![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29381-29389, October 8, 1999
From the G protein-coupled receptor kinases
(GRKs) desensitize G protein-coupled receptors by phosphorylating
activated receptors. The six known GRKs have been classified into three
subfamilies based on sequence and functional similarities. Examination
of the mouse GRK4 subfamily (GRKs 4, 5, and 6) suggests that mouse GRK4
is not alternatively spliced in a manner analogous to human or rat
GRK4, whereas GRK6 undergoes extensive alternative splicing to generate
three variants with distinct carboxyl termini. Characterization of the
mouse GRK 5 and 6 genes reveals that all members of the GRK4 subfamily
share an identical gene structure, in which 15 introns interrupt the
coding sequence at equivalent positions in all three genes.
Surprisingly, none of the three GRK subgroups (GRK1, GRK2/3, and
GRK4/5/6) shares even a single intron in common, indicating that these
three subfamilies are distinct gene lineages that have been maintained
since their divergence over 1 billion years ago. Comparison of the
amino acid sequences of GRKs from various mammalian species indicates
that GRK2, GRK5, and GRK6 exhibit a remarkably high degree of sequence
conservation, whereas GRK1 and particularly GRK4 have accumulated amino
acid changes at extremely rapid rates over the past 100 million years.
The divergence of individual GRKs at vastly different rates reveals that strikingly different evolutionary pressures apply to the function
of the individual GRKs.
The G protein-coupled receptor kinases
(GRKs)1 are a family of six
serine/threonine protein kinases characterized by their ability to
phosphorylate and desensitize agonist-occupied cell surface G
protein-coupled receptor proteins (1, 2). There is increasing
functional evidence that these kinases can be segregated into three
distinct subfamilies: GRK1 (rhodopsin kinase), GRK2-like (GRKs 2 and
3), and GRK4-like (GRKs 4, 5, and 6).
Although the GRK4-like kinases were initially identified through their
similarity to GRK2, close examination reveals that the highest sequence
similarity is clustered within the central protein kinase catalytic
domain. There is considerable sequence divergence among the six GRKs in
the regulatory amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains, which correlates
with differences in regulation among the three kinase subfamilies. Thus
GRK2-like kinases are translocated to the plasma membrane following
receptor activation by interaction of the carboxyl-terminal
pleckstin homology domain with G protein We have cloned the cDNAs encoding mouse GRKs 4, 5, and 6, and the
genes for mouse GRK5 and 6. In this paper, we show that GRK4
alternative splicing is not conserved across species, whereas GRK6
alternative splicing is conserved in several species. Further, the
conservation in gene organization within the GRK4 subfamily strongly
supports the functional classification of these GRKs into a distinct
subgroup. However, the amino acid sequences of the three individual
GRKs in this subgroup appear to be evolving at vastly different rates.
Materials--
Restriction enzymes and thermostable polymerases
were from Promega. TA cloning kit was from Invitrogen. Random-prime
label reagents were from New England Biolabs. Nucleotides were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals, and radioisotopes from NEN Life Science
Products. General laboratory chemicals were from Sigma.
Genomic Library Screening--
A mouse 129/SVJ genomic library
in Cloning of Mouse GRK cDNAs--
Mouse GRK cDNA sequences
were obtained by amplification of mouse tissue first strand cDNA
using degenerate oligonucleotide primers (10). Oligo(dT)-primed first
strand cDNA was synthesized from mouse brain and testis poly(A) RNA
(CLONTECH) as described previously (11).
Amplification reactions were performed in 100 µl of volume containing
1× polymerase buffer (Promega), 1.5 mM MgCl2,
200 µM of each dNTP, 500 nM of each primer,
and 10 ng of first strand cDNA. Reactions were heated to 95 °C
for 5 min and initiated by addition of 2.5 units of polymerase to each
tube, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C for 1 min,
and 72 °C for 3 min. The polymerase used was a mixture of
Taq and Tli polymerases (Promega), mixed 40:1 by
units. The amino-terminal and catalytic domain sequences were obtained
using a forward primer (5'-CGAGGCCATGGARCTIGARAAYATIGTIGC)2
based on the highly conserved amino acid sequence MELENIVA at the
extreme 5' end of GRKs 4, 5, and 6, whereas the reverse primer (5'-GCCCTTCTCGAGGACYTCIGGIGCCATRWAICC) was based on the
conserved catalytic domain sequence of all known GRKs, GYMAPEV
(5). Appropriate size products were subcloned and sequenced. Brain
cDNA yielded GRK5 and GRK6 sequences, whereas testis cDNA
yielded the GRK4 sequence. The extreme 5' coding region and
5'-untranslated region sequences of GRK5 and GRK6 were obtained by two
rounds of amplification from nested gene-specific antisense primers and
the CLONTECH RACE anchor primer
(5'-CTGGTTCGGCCCACCTCTGAAGGTTCCAGAATCGATAG) using mouse brain 5'
RACE-ready cDNA (CLONTECH) as template. The
GRK5 primers used were: 1° rxn, 5'-CTTTGGAGTGAGGTACTTGGTCAT, and 2° rxn, 5'-CACTAAGTCCAGGAACTGAATGTA. The GRK6 primers were: 1° rxn, 5'-CGTGTGGCTCAGAAAGTTCTGCAT, and 2° rxn, 5'-CACCCCATCCAGGGAGGCAGTACA. DNA bands were subcloned into pCR2.1 (Invitrogen). The
carboxyl-terminal coding regions were obtained using gene-specific
forward primers (GRK5, 5'-AAGTTCTCCGAGGAGGCCAAG, and GRK6,
5'-GATCTAAAGCCAGAGAATATCCTT), and reverse primers were based on the
carboxyl-terminal sequences of bovine GRK5
(5'-AGGCCAGTCGACTCACTAGCTGCTTCCGGTGGAGTTTGA) and of
human GRK6 (5'-TCGGGCGAATTCCTAGAGGCGGGTGGGGAG). The
3'-untranslated region sequences were obtained by amplification
using primers based on partial sequences deposited in the EST data base
(GRK4, EST AA110341,
5'-ACCAAGTCTAGACTCTGTGGTCTGCACAGTGAATGG; GRK5, EST W91298,
5'-CCAGAGTCTAGACTAGC-TGCTTCCAGTGGAGTTTGA; GRK6(A/B), EST
AA244873, 5'-CCAGTGGCTGAGGAACGGAGGACA; GRK6(C), EST AA103881, 5'-CTCTGTCCATCCCCCTGGACAGAC). EST sequences were obtained using BLAST (12) to identify sequences with similarity to known GRKs. All
DNAs were sequenced on both strands as described above and also were
compared with genomic exon sequences.
Northern Blotting--
Mouse multiple tissue and whole embryonic
Northern blots were obtained from CLONTECH. Total
RNAs were isolated from mouse testes at various ages after birth (10).
5 µg of testes total RNAs were separated on 1% agarose/formaldehyde
gels and transferred to nitrocellulose filters (10). Blots were
hybridized in ExpressHyb buffer (CLONTECH), and
washed at high stringency following the manufacturer's protocol.
Amino-terminal probes (200-300 bp) for each of mouse GRKs 4, 5, and 6, as well as a GRK6C-specific 3'-untranslated region probe, were
amplified from mouse cDNAs and subcloned into the pCRII vector
(Invitrogen). Insert DNAs were gel purified and radiolabeled with
[ Mouse Genomic Localization--
Genomic localization was
determined by single strand conformational polymorphism analysis (13)
using genomic DNAs from the European Collaborative Interspecific Mouse
Backcross panel (14). Primer pairs were chosen to amplify intronic
regions containing potentially polymorphic sequences. The primer
pair for GRK4 (5'-GGTTTCTATTGCTACCAAGAGACAT; 5'-TGCACCAAACCCTGGACTAAGCAT) amplified a 410-bp region within intron F. The primer pair for mouse GRK5 (5'-ACCTATGCCTCCCTTTCTATTCTC; 5'-TTACAACTTCTCCCATCCCAGTGT) amplified a 174-bp region of intron D. The
primer pair for mouse GRK6 (5'-CACATTCGGATCTCGGACCTGGGA; 5'-CTCACAGGCCCACCCAGTCCTAGG) amplified a 350-bp region including exon IX and intron K which contains a GT repeat. 10 ng of individual Mus musculus (C57Bl/6) × Mus spretus
backcross mouse genomic DNA (14) was amplified in a 20-µl reaction
containing buffer and nucleotides as above, but with 1 µM
of each primer and 2 µCi of [ Phylogenetic Analysis--
Protein sequences corresponding to
all known mammalian GRKs, and to those from Drosophila
melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, were obtained
from the GenBankTM and SwissProt data bases using BLAST
(12) and aligned using ClustalX. The resulting alignment was used as
the framework to align the cDNA sequences encoding these protein
sequences. These two alignments were then used for subsequent
inferences of phylogenetic relationships.
For proteins, trees were calculated using the NJ method (with bootstrap
resampling of 1000 subreplicates) and, independently, using maximum
parsimony (PROTPARS) in the PHYLIP (16) suite of programs. For DNA
sequences, the alignment was used directly in the NJ method, a maximum
likelihood method (DNAML), and was also used to calculate a distance
matrix (DNADIST), which was used in the Fitch-Margoliash least squares
methods (with and without clock assumptions). All of the trees produced
were unrooted. Tree topologies were drawn with DRAWGRAM. Pairwise
identities between proteins or nucleic acid sequences were computed
during multiple alignment.
Mouse GRK4, 5, and 6 cDNAs--
To examine the GRK4 subfamily
in a single species, the mouse GRK4, GRK5, and GRK6 cDNA and gene
sequences were determined. The deduced amino acid sequences of mouse
GRK4, GRK5, and GRK6 are shown in Fig.
1A.
Mouse GRK4 is 574 amino acids in length, with a predicted mass of 66.8 kDa. This mouse GRK sequence is only 77% identical to human GRK4, a
degree of homology low enough to raise the possibility that this might
represent a novel GRK4-like sequence. However, gene mapping and
Northern blotting experiments (see below) indicate that this sequence
does represent the mouse GRK4 homolog. Mouse GRK4 retains a single
carboxyl-terminal domain cysteine residue (Cys560) as a
potential site for palmitoylation, in contrast to the two potential
sites in human GRK4 (6). Human GRK4 mRNA and protein has been shown
to exist in four forms, which arise from the alternative splicing of
exons II and XV (6), whereas rat GRK4 has been reported to undergo
distinct alternative splicing of exons VI, VII, and XIV (17).
Amplification of the amino-terminal, central, and carboxyl-terminal
domains of the GRK4 cDNA from mouse testis cDNA and isolated
mouse germ cell cDNA yielded only single product bands (data not
shown), evidence that alternative splicing of the mouse GRK4 mRNA
is not prominent. Mouse GRK4 appears to exist as only a single form,
equivalent to the longest (
Mouse GRK5 is 590 amino acids in length, with a predicted size of 67.6 kDa. This mouse GRK5 sequence is 99% identical to rat and 95%
identical to human and bovine GRK5. Mouse GRK5 retains the major
autophosphorylation sites (Ser503-Thr504)
localized in bovine and human GRK5 (5, 18), as well as the presumed
protein kinase C sites (Ser566 and Ser572)
found in human GRK5 (19). Mouse GRK5 contains an amino-terminal phosphatidylinositol binding polybasic region
(K22RKGKSKK) (7), as well as a
carboxyl-terminal region rich in basic and serine residues (5).
GRK6 has recently been reported to exist as two splice variants in the
rat, called GRK6A and GRK6B (20). Rat GRK6A and B differ in the
sequence of the extreme carboxyl-terminal region, where the addition of
2 bp in the type B mRNA leads to a shift in the reading frame.
Amplification of mouse GRK6 cDNA sequences using both an extreme
carboxyl-terminal primer and a 3'-untranslated region primer led to the
identification of these two variants of the mouse GRK6 cDNA as well
(Fig. 1B). In addition, searches of the
GenBankTM EST data base confirmed the presence of mouse EST
sequences encoding GRK6A and B variants, as well as a third GRK6
variant we call GRK6C (Fig. 1B). Mouse GRK6C appears to
arise from the use of a novel last exon (see below) that encodes only a
single amino acid, arginine, before the termination codon.
Mouse GRK6A has 576 residues and a predicted size of 65.9 kDa, mouse
GRK6B has 589 residues and a size of 67.0 kDa, and mouse GRK6C has 560 residues and a calculated size of 64.2 kDa. The mouse GRK6 sequences
are 99% identical to rat and 97% identical to human GRK6. All
variants of mouse GRK6 retain the Thr504 residue in the
autophosphorylation region, although this site appears not to
autophosphorylate in human GRK6 (21). The sequence of the mouse GRK6A
carboxyl-terminal region (17 residues) is identical to those of rat and
human and contains the three carboxyl-terminal cysteine residues that
are the sites of palmitoylation (22). The sequence of the GRK6B variant
carboxyl-terminal region (30 residues) has only one conservative
difference with that of rat (Arg570 to Lys) and has five
differences with the equivalent region of human GRK6B (Fig.
1B). Mouse GRK6B contains a consensus protein kinase A
phosphorylation site at Ser573, which is also conserved in
rat and human sequences. Like mouse GRK6C, rat and human GRK6C also end
with a single arginine residue (Fig. 1B). The type C variant
has a truncated carboxyl-terminal region compared with GRK6 A or B and
lacks both the sites of palmitoylation in GRK6A and the consensus
cAMP-dependent protein kinase site found in GRK6B.
Tissue Distribution of GRK mRNAs in the Mouse--
Because of
the quite low similarity of the mouse GRK4 sequence with human GRK4, we
were unsure whether this represented a novel GRK4-like kinase.
Therefore, we documented the pattern of the expression of this mRNA
in adult tissues and during embryonic development in the mouse, along
with those of the more highly conserved GRK5 and GRK6 homologs (Fig.
2A). Hybridization of mouse Northern blots with probes specific for each of GRKs 4-6 shows the
distinct patterns of expression for each previously described in other
species (1, 2). GRK6 is widely expressed at high levels, GRK5 is highly
expressed in the heart and lung with widespread low expression, and
GRK4 expression is quite high but confined to the testis, as expected
from the distribution of human GRK4 mRNA (6, 23, 24). Further,
probing the mouse tissue Northern blot with a human GRK4 probe revealed
hybridization only to a testis mRNA species of the same size (data
not shown). In the developing embryo, GRK6 mRNA is highly expressed
at all stages of development. GRK4 mRNA expression is not detected
in the developing embryo. Finally, although it appears that GRK5
mRNA is most prevalent in the day 7 embryo, these samples contain
placenta,3 a tissue that has
previously been shown to express high levels of GRK5 (25).
Because the GRK4 mRNA is readily apparent in testis RNA from adults
but is not detected in whole embryo RNA, RNAs isolated from mouse
testes at various ages after birth were blotted and hybridized to mouse
GRK4 probe (Fig. 2B). No GRK4 hybridization is apparent
until after post-partum day 16. GRK4 mRNA is expressed at high
levels from day 18 after birth, and expression continues through
adulthood. In contrast, GRK2 mRNA is present at a low level in the
testis at all times examined (data not shown). In the development of
the testis in mouse, day 18 marks the first appearance of secondary
spermatocytes and round spermatids (26). From the timing of the onset
of GRK4 mRNA accumulation, it appears that GRK4 gene transcription
is initiated in the developing male germ cells during the late
pachytene stage in spermatocytes, just prior to the first meiotic
division (26, 27). The GRK4 protein has been reported to be present in
mature sperm cells, and the GRK4 mRNA has been observed in a
spermatogonial cell line by Northern blotting and in spermatocytes and
spermatids by RNA in situ hybridization (17, 23).
The tissue distribution of mRNA encoding the GRK6C variant was
examined using a probe specific for this form (Fig. 2C).
Specific hybridization to a 3.8-kb mRNA band was observed in all
tissues, but at a quite low level that required a much longer exposure compared with the "common" GRK6 probe (compare Fig. 2A).
Interestingly, the levels of GRK6C mRNA appear relatively high in
the day 11 and day 15 mouse embryo, suggesting that this variant may be
developmentally regulated. Because of the overlapping nature of exons
16A and 16B (Ref. 20 and see below), mRNAs encoding the GRK6A and B variants cannot be distinguished by Northern blotting.
GRK Gene Localization in Mouse--
To further confirm that the
mouse GRK4 sequence represents the homolog of human GRK4, this gene was
mapped to 20 centimorgans from the centromere of chromosome 5, near the
D5MIT75 marker (Fig. 3). This is
consistent with the known location of the GRK4 gene, because GRK4 was
identified by positional cloning at human chromosome band 4p16.3 in the
search for the Huntington's disease locus, and the GRK4 gene lies
immediately adjacent to the Huntington's disease gene in both the
human and mouse genomes (24, 28, 29).
The mouse GRK5 gene maps to 52 centimorgans from the centromere of
chromosome 19, in a position indistinguishable from the d19MIT1 marker
(Fig. 3). This is within a region of synteny with human chromosome 10, band q25, and in agreement with the localization of the GRK5 gene to
human chromosome interval 10q24-qter (30). The GRK5 locus is near the
genes for the mouse
Mouse GRK6 gene maps to 45 centimorgans from the centromere of
chromosome 13, between the d13MIT21 and d13MIT47 markers (Fig. 3). Most
genes within this area of the mouse genome map to human band 5q13
(adenylyl cyclase 2 at 41 centimorgans, sodium/hydrogen exchanger 3 at
43 centimorgans, dopamine transporter at 46 centimorgans, and rasA at
47 centimorgans). However, the sodium/hydrogen exchanger 2 gene also
maps to 45 centimorgans in the mouse and to human band 5q35. Thus the
GRK6 and NHE2 genes appear to be in a small region of synteny with
human chromosome 5, band 5q35, that is within a larger region of
synteny with human region 5q13. The GRK6 gene in human has been
previously localized to human chromosome band 5q35 (30). A human
GRK6-like pseudogene has also been localized to human chromosome band
13pter-q21 (30, 31). Rodents appear to have no GRK6-like pseudogene
(data not shown and Ref. 20).
Comparative Organization of the GRK4/5/6 Genes--
The mouse GRK5
gene consists of 16 exons separated by 15 introns (Fig.
4A and Table
I). All splice junctions conform to the GT-AG consensus. The lengths of the four largest introns (A, B, C, and
D) have not been determined, because phage containing the flanking
exons did not overlap; however, the GRK5 gene extends over more than 80 kb in the genome. For the 11 fully sequenced introns within the mouse
GRK5 gene, only three are less than 1 kb in length.
The GRK6 gene consists of 16 exons separated by 15 introns, as
summarized in Fig. 4B and Table
II. Only two GRK6 introns are significantly greater than 1 kb (introns A and M), and nine are less
than 350 bp. Thus, the GRK6 gene is comparatively compact and extends
over less than 20 kb of genomic DNA. The alternatively spliced exons
16A, 16B, and 16C are all found in the proper region of the GRK6 locus
(Fig. 4, B and C). Exon 16A uses a canonical 3'
splice site and leads to the addition of 17 amino acid residues prior
to termination. Exon 16B uses a nonconventional 3' splice site
(underlined in Table II) that is shifted 2 bp upstream from the
canonical 3' splice site of exon 16A, leading to an alteration of the
reading frame and the addition of a further 30 amino acids, as noted
for rat GRK6B (20). All other splice junctions in the GRK6 gene conform
to the GT-AG consensus. Exon 16C arises from the use of a canonical 3'
splice site adjoining exon 16C, 451 bp upstream from exons 16A/B (Fig.
4C). Analysis of the rat GRK6 gene intron O sequence
amplified by Firsov and Elalouf (20) and of the human GRK6 gene intron
O sequence amplified from human genomic DNA using primers in the
flanking exons 15 and 16A/B indicates that a potential exon 16C
encoding a single arginine residue before a stop codon resides within a
150-bp region of high sequence conservation in the cognate positions in
the rat and human GRK6 genes (data not shown). The use of this putative
exon 16C in spliced mouse and human GRK6 mRNAs was confirmed by
amplification across the junction of exons 15 and 16C from several
cDNA libraries, followed by direct sequencing of the product bands
(data not shown).
Comparison of the mouse GRK6 and GRK5 genes reveals that their
exon/intron organization is identical, with each intron located in the
equivalent position in these two genes. Further, the GRK5 and GRK6
organization is identical to the organization of the human GRK4 gene
(6) and the partially characterized mouse GRK4 gene (data not shown).
Amino acid sequence comparisons had previously indicated that GRKs 4, 5, and 6 comprise a distinct subfamily within the GRK family (1). This
relationship clearly also extends to the genomic level.
Evolution of GRK Subfamilies--
The high degree of dissimilarity
of the mouse and human GRK4 sequences prompted a closer examination of
GRK sequence conservation. GRK sequences from several mammalian species
have now been deposited in the sequence data bases. Comparisons were
based on protein sequence alignment and subsequent cDNA sequence
alignment as described under "Experimental Procedures." The global
alignment of GRK protein sequences reveals overall higher conservation
of the central kinase catalytic domains of these proteins, compared
with the amino- and carboxyl-terminal regions (data not shown).
Pairwise comparison of all available mammalian GRK amino acid sequences
indicates that there is a strikingly variable degree of sequence
conservation for individual GRK subtypes. GRK2 is the most highly
conserved member of the family, with 96% of amino acid residues
identical among mammalian homologs. Only 19 out of 689 amino acids vary among rodent, bovine, and human GRK2 enzymes, and no more than 16 residues change between any two species. The GRK2 protein kinase catalytic domain is almost completely conserved. Similarly, GRK6 from
mouse, rat, and human exhibits 96% identity, whereas GRK5 from mouse,
rat, bovine, and human remains 94% identical. GRK3 is less well
conserved, with 89% identical residues among rat, bovine, and human
enzymes. Surprisingly, GRK1 and GRK4 appear to be very poorly
conserved. Comparison of the rat, bovine, and human GRK1 sequences
reveals that only 78% of amino acid residues are identical among these
species. Similarly, GRK4 retains only 72% identity from mouse or rat
to human. Mouse and rat GRK4 sequences retain a surprisingly low 90% identity.
To examine further the relationships between GRK proteins and their
evolution, phylogenetic trees were constructed based on aligned protein
and cDNA sequences. All of the independent methods gave
topologically equivalent trees for protein or DNA sequence (with one
minor exception; see below). A representative protein tree with branch
lengths scaled proportionally to genetic distances is shown in Fig.
5. The first observation is that three
major subclasses are evident, containing the GRK1 sequences, the GRK2/3 sequences, and the GRK4/5/6 sequences. To date, two homologous GRK
subtypes have been described in C. elegans and in D. melanogaster. These proteins cluster with and are therefore
orthologous to the mammalian GRK2 and GRK4 subgroups rather than with
each other. Thus the duplications that gave rise to the GRK family
subgroups are ancient, having been present in the common metazoan
ancestor of flies and worms. The GRK1 proteins appear to form a
separate grouping; however, the absence of an invertebrate ortholog for this group makes it difficult to infer a precise time of origin. One
possibility is that the GRK1 proteins are orthologs of the precursor to
GRK2/3 and GRK4/5/6. In one reconstruction only (DNA maximum
likelihood), this topology was suggested for the root of the tree. The
representative tree shows one additional feature. In the phylogenies
reconstructed from protein or DNA sequence, it is clear that there is
variation both between subtypes within a group (i.e., GRK4
versus GRK6 and GRK2 versus GRK3) and between subgroups (GRK2/3 versus GRK4/5/6) in the rate of sequence
variation. This suggests that the GRK2/3 subgroup has been more
constrained by selective pressure than the GRK4/5/6 subgroup, which
appears to be evolving more rapidly. The rate of divergence of GRK4 is the highest of all and is severalfold higher than that of the most
slowly diverging subtype, GRK2. These relative rates of divergence were
reflected in the genetic distance irrespective of the method used to
generate the protein tree.
Characterization of the mouse GRK4 subfamily cDNAs and genes
has revealed several interesting features. We determined that GRK4
alternative splicing is not conserved among mammalian species, whereas
GRK6 alternative splicing is conserved in rodents and primates. We
identified a novel GRK6 splice variant, GRK6C, which is expressed
during embryonic development but is found only at low levels in adult
tissues. The GRK4, 5, and 6 genes are located in the equivalent
locations in the human and mouse genomes, indicating that these genes
diverged and were distributed in the mammalian genome prior to the
divergence of rodents and primates 100 million years ago. However, the
GRK4, 5, and 6 genes share an identical exon organization that is
totally distinct from the genes of other GRKs, further supporting their
assignment as a distinct GRK subfamily with a common ancestry. Finally,
comparison of individual GRKs from several species revealed that some
GRKs are very highly conserved (GRK2 and GRK6), whereas others are very
poorly conserved (GRK4 and GRK1).
GRK Alternative Splicing--
Alternative splicing generates four
forms of the human GRK4 mRNA that differ in the presence or absence
of exon II in the amino-terminal region and exon XV in the
carboxyl-terminal region (6, 23). Rat GRK4 was recently reported to
undergo alternative splicing as well, but of exons VI, VII, and XIV
(24). In examining the mouse GRK4 cDNA, we have found no evidence
for either pattern of alternative splicing. Thus GRK4 alternative
splicing may not be a common feature among mammalian species.
In contrast, GRK6 appears to undergo extensive alternative splicing of
its extreme carboxyl-terminal to yield three distinct variants, GRK6A,
B, and C, and these variants can be found in mouse, rat, and human.
Mouse GRK6A and B differ by the retention of 2 bp during the splicing
of intron O, presumably because of the use of a secondary 3' splice
site, as noted for rat GRK6 (20). This 2-bp difference leads to a
shifted reading frame for the last 17 or 30 amino acids, respectively.
The GRK6C variant arises from the use of a distinct exon (exon 16C)
that encodes a single amino acid residue. This alternative splicing
should have significant functional consequences for GRK6, because these
final residues are known to be important for the membrane localization
and activity of the enzyme. The palmitoylation of GRK6 within the
GRK6A-specific carboxyl-terminal region is associated with membrane
localization of the enzyme, and palmitate-modified GRK6A is
substantially more active than GRK6A protein that has no lipid
modification (22, 32, 33). Therefore, the GRK6B and GRK6C variants,
which are predicted to lack palmitoylation, would require some other
mechanism for membrane localization. The GRK6B variant
carboxyl-terminal sequence resembles and aligns with the cognate domain
of GRK5, which is basic and rich in proline and hydroxyl groups. This
region of GRK5 is thought to be important for constitutive association of GRK5 with the membrane (5). Interestingly, this region of GRK6B
contains a consensus cAMP-dependent protein kinase site that might allow phosphorylation-regulated association of the GRK6B
protein with the membrane. By contrast, GRK6C has a truncated carboxyl-terminal domain lacking both palmitoylation sites and GRK5-like membrane localization domains. This form of GRK6 might be
expected to associate with membranes poorly and be a poor regulator of
G protein-coupled receptors. These multiple GRK6 variants may underlie
the heterogeneity of GRK6 in tissue immunoblots (34).
Organization of GRK Genes--
Direct comparison of the human GRK4
gene with the mouse GRK5 and GRK6 genes reveals that all three genes
share an identical gene organization, in which all 15 introns are found
in the equivalent positions within the coding regions. However, the
length of the cognate introns varies considerably among these three
genes. This conservation of gene structure within the GRK4 family
supports the previous classification of these three sequences as a
distinct subfamily of GRKs based on primary sequence similarity (1, 2).
The C. elegans genomic sequencing project has identified a
single GRK4-like gene, F19C6.1 (35), which has 13 exons. This gene
shares six exon/intron boundaries (mammalian introns A, E, H, K, N, and
O) with the mammalian GRK4-like genes, whereas four other introns are
located within 6 bp of the mammalian position (data not shown).
GRK2 and GRK3 also form a subfamily of GRKs based on amino acid
sequence and functional similarities (1). The GRK2 gene has 21 exons
separated by 20 introns (36, 37). The portion of the mouse GRK3 gene
that has been cloned and characterized appears identical in
organization to the human and mouse GRK2 genes, although the introns
are much larger (38). A single C. elegans sequence for a
GRK2-like gene, W02B3.2, has eight introns and shares four exon/intron
boundaries (introns C, D, H, and L) with the mammalian GRK2-like genes
(35). Three other introns are shifted (4, 15, and 9 bp) relative to
human introns P, R, and S. The final intron is within the equivalent of
the last exon of human GRK2 (data not shown).
No single exon/intron boundary is shared between the GRK2-like and the
GRK4-like GRK gene families. This is true in mammals, in C. elegans, and even when comparing mammalian and C. elegans GRK genes. The complete dissimilarity of the exon/intron
structure of both the mammalian and the C. elegans GRK2-like
and GRK4-like genes indicates that these two gene families have not
arisen recently from a common ancestor but that the common GRK ancestor
gene diverged prior to the divergence of protostomes and deuterostomes
1 billion years ago (39). The complete conservation of gene structure within each GRK subfamily in mammals provides evidence that the members
of each subfamily arose more recently by gene duplication.
GRK1 forms a third distinct subfamily among the mammalian GRKs (1). The
human GRK1 gene has seven exons separated by six introns (40). The GRK1
gene shares no exon/intron boundaries with either the GRK2-like or
GRK4-like genes. The complete dissimilarity of the GRK1 gene structure
with those of the GRK2-like and GRK4-like subfamilies argues that GRK1
is also an ancient gene lineage and is not recently derived from a GRK2
or GRK4 subfamily member. It will be of interest to examine the rate of
divergence of this subfamily in lower vertebrates and to search for its
existence in sister groups to the vertebrates, such as amphioxus.
Conservation of GRK Sequences--
The relationships among family
members and their relative rates of divergence are illustrated by the
phylogenetic reconstruction of relationships. This analysis emphasizes
and confirms these differences and supports the existence of three
ancient groups of GRK sequences. Individual GRKs clearly are subject to
a variable degree of pressure for sequence conservation, because there
exist GRKs that have an unusually slow rate of amino acid substitution (GRKs 2, 5, and 6), and others (GRK1 and GRK4) with a 10-fold higher
apparent rate of amino acid substitution.
Given the variable rate of evolution for these genes, what
relationships can be inferred among the GRK family groupings and their
purported functions that might account for these selective pressures?
Targeted deletion of the GRK2 gene leads to embryonic lethality because
of malformation of the heart during development (36). GRK2 is expressed
ubiquitously throughout the body and appears to play a role in the
regulation of many distinct receptor proteins in diverse cell types
(2). These widespread roles may in part underlie the strong
evolutionary pressure to conserve the GRK2 sequence. GRK3 appears to
play a subsidiary role to the highly similar GRK2 protein, with few
tissues expressing more GRK3 than GRK2 (2). It is therefore not
surprising that targeted deletion of the GRK3 gene does not alter
viability (38). Although their global functions remain unknown, the
relatively high conservation of GRK5 and GRK6 argues that these may
also be fundamental to conserved processes in several systems.
In marked contrast, GRK1 and GRK4 are known to have very limited tissue
distributions. For GRK1, restriction to the rod and cone outer segments
(41) limits the functional role of the enzyme to that of a "rhodopsin
kinase," because other potential substrates are unavailable. GRK4
expression is primarily in cells of the male germ line (6, 17, 23), and
expression does not begin until after day 16 post-partum. The natural
substrates of GRK4 remain unknown, but the limited expression of GRK4
suggests that there can be very few of them. It is possible that these
limited functional roles for GRK1 and GRK4 allow greater flexibility
for the enzymes, which in turn permits a very high rate of sequence substitution. Once GRK sequences from additional nonmammalian species
are available, a more comprehensive analysis of the relationship of
expression pattern, function, and evolutionary history and divergence
of the GRKs will be possible.
We thank Millie McAdams and Judy Phelps of
the HHMI/DUMC Bioploymer Facility for ABI 377 DNA sequencing and Drs.
Helena Abushamaa and Andy Peterson of the Genome Center of the DUMC
Comprehensive Cancer Center for the single-strand conformational
polymorphism gene localization analysis. Thanks also to Dr. Cliff
Cunningham for discussions of phylogenetic analysis and sequence
divergence and Drs. Randy Hall and Julie Pitcher for helpful comments.
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant HL16037 (to R. J. L.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF040745 (mouse GRK4 cDNA), AF040746 (mouse GRK5
cDNA), AF040747, AF040748, and AF040749 (mouse GRK6A, B, and C
cDNAs), AF040750 (rat GRK6C cDNA), AF040751 and AF040752 (human
GRK6B and C cDNAs), AF040753 (human GRK6 intron O), AF040755,
AF040756, AF040757, AF040758, and AF040759 (mouse GRK5 gene), and
AF040754 (mouse GRK6 gene).
§
Supported in part by a Wellcome Trust Advanced Training Fellowship
from the Department of Medicine, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, Du
Cane Road, London, UK. Present address: Neuroscience Therapeutics Unit,
SmithKline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, 3rd Ave., Harlow, Essex CM19 5AW, UK.
**
Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. To whom
correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Medicine, Howard Hughes
Medical Inst., Box 3821, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
27710. Tel.: 919-684-2974; Fax: 919-684-8875; E-mail: lefko001@mc.duke.edu.
2
Degenerate nucleotide codes in oligonucleotide
primers are: S = C and G, W = A and T, R = A and G,
Y = C and T, I = inosine. Restriction sites in primers are underlined.
3
Dr. Patricia Whaley, personal communication.
The abbreviations used are:
GRK, G
protein-coupled receptor kinase;
EST, expressed sequence tag;
G
protein, heterotrimeric
The GRK4 Subfamily of G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinases
ALTERNATIVE SPLICING, GENE ORGANIZATION, AND SEQUENCE
CONSERVATION*
,
§,
,
, and
**
Departments of Medicine (Cardiology) and
Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University
Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, ¶ Wellcome/CRC
Institute, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QR, United Kingdom, and
the
Reproductive Toxicology Division, National Health and
Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, MD-72, United States
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

-subunits and
membrane phosphatidyl inositol 4,5-bisphosphate (3, 4). In contrast,
GRK4-like kinases exhibit high constitutive membrane association (5,
6). Although both GRK2-like and GRK4-like kinases are regulated by
membrane lipids, the site and mechanism of action differ between the
two groups (7). Recently, GRK2 and GRK5 were shown to be regulated
differentially by protein kinase C phosphorylation and by
Ca2+/calmodulin (2). Nevertheless, both GRK2-like and
GRK4-like GRKs are capable of phosphorylating agonist-occupied G
protein-coupled receptors. In the case of rhodopsin and the
2-adrenergic receptor, many individual sites of GRK
phosphorylation by GRK2 and GRK5 are the same (8, 9), indicating that
these distinct kinases can exert similar effects on the receptor.
However, it is also evident that GRK2-like and GRK4-like GRKs can have
distinct functional effects on other G protein-coupled receptors
(2).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
FIXII vector was obtained from Stratagene. 1.2 × 106 plaques were hybridized with full-length human GRK4,
bovine GRK5 and human GRK6 cDNA probes under standard conditions
(10). Phage were sorted into three classes based on relative signal
intensity with the three full-length GRK cDNA probes and were
further sorted by hybridization to amino-terminal and carboxyl-terminal
region probes. XbaI-digested phage insert fragments were
subcloned into pBS II for sequencing. Fragments were ordered using
restriction mapping and Southern blotting, DNA sequencing, or
polymerase chain reaction amplification of the phage DNA from primers
derived from partial sequences of subcloned fragments, in which case
XbaI junctions were confirmed by direct sequencing of the
resulting DNA bands. In addition, some intron regions were amplified
from phage templates using flanking exon primers, and the resulting DNA
bands were subjected to DNA sequencing directly. Amplification
reactions were performed for 15 cycles of 95 °C for 1 min, 60 °C
for 1 min, and 72 °C for 10 min using reagents as described below.
Internal regions were sequenced from specific primers, and all regions were sequenced on both strands of DNA. Sequencing was performed using
dye terminator cycle sequencing using ABI Prism AmpliTaq FS reagent
(Perkin-Elmer), and reactions were visualized on ABI 373 or ABI 377 instruments. Raw sequence data were edited using EditView and
AutoAssembler software (Perkin-Elmer) and analyzed using GeneWorks (Intelligenetics).
-32P]dCTP. Equivalent amounts of probe were used for
each blot.
-32P]dCTP. Polymerase
chain reaction products were denatured and separated on 6%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels containing 10% glycerol. The gel was
dried and exposed to x-ray film, and polymorphic bands were scored for
species origin. Polymorphisms were analyzed, and locus order was
determined using the Map Manager program (15). Absolute map
positions on mouse chromosomes as well as nearby mouse genes and
syntenic human chromosome regions were identified using the
chromosome maps of the mouse genome data base through the Encyclopedia
of the Mouse Genome at the Jackson Labs.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The mouse GRK4 subfamily. A,
alignment of mouse GRK4, GRK5, and GRK6 deduced amino acid sequences.
The alignment was produced using the GeneWorks UPGMA multiple alignment
program, and the divergent carboxyl-terminal regions were adjusted by
hand. B, comparison of GRK6 variant carboxyl-terminal (exon
16) sequences from various species. Underlined letters
indicate palmitoylation sites in GRK6A and the predicted protein kinase
A site in GRK6B.
-variant) of human and rat GRK4 (6,
17).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Expression of mRNA for mouse GRK4
subfamily members. A, hybridization of mouse adult
tissue and whole embryo Northern blots with mouse amino-terminal probes
for GRKs 4, 5, and 6. All blots were hybridized with equivalent amounts
of probe and exposed to film for 1 day, with the exception of the GRK3
embryo blot, which was exposed for 3 days. B, hybridization
of staged testis total RNA Northern blot with mouse GRK4 probe. Blots
were exposed to film for 1 day. C, hybridization of mouse
adult tissue and whole embryo Northern blots with mouse GRK6C-specific
3'-untranslated region probe. Blots were exposed for 5 days.

View larger version (12K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Chromosomal localization of mouse GRK4, GRK5,
and GRK6 genes. cM, centimorgans.
2A- (50 centimorgans) and
1-adrenergic receptors (51 centimorgans) and the
vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (53 centimorgans).

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Organization of the mouse GRK5
(A) and GRK6 (B) genes. Exon
maps were prepared from completely sequenced phage insert DNAs or, for
the amino-terminal region of the GRK5 gene, from maps based on partial
sequencing of subcloned phage insert restriction fragments and fragment
ordering by polymerase chain reaction. In GRK6, exons 16A, 16B, and 16C
indicate the alternatively spliced last exon. Both GRK5 and GRK6 genes
are comprised of 16 exons separated by 15 introns. All introns reside
in equivalent locations in the two genes. C, alternative
splicing of the last coding exon of the GRK6 transcript.
Exon/intron structure of the mouse GRK5 gene
Exon/intron structure of the mouse GRK6 gene

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Phylogenetic analysis of the GRKs. The
figure shows a representative phylogenetic tree inferred by the NJ
method from the CLUSTALX multiple alignment of vertebrate and
invertebrate GRK proteins. The sequences used were GRK1 (human, rat,
bovine, and chicken), GRK2 (human, mouse, rat, hamster, and bovine),
GRK3 (human, rat, and bovine), GRK4 (human, mouse, and rat), GRK5
(human, mouse, rat, and bovine), GRK6 (human, mouse, and rat), and two
GRK sequences found in C. elegans and in D. melanogaster. Topologically equivalent trees were obtained with
other protein methods or with DNA sequence alignments based on the
protein alignment. Branch lengths are scaled proportional to genetic
distance. The tree is unrooted.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS


guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory
protein;
bp, base pair(s);
kb, kilobase pair(s).
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Premont, R. T.,
Inglese, J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1995)
FASEB J.
9,
175-182[Abstract]
2.
Pitcher, J. A.,
Freedman, N. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1998)
Annu. Review Biochem.
67,
653-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Pitcher, J. A.,
Inglese, J.,
Higgins, J. B.,
Arriza, J. L.,
Casey, P. J.,
Kim, C.,
Benovic, J. L.,
Kwatra, M. M.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1992)
Science
257,
1264-1267 4.
Pitcher, J. A.,
Touhara, K.,
Payne, E. S.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11707-11710 5.
Premont, R. T.,
Koch, W. J.,
Inglese, J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6832-6841 6.
Premont, R. T.,
Macrae, A. D.,
Stoffel, R. H.,
Chung, N.,
Pitcher, J. A.,
Ambrose, C.,
Inglese, J.,
MacDonald, M. E.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
6403-6410 7.
Pitcher, J. A.,
Fredericks, Z. L.,
Stone, W. C.,
Premont, R. T.,
Stoffel, R. H.,
Koch, W. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24907-24913 8.
Palczewski, K.,
Ohguro, H.,
Premont, R. T.,
and Inglese, J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15294-15298 9.
Fredericks, Z. L.,
Pitcher, J. A.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13796-13803 10.
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T.
(eds)
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
11.
Premont, R. T.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
238,
116-127[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Orita, M.,
Iwahana, H.,
Kanazawa, H.,
Hayashi, K.,
and Sekiya, T.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
2766-2770 14.
Breen, M.,
Deakin, L.,
MacDonald, B.,
Miller, S.,
Sibson, R.,
Tarttelin, E.,
Avner, P.,
Bourgade, F.,
Guenet, J. L.,
Montagutelli, X.,
Poirier, C.,
Simon, D.,
Tailor, D.,
Bishop, M.,
Kelly, M,
Rysavy, F,
Rastan, S.,
Norris, D.,
Shepherd, D.,
Abbott, C.,
Pilz, A.,
Hodge, S.,
Jackson, I.,
Boyd, Y.,
Blair, H.,
Maslen, G.,
Todd, J. A.,
Reed, P. W.,
Stoye, J.,
Ashworth, A.,
McCarthy, L.,
Cox, R.,
Schalkwyk, L.,
Lehrach, H.,
Klose, J.,
Gangadharan, U.,
and Brown, S.
(1994)
Human Mol. Genet.
3,
621-627 15.
Manly, K. F.,
and Elliott, R. W.
(1991)
Mamm. Genome
1,
123-126[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Felsenstein, J.
(1989)
Cladistics
5,
164-166
17.
Virlon, B.,
Firsov, D.,
Cheval, L.,
Reiter, E.,
Troispoux, C.,
Guillou, F.,
and Elalouf, J.-M.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
2784-2795 18.
Kunapuli, P.,
Gurevich, V. V.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
10209-10212 19.
Pronin, A. N.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
3806-3812 20.
Firsov, D.,
and Elalouf, J.-M.
(1997)
Am. J. Physiol.
273,
C953-C961 21.
Loudon, R. P.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22691-22697 22.
Stoffel, R. H.,
Randall, R. R.,
Premont, R. T.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
and Inglese, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27791-27794 23.
Sallese, M.,
Mariggio, S.,
Collodel, G.,
Moretti, E.,
Piomboni, P.,
Baccetti, B.,
and De Blasi, A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
10188-10195 24.
Ambrose, C.,
James, M.,
Barnes, G.,
Lin, C.,
Bates, G.,
Altherr, M.,
Duyao, M.,
Groot, N.,
Church, D.,
Wasmuth, J. J.,
Lehrach, H.,
Housman, D.,
Buckler, A.,
Gusella, J. F.,
and MacDonald, M. E.
(1992)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
1,
697-703 25.
Kunapuli, P.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5588-5592 26.
Bellve, A. R.,
Cavicchia, J. C.,
Millette, C. F.,
O'Brien, D. A.,
Bhatnagar, Y. M.,
and Dym, M.
(1977)
J. Cell Biol.
74,
68-85 27.
Russell, L. D.,
Ettlin, R. A.,
SinhaHikim, A. P.,
and Clegg, E. D.
(1990)
Histological and Histopathological Evaluation of the Testis
, Cache River Press, Clearwater, FL
28.
Grosson, C. L. S.,
MacDonald, M. E.,
Duyao, M. P.,
Ambrose, C. M.,
Roffler-Tarlov, S.,
and Gusella, J. F.
(1994)
Mamm. Genome
5,
424-428[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group.
(1993)
Cell
72,
971-983[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Bullrich, F.,
Druck, T.,
Kunapuli, P.,
Gomez, J.,
Gripp, K. W.,
Schlegelberger, B.,
Lasota, J.,
Aronson, M.,
Cannizzaro, L. A.,
Heubner, K.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1995)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
70,
250-254[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Gagnon, A. W.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1997)
Gene (Amst.)
184,
13-19[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Stoffel, R. H.,
Inglese, J.,
Macrae, A. D.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
and Premont, R. T.
(1998)
Biochemistry
37,
16053-16059[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Loudon, R. P.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27422-27427 34.
Loudon, R. P.,
Perussia, B.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1996)
Blood
12,
4547-4557
35.
Wilson, R.,
Ainscough, R.,
Anderson, K.,
Baynes, C.,
Berks, C.,
Bonfield, J.,
Burton, J,
Connell, M.,
Copsey, T.,
Cooper, J.,
Coulson, A.,
Craxton, M.,
Dear, S.,
Du, Z.,
Durbin, R.,
Favello, A.,
Fulton, L.,
Gardner, A.,
Green, P.,
Hawkins, T.,
Hillier, L.,
Jier, M.,
Johnston, L.,
Jones, M.,
Kershaw, J.,
Kirsten, J.,
Laister, N.,
Latreille, P.,
Lightning, J.,
Lloyd, C.,
McMurray, A.,
Mortimore, B.,
O'Callaghan, M.,
Parsons, J.,
Percy, C.,
Rifken, L.,
Roopra, A.,
Saunders, D.,
Shownkeen, R.,
Smaldon, N.,
Smith, A.,
Sonnhammer, E.,
Staden, R.,
Sulston, J.,
Thiery-Mieg, J.,
Thomas, K.,
Vaudin, M.,
Vaughan, K.,
Waterston, R.,
Watson, A.,
Weinstock, L.,
Wilkinson-Sproat, J.,
and Wohldman, P.
(1994)
Nature
368,
32-38[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Jaber, M.,
Koch, W. J.,
Rockman, H.,
Smith, B.,
Bond, R. A.,
Sulik, K. K.,
Ross, J., Jr.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Giros, B.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
12974-12979 37.
Penn, R. B.,
and Benovic, J. L.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
14924-14930 38.
Peppel, K,
Boekhoff, I.,
MacDonald, P.,
Breer, H.,
Caron, M. G.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
25425-25428 39.
Wray, G. A.,
Levinton, J. S.,
and Shapiro, L. H.
(1996)
Science
274,
568-573 40.
Khani, S. C.,
Abitbol, M.,
Yamamoto, S.,
Maravic-Magovcevic, I.,
and Dryja, T. P.
(1996)
Genomics
35,
571-576[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Palczewski, K.,
Buczylko, J.,
Lebioda, L.,
Crabb, J. W.,
and Polans, A. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
6004-6013
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Zeng, V. A. M. Villar, G. M. Eisner, S. M. Williams, R. A. Felder, and P. A. Jose G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 4: Role in Blood Pressure Regulation Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1449 - 1455. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Singh, B. Wang, T. Maeda, K. Palczewski, and J. J. G. Tesmer Structures of Rhodopsin Kinase in Different Ligand States Reveal Key Elements Involved in G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase Activation J. Biol. Chem., May 16, 2008; 283(20): 14053 - 14062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. S. Lynch and J. G. Ryall Role of {beta}-Adrenoceptor Signaling in Skeletal Muscle: Implications for Muscle Wasting and Disease Physiol Rev, April 1, 2008; 88(2): 729 - 767. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Mayer, B. Wulffen, C. Huber, J. Brockmann, B. Flicke, L. Neumann, D. Hafenbradl, B. M. Klebl, M. J. Lohse, C. Krasel, et al. An RNA molecule that specifically inhibits G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in vitro RNA, March 1, 2008; 14(3): 524 - 534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Jiang, J. L. Benovic, and P. B. Wedegaertner Plasma Membrane and Nuclear Localization of G Protein coupled Receptor Kinase 6A Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2007; 18(8): 2960 - 2969. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Wang, I. Armando, L. D. Asico, C. Escano, X. Wang, Q. Lu, R. A. Felder, C. G. Schnackenberg, D. R. Sibley, G. M. Eisner, et al. The elevated blood pressure of human GRK4{gamma} A142 |