JBC Oz Biosciences

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brancaccio, M.
Right arrow Articles by Silengo, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brancaccio, M.
Right arrow Articles by Silengo, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29282-29288, October 8, 1999


Melusin Is a New Muscle-specific Interactor for beta 1 Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain*

Mara BrancaccioDagger §, Simona GuazzoneDagger , Nadia MeniniDagger , Elena SibonaDagger , Emilio HirschDagger , Marco De Andrea, Mariano Rocchiparallel , Fiorella AltrudaDagger , Guido TaroneDagger , and Lorenzo SilengoDagger

From the Dagger  Department of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry, University of Torino, Torino 10126, Italy, the  Immunogenetic and Experimental Oncology Center, CNR, Torino 10126, Italy, and the parallel  Institute of Genetics, University of Bari, Bari 70122, Italy

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Here we describe the isolation and partial characterization of a new muscle-specific protein (Melusin) which interacts with the integrin cytoplasmic domain. The cDNA encoding Melusin was isolated in a two-hybrid screening of a rat neonatal heart library using beta 1A and beta 1D integrin cytoplasmic regions as baits. Melusin is a cysteine-rich cytoplasmic protein of 38 kDa, with a stretch of acidic amino acid residues at the extreme carboxyl-terminal end. In addition, putative binding sites for SH3 and SH2 domains are present in the amino-terminal half of the molecule. Chromosomic analysis showed that melusin gene maps at Xq12.1/13 in man and in the synthenic region X band D in mouse. Melusin is expressed in skeletal and cardiac muscles but not in smooth muscles or other tissues. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that Melusin is present in a costamere-like pattern consisting of two rows flanking alpha -actinin at Z line. Its expression is up-regulated during in vitro differentiation of the C2C12 murine myogenic cell line, and it is regulated during in vivo skeletal muscle development. A fragment corresponding to the tail region of Melusin interacted strongly and specifically with beta 1 integrin cytoplasmic domain in a two-hybrid test, but the full-length protein did not. Because the tail region of Melusin contains an acidic amino acid stretch resembling high capacity and low affinity calcium binding domains, we tested the possibility that Ca2+ regulates Melusin-integrin association. In vitro binding experiments demonstrated that interaction of full-length Melusin with detergent-solubilized integrin heterodimers occurred only in absence of cations, suggesting that it can be regulated by intracellular signals affecting Ca2+ concentration.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Integrins are heterodimeric alpha beta membrane receptors that link extracellular matrix proteins to cytoskeletal elements controlling adhesive and motile behavior of cells. They are also crucial in transferring signals that affect cell proliferation and differentiation. Both the ability to interact with cytoskeletal proteins and to generate intracellular signals depends on the integrin cytoplasmic domain that consists of short amino acid sequences, devoid of enzymatic activity. Mutational analyses have shown that the beta 1 subunit cytoplasmic domain is responsible for the localization of the integrin heterodimer in focal adhesions, the sites where actin filaments are connected to the plasma membrane (1, 2). beta 1 cytoplasmic domain interacts with several cytoskeletal and signaling molecules such as talin, filamin, alpha -actinin, paxillin, and p125FAK as shown by in vitro binding assays (3, 4). All these proteins are selectively concentrated at focal adhesions, and their association with integrins in vivo is likely to require the organization of supramolecular complexes. Using the two-hybrid system, new proteins such as the serine-threonine kinase ILK (Integrin Linked Kinase) (5), ICAP (Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain Associated Protein) (6, 7), and RACK1 (Receptor for Activated Protein Kinase C) (8) were shown to bind directly to the beta 1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Analysis of the integrin cytoplasmic domain indicated the existence of four different splicing variants referred as beta 1A, -B, -C, and -D (9). Whereas beta 1B and beta 1C are rare isoforms expressed at low level only in human species, the beta 1A is the most widely expressed isoform and beta 1D is selectively expressed in striated muscle tissues where it represents the only beta 1 integrin splice variant (10). We have previously shown that beta 1D cytoplasmic domain endows this isoform with higher binding affinity for both cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix proteins, indicative of the ability of beta 1D to form stable cytoskeleton/matrix connections (11).

In muscle tissue, the membrane-actin cytoskeleton interaction occurs at myotendinous junctions and costamers, two highly specialized junctional complexes. At myotendinous junctions, actomyosin filaments are anchored end-on to the plasma membrane, whereas at costamers they are joined laterally. Integrins are selectively enriched both in myotendinous junctions and costamers (10, 12, 13), suggesting an important role of these receptors in connecting the cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix in muscles. Direct evidence of the role of integrins in muscle function and in actin organization also comes from gene knockout experiments. In Drosophila, lack of integrin beta  subunit expression causes muscle detachment from its attachment points when the first contraction occurs (14). Gene knockout experiments in mice indicated that beta 1 is not essential for myoblast fusion during in vitro myogenic differentiation (15), but an impaired sarcomere cytoarchitecture is observed in beta 1-null cardiomyocytes derived by in vitro differentiated embryonic stem cells (16). Moreover, mice lacking expression of alpha 7, the major muscle integrin alpha  subunit, develop muscular dystrophy postnatally and display major alterations in the muscle-tendon junction (17).

Experiments directed to investigate whether integrins are involved in the formation of the sarcomeres or in their stabilization after formation indicate that localization of integrins to actin-membrane junctions occurs once the organization of actin in sarcomeres has already occurred (18, 19). These data strongly suggest that the localization of integrins at myotendinous junctions and costamers is driven by the organization of actin inside the cells. Their presence at these sites is crucial for the mechanical stabilization of these junctions as indicated by the gene knockout experiments (16, 17).

To better understand the mechanisms of integrin-cytoskeletal interactions, we searched for muscle proteins capable of interacting with the beta 1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. Using a two-hybrid screening, we isolated a new muscle-specific interactor capable of binding both beta 1A and beta 1D isoforms, but not other integrin beta  subunits.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Interaction Trap-- Screening for proteins that interact with cytoplasmic tails of beta 1A and beta 1D was performed as described (20). To construct bait plasmids, sequences encoding amino acids 752-798 of beta 1A and amino acids 752-801 of beta 1D were amplified by PCR1 using primers containing EcoRI and BamHI site on either ends (beta 1A, 5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3'and 5'-CGGGATCCTCATTTTCCCTCATACTT-3'; beta 1D, 5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3'and 5'-CGGGATCCTCAGAGACCAGCTTTACG-3') and cloned in pEG202 vector in frame with LexA coding sequence. Both plasmids were unable to activate transcription when cotransformed in EGY48 yeast strain with pSH18-34 reporter plasmid (data not shown). We confirmed the expression of these fusion proteins in yeast total protein extracts by Western blot analysis using an anti-LexA antibody (a gift from A. Zervos). A cDNA library from heart neonatal rat fused to a galactose-inducible activation domain (a gift from A. Zervos) was transformed in yeast strain EGY48 that already contained pSH18-34 reporter plasmid and pEG202-beta 1A or -beta 1D using a LiAc high efficiency transformation protocol (21). Primary transformants (2 × 106) were screened by plating 10 million colonies on selectable medium lacking Ura, His, Trp, and Leu. Several positive clones for beta 1A and beta 1D were isolated, and their specific binding to integrins was tested by assaying the interaction with control baits such as bicoid, bFGF, a ciclyn A, and c-Myc (a gift from A. Zervos).

Other baits were produced to test the ability of Melusin to interact with other integrin cytoplasmic tails: sequences encoding amino acids 724-769 of beta 2 (5'-CATGCCATGGAAGGCTCTGATCCACCTG-3' and 5'CCGCTCGAGCTAACTCTCAGCAAACTT-3'), 716-762 of human beta 3 (5'-GCATGCCATGGAAACTCCTCATCACCATC-3' and 5'-CCGCTCGAGTTAAGTGCCCCGGTACGT-3'), 752-789 of beta 1B (5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3 and 5'-CGGGATCCTTATAAGCCACTTTGCTT-3'), 752-777 of beta 1 common region (5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTTTAATGATAATT-3 and 5'-GGATCCTCACGTGTCCCATTTGGC-3'), and 1022-1049 of alpha 5 (5'-GGAATTCAAGCTTGGATTCTTCAAA-3' and 5'-CGGGATCCTCAGGCATCAGAGGTGGC-3') were amplified by PCR and cloned in frame with LexA coding sequence in pEG202.

To map the integrin binding site in Melusin, an additional construct was created. The Melusin cDNA fragment coding for amino acids 211-320 (D3-2Delta ) was amplified by PCR (5'-CGGAATTCTGGGCAAAGCAGCTGCCA-3' and 5'-CCCTCGAGTTATAGTAAAACCCCTGCCCT-3') and cloned in frame with the B42 transactivation domain in pJG4-5.

Sequencing and cDNA Cloning-- Positive clones were sequenced using ABI PRISM Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Ready Reaction Kit (Perkin-Elmer). D3-2 and D7-2 cDNA fragments containing overlapping sequences of Melusin were used to isolate the full-length cDNA from a human skeletal muscle library in lambda gt10 (CLONTECH) and a mouse skeletal muscle library in lambda gt11 (CLONTECH). Positive human and mouse clones were subcloned in pBluescript II SK- and sequenced. Sequences were analyzed with the BLAST (22) server at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Our cDNA contains the complete Melusin coding sequence as indicated by the fact that mouse cDNA transfected COS cells show a band which co-migrates with the endogenous Melusin present in differentiated C2C12 myogenic cells. The first atg of the sequence was considered the putative start codon. Analysis of mouse genomic DNA sequences showed that two stop codons are present 18 and 30 nt upstream of this putative atg. This genomic region just upstream of the start codon is not an intronic sequence because it is present in dbEST (23) data base that contains randomly expressed sequences.

Northern Blot-- RNA from C2C12 cells and from mouse embryo and neonatal skeletal muscle was extracted using RNeasy Mini kit (QIAGEN Inc.). Adult skeletal muscle RNA was extracted according to Chomczynsky and Sacchi (24). 20 µg of total RNA from each sample was run on 0.8% agarose-formaldehyde gels and transferred to N+ nylon membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Poly(A)+ RNA isolated from human and mouse tissues and immobilized onto nitrocellulose filters after electrophoretic separation was obtained from CLONTECH (Multiple Tissue Northern blot). Filters were probed at 65 °C with D3-2 insert labeled with 32P using a random prime labeling system (Rediprime II, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and were washed twice with 2× SSC, 1% SDS and twice with 0.4% SSC, 1% SDS at 65 °C, and exposed to x-ray film.

In Situ Hybridization-- Human metaphase spreads were obtained from PHA-stimulated peripheral lymphocytes of a normal donor by standard procedures. Mouse spreads were prepared from a mouse cell line containing multiple well characterized Robertsonian translocations allowing an easy identification of the mouse chromosomes (25). The cell line was a generous gift from Dr. H. Hameister (Ulm, Germany). Full-length human Melusin cDNA and 14.8-kilobase mouse genomic DNA fragment spanning the atg-containing exon and the three following ones were used as probes. Chromosome preparations were hybridized in situ with probes labeled with biotin nick translation, essentially as described by Lichter et al. (26), with minor modifications. Briefly, 500 ng of labeled probe were used for the FISH experiments; hybridization was performed at 37 °C in 2× SSC, 50% (v/v) formamide, 10% (w/v) dextran sulfate, 5 µg COT1 DNA (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), and 3 µg of sonicated salmon sperm DNA in a volume of 10 µl. Post-hybridization washing was performed at 42 °C in 2× SSC, 50% formamide (×3) followed by three washes in 0.1× SSC at 60 °C. Biotin-labeled DNA was detected with Cy3-conjugated avidin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Chromosome identification was obtained by simultaneous DAPI staining, that produces a Q-banding pattern.

Antibody Preparation-- GST-Melusin fusion protein was produced by expressing the entire sequence of the human Melusin cloned in pGEX 4T2 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in Escherichia coli BL21 bacterial strain. GST-Melusin was purified on glutathione-Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and elution was performed following the recommendations of the manufacturer. Rabbits were immunized by repeated intramuscular injections of the purified fusion protein (500 µg) suspended in Complete Freund Adjuvant. Specificity of the antiserum was demonstrated in Western blots on protein extracts from wild type and Melusin cDNA-transfected COS cells. To affinity purify antibodies from rabbit serum, Melusin was fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP) by cloning the cDNA into the pMALp2 vector (New England Biolabs). The MBP-Melusin fusion protein was purified on an amylose column according to the instructions of the manufacturer and coupled to Sepharose. Antibodies were adsorbed on the MBP-Melusin-Sepharose column and eluted with pH 3 glycin-HCl buffer.

Cell Culture and Western Blot-- C2C12 mouse skeletal muscle cell line was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal calf serum. Cells were induced to differentiate into myotubes by switching to culture medium with 2% horse serum.

Western blots on cell and tissue extracts were performed as follows. Cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (containing 0.5% Triton X-100 and the following protease inhibitors: 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml pepstatin, and 0.1 TIU/ml aprotinin) for 10 min at 4 °C. Extracts were centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to remove insoluble material. Tissues were frozen and triturated in liquid nitrogen and extracted in lysis buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml pepstatin, and 0.1 TIU/ml aprotinin. Tissue extracts were sonicated three times for 10 s and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min to remove insoluble material. Protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad Assay. 60 µg of every protein extract were separated on polyacrylamide gel in presence of SDS and subsequently blotted to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were saturated with TBS, 5% BSA and incubated in TBS, 1% BSA containing primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. After washing, the filters were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature, and detection was performed with chemiluminescent substrate ECL (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Muscle Regeneration-- Adult CBA male mice were anesthetized with Avertin (17 µl of 2.5% Avertin per gram of body weight). Tibialis anterior muscles were exposed, and degeneration was induced by deep freezing with liquid nitrogen-cooled steel rod according to Toyota et al. (27). Muscles were surgically removed 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after freezing, and protein extracts were obtained as described above. 100 µg of every total extract were separated on polyacrylamide gel, and equal loading was verified by Ponceau red staining. Untreated tibialis anterior muscle was used as control.

Immunofluorescence-- 1-week old mouse limb muscles and soleus muscle from 6-months old mice were collected and fixed in PBS, 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 h at room temperature. After washing in PBS and PBS, 15% sucrose for cryoprotection, muscle fragments were frozen in liquid nitrogen in Embedding Medium Compound (Bio-Optica S.p.a.). 10-µm cryosections were collected on polylysine-subbed slides. Sections were saturated with goat serum 1:100 in PBS, 1% BSA and incubated overnight at room temperature with primary antibody in PBS, 1% BSA, followed by 2-h incubation with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody. The following primary antibodies were used: 5 µg/ml affinity purified rabbit anti-Melusin and 5 µg/ml monoclonal antibody EA-53 to sarcomeric alpha -actinin (Sigma). Secondary antibodies specific for rat or mouse IgG were labeled with fluorescein, while antibodies specific for rabbit IgG were labeled with Texas red (Molecular Probes). The specie specificity of the secondary antibodies was cross-tested. Non-immune rabbit and mouse IgG were used as controls and resulted in negative staining. Samples were observed under Olympus fluorescence microscope, and pictures were taken with an Olympus DP10 digital photomicrography system. Confocal images were obtained with Olympus 1X70 inverted confocal laser scanning microscope equipped with a krypton-argon ion laser (488/568 nm).

Melusin-Integrin in Vitro Binding Assay-- GST fusion proteins were prepared by cloning the full-length human Melusin cDNA and a cDNA fragment coding for amino acid residues 149-350 (Cterm) in pGEX vectors (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). GST and GST fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli BL21 bacterial strain and purified on glutathione-Sepharose 4B. COS cells, used as source of beta 1 integrin heterodimers, were washed twice with cold PBS and lysed in TBS (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM NaVO4, 10 mM NaF, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 4 µg/ml pepstatin and 0.1 TIU/ml aprotinin) 0.5% Nonidet P-40 + 1 mM Ca2+, or with TBS, 0.5% Nonidet P-40 + 5 mM EDTA. Cell extracts were precleared for 1 h at 4 °C with 10 µg of GST-Sepharose. 2 mg of every protein extract were incubated overnight at 4 °C with 10 µg of GST-Melusin, GST-Cterm and GST alone (as control). Sepharose beads were then washed, boiled in Laemmli buffer and proteins were separated on 6% polyacrylamide gel in nonreducing conditions. The gel was blotted to a nitrocellulose filter that was then saturated with TBS, 5% BSA and incubated over night at 4 °C in TBS 1% BSA containing 10 µg/ml TS2/16 monoclonal antibody to beta 1 integrin. After washing, the filter was incubated with peroxidase conjugated anti-mouse antibody for 2 h at room temperature and detection was performed with chemiluminescent substrate ECL (Amersham).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation of beta 1 Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain Interactors-- To identify muscle proteins able to interact with the beta 1 integrin subunit cytoplasmic domain, we carried out an interaction trap approach (20). We screened a heart neonatal rat library using the entire cytoplasmic region of beta 1A, the ubiquitously expressed isoform, and beta 1D, the muscle-specific isoform, as baits. We obtained 3 different specific interactors for beta 1A and beta 1D. One of the beta 1A interactors was identified as the rat homologues of ICAP-1alpha (Integrin Cytoplasmic Domain-Associated Protein), also called bodenin, and recently described as a beta 1 interacting protein (6, 7). Another protein that we found to weakly interact with beta 1D was RACK-1 (Receptor for Activated Protein Kinase C), a molecule recently described as interactor for beta 1, beta 2 and beta 5 integrin cytoplasmic domains (8, 7).

The most abundantly retrieved cDNA corresponded to an unknown sequence and was isolated once in the beta 1A and 8 times in the beta 1D screening, where it was obtained as two different overlapping cDNA fragments with an open reading frame of 423 nt (D3-2) and 561 nt (D7-2). To verify the specificity of this interaction we tested the ability of the proteins coded by the D3-2 and D7-2 cDNA fragments to bind beta 1A, beta 1D and other unrelated baits (cyclin A, bFGF, c-Myc and bicoid) in a yeast interaction test. Our results showed that D3-2 and D7-2 protein fragments bind specifically and strongly to beta 1A and beta 1D cytoplasmic domains and not to the unrelated baits. We consequently focused our study on this new interactor that we called Melusin.

Isolation of Melusin Full-length cDNA-- Using D3-2 cDNA fragment as probe we isolated human and mouse full-length Melusin cDNAs from human and mouse skeletal muscle libraries. The human clone is 1235 nt in length and conceptual translation of this sequence revealed the presence of an open reading frame of 347 amino acids (GenBankTM AF140690). The mouse cDNA was 1420 nt in length, with an open reading frame coding for 350 amino acids (GenBankTM AF140691), with 92% identity with the human amino acidic sequence. The D3-2 and D7-2 cDNA fragments isolated by the two-hybrid screening were found to code for amino acid residues 211-350 and 164-350 respectively.

Sequence analysis by BLAST homology search (22) revealed no evident homology with any other known protein. Inspection of the sequence indicated the presence at the extreme carboxyl-terminal portion of the molecule of a region highly enriched in aspartic and glutamic acid residues. Analysis by FTHOM domain homology search (22, 28, 29) indicated that this acidic sequence of Melusin closely resembles calreticulin and calsequestrin C-domain, known to bind calcium at high capacity and low affinity (30, 31). At the amino-terminal end, Melusin contains two cysteine rich repeats spaced by an intervening sequence of approximately 90 amino acid residues. The cysteine residues contained in the cysteine repeats are characteristically spaced with a pattern that was not found in other proteins (Fig. 1B). Moreover, four distinct PXXP motifs, representing the minimal consensus sequence recognized by SH3 domains (32, 33) and two YXXI/P sequences, putative binding sites for SH2 domains (34), are scattered in the amino-terminal half of the molecule.


View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Amino acid sequence of Melusin. A, the amino acid sequence was deduced from the full-length human and mouse cDNAs. Identical residues are indicated by vertical bars and conservative substitutions by double dots. The two cysteine-rich domains are underlined, and the acidic amino acid stretch at the extreme carboxyl-terminal is double underlined. PXXP sequences, putative SH3 domain binding motifs, are boxed. YXXI/P sequences, putative SH2 binding sites are shown in dashed line boxes. B, the spacing of cysteine residues in the two cysteine-rich motifs in mouse and human Melusin are indicated.

The chromosomal localization of the Melusin gene was also investigated, both in man and in mouse. Fish analysis clearly showed that the gene is localized on the X chromosome in both species, respectively at Xq12.1-13 and at X band D.

Regulation of Melusin Expression during Myogenic Differentiation-- To investigate the expression of this new gene, poly(A)+ RNA from human and mouse tissues was analyzed by Northern blotting with a Melusin probe. A single transcript of 1.4 kilobases was detected in human skeletal and cardiac muscles, whereas no hybridization occurred in all other tested tissues (Fig. 2A). Identical expression pattern was detected in mouse tissues (not shown). Analysis of the Melusin protein by Western blotting with polyclonal antibodies raised against a GST-Melusin fusion protein confirmed the specific expression in striated muscles (Fig. 2B).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Expression of Melusin is restricted to striated muscle tissue. A, poly(A)+ RNA from different human tissues was hybridized with D3-2 rat probe isolated with the two-hybrid screening as described under "Materials and Methods." A single band of approximately 1.4 kilobases was present only in heart and skeletal muscles. B, protein extracts from newborn mouse tissues were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose filter. The filter was probed with polyclonal antibody raised against a GST-Melusin fusion protein as described under "Materials and Methods." A band of 38 kDa was detected in skeletal muscle and heart.

To evaluate if Melusin expression was regulated during muscle differentiation, we analyzed the C2C12 myogenic cell line that can be induced to differentiate to form myotubes by serum starvation. Melusin expression was tested both by Western and Northern blotting. As shown in Fig. 3A, Melusin was absent in undifferentiated myoblasts, and its expression was turned on in differentiated myotubes after 6 days of serum starvation.


View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Melusin expression is regulated during in vitro and in vivo myogenesis and during muscle regeneration. A, C2C12 mouse myoblasts (0) were allowed to differentiate in serum-free medium for 1 or 6 days. NIH 3T3 fibroblasts were used as negative control. Protein extracts were analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies to Melusin and to beta 1D integrin as marker for differentiation (two upper panels). Total RNA was also extracted and hybridized with the Melusin probe, or stained with ethidium bromide as gel loading control (two lower panels). B, protein extracts (two upper panels) from heart and limb muscles of mouse embryos at 15 (E15) and 17 (E17) days of fetal life, newborn mice (P1), 1-week old (P6), and adult (Ad) mice were analyzed by Western blotting with Melusin polyclonal antibodies. Total RNA was also extracted from limb muscles at different stages of development and analyzed by Northern blotting with Melusin probe. Total RNA stained with ethidium bromide (lower panel) is shown as gel loading control. C, degeneration of tibialis anterior muscle of adult mice was induced by liquid nitrogen freezing, and regeneration was allowed to proceed for 3, 6, 9, and 12 days. The muscles were excised and protein extracts were analyzed by Western blotting for the expression of Melusin with specific polyclonal antibodies. Day 0 (0) is untreated tibialis anterior muscle.

Melusin expression was also examined during mouse embryonic development in vivo. Melusin protein and mRNA became detectable in embryo limbs at day 15 (E15), reached a maximum in newborn mice, and declined in adult limb muscles (Fig. 3B). In adult muscles a doublet of protein bands was detected by Western blotting, suggesting possible posttranslational modifications. During heart development, on the other hand, Melusin level remains steady with no major changes in expression from embryonic day 15 to adult stage.

To investigate if Melusin expression is regulated in regenerating adult muscle, we induced regeneration of mouse tibialis anterior following freeze injury. 3, 6, 9, and 12 days after freeze trauma, muscles were collected and Melusin expression was investigated by Western blot analysis on total protein extracts using normal muscle as control. As shown in Fig. 3C, Melusin is up-regulated from day 6 on during muscle regeneration, consistent with a role of this molecule in myogenetic processes.

Subcellular Localization of Melusin by Immunofluorescence-- Using affinity purified Melusin antibody, we performed immunofluorescence analysis on newborn and adult mouse muscle cryosections. Fluorescence was localized only on skeletal muscle and not in the surrounding tissues, confirming the muscle-specific expression. Longitudinal sections of posterior leg muscles from 1-week old mice clearly revealed a striated pattern of two Melusin rows flanking the alpha -actinin band in the Z disc (Fig. 4). In adult soleus muscle, the striated localization of Melusin was still detectable although to a lower intensity compared with newborn muscles (Fig. 4).


View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Melusin is enriched at costameres. Panels in left column show longitudinal cryosections of 1-week old (P6) mouse limb co-stained with affinity purified Melusin polyclonal antibody and alpha -actinin monoclonal antibody. The two images are superimposed in the lower panel (merge). Soleus muscle from 6-month old mouse was also stained and is shown in panels of right column. Note the striated localization of Melusin and the reduced staining intensity in adult muscle. Scale bar, 10 µm.

Mapping of the beta 1 Integrin-Melusin Interaction Sites with the Two-hybrid Test-- The integrin beta  subunit cytoplasmic domains are highly homologous to each other (3). Using the two-hybrid test, we analyzed whether Melusin was capable of interacting with beta  subunits other than beta 1. Using the protein fragment coded by plasmid D3-2, corresponding to the carboxyl-terminal of Melusin (tail domain) as a bait, interaction occurred with beta 1 but not with beta 2 and beta 3 cytoplasmic domains (Table I). Moreover, no interaction occurred with the integrin alpha 5 cytoplasmic domain used as control (Table I). The beta 1 cytoplasmic domain consists of a 26-amino acid long membrane proximal subdomain common to all known isoforms and of variable carboxyl-terminal subdomains specific for each splicing variant (35). As shown in Table I, the interaction occurred with all three tested isoforms (beta 1A, beta 1B, and beta 1D) suggesting that the interaction involved the common subdomain. To further test this hypothesis, we used a truncated bait consisting only of the common subdomain. As shown in Table I, the common beta 1 subdomain interacted with the tail region of Melusin with an intensity comparable with the one observed for the entire cytoplasmic regions.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Binding of integrin subunit cytoplasmic domains to melusin and its tail domain
Baits consisting of different beta  integrin cytoplasmic domains were used in the two-hybrid system to measure interaction with the D3-2 melusin fragment (coding for the tail domain, amino acid residues 211-350) and the full-length melusin protein. beta 1A, beta 1B and beta 1D are different splicing variant of beta 1 integrin. beta 1Com is a mutant containing the cytoplasmic subdomain common to all splicing variants (35). alpha 5 integrin subunit cytoplasmic domain was used as control.

Different Melusin constructs were also tested for their ability to interact with the beta 1 integrin cytoplasmic domain. As mentioned above, the interaction occurred with preys consisting of the tail domain plus a large fragment of the second cysteine-rich repeat (D7-2) or the tail domain alone (D3-2) (Table II). Further deletion of the acidic amino acid stretch did not affect the interaction, allowing mapping the binding site for the beta 1 integrin in a restricted portion of the Melusin tail domain from amino acid residues 211 to 320 (Table II). Interestingly the full-length Melusin construct showed no interaction (Tables I and II), suggesting that the tail domain is unavailable for binding to beta 1 in the full-length protein.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table II
Interaction of different melusin constructs with beta 1 integrin
Different melusin constructs used are schematized. The ability of the constructs to bind the beta 1 integrin cytoplasmic domain in the two-hybrid test or the intact integrin complexes from COS cell extracts are indicated. nt, not tested.

Binding of Melusin to beta 1 Integrins in Vitro-- To further test the interaction of Melusin with integrin cytoplasmic domains, we performed in vitro binding assays. Either the full-length or a fragment (Cterm), consisting of the second cysteine-rich repeat and the tail domain, were fused to GST and bound to Sepharose beads (see "Materials and Methods" and Table II). When detergent extract of COS cells in Ca2+-containing buffer was incubated with the Sepharose beads, beta 1 integrins bound strongly to the Cterm Melusin fragment but not to the full-length protein. Because Melusin contains a putative Ca2+ binding domain, we investigated whether Ca2+ ions are inhibiting the interaction of the full-length Melusin with beta 1 integrin. As shown in Fig. 5, Ca2+ chelator (EDTA) strongly enhanced binding of Melusin to beta 1 integrin. Interestingly, Ca2+ concentration did not affect binding of the Cterm portion of Melusin to beta 1 integrin (Fig. 5).


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Interaction of Melusin with integrins is Ca2+ dependent. GST fusion proteins containing either the Cterm portion or the full-length Melusin protein (see "Materials and Methods" section and Table II) were bound to glutathione-Sepharose. GST protein alone was used as control. COS cells were detergent-extracted in buffer containing 1 mM CaCl2 or 5 mM EDTA. Cell extracts were incubated with GST fusion protein-Sepharose, and beta 1 integrin binding was determined by Western blot analysis of eluted material. While beta 1 integrin binds to the Cterm region of Melusin both in the presence or absence of Ca2+ ions, binding to the intact Melusin occurred only in the absence of divalent cations.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

In this work we describe a new muscle-specific protein, Melusin, interacting with the cytoplasmic domain of the beta 1 integrin subunit. Melusin is expressed in striated skeletal and cardiac muscles, both at mRNA and protein level, but it is undetectable in all other tested tissues including gut smooth muscle, brain, placenta, lung, liver, kidney, and pancreas. Its expression appears to be regulated during myogenesis both in vitro and in vivo. In fact, Melusin was undetectable in cultured proliferating myoblasts, but it is highly expressed in differentiated myotubes. During in vivo skeletal muscle myogenesis, Melusin starts to be detectable in 15-day old embryos, and its level peaks in newborn mice. In adult skeletal muscle tissue the level of expression slightly declines, and in Western blotting a doublet of bands becomes visible, suggesting that the molecule undergoes post-translational modifications. The doublet of bands could also be indicative of alternatively spliced isoforms of the protein, but reverse transcription PCR analysis of adult and neonatal muscle with primers covering the entire length of the molecule did not reveal the existence of alternatively spliced forms. This conclusion is also supported by the presence of a single band in Northern blot analysis from both newborn and adult mice (see Fig. 3B). The highest expression level of Melusin in skeletal muscle coincides with secondary myogenesis, a process in which a distinct myoblast population line up using primary myotubes as scaffold and fuse to each other forming secondary myotubes that will give rise to the muscle fibers of adult tissue. High level of Melusin expression was also observed in regenerating adult tibialis anterior muscle, further suggesting that Melusin might play a crucial role during maturation and/or organization of muscle cells. A possible role in myoblast fusion seems unlikely because Melusin is also expressed in heart where cardiomyocytes do not undergo cell fusion. The two-hybrid test showed that the tail domain of Melusin binds equally well to the cytoplasmic domain of both beta 1A and beta 1D integrin isoforms. These two isoforms are differentially expressed during muscle development (36). beta 1A is expressed in muscles during embryonic development and is down-regulated after birth. On the other hand, the beta 1D isoform starts to appear in skeletal muscle in 17-day embryos and becomes the only beta 1 isoform in adult muscles. The ability to bind beta 1A and beta 1D integrin isoforms allows Melusin to interact with integrins both in developing and in adult muscles. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that Melusin is localized in rows flanking the Z line containing alpha -actinin. Similar pattern has been described for vinculin (37) and beta 1 integrin (12, 13, 10) and is thought to correspond to sites of lateral interaction of actin with the plasma membrane known as costameres (37, 38). This pattern of localization suggests that Melusin is a component of the actin-integrin junctional complex in muscle.

The amino acid sequence of Melusin revealed four domains. The protein consists of 347 and 350 amino acid residues in man and mouse, respectively, with a 92% identity (96% considering conservative substitutions). A 55-amino acid long domain, containing a unique cysteine-rich motif, is repeated twice in the molecule. These repeats share 42% identity among each other, while the cysteine pattern is conserved. Interestingly, in human Melusin, the first repeat contains an extra cysteine residue immediately adjacent to cysteine 3. This is not a sequence polymorphism or a mutation in our clones because codons coding these double cysteine residues were found in human Melusin cDNA fragments present in the dbEST data base. An intervening sequence of 89-90 amino acid residues is present between the two cysteine-rich regions. The carboxyl-terminal portion of the molecule consists of a tail domain of 143/145 residues and contains a stretch of 18/20 negatively charged amino acids at the extreme carboxyl-terminal. Similar acidic carboxyl-terminal sequences are present in calsequestrin (31) and calreticulin and are shown to bind Ca2+ ions with high capacity and low affinity (30). As detected in the two-hybrid screening, the tail domain was sufficient to bind beta 1 cytoplasmic region, and deletion experiments allowed to exclude a role of the acidic amino acid stretch in this process (see Table II). Interestingly, the full-length Melusin protein was unable to interact with beta 1 cytoplasmic domain in the two-hybrid system (Tables I and II). In vitro binding experiments showed that the interaction of Melusin with integrins is regulated by divalent cations, and it occurs only in the absence of Ca2+ (Table II). It is possible that Ca2+ directly competes for binding to integrins. This, however, is not the case, in fact, the presence of Ca2+ ions did not prevent binding of the truncated Melusin Cterm fragment (see Table II). In addition, the acidic amino acid stretch of Melusin, that it is likely to bind Ca2+ ions, is not required for integrin binding (see Table II). Thus the most likely explanation is that Ca2+ modulates the conformation of Melusin exposing the integrin binding site located in the tail domain. In this model the amino-terminal region of Melusin masks the integrin binding site present in the tail domain of the molecule, and removal of Ca2+ releases this inhibition. These data suggest that Melusin-integrin interaction depends on Ca2+ concentration and can thus be regulated by intracellular alteration of Ca2+ level in response to extracellular stimuli.

Whereas Melusin tail domain is responsible for the interaction with beta 1 integrin, the amino-terminal portion of the molecule can possibly bind to SH3- and SH2-containing proteins, as suggested by the presence of multiple proline-rich motifs and tyrosine phosphorylation sites. These properties suggest that Melusin could be an important molecular link between integrin receptors and cytoskeletal or transducing proteins in muscle cells.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. G. P. Dotto for the generous hospitality in his laboratory in the initial phase of this work and to Drs. A. Zervos and C. Fusco for teaching the technique and all crucial laboratory tips of the two-hybrid screening. We are also indebted to Drs. A. Zervos and R. Brent for sharing a number of important reagents. We thank Dr. F. Di Cunto, Dr. E. Calautti, and Dr. G. Topley for stimulating discussion during the work. The technical help of P. Caudana, M. Isabello, I. Carfora, and L. Cavarretta is gratefully acknowledged.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grants 851 (to G. T.) and E.672 (to M. R.) from Theleton, from the Ministry of University and Scientific Research (to F. A.), from the National Research Council (P. F. Biotecnologie) (to F. A.) and from ASI (Italian Space Agency Grant 98-112).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF140690 and AF140691.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Genetics, Biology and Biochemistry, Via Santena 5 bis, 10126 Torino, Italy. Tel.: 39-011-6706680; Fax: 39-011-6706547; E-mail: brancacc@molinette.unito.it.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; dbEST, data base of expressed sequence tags; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MBP, maltose binding protein; bFGF, bovine fibroblast growth factor; nt, nucleotide(s); DAPI, 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TBS, Tris-buffered saline; TIU, trypsin inhibitory units; BSA, bovine serum albumin; Cterm, carboxyl-terminal.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Reszka, A. A., Hayashi, Y., and Horwitz, A. F. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 117, 1321-1330[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Marcantonio, E. E., Guan, J. L., Trevithick, J. E., and Hynes, R. O. (1990) Cell Regul. 1, 597-604[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Sastry, S. K., and Horwitz, A. F. (1993) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 5, 819-831[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Hemler, M. E. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 578-585[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Hannigan, G. E., Leung-Hagesteijn, C., Fitz-Gibbon, L., Coppolino, M. G., Radeva, G., Filmus, J., Bell, J. C., and Dedhar, S. (1996) Nature 379, 91-96[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Chang, D. D., Wong, C., Smith, H., and Liu, J. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 1149-1157[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Zhang, X. A., and Hemler, M. E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 11-19[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Lilental, J., and Chang, D. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 2379-2383[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Fornaro, M., and Languino, L. R. (1997) Matrix Biol. 16, 185-193[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Belkin, A. M., Zhidkova, N. I., Balzac, F., Altruda, F., Tomatis, D., Maier, A., Tarone, G., Koteliansky, V. E., and Burridge, K. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 132, 211-226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Belkin, A. M., Retta, S. F., Pletjushkina, O. Y., Balzac, F., Silengo, L., Fassler, R., Koteliansky, V. E., Burridge, K., and Tarone, G. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 139, 1583-1595[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Bozyczko, D., Decker, C., Muschler, J., and Horwitz, A. F. (1989) Exp. Cell Res. 183, 72-91[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Swasdison, S., and Mayne, R. (1989) Cell Tissue Res. 257, 537-543[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Volk, T., Fessler, L. I., and Fessler, J. H. (1990) Cell 63, 525-536[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Hirsch, E., Lohikangas, L., Gullberg, D., Hohansson, S., and Fassler, R. (1998) J. Cell Sci. 111, 2397-2409[Abstract]
16. Fassler, R., Rohwedel, J., Maltsev, V., Bloch, W., Lentini, S., Guan, K., Gullberg, D., Hescheler, J., Addicks, K., and Wobus, A. M. (1996) J. Cell Sci. 109, 2989-2999[Abstract]
17. Mayer, U., Saher, G., Fassler, R., Bornemann, A., Echtermeyer, F., von der Mark, H., Miosge, N., Poschl, E., and von der Mark, K. (1997) Nat. Genet. 17, 318-323[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. McDonald, K. A., Lakonishok, M., and Horwitz, A. F. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 2573-2581[Abstract]
19. Martin-Bermudo, M. D., and Brown, N. H. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 134, 217-226[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Gyuris, J., Golemis, E., Chertkov, H., and Brent, R. (1993) Cell 75, 791-803[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Gietz, D., St Jean, A., Woods, R. A., and Schiestl, R. H. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 1425[Free Full Text]
22. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Boguski, M. S., Lowe, T. M., and Tolstoshev, C. M. (1993) Nat. Genet. 4, 332-333[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Chomczynski, P., and Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Zornig, M., Klett, C., Lovec, H., Hameister, H., Winking, H., Adolph, S., and Moroy, T. (1995) Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 71, 37-40[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Lichter, P., Tang Chang, C. J., Call, K., Hermanson, G., Evans, G. A., Housman, D., and Ward, D. C. (1990) Science 247, 64-69[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Toyota, N., and Shimada, Y. (1984) Cell Tissue Res. 236, 549-554[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Hegyi, H., and Pongor, S. (1993) Comput. Appl. Biosci. 9, 371-372[Free Full Text]
29. Bairoch, A., and Boeckmann, B. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3093-3096[Free Full Text]
30. Baksh, S., and Michalak, M. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21458-21465[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Fliegel, L., Ohnishi, M., Carpenter, M. R., Khanna, V. K., Reithmeier, R. A., and MacLennan, D. H. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 1167-1171[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Rickles, R. J., Botfield, M. C., Weng, Z., Taylor, J. A., Green, O. M., Brugge, J. S., and Zoller, M. J. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 5598-5604[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Yu, H., Chen, J. K., Feng, S., Dalgarno, D. C., Brauer, A. W., and Schreiber, S. L. (1994) Cell 76, 933-945[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., et al.. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Retta, S. F., Balzac, F., Ferraris, P., Belkin, A. M., Fassler, R., Humphries, M. J., De Leo, G., Silengo, L., and Tarone, G. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 4, 715-731[Abstract]
36. Brancaccio, M., Cabodi, S., Belkin, A. M., Collo, G., Koteliansky, V. E., Tomatis, D., Altruda, F., Silengo, L., and Tarone, G. (1998) Cell Adhes. Commun. 5, 193-205[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Pardo, J. V., Siliciano, J. D., and Craig, S. W. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 1008-1012[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Koteliansky, V. E., and Gneushev, G. N (1983) FEBS Lett. 159, 158-160[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. E. Hannigan, J. G. Coles, and S. Dedhar
Integrin-Linked Kinase at the Heart of Cardiac Contractility, Repair, and Disease
Circ. Res., May 25, 2007; 100(10): 1408 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
D. W. Donker, J. G. Maessen, F. Verheyen, F. C. Ramaekers, R. L. H. M. G. Spatjens, H. Kuijpers, C. Ramakers, P. M. H. Schiffers, M. A. Vos, H. J. G. M. Crijns, et al.
Impact of acute and enduring volume overload on mechanotransduction and cytoskeletal integrity of canine left ventricular myocardium
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): H2324 - H2332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D. Srivastava and S. Yu
Stretching to meet needs: integrin-linked kinase and the cardiac pump
Genes & Dev., September 1, 2006; 20(17): 2327 - 2331.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. Brancaccio, E. Hirsch, A. Notte, G. Selvetella, G. Lembo, and G. Tarone
Integrin signalling: The tug-of-war in heart hypertrophy
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2006; 70(3): 422 - 433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
M. Hoshijima
Mechanical stress-strain sensors embedded in cardiac cytoskeleton: Z disk, titin, and associated structures
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): H1313 - H1325.
[Abstract] [Full Text]<