![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 41, 29420-29425, October 8, 1999
From the Sulfonylurea receptors (SURx) are
required subunits of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel.
SURx alone is electrophysiologically inert. However, when
SURx is combined with an inward rectifier Kir6.2 subunit,
ATP-sensitive potassium channel activity is generated. We report the
identification, characterization, and localization of Dsur,
a novel Drosophila gene that is highly related to the vertebrate SUR family. The Dsur coding sequence contains
structural features characteristic of the ABC transporter family and,
in addition, harbors 1.7 kilobases of a distinctive sequence that does
not share homology with any known gene. When Dsur alone is expressed in Xenopus oocytes glibenclamide-sensitive
potassium channel activity occurs. During Drosophila
embryogenesis, the Dsur gene is specifically expressed in
the developing tracheal system and dorsal vessel. Studies of the
Drosophila genome support that only a single
Dsur gene is present. Our data reveal conservation of
glibenclamide-sensitive potassium channels in Drosophila
and suggest that Dsur may play an important role during
Drosophila embryogenesis. The lack of gene duplication in
the Drosophila system provides a unique opportunity for
functional studies of SUR using a genetic approach.
ATP-sensitive potassium
(KATP)1 channels
serve as a vital link between cellular metabolism and membrane
electrical activity in excitable cells, including those of the
pancreatic islets, cardiac, smooth, and skeletal muscle, neurons, and
epithelia (1). These channels are involved in a variety of important
processes, such as control of insulin secretion from pancreatic islet
beta cells, the response of cardiac and cerebral cells to ischemia, regulation of vascular smooth muscle tone, and modulation of
transmitter release at brain synapses. The pharmacologic
characteristics of KATP channels include blockade by the
sulfonylurea class of agents, such as glibenclamide (1).
At the molecular level, a complex of two subunits, the sulfonylurea
receptor (SURx) (2) and the inward rectifier Kir6.2 (3),
form the KATP channel. Both subunits are required, as individually neither intact subunit is able to produce a functional KATP channel and assemble as an octamer in a 4:4
stoichiometry (4). The SURx is a member of the ATP-binding
cassette family (2). Characteristic of this family is the presence of
two conserved nucleotide binding folds (NBF), each with Walker A and B
subsequences forming the nucleic acid binding pocket (5, 6), the ABC signature sequence, and the NBF-2 TIAHRL motif (7). Alignment of
SURx sequences with other ATP-binding cassette family
members reveals the greatest similarity with members of the multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) group (8). In addition to the MRP
and SUR genes, this group includes the yeast cadmium factor YCF1, the
liver canalicular multispecific organic anion transporter, and the
rabbit epithelial basolateral chloride conductance regulator genes
(8).
Three vertebrate isoforms of SURx, to which the presence of
tissue-specific KATP channels with different
pharmacological sensitivities may be attributed, have been identified.
In combination with a Kir6.2 subunit SUR1 forms the pancreatic (3),
SUR2A the cardiac (9), and the splice variant SUR2B (10) the smooth
muscle types of KATP channels.
As with many other classes of ion channels, mutation of
KATP channels has been found to be associated with human
disease. Loss of function of the pancreatic islet KATP
channel, because of mutation of either the SUR1 or Kir6.2 subunit
(11-14), has been demonstrated to lead to persistent hyperinsulinemic
hypoglycemia of infancy, an autosomal recessive disorder characterized
by unregulated insulin secretion and severe hypoglycemia (15). Disease
phenotypes have not yet been assigned to the other KATP
channels. However, based on their importance in the physiology of
cardiac and smooth muscle and neurons, one can speculate that
abnormalities of them may contribute to disease states.
Conservation of several channel types, but not the KATP
channel, has been demonstrated in invertebrate species. The study of
Drosophila has been an effective approach for the
identification and characterization of the structure, function, and
gene regulation of other potassium channels (16-18). Here we report
the identification and characterization of a novel member of the
SURx family, Dsur, and thereby demonstrate
conservation of glibenclamide-sensitive potassium channel activity in a
lower organism. Dsur is expressed specifically in the
developing Drosophila dorsal vessel and tracheal system
during embryogenesis. The implication of Drosophila as a
model system for structural and functional studies of the
KATP channel is discussed.
Isolation of Dsur cDNA
Three expressed sequence tags (ESTs) that contained novel
Drosophila ABC transporter NBF-2 region motifs were
identified. Gene-specific primers were used to amplify 400-500-base
pair fragments located at the 5' end of each EST clone to create probes
for library screening. Approximately 106 phage plaques from
a Drosophila melanogaster embryonic cDNA
library were screened (5'-STRETCH cDNA library,
CLONTECH) using standard methods. The full-length
SUR homolog was isolated using a combination of several rounds of
overlapping library and PCR screening. The 5' end of the cDNA was
isolated using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends strategy (Life
Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
The final sequence was confirmed as a single message by the sequencing
of full-length cDNA products amplified by reverse transcriptase-PCR
from Drosophila embryonic mRNA. Sequence analyses,
comparison, and alignments were performed using the BCM Search Launcher
interface (19) and Lasergene software.
Low Stringency Southern Blot Analysis
Low stringency conditions included a hybridization and wash
temperature of 55 °C, wash buffer of 2× SSC, 0.1% SDS, and a final wash of 0.5× SSC, 0.1% SDS. The probe was located between nucleic acids Electrophysiological Studies
Whole Cell Currents--
Stage V-VI Xenopus laevis
oocytes were isolated and injected with RNA as described previously
(20). The two-electrode voltage clamp technique was used, and
recordings were obtained from currents elicited by 20-ms test pulses
from Single-channel Currents--
Oocytes were placed in a hypertonic
solution ((in mmol/liter): 220 N-methylglucamine, 220 aspartic acid, 2 MgCl2,
10 EGTA, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4, room temperature) and allowed to shrink for 2-5 min to aid removal of the vitelline membrane. Following an
equilibration period, conventional patch clamp techniques were used to
record single-channel currents from cell-attached and inside-out
patches expressing Dsur cRNA. Solutions included standard pipette solution (in mmol/liter): 150 KCl, 1.0 CaCl2, 1.0 MgCl2, and 5.0 HEPES, pH 7.4, which was used throughout the
entire study, and bath solution (in mmol/liter): 150 KCl, 5.0 EDTA, and
5.0 HEPES, pH 7.4. Glibenclamide (Sigma) was prepared as a 100 mM stock solution in Me2SO and EtOH (volume
ratio, 1:2) and diluted in the appropriate bath solution.
Single-channel currents were recorded with a patch clamp amplifier
(Axopatch 200A, Axon Instruments Inc., Foster City, CA), low pass
filtered at 1 kHz using an 8-pole Bessel filter, and stored on
videotape after pulse code modulation (PCM-501ES, Sony). For analysis,
data were redigitized (4 kHz) and transferred to a personal computer
and analyzed using pCLAMP 6.04 (Axon Instruments Inc., Foster City, CA).
Chromosomal Localization of Dsur
Filter copies of the arrayed P1 library were obtained (Genome
Systems, St. Louis, MO) and hybridized with a Dsur
cDNA-specific probe, which had been proven to be single copy in the
genome by genomic Southern blot. To confirm the result obtained by
hybridization against the array, the identified P1 clones were obtained
(Genome Systems) and prepped, and the presence of each gene was
confirmed by PCR amplification using primers previously demonstrated to be Dsur-specific. Direct sequence analysis of the PCR
amplicons confirmed the presence of the Dsur sequence.
In Situ Hybridization and Immunochemistry of Whole-mount
Embryos
Preparation, in situ hybridization, and
immunohistochemistry of whole-mount embryos were performed as described
(21). Digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes were synthesized in
vitro according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) using 1.2 kilobases of Dsur template
that extended from 5455 base pairs through the 3'-noncoding region.
Probe detection was performed through use of an alkaline phosphatase
enzyme conjugated to anti-digoxigenin antibody. Homozygous mutant
embryos were identified by the absence of Isolation of Dsur--
We used an approach based on computer
searching of the EST data base to identify a Drosophila gene
that is highly related to the vertebrate SUR family. Three
novel ESTs were identified. However, only one retained consistent
homology with SUR sequences through its 5' end, and we named
this gene Dsur. The full-length Dsur cDNA
contains an open reading frame of 2167 amino acids (Fig. 1), with a predicted molecular mass of
241,858 daltons. Northern analysis performed on Drosophila
embryonic mRNA revealed a message size of approximately 6.5 kilobases, supporting the hypothesis that the full-length cDNA had
been isolated (data not shown). The methionine chosen as the
translation start site met the Kozak criteria for having the ATG codon
flanked by a favorable context for initiation, stop codons in all three
reading frames 5' to this location, and no strong upstream ATG codons
in any frame (22, 23). A consensus polyadenylation site (AATAAA) is
located 205 base pairs after the stop codon.
Structural Features of Dsur--
Similar to its vertebrate
counterparts, Dsur contains structural features
characteristic of the ABC transporter family, including the presence of
two NBF regions each with a Walker A and B consensus sequence, the ABC
signature sequence, and the NBF-2 TIAHRL motif (Refs. 5-7; Fig. 1). A
computer sequence search of public data bases, using the BLASTP with
BEAUTY enhancement program (19), reveals that the full-length
Dsur sequence shares greatest homology with vertebrate
SUR sequences, whereas further alignments reveal that it
fits into the MRP subfamily of ABC transporters (Ref. 8; Fig.
2). The similarity of Dsur to
members of the vertebrate MRP group is greater than that to other
Drosophila ABC transporter sequences. For example, within
the NBF2 region, Dsur was 77% homologous and 51% identical
to the rat SUR1/SUR2 genes but 42% homologous and 27% identical to
the Drosophila MDR49 gene (24). Dsur is predicted
to contain 15 membrane-spanning regions, in a nine + six pattern, with
the two cytoplasmic NBF regions each following a transmembrane group
(25). This is consistent with the structure predicted for the MRP
subfamily of ABC transporters (8).
Two regions of hydrophilic sequence that flank the transmembrane region
between the NBF domains are present in Dsur but not in
either vertebrate SUR or other ABC transporter sequences
(Fig. 1). These unique regions of sequence are contained within the Dsur transcript and do not represent either cloning
artifacts or retained intronic sequences. This was demonstrated by
amplification and sequencing of the full-length Dsur
cDNA from Drosophila mRNA template and determination
of genomic organization upon comparison of cDNA and genomic
sequences. A computer search of public sequence data bases with these
unique portions of Dsur does not reveal significant homology
with any known sequence, including potassium channel pore sequences.
These two regions of unique sequence are responsible for the difference
in size of 585 codons between the vertebrate and Drosophila
SUR molecules.
To assess the complexity of the Drosophila KATP
channel system, we sought other SUR isoforms and an inward
rectifier subunit. Neither was detected by computer search of the
Drosophila EST data base, PCR screening of
Drosophila genomic DNA template using degenerate primers
against conserved channel pore regions, or low stringency screening of
Drosophila libraries. Southern blot analysis of
Drosophila genomic DNA, using a Dsur cDNA
probe and low stringency conditions, revealed only fragments consistent with Dsur (Fig. 3).
Electrophysiological Activity of Dsur--
Because we were unable
to isolate an inward rectifier subunit sequence from
Drosophila and Dsur contains additional sequences beyond that present in vertebrate SUR family members, we
postulated that Dsur would be sufficient to generate
KATP channel activity. Two microelectrode voltage clamp
techniques were used to measure outward whole cell currents from
Xenopus oocytes injected with Dsur, human
SUR1, or human Kir6.2 cRNA (Fig.
4). In oocytes expressing Dsur, average current was 224 ± 5 nA
(n = 12) (Fig. 4A), which is significantly
different from the average current of 57 ± 5 nA found in control
noninjected oocytes (n = 11, p = 0.001)
(Fig. 4D). To determine the amount of whole cell current
that was sensitive to sulfonylureas, the oocytes were perfused with a
solution of glibenclamide, a sulfonylurea agent and prototypical
inhibitor of the KATP channel (1). 96.4 ± 0.6% of
this Ba2+-sensitive potassium current was found to be
irreversibly inhibited by glibenclamide (n = 10). The
residual glibenclamide-insensitive current was not different from the
base-line current found in uninjected cells (n = 10, p = 0.12) and was neither Ba2+- nor
amiloride-sensitive. No statistically significant increase in whole
cell current was observed in those oocytes expressing either human
SUR1 (n = 8) or Kir6.2
(n = 3) (Fig. 4, B and C). Average whole cell current for oocytes expressing human
SUR1 was 87.8 ± 4.5 nA, and for those expressing
Kir6.2, the whole cell current was 77.3 ± 7 nA.
Measurement of single-channel currents from inside-out patches, made
from Xenopus oocytes expressing the full-length
Dsur cRNA, confirmed the whole cell current studies (Fig.
5). In excised patches in the absence of
ATP, a low conductance inwardly rectifying potassium channel was
observed (n = 3). This channel activity was inhibited
by glibenclamide.
Expression and Chromosomal Localization of Dsur--
To determine
the embryonic expression pattern of Dsur, whole-mount
in situ hybridization was performed using a specific
cDNA probe (Fig. 6). The very early
embryonic expression is consistent with remnant maternal messages.
Specific embryonic expression was noted beginning at stage 10 in the
dorsal vessel, the Drosophila homolog of the heart and
circulatory system, and beginning at stage 15 in the tracheal system
(including tracheal pits, trees, and placodes), posterior spiracles,
and salivary glands. Once initiated, expression remained present
throughout embryogenesis. Dsur is expressed in the larval
and adult stages, as demonstrated by reverse transcription and
polymerase chain reaction amplification of RNA isolated from wild-type
Drosophila (data not shown).
Using the arrayed P1 library generated by the Berkeley
Drosophila Genome Project, we demonstrated that P1 clones
DS07249, DS04407, and DS05801 contain the Dsur sequence,
placing it in the 31B1-2 region of the second Drosophila
chromosome. Chromosomal deficiencies Df(2L)J2 and Df(2L)J1 span this
region (26). As assessed by in situ hybridization, animals
with homozygous mutants for either genotype or heterozygous mutants for
both genotypes lack the Dsur message, confirming the
chromosomal localization of Dsur (data not shown).
We have isolated a novel member of the SUR family,
Dsur, from the Drosophila genome. Sequence
analysis places Dsur into the MRP group of ABC transporters.
In general, ABC transporters of various types exhibit the greatest
homology in the characteristic and conserved NBF regions. Little or no
homology may be present in other regions of the molecules, although the
membrane topology is anticipated to be similar (7). The sequence
homology between Dsur and vertebrate SUR family members is
not limited to the NBF regions but rather extends the length of the
molecule to the amino terminus. Together, sequence analysis results and
electrophysiologic characterization support the assignment of
Dsur into the SUR family of ABC transporters.
These data support the hypothesis that Dsur encodes a
glibenclamide-sensitive potassium channel with inward rectification characteristics like those of IK(ATP) generated
by the complex of SURx and Kir6.2 subunits (3).
Dsur appears novel among SUR family members because
expression of it alone in Xenopus oocytes results in
measurable channel activity. We cannot discount the possibility that an
endogenous protein present in Xenopus oocytes may interact
with Dsur and confer the ability for production of channel
activity. However, heterologous expression of mammalian SUR alone in
Xenopus oocytes, HEK 293 cells, and COS cells has not
demonstrated such an event, making this possibility seem remote (Refs.
2, 3, and 27; Fig. 4B). We speculate that the unique ability
of Dsur to generate potassium channel activity when
expressed alone stems from those regions of the sequence that are
present in Dsur but not other SUR family members.
Detailed electrophysiological characterization of engineered
Dsur mutants might provide additional information in this regard.
Our results reveal that isolation of Dsur provides
Drosophila as a unique model system for structural
definition and functional analysis of the KATP channel in a
relatively simple system that lacks gene redundancy. The increase in
size and complexity of the mammalian genome, which is estimated to be
four to six times larger than that of Drosophila, is
attributed to the duplication of ancestral genomes. However, the core
number of biochemical pathways and signaling mechanisms is predicted to
be similar between Drosophila and mammals (28).
The embryonic expression pattern of Dsur implies a potential
role for the sulfonylurea receptor family in cell migration, as the
tracheal system is undergoing directed cell migration but not cell
division during the developmental stages of Dsur expression (29). Indeed, our preliminary analysis of deletion mutants in the
region of Dsur reveals normal tracheal cell specification but marked abnormalities in the architecture of the tracheal system, which can be attributed to aberrant cell migration. Branched tubular epithelial structures like the Drosophila tracheal system
are common in nature (29) and include the cardiovascular system, lung,
and pancreas. Therefore, additional understanding of upstream regulators, downstream effectors, and physiological function of Dsur gained from the study of the Drosophila
model system may have much broader implications.
We thank Terrence Barrette for excellent
technical assistance and Andy Shenker both for thoughtful comments and
review of the manuscript. The University of Michigan DNA sequencing
core facility performed automated fluorescent DNA sequencing.
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grant HD28820, a Michigan Diabetes Research Center grant, and a
Lawson Wilkins Genentech Clinical Scholars award (to P. M. T.) and by
a March of Dimes grant and National Institutes of Health Grant
R01DK53428 (to M. E.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF167431.
§
Present address: Dept. of Human Genetics, University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0646.
¶
Supported by a TUBITAK scholarship.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pediatrics,
MSRB III, Rm. 8220A, Box 0646, 1150 W. Medical Center Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0646. Tel.: 313-764-5175; Fax: 313-763-408; E-mail: pamt@umich.edu.
The abbreviations used are:
KATP, ATP-sensitive potassium channel;
SURx, sulfonylurea receptor
x;
NBF, nucleotide binding folds;
MRP, multidrug
resistance-associated protein;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
EST, expressed sequence tag.
A Novel Sulfonylurea Receptor Family Member Expressed in the
Embryonic Drosophila Dorsal Vessel and Tracheal System*
§,
¶,
,
,
,
,
, and
**
Department of Pediatrics and Communicable
Diseases, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0646 and the
Department of Pediatrics, Yale University, New
Haven, Connecticut 06520
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
131 and 763, relative to the ATG translation initiation codon.
100 to 40 mV in 20-mV increments (Vhold =
65 mV). Microelectrode pipettes (Kimax-51, Kimble Products) typically
had resistances of 0.5-2.0 M (when filled with 3 M KCl solution). Oocytes were bathed with a control
solution containing (in mmol/liter): 105 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, 1 CaCl2, and 5 HEPES, pH 7.4. The initial experimental
protocol was used to determine whether the current generated was a
barium (Ba2+)-sensitive potassium current. It consisted of
a 10-min equilibration period in control solution, impalement of the
cell, a 5-min control period, a 3-min exposure to 2 mM
Ba2+, wash in control solution, and a recovery period. In
subsequent experiments, the protocol consisted of a 10-min
equilibration in control solution, impalement of the cell, a 5-min
control period, a 15-min exposure to 500 µM glibenclamide
in control bath solution followed by a 3-min exposure to 2 mM Ba2+-containing bath solution, and a 5-min
wash in control solution.
-galactosidase enzyme
staining, which was carried on a balancer chromosome lacZ insert.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (103K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The Drosophila SUR gene. The predicted cDNA sequence of Dsur is
marked as follows. Nucleotide binding fold regions are
boxed, with the Walker A (GXXGXGKS)
sequences, ABC transporter signature sequences, and Walker B sequences
indicated in bold with a dotted underline and the
NBF-2 TIAHRL motif marked with a double underline. The
regions in gray are unique to the Dsur sequence.
Predicted transmembrane domains are underlined.
Single-letter amino acid codes are used.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic analysis of the full-length
Dsur and other ABC transporter family members.
Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis were carried out
with LASERGENE (DNASTAR, Madison, WI). The EBI accession numbers of the
protein sequences used here are as follows: SUR1-Human,
L78207; SUR1-Rat, L40624; SUR2-Rat, D83598;
epithelial basolateral chloride conductance regulator
(EBCR-Rabbit), Z49144; canalicular multispecific organic
anion transporter (cMOAT-Rat), L49379; MRP-Mouse,
1488428; yeast cadmium factor (YCF1-Yeast), L35237; cystic
fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR-Human),
U66261, P-glycoprotein49-Drosophila, M59076;
P-glycoprotein65-Drosophila, M59077; multidrug resistance
(MDR1-Human), M14578.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Low stringency Southern blot of wild-type
genomic Drosophila DNA using a 5' Dsur cDNA probe reveals only a single SUR species. All visualized fragments are consistent with the
genomic organization of Dsur, and the probe spans genomic
PstI and EcoRI restriction endonuclease sites.
Lanes are labeled with the restriction endonuclease used for
genomic DNA digestion.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Whole cell currents measured from
Xenopus oocytes expressing Dsur,
human SUR1, or human Kir6. Shown
are outward whole cell currents at Vhold =
65
mV, obtained using two microelectrode voltage clamp techniques and
plotted against time. The effects of glibenclamide on
Ba2+-sensitive currents are presented. A,
expression of Dsur leads to an increase in whole cell
current of approximately 300 nA (n = 10). Expression of
human SUR1 (B) (n = 8) or the
expression of human Kir6.2 (C) (n = 3) does not lead to an increase in whole cell current. D,
control oocytes (n = 11).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Single-channel conductance characteristics
for Xenopus oocytes expressing Dsur.
A, single-channel voltage-current relationship for
Dsur. B, representative single-channel traces for
specific voltages. Solid lines mark the base lines and
dotted lines indicate channel levels. Data were obtained
from excised inside-out patches for Dsur. Channel activity
is maintained in Mg2+-free, ATP-free solutions. Data were
low pass filtered at 1 kHz and filtered at 300 Hz.

View larger version (78K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Embryonic expression pattern of
Dsur. Whole-mount in situ
hybridization of wild-type Drosophila embryos reveals the
presence of the Dsur message in the tracheal system
(including tracheal pits, tree, and placodes), posterior spiracles,
salivary glands, and dorsal vessels (heart and aorta). A,
expression in stage 2 embryos is consistent with remnant maternal
expression. B, C, and D, no expression
is evident in stages 4, 5, and 8. E, stage 10, lateral view
reveals expression limited to the developing dorsal vessel.
F, same embryo as in E, rotated to a
dorsal/ventral view. G-I, presence of the Dsur
message throughout dorsal vessel closure. G, stage 13, lateral view; H, stage 13, dorsal/ventral view;
I, stage 17. J, beginning with stage 15, staining
of both the dorsal vessel system and tracheal system is evident in most
embryos, as depicted here. K, tracheal system of stage 17 embryo. L, negative control (sense probe). Embryos were
staged according to Campos-Ortega and Hartenstein (30).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Ashcroft, F. M.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Neurosci.
11,
97-118[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Aguilar-Bryan, L.,
Nichols, C. G.,
Wechsler, S. W.,
Clement, J. P.,
Boyd, A. E.,
Gonzalez, G.,
Herrera-Sosa, H.,
Nguy, K.,
Bryan, J.,
and Nelson, D. A.
(1995)
Science
268,
423-426 3.
Inagaki, N.,
Gonoi, T.,
Clement, J. P.,
Namba, N.,
Inazawa, J.,
Gonzalez, G.,
Aguilar-Bryan, L.,
Seino, S.,
and Bryan, J.
(1995)
Science
270,
1166-1170 4.
Clement, J. P.,
Kunjilwar, K.,
Gonzalez, G.,
Schwanstecher, M.,
Panten, U.,
Aguilar-Bryan, L.,
and Bryan, J.
(1997)
Neuron
18,
827-838[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
5.
Higgins, C. F.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8,
67-113[CrossRef]
6.
Walker, J. E.,
Saraste, M.,
Runswick, M. J.,
and Gay, N. J.
(1982)
EMBO J.
1,
945-951[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Decottinges, A.,
and Goffeau, A.
(1997)
Nat. Genet.
15,
137-145[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Tusnady, G.,
Bakos, E.,
Varadi, A.,
and Sarkadi, B.
(1997)
FEBS Lett.
402,
1-3[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Inagaki, N.,
Gonoi, T.,
Clement, J. P., IV,
Wang, C.,
Aguilar-Bryan, L.,
Bryan, J.,
and Seino, S.
(1996)
Neuron
16,
1011-1017[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Isomoto, S.,
Kondo, C.,
Yamada, M.,
Matsumoto, S.,
Higashiguchi, O.,
Horio, Y.,
Matsuzawa, Y.,
and Kurachi, Y.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
24321-24324 11.
Thomas, P. M.,
Cote, G. J.,
Wohllk, N.,
Haddad, B.,
Mathew, P. M.,
Rabl, W.,
Aguilar-Bryan, L.,
Gagel, R. F.,
and Bryan, J.
(1995)
Science
268,
426-429 12.
Thomas, P.,
Ye, Y.,
and Lightner, E.
(1996)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
5,
1809-1812 13.
Kane, C.,
Shepherd, R. M.,
Squires, P. E.,
Johnson, P.,
James, R.,
Milla, R. P.,
Aynsley-Green, A.,
Lindley, K. J.,
and Dunne, M. J.
(1996)
Nat. Med.
2,
1344-1347[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
14.
Nestorowicz, A.,
Glaser, B.,
Wilson, B. A.,
Shyng, S.-L.,
Nichols, C. G.,
Stanley, C. A.,
Thornton, P. S.,
and Permutt, M. A.
(1998)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
7,
1119-1128 15.
Aynsley-Green, A.,
Polak, J. M.,
Bloom, S. R.,
Gough, M. H.,
Keeling, J.,
Ashcroft, S. J. H.,
Turner, R. C.,
and Baum, J. D.
(1981)
Arch. Dis. Child.
56,
496-508[Abstract]
16.
Papazian, D. M.,
Schwarz, T. L.,
Tempel, B. L.,
Jan, Y. N.,
and Jan, L. Y.
(1987)
Science
237,
749-753 17.
Tempel, B. L.,
Papazian, D. M.,
Schwarz, T. L.,
Jan, Y. N.,
and Jan, L. Y.
(1987)
Science
237,
770-775 18.
Pongs, O.,
Muller, R.,
Krah-Jentgens, I.,
Boumann, A.,
Kiltz, H. H.,
Canal, I.,
Llamazares, S.,
and Ferrus, A.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
1087-1096[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Worley, K. C.,
Wiese, B. A.,
and Smith, R. F.
(1995)
Genome Res.
5,
173-184 20.
McNicholas, D. M.,
Guggino, W. B.,
Schwiebert, E. M.,
Giebisch, G.,
and Egan, M. E.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A
93,
8083-8088 21.
Lehman, R.,
and Tautz, D.
(1994)
In Situ Hybridization to RNA
in
Drosophila melanogaster: Practical Uses in Cell Biology
(Goldstein, L.
, and Gyrberg, E., eds), Vol. 44
, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
22.
Kozak, M.
(1996)
Mamm. Genome
7,
563-574[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
23.
Cavener, D. R.
(1987)
Nucleic Acids Res.
15,
1353-1361 24.
Wu, C. T.,
Budding, M.,
Griffin, M. S.,
and Croop, J. M.
(1991)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11,
3940-3948 25.
Rost, B.,
Casadio, R.,
Rariselli, P.,
and Sander, C.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
4,
521-533[Abstract]
26.
Clegg, N. J.,
Whitehead, I. P.,
Brock, J. K.,
Sinclair, D. A.,
Mottus, R.,
Stromotich, G.,
Harrington, M. J.,
and Grigliati, T. A.
(1993)
Genetics
134,
221-230[Abstract]
27.
Seino, S.,
Inagaki, N.,
Namba, N.,
and Gonoi, T.
(1996)
Diabetes Metab. Rev.
4,
177-190
28.
Miklos, G.,
and Rubin, G. M.
(1996)
Cell
86,
521-529[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Manning, G.,
and Krasnow, M. A.
(1993)
in
The Development of Drosophila melanogaster
(Bate, M.
, and Martinez-Arias, A., eds), Vol. 1
, pp. 609-687, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
30.
Campos-Ortega, J.,
and Hartenstein, V.
(1985)
The Embryonic Development of Drosophila melanogaster
, Springer-Verlag New York Inc., New York
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Zaffran, I. Reim, L. Qian, P. C. Lo, R. Bodmer, and M. Frasch Cardioblast-intrinsic Tinman activity controls proper diversification and differentiation of myocardial cells in Drosophila Development, October 15, 2006; 133(20): 4073 - 4083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Akasaka, S. Klinedinst, K. Ocorr, E. L. Bustamante, S. K. Kim, and R. Bodmer The ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channel-encoded dSUR gene is required for Drosophila heart function and is regulated by tinman PNAS, August 8, 2006; 103(32): 11999 - 12004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhang, T. Miki, T. Shibasaki, M. Yokokura, A. Saraya, and S. Seino Identification and characterization of a novel member of the ATP-sensitive K+ channel subunit family, Kir6.3, in zebrafish Physiol Genomics, February 23, 2006; 24(3): 290 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Reim and M. Frasch The Dorsocross T-box genes are key components of the regulatory network controlling early cardiogenesis in Drosophila Development, November 15, 2005; 132(22): 4911 - 4925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Doring, E. Wischmeyer, R. P. Kuhnlein, H. Jackle, and A. Karschin Inwardly Rectifying K+ (Kir) Channels in Drosophila. A CRUCIAL ROLE OF CELLULAR MILIEU FACTORS FOR Kir CHANNEL FUNCTION J. Biol. Chem., July 5, 2002; 277(28): 25554 - 25561. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ponzielli, M. Astier, A. Chartier, A. Gallet, P. Therond, and M. Semeriva Heart tube patterning in Drosophila requires integration of axial and segmental information provided by the Bithorax Complex genes and hedgehog signaling Development, January 10, 2002; 129(19): 4509 - 4521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. ZAFFRAN, X. XU, P.C.H. LO, H.-H. LEE, and M. FRASCH Cardiogenesis in the Drosophila Model: Control Mechanisms during Early Induction and Diversification of Cardiac Progenitors Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2002; 67(0): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Conti, C. M. Radeke, S.-L. Shyng, and C. A. Vandenberg Transmembrane Topology of the Sulfonylurea Receptor SUR1 J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2001; 276(44): 41270 - 41278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |