J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 42, 30288-30296, October 15, 1999
Stimulatory Function of Paired Immunoglobulin-like Receptor-A
in Mast Cell Line by Associating with Subunits Common to Fc
Receptors*
Masao
Ono
§,
Takae
Yuasa
§,
Chisei
Ra§¶, and
Toshiyuki
Takai
§
From the
Department of Experimental Immunology,
Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai
980-8575, Japan, the § Core Research for Evolutional Science
and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Tokyo
101-0062, Japan, and the ¶ Department of Immunology, Juntendo
University School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
Paired Ig-like receptors (PIR) are polymorphic
type I transmembrane proteins belonging to an Ig superfamily encoded by
multiple isotypic genes. They are expressed on immune cells such as
mast cells, macrophages, and B lymphocytes. Two subtypes of PIR have been classified according to the difference in the primary structure of
the PIR transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions. These subtypes are
designated as PIR-A and PIR-B. In this study, the transmembrane and
cytoplasmic regions of the PIR-A subtype were shown to mediate activation signal events such as cytoplasmic calcium mobilization, protein tyrosine phosphorylations, and degranulation in rat mast cell
line RBL-2H3. The association of the Fc receptor
and
subunits
with PIR-A was shown to be responsible for PIR-A function but not
required for membrane expression of PIR-A on COS-7 cells. We further
revealed the role of two charged amino acid residues in the
transmembrane region, namely arginine and glutamic acid, in PIR-A
function and its association with the above subunits. In contrast to
the inhibitory nature of the PIR-B subtype, present findings reveal
that PIR-A potentially acts as a stimulatory receptor in mast cells,
suggesting a mechanism for regulation of mast cell functions by the PIR family.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Paired Ig-like receptor
(PIR)1 (1, 2) has recently
been found to be a murine receptor analogous to human Fc receptor for
IgA (Fc
R), although its binding capacity for murine IgA has not been
shown. Analyses of a number of cDNA sequences and genomic clones
for PIR revealed a gene family consisting of at least three isotypic
genes (3). Its structural features have been determined to consist of
type I transmembrane glycoprotein with six conserved Ig-like domains
followed by two distinct amino acid sequences encompassing the
transmembrane to cytoplasmic region. These amino acid sequences serve
as the basis for classification of PIR into two subtypes, PIR-A and
PIR-B (2, 3). mRNA expression for both subtypes has been detected
in B cells, interleukin-3-induced bone marrow mast cells, and
myelomonocytic lineage cells (2, 3). PIR is currently thought to be a
murine receptor homologous to the human receptor ILT/LIR because of the
similarity of their primary structures (3, 4), their expression
patterns in immune cell types except for NK cells (5, 6), the
polymorphic nature of their isotypes (4-7), and chromosomal locations
(3, 8, 9). Recent studies have demonstrated inhibitory function and
recognition for human major histocompatibility complex class I and
virus-related major histocompatibility complex class I-like proteins by
some isotypes of the ILT/LIR family, suggesting a regulatory function
of ILT/LIR for immune responses in the context of major
histocompatibility complex class I recognition as in the case of killer
cell inhibitory receptor (6, 10). PIR-B was shown to function as an
inhibitory receptor, whereas the functions of PIR-A and ligands of the
entire PIR family remain unknown.
The main feature of PIR-B subtype is to harbor the conserved amino acid
motifs in a cytoplasmic region denoted as immunoreceptor tyrosine-based
inhibitory motif. Inhibitory function of PIR-B has been shown in
splenic B cells (11), a B cell line (12), and a mast cell line (13),
and the two immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs of the
PIR-B cytoplasmic region have been proven to exert inhibitory signaling
by recruiting protein-tyrosine phosphatase, SHP-1 or SHP-2, which
commonly functions as the signal transducer of immunoreceptor
tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-based receptors including killer cell
inhibitory receptor (14-17), Ly-49 (18), NKG2 (19), CD22 (20-23), and
ILT/LIR (5, 6, 10). The inhibitory nature of PIR-B led us to postulate
a role of PIR signaling in regulation of immune responses involving
mast cells, B cells, and macrophages.
PIR-A is defined as a group of noninhibitory type of PIR family
receptors characterized by a short cytoplasmic region that is free of
any consensus amino acid sequence for activation. Instead, the
transmembrane region of PIR-A harbors positively and negatively charged
amino acid residues (see Fig. 7). Transmembrane-charged residues can
typically be seen in stimulatory receptors mediating a variety of
immune responses, such as T cell receptor, the ligand binding
chains of type I and type III Fc receptors for IgG (Fc
RI
and
Fc
RIII
, respectively), Fc
R, killer cell inhibitory
receptor-2DS/3DS (alternatively called KAR), and NKR-P1 (CD161). All of
these themselves have no amino acid motif for activation but associate
with signaling subunits such as CD3 complex,
and
chains (FcR
and FcR
, respectively) of type I FcR for IgE (Fc
RI), and DAP12
(24-28) to generate an activation signal in response to receptor
aggregation. Previous studies on T cell receptor
chain and Fc
R
have demonstrated the requirement of a positively charged amino acid
residue in the transmembrane region for their function and subunit
association (29, 30). The presence of charged amino acid residues in
the transmembrane region of PIR-A suggests the possibility that PIR-A associates with activation subunits to deliver an activation signal into the cell. Our recent observations have suggested that one of the
PIR-A isotypes, previously denoted by p91D, mediates the activation
signal revealed by cytoplasmic calcium mobilization and degranulation
in mast cell line (13).
The present study focuses on the following two points. The first point
is the mechanism of PIR-A function, and the second point is the
evaluation of the role in PIR-A function of two charged amino acid
residues present in the PIR-A transmembrane region. We have shown that
the association of homodimeric FcR
chains and FcR
enable PIR-A to
generate an activation signal in a mast cell line and that the charged
amino acid residues contribute to the subunit association and
stimulatory function of PIR-A.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cells and Antibodies--
A rat cell line, RBL-2H3, was obtained
from the Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank (JCRB, Tokyo). This
cell line has been shown to undergo a mutation causing constitutively
active signaling of c-kit receptor and exhibit mast cell
function (31). RBL-2H3 and its transfectants were maintained in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 8% fetal calf
serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, antibiotics, and 20 µM 2-mercaptoethanol at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator. COS-7 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum,
antibiotics, and 2 mM L-glutamine. Pervanadate
was prepared from 10 ml of 5 mM sodium orthovanadate
solution incubated with 56.7 µl of 30% hydrogen peroxide solution
for several min at 25 °C (32). COS-7 cells were stimulated by 50 µM pervanadate in medium for 10 min under the culture
condition. The F(ab')2 fragments of rat monoclonal antibody
specific for mouse Fc
RII/III (
FcR, 2.4G2, PharMingen, San Diego,
CA) were prepared with pepsin cleavage (Immobilized pepsin, Pierce) at
37 °C for 4 h followed by purification with gel filtration
chromatography (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as described previously
(33). Mouse IgE and IgG1 antibodies specific for trinitrophenyl hapten
(anti-TNP IgE) was prepared with DEAE-cellulose column chromatography
from supernatant of hybridoma.
DNA Constructions and Vectors--
Mouse Fc
RII, Fc
RIII
(donated by Dr. J. V. Ravetch, The Rockefeller University, New
York, NY) and mouse FcR
(donated by Dr. T. Kurosaki, Kansai Medical
University, Osaka, Japan) in pcEXV-3 vector and mouse FcR
in pSVl
vector were used for the stable and transient expression studies. The
cDNA fragment coding for transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions of
PIR-A was prepared from spleen RNA of 129/SvJ mouse by polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) using a primer pair of PAF-1 and PAR-1: PAF-1,
5'-GAGGGCCCCACACAATGGAGAATCTCAT-3' (sense primer) and PAR-1,
5'-AAGGGCCCATCAGCTTTATTTCCCAGCG-3' (antisense primer). The PCR
fragment, in which the nucleotide sequence corresponding to PIR-A
cDNA matched that previously reported as p91B (available from
EMBL/GenBank/DDBJ under accession number AF041035; Ref. 3), was
digested with ApaI and then ligated into the ApaI
restriction site of mouse Fc
RII cDNA, which locates in the
pretransmembrane, in the sense orientation. Mutations corresponding to
ARM and AEQ1 (see Fig. 1A) were generated by PCR as well
using PAF-2 and PAF-3, respectively, instead of PAF-1: PAF-2,
5'-GGGCCCCACACAATGGAGAATCTCATCATGATG-3' (sense primer) and
PAF-3, 5'-GGGCCCCACACAATGCAGAATCTC-3' (sense primer). The
replaced bases are underlined. The mutation of AEQ2 was introduced by
two rounds of PCR using connective primers of PAF-4 and PAR-4: PAF-4,
5'-TTCTAGCCACTCAGGCTT-3' (sense primer) and PAR-4,
5'-TCGCCAAGCCTGAGTGGC-3' (antisense primer). The replaced bases are underlined. These primers overlap each other surrounding the
residue to be changed. The first round of PCR with PAF-1 plus PAR-4 and
PAF-4 plus PAR-1 generated two mutant fragments that were subsequently
connected by the second round of PCR with PAF-1 and PAR-1.
Transfection and Assay for Membrane Expression--
20 µg of
linearized DNA construct plus 1 µg of linearized pSV2-Neo vector were
transfected into 5 × 106 of RBL-2H3 cells by
electroporation with single pulse conditions of 250 V and 975 µF
(Gene Pulser II, Bio-Rad). The selection and cloning for
neomycin-resistant cells were performed for 2 weeks in the presence of
100 µg/ml geneticin (Life Technologies, Inc.). For transient
expression of the receptor of interest, 3 µg for a single construct
or a total of 6 µg for two constructs were transfected into
approximately 2 × 106 COS-7 cells by a procedure with
DEAE-dextran. In short, cells were incubated with DNA and DEAE-dextran
(0.4 mg/ml) in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium buffered
with 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, at 37 °C for a few hours
and then additionally treated with 0.1 mM chloroquine
(Sigma) for 3 h in serum-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium. Cells were harvested at 48 h after transfection. Membrane
expression of the receptor of interest was monitored for live cells
with flow cytometric apparatus (FACSCalibur®, Becton Dickinson, San
Jose, CA) by immunostaining of R-phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-FcR
(2.4G2, PharMingen), which recognized a common epitope in extracellular
regions of mouse Fc
RII and Fc
RIII
(34, 35). Dead cells were
eliminated from the data as the positive cells for propidium iodide
staining. Base line for the positive expression was determined with
FcR staining for mock-transfected cells or with isotype-matched
control antibody (rat IgG2b).
Degranulation Assay--
About 5 × 104 of
RBL-2H3 or transfectants in 0.4 ml of culture medium were labeled with
3.3 µCi/ml of 5-[1,2-3H]-hydroxytryptamine creatinine
sulfate (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc.) for 8 h and
sensitized with intact or F(ab')2 fragments of
FcR,
biotinylated
FcR, anti-TNP IgE, or biotinylated anti-TNP IgE at the
indicated antibody concentration for 15 min. After unbound antibodies
were washed out, the receptor of interest was aggregated by 5 µg/ml
of F(ab')2 fragments of goat anti-rat IgG (Immunotech,
Cedex, France), 5 µg/ml of streptavidin (Sigma), or 30 ng/ml of
TNP7-conjugated ovalbumin (Sigma) for 30 min. The percentage serotonin release (% degranulation) was calculated using
the following formula: % degranulation = (cpm of
supernatant)/(cpm of supernatant + cpm of cells) × 100, where cpm
of cells is represented by the counts/minute in cells disrupted with
1% Nonidet P-40 plus 1% SDS solution.
Measurement of Cytoplasmic Calcium
Mobilization--
Exponentially growing 106 cells in 1 ml
of culture medium were labeled with 2 µM of Fura-2AM
(Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 30 min at 35 °C and sensitized
with 1 µg/ml of biotinylated
FcR or 1 µg/ml of biotinylated
mouse IgE for 10 min at 25 °C. After unbound antibody was washed
out, cells in 2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline supplemented with 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2
were stimulated with 10 µg of streptavidin while agitating gently.
Cytoplasmic calcium mobilization was monitored at 510 nm emission
wavelength excited by 340 and 360 nm with a fluorescence
spectrophotometer (Hitachi model F-4500, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo).
Calibration and calculation of calcium concentration were performed as
described (36).
Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analyses--
RBL-2H3
transfectants (5 × 107) or COS-7 transfectants
(107) were lysed in 3 or 1 ml, respectively, of
digitonin-lysis buffer, pH 7.8, supplemented with 1% digitonin (Wako
Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan), 13.6 mM triethanolamine, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM iodoacetamide (Sigma), 5 µg/ml aprotinine, and 5 µg/ml leupeptine (Sigma). For immunoprecipitation of FcR
after stimulation, cells (107) were lysed with RIPA buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.5% deoxycholic acid, 1 mM sodium
orthovanadate, 1% Triton X-100, 5 µg/ml aprotinine, and 5 µg/ml
leupeptine. For some experiments, cells were stimulated with immune
complex made of 50 µg of anti-TNP IgG1 plus 2.5 µg of
TNP7-OVA/1 ml of medium before cell lysis. Cleared
supernatants of cell lysates were used for immunoprecipitation with 50 µg of 2.4G2 conjugated to Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech) by 2 mg/ml wet bead volume. Immunoadsorbed beads were washed
four times with lysis buffer, and then immunoprecipitates were
denatured at 95 °C for 5 min in the presence or absence of 5%
2-mercaptoethanol to generate reduced or nonreduced sample,
respectively. Samples were separated with SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (16.5%) and transferred onto a polyvinylidene
difluoride (Millipore, Bedford, MA) membrane. For immunoprecipitation
with anti-FcR
(polyclonal rabbit IgG) (26) or anti-FcR
(JRK;
kindly provided by Dr. J. Rivera, NIAMSD, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, MD) (37), 107 cells were treated as well.
Membranes were incubated with a series of the appropriate amount of
antibodies indicated followed by probing with secondary antibody,
peroxidase-linked donkey anti-rabbit Ig or peroxidase-linked sheep
anti-mouse Ig (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). For the tyrosine
phosphorylation in total cellular proteins, the preceding sensitization
was performed as those for the degranulation assay. Sensitized cells
(106) in 0.2 ml of phosphate-buffered saline supplemented
with 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM
MgCl2 were stimulated with 10 µg of streptavidin for 1, 2, and 5 min at 37 °C. The induction was terminated by adding
ice-cold lysis buffer. Anti-phosphotyrosine monoclonal antibody (4G10;
Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) was used for subsequent
immunoblot analysis.
 |
RESULTS |
Transmembrane and Cytoplasmic Regions of PIR-A Sufficiently
Function for Triggering Cellular Activation in RBL-2H3--
To analyze
PIR-A function in the rat mast cell line, RBL-2H3, we took advantage of
the chimeric receptor consisting of the extracellular region of mouse
Fc
RIIB and the C-terminal portion of PIR-A encompassing the
transmembrane to cytoplasmic regions, denoted by Fc
RII-PIR-A (Fig.
1A). This portion is highly
conserved in amino acid level among presently identified PIR-A isotypes and expresses a striking difference from the corresponding portion of
PIR-B. According to the designation of PIR isotypes by Kubagawa et al. (2), the isotype of PIR-A used in this study matches PIR-A6 except for one amino acid mismatch at the second serine residue
in the cytoplasmic region. The strategy of chimeric receptor enables us
to perform functional analyses of PIR-A-derived signaling without the
ligand or antibody to PIR, both of which are not available presently,
and to analyze biochemical changes upon receptor aggregation in
comparison with the established positive (mouse Fc
RIII) and negative
(mouse Fc
RIIB) control by using the same monoclonal antibody (2.4G2,
denoted as
FcR in this report).

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Stimulatory functions of PIR-A chimeric
receptor in RBL-2H3 cells. A, primary structure of the
Fc RII-PIR-A chimeric receptor. The amino acid sequence corresponding
to PIR-A is boxed. Charged amino acid residues are indicated
with circled symbols on above them. The predicted
transmembrane region is determined according to the computed algorithm
(SOSUI system) and highlighted by black background. The
amino acid residue is denoted by a one-letter code. B,
membrane expression of the transfected receptor on RBL-2H3 cells.
Filled histogram represents the level of membrane expression
of the receptor revealed by flow cytometry with
R-phycoerythrin-conjugated FcR (2.4G2) staining. The negative
reference (shadowed) is given by staining with control
antibody (R-phycoerythrin-rat IgG2b). C, degranulation
response of RBL-2H3 cells on receptor aggregation. The percentage of
degranulation denotes the percentage of serotonin released into medium.
Receptors on the RBL-2H3 transfectant were aggregated by intact FcR
(5 µg/ml in sensitization) plus F(ab')2 goat anti-rat IgG
(GAR) (shaded), F(ab')2 FcR (5 µg/ml in
sensitization) plus GAR (filled), biotinylated FcR (5 µg/ml in sensitization) plus streptavidin (horizontally
striped), or biotinylated anti-TNP IgE (1 µg/ml in
sensitization) plus streptavidin (vertically striped).
Negative control was given by GAR (open) or streptavidin
(dotted) treatment. The value of more than 3% of the
standard error of triplicate samples is indicated on each column.
D, cytoplasmic calcium mobilization
([Ca2+]i) on receptor
aggregation. The cells (106) labeled with Fura-2 were
stimulated by streptavidin (the time point indicated by
arrow) after sensitization with 1 µg of biotinylated
anti-TNP IgE (thin trace) or 5 µg of biotinylated FcR
(thick trace) in 1 ml of culture medium. E,
tyrosine phosphorylation of total cellular protein in response to the
receptor aggregation. Protein phosphorylations were terminated at the
time points indicated on each lane. The whole cell lysate from 5 × 104 cells was separated on 7.5% (upper) and
15% (lower) SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and the blots were
probed with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (anti-pTyr). The
clone induced and the antibodies used for sensitization are indicated
on and below the blot, respectively.
|
|
We successfully isolated stable clones of RBL-2H3 expressing the
chimeric receptor, mouse Fc
RIIB or Fc
RIII, by cell surface immunostaining with
FcR (Fig. 1B). Immunostainings with
isotype-matched control antibody or untransfected cells assure the
specificity of 2.4G2 staining for RBL-2H3 cells. The effects of
receptor aggregation on cellular activation were evaluated with
degranulation revealed by serotonin release (Fig. 1C),
cytoplasmic calcium mobilization (Fig. 1D), and
activation-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of total cellular proteins
(Fig. 1E). Every mode of aggregation of Fc
RII-PIR-A
receptor using
FcR induced degranulation to an extent comparable
with that of Fc
RIII, which is a well characterized stimulatory
receptor in mast cells. Comparable induction of degranulation by intact
and F(ab')2 fragment of
FcR ruled out any additive stimulatory effects from recognition of
FcR-bearing Fc portion (rat
IgG2b) by unknown receptor on RBL-2H3 cells. No degranulation was
detected in wild-type RBL and Fc
RIIB clone in response to
FcR
stimulation, eliminating any possibility for nonspecific stimulatory
effects of the reagents and methods on cellular activation. To qualify
the earlier traits for cellular activation induced by the aggregation
of transfected receptors, we observed the time-dependent kinetics of cytoplasmic calcium mobilization and tyrosine
phosphorylation of total cellular proteins after the saturated
stimulation. Fc
RII-PIR-A aggregation elicited calcium mobilization
in a manner essentially similar to that of Fc
RIII in respect of the
rapid increment comparable with that with Fc
RI, slow but substantial
retraction, and level of calcium concentration (Fig. 1D).
Fc
RII-PIR-A aggregation also induced tyrosine phosphorylation in
total cellular proteins as revealed by anti-phosphotyrosine blot (Fig.
1E). Proteins migrating around 150, 100, 70, and 30-40 kDa
were extensively phosphorylated in response to Fc
RII-PIR-A
aggregation. This induced pattern was not grossly different from those
by Fc
RIII and Fc
RI aggregation. These results consistently
support that the PIR-A moiety corresponding to transmembrane and
cytoplasmic region is sensitive to aggregation and capable of
generating an activation signal in the manner similar to Fc
RIII.
PIR-A Constitutively Associates with Homodimeric FcR
and an
FcR
in RBL-2H3--
PIR-A in itself is free of any known amino acid
motifs for activation in its cytoplasmic region. Then the question
arises as to how PIR-A generated the activation signal. The similarity of biochemical traits in activation and the conservation of charged amino acid residues in the transmembrane region (see Fig. 7) over PIR-A
and Fc
RIII
led us to the hypothesis of the similar or shared
receptor composition between these receptors in mast cells. To identify
subunits constitutively associating with Fc
RII-PIR-A, digitonin-treated cell extracts from untreated cells were subjected to
immunoprecipitation with
FcR or control antibodies. The samples in
part were prepared both under reduced and nonreduced conditions. Immunoblots following the immunoprecipitations (Fig.
2) clearly revealed the reduced and
nonreduced FcR
subunits at 8 kDa and mainly 16 kDa, respectively,
and the reduced FcR
subunit was at 30 kDa for Fc
RII-PIR-A and
Fc
RIII preparations. The nonreduced FcR
was detected at 30 kDa in
the same samples (data not shown). Other signals near 16 kDa for FcR
under nonreducing conditions previously have been observed as well (26,
38), assumed to be FcR
with unknown modification. The positive
reference samples of RBL-2H3 whole cell extract and the
immunoprecipitation with anti-FcR
and anti-FcR
antibodies
followed these signals as expected. No signal was detected in
anti-FcR
immunoprecipitates from wild-type RBL-2H3 and
Fc
RIIB-expressing cells as well as a negative reference sample of
COS-7 whole cell extract (Fig. 2). These results confirmed the fact
shown by the recent studies in which FcR
associates with PIR-A (39,
40) and is also showing the new finding that FcR
is in the PIR-A
complex, indicating that Fc
RII-PIR-A receptor associates with
homodimeric FcR
and single FcR
in RBL-2H3 to trigger the
downstream events shared with Fc
RI and Fc
RIII in mast cells.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Association of FcR and FcR with
Fc RII-PIR-A in RBL-2H3 cells. Digitonin
lysates from the untreated cells were used for immunoprecipitations
(IP) with FcR (2.4G2) (lanes 1-4),
anti-FcR (lane 7), or anti-FcR (lane 8)
followed by immunoblot with anti-FcR (anti- ) or anti-FcR
(anti- ). Whole cell lysates (WCL) from RBL-2H3
(lane 5) and COS-7 (lane 6) are analyzed by
immunoblot as well. The samples were processed in the absence
(NR) or presence (R) of 2-ME to reveal the
disulfide interaction of subunits. Signals for FcR and FcR are
indicated with arrowheads. The signals given by Ig light
chain (IgL) are indicated with arrows.
|
|
PIR-A Does Not Require FcR
or FcR
for Its Membrane Expression
in COS-7 Cells--
Because the previous study has demonstrated the
necessity of FcR
for Fc
RIII
expression on the cell surface
(41, 42), we questioned if PIR-A required FcR
or FcR
for its
expression on the cell surface as well. Transient expressions of
Fc
RII-PIR-A, Fc
RIIB, and Fc
RIII
with or without subunit are
examined in COS-7 cells, in which endogenous expressions of FcR
and
FcR
are not detected (Fig. 2). Membrane expression of Fc
RII-PIR-A was detected regardless of co-expression of subunit, followed by the
pattern of Fc
RIIB whose expression on cell membrane is known to be
independent of subunit expression (Fig.
3A). In striking contrast,
membrane expression of Fc
RIII
was dependent upon co-expression of
FcR
as shown previously. Utilizing the Fc binding property of
extracellular regions of Fc
RII-PIR-A and Fc
RIII, membrane expressions of these two receptors were examined by rosetting formation
with mouse IgG1-opsonized sheep red blood cells. Consistent with the
data from
FcR detection, the transfectants expressing Fc
RII-PIR-A
and expressing Fc
RII-PIR-A plus FcR
displayed rosetting for the
opsonized sheep red blood cells to a similar extent of that expressing
Fc
RIII
plus FcR
(data not shown), suggesting topologically
normal expression of Fc
RII-PIR-A in the absence of FcR
. These
results indicate that PIR-A expresses a different requirement of FcR
or FcR
for its membrane expression from Fc
RIII
in COS-7 cells.
Then a question arises as to whether or not intrinsic subunits in COS-7
allowed Fc
RII-PIR-A expression in place of FcR
. To answer this
question in part, we attempted to detect any association of
tyrosine-phosphorylated protein with Fc
RII-PIR-A in COS-7 cells
after treatment of pervanadate, which is known as the inhibitor for
protein-tyrosine phosphatases to enforce tyrosine phosphorylations of
cytoplasmic proteins. Digitonin cell lysate from COS-7 or RBL-2H3
transfectants was used for immunoprecipitation with
FcR followed by
anti-phosphotyrosine blot (Fig. 3B). Tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins corresponding to FcR
in size were detected in samples from
transfectants with Fc
RII-PIR-A plus FcR
and Fc
RIII
plus FcR
, as well as in that from Fc
RIII
in RBL-2H3. However, there was no detection for tyrosine-phosphorylated protein specifically observed in the sample from Fc
RII-PIR-A single transfectant in the
range lower than 25 kDa, where ordinal activation subunits are supposed
to be detected. A shorter exposed film did not show any definitively
specific signals over the entire range of separation (data not shown).
It is suggested that PIR-A can exist on the cell surface as both active
and inactive receptors in signal transduction.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Membrane expression of
Fc RII-PIR-A independent of co-expression of
FcR and FcR in COS-7
cells. A, transient membrane expression of the receptor
on COS-7 cells in the presence of FcR (filled) and FcR
(shaded) or their absence (open) was evaluated
with flow cytometry with FcR staining for live cells. The
percentages of positive cells for Fc RII/RIII expression were
calculated with the cell count over the base line given by FcR
(2.4G2) staining for mock-transfected COS-7 cells. Error
bars for Fc RII-PIR-A and Fc RIII represent the value of
standard error of four independent experiments. The Fc RIIB clone was
examined once. B, no detection for the association of
tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins with Fc RII-PIR-A in COS-7 cells.
Tyrosine phosphorylation in the COS-7 and RBL transfectants were
induced by 50 µM pervanadate treatment for 10 min, and
their digitonin lysates were used for immunoprecipitation
(IP) with FcR (2.4G2) followed by immunoblot with
anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10, anti-pTyr). The signals
corresponding to FcR are indicated.
|
|
Positively Charged Arg626 Residue in Transmembrane
Region Is Necessary for PIR-A Function--
A positively charged amino
acid such as arginine, lysine, or histidine in the transmembrane region
is frequently found in FcR
-dependent stimulatory
receptors, although this is not the case for human and mouse Fc
RI
and human Fc
RIII
(see Fig. 7A). In addition to the
positively charged residue, it could be pointed out as a secondary
common feature that a negatively charged residue such as aspartic acid
or glutamic acid exists in the C-terminal portion of the transmembrane
region, suggesting a role of the negative charged residue in receptor
function. Because PIR-A possesses both conserved charged residues in
the transmembrane region, we accordingly evaluated the roles of Arg and
Glu at positions 626 and 643 (Arg626 and
Glu643), respectively, in PIR-A functions (Fig.
4). In addition, Glu at position 622 (Glu622) located in the N-terminal peri-transmembrane
region is found to be characteristic among the other
FcR
-dependent receptors and to be conserved at the
corresponding residue of ILT1/LIR7, so that its role in PIR-A function
was investigated. Point mutation at the position corresponding to each
of three charged residues was introduced into the Fc
RII-PIR-A to
generate mutant chimeric receptor with single replacement of
Glu622, Arg626, or Glu643 by the
noncharged residues, glutamine, methionine, or glutamine, respectively.
These mutant DNA constructs and related products (protein and
transfectant) are denoted by AEQ1, ARM, or AEQ2, respectively (Fig.
4A). All of the mutant constructs were successfully expressed on RBL-2H3 cells as well as the prototype Fc
RII-PIR-A (Fig. 4B). Degranulation and calcium mobilization assay were
performed to examine capacity for signal transduction of mutant
receptors (Fig. 4, D and E). ARM mutation was
found to totally remove the capacity for signal transduction from
Fc
RII-PIR-A receptor, and the unresponsiveness of the ARM clones
could be reconfirmed with the other clones independently isolated (Fig.
4E). On the other hand, AEQ1 and AEQ2 mutation conserved
PIR-A function, although delayed calcium response was observed in AEQ2
clones (Fig. 4D). These results indicate that
Arg626 is necessary and Glu622 and
Glu643 is not critical for PIR-A function.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
PIR-A functions depend on the charged amino
acid residues of the transmembrane region in RBL-2H3 cells.
A, pyrimary structures of the mutant chimeric receptors. The
amino acid sequence related to PIR-A is boxed. Charged amino
acid residues are indicated with circled symbols on above
them. Predicted transmembrane region is highlighted by black
background. The arrows indicate the residue changed by
the mutation. Amino acid residues are denoted by one-letter codes.
B, membrane expression of the transfected receptor on
RBL-2H3. Filled histogram represents the level of membrane
expression of the receptor revealed by flow cytometry with
R-phycoerythrin-conjugated FcR (2.4G2) staining. Superimposed
histograms (solid line) represent the levels of receptor
expression of the other four ARM clones isolated independently. The
negative reference (broken line) is given by nontransfected
cells. C, degranulation response of RBL-2H3 cells on
receptor. Receptors on RBL-2H3 transfectant were aggregated by
F(ab')2 FcR (2.4G2) plus GAR (hatched) or
anti-TNP IgE plus TNP7-OVA (dotted). Negative
control was given by GAR (open) or TNP7-OVA
(filled) treatment. The value of more than 3% of the
standard error of triplicate samples is indicated on each column.
Expression level of the receptor transfected is indicated in
parentheses. The values for average and standard deviation
are calculated from mean-fluorescence-intensity (M.F.I.)
values of three clones given by flow cytometric analysis. D,
cytoplasmic calcium mobilization
([Ca2+]i) upon receptor
aggregation. The cells (106) labeled with Fura-2 were
stimulated by streptavidin (the time point indicated by
arrow) after sensitization with biotinylated IgE (thin
trace) or biotinylated anti-Fc RII/RIII (thick
trace). E, no response of [Ca2+]i
to the ARM receptor aggregation. The data represent the
[Ca2+]i of the cell mixture consisting of the
four independent ARM clones. The experiment was performed in the same
way as D. The sample with no sensitization (broken
trace) followed the base line of [Ca2+]i.
Expression levels of receptor on selected ARM clones are indicated in
B (superimposed thick lines).
|
|
Both Arg626 and Glu643 in PIR-A
Transmembrane Play an Important Role in Subunit Association with
PIR-A--
We examined whether the functional alteration by single
mutation could be attributed to the difference in capacity of the mutant receptor to bind to subunit. Digitonin lysates from untreated cells were used for immunoprecipitation with the saturating amount of
FcR antibody followed by immunoblot with anti-FcR
or anti-FcR
antibody (Fig. 5A). ARM and
AEQ2 mutation were found to attenuate the association of both FcR
and FcR
to the mutant receptors, although a small amount of FcR
and FcR
was still found to be associated. By densitometric analysis,
the amount of subunits associating with ARM and AEQ2 mutant receptors
was estimated to be 8 and 23% for FcR
, respectively, and 7 and 16%
for FcR
, respectively, of that to wild-type Fc
RII-PIR-A receptor.
The mutation of AEQ1 did not significantly perturb the association of
the subunits. The difference of subunit association in quantity did not
reflect the variance of expression of subunits among the clones
analyzed (Fig. 5, blots for whole cell lysates). Decrease of subunit
association by ARM and AEQ2 mutations was supported in COS-7 cells
co-expressing mutant receptors and FcR
(Fig. 5B). These
results indicate that Arg626 and Glu643 in the
PIR-A transmembrane region are respectively important for subunit
association with PIR-A.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Contribution of transmembrane charges to
subunit association with PIR-A in RBL-2H3 cells. Digitonin lysates
from untreated RBL (A) or COS-7 (B) transfectants
were used for immunoprecipitation (IP) with FcR (2.4G2)
followed by immunoblot with anti-FcR or anti-FcR . Whole cell
lysates (WCL) from the same transfectants are analyzed by
immunoblot as well. Signals for FcR and FcR are indicated as
and , respectively.
|
|
To clarify a mechanism for signal transduction by AEQ2 receptor that
substantially loses the capacity for subunit association, we examined
whether FcR
was involved in AEQ2-derived signal transduction. By
taking advantage of Ig Fc binding capacity of extracellular region of
chimeric receptors used in this study, cells were stimulated with mouse
IgG1-containing immune complex; subsequently FcR
was immunoprecipitated and examined by tyrosine phosphorylation by anti-phosphotyrosine blot. FcR
was shown to be phosphorylated in
consequence of AEQ2 receptor aggregation as well as Fc
RII-PIR-A and
AEQ1 receptor (Fig. 6A),
indicating the involvement of FcR
in AEQ2-derived signal
transduction. Then cells were stimulated with IgG1-containing immune
complex as well as above, subsequently chimeric receptors were
immunoprecipitated, and FcR
and phosphorylated FcR
were
respectively detected by anti-FcR
and anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 6B). The results indicate that
phosphorylation of FcR
indeed takes place in the fraction associated
with AEQ2 receptor but that the amount of FcR
associated with AEQ2
receptor remains unchanged after stimulation, suggesting the mechanism by which the minor fraction of AEQ2-subunit complex sufficiently elicits signal transduction.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
FcR phosphorylation
in response to aggregation of PIR-A related mutant receptors in RBL-2H3
cells. A, total tyrosine phosphorylation of FcR
(arrowhead with p- ) was detected by
anti-FcR (anti- ) immunoprecipitation (IP)
followed by anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-pTyr) blot.
Transfected RBL cells (107) in 1 ml of medium were
stimulated with IgG1-immune complex consisting of 50 µg of anti-TNP
IgG1 and 2.5 µg of TNP7-OVA and were solublized in RIPA
buffer. Unstimulated samples were prepared in the same way except for
the addition of immune complex. +, stimulated; , unstimulated. Total
amount of FcR (arrowhead with ) was shown
by anti-FcR blot. B, tyrosine phosphorylation of FcR
(arrowhead with p- ) associated with PIR-A
related receptor was detected by anti-FcR immunoprecipitation followed
by anti-phosphotyrosine blot. Transfected RBL cells (5 × 107) in 3 ml of medium were stimulated with IgG1 immune
complex consisting of 150 µg of anti-TNP IgG1 and 7.5 µg of
TNP7-OVA and were solublized in digitonin lysis buffer.
Total amount of FcR (arrowhead with )
associated with receptors was shown by anti-FcR blot.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The present results demonstrate the potent stimulatory function of
PIR-A in mast cell line RBL-2H3, and the association of FcR
as well
as homodimeric FcR
with PIR-A to activate the signaling pathway
shared with Fc
RI and Fc
RIII. Our results also confirmed the
recently reported FcR
association with PIR-A (39, 40). Previous
studies on FcR
-deficient mice have demonstrated that mast cells were
affected in effector functions but not in ontogeny (40, 42), suggesting
that PIR-A may not be involved in a developmental signal to support the
differentiation of mast cells. Thus, physiological PIR-A functions are
discussed in relation to effector functions of mast cells. Several
lines of evidence based on recent experiments in vivo have
indicated that Fc
RI and Fc
RIII on mast cells play an important
role in triggering distinct types of inflammatory responses such as
anaphylaxis and Arthus reaction (42-47). Mast cell activation by these
FcRs may also contribute to the development of chronic allergic
syndromes in humans, examples of which include atopic syndrome and
bronchial hypersensitivity, by means of activating other cell types
with mast cell-derived inflammatory cytokines (48). These allergic
manifestations can presently be attributed, at least in part, to the
result of up-regulation of signals by Fc
RI and/or Fc
RIII in mast
cells. The present findings lead to the tempting possibility that PIR-A
aggregation exerts an additive effect on the signal by FcRs and,
consequently, that PIR-A functions as an accelerator in developing mast
cell-related pathological manifestations.
ILT/LIRs are thought to be the human homologue of PIR, and its mRNA
expression in human lung mast cells has been reported by Arm et
al. (9). The transmembranes of their noninhibitory types,
ILT1/LIR7, and PIR-A express strikingly conserved primary structures
(Fig. 7A), suggesting that
noninhibitory types ILT1/LIR7 associate with FcR
and FcR
. In
fact, FcR
association with ILT1 has been reported very recently
(49). Thus, the insight from our findings may be allowed to extend to
human physiology.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Alignments of amino acid sequence of the
FcR -associating receptors (A)
and the subunits FcR and DAP-12
(B). The predicted transmembrane regions are
determined according to the computed algorithm (SOSUI system) and
boxed. Charged amino acid residues are indicated with
circled symbols above them. Histidine is regarded as a
positively charged amino acid in this figure, although its charge is
known to be weak in neutral solution. Amino acid residues are denoted
by one-letter codes. Dashes indicate the same amino acid
residue as that of the top line.
|
|
We have shown that PIR-A potentially acts as a stimulatory receptor,
and its function relates to the association of FcR
and FcR
subunits in RBL-2H3 cells. Not all cell types bearing PIR-A express
FcR
subunits, i.e. monocytes and granulocytes. As in the
case of Fc receptors (50, 51), FcR
may not be necessary but may act
as an accelerator for signal transduction. The role of FcR
in
PIR-A-derived signal transduction should be addressed by further
investigation. The mRNA for PIR-A and PIR-B were also detected in
mature B cells that are known to express neither FcR
nor FcR
.
Based on current information, PIR-A cannot exert any stimulatory
function, so that PIR-B has a dominant function over PIR-A in mature B
cells. To further understand the mechanism of positive and negative
regulations by PIR-A and PIR-B receptors, we also examined whether
PIR-A requires subunits for its membrane expression. In contrast to
Fc
RIII, Fc
RII-PIR-A did not require FcR
for its membrane
expression in COS-7 cells as well as human Fc
R (26, 30). Our results
for PIR-A expression using COS-7 cells are similar to the results in
transfected 293T cells (39) but different from the results in
transfected LTK fibroblasts or splenocytes from FcR
deficient mice
(40). Because the two cell lines permissive to expression of PIR-A in
the absence of FcR
were those transformed with the gene encoding
SV40 large T antigen, a high level of PIR-A translation could cause
redundant accumulation of the receptor protein in these cells,
resulting in membrane expression without FcR
association. It is also
possible that the FcR
requirement for PIR-A expression might differ
by cell type, although the mature cell population present in the spleen
requires FcR
for PIR-A expression (40). In this sense, the
physiological requirement of FcR
for PIR-A membrane expression still
needs to be investigated using a highly sorted cell species.
The results from mutation analyses on Fc
RII-PIR-A demonstrate the
role of transmembrane-charged amino acids of PIR-A, Arg626
and Glu643, in subunit association and PIR-A-mediated
signal transduction. Charged amino acids of the transmembrane region
are commonly found in stimulatory receptors (Fig. 7). The hydrophobic
nature of
helix structure is thought to be a basic requirement for
membrane integration by the transmembrane region (52). Accordingly, the presence of charged amino acids is unfavorable for stable membrane expression. However, membrane expression of these stimulatory receptors
is presently rationalized by association of a subunit bearing
counter-charged transmembrane region to achieve hydrophobicity by
neutralizing transmembrane charges. As shown Fig. 7B, FcR
distributes two charged amino acids, aspartic acid and arginine, in the
transmembrane region at seemingly parallel positions to those of PIR-A
with the opposite charges. Our results indicate that both
Arg626 and Glu643 of PIR-A each have an effect
on the binding affinity of FcR
and FcR
to PIR-A, supporting the
existence of a mechanism for subunit assembly and specificity based on
electrostatic protein interaction at a membrane site. We unexpectedly
observed that the requirement of Arg626 and
Glu643 for PIR-A-derived signal transduction does not
parallel that for subunit association. The loss of the negative charge
of Glu643 does result in a decrease of subunit association
but does not affect the capacity for FcR
phosphorylation and its
downstream PIR-A-mediated function. These findings brought us to assume
the following two mechanisms for AEQ2-derived signal transduction. The
first was that an increase in subunit association with AEQ2 receptor
took place along with receptor aggregation, and the second was that
efficient phosphorylation of FcR
was undertaken by the minor
fraction of AEQ2 receptor where the subunit association was resistant
to mutation. Stimulation of AEQ2 receptor was found to induce FcR
phosphorylation in both total and AEQ2-associated FcR
fractions to
the same extent as the intact receptor, despite the fact that the
amount of subunit associated with AEQ2 receptor remained much smaller
than the amount of intact receptor. These findings may support the
latter mechanism mentioned above and suggest the presence of a
functionally competent fraction of the receptor-subunit complex in the
membrane. It is important to note that our discussions were based on
experiments using detergent-soluble cell fractions. Recent findings
have shown the importance of detergent-insoluble fractions in signal
transduction for some receptors. We did not examine whether or not AEQ2
receptor functioned in detergent-insoluble fractions. Further
investigation is therefore required to understand the mechanism of
receptor function and its subunit association.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We are grateful to Dr. F. Nakamura for help
in F(ab')2 preparation, Dr. Y. Yamashita for helpful
discussion, A. Ujike and S. Uchida for technical support, and N. Takagi
for secretarial support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by research grants from the Ministry
of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, and CREST, Japan
Science and Technology Corp. (to T. T.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Experimental Immunology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, 4-1 Seiryo, Sendai 980-8575, Japan. Tel.:
81-22-717-8501; Fax: 81-22-717-8505; E-mail:
tostakai@idac.tohoku.ac.jp.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PIR, paired Ig-like
receptor;
Fc
R, Fc
R, and Fc
R, Fc receptors for IgA, IgE, and
IgG, respectively;
FcR
and FcR
,
and
subunits of the high
affinity Fc receptor for IgE, respectively;
IL, interleukin;
ILT, Ig-like transcript;
LIR, leukocyte Ig-like receptor;
PCR, polymerase
chain reaction.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hayami, K.,
Fukuta, D.,
Nishikawa, Y.,
Yamashita, Y.,
Inui, M.,
Ohyama, Y.,
Hikida, M.,
Ohmori, H.,
and Takai, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
7320-7327[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 2.
|
Kubagawa, H.,
Burrows, P. D.,
and Cooper, M. D.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
5261-5266[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Yamashita, Y.,
Fukuta, D.,
Tsuji, A.,
Nagabukuro, A.,
Matsuda, Y.,
Nishikawa, Y.,
Ohyama, Y.,
Ohmori, H.,
Ono, M.,
and Takai, T.
(1998)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
123,
358-368[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Samaridis, J.,
and Colonna, M.
(1997)
Eur. J. Immunol.
27,
660-665[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Cella, M.,
Döhring, C.,
Samaridis, J.,
Dessing, M.,
Brockhaus, M.,
Lanzavecchia, A.,
and Colonna, M.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
1743-1751[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Cosman, D.,
Fanger, N.,
Borges, L.,
Kubin, M.,
Chin, W.,
Peterson, L.,
and Hsu, M.-L.
(1997)
Immunity
7,
273-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Torkar, M.,
Norgate, Z.,
Colonna, M.,
Trowsdale, J.,
and Wilson, M. J.
(1998)
Eur. J. Immunol.
28,
3959-3967[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Wagtmann, N.,
Rojo, S.,
Eichler, E.,
Mohrenweiser, H.,
and Long, E. O.
(1997)
Curr. Biol.
7,
615-618[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Arm, J. P.,
Nwankwo, C.,
and Austen, K. F.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
2342-2349[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Colonna, M.,
Navarro, F.,
Bellón, T.,
Llano, M.,
García, P.,
Samaridis, J.,
Angman, L.,
Cella, M.,
and López-Botet, M.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1809-1818[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Bléry, M.,
Kubagawa, H.,
Chen, C.,
Vély, F.,
Cooper, M. D.,
and Vivier, E.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
2446-2451[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Maeda, A.,
Kurosaki, M.,
Ono, M.,
Takai, T.,
and Kurosaki, T.
(1998)
J. Exp. Med.
187,
1355-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Yamashita, Y.,
Ono, M.,
and Takai, T.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
161,
4042-4047[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Olcese, L.,
Lang, P.,
Vély, F.,
Cambiaggi, A.,
Marguet, D.,
Bléry, M.,
Hippen, K. L.,
Biassoni, R.,
Moretta, A.,
Moretta, L.,
Cambier, J. C.,
and Vivier, E.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
4531-4534[Abstract]
|
| 15.
|
Campbell, K. S.,
Dessing, M.,
López-Botet, M.,
Cella, M.,
and Colonna, M.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
93-100[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Fry, A. M.,
Lanier, L. L.,
and Weiss, A.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
184,
295-300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 17.
|
Binstadt, B. A.,
Brumbaugh, K. M.,
Dick, C. J.,
Scharenberg, A. M.,
Williams, B. L.,
Colonna, M.,
Lanier, L. L.,
Kinet, J.-P.,
Abraham, R. T.,
and Leibson, P. J.
(1996)
Immunity
5,
629-638[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Nakamura, M. C.,
Niemi, E. C.,
Fisher, M. J.,
Shultz, L. D.,
Seaman, W. E.,
and Ryan, J. C.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
185,
673-684[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Dréan, E. L.,
Vély, F.,
Olcese, L.,
Cambiaggi, A.,
Guia, S.,
Krystal, G.,
Gervois, N.,
Moretta, A.,
Jotereau, F.,
and Vivier, E.
(1998)
Eur. J. Immunol.
28,
264-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Campbell, M. A.,
and Klinman, N. R.
(1995)
Eur. J. Immunol.
25,
1573-1579[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Doody, G. M.,
Justement, L. B.,
Delibrias, C. C.,
Matthews, R. J.,
Lin, J.,
Thomas, M. L.,
and Fearon, D. T.
(1995)
Science
269,
242-244[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Lankester, A. C.,
van Schijndel, G. M.,
and van Lier, R. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20305-20308[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Law, C. L.,
Sidorenko, S. P.,
Chandran, K. A.,
Zhao, Z.,
Shen, S. H.,
Fischer, E. H.,
and Clark, E. A.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
547-560[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Ravetch, J. V.,
and Kinet, J.-P.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
9,
457-492[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Pfefferkorn, L. C.,
and Yeaman, G. R.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
3228-3236[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Saito, K.,
Suzuki, K.,
Matsuda, H.,
Okumura, K.,
and Ra, C.
(1995)
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
96,
1152-1160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Arase, N.,
Arase, H.,
Park, S. Y.,
Ohno, H.,
Ra, C.,
and Saito, T.
(1997)
J. Exp. Med.
186,
1957-1963[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Lanier, L. L.,
Corliss, B. C.,
Wu, J.,
Leong, C.,
and Phillps, J. H.
(1998)
Nature
391,
703-707[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Manolios, N.,
Bonifacino, J. S.,
and Klausner, R. D.
(1990)
Science
249,
274-277[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Morton, H. C.,
van den Herik-Oudijk, I. E.,
Vossebeld, P.,
Snijders, A.,
Verhoeven, A. J.,
Capel, P. J.,
and van de Winkel, J. G. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29781-29787[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Tsujimura, T.,
Furitsu, T.,
Morimoto, M.,
Kanayama, Y.,
Nomura, S.,
Matsuzawa, Y.,
Kitamura, Y.,
and Kanakura, Y.
(1995)
Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.
106,
377-385[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Singh, S.,
Darnay, B. G.,
and Aggarwal, B. B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
31049-31054[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Rousseaux, J.,
Rousseaux-Prevost, R.,
and Bazin, H.
(1983)
J. Immunol. Methods
64,
141-146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Unkeless, J. C.
|