J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29274-29281, October 8, 1999
A Peptide Representing the Carboxyl-terminal Tail of the Met
Receptor Inhibits Kinase Activity and Invasive Growth*
Alberto
Bardelli
,
Paola
Longati,
Tracy A.
Williams,
Silvia
Benvenuti, and
Paolo M.
Comoglio
From the Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (IRCC),
University of Torino, School of Medicine, 10060, Candiolo, Italy
 |
ABSTRACT |
Interaction of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)
with its receptor, the Met tyrosine kinase, results in invasive growth, a genetic program essential to embryonic development and implicated in
tumor metastasis. Met-mediated invasive growth requires
autophosphorylation of the receptor on tyrosines located in the kinase
activation loop (Tyr1234-Tyr1235) and in
the carboxyl-terminal tail (Tyr1349-Tyr1356).
We report that peptides derived from the Met receptor tail, but not
from the activation loop, bind the receptor and inhibit the kinase
activity in vitro. Cell delivery of the tail receptor peptide impairs HGF-dependent Met phosphorylation and
downstream signaling. In normal and transformed epithelial cells, the
tail receptor peptide inhibits HGF-mediated invasive growth, as
measured by cell migration, invasiveness, and branched morphogenesis.
The Met tail peptide inhibits the closely related Ron receptor but does
not significantly affect the epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, or vascular endothelial growth factor receptor activities. These experiments show that carboxyl-terminal sequences impair the catalytic properties of the Met receptor, thus suggesting that in the resting state the nonphosphorylated tail acts as an intramolecular modulator. Furthermore, they provide a strategy to
selectively target the MET proto-oncogene by using small,
cell-permeable, peptide derivatives.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Met tyrosine kinase is a high affinity receptor for hepatocyte
growth factor (HGF/scatter
factor)1 (1, 2). Both Met and
HGF are expressed in numerous tissues, although their expression is
confined predominantly to cells of epithelial and mesenchymal origin,
respectively. Signaling via this ligand-receptor pair triggers a unique
biological program in target cells leading to "invasive cell
growth." The latter results from the integration of multiple
biological responses to HGF such as cell proliferation, survival,
motility, invasion of extracellular matrices, and formation of tubular
structures (branched morphogenesis) (3-6). During mouse development
the coordinated control of the invasive growth program by the HGF/Met pair is essential, since knock-out experiments involving either the
ligand or the receptor result in embryonic lethality due to defects in
migration of myoblasts, implantation of placenta, and liver development
(7-9).
c-MET was originally identified as the cellular counterpart
of a transforming gene, TPR-MET, resulting from a
chromosomal rearrangement (10, 11). A direct genetic link between
MET and human cancer has been established by the
identification of activating mutations in the c-MET gene in
hereditary papillary renal carcinomas (12). Deregulated activation of
the invasive growth phenotype by the MET oncogene confers
invasive and metastatic properties to cancer cells (13, 14).
Binding of growth factors has been shown to induce receptor
dimerization and is associated with autophosphorylation on tyrosine residues both within and outside the catalytic domain in the receptor dimer (15-17). Whereas the former are required for catalytic activity (catalytic tyrosines), the latter can serve as high affinity binding sites (docking tyrosines) for effector or adaptor molecules that recruit signal transducers to the receptor (18-20).
As for other tyrosine kinase receptors, activation of Met results in
autophosphorylation of both "catalytic" and "docking" tyrosines. The major Met phosphorylation site is represented by tyrosines Tyr1234 and Tyr1235 (21). These are
located within the activation loop of the kinase domain and are part of
a three-tyrosine motif (Tyr1230, Tyr1234, and
Tyr1235) conserved in other kinase receptors. Both
Tyr1234 and Tyr1235 are essential for full
activation of the enzyme (22). Upon phosphorylation of these residues,
the enzymatic activity of the Met kinase is up-regulated in an
autocatalytic fashion (21, 23).
When the Met receptor is activated, in addition to phosphorylation of
the catalytic tyrosines, two other tyrosines
(Tyr1349-Tyr1356) located in the
carboxyl-terminal tail of the receptor become phosphorylated (24-26).
These tyrosine residues mediate coupling of the receptor with several
SH2-containing effectors, including the Grb2/SoS complex (25, 26), the
p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (24), Stat-3
(27), and the multiadaptor protein Gab1 (28-30). Tyr1349
and Tyr1356 are strictly required for Met-mediated invasive
growth. Substitution of both tyrosines with phenylalanine does not
affect the receptor kinase activity but completely abolishes
proliferation, motility, invasion, and tubulogenesis (26, 31-33).
Selective inhibition of tyrosine kinase receptors can be useful to
study their activation mechanisms, to dissect their signaling pathways,
and to interfere with their biological effects. A number of receptors
(fibroblast growth factor receptor, Ret, epidermal growth factor
receptor, Kit/Steel, Met) are directly involved in human diseases
including cancer, skeletal, and other developmental disorders (34-37).
Therefore, the development of molecules capable of selective inhibition
of tyrosine kinase receptors has a number of potential applications.
In the current study we sought to identify peptides capable of blocking
both the kinase activity and the biological properties of the Met
receptor. Previous kinetic and crystallographic studies suggest that
receptor tyrosine kinases (i.e. IR, fibroblast growth factor
receptor) can be inhibited by sequences corresponding to autophosphorylation sites located in the kinase activation loop (38-40). In view of these observations we exploited the use of sequences derived from the activation loop to interfere with the biochemical and biological properties of the Met receptor.
Unexpectedly, we found that activation loop peptides do not act as Met
inhibitors. We reasoned that sequences containing autophosphorylation
sites of the carboxyl-terminal tail could be an alternative approach to
modulate receptor activity. Accordingly, we show that a tail peptide
inhibited Met kinase activity in vitro, blocked
ligand-dependent phosphorylation and signal transduction,
and impaired Met-induced invasive growth in transformed epithelial
cells. The Met tail peptide does not significantly affect the EGF,
PDGF, or VEGF receptor activities, demonstrating that the inhibitory
mechanism is selective. These data provide evidence that peptides
containing carboxyl-terminal sequences can efficiently work as
inhibitors of the Met tyrosine kinase, and suggest that in the resting
state the carboxyl-terminal domain may act as an intramolecular
modulator of this receptor.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Reagents, Peptides, Antibodies, and Cell Culture--
All
reagents used were from Fluka (FlukaChemie AG) and Sigma. Reagents for
SDS-PAGE were from Bio-Rad. HGF and macrophage-stimulating protein were
obtained as described (52, 53). EGF and PDGF were from Sigma. VEGF was
provided by Dr. Bussolino. Cell-permeable peptides derived from Met
sequences in tandem with the Antennapedia sequence were obtained from
Genosys Biotechnologies. Anti-phosphotyrosine, anti-Gab1, and anti-EGF
receptor antibodies were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc.
Anti-Active MAP kinase antibody was obtained from Promega, anti-PDGF
receptor was from Transduction Laboratories. Anti-VEGF was from Santa
Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-Met and anti-Ron antibodies were obtained as
(53, 54). Anti-fluorescein antibody was from Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech. A549 cells were from ATCC. GTL16 and MLP-29 (mouse liver
progenitor cells) have been previously described (47). Human
endothelial cells cells were kindly provided by Dr. Bussolino. Cultures
of mammalian cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium or RPMI supplemented with 10% serum (Sigma) (or 20% in the
case of human endothelial cells cells) in a humidified atmosphere of
5% CO2, air.
Cell Delivery of Peptides--
200 µg of each peptide were
incubated in 0.01 M NH4HCO3, pH
9.0, at a final concentration of 200 µM in the presence
of 100 µg/ml fluorescein isothiocyanate (Sigma) for 3 h at room
temperature. Efficiency of fluoresceination was verified by 22%
SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-fluorescein antibodies.
To assess cell permeability of peptides, fluoresceinated peptides were
added to culture medium at a final concentration of 20 µM, and after 2 h, cells were fixed and examined by
fluorescence microscopy. To calculate the intracellular concentration
of Antennapedia peptides, cells were incubated with the
Ant-Tyr1234-1235- and
Ant-Tyr1349-1356-fluoresceinated peptides for 1 h,
washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed. Total lysates
were analyzed by 22% SDS-PAGE. The presence of the fluoresceinated
peptide in the lysate was revealed directly using the Fluorimager
system (Molecular Dynamics). The concentration of the peptide was
evaluated by comparison with lysates containing known amount of
fluoresceinated peptide.
In Vitro Auto- and Substrate Phosphorylation--
The Met or the
Tpr-Met tyrosine kinase were immunoprecipitated with anti-Met
antibodies from GTL-16 or from transfected COS cells lysates in the
absence of sodium orthovanadate to allow dephosphorylation. After
extensive washing, immunoprecipitates were subjected to
autophosphorylation in kinase buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 12.5 mM MgCl2) in the
presence of 20 µM peptide, 10 µM cold ATP,
and [
-32P]ATP (5 µCi/sample) for 20 min at 4 °C.
The reaction was stopped by adding boiling Laemmli buffer, and samples
were analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE. Gels were dried and exposed for
autoradiography. In kinetic experiments, 5 µM myelin
basic protein (Sigma) was also included in the reaction as a substrate
together with increasing concentrations of peptides, 40 µM cold ATP, and [
-32P]ATP (5 µCi/sample). The reaction was performed at 4 °C for 25 min and
stopped by adding Laemmli buffer. Samples were separated by 8-12%
SDS-PAGE followed by analysis with the PhosphorImager STORM (Molecular
Dynamics). The intensity of bands corresponding to phosphorylated Met
and myelin basic protein was quantitated using the program ImageQuant
(Molecular Dynamics).
In Vitro Interaction of Peptides with the Receptor--
A549
cells were lysed in EB buffer (100 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton
X-100) including 1 mM sodium orthovanadate and protease
inhibitors. Cell lysates were incubated with 20 µM
peptide for 1 h; heparin-Sepharose was then added for 2 h to
allow peptide binding to heparin. Samples were washed extensively with
EB buffer including 1 M LiCl and analyzed by SDS-PAGE
followed by Western blotting with anti-Met antibodies. Alternatively,
peptides were coupled to Affi-Gel 10, an activated affinity support
from Bio-Rad, by incubation in Me2SO for 4 h at
4 °C. 100 mM ethanolamine was added to block any other active groups, and interaction with the receptor was assayed as above.
The binding of immobilized peptides with the Met catalytic domain was
detected using lysates from Sf9 cells expressing the isolated
Met kinase domain.
Cell Starvation and Treatment with Peptides--
A549 cells were
starved in serum-free medium for 48 h; MLP-29 cells were
maintained in 2% serum for 3 days and then starved for 16 h in
serum-free medium; human endothelial cells cells were starved for
12 h in serum-free medium with the addition of 2% bovine serum
albumin. After starvation, cells were treated with peptides at the
indicated concentrations for the indicated time and stimulated with the
appropriate factor (80 ng/ml HGF, 100 ng/ml macrophage-stimulating
protein, 100 ng/ml EGF, 100 ng/ml PDGF, 20 ng/ml VEGF) for 10 min at
37 °C. Cells were then lysed in EB buffer including sodium
orthovanadate and protease inhibitors. Immunoprecipitation was
performed with the appropriate antibodies, and samples were analyzed by
SDS-PAGE followed by Western immunoblotting as indicated. To evaluate
MAP kinase phosphorylation, 100 µg of total lysates/sample were
separated on a 12% polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by Western blotting
with anti-active MAP kinase antibodies.
Scatter Assay--
3.5 × 103 cells/well (24 well cluster: Costar) were seeded in medium containing 2% serum. Cells
were pretreated for 2 h with peptides at a final concentration of
20 µM and incubated with HGF (20 ng/ml) in the presence
of peptides. After 12 h, cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde
(11% in phosphate-buffered saline) and stained with crystal violet.
Invasion Assay--
105 cells were seeded in medium
containing 10% serum on the upper side of a porous polycarbonate
membrane (8.0-µm pore size) coated with 1.2 mg/ml artificial basement
membrane, Matrigel® (Collaborative Research, Waltham, MA)
containing laminin, collagen type IV, proteoglycans, and growth
factors. Cells were treated with 20 µM peptides for
2 h and incubated with 20 ng/ml HGF in the presence of peptides.
After 24 h of incubation, cells on the upper side of the filters
were mechanically removed. Cells that had invaded the
Matrigel® and migrated to the lower side of the filter
were fixed with glutaraldehyde (11% in phosphate-buffered saline) and
stained with crystal violet. The crystal violet was solubilized with
10% acetic acid, and the concentration was evaluated as absorbance at
590 nm.
Tubulogenesis Assay--
Invasive growth in collagen was
assessed in tridimensional collagen gels as described (47).
105 cells/ml were suspended on ice in gel solution
containing eight parts type I collagen 2 mg/ml stock solution (G
Collagen, Seromed), 1 part 10× Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium,
and 1 part Hepes, 0.5 M, pH 7.4. The cold mixture was
placed into microtiter plate wells and allowed to polymerize for 15 min
at 37 °C before adding 0.1 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 20% serum. Cells were cultured for 24-36 h
until they formed spherical structures, then treated with 20 µM peptides for 2 h and incubated with 20 ng/ml HGF
in the presence of peptides. Cells were cultured for 5 days and
examined under a phase-contrast microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Design of Cell-permeable Peptides Containing Met
Autophosphorylation Sites--
Activation of the Met receptor results
in autophosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues located both in
the kinase activation loop (Tyr1234-Tyr1235)
and in the carboxyl-terminal tail
(Tyr1349-Tyr1356) (21, 25). A number of
peptides were synthesized corresponding to the Met autophosphorylation
sites (Fig. 1). All peptides contained the Antennapedia internalization domain at the amino terminus (41).
This sequence has been shown to freely translocate across biological
membranes with minimal cell toxicity (42). An unphosphorylable version
of the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide was obtained by
substituting the tyrosines with phenylalanine residues
(Ant-Phe1349-1356). Two additional peptides were
synthesized including the Antennapedia control peptide (Ant), a shorter
version of the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide lacking
tyrosine 1356 (Ant- Tyr1349), and a scrambled
Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide (Ant-scrambled).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cell-permeable peptides containing Met
autophosphorylation sites. A,
schematic representation of the functional domains of the Met tyrosine
kinase receptor. The tyrosine kinase domain (KD) is
indicated by a gray box. Tyr1234 and
Tyr1235 are the catalytic tyrosines located in the
activation loop (AL) of the kinase domain.
Tyr1349-Tyr1356 are located in the
carboxyl-terminal tail (CT) of the receptor and upon
phosphorylation, generate docking sites for signal transducers.
B, list of peptides corresponding to the Met
autophosphorylation sites. Peptides were synthesized with an
amino-terminal internalization sequence derived from the Antennapedia
protein.
|
|
Peptides Containing Met Carboxyl-terminal Sequences Inhibit the
Kinase Activity--
We investigated the possibility that peptides
derived from the activation loop and the carboxyl-terminal tail could
be used as inhibitors of the Met receptor. Peptides including
Tyr1234-Tyr1235 and
Tyr1349-Tyr1356 were compared for their
ability to inhibit the receptor kinase activity in autophosphorylation
assays performed in vitro. The Met receptor was
immunopurified from GTL16 cells and incubated with
[
-32P]ATP in the presence of increasing concentrations
of the indicated peptide. We observed that the tail peptide efficiently
inhibited Met autophosphorylation whereas the activation loop peptide
had little effect (Fig. 2, panel
A and B). To exclude a nonspecific effect of the tail
peptide, either a scrambled Tyr1349-Tyr1356
peptide version or a truncated peptide lacking Tyr1356 was
included in the experiments. These peptides had little effect on the
kinase activity of the Met receptor, showing that inhibition by the
tail peptide depends on its primary amino acid sequence. The effect of
the Tyr1349-Tyr1356 peptide could be due to
ATP depletion (resulting from progressive peptide phosphorylation) or
to direct inhibition of the kinase reaction (resulting from interaction
of the peptide substrate with the catalytic active site). To test this,
a nonphosphorylable peptide analogue was designed by replacing the
tyrosine with phenylalanine residues unable to accept kinase-catalyzed
phosphoryl transfer from ATP. The Phe-containing tail peptide inhibited
Met autophosphorylation in vitro as efficiently as the
parental Tyr counterpart, suggesting that direct binding to the active
site could be responsible for the
Tyr1349-Tyr1356 inhibitory potential (Fig. 2,
panel A and B).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Tail peptides inhibit Met
kinase activity. A, Met receptor was
immunoprecipitated from GTL16 cells, and immunocomplexes were subjected
to in vitro kinase assay in the presence of the indicated
peptides and [ -32P]ATP under conditions described
under "Experimental Procedures." Autophosphorylated receptors were
separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography. B,
immunoprecipitated Met receptors were subjected to kinase assays in the
presence of the indicated peptides and analyzed as in panel
A. The inhibitory effect of the peptides was evaluated by
measuring either receptor autophosphorylation and phosphorylation of
the exogenous substrate myelin basic protein (MBP). After
densitometric analysis, values were expressed as percentage of
inhibition. , Ant-Tyr1349-1356; ,
Ant-Phe1349-1356; , Ant-Tyr1234-1235; ,
Ant-scramble; ×, Ant.
|
|
The effect of peptides on substrate phosphorylation was next measured
using myelin basic protein. At low peptide concentrations, only the
Tyr1349-Tyr1356 and the
Phe1349-Phe1356-containing peptides inhibited
the reaction. As expected, at higher concentrations the competitive
effect of the Tyr1234-Tyr1235 derivative was
also detected (Fig. 2, panel B).
These experiments show that peptides containing carboxyl-terminal
sequences efficiently inhibit the Met kinase activity in vitro through a mechanism that does not rely on substrate competition.
Peptides Containing Met Carboxyl-terminal Sequences Bind the
Receptor in Vitro--
The possibility that the carboxyl-terminal
domain may interfere with the kinase activity by interacting directly
with the kinase domain of the receptor was evaluated. Peptides were
immobilized on heparin-Sepharose that has been shown previously to bind
the Antennapedia moiety (43). Cell lysates containing the Met protein were incubated with the immobilized peptides, and the associated receptor was visualized by immunoblotting with anti-Met antibodies. Fig. 3 shows that the carboxyl-terminal
peptides bind the Met receptor most likely by interacting with its
catalytic region. To verify this hypothesis, we performed similar
experiments using the isolated catalytic domain (amino acid 1044-1347)
lacking the juxtamembrane domain and the carboxyl-terminal tail docking
sites. The isolated Met kinase domain, containing a polyhistidine tag, is catalytically active and constitutively tyrosine-phosphorylated when
expressed in Sf9 cells (data not shown). Immobilized tail peptides were incubated with lysates containing the catalytic domain.
The associated kinase domain protein was visualized by immunoblotting
with anti-Ptyr antibodies (Fig. 3, panel C). To further
characterize the interaction mechanism, we performed the same
experiment with tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides. The phosphorylated tail peptide interacts with the Met catalytic domain with a slightly increased efficiency when compared with its unphosphorylated
counterpart (data not shown).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Tail peptides bind the Met receptor in
vitro. The indicated peptides were immobilized on
heparin-Sepharose (A) or coupled to an agarose affinity
support (Affi-Gel) (B) and incubated with lysates of GTL-16
cells. The amount of associated receptor was determined by Western
blotting with anti-Met antibodies. Arrows indicate the
position of the 145-kDa Met receptor -chain (p145Met).
C, tail peptides coupled to heparin-Sepharose were incubated
with lysate of Sf9 cells expressing the isolated Met kinase
domain (p34Met-KD). The amount of associated Met-KD protein
was determined by Western blotting with anti-phosphotyrosine
antibodies.
|
|
Carboxyl-terminal Peptides Inhibit the Kinase Activity of Oncogenic
Met Mutants--
Oncogenic forms of the Met receptor have been
described including Tpr-Met and Met-PRC mutants. In Tpr-Met the
extracellular domain of Met is replaced by Tpr sequences, which provide
two strong dimerization motifs. Dimerization causes constitutive
activation of the Tpr-Met kinase, which acquires transforming and
metastatic properties (10, 11, 14, 44). Met-PRCM1250T and
Met-PRCD1228H are Met variants identified in papillary
renal carcinomas (PRC) in which critical residues located in the kinase
domain are mutated (12). Tpr-Met and Met-PRC mutants were expressed in
COS cells, and association experiments with immobilized tail peptides
were performed as described in the previous paragraph. Both the Tpr-Met and Met-PRC mutants were found to interact with the immobilized peptides (data not shown). To evaluate the inhibitory potential of tail
peptides on the mutant forms of Met, the corresponding proteins were
immunopurified from transfected COS cells with anti-Met-specific antibodies. Peptides were then compared for their ability to inhibit the kinase activity in autophosphorylation assays performed in vitro in the presence of the indicated peptide (20 µM). We observed that the tail peptides inhibit the
kinase activity of Met mutants (Fig. 4).
These data suggest that the tail peptides could be used as inhibitors
of the Met oncogenic potential.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Tail peptides inhibit the constitutively
activated Tpr-Met and Met-PRC kinases.
Met-PRC mutants (A) and Tpr-Met (B)
were immunoprecipitated from transfected COS cells, and immunocomplexes
were subjected to in vitro kinase assay (see Fig. 2) in the
presence of the indicated peptides and [ -32P]ATP.
Autophosphorylated receptors were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by
autoradiography. Arrows indicate bands corresponding to
Met-PRC (the precursor and the -chain) and to Tpr-Met
(p65Tpr-Met). Ctr, control.
|
|
Efficient Cell Delivery of Met-derived Peptides Containing the
Antennapedia Internalization Sequence--
To verify that the
Antennapedia-containing peptides could efficiently translocate across
the plasma membrane, peptides were labeled with fluorescein (see
"Experimental Procedures"). When added to cell cultures, peptides
were recovered in the intracellular compartment of epithelial cells
after as little as 15 min of incubation (Fig.
5). The amount of internalized peptides
increased with its concentration in the culture medium with saturation
at 25 µM (data not shown). Peptides were detectable
intracellularly for up to 16 h. No significant differences were
detected among the internalization efficiency of the different
peptides. To evaluate the delivery efficiency, two different peptides
were added to the culture medium (final concentration 20 µM), and the intracellular peptide concentrations were
calculated (see "Experimental Procedures"). The cytosolic peptide
concentration was found to be in the micromolar range (10-20
µM), which is sufficient to achieve inhibition of the Met receptor kinase activity (see Fig. 2). The relatively high
intracellular peptide concentration is similar to that of the peptides
originally added to the culture medium. This can be explained
considering that translocation of the peptides across the
plasma-membrane occurs in the absence of a receptor (42). In this
situation the peptides can diffuse freely across the membrane, and
equilibrium can be reached.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Cellular internalization of the
Antennapedia-Met peptides. Peptides were labeled
at the amino terminus with fluorescein under conditions described under
"Experimental Procedures." Labeling efficiency was verified by
SDS-PAGE followed by Western blotting with anti-fluorescein antibodies.
Subconfluent monolayers of A549 cells were treated for 2 h with
the indicated peptides (20 µM), washed, and analyzed by
fluorescence microscopy. Ctr, control.
|
|
Carboxyl-terminal Peptides Impair HGF-dependent Met
Autophosphorylation in Intact Cells--
The ability of the tail
peptides to inhibit Met autophosphorylation in vitro
suggests that they could also be used to impair ligand-dependent activation of the receptor in intact
cells. To verify this hypothesis, Met-expressing epithelial cells were
serum-starved and treated with the peptides before ligand stimulation.
Cells were incubated with recombinant HGF, and the level of Met
tyrosine phosphorylation was evaluated by immunoblotting with
anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 6,
panel A). In agreement with the data obtained in
vitro, both the Tyr and Phe versions of tail peptides
efficiently blocked ligand-dependent Met
autophosphorylation, whereas the activation loop peptide was
ineffective. In addition, the scrambled and the truncated tail peptides
had little effect on ligand-dependent Met
phosphorylation, confirming the specificity of the inhibitory effect
(Fig. 6, panel A). Dose-response experiments showed that the
inhibitory potential was dependent on peptide concentration with almost
complete inhibition observed at 20 µM (Fig. 6,
panel B). The effect of the peptides was reversible as shown
by recovery of HGF-dependent Met phosphorylation 16 h
after treatment (Fig. 6, panel C).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Inhibition of ligand dependent Met
phosphorylation by tail peptides. A,
effect of peptides derived from the activation loop or the
carboxyl-terminal tail on ligand-dependent Met
phosphorylation. A549 cells were serum-starved for 3 days and treated
with the indicated peptides at a final concentration of 20 µM. Two hours later cells were treated with recombinant
HGF for 15' and then lysed. Met phosphorylation was evaluated by
immunoprecipitation (IP) of the receptor with anti-Met
antibodies followed by Western blotting with anti-pTyr antibodies. The
identity of the phosphorylated protein was confirmed by reprobing the
same blot with an anti-Met antibody. Ctr, control.
B, dose-response activity of the
Ant-Tyr1349-1356 peptide on ligand-dependent
Met phosphorylation. Serum-starved A549 cells were treated with the
tail peptide at the indicated concentrations and stimulated with HGF.
Met phosphorylation was assessed as described in A.
C, time course activity of the Ant-
Tyr1349-1356 peptide on ligand-dependent Met
phosphorylation. Serum-starved A549 cells were treated for 2 h
with the tail peptide (20 µM). At the indicated time
points, cells were stimulated with HGF, and Met phosphorylation was
assessed as above. The arrows indicate the position of the
Met receptor -chain (p145Met).
|
|
Met Tail Peptides Inhibit the Closely Related Ron Receptor but Do
Not Significantly Affect the EGF, PDGF, or VEGF Receptor
Activities--
The inhibitory effect of the Met tail peptide on
ligand stimulation of other receptor tyrosine kinases was evaluated. We
tested a highly homologous receptor such as Ron and other distant Met relatives such as the EGF, PDGF, and VEGF receptors. Cells expressing the receptor of interest were serum-starved, treated with the Met or
control peptides, and stimulated with the appropriate ligand. The
receptors were immunoprecipitated, and tyrosine phosphorylation was
measured by immunoblotting with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig.
7). Interestingly, the Met
carboxyl-terminal peptides significantly impaired ligand stimulation of
the Ron receptor, whereas they had either no or a minor effect on
activation of the EGF and VEGF and PDGF receptors. These data show that
the Met peptide acts through a mechanism that is similar for Met and
Ron; furthermore they indicate that the inhibitory activity of the Met
peptide is selective.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effect of the tail Met peptide on
ligand-dependent phosphorylation of different receptor
tyrosine kinases. A, cell lines expressing different
receptors were serum-starved, incubated with the indicated peptides (20 µM) for 2 h, and stimulated with the appropriate
ligands as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Phosphorylation of the EGF receptor (EGFR) was assessed in
human epithelial cell (A549)-stimulated EGF. Phosphorylation of Ron,
VEGF receptor (VEGFR), and PDGF receptor (PDGFR)
was evaluated, respectively, in mouse liver progenitor cells (MLP-29)
stimulated with macrophage-stimulating protein, in human endothelial
cells stimulated with VEGF, and in mouse fibroblasts stimulated with
PDGF. Phosphorylation was detected by immunoprecipitation with
receptor-specific antibodies followed by Western blotting with
anti-Tyr(P) antibodies. The PDGF receptor was immunoprecipitated with
anti-Tyr(P) antibodies. The identity of the phosphorylated proteins was
confirmed by Western blotting with specific antibodies. Ctr,
control. G.F., growth factor. B,
quantitative analysis of the Met peptide inhibitory activity is
expressed as a percentage of inhibition compared with receptor
phosphorylation in the absence of peptide.
|
|
Tail Peptides Inhibit Met-dependent Downstream
Signaling--
The HGF/Met pair triggers invasive growth by activation
of a cascade of downstream signaling events. After ligand
phosphorylation Met binds and phosphorylates the multiadaptor protein
Gab1, which in turn recruits and activates a number of SH2-containing
effectors (28-30). The signal is then transmitted to the nucleus via
activation of various pathways including the MAP kinase cascade (25).
We assessed whether the peptides that impair Met kinase activity also
inhibited receptor signaling. Panel A of Fig.
8 shows that in cells treated with the
Tyr or the Phe version of the tail peptide, Met-dependent
Gab1 phosphorylation is impaired. This is also the case for activation
of the p42 MAP kinase as evaluated using activation specific antibodies
(Fig. 8, panel B). These data show that in addition to
blocking the Met kinase activity, tail peptides also interrupt
downstream signaling initiated by the HGF/Met interaction.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Tail peptides inhibit
Met-dependent phosphorylation of Gab1 and MAP kinase
activation. A, effect of peptides derived from the
activation loop or the carboxyl-terminal tail on
Met-dependent Gab1 phosphorylation. A549 cells were
serum-starved and incubated with the indicated peptides at a final
concentration of 20 µM. Two h later cells were treated
with recombinant HGF for 15 min and then lysed. Lysates were
immunoprecipitated (IP) with anti-Gab1 antibodies and
analyzed by Western immunoblotting with anti-Tyr(P) (pTyr)
antibodies. The identity of the phosphorylated protein was confirmed by
reprobing the same blot with anti-Gab1 antibodies. Arrows
indicate the position of Gab1 protein (p110Gab1).
B, effect of activation loop or tail peptides on
Met-dependent MAP kinase activation. Total lysates from
A549 cells treated as in panel A were analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and Western immunoblotting with anti-active MAP kinase antibodies.
Arrows indicate bands corresponding to the MAP kinase active
forms p42ERK1 and p44ERK2. Ctr,
control.
|
|
Tail Peptides Inhibit HGF-mediated Cell Migration, Invasiveness,
and Branched Morphogenesis--
HGF/Met promote a highly integrated
biological program leading to "invasive growth," which is
characterized by cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of
extracellular matrix (3, 4, 45). The most complex response of HGF/Met
is morphogenesis, which requires the coordinated accomplishment of each
of the aforementioned biological activities (46, 47). The effects of
the peptides on HGF-mediated motility, invasion, and morphogenesis were
assessed (Fig. 9). The effect on cell
migration was evaluated on normal epithelial cells (MLP29) in a
"scatter assay." Cells were pretreated with the peptides and
stimulated with HGF. Dissociation and migration of cells (scattering)
was then monitored. Both the Tyr and Phe versions of the tail peptide
partially inhibited HGF/Met-mediated scattering, whereas the activation
loop peptide was ineffective (Fig. 9, panel A). The partial
inhibitory effect of peptides can be explained by previous data
indicating that even low levels of Met activation are sufficient to
induce scattering in epithelial cells. The effect of peptides on
invasion was assessed by the Matrigel® invasion assay
using epithelial transformed cells (A549) (Fig. 9, panels B
and C). This kind of experiment evaluates the ability of
HGF-stimulated cells to cross reconstituted basal membranes made of
laminin, collagen type IV, and proteoglycans. The inhibitory effect was
more pronounced than that previously observed in the scatter assay.
This indicates that the level of kinase inhibition achieved by the tail
peptide is sufficient to block Met-mediated invasiveness, whereas it
results in partial inhibition of cell motility. To measure the effects
of the peptides on morphogenesis, MLP-29 cells were grown in a
tridimensional type-1 collagen matrix for 3 days. By this time
spherical aggregates of cells were observed that, after HGF
stimulation, differentiated and formed tubular-like structures (Fig. 9,
panel D). In the presence of the tail peptides this response
was dramatically impaired. As in the invasion assay, the activation
loop peptide had no effect. We also found that the Phe version of the
tail peptide inhibited morphogenesis more efficiently than its Tyr
counterpart. This data correlates with the relative activities of the
two peptides in blocking the Met kinase activity in vitro
(cf. Fig. 2, panel B).

View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Tail peptides inhibit Met-mediated cell
migration, invasion, and branched morphogenesis. A, the
effect of Met peptides on HGF-induced cell migration was evaluated
using the scatter assay. Liver progenitor cells (MLP29) were seeded on
coverslips, treated with the indicated peptides (20 µM)
for 2 h, and then stimulated with HGF. Cells were allow to migrate
12 h, fixed, and stained with crystal violet. Micrographs show
representative cell fields. B, the effect of Met peptides on
HGF-induced cell invasion was evaluated by the Matrigel®
Transwell assay. This assay measures the ability of cells to invade
reconstituted basal membranes made of laminin, collagen type IV, and
proteoglycans (Matrigel®). Epithelial cells (A549) were
seeded in the upper compartment, treated with the indicated peptides
for 2 h, and then stimulated with HGF. After a 24-h incubation,
cells that had crossed the Matrigel® and attached to the
lower side of the filter were fixed and stained with crystal violet.
Micrographs show representative cell fields. C, cell
invasion was quantitated as described under "Experimental
Procedures." Values are expressed as percentage of inhibition.
D, the effect of peptides on HGF-induced branched
morphogenesis was evaluated in a tridimensional network of collagen
type I. MLP29 cells were seeded in collagen gels and grown until they
formed spheric structures. Cells were treated with the indicated
peptides (20 µM) for 2 h and then stimulated with
HGF. The morphogenic effects was detected 24 h after HGF treatment
and was most evident after 72 h. Micrographs of representative
fields were taken after 48-72 h. Ctr, control.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Tyrosine kinase receptors are involved in human diseases including
cancer, metabolic disorders, and developmental defects (34-37). On the
basis of their mechanism of action, there are at least two possible
strategies to inhibit receptor tyrosine kinases. On one side the
catalytic process can be targeted by developing inhibitors of the
enzymatic activity. On the other, receptor coupling to signal
transducers can be blocked using molecules that bind the SH2 domain of
the effector proteins. The finding that multiple receptors are coupled
to overlapping arrays of SH2 effectors makes it difficult to interfere
with signaling by a single receptor without simultaneously affecting others.
In this work we sought to target the biochemical and biological
properties of the Met receptor by interfering with the mechanism of
receptor autophosphorylation. On the basis of previous crystallographic studies we initially used peptides containing autophosphorylation sites
located in the activation loop (39, 40). Unexpectedly, the activation
loop peptide did not block Met autophosphorylation, although it
interfered with substrate phosphorylation at high concentrations.
Molecular modeling of the Met cytoplasmic domain suggested that the
tail could actually get in contact with the catalytic pocket (data not
shown). We therefore exploited the possibility that tail sequences
could modulate the kinase activity of the Met receptor. A tail-derived
peptide blocked both auto and substrate phosphorylation of the Met
receptor. Receptor tyrosine kinases preferentially phosphorylate
tyrosine residues followed by a hydrophobic residue in the +3 position
(48). The tyrosines located in the Met activation loop do not match the
optimal consensus for phosphorylation. Conversely, tyrosines located in
the carboxyl-terminal tail are predicted to be optimal substrates of
the Met receptor. In agreement with this, we reported recently that Met
preferentially phosphorylates peptides derived from the
carboxyl-terminal tail compared with peptides derived from the
activation loop (49). Substrate selectivity may therefore account for
the differential effect on the Met kinase activity displayed by
activation loop and tail peptides.
The inhibitory potential of the tail peptide requires the presence of a
unique amino acid sequence
(Ile-Gly-Glu-His-Tyr1349-Val-His-Val-Asn-Ala-Thr-Tyr1356-Val-Asn-Val-Lys-Cys-Val-Ala),
because either a peptide truncated at tyrosine 1356 or a scramble
version were inactive. The finding that a
Phe1349-Phe1356 nonphosphorylable analogue
also blocked the Met kinase activity suggested that the inhibitory
mechanism relies on peptide binding to the active site rather then on
ATP depletion. This was confirmed by experiments demonstrating the
interaction of the immobilized tail peptide with the Met receptor.
The crystal structures of the insulin and fibroblast growth factor
receptors indicate that, in the inactive state, the activation loop
blocks the access of the substrate peptide to the catalytic site loop
(39, 40). This situation may be different in Met. The inhibitory
activity of peptides containing sequences from the Met
carboxyl-terminal tail suggest that this region modulates the function
of the receptor. One possibility is that, in the inactive receptor
state, the tail interferes with access of the substrate to the
catalytic pocket of the enzyme. Ligand-induced dimerization may unleash
the kinase activity by releasing this autoinhibitory mechanism.
Alternatively, the tail could impair receptor phosphorylation by
interacting with another moiety of the catalytic domain. We are
currently performing crystallographic studies to verify this hypothesis.
Interestingly the Met tail peptide also inhibited Ron, a Met-related
receptor, but not the EGF, VEGF, and PDGF receptors. Among the receptor
tyrosine kinases, Ron has the highest sequence homology with Met. In
particular, the amino acid sequence surrounding the tail
phosphorylation sites
(Y-hydrophobic-X-hydrophobic-X3-Y-hydrophobic-X-hydrophobic) is conserved between Met and Ron (25). The finding that the inhibitory activity was restricted to receptors of the Met family implies a common mechanism. These experiments further indicate that
intramolecular peptide sequences can be utilized to selectively target
the catalytic properties of tyrosine kinase receptors.
The membrane internalization properties of the Antennapedia homeodomain
were used to transduce the Met inhibitory peptides into epithelial
cells. Once internalized, the tail peptide blocked both
ligand-dependent autophosphorylation and downstream Met
signaling. In particular, the peptides impaired Gab1 phosphorylation
and MAP kinase activation. The effects were dose-dependent
and reversible, confirming the specificity of the inhibitory process.
A number of biological assays were used to study whether peptides
derived from the Met tail could interfere with HGF-induced invasive
growth as measured by cell motility, invasion, and branched morphogenesis. Met-mediated invasion and tubulogenesis were severely impaired by the tail receptor peptide. Interestingly, motility was only
partially affected, suggesting that a low level of receptor activation
is sufficient to induce cell flattening and dissociation. This is in
agreement with previous data showing that Met receptor mutants unable
to promote invasion and tubulogenesis are still competent in inducing
motility (31, 50, 51). Met-triggered invasive growth is required for
embryonic development, whereas its inappropriate activation confers to
cancer cells invasive and metastatic properties. Selective inhibitors
of this process could be useful in understanding the HGF/Met biology
and in targeting the invasive metastatic potential of Met-expressing
cells. By demonstrating that tail sequences act as inhibitors of the
Met tyrosine kinase, this study provides an approach to interfere with
the biological effects triggered by the MET
proto-oncogene.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are indebted to S. Toniol for the peptide
inhibition experiments, L. Pugliese for molecular modeling the Met
cytoplasmic domain, E. Wright for editing the manuscript, and A. Cignetto for the excellent secretarial help. We are grateful to E. Medico and P. Gual for critical reading of the manuscript. The
excellent technical assistance of G. Petruccelli and R. Albano is acknowledged.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by research grants from the
Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) and from the
Giovanni Armenise-Harvard Foundation for Advanced Scientific Research.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address. To whom correspondence should be addressed: The
Johns Hopkins University-School of Medicine Oncology Center, 424 N. Bond St., Baltimore, MD 21231.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
HGF, hepatocyte
growth factor;
EGF, epidermal growth factor;
PDGF, platelet-derived
growth factor;
VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
MAP, mitogen-activated protein;
PRC, papillary renal carcinomas.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bottaro, D. P.,
Rubin, J. S.,
Faletto, D. L.,
Chan, A. M.,
Kmiecik, T. E.,
Vande Woude, G. F.,
and Aaronson, S. A.
(1991)
Science
251,
802-804[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Naldini, L.,
Weidner, K. M.,
Vigna, E.,
Gaudino, G.,
Bardelli, A.,
Ponzetto, C.,
Narsimhan, R. P.,
Hartmann, G.,
Zarnegar, R.,
Michalopoulos, G. K.,
Birchmeier, W.,
and Comiglio, P. M.
(1991)
EMBO J
10,
2867-2878[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Stoker, M.,
Gherardi, E.,
Perryman, M.,
and Gray, J.
(1987)
Nature
327,
239-242[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Montesano, R.,
Matsumoto, K.,
Nakamura, T.,
and Orci, L.
(1991)
Cell
67,
901-908[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Nakamura, T.,
Teramoto, H.,
and Ichihara, A.
(1986)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
83,
6489-6493[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Michalopoulos, G.,
Houck, K. A.,
Dolan, M. L.,
and Leutteke, N. C.
(1984)
Cancer Res.
44,
4414-4419[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Bladt, F.,
Riethmacher, D.,
Isenmann, S.,
Aguzzi, A.,
and Birchmeier, C.
(1995)
Nature
376,
768-771[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Schmidt, C.,
Bladt, F.,
Goedecke, S.,
Brinkmann, V.,
Zschiesche, W.,
Sharpe, M.,
Gherardi, E.,
and Birchmeier, C.
(1995)
Nature
373,
699-702[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Uehara, Y.,
Minowa, O.,
Mori, C.,
Shiota, K.,
Kuno, J.,
Noda, T.,
and Kitamura, N.
(1995)
Nature
373,
702-705[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Cooper, C. S.,
Park, M.,
Blair, D. G.,
Tainsky, M. A.,
Huebner, K.,
Croce, C. M.,
and Vande Woude, G. F.
(1984)
Nature
311,
29-33[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Park, M.,
Dean, M.,
Cooper, C. S.,
Schmidt, M., S. J., O. B.,
Blair, D. G.,
and Vande Woude, G. F.
(1986)
Cell
45,
895-904[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Schmidt, L.,
Duh, F. M.,
Chen, F.,
Kishida, T.,
Glenn, G.,
Choyke, P.,
Scherer, S. W.,
Zhuang, Z.,
Lubensky, I.,
Dean, M.,
Allikmets, R.,
Chidambaram, A.,
Bergerheim, U. R.,
Feltis, J. T.,
Casadevall, C.,
Zamarron, A.,
Bernues, M.,
Richard, S.,
Lips, C. J.,
Walther, M. M.,
Tsui, L. C.,
Geil, L.,
Orcutt, M. L.,
Stackhouse, T.,
and Zbar, B.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
16,
68-73[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Rong, S.,
Segal, S.,
Anver, M.,
Resau, J. H.,
and Vande Woude, G. F.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4731-4735[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Giordano, S.,
Bardelli, A.,
Zhen, Z.,
Menard, S.,
Ponzetto, C.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13868-13872[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Ullrich, A.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1990)
Cell
61,
203-212[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Johnson, L. N.,
Noble, M. E.,
and Owen, D. J.
(1996)
Cell
85,
149-158[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Hubbard, S. R.,
Mohammadi, M.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
11987-11990[Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Cantley, L. C.,
Auger, K. R.,
Carpenter, C.,
Duckworth, B.,
Graziani, A.,
Kapeller, R.,
and Soltoff, S.
(1991)
Cell
64,
281-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Kavanaugh, M. W.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1994)
Science
266,
1862-1865[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Pawson, T.
(1995)
Nature
373,
573-580[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Ferracini, R.,
Longati, P.,
Naldini, L.,
Vigna, E.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19558-19564[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Longati, P.,
Bardelli, A.,
Ponzetto, C.,
Naldini, L.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1994)
Oncogene
9,
49-57[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Naldini, L.,
Vigna, E.,
Ferracini, R.,
Longati, P.,
Gandino, L.,
Prat, M.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
1793-1803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Ponzetto, C.,
Bardelli, A.,
Maina, F.,
Longati, P.,
Panayotou, G.,
Dhand, R.,
Waterfield, M. D.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4600-4608[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Ponzetto, C.,
Bardelli, A.,
Zhen, Z.,
Maina, F.,
dalla Zonca, P.,
Giordano, S.,
Graziani, A.,
Panayotou, G.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1994)
Cell
77,
261-271[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Fixman, E. D.,
Naujokas, M. A.,
Rodrigues, G. A.,
Moran, M. F.,
and Park, M.
(1995)
Oncogene
10,
237-249[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Boccaccio, C.,
Ando, M.,
Tamagnone, L.,
Bardelli, A.,
Michieli, P.,
Battistini, C.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1998)
Nature
391,
285-288[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Weidner, K.,
DiCesare, S.,
Sachs, M.,
Brinkmann, V.,
Behrens, J.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1996)
Nature
384,
173-176[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Bardelli, A.,
Longati, P.,
Gramaglia, D.,
Stella, M. C.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1997)
Oncogene
15,
3103-3111[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Nguyen, L.,
Holgado-Madruga, M.,
Maroun, C.,
Fixman, E. D.,
Kamikura, D.,
Fournier, T.,
Charest, A.,
Tremblay, M. L.,
Wong, A. J.,
and Park, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20811-20819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Ponzetto, P.,
Zhen, Z.,
Audero, E.,
Maina, F.,
Bardelli, A.,
Basile, M. L.,
Giordano, S.,
Narsimhan, R.,
and Comoglio, P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
14119-14123[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Zhu, H.,
Naujokas, M. A.,
Fixman, E. D.,
Torossian, K.,
and Park, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
29943-29948[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Weidner, K. M.,
Sachs, M.,
Riethmacher, D.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
2597-2601[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Muenke, M.,
and Schell, U.
(1995)
Trends Genet.
11,
308-313[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Pasini, B.,
Ceccherini, I.,
and Romeo, G.
(1996)
Trends Genet.
12,
138-144[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Moley, J. F.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Med.
48,
409-320[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Kolibaba, K. S.,
and Druker, B. J.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1333,
217-248
|
| 38.
|
Shoelson, S. E.,
White, M. F.,
and Kahn, C. R.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7831-7836[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Hubbard, S. R.,
Wei, L.,
Ellis, L.,
and Hendrickson, W. A.
(1994)
Nature
372,
746-754[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Mohammadi, M.,
Schlessinger, J.,
and Hubbard, S. R.
(1996)
Cell
86,
577-587[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Joliot, A.,
Pernelle, C.,
Deagostini-Bazin, H.,
and Prochiantz, A.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
1864-1868[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Derossi, D.,
Chassaing, G.,
and Prochiantz, A.
(1998)
Trends Cell Biol.
8,
84-87[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Perez, F.,
Joliot, A.,
Bloch-Gallego, E.,
Zahraoui, A.,
Triller, A.,
and Prochiantz, A.
(1992)
J. Cell Sci.
102,
717-722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Rodrigues, G. A.,
and Park, M.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6711-6722[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Jeffers, M. J.,
Rong, S.,
and Vande Woude, G. F.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
1115-1125[Abstract]
|
| 46.
|
Weidner, K. M.,
Sachs, M.,
and Birchmeier, W.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
121,
145-154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Medico, E.,
Mongiovì, A. M.,
Huff, J.,
Jelinek, M. A.,
Follenzi, A.,
Gaudino, G.,
Parsons, J. T.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1996)
Mol. Biol. Cell
7,
495-504[Abstract]
|
| 48.
|
Songyang, Z.,
Blechner, S.,
Hoagland, N.,
Hoekstra, M. F.,
Piwnica-Worms, H.,
and Cantley, L. C.
(1994)
Curr. Biol.
4,
973-982[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Bardelli, A.,
Longati, P.,
Gramaglia, D.,
Basilico, C.,
Tamagnone, L.,
Giordano, S.,
Ballinari, D.,
Michieli, P.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
14379-14383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Fournier, E.,
Dubreuil, P.,
Birnbaum, D.,
and Borg, J. P.
(1995)
Oncogene
11,
921-931[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Royal, I.,
Fournier, T. M.,
and Park, M.
(1997)
J. Cell. Physiol.
173,
196-201[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Naldini, L.,
Vigna, E.,
Bardelli, A.,
Follenzi, A.,
Galimi, F.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
603-611[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Gaudino, G.,
Follenzi, A.,
Naldini, L.,
Collesi, C.,
Santoro, M.,
Gallo, K. A.,
Godowski, P. J.,
and Comoglio, P. M.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3524-3532[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Prat, M.,
Crepaldi, T.,
Gandino, L.,
Giordano, S.,
Longati, P.,
and Comoglio, P.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
5954[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. O'Toole, K. E. Rabenau, K. Burns, D. Lu, V. Mangalampalli, P. Balderes, N. Covino, R. Bassi, M. Prewett, K. J. Gottfredsen, et al.
Therapeutic Implications of a Human Neutralizing Antibody to the Macrophage-Stimulating Protein Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (RON), a c-MET Family Member.
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2006;
66(18):
9162 - 9170.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|