JBC INTERFERin siRNA transfection reagent

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geisbrecht, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geisbrecht, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, S. J.

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 43, 30527-30533, October 22, 1999


The Human PICD Gene Encodes a Cytoplasmic and Peroxisomal NADP+-dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase*

Brian V. Geisbrecht and Stephen J. GouldDagger

From the Department of Biological Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Human PICD was identified by homology probing the data base of expressed sequence tags with the protein sequence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Idp3p, a peroxisomal NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. The human PICD cDNA contains a 1242-base pair open reading frame, and its deduced protein sequence is 59% identical to yeast Idp3p. Expression of PICD partially rescued the fatty acid growth defect of the yeast idp3 deletion mutant suggesting that PICD is functionally homologous to Idp3p. Kinetic studies on bacterially expressed PICD demonstrated that this enzyme catalyzed the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to 2-oxoglutarate with a specific activity of 22.5 units/mg and that PICD displayed KM values of 76 µM for isocitrate and 112 µM for NADP+. In subcellular fractionation experiments, we found PICD in both peroxisomes and cytoplasm of human and rat liver cells, with approximately 27% of total PICD protein associated with peroxisomes. The presence of PICD in mammalian peroxisomes suggests roles in the regeneration of NADPH for intraperoxisomal reductions, such as the conversion of 2,4-dienoyl-CoAs to 3-enoyl-CoAs, as well as in peroxisomal reactions that consume 2-oxoglutarate, namely the alpha -hydroxylation of phytanic acid. As for cytoplasmic PICD, the phenotypes of patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency (Luzzatto, L., and Mehta, A. (1995) in The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S., and Valle, D., eds) Vol. 3, 7th Ed., pp. 3367-3398, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York) suggest that PICD serves a significant role in cytoplasmic NADPH production, particularly under conditions that do not favor the use of the hexose monophosphate shunt (Luzzatto et al.).

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isocitrate dehydrogenases catalyze the nucleotide-dependent oxidative decarboxylation of isocitric acid to 2-oxoglutarate. Mechanistically, these enzymes exist in two distinct subclasses that utilize either NAD+ or NADP+, respectively, as an electron acceptor. In mammalian cells three highly similar isoforms of NAD+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase have been thoroughly examined and are localized to the mitochondrial matrix (2) where they catalyze the allosterically regulated rate-limiting step of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (3). Prior studies have also reported the existence of at least two NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenases in mammalian cells, one of which is mitochondrial whereas the other is cytosolic (4). Although the precise metabolic roles of the NADP+-utilizing enzymes are not yet clear, they are probably related to the production of NADPH for biosynthetic processes in the cytoplasm and other cellular compartments (5, 6).

It has long been suggested that peroxisomes may contain an NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase (7), but molecular evidence to support this hypothesis has been provided only recently. Two reports have established that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene IDP3 encodes a peroxisomal NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase (8, 9). Furthermore, the phenotypes of the idp3Delta mutant suggest that this enzyme is required to regenerate the NADPH consumed by reductive processes inside the peroxisome (8, 9). Mammalian peroxisomes also contain NADPH-consuming enzymes such as 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase (10, 11) and hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (12-15) and may also require an intraperoxisomal NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. Moreover, such an enzyme has the potential to contribute intraperoxisomal 2-oxoglutarate that is required by peroxisomal enzymes such as phytanoyl-CoA alpha -hydroxylase (16-18).

In this report we present the identification of PICD, a human homolog of S. cerevisiae IDP3. Activity analysis and kinetic characterization of a bacterially expressed form of PICD revealed that this protein is an NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase, and subcellular fractionation experiments demonstrated that PICD is localized to both peroxisomes and the cytoplasm in both human and rat cells. We discuss the potential metabolic roles of both peroxisomal and cytoplasmic PICD.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmids-- The human cDNA clone (GenBankTM accession number AA313574) for the candidate peroxisomal NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase was obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and was sequenced in its entirety. Two forms of the PICD open reading frame (ORF)1 were amplified by PCR using the cDNA clone as a template. The complete ORF was amplified using the primers 5'-AAAGTCGACAATGTCCAAAAAAATCAGTGGCGGT-3' and 5'-AAAGCGGCCGCTTAAAGTTTGGCCTGAGCTAGTTTG-3'. A form of PICD lacking the final three codons of the ORF (PICDDelta AKL) was amplified using the primer 5'-AAAGCGGCCGCTTACTGAGCTAGTTTGATCTTC-3' in conjunction with the first primer above. Both sets of oligonucleotides append SalI and NotI sites (underlined sequences) at the 5'- and 3'-ends of the PICD ORF. All PCR reactions were performed with a low error rate mixture of polymerases (Expand, Roche Molecular Biochemicals). The PCR product from each reaction was digested with SalI and NotI and cloned between the SalI and NotI sites of pMBP (19). The sequence of each form of the PICD ORF in pMBP was confirmed by automated fluorescent sequencing, and the resulting plasmids were denoted pMBP-PICD and pMBP-PICDDelta AKL. The SalI-NotI fragment of pMBP-PICD was excised and transferred to the oleic acid-inducible yeast expression vector pOIE (19), as well as the T7-based expression vector, pT7 (20).

Strains, Media, and Growth Curves-- All bacterial manipulations were performed with the Escherichia coli strain DH10B (21). The yeast strains BY4733 (22), BY4733, idp3Delta ::HIS3 (23), and BY4733, pex8Delta ::HIS3 (23) have been described. Methods for yeast transformations, routine culture of yeast strains, and growth curves have been described (19).

Production of Recombinant PICD-- The plasmids pMBP-PICD and pMBP-PICDDelta AKL are designed to express the PICD and PICDDelta AKL proteins, respectively, in fusion with E. coli maltose-binding protein (MBP). Induction of protein expression, cell growth and lysis, and amylose-affinity chromatography methods were as described in Geisbrecht et al. (19). Following elution of the MBP-PICD fusion protein, the fractions containing highly purified MBP-PICD (>95% pure by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) were pooled, precipitated with 0.4 g/ml (NH4)2SO4, aliquoted, and stored at -70 °C until use. Recombinant MBP-PICDDelta AKL and MBP were expressed and purified according to a similar procedure.

The vector pT7-PICD was used as a template for all in vitro translations of PICD from a T7-coupled rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (TnT, Promega; Madison, WI). Reactions were carried out at 37 °C according to the manufacturer's suggestions.

Generation of Antibodies and Immunoblotting-- Bacterially expressed MBP-PICDDelta AKL was used to elicit the production of polyclonal anti-PICD antibodies in New Zealand White rabbits. Rabbits were purchased from, maintained at, and immunized according to the standard protocols of Cocalico Biologicals, Inc. (Reamstown, PA). Crude serum was obtained from the supplier. The specificity of the crude sera for PICD was confirmed as follows. Samples containing either total human skin fibroblast protein (40 µg per lane, prepared as described (24)), in vitro synthesized PICD, or rabbit reticulocyte lysate alone were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to membranes. Immune sera were used at a 1:2500 dilution, and immunoblotting was performed as described in Crane et al. (25). Following chemiluminescent detection (data not shown), anti-PICD immunoreactivity was present as one band of approximately 46 kDa in lanes corresponding to the fibroblast cellular protein and in vitro synthesized PICD but not in the control lane. Thus, the immune sera was judged to be specific for PICD.

Analytical Procedures-- Isocitrate dehydrogenase activity was monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm as described by Loftus et al. (26), with the exception that assays were performed at 20 °C. One unit of NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the oxidative decarboxylation of 1.0 µmol of D-isocitrate to 2-oxoglutarate in 1 min under standard assay conditions (26). A molar extinction coefficient (epsilon 340) of 6220 M-1 cm-1 was assumed for NADPH, and this figure was used in the calculation of all reaction rates. Assays for catalase (a peroxisomal marker) (27, 28), succinate dehydrogenase (a mitochondrial marker) (29), NADPH-cytochrome c reductase (an endoplasmic reticulum marker) (30), and lactate dehydrogenase (a cytosolic marker) (31) have been described. Total protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad) with bovine serum albumin as a reference. Curve fitting was performed with GraFit data analysis software. Quantitation of film exposure was performed by densitometry using MacBas software (version 2.0).

Subcellular Fractionation-- Preparation of a post-nuclear supernatant from HepG2 cells and fractionation of this post-nuclear supernatant by ultracentrifugation on a 15-40% (w/v) linear Nycodenz density gradient has been described (32). Following ultracentrifugation, fractions (750 µl) were drawn from the bottom of the gradient and assayed for a peroxisomal marker enzyme catalase, for a mitochondrial marker enzyme succinate dehydrogenase, and for an endoplasmic reticulum marker enzyme NADPH-cytochrome c reductase. The proteins present in each fraction were then precipitated by adding trichloroacetic acid to 15% and incubating on ice for 10 min, and the precipitate was collected by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 5 min. The precipitated samples were prepared for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described by Dodt et al. (32). Generation and fractionation of a post-nuclear supernatant from rat liver was performed as described (33), using a 15-42% (w/v) linear Nycodenz density gradient.

Selective Permeabilization Experiments-- Human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) were grown to confluency on two 10-cm dishes. These cells were harvested with trypsin and washed with an isotonic sucrose buffer as described previously (32). The washed cells were divided into 6 aliquots, pelleted by centrifugation at 1,500 × g for 5 min, and placed on ice. The cells in individual aliquots were gently resuspended in isotonic sucrose buffer containing 0, 50, 100, 250, and 500 µg/ml digitonin, and the remaining aliquot was resuspended in the same buffer containing 500 µg/ml digitonin with 1% Triton X-100. The cell suspensions were incubated on ice for 10 min and then centrifuged at 15,000 × g to yield a pellet and supernatant. The soluble proteins present in the supernatant were precipitated by adding trichloroacetic acid as described above, and the samples were prepared for SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting as described (32).

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Identification of a Human Homolog of S. cerevisiae Idp3p-- IDP3 encodes the peroxisomal NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase of S. cerevisiae (8, 9). We used the BLAST algorithm to scan the human data base of expressed sequence tags (dbEST) for candidate human homologs of yeast Idp3p. Successive rounds of prioritized BLAST screening identified a human colon carcinoma cDNA (clone AA313574) whose insert had the potential of encoding a protein with a high degree of similarity to the N-terminal sequence of Idp3p. This cDNA was sequenced in its entirety and was found to contain a 1242-base pair ORF (Fig. 1). The initial ATG codon of this ORF has a near-consensus match for high efficiency translation initiation (34, 35) and is preceded by three in-frame stop codons in the 5'-untranslated region at positions -38, -41, and -135 relative to the A of the putative initiator codon. The deduced product of this cDNA is 59% identical to Idp3p (Fig. 2). Idp3p and PICD were more similar to one another than to any other proteins in these species, indicating that this cDNA (PICD) encoded the human homolog of yeast Idp3p.


View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Structure of the human PICD cDNA and its deduced product. The nucleotide sequence of the PICD cDNA is presented, together with the amino acid sequence of its deduced protein product. Positions are shown to the right, and the nucleotide sequence is numbered from the first nucleotide of the PICD ORF. The deduced protein is predicted to terminate in the PTS-1 Ala-Lys-Leu-COOH (underlined). Three in-frame, upstream stop codons in the 5'-untranslated region are also underlined.


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Human PICD is related to yeast IDP3. The deduced products of the human PICD and yeast IDP3 genes were aligned using the Clustal algorithm and DNASTAR software. Identical residues are boxed in black and shown in reverse type.

Idp3p plays a critical role in regenerating the NADPH equivalents necessary to complete the beta -oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids (8, 9). Oleic acid (C18:Delta 9) is such a fatty acid, and yeast strains lacking the IDP3 gene (idp3Delta ) display a reduced growth rate on oleic acid (9). In order to test whether or not the PICD cDNA encoded a functional homolog of Idp3p, we examined the ability of PICD expression to complement the oleate growth defect of an idp3Delta yeast strain (BY4733, idp3Delta ::HIS3) (23). Growth rates were determined in oleic acid medium for the wild-type strain BY4733 (22), the idp3Delta derivative of BY4733 containing the PICD cDNA on an episomal plasmid, the idp3Delta derivative of BY4733, and the pex8Delta derivative of BY4733 (BY4733, pex8Delta ::HIS3) (pex mutants of S. cerevisiae are unable to grow on fatty acids (36)). We observed that expression of PICD restored growth of the idp3Delta strain to approximately 75% of wild-type or about twice the growth observed for the idp3Delta strain alone (Fig. 3).


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Expression of human PICD in an idp3Delta strain of S. cerevisiae restores growth on oleic acid. Growth of idp3Delta cells expressing PICD from an episomal plasmid (filled circle) was monitored and compared with that of idp3Delta (open circle), wild-type (filled square), and pex8Delta cells (open square) over a period of 150 h. Expression of PICD was observed to complement the growth defect of idp3Delta cells, suggesting that PICD is a functional homolog of Idp3.

PICD Encodes an NADP+-dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-- The fact that PICD expression was able to complement the oleate growth defect of the idp3Delta strain suggested that the PICD protein, like Idp3, was an NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase. To test this directly, we expressed a recombinant form of PICD in fusion with E. coli maltose-binding protein (MBP), purified this protein by amylose affinity chromatography, and assayed the purified protein for NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase activity. The purified MBP-PICD protein catalyzed the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitric acid with a specific activity of 22.5 ± 2.3 units/mg PICD, whereas purified MBP alone was devoid of detectable isocitrate dehydrogenase activity (Table I). In addition, we were unable to detect isocitrate dehydrogenase activity with purified MBP-PICD when NADP+ was replaced with NAD+ (Table I). To examine the kinetics of the PICD catalyzed reaction in more detail, we measured the initial velocities of the enzymatic reaction at various isocitrate and NADP+ concentrations and used nonlinear least squares analysis to determine both KM constants of the enzyme (data not shown). The KM constants for the purified enzyme were found to be 76 µM for isocitrate and 112 µM for NADP+. These values are in the range of those reported for a bacterially expressed form of Idp3p (9). Interestingly for PICD, the KM constant observed with respect to NADP+ is higher than for isocitrate, a unique property that has not been observed for the peroxisomal NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenases of yeasts (9, 37).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Isocitrate dehydrogenase activities of bacterially expressed PICD (units/mg)

The PICD Protein Is Bimodally Distributed between Peroxisomes and the Cytosol-- The above data demonstrated that the human PICD gene encodes a protein highly similar to S. cerevisiae Idp3p that can partially complement the yeast idp3Delta mutant and that PICD has NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase activity. The presence of the type 1 peroxisomal targeting signal sequence (PTS-1), Ala-Lys-Leu-COOH, at the C terminus of PICD suggested that this enzyme might be targeted to peroxisomes in human cells (38). Rabbit polyclonal antibodies were generated against a recombinant form of PICD lacking its last three amino acids (to avoid generating antibodies to the PTS-1 (39)) and were used to examine PICD distribution in subcellular fractionation experiments. Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells were homogenized, and a post-nuclear supernatant was prepared by differential centrifugation. This post-nuclear supernatant was fractionated further by ultracentrifugation on a linear, 15-40% Nycodenz density gradient. Equal portions of each fraction were assayed for peroxisomal, mitochondrial, and endoplasmic reticulum marker enzyme activities (Fig. 4A) and for PICD by Western blot (Fig. 4B). PICD immunoreactivity (approximate mass 46 kDa) was found to be bimodally distributed across the gradient. Significant amounts of PICD were found to colocalize with the peroxisomal marker enzyme catalase, suggesting that PICD is a resident peroxisomal enzyme. However, we observed that the majority of PICD was present in cytosolic fractions at the top of the gradient. Based on the amount of catalase present at the top of the gradient, the levels of PICD in these fractions were disproportionate to the amount expected from peroxisome rupture during homogenization and centrifugation. Thus PICD appeared to be present in the cytoplasm as well as peroxisomes.


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Endogenous PICD is present in the peroxisomes and cytosol of HepG2 cells. A post-nuclear supernatant from human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) was fractionated by Nycodenz density gradient ultracentrifugation. A, equal portions of each fraction were assayed for a peroxisomal marker enzyme, catalase (black bar), a mitochondrial marker enzyme, succinate dehydrogenase (gray bar), and for an endoplasmic reticulum marker enzyme, NADPH-cytochrome c reductase (open bar). B, equal portions of each fraction were also separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to membranes, and blotted with anti-PICD antibodies.

We next tested whether PICD from any other mammals shared a similar bimodal distribution. The anti-PICD antibodies detected a protein of the appropriate molecular mass in rat liver homogenates (data not shown), and we found that rat PICD was also present in both peroxisomes and the cytoplasm (Fig. 5, A and B). Comparative densitometry of the anti-PICD immunoreactivity in peroxisome-containing fractions (numbers 1-8) with the non-peroxisomal fractions (numbers 9-16) revealed that approximately 27% of total cellular PICD was peroxisome-associated. We compared this ratio to that of a cytoplasmic marker enzyme activity, lactate dehydrogenase (Fig. 5C), to determine if the peroxisome-associated PICD was due to contamination of the peroxisome-containing fractions with cytoplasmic proteins. The very low level of lactate dehydrogenase activity in the peroxisomal fractions (2% total) confirmed that the peroxisomal PICD was not due to cytoplasmic contamination and instead supported the hypothesis that PICD is a bimodally distributed protein.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Rat liver PICD is bimodally distributed to the peroxisome and cytoplasm. A post-nuclear supernatant of rat liver was fractionated by Nycodenz density gradient ultracentrifugation. A, equal portions of each fraction were assayed for a peroxisomal marker enzyme, catalase (black bar), and a mitochondrial marker enzyme, succinate dehydrogenase (gray bar). B, equal portions of each fraction were also separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, transferred to membranes, and blotted with anti-PICD antibodies. C, fractions were also assayed for a cytosolic marker enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase (black bar), to control for cytoplasmic contamination in higher density fractions.

Although the simplest explanation for these data is that PICD is only poorly imported into peroxisomes and that most PICD is cytoplasmic, some studies have described peroxisomal proteins that are preferentially lost from the organelle during homogenization and/or fractionation (40). Therefore, in an alternative approach to determine whether PICD is truly predominantly cytoplasmic, we permeabilized HepG2 cells with increasing amounts of digitonin and followed the amount of PICD released as compared with the release of a peroxisomal marker protein catalase (41). At low concentrations of digitonin, most PICD was released from the cells, as expected for a predominantly cytoplasmic protein (Fig. 6). In contrast, release of catalase was observed only when all cellular membranes were permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100. Thus, the cytoplasmic localization of PICD suggested by the subcellular fractionation experiments appeared to reflect bona fide cytoplasmic enzyme instead of peroxisomal PICD that had been released by damage to the organelle.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Detection of cytoplasmic PICD by differential permeabilization. Human HepG2 cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of digitonin as shown (0, 50, 100, 250, 500, and 500 µg/ml + 1% Triton X-100) and then separated into a supernatant and pellet by differential centrifugation. Proteins present in the individual supernatants were precipitated by trichloroacetic acid, separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to membranes. The PICD present in each sample was detected by immunoblot, as was the peroxisomal matrix protein, catalase. The extraction of PICD following treatment with limiting amounts of digitonin confirmed that PICD is found in the cytosol of intact mammalian cells.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Recent genetic and biochemical studies revealed the presence of an NADPH-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase, Idp3p, in peroxisomes of S. cerevisiae. These studies also established that Idp3p is essential for the activity of peroxisomal 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase, an NADPH-dependent enzyme, and thus that Idp3p is required for producing intraperoxisomal NADPH. To determine whether mammalian peroxisomes also require intraperoxisomal enzymes for the regeneration of enzyme cofactors, we searched for human homologs of yeast IDP3, and we identified a single candidate gene, PICD. We observed that human PICD can rescue the phenotypes of the yeast idp3Delta mutant and that PICD encodes a peroxisomal protein with intrinsic NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase activity, thereby providing strong evidence that PICD is the human homolog of yeast IDP3.

Mammalian peroxisomes contain multiple NADPH-dependent enzymes, including 2,4-dienoyl-CoA reductase (10, 11), hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (12-15), and acyl-CoA reductase (42). Furthermore, they contain at least one enzyme, phytanoyl-CoA alpha -hydroxylase, that requires 2-oxoglutarate as a cosubstrate (16-18). However, the source of the intraperoxisomal NADPH and 2-oxoglutarate that are required by these enzymes has not previously been identified. The presence of PICD in human peroxisomes suggests that this enzyme is responsible for generating these compounds within the organelle. Furthermore, it suggests that mutations in PICD may result in defects in multiple peroxisomal metabolic pathways, namely the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids and the degradation of phytanic acid. This combination of phenotypes is highly likely to result in human disease given that defects in phytanic acid degradation alone are sufficient to cause Refsum disease (18, 43). Yet to be determined is the source of intraperoxisomal isocitrate, the PICD substrate, as well as the mechanism(s) by which peroxisomes take up the biochemical quantities of NADP+ and/or NADPH required to initiate a metabolically relevant NADP+/NADPH cycle within the organelle.

In addition to resolving the intraperoxisomal source of NADPH and 2-oxoglutarate, the detection of PICD in human peroxisomes has significant implications for peroxisome permeability. Prior studies of mammalian peroxisomes have suggested that they contain a porin-like protein and are permeable to virtually all small molecules, including sugars as large as sucrose (44). This model implies that the substrates and products of peroxisomal enzymatic reactions can diffuse freely across the peroxisome membrane and, furthermore, that there is no need for peroxisomal metabolite transporters and antiporters, such as those present in the inner mitochondrial membrane. However, this model is based primarily on in vitro data using purified peroxisomes that are subject to the caveat that the organelle membranes may have been damaged during purification. Interestingly, recent studies from yeast (including the analysis of Idp3p) provide strong evidence that the membrane of yeast peroxisomes is impermeable to small metabolites such as NADP+, NAD+, CoA, acetyl-CoA, etc. (45). Since a peroxisome with a freely permeable membrane should not require an intraperoxisomal NADPH-regenerating enzymatic activity a priori, the mere identification of PICD supports the hypothesis that mammalian peroxisomes also have an impermeable membrane. This hypothesis predicts the existence of multiple transporters to mediate the exchange of metabolites between the peroxisome and cytoplasm. Consistent with this idea, mammalian peroxisomes have been shown to contain at least four members of the ATP-binding cassette family of transmembrane transporters (46-49) and two members of the solute carrier family of antiporters (50).

In addition to being a component of peroxisomes, PICD is also located in the cytoplasm of human cells. In fact, the amount of PICD in the cytoplasm appears to be at least 3-fold greater than the amount that is present in the peroxisome. Although the presence of a cytoplasmic NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase was established previously (51), it was not known that a common gene encoded both cytoplasmic and peroxisomal enzyme activities. We have examined the mRNA products of PICD in mammalian cells, and we find no evidence of alternative structures, indicating that a single PICD polypeptide is differentially localized to both the cytoplasm and peroxisome. PICD contains what would appear to be an efficient PTS-1 (the protein terminates in the amino acids Ala-Lys-Leu-COOH), and we have no evidence for why only a subset of PICD is transported into peroxisomes. One possible explanation is that the PICD C terminus may be masked by oligomerization or by interaction with one or more cytoplasmic proteins, thereby preventing the recognition of its PTS-1 by PEX5, the cytoplasmic PTS-1 receptor (32, 52, 53).

Although the molecular events involved in retaining PICD in the cytoplasm remain to be elucidated, there is little doubt that PICD is predominantly cytoplasmic. As for the function of cytoplasmic PICD, this protein is likely to particpate in the production of NADPH for cytoplasmic reductive chemical reactions (51). In mammalian liver cytosol, the major NADPH-dependent reductive processes are fatty acid synthesis and cholesterol synthesis. Whereas a large body of work has established that the hexose monophosphate shunt serves as a major source of the NADPH consumed by these processes, the role of cytoplasmic PICD cannot be dismissed as insignificant. In fact, genetic deficiencies in the enzyme glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, which catalyzes the first NADPH-yielding reaction of the hexose monophosphate shunt, are well described and are among the most common enzymatic defects known in humans (1). Clinically, such patients suffer from acute hemolysis but do not present with deficiencies in either fatty acid or sterol synthesis (1). That this enzymatic reaction, and thus all NADPH-yielding steps of the hexose monophosphate shunt, can be blocked without significant effects on fatty acid and sterol metabolism (1) suggests that cytoplasmic PICD plays an important role in the generation of cytoplasmic NADPH.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Stephanie Mihalik and Paul Watkins for their generous assistance with the subcellular fractionation and selective permeabilization experiments.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported by Grant DK45787 from the National Institutes of Health (to S. J. G.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF113917.

Dagger To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biological Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 725 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21205. Tel.: 410-955-3085; Fax: 410-955-0215.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: ORF, open reading frame; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; MBP, maltose-binding protein.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Luzzatto, L., and Mehta, A. (1995) in The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease (Scriver, C. R. , Beaudet, A. L. , Sly, W. S. , and Valle, D., eds), 7th Ed., Vol. 3 , pp. 3367-3398, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York
2. Ramachandran, N., and Colman, R. F. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 8859-8864[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Plaut, G. W. E. (1970) Curr. Top. Cell. Regul. 2, 1-27
4. Plaut, G. W., Cook, M., and Aogaichi, T. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 760, 300-308[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Flint, A. P. F., and Denton, R. M. (1970) Biochem. J. 117, 73-83[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Klinken, S. P., and Stevenson, P. M. (1977) Eur. J. Biochem. 81, 327-332[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Leighton, F., Poole, B., Beaufay, H., Baudhuin, P., Coffey, J. W., Fowler, S., and DeDuve, C. (1968) J. Cell Biol. 37, 482-513[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. van Roermund, C. W., Hettema, E. H., Kal, A. J., van den Berg, M., Tabak, H. F., and Wanders, R. J. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 677-687[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Henke, B., Girzalsky, W., Berteaux-Lecellier, V., and Erdmann, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 3702-3711[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. Fransen, M., Van Veldhoven, P., and Subramani, S. (1999) Biochem. J. 340, 561-568
11. Geisbrecht, B., Liang, X., Morrell, J., Schulz, H., and Gould, S. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 25814-25820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12. Keller, G. A., Barton, M. C., Shapiro, D. J., and Singer, S. J. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 770-774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Keller, G., Pazirandeh, M., and Krisans, S. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 875-886[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Rusnak, N., and Krisans, S. K. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 148, 890-895[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Krisans, S. K. (1996) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 804, 142-164[Abstract]
16. Mihalik, S. J., Rainville, A. M., and Watkins, P. A. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 232, 545-551[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Wanders, R. J., Jansen, G., van Roermund, C. W., Denis, S., Schutgens, R. B., and Jakobs, B. S. (1996) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 804, 450-460[Abstract]
18. Mihalik, S., Morrell, J., Kim, D., Sacksteder, K., Watkins, P., and Gould, S. (1997) Nat. Genet. 17, 185-189[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Geisbrecht, B. V., Zhu, D., Schulz, K., Nau, K., Morrell, J. C., Geraghty, M., Schulz, H., Erdmann, R., and Gould, S. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 33184-33191[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Geisbrecht, B. V., Zhang, D., Schulz, H., and Gould, S. J. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21797-21803[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21. Grant, S. G., Jessee, J., Bloom, F. R., and Hanahan, D. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 4645-4649[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Baker-Brachmann, C., Davies, A., Cost, G. J., Caputo, E., Li, J., Hieter, P., and Boeke, J. D. (1998) Yeast 14, 115-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Geraghty, M. T., Bassett, D., Morrell, J. C., Gatto, G. J., Bai, J., Geisbrecht, B. V., Hieter, P., and Gould, S. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 2937-2942[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Dodt, G., and Gould, S. J. (1996) J. Cell Biol. 135, 1763-1774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Crane, D. I., Kalish, J. E., and Gould, S. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21835-21844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Loftus, T., Hall, L., Anderson, S., and McAlister-Henn, L. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 9661-9667[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Moreno de la Garza, M., Schultz-Borchardt, U., Crabb, J. W., and Kunau, W.-H. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 148, 285-291[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Peters, T. J., Muller, M., and de Duve, C. (1972) J. Exp. Med. 136, 1117-1139[Abstract]
29. Pennington, R. J. (1961) Biochem. J. 80, 649-654[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Beaufay, H., Amar-Costesec, A., Feytmans, E., Thines-Sempoux, D., Wibo, M., Robbi, M., and Berthet, J. (1974) J. Cell Biol. 61, 188-200[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Storrie, B., and Madden, E. (1990) Methods Enzymol. 182, 203-225[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
32. Dodt, G., Braverman, N., Wong, C., Moser, A., Moser, H. W., Watkins, P., Valle, D., and Gould, S. J. (1995) Nat. Genet. 9, 115-124[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
33. Mihalik, S. J. (1992) Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 357, 239-244
34. Kozak, M. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 229-241[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Kozak, M. (1992) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 8, 197-225[CrossRef]
36. Erdmann, R., Veenhuis, D., Mertens, D., and Kunau, W.-H. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 5419-5423[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Yamamoto, S., Atomi, H., Ueda, M., and Tanaka, A. (1995) Arch. Microbiol. 163, 104-111[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Gould, S. J., Keller, G. A., Hosken, N., Wilkinson, J., and Subramani, S. (1989) J. Cell Biol. 108, 1657-1664[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Gould, S. J., Krisans, S., Keller, G. A., and Subramani, S. (1990) J. Cell Biol. 110, 27-34[Abstract/Free Full Text]
40. Krisans, S., Ericsson, J., Edwards, P., and Keller, G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14165-14169[Abstract/Free Full Text]
41. Matsuzono, Y., Kinoshita, N., Tamura, S., Shimozawa, N., Hamasaki, M., Ghaedi, K., Wanders, R. J., Suzuki, Y., Kondo, N., and Fujiki, Y. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 2116-2121[Abstract/Free Full Text]
42. Wanders, R. J., and Tager, J. M. (1998) Mol. Aspects Med. 19, 69-154[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
43. Jansen, G. A., Ofman, R., Ferdiandusse, S., Ijlst, L., Muijsers, A. O., Skjeldal, O. H., Stokke, O., Jakobs, C., Besley, G. T. N., Wraith, J. E., and Wanders, R. J. A. (1997) Nat. Genet. 17, 190-193[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
44. Van Veldhoven, P. P., Just, W. W., and Mannaerts, G. P. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 4310-4318[Abstract/Free Full Text]
45. van Roermund, C. W., Elgersma, Y., Singh, N., Wanders, R. J., and Tabak, H. F. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3480-3486[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
46. Kamijo, K., Taketani, S., Yokata, S., Osumi, T., and Hashimoto, T. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 4534-4540[Abstract/Free Full Text]
47. Mosser, J., Lutz, Y., Stoeckel, M. E., Sarde, C. O., Kretz, C., Douar, A. M., Lopez, J., Aubourg, P., and Mandel, J. L. (1994) Hum. Mol. Genet. 3, 265-271[Abstract/Free Full Text]
48. Shani, N., Jimenez-Sanchez, G., Steel, G., Dean, M., and Valle, D. (1997) Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 1925-1931[Abstract/Free Full Text]
49. Lombard-Platet, G., Savary, S., Sarde, C. O., Mandel, J. L., and Chimini, G. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 1265-1269[Abstract/Free Full Text]
50. Wylin, T., Baes, M., Brees, C., Mannaerts, G. P., Fransen, M., and Van Veldhoven, P. P. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem. 258, 332-338[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
51. Jennings, G. T., Sechi, S., Stevenson, P. M., Tuckey, R. C., Parmelee, D., and McAlister-Henn, L. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 23128-23134[Abstract/Free Full Text]
52. McCollum, D., Monosov, E., and Subramani, S. (1993) J. Cell Biol. 121, 761-774[Abstract/Free Full Text]
53. van der Leij, I., Fransen, M. M., Elgersma, Y., Distel, B., and Tabak, H. F. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 11782-11786[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. Contreras-Shannon, A.-P. Lin, M. T. McCammon, and L. McAlister-Henn
Kinetic Properties and Metabolic Contributions of Yeast Mitochondrial and Cytosolic NADP+-specific Isocitrate Dehydrogenases
J. Biol. Chem., February 11, 2005; 280(6): 4469 - 4475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Xu, J. Zhao, Z. Xu, B. Peng, Q. Huang, E. Arnold, and J. Ding
Structures of Human Cytosolic NADP-dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Reveal a Novel Self-regulatory Mechanism of Activity
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33946 - 33957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
I. Shechter, P. Dai, L. Huo, and G. Guan
IDH1 gene transcription is sterol regulated and activated by SREBP-1a and SREBP-2 in human hepatoma HepG2 cells: evidence that IDH1 may regulate lipogenesis in hepatic cells
J. Lipid Res., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 2169 - 2180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
T. Yoshihara, T. Hamamoto, R. Munakata, R. Tajiri, M. Ohsumi, and S. Yokota
Localization of Cytosolic NADP-dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase in the Peroxisomes of Rat Liver Cells: Biochemical and Immunocytochemical Studies
J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2001; 49(9): 1123 - 1132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Szewczyk, A. Andrianopoulos, M. A. Davis, and M. J. Hynes
A Single Gene Produces Mitochondrial, Cytoplasmic, and Peroxisomal NADP-dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase in Aspergillus nidulans
J. Biol. Chem., September 28, 2001; 276(40): 37722 - 37729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Geisbrecht, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Geisbrecht, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Gould, S. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.