JBC Invitrogen Ultrasensitive Cytokine Assays

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hattori, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.-i.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hattori, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.-i.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 42, 29641-29647, October 15, 1999


Molecular Dissection of the Interactions among Ikappa Balpha , FWD1, and Skp1 Required for Ubiquitin-mediated Proteolysis of Ikappa Balpha *

Kimihiko HattoriDagger §, Shigetsugu HatakeyamaDagger §, Michiko ShiraneDagger §, Masaki MatsumotoDagger §, and Kei-ichi NakayamaDagger §

From the Dagger  Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582 and § CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kawaguchi 332-0012, Japan

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The SCF complex containing Skp1, Cul1, and the F-box protein FWD1 (the mouse homologue of Drosophila Slimb and Xenopus beta -TrCP) functions as the ubiquitin ligase for Ikappa Balpha . FWD1 associates with Skp1 through the F-box domain and also recognizes the conserved DSGXXS motif of Ikappa Balpha . The structural requirements for the interactions of FWD1 with Ikappa Balpha and with Skp1 have now been investigated further. The D31A mutation (but not the G33A mutation) in the DSGXXS motif of Ikappa Balpha abolished the binding of Ikappa Balpha to FWD1 and its subsequent ubiquitination without affecting the phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha . The Ikappa Balpha mutant D31E still exhibited binding to FWD1 and underwent ubiquitination. These results suggest that, in addition to site-specific phosphorylation at Ser32 and Ser36, an acidic amino acid at position 31 is required for FWD1-mediated ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha . Deletion analysis of Skp1 revealed that residues 61-143 of this protein are required for binding to FWD1. On the other hand, the highly conserved residues Pro149, Ile160, and Leu164 in the F-box domain of FWD1 were dispensable for binding to Skp1. Together, these data delineate the structural requirements for the interactions among Ikappa Balpha , FWD1, and Skp1 that underlie substrate recognition by the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway is essential for several key biological processes, including cell cycle progression, gene transcription, and signal transduction (1-3). The formation of ubiquitin-protein conjugates requires three components that participate in a cascade of ubiquitin transfer reactions as follows: a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and a ubiquitin ligase (E3).1 The specificity of protein ubiquitination is often determined by E3 enzymes, and proteins polyubiquitinated by these enzymes are subjected to degradation by the 26 S proteasome. Recent genetic and biochemical studies of yeast have led to the identification of a new class of E3 ligases, termed SCF complexes, that are required for degradation of cyclins and their inhibitors (4, 5). However, in addition to cell cycle-related proteins, an increasing number of molecules important in other biological processes in yeast have been identified as substrates for the SCF complexes (6). These complexes consist of invariable components such as Skp1 and Cdc53 as well as variable components known as F-box proteins, which bind to Skp1 through the F-box domain (7-9). F-box proteins function as receptors for the target protein, which is usually phosphorylated (8, 9). Thus, the substrate specificity of the SCF complex is thought to be determined by F-box proteins. The physiological roles of the SCF complex in multicellular organisms remain to be elucidated.

Various short-lived regulatory proteins undergo ubiquitination in mammalian cells. One of the most extensively studied of these molecules is Ikappa Balpha , an inhibitory protein that associates with the dimeric nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B) and thereby prevents it from entering the nucleus. NF-kappa B plays a central role in the regulation of genes that function in inflammation, cell proliferation, and apoptosis (10-14). It is located in the cytoplasm of resting cells but enters the nucleus in response to various stimuli, including viral infection, ultraviolet radiation, and inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-1. In response to these external signals, Ikappa Balpha is rapidly phosphorylated by a protein kinase complex known as IKK (Ikappa B kinase) (15-23). The IKK complex contains at least four kinases (IKKalpha , IKKbeta , IKKgamma (or NEMO), and NIK) as well as the scaffold protein IKAP (24). IKK specifically phosphorylates the two serine residues (Ser32 and Ser36) of the DSGXXS motif present in the NH2-terminal region of Ikappa Balpha (16-21). Phosphorylated Ikappa Balpha is then ubiquitinated on Lys21 and Lys22, which triggers the rapid degradation of the protein by the 26 S proteasome (25-29). The liberated NF-kappa B then translocates to the nucleus and activates the expression of target genes.

We and others (30-42) have recently shown that FWD1, the mouse homologue of Drosophila Slimb and Xenopus beta -TrCP, is a member of the F-box- and WD40 repeat-containing family of proteins and that it specifically recognizes Ikappa Balpha and beta -catenin as substrates only when they are phosphorylated at the serine residues in the conserved DSGXXS motif. FWD1 also interacts with the Skp1-Cul1 complex through its F-box domain, thereby forming the SCF complex SCFFWD1. Mutation of the serine residues in the DSGXXS motif stabilizes Ikappa Balpha and beta -catenin by inhibiting both their binding to FWD1 and their subsequent ubiquitination (30, 31). It is therefore likely that phosphorylation of the DSGXXS motif serves to recruit FWD1 and thereby to link Ikappa Balpha to the ubiquitination machinery. However, it has remained unknown whether other conserved residues, including Asp31 and Gly33 of the DSGXXS motif, are also essential for ubiquitin-dependent degradation of Ikappa Balpha .

We have now investigated the binding motifs that mediate the interactions of FWD1 with Ikappa Balpha and Skp1. We molecularly dissected the pathway of Ikappa Balpha ubiquitination into two steps as follows: phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha and subsequent binding of FWD1 to the phosphorylated DSGXXS motif. We identified the region of Skp1 required for binding to FWD1 and performed a mutation analysis of the F-box domain. Our results reveal the structural requirements for complex formation among Ikappa Balpha , FWD1, and Skp1 during the ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha . Furthermore, they may facilitate the identification of new substrates for SCFFWD1 by screening of sequence data bases.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture-- 293T cells were grown at 37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.).

Construction of Expression Plasmids and Mutagenesis-- Molecular cloning of Skp1 and FWD1 cDNAs was described previously (30, 31). Complementary DNAs encoding Skp1 and its deletion mutants, FWD1, and the mutant FWD1(Delta F), each protein-tagged at its NH2 terminus with the Myc or FLAG epitope, were generated by the polymerase chain reaction with the high fidelity thermostable DNA polymerase KOD (Toyobo, Tokyo, Japan). Complementary DNAs encoding one- or two-site FWD1 mutants, each tagged at its NH2 terminus with the FLAG epitope, were generated with the use of a Chameleon site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Ikappa Balpha and IKKbeta cDNAs were kindly provided by H. Nakano. Complementary DNAs encoding Ikappa Balpha mutants, each tagged at its NH2 terminus with the Myc epitope, were generated with the use of a QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). Complementary DNAs encoding all mutant proteins were sequenced and subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen).

Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, and Immunoblot Analysis-- 293T cells were transfected by the calcium phosphate method (43). After 48 h, the cells were lysed with a solution containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 300 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100, aprotinin (10 µg/ml), leupeptin (10 µg/ml), 10 mM iodoacetamide, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.4 mM Na3VO4, 0.4 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, and 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate. The cell lysates were treated with 50 µl of protein G-Sepharose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 1 h at 4 °C and then incubated with 5 µg of appropriate antibodies and protein G-Sepharose beads for 4 h at 4 °C. The resulting immunoprecipitates were then washed thoroughly four times with ice-cold lysis buffer, fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies (1 µg/ml) to Myc (9E10, Roche Molecular Biochemicals), to the FLAG epitope (M5, Sigma), or to ubiquitin (1B3, MBL, Nagoya, Japan).

In Vitro Kinase Assay-- Complementary DNAs encoding Myc-tagged Ikappa Balpha and its mutants were subcloned into pGEX-6P1 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The recombinant glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins containing the Myc-Ikappa Balpha sequences were purified from bacteria with the use of glutathione beads and then treated with PreScission protease (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) to remove the glutathione S-transferase sequence. Recombinant AU1-tagged IKKbeta was generated as described previously (30). In vitro kinase reactions were performed for 30 min at 30 °C with purified AU1-tagged IKKbeta and bacterially expressed Myc-tagged Ikappa Balpha proteins in a reaction mixture containing 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 10 mM MgCl2, 4.5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EGTA, 100 µM ATP, and 1 µCi of [gamma -32P]ATP. The reaction was terminated by adding SDS sample buffer and boiling. The samples were then subjected to SDS-PAGE on a 9% gel, which was then dried and exposed to x-ray film.

Pulse-Chase Experiments-- Transfected 293T cells were metabolically labeled with Trans-35S (ICN, Costa Mesa, CA) at a concentration of 100 µCi/ml for 1 h. After incubation for various times in the absence of isotope, the cells were lysed and subjected to immunoprecipitation with antibodies to Myc (9E10) and protein G-Sepharose. The immunoprecipitates were fractionated by SDS-PAGE on a 9% gel, and 35S-labeled protein bands were detected by autoradiography.

Yeast Two-hybrid Binding Assay-- Complementary DNAs encoding Skp1 or FWD1 derivatives were subcloned into pGBT9 or pACTII (CLONTECH), respectively, and used to transform yeast strain SFY526. Transformants were grown in selective medium, and beta -galactosidase activity was determined with an o-nitrophenyl beta -D-galactoside assay.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Effect of Mutations in the DSGXXS Motif on Ikappa Balpha Phosphorylation-- We and others (30-42, 44) have recently shown that FWD1 mediates the ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha , Ikappa Bbeta , Ikappa Bepsilon , beta -catenin, and Vpu by functioning as an intracellular receptor that links these substrates to the core complex of the SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase. All five of these substrates share the DSGXXS motif (Fig. 1A), the two serine residues of which undergo signal-induced phosphorylation that is a prerequisite for protein ubiquitination and degradation. This shared property suggests that FWD1 may recognize the phosphorylated DSGXXS motif in each of these proteins. To investigate further the role of this motif in Ikappa Balpha ubiquitination, we mutated conserved residues and thereby created the mutants D31A, D31E, G33A, S32A/S36A, D31A/S32A, and D31A/S36A (Fig. 1B).


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   The conserved DSGXXS motif in FWD1 substrates and its mutation in Ikappa Balpha . A, alignment of amino acid sequences of the DSGXXS motif in Ikappa Balpha (human), Ikappa Bbeta (human), Ikappa Bepsilon (human), beta -catenin (mouse), and Vpu (human immunodeficiency virus). Amino acids identical among all these proteins are boxed. Residue numbers are shown at the ends of each sequence. B, representation of the Ikappa Balpha mutants used in the present study. Only substituted amino acids are indicated.

IKKbeta specifically and equally phosphorylates the two serine residues (Ser32 and Ser36) of the DSGXXS motif in the NH2-terminal region of Ikappa Balpha (18, 19, 21). To examine the effects of the DSGXXS motif mutations on Ikappa Balpha phosphorylation, we performed in vitro kinase assays (Fig. 2). Myc-tagged wild-type and mutant Ikappa Balpha proteins were incubated with or without purified AU1-tagged IKKbeta in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. The extent of phosphorylation of D31A, D31E, and G33A in the presence of AU1-tagged IKKbeta was virtually identical to that of the wild-type protein (Fig. 2A). Although IKKbeta has also been shown to phosphorylate the COOH-terminal region of Ikappa Balpha (16, 18), such activity was not apparent under our experimental conditions, as indicated by the fact that phosphorylation of S32A/S36A by IKKbeta was not detected. Taken together, these results suggest that the amino acid substitutions at Asp31 or Gly33 did not affect Ikappa Balpha phosphorylation at Ser32 and Ser36 by IKKbeta .


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Effects of Ikappa Balpha mutations at Asp31 or Gly33 on the phosphorylation of Ser32 and Ser36. A, in vitro phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha mutants by IKKbeta . Myc-tagged wild-type Ikappa Balpha (WT) and its mutants D31A, D31E, G33A, and S32A/S36A were incubated either alone or together with an equal amount of purified recombinant AU1-IKKbeta protein, as indicated, in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. The reaction mixtures were then subjected to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (upper panel). The D31A mutant migrated faster than did the other Myc-tagged Ikappa Balpha proteins, probably because of the removal of the negative charge of Asp31. The Ikappa Balpha proteins were also subjected to Coomassie Blue (CB) staining to verify the equal abundance of substrates in the assay mixtures (lower panel). The positions of IKKbeta , Ikappa Balpha , and phosphorylated Ikappa Balpha are indicated. B, effect of the D31A mutation on phosphorylation of Ser32 and Ser36 by IKKbeta . Myc-tagged Ikappa Balpha proteins were incubated either alone or together with an equal amount of purified recombinant AU1-IKKbeta protein, as indicated, in the presence of [gamma -32P]ATP. The reaction mixtures were then analyzed as in A.

Requirement of an Acidic Residue at Position 31 for Association of Ikappa Balpha with FWD1-- We next examined whether FWD1 binds to the Ikappa Balpha mutants in vivo. Expression vectors encoding Myc-tagged Ikappa Balpha or its mutants and FLAG-tagged FWD1 were introduced into 293T cells, with or without a vector encoding FLAG-tagged IKKbeta , and immunoprecipitation assays were performed (Fig. 3). As shown previously, the interaction of wild-type Ikappa Balpha with FWD1 required coexpression of IKKbeta (30). The D31A mutant did not associate with FWD1 even in the presence of recombinant IKKbeta . In contrast, the D31E mutant, in which Asp31 was replaced by another acidic amino acid (Glu), interacted with FWD1 in the presence of IKKbeta , although the extent of the interaction was slightly reduced compared with that observed with the wild-type protein. The G33A mutant also interacted with FWD1. Given that mutations at positions 31 or 33 did not affect the phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha by IKKbeta (Fig. 2A), these results suggest that the phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha at Ser32 and Ser36 is not sufficient and that an acidic residue at position 31 is also required, for binding to FWD1. The possibility remained, however, that only a single serine residue, either Ser32 or Ser36, was phosphorylated in D31A. To exclude this possibility, we generated the double mutants D31A/S32A and D31A/S36A (Fig. 1B). The in vitro kinase assay revealed that the extent of phosphorylation of D31A/S32A and D31A/S36A was similar and approximately half that of D31A (Fig. 2B), suggesting that the replacement of Asp31 with Ala did not affect the phosphorylation of either Ser32 or Ser36.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Requirement of an acidic residue at position 31 for FWD1-mediated ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha . 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding Myc-tagged wild-type Ikappa Balpha (WT) or its mutants and FLAG-tagged FWD1, either alone or together with a vector encoding FLAG-tagged IKKbeta , as indicated. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with antibodies to Myc, and the resulting immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot analysis (IB) with antibodies to FLAG or to ubiquitin (Ub). Polyubiquitinated Ikappa Balpha proteins are indicated by Ikappa Balpha -Ubn. A portion of the cell lysates corresponding to 10% of the input for immunoprecipitation was also subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to FLAG or to Myc in order to indicate the level of expression of IKKbeta , FWD1, and Ikappa Balpha .

FWD1-induced Ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha Mutants-- We next examined whether the various Ikappa Balpha mutants are susceptible to ubiquitination. Immunoblot analysis with antibodies to ubiquitin of immunoprecipitates prepared from transfected cells with antibodies to Myc revealed a correlation between the pattern of ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha proteins and the pattern of FWD1 binding (Fig. 3). Thus, interaction with FWD1 was associated with a marked increase in the extent of ubiquitination of wild-type Ikappa Balpha , D31E, and G33A in the presence of IKKbeta , with the extent of ubiquitination of D31E and G33A being slightly less than that of the wild-type protein. The D31A mutant neither associated with FWD1 nor underwent ubiquitination. These results indicate that FWD1-induced ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha requires not only site-specific phosphorylation but also an acidic residue at position 31. Substitution of Gly33 of Ikappa Balpha prevented neither its binding to FWD1 nor its ubiquitination mediated by FWD1, although the extent of both reactions was slightly reduced, suggesting that Gly33 might be necessary for maximal ubiquitination. The intracellular abundance of wild-type, D31E, and G33A Ikappa Balpha proteins was markedly reduced, compared with that of D31A and S32A/S36A, in the presence of FWD1 and IKKbeta , likely reflecting an increased rate of turnover of these proteins in the transfected cells (see Fig. 4).


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Importance of an acidic residue at position 31 for Ikappa Balpha degradation. 293T cells were transfected with vectors encoding the indicated Myc-tagged Ikappa Balpha proteins and FLAG-FWD1 in the absence or presence of a vector encoding FLAG-IKKbeta . The cells were subsequently pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine and then incubated in the absence of isotope for the indicated chase periods. Cell lysates were then subjected to immunoprecipitation with antibodies to Myc, and the resulting precipitates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The positions of Ikappa Balpha and phosphorylated Ikappa Balpha proteins are indicated. WT, wild type.

FWD1-induced Degradation of Ikappa Balpha Mutants-- To examine whether mutations in the DSGXXS motif of Ikappa Balpha affect the turnover rate of the protein, we performed pulse-chase experiments (Fig. 4). When expressed in the presence of FWD1 alone, the wild-type and mutant Ikappa Balpha proteins showed similar turnover rates. However, when coexpressed with both FWD1 and IKKbeta , the rates of degradation of the wild-type protein and the D31E and G33A mutants were markedly increased, although the kinetics of degradation of D31E and G33A were slightly slower than those of wild-type Ikappa Balpha . In contrast, the D31A mutant was relatively stable and, with the exception of the accumulation of a phosphorylated form, showed a pattern of degradation similar to that of the S32A/S36A mutant. This latter result is consistent with our observation that the D31A mutant has lost the ability to bind FWD1 and to undergo ubiquitination but is still phosphorylated on Ser32 and Ser36. Together, these data demonstrate that an acidic residue at position 31 in the DSGXXS motif of Ikappa Balpha is important for binding to FWD1, for ubiquitination, and for protein degradation but not for phosphorylation.

Delineation of the Region of Skp1 Required for Binding to FWD1 in Vivo-- Although it has been established that F-box proteins bind to Skp1 through the F-box domain (7), it remains unclear which region of Skp1 interacts with the F-box domain in vivo. To identify the region of Skp1 required for binding to FWD1 in vivo, we generated a series of Myc-tagged NH2- and COOH-terminal deletion mutants of Skp1 (Fig. 5A). Myc-tagged wild-type Skp1, its deletion mutants, or p21Cip1/Waf1 (negative control) was expressed in 293T cells together with FLAG-tagged FWD1, FWD1(Delta F), or p27Kip1 (negative control). Immunoprecipitation assays revealed that wild-type Skp1 as well as the Delta N40 and Delta C20 mutants were detected in FWD1 immunoprecipitates, whereas the Delta N80 and Delta C30 mutants were not (Fig. 5B). The Delta N60 mutant was also coprecipitated with FWD1, although to a slightly reduced extent compared with that of wild-type Skp1. These results were confirmed by a reciprocal immunoprecipitation analysis (Fig. 5B). Thus, FLAG-tagged FWD1 was present in the wild-type Skp1, Delta N40, and Delta C20 immunoprecipitates but not in those containing Delta N80 or Delta C30 Skp1 mutants. Again, the amount of FWD1 in the Delta N60 immunoprecipitate was slightly less than that in the wild-type Skp1 precipitate. None of the Skp1 proteins interacted with the FWD1(Delta F) mutant, which comprises residues 1-140 fused to residues 194-569 of FWD1 and therefore lacks the F-box domain. These observations suggest that residues 61-143 of Skp1 are required for binding to FWD1 in vivo.


View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Delineation of the region of Skp1 responsible for binding to FWD1. A, schematic representation of Skp1 deletion mutants. Delta N and Delta C denote deletions from the NH2 and COOH termini, respectively, and the numbers correspond to amino acid positions of Skp1. Whether or not the various mutants interact with FWD1 is also indicated by the plus and minus signs. B, interactions between Skp1 deletion mutants and FWD1. 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding Myc-tagged wild-type Skp1 (Skp1 WT), its deletion mutants, or p21 (negative control) together with a plasmid encoding FLAG-tagged wild-type FWD1, FWD1(Delta F), or p27 (negative control), as indicated. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with antibodies to the FLAG epitope or to Myc, and the resulting immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot (IB) analysis with antibodies to Myc or to FLAG, respectively, as indicated. Portions of the cell lysates corresponding to 10% of the input for immunoprecipitation were also subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to Myc or to FLAG in order to indicate the level of expression of the various recombinant proteins. The relative positions of Delta N40, Delta N60, Delta C20, and Delta C30 do not appear to correspond to their molecular sizes, probably because of the charge of these proteins.

Mutational Analysis of the F-Box Domain-- Several amino acid residues are highly conserved among the F-box domains of many F-box proteins (Fig. 6A). To determine which residues in the F-box domain are necessary for binding to Skp1 in vivo, we replaced the highly conserved amino acids Pro149, Ile160, and Leu164 in the F-box domain of FWD1 with Ala (Fig. 6B). FLAG-tagged FWD1 derivatives or p27Kip1 (negative control) were expressed in 293T cells together with Myc-tagged Skp1 or p21Cip1/Waf1 (negative control). Immunoprecipitation assays revealed that similar amounts of wild-type FWD1 and its various point mutants were present in Skp1 immunoprecipitates (Fig. 6C). Again, the FWD1(Delta F) mutant, which lacks the entire F-box domain, did not interact with Skp1. These results were confirmed by reciprocal immunoprecipitation analysis (Fig. 6C). Thus, virtually identical amounts of Skp1 were detected in the immunoprecipitates containing FWD1 and its various point mutants, whereas Skp1 was not present in the FWD1(Delta F) immunoprecipitate.


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Effect of mutation of conserved amino acids in the F-box domain of FWD1 on its interaction with Skp1. A, alignment of amino acid sequences of the F-box domains in FWD1 (mouse), cyclin F (human), Cdc4, and Grr1 (S. cerevisiae), and Skp2 (mouse). Amino acids that are identical in all proteins are boxed, and residues mutated in the present study are indicated by arrows. Residue numbers are shown on the left. B, schematic representation of F-box mutants generated in the present study. The black and gray boxes indicate the F-box domain and the WD40 repeats, respectively. Mutated amino acids are indicated by asterisks. The results of immunoprecipitation (IP) assays and a yeast two-hybrid assay of the interaction between the various mutants and Skp1 are summarized (n.d., not determined). C, immunoprecipitation assays of the interaction of FWD1 mutants with Skp1. 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding FLAG-tagged wild-type FWD1 (WT), FWD1 mutants, or p27 (negative control), together with plasmids encoding Myc-tagged wild-type Skp1 or p21 (negative control), as indicated. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoprecipitation with antibodies to Myc or to FLAG, and the resulting immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot (IB) analysis with antibodies to FLAG or to Myc, respectively, as indicated. Portions of the cell lysates corresponding to 10% of the input for immunoprecipitation were also subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to FLAG or to Myc in order to indicate the levels of expression of the various recombinant proteins. D, SFY526 yeast cells were transformed with expression plasmids encoding the Gal4 activation domain (Gal4-AD) fused with FWD1 derivatives (WT, P149A, I160A, L164A, and Delta F) together with a plasmid encoding the Gal4 DNA binding domain either alone (Gal4-BD) or fused to Skp1 (Gal4-BD/Skp1), as indicated. Cell lysates were assayed for beta -galactosidase activity, and data are expressed as means ± S.E. from three independent experiments.

However, quantitative analysis with the yeast two-hybrid system indicated that the replacement of Ile160 and Leu164, but not that of Pro149, with Ala reduced the extent of FWD1 binding to Skp1 (Fig. 6D). This apparent discrepancy between the results of the immunoprecipitation assays and those of the yeast two-hybrid assay might be attributable to other constituents of the SCF complex, such as Cul1 or Rbx1 (which appear to interact directly with F-box proteins) (35, 45-48), reinforcing the interaction between FWD1 and Skp1 in 293T cells. Thus, we conclude that the highly conserved Pro149, Ile160, and Leu164 residues in the F-box domain of FWD1 are dispensable for binding to Skp1 in vivo.

FWD1-mediated Association of Skp1 with Ikappa Balpha -- We have analyzed in detail the interactions of FWD1 with Ikappa Balpha and with Skp1. Finally, we investigated whether Ikappa Balpha , FWD1, and Skp1 form a trimolecular complex in vivo. FLAG-tagged Ikappa Balpha and Myc-tagged Skp1 were coexpressed in 293T cells in the absence or presence of exogenous FWD1 and IKKbeta . Immunoprecipitation assays revealed that Ikappa Balpha was present in Skp1 immunoprecipitates only when both proteins were expressed together with FWD1 and IKKbeta (Fig. 7). The fact that the Ikappa Balpha -Skp1 association was not observed in the absence of FWD1 confirms that it is mediated through FWD1. This association was also not detected with the S32A/S36A mutant of Ikappa Balpha or in the absence of coexpression of IKKbeta , indicating the importance of phosphorylation of the two serine residues by IKKbeta for its manifestation. The negative control protein p21Cip1/Waf1 did not interact with Ikappa Balpha even in the presence of both FWD1 and IKKbeta , indicating that the association between Ikappa Balpha and Skp1 is specific. These data demonstrate that FWD1 binds simultaneously to Skp1 through its F-box domain and to the serine-phosphorylated DSGXXS motif of Ikappa Balpha .


View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Association of Skp1 with Ikappa Balpha mediated through FWD1. 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding FLAG-tagged wild-type Ikappa Balpha or its S32A/S36A mutant together with the indicated combinations of vectors encoding FLAG-FWD1, FLAG-IKKbeta , and either Myc-Skp1 or Myc-p21. Cell lysates were subsequently prepared and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with antibodies to Myc. The resulting immunoprecipitates were subjected to immunoblot (IB) analysis with antibodies to FLAG. Portions of the cell lysates corresponding to 10% of the input for immunoprecipitation were also subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to FLAG or to Myc in order to indicate the expression levels of the various recombinant proteins.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein ubiquitination mediated by the SCF complex requires the same core complex, containing a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, Cul1 (or Cdc53), and Skp1, together with different F-box proteins that function as substrate-tethering molecules (4-6). Skp1 is thus able to participate in multiple ubiquitination pathways by assembling with different F-box proteins that recruit specific substrates for ubiquitination. In addition to the F-box domain, which mediates interaction with Skp1, all F-box proteins are thought to contain a motif that is necessary for substrate recognition. The F-box proteins Cdc4 and Met30 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), Pop1 and Pop2 (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), SEL-10 (Caenorhabditis elegans), Slimb (Drosophila melanogaster), beta -TrCP (Xenopus laevis), and FWD1 and FWD2 (Mus musculus) all contain WD40 repeats (7, 30, 31, 49-54); we designate this group of proteins the FWD family. On the other hand, the F-box proteins Grr1 (S. cerevisiae) and Skp2 (Homo sapiens) contain leucine-rich repeats (7, 55); we designate these proteins the FLR family. In addition, we have identified many F-box proteins that do not possess known structural features that mediate protein-protein interactions (data not shown).

In the present study, we investigated the structural features required for the interaction between Ikappa Balpha and FWD1 as a model system for interaction of F-box proteins with their corresponding substrates. Our results indicate that an acidic residue is required immediately upstream of the phosphorylated serines of the DSGXXS motif of Ikappa Balpha for interaction with FWD1. Furthermore, our data suggest that the interaction between the F-box domain of FWD1 and Skp1 is mediated by a broad range of contacts between the two proteins.

Ikappa Balpha , a substrate of SCFFWD1, is one of the most studied of proteins that are regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Previous studies have shown that site-specific phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha on Ser32 and Ser36 is a prerequisite for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation of the protein (25-27, 29). Consistent with this observation, FWD1 recognizes Ikappa Balpha only when both Ser32 and Ser36 in the DSGXXS motif are phosphorylated (30). It has therefore been thought that site-specific phosphorylation of Ikappa Balpha is the key signal for ubiquitination of Ikappa Balpha . However, our results now show that, in addition to site-specific phosphorylation, an acidic residue at position 31 in the DSGXXS motif of Ikappa Balpha is required for binding to FWD1 and subsequent ubiquitination.

Our results are consistent with those of DiDonato et al. (56), showing that the D31A mutant of Ikappa Balpha is more stable than is the wild-type protein, although the reason for the increased stability of the mutant was not evident at the time of this previous study. We molecularly dissected the pathway of Ikappa Balpha ubiquitination into two steps as follows: phosphorylation of Ser32 and Ser36 by the IKK complex and subsequent binding of FWD1 to the phosphorylated DSGXXS motif. An acidic residue at position 31 of Ikappa Balpha appears to be required for the second step but not for the first step. The other conserved residue of the DSGXXS motif, Gly33, is dispensable for the binding of Ikappa Balpha to FWD1 as well as for its ubiquitination and degradation. Therefore, we propose that the (D/E)S*XXXS* sequence (S*, phosphorylated serine) represents the primary destruction motif for the binding of Ikappa Balpha to FWD1 and its subsequent ubiquitination. These results may facilitate the identification of other substrates that are regulated by SCFFWD1 from sequence data bases. In the case of beta -catenin, another substrate of SCFFWD1, mutation of Asp32 (the residue corresponding to Asp31 in Ikappa Balpha ) has been frequently detected in human neoplasms, including synovial sarcomas (D32Y) (57), hepatocellular carcinomas (D32N, D32Y, and D32V) (58), hepatoblastomas (D32T) (59), pilomatricomas (D32Y and D32G) (60), and prostate cancer (D32Y) (61). Although it has not been determined whether all of these beta -catenin mutants have lost the ability to bind FWD1, these observations suggest that the (D/E)S*XXXS* motif functions as the primary determinant of destruction in beta -catenin. Thus, it is likely that these natural mutations of Asp32 in beta -catenin prevent both binding to FWD1 and subsequent ubiquitination and thereby promote tumorigenesis. None of the known substrates for FWD1 contains Glu instead of Asp in the (D/E)S*XXXS* motif, suggesting that the slight reduction in binding to FWD1 and in ubiquitination observed with the D31E mutant of Ikappa Balpha might not be negligible under physiological conditions.

Ng et al. (62) recently delineated the region of Skp1 required for binding to the F-box protein Skp2 in vitro. They showed that deletion of 35 amino acids from the NH2 terminus or 49-98 amino acids from the COOH terminus of Skp1 significantly reduced the extent of binding to Skp2. Although these in vitro results are roughly in agreement with our in vivo delineation of the region of Skp1 required for binding to FWD1, it remains unclear whether other F-box proteins also bind to Skp1 through this region. We showed that about half of the Skp1 protein is required for binding to FWD1. Another component of the SCF complex, Cul1, has been shown to bind to the NH2-terminal half of Skp1 (63). Furthermore, a kinetochore component has also been shown to associate with Skp1 (64). Given that Skp1 is a small protein (~19 kDa), it is unlikely that it interacts with many molecules simultaneously; the various binding regions might overlap with each other, or some of the described interactions of Skp1 might be indirect.

Unlike the situation for Skp1, the region of F-box proteins responsible for binding to Skp1 has been well established as the F-box domain (7). A previous mutational study of the yeast F-box protein Cdc4 showed that replacement of Pro279, Ile286, or Leu290 (corresponding to Pro149, Ile160, and Leu164 of FWD1, respectively) with Ala significantly reduced or abolished binding to yeast Skp1 in vitro (7). However, we have now shown that the corresponding mutations did not affect the interaction of FWD1 with Skp1 in vivo. This apparent discrepancy might be attributable to promotion of the FWD1-Skp1 interaction by other SCF constituents, such as Cul1 or Rbx1, in vivo (35, 45-48). The possibility remains, however, that all of the F-box domain is not required for binding to Skp1. Our observations that the interaction between Skp1 and the F-box domain of FWD1 requires a large portion of the Skp1 molecule and is not affected by single or double point mutations in the F-box domain suggest that the two proteins interact through a broad range of intermolecular contacts.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. H. Nakano, K. Okumura, and S. Tanaka for the plasmids and cell lines used in this study; A. Yamanaka, N. Ishida, S. Matsushita, N. Nishimura, R. Yasukochi and other laboratory members for technical assistance; and M. Kimura for secretarial assistance.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Medical Institute of Bioregulation, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3-1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. Tel.: 81-92-642-6815; Fax.: 81-92-642-6819; E-mail: nakayak1@ bioreg.kyushu-u.ac.jp.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: E3, ubiquitin ligase; NF-kappa B, nuclear factor-kappa B; IKK, Ikappa B kinase; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; WT, wild type.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hershko, A., and Ciechanover, A. (1992) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 61, 761-807[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Hershko, A., and Ciechanover, A. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425-479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Weissman, A. M. (1997) Immunol. Today 18, 189-198[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Elledge, S. J., and Harper, J. W. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1377, 61-70
5. Krek, W. (1998) Curr. Opin. Genet. & Dev. 8, 36-42[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Patton, E. E., Willems, A. R., and Tyers, M. (1998) Trends Genet. 14, 236-243[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bai, C., Sen, P., Hofmann, K., Ma, L., Goebl, M., Harper, J. W., and Elledge, S. J. (1996) Cell 86, 263-274[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Skowyra, D., Craig, K. L., Tyers, M., Elledge, S. J., and Harper, J. W. (1997) Cell 91, 209-219[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Feldman, R. M., Correll, C. C., Kaplan, K. B., and Deshaies, R. J. (1997) Cell 91, 221-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Baldwin, A. S., Jr. (1996) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14, 649-683[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Verma, I. M., Stevenson, J. K., Schwarz, E. M., Van Antwerp, D., and Miyamoto, S. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 2723-2735[Free Full Text]
12. May, M. J., and Ghosh, S. (1998) Immunol. Today 19, 80-88[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Thanos, D., and Maniatis, T. (1995) Cell 80, 529-532[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Ghosh, S., May, M. J., and Kopp, E. B. (1998) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16, 225-260[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Malinin, N. L., Boldin, M. P., Kovalenko, A. V., and Wallach, D. (1997) Nature 385, 540-544[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. DiDonato, J. A., Hayakawa, M., Rothwarf, D. M., Zandi, E., and Karin, M. (1997) Nature 388, 548-554[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Regnier, C. H., Song, H. Y., Gao, X., Goeddel, D. V., Cao, Z., and Rothe, M. (1997) Cell 90, 373-383[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Zandi, E., Rothwarf, D. M., Delhase, M., Hayakawa, M., and Karin, M. (1997) Cell 91, 243-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Zandi, E., Chen, Y., and Karin, M. (1998) Science 281, 1360-1363[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Mercurio, F., Zhu, H., Murray, B. W., Shevchenko, A., Bennett, B. L., Li, J., Young, D. B., Barbosa, M., Mann, M., Manning, A., and Rao, A. (1997) Science 278, 860-866[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Woronicz, J. D., Gao, X., Cao, Z., Rothe, M., and Goeddel, D. V. (1997) Science 278, 866-869[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Nakano, H., Shindo, M., Sakon, S., Nishinaka, S., Mihara, M., Yagita, H., and Okumura, K. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 3537-3542[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Rothwarf, D. M., Zandi, E., Natoli, G., and Karin, M. (1998) Nature 395, 297-300[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Cohen, L., Henzel, W. J., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1998) Nature 395, 292-296[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Traenckner, E. B., Pahl, H. L., Henkel, T., Schmidt, K. N., Wilk, S., and Baeuerle, P. A. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 2876-2883[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Brown, K., Gerstberger, S., Carlson, L., Franzoso, G., and Siebenlist, U. (1995) Science 267, 1485-1488[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Chen, Z., Hagler, J., Palombella, V. J., Melandri, F., Scherer, D., Ballard, D., and Maniatis, T. (1995) Genes Dev. 9, 1586-1597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Scherer, D. C., Brockman, J. A., Chen, Z., Maniatis, T., and Ballard, D. W. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 11259-11263[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Yaron, A., Gonen, H., Alkalay, I., Hatzubai, A., Jung, S., Beyth, S., Mercurio, F., Manning, A. M., Ciechanover, A., and Ben-Neriah, Y. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6486-6494[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Hatakeyama, S., Kitagawa, M., Nakayama, K., Shirane, M., Matsumoto, M., Hattori, K., Higashi, H., Nakano, H., Okumura, K., Onoe, K., Good, R. A., and Nakayama, K. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 3859-3863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Kitagawa, M., Hatakeyama, S., Shirane, M., Matsumoto, M., Ishida, N., Hattori, K., Nakamichi, I., Kikuchi, A., Nakayama, K., and Nakayama, K. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 2401-2410[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Yaron, A., Hatzubai, A., Davis, M., Lavon, I., Amit, S., Manning, A. M., Andersen, J. S., Mann, M., Mercurio, F., and Ben-Neriah, Y. (1998) Nature 396, 590-594[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Winston, J. T., Strack, P., Beer-Romero, P., Chu, C. Y., Elledge, S. J., and Harper, J. W. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 270-283[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Spencer, E., Jiang, J., and Chen, Z. J. (1999) Genes Dev. 13, 284-294[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Tan, P., Fuchs, S. Y., Chen, A., Wu, K., Gomez, C., Ronai, Z., and Pan, Z. Q. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 527-533[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Latres, E., Chiaur, D. S., and Pagano, M. (1999) Oncogene 18, 849-854[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Fuchs, S. Y., Chen, A., Xiong, Y., Pan, Z. Q., and Ronai, Z. (1999) Oncogene 18, 2039-2046[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Kroll, M., Margottin, F., Kohl, A., Renard, P., Durand, H., Concordet, J. P., Bachelerie, F., Arenzana-Seisdedos, F., and Benarous, R. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 7941-7945[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Hart, M., Concordet, J. P., Lassot, I., Albert, I., del los Santos, R., Durand, H., Perret, C., Rubinfeld, B., Margottin, F., Benarous, R., and Polakis, P. (1999) Curr. Biol. 9, 207-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Liu, C., Kato, Y., Zhang, Z., Do, V. M., Yankner, B. A., and He, X. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 6273-6278[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Suzuki, H., Chiba, T., Kobayashi, M., Takeuchi, M., Suzuki, T., Ichiyama, A., Ikenoue, T., Omata, M., Furuichi, K., and Tanaka, K. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 256, 127-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Suzuki, H., Chiba, T., Kobayashi, M., Takeuchi, M., Furuichi, K., and Tanaka, K. (1999) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 256, 121-126[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Wigler, M., Silverstein, S., Lee, L. S., Pellicer, A., Cheng, Y., and Axel, R. (1977) Cell 11, 223-232[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Margottin, F., Bour, S. P., Durand, H., Selig, L., Benichou, S., Richard, V., Thomas, D., Strebel, K., and Benarous, R. (1998) Mol. Cell 1, 565-574[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
45. Lyapina, S. A., Correll, C. C., Kipreos, E. T., and Deshaies, R. J. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7451-7456[Abstract/Free Full Text]
46. Skowyra, D., Koepp, D. M., Kamura, T., Conrad, M. N., Conaway, R. C., Conaway, J. W., Elledge, S. J., and Harper, J. W. (1999) Science 284, 662-665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Kamura, T., Koepp, D. M., Conrad, M. N., Skowyra, D., Moreland, R. J., Iliopoulos, O., Lane, W. S., Kaelin, W. G., Jr., Elledge, S. J., Conaway, R. C., Harper, J. W., and Conaway, J. W. (1999) Science 284, 657-661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Ohta, T., Michel, J. J., Schottelius, A. J., and Xiong, Y. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 535-541[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
49. Kaiser, P., Sia, R. A., Bardes, E. G., Lew, D. J., and Reed, S. I. (1998) Genes Dev. 12, 2587-2597[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Kominami, K., Ochotorena, I., and Toda, T. (1998) Genes Cells 3, 721-735[Abstract]
51. Hubbard, E. J., Wu, G., Kitajewski, J., and Greenwald, I. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 3182-3193[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. Wu, G., Hubbard, E. J., Kitajewski, J. K., and Greenwald, I. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 15787-15791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. Jiang, J., and Struhl, G. (1998) Nature 391, 493-496[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
54. Marikawa, Y., and Elinson, R. P. (1998) Mech. Dev. 77, 75-80[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
55. Li, F. N., and Johnston, M. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 5629-5638[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
56. DiDonato, J., Mercurio, F., Rosette, C., Wu-Li, J., Suyang, H., Ghosh, S., and Karin, M. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1295-1304[Abstract]
57. Iwao, K., Miyoshi, Y., Nawa, G., Yoshikawa, H., Ochi, T., and Nakamura, Y. (1999) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 90, 205-209[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
58. de La Coste, A., Romagnolo, B., Billuart, P., Renard, C. A., Buendia, M. A., Soubrane, O., Fabre, M., Chelly, J., Beldjord, C., Kahn, A., and Perret, C. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 8847-8851[Abstract/Free Full Text]
59. Koch, A., Denkhaus, D., Albrecht, S., Leuschner, I., von Schweinit