![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29399-29405, October 8, 1999
From the Division of Enzymology, Institute for Protein Research,
Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan and the
¶ Department of Applied Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of
Engineering, Kumamoto University, Kurokami, Kumamoto,
860-0862, Japan
Plant-type ferredoxin (Fd), a [2Fe-2S]
iron-sulfur protein, functions as an one-electron donor to
Fd-NADP+ reductase (FNR) or sulfite reductase (SiR),
interacting electrostatically with them. In order to understand the
protein-protein interaction between Fd and these two different enzymes,
10 acidic surface residues in maize Fd (isoform III), Asp-27, Glu-30,
Asp-58, Asp-61, Asp-66/Asp-67, Glu-71/Glu-72, Asp-85, and Glu-93, were
substituted with the corresponding amide residues by site-directed
mutagenesis. The redox potentials of the mutated Fds were not markedly
changed, except for E93Q, the redox potential of which was more
positive by 67 mV than that of the wild type. Kinetic experiments
showed that the mutations at Asp-66/Asp-67 and Glu-93 significantly
affected electron transfer to the two enzymes. Interestingly, D66N/D67N was less efficient in the reaction with FNR than E93Q, whereas this
relationship was reversed in the reaction with SiR. The static interaction of the mutant Fds with each the two enzymes was analyzed by
gel filtration of a mixture of Fd and each enzyme, and by affinity chromatography on Fd-immobilized resins. The contributions of Asp-66/Asp-67 and Glu-93 were found to be most important for the binding to FNR and SiR, respectively, in accordance with the kinetic data. These results allowed us to map the acidic regions of Fd required
for electron transfer and for binding to FNR and SiR and demonstrate
that the interaction sites for the two enzymes are at least partly distinct.
Plant-type ferredoxin
(Fd)1 is a small (11-kDa),
soluble, acidic protein distributed in plants, algae, and
cyanobacteria. This protein contains a single [2Fe-2S] cluster and
its oxidation-reduction potential is very low ranging from In chloroplasts, this type of Fd mediates one-electron transfer from
photosystem I to several Fd-dependent enzymes, which function in photosynthetic metabolism, such as
ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase (FNR) (EC 1.18.1.2), which is
involved in the process of carbon assimilation; nitrite reductase and
glutamate synthase, which are involved in nitrogen assimilation;
sulfite reductase (SiR) (EC 1.8.7.1), which is involved in sulfur
assimilation; and ferredoxin-thioredoxin reductase, which is involved
in redox regulation of several enzymes (9). Fd and each
Fd-dependent enzyme form a 1:1 protein-protein complex, and
this specific interaction is considered to be important for efficient
electron transfer between the two proteins. The sites involved in the
interaction between Fd and its complementary electron transfer partners
have been studied in several laboratories, although the actual geometry of the complex has not been established. Among the physical and chemical forces involved in protein interactions, such as hydrophobic packing interaction, electrostatic forces, and hydrogen bonding, several lines of evidence from chemical modification experiments (10-16), cross-linking experiments (17, 18), and computer modeling studies (3, 19) indicate that the complex is mainly formed as a result
of electrostatic forces through the negative charges of Fd and the
positive charges of each enzyme. Ionic strength affects the transient
kinetics of electron transfer from Fd to FNR also indicating that
complementary electrostatic charges influence complex formation
(20).
In this study, we attempted to identify and compare the binding sites
in Fd for two Fd-dependent enzymes, FNR and SiR, by site-directed mutagenesis of maize Fd (isoform III) (21, 22). FNR is a
35-kDa, soluble flavoprotein containing one noncovalently bound flavin
adenine dinucleotide, and it catalyzes the reduction of
NADP+ to NADPH with two electrons from reduced Fd. SiR
found in higher plants is a 64-kDa, soluble protein containing one
[4Fe-4S] cluster and one siroheme, and it catalyzes the six-electron
reduction of sulfite to sulfide. Acidic residues (Asp and Glu) located
at eight different sites in maize Fd, Asp-27, Glu-30, Asp-58,
Asp-61, Asp-66/Asp-67, Glu-71/Glu-72, Asp-85, and Glu-93 were chosen as targets of substitution, to be replaced by the corresponding amide residues. Although the three-dimensional structure of maize Fd is not
known, the structure could be superimposed on those of the three
plant-type Fds (Fig. 1), because about
60-70% of the amino acid sequence of maize Fd is identical to
those of the three Fds. The spatial orientation of the side-chains of
the acidic residues corresponding to those altered through mutagenesis
in maize Fd is considered to be similar among the plant-type Fds (Fig.
1). We examined the ability of each of the resulting Fd mutants to bind
to FNR and SiR and their capacity for electron transfer. The binding
ability was successfully analyzed by gel filtration of a mixture of Fd
and each enzyme. Affinity chromatography on Fd-immobilized resins was
also applied to evaluate the interaction of the two proteins. We report
here that certain acidic residues are indeed crucial for the
interaction with FNR and SiR and furthermore that the distribution of
such residues in the three-dimensional structure of Fd is partly
distinct for the two enzymes.
Mutagenesis of the Fd Gene--
The insert DNA in the region
from the NcoI site to the XhoI site of pSMmFD3, a
maize Fd III expression plasmid (22) originally constructed using the
vector pKK233-2 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), was ligated into the
NcoI/XhoI cloning site of another expression vector, pTrc99A (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to obtain pSMmFD3-1. For
construction of D66N/D67N and D66K/D67K, cassettes of two complementary
oligonucleotides (Table I) were inserted
into the BamHI and PstI sites of pSMmFD3-1.
Other mutant Fds were constructed by an overlap extension method by
two-step polymerase chain reaction (23, 24), using a combination of two
terminal primers and a pair of two mutagenic primers as listed in Table
I. The terminal primers were designed to produce NcoI and
XhoI sites at the ends of each amplified fragment, and the
fragments with the mutation site were easily inserted into the
corresponding region of pSMmFD3-1. All mutation sites and the sequence
integrity of the entire coding region of Fd were confirmed by DNA
sequencing using a dye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied
Biosystems) and an automated DNA sequencer (model 370A; Applied
Biosystems).
Culture of Bacterial Cells and Preparation of Recombinant
Fds--
Escherichia coli strain JM105 cells transformed
with various mutant Fd genes were grown in 8 liters of Luria broth
medium supplemented with 100 µM FeSO4 and 50 µg/ml ampicillin for 2 h at 37 °C after inoculation with an
overnight seed culture at 1% volume.
Isopropyl-
Fd was extracted and purified essentially according to a published
method (22, 25). The purity of the Fds was checked by nondenaturing
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using a gel with a linear gradient
of 15-25% acrylamide as described previously (26). The concentration
of Fd was determined spectrophotometrically based on a molar extinction
coefficient of 9.68 mM Preparation of FNR and SiR from Maize Leaves--
Maize leaves
were broken into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen with a Waring blender
and homogenized in an extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
0.1% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol) with 10% (w/v) Polyclar AT. Thereafter,
the homogenate was roughly filtered through several layers of
cheesecloth, and the leaf extract was fractionated by ammonium sulfate
precipitation. FNR and SiR were recovered in the fraction from 40-70%
saturation and were separated by chromatography on DE-52 (Whatman),
developed with a linear gradient of NaCl from 0 to 400 mM
in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. Both enzymes were separately
purified by successive chromatographic steps on columns of Sephacryl
S-200, Blue-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and Fd-immobilized
resin essentially according to published procedures (28).
The concentrations of FNR and SiR were determined
spectrophotometrically based on molar extinction coefficients of 9.40 mM Cyclic Voltammetry--
Cyclic voltammetry of Fds was carried
out using a BAS-50W electrochemical analyzer with a
poly-L-lysine modified In2O3
electrode as described previously (31). Fds were dissolved in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl at a
concentration of 50 µM, and voltammetric responses were
measured at a scan rate of 2 mV/s under anaerobic conditions, purged
with nitrogen gas. Catalytic reactions of FNR and SiR through the
reduction of Fds on the electrode were measured in a mixture consisting
of 0.25 µM FNR or SiR, 50 µM Fd in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl with 0.3 mM NADP+ or 0.6 mM
Na2SO3, respectively, as the substrate.
CD Spectrum--
CD spectra of mutant Fds were measured with a
JASCO J-720 spectropolarimeter. Fd was dissolved in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl at a final concentration of
45 and 4.5 µM for the measurements in the visible and UV
regions, respectively.
Gel Filtration Chromatography--
Complex formation between Fd
and SiR and between Fd and FNR was analyzed by gel filtration
chromatography using the Smart system with a µpeak Monitor (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). A mixture (30 µl) of Fd and SiR at certain
concentrations was loaded on a small column of Superdex 75 (PC3.2/30;
Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl at a constant flow rate of 40 µl/min
at 15 °C. Fd and SiR were monitored by the absorbance at 330 nm
derived from the prosthetic groups of the proteins. For chromatography
of the mixture of Fd and FNR, all conditions were the same as above
except that 10 mM NaCl was omitted from the elution buffer.
Affinity Chromatography--
One mg of Fd was immobilized on
0.5 g of CNBr-activated Sepharose 4B (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
according to the method recommended by the supplier. A small column (HR
5/2; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) packed with 200 µl of the
Fd-immobilized resin was mounted in the Smart system. After
equilibrating the column with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 30 µl of 1.5 µM FNR or SiR was loaded and a linear
gradient of NaCl from 0 to 400 mM was applied as eluent at
a flow rate of 50 µl/min. Elution of the enzymes was monitored by the
absorbance at 280 nm.
Enzyme Assays--
FNR activity was assayed by monitoring the
photoreduction of NADP+ with thylakoid membranes of spinach
chloroplasts in the presence of various concentrations of Fd (0-40
µM) essentially according to the method described
previously (22). SiR activity was assayed by monitoring the coupling
reaction with cysteine synthase according to a published method (28).
Briefly, the reaction mixture consisted of 100 mM
HEPES-NaOH, pH 7.5, 5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM
Na2SO3, 12.5 mM
O-acetyl-L-serine, an excess amount of cysteine
synthase, 20 nM SiR, and various concentrations of Fds
(0-10 µM). The reaction was started by addition of
Na2S2O4 at a final concentration of 8 mM, and the amount of cysteine formed in 30 min at
30 °C was determined by an acid-ninhydrin reaction.
Preparation of Mutant Fds--
All mutant Fds isolated from
E. coli cells were assembled with the [2Fe-2S] cluster and
showed absorption spectra comparable to that of wild type Fd, with the
value of the A422/A276
ratio being greater than 0.48 (data not shown). Each migrated as a
single band during nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and their mobilities were slower than that of the wild type Fd in
accordance with their net charge differences, suggesting that the
mobility shift was mainly due to the surface charge change introduced
by mutation (Fig. 2).
Redox Potential and CD Spectra--
The redox potentials of the
wild type and mutant Fds were measured by cyclic voltammetry (Table
II). The wild type Fd had a redox
potential of Biochemical Assay of Electron Transfer--
Mutant Fds were tested
to assess the ability to transfer electrons to two different
Fd-dependent enzymes, FNR and SiR. As summarized in Table
II, significant variation in electron transfer ability was found. Among
all of the mutant Fds, the mutations at Asp-66/Asp-67 and Glu-93 caused
the largest decrease in electron transfer to FNR and SiR, respectively.
It is noteworthy that mutations in two acidic regions had different
effects on the electron transfer activity; D66N/D67N and D66K/D67K each
had lower activity in electron transfer to FNR than in electron
transfer to SiR, whereas E93Q had the reverse effect. Kinetic analyses
revealed that the mutations caused an increase in Km
values and a decrease in Vmax values (Table
III). The subtle difference in
Km values between the two mutant Fds implies that
Asp-66/Asp-67 and Glu-93 may differentially contribute to the affinity
of Fd for FNR and SiR.
Electrochemical Assay of Electron Transfer--
In addition to the
biochemical assay of the mutant Fds, electron transfer from D66N/D67N
and E93Q to FNR and SiR was measured by cyclic voltammetry. As shown in
Fig. 4, a catalytic reduction current was
observed due to the continuous oxidation of the wild type Fd in the
presence of FNR and NADP+, or SiR and sulfite. This
catalytic current was largely decreased when either D66N/D67N or E93Q
was used as an electron carrier from the electrode to the enzymes. In
the case of SiR, the extent of the decrease was found to be larger with
E93Q than with D66N/D67N, in agreement with the results obtained in the
biochemical assay as described above.
Electrostatic Binding of Mutant Fds to SiR and FNR--
When a
mixture of Fd and SiR in a molar ratio of 1:1 was loaded onto a
Superdex G-75 column equilibrated and developed with 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, these proteins were eluted as a single peak at a
retention time earlier than that of Fd or SiR applied singly (Fig.
5A). Upon addition of 100 mM NaCl to the elution buffer, the two proteins in the
mixture were separately eluted, indicating that the complex of Fd and
SiR was formed mainly by electrostatic interaction (Fig.
5B). Titration of Fd in binding to SiR showed that the two
proteins were bound with 1:1 stoichiometry (Fig. 5C).
The ability of each of the mutant Fds to bind to SiR was examined by
gel filtration chromatography. As shown in Fig.
6B, E93Q and E30Q were unable
to form the complex with SiR, and D66N/D67N and D61N were inferior to
the wild type Fd. The other mutant Fds, D85N, D58N, D27N, and
E71Q/E72Q, each showed complex-forming ability comparable to that of
the wild type Fd. These results show a good correlation with those
obtained by the enzymatic assay (Table II); E93Q, E30Q, D66N/D67N, and
D61N with decreased binding ability showed 30-80% of the activity of
the wild type Fd, whereas the other mutant Fds retained essentially
wild type activity.
The same chromatographic assay of the mutant Fds was applied to examine
complex formation with FNR. As shown in Fig. 6A, D66N/D67N could not form the complex with FNR, D61N, E71Q/E72Q, D27N, and E30Q
each had less binding ability than the wild type Fd, and D85N, E93Q,
D58N retained the same or similar ability. Although mutant Fds with
lowered binding tended to show decreased electron transfer to FNR
(Table II), there seems to be no good correlation between them as seen
with SiR, because E71Q/E72Q, D27N, and E30Q, which displayed a
diminished capacity for complex formation compared with the wild type
Fd, still retained the full electron transfer activity. It is
noteworthy that E93Q showed different characteristics compared with the
other mutants. This mutant, which was able to form a stable complex
with FNR, but not with SiR, showed considerably lowered electron
transfer ability toward both enzymes. This phenomenon seems to be due
to the large positive shift in the redox potential.
Fd-Affinity Chromatography--
Binding of FNR and SiR to the wild
type Fd, D66N/D67N, and E93Q was further examined using Fd-immobilized
Sepharose columns. As shown in Fig.
7A, FNR was not retained on
the D66N/D67N column, whereas FNR became bound to the E93Q column and
was eluted with a gradient of NaCl in a manner similar to that in the
case of the wild type Fd column. SiR was eluted from the three
Fd-affinity columns in the following order, E93Q, D66N/D67N, and wild
type Fd (Fig. 7B). The differential binding of FNR and SiR
to D66N/D67N and E93Q observed by Fd-affinity chromatography was in
good agreement with the results obtained by gel filtration
chromatography described in the above section.
Systematic site-directed mutagenesis of acidic residues located on
the surface of maize Fd was successfully applied to map the regions
involved in complex formation with FNR and SiR. Fig. 8 summarizes these results and shows the
acidic residues contributing to formation of the complex with each of
these enzymes.
Interaction of Fd with FNR--
Regarding the sites involved in
the interaction between Fd and FNR, the results of the present work are
comparable to previous data obtained by chemical modification and
computer modeling. By differential chemical modification of spinach Fd
with 1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethyl-aminopropyl] carbodiimide/taurine in
the presence and absence of spinach FNR, Asp-26, Glu-29, Glu-30,
Asp-34, Asp-65, and Asp-66 (Asp-27, Glu-30, Thr-31, Asp-35, Asp-66, and
Asp-67 in maize Fd) were protected from modification only when Fd was
present as a complex with FNR (10). Computer modeling of the complex of
Spirulina Fd and spinach FNR (3) suggested that Asp-28 and
Glu-31 in the Fd (Asp-27 and Glu-30 in maize Fd) are close to Lys-300,
Arg-301, Lys-304, and Lys-305 of the FNR, Asp-67 (Asp-66 in maize Fd)
is close to Lys-33 and Lys-35, and Asp-62 (Asp-61 in maize Fd) is close
to Lys-153. As shown in Fig. 8, most of these acidic residues in maize
Fd are involved in the interaction with FNR. A cross-linking study of
the complex of Fd and FNR indicated that the acidic residues at
positions 92-94 in spinach Fd (93-95 in maize Fd) are the sites cross-linked to spinach FNR (17, 32). The present data, however, do not
support the view that Glu-93 in maize Fd is the main site involved in
binding to FNR. It seems that the cross-linked acidic residues may not
necessarily contribute to electrostatic interaction in the Fd-FNR complex.
The degree of static interaction with FNR dose not show a clear
correlation with the activity in electron transfer to FNR in the case
of some Fd mutants. In the complex formation and electron transfer of
Fd and FNR from spinach and Anabaena, transient kinetic measurements have suggested that the static interaction plays differing
roles in controlling electron transfer between the two redox partners;
one is stabilization of the Fd-FNR complex and the other is structural
rearrangement within the transient complex, which optimizes the
intracomplex electron transfer (20). The interaction measured by
chromatographic techniques in this study do not necessarily reflect the
ability of mutant Fds for such rearrangement of transient complex
formation. Short range of forces, such as hydrophobic packing, van der
Waals contact, and hydrogen bonding, on the top of the electrostatic
force, also contribute to fine structural turning of the two redox
partners. Although present data suggest some of acidic residues of
maize Fd contribute mainly in an ensemble of loose interaction with
FNR, but not in the fine interaction productive for the efficient
electron transfer, the precise explanations for this matter require
further study.
However, the results of mutation at positions 66/67 were very
straightforward; the negative charges in this region are crucial for
both complex formation and electron transfer to FNR. Of these two
acidic residues, Asp-66 seems to be physiologically important for the
interaction with FNR. Among the maize Fd isoproteins, Fd I, Fd II, and
Fd III, only Fd II has Asn at position 65 (corresponding to 66 in Fd
III), and the Km of FNR for Fd II was considerably higher than that for Fd I, whereas there was no substantial difference in Vmax between the two Fds (33). In addition,
the N65D mutant of Fd II showed increased activity, a level comparable
to Fd I (33). The electrostatic interaction between Fd II and FNR was found to be weaker than that in the case of the other Fd isoproteins (data not shown). These data also support the view that the negative charge at this site is crucial for electron transfer between Fd and
FNR.
Differential Sites in Fd for Interaction with
Fd-dependent Enzymes--
The present data demonstrate
that the sites in Fd involved in binding to SiR are partly different
from those for FNR; Glu-93 is the most important site for binding to
SiR but not for binding to FNR. De Pascalis et al. (11) also
proposed that there are different sites in Fd for binding to FNR and
Fd-thioredoxin reductase as determined by chemical modification.
Asp-34, Asp-65, Glu-92, Glu-93, and Glu-94 in spinach Fd (Asp-35,
Asp-66, Glu-93, Gly-94, and Asp-95 in maize Fd) were shown to be close
to the contact sites in the complex with spinach Fd-thioredoxin
reductase, but not in the complex with spinach FNR. Comparing these
findings with the present results, the sites involved in binding of Fd for Fd-thioredoxin reductase appear to be similar to those for SiR. The
common sites in binding of Fd to FNR and SiR are mostly positioned
around the [2Fe-2S] cluster. This suggests that although Fd may have
a unique site for interaction with each Fd-dependent enzyme, the route of electron transfer from the [2Fe-2S] cluster of
Fd to each of these enzymes is the same.
Regarding electron transfer to SiR, the static Fd-SiR interaction
showed a good correlation with the kinetic activity in the case of most
Fd mutants. This suggests that formation of the complex for electron
transfer between Fd and SiR is largely dependent on electrostatic forces.
Role of Glu-93 in Determining the Redox Potential of the [2Fe-2S]
Cluster--
E93Q was found to be an inefficient electron carrier for
transfer to both FNR and SiR, although this mutant interacts with FNR
as well as the wild type. Recently, this glutamic acid residue at the
same position was shown to be important for the reaction with a few
Fd-dependent enzymes in the case of Fds from spinach (34),
Anabaena (35), Chlamydomonas (36), and
Synechocystis (37). E92Q, E92A, and E92K of spinach Fd and
E94Q and E94K of Anabaena Fd showed a 60-90 mV positive
shift in redox potential as observed in the case of the mutant E93Q of
maize Fd. Thus, the change in redox potential appears to be the major
factor responsible for the decrease in electron transfer ability. The
negative charge at position 93 may be important to maintain the low
redox potential of the [2Fe-2S] cluster, because the E94D mutant of
Anabaena Fd showed a redox potential nearly equal to that of
the wild type and because the mutant E94K with a positively changed
side-chain showed a greater increase in redox potential than a mutant
with a neutral side-chain (35).
According to the three-dimensional structure of the Anabaena
Fd (38), the side-chain of Glu-94 was proposed to play a role in
stabilizing the [2Fe-2S] cluster binding loop of the polypeptide backbone through a hydrogen bond with the side-chain of Ser-47 (Ser-46
in maize Fd). The crystal structure of mutant E94K of Anabaena Fd, which lacks the hydrogen bond, indicates that
this mutation caused only a minor perturbation in the vicinity around the [2Fe-2S] center (39). We are also currently studying the x-ray
structure of S46G mutant of maize Fd, which shows about 180 mV positive
shift (31), and the preliminary data suggest that only a local
configuration of the [2Fe-2S] cluster binding loop is perturbed in
this mutant.2 These combined
data suggested that at least two factors, a small change in the
conformation around the [2Fe-2S] cluster and the introduction of
neutral and positively charged side-chains at position 93, which may
result in stabilization of the [2Fe-2S] cluster with an overall
negative charge, should induce significant redox changes.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the ability of Fd to transfer
electrons to two Fd-dependent enzymes, FNR and SiR, is
decreased by lowering the ability of Fd to form a stable complex with
each of the enzymes by mutagenesis of specific acidic residues. We have
also found that Fd has electrostatic interaction sites both common and
unique to each enzyme. This specific Fd-enzyme interaction site might
be an important factor in regulating the distribution of electrons
among several Fd-dependent enzymes in various metabolic
pathways of chloroplasts.
*
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research 08249102 (to T. H.) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology,
Nippon Medical School, Sendagi, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113, Japan.
2
G. Kurisu, M. Kusunoki, and T. Hase, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
Fd, ferredoxin;
FNR, ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase;
SiR, sulfite reductase.
Comparison of the Electrostatic Binding Sites on the Surface of
Ferredoxin for Two Ferredoxin-dependent Enzymes,
Ferredoxin-NADP+ Reductase and Sulfite Reductase*
,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
310 mV to
455 mV (1). Amino acid sequences of more than 70 plant-type Fds are
highly homologous (2). X-ray crystallographic structures of five
plant-type Fds from cyanobacteria (3-7) to higher plants (8) are also conserved in term of backbone and side-chain structures.

View larger version (76K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The three-dimensional structures of
plant-type Fds. The backbones of the three plant-type Fds from
Spirulina, Equisetum, and Anabaena are
superimposed. Side-chains of 10 conserved acidic residues are shown
with ball and stick style. The numbering of the acidic residues
corresponds to that of maize Fd (isoform III). The [2Fe-2S] cluster
located on the edge of the molecule is also shown. Amino- and carboxyl
termini are marked N and C, respectively.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
A list of oligonucleotides used for site-directed mutagenesis
-D(
)-thiogalactoside was then added to a
final concentration of 0.5 mM, and cultivation was
continued for a further 8-12 h. The cells were harvested by
centrifugation at 3000 × g for 10 min and stored at
30 °C until use.
1 cm
1 at
422 nm (27).
1 cm
1 at 459 nm (29) and 18.0 mM
1 cm
1 at 587 nm (30), respectively.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (84K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Comparison of the electrophoretic mobilities
of wild type and mutated Fds on nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel.
Lanes 1, 8, and 12, wild type Fd; lane
2, D27N; lane 3, E30Q; lane 4, D58N;
lane 5, D61N; lane 6, D66N/D67N; lane
7, D66K/D67K; lane 9, E71Q/E72Q; lane 10, D85N; lane 11, E93Q.
321 mV (versus a normal hydrogen electrode), and only the value in the case of E93Q was shifted to a significantly higher value by 67 mV. All other mutations had little effect on the
redox potential. The shift in the case of E93Q seemed not to be due to
any large conformational change in the backbone or any structural
perturbation of the cluster, because the CD spectra of E93Q in both the
ultra-violet and visible regions were essentially the same as those of
the wild type Fd and D66N/D67N as shown in Fig.
3.
Electron transfer activity of wild type and mutated Fds in interaction
with FNR and SiR and the redox potential of these Fds

View larger version (20K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Circular dichroism spectra of wild type and
mutated Fds. Far UV spectra (A) and visible spectra
(B) of wild type (WT), D66N/D67N, and E93Q are
shown. 45 and 4.5 µM Fd was dissolved in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl for the
measurements in the visible and UV regions, respectively.
Kinetic parameter values for FNR and SiR in interaction with wild type
Fd, or the mutant Fd, D66N/D67N, or E93Q

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Assay of electron transfer from Fd to FNR and
SiR by cyclic voltammetry. A, cyclic voltammograms
obtained using reaction mixtures containing 50 µM Fd and
0.25 µM FNR without (solid line) or with
(dashed line) 0.3 mM NADP+.
B, cyclic voltammograms obtained using reaction mixtures
containing 50 µM Fd and 0.25 µM SiR without
(solid line) or with (dashed line) 0.6 mM Na2SO3.

View larger version (19K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
The interaction between Fd and SiR
demonstrated by gel filtration chromatography on a Superdex 75 column. A, elution profiles of 30 µl of 3 µM Fd (a), 3 µM SiR
(b), and the mixture of the two proteins (c) when
developed with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. B,
elution profile of the mixture of the two proteins when developed with
50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM NaCl.
C, titration of Fd concentrations for binding to SiR: 30 µl of 3 µM SiR was mixed with 30 µl of 0.75 µM (a), 1.5 µM (b),
3.0 µM (c), and 12 µM
(d) Fd.

View larger version (52K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Co-chromatography of the mutated Fds and FNR
(A) or SiR (B) on a gel filtration
column. A, a mixture of FNR and Fd in 1:1 stoichiometry
was chromatographed on a Superdex 75 column. The complex of FNR and Fd,
free FNR, and free Fd were eluted at 26.3, 26.8, and 28.7 min,
respectively. B, a mixture of SiR and Fd in 1:1
stoichiometry was chromatographed on a Superdex 75 column. The complex
of SiR and Fd, free SiR, and free Fd were eluted at 25.6, 26.4, and
29.8 min, respectively. The elution conditions are described under
"Experimental Procedures." WT, wild type.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Analysis of the ability of FNR or SiR to bind
to the mutated Fds by affinity chromatography. A, FNR
was loaded on three affinity columns with immobilized wild type Fd
( 
), D66N/D67N (- - - -), or E93Q (- - - -). The enzymes
were eluted with a NaCl gradient from 0 to 400 mM in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. B, SiR was loaded on the
three Fd affinity columns and eluted under the same conditions as in
A. The conductivity of the eluate was monitored.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (33K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Comparison of the sites in Fd for
electrostatic binding to FNR and SiR. The sites of acidic residues
in Fd are divided into three groups depending on the degree of
contribution to the binding to FNR (A) and SiR
(B): strong (black), medium (gray),
and weak (light gray).
![]()
FOOTNOTES
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 81-6-6879-8612;
Fax: 81-6-6879-8613; E-mail: enzyme@protein.osaka-u.ac.jp.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Cammack, R.,
Rao, K. K.,
Bargeron, C. P.,
Hutson, K. G.,
Andrew, P. W.,
and Rogers, L. J.
(1977)
Biochem. J.
168,
205-209[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Matsubara, H.,
and Saeki, K.
(1992)
Adv. Inorg. Chem.
38,
223-280
3.
Fukuyama, K.,
Ueki, N.,
Nakamura, H.,
Tsukihara, T.,
and Matsubara, H.
(1995)
J. Biochem.
117,
1017-1023 4.
Tsukihara, T.,
Fukuyama, K.,
Mizushima, M.,
Harioka, T.,
Kusunoki, M.,
Katsube, Y.,
Hase, T.,
and Matsubara, H.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
216,
399-410[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Rypniewski, W. R.,
Breiter, D. R.,
Benning, M. M.,
Wesenberg, G.,
Oh, B. -H.,
Markley, J. L.,
Rayment, I.,
and Holden, H. M.
(1991)
Biochemistry
30,
4126-4131[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Jacobson, B. L.,
Chae, Y. K.,
Markley, J. L.,
Rayment, I.,
and Holden, H. M.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
6788-6793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Ikemizu, S.,
Bando, M.,
Sato, T.,
Morimoto, S.,
Tsukihara, T.,
Katsube, Y.,
Tanaka, N.,
Kakudo, M.,
Wada, K.,
and Matsubara, H.
(1994)
Acta Crystallogr. D
50,
167-174[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Binda, C.,
Coda, A.,
Aliverti, A.,
Zanetti, G.,
and Mattevi, A.
(1998)
Acta Crystallogr. D
54,
1353-1358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Knaff, D. B.,
and Hirasawa, M.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1056,
93-125[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
De Pascalis, A. R.,
Jelkesarov, I.,
Ackermann, F.,
Koppenol, W. H.,
Hirasawa, M.,
Knaff, D. B.,
and Bosshard, H. R.
(1993)
Protein Sci.
2,
1126-1135[Abstract]
11.
De Pascalis, A. R.,
Schürmann, P.,
and Bosshard, H. R.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
337,
217-220[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Medina, M.,
Peleato, M. L.,
Mendez, E.,
and Gomez-Moreno, C.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
203,
373-379[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Medina, M.,
Gomez-Moreno, C.,
and Tollin, G.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
210,
577-583[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Hirasawa, M.,
and Knaff, D. B.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1144,
85-91[CrossRef]
15.
Hirasawa, M.,
De Best, J. H.,
and Knaff, D. B.
(1993)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1140,
304-312[CrossRef]
16.
Dose, M. M.,
Hirasawa, M.,
Kleis-San Francisco, S.,
Lew, E. L.,
and Knaff, D. B.
(1997)
Plant Physiol.
114,
1047-1053[Abstract]
17.
Zanetti, G.,
Morelli, D.,
Ronchi, S.,
Negri, A.,
Aliverti, A.,
and Curti, B.
(1988)
Biochemistry
27,
3753-3759[CrossRef]
18.
Hirasawa, M.,
Chang, K. T.,
and Knaff, D. B.
(1991)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
286,
171-177[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Karplus, P. A.,
Daniels, M. J.,
and Herriott, J. R.
(1991)
Science
251,
60-65 20.
Walker, M. C.,
Pueyo, J. J.,
Navarro, J. A.,
Gomez-Moreno, C.,
and Tollin, G.
(1991)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
287,
351-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
21.
Hase, T.,
Kimata, Y.,
Yonekura, K.,
Matsumura, T.,
and Sakakibara, H.
(1991)
Plant Physiol.
96,
77-83 22.
Hase, T.,
Mizutani, S.,
and Mukohata, Y.
(1991)
Plant Physiol.
97,
1395-1401 23.
Higuchi, R.,
Krummel, B.,
and Saiki, R., K.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
7351-7367 24.
Good, L.,
and Nazar, R. N.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
4934 25.
Matsumura, T.,
Sakakibara, H.,
Nakano, R.,
Kimata, Y.,
Sugiyama, T.,
and Hase, T.
(1997)
Plant Physiol.
114,
653-660[Abstract]
26.
Kimata, Y.,
and Hase, T.
(1989)
Plant Physiol.
89,
1193-1197 27.
Tagawa, K.,
and Arnon, D. I.
(1968)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
153,
602-613[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Yonekura-Sakakibara, K.,
Ashikari, T.,
Tanaka, Y.,
Kusumi, T.,
and Hase, T.
(1998)
J. Biochem.
124,
615-621 29.
Pueyo, J. J.,
and Gomez-Moreno, C.
(1991)
Prep. Biochem.
21,
191-204[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
30.
Siegel, L. M.,
and Davis, P. S.
(1974)
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
1587-1598 31.
Taniguchi, I.,
Miyahara, A.,
Iwakiri, K.,
Hirakawa, Y.,
Hayashi, K.,
Nishiyama, K.,
Akashi, T.,
and Hase, T.
(1997)
Chem. Lett.
1997,
929-930[CrossRef]
32.
Aliverti, A.,
Livraghi, A.,
Piubelli, L.,
and Zanetti, G.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1342,
45-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Matsumura, T.,
Kimata-A, Y.,
Sakakibara, H.,
Sugiyama, T.,
Murata, H.,
Takao, T.,
Shimonishi, Y.,
and Hase, T.
(1999)
Plant Physiol.
119,
481-488 34.
Piubelli, L.,
Aliverti, A.,
Bellintani, F.,
and Zanetti, G.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
236,
465-469[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
35.
Hurley, J. K.,
Salamon, Z.,
Meyer, T. E.,
Fitch, J. C.,
Cusanovich, M. A.,
Markley, J. L.,
Cheng, H.,
Xia, B.,
Chae, Y. K.,
Medina, M.,
Gomez-Moreno, C.,
and Tollin, G.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
9346-9354[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Jacquot, J. P.,
Stein, M.,
Suzuki, A.,
Liottet, S.,
Sandoz, G.,
and Miginiac-Maslow, M.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
400,
293-296[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Schmitz, S.,
Navarro, F.,
Kutzki, C. K.,
Florencio, F. J.,
and Bohme, H.
(1996)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1277,
135-140[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Holden, H. M.,
Jacobson, B. L.,
Hurley, J. K.,
Tollin, G.,
Oh, B. -H.,
Skjeldal, L.,
Chae, Y. K.,
Cheng, H.,
Xia, B.,
and Markley, J. L.
(1994)
J. Bioenerg. Biomembr.
26,
67-88[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
39.
Hurley, J. K.,
Weber-Main, A. M.,
Stankovich, M. T.,
Benning, M. M.,
Thoden, J. B.,
Vanhooke, J. L.,
Holden, H. M.,
Chae, Y. K.,
Xia, B.,
Cheng, H.,
Markley, J. L.,
Martinez-Julvez, M.,
Gomez-Moreno, C.,
Schmeits, J. L.,
and Tollin, G.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
11100-11117[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-L. Tu, H.-C. Chen, and L.-W. Ku Mechanistic Studies of the Phytochromobilin Synthase HY2 from Arabidopsis J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2008; 283(41): 27555 - 27564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimata-Ariga, T. Saitoh, T. Ikegami, T. Horii, and T. Hase Molecular Interaction of Ferredoxin and Ferredoxin-NADP+ Reductase from Human Malaria Parasite J. Biochem., December 1, 2007; 142(6): 715 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. H. Chang, P. W. King, M. L. Ghirardi, and K. Kim Atomic Resolution Modeling of the Ferredoxin:[FeFe] Hydrogenase Complex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Biophys. J., November 1, 2007; 93(9): 3034 - 3045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimata-Ariga, G. Kurisu, M. Kusunoki, S. Aoki, D. Sato, T. Kobayashi, K. Kita, T. Horii, and T. Hase Cloning and Characterization of Ferredoxin and Ferredoxin-NADP+ Reductase from Human Malaria Parasite J. Biochem., March 1, 2007; 141(3): 421 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Saitoh, T. Ikegami, M. Nakayama, K. Teshima, H. Akutsu, and T. Hase NMR Study of the Electron Transfer Complex of Plant Ferredoxin and Sulfite Reductase: MAPPING THE INTERACTION SITES OF FERREDOXIN J. Biol. Chem., April 14, 2006; 281(15): 10482 - 10488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.-L. Tu, W. Sughrue, R. D. Britt, and J. C. Lagarias A Conserved Histidine-Aspartate Pair Is Required for Exovinyl Reduction of Biliverdin by a Cyanobacterial Phycocyanobilin:Ferredoxin Oxidoreductase J. Biol. Chem., February 10, 2006; 281(6): 3127 - 3136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Okutani, G. T. Hanke, Y. Satomi, T. Takao, G. Kurisu, A. Suzuki, and T. Hase Three Maize Leaf Ferredoxin:NADPH Oxidoreductases Vary in Subchloroplast Location, Expression, and Interaction with Ferredoxin Plant Physiology, November 1, 2005; 139(3): 1451 - 1459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kurisu, D. Nishiyama, M. Kusunoki, S. Fujikawa, M. Katoh, G. T. Hanke, T. Hase, and K. Teshima A Structural Basis of Equisetum arvense Ferredoxin Isoform II Producing an Alternative Electron Transfer with Ferredoxin-NADP+ Reductase J. Biol. Chem., January 21, 2005; 280(3): 2275 - 2281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. T. Hanke, Y. Kimata-Ariga, I. Taniguchi, and T. Hase A Post Genomic Characterization of Arabidopsis Ferredoxins Plant Physiology, January 1, 2004; 134(1): 255 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hirohashi, T. Hase, and M. Nakai Maize Non-Photosynthetic Ferredoxin Precursor Is Mis-Sorted to the Intermembrane Space of Chloroplasts in the Presence of Light Plant Physiology, April 1, 2001; 125(4): 2154 - 2163. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Schultz, M. C. Suh, and J. B. Ohlrogge Stearoyl-Acyl Carrier Protein and Unusual Acyl-Acyl Carrier Protein Desaturase Activities Are Differentially Influenced by Ferredoxin Plant Physiology, October 1, 2000; 124(2): 681 - 692. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |