![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29282-29288, October 8, 1999
From the Here we describe the isolation and partial
characterization of a new muscle-specific protein (Melusin) which
interacts with the integrin cytoplasmic domain. The cDNA encoding
Melusin was isolated in a two-hybrid screening of a rat neonatal heart
library using Integrins are heterodimeric In muscle tissue, the membrane-actin cytoskeleton interaction occurs at
myotendinous junctions and costamers, two highly specialized junctional
complexes. At myotendinous junctions, actomyosin filaments are anchored
end-on to the plasma membrane, whereas at costamers they are joined
laterally. Integrins are selectively enriched both in myotendinous
junctions and costamers (10, 12, 13), suggesting an important role of
these receptors in connecting the cytoskeleton to the extracellular
matrix in muscles. Direct evidence of the role of integrins in muscle
function and in actin organization also comes from gene knockout
experiments. In Drosophila, lack of integrin Experiments directed to investigate whether integrins are involved in
the formation of the sarcomeres or in their stabilization after
formation indicate that localization of integrins to actin-membrane junctions occurs once the organization of actin in sarcomeres has
already occurred (18, 19). These data strongly suggest that the
localization of integrins at myotendinous junctions and costamers is
driven by the organization of actin inside the cells. Their presence at
these sites is crucial for the mechanical stabilization of these
junctions as indicated by the gene knockout experiments (16, 17).
To better understand the mechanisms of integrin-cytoskeletal
interactions, we searched for muscle proteins capable of interacting with the Interaction Trap--
Screening for proteins that interact with
cytoplasmic tails of
Other baits were produced to test the ability of Melusin to interact
with other integrin cytoplasmic tails: sequences encoding amino acids
724-769 of
To map the integrin binding site in Melusin, an additional construct
was created. The Melusin cDNA fragment coding for amino acids
211-320 (D3-2 Sequencing and cDNA Cloning--
Positive clones were
sequenced using ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready
Reaction Kit (Perkin-Elmer). D3-2 and D7-2 cDNA fragments
containing overlapping sequences of Melusin were used to isolate the
full-length cDNA from a human skeletal muscle library in Northern Blot--
RNA from C2C12 cells and from mouse embryo
and neonatal skeletal muscle was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit
(QIAGEN Inc.). Adult skeletal muscle RNA was extracted according to
Chomczynsky and Sacchi (24). 20 µg of total RNA from each sample was
run on 0.8% agarose-formaldehyde gels and transferred to
N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Poly(A)+ RNA isolated from human and mouse tissues and
immobilized onto nitrocellulose filters after electrophoretic
separation was obtained from CLONTECH (Multiple
Tissue Northern blot). Filters were probed at 65 °C with D3-2
insert labeled with 32P using a random prime labeling
system (Rediprime II, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and were washed twice
with 2× SSC, 1% SDS and twice with 0.4% SSC, 1% SDS at 65 °C,
and exposed to x-ray film.
In Situ Hybridization--
Human metaphase spreads were obtained
from PHA-stimulated peripheral lymphocytes of a normal donor by
standard procedures. Mouse spreads were prepared from a mouse cell line
containing multiple well characterized Robertsonian translocations
allowing an easy identification of the mouse chromosomes (25). The cell line was a generous gift from Dr. H. Hameister (Ulm, Germany). Full-length human Melusin cDNA and 14.8-kilobase mouse genomic DNA
fragment spanning the atg-containing exon and the three following ones
were used as probes. Chromosome preparations were hybridized in
situ with probes labeled with biotin nick translation, essentially as described by Lichter et al. (26), with minor
modifications. Briefly, 500 ng of labeled probe were used for the FISH
experiments; hybridization was performed at 37 °C in 2× SSC, 50%
(v/v) formamide, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 5 µg COT1 DNA (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals), and 3 µg of sonicated salmon sperm DNA in a
volume of 10 µl. Post-hybridization washing was performed at 42 °C
in 2× SSC, 50% formamide (×3) followed by three washes in 0.1× SSC
at 60 °C. Biotin-labeled DNA was detected with Cy3-conjugated avidin
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Chromosome identification was obtained by
simultaneous DAPI staining, that produces a Q-banding pattern.
Antibody Preparation--
GST-Melusin fusion protein was
produced by expressing the entire sequence of the human Melusin cloned
in pGEX 4T2 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in Escherichia coli
BL21 bacterial strain. GST-Melusin was purified on
glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and elution was
performed following the recommendations of the manufacturer. Rabbits
were immunized by repeated intramuscular injections of the purified
fusion protein (500 µg) suspended in Complete Freund Adjuvant.
Specificity of the antiserum was demonstrated in Western blots on
protein extracts from wild type and Melusin cDNA-transfected COS
cells. To affinity purify antibodies from rabbit serum, Melusin was
fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP) by cloning the cDNA into the
pMALp2 vector (New England Biolabs). The MBP-Melusin fusion protein was
purified on an amylose column according to the instructions of the
manufacturer and coupled to Sepharose. Antibodies were adsorbed on the
MBP-Melusin-Sepharose column and eluted with pH 3 glycin-HCl buffer.
Cell Culture and Western Blot--
C2C12 mouse skeletal muscle
cell line was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with
10% fetal calf serum. Cells were induced to differentiate into
myotubes by switching to culture medium with 2% horse serum.
Western blots on cell and tissue extracts were performed as follows.
Cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed in Tris-buffered saline
(TBS) (containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and the following protease inhibitors: 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml pepstatin, and 0.1 TIU/ml aprotinin) for 10 min at 4 °C. Extracts were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to remove insoluble material. Tissues were frozen and
triturated in liquid nitrogen and extracted in lysis buffer containing
150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml
pepstatin, and 0.1 TIU/ml aprotinin. Tissue extracts were sonicated
three times for 10 s and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to
remove insoluble material. Protein concentration was determined using
Bio-Rad Assay. 60 µg of every protein extract were separated on
polyacrylamide gel in presence of SDS and subsequently blotted to
nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were saturated with TBS, 5% BSA
and incubated in TBS, 1% BSA containing primary antibody overnight at
4 °C. After washing, the filters were incubated with
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room
temperature, and detection was performed with chemiluminescent substrate ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Muscle Regeneration--
Adult CBA male mice were anesthetized
with Avertin (17 µl of 2.5% Avertin per gram of body weight).
Tibialis anterior muscles were exposed, and degeneration was induced by
deep freezing with liquid nitrogen-cooled steel rod according to Toyota
et al. (27). Muscles were surgically removed 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after freezing, and protein extracts were obtained as described
above. 100 µg of every total extract were separated on polyacrylamide
gel, and equal loading was verified by Ponceau red staining. Untreated tibialis anterior muscle was used as control.
Immunofluorescence--
1-week old mouse limb muscles and soleus
muscle from 6-months old mice were collected and fixed in PBS, 4%
paraformaldehyde for 2 h at room temperature. After washing in PBS
and PBS, 15% sucrose for cryoprotection, muscle fragments were frozen
in liquid nitrogen in Embedding Medium Compound (Bio-Optica S.p.a.).
10-µm cryosections were collected on polylysine-subbed slides.
Sections were saturated with goat serum 1:100 in PBS, 1% BSA and
incubated overnight at room temperature with primary antibody in PBS,
1% BSA, followed by 2-h incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated
secondary antibody. The following primary antibodies were used: 5 µg/ml affinity purified rabbit anti-Melusin and 5 µg/ml monoclonal
antibody EA-53 to sarcomeric Melusin-Integrin in Vitro Binding Assay--
GST fusion proteins
were prepared by cloning the full-length human Melusin cDNA and a
cDNA fragment coding for amino acid residues 149-350 (Cterm) in
pGEX vectors (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). GST and GST fusion proteins
were expressed in E. coli BL21 bacterial strain and purified
on glutathione-Sepharose 4B. COS cells, used as source of
Isolation of
The most abundantly retrieved cDNA corresponded to an unknown
sequence and was isolated once in the Isolation of Melusin Full-length cDNA--
Using D3-2
cDNA fragment as probe we isolated human and mouse full-length
Melusin cDNAs from human and mouse skeletal muscle libraries. The
human clone is 1235 nt in length and conceptual translation of this
sequence revealed the presence of an open reading frame of 347 amino
acids (GenBankTM AF140690). The mouse cDNA was 1420 nt
in length, with an open reading frame coding for 350 amino acids
(GenBankTM AF140691), with 92% identity with the human
amino acidic sequence. The D3-2 and D7-2 cDNA fragments isolated
by the two-hybrid screening were found to code for amino acid residues
211-350 and 164-350 respectively.
Sequence analysis by BLAST homology search (22) revealed no evident
homology with any other known protein. Inspection of the sequence
indicated the presence at the extreme carboxyl-terminal portion of the
molecule of a region highly enriched in aspartic and glutamic acid
residues. Analysis by FTHOM domain homology search (22, 28, 29)
indicated that this acidic sequence of Melusin closely resembles
calreticulin and calsequestrin C-domain, known to bind calcium at high
capacity and low affinity (30, 31). At the amino-terminal end, Melusin
contains two cysteine rich repeats spaced by an intervening sequence of
approximately 90 amino acid residues. The cysteine residues contained
in the cysteine repeats are characteristically spaced with a pattern that was not found in other proteins (Fig.
1B). Moreover, four distinct
PXXP motifs, representing the minimal consensus
sequence recognized by SH3 domains (32, 33) and two YXXI/P
sequences, putative binding sites for SH2 domains (34), are scattered
in the amino-terminal half of the molecule.
The chromosomal localization of the Melusin gene was also investigated,
both in man and in mouse. Fish analysis clearly showed that the gene is
localized on the X chromosome in both species, respectively at
Xq12.1-13 and at X band D.
Regulation of Melusin Expression during Myogenic
Differentiation--
To investigate the expression of this new gene,
poly(A)+ RNA from human and mouse tissues was analyzed by
Northern blotting with a Melusin probe. A single transcript of 1.4 kilobases was detected in human skeletal and cardiac muscles, whereas
no hybridization occurred in all other tested tissues (Fig.
2A). Identical expression pattern was detected in mouse tissues (not shown). Analysis of the
Melusin protein by Western blotting with polyclonal antibodies raised
against a GST-Melusin fusion protein confirmed the specific expression
in striated muscles (Fig. 2B).
To evaluate if Melusin expression was regulated during muscle
differentiation, we analyzed the C2C12 myogenic cell line that can be
induced to differentiate to form myotubes by serum starvation. Melusin
expression was tested both by Western and Northern blotting. As shown
in Fig. 3A, Melusin was absent
in undifferentiated myoblasts, and its expression was turned on in
differentiated myotubes after 6 days of serum starvation.
Melusin expression was also examined during mouse embryonic development
in vivo. Melusin protein and mRNA became detectable in
embryo limbs at day 15 (E15), reached a maximum in newborn mice, and declined in adult limb muscles (Fig. 3B). In adult
muscles a doublet of protein bands was detected by Western blotting,
suggesting possible posttranslational modifications. During heart
development, on the other hand, Melusin level remains steady with no
major changes in expression from embryonic day 15 to adult stage.
To investigate if Melusin expression is regulated in regenerating adult
muscle, we induced regeneration of mouse tibialis anterior following
freeze injury. 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after freeze trauma, muscles were
collected and Melusin expression was investigated by Western blot
analysis on total protein extracts using normal muscle as control. As
shown in Fig. 3C, Melusin is up-regulated from day 6 on
during muscle regeneration, consistent with a role of this molecule in
myogenetic processes.
Subcellular Localization of Melusin by
Immunofluorescence--
Using affinity purified Melusin antibody, we
performed immunofluorescence analysis on newborn and adult mouse muscle
cryosections. Fluorescence was localized only on skeletal muscle and
not in the surrounding tissues, confirming the muscle-specific
expression. Longitudinal sections of posterior leg muscles from 1-week
old mice clearly revealed a striated pattern of two Melusin rows
flanking the Mapping of the
Different Melusin constructs were also tested for their ability to
interact with the Binding of Melusin to In this work we describe a new muscle-specific protein, Melusin,
interacting with the cytoplasmic domain of the The amino acid sequence of Melusin revealed four domains. The protein
consists of 347 and 350 amino acid residues in man and mouse,
respectively, with a 92% identity (96% considering conservative substitutions). A 55-amino acid long domain, containing a unique cysteine-rich motif, is repeated twice in the molecule. These repeats
share 42% identity among each other, while the cysteine pattern is
conserved. Interestingly, in human Melusin, the first repeat contains
an extra cysteine residue immediately adjacent to cysteine 3. This is
not a sequence polymorphism or a mutation in our clones because codons
coding these double cysteine residues were found in human Melusin
cDNA fragments present in the dbEST data base. An intervening
sequence of 89-90 amino acid residues is present between the two
cysteine-rich regions. The carboxyl-terminal portion of the molecule
consists of a tail domain of 143/145 residues and contains a stretch of
18/20 negatively charged amino acids at the extreme carboxyl-terminal.
Similar acidic carboxyl-terminal sequences are present in calsequestrin
(31) and calreticulin and are shown to bind Ca2+ ions with
high capacity and low affinity (30). As detected in the two-hybrid
screening, the tail domain was sufficient to bind Whereas Melusin tail domain is responsible for the interaction with
We are grateful to Dr. G. P. Dotto for
the generous hospitality in his laboratory in the initial phase of this
work and to Drs. A. Zervos and C. Fusco for teaching the technique and
all crucial laboratory tips of the two-hybrid screening. We are also indebted to Drs. A. Zervos and R. Brent for sharing a number of important reagents. We thank Dr. F. Di Cunto, Dr. E. Calautti, and Dr.
G. Topley for stimulating discussion during the work. The technical
help of P. Caudana, M. Isabello, I. Carfora, and L. Cavarretta is
gratefully acknowledged.
*
This work was supported by Grants 851 (to G. T.) and E.672
(to M. R.) from Theleton, from the Ministry of University and
Scientific Research (to F. A.), from the National Research Council
(P. F. Biotecnologie) (to F. A.) and from ASI (Italian Space
Agency Grant 98-112).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF140690 and AF140691.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Genetics,
Biology and Biochemistry, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Torino, Italy. Tel.:
39-011-6706680; Fax: 39-011-6706547; E-mail:
brancacc@molinette.unito.it.
The abbreviations used are:
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction;
dbEST, data base of expressed sequence tags;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
MBP, maltose binding protein;
bFGF, bovine fibroblast growth factor;
nt, nucleotide(s);
DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
TIU, trypsin inhibitory units;
BSA, bovine
serum albumin;
Cterm, carboxyl-terminal.
Melusin Is a New Muscle-specific Interactor for
1
Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain*
§,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
Department of Genetics, Biology and
Biochemistry, University of Torino, Torino 10126, Italy, the
¶ Immunogenetic and Experimental Oncology Center, CNR, Torino
10126, Italy, and the
Institute of Genetics, University of Bari,
Bari 70122, Italy
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1A and
1D integrin
cytoplasmic regions as baits. Melusin is a cysteine-rich cytoplasmic
protein of 38 kDa, with a stretch of acidic amino acid residues at the
extreme carboxyl-terminal end. In addition, putative binding sites for
SH3 and SH2 domains are present in the amino-terminal half of the
molecule. Chromosomic analysis showed that melusin gene
maps at Xq12.1/13 in man and in the synthenic region X band D in mouse.
Melusin is expressed in skeletal and cardiac muscles but not in smooth
muscles or other tissues. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that
Melusin is present in a costamere-like pattern consisting of two rows
flanking
-actinin at Z line. Its expression is up-regulated during
in vitro differentiation of the C2C12 murine myogenic cell
line, and it is regulated during in vivo skeletal muscle
development. A fragment corresponding to the tail region of Melusin
interacted strongly and specifically with
1 integrin
cytoplasmic domain in a two-hybrid test, but the full-length protein
did not. Because the tail region of Melusin contains an acidic amino
acid stretch resembling high capacity and low affinity calcium binding
domains, we tested the possibility that Ca2+ regulates
Melusin-integrin association. In vitro binding experiments demonstrated that interaction of full-length Melusin with
detergent-solubilized integrin heterodimers occurred only in absence of
cations, suggesting that it can be regulated by intracellular signals
affecting Ca2+ concentration.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

membrane receptors that link
extracellular matrix proteins to cytoskeletal elements controlling adhesive and motile behavior of cells. They are also crucial in transferring signals that affect cell proliferation and
differentiation. Both the ability to interact with cytoskeletal
proteins and to generate intracellular signals depends on the integrin
cytoplasmic domain that consists of short amino acid sequences, devoid
of enzymatic activity. Mutational analyses have shown that the
1 subunit cytoplasmic domain is responsible for the
localization of the integrin heterodimer in focal adhesions, the sites
where actin filaments are connected to the plasma membrane (1, 2).
1 cytoplasmic domain interacts with several cytoskeletal
and signaling molecules such as talin, filamin,
-actinin, paxillin, and p125FAK as shown by in vitro
binding assays (3, 4). All these proteins are selectively concentrated
at focal adhesions, and their association with integrins in
vivo is likely to require the organization of supramolecular
complexes. Using the two-hybrid system, new proteins such as the
serine-threonine kinase ILK (Integrin Linked Kinase) (5), ICAP
(Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain Associated Protein) (6, 7), and RACK1
(Receptor for Activated Protein Kinase C) (8) were shown to bind
directly to the
1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Analysis
of the integrin cytoplasmic domain indicated the existence of four
different splicing variants referred as
1A, -B, -C, and
-D (9). Whereas
1B and
1C are rare
isoforms expressed at low level only in human species, the
1A is the most widely expressed isoform and
1D is selectively expressed in striated muscle tissues
where it represents the only
1 integrin splice variant
(10). We have previously shown that
1D cytoplasmic domain endows this isoform with higher binding affinity for both cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins, indicative of the
ability of
1D to form stable cytoskeleton/matrix
connections (11).
subunit
expression causes muscle detachment from its attachment points when the
first contraction occurs (14). Gene knockout experiments in mice
indicated that
1 is not essential for myoblast fusion
during in vitro myogenic differentiation (15), but an
impaired sarcomere cytoarchitecture is observed in
1-null cardiomyocytes derived by in vitro
differentiated embryonic stem cells (16). Moreover, mice lacking
expression of
7, the major muscle integrin
subunit, develop
muscular dystrophy postnatally and display major alterations in the
muscle-tendon junction (17).
1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Using a
two-hybrid screening, we isolated a new muscle-specific interactor
capable of binding both
1A and
1D
isoforms, but not other integrin
subunits.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1A and
1D was
performed as described (20). To construct bait plasmids, sequences
encoding amino acids 752-798 of
1A and amino acids
752-801 of
1D were amplified by
PCR1 using primers containing
EcoRI and BamHI site on either ends (
1A, 5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3'and
5'-CGGGATCCTCATTTTCCCTCATACTT-3';
1D,
5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3'and 5'-CGGGATCCTCAGAGACCAGCTTTACG-3') and cloned in pEG202 vector in frame with LexA coding sequence. Both plasmids were unable to activate transcription when cotransformed in EGY48 yeast strain with pSH18-34 reporter plasmid (data not shown).
We confirmed the expression of these fusion proteins in yeast total
protein extracts by Western blot analysis using an anti-LexA antibody
(a gift from A. Zervos). A cDNA library from heart neonatal rat
fused to a galactose-inducible activation domain (a gift from A. Zervos) was transformed in yeast strain EGY48 that already contained
pSH18-34 reporter plasmid and pEG202-
1A or
-
1D using a LiAc high efficiency transformation protocol
(21). Primary transformants (2 × 106) were screened
by plating 10 million colonies on selectable medium lacking Ura, His,
Trp, and Leu. Several positive clones for
1A and
1D were isolated, and their specific binding to
integrins was tested by assaying the interaction with control baits
such as bicoid, bFGF, a ciclyn A, and c-Myc (a gift from A. Zervos).
2 (5'-CATGCCATGGAAGGCTCTGATCCACCTG-3' and
5'CCGCTCGAGCTAACTCTCAGCAAACTT-3'), 716-762 of human
3
(5'-GCATGCCATGGAAACTCCTCATCACCATC-3' and
5'-CCGCTCGAGTTAAGTGCCCCGGTACGT-3'), 752-789 of
1B
(5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3 and 5'-CGGGATCCTTATAAGCCACTTTGCTT-3'),
752-777 of
1 common region (5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3 and 5'-GGATCCTCACGTGTCCCATTTGGC-3'), and 1022-1049 of
5 (5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTGGATTCTTCAAA-3' and
5'-CGGGATCCTCAGGCATCAGAGGTGGC-3') were amplified by PCR and
cloned in frame with LexA coding sequence in pEG202.
) was amplified by PCR
(5'-CGGAATTCTGGGCAAAGCAGCTGCCA-3' and
5'-CCCTCGAGTTATAGTAAAACCCCTGCCCT-3') and cloned in frame with the
B42 transactivation domain in pJG4-5.
gt10
(CLONTECH) and a mouse skeletal muscle library in
gt11 (CLONTECH). Positive human and mouse clones
were subcloned in pBluescript II SK
and sequenced.
Sequences were analyzed with the BLAST (22) server at the National
Center for Biotechnology Information. Our cDNA contains the
complete Melusin coding sequence as indicated by the fact that mouse
cDNA transfected COS cells show a band which co-migrates with the
endogenous Melusin present in differentiated C2C12 myogenic cells. The
first atg of the sequence was considered the putative start codon.
Analysis of mouse genomic DNA sequences showed that two stop codons are
present 18 and 30 nt upstream of this putative atg. This genomic region
just upstream of the start codon is not an intronic sequence because it
is present in dbEST (23) data base that contains randomly expressed sequences.
-actinin (Sigma). Secondary antibodies
specific for rat or mouse IgG were labeled with fluorescein, while
antibodies specific for rabbit IgG were labeled with Texas red
(Molecular Probes). The specie specificity of the secondary antibodies
was cross-tested. Non-immune rabbit and mouse IgG were used as controls and resulted in negative staining. Samples were observed under Olympus
fluorescence microscope, and pictures were taken with an Olympus DP10
digital photomicrography system. Confocal images were obtained with
Olympus 1X70 inverted confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with
a krypton-argon ion laser (488/568 nm).
1 integrin heterodimers, were washed twice with cold PBS
and lysed in TBS (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM NaVO4, 10 mM NaF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml pepstatin and 0.1 TIU/ml aprotinin) 0.5% Nonidet P-40 + 1 mM
Ca2+, or with TBS, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 + 5 mM
EDTA. Cell extracts were precleared for 1 h at 4 °C with 10 µg of GST-Sepharose. 2 mg of every protein extract were incubated
overnight at 4 °C with 10 µg of GST-Melusin, GST-Cterm and GST
alone (as control). Sepharose beads were then washed, boiled in Laemmli
buffer and proteins were separated on 6% polyacrylamide gel in
nonreducing conditions. The gel was blotted to a nitrocellulose filter
that was then saturated with TBS, 5% BSA and incubated over night at
4 °C in TBS 1% BSA containing 10 µg/ml TS2/16 monoclonal antibody
to
1 integrin. After washing, the filter was incubated
with peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse antibody for 2 h at room
temperature and detection was performed with chemiluminescent substrate
ECL (Amersham).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1 Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain
Interactors--
To identify muscle proteins able to interact with the
1 integrin subunit cytoplasmic domain, we carried out an
interaction trap approach (20). We screened a heart neonatal rat
library using the entire cytoplasmic region of
1A, the
ubiquitously expressed isoform, and
1D, the
muscle-specific isoform, as baits. We obtained 3 different specific
interactors for
1A and
1D. One of the
1A interactors was identified as the rat homologues of
ICAP-1
(Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain-Associated Protein), also called
bodenin, and recently described as a
1 interacting
protein (6, 7). Another protein that we found to weakly interact with
1D was RACK-1 (Receptor for Activated Protein Kinase C),
a molecule recently described as interactor for
1,
2
and
5 integrin cytoplasmic domains (8, 7).
1A and 8 times in
the
1D screening, where it was obtained as two different
overlapping cDNA fragments with an open reading frame of 423 nt
(D3-2) and 561 nt (D7-2). To verify the specificity of this
interaction we tested the ability of the proteins coded by the D3-2
and D7-2 cDNA fragments to bind
1A,
1D and other unrelated baits (cyclin A, bFGF, c-Myc and
bicoid) in a yeast interaction test. Our results showed that D3-2 and
D7-2 protein fragments bind specifically and strongly to
1A and
1D cytoplasmic domains and not to
the unrelated baits. We consequently focused our study on this new interactor that we called Melusin.

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Amino acid sequence of Melusin.
A, the amino acid sequence was deduced from the full-length
human and mouse cDNAs. Identical residues are indicated by
vertical bars and conservative substitutions by double
dots. The two cysteine-rich domains are underlined, and
the acidic amino acid stretch at the extreme carboxyl-terminal is
double underlined. PXXP sequences, putative SH3
domain binding motifs, are boxed. YXXI/P
sequences, putative SH2 binding sites are shown in dashed line
boxes. B, the spacing of cysteine residues in the two
cysteine-rich motifs in mouse and human Melusin are indicated.

View larger version (39K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression of Melusin is restricted to
striated muscle tissue. A, poly(A)+ RNA
from different human tissues was hybridized with D3-2 rat probe
isolated with the two-hybrid screening as described under "Materials
and Methods." A single band of approximately 1.4 kilobases was
present only in heart and skeletal muscles. B, protein
extracts from newborn mouse tissues were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to
nitrocellulose filter. The filter was probed with polyclonal antibody
raised against a GST-Melusin fusion protein as described under
"Materials and Methods." A band of 38 kDa was detected in skeletal
muscle and heart.

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Melusin expression is regulated during
in vitro and in vivo myogenesis and
during muscle regeneration. A, C2C12 mouse myoblasts
(0) were allowed to differentiate in serum-free medium for 1 or 6 days. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were used as negative control. Protein
extracts were analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies to Melusin
and to
1D integrin as marker for differentiation (two
upper panels). Total RNA was also extracted and hybridized
with the Melusin probe, or stained with ethidium bromide as gel loading
control (two lower panels). B, protein extracts
(two upper panels) from heart and limb muscles of mouse
embryos at 15 (E15) and 17 (E17) days of fetal
life, newborn mice (P1), 1-week old (P6), and
adult (Ad) mice were analyzed by Western blotting with
Melusin polyclonal antibodies. Total RNA was also extracted from limb
muscles at different stages of development and analyzed by Northern
blotting with Melusin probe. Total RNA stained with ethidium bromide
(lower panel) is shown as gel loading control. C,
degeneration of tibialis anterior muscle of adult mice was induced by
liquid nitrogen freezing, and regeneration was allowed to proceed for
3, 6, 9, and 12 days. The muscles were excised and protein extracts
were analyzed by Western blotting for the expression of Melusin with
specific polyclonal antibodies. Day 0 (0) is untreated
tibialis anterior muscle.
-actinin band in the Z disc (Fig.
4). In adult soleus muscle, the striated
localization of Melusin was still detectable although to a lower
intensity compared with newborn muscles (Fig. 4).

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Melusin is enriched at costameres.
Panels in left column show longitudinal
cryosections of 1-week old (P6) mouse limb co-stained with
affinity purified Melusin polyclonal antibody and
-actinin
monoclonal antibody. The two images are superimposed in the lower
panel (merge). Soleus muscle from 6-month old mouse was
also stained and is shown in panels of right column. Note
the striated localization of Melusin and the reduced staining intensity
in adult muscle. Scale bar, 10 µm.
1 Integrin-Melusin Interaction Sites
with the Two-hybrid Test--
The integrin
subunit cytoplasmic
domains are highly homologous to each other (3). Using the two-hybrid
test, we analyzed whether Melusin was capable of interacting with
subunits other than
1. Using the protein fragment coded
by plasmid D3-2, corresponding to the carboxyl-terminal of Melusin
(tail domain) as a bait, interaction occurred with
1 but
not with
2 and
3 cytoplasmic domains
(Table I). Moreover, no interaction
occurred with the integrin
5 cytoplasmic domain used as
control (Table I). The
1 cytoplasmic domain consists of
a 26-amino acid long membrane proximal subdomain common to all known
isoforms and of variable carboxyl-terminal subdomains specific for each
splicing variant (35). As shown in Table I, the interaction occurred
with all three tested isoforms (
1A,
1B,
and
1D) suggesting that the interaction involved the
common subdomain. To further test this hypothesis, we used a truncated bait consisting only of the common subdomain. As shown in Table I, the
common
1 subdomain interacted with the tail region of Melusin with an intensity comparable with the one observed for the
entire cytoplasmic regions.
Binding of integrin subunit cytoplasmic domains to melusin and its tail
domain
integrin cytoplasmic domains were
used in the two-hybrid system to measure interaction with the D3-2
melusin fragment (coding for the tail domain, amino acid residues
211-350) and the full-length melusin protein.
1A,
1B and
1D are different splicing variant of
1 integrin.
1Com is a mutant containing the
cytoplasmic subdomain common to all splicing variants (35).
5 integrin subunit cytoplasmic domain was used as control.
1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. As
mentioned above, the interaction occurred with preys consisting of the
tail domain plus a large fragment of the second cysteine-rich repeat (D7-2) or the tail domain alone (D3-2) (Table
II). Further deletion of the acidic amino
acid stretch did not affect the interaction, allowing mapping the
binding site for the
1 integrin in a restricted portion
of the Melusin tail domain from amino acid residues 211 to 320 (Table
II). Interestingly the full-length Melusin construct showed no
interaction (Tables I and II), suggesting that the tail domain is
unavailable for binding to
1 in the full-length protein.
Interaction of different melusin constructs with
1 integrin
1 integrin cytoplasmic domain in the
two-hybrid test or the intact integrin complexes from COS cell extracts
are indicated. nt, not
tested.
1 Integrins in Vitro--
To
further test the interaction of Melusin with integrin cytoplasmic
domains, we performed in vitro binding assays. Either the
full-length or a fragment (Cterm), consisting of the second cysteine-rich repeat and the tail domain, were fused to GST and bound
to Sepharose beads (see "Materials and Methods" and Table II). When
detergent extract of COS cells in Ca2+-containing buffer
was incubated with the Sepharose beads,
1 integrins
bound strongly to the Cterm Melusin fragment but not to the full-length
protein. Because Melusin contains a putative Ca2+ binding
domain, we investigated whether Ca2+ ions are inhibiting
the interaction of the full-length Melusin with
1
integrin. As shown in Fig. 5,
Ca2+ chelator (EDTA) strongly enhanced binding of Melusin
to
1 integrin. Interestingly, Ca2+
concentration did not affect binding of the Cterm portion of Melusin to
1 integrin (Fig. 5).

View larger version (46K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Interaction of Melusin with integrins is
Ca2+ dependent. GST fusion proteins
containing either the Cterm portion or the full-length Melusin protein
(see "Materials and Methods" section and Table II) were bound to
glutathione-Sepharose. GST protein alone was used as control. COS cells
were detergent-extracted in buffer containing 1 mM
CaCl2 or 5 mM EDTA. Cell extracts were
incubated with GST fusion protein-Sepharose, and
1
integrin binding was determined by Western blot analysis of eluted
material. While
1 integrin binds to the Cterm region of
Melusin both in the presence or absence of Ca2+ ions,
binding to the intact Melusin occurred only in the absence of divalent
cations.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1
integrin subunit. Melusin is expressed in striated skeletal and cardiac muscles, both at mRNA and protein level, but it is undetectable in
all other tested tissues including gut smooth muscle, brain, placenta,
lung, liver, kidney, and pancreas. Its expression appears to be
regulated during myogenesis both in vitro and in
vivo. In fact, Melusin was undetectable in cultured proliferating
myoblasts, but it is highly expressed in differentiated myotubes.
During in vivo skeletal muscle myogenesis, Melusin starts to
be detectable in 15-day old embryos, and its level peaks in newborn
mice. In adult skeletal muscle tissue the level of expression slightly declines, and in Western blotting a doublet of bands becomes visible, suggesting that the molecule undergoes post-translational
modifications. The doublet of bands could also be indicative of
alternatively spliced isoforms of the protein, but reverse
transcription PCR analysis of adult and neonatal muscle with primers
covering the entire length of the molecule did not reveal the existence
of alternatively spliced forms. This conclusion is also supported by
the presence of a single band in Northern blot analysis from both
newborn and adult mice (see Fig. 3B). The highest expression level of Melusin in skeletal muscle coincides with secondary
myogenesis, a process in which a distinct myoblast population line up
using primary myotubes as scaffold and fuse to each other forming
secondary myotubes that will give rise to the muscle fibers of adult
tissue. High level of Melusin expression was also observed in
regenerating adult tibialis anterior muscle, further suggesting that
Melusin might play a crucial role during maturation and/or organization of muscle cells. A possible role in myoblast fusion seems unlikely because Melusin is also expressed in heart where cardiomyocytes do not
undergo cell fusion. The two-hybrid test showed that the tail domain of
Melusin binds equally well to the cytoplasmic domain of both
1A and
1D integrin isoforms. These two
isoforms are differentially expressed during muscle development (36).
1A is expressed in muscles during embryonic development
and is down-regulated after birth. On the other hand, the
1D isoform starts to appear in skeletal muscle in 17-day
embryos and becomes the only
1 isoform in adult muscles.
The ability to bind
1A and
1D integrin
isoforms allows Melusin to interact with integrins both in developing
and in adult muscles. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that Melusin is localized in rows flanking the Z line containing
-actinin. Similar pattern has been described for vinculin (37) and
1 integrin (12, 13, 10) and is thought to correspond to
sites of lateral interaction of actin with the plasma membrane known as
costameres (37, 38). This pattern of localization suggests that Melusin
is a component of the actin-integrin junctional complex in muscle.
1
cytoplasmic region, and deletion experiments allowed to exclude a role
of the acidic amino acid stretch in this process (see Table II).
Interestingly, the full-length Melusin protein was unable to interact
with
1 cytoplasmic domain in the two-hybrid system
(Tables I and II). In vitro binding experiments showed that
the interaction of Melusin with integrins is regulated by divalent
cations, and it occurs only in the absence of Ca2+ (Table
II). It is possible that Ca2+ directly competes for binding
to integrins. This, however, is not the case, in fact, the presence of
Ca2+ ions did not prevent binding of the truncated Melusin
Cterm fragment (see Table II). In addition, the acidic amino acid
stretch of Melusin, that it is likely to bind Ca2+ ions, is
not required for integrin binding (see Table II). Thus the most likely
explanation is that Ca2+ modulates the conformation of
Melusin exposing the integrin binding site located in the tail domain.
In this model the amino-terminal region of Melusin masks the integrin
binding site present in the tail domain of the molecule, and removal of
Ca2+ releases this inhibition. These data suggest that
Melusin-integrin interaction depends on Ca2+ concentration
and can thus be regulated by intracellular alteration of
Ca2+ level in response to extracellular stimuli.
1 integrin, the amino-terminal portion of the molecule can possibly bind to SH3- and SH2-containing proteins, as suggested by
the presence of multiple proline-rich motifs and tyrosine
phosphorylation sites. These properties suggest that Melusin could be
an important molecular link between integrin receptors and cytoskeletal
or transducing proteins in muscle cells.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Reszka, A. A.,
Hayashi, Y.,
and Horwitz, A. F.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
1321-1330 2.
Marcantonio, E. E.,
Guan, J. L.,
Trevithick, J. E.,
and Hynes, R. O.
(1990)
Cell Regul.
1,
597-604[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Sastry, S. K.,
and Horwitz, A. F.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5,
819-831[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Hemler, M. E.
(1998)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
10,
578-585[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Hannigan, G. E.,
Leung-Hagesteijn, C.,
Fitz-Gibbon, L.,
Coppolino, M. G.,
Radeva, G.,
Filmus, J.,
Bell, J. C.,
and Dedhar, S.
(1996)
Nature
379,
91-96[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Chang, D. D.,
Wong, C.,
Smith, H.,
and Liu, J.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
138,
1149-1157 7.
Zhang, X. A.,
and Hemler, M. E.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
11-19 8.
Lilental, J.,
and Chang, D. D.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
2379-2383 9.
Fornaro, M.,
and Languino, L. R.
(1997)
Matrix Biol.
16,
185-193[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Belkin, A. M.,
Zhidkova, N. I.,
Balzac, F.,
Altruda, F.,
Tomatis, D.,
Maier, A.,
Tarone, G.,
Koteliansky, V. E.,
and Burridge, K.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
211-226 11.
Belkin, A. M.,
Retta, S. F.,
Pletjushkina, O. Y.,
Balzac, F.,
Silengo, L.,
Fassler, R.,
Koteliansky, V. E.,
Burridge, K.,
and Tarone, G.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
139,
1583-1595 12.
Bozyczko, D.,
Decker, C.,
Muschler, J.,
and Horwitz, A. F.
(1989)
Exp. Cell Res.
183,
72-91[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Swasdison, S.,
and Mayne, R.
(1989)
Cell Tissue Res.
257,
537-543[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Volk, T.,
Fessler, L. I.,
and Fessler, J. H.
(1990)
Cell
63,
525-536[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Hirsch, E.,
Lohikangas, L.,
Gullberg, D.,
Hohansson, S.,
and Fassler, R.
(1998)
J. Cell Sci.
111,
2397-2409[Abstract]
16.
Fassler, R.,
Rohwedel, J.,
Maltsev, V.,
Bloch, W.,
Lentini, S.,
Guan, K.,
Gullberg, D.,
Hescheler, J.,
Addicks, K.,
and Wobus, A. M.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
2989-2999[Abstract]
17.
Mayer, U.,
Saher, G.,
Fassler, R.,
Bornemann, A.,
Echtermeyer, F.,
von der Mark, H.,
Miosge, N.,
Poschl, E.,
and von der Mark, K.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
17,
318-323[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
18.
McDonald, K. A.,
Lakonishok, M.,
and Horwitz, A. F.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
2573-2581[Abstract]
19.
Martin-Bermudo, M. D.,
and Brown, N. H.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
217-226 20.
Gyuris, J.,
Golemis, E.,
Chertkov, H.,
and Brent, R.
(1993)
Cell
75,
791-803[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Gietz, D.,
St Jean, A.,
Woods, R. A.,
and Schiestl, R. H.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
1425 22.
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Boguski, M. S.,
Lowe, T. M.,
and Tolstoshev, C. M.
(1993)
Nat. Genet.
4,
332-333[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
24.
Chomczynski, P.,
and Sacchi, N.
(1987)
Anal. Biochem.
162,
156-159[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
25.
Zornig, M.,
Klett, C.,
Lovec, H.,
Hameister, H.,
Winking, H.,
Adolph, S.,
and Moroy, T.
(1995)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
71,
37-40[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Lichter, P.,
Tang Chang, C. J.,
Call, K.,
Hermanson, G.,
Evans, G. A.,
Housman, D.,
and Ward, D. C.
(1990)
Science
247,
64-69 27.
Toyota, N.,
and Shimada, Y.
(1984)
Cell Tissue Res.
236,
549-554[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Hegyi, H.,
and Pongor, S.
(1993)
Comput. Appl. Biosci.
9,
371-372 29.
Bairoch, A.,
and Boeckmann, B.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
3093-3096 30.
Baksh, S.,
and Michalak, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
21458-21465 31.
Fliegel, L.,
Ohnishi, M.,
Carpenter, M. R.,
Khanna, V. K.,
Reithmeier, R. A.,
and MacLennan, D. H.
(1987)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
84,
1167-1171 32.
Rickles, R. J.,
Botfield, M. C.,
Weng, Z.,
Taylor, J. A.,
Green, O. M.,
Brugge, J. S.,
and Zoller, M. J.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
5598-5604[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Yu, H.,
Chen, J. K.,
Feng, S.,
Dalgarno, D. C.,
Brauer, A. W.,
and Schreiber, S. L.
(1994)
Cell
76,
933-945[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Songyang, Z.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Chaudhuri, M.,
Gish, G.,
Pawson, T.,
Haser, W. G.,
King, F.,
Roberts, T.,
Ratnofsky, S.,
Lechleider, R. J.,
et al..
(1993)
Cell
72,
767-778[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Retta, S. F.,
Balzac, F.,
Ferraris, P.,
Belkin, A. M.,
Fassler, R.,
Humphries, M. J.,
De Leo, G.,
Silengo, L.,
and Tarone, G.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
4,
715-731[Abstract]
36.
Brancaccio, M.,
Cabodi, S.,
Belkin, A. M.,
Collo, G.,
Koteliansky, V. E.,
Tomatis, D.,
Altruda, F.,
Silengo, L.,
and Tarone, G.
(1998)
Cell Adhes. Commun.
5,
193-205[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Pardo, J. V.,
Siliciano, J. D.,
and Craig, S. W.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
1008-1012 38.
Koteliansky, V. E.,
and Gneushev, G. N
(1983)
FEBS Lett.
159,
158-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. E. Hannigan, J. G. Coles, and S. Dedhar Integrin-Linked Kinase at the Heart of Cardiac Contractility, Repair, and Disease Circ. Res., May 25, 2007; 100(10): 1408 - 1414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Donker, J. G. Maessen, F. Verheyen, F. C. Ramaekers, R. L. H. M. G. Spatjens, H. Kuijpers, C. Ramakers, P. M. H. Schiffers, M. A. Vos, H. J. G. M. Crijns, et al. Impact of acute and enduring volume overload on mechanotransduction and cytoskeletal integrity of canine left ventricular myocardium Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2324 - H2332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Srivastava and S. Yu Stretching to meet needs: integrin-linked kinase and the cardiac pump Genes & Dev., September 1, 2006; 20(17): 2327 - 2331. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brancaccio, E. Hirsch, A. Notte, G. Selvetella, G. Lembo, and G. Tarone Integrin signalling: The tug-of-war in heart hypertrophy Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2006; 70(3): 422 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hoshijima Mechanical stress-strain sensors embedded in cardiac cytoskeleton: Z disk, titin, and associated structures Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): H1313 - H1325. [Abstract] [Full Text]< |