![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 43, 30447-30450, October 22, 1999
From the Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, The
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,
Baltimore, Maryland 21205
A thermostable 8-oxoguanine (oxoG) DNA
glycosylase from Methanococcus jannaschii has been
expressed in Escherichia coli, purified, and
characterized. The enzyme, which has been named mjOgg, belongs to the
same diverse DNA glycosylase superfamily as the 8-oxoguanine DNA
glycosylases from yeast (yOgg1) and human (hOgg1) but is substantially different in sequence. In addition, unlike its eukaryotic counterparts, which have a strong preference for oxoG·C base pairs, mjOgg has little specificity for the base opposite oxoG. mjOgg has both DNA
glycosylase and DNA lyase ( 8-Oxoguanine (oxoG)1 is
a prevalent lesion caused by oxidizing agents or ionizing radiation and
is highly mutagenic (1, 2). DNA glycosylases with specificity for oxoG
have been characterized from bacterial and eukaryotic species (3-11).
Interestingly, the enzymes do not seem to belong to the same family,
rather appearing to be an example of convergent evolution toward a
similar function. The oxoG DNA glycosylases identified from yeast and
mammals (5-11) belong to a superfamily of sequence-related DNA
glycosylases whose members have a wide range of specificities. In
contrast, the prokaryotic enzymes, as typified by Escherichia
coli MutM (Fpg) (3, 4), appear to comprise their own distinct
sequence family, require zinc for activity, and differ from the
glycosylase superfamily members in having a robust As part of a study of DNA glycosylase sequences, we recently screened
several new DNA glycosylase superfamily homologs for base excision
activity.2 In the course of
that screen, we found that Methanococcus jannaschii open
reading frame MJ0704 has oxoG DNA glycosylase activity. The specificity
of this enzyme for oxoG (and for a second guanine oxidation product,
2,6-diamino-4-hydroxy-5-formamidopyrimidine (FapyG)) was established
using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to analyze bases released by
the enzyme following treatment of oxidized DNA.2 Because
this enzyme appears to be the first archaeal oxoG DNA glycosylase to be
identified, it is important to investigate its properties in detail.
Protein Purification--
The mjOgg gene was cloned as described
previously.2 The gene was expressed in E. coli
as a fusion to maltose-binding protein using the vector pMal-c2 (New
England Biolabs). The fusion polypeptide contains a Factor Xa cleavage
site that is expected to produce mjOgg with two extraneous residues
(Ile and Ser) at the N-terminal end. The fusion protein was expressed
in the mutM Substrate Preparation--
The two complementary
oligonucleotides synthesized were
d(5'-GTGACGATCTGCAGTGGCCTTCTGCAGGCA-3') and
d(3'-CACTGCTAGACGTCAXCGGAAGACGTCCGT-5'), where X
stands for A, C, G, or T and G stands for oxoG. The
deprotection of oligomers containing oxoG was supplemented with 0.25 M Glycosylase and Lyase Assays--
Unless otherwise noted, the
substrates were incubated with mjOgg at 37 or 50 °C in 20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 80 mM NaCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, and 1 mM EDTA. The final concentrations
were 8 nM substrate and 0.8 nM mjOgg (10:1
ratio). To measure glycosylase activity (production of abasic DNA),
aliquots were treated with 1 M piperidine and incubated at
98 °C for 30 min to cleave the DNA strand at the abasic site. To
measure lyase activity (production of backbone-cleaved DNA), aliquots
were removed and the reaction was stopped by extraction with
phenol/chloroform. All mixtures were ethanol-precipitated, air-dried,
resuspended in 90% formamide loading buffer, and electrophoresed on a
denaturing gel. The gels were quantitated using a PhosphorImager. The
fraction of cleaved DNA was calculated from the intensity of the
substrate and product bands. A correction was made for the amount of
the substrate that comigrates with the product band in the absence of
enzyme (typically ~5% for lyase and ~10% for glycosylase assays).
This high background precluded the use of substantially higher
substrate:enzyme ratios. Initial reaction rates were obtained by
fitting to a modified Michaelis-Menten equation that included an
exponential decay term to model the loss of enzyme activity.
pH Profile--
The effect of pH was examined using 80 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM
EDTA, 3% glycerol and one of the following: (a) 30 mM MES, pH 6.4; (b) 20 mM Hepes, pH
7.15; (c) 20 mM Tris, pH 7.3; (d) 30 mM Hepes, pH 7.8; (e) 20 mM Tris, pH
8.1; (f) 20 mM Tris, pH 8.5; (g) 20 mM Ches, pH 9.0; (h) 20 mM Ches, pH
9.5; or (i) 20 mM CAPS, pH 10.1. All pH values
were measured at 50 °C.
Protein Preincubation in the Presence of Bovine Serum
Albumin--
The protein (0.8 nM) was preincubated with 0, 100, and 500 µg/ml bovine serum albumin for 5 and 30 min in a total
volume of 95.5 µl. The substrate was added at the start of the
reaction to a concentration of 8 nM.
Protein Stock Preincubation--
The protein stock was
preincubated for different time periods. To start the reaction, 1 µl
of the preincubated enzyme was added to the substrate in a total volume
of 50 µl. The final concentrations were 32 nM protein and
320 nM substrate.
Mutagenesis--
The K129S mutant was constructed using
site-directed mutagenesis by combining polymerase chain reaction
fragments that overlap in sequence. Primers 1 and 2 produce the 5'-gene
fragment and 3 and 4 produce the 3'-gene fragment; primers 2 and 3 are
complementary to one another and encode the amino acid
substitution. The sequences of the four primers are as follows: primer
1, 5'-GCCGCCACCATGGAAAAC-3'; primer 2, 5'-GATTGGATATAGTGAGGCGAGCCA-3';
primer 3, 5'-TGGCTCGCCTCACTATATCCAATC-3'; and primer 4, 5'-GGGGGGGATCCCTACTATTTTAAAACTTTTCCTGTCCTTAAATA-3'. The
NcoI/BamHI fragment of the final polymerase chain
reaction product was inserted into the pMal-c2 vector, and its sequence was verified. The protein was overexpressed and purified as described for the wild-type protein.
Circular Dichroism--
Circular dichroism data were obtained
for mjOgg and the K129S mutant using an Aviv CD60 spectropolarimeter.
Thermal denaturation was performed using a Peltier device temperature
controller at a rate of 2 °C/min at 222 nm.
mjOgg was readily purified as a fusion protein, proteolytically
cleaved, and purified to homogeneity by preferential heat denaturation
and heparin chromatography. As expected for a protein from a
thermophilic organism, mjOgg is thermally stable, denaturing at
93 °C (Fig. 1). However, the enzyme
loses activity under normal assay conditions. This apparent loss of
activity is not due to depletion of substrate because the extent of the
reaction is similar even when the DNA concentration is increased
10-fold. It also does not appear to be due to product inhibition
because incubation of the enzyme under assay conditions in the absence
of substrate led to the complete loss of activity within 1 h (data
not shown). To obtain rate constants from these data, the time courses
were fit with the assumption that the loss in activity follows an
exponential decay once it is diluted into the assay mix. Testing under
a variety of conditions (see "Experimental Procedures") indicated
that the protein is more stable in the presence of bovine serum albumin and DNA and less stable in high levels of salt (200 mM
NaCl). The protein as purified and stored is quite stable, however.
Incubation of the enzyme stock for 3 h at 50 °C decreased the
activity by only one-third (data not shown). The enzyme activity is
optimal near pH 8.5 (Fig. 2).
The enzyme is 6-fold more active at 50 °C than at 37 °C (Fig.
3). It seems probable that the enzyme is
active at significantly higher temperatures, but this was not
investigated because of concern for the denaturation of substrate. At
both 37 and 50 °C, the rate of the combined glycosylase/lyase
activity is very similar to that of the glycosylase activity alone,
indicating that the lyase reaction is fast once the base has been
excised (Fig. 3). This is consistent with a proposed mechanism for
bifunctional glycosylases like mjOgg (14, 15). In this proposal, a
lysine common to this subgroup of enzymes (Lys-129 in mjOgg) displaces the base by nucleophilic attack and, in a concerted reaction, forms a
Schiff base with the ring-opened sugar that promotes
Characterization of an 8-Oxoguanine DNA Glycosylase from
Methanococcus jannaschii*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-elimination) activity, and the combined
glycosylase/lyase activity occurs at a rate comparable with the
glycosylase activity alone. Mutation of Lys-129, analogous to Lys-241
of yOgg1, abolishes glycosylase activity.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-elimination
activity (12).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
strain NR12389 (provided by Dr.
Roel M. Schaaper). The cells were grown in rich broth to mid-log
phase and induced with 0.3 mM
isopropyl-1-thio-
-D-galactopyranoside for 3 h. The
cell pellet was collected, resuspended in Buffer A (0.5 M
NaCl, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol) with the addition of protease inhibitors
(Pefabloc SC, leupeptin, and pepstatin), and frozen at
20 °C
overnight. The cells were lysed by sonication. The fusion protein was
purified by affinity chromatography of the crude bacterial lysate on an
amylose column, eluted with 10 mM maltose in Buffer A, and
then cleaved using Factor Xa protease (
12 µg/mg of protein for
42 h at room temperature). The digestion mixture was heated to
65 °C for 50 min, which effectively precipitates any uncleaved fusion protein. Following centrifugation to remove precipitated protein, mjOgg was diluted 5-fold to reduce the salt concentration and
was applied to a heparin column. mjOgg was then eluted with Buffer A
(0.5 M NaCl) in an essentially homogeneous form. mjOgg was
stored at
20 °C in Buffer A plus 10% glycerol at a concentration of 40 µg/ml.
-mercaptoethanol. The oxoG-containing oligonucleotide
was 5'-end-labeled using polynucleotide kinase and
[
-32P]ATP and purified with Amersham Pharmacia Biotech
G-25 microspin columns. The duplexes were annealed in buffer containing
20 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 80 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, and 3% glycerol
by heating to 75 °C for 5 min and then cooling to room temperature.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (9K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Thermal denaturation of mjOgg measured by
circular dichroism at 222 nm. The raw data were transformed into
fraction unfolded and are presented as a function of temperature. The
curve was fit to the data assuming a two-state unfolding model.

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
pH profile. Error bars
indicate errors in the calculated fit to the kinetic data.
-elimination and cleavage of the backbone. To verify the importance of Lys-129, it
was mutated to serine, and the mutant protein was assayed for DNA
glycosylase activity toward both oxoG·C and oxoG·A base pairs. No
activity was detected on either strand. The loss of activity is
probably not due to disruption of the structure because the thermal
denaturation properties of the mutant are nearly the same as those of
the wild type (data not shown).

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
A, time course (in min) for DNA
glycosylase activity (top) and the combined DNA
glycosylase/lyase activities (bottom) at 50 °C. The
products of the two reactions are indicated as P1 and
P2 because they have slightly different mobilities as
described in the text. S, substrate. B, DNA
glycosylase and combined glycosylase/lyase rates at 37 and 50 °C
were calculated as described under "Experimental Procedures."
Error bars indicate errors in the fit of the data.
mjOgg was assayed for glycosylase/lyase activity against all four
oxoG·N substrates. Unlike other oxoG DNA glycosylases, mjOgg has
little specificity for the base opposite oxoG (Fig.
4). Although there is a slight preference
for pyrimidines over purines, the strong preference for oxoG·C base
pairs that characterizes yeast and hOgg1 was not observed (7, 12).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
M. jannaschii is a hyperthermophilic methanogen and a member of the euryarchaeotal kingdom of the Archaea. It was originally isolated from a deep sea vent and grows optimally at 85 °C and at pressures up to 200 atm. The entire genome sequence of M. jannaschii has been determined, making it the first archael organism to be sequenced in its entirety (16).
mjOgg was originally identified in a screen of several novel DNA glycosylase homologs whose specificity was not readily predicted from considerations of sequence similarity. Fig. 5 illustrates the point that mjOgg is very distantly related to the other known oxoG-specific enzymes that belong to the same glycosylase superfamily. Indeed, the degree of sequence similarity between mjOgg and its eukaryotic counterparts is not dramatically greater than between mjOgg and other members of the superfamily that have very different specificity.2 As a result conventional sequence clustering methods fail to group mjOgg with eukaryotic homologs of similar specificity. However, principal component analysis of the sequence family does cluster mjOgg properly with its eukaryotic counterparts.2
mjOgg differs from the eukaryotic oxoG DNA glycosylases not only within
the common catalytic domain but also in lacking an extended segment
N-terminal to this domain (Fig. 5). The
existence of this N-terminal sequence in the eukaryotic enzymes and its absence in mjOgg may be related to differences in specificity. In
particular, the N-terminal region of the eukaryotic enzymes could be
responsible for their specificity for C opposite the excised oxoG.
There is precedence for this suggestion; we have recently shown that
MutY, an adenine DNA glycosylase belonging to the same superfamily as
mjOgg, uses a C-terminal domain unique to its subfamily to confer
opposite-base specificity for oxoguanine over guanine (13).
|
We have established that mjOgg is an authentic DNA lyase as well as a
DNA glycosylase. The lyase reaction probably proceeds through
-elimination, as has been shown for related enzymes, because the
product of the lyase reaction has slightly slower electrophoretic
mobility than the product of the piperidine-cleaved glycosylase
product. This is the expected result because
-elimination leaves a
3'-phosphoribosyl moiety rather than the 3'-phosphate left by
piperidine cleavage.
Lys-129 is analogous to lysines in other homologs that have been shown to be necessary for lyase activity because they form a Schiff base to the sugar (12). According to the prevailing model for the mechanism of bifunctional DNA glycosylases (14, 15), this lysine has also been proposed to be the nucleophile that cleaves the glycosylic bond. Consistent with this model, mutation to serine resulted in the complete loss of glycosylase activity. However, this experiment, and similar ones in the literature, should be interpreted with caution. The amino acid found at this position is correlated quite strongly with the substrate specificity of the enzyme; homologs that exise oxidized bases (e.g. mjOgg and endonuclease III) tend to have a lysine at this position, those that excise alkylated purines tend to have a tryptophan, and those that excise adenine mispairs tend to have a hydroxyl-containing amino acid. Thus, loss of glycosylase activity could be due to the loss of substrate recognition rather than the loss of an active site nucleophile.
mjOgg adds important information to our understanding of the
endoIII/MutY/AlkA superfamily because it is the first oxoG-specific glycosylase in this family to be characterized from a noneukaryotic organism. Although clearly belonging to the same family, mjOgg is
remote in sequence from its eukaryotic homologs. This divergence in
sequence helps to identify the residues that are most characteristic of
oxoG DNA glycosylases2 and can provide insights into the
way these enzymes recognize substrate and how they evolve. mjOgg also
differs from the eukaryotic oxoG DNA glycosylases in its relative
indifference to the base opposite oxoG. Further characterization of
other distantly related members of the family will shed further light
on the sequence features responsible for substrate specificity.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
|---|
We thank David Noll for synthesis of oligonucleotides and for helpful discussions.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by the American Cancer Society.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biophysics
and Biophysical Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205. Tel.: 410-614-0338; Fax: 410-502-6910; E-mail: nclarke@jhmi.edu.
2 A. Gogos, D. Jantz, S. Senturker, D. Richardson, M. Dizdaroglu, and N. D. Clarke, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: oxoG, 8-oxoguanine; MES, 4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid; Ches, 2-(cyclohexylamino)ethanesulfonic acid; CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)propanesulfonic acid.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Burrows, C. J., and Muller, J. G. (1998) Chem. Rev. 98, 1109-1151[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. | Friedberg, E. C., Walker, G. C., and Siede, W. (1995) DNA Repair and Mutagenesis , American Society for Microbiology Press, Washington, D. C. |
| 3. |
Tchou, J.,
Kasai, H.,
Shibutani, S.,
Chung, M.-H.,
Laval, J.,
Grollman, A. P.,
and Nishimura, S.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
4690-4694 |
| 4. |
Castaing, B.,
Geiger, A.,
Seliger, H.,
Nehls, P.,
Laval, J.,
Zelwer, C.,
and Boiteux, S.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
2899-2905 |
| 5. | Nash, H. M., Bruner, S. D., Scharer, O. D., Kawate, T., Addona, T. A., Spooner, E., Lane, W. S., and Verdine, G. L. (1996) Curr. Biol. 6, 968-980[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. |
van der Kemp, P. A.,
Thomas, D.,
Barbey, R.,
de Oliveira, R.,
and Boiteux, S.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
5197-5202 |
| 7. | Bjoras, M., Luna, L., Johnsen, B., Hoff, E., Haug, T., Rognes, T., and Seeberg, E. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6314-6322[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Arai, K., Morishita, K., Shinmura, K., Kohno, T., Kim, S. R., Nohmi, T., Taniwaki, M., Ohwada, S., and Yokota, J. (1997) Oncogene 14, 2857-2861[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Prieto Alamo, M. J.,
Jurado, J.,
Francastel, E.,
and Laval, F.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
5199-5202 |
| 10. |
Rosenquist, T. A.,
Zharkov, D. O.,
and Grollman, A. P.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
7429-7434 |
| 11. | Lu, R., Nash, H. M., and Verdine, G. L. (1997) Curr. Biol. 7, 397-407[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Girard, P. M.,
Guibourt, N.,
and Boiteux, S.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3204-3211 |
| 13. | Noll, D. M., Gogos, A., Granek, J. A., and Clarke, N. D. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 6374-6379[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Dodson, M. L.,
Michaels, M. L.,
and Lloyd, R. S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
32709-32712 |
| 15. |
Sun, B.,
Latham, K. A.,
Dodson, M. L.,
and Lloyd, R. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
19501-19508 |
| 16. | Bult, C. J., White, O., Olsen, G. J., Zhou, L., Fleischmann, R. D., Sutton, G. G., Blake, J. A., FitzGerald, L. M., Clayton, R. A., Gocayne, J. D., Kerlavage, A. R., Dougherty, B. A., Tomb, J. F., Adams, M. D., Reich, C. I., Overbeek, R., Kirkness, E. F., Weinstock, K. G., Merrick, J. M., Glodek, A., Scott, J. L., Geoghagen, N. S. M., and Venter, J. C. (1996) Science 273, 1058-1073[Abstract] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Takao, S.-i. Kanno, K. Kobayashi, Q.-M. Zhang, S. Yonei, G. T. J. van der Horst, and A. Yasui A Back-up Glycosylase in Nth1 Knock-out Mice Is a Functional Nei (Endonuclease VIII) Homologue J. Biol. Chem., October 25, 2002; 277(44): 42205 - 42213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dherin, M. Dizdaroglu, H. Doerflinger, S. Boiteux, and J. P. Radicella Repair of oxidative DNA damage in Drosophila melanogaster: identification and characterization of dOgg1, a second DNA glycosylase activity for 8-hydroxyguanine and formamidopyrimidines Nucleic Acids Res., December 1, 2000; 28(23): 4583 - 4592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |