![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 42, 29960-29967, October 15, 1999
,From the Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Deregulated activity of cdk4 or cdk6 can lead to
inappropriate cellular proliferation and tumorigenesis accompanied by
unchecked inactivation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein.
Certain tumor types preferentially activate either cdk4 or cdk6,
suggesting that these kinases may not be equivalently oncogenic in all
cell types. Although it is clear that cdk4 can act as an oncogene at least in part by evading inhibition by p16INK4a, the role of
cdk6 in tumorigenesis is less well understood. To investigate the
consequences of aberrant expression of cdk6, the requirements for
proliferation caused by cdk6 overexpression were studied.
cdk6-transfected U2OS cells displayed an accelerated progression
through G1 phase that was dependent on kinase
activity and that did not correlate with p27 binding. Furthermore, a
mutation that prevents cdk6 interaction with INK4 proteins (cdk6R31C)
was found to inactivate the proliferative effect of cdk6 and increase cytoplasmic localization, despite the fact that this mutant could phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein in vitro.
Together, these data suggest a role for the cdk6 INK4 interaction
domain in the generation of functional, nuclear cdk6 complexes and
demonstrate the importance of elevated cdk6 kinase activity in
G1 acceleration.
In mammalian cells, the regulation of cell division is tightly
controlled through a series of checkpoints within the cell cycle,
including the restriction point in late G1 phase, a
checkpoint that determines commitment to DNA replication. The
restriction point may be viewed as the culmination of activation of
G1 cyclin-dependent kinases, enzymes that
govern cell cycle progression through phosphorylation of key regulatory
substrates. Specifically, the cyclin D proteins and their associated
kinases, cyclin-dependent kinase
(cdk)1 4 and cdk6, function
early in G1 phase of the cell cycle to link growth
regulatory signals to the control of cell division. Both cdk4 and cdk6
can be activated by all three D-type cyclins (cyclins D1, D2, and
D3) and are thought to function as positive effectors of G1
progression (1-4). Activation of cdk4 and cdk6 allows progression from G1 phase to the start of DNA synthesis in normal
eukaryotic cells by phosphorylating and inactivating the retinoblastoma
protein (pRb). This initial modification of pRb by
cdk4/cdk6-dependent phosphorylation may be followed by
further phosphorylation by cyclin E/cdk2 complexes and ultimately
relieves repression of E2F-dependent promoters, allowing
the transcription of S phase genes and the onset of DNA replication
(for review, see Ref. 5).
Because the cyclin D-dependent kinases play a pivotal role
linking growth regulatory signals to cell division, activity of these
kinases is very tightly controlled. Kinase activity is regulated by the
periodic synthesis and destruction of the cyclin subunits, by
phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of the kinase subunit, and
through complex formation with two families of
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) (6). The CIP/KIP
family of inhibitors includes p21, p27, and p57, which associate with
several different cyclin/cdk complexes (7-11). These proteins may act
as stimulators of cdk activity as well as inhibitors because p21 has
been shown to both activate and inactivate cyclin/cdk complexes,
perhaps dependent on stoichiometry (12, 13). Indeed, the ability of p21
and p27 to stabilize D cyclin/cdk4 (6) complexes may be required for
the proper formation of these complexes (14). In contrast to the
CIP/KIP family, the INK family of CKIs (p15INK4b,
p16INK4a, p18INK4c, and p19INK4d) specifically
inhibits the activities of cdk4 and cdk6 by binding directly to the
kinase subunit, disallowing association with the activating cyclin D
subunit (Refs. 15 and 16; for review, see Ref. 17).
Aberrant cell proliferation and tumorigenesis can result from
deregulated activity of cdk4 and/or cdk6 with subsequent, inappropriate inactivation of pRb in several tissue types. This increased kinase activity can result from overexpression of the regulatory subunit, cyclin D1, and also from amplification of the kinase-encoding gene. In
addition, deletion or inactivation of the gene encoding p16INK4a frequently leads to dysregulated cdk4/cdk6 activity in
human tumors, as do mutations in cdk4 that prevent its association with p16INK4a (18-25, 29). In most cases, tumors containing
hyperactivated cdk4 or cdk6 retain intact RB alleles,
suggesting that such kinase activations render pRb unable to control
proliferation. These findings indicate that deregulated cdk4 and cdk6
activity can substitute for RB mutations and define the
"pRb pathway" of genetic events that have the identical phenotypic
consequence of pRb inactivation and inappropriate proliferation. A
further oncogenic consequence of excess cyclin D/cdk4(6) expression is
sequestration of p21 and p27 with consequent elevated activity of
cyclin E/cdk2, a function that may be an extension of a physiological
role of cyclin D/cdk4 (6) complexes (14, 26-28).
To better understand the consequences of dysregulated cdk6 expression
as is seen in some tumor types (30, 31), we began by studying the
requirements for proliferation caused by ectopic cdk6 expression.
cdk6-transfected cells demonstrated accelerated transit through the
G1 phase of the cell cycle. This effect of cdk6 on cell
cycle progression was dependent on the INK4 binding domain, because a
cdk6 mutant (R31C) unable to associate with INK4 proteins did not show
G1 acceleration. In addition, this mutant protein failed to
accumulate in the nucleus, suggesting that nuclear localization and
function of cdk6 is dependent on the INK4 interaction domain.
Furthermore, catalytic activity of cdk6 was required for G1
acceleration in this assay, because a catalytically inactive NFG mutant
slowed S phase entry rather than accelerated it, despite an ability to
form complexes with cyclin D1 and p27. Thus, cdk6 activity is limiting
for G1-to-S phase progression, even in tumor cells such as
U2OS, which lacks p16INK4a, strongly supporting a role for
cdk6-specific phosphorylation events in G1 progression.
Expression Vectors, Transfection Procedures, and Cell
Lines--
The kinase expression plasmids pCMVcdk6 and HA-tagged cdk6,
pCMVcdk6HA, pCMVcdk6NFG, the vector pCMVneobam, and the CD20-encoding plasmid pCMVCD20 were kindly provided by Dr. Sander van den Heuvel (32). pCMVBamNeo, the vector containing the cDNAs, has been described
previously (33). U2OS cells were transiently transfected with 15 µg
of kinase-expressing plasmid plus 5 µg of pCMVCD20 (where
appropriate) and sheared herring sperm DNA to a total of 30 µg by
calcium phosphate precipitation essentially as described by Chen and
Okayama (34). DNA precipitates remained on the cell monolayer for
17 h, and cells were harvested 24 h after removal of DNA
precipitates unless otherwise noted. U2OS cells were maintained in 10%
fetal calf serum at 5% CO2.
Analysis of Cell Cycle Distribution--
For
fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) experiments, transfected
U2OS cells were harvested in PBS with 0.1% EDTA at 24 h after
removal of DNA precipitates. Cells were then stained with fluorescein
isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated antibody to human CD20 (Pharmingen)
and ethanol fixed and stained with propidium iodide for DNA content.
Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry of CD20-positive
(FITC-positive) cells using a Coulter cytometer and Multicycle DNA
analysis. In FACS studies of nocodazole-treated cells, nocodazole was
added at 24 h after removal of DNA precipitates to a final
concentration of 100 ng/ml for 18 h. In FACS studies following
mitotic shake, mitotic fractions were harvested by gentle pipetting
followed by centrifugation at 1000 rpm at 25 °C for 5 min. Cells
were washed three times with media to remove nocodazole and replated in
10% fetal calf serum media. Cells were harvested at time points
indicated and prepared for FACS as described above.
BrdUrd and Immunofluorescence--
In
5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation experiments
nocodazole was added to 100 ng/ml approximately 5 h after removal of DNA precipitates and remained on cells 18 h. BrdUrd was added to a final concentration of 10 µM at the time points
indicated. Coverslips from BrdUrd experiments were fixed in 70%
ethanol, 50 mM glycine, pH 2.0, and incubated with BrdUrd
monoclonal antibody (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) and polyclonal
peptide antibodies to cdk6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, C-21) for 60 min
at 37 °C. Secondary antibodies rhodamine-conjugated donkey
anti-rabbit (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) and
fluorescein-conjugated anti-mouse (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) were
incubated 30 min at 37 °C. Coverslips were mounted in Fluoromount.
For time courses, mitotic shake was performed as described above, and
coverslips were fixed at the indicated time points. For
immunofluorescence without BrdUrd, coverslips were stained in methanol
followed by acetone. Immunofluorescence was performed with antibodies
indicated above, as well as cdk6 polyclonal sera of Meyerson (4) and
cdk6 monoclonal sera Ab-3 (Neomarkers, Fremont, CA) for 60 min at
37 °C. Secondary antibody staining was performed as described above
or with fluorescein-conjugated donkey anti-mouse antibody (Jackson
ImmunoResearch). In relevant cases, cells were counterstained by
Hoechst stain. All photography was performed on a Leica microscope with
Sony digital imaging.
Biochemical Assays--
For immunoblot and immunoprecipitation
experiments, 1.25 × 106 U2OS cells were transfected
as described above, harvested 24 h after removal of DNA
precipitates, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and harvested
in E1A lysis buffer (250 mM NaCl, 50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1% Nonidet P-40). Extracts were
incubated for 20 min on ice with mixing and clarified by centrifugation for 20 min at 4 °C. Proteins were separated on polyacrylamide denaturing gels, transferred to supported nitrocellulose (Life Technologies, Inc.) and blotted using antisera as noted.
Immunoprecipitations were performed with 2 µg of polyclonal cdk6
antisera C-21. Transfected U2OS cells were lysed in E1A lysis buffer as
described above, and 200 µg (cyclin D1) or 400 µg (p18, p27) of
extract was immunoprecipitated for 60 min at 4 °C with mixing. 35 µl of swollen protein A-Sepharose beads were added for an additional
30 min, washed four times with 1 ml of E1A lysis buffer, and separated
on denaturing acrylamide gels. Antibodies used were p18 polyclonal N-20
antibody (1:3000) (Santa Cruz), p27 monoclonal antibody (1:2500)
(Transduction Laboratories), and cyclin D1 monoclonal DCS-6 antibody
(1:200) (Neomarkers).
For kinase assays, SAOS-2 cells at 80% confluency were transfected
with 10 µg of pCMVD1 and 10 µg of pCMVcdk6HA or cdk6mutantHA in the
pCMV vector by calcium phosphate as described above. DNA precipitates
remained on cells for 10 h and were harvested 36 h after
removal of DNA precipitates. Cells were harvested in D-IP kinase buffer
(50 mM Hepes, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 1 mM EDTA; 2.5 mM EGTA; 0.1% Tween 20; 10%
glycerol with the protease inhibitors aprotinin, leupeptin, and
Pefablock and phosphatase inhibitors sodium orthovanadate (100 µM), sodium flouride (10 mM), and
betaglycerophosphate (10 mM)) and incubated on ice for 20 min with gentle mixing. Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at
4 °C for 10 min. 100 µl of 12CA5 antibody was preincubated with 30 µl of swollen protein A-Sepharose beads for at least 1 h at
4 °C with mixing. 100 µg of cell lysate was added for an
additional 1 h at 4 °C with mixing. Beads were washed three times
with D-IP buffer and three times with kinase reaction buffer (250 mM Hepes, pH 7.2, 50 mM MgCl2, 25 mM MnCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol).
Kinase reactions were performed with HA-immunoprecipitated
extracts at 37 °C for 30 min in kinase reaction buffer with 100 µM ATP, 10 µCi of [ cdk6 Causes Increased S Phase of Transfected Cell
Populations--
The effect of ectopic expression of cdk6 on cell
cycle progression was determined by FACS studies in transfected U2OS
cells. These human osteosarcoma cells produce wild-type pRb but lack p16INK4a, a defect that is thought to allow constitutive
phosphorylation and inactivation of pRb. In light of this, it was
surprising to observe that cells transfected with plasmid encoding cdk6
consistently showed a higher percentage of S phase cells than did
vector-transfected cells in the same experiment (Fig.
1). To confirm that this increase in DNA
content measured by FACS truly reflected an increase in S phase cells,
transfected cell cultures were also analyzed using BrdUrd incorporation
as a measure of S phase. U2OS cells transfected with pCMVcdk6 or
pCMVvector were pulsed with BrdUrd, fixed, and subjected to indirect
immunofluorescence using both anti-BrdUrd and anti-cdk6 antibodies.
Transfected cells were identified as those that demonstrated intense
fluorescence with anti-cdk6 antibody and were scored as either
BrdUrd-positive or BrdUrd-negative. The results of at least two
independent transfections ( cdk6 Shortens the G1 Interval of Transfected U2OS
Cells--
The observed increase in S phase cells conferred by cdk6
could result from either an S phase cell cycle block or from decreased transit time through G1 or G2/M. To distinguish
between these possibilities, transfected cells were treated with the
mitotic inhibitor nocodazole. In the presence of nocodazole, an S phase delay would reduce the number of cells able to enter G2/M.
However, if the increased S phase population was due to a shortening of G1 phase (or G2/M phase) cells would arrest in
mitosis under nocodazole treatment. At 24 h after removal of DNA
precipitates, parallel sets of transfected U2OS cells were either
harvested or treated with nocodazole for 18 h. A p16 control for
nocodazole arrest demonstrated that p16 transfected cells maintained a
G1 phase peak as expected with a G1-arresting
inhibitor (Fig. 2A). In the same experiment, cdk6-transfected cells accumulated in mitosis in the
presence of nocodazole, indicating that the S phase increase seen by
FACS and BrdUrd incorporation studies (Fig. 1) was not due to a
profound S phase delay but was more likely a result of a decreased
G1 or G2/M transit time.
To determine whether ectopic cdk6 expression decreased G1
phase transit time, FACS analysis was performed on synchronized cell
populations. Transfected U2OS cells were treated with nocodazole for
18 h followed by shaking and replating in nocodazole-free medium.
The cells were harvested at 4 and 8 h after mitotic shake, and DNA
profiles of CD20-positive cells were obtained by FACS as shown in Fig.
2B. At 4 h after mitotic shake, cdk6-transfected cells
showed a synchronized DNA profile indistinguishable from that of vector
transfected cells. Interestingly, at 8 h post-mitotic shake,
cdk6-transfected cells showed a shift toward S phase (increased DNA
content) as compared with vector-transfected cells. Together, these
experiments indicate that cdk6-transfected U2OS cells pass through
G1 phase faster than vector-transfected cells,
demonstrating a cdk6-dependent acceleration of
G1 transit in U2OS cells. Also shown in Fig. 2B
are DNA profiles of a mutant form of cdk6, cdk6R31C. cdk6R31C contains
a mutation of the arginine residue corresponding to Arg-24 in cdk4.
Mutation of this residue (Arg-24 to Cys) in cdk4 was identified in a
human melanoma and prevents binding to the kinase inhibitor, p16 (24).
Interestingly, cdk6R31C did not demonstrate the shift toward S phase
seen with the wild-type cdk6, suggesting a role for the INK4 binding
domain in the G1 acceleration function of cdk6. The lack of
G1 acceleration exhibited by cdk6R31C could be due to an
unexpected loss of catalytic activity or to the disruption of another
property of cdk6 required for this G1 acceleration
function in U2OS cells.
Biochemical Characterization of cdk6 Mutants--
The acceleration
of G1 phase caused by ectopic expression of cdk6 could be
the result of direct catalytic activity of the introduced kinase
subunit phosphorylating substrates such as pRb to shorten
G1 phase. Alternatively, excess kinase subunits could titrate inhibitory proteins to allow activation of other cdks and
concomitant cell cycle advance. Titration of inhibitory proteins has
been observed to occur upon introduction of both functional and
nonfunctional kinases in another system, apparently through titration
of p21 (28), and cyclin D/cdk4(6) complexes have been suggested to
sequester p27 in the absence of anti-mitogenic signals (26, 27). In an
effort to determine the properties of cdk6 required to accelerate
G1 progression in U2OS cells, a series of cdk6 mutants
compromised in their ability to bind to INK4 protein (cdk6R31C),
hydrolyze ATP (cdk6NFG) (32), or both (cdk6R31CNFG) were used in cell
cycle analyses. The biochemical characterization of these mutant
proteins is presented in Fig. 3. All cdk6
mutants consistently showed approximately equal protein levels in
transfected U2OS lysates (Fig. 3A). Consistent with the
predicted result, we found that the R31C mutation prevented interaction
with p16INK4a (data not shown) and p18INK4c in
transfected U2OS lysates (Fig. 3B), as has also been
observed in breast cancer cell lines (35). The p18INK4c
interaction is particularly relevant to U2OS cells because these cells
lack p16INK4a yet express detectable levels of p18INK4c
bound to cdk6 (data not shown). Disruption of INK4 binding occurred whether the mutation was present alone (cdk6R31C) or in combination (cdk6R31CNFG) with the catalytically inactive mutation (Fig.
3B). Importantly, the R31C mutation does not disrupt the
ability of cdk6 to bind cyclin D1 or p27 in immunoprecipitations of
transfected U2OS extracts (Fig. 3, C and D). In
these experiments, immunoblots were stripped and reprobed with
anti-cdk6 antibody to ensure that equivalent levels of cdk6 protein
were compared in binding studies, and control immunoblots of the
lysates demonstrated that cyclin D1 or p27 levels were equivalent in
extract of transfected cells (data not shown). Thus, the cdk6R31C
mutation that corresponds to the tumor-derived cdk4R24C mutation (24)
specifically disrupts cdk6 binding to INK4 proteins without altering
interaction with other known cdk6 partners.
To ensure that the R31C mutant form of cdk6 retained catalytic
activity, the cdk6 mutants were also examined for kinase activity in
transfected SAOS-2 cells (used in these assays because they contain
low-levels of endogenous cyclin D1 and cdk6 activity). As shown in Fig.
3E, when co-transfected with cyclin D1 and
immunoprecipitated with antibody to the HA tag, HAcdk6 phosphorylated
the C-terminal GST-Rb substrate. Conversely, cdk6NFG containing the
kinase-inactivating mutation showed no kinase activity above
vector-transfected background. Significantly, cdk6R31C-transfected
extracts reproducibly showed in vitro kinase activity
greater than that observed with wild-type cdk6 extracts, as expected
for a mutant that can evade the p16INK4a present at high level
in SAOS-2 cells. Anti-HA immunoblots of these extracts confirmed that
the level of cdk6R31C was at or below the level of wild-type cdk6
protein (not shown). Interestingly, the double mutant cdk6R31CNFG had a
slightly elevated activity relative to the inactive NFG mutant. This
result suggests that a low level cdk6NFG activity is unmasked in
cdk6R31CNFG by the disruption of INK binding.
Thus, the cdk6R31C mutation disrupts INK4 protein binding but did not
disrupt intrinsic catalytic activity of this cdk6 protein, similar to
studies demonstrating retention of kinase activity by the
p16INK4a binding-defective mutant of cdk4, cdk4R24C (24).
Importantly, these binding studies and kinase assays also indicate that
these mutations are not causing gross structural alterations in the cdk6 protein. These reagents are thus ideal for assessing the potential
roles of catalytic activity and INK4 titration in the cdk6-mediated
acceleration of G1 phase in transfected U2OS cells.
cdk6 Mutants Do Not Accelerate G1 Phase--
The cdk6
mutants described above were used to further examine cdk6 function in
G1 acceleration of U2OS cells. To test the ability of
mutant forms of cdk6 to decrease G1 transit time, BrdUrd incorporation was used to measure S phase entry by the cdk6 mutants. In
these experiments BrdUrd was added to transfected U2OS cells 4 h
after mitotic shake and BrdUrd incorporation was measured at 5, 7, and
10 h after mitotic shake. The results of these experiments in
which cumulative BrdUrd incorporation was measured are presented in Fig. 4. These BrdUrd studies
indicated that the kinase inactive mutant, cdk6NFG, showed a slower
entry into S phase as compared with the vector-transfected control. In
fact, cdk6NFG showed a greatly decreased percent of cells in S phase at
all time points measured (27% at 10 h). FACS analysis after
nocodazole treatment suggested that this decrease in S phase entry was
due to a G1 delay because a significant G1
fraction persisted in nocodazole-arrested cells (not shown). A similar
delay to S phase entry has been observed with cdk4NFG (36). Thus,
catalytic activity in addition to inhibitor titration appears to be
required for the G1 acceleration observed with wild-type
cdk6 because cdk6NFG was incapable of increasing the S phase fraction
of transfected cells but is fully capable of inhibitor interaction.
Because the result above suggests that kinase activity intrinsic to
cdk6 is key to accelerating G1 phase in transfected U2OS cells, the cdk6R31C mutant initially was expected to give an increase in S phase cells equal to or greater than that conferred by wild-type cdk6, given the ability of cdk6R31C to phosphorylate pRb and avoid interaction with INK4 proteins. However, consistent with results in
Fig. 2B, cdk6R31C did not show the G1
acceleration typical of wild-type cdk6, as might be expected if
p18INK4c acts to limit cdk6 activity in these cells. In fact,
both cdk6R31C (41%) and cdk6R31CNFG (38%) show significantly fewer
cells in S phase than did cdk6wt (60%) at 10 h after release from
mitotic block. The values for the cdk6R31C and cdk6R31CNFG mutants were similar to that of the vector-transfected control (39%). Thus, intrinsic kinase activity appears to be necessary but not sufficient for the increase in S phase population caused by cdk6wt because cdk6R31C, which has demonstrated in vitro kinase activity,
cannot accelerate G1 phase. Furthermore, the R31C
mutation in cdk6R31CNFG nullifies the S phase inhibitory effect seen
after introduction of cdk6NFG, suggesting a critical role for the R31
residue in cdk6 function.
Cell Cycle Effects Correlate with Nuclear
Localization--
Previous studies have shown that the subcellular
localization of cdk4 may influence its interaction with the CIP and INK
families of inhibitors (27). In addition, both cdk4 and cdk6 have been observed to localize to the cytoplasm in a variety of cell types (37-39). Thus, we wished to test the hypothesis that the inability of
the cdk6 mutants to accelerate G1 phase may be in part due to differential localization within the cell. Transfected U2OS cells
were synchronized using nocodazole and analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence for cdk6. Repeatedly, the mutant forms of cdk6 that
failed to bind INK4 proteins (cdk6R31C and cdk6R31CNFG) demonstrated greatly decreased nuclear staining as compared with cdk6wt and cdk6NFG
at 8-10 h after mitotic shake (Fig. 5).
These results were repeated in at least three separate transfections
and with two distinct staining methods using both polyclonal and
monoclonal antibodies (Fig. 5).
The decrease in nuclear staining observed in cdk6R31C and cdk6R31CNFG
transfectants was also observed in asynchronous populations at 24 h after removal of DNA precipitates, but in these populations the
percentage of cdk6R31C and cdk6R31CNFG mutants with predominantly cytoplasmic staining was lower than the percentage seen in a
synchronous population (shown in Fig. 5), suggesting that the
localization of these kinases is cell cycle-regulated.
Together, these studies demonstrate that the R31C mutation affects
compartmentalization of cdk6, as well as the ability to interact with
INK4 proteins. R31C mutants showed a remarkable decrease in nuclear
staining particularly at time points predicted to be at or near the
G1/S boundary. This difference in compartmentalization directly correlated with the inability of the same mutants to accelerate G1 phase of the cell cycle and suggested a role
for INK4 protein binding domain in the generation of functional,
nuclear cdk6 complexes.
The D-cyclin-dependent kinases cdk4 and cdk6 share pRb
as their only proven physiological substrate, and both can act as
oncogenes in human tumors that retain pRb. Previous experiments have
identified numerous, tumor-derived cdk4 mutants that fail to interact
with p16INK4a, suggesting that this kinase acts as an oncogene
by evading inhibition by INK4 proteins. This may in turn result in
direct modification of substrates by high levels of kinase activity or
may produce an indirect effect through increased p21/p27 titration. The
results presented here demonstrate that cdk6 can accelerate
G1 phase transit when ectopically expressed in U2OS cells
even though these cells do not express p16INK4a.
Expression of cdk6 resulted in increased S phase as measured by FACS
and BrdUrd incorporation. Nocodazole and mitotic release studies
indicated that the observed increase in S phase cells resulted at least
in part from decreased transit time through G1 phase of the
cell cycle. Although we cannot rule out an accompanying lengthening of
S phase, nocodazole-treated, cdk6-transfected cells did accumulate in M
phase, suggesting that any effect of S phase transit time was not
large. Surprisingly, the accelerated G1 phase did not
require co-transfection of the kinase-activating partner, cyclin D. G1 acceleration by cdk6 in the absence of increased cyclin
D is consistent with a model in which the supply of cyclin D is not the
only rate-limiting step in kinase activation. Indeed, cyclin D1 levels
are quite stable across the cell cycle in many proliferating cells,
unlike cyclins A, E, and B. Thus, whereas cyclin D complex formation is
obviously a critical step in kinase activation, it may not be the
rate-limiting step in cultures of proliferating cells.
The availability of the kinase may be particularly limiting for cyclin
D/cdk6 complexes, because the INK4 family of inhibitors act as
competitors with cyclin D for cdk6 binding. In light of this, the
ability of cdk6 to accelerate G1 in U2OS cells is somewhat surprising, given that U2OS cells lack p16INK4a and thus are
thought to be able to phosphorylate and inactivate pRb without
hindrance of cdk4 or cdk6 activity. Nevertheless, our results suggest
that cdk6 is limiting for cell cycle progression despite the absence of
p16INK4a. This is consistent with the observed ability of
excess cdk4 to increase the proliferation of astrocyte cell lines
lacking p16INK4a (40). One possibility arising from such
observations is that cdk6 can act "noncatalytically" in this system
by sequestering p21 or p27 away from cdk2. Such a role for cyclin
D/cdk4(6) complexes is strongly supported by experiments demonstrating
that p15INK4b and p16INK4a can cause redistribution of
p21 and p27 from cyclin cdk4(6) complexes to those containing cdk2,
thereby augmenting cell cycle arrest (26, 27, 41, 42).
The role of cyclin D/cdk4(6) complexes as "sinks" for p21 and p27
would suggest that catalytic activity of cdk6 would be dispensable for
G1 acceleration if titration alone were sufficient to
shorten G1. Our results using cdk6NFG, which is
catalytically inactive yet still able to bind D cyclins and p27, argue
that such p21 and p27 titration is not responsible for cdk6-mediated
G1 acceleration in U2OS cells. cdk6NFG was completely
incapable of shortening G1 phase in these experiments, and
indeed it detectably delayed S phase entry as determined by BrdUrd
incorporation following release from nocodazole (Fig. 4). These results
strongly argue that catalytic activity of cdk6 is required for the
observed effects on cell cycle progression in U2OS cells and inhibitor
sequestration is not sufficient for this effect.
It is possible that kinase inhibition by other members of the INK4
family limit proliferation in cultured cells lacking p16INK4a.
For example, G1 length may be partly determined by the
ratio of endogenous cdk6 to p18INK4c (43), which is expressed
in U2OS cells, and excess cdk6 would thus result in a shortened
G1 phase. This model predicts that elimination of INK4c
binding by the R31C mutation, which is analogous to the oncogenic R24C
mutation in cdk4, would enhance the G1 acceleration function of cdk6. However, our results using cdk6R31C stand in direct
contradiction to this, because R31C is completely unable to alter
G1 phase in transfected U2OS cells. Because this mutation, like the NFG mutation, does not disturb properties of cdk6 such as cyclin D1 or p27 binding, this result further argues against a role
for inhibitor titration in the G1 acceleration function of
cdk6. Indeed, because cdk6R31C can be activated by cyclin D1 in
cotransfected cells, these results suggest that the N terminus of cdk6
may be involved in the proper function of cdk6 within cells (but not
in vitro), perhaps at the level of substrate recognition or compartmentalization.
Published reports indicate that both cdk4 and cdk6 are indeed regulated
at the level of subcellular localization (13, 27, 38).
Consistent with these studies, data shown here demonstrate that cdk6
localizes to both the nucleus and the cytoplasm, whereas cdk6R31C
preferentially localizes to the cytoplasm. Synchronized U2OS cells show
a striking lack of cdk6R31C and cdk6R31CNFG protein in the nucleus in
late G1 phase. Recently, it has been shown that cytoplasmic
cdk6 exists primarily in inactive complexes with cdc37 and hsp90 or (in
T cells) with p19INK4d (37, 39). In light of this, the
localization pattern of the cdk6R31C protein presents an apparent
paradox. Why is an INK4 binding-defective cdk6 protein preferentially
localized in the cytoplasm if the major function of the cytoplasmically
localized INK4 protein (in this case, specifically p18INK4c) is
to anchor kinases in an inactive state? We suggest that the N terminus
of cdk6 is critically involved in the dissolution of cytoplasmic
complexes and may be a binding site for proteins that serve to promote
translocation of cdk6 to the nucleus. It is possible that such proteins
resemble INK4 proteins, or it may even be the case that INK4 proteins
themselves could promote nuclear entry of cdk6 under certain
circumstances, because INK4 proteins can compete with cdc37/hsp90 for
binding to cdk4 and cdk6
(44).2 The precise role of
the cdk6 N terminus in subcellular localization is currently under
investigation, but whatever the mechanism, maintenance of the cdk6R31C
mutant in the cdc37 complex predicts a persistence of cytoplasmic
localization and a functionally inactive kinase. In fact, this is
precisely the phenotype observed with cdk6R31C: an increased
cytoplasmic retention (Fig. 5) and a loss of function in either
G1 acceleration (cdk6wt) or G1 retardation (cdk6NFG) (Fig. 4), despite greater than wild-type catalytic activity of cdk6R31C in in vitro kinase assays (Fig. 3).
The requirement for cdk6 nuclear localization in G1
acceleration, its likely regulation in the cell cycle, and the novel
role of the N terminus in this localization raise the possibility of the existence of a cdk6 regulatory pathway that may result in differential activity of cdk4 and cdk6 in the same cell. Indeed, the
fact that cdk4R24C has been reported to be hyperactive but cdk6R31C is
inactive in cell cycle progression suggests that these kinases may be
subject to discrete activation programs. In the case of cdk6,
production of active complexes may require the presence of a factor
that interacts with the N terminus and that is itself subject to cell
cycle regulation. If this factor is not required by cdk4, the two
kinases could respond differently to extracellular signals, and this in
turn could favor activation of one kinase versus another in
tumor cells. Clearly, a better understanding of the role of the cdk6 N
terminus in functional regulation and the identification of putative
activating factors that interact with this domain are required to fully
understand the role of cdk6 in cancer cells.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP and 0.5 µg of C-terminal GST-Rb (amino acids 769-921) (Santa-Cruz Biotechnology) as substrate. Reactions were stopped by addition of
protein sample buffer with 10% betamercaptoethanol and placed on ice.
Samples were boiled and separated on 12.5% denaturing acrylamide gel,
Coomassie Brilliant Blue-stained to ensure equal loading and addition
of Rb substrate, and exposed to film overnight.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
700 kinase-positive cells counted)
demonstrated that 34% of vector-transfected cells were
BrdUrd-positive, whereas in the same experiment, 50% of
cdk6-transfected cells were BrdUrd-positive (Fig. 1B). These
data closely match the results of FACS analysis shown in Fig.
1A and indicate that cells transfected with cdk6 showed a
statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in the
percentage of S phase population as compared with vector-transfected
cells.

View larger version (25K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
DNA profiles and BrdUrd incorporation of
vector and cdk6-transfected cells. A, U2OS cells were
transfected with indicated plasmids and harvested for FACS analysis.
Cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated CD20 antibody to distinguish
transfected populations, fixed, and stained with propidium iodine for
DNA content. At least 1800 CD20-positive events were counted per
histogram. Results are representative of those found in at least three
independent experiments. B, BrdUrd incorporation for vector-
and cdk6-transfected cells. Values represent the average of at least
two independent experiments for which a total of at least 700 events
were counted.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Cell cycle profiles of transfected
cells. Cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated CD20 antibody to
distinguish transfected populations, fixed, and stained with propidium
iodine for DNA content. A, FACS profiles of p16- and
cdk6-transfected U2OS cells either untreated or nocodazole-treated, as
indicated. B, DNA profiles of nocodozole synchronized cells
transfected with vector (solid line), cdk6 (dotted
line), or cdk6R31C (boldface line) and harvested at 4 and 8 h following mitotic shake and replating.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Biochemical characterization of cdk6 and cdk6
mutants. A, direct immunoblot of 20 µg of transfected
U2OS cell lysate using polyclonal anti-cdk6 antibody C-21.
B, cdk6 immunoprecipitation of 400 µg of transfected cell
lysate immunoblotted with polyclonal p18 antibody and then reprobed
with cdk6 antibody, as noted. Anti-p18 immunoblots of these lysates
demonstrated equivalent levels of p18 expression in each case (not
shown). C, cdk6 immunoprecipitation of 200 µg of U2OS
lysate immunoblotted with monoclonal cyclin D1 antibody and cdk6
antibody, as noted. D, cdk6 immunoprecipitation of 400 µg
of cell lysate immunoblotted with polyclonal p27 antibody and reprobed
with cdk6 antibody, as noted. In C and D, control
immunoblots showed that these lysates contained equivalent levels of
cyclin D1 or p27, respectively (data not shown). E, in
vitro kinase assay. SAOS-2 cells were transfected with cyclin D1
(lanes 1 and 3-7) or its empty vector
(lane 2) and the indicated kinase or its vector. Lysates
from each transfection were tested for their kinase activity using
C-terminal GST-Rb substrate (amino acids 769-921).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
BrdUrd incorporation of U2OS cells expressing
cdk6 mutants. Graph of BrdUrd incorporation of kinase-positive
cells as determined by immunofluorescence. BrdUrd incorporation of
transfected U2OS cells harvested at 5, 7, or 10 h after mitotic
shake. At least 120 vector (closed squares), cdk6wt
(closed circles), cdk6R31C (closed triangles),
cdk6R31CNFG (open triangles), and cdk6NFG (open
squares), transfected cells were scored as BrdUrd-positive or
BrdUrd-negative at each time point.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Localization of kinases. Indirect
immunofluorescence of transfected cdk6 or mutant forms of cdk6.
A, cells were fixed at 10 h after synchronization and
stained with polyclonal antibody to cdk6 (C-21). B, cells
were fixed at 9 h after synchronization and stained with
monoclonal antibody to cdk6 (Ab-3).
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Dr. David Livingston and Dr. Karl Münger for critical review of the manuscript. We also thank Dr. Wade Harper for the gift of cdc37 antibody and Dr. Matt Meyerson for the gift of cdk6 antibody.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was funded by National Institutes of Health Grant GM55684 (to P. H.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Funded by United States Army Breast Cancer Fellowship
DAMD17-97-1-7167.
§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, 200 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115. Tel.: 617-432-2901; Fax: 617-432-0136; E-mail: Phil_Hinds@hms.harvard.edu.
2 M. Grossel and P. Hinds, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; Rb, retinoblastoma; pRb, Rb protein; HA, hemagglutinin; BrdUrd, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Matsushime, H., Ewen, M., Strom, D., Kato, J., Hanks, S., Foussel, M., and Sherr, C. (1992) Cell 71, 323-334[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Meyerson, M., Enders, G. H., Wu, C., Su, L., Gorka, C., Nelson, C., Harlow, E., and Tsai, L. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2909-2917[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. |
Matsushime, H.,
Quelle, D. E.,
Shurtleff, S. A.,
Shibuya, M.,
Sherr, C. J.,
and Kato, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2066-2076 |
| 4. |
Meyerson, M.,
and Harlow, E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2077-2086 |
| 5. | Weinberg, R. (1995) Cell 81, 323-330[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Morgan, D. (1995) Nature 474, 131-134 |
| 7. | El-Deiry, W. S., Tokino, T., Velculescu, V. E., Levy, D. B., Parsons, R., Trent, J. M., Lin, D., Mercer, W. E., Kinzler, K. W., and Vogelstein, B. (1993) Cell 75, 817-825[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Harper, J. W., Adami, G. R., Wei, N., Keyomarsi, K., and Elledge, S. J. (1993) Cell 75, 805-816[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Xiong, Y., Hannon, G., Zhang, H., Casso, D., Kobayashi, R., and Beach, D. (1993) Nature 366, 701-704[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Polyak, K.,
Kato, J.,
Solomon, M.,
Sherr, C.,
Massague, J.,
Roberts, J.,
and Koff, A.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
9-22 |
| 11. | Toyoshima, H., and Hunter, T. (1994) Cell 78, 67-74[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Zhang, H.,
Hannon, G.,
and Beach, D.
(1994)
Genes Dev.
8,
1750-1758 |
| 13. |
LaBaer, J.,
Garrett, M. D.,
Stevenson, L. F.,
Slingerland, J. M.,
Sandhu, C.,
Chou, H. S.,
Fattaey, A.,
and Harlow, E.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
847-862 |
| 14. | Cheng, M. G., Olivier, P., Diehl, J. D., Fero, M., Roussel, M. F., Roberts, J. M., and Sherr, C. J. (1999) EMBO J. 18, 1571-1583[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Brotherton, D., Dhanaraj, V., Wick, S., Brizuela, L., Domaille, P., Volyanik, E., Xu, X., Parisini, E., Smith, B., Archer, S., Serrano, M., Brenner, S., Blundell, T., and Laue, E. (1998) Nature 395, |
| 16. | Russo, A., Tong, L., Lee, J., Jeffrey, P., and Pavletich, N. (1998) Nature 395, 237-243[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Peter, M., and Herskowitz, I. (1994) Cell 79, 181-184[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Motokura, T., Bloom, T., Kim, H. G., Juppner, H., Ruderman, J. V., Kronenberg, H. M., and Arnold, A. (1991) Nature 350, 512-515[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. |
Khatib, Z.,
Matushime, H.,
Valentine, M.,
Shapiro, D.,
Sherr, C.,
and Look, T.
(1993)
Cancer Res.
53,
5535-5541 |
| 20. | Nobori, T., Miura, K., Wu, D., Lois, A., Takabayashi, K., and Carson, D. (1994) Nature 368, 753-756[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Tsujimoto, Y., Yunis, J., Onorato-Showe, L., Erikson, J., Nowell, P. C., and Croce, C. M. (1994) Science 224, 1403-1406 |
| 22. |
Kamb, A.,
Gruis, N.,
Weaver-Feldhaus, J.,
Liu, Q.,
Harshman, K.,
Tavtigian, S.,
Stockert, E.,
Day, R.,
Johnson, B.,
and Skolnick, M.
(1994)
Science
264,
436-440 |
| 23. | Ladanyi, M., Lewis, R., Jhanwar, S., Gerald, W., Huvos, A., and Healey, J. (1995) J. Pathol. 175, 211-217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 24. |
Wolfel, J.,
Hauer, M.,
Schneider, J.,
Serrano, M.,
Wölfel, C.,
Klehmann-Hieb, E.,
De Plaen, E.,
Hankelen, T.,
Meyer zum Buschenfelde, K.,
and Beach, D.
(1995)
Science
269,
1281-1284 |
| 25. |
Costello, J. F.,
Plass, C.,
Arap, W.,
Chapman, V. M.,
Held, W. A.,
Berger, M. S.,
Huang, H. S.,
and Cavanee, W. K.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
1250-1254 |
| 26. |
Reynisdottir, I.,
Polyak, K.,
Iavarone, A.,
and Massague, J.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1831-1845 |
| 27. |
Reynisdottir, I.,
and Massague, J.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
492-503 |
| 28. | Latham, K. M., Eastman, S. W., Wong, A., and Hinds, P. W. (1996) Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 4445-4455[Abstract] |
| 29. | Zuo, L., Weger, J., Yang, Q., Goldstein, A., Tucker, M., Walker, G., Hayward, N., and Dracopoli, N. (1996) Nat. Genet. 12, 97-99[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Timmermann, S., Hinds, P. W., and Munger, K. (1997) Cell Growth Differ. 8, 361-370[Abstract] |
| 31. |
Easton, J.,
Wei, T.,
Lahti, J.,
and Kidd, V.
(1998)
Cancer Res.
58,
2624-2632 |
| 32. |
van den Heuvel, S.,
and Harlow, E.
(1993)
Science
262,
2050-2054 |
| 33. |
Baker, S. J.,
Markowitz, S.,
Fearon, E. R.,
Wilson, J. K. V.,
and Vogelstein, B.
(1990)
Science
249,
912-915 |
| 34. |
Chen, C.,
and Okayama, H.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
2745-2752 |
| 35. |
Lapointe, J.,
Lachance, Y.,
Labrie, Y.,
and Labrie, C.
(1996)
Cancer Res.
56,
4586-4589 |
| 36. |
Jiang, H.,
Chou, H.,
and Zhu, L.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
5284-5290 |
| 37. |
Stepanova, L.,
Leng, X.,
Parker, S. B.,
and Harper, J. W.
(1996)
Genes Dev.
10,
1491-1502 |
| 38. | Nagasawa, M., Melamed, I., Kupfer, A., Gelfand, E., and Lucas, J. (1997) J. Immunology 158, 5146-5154[Abstract] |
| 39. | Mahony, D., Parry, K., and Lees, E. (1998) Oncogene 16, 603-611[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Holland, E. C.,
Hively, W. P.,
Gallo, V.,
and Varmus, H. E.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3644-3649 |
| 41. |
Parry, D.,
Mahony, D.,
Wills, K.,
and Lees, E.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1775-1783 |
| 42. |
McConnell, B. B.,
Gregory, F. J.,
Stott, F. J.,
Hara, E.,
and Peters, G.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
1981-1989 |
| 43. | Zindy, F., Quelle, D., Roussel, M., and Sherr, C. (1997) Oncogene 15, 203-211[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. | Lamphere, L., Fiore, F., Xu, X., Brizuela, L., Keezeer, S., Sardet, C., Draetta, G., and Gyuris, J. (1997) Oncogene 14, 1999-2004[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Ruas, F. Gregory, R. Jones, R. Poolman, M. Starborg, J. Rowe, S. Brookes, and G. Peters CDK4 and CDK6 Delay Senescence by Kinase-Dependent and p16INK4a-Independent Mechanisms Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2007; 27(12): 4273 - 4282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. E. Lim, M. Mansukhani, and I. B. Weinstein Cyclin-dependent kinase 6 associates with the androgen receptor and enhances its transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells PNAS, April 5, 2005; 102(14): 5156 - 5161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Marchini, T. Marttila, A. Winter, S. Caldeira, I. Malanchi, R. J. Blaschke, B. Hacker, E. Rao, M. Karperien, J. M. Wit, et al. The Short Stature Homeodomain Protein SHOX Induces Cellular Growth Arrest and Apoptosis and Is Expressed in Human Growth Plate Chondrocytes J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 37103 - 37114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. F. Kalejta and T. Shenk The Human Cytomegalovirus UL82 Gene Product (pp71) Accelerates Progression through the G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle J. Virol., March 15, 2003; 77(6): 3451 - 3459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Odom and M. J. Grossel Using the Two-Hybrid Screen in the Classroom Laboratory CBE Life Sci Educ, March 1, 2002; 1(1): 43 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Todd, P.W. Hinds, K. Munger, A.K. Rustgi, O.G. Opitz, Y. Suliman, and D.T. Wong CELL CYCLE DYSREGULATION IN ORAL CANCER Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 51 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Matushansky, F. Radparvar, and A. I. Skoultchi Manipulating the onset of cell cycle withdrawal in differentiated erythroid cells with cyclin-dependent kinases and inhibitors Blood, October 15, 2000; 96(8): 2755 - 2764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||