JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giusti, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giusti, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29318-29322, October 8, 1999


Requirement of a Src Family Kinase for Initiating Calcium Release at Fertilization in Starfish Eggs*,

Andrew F. GiustiDagger §, David J. Carroll§, Yama A. Abassi§, Mark TerasakiDagger , Kathy R. Foltz§, and Laurinda A. JaffeDagger parallel

From the Dagger  Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, the § Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, and the  Department of Physiology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut 06032

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Signal transduction leading to calcium release in echinoderm eggs at fertilization requires phospholipase Cgamma -mediated production of inositol trisphosphate (IP3), indicating that a tyrosine kinase is a likely upstream regulator. Because previous work has shown a fertilization-dependent association between the Src homology 2 (SH2) domains of phospholipase Cgamma and a Src family kinase, we examined whether a Src family kinase was required for Ca2+ release at fertilization. To inhibit the function of kinases in this family, we injected starfish eggs with the SH2 domains of Src and Fyn kinases. This inhibited Ca2+ release in response to fertilization but not in response to injection of IP3. We further established the specificity of the inhibition by showing that the SH2 domains of several other tyrosine kinases (Abl, Syk, and ZAP-70), and the SH3 domain of Src, were not inhibitory. Also, a point-mutated Src SH2 domain, which has reduced affinity for phosphotyrosine, was a correspondingly less effective inhibitor of fertilization-induced Ca2+ release. These results indicate that a Src family kinase, by way of its SH2 domain, links sperm-egg interaction to IP3-mediated Ca2+ release at fertilization in starfish eggs.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

At fertilization, inositol trisphosphate (IP3)1 releases calcium from the egg's endoplasmic reticulum (1-4), which signals many events including resumption of the cell cycle (5, 6). In echinoderm eggs, the IP3 is produced by phospholipase Cgamma (PLCgamma ), as indicated by the inhibition of Ca2+ release by microinjection of the PLCgamma Src homology 2 (SH2) domains (7, 8, 37). Because PLCgamma is activated by phosphorylation that occurs when its SH2 domains interact with a specific binding site on a tyrosine kinase (9), a tyrosine kinase is a likely upstream regulator. Consistently, tyrosine kinase activity in sea urchin eggs increases by 15 s post-insemination (10), and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein delays Ca2+ release at fertilization (11). In starfish eggs, an increase in tyrosine kinase activity associating with PLCgamma SH2 domains in vitro occurs by 15 s post-insemination (12).

The Src family is among the several tyrosine kinase families thought to participate in activation of PLCgamma , based on studies using cells from mice deficient in the Src family kinase Fyn (13) and on studies using Src inhibitory antibodies (14, 15), as well as on evidence for molecular associations between PLCgamma and Src family kinases (16, 17). Evidence that a Src family kinase might activate PLCgamma at fertilization is provided by the finding that a Src family protein in starfish eggs associates with PLCgamma SH2 domains in vitro by 15 s post-insemination (12).

Progress in understanding the cellular functions of Src family kinases has been limited by the lack of convincingly specific inhibitors. However, it was recently shown that serum stimulation of cell division in fibroblasts was partially inhibited by injection of recombinant SH2 domains of Fyn (18). Injection of SH2 domains of three unrelated enzymes had no effect, indicating that SH2 domain injection is likely to be a specific way to inhibit Src family kinases. In the present study, we establish the specificity of the inhibitory action of Src family kinase SH2 domains and use them to demonstrate a requirement for this kinase family in initiating Ca2+ release at fertilization in starfish eggs.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

GST Fusion Proteins-- GST fusion proteins of SH2 domains from various tyrosine kinases were synthesized in bacteria as described previously (7). DNA encoding the indicated amino acids was obtained as follows. For wild-type chicken cSrc SH2, amino acids 148-246 were amplified from a full-length cSrc cDNA (provided by S. A. Courtneidge, Sugen, Inc., Redwood City, CA) using the polymerase chain reaction and oligonucleotides that introduced the restriction sites BamHI (5') and EcoRI (3'). Amplification products were then cloned in-frame into pGEX2. For the chicken c-Src SH2 R175K mutant, arginine 175 of the SH2 domain was mutated to lysine by primer-mediated mutagenesis using the Transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit (CLONTECH). Chicken cSrc SH3 (amino acids 82-167) and chicken Fyn SH2 (amino acids 148-251) were provided by K. Vuori (The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA). Murine cAbl SH2 (amino acids 120-220) was from B. J. Mayer (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA); human ZAP-70 SH2 (two tandem SH2 domains, amino acids 1-263) was from L. E. Samelson (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD); and rat Syk SH2 (two tandem SH2 domains, amino acids 1-269) was from R. P. Siraganian (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Sequences of all DNA constructs were confirmed by double-strand cycle sequencing by the Iowa State sequencing facility (Ames, IA).

Calcium Measurements-- Experiments were performed as described previously (7) using oocytes and sperm from the starfish Asterina miniata. To measure calcium, the oocytes were injected with calcium green 10-kDa dextran (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). See Ref. 38 for a description of procedures used for quantitative injection. Calcium green fluorescence was measured with a photodiode (71182; Oriel Instruments, Stratford, CT) or imaged with a confocal microscope (MRC600; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). SH2 domain GST fusion proteins were mixed with calcium green dextran, and oocytes were injected with 90 picoliters (3% of their 3100-picoliter volume) to give the indicated cytoplasmic protein concentrations and 10 µM calcium green. 1-5 min later, the oocytes were treated with 1 µM 1-methyladenine to induce meiotic maturation. 50-75 min after injection, when the eggs were at first metaphase, they were inseminated with a 1:20,000 dilution of the sperm suspension from the testis. All experiments were performed at 18 °C. In other experiments (not shown), injections of the Src SH2 protein were made after oocyte maturation, 10-30 min before insemination, with similar results to those shown in Table I.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Inhibition of Ca2+ Release at Fertilization by Src SH2 Domains-- GST fusion proteins comprising the SH2 domains of chicken Src and other vertebrate tyrosine kinases (Fig. 1) were injected into starfish eggs, and fertilization-induced Ca2+ release was monitored using the fluorescent Ca2+ indicator, calcium green dextran. Fertilization of eggs injected with calcium green dextran alone or with control proteins resulted in a small transient Ca2+ rise around the cell cortex, because of the opening of voltage-dependent plasma membrane Ca2+ channels at the time of sperm-egg fusion (Figs. 2A and 3A; see Ref. 19). This Ca2+ action potential was followed ~8 s later by a much larger rise in Ca2+ , which propagated across the egg in a wave, as a result of IP3-mediated Ca2+ release from the egg's endoplasmic reticulum (Figs. 2A and 3A, Table I; see Ref. 7).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   SH2 domain-GST fusion proteins used for microinjection. Proteins (1 µg/lane) were separated on a 10% gel and stained with Coomassie Blue. Molecular weight markers are shown on the left. WT, wild type.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Inhibition of Ca2+ release at fertilization in starfish eggs injected with Src or Fyn SH2 domains. A, Calcium green dextran only, 10 µM. B, Src SH2 domain, 1 mg/ml (cytoplasmic concentration). C, Src SH2, R175K mutation, 1 mg/ml. D, Fyn SH2, 1 mg/ml. E, Abl SH2, 1 mg/ml. Traces show calcium green fluorescence as a function of time. The asterisk in A indicates the action potential. The amplitude of the action potential in eggs from different starfish was variable but was not affected by any of the injected proteins. Arrowheads indicate the time of insemination.


View larger version (115K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Imaging of the inhibition of Ca2+ release at fertilization in a starfish egg injected with Src SH2 domains. A, control, calcium green dextran only, 10 µM. B, Src SH2, 1 mg/ml (cytoplasmic concentration). Confocal images are arranged horizontally at 5-s intervals. Increasing Ca2+ is displayed in pseudocolor: green < yellow < red. The second image in each sequence shows the Ca2+ action potential, which appears as a red rim at the egg surface. Scale bar = 100 µm. In A, the action potential is followed immediately by a propagating wave of Ca2+ release. In B, the action potential is followed by a return to baseline Ca2+ ; 160 s later, Ca2+ rises slightly, as indicated by the red color at the upper right. Small rises in Ca2+ are also seen in subsequent images. Quicktime movies corresponding to these still images show Ca2+ release in control and Src SH2-injected eggs at 30× real time. Each movie is composed of confocal images taken at 5-s intervals (played back at 6 frames/s). For the control, the total duration is 2 min; for SrcSH2, the total duration is 6 min.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Calcium release in starfish eggs injected with SH2 domains
Values for delay indicate the time between the rise of the action potential and the time at which the fluorescence versus time trace started its second rise. Values for peak amplitude are expressed as: change in fluorescence after fertilization/fluorescence of the unfertilized egg × 100. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E. Points marked with asterisks are significantly different from eggs injected with calcium green dextran only (p < 0.01). Data were analyzed using the two-tailed t test (Instat), comparing each set of data in Table I with the complete set of calcium green dextran controls (n = 17). Calcium green dextran controls were done on the same days and with the same starfish as the experimental eggs. Points marked with asterisks were also found to be significantly different from the pooled values for the three control SH2 domain proteins (Abl SH2, Syk SH2, ZAP SH2) (p < 0.01). In addition, data for the delays seen with Src SH2 R175K (1 mg/ml) and with Src SH2 wild type (1 mg/ml) were significantly different (p = 0.02).

In contrast, fertilization of eggs injected with the SH2 domains of Src at an intracellular concentration of 1 mg/ml (25 µM) resulted in a Ca2+ action potential, but the subsequent Ca2+ release was delayed for an average of 3.3 min and reduced in amplitude (Figs. 2B and 3B, Table I). When these eggs were imaged with confocal microscopy, two of six showed a Ca2+ wave that propagated over the entire cell, but this occurred with an increased delay after the Ca2+ action potential. In three of six of these eggs, the Ca2+ action potential was followed by local Ca2+ rises only (Fig. 3B), and in one of six eggs, Ca2+ release after the action potential was not detected. Five of five control eggs showed a normal Ca2+ action potential and Ca2+ wave (Fig. 3A).

Eggs that were fertilized after injection of 1 mg/ml Src SH2 domains showed multiple pronuclei in their cytoplasm, indicating that they were polyspermic (data not shown). The multiple sperm entries may correspond to the multiple rises seen in the Ca2+ traces (Fig. 2B) and the multiple sites of local Ca2+ increase seen in the confocal images (Fig. 3B).

The inhibition of Ca2+ release by Src SH2 domains was concentration-dependent; weaker inhibition was seen with 0.1 mg/ml (2.5 µM) of the Src SH2 domains (Table I). No inhibition of Ca2+ release was seen in eggs injected with 1 mg/ml (25 µM) of the SH3 domain of Src (Table I).

Requirement for an Active Phosphotyrosine Binding Region-- To test whether the inhibition of Ca2+ release at fertilization required the presence of an active phosphotyrosine binding region in the Src SH2 domain, we injected eggs with a point-mutated form of the Src SH2 domain, in which arginine 175 in the phosphotyrosine binding pocket was changed to lysine. This mutation reduces the in vitro association of the v-Src SH2 domain with phosphotyrosyl proteins to 35% of the wild-type SH2 domain (20). Correspondingly, eggs injected with 1 mg/ml R175K Src SH2 domains showed weaker inhibition of Ca2+ release at fertilization compared with the wild-type protein (Fig. 2C and Table I). These results indicate that the inhibition of Ca2+ release by Src SH2 domains requires the ability to bind phosphotyrosine.

Specificity among Different Tyrosine Kinases-- Similar concentration-dependent inhibition of Ca2+ release at fertilization was observed in eggs injected with SH2 domains of another Src family kinase, Fyn (Fig. 2D and Table I). This finding was as expected, because Src and Fyn SH2 domains have similar binding preferences for peptide sequences containing phosphotyrosine (21). In starfish eggs, 2.5 µM Src and Fyn SH2 domains was sufficient to delay Ca2+ release at fertilization and reduce its amplitude. The concentration of Fyn SH2 domains that was used to inhibit serum stimulation of cell division in mammalian fibroblasts is not known precisely but has been estimated to be in a similar range of about 1-2 µM (Ref. 18 and footnote 2).2

Injection of 1 mg/ml SH2 domains of three non-Src-family tyrosine kinases (Abl, Syk, and ZAP-70) did not inhibit Ca2+ release (Fig. 2E and Table I). Like Src and Fyn, Abl has a single SH2 domain, whereas Syk and ZAP-70 have two tandem SH2 domains. All of these SH2 domains are structurally similar (22, 23). Compared with Src and Fyn, the SH2 domains of Abl, Syk, and ZAP-70 share some but not all preferences for phosphotyrosine-containing peptides (21, 23). The lack of any effect on Ca2+ release of these control SH2 domains indicates that the inhibition of Ca2+ release at fertilization is specific for the SH2 domain of Src-family kinases. These results are consistent with the finding that injection of sea urchin eggs with SH2 domains of Fyn, but not Abl, results in polyspermy.3

Lack of Inhibition of IP3-induced Ca2+ Release by Src and Fyn SH2 Domains-- To determine whether the inhibition of Ca2+ release at fertilization was upstream or downstream of IP3 production, we tested whether Src or Fyn SH2 domains inhibited Ca2+ release in response to injection of IP3. These experiments showed no inhibition of IP3-induced Ca2+ release (Fig. 4) even when using an IP3 concentration close to the minimum needed to cause Ca2+ release (24). This result indicates that a Src family kinase acts on an early step in the fertilization signaling pathway, upstream of IP3 production.


View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   No inhibition of Ca2+ release in response to IP3 injection in eggs injected with Src or Fyn SH2 domains. A, Calcium green dextran only, 10 µM; B, Src SH2, 1 mg/ml (cytoplasmic concentration); C, Fyn SH2, 1 mg/ml. 62-93 min after injection of the SH2 domain fusion proteins, the eggs were injected (at the arrows) with 30 picoliters (1% of their volume) of 1 µM IP3 (concentration in the pipette). Ca2+ release occurred immediately upon injection of IP3. The peak Ca2+ rise was 72 ± 5% (mean ± S.E., n = 6) over baseline for control eggs injected with calcium green dextran only, 63 ± 4% (n = 3) for Src SH2-injected eggs, and 58 ± 4% (n = 3) for Fyn SH2-injected eggs. These values are not statistically different from control values (two-tailed t test, Instat).


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have used the SH2 domains of Src family kinases to specifically inhibit the cellular function of these kinases and to demonstrate a requirement for their function in initiating Ca2+ release at fertilization of starfish eggs. Evidence for the specificity of the inhibitory action of the SH2 domains is as follows. 1) Src and Fyn SH2 domains have similar effects, as expected from their similar phosphopeptide binding specificities. 2) The SH2 domains of three other tyrosine kinases with similar protein structure but different phosphopeptide binding specificities (Abl, Syk, ZAP-70) have no effect. 3) A point-mutated Src SH2 domain with reduced ability to bind phosphotyrosine has a correspondingly reduced inhibitory effect. 4) Injection of a downstream component of the pathway (IP3) bypasses the inhibition. Based on our results, Src family SH2 domains are among the best characterized means available to investigate the requirement of these proteins for cellular functions.

Although our results demonstrate that a Src family kinase is required for Ca2+ release at fertilization, it is not known which particular Src family kinase is involved and whether the function of the Src family protein depends on its kinase activity. The function of Src family proteins does not always depend on their kinase activity (25-27), suggesting that in some cases they function as adapter proteins. In sea urchin eggs, the kinase activity immunoprecipitated by antibodies directed against mammalian Fyn was found to increase by 5 min post-insemination (28). No significant increase was detected at earlier time points preceding Ca2+ release, but local activation of a kinase at the site of fertilization might produce only a small increase, below the limit of the method of detection. Alternatively, the primary role of the kinase activity associating with these particular antibodies may occur in later events. Only one Src family kinase present in echinoderm eggs has been cloned and sequenced (29). Characterization of which Src family kinases are present in echinoderm eggs will allow determination of which if any are activated within the first minute after fertilization.

Directly or indirectly, the target of the Src family kinase in the signaling pathway at fertilization is very likely phospholipase Cgamma , because PLCgamma is necessary for Ca2+ release at fertilization in starfish and sea urchin eggs (7, 8, 37) and because PLCgamma is activated by tyrosine phosphorylation (9). In vitro, PLCgamma SH2 domains associate with a 58-kDa protein in fertilized starfish egg lysates, which is recognized by a vertebrate Src family kinase antibody (12). This association is not seen in unfertilized egg lysates but is detected by 15 s post-insemination. A Src family kinase might activate PLCgamma by directly phosphorylating it (16, 17), or alternatively, the Src family kinase might be coupled to PLCgamma activation by intermediate kinases and/or adapter proteins as in T cell receptor signaling (30). As noted above, the Src family kinase might itself be an adapter protein (25-27).

As in echinoderms (11), tyrosine kinase inhibitors also inhibit or delay Ca2+ release at fertilization in vertebrate eggs (31, 32). However, only general chemical tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been used, for which the specificity is uncertain. Signaling at fertilization of mammalian eggs appears to differ somewhat from that in echinoderms, because although the IP3 receptor is required for Ca2+ release (4), the Ca2+ release is not inhibited by PLCgamma SH2 domains (33).

What upstream events in starfish fertilization might involve the SH2 domain of a Src family kinase? One possibility is suggested by findings in other cells that receptor cross-linking can lead to Src activation; this can occur by way of the tyrosine phosphorylation of Fak family kinases, which provides a high affinity binding site for the SH2 domain of Src (34). Similarly, receptor cross-linking at the site where the sperm contacts the egg surface could result in an SH2-dependent activation of a Src family kinase at fertilization. Alternatively, because sperm and egg cytoplasm and membranes intermix following fusion, signaling components might interact in novel ways. Components from sperm can cause Ca2+ release when injected into eggs (35, 36), suggesting that a factor in sperm might activate an egg Src family kinase, leading to PLCgamma activation and initiation of Ca2+ release. Identification of molecules in eggs or sperm that associate with Src family SH2 domains during fertilization will help to elucidate how the contact and fusion of eggs and sperm initiates embryonic development.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

DNA constructs were generously provided by the colleagues listed under "Experimental Procedures." We are happy to acknowledge useful discussions with W. H. Kinsey, L. M. Mehlmann, W. T. Miller, S. Roche, L. L. Runft, S. S. Shen, and C. Vandenberg, and technical assistance from B. Hinkle, K. M. Hoang, and D. R. Serwanski.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by a summer research fellowship from the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA (to A. F. G.), a grant from the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation (to M. T.), a grant from the National Science Foundation (to K. R. F.), and grants from the National Institutes of Health (to D. J. C., K. R. F., and L. A. J.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains two Quicktime movies.

parallel To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology, MC3505, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06032. Tel.: 860-679-2661; Fax: 860-679-1661; E-mail: ljaffe@neuron.uchc.edu.

2 S. Roche, personal communication.

3 W. H. Kinsey, personal communication.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: IP3, inositol trisphosphate; SH2, Src homology 2; PLCgamma , phospholipase Cgamma .

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Whitaker, M., and Irvine, R. F. (1984) Nature 312, 636-639[CrossRef]
2. Ciapa, B., and Whitaker, M. (1986) FEBS Lett. 195, 347-351[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Mohri, T., Ivonnet, P. I., and Chambers, E. L. (1995) Dev. Biol. 172, 139-157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Miyazaki, S., Yuzaki, M., Nakada, K., Shirakawa, H., Nakanishi, S., Nakade, S., and Mikoshiba, K. (1992) Science 257, 251-255[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Steinhardt, R. A., and Epel, D. (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 71, 1915-1919[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Kline, D., and Kline, J. T. (1992) Dev. Biol. 149, 80-89[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Carroll, D. J., Ramarao, C. S., Mehlmann, L. M., Roche, S., Terasaki, M., and Jaffe, L. A. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 1303-1311[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Carroll, D. J., Albay, D. T., Terasaki, M., Jaffe, L. A., and Foltz, K. R. (1999) Dev. Biol. 206, 232-247[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Rhee, S. G., and Bae, Y. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15045-15048[Free Full Text]
10. Ciapa, B., and Epel, D. (1991) FEBS Lett. 295, 167-170[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Shen, S. S., Kinsey, W. H., and Lee, S. J. (1999) Dev. Growth Differ. 41, 345-355[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Giusti, A. F., Carroll, D. J., Abassi, Y. A., and Foltz, K. R. (1999) Dev. Biol. 208, 189-199[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Melford, S. K., Turner, M., Briddon, S. J., Tybulewicz, V. L. J., and Watson, S. P. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27539-27542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Dhar, A., and Shukla, S. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9123-9127[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Marrero, M. B., Schieffer, B., Paxton, W. G., Schieffer, E., and Bernstein, K. E. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15734-15738[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Nakanishi, O., Shibasaki, F., Hidaka, M., Homma, Y., and Takenawa, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10754-10759[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Liao, F., Shin, H. S., and Rhee, S. G. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 191, 1028-1033[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Roche, S., Fumagalli, S., and Courtneidge, S. A. (1995) Science 269, 1567-1569[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. McCulloh, D. H., and Chambers, E. L. (1992) J. Gen. Physiol. 99, 137-175[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Tian, M., and Martin, G. S. (1996) Oncogene 12, 727-734[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Songyang, Z., and Cantley, L. C. (1995) Trends Biochem. Sci. 20, 470-475[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Waksman, G., Kominos, D., Robertson, S. C., Pant, N., Baltimore, D., Birge, R. B., Cowburn, D., Hanafusa, H., Mayer, B. J., Overduin, M., Resh, M. D., Rios, C. B., Silverman, L., and Kuriyan, J. (1992) Nature 358, 646-653[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Hatada, M. H., Lu, X., Laird, E. R., Green, J., Morgenstern, J. P., Lou, M., Marr, C. S., Phillips, T. B., Ram, M. K., Theriault, K., Zoller, M. J., and Karas, J. L. (1995) Nature 377, 32-38[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Chiba, K., Kado, R. T., and Jaffe, L. A. (1990) Dev. Biol. 140, 300-306[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Kaplan, K. B., Swedlow, J. R., Morgan, D. O., and Varmus, H. E. (1995) Genes & Dev. 9, 1505-1517[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Schwartzberg, P. L., Xing, L., Hoffmann, O., Lowell, C. A., Garrett, L., Boyce, B. F., and Varmus, H. E. (1997) Genes & Dev. 11, 2835-2844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Fincham, V. J., and Frame, M. C. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 81-92[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Kinsey, W. H. (1996) Dev. Biol. 174, 281-287[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Onodera, H., Kobari, K., Sakuma, M., Sato, M., Suyemitsu, T., and Yamasu, K. (1999) Dev. Growth Differ. 41, 19-28[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Finco, T. S., Kadlecek, T., Zhang, W., Samelson, L. E., and Weiss, A. (1998) Immunity 9, 617-626[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Dupont, G., McGuinness, O. M., Johnson, M. H., Berridge, M. J., and Borgese, F. (1996) Biochem. J. 316, 583-591
32. Glahn, D., Mark, S. D., Behr, R. K., and Nuccitelli, R. (1999) Dev. Biol. 205, 171-180[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Mehlmann, L. M., Carpenter, G., Rhee, S. G., and Jaffe, L. A. (1998) Dev. Biol. 203, 221-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Parsons, J. T., and Parsons, S. J. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 187-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Dale, B., DeFelice, L. J., and Ehrenstein, G. (1985) Experientia 41, 1068-1070[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Kyozuka, K., Deguchi, R., Mohri, T., and Miyazaki, S. (1998) Development 125, 4099-4105[Abstract]
37. Shearer, J., De Nadai, C., Emily-Fenouil, F., Gache, C., Whitaker, M., and Ciapa, B. (1999) Development 126, 2273-2284[Abstract]
38. Kiehart, D. P. (1982) Methods Cell Biol. 25, 13-31


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
A.K.M. Mahbub Hasan, Z. Ou, K. Sakakibara, S. Hirahara, T. Iwasaki, K.-i. Sato, and Y. Fukami
Characterization of Xenopus egg membrane microdomains containing uroplakin Ib/III complex: roles of their molecular interactions for subcellular localization and signal transduction.
Genes Cells, February 1, 2007; 12(2): 251 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. Meng, J. Luo, C. Li, and W. H Kinsey
Role of Src homology 2 domain-mediated PTK signaling in mouse zygotic development.
Reproduction, September 1, 2006; 132(3): 413 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
M. Whitaker
Calcium at Fertilization and in Early Development
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2006; 86(1): 25 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
L. M Mehlmann and L. A Jaffe
SH2 domain-mediated activation of an SRC family kinase is not required to initiate Ca2+ release at fertilization in mouse eggs
Reproduction, May 1, 2005; 129(5): 557 - 564.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
F. J. O'Neill, J. Gillett, and K. R. Foltz
Distinct roles for multiple Src family kinases at fertilization
J. Cell Sci., December 1, 2004; 117(25): 6227 - 6238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
M. Kurokawa, K.-i. Sato, J. Smyth, H. Wu, K. Fukami, T. Takenawa, and R. A Fissore
Evidence that activation of Src family kinase is not required for fertilization-associated [Ca2+]i oscillations in mouse eggs
Reproduction, April 1, 2004; 127(4): 441 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A Talmor-Cohen, R Tomashov-Matar, E Eliyahu, R Shapiro, and R Shalgi
Are Src family kinases involved in cell cycle resumption in rat eggs?
Reproduction, April 1, 2004; 127(4): 455 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K.-i. Sato, A. A. Tokmakov, C.-L. He, M. Kurokawa, T. Iwasaki, M. Shirouzu, R. A. Fissore, S. Yokoyama, and Y. Fukami
Reconstitution of Src-dependent Phospholipase C{gamma} Phosphorylation and Transient Calcium Release by Using Membrane Rafts and Cell-free Extracts from Xenopus Eggs
J. Biol. Chem., October 3, 2003; 278(40): 38413 - 38420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
B. J. Tunquist and J. L. Maller
Under arrest: cytostatic factor (CSF)-mediated metaphase arrest in vertebrate eggs
Genes & Dev., March 15, 2003; 17(6): 683 - 710.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K.-i. Sato, T. Iwasaki, K. Ogawa, M. Konishi, A. A. Tokmakov, and Y. Fukami
Low density detergent-insoluble membrane of Xenopus eggs: subcellular microdomain for tyrosine kinase signaling in fertilization
Development, March 4, 2003; 129(4): 885 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Wu, J. Smyth, V. Luzzi, K. Fukami, T. Takenawa, S. L. Black, N. L. Allbritton, and R. A. Fissore
Sperm Factor Induces Intracellular Free Calcium Oscillations by Stimulating the Phosphoinositide Pathway
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2001; 64(5): 1338 - 1349.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
L. Runft and L. Jaffe
Sperm extract injection into ascidian eggs signals Ca(2+) release by the same pathway as fertilization
Development, January 8, 2000; 127(15): 3227 - 3236.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. F. Giusti, W. Xu, B. Hinkle, M. Terasaki, and L. A. Jaffe
Evidence That Fertilization Activates Starfish Eggs by Sequential Activation of a Src-like Kinase and Phospholipase Cgamma
J. Biol. Chem., May 26, 2000; 275(22): 16788 - 16794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giusti, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giusti, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jaffe, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics