J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 42, 30139-30145, October 15, 1999
Transforming Growth Factor-
Overrides the Adhesion Requirement
for Surface Expression of
5
1 Integrin
in Normal Rat Kidney Fibroblasts
A NECESSARY EFFECT FOR INDUCTION OF ANCHORAGE-INDEPENDENT
GROWTH*
Stephen L.
Dalton
§,
Eric
Scharf
¶,
Gabriela
Davey
, and
Richard K.
Assoian**
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6084
 |
ABSTRACT |
We have previously shown that the expression of
5
1 integrin on the cell surface is
dependent upon cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, and we report
here that transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
) overcomes this
requirement in normal rat kidney (NRK) fibroblasts. Thus, suspended NRK
cells treated with TGF-
show levels of surface
5
1 integrin that are equivalent to those
seen in adherent cells. Moreover, several experiments showed that this
effect is necessary for the induction of anchorage-independent growth
by TGF-
. First, a kinetic analysis showed that surface expression of
5
1 integrin was restored in
TGF-
-treated NRK cells prior to the induction of
anchorage-independent growth. Second, NRK cell mutants that have lost
their TGF-
requirement for surface expression of
5
1 integrin were anchorage-independent in
the absence of TGF-
. Third, an antisense oligonucleotide to the
1 integrin subunit or, fourth, stable expression of an
5-antisense cDNA blocked the ability of TGF-
to
stimulate anchorage-independent growth. Thus, TGF-
overrides the
adhesion requirement for surface expression of
5
1 integrin in NRK cells, and this effect
is necessary for the induction of anchorage-independent growth.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The proliferation of normal cells is dependent upon cell adhesion
to a substratum; this phenotype has been termed anchorage dependence.
Cell anchorage to substratum is mediated largely by the interaction of
cell-surface integrins with the extracellular matrix, and it now seems
clear that the anchorage-dependent phenotype reflects the
fact that extracellular matrix/integrin-mediated signaling (in
cooperation with growth factor/receptor tyrosine kinase-mediated
signaling) is required for proliferation through the G1
phase of the cell cycle (1, 2). In contrast, most transformed cells
have lost their adhesion requirement for proliferation. This phenotype
is termed anchorage independence and is thought to occur because the
signaling events normally stimulated by cell adhesion have become
constitutively activated. Anchorage-independent growth is an excellent
correlate to tumorigenicity in vivo (3, 4).
In addition to initiating growth stimulatory signal transduction
cascades, cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix stabilizes the
expression of integrins on the cell surface (5-7). Preexisting surface
integrins are internalized and degraded within lysosomes if cells are
detached from their substratum. Attachment to substratum also permits
surface expression of newly synthesized integrins. We have suggested
that this down-regulation of surface integrins may contribute to the
anchorage-dependent phenotype by limiting integrin-dependent signaling in suspended cells (5, 6).
Several studies have shown that the adhesive properties of cells are
altered when they are exposed to transforming growth factor-
(TGF-
).1 TGF-
typically
decreases the expression of matrix-degrading proteases and increases
the expression of matrix proteins, integrins, and inhibitors of
matrix-degrading proteases (8). TGF-
is most often a negative
regulator of cell proliferation (9-12), but it also stimulates
anchorage-independent growth of certain fibroblastic cell lines. In NRK
fibroblasts, TGF-
cooperates with mitogens (typically serum and EGF
or transforming growth factor-
) to induce vigorous colony formation
of NRK cells in soft agar. Several years ago, Ignotz and Massagué
(13) reported that RGD peptides (which block the binding of several
extracellular matrix proteins to their integrin receptors) block the
induction of anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
and that
fibronectin could replace TGF-
to induce anchorage-independent
growth of NRK cells. Since TGF-
stimulates the synthesis of
fibronectin, these authors proposed that TGF-
induced anchorage
independence by stimulating the secretion of fibronectin, which, in
turn, would bind to and activate
5
1
integrin. However, others found that purified fibronectin would not
substitute for TGF-
(14), and then we reported that
5
1 integrin is not expressed on the
surface of suspended NRK cells (see above). These results are not
compatible with the specifics of the original model, but the inhibitory
effect of RGD on NRK cell colony formation remains a compelling result that implicates integrins in the transforming effect of TGF-
.
Grotendorst and co-workers (15) have shown that TGF-
induces
synthesis of connective tissue growth factor and that this effect is
necessary but not sufficient for induction of NRK cell anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
. Connective tissue growth factor also stimulates the expression of fibronectin, collagen, and
5
1 integrin in adherent NRK cells (16),
indicating that it is a likely effector of the TGF-
signal in this
system. However, these studies do not address the functional
significance of the matrix or
5
1 integrin
effects on anchorage-independent growth. To resolve the relationship
between integrin expression and induction of anchorage-independent
growth by TGF-
, we developed a system that allowed us to examine the
effects of TGF-
on surface integrin expression and
anchorage-independent growth simultaneously and within the same cell.
We report here that TGF-
overrides the adhesion requirement for
surface expression of
5
1 integrin in NRK
fibroblasts and that this effect is necessary for the induction of
anchorage-independent growth.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture and Assessment of Anchorage-independent
Growth--
Near confluent asynchronous NRK fibroblasts (clone 49F)
were trypsinized, plated at half-confluence, and cultured for 24 h with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and 5% FCS. The cells were
then retrypsinized and replated in 100-mm tissue culture dishes
(monolayer cultures) or 100-mm agar-coated dishes (suspension cultures)
using 106 cells in 10 ml of 5% FCS and 2 nM
EGF ± 100 pM TGF-
1 (5).
5-Antisense and
5-control (sense) NRK
transfectants were cultured under the same conditions used for parental
NRK cells. Proliferation of suspended cells in preparative suspension
culture was assessed by incorporation of [3H]thymidine
into DNA (trichloroacetic acid-insoluble radioactivity) essentially as
described (17). In some experiments, the cultures labeled with
[3H]thymidine contained 0.5% or 1% methylcellulose to
inhibit diffusion of daughter cells. Colony formation in soft agar was
determined as described (18). Recombinant TGF-
1 and
purified EGF were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.
Surface Radioiodination and Immunoprecipitation of
Integrins--
Cells were collected from monolayer or suspension
culture, and cell-surface proteins were radioiodinated as described
(5). Labeled cells were extracted in lysis buffer A (0.1 M
Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.5 mM
MgCl2, and 0.5% Nonidet P-40), and 5-µl aliquots were
precipitated in 5% trichloroacetic acid to quantify the total
incorporation of isotope into protein as described (5). Selected
amounts of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity (typically
2.5 × 105 cpm for anti-
5, 1 × 106 cpm for anti-
1
1, and
2 × 106 cpm for anti-
3 antibodies)
were brought to 0.5 ml with lysis buffer A and incubated with 2-4 µl
of anti-integrin antibodies. Rabbit anti-
5 antibody was
prepared in our laboratory; rabbit anti-
3 antibody was a
generous gift from E. Marcantonio; and mouse
anti-
1
1 monoclonal antibody was a
generous gift from S. Carbonetto. Immune complexes containing rabbit
and murine antibodies were collected with 25-50 µl of Pansorbin
(Calbiochem) and anti-mouse agarose (Sigma), respectively. Conditions
for the immunoprecipitations have been previously described (5, 6),
except for the mouse anti-rat
1
1
monoclonal antibody. In this case, the incubations were performed at
4 °C for 2 h (primary antibody) and 1 h (secondary antibody-agarose). Protein A-antibody complexes for
3
1 were typically washed once with lysis
buffer A and 1 M KCl prior to extensive washing in lysis
buffer A. The washed immunoprecipitates were solubilized in SDS sample
buffer lacking reductant, and the radiolabeled integrin subunits were
detected by autoradiography after electrophoresis on SDS-polyacrylamide
gels containing 5% acrylamide (19:1 acrylamide/bisacrylamide).
Combined Analysis of TGF-
Effects on Integrin Surface
Expression and Anchorage-independent Growth--
Quiescent suspended
NRK cells were prepared in two steps. First, freshly trypsinized cells
were replated and allowed to spread for 6-8 h prior to serum
starvation for 3 days in defined medium (19). Second, these cells were
trypsinized and preincubated in their conditioned medium overnight.
These quiescent suspended cells were collected by centrifugation,
washed with fresh defined medium, and added (1 × 106
cells) to agar-coated 100-mm dishes containing 10 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 5% FCS, and 2 nM EGF ± 100 pM TGF-
. Cells were collected at 12, 24, and 48 h
after exposure to TGF-
, and surface expression of specific integrin
subunits was determined by radioiodination and immunoprecipitation. A
duplicate aliquot of the quiescent suspended cells was
surface-radioiodinated prior to stimulation with mitogens (time 0).
Aliquots of the quiescent serum-starved cells (4 × 104) were also added to agar-coated 35-mm dishes in 2 ml of
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, 5% FCS, and 2 nM
EGF ± 100 pM TGF-
. The cultures were labeled for
24 h with [3H]thymidine between days 0 and 1, 1 and
2, or 2 and 3. Cells were collected, and trichloroacetic
acid-precipitable radioactivity was isolated and quantified to assess
the degree of cell cycling.
In some experiments, the overnight preincubation contained 0-20
µg/ml concentrations of an antisense (GTTGNAAATTCATCTTTTC) or a sense
(GAAAAGATGAATTTNCAAC; control) phosphorothioate-modified oligonucleotide (Oligos Etc.) to the
1 integrin subunit.
The oligonucleotide-treated cells were then stimulated with FCS, EGF, and TGF-
as described above, except that cells destined for surface radioiodination were added to agar-coated 35-mm wells (six
wells/sample), and those destined for pulse labeling with
[3H]thymidine were added to agar-coated 15-mm dishes
(7.5 × 103 cells in 0.5 ml/well in triplicate) and
pulsed with [3H]thymidine for 24 h after 2 days in
culture. The surface level of
1 integrin and the degree
of anchorage-independent growth were assessed by immunoprecipitation
and analysis of trichloroacetic acid-insoluble radioactivity,
respectively, as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
TGF-
Overrides the Adhesion Requirement for Surface Expression
of
5
1 Integrin in NRK
Fibroblasts--
We (5, 6) and others (7) have shown that cell-surface
integrins are internalized and degraded when cells are cultured in the
absence of substratum. This effect presumably contributes to the
anchorage-dependent phenotype by preventing integrin
signaling in nonadherent cells. We used NRK fibroblasts to examine the
effect of TGF-
on this regulation of cell-surface integrin
expression. Cells were cultured in a preparative suspension system in
the presence and absence of TGF-
and then radioiodinated for
analysis of integrin surface expression by immunoprecipitation, SDS gel electrophoresis, and autoradiography. We detected
1
1 (a collagen/laminin receptor),
3
1 (a laminin, collagen, and fibronectin
receptor), and
5
1 (the classical
fibronectin receptor) in NRK cell monolayers (Fig.
1, Mn
TGF-
). As
expected from our previous studies (5, 6), the surface expression of
each of these integrins was lost when the cells were cultured in
suspension (Sp
TGF-
). Lack of suitable antibodies
prevented similar analysis for rat
2
1 integrin (a collagen/laminin receptor), but
2
1 is also adhesion-dependent for surface expression in NIH-3T3 cells transfected with the human
2 cDNA (data not shown).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
TGF- overrides the
adhesion requirement for surface expression of integrins.
Asynchronous NRK cells were cultured in monolayer (Mn) and
suspension (Sp) for 2 days with 5% FCS and 2 nM
EGF ± 100 pM TGF- . Surface proteins of collected
cells were radioiodinated; the cells were lysed; and equal amounts of
trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity were incubated with
antibodies specific for 1 1,
3 1, and
5 1.
|
|
Addition of TGF-
resulted in distinct effects on the surface
expression of NRK cell integrins. In adherent cells, TGF-
slightly increased the surface expression of
1
1
and
5
1 and inhibited the surface
expression of
3
1 (Fig. 1, compare
Mn ± TGF-
). Although TGF-
usually stimulates the
biosynthesis of multiple integrins in human fibroblasts (20), it can
also have selective stimulatory effects on, and even inhibit, the
expression of particular integrin subunits (21). For example, TGF-
inhibits the expression of
3
1 in NRK
cells (this report) and MG-63 cells (21).
In contrast to these relatively complex and often modest effects,
treatment of suspended cells with TGF-
resulted in a dramatic increase in the surface expression of
5
1
integrin (Fig. 1, compare Sp ± TGF-
), completely
restoring expression to the level normally seen in adherent cells
(compare Mn
TGF-
with Sp + TGF-
). TGF-
also increased the surface expression of
1
1 (compare Sp ± TGF-
), but the surface expression of this integrin was much
less than that of
5
1 (compare signal
intensities and the amount of radioactivity immunoprecipitated; see
"Experimental Procedures"). Moreover, TGF-
failed to restore
1
1 levels in suspended NRK cells to those
normally seen in adherent cells (compare Mn
TGF-
with Sp + TGF-
). Note that NRK cells express very low levels
of
V
3 integrin, and treatment with
TGF-
did not significantly increase
V
3
surface expression (data not shown). Thus, the predominant effect of
TGF-
on integrins in NRK fibroblasts is to permit surface expression
of
5
1 integrin when the cells are
cultured in the absence of substratum.
Restored surface expression of
5
1
integrin in TGF-
-treated cells indicates that TGF-
alters the
steady-state equilibrium of this integrin on the cell surface, either
by inhibiting internalization/degradation or by increasing
synthesis/maturation. To directly assess the effect of TGF-
on
integrin internalization and degradation, we prepared NRK cells in
which plasma membrane
1-associated integrins had been
biosynthetically labeled with [35S]methionine (see Ref. 6
for detailed procedures). The cells were cultured in suspension to
initiate internalization and degradation, and we asked if exposure to
TGF-
would inhibit those events. Cells were collected and divided
into two equal portions, which were briefly incubated in the presence
or absence of Pronase prior to extraction. The level of
1 integrin subunit in each extract was determined by
immunoprecipitation, and the Pronase digestion allowed us to
distinguish cell-surface (Pronase-sensitive) from internalized
(Pronase-insensitive)
1 integrin subunit. As shown in
the first two lanes of Fig.
2A (0 ± Pronase), the very large majority of
1 integrin
subunit was present on the surface of NRK cells prior to incubation in
suspension. After ~1 day in suspension, cell-surface
1
integrin levels were greatly decreased, yet no integrin was detected
intracellularly (Sp ± Pronase). The absence of
intracellular
1 integrin subunit, together with the
large decrease in total cell-associated
1 integrin
levels, indicated that
1 integrin had been degraded,
consistent with our previous results (6). Incubation with TGF-
did
not block this process (compare Sp ± TGF-
).

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Internalization and synthesis of the 1 integrin subunit. A,
cell-surface proteins in NRK fibroblasts were biosynthetically labeled
by pulse chasing with [35S]methionine as described (6).
The cells were detached with Versene and either processed immediately
as described below or added to agar-coated dishes containing 5% FCS
and 1 nM EGF ± 100 pM TGF- and
incubated in suspension (Sp) for 21 h prior to
processing. For processing, cells were incubated in the presence and
absence of Pronase (to degrade surface integrin that had not been
internalized, allowing an assessment of internalization efficiency; see
Ref. 6 for details). The Pronase digestion was stopped by addition of
SDS sample buffer, and the amount of surface 1 integrin
in the presence and absence of Pronase was assessed by
immunoprecipitation with anti- 1 antibody followed by SDS
gel electrophoresis and fluorography. B, NRK fibroblasts
(106 cells/100-mm agar-coated dish) were preincubated for
8 h in 5% FCS and 1 nM EGF ± 100 pM
TGF- . The cells were collected, resuspended in methionine-free
minimal essential medium, and incubated for 16 h with 5% dialyzed
FCS, 1 nM EGF, and 2 mCi of Tran35S-label
(ICN) ± 100 pM TGF- . Identically treated cells
lacking TGF- were pulsed with 2 mCi of Tran35S-label for
the last hour of the 16-h incubation to generate a sample enriched for
the immature pre- 1 integrin subunit (pre- 1 std.). Cells were collected and extracted. The extracts were
incubated with anti- 1 integrin antibody or normal rabbit
serum (NRS), followed by SDS gel electrophoresis and
fluorography.
|
|
We then measured the effect of TGF-
on the biosynthesis of the
1 integrin subunit (Fig. 2B). Control and
TGF-
-treated NRK cell suspensions were incubated with
[35S]methionine for 16 h prior to
immunoprecipitation of cell lysates with an antibody recognizing the
1 integrin subunit. These experiments showed that (i)
synthesis of the mature
1 subunit was readily detected
during the incubation with [35S]methionine and (ii)
TGF-
increased the amount of mature
1 subunit as well
as the amount of pre-
1 subunit. Although limits of
detection prevented the examination of individual 
1
heterodimers, the results of Fig. 2 (A and B)
show that that the restorative effect of TGF-
on
1
integrin surface expression in suspended NRK cells is associated with
increased biosynthesis rather than decreased degradation.
Kinetic and Genetic Relationships between Restored Surface
Expression of
5
1 Integrin and
Anchorage-independent Growth--
Since
5
1 has been strongly implicated in
adhesion-dependent cell cycle progression, we reasoned that
restored
5
1 surface expression might be
involved in the induction of anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
. A
kinetic analysis showed that TGF-
restored
5
1 surface expression (shown as the
5 subunit) within 12 h (Fig.
3A), whereas its effect on
anchorage-independent growth (defined as incorporation of
[3H]thymidine beyond the background level seen with FCS
and EGF) required >24 h (Fig. 3B). Thus, restoration of
cell-surface
5
1 integrin by TGF-
was
prior to its stimulatory effect on anchorage-independent growth. This
result indicates that restored
5
1 surface
integrin is not a secondary consequence of restored cell cycling. Note that the up-regulation of surface
5
1 and
induction of anchorage independence occurred while
3
1 expression was down-regulated (Fig.
3A). This result argues against a role for this alternative fibronectin receptor and supports a role for
5
1 integrin in the induction of
anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Restored surface expression of 5 1
integrin precedes induction of anchorage-independent growth by
TGF- . A, quiescent suspended
NRK fibroblasts were stimulated with 5% FCS and 2 nM
EGF ± 100 pM TGF- for 0-2 days. Cells were
collected, surface-radioiodinated, and extracted. Equal amounts of
trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity (see "Experimental
Procedures") were incubated with antibodies specific to the
3 and 5 subunits. B, duplicate
cultures of quiescent suspended NRK cells were stimulated with 5% FCS
and 2 nM EGF in the absence or presence of 100 pM TGF- . Induction of anchorage-independent growth was
monitored by incorporation of [3H]thymidine into newly
synthesized DNA.
|
|
We have previously mutagenized NRK cells with EMS (ethylmethane
sulfonate) and identified mutants that have lost their adhesion/TGF-
requirement, but retained their mitogen requirement for proliferation (17). These mutants (called NRK/EMS clones B and F) do not produce elevated levels of TGF-
, and they respond to exogenous TGF-
. However, they proliferate in suspension and form colonies in soft agar
when treated with FCS and EGF alone (17). We cultured these NRK/EMS
clones in monolayer and suspension with FCS/EGF and examined their
adhesion requirements for surface expression of
5
1 integrin (Fig.
4). In contrast to parental NRK cells,
the surface expression of
5
1 was similar
in both adherent and suspended NRK/EMS clones. Thus, these NRK mutants
have lost their TGF-
requirements for both anchorage-independent
growth and surface expression of
5
1 integrin. This result (i) indicates that surface expression of
5
1 integrin and anchorage-independent
growth are coupled in NRK cells and (ii) provides genetic evidence
supporting the role of restored surface
5
1 expression in the induction of
anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Anchorage-independent NRK cell mutants
constitutively express cell-surface 5 1
integrin. Parallel cultures of adherent (monolayer
(Mn)) and nonadherent (suspension (Sp)) NRK/EMS
clone B (left lanes), NRK/EMS clone F (middle
lanes), and nonmutagenized NRK (right lanes)
fibroblasts were prepared and incubated for 2 days in the presence of
5% FCS and 2 nM EGF. The cells were then subjected to
surface radioiodination and extracted. Equal amounts of trichloroacetic
acid-precipitable radioactivity from each extract was incubated with
anti- 5 antibody, and the surface expression of the
immunoprecipitated 5 1 heterodimer was
assessed by SDS gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Normal rabbit
serum ( ) was used to control for nonspecific
immunoprecipitation.
|
|
Inhibition of Restored
5
1 Surface
Expression Blocks Induction of Anchorage-independent Growth by
TGF-
--
To determine if restored integrin surface expression was
necessary for induction of anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
, quiescent suspended NRK cells were preincubated with an antisense or a
control (sense) oligonucleotide complementary to a conserved sequence
in
1 integrin. The preincubated cells were stimulated with FCS, EGF, and TGF-
. Anchorage-independent growth was
assessed by [3H]thymidine incorporation (Fig.
5), and duplicate cultures were radioiodinated for analysis of
1 integrin surface
expression by immunoprecipitation (inset). Consistent with
the results in Fig. 1, addition of TGF-
to suspended NRK cells
increased the expression of
1 integrins well above the
barely detectable levels normally seen in suspended cells
(first and second lanes). This TGF-
-mediated
increase in cell-surface
1 integrin was partially blocked (~50-70%) by the antisense oligonucleotide
(second and third lanes), whereas the sense
oligonucleotide was completely without effect (second and
fourth lanes). Parallel immunoprecipitations showed that
surface levels of the
5 integrin subunit were also specifically inhibited by the antisense oligonucleotide (data not
shown). The antisense oligonucleotide also inhibited the ability of
TGF-
to induce anchorage-independent growth, and this effect was
dose-dependent (Fig. 5). Moreover, the concentration of
antisense oligonucleotide used to block restored expression of
1 integrin (20 µg/ml) was also effective in blocking
anchorage-independent growth. In contrast, the sense oligonucleotide
had only a minor effect on TGF-
-induced anchorage-independent
growth, and this effect was not dose-dependent.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Antisense oligonucleotide to the 1 integrin subunit inhibits the effect
of TGF- on restored surface integrin
expression and anchorage-independent growth. Duplicate cultures of
quiescent suspended NRK cells were preincubated for 18 h with
2-20 µg/ml concentrations of the antisense (A) or sense
(S) phosphorothioate oligonucleotide prior to stimulation
with 5% FCS, 2 nM EGF, and 100 pM TGF- .
After 2 days, [3H]thymidine was added to the cultures;
cells were collected 24 h later, and anchorage-independent growth
was quantified by isolating and counting trichloroacetic
acid-precipitable DNA. Maximal and background thymidine incorporation
(first and second columns, respectively) were
determined with FCS/EGF-treated NRK cells cultured in the absence of
oligonucleotide with and without TGF- , respectively.
Inset, quiescent suspended NRK cells were pretreated with 0 or 20 µg/ml antisense (AS) or sense (S)
oligonucleotide for 18 h. The treated cells were then stimulated
with 5% FCS and 2 nM EGF ± 100 pM
TGF- for 2 days prior to collection, surface radioiodination, and
analysis of 1 integrin surface expression by
immunoprecipitation, SDS gel electrophoresis, and
autoradiography.
|
|
To assess specifically the role of
5
1 in
the induction of anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
, we used NRK
cells that had been stably transfected with a 1.3-kilobase pair
5-antisense cDNA
fragment.2 The surface
expression of
5
1 integrin is reduced
4-fold in this antisense cell line as compared with parental NRK cells
or NRK cells transfected with
5 cDNA fragment in the
sense orientation (control transfectant). Expression of other
1-containing integrins is similar in
5-antisense,
5-control, and parental NRK
cells. (Note that the
5 cDNA we transfected encodes
only a small part of the
5 ectodomain and does not
result in expression of bona fide
5 protein
when transfected in the sense orientation.) Fig. 6 shows the low level of surface
5
1 in the control (sense (S)) transfectants cultured in suspension and that exposure to TGF-
increased
5
1 surface expression
significantly (compare S ± TGF-
). This result is
identical to that seen with parental NRK cells (compare NRK ± TGF-
). TGF-
also increased the expression of
5
1 in the antisense (AS)
transfectants, indicating that they have retained TGF-
responsiveness (compare AS ± TGF-
). However, surface
5
1 was barely detectable in the
antisense cells lacking TGF-
, and even after adding TGF-
, the
surface expression of
5
1 was no higher
than the basal levels seen in the control cells lacking TGF-
. Thus,
suspended antisense cells treated with TGF-
have much lower surface
5
1 integrin levels than seen in suspended control transfectants treated with TGF-
. (Note that the
autoradiogram in Fig. 6 was deliberately overexposed to allow for
comparisons of the basal
5
1 surface
levels in parental, control, and antisense cells cultured in
suspension.)

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of TGF- on
restored 5 1
surface expression are inhibited in 5-antisense transfectants.
Parental NRK fibroblasts and stable 5-antisense
(AS) and 5-control (sense (S)) NRK
transfectants were incubated in suspension with 5% FCS and 2 nM EGF ± 100 pM TGF- for 3 days before
collection and analysis. Collected cells were surface-radioiodinated
and extracted. Equal amounts of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable
radioactivity were incubated with anti- 5 antibody, and
surface expression of the 5 1 heterodimer
was assessed by SDS gel electrophoresis and autoradiography.
|
|
TGF-
induced anchorage-independent growth of the control (sense)
transfectants, and this effect was strongly inhibited in the antisense
transfectant (Fig. 7A).
Moreover, TGF-
stimulated colony formation of the control (sense)
NRK transfectants in soft agar, whereas colony formation of the
antisense cells was not stimulated by TGF-
(Fig. 7B).
Similar results were obtained with two distinct
5-antisense and
5-control transfectants.
These data are in excellent agreement with those obtained with the
1-antisense oligonucleotide (Fig. 5), but specifically
emphasize the role of
5
1 integrin in
TGF-
-induced anchorage independence.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
TGF- fails to induce
anchorage-independent growth in 5-antisense NRK cells.
A, suspended 5-antisense and
5-control (sense) NRK transfectants were cultured in
suspension for 3 days with 5% FCS and 2 nM EGF ± 100 pM TGF- . Anchorage-independent growth was quantified by
pulse labeling with [3H]thymidine for the last 24 h
of the incubation. B, 5-antisense and
5-control (sense) NRK transfectants were cultured in
soft agar in the presence of 5% FCS and 2 nM EGF ± 100 pM TGF- . Shown are phase-contrast photographs taken
at 10× magnification after 10 days in culture.
|
|
Anchorage-independent Growth by TGF-
Does Not Require Formation
of an Extensive Fibronectin Matrix--
We asked whether deposition of
a fibrillar fibronectin matrix was required for anchorage-independent
growth of NRK cells induced by TGF-
. We treated NRK cells with
TGF-
and looked for the formation of multicellular aggregates that
might indicate conversion of serum or cellular fibronectin into a
local, extensive fibrillar matrix. NRK cells were induced to undergo
anchorage-independent growth by exposure to mitogens and TGF-
. The
cells were cultured in soft agar or in different concentrations of
methylcellulose to gradually remove the constraints on diffusion of
dividing daughter cells. As expected, NRK cells formed discrete
multicellular colonies when cultured in soft agar (Fig.
8A), and a similar pattern was observed in high concentrations of methylcellulose (Fig.
8B). An intermediate concentration of methylcellulose led to
the appearance of single cells and a reduced number of multicellular
aggregates (Fig. 8C). Almost no multicellular aggregates
were seen when the cells were cultured in the absence of
methylcellulose (Fig. 8D). Simultaneous assessment of
anchorage-independent growth by [3H]thymidine
incorporation showed that the extent of cell proliferation was the same
under all three preparative suspension conditions (Fig. 8E).
We conclude that, if diffusion of daughter cells is permitted,
induction of anchorage-independent growth of NRK cells by TGF-
does not involve the formation of multicellular aggregates characteristic of colony formation in soft agar.

View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of TGF- on
anchorage-independent growth and morphology of NRK cells.
A-D, phase-contrast photographs (magnification × 10)
of NRK cells stimulated with 5% FCS, 2 nM EGF, and 100 pM TGF- and cultured for 7 days in medium containing
soft agar (A), 1% methylcellulose (B), 0.5%
methylcellulose (C), and 0% methylcellulose (D);
E, NRK fibroblasts (2 × 104 cells)
cultured in preparative suspension containing 5% FCS, 2 nM
EGF, and selected concentrations of TGF- . The cell layer contained
1% ( ), 0.5% ( ), and 0% ( ) methylcellulose.
Anchorage-independent growth was quantified at days 6-7 by 24 h
of incubation with [3H]thymidine and subsequent isolation
of trichloroacetic acid-precipitable radioactivity.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Oncogenically transformed cells express low levels of
5
1 integrin (23-25), presumably because
these cells have constitutively activated
integrin-dependent signaling pathways, and selective pressure to maintain integrin expression has been lost. We show here
that phenotypic transformation of NRK fibroblasts by TGF-
is
fundamentally different in this regard. First, like all
anchorage-dependent cells tested (5-7), NRK cells
down-regulate surface
5
1 integrin expression when cultured in suspension. Second, TGF-
restores surface expression of
5
1 integrin, and
this effect is necessary for induction of anchorage-independent growth.
Thus, induction of NRK cell anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
, at
least in part, reflects the fact that this growth factor permits normal surface expression of
5
1 in the absence
of substratum.
TGF-
has been reported to increase the synthesis of both
5 and
1 mRNAs (20, 26, 27), and our
experiments with the
1 subunit support the idea that
increased synthesis accounts for the restored expression of
5
1 on the surface of nonadherent NRK
cells. However, the studies reporting TGF-
effects on integrin subunit synthesis have used adherent cells, and it is possible that the
subcellular effects of TGF-
can be influenced by the presence or
absence of a substratum. Moreover, restored expression of
5
1 integrin may also require TGF-
effects on subunit mRNA translation, glycosylation, heterodimer
formation, and/or heterodimer transport to the plasma membrane. The
degree to which these potential mechanisms contribute to the
TGF-
effect reported here is a topic for further study.
Like Fava and McClure (14), we also found that fibronectin is unable to
replace TGF-
in stimulating anchorage-independent growth (data not
shown). However, the data in this report also explain why fibronectin
should not be able to replace TGF-
: surface
5
1 would be absent from suspended NRK
cells treated with mitogens and fibronectin, whereas it would be
present at normal levels in suspended cells treated with mitogens and
TGF-
. This difference notwithstanding, our results do support and
extend the original hypothesis (13) that the
fibronectin-
5
1 interaction is an important aspect of TGF-
action during induction of NRK cell anchorage-independent growth. Since our studies and most others on the
induction of anchorage-independent growth by TGF-
were performed in
serum-containing medium, either serum-derived fibronectin or
TGF-
-induced synthesis of cellular fibronectin could supply the
ligand for
5
1 integrin.
We also investigated the nature of fibronectin ligand in NRK cells
undergoing anchorage-independent growth in response to TGF-
. We
found that if diffusion of daughter cells was not blocked, nonadherent
NRK cells treated with TGF-
would proliferate, at least in large
part, as a single cell suspension and certainly without the large
multicellular aggregates characteristic of colony formation in soft
agar. This result indicates that the growth stimulatory effect of
TGF-
is distinguishable from a mechanism involving extensive
cell-cell adhesion on a local, TGF-
-stimulated matrix.
Although our studies show that restored expression of
5
1 integrin is associated with induction
of anchorage-independent growth, others studies show that transformed
fibroblasts have a reduced expression of
5
1 integrin (23-25). Moreover, surface
5
1 integrin levels inversely correlate
with anchorage-independent growth in transformed cells (22, 28). We
suggest that the ability of overexpressed
5
1 integrin to inhibit anchorage
independence of transformed cells and the ability of restored surface
5
1 integrin to induce
anchorage-independent growth of nontransformed cells indicate that
inhibition and induction of anchorage-independent growth are
mechanistically distinct. Indeed, the fact that surface
5
1 integrin is down-regulated when normal
(anchorage-dependent) cells are cultured in suspension
(Refs. 5 and 6 and this report) strongly argues that loss of surface
5
1 is not causal for the induction of
anchorage-independent growth.
Integrins cooperate with growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases to
regulate cell proliferation, and
5
1
integrin, in particular, has been implicated in several G1
phase growth stimulatory signaling pathways (1, 2). The results shown
here indicate that TGF-
overrides the normal adhesion requirement
for surface expression of
5
1 integrin and
that this effect is necessary for induction of anchorage-independent
growth in NRK cells. Restored
5
1 integrin presumably binds to fibronectin, but the bound fibronectin is not
extensively converted into a fibrillar matrix. In this regard, anchorage-dependent proliferation and anchorage-independent
proliferation induced by TGF-
are distinguishable processes.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank S. Carbonetto and E. E. Marcantonio for antibodies and Dean Sheppard for comments about the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants GM48224 and GM51878.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Co-first authors.
§
Present address: Dept. of Dermatology, University of California,
San Francisco, CA 94143-0316.
¶
Present address: Zymed Laboratories Inc.,
South San Francisco, CA 94080.
Present address: Dept. of Pediatrics, Div. of Clinical
Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland CH-8032
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 3620 Hamilton Walk, 167 Johnson Pavillion, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084. Tel.: 215-898-7157;
Fax: 215-573-5656; E-mail: rka@pharm.med.upenn.edu.
2
G. E. Davey, M. Buzzai, and R. K. Assoian, submitted for publication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
TGF-
, transforming growth factor-
;
NRK, normal rat kidney;
EGF, epidermal
growth factor;
FCS, fetal calf serum;
EMS, ethylmethane
sulfonate.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Giancotti, F. G.
(1997)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
9,
691-700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Bottazzi, M. E.,
and Assoian, R. K.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
348-352[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Shin, S.-I.,
Freedman, V. H.,
Risser, R.,
and Pollack, R.
(1975)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
72,
4435-4439[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Ruoslahti, E.,
and Reed, J.
(1994)
Cell
77,
477-478[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Dalton, S. L.,
Marcantonio, E. E.,
and Assoian, R. K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
8186-8191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Dalton, S. L.,
Scharf, E.,
Briesewitz, R.,
Marcantonio, E. E.,
and Assoian, R. K.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
1781-1791[Abstract]
|
| 7.
|
Hotchin, N. A.,
Gandarillas, A.,
and Watt, F. M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
128,
1209-1219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Massagué, J.
(1990)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
6,
597-641[CrossRef]
|
| 9.
|
Hannon, G. J.,
and Beach, D.
(1994)
Nature
371,
257-260[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Datto, M. B.,
Li, Y.,
Panus, J. F.,
Howe, D. J.,
Xiong, Y.,
and Wang, X.-F.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5545-5549[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Reynisdottir, I.,
Polyak, K.,
Iavarone, A.,
and Massagué, J.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
1831-1845[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Iavarone, A.,
and Massagué, J
(1997)
Nature
387,
417-422[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Ignotz, R. A.,
and Massagué, J.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
4337-4345[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Fava, R. A.,
and McClure, D. B.
(1986)
J. Cell. Physiol.
131,
184-189
|
| 15.
|
Kothapalli, D.,
Frazier, K. S.,
Welply, A.,
Segarini, P. R.,
and Grotendorst, G. R.
(1997)
Cell Growth Differ.
8,
61-68[Abstract]
|
| 16.
|
Frazier, K.,
Williams, S.,
Kothapalli, D.,
Klapper, H.,
and Grotendorst, G. R.
(1996)
J. Invest. Dermatol.
107,
404-411[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Han, E. K.-H.,
Guadagno, T. M.,
Dalton, S. L.,
and Assoian, R. K.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
461-471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Assoian, R. K.,
Boardman, L. A.,
and Drosinos, S.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
177,
95-99[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Guadagno, T. M.,
and Assoian, R. K.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
115,
1419-1425[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Heino, J.,
Ignotz, R. A.,
Hemmler, M. E.,
Crouse, C.,
and Massagué, J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
380-388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Heino, J.,
and Massagué, J.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
21806-21811[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Wang, D.,
Zhou, G.,
Birkenmeier, T. M.,
Gong, J.,
Sun, L.,
and Brattain, M. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14154-14159[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Plantefaber, L. C.,
and Hynes, R. O.
(1989)
Cell
56,
281-290[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Schreiner, C.,
Fisher, M.,
Hussein, S.,
and Juliano, R. L.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
1738-1740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Hynes, R. O.
(1992)
Cell
69,
11-25[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Ignotz, R. A.,
and Massague, J.
(1987)
Cell
51,
189-197[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Roberts, C. J.,
Birkenmeier, T. M.,
McQuillan, J. J.,
Akiyama, S. K.,
Yamada, S. S.,
Chen, W.-T.,
Yamada, K. M.,
and McDonald, J. A.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
4586-4592[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Giancotti, F. G.,
and Ruoslahti, E.
(1990)
Cell
60,
849-859[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|