J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 43, 30707-30714, October 22, 1999
Cell Surface Localization of Tissue Transglutaminase Is Dependent
on a Fibronectin-binding Site in Its N-terminal
-Sandwich
Domain*
Claire A.
Gaudry
,
Elisabetta
Verderio
,
Daniel
Aeschlimann§,
Anne
Cox
,
Colin
Smith¶, and
Martin
Griffin
From the
Department of Life Sciences, Nottingham
Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11 8NS, United Kingdom,
the § Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of
Wisconsin, H4/735 CSC, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, and ¶ Unilever
Research, Colworth House, Bedford, United Kingdom
 |
ABSTRACT |
Increasing evidence indicates that tissue
transglutaminase (tTG) plays a role in the assembly and remodeling of
extracellular matrices and promotes cell adhesion. Using an inducible
system we have previously shown that tTG associates with the
extracellular matrix deposited by stably transfected 3T3 fibroblasts
overexpressing the enzyme. We now show by confocal microscopy that tTG
colocalizes with pericellular fibronectin in these cells, and by
immunogold electron microscopy that the two proteins are found in
clusters at the cell surface. Expression vectors encoding the
full-length tTG or a N-terminal truncated tTG lacking the proposed
fibronectin-binding site (fused to the bacterial reporter enzyme
-galactosidase) were generated to characterize the role of
fibronectin in sequestration of tTG in the pericellular matrix.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay style procedures using extracts of
transiently transfected COS-7 cells and immobilized fibronectin showed
that the truncation abolished fibronectin binding. Similarly, the
association of tTG with the pericellular matrix of cells in suspension
or with the extracellular matrix deposited by cell monolayers was
prevented by the truncation. These results demonstrate that tTG binds
to the pericellular fibronectin coat of cells via its N-terminal
-sandwich domain and that this interaction is crucial for cell surface association of tTG.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The 80-kDa tissue transglutaminase
(tTG)1 is a member of a
family of Ca2+-dependent enzymes which catalyze
the formation of cross-links between the
-carboxamide group of
peptide-bound glutamine residues and either the amino groups of primary
amines such as putrescine and cadaverine or the
-amino group of
peptide bound lysine residues (1-3). Although initially believed to be
an intracellular enzyme, there is growing evidence for the involvement
of tissue transglutaminase in the assembly and stabilization of the
pericellular matrix of cells (4-7) and of various extracellular
matrices including basement membranes (8, 9). It has also been shown
that the tissue-type enzyme binds to the extracellular matrix with high
affinity (10) independently of its cross-linking activity (11, 12).
Unlike the other members of the transglutaminase protein family, tTG is
a GTP/GDP-binding protein which shows minimal transglutaminase activity
in the GTP/GDP-bound form (13, 14). In the intracellular environment
its binding to these nucleotides consequently prevents Ca2+
activation of the enzyme (15), consistent with an extracellular function (16). Despite the growing evidence for an extracellular role
for tTG, the enzyme presents the features of a cytosolic protein such
as N-terminal acetylation, lack of disulfide bridges, and lack of
glycosylation (17, 18). A further feature of this protein and other
members of this protein family with an extracellular function including
factor XIIIa is the lack of a classical leader sequence necessary for
the translocation of proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum for their
secretion (19). It is conceivable that tTG is released passively from
cells through stress-induced transient ruptures in the plasma membrane
or it may be actively secreted by one of the more recently proposed
alternative mechanisms (for review, see Ref. 3).
A number of studies (10, 11, 20) have shown a high affinity of tTG for
fibronectin and a putative fibronectin-binding site has been localized
on tTG (21). Cell culture experiments have indicated that
polymerization of fibronectin by cells is promoted by cell
surface-associated tTG (4, 7, 20, 22, 23). Antisense experiments (23)
have also suggested that the cross-linking of cell surface-associated
fibronectin by tTG may be related to the proposed role for the enzyme
in cell adhesion and spreading (24), in agreement with the observation
that adhesion and spreading of cells on a fibrin-fibronectin matrix
formed with a mutant fibronectin lacking its transglutaminase
cross-linking site is greatly reduced as compared with a matrix formed
with wild type fibronectin (25). These findings together with the reported close association of tTG and fibronectin in confluent cell
monolayers as detected by immunocytochemistry (Ref. 20, and references
therein) raise the possibility that the externalization of tTG from
cells could be associated with the assembly of fibronectin fibrils.
To study the relationship between fibronectin and cell surface
association of tTG, two lines of investigation were undertaken. In the
first, a Swiss 3T3 cell line stably transfected with the cDNA of
tTG under the control of a tetracycline inducible promoter (20) was
used to establish colocalization of tTG and fibronectin at the cell
surface on the ultrastructural level. In the second, fusion proteins
between tTG and the bacterial reporter enzyme
-galactosidase were
engineered, one of which carried a truncated tTG which lacked the first
seven N-terminal amino acids. These amino acids have been proposed by
in vitro analysis to be essential for fibronectin binding
(21). COS-7 cells transiently expressing the fusion constructs provided
a tool to analyze the dependence of the cell surface-associated tTG
pool on the integrity of its binding site for fibronectin. Our results
demonstrate that the introduced deletion abolishes binding of the
enzyme to fibronectin and prevents its cell surface localization. We
conclude that an intact N-terminal domain of tTG is required for its
association with the extracellular matrix.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Cell Culture--
Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, COS-7, and endothelial
ECV304 cells were obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell
Cultures and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)
complemented with 10%(v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM
glutamine, 20 units/ml penicillin, and 20 µg/ml streptomycin (Sigma,
United Kingdom). The Swiss 3T3 cell line which was inducible for tTG
under a tetracycline regulatable promoter was grown in DMEM containing
10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, 20 units/ml
penicillin, 20 µg/ml streptomycin, 400 µg/ml geneticin, 250 µg/ml
xanthine, 15 µg/ml hypoxanthine, 10 µg/ml thymidine, 2 µg/ml
aminopterin, and 10 µg/ml mycophenolic acid (Sigma). The cells were
usually cultured in the presence of 2 µg/ml tetracycline when no
induction of tTG was required (20).
ELISA--
The presence of tTG antigen in conditioned culture
medium was investigated using a modification of the quantitative ELISA method of Achyuthan et al. (26). The plates were precoated
with 3%(w/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C
prior to the assay as an additional step. Culture supernatants were
concentrated approximately 10-fold on 30-kDa cut-off columns (Falcon
Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom) prior to assay.
Immunocytochemistry--
Stably transfected Swiss 3T3 cells (20)
which had been induced to express tTG by withdrawal of tetracycline
from the culture medium for 72 h were seeded on glass slides and
incubated overnight to obtain a subconfluent monolayer. Cells were
fixed in 1% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min, blocked for
1 h in 3% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS, and incubated
overnight at 4 °C with a mixture of primary antibodies in blocking
solution. The primary antibodies used were Cub7402 (Neomarkers, Union
City, CA), a mouse monoclonal antibody targeting the active site of tTG
(27) and rabbit polyclonal antibodies against fibronectin (Sigma). A
similar method was used for immunostaining of transiently transfected COS-7 cells using a mouse monoclonal antibody to
-galactosidase (Promega) with the exception that cells were permeabilized in 0.1%
Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min prior to blocking. After thorough rinsing in PBS, secondary antibodies, fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-mouse, and tetramethylrhodamine
isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit (DAKO) were applied for
2 h at room temperature. Slides were rinsed in PBS, mounted in
Vectashield mountant (Sigma), and examined on a LEICA laser confocal microscope.
Immunogold Electron Microscopy--
Cells were cultured to
confluency on 0.5-cm squares of Melinex, previously conditioned by
overnight incubation in serum containing DMEM. For immunolabeling of
tTG in the ECM, cultures were labeled prior to fixation by addition of
monoclonal antibody Cub7402 into the culture medium at a final dilution
of 1/300 for 2 h (20). Unbound antibodies were removed by
extensive rinsing in PBS and cells were then fixed in 1% (w/v)
paraformaldehyde and 0.05% (w/v) glutaraldehyde in PBS, dehydrated
through increasing concentrations of ethanol and placed in hydrophilic
resin (LRGold resin and glycolmethacrylate (low acid) (6:4), plus 0.1%
bezoinethylether (Taab, Berks, UK)). Following several changes of
resin, the samples were placed in plastic molds and embedded by
polymerization of the resin using ultraviolet light (360 nm) (under
nitrogen gas) for 24 h at room temperature. The Melinex support
was removed to allow for vertical sectioning of the cells. Ultrathin
sections (60-90 nm) were collected on collodion (2% w/v in amyl
acetate)-coated nickel grids. Sections were blocked for nonspecific
binding with 0.5% (w/v) bovine serum albumin in TBS (20 mM
Tris/HCl, pH 7.6, 225 mM NaCl) prior to being exposed to
the primary antibody as indicated. Fibronectin was detected with rabbit
polyclonal anti-fibronectin antibodies (Sigma) diluted 1/200 in
blocking solution. For labeling of intracellular tTG, sections were
also incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-tTG antibody (Cub7402)
diluted 1/500 in blocking buffer containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween 20. Grids
were then incubated with the respective colloidal gold-conjugated
secondary antibodies (BioCell, Cardiff, UK), a goat anti-rabbit
antibody (5-nm gold conjugate, diluted 1/200), and a goat anti-mouse
antibody (15-nm gold conjugate, diluted 1/100). The grids were silver
enhanced (Silver Enhancement Kit, BioCell), prior to counterstaining,
with 2% aqueous uranyl acetate and alkaline lead citrate. Samples were
viewed on a JEOL transmission electron microscope (100 CX-II).
Generation of tTG-
-Galactosidase Fusion
Constructs--
Fusion protein constructs were engineered by
subcloning the human tTG cDNA into the KpnI restriction
site of the pCHK vector which was designed to fuse proteins with the
enzyme
-galactosidase (28). The following primers were used to
amplify by PCR the complete tTG cDNA, with bold letters indicating
the KpnI restriction site added to the cDNA to allow
subcloning into pCHK: sense primer, 5'-CAGTGGTACCCATGGCCGAGGAGCTG-3'; antisense primer,
5'-TGAGGTACCGTGGCGGGGCCAATGATGAC-3'. To amplify a truncated
tTG cDNA which lacked its first 21 bases, the following sense
primer was used together with the above antisense primer:
5'-CGATGGTACCCAGGTGTGATCTGGAG-3'. The PCR reactions were carried out with 2.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) and 0.3 µg of DNA template (pSG5/hTG-1 kindly
provided by Dr. Peter J. A. Davies, Houston, TX) in a total volume
of 100 µl containing 1.25 mM of each dNTPs and 60 pmol of
each primer. The PCR cycles were 1 min at 95 °C (denaturation), 1 min at 60 °C (annealing), and 1 min at 72 °C (elongation) for a
total of 30 cycles. The PCR products were cleaved with KpnI
and ligated following standard protocols. The engineered constructs
were sequenced to confirm proper integration of the cloned DNA fragment
and the absence of mutations in the PCR amplified tTG coding sequence.
Transient Transfection of COS-7 Cells with Fusion
Constructs--
Transient transfection of COS-7 cells with the
generated plasmids (pCHKTG, pCHKTG/
N) and the control pCHK was
carried out using 30 µl of the transfection reagent DOTAP (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) and 5 µg of plasmid DNA per 28.3 cm2 of cells following the manufacturer's instructions.
Cells were grown on plastic to 80% confluency for transfection and
transfected cells were cultured for another 48 h in 5%
CO2 at 37 °C in phenol red-free culture medium before
being processed for different assays as indicated. Transfection
efficiencies were calculated by determining the number of transfected
cells using the
-galactosidase in situ staining system
(Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfection
efficiencies were established from parallel cultures (duplicates) to
the experimental cultures in every experiment.
Preparation of Cell Extracts--
Transiently transfected COS-7
cells were harvested by trypsinization in PBS containing 5 mM EDTA and extracted by sonication in 0.25 M
sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, 5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and
protease inhibitors: 1 µg/ml pepstatin, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Cells were cleared from
particulate material by centrifugation at 10,000 × g
for 5 min.
SDS-PAGE and Immunoblotting--
Western blot analysis was
performed following standard procedures (29). Proteins were separated
in 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gels under reducing conditions and
transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane.
-Galactosidase and fusion
proteins were detected using a mouse monoclonal antibody against
-galactosidase (Promega). A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
anti-mouse antibody was used in combination with the ECL kit (Amersham
International Plc.) to develop the blots.
Binding of tTG Fusion Proteins to GTP-Agarose--
Cell extracts
from 2 × 106 transiently transfected COS-7 cells were
clarified by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 20 min.
The resultant supernatant (150 µl containing approximately 2000 µg of protein) was incubated with GTP-agarose previously washed and equilibrated in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 (volume of
GTP-agarose used, equivalent to 0.5 ml of original suspension) (Sigma),
and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with gentle shaking. The
agarose beads were pelleted by centrifugation, the supernatant removed, and the beads washed twice in cold (4 °C) 50 mM Tris
buffer, pH 7.5, and once more in PBS. The washed beads were boiled in
2 × strength Laemmli sample buffer for 5 min to solubilize
GTP-binding proteins and the extracted proteins were then fractionated
by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described above. Gel loadings were adjusted to take differences in transfection efficiency into account.
Determination of
-Galactosidase Activity--
The reaction
was performed by incubation of samples in
-galactosidase assay
buffer (120 mM Na2HPO4, 80 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM
MgCl2, 100 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 1.33 mg/ml
o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (Promega)
at 37 °C for 1 h. The hydrolysis of the
-galactosidase substrate o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside
into o-nitrophenol was assessed by measuring the absorbance
at 420 nm. Standards were made up in DMEM without phenol red following
the kit's instructions (Promega). Knowing the corresponding
transfection efficiency (see above), the specific
-galactosidase
activity for each cell extract could be calculated and is given in
-galactosidase milliunits per 100,000 transfected cells.
Binding of tTG Fusion Proteins to Immobilized
Fibronectin--
150 µl extract of transfected COS-7 cells was
diluted to 500 µl with PBS and incubated on a fibronectin-coated
plastic surface (24-well tissue culture plates (Corning) coated
overnight with 10 µg/ml fibronectin in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.4) for 2 h at 37 °C. The plates were thoroughly rinsed with
PBS and bound
-galactosidase activity measured as described.
Detection of Cell Surface-associated Pool of tTG Fusion
Proteins--
COS-7 cells were cultured in 10-cm dishes and
transfected as described. The conditioned culture media were harvested,
centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min to eliminate any cell
debris, and analyzed for
-galactosidase activity (see below). The
cells were recovered by brief trypsinization and immediately
resuspended in serum containing medium to stop further protease action.
Cells were collected by centrifugation, resuspended in 1 ml of
serum-free DMEM, and counted. After incubation in suspension for a
total of 30-35 min, the cells were fixed in 3.7% (w/v)
paraformaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. The fixed cells
were washed 3 times in culture medium and finally resuspended in 150 µl of phenol red and serum-free DMEM. The cell suspensions, as well
as the harvested media, were analyzed in the
-galactosidase enzyme
assay described above with
-galactosidase standard solutions
prepared in phenol red and serum-free DMEM. After a 1-h incubation at
37 °C, the cells were pelleted and the absorbance of the supernatant
and the conditioned media were measured at 420 nm. To check the
membrane integrity of the cell preparation, the fixed cells were
incubated for 10 min at room temperature in a solution of trypan blue
(Sigma) diluted 1/4 in PBS and analyzed for exclusion of the dye.
Detection of tTG Fusion Proteins in Extracellular Matrix
Structures--
Adherent transfected COS-7 cells (180,000 cells were
originally plated out in 6-well plates for each assay) were rinsed with PBS before solubilization in 0.1% deoxycholate in PBS containing 5 mM EDTA. The remaining ECM on the plastic surface was
washed thoroughly with PBS containing 5 mM EDTA and the
associated
-galactosidase activity was determined as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Assessment of tTG Secretion into Culture Supernatants
Initial investigations were undertaken to assess any direct
secretion of tTG into the growth medium of cells expressing high levels
of the enzyme either constitutively or after transfection with an
expression construct. Cells chosen for this study included stably
transfected Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts in which tTG expression is under
control of the tetracycline regulatable promoter (20) and the human
endothelial cell line ECV304 (23). Immunochemical analysis by
quantitative ELISA was conducted on concentrated culture medium and did
not reveal any detectable levels of tTG (data not shown). Since it has
previously been shown that tTG is present at the surface of cells in
suspension (4, 23) but is only released on the basal side of adherent
cells (7), the experiment was repeated with cells that were trypsinized
and kept in suspension in serum-free medium (to prevent scavenging of
the enzyme by serum components including fibronectin) for 3 h at
37 °C. Although tTG has been shown by several authors to be
implicated in the processing of the pericellular matrix in different
cell types by providing evidence for its activity at the cell surface
(4-7, 20, 23), several replicates of ELISA on the conditioned culture
medium showed that there is no detectable secretion of tTG under these conditions from either cell type (data not shown). tTG binds with high
affinity to ECM proteins, and in particular to cell surface-associated fibronectin (10) which could result in sequestration of tTG at the cell
surface and prevent it from being released into the culture medium.
This is consistent with the fact that cells are known to contain a
pericellular coat of fibronectin which is very rapidly re-established
after trypsin treatment (less than 1 h) or which might only be
partially removed by proteolytic cleavage (30).
Immunochemical Analysis of Cell Surface-associated tTG and
Fibronectin
A logical working hypothesis is that tTG is released to the cell
surface but effectively and tightly bound at the cell surface, as
suggested by the presence of tTG activity at the cell surface but its
absence in the culture medium. To test this hypothesis, immunocytochemical analysis of the cell surface was undertaken on
stably transfected Swiss 3T3 cells which had been induced by withdrawal
of tetracycline from the medium for 72 h to obtain a maximal level
of tTG expression. These cells together with their non-induced controls
were seeded at low density on culture slides 12 h prior to
fixation and labeled with antibodies to tTG and fibronectin without
permeabilization. We have previously shown that these cells secrete
fibronectin and over time elaborate fibronectin fibrils on their
surface as part of the organization of their ECM (20). Detection of tTG
and FN in the induced non-confluent cells showed a punctate pattern of
staining which seemed to colocalize (Fig.
1). In the non-induced cells, which
showed negligible cell surface staining for tTG, FN staining did not
appear altered (Fig. 1). This result showed first of all that tTG is
detectable at the cell surface, and second, it showed a close
association between tTG and fibronectin during the early stages of the
organization of a pericellular fibronectin matrix.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Detection of cell surface-related tTG and
fibronectin antigen in stably transfected Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts induced
and non-induced for overexpression of tTG. Panels A, B,
and C show the immunostaining patterns of the same field for
non-induced (+tetracycline) cells, whereas D, E, and
F show the respective patterns of the same field for induced
cells ( tetracycline). For immunostaining, cells were fixed but not
permeabilized to detect pericellular antigen. Cells were stained with a
mouse monoclonal anti-tTG antibody using an fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (A and
D), and rabbit polyclonal antibodies to fibronectin using a
secondary antibody conjugated to rhodamine (B and
E). Panels C and F show the areas of
colocalization of tTG and fibronectin in an orange/yellow
color in the superimposed images. Pictures were taken on a laser
scanning confocal microscope and micrographs represent an extended
focus view calculated from 0.5-µm section planes. The bar
in panel E indicates 10 µm.
|
|
This close association of tTG with fibronectin at the cell surface as
shown by confocal microscopy was further confirmed when stably
transfected 3T3 cells induced to overexpress tTG were analyzed at the
electron microscope level using immunogold labeling (Fig. 2). Specific intracellular labeling for
tTG and fibronectin was obtained as well as in the pericellular matrix
of the cells. In the case of tTG, detection of the enzyme in the
pericellular matrix was only made possible by addition of the primary
antibody to live cells in culture prior to fixation and embedding,
suggesting that the epitope of the enzyme recognized by the monoclonal
antibody becomes occluded or destroyed during the processing techniques for immunogold labeling. We have previously used this technique to
detect extracellular tTG by immunofluorescence in non-induced and
induced transfected cells (20) which indicated very little labeling in
the non-induced cells thus demonstrating the specificity of the
antibodies for tTG in live cultures. Moreover detection of the enzyme
by this methodology illustrates that its extracellular location is not
a result of leakage of the enzyme from cells during the fixation and
processing procedure. Labeling of tTG using a secondary antibody
conjugated to 15-nm gold particles indicated enzyme clusters present at
both the basal and apical surfaces with high density staining at cell
surfaces involving overlapping cells (Fig. 2A). Labeling of
fibronectin using a secondary antibody conjugated to 5-nm gold
particles showed a close colocalization of this protein with tTG (Fig.
2, A and B). The presence of dense clusters of
gold particles containing both tTG and fibronectin that were closely
associated with the cell surface (see arrows Fig.
2A) was revealed and could represent cell surface assembly sites of fibronectin (22). Fig. 2B which represents a larger cytoplasmic area for two fibroblasts as opposed to Fig. 2A
which shows an area of several overlapping cells, indicates as pointed out by the arrowheads that tTG can be found in association
with fibronectin in the intracellular environment. The significance of
this remains, however, unclear since the secretory vesicles in which
fibronectin is likely to be found are not clearly discernible because
of the type of EM processing required for immunogold techniques. Moreover active translocation of tTG into membrane bound vesicles or
across the plasma membrane has not been shown.

View larger version (128K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Immunogold electron microscopic localization
of tTG and fibronectin in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts overexpressing
tTG. Ultrathin sections of resin-embedded cell monolayers
(vertical section plane) were labeled using a mouse
monoclonal antibody against tTG and rabbit polyclonal antibodies
against fibronectin. Anti-mouse secondary antibodies conjugated to
15-nm gold particles were used for revealing tTG and anti-rabbit
antibodies conjugated to 5-nm gold particles for fibronectin.
Representative images are shown (warranted by capture and selection of
the images by a person specializing in this technology but unfamiliar
with the research area). Besides a broad distribution of tTG in the
cell cytosol, intense labeling for both tTG and fibronectin was
apparent at the cell surface at basal and apical membranes and
intercellular junctions with clusters apparently containing both
proteins being frequently present in these localities
(arrows in A). The inset in
panel A shows an enlarged (× 2) region taken from the area
between cells indicated by the arrow while the
inset in panel B shows an enlarged (× 2.2)
region taken from the basal side of the cell adjacent to the enlarged
area further demonstrating the close association of the two proteins at
the cell surface. tTG and fibronectin are occasionally also detected in
close proximity in the intracellular environment (arrows in
B). Panels A and B represent images
magnified 68,000 times.
|
|
Investigation of the Interaction of tTG with Fibronectin by
Transfection of Cells with Constructs Containing Full-length and
Truncated tTG
Generation of Expression Constructs and Characterization of Fusion
Proteins--
A more quantitative method of tracking the enzyme was
sought which would allow the analysis of the mechanism of interaction between tTG and FN and the influence of this interaction on the accumulation of the enzyme at the cell surface. For this purpose, fusion constructs were engineered by subcloning the tTG cDNA into the mammalian expression vector pCHK resulting in the fusion of the
C-terminal end of the tTG protein to the N-terminal end of
-galactosidase with the spacer Thr-Val-Pro-Pro between the two proteins. The pCHK vector allows for high level constitutive expression of fusion proteins under control of the SV40 promoter. As a further means of studying the interaction between tTG and fibronectin, a fusion
protein was made which had the first seven N-terminal amino acids
deleted from the tTG protein. These amino acids were reported by
in vitro analysis to be essential to confer a
fibronectin-binding site to the enzyme tTG (21). A schematic
representation of the fusion proteins constructed is shown in Fig.
3.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Schematic representation of engineered
tTG- -galactosidase fusion constructs. The
expression vector pCHK encodes for the bacterial enzyme
-galactosidase (1). By subcloning the tTG cDNA into pCHK as
described in detail under "Experimental Procedures," the vector
pCHKTG was engineered which encodes for a fusion protein of tTG and
-galactosidase linked by the sequence Thr-Val-Pro-Pro (2).
pCHKTG/ N is encoding for a similar fusion protein lacking the first
N-terminal 7 amino acids ((Met)Ala-Glu-Glu-Leu-Val-Leu-Glu) of tTG
(3).
|
|
Since the activity of
-galactosidase is retained after
paraformaldehyde fixation of cells, determination of
-galactosidase activity using a colorimetric assay could serve as a simple means of
localization and quantification of tTG in different compartments. COS-7
cells were chosen for transient transfection experiments with the
fusion constructs since they contain very low endogenous levels of tTG
(0.3 units/mg of protein) and higher transfection efficiencies can be
obtained with these cells compared with other cell lines such as Swiss
3T3 fibroblasts. The transfection efficiency varied between 5 and 20%
throughout the study and was determined and corrected for in each of
the subsequent experiments. Correct expression of the fusion proteins
in COS-7 cells was first examined by Western blot analysis using an
anti-
-galactosidase antibody (Fig. 4).
-Galactosidase in extracts of transfected cells migrated with an
apparent molecular mass of 120 kDa, whereas the tTG-
-galactosidase fusion proteins showed a molecular mass of around 200 kDa (the truncated fusion had only 7 amino acids removed, a difference which is
undetectable by SDS-PAGE analysis), in agreement with expectations.
Immunocytochemical staining of permeabilized transfected cells with the
anti-
-galactosidase antibodies and the monoclonal antibody to tTG
gave a coinciding pattern highlighting the transfected cells, thus
confirming the immunoreactivity of the fusion proteins with their
respective antibodies and the presence of the epitope recognized by the
monoclonal antibody to tTG on the fusion proteins in particular (Fig.
5). To ensure that the
-galactosidase
activity was comparable for native
-galactosidase and
-galactosidase fusion proteins, the specific (corrected for
transfection efficiency)
-galactosidase activity expressed by the
different constructs in cell lysates was analyzed and shown to be very
similar (Table I).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Western blot analysis of fusion proteins
expressed in transiently transfected COS-7 cells. Transiently
transfected COS-7 cells were extracted by sonication in Tris-buffered
saline (containing EDTA to prevent cross-linking) and proteins were
fractionated on a 8% SDS-PAGE gel under reducing conditions and
analyzed by immunoblotting using an anti- -galactosidase antibody:
pCHKTG/ N, lane 1; pCHKTG, lane 2; pCHK,
lane 3. Lane 4 shows a cell extract from COS-7 cells that
had not been transfected. Purified -galactosidase was added to
lane 5. The migration position of the tTG- -galactosidase
fusion proteins and -galactosidase alone are in good agreement with
the expected molecular weight based on their primary structure. The
migration position of molecular weight standards is shown on the
right.
|
|

View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Immunocytochemical analysis of COS-7 cells
transiently transfected with the different fusion constructs.
Panels A and B show pCHKTG transfected cells,
panels C and D show pCHKTG/ N transfected
cells. Cells were fixed 48 h post-transfection and permeabilized
to facilitate antigen detection. tTG (A and C)
and -galactosidase (B and D) were detected
using monoclonal antibodies to the respective proteins and fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies. Cell nuclei were
stained with propidium iodide. Images are computer generated after
examination on a LEICA laser confocal microscope. The bar
represents 10 µm.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
-Galactosidase ( -Gal) activity expressed by cells transfected
with the different constructs
COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with the different vectors as
indicated, and transfection efficiency (number of -galactosidase
expressing cells) and -galactosidase activity in cell extracts were
determined 48 h post transfection from parallel cultures. The data
represents the mean ± S.E. of three separate experiments.
|
|
GTP Binding of tTG Fusion Proteins--
Further confirmation of
the structural integrity of tTG and truncated tTG when fused with
-galactosidase was obtained by their retained ability to bind GTP.
The GTP-binding site has recently been shown to be part of the
catalytic core domain of tTG but to be distinct from the active center
providing the cross-linking activity (31). Cytosol fractions of cell
extracts obtained from COS-7 cells transiently transfected with pCHK,
pCHKTG, and pCHKTG/
N were allowed to bind to GTP-agarose overnight.
Nonbound proteins were then eluted from the beads and the bound
proteins recovered from the beads by boiling in SDS sample buffer and
analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting with antibodies to
-galactosidase. As shown in Fig. 6,
the fusion proteins synthesized by cells transiently transfected with
the pCHKTG and pCHKTG/
N vectors bound to GTP-agarose, thus
confirming the GTP binding ability of tTG when part of a fusion protein
with
-galactosidase or N-terminally truncated.

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
GTP binding of
tTG- -galactosidase fusion proteins.
Cytosol fractions from COS-7 cells transiently transfected with the
pCHK, pCHKTG, and PCHKTG/ N vector were incubated with GTP-agarose.
After rinsing, bound proteins were solubilized in Laemmli sample buffer
and separated on a 8% SDS-PAGE gel under reducing conditions. After
transfer to nitrocellulose, fusion proteins were detected with
antibodies to -galactosidase. The migration position of molecular
weight standards is shown on the left.
|
|
Binding of tTG Fusion Proteins to Fibronectin in Vitro--
To
determine whether the full-length and truncated tTG fusion proteins
were able to bind to fibronectin, extracts of transfected COS-7 cells
were incubated on fibronectin-coated plastic surfaces and the binding
of the fusion proteins was assessed by determining retained
-galactosidase activity following extensive rinsing as described
under "Experimental Procedures" (Table
II). With extracts obtained from cells
transfected with the full-length tTG construct, significant
-galactosidase activity was bound on the FN-coated surface. In
contrast, with extracts obtained from cells transfected with the
construct containing the N-terminal-truncated tTG fusion protein, very
little activity was recovered on the fibronectin-coated surface. Since
-galactosidase activity in the cell extracts was comparable for the
two fusion proteins this suggests that fibronectin binding is abolished
by the introduced N-terminal deletion. This experiment confirms results
obtained with denatured proteolytic fragments of tTG in a solid phase
assay (21) and extends these findings by showing for the first time, using a cellular system, the importance of the first seven amino acids
of tTG in fibronectin binding for a close to native and therefore
physiologically relevant protein preparation.
Detection of Cell Surface-associated tTG Fusion Protein Pools in
Transiently Transfected COS-7 Cells
The externalization of the tTG fusion proteins from transiently
transfected COS-7 cells was assessed by measuring cell
surface-associated
-galactosidase activity using cells in
suspension. No
-galactosidase activity was found in the conditioned
culture medium for any of the constructs (including pCHK) in agreement
with the initial ELISA analysis of ECV304 and induced Swiss 3T3
fibroblast-conditioned cell culture media. To determine cell
surface-associated
-galactosidase activity, the cells were first
fixed to stop membrane transport mechanisms so that the substrate for
-galactosidase would not access the intracellular pool of the
enzyme.
-Galactosidase activity was assessed by photometric
measurement of the breakdown of
o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside and is
shown in Table III. pCHKTG (full-length
tTG) transfected cells express an average of 164% of the control (pCHK
expressing
-galactosidase alone) and pCHKTG/
N (truncated tTG)
transfected cells express an average of 82.7% of the control. While
the activity of the
-galactosidase and the truncated fusion
protein-expressing cells is comparable, the difference in activity of
these as compared with the full-length fusion protein-expressing cells
is statistically significant (p
0.05). The activity
expressed by the pCHK-transfected control is likely due to
o-nitrophenyl-
-D-galactopyranoside gaining access to a limited pool of intracellular
-galactosidase in damaged cells. Cells processed in this way showed that between 85 and 95% were
capable of excluding trypan blue. The higher activity measured in the
pCHKTG-transfected cells is presumably due to cell surface-associated
tTG fusion protein. This suggests that a pool of the full-length tTG is
translocated to the cell surface following synthesis. The truncated
fusion protein may be absent from the cell surface either because it is
not translocated or because it fails to bind to the cell surface
following translocation due to the deletion altering its ability to
bind fibronectin. However, the latter appears less likely since no
detectable
-galactosidase activity was present in the suspending
medium of these cells. A further possibility which we cannot exclude is
that in the pCHKTG-transfected cells a small fraction of full-length
tTG released from damaged cells becomes surface associated by binding
to the pericellular fibronectin matrix of other cells and contributes
to the observed difference. However, following trypsinization, cells
were immediately suspended in serum containing medium which is likely
to scavenge any enzyme released from damaged cells.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table III
Cell surface-associated -galactosidase activity in COS-7 cells
transfected with the different constructs
COS-7 cells were transfected with the indicated constructs and after
48 h, cells were harvested by brief trypsinization. After blocking
of further proteolysis, cells (105) were rinsed and incubated
in suspension in serum-free medium for ~30 min, prior to fixation.
-Galactosidase activity associated with fixed cells in suspension
(exposed on cell surface) was determined. Specific activity is given
with numbers in parentheses representing percentages of specific
-galactosidase activity for pCHKTG and pCHKTG/ N transfectants
assuming 100% activity for pCHK transfectants.
|
|
Detection of tTG Fusion Proteins Associated with the Extracellular
Matrix (ECM) of Transiently Transfected COS-7 Cells
A further experiment was performed to investigate the
externalization of the tTG fusion proteins in which the extracellular matrix of adherent cells was analyzed (Table
IV). In the remaining ECM after adherent
transfected COS-7 cells were removed by extraction with EDTA (to
prevent cross-linking) and deoxycholate containing buffer, the
pCHKTG-transfected culture showed 12 times the
-galactosidase activity of the pCHKTG/
N-transfected culture. The data indicates that the intact tTG fusion protein, unlike the truncated tTG fusion protein, is deposited into the ECM laid down by the cells. Again we
cannot exclude the possibility that a small fraction of full-length fusion protein released from cells upon solubilization is binding to
matrix-associated fibronectin. However, the association of a pool of
the intact tTG fusion protein with the extracellular matrix is
consistent with the immunoelectron microscopic localization of a pool
of tTG in the extracellular matrix of cells on sections of monolayers
(Fig. 2).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table IV
-Galactosidase activity found in the extracellular matrix of cells
transfected with the different constructs
COS-7 cells were transfected with the different fusion constructs as
indicated. After 48 h, the cell layer was removed by extraction
with deoxycholate (in the presence of EDTA to prevent cross-linking),
and -galactosidase activity bound to the remaining ECM structures
was determined. Numbers in parentheses represent the percentage of
-galactosidase activity for pCHKTG/ N transfectants assuming 100%
activity for the pCHKTG transfectants.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Although several reports have provided indirect evidence for an
externalization of tTG by cells and for a pericellular localization of
the enzyme through its capacity to cross-link fibronectin and other
pericellular proteins (4, 7, 10, 20), the mechanism for externalization
of tTG and other members of this protein family with an extracellular
function including factor XIII a-subunit remains unclear (3). Despite
the abundance of tTG in the extracellular matrix in tissues (8, 32-34)
and that deposited by cultured cells (6, 7, 20, 35, 36), our attempts
to detect tTG in culture supernatants of cells expressing the enzyme at
high level either constitutively, endothelial cells (ECV304), or after induction from an introduced expression construct, stably transfected Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, indicated its absence from the conditioned culture media. These initial experiments together with our previous studies (20) demonstrating tTG activity at the cell surface and
cross-linking of pericellular fibronectin indicated that in these cells
tTG remained tightly bound to the cell surface after externalization.
The immunocytochemical analysis of the cells using laser scanning
confocal microscopy and immunogold electron microscopy revealed that
tTG is found in clusters with FN at the cell surface (Figs. 1 and 2).
To our knowledge, this is the first report showing the association of
the two proteins in situ at the ultrastructural level.
Detection of extracellular tTG protein for ultrastructural analysis was
made possible by addition of the primary antibody to live cells in
culture which eliminates the well known problem of masking of the
epitope in this compartment by fixation procedures (33). The punctate
pattern of immunostaining at the cell surface, revealed by confocal
microscopy, for both tTG and FN during the re-establishment of the
pericellular matrix following trypsinization is likely to represent
matrix assembly sites of FN (22) and suggest that tTG might play a role
in FN fibril formation. This observation is consistent with an earlier study that suggested the association of tTG with distinct domains of
the plasma membrane in hepatocytes that contain FN as determined from
isolation of membrane-bound protein complexes (37). These results are
also consistent with a recent study on endothelial cell monolayers
demonstrating that cell surface-associated transglutaminase activity in
polarized cells is restricted to the basolateral surface (7) where an
extracellular matrix is laid down. This suggests that externalization
of tTG may be linked to the deposition and assembly of extracellular
matrices where close association of the enzyme with one or more matrix
proteins e.g. fibronectin, is an essential part of the
externalization mechanism.
The apparent association between tTG and FN at the cell surface
therefore, raised the question whether the interaction between the two
proteins was playing a role in the cell surface localization of tTG. To
address this question, we used fusion proteins between tTG and the
reporter enzyme
-galactosidase (Fig. 3) for ease of detection of the
latter in a quantitative manner. The fusion of
-galactosidase to the
C terminus of tTG did not interfere with the interaction of tTG and FN
(Table II), consistent with the expectations from data suggesting that
the N terminus of tTG mediates fibronectin binding (21). A high
affinity binding site for tTG on fibronectin has been localized to a
segment constituting the third to fifth type I domain using rotary
shadowing electron microscopy (11), but the nature of the interaction
of the fibronectin type I repeats with the N-terminal
-sandwich
domain of tTG is not known. Using immobilized SDS-denatured tTG
proteolytic fragments in overlay assays, Lorand and co-workers (21)
identified the first 7 amino acids of tTG as the FN-binding site
located in the N-terminal domain. To further characterize the role of
this linear peptide sequence of tTG in the interaction between the two
proteins under more physiological conditions, a truncated fusion
protein was generated lacking the first 7 N-terminal amino acids of
tTG. For this purpose, the tTG cDNA was subcloned into the
expression vector pCHK such that an additional 3 amino acids,
Met-Val-Pro, were generated at the N terminus of tTG in both constructs
(Fig. 3). This N-terminal extension of tTG is unlikely to affect
protein folding of wild-type tTG as suggested by the N-terminal
heterogeneity seen among different transglutaminase gene products (3).
However, the introduction of these amino acids in the truncated version of tTG reconstitutes a Val in position 7 that is believed to be important for proper folding of the
-sheet of the N-terminal domain
(38). Similar to Ala in wild-type tTG, a Val in the penultimate position is known to have a stabilizing effect on the translated polypeptide. tTG as well as factor XIII a-subunit are known to be N
terminally processed by removal of the terminal Met and acetylation of
the penultimate residue (18, 39). Ala and Ser found in this position in
wild-type tTG and factor XIII a-subunit, respectively, unlike Val in
the generated fusion proteins, favor co-translational N-acetylation (40). While we have not assessed whether or
not the fusion proteins are N-acetylated, it has previously
been shown that the catalytic activity of tTG is not altered by the
absence of N-acetylation (by determining kinetic constants
for cross-linking reaction) (41). Despite the fact that we demonstrate
the expected dual functionality of the fusion proteins and conservation
of epitopes recognized by monoclonal antibodies for both proteins (Figs. 4-6, Table I), we cannot completely rule out that the
introduced N-terminal truncation leads to an alteration in the folding
of the N-terminal
-sandwich domain of tTG resulting in
conformational changes in the fibronectin-binding site rather than its
deletion per se. Our results with these fusion proteins
demonstrate not only that the presence of these 7 amino acids is
essential for binding of tTG to FN under physiological conditions
(Table II) but also for the association of tTG with the cell surface
and ultimately the extracellular matrix of transiently transfected COS-7 cells (Tables III and IV).
We cannot exclude that release of tTG from a small number of damaged or
dying cells which are always present in cultures contributed to the
pool of the enzyme found at the cell surface in the different experiments reported herein. However, it is likely that both
physiologically and in our cell systems, tTG is externalized through a
more efficient mechanism than just relying on its release from dying
neighboring cells. Several alternative mechanisms for export of
proteins synthesized in the cytosolic compartment have been described
and involves processes ranging from passive diffusion through
stress-induced transient ruptures in the plasma membrane to active
transport across the membrane through specialized pores in the plasma
membrane, e.g. formed by members of the multidrug resistance
protein family (42-45). Typically, proteins belonging to this class
contain specific post-translational modifications which presumably
constitute signals for export or facilitate membrane association.
N-Acylation may play a role in sequestration of tTG to the
membrane and thus have an impact on its externalization. In fact,
preliminary data suggests the presence of a fatty acid anchor on a
fraction of the cellular tTG pool (46) in analogy to other
transglutaminases (47, 48). This fraction of tTG may well correspond to
the membrane-associated fraction of tTG in the cell (49, 50),
translocate across the plasma membrane by a mechanism that is not
understood, and ultimately through binding to fibronectin constitute
the cell surface-associated tTG activity forming cross-linked complexes
containing fibronectin. It is interesting in this regard that with the
N terminally truncated tTG, the pool of enzyme which was absent from
the cell surface could not be detected in the culture supernatants.
This suggests that the N-terminal domain of tTG which comprises the
fibronectin-binding site is not only required for association of the
enzyme with the cell surface, but apparently also constitutes a
discriminatory signal for efficient export of the enzyme into the
extracellular environment.
While the mechanism for the release of tTG into the extracellular
compartment remains to be elucidated, our results demonstrate that the
interaction of tTG with fibronectin is crucial for its presence at the
cell surface. Several lines of evidence suggest that cell
surface-associated tTG plays a role in cell-substratum interaction.
Both, culturing of cells in the presence of nonpeptidyl inactivators
specific for transglutaminases as well as down-regulation of tTG
synthesis by stable transfection of cells with a tTG antisense construct rendered the cells susceptible to detachment from the substratum (7, 23). Conversely, overexpression of tTG in Balb-c 3T3
fibroblasts increased cell spreading and adhesion of the cells to the
substratum (24). Further support for a direct link between the
interaction of tTG with FN and cell adhesion comes from a recent study
where a series of FN variants carrying point mutations have been
generated. The attachment and spreading of fibroblasts on fibrin clots
formed with mutant FN lacking the major cross-linking site for factor
XIII was significantly reduced as compared with clots formed with
wild-type FN (25). Since the major amine acceptor sites for
cross-linking of FN by factor XIII and tTG are identical (51), this
suggests that the effect of tTG on cell attachment and spreading is
likely to be mediated by cross-linking of FN which is consistent with
the results obtained with transglutaminase inhibitors. However, this is
not necessarily obvious since high affinity binding sites for tTG on
substrate proteins including fibronectin have been shown to be distinct from the cross-linking sites (11, 12) and since band 4.2, a member of
this protein family without catalytic activity, has a structural role
based on protein-protein interactions.
In conclusion, our results show that binding of tTG to fibronectin is
mediated by its N-terminal
-sandwich domain and that this
interaction is crucial to its presence at the cell surface and for
association with the pericellular matrix of cells. Taken together with
the data in the literature, our results suggest that tTG through its
association and cross-linking of the pericellular matrix of cells, is
an important contributing factor to cell adhesion. Moreover they also
indicate that this function is mediated in the first instance by the
interaction of the enzyme with cell surface-associated fibronectin.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We express our gratitude to Dr. Menissier de
Murcia for the kind gift of the plasmid pCHK. We also thank Dr. C. Scholfield for invaluable help with the use of the confocal microscope.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by the Samuel Noble
Foundation, Ardmore, OK, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences
Research Council (EPSRC).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Life
Sciences, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Lane, Nottingham NG11
8NS, UK. Tel.: 01159-486-6670; Fax: 01159-486-6636; E-mail: martin.griffin@ntu.ac.uk.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
tTG, tissue
transglutaminase;
DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
ECM, extracellular matrix;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis;
FN, fibronectin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Lorand, L.,
and Conrad, S. M.
(1984)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
58,
9-35[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Greenberg, C. S.,
Birckbichler, P. J.,
and Rice, R. H.
(1991)
FASEB J.
5,
3071-3077[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Aeschlimann, D.,
and Paulsson, M.
(1994)
Thromb. Haemostasis
71,
402-415[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 4.
|
Barsigian, C.,
Stern, A. M.,
and Martinez, J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22501-22509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Aeschlimann, D.,
Kaupp, O.,
and Paulsson, M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
881-892[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 6.
|
Kleman, J. P.,
Aeschlimann, D.,
Paulsson, M.,
and van der Rest, M.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
13768-13775[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Martinez, J.,
Chapulowicz, D. G.,
Roush, R. K.,
Sheth, A.,
and Barsigian, C.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
2538-2545[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Aeschlimann, D.,
and Paulsson, M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
15308-15317[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Raghunath, M.,
Hopfner, B.,
Aeschlimann, D.,
Luthi, U.,
Meuli, M.,
Altermatt, S.,
Gobet, R.,
Brucker-Tuderman, L.,
and Steinmann, B.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
98,
1174-1184[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Upchurch, H. F.,
Conway, E.,
Patterson, M. K., Jr.,
and Maxwell, M. D.
(1991)
J. Cell Physiol.
149,
375-382[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
LeMosy, E. K.,
Erickson, H. P.,
Beyer, W. F.,
Radek, J. T., Jr.,
Jeong, J. M.,
Murthy, S. N.,
and Lorand, L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
7880-7885[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Hohenadl, C.,
Mann, K.,
Mayer, U.,
Timpl, R.,
Paulsson, M.,
and Aeschlimann, D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23415-23420[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 13.
|
Mian, S.,
El Alaoui, S.,
Lawry, J.,
Gentile, V.,
Davies, P. J. A.,
and Griffin, M.
(1995)
FEBS letters
370,
27-31[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Achyuthan, K. E.,
and Greenberg, C. S.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
1901-1906[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Smethurst, P. A.,
and Griffin, M.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
313,
803-808
|
| 16.
|
Johnson, T. S.,
Griffin, M.,
Thomas, G. L.,
Skill, N. J.,
Cox, A.,
Yang, B.,
Nicholas, B.,
Birckbichler, P. J.,
Muchaneto-Kubara, C.,
and El Nahas, A. M.
(1997)
J. Clin. Invest.
99,
2950-2960[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Ikura, K.,
Nasu, T.,
Yokota, H.,
Tsuchiya, Y.,
Sasaki, R.,
and Chiba, H.
(1988)
Biochemistry.
27,
2898-2905[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Ikura, K.,
Yokota, H.,
Sasaki, R.,
and Chiba, H.
(1989)
Biochemistry.
28,
2344-2348[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 19.
|
Ichinose, A.,
Bottenus, R. E.,
and Davie, E. W.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
13411-13414[Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Verderio, E.,
Nicholas, B.,
Gross, S.,
and Griffin, M.
(1998)
Exp. Cell Res.
239,
119-138[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Jeong, J. M.,
Murthy, S. N. P.,
Radek, J. T.,
and Lorand, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5654-5658[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Zhang, Q.,
and Mosher, D. F.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
33284-33292[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Jones, R. A.,
Nicholas, B.,
Mian, S.,
Davies, P. J. A.,
and Griffin, M.
(1997)
J. Cell Sci.
110,
2461-2472[Abstract]
|
| 24.
|
Gentile, V.,
Thomazy, V.,
Piacentini, M.,
Fesus, L.,
and Davies, P. J. A.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
463-474[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Corbett, S. A.,
Lee, L.,
Wilson, C. L.,
and Schwarzbauer, J. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24999-25005[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Achyuthan, K. E.,
Goodell, R. J.,
Kennedye, J. R.,
Lee, K. N.,
Henley, A.,
Stiefer, J. R.,
and Birckbichler, P. J.
(1995)
J. Immun. Met.
180,
69-79
|
| 27.
|
Birckbichler, P.,
Upchurch, H. F.,
Patterson, M. K.,
and Conway, E.
(1985)
Hybridoma
4,
179-186[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Shreiber, V.,
De Murcia, G.,
and Menissier de Murcia, J.
(1994)
Gene (Amst.)
150,
411-412[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Ausubel, F. A., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K.
(eds)
(1990)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, Greene Publishing & Wiley-Interscience, New York
|
| 30.
|
Burridge, K.,
Turner, C. E.,
and Romer, L. N.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
893-903[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Iismaa, S. E.,
Chung, L.,
Wu, M. J.,
Teller, D. C.,
Yee, V. C.,
and Graham, R. M.
(1997)
Biochemistry
36,
11655-11664[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 32.
|
Schittny, J. C.,
Paulsson, M.,
Vallan, C.,
Burri, P. H.,
Kedei, N.,
and Aeschlimann, D.
(1997)
Am. J. Resp. Cell Mol. Biol.
17,
334-343[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Aeschlimann, D.,
Wetterwald, A.,
Fleisch, H.,
and Paulsson, M.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
1461-1470[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
| Johnson, T. S., Skill, N. J., El Nahas, A. M., Oldroyd,
S. D., Thomas, G. L., Douthwaite, J. A., Haylor, J. L., and Griffin, M. (1999) J. Am. Soc. Neph., in
press
|