiecik, T. E., Vande Woude, G. F., and Aaronson, S. A. (1991) Science 251, 802-804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Naldini, L., Weidner, K. M., Vigna, E., Gaudino, G., Bardelli, A., Ponzetto, C., Narsimhan, R. P., Hartmann, G., Zarnegar, R., Michalopoulos, G. K., Birchmeier, W., and Comiglio, P. M. (1991) EMBO J 10, 2867-2878[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Stoker, M., Gherardi, E., Perryman, M., and Gray, J. (1987) Nature 327, 239-242[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Montesano, R., Matsumoto, K., Nakamura, T., and Orci, L. (1991) Cell 67, 901-908[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Nakamura, T., Teramoto, H., and Ichihara, A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 6489-6493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Michalopoulos, G., Houck, K. A., Dolan, M. L., and Leutteke, N. C. (1984) Cancer Res. 44, 4414-4419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Bladt, F., Riethmacher, D., Isenmann, S., Aguzzi, A., and Birchmeier, C. (1995) Nature 376, 768-771[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Schmidt, C., Bladt, F., Goedecke, S., Brinkmann, V., Zschiesche, W., Sharpe, M., Gherardi, E., and Birchmeier, C. (1995) Nature 373, 699-702[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Uehara, Y., Minowa, O., Mori, C., Shiota, K., Kuno, J., Noda, T., and Kitamura, N. (1995) Nature 373, 702-705[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Cooper, C. S., Park, M., Blair, D. G., Tainsky, M. A., Huebner, K., Croce, C. M., and Vande Woude, G. F. (1984) Nature 311, 29-33[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Park, M., Dean, M., Cooper, C. S., Schmidt, M., S. J., O. B., Blair, D. G., and Vande Woude, G. F. (1986) Cell 45, 895-904[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Schmidt, L., Duh, F. M., Chen, F., Kishida, T., Glenn, G., Choyke, P., Scherer, S. W., Zhuang, Z., Lubensky, I., Dean, M., Allikmets, R., Chidambaram, A., Bergerheim, U. R., Feltis, J. T., Casadevall, C., Zamarron, A., Bernues, M., Richard, S., Lips, C. J., Walther, M. M., Tsui, L. C., Geil, L., Orcutt, M. L., Stackhouse, T., and Zbar, B. (1997) Nat. Genet. 16, 68-73[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Rong, S., Segal, S., Anver, M., Resau, J. H., and Vande Woude, G. F. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4731-4735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Giordano, S., Bardelli, A., Zhen, Z., Menard, S., Ponzetto, C., and Comoglio, P. M. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 13868-13872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) Cell 61, 203-212[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Johnson, L. N., Noble, M. E., and Owen, D. J. (1996) Cell 85, 149-158[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Hubbard, S. R., Mohammadi, M., and Schlessinger, J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 11987-11990[Free Full Text]
18. Cantley, L. C., Auger, K. R., Carpenter, C., Duckworth, B., Graziani, A., Kapeller, R., and Soltoff, S. (1991) Cell 64, 281-302[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Kavanaugh, M. W., and Williams, L. T. (1994) Science 266, 1862-1865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573-580[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Ferracini, R., Longati, P., Naldini, L., Vigna, E., and Comoglio, P. M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19558-19564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Longati, P., Bardelli, A., Ponzetto, C., Naldini, L., and Comoglio, P. M. (1994) Oncogene 9, 49-57[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Naldini, L., Vigna, E., Ferracini, R., Longati, P., Gandino, L., Prat, M., and Comoglio, P. M. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 1793-1803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Ponzetto, C., Bardelli, A., Maina, F., Longati, P., Panayotou, G., Dhand, R., Waterfield, M. D., and Comoglio, P. M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4600-4608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Ponzetto, C., Bardelli, A., Zhen, Z., Maina, F., dalla Zonca, P., Giordano, S., Graziani, A., Panayotou, G., and Comoglio, P. M. (1994) Cell 77, 261-271[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Fixman, E. D., Naujokas, M. A., Rodrigues, G. A., Moran, M. F., and Park, M. (1995) Oncogene 10, 237-249[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Boccaccio, C., Ando, M., Tamagnone, L., Bardelli, A., Michieli, P., Battistini, C., and Comoglio, P. M. (1998) Nature 391, 285-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Weidner, K., DiCesare, S., Sachs, M., Brinkmann, V., Behrens, J., and Birchmeier, W. (1996) Nature 384, 173-176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Bardelli, A., Longati, P., Gramaglia, D., Stella, M. C., and Comoglio, P. M. (1997) Oncogene 15, 3103-3111[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Nguyen, L., Holgado-Madruga, M., Maroun, C., Fixman, E. D., Kamikura, D., Fournier, T., Charest, A., Tremblay, M. L., Wong, A. J., and Park, M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 20811-20819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Ponzetto, P., Zhen, Z., Audero, E., Maina, F., Bardelli, A., Basile, M. L., Giordano, S., Narsimhan, R., and Comoglio, P. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14119-14123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Zhu, H., Naujokas, M. A., Fixman, E. D., Torossian, K., and Park, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29943-29948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Weidner, K. M., Sachs, M., Riethmacher, D., and Birchmeier, W. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2597-2601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Muenke, M., and Schell, U. (1995) Trends Genet. 11, 308-313[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Pasini, B., Ceccherini, I., and Romeo, G. (1996) Trends Genet. 12, 138-144[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Moley, J. F. (1997) Annu. Rev. Med. 48, 409-320[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Kolibaba, K. S., and Druker, B. J. (1997) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1333, 217-248
38. Shoelson, S. E., White, M. F., and Kahn, C. R. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 7831-7836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Hubbard, S. R., Wei, L., Ellis, L., and Hendrickson, W. A. (1994) Nature 372, 746-754[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Mohammadi, M., Schlessinger, J., and Hubbard, S. R. (1996) Cell 86, 577-587[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Joliot, A., Pernelle, C., Deagostini-Bazin, H., and Prochiantz, A. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1864-1868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Derossi, D., Chassaing, G., and Prochiantz, A. (1998) Trends Cell Biol. 8, 84-87[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Perez, F., Joliot, A., Bloch-Gallego, E., Zahraoui, A., Triller, A., and Prochiantz, A. (1992) J. Cell Sci. 102, 717-722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
44. Rodrigues, G. A., and Park, M. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6711-6722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. Jeffers, M. J., Rong, S., and Vande Woude, G. F. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1115-1125[Abstract]
46. Weidner, K. M., Sachs, M., and Birchmeier, W. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 145-154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Medico, E., Mongiovì, A. M., Huff, J., Jelinek, M. A., Follenzi, A., Gaudino, G., Parsons, J. T., and Comoglio, P. M. (1996) Mol. Biol. Cell 7, 495-504[Abstract]
48. Songyang, Z., Blechner, S., Hoagland, N., Hoekstra, M. F., Piwnica-Worms, H., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) Curr. Biol. 4, 973-982[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Bardelli, A., Longati, P., Gramaglia, D., Basilico, C., Tamagnone, L., Giordano, S., Ballinari, D., Michieli, P., and Comoglio, P. M. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 14379-14383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Fournier, E., Dubreuil, P., Birnbaum, D., and Borg, J. P. (1995) Oncogene 11, 921-931[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Royal, I., Fournier, T. M., and Park, M. (1997) J. Cell. Physiol. 173, 196-201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
52. Naldini, L., Vigna, E., Bardelli, A., Follenzi, A., Galimi, F., and Comoglio, P. M. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 603-611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Gaudino, G., Follenzi, A., Naldini, L., Collesi, C., Santoro, M., Gallo, K. A., Godowski, P. J., and Comoglio, P. M. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 3524-3532[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Prat, M., Crepaldi, T., Gandino, L., Giordano, S., Longati, P., and Comoglio, P. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 5954[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. O'Toole, K. E. Rabenau, K. Burns, D. Lu, V. Mangalampalli, P. Balderes, N. Covino, R. Bassi, M. Prewett, K. J. Gottfredsen, et al.
Therapeutic Implications of a Human Neutralizing Antibody to the Macrophage-Stimulating Protein Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (RON), a c-MET Family Member.
Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 66(18): 9162 - 9170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]