J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 42, 29805-29811, October 15, 1999
Novel Protein-disulfide Isomerases from the Early-diverging
Protist Giardia lamblia*
Leigh A.
Knodlerab,
Robert
Noivacd,
Kapil
Mehtae,
J. Michael
McCafferyfg,
Stephen B.
Aleyah,
Staffan G.
Svärdai,
Todd G.
Nystula,
David S.
Reinera,
Jeffrey D.
Silbermanjk, and
Frances D.
Gillinalm
From the a Department of Pathology, Division of Infectious
Diseases, and the l Center for Molecular Genetics, University of
California, San Diego, California 92103-8416, the c Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology Group, University of South Dakota School of
Medicine, Vermillion, South Dakota 57069, the e Department of
Bioimmunotherapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center,
Houston, Texas 77030, the f Division of Cellular and Molecular
Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
92093, and the j Josephine Bay-Paul Center of Comparative
Molecular Biology and Evolution, Marine Biological Laboratory,
Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543-1015
 |
ABSTRACT |
Protein-disulfide isomerase is
essential for formation and reshuffling of disulfide bonds during
nascent protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. The two
thioredoxin-like active sites catalyze a variety of thiol-disulfide
exchange reactions. We have characterized three novel protein-disulfide
isomerases from the primitive eukaryote Giardia lamblia.
Unlike other protein-disulfide isomerases, the giardial enzymes have
only one active site. The active-site sequence motif in the giardial
proteins (CGHC) is characteristic of eukaryotic protein-disulfide
isomerases, and not other members of the thioredoxin superfamily that
have one active site, such as thioredoxin and Dsb proteins from
Gram-negative bacteria. The three giardial proteins have very different
amino acid sequences and molecular masses (26, 50, and 13 kDa). All three enzymes were capable of rearranging disulfide bonds, and giardial
protein-disulfide isomerase-2 also displayed oxidant and reductant
activities. Surprisingly, the three giardial proteins also had
Ca2+-dependent transglutaminase activity. This
is the first report of protein-disulfide isomerases with a single
active site that have diverse roles in protein cross-linking. This
study may provide clues to the evolution of key functions of the
endoplasmic reticulum in eukaryotic cells, protein disulfide formation,
and isomerization.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Many secreted proteins have disulfide bonds that are crucial for
their structure or function. It has long been known that although the
necessary information for folding is dictated by the primary structure
of a protein, this process can be exceedingly slow (1). In
vivo, the actions of specialized enzymes located in specific
compartments of both bacterial and eukaryotic cells catalyze the
formation and isomerization of disulfide bonds. In Gram-negative
bacteria, the crucial function of disulfide bond formation is
sequestered within the periplasmic space between the inner and outer
cell membranes and is catalyzed by a group of enzymes belonging to the
Dsb (disulfide bond) family. These proteins have a single thioredoxin-like active site consisting of a
pair of cysteines in a CXXC motif. In eukaryotic cells, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1
is the only cellular compartment that is sufficiently oxidizing for
disulfide bond formation. The ER has a high concentration of the
enzymes and molecular chaperones involved in the folding and assembly
of proteins (2). The ER-resident enzyme, protein-disulfide isomerase
(PDI; EC 5.3.4.1), catalyzes thiol-disulfide exchange reactions. Like
Dsb proteins, PDI is a member of the thioredoxin superfamily, but has
two thioredoxin-like active sites (CGHC) that are involved in disulfide
bond formation and rearrangement reactions (3).
In the case of the protozoan parasite Giardia lamblia, it is
likely that PDI activity plays a key role in the folding of outer surface proteins that are central to avoidance of the host immune system and survival of this parasite in the external environment (4).
Specifically, the plasmalemma of the trophozoite is coated with an
extremely cysteine-rich (12-16%) variable surface protein (5, 6). Of
the variable surface proteins studied to date, all the cysteine
residues are in intramolecular disulfide bonds that are not susceptible
to reduction in the native protein (7). This presents a formidable
challenge for correct disulfide bond formation and variable surface
protein folding in the ER. Interestingly, a large proportion of the
cysteine residues are in a tetrapeptide CXXC motif that
rarely corresponds to the thioredoxin family active-site sequence.2 In addition, the
two major proteins of the extracellular cyst wall are cysteine-rich (8,
9), and disulfide bonds are important to cyst wall integrity (10). In
contrast to the variable surface proteins, the cyst wall proteins are
linked by intermolecular disulfide bonds (9).
Giardia is a biological fossil, with both eukaryotic and
prokaryotic characteristics (11, 12). This protozoan has an ER structure, but does not contain certain other internal organelles typical of eukaryotes, such as mitochondria and peroxisomes (13). Furthermore, unlike most other eukaryotes, Giardia uses
cysteine instead of glutathione as the ER thiol redox buffer (14). To gain insight into the evolution of thiol-disulfide exchange mechanisms in eukaryotes and because of their likely importance in giardial biology, we characterized genes encoding giardial PDIs (gPDIs). The
hypothesis underlying this work was that gPDIs might reflect an
early-diverging state of these enzymes in eukaryotic cells. We found
three very different genes (gPDI-1, gPDI-2, and gPDI-3) that encode
proteins of ~26, 50, and 13 kDa with only one CGHC active site and so
are unlike most other eukaryotic PDIs. However, this active site is
identical in sequence to the two active sites found in eukaryotic PDIs
and is distinct from the single active site of the Dsb proteins and
thioredoxins (15). The gPDIs can catalyze the shuffling of disulfide
bonds and, interestingly, also display significant transglutaminase
activity. This is the first report of PDIs with only one
thioredoxin-like active site that have diverse enzymatic roles in
protein cross-linking.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Identification and Sequencing of PDI Genes--
A fragment of
the gPDI-1 gene (clone cLM-12a-12t; GenBankTM/EBI accession
number AQ049081) was identified from a random genome sequence survey
(16). A segment was amplified from genomic DNA with primers PDI-5
(5'-GCC AGA GTA CGC TAA GGC C-3') and PDI-3 (5'-TTG CGC CGT TAT AGT CGA G-3'), purified, and labeled with 32P by random priming (Prime It II kit, Stratagene, La
Jolla, CA). A full-length clone was identified from a genomic DNA
library in
Zap II (17). A clone expressing full-length gPDI-2 was
isolated by screening a genomic DNA expression library (1-3-kilobase
pair inserts) in
Zap II with polyclonal antibodies prepared against a protein fraction of ~49 kDa from a polyacrylamide gel segment (18).
The gPDI-3 gene was identified by 3'-rapid amplification of cDNA
ends (RACE) with a degenerate oligonucleotide designed against the PDI
active site. The complete gene was isolated by screening a
Zap II
genomic library (3-5-kilobase pair inserts) with a 183-base pair probe
generated from genomic DNA with primers PDI-S:1
(5'-GAT CTG TCT GAT GAC GCT CCC GAG-3') and PDI3-3'
(5'-CAC GTG GAA TCA CAG CCT CTG-3'). The double strand sequences
of gPDI-1 and gPDI-2 were obtained by primer walking using the T7
Sequenase Version 2.0 sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and
that of gPDI-3 by automated sequencing.
5'- and 3'-RACE Analyses--
5'-RACE was performed using the
5'-RACE Version 2.0 system (Life Technologies, Inc.). For gPDI-1,
oligonucleotide PDQ7 (5'-CCT GAA CGG CTT CTT CAT G-3') was used
as the first strand primer, and PDI-3 (see above) was used as the
nested primer. For gPDI-2, oligonucleotide 974-P7
(5'-GAT CTC AAA CTG TTC CAT G-3') was used as the first strand
primer and oligonucleotide 974-2 (5'-TAT CGA GCT GAG GGC CT-3') as
the nested primer. For gPDI-3, oligonucleotide PDI3-3' (see above) was
used as the first strand primer, and PDI-31 (5'-AGC GTC ATC AGA CAG ATC GA-3') as the nested primer. 3'-RACE was performed for gPDI-3 on cDNA generated from 1 µg of
trophozoite total RNA using Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life
Technologies, Inc.) and an oligo(dT) primer, SGS-10
(5'-CGA GCT GCG TCG ACA GGC (T)17-3'), according to
the manufacturer's instructions. PDI-S:1 (see above) was used as the
gene-specific primer. The polymerase chain reaction products were
cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and
sequenced.
Analyses of gPDI Expression--
G. lamblia
trophozoites (strain WB, ATCC 30957, clone C6) were cultivated and
encysted as described (19). Total RNA was isolated from G. lamblia at the indicated stages of differentiation by extraction
with RNAzol B (Tel-Test Inc., Friendswood, TX). Samples of total RNA
(15 µg/lane) were fractionated on 1.5% formaldehyde-agarose gels,
downward capillary-blotted in 20× SSC, and immobilized onto nylon
membranes (Zeta-Probe, Bio-Rad) by baking in a vacuum oven for 1 h
at 80 °C. For Northern hybridization, probes corresponding to the
open reading frames of gPDI-1, gPDI-2, and gPDI-3 were polymerase chain
reaction-amplified, gel-purified, and radiolabeled by random priming
(Prime It II kit). Blots were prehybridized in 6× SSC, 5×Denhardt's
solution, 0.5% (w/v) SDS, and 20 µg/ml salmon sperm DNA for 1 h
at 65 °C. Hybridization at 65 °C was continued overnight in the
presence of a mixture of the three gPDI probes. The membrane was washed
twice in 2× SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS at room temperature for 15 min and
then once at 60 °C for 15 min in 0.2× SSC and 0.1% (w/v) SDS. The
washed membrane was exposed to film overnight.
Cellular protein was isolated from trophozoites and at different times
during encystation (20). Ten µg of total protein/lane for gPDI-1, 20 µg for gPDI-2, and 15 µg for gPDI-3 (determined by the Bio-Rad
protein assay) was separated on 4-20% gradient gels (Novex, San
Diego, CA) and transferred to nitrocellulose (20). Because of its small
size, gPDI-3 was transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane
(Bio-Rad) for 2 h at 70 V. Blots were reacted with protein
A-purified rabbit anti-gPDI-1 and anti-gPDI-3 serum at 10 µg/ml and
anti-gPDI-2 serum at 1:500 dilution. gPDI-1 and gPDI-2 analyses were
developed with protein A-alkaline phosphatase, and gPDI-3 with protein
A-peroxidase and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Heterologous Expression of gPDI Gene Products for Enzymatic
Studies and Antibody Production--
gPDIs were overexpressed as
C-terminal glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion proteins
lacking the predicted N-terminal signal peptides. Each gene was
amplified from Giardia genomic DNA (QIAGEN Blood and Cell
Culture kit) with Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and subcloned
into pGEX-KG (21) using XbaI and HindIII linkers. gPDI-1 was amplified with PDI1Q5'
(5'-CAT CTA GAG GTT GTC GAG TTA GGC-3') and PDI1Q3'
(5'-TGA AGC TTA TGG AGC CAC TTC TC-3'). For gPDI-2,
oligonucleotides PDI2-GEX-5'
(5'-TAT TCT AGA GGT CTT GGT TCT CA-3') and PDI2-GEX-3'
(5'-ATA AAG CTT AGA AGT TCT CAT TGA GCA T-3') were used. For
gPDI-3, oligonucleotides PDI3MAL5' and PDI3MAL3' (see below) were used.
The GST-PDI fusion proteins were overexpressed and purified on
glutathione-agarose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The purified
preparations contained some free GST that did not interfere with the
enzymatic activities. Antibodies against each recombinant GST-gPDI
fusion protein were raised in New Zealand White rabbits as described
(22). Purification of anti-gPDI-1 and anti-gPDI-3 antibodies over a
protein A-agarose column did not affect their reactivity.
Giardia has neither glutathione nor GST (14), and
anti-GST antibodies did not interfere with detection of gPDIs in
immunoblots or immunocytochemistry.
Immunoelectron Microscopy--
Trophozoites were processed for
cryosection immunoelectron microscopy, and polyclonal antibodies
against each gPDI were detected with 5-nm gold-labeled goat anti-rabbit
antibodies (10).
PDI Enzymatic Assays--
Purified recombinant GST-gPDI-1,
GST-gPDI-2, and GST-gPDI-3 fusion proteins were used in each assay. The
ability of the recombinant gPDIs to catalyze the refolding of
"scrambled" bovine pancreatic ribonuclease type III-A (Sigma; a
measure of disulfide isomerization) was determined as described by
Hawkins et al. (23). The PDI-catalyzed folding of reduced
bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI; type I-P, Sigma; oxidative
formation of native disulfide bonds) was measured as described (24) in
0.2 M Tris-Cl containing 0.1 mM GSSG and 0.2 mM GSH. PDI purified from chick liver (25) was used as a
positive control in these assays.
The ability of PDIs to reduce the disulfide bond between insulin chains
with 0.33 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) or 1 mM
L-cysteine was measured as
A650
(26). Bovine PDI (PanVera, Madison, WI) and purified Escherichia
coli DsbA protein (provided by Dr. J. Bardwell) (27) were used as
positive controls.
DsbA Complementation--
gPDIs were subcloned into pMAL-P2 (New
England Biolabs Inc.) for targeting to the periplasm of E. coli as C-terminal fusions to maltose-binding protein. The
following oligonucleotides were used: for gPDI-1, PDI1-5'
(5'-GCT CTA GAA TCA CTCCTC TGC TCC TTG TG-3') and PDI1-3'
(5'-TTC TGC AGT TAC TTGGCG TGG TTA TGG AG-3'); for
gPDI-2, PDI2-5'
(5'-GCT CTA GAG- AGG TCT TGG TTC TCA CGC AA-3') and PDI2-3'
(5'-CCC AAG CTTTTA CTT CTT GCG CTT CTC CTG-3'); and for gPDI-3,
PDI3MAL5' (5'-GCT CTA GAA TTG CCG GCC TCC TCC TCG TC-3') and
PDI3MAL3'
(5'-CCA AGC TTT TAC AGC CTC TGC TTG ATC CAC TC-3').
Constructs were electroporated into E. coli strain JCB571 (JCB570 dsbA::kan1) (27). JCB570 (MC1000
phoR zih12::Tn10) (27) and JCB571 were grown in
minimal medium without cysteine or methionine, and bacterial alkaline
phosphatase activity was measured (28).
Peptide Affinity Binding--
Photoaffinity labeling of gPDI was
performed using an affinity probe specific for the proposed
peptide-binding site of rat PDI (residues 451-476):
125I-labeled
monoiodo-N
-3- (4-hydroxyphenylpropionyl)-Asn-Lys-(N
-p-azidobenzoyl)-Ala-NH2
(29). Each gPDI was preincubated with the probe in 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) for 10 min at room temperature.
The cross-linking moiety was activated by exposure to a short-wave
source (254 nm, 8 watts) at 1 cm for 2 min. Affinity labeling was
assessed by autoradiography of the samples after separation on 10%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Immunoreactivity to anti-rat PDI antisera was
characterized after transfer to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane.
Binding was identified using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat
anti-rabbit IgG, followed by colorimetric detection with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate and nitro blue tetrazolium.
Transglutaminase Assays--
Transglutaminase (TGase) activity
of recombinant gPDIs was measured in a microtiter plate assay
containing 200 µl of 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5), 10 mM DTT, and 10 mM CaCl2 or EDTA
(30). The reaction was incubated at 55 °C for 1 h, and TGase
conjugation of the amino group donor 5-(biotinamido)pentylamine to
dimethylcasein was measured using alkaline phosphatase-labeled
streptavidin and p-nitrophenyl phosphate as a reporter.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification and Sequencing of PDI Genes--
Our initial
identification of putative gPDI gene fragments was based on the
presence of a classical PDI active site: F(Y/F)APWCGHCK (15,
31). Three PDI genes were isolated from Giardia (Fig. 1A). Interestingly, the three
gPDIs have only one active site, each of which corresponds exactly to
that of "classical" PDIs rather than to the active sites of
thioredoxin or bacterial Dsb proteins (Fig. 1B) (15). Other
short regions (VDCT and G(Y/F)PT) were also common to many other PDIs
(Fig. 1A).3 Little
similarity between gPDI-1 and gPDI-2 was evident after the terminus of
gPDI-3 (Fig. 1A). Additionally, the three gPDI sequences
have rather similar predicted N-terminal signal peptides, but only
gPDI-3 has a potential KDEL-type signal for retention in the ER (KQRL).
However, the C-terminal KRKK motif of gPDI-2 conforms to
KKXX ER retention signal criteria (Fig. 1A) (32). The gPDIs differ greatly in the sizes of their predicted open reading
frames and encoded polypeptides: gPDI-2 (50,431 Da) is similar in size
to PDIs with two active sites from higher organisms (15, 25, 31). With
a predicted molecular mass of 25,846 Da, gPDI-1 is slightly smaller
than the yeast Mpd1 and Mpd2 proteins (36.4 and 32.4 kDa) (33, 34) and
similar to the bacterial Dsb proteins (DsbA is 21.5 kDa), which also
have one active site (15, 27). gPDI-3, with a predicted molecular mass
of 12,648 Da, is the smallest eukaryotic protein containing the PDI
active site reported to date.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Predicted amino acid sequences of gPDIs and
thioredoxin superfamily active sites. A, deduced amino
acid sequences of gPDI-1, gPDI-2, and gPDI-3. The numbering is for the
gPDI-2 amino acid sequence. The first 121 amino acids were aligned with
ClustalW Version 1.7. The remaining C-terminal sequences of gPDI-1 and
gPDI-2 were aligned manually. Asterisks indicate identical
amino acids, and colons (A) or dots
(B) are conserved amino acid substitutions. Predicted
N-terminal signal peptides (48) and C-terminal ER retention signals
(for gPDI-2 and gPDI-3) are in boldface, and a potential
hydrophobic membrane-spanning region in gPDI-2 is
underlined. B, alignment of thioredoxin
superfamily active sites from PDIs, thioredoxins (Tx), and
Dsb proteins. GenBankTM/EBI accession numbers are in
parentheses, and the active-site cysteine residues are in
boldface.
|
|
Expression of gPDIs during the Life Cycle of Giardia--
Although
vegetative trophozoites and encysting cells secrete different
cysteine-rich outer surface proteins that must be folded in the ER
(15), the levels of gPDI-1, gPDI-2, and gPDI-3 proteins did not change
during encystation (Fig. 2A).
Northern analyses showed that early in encystation (5 h), the mRNA
levels of each gPDI increased slightly, and they decreased late in
encystation (48 h) (Fig. 2B). The sizes of the gPDI-1,
gPDI-2, and gPDI-3 transcripts (~0.7, 1.3, and 0.35 kilobase pairs,
respectively) were similar to those predicted by the open reading
frames, suggesting that the untranslated regions were short, as is
typical of other giardial transcripts (35). Indeed, the 5'-untranslated
regions for gPDI-1, gPDI-2, and gPDI-3 were 3, 4, and 14 nucleotides, respectively, and each transcript begins in an AT-rich region, as do
many other giardial genes (36). For gPDI-1, a classical (AGTPurAAPyr)
giardial polyadenylation signal (35), AGTGAAT, was 8 nucleotides past
the stop codon. For gPDI-2, it overlapped the TAA stop codon, which is
not unusual for Giardia. gPDI-3 had a slightly divergent
polyadenylation signal, and 3'-RACE analysis showed that the transcript
was polyadenylated 20 nucleotides past the TGA stop codon
(TGAttccacgtgtaaactatgctAAAAA ... ). This supports the
idea that the first position is the least stringent nucleotide in the
polyadenylation signal (37).

View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Expression of gPDIs during growth and
differentiation. V, vegetatively growing trophozoites;
5, 24, and 48, cultures induced to
encyst for 5, 24, and 48 h (19). A, immunoblot analyses
with rabbit antibodies against recombinant gPDIs were performed as
described under "Experimental Procedures." The antigen
concentrations were as follows: gPDI-1, 10 µg of protein/lane;
gPDI-2, 20 µg of protein/lane; and gPDI-3, 15 µg of protein/lane.
B, a Northern blot was hybridized simultaneously with the
three gPDI probes as described under "Experimental
Procedures."
|
|
gPDI Enzymatic Activities--
The particular thiol-disulfide
oxidoreductase activity displayed by PDI is dependent on both the redox
status of the substrate and the cellular milieu. We investigated the
oxidant, reductant, and isomerization activities of the gPDIs. The
ability to refold RNase that has been scrambled (reduced, denatured,
and randomly refolded by reoxidation in air) is a common measure of
protein-disulfide isomerization (23, 28, 38). Recombinant gPDI-1,
gPDI-2, and gPDI-3 each had significant activity in catalyzing the
restoration of RNase activity (Fig.
3A).

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Recombinant gPDIs have PDI enzymatic
activities. Purified recombinant GST-gPDI-1, GST-gPDI-2, and
GST-gPDI-3 fusion proteins were used in each assay. , PDI controls (chick PDI in
A and B; bovine PDI in C); ,
gPDI-1; , gPDI-2; ×, gPDI-3; (in C only), DsbA; ,
buffer control minus enzyme. A, the ability of the
recombinant gPDIs to catalyze the refolding of scrambled bovine
pancreatic ribonuclease type III-A (a measure of disulfide
isomerization) was determined as described (23). The data shown are
from a single experiment that is representative of at least three
separate repeats. Incubation times were not the same for all three
experiments. B, the oxidative formation of native disulfide
bonds was measured as the folding of reduced and denatured BPTI (type
I-P) (24). Purified chick liver PDI (25) was used as a positive control
in these assays. Each time point was the average of four separate
samples for each gPDI or control, and the experiments were conducted
twice. C, the ability of PDIs to reduce the disulfide bond
between insulin chains was measured as described (26). The data shown
are from one experiment that is representative of at least three
separate experiments.
|
|
The catalysis of disulfide bond formation or oxidation by PDI can be
quantitated by measuring the folding of reduced BPTI as the inhibition
of trypsin hydrolysis. The rate-limiting step in the folding of BPTI
in vitro is the isomerization of two-disulfide intermediates
(24). Recombinant gPDI-2 showed a time-dependent increase
in BPTI folding, whereas gPDI-1 and gPDI-3 had low to negligible
activity (Fig. 3B).
In addition, microsomal PDI and cell-surface PDI can reduce disulfide
bonds in the presence of a reducing agent as measured by the
precipitation of reduced insulin chains (26). gPDI-2 and bovine PDI
catalyzed the reduction of insulin with DTT more rapidly than DsbA
(Fig. 3C). Since Giardia lacks glutathione and uses cysteine as its major low molecular mass thiol (14), we asked if
cysteine could also support insulin reduction. gPDI-2 catalyzed the
reduction of insulin with either DTT or
cysteine.4 gPDI-3 had a low
level of activity only with DTT (Fig. 3C), and gPDI-1 was
inactive (Fig. 3C).4
DsbA is an extremely efficient catalyst of disulfide bond formation in
the bacterial periplasm, but has poor isomerase activity. E. coli
dsbA
mutants have defects in the functioning of many
proteins (including alkaline phosphatase,
-lactamase, and OmpA) that
require disulfide bond formation in the periplasm for activity (15,
27). Alkaline phosphatase activity in the dsbA
mutant JCB571 is diminished between 5- and 58-fold (33). The gPDIs were
cloned into the pMAL-P2 vector for targeting to the periplasmic space.
gPDI-2 was able to partially complement the dsbA
mutant JCB571 (Fig.
4). In addition, the assembly of
bacterial flagella is dependent on disulfide-bonded proteins; hence,
dsbA mutants are also defective in motility (27). gPDI-2 was
also able to restore motility to a dsbA
mutant.4 However, neither gPDI-1 nor gPDI-3 complemented
dsbA
mutants (Fig. 4). Since a eukaryotic PDI
must be capable of reoxidation by DsbB to observe complementation (39),
these results for gPDI-1 and gPDI-3 are consistent with the enzymatic
data in Fig. 3B.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
gPDI-2 can complement a
dsbA mutant.
gPDI-1, gPDI-2, and gPDI-3 were expressed as maltose-binding protein
fusion proteins in the periplasm of the E. coli
dsbA mutant strain JCB571. Alkaline phosphatase
activity for dsbA+ JCB570,
dsbA JCB571, and JCB571 transformed with the
maltose-binding protein-gPDI fusions was measured as described (27).
Results are means ± S.D. from four to six separate
experiments.
|
|
PDI can have chaperone activity (3, 30, 40), which seems to facilitate
productive folding, or anti-chaperone activity, which diverts substrate
proteins into inactive cross-linked aggregates. A peptide-binding site
that binds peptides and unfolded PDI substrates with little regard for
sequence has been identified by photoaffinity labeling of mammalian PDI
(29). This peptide-binding site appears to participate in substrate
recognition for both the oxidoreductase and chaperone activities of PDI
(40). The affinity probe labeled gPDI-2, but did not label gPDI-1,
gPDI-3, or free GST. The labeling was faint compared with that of chick
liver PDI, and antibodies against the latter did not react with any of
the gPDIs (data not shown). However, the affinity labeling of gPDI-2
suggests that it is similar to the mammalian PDIs in its ability to
bind denatured proteins or peptides.
Transglutaminase Activity of gPDIs--
Recently, TGase activity
of filarial worms was purified, and its encoding gene was analyzed
(41). Surprisingly, the gene did not resemble other TGases, but had two
PDI active sites. The recombinant filarial protein had both TGase and
PDI activities. Mammalian PDI also has TGase activity. Recombinant
gPDI-1 and gPDI-3 had high TGase activity, whereas gPDI-2 was less
active. In all cases, the TGase activity was
calcium-dependent (Fig.
5).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
gPDIs have calcium-dependent
transglutaminase activity. TGase activity of recombinant gPDIs was
measured in a microtiter plate assay in the presence of 10 mM CaCl2 (closed bars) or EDTA
(open bars) (30). The reaction was incubated at 55 °C for
1 h, and TGase conjugation of the amino group donor
5-(biotinamido)pentylamine to dimethylcasein was measured using
alkaline phosphatase-labeled streptavidin and p-nitrophenyl
phosphate as a reporter. The data shown are means ± S.D. from
four separate experiments. HPDI, human PDI.
|
|
Localization of PDIs in Giardia--
Since the three gPDIs all
have a putative N-terminal signal peptide, they can be predicted to
enter the secretory pathway. gPDI-3 has a potential ER
retention/retrieval signal (KQRL), and gPDI-2 has a KRKK motif
following a predicted membrane-spanning region (32). Frozen section
immunoelectron microscopy with specific antibodies showed that each
gPDI localized to the ER (Fig. 6). The
protein chaperone BiP uses a KDEL motif to localize to the ER in
Giardia (13). These studies suggest that Giardia
may have additional mechanisms for protein retention in the ER, as is
also true of higher organisms (42).

View larger version (132K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Ultrastructural localization of gPDIs to the
giardial ER. Trophozoites were processed for cryosection
immunoelectron microscopy as described previously (10). Polyclonal
antibodies against gPDI-1, gPDI-2, or gPDI-3 were detected with goat
anti-rabbit antibodies labeled with 5-nm gold (arrowheads)
(10). A and D, gPDI-3; B, gPDI-1;
C, gPDI-2. er, endoplasmic reticulum;
ad, adhesive ventral disc; pm, plasmalemma;
pv, lysosome-like peripheral vacuoles. Bar = 0.1 µm.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The evolutionary appearance of the complex endomembrane-mediated
system of protein folding, modification, sorting, and transport in
eukaryotes remains a biological mystery in part because of a paucity of
useful models. G. lamblia is a valuable model for gaining
basic biological insights because it belongs to one of the earliest
known lineages to diverge from the eukaryotic line of descent (11).
Most protein trafficking pathways are conserved between yeast and man
(43, 44). However, in evolutionary terms, the divergence time between
Giardia and yeast is at least as great as that between yeast
and man (11).
Extensive biochemical evidence showed that Giardia lacks
mitochondria and peroxisomes (45, 46). However, the statement that this
protist "lacks conventional eukaryotic ER" is premature (42).
Giardia does have an ER structure that functions in protein transport and secretion (10, 13, 47). A giardial signal recognition
particle receptor subunit (47) and a BiP ER chaperone gene (13)
localize to the ER and clearly resemble their counterparts in higher
eukaryotic cells. In contrast, the gPDIs, which are also involved in
secretory protein maturation, are unlike their counterparts in higher
eukaryotic cells. They are novel in being very small and having only
one canonical active site. Although sequence similarity is largely
restricted to the active site region, all three gPDIs have disulfide
isomerase activities characteristic of PDIs, and gPDI-2 can also
oxidize and reduce disulfide bonds.
Although the existence of PDIs has been documented for many years,
their size, duplicated active sites, and multiple domains have delayed
the in depth understanding of structure-function relationships. A
central question is, why do PDIs need two active sites? It has been
reported that the two active sites have different catalytic properties
(49) and that both sites are not required for oxidative activity (50).
However, isomerase activity is greatest in the presence of both active
sites, although a 21-kDa C-terminal PDI fragment can unscramble RNase
(51). This is interesting because the three gPDIs, each with only one
active site, all showed isomerase activity. From nonreducing Western
analysis, the gPDIs do not appear to be disulfide-bonded
homodimers,5 unlike other
PDIs (1, 52).
In addition, proteins with three CGHC active sites are known (31); and
recently, two yeast proteins with a single CGHC (yeast Mpd1) and CQHC
(yeast Mpd2) active site have been shown to partially rescue lethal PDI
deletions (33, 34). All of the gPDIs have only one thioredoxin-like
active site. gPDI-2 appears to be a "true" PDI in the sense that it
can make, break, and shuffle disulfide bonds. gPDI-3 is especially
intriguing because, although it is only 13 kDa, it could both renature
scrambled ribonuclease (isomerization activity) and slowly reduce
disulfide bonds. Perhaps gPDI-3 is equivalent to bacterial DsbC, which
is primarily involved in disulfide bond isomerization (15).
Alternatively, in Giardia, the transglutaminase activities
of gPDI-1 and gPDI-3 may be more important than their disulfide
exchange properties because PDIs can serve multifunctional roles in the
cell (e.g. Refs. 2, 3, and 53). Expressing the gPDIs in a
bacterial system may be responsible for the low thiol-disulfide
activities of gPDI-1 and gPDI-3. It is not known why multiple PDI-like
proteins are present in Giardia, although in yeast, one PDI
and three PDI-related proteins exist (Eug1, Mpd1, and Mpd2), and
Gram-negative bacteria have multiple thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases
(15, 53).
PDI biological activities depend on redox cycling of the vicinal
active-site cysteines between dithiol and disulfide states (44).
In vitro, the balance is maintained by the redox buffer, usually GSH/GSSG. In vivo, the GSH/GSSG balance of the ER in
mammalian cells, which promotes disulfide bond formation, is more
oxidizing than that of the cytosol (54). However, yeast strains unable to synthesize GSH can form disulfide bonds in the presence of DTT. A
protein called Ero1p (55, 56) may play a role similar to that of DsbB
from E. coli. It will be of interest to determine if a
protein resembling Ero1p is also present in Giardia. Many bacteria and virtually all eukaryotic cells use GSH (or related cysteine conjugates) as their major low molecular mass thiol redox buffer. In contrast, only certain bacteria use cysteine (57). However,
it is striking that among eukaryotic cells, the absence of GSH and the
use of free cysteine are known only for the amitochondriate protozoa,
Entamoeba, Trichomonas, and Giardia
(14, 58), which are not closely related. This may be part of a larger
pattern of convergent evolution since these parasites colonize human
mucosa and share other unusual metabolic pathways. Our studies may help reveal whether these are early-diverging pathways that have been selectively retained or later adaptations to a similar parasitic niche.
The use of cysteine, rather than glutathione, by gPDIs may also have
functional implications because cysteine is much less stable than GSH.
In contrast to disulfide bonds, certain proteins are cross-linked by
isopeptide bonds that cannot be reduced and are extremely resistant to
proteolysis. Isopeptide bonds are formed by TGases that catalyze a
Ca2+-dependent acyl transfer reaction in which
an amide bond is formed between the
-carboxyamide group of a
glutamine residue in a specific target protein and certain primary
amines. If the physiological amine substrate is a lysine of a second
protein, the reaction results in formation of
-glutamyl-
-aminolysine protein cross-links. In metazoan
organisms, such isopeptide bonds are crucial to structures as diverse
as thrombin clots, cataracts, and skin (59). TGase activity of filarial
worms is required for both egg formation and molting and may lead to
the cross-linking of worm proteins to host proteins. Surprisingly,
purified filarial worm TGase is encoded by a gene with homology to
PDIs, and mammalian PDI also exhibit TGase activity (41). Since
Giardia is such an early-diverging eukaryote, our finding
that three PDIs with very different sequences also have substantial
TGase activity suggests that most, if not all, PDIs may be able to
catalyze the formation of two very distinct types of protein
cross-links. The gPDIs do not have the consensus TGase active site:
YGQCWVF (59). Because of its small size, gPDI-3 may be a good candidate
for investigating the novel TGase activity of PDIs. We speculate that
isopeptide bonds may play a crucial role in the resistance of the
giardial cyst wall to degradation.
The existence of PDIs with a single active site influences overall
phylogenetic analyses of the thioredoxin-like domains of eukaryotic
PDIs. Without yet resolving the phylogenetic root, it is simplest to
hypothesize that two- and three-domain PDIs arose from a single domain
ancestor (53), of which gPDI-2 and gPDI-3 appear to be direct
descendants. In contrast, our preliminary phylogenetic
analyses6 suggest that the
yeast single-domain PDIs and gPDI-1 appear to be secondarily derived
from ancestors with two domains, i.e. these genes branch
within a clade of two-domain PDIs. However, because gPDI-1 is so
divergent from the other gPDIs, its placement is not entirely clear at
present. We, like Kanai et al. (53), find loss and
duplication of thioredoxin-like domains common during evolution of the
various eukaryotic PDIs. The single-domain PDIs of G. lamblia appear key to understanding the origin of two domain PDIs
within the Eukaryotae.
One of the major functions of the ER is the folding and formation of
disulfide bonds of membrane and secreted proteins. If correct disulfide
bond formation is prevented by treating living cells with the
membrane-permeable reductant DTT, thereby interfering with the ER redox
environment (60), further protein modifications and transport are
blocked or delayed. In yeast and higher eukaryotic cells, protein
glycosylation in the ER is dependent upon correct S-S bond formation
(60). Giardia may be a simpler model for the study of
endomembrane systems, as it appears to have relatively little
glycosylation of secreted proteins (35). Nonetheless, DTT prevents
disulfide bond formation in cyst wall proteins and blocks
differentiation into the cyst form in a reversible
manner.7 This supports a
critical role for PDI activity in the ER during giardial differentiation.
Our analyses of a novel group of ER protein-folding enzymes has
revealed significantly less complexity than the corresponding enzymes
from later-diverging eukaryotes. Studies of the gPDIs may give valuable
insights into the divergence of the Dsb and PDI members of the
thioredoxin superfamily and into the appearance of the eukaryotic
endomembrane system. It will also be of great interest to examine the
functions of gPDI sequences outside the active-site regions because
there is great diversity between the three protein sequences. The
crystal structures of both DsbA (61) and thioredoxin (62) have been
resolved. Despite little homology between the primary amino acid
sequences, the two proteins have a strikingly similar "thioredoxin
fold" formed by discontinuous parts of the primary amino acid
sequence. The CXXC active site lies at the base of this
fold, with the N-terminal cysteine thiol group able to form a covalent
intermediate with the substrate. Apart from the thioredoxin-like active
site, PDIs share little homology with thioredoxins or Dsb proteins.
Since the gPDIs are smaller than other PDIs, especially gPDI-3, which
is only ~13 kDa, they may be good candidates for crystallization and
detailing structure-function relationships of eukaryotic disulfide
exchange proteins. gPDIs may be "minimal" enzymes and possibly
represent an ancestral PDI. Therefore, our studies could provide clues
to the evolution of the ER and its specific functions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. J. Bardwell for E. coli strains JCB570, JCB571, JCB502, and JCB572 and purified DsbA;
Drs. A. G. McArthur and Mitchell L. Sogin for evolutionary
insights; and Drs. T.-C. Meng, S. Das, X. Que, and W. Lennarz for help
at the beginning this project.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by United States Public
Health Service Grants GM53835, AI42488, AI24285, and DK35108 from the
National Institutes of Health.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U64730 (gPDI-1), U65017 (gPDI-2), and AF164117 (gPDI-3).
b
Present address: Biotechnology Lab., University of British
Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada.
d
Supported by CAREER Grant MCB9631485 from the National
Science Foundation.
g
Present address: Integrated Imaging Center, Dept. of
Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218.
h
Present address: Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of
Texas, El Paso, TX 79968.
i
Present address: Karolinska Inst., Microbiology and
Tumourbiology Center, Doktorsringen 13, P. O. Box 280, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
k
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM32964 (to
M. L. Sogin).
m
To whom correspondence should be addressed: UCSD School of
Medicine, 214 Dickinson St., San Diego, CA 92103-8416. Tel.:
619-543-6146; Fax: 619-543-6614; E-mail: fgillin@ucsd.edu.
2
F. D. Gillin and S. B. Aley,
unpublished observations.
3
F. D. Gillin, unpublished observations.
4
L. A. Knodler and F. D. Gillin,
unpublished observations.
5
F. D. Gillin and T. Nystul, unpublished observations.
6
A. G. McArthur, et al.,
manuscript in preparation.
7
D. S. Reiner, et al., manuscript
in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
ER, endoplasmic
reticulum;
PDI, protein-disulfide isomerase;
gPDI, giardial PDI;
RACE, rapid amplification of cDNA ends;
GST, glutathione
S-transferase;
BPTI, bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor;
DTT, dithiothreitol;
TGase, transglutaminase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Huppa, J. B.,
and Ploegh, H. L.
(1998)
Cell
92,
145-148[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Nigam, S. K.,
Goldberg, A. L.,
Ho, S.,
Rohde, M. F.,
Bush, K. T.,
and Sherman, M. Y.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1744-1749[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Gilbert, H. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29399-29402[Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Gillin, F. D.,
Reiner, D. S.,
and McCaffery, J. M.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
50,
679-705[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Nash, T.
(1992)
Parasitol. Today
8,
229-234
|
| 6.
|
Gillin, F. D.,
Hagblom, P.,
Harwood, J.,
Aley, S. B.,
Reiner, D. S.,
McCaffery, M.,
So, M.,
and Guiney, D. G.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
4463-4467[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Aley, S. B.,
and Gillin, F. D.
(1993)
Exp. Parasitol.
77,
295-305[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Mowatt, M. R.,
Lujan, H. D.,
Cotten, D. B.,
Bowers, B.,
Yee, J.,
Nash, T. E.,
and Stibbs, H. H.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
15,
955-963[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Lujan, H. D.,
Mowatt, M. R.,
Conrad, J. T.,
Bowers, B.,
and Nash, T. E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29307-29313[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
McCaffery, J. M.,
Faubert, G. M.,
and Gillin, F. D.
(1994)
Exp. Parasitol.
79,
236-249[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Sogin, M. L.,
Gunderson, J. H.,
Elwood, H. J.,
Alonso, R. A.,
and Peattie, D. A.
(1989)
Science
243,
75-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Knodler, L. A.,
Sekyere, E. O.,
Stewart, T. S.,
Schofield, P. J.,
and Edwards, M. R.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4470-4477[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Soltys, B. J.,
Falah, M.,
and Gupta, R. S.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
1909-1917[Abstract], and references therein
|
| 14.
|
Brown, D. M.,
Upcroft, J. A.,
and Upcroft, P.
(1993)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
61,
155-158[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Rietsch, A.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Genet.
32,
163-184[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Smith, M. W.,
Aley, S. B.,
Sogin, M. L.,
Gillin, F. D.,
and Evans, G.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
95,
267-280[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J. G.,
Smith, J. A.,
and Struhl, K.
(1997)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
|
| 18.
|
Das, S.,
Traynor-Kaplan, A.,
Reiner, D. S.,
Meng, T.-C.,
and Gillin, F. D.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
21318-21325[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Que, X.,
Svärd, S. G.,
Meng, T.-C.,
Hetsko, M. L.,
Aley, S. B.,
and Gillin, F. D.
(1996)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
81,
101-110[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Hetsko, M. L.,
McCaffery, J. M.,
Meng, T.-C.,
Que, X.,
and Gillin, F. D.
(1998)
Exp. Parasitol.
88,
172-183[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Guan, K.,
and Dixon, J. E.
(1991)
Anal. Biochem.
192,
262-267[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Hattori, K.,
Adachi, H.,
Matsuzawa, A.,
Yamamoto, K.,
Tsujimoto, M.,
Aoki, J.,
Hattori, M.,
Arai, H.,
and Inoue, K.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33032-33038[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Hawkins, H. C.,
Blackburn, E. C.,
and Freedman, R. B.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
275,
349-353
|
| 24.
|
Creighton, T. E.,
Bagley, C. J.,
Cooper, L.,
Darby, N. J.,
Freedman, R. B.,
Kemminck, J.,
and Sheikh, A.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
232,
1176-1196[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Lambert, N.,
and Freedman, R. B.
(1983)
Biochem. J.
213,
235-243[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Holmgren, A.
(1979)
J. Biol. Chem.
254,
9627-9632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Bardwell, J. C.,
McGovern, K.,
and Beckwith, J.
(1991)
Cell
67,
582-589
|
| 28.
|
Humphreys, D. P.,
Weir, N.,
Mountain, A.,
and Lund, P. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28210-28215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Noiva, R.,
Freedman, R. B.,
and Lennarz, W. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
19210-19217[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Mehta, K.,
Chandrashekar, R.,
and Rao, U. R.
(1996)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
76,
105-114[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Mazzarella, R. A.,
Srinivasan, M.,
Haugejorden, S. M.,
and Green, M.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
1094-1101[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Vincent, M. J.,
Martin, A. S.,
and Compans, R. W.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
950-956[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Tachikawa, H.,
Takeuchi, Y.,
Funahashi, W.,
Miura, T.,
Gao, X.-D.,
Fujimoto, D.,
Mizunaga, T.,
and Onodera, K.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
369,
212-216[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Tachikawa, H.,
Funahashi, W.,
Takeuchi, Y.,
Nakanishi, H.,
Nishihara, R.,
Katoh, S.,
Gao, X.-D.,
Mizunaga, T.,
and Fujimoto, D.
(1997)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
239,
710-714[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Adam, R. D.
(1991)
Microbiol. Rev.
55,
706-732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Hilario, E.,
and Gogarten, J. P.
(1995)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
128,
94-98
|
| 37.
|
Svärd, S. G.,
Meng, T.-C.,
Hetsko, M. L.,
McCaffery, J. M.,
and Gillin, F. D.
(1998)
Mol. Microbiol.
30,
979-989[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Walker, K. W.,
Lyles, M. M.,
and Gilbert, H. F.
(1996)
Biochemistry
35,
1972-1980[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Ostermeier, M.,
De Sutter, K.,
and Georgiou, G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
10616-10622[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Puig, A.,
Lyles, M. M.,
Noiva, R.,
and Gilbert, H. F.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19128-19135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
Chandrashekar, R.,
Tsuji, N.,
Ozols, V.,
and Mehta, K.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
531-536[Abstract/Free Full Text], and references therein
|
| 42.
|
Alberts, B.,
Bray, D.,
Lewis, J.,
Raff, M.,
Roberts, K.,
and Watson, J. D.
(1994)
Molecular Biology of the Cell
, Garland, New York
|
| 43.
|
Rothman, J. E.
(1994)
Nature
372,
55-63[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Gething, M. J.,
and Sambrook, J.
(1992)
Nature
355,
33-45[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 45.
|
Müller, M.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
42,
465-488[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 46.
|
Lindmark, D.
(1980)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
1,
1-12[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Svärd, S. G.,
Rafferty, C.,
McCaffery, J. M.,
Smith, M. W.,
Reiner, D. S.,
and Gillin, F. D.
(1999)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
98,
253-264[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
von Heijne, G.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
947,
307-333[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 49.
|
Westphal, V.,
Darby, N. J.,
and Winther, J. R.
(1999)
J. Mol. Biol.
286,
1229-1239[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Darby, N. J.,
and Creighton, T. E.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
11725-11735[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Puig, A.,
Primm, T. P.,
Surendran, R.,
Lee, J. C.,
Ballard, K. D.,
Orkiszewski, R. S.,
Makarov, V.,
and Gilbert, H. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
32988-32994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 52.
|
Ferrari, D. M.,
and Soling, H. D.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
339,
1-10
|
| 53.
|
Kanai, S.,
Toh, H.,
Hayano, T.,
and Kikuchi, M.
(1998)
J. Mol. Evol.
47,
200-210[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 54.
|
Hwang, C.,
Sinskey, A. J.,
and Lodish, H. F.
(1992)
Science
257,
1496-1502[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Frand, A. R.,
and Kaiser, C. A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
161-170[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 56.
|
Pollard, M. G.,
Travers, K. J.,
and Weissman, J. S.
(1998)
Mol. Cell
1,
171-182[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Newton, G. L.,
Arnold, K.,
Price, M. S.,
Sherrill, C.,
Delcardayre, S. B.,
Aharonowitz, Y.,
Cohen, G.,
Davies, J.,
Fahey, R. C.,
and Davis, C.
(1996)
J. Bacteriol.
178,
1990-1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Fahey, R. C.,
and Newton, G. L.
(1984)
Science
224,
70-72[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 59.
|
Jeon, S.,
Djian, P.,
and Green, H.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
687-690[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Braakman, I.,
Helenius, J.,
and Helenius, A.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
1717-1722[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 61.
|
Martin, J. L.,
Bardwell, J. C. A.,
and Kuriyan, J.
(1993)
Nature
365,
464-468[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Eklund, H.,
Gleason, F. S.,
and Holmgren, A.
(1991)
Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet.
11,
13-28[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.