J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 43, 30738-30746, October 22, 1999
Divergent Signaling Pathways Link Focal Adhesion Kinase to
Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Cascades
EVIDENCE FOR A ROLE OF PAXILLIN IN c-Jun
NH2-TERMINAL KINASE ACTIVATION*
Tadashi
Igishi
,
Shigetomo
Fukuhara
,
Vyomesh
Patel
,
Ben-Zion
Katz§,
Kenneth M.
Yamada§, and
J. Silvio
Gutkind
¶
From the
Oral and Pharyngeal Cancer Branch and
§ Craniofacial Developmental Biology and Regeneration
Branch, NIDCR, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4330
 |
ABSTRACT |
Stimulation of a number of cell surface
receptors, including integrins and G protein-coupled receptors, results
in the activation of a non-receptor tyrosine kinase known as focal
adhesion kinase (FAK). In turn, this kinase is believed to play a
critical role in signaling to intracellular kinase cascades controlling
gene expression such as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), by a yet poorly defined mechanism. Furthermore, whether this tyrosine kinase also mediates the activation of other mitogen-activated protein
kinase family members, such as c-Jun NH2-terminal
kinases (JNKs), is still unclear. We show here that the activation of FAK by anchoring to the cell membrane is itself sufficient to stimulate
potently both ERK and JNK. These effects were found to be
phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-independent, as FAK effectively stimulated Akt, and wortmannin suppressed Akt but not ERK or JNK activation. As previously reported by others, activation of ERK correlated with the ability of FAK to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc. Surprisingly, however, stimulation of JNK was not dependent on
the kinase activity of FAK or on the ability to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK substrates. Instead, we provide evidence that
FAK may stimulate JNK through a novel pathway involving the recruitment
of paxillin to the plasma membrane and the subsequent activation of a
biochemical route dependent on small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Stimulation of a variety of cell surface receptors causes the
rapid elevation of the enzymatic activity of a family of closely related proline-directed serine-threonine protein kinases, known as
mitogen-activated protein kinases
(MAPKs)1 (1). The function of
MAPKs is to convert extracellular stimuli to intracellular signals,
which, in turn, control the expression of genes that are essential for
many cellular processes, including cell growth and differentiation (2).
At present, 10 mammalian MAPKs have been identified, which can be
broadly divided into three families: extracellular
signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), c-Jun NH2-terminal
kinases (JNKs), also termed
stress-activated protein
kinases (SAPK), and p38 (also known as CSBP, RK, and
SAPK2a) (3). ERKs phosphorylate and regulate the activity of certain enzymes, including phospholipase A2, and nuclear proteins,
such as the ternary complex factor p62TCF or Elk-1 (4). The
latter represents a critical event in controlling the expression of
several genes, including c-fos (5). In the case of JNKs,
they have being shown to phosphorylate the transactivating domain of
c-Jun and ATF2 (6), thereby increasing their transcriptional activity.
A prototypical model of the pathway linking cell surface receptors to
MAPKs of the ERK family has been proposed from studies on the tyrosine
kinase class of growth factor receptors (7). For example, binding of
epidermal growth factor to its cognate tyrosine-kinase receptor leads
to the rapid phosphorylation of the receptor itself on tyrosine
residues, which provides binding sites for the adaptor molecules Shc
and Grb2, thus resulting in the recruitment to the plasma membrane of
the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Sos and the activation of Ras
(reviewed in Ref. 7). GTP-bound forms of Ras then recruit and activate
the serine-threonine kinase Raf, leading to the activation of a kinase
cascade composed of Raf, MEKs, and ERKs (1). Tyrosine kinases have been
also shown to play an important role in signaling from G
protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and integrins to ERKs. For GPCRs,
they include tyrosine kinases of the Src family (8, 9), Syk and Btk
(10, 11), and the recently identified Pyk2 (12), as well as the engagement of tyrosine kinases of the receptor class (13). Similarly, focal adhesion kinase (FAK)-Src complexes also play an important role
in mediating the signal from integrins to ERKs through the recruitment
of Grb2 and Shc (14), in addition to the proposed association of
certain integrins with Shc (15).
In contrast, the mechanism of activation of JNKs is still poorly
understood. JNKs were shown to be activated by a variety of stimuli
distinct from those that elevate the enzymatic activity of ERKs,
including protein synthesis inhibitors, heat shock, changes in
osmolarity, and ultraviolet irradiation (6, 16). JNKs can be also
activated by agents acting on cell surface receptors, such as tumor
necrosis factor-
, IL-1, or epidermal growth factor (16).
Furthermore, we have recently shown that JNK activity can be elevated
upon stimulation of GPCRs (17, 18) and integrin aggregation (19). In
these cases, the involvement of tyrosine kinases in the signaling
pathway from GPCR and integrins to JNK is less clear. One group has
provided evidence that Pyk2 (also known as CAK
, RAFTK, and CADTK)
(12, 20), a new member of the FAK family of tyrosine kinases with
restricted tissue distribution, may play a role relaying signals from
GPCR to JNK. Conversely, it has been established that FAK is activated
by cell binding to extracellular matrix components such as fibronectin
(21) and by several agonists acting on GPCRs (22-25).
Based on these observations, it can be hypothesized that FAK may
participate in a biochemical route linking cell surface receptors to
MAPK cascades. Here, we explored the ability of FAK to stimulate signaling events leading to the activation of ERK and JNK, using the
expression of an activated form of FAK as an experimental approach.
Interestingly, expression of an activated FAK upon targeting this
molecule to the cell membrane was sufficient to stimulate potently ERK
and JNK activity. The activation of ERK correlated with the ability of
FAK to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc. In contrast, however,
stimulation of JNK was not dependent on the kinase activity of FAK, or
on the ability to induce tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK substrates or
to activate PI3K. Instead, we show that recruitment of paxillin to the
plasma membrane is sufficient to stimulate a biochemical route
depending on small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family, thereby
providing a likely mechanism by which FAK can stimulate JNK.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Reagents--
Lysophosphatidic acid and anisomycin were obtained
from Sigma. Human plasma fibronectin and poly-D-lysine were
purchased from Roche Molecular Biochemicals.
Cell Lines and Transfection--
Human kidney 293T cells were
maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with
10% fetal bovine serum. Tissue culture plates were treated with
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 20 µg/ml
poly-D-lysine for 15 min before seeding the cells, to
prevent them from detaching from the plates when in serum-free
conditions. For the stimulation by fibronectin, cells were seeded on
the plates coated with human plasma fibronectin (10 µg/ml in PBS).
Cells were serum starved for 3 h in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium containing 10 mM HEPES before lysis for kinase
assays or analyses of tyrosine phosphorylation. Cells were transfected
by the calcium-phosphate precipitation method adjusting total amount of
DNA to 5-10 µg/plate with the appropriate vector control.
DNA Constructs--
Plasmids expressing epitope-tagged ERK, JNK,
and Shc (pcDNA3 HA-ERK2, pcDNA3 HA-JNK1, and pcDNA3 HA-Shc,
respectively) and the dominant negative mutants of the small
GTP-binding proteins RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 have been described
(26-28). For expression of wild type and membrane-targeted forms of
FAK, the cDNA was subcloned into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen) and pCEFL
myr (a modified pcDNA3 expression plasmid encoding the
NH2-terminal 21 amino acids of chicken c-Src; (27),
respectively, which includes the c-Src NH2-terminal
myristoylation signal (pcDNA3 FAK and pCEFL myr-FAK, respectively).
Point mutants of FAK were obtained by replacing a lysine in position
454 by arginine (designated FAK KR) and tyrosine in position 925 by
phenylalanine (designated FAK YF), using polymerase chain
reaction-directed mutagenesis. The mutated cDNAs were subcloned into pCEFL myr between BamHI and NotI sites
(pCEFL myr-FAK KR and pCEFL myr-FAK YF, respectively). The expression
vector for extracellular and transmembrane domains of interleukin-2
receptor
(pCMV IL2R) have been described (29). For expression of
membrane-targeted form of paxillin, cDNA of human paxillin (a
generous gift from Ken Nagata and Kazue Matsumoto) was subcloned in
frame into pCMV IL2R, between HindIII and XbaI
sites (pCMV IL2R-paxillin). The expression vector for wild type
paxillin, pcDNA3 paxillin, was constructed by subcloning the
corresponding cDNA between HindIII and XbaI
sites. pCEFL HA-paxillin was obtained by subcloning the coding region
for paxillin between BglII and EcoRI sites in
frame with the sequence for HA. The cDNA for
p130cas was kindly provided by Hisamaru Hirai.
pCEFL HA-p130cas and pCEFL
myr-p130cas were obtained by subcloning between
BglII, or BamHI and EcoRI sites in
frame with the sequence for HA or myr, respectively. The epitope-tagged
Akt (pCEFL HA-Akt) has been recently described (30).
Kinase Assays--
ERK kinase activity in cells transfected with
an epitope-tagged ERK2 (HA-ERK) was determined as described previously,
using myelin basic protein (Sigma) as a substrate (26). JNK activity in
cells transfected with an epitope-tagged JNK1 (HA-JNK) was determined
as described previously (27), using purified, bacterially expressed
glutathione S-transferase-ATF2 (96) fusion protein as a
substrate. Akt/PKB activity in 293T cells transfected with an expression vector for an epitope-tagged Akt (pCEFL HA-Akt) was determined as described (30), using histone H2B (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) as substrate. Samples were analyzed by SDS-gel
electrophoresis on 12% acrylamide gels for ERK and JNK, and 15%
acrylamide gel for Akt assay. Autoradiography was performed with the
aid of an intensifying screen. Radioactivity of phosphorylated
substrates were quantified with the use of PhosphorImager (Molecular
Dynamics). Parallel lysates (50 µg of protein) of cells transfected
with the appropriate expression plasmids were processed for Western blot analysis with anti-HA (BAbCO) to confirm the expression levels.
Cellular Fractionation--
Cells were washed twice with PBS,
collected by scraping in ice-cold hypotonic buffer (10 mM
HEPES, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml aprotinin and
leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and
homogenized by passing 20 times through a 22-gauge needle. Unbroken
cells and nuclei were removed by centrifugation at 1000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, and supernatants were adjusted to
150 mM NaCl and centrifuged at 14,000 × g
for 20 min at 4 °C. The resulting supernatants and pellets,
cytosolic and crude membrane fractions, respectively, were suspended in
lysis buffer at a final concentration of 1 mg of total cellular
protein/ml.
Cell Lysis, Immunoprecipitation, and Western Blot--
Cells
were lysed in a modified radioimmune precipitation buffer (1% Triton
X-100, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 100 mM NaCl,
10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 2 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml
aprotinin and leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 10 mM NaF, 40 mM
-glycerophosphate, and 2 mM
Na3VO4), and insoluble material was removed by
centrifugation. For co-immunoprecipitation, the same lysis buffer
without sodium deoxycholate and SDS was used. Lysates containing
approximately 50 µg of total cellular protein or immunoprecipitates
with the indicated antibodies were analyzed by Western blotting after
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence detection (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) using goat
anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit IgGs coupled to horseradish peroxidase
as a secondary antibody (Cappel). Membranes were stripped of bound
antibodies by incubation in 70 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1%
SDS, 150 mM
-mercaptoethanol at 50 °C for 30 min.
Prior to reprobing with different primary antibody, stripped membranes
were washed extensively in TN buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl,
pH7.5, 100 mM NaCl) and placed in blocking buffer (TN containing 4% bovine serum albumin). Antibodies against FAK (C20) and
Src (N16) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Anti-paxillin and p130cas antibodies were obtained from
Transduction Laboratories. Monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine (4G10) was
purchased from Upstate Biotechnology.
Flow Cytometry--
Transfected 293T cells were harvested with 5 mM EDTA, washed in PBS and PBS containing 3% BSA,
respectively, prior to incubation with 100 µl of fluorescein
isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-CD25 (Serotec), at 10 µg/ml, for 60 min on ice. After washes in PBS containing 1% BSA and PBS, the cells
were fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol and resuspended in PBS containing
propidium iodide (50 µg/ml) and RNase A (1 µg/ml). Fluorescence of
the cells was analyzed on a Becton FACScan, using the Cell Quest
software (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA).
Cell Attachment Assay--
293T cells were transfected with the
indicated expression plasmids together with pcDNAIII-
gal, a
plasmid expressing the enzyme
-galactosidase. After 2 days in
culture, cells were detached by pipetting, washed with Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 0.5% BSA, and resuspended in the
same medium. After incubation for 60 min at 37 °C, cells were plated
onto fibronectin-coated dishes or lysed in reporter lysis buffer
(Promega) to determine the total
-galactosidase activity in the
cellular sample. Plated cells were allowed to attach at 37 °C and,
at different times, washed twice with PBS, lysed, and assayed for
-galactosidase activity. Cell attachment was assessed by the
-galactosidase activity in the cells attached relative to the
-galactosidase activity present in each total cellular sample. Under
these conditions, all control cells attach in 30 min, and approximately
50% of the cells attach in 15 min (data not shown). Thus, we chose a
15-min time point for examining the effect of the expressed molecules in the ability of 293T to attach to fibronectin-coated plates.
Cell Morphology--
293T cells were plated in 24-well plates
coated with fibronectin, and transfected with the indicated expression
plasmids together with pCEFL-GFP, a plasmid expressing green
fluorescence protein (GFP). After 2 days, cells were visualized using a
phase contrast microscopy, and transfected cells were identified by the
expression of GFP using fluorescent microscope.
 |
RESULTS |
Engagement of integrins and stimulation of GPCRs lead to the
activation of FAK and of many intracellular signaling pathways, including those controlling the activity of members of the MAPK superfamily of serine-threonine kinases (19, 31). Furthermore, recent
reports suggest that FAK can participate in biochemical routes
resulting in increased ERK activity (32). As an experimental approach
to investigate whether FAK can alone enhance the activity of MAPKs, we
overexpressed in 293T cells a wild type and a membrane-targeted form
FAK (myr-FAK). The latter was constructed by fusing the amino-terminal myristoylation signal from c-Src with FAK (27), a modification that has
been shown to render FAK constitutively active (33). As seen in Fig.
1A, similar levels of the two
proteins were observed in 293T cells after transfection, as judged by
Western blot analysis with an antibody to FAK. Endogenous FAK was
detected after prolonged exposure (data not shown) or after
immunoprecipitation with a FAK-specific antibody (Fig. 1A,
right panel). However, the mobility of myr-FAK in
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was slower, most likely due to
the addition of the amino-terminal myristoylation signal from c-Src, as
demonstrated by immunoblotting with an anti-Src antibody. As expected,
subcellular fractionation revealed that myr-FAK accumulates in the
membrane-containing cellular compartment (Fig. 1B), in
contrast to FAK, which is exclusively cytosolic. Interestingly, the
myristoylated form of FAK was found to be heavily tyrosine-phosphorylated (Fig. 1A, right
panel), further supporting that the membrane-targeted form
of FAK is constitutively active (33).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of a myristoylated
form of FAK (myr-FAK) and its localization to membrane-containing
fractions. A, 293T cells were transfected with 2 µg/plate of the indicated plasmids DNA. Cell lysates containing 50 µg of protein (left panel) or anti-FAK
immunoprecipitates (right panel) were subjected to Western
blot (WB) analysis with the indicated antibodies. Tyrosine
phosphorylation of FAK was determined in the anti-FAK
immunoprecipitates (IP) using anti-phosphotyrosine
(PY) antibodies. Membranes were stripped and re-blotted with
anti-FAK antibodies. B, 293T cells were transfected with 0.5 µg/plate of empty vector (control) or expression plasmids
for FAK (FAK) and myr-FAK (myr-FAK), and
fractionated into cytosolic (c) and membrane (m)
fractions as described under "Materials and Methods." Soluble
proteins present in the total lysates (t) or each cellular
fraction were subjected to Western blot (WB) analysis with
anti-FAK antibody, as indicated.
|
|
We next asked whether the membrane-anchored form of FAK could activate
biochemical routes enhancing the activity of an epitope-tagged form of
ERK2 (HA-ERK) and JNK1 (HA-JNK) when transiently expressed in 293T
cells. As shown in Fig. 2, overexpression
of FAK had only a limited effect on ERK and JNK activity, respectively,
but in contrast, expression of myr-FAK potently stimulated the
phosphorylating activity of the HA-ERK and HA-JNK. These results
indicate that the recruitment of FAK to the plasma membrane is
sufficient to evoke downstream signaling event(s), including those
leading to ERK and JNK activation. These findings prompted us to
explore further the nature of the signaling pathway connecting FAK to ERK and JNK.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Activation of MAPK and JNK by a
membrane-targeted form of FAK. A, 293T cells were
co-transfected with pcDNA3 HA-ERK2 or pcDNA3 HA-JNK1 (2 µg/plate) together with either pcDNA3 vector (control) or
expression vectors carrying cDNAs for FAK or myr-FAK (3 µg/plate
in each case). Kinase reactions were performed using anti-HA
immunoprecipitates from the corresponding cellular lysates as described
under "Materials and Methods." Labeled substrates for each kinase
are indicated. Data shown are from a representative experiment for each
assay. Western blot analysis was performed with anti-HA antibodies
using total cell lysate to confirm similar expression levels of HA-ERK
or HA-JNK. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of three to five
independent experiments, expressed as -fold increase with respect to
vector-transfected cells (control).
|
|
Recent data have shown a role for PI3K in signaling ERK and JNK
activation in a number of cellular systems (28, 34). Furthermore, GPCR
activation and cell attachment to extracellular matrix enhances PI3K
activity, resulting in Akt activation (30, 35, 36). Thus, as PI3K is
reported to bind FAK (37), it is reasonable to postulate that
activation of FAK by integrins and GPCRs may up-regulate PI3K activity,
which in turn might mediate the activation of ERK and JNK. To address
this possibility, we asked whether the constitutively active form of
FAK could stimulate Akt activity, whose enzymatic activity is enhanced
in response to PI3K activation (38). As demonstrated in Fig.
3, expression of myr-FAK potently stimulated the histone kinase activity of a co-expressed epitope-tagged Akt (HA-Akt), and this activation was abolished by pretreatment of
cells with increasing concentrations (25-100 nM) of a PI3K blocker, wortmannin (39). In contrast, however, treatment with wortmannin demonstrated no effect on the ability of myr-FAK to stimulate ERK and JNK (Fig. 3). Taken together, these data suggest that
FAK can directly signal Akt activation, likely through PI3K. However,
PI3Ks appear not to be involved in the biochemical route(s) linking FAK
to ERK and JNK in this cellular system.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Activation of Akt, ERK, and JNK by myr-FAK:
effect of wortmannin. 293T cells were co-transfected either with
pCEFL HA-Akt, pcDNA3 HA-ERK2, or pcDNA3 HA-JNK1 (2 µg/plate
in each case) and with pcDNA3 vector (control) or expression
vectors carrying cDNA for myr-FAK (3 µg/plate in each case).
Transfected cells were treated for 60 min prior to lysis with the
indicated concentrations of wortmannin or Me2SO (0.1%) as
the control. Cell lysates were processed as described under
"Materials and Methods" for each kinase assay. Western blot
analysis was performed with anti-HA antibodies using total cell lysate
to confirm similar expression levels of HA-Akt. Identical results were
observed in three independent experiments. Data shown are from a
representative experiment for Akt, ERK, and JNK assays.
|
|
The tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc is proposed to be a downstream
event of FAK, leading to ERK activation (32). In addition, two cellular
proteins, paxillin and p130cas, are direct
substrates of FAK, although the functional consequences of paxillin and
p130cas tyrosine phosphorylation are still not
fully understood (40, 41). Thus, we next explored whether these
molecules participate in JNK and ERK activation by FAK. We initially
engineered epitope-tagged forms of Shc, paxillin, and
p130cas (HA-Shc, HA-paxillin, and
HA-p130cas, respectively) and confirmed their
expression in total lysates and anti-HA immunoprecipitates from
transfected 293T cells (Fig. 4A and data not shown). We
next examined the status of tyrosine phosphorylation of these molecules
when co-transfected with a plasmid control, or together with wild type
or myr-FAK. As seen in Fig. 4B, overexpression of wild type
FAK was sufficient to cause the accumulation of tyrosine-phosphorylated
species of paxillin and p130cas, which became
more prominent when each molecule was co-expressed with myr-FAK. By
contrast, Shc was only poorly tyrosine-phosphorylated when co-expressed
with wild type FAK, but myr-FAK induced a dramatic increase in the
level of Shc phosphorylation detectable by anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (Fig. 4B). Thus, the ability to induce the
tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc, but not of paxillin and
p130cas, appears to correlate with ERK and JNK
activation.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
The effects of overexpression of FAK and
expression of the membrane-targeted form of FAK on the tyrosine
phosphorylation of paxillin, p130cas, and Shc.
A, lysates containing 50 µg of protein or anti-HA
immunoprecipitates from 293T cells transfected with the indicated DNAs
were subjected to Western blot (WB) analysis with the
indicated antibodies. B, expression vectors for FAK or
myr-FAK were co-transfected into 293T cells with the indicated
expression plasmids. Cells were lysed, and tyrosine phosphorylation was
determined in the anti-HA immunoprecipitates (IP) using
anti-phosphotyrosine (PY) antibodies. Membranes were
subsequently stripped and re-blotted with anti-HA antibody to estimate
immunoprecipitated protein levels. Identical results were obtained in
three independent experiments.
|
|
To analyze further whether the tyrosine kinase activity of FAK
contributes to its ability to induce the activation of these MAPKs, we
generated a kinase-deficient mutant of myr-FAK, by replacing a critical
lysine residue in position 454 for arginine (designated myr-FAK KR). In
addition, considering the possibility that the binding of Grb2 to FAK
may participate in FAK-induced activation of MAPKs, we generated an
additional mutant of myr-FAK, replacing tyrosine 925, the Grb2 binding
site (42), by phenylalanine (designated myr-FAK YF). The former is
expected to encode a kinase-inactive form of FAK, and the latter would
be expected to have lost the ability to bind Grb2 (42).
When transfected into 293T cells, all myr-FAK mutants were expressed at
similar levels, as judged by Western blot analysis with anti-Src
antibody (Fig. 5A, where wild
type myr-FAK is designated as myr-FAK WT for clarity).
However, as expected, the level of tyrosine phosphorylation of myr-FAK
KR was significantly reduced when compared with that of wild type
myr-FAK and myr-FAK YF (Fig. 5A). Under these experimental
conditions, myr-FAK YF retained the ability to phosphorylate paxillin,
p130cas and Shc to an extent similar to that of
wild type myr-FAK. However, myr-FAK KR failed to phosphorylate
HA-paxillin and Shc, although it caused a weak increase in the tyrosine
phosphorylation of HA-p130cas by a still unclear
mechanism. We next explored the effects of these mutated forms of
myr-FAK on ERK and JNK activity (Fig. 5C). Whereas myr-FAK
YF stimulated ERK activity to a degree comparable to that observed for
wild type myr-FAK, myr-FAK KR failed to activate ERK. These data
provide further support to the proposed function of the tyrosine kinase
activity of FAK in signaling ERK activation (32). In contrast, to our
surprise, all myr-FAK proteins potently stimulated JNK to a very
similar extent. These results suggested that the recruitment of FAK to
the plasma membrane, rather than its catalytic activity, might be the
critical factor determining its ability to stimulate JNK
activation.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Mutated forms of myr-FAK display distinct
ability to phosphorylate paxillin, p130cas, and Shc, and to
activate ERK and JNK. A, lysates containing 50 µg of
cellular proteins or anti-FAK immunoprecipitates from 293T cells
transfected with the indicated DNAs (2 µg/plate) were subjected to
Western blot (WB) analysis with the antibodies indicated.
B, expression vectors for the indicated forms of myr-FAK
were co-transfected into 293T cells with the indicated expression
vector DNAs. Cells were lysed, and tyrosine phosphorylation was
determined in the anti-HA immunoprecipitates (IP) using
anti-phosphotyrosine (PY) antibodies. Membranes were
stripped and re-blotted (WB) with anti-HA (lower panels of each set). Identical results were obtained in
three independent experiments. C, 293T cells were
co-transfected with pcDNA3 HA-ERK2 or pcDNA3 HA-JNK1 (2 µg/plate) and pcDNA3 vector (control) or expression vectors
carrying cDNAs for the indicated myr-FAK construct (3 µg/plate in
each case). Kinase reactions were performed in anti-HA
immunoprecipitates from the corresponding cellular lysates. Labeled
substrates for each kinase assay are indicated. Data shown are from a
representative ERK and JNK assay. Western blot analysis was performed
with anti-HA antibodies using total cell lysate to confirm similar
expression of HA-ERK and HA-JNK. Data represent the mean ± S.E.
of three independent experiments, expressed as -fold increase with
respect to vector-transfected cells (control).
|
|
Paxillin and p130cas have been reported to form
a stable complex with FAK (43-45), thus suggesting that they may be
recruited to plasma membrane upon expression of myr-FAK. To test this
possibility, we investigated whether HA-paxillin and
HA-p130cas would co-immunoprecipitate with wild
type or the mutated myr-FAKs. As shown in Fig.
6, all myr-FAK constructs were detected
in anti-HA immunoprecipitates from co-transfected 293T cells, but not
in control transfected cells (data not shown). These data demonstrate that FAK can form stable molecular complexes with paxillin and p130cas, and that complex formation does not
require the tyrosine kinase activity of FAK or the tyrosine
phosphorylation of these FAK substrates (see above).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Co-immunoprecipitation of myr-FAK and its
mutants with paxillin and p130cas. The indicated DNAs (3 µg/plate) were co-transfected into 293T cells, and anti-HA
immunoprecipitates were analyzed with anti-Src antibody to detect the
myristoylation motif (upper panel) and anti-HA
antibody (lower panel).
|
|
This observation raised the possibility that the recruitment of
paxillin or p130cas to the plasma membrane may
be by itself sufficient to activate JNK. To test this possibility, we
examined the biochemical consequences of targeting paxillin and
p130cas to the membrane. For
p130cas, we engineered a myristoylated form
(myr-p130cas). Because the myristoylated form of
paxillin could not be expressed successfully, the coding sequence of
paxillin was fused in frame to a membrane anchor consisting of the
extracellular and transmembrane domain of the interleukin 2-receptor
subunit (IL2R-paxillin). Both IL2R-paxillin and
myr-p130cas were efficiently expressed, as
judged by Western blot analysis with the appropriate antibodies, or by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis using an anti-IL2R
antibody (Fig. 7A). Endogenously expressed paxillin was also detected, but that required longer exposure of the immunoblots (data not shown). As shown in Fig.
7B, whereas myr-p130cas stimulated
JNK only poorly, expression of IL2R-paxillin resulted in a remarkable
increase (6-9-fold) in HA-JNK activity. In contrast, no activation of
co-transfected ERK was detected in myr-p130cas
and IL2R-paxillin expressing cells (data not shown). Thus, we concluded
that recruitment of paxillin to the plasma membrane is by itself
sufficient to signal JNK activation, and that the pathway linking FAK
to JNK diverges from that communicating FAK to ERK.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
A membrane-targeted form of paxillin, but not
of p130cas, potently activates JNK. A, 293T
cells were transfected with the indicated expression plasmids
(pcDNA3 paxillin, pCMV IL2R-paxillin, and pCEFL
myr-p130cas; 2 µg/plate). Lysates containing
50 µg of total protein from transfectants were subjected to Western
blot (WB) analysis with the indicated antibodies. To confirm
the expression of IL2R in IL2R-paxillin transfected cells,
fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis was performed using
fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated anti-CD25 antibody
(upper right panel). B,
293T cells were transfected with pcDNA3 HA-JNK1 (2 µg/plate)
together with vector expressing extracellular and transmembrane domains
of interleukin-2 receptor (IL2R) or
NH2-terminal 21 amino acids of chicken c-Src
(myr) or the indicated amount of expression vectors carrying
cDNAs for IL2R-paxillin or myr-p130cas.
Kinase reactions were performed in anti-HA immunoprecipitates from the
corresponding cellular lysates. Labeled substrates are indicated. The
autoradiograms correspond to a representative JNK assay. Immunoblot
analysis was performed with anti-HA antibodies using total cell lysate
to confirm similar expression levels of HA-JNK. Data are expressed as
-fold increase with respect to control vector-transfected cells and
represent the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments.
C, expression vectors for the indicated membrane-targeted
proteins were transfected into 293T cells. Cells were lysed, and the
tyrosine phosphorylation status of these molecules was determined in
the corresponding immunoprecipitates (IP) by Western blot
(WB) using anti-phosphotyrosine (PY) antibodies.
The same membranes were stripped and re-blotted with the indicated
antibodies (right panel). Identical results were
obtained in three independent experiments.
|
|
We next explored whether tyrosine phosphorylation was required for the
activation of JNK by the membrane-targeted paxillin. As observed in
Fig. 7C, immunoprecipitated
myr-p130cas was tyrosine-phosphorylated to a
level comparable to that of the endogenous
p130cas, but, unexpectedly, we could not detect
any tyrosine phosphorylation of IL2R-paxillin even after prolonged
exposure of the anti-phosphotyrosine Western blots, although tyrosine
phosphorylation of endogenous paxillin was detected. Taken together, we
conclude that recruitment of paxillin to the plasma membrane triggers
JNK activation without the need for its tyrosine phosphorylation, which
is consistent with the observation that the membrane-bound form of FAK
induces JNK activation irrespective of its tyrosine kinase activity.
Thus, the interaction of FAK and paxillin leading to the recruitment of
paxillin to plasma membrane, rather than the tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin, might play an important role in JNK activation.
As activation of FAK might affect integrin function, we next asked
whether activation of JNK by the membrane-targeted forms of FAK and
paxillin was a consequence of cellular stress caused by diminished
attachment to the plates. For these experiments, we transfected 293T
cells with expression plasmids for FAK and paxillin together with a
plasmid for
-galactosidase. Two days later, cells were suspended by
pipetting, washed, and allowed to attach to fibronectin-coated plates
for different periods of time.
-Galactosidase activity was then
determined in attached cells, and normalized for the total enzymatic
activity in each cellular sample. Under these conditions,
myr-FAK-expressing cells attached to the plates poorly, as shown in
Fig. 8A for a 15 min time
point. In contrast, wild type FAK, and wild type and IL2R-paxillin did
not affect the ability of cells to attach to the plates. Similarly, only myr-FAK caused cell rounding, as judged by the morphology of
fluorescent cells upon co-transfection with a GFP expression vector
(Fig. 8B). Thus, whereas myr-FAK may affect integrin
function as suggested by the decreased attachment to fibronectin-coated plates and cell rounding, this does not appear to be the case for
IL2R-paxillin. Furthermore, we did not observe any apoptotic or growth
inhibitory effect in cells expressing IL2R-paxillin (data not shown),
thus suggesting that cellular stress is not responsible for the
activation of JNK by this membrane-localized form of paxillin.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effect of myr-FAK and IL2R-paxillin
overexpression on the attachment of cells to fibronectin and cell
morphology. A, 293T cells were transfected with the
indicated expression plasmids (1.0 µg/plate) together with
pcDNAIII- gal (0.5 µg/plate), and their abilities to attach the fibronectin-coated plates was examined as described
under "Materials and Methods." Data are expressed as the percentage
of -galactosidase activity in cells attached to the plates with
respect to the total -galactosidase activity in the cellular sample,
and represent the mean ± S.E. of triplicate dishes. Similar
results were obtained in three independent experiments. B,
293T cells were transfected with the indicated expression plasmids (0.2 µg/well) together with pCEFL-GFP (0.2 µg/well) and photographed
using a phase contrast microscopy. Transfected cells were visualized by
co-expression of GFP, and identified using fluorescence
microscopy.
|
|
In this regard, as small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family have
been suggested to represent integral components of many signaling
pathways regulating JNK activity (27, 46), we next asked whether these
GTPases participate in signaling from paxillin to JNK using their
corresponding dominant-negative mutants (Rho N19, Rac N17, and Cdc42
N17) as an approach. As shown in Fig. 9,
co-expression of these mutants diminished the activation of JNK by
IL2R-paxillin, without displaying any demonstrable effect on the JNK
response to anisomycin when used as a control. Of interest, the
dominant-negative mutant of Rho was the most effective, which is
consistent with the finding that, in 293T cells, Rho can play a role
regulating JNK (47). Taken together, these data suggest that the
recruitment of paxillin to the plasma membrane does not cause cellular
stress, but may initiate the activation of a pathway involving small
GTPases of the Rho family, which, ultimately, leads to JNK
stimulation.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Activation of JNK by IL2R-paxillin: a
potential role for small GTPases of the Rho family. 293T cells
were transfected with pcDNA3 HA-JNK1 and pCMV IL2R-paxillin (2 µg/plate) or empty vector together with either pcDNA3 (vector)
without insert or carrying cDNAs for RhoA N19, Rac1 N17, or Cdc42
N17 (2 µg/plate), and cells were left either untreated or stimulated
with anisomycin (10 µg/ml) for 15 min, as indicated. Cell lysates
were processed as described under "Materials and Methods." Data
shown are expressed as percentage of activation with respect to the
corresponding vector co-transfected control (100%) and represent the
mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. The
lower panel shows the autoradiogram corresponding
to a representative JNK assay.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
FAK is regarded as a merging point of the GPCR and
integrin-initiated signaling pathways (21, 25). However, the nature of
the biochemical routes regulated by FAK is still poorly understood. With the aim of investigating signaling events mediated by FAK, we took
advantage of the observation that the membrane-bound form of FAK can
behave as a constitutive active mutant (33). As such, the expression of
myr-FAK potently activated an epitope tagged-ERK, which has been
previously reported to be a downstream target of FAK function (32).
This activated FAK was also able to induce a remarkable increase in the
activity of a co-expressed epitope-tagged JNK, which was consistent
with our recent observations that both integrin and GPCR stimulation
enhances JNK activity, albeit by a yet poorly understood biochemical
route (17-19). These data therefore suggested that FAK might
participate in JNK stimulation, and prompted us to explore the
mechanism whereby this ubiquitously expressed tyrosine kinase activates
JNK.
Initially, we asked whether PI3K, which has been shown to bind FAK
(37), could participate in MAPK and JNK activation by FAK by using a
potent PI3K inhibitor, wortmannin, as an experimental approach. As a
control, we assessed the ability of the activated FAK to stimulate Akt,
a known downstream target for PI3K (38). We observed that FAK was able
to activate Akt, which was abolished by the treatment with wortmannin.
This finding, initially meant to be used as a control, might have
important implications regarding the in vivo function of
FAK, as Akt is known to act as a key component of cell survival
pathways (38), and recent observations suggest that FAK can prevent
cell death induced by deprivation of cell attachment to substrates, a
phenomenon known as anoikis (48). Whether Akt participates
in the anti-apoptotic response to FAK is under current investigation.
Interestingly, in contrast to Akt, the activation of ERK and JNK by FAK
was found to be insensitive to wortmannin, thus suggesting that,
whereas FAK can activate Akt through PI3K, the pathway linking FAK to
ERK and JNK does not require PI3K function.
We next explored whether ERK and JNK stimulation correlated with the
tyrosine phosphorylation of a common set of molecules believed to act
downstream of FAK, focusing our attention on Shc, p130cas, and paxillin. We observed that
overexpression of wild type FAK was sufficient to induce the appearance
of tyrosine-phosphorylated species of p130cas
and paxillin, but without ERK or JNK activation. Thus, we concluded that the phosphorylation of p130cas and paxillin
on tyrosine residues was not by itself sufficient to activate these
MAPK cascades. In contrast, myr-FAK caused a remarkable tyrosine
phosphorylation of Shc and ERK activation, and a kinase-defective
mutant of FAK that failed to induce Shc phosphorylation also failed to
enhance ERK activity. Thus, the ability to induce ERK activation by FAK
was parallel to its ability to cause Shc tyrosine phosphorylation,
which provides further support for the recently proposed model of
Schlaepfer et al. (32), who suggested that FAK and Src
activate ERKs though tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc upon integrin
stimulation. Unexpectedly, however, the tyrosine kinase-deficient
mutant of myr-FAK was still able to stimulate JNK to a similar level as
that caused by the wild type myr-FAK form. These data indicated that
Shc phosphorylation is not required for JNK activation, and that the
pathway connecting FAK to JNK is distinct from that linking FAK to ERKs.
Our initial expectation was that FAK might activate JNK through
tyrosine phosphorylation of paxillin and/or
p130cas, as these two proteins bind to the
adaptor protein Crk in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent
manner (40, 49-51), and the Crk/C3G complex is proposed to be involved
in JNK activation (52, 53). However, this was not found to be the case,
because we observed that the membrane-bound form of the
kinase-deficient mutant of FAK stimulated JNK even without tyrosine
phosphorylation of p130cas or paxillin. In this
regard, however, it has been shown that FAK forms stable complexes with
paxillin and p130cas, and that complex formation
is independent of the protein-tyrosine kinase activity of FAK (43, 45).
Thus, we speculated that the recruitment of
p130cas or paxillin to the plasma membrane might
participate in JNK activation. Indeed, we observed that, by targeting
paxillin to the membrane, JNK was activated even without detectable
tyrosine phosphorylation. These results suggested that the ability of
FAK to recruit paxillin to the membrane might be sufficient to
stimulate biochemical routes leading to JNK activation. However,
whether recruitment of paxillin is strictly required for JNK activation
by FAK is still unknown. Although the carboxyl-terminal region of FAK
has been shown to bind paxillin with high affinity (43, 54), we
observed that a COOH-terminal truncated form of myr-FAK, including
amino acids 1-840, can still associate in vivo with
paxillin-containing complexes and activates JNK, and overexpression of
the COOH-terminal domain of FAK (designated FRNK, amino acids
693-1052; Ref. 55) was not sufficient to prevent the association of
myr-FAK with paxillin or its ability to stimulate
JNK.2 These observations
raise the possibility that FAK might possess additional binding sites
for paxillin besides its carboxyl-terminal region, or that additional
molecules participate in the indirect association of paxillin with FAK.
These, as well as other possibilities, are under current investigation.
Our findings strongly suggest that recruitment of paxillin to the
plasma membrane is sufficient to cause JNK activation. So far,
enzymatic activity has not been demonstrated in paxillin. Instead, this
molecule exhibits a number of structural domains suggestive of a role
in signal transduction, including four LIM domains, five repeats of a
leucine-rich sequence named LD motif, an Src homology 3 binding site,
and tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent Src homology 2 binding sites
(56-58). Thus, these structural features provide many potential
mechanisms by which paxillin-binding molecules can be activated upon
recruitment to the plasma membrane. Interestingly, while this study was
under revision, Turner et al. (59) demonstrated that a new
95-kDa protein, termed p95PKL (paxillin-kinase linker), binds directly
to the LD4 domain of paxillin. Furthermore, they have shown that this
novel protein also binds a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for
Rho-like proteins, PIX, which in turn recruits to the
paxillin-containing complex the protein-kinase PAK, an upstream
component of the JNK pathway (60, 61). Taken together, these findings
and our present results strongly suggest that paxillin can interact
with the large family of Dbl-related guanine-nucleotide exchange
factors for small GTP-binding proteins of the Rho-family (62) and with
signal transducing kinases, thus providing a direct link between
paxillin, the activation of Rho proteins, and the stimulation of the
JNK pathway.
In conclusion, our data demonstrate that FAK can stimulate the activity
of divergent signaling pathways acting on each MAPK cascade. Several
lines of evidence suggest that cell surface receptors, including GPCRs
and integrins, provoke the activation and tyrosine phosphorylation of
FAK, paxillin, and p130cas (22, 25, 63). FAK, in
turn, stimulates Akt through PI3K, and activates ERKs through the
tyrosine phosphorylation of the adapter molecule Shc. Independently,
FAK initiates the activation of a distinct biochemical route resulting
in JNK activation. In this regard, the recruitment of paxillin to the
membrane may initiate the activation of a signal transducing pathway
dependent on GTP-binding proteins of the Rho family, thereby providing
a novel mechanism by which cell surface receptors and FAK may signal to
the nucleus through JNK.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Oral and
Pharyngeal Cancer Branch, NIDCR, National Institutes of Health, 30 Convent Dr., Bldg. 30, Rm. 212, Bethesda, MD 20892-4330. E-mail:
SG39V@nih.gov.
2
T. Igishi, S. Fukuhara, V. Patel, B.-Z. Katz,
K. M. Yamada, and J. S. Gutkind, unpublished results.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase;
JNK, c-Jun NH2-terminal
kinase;
ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
SAPK, stress-activated protein kinase;
GPCR, G protein-coupled receptor;
FAK, focal adhesion kinase;
IL, interleukin;
PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
HA, hemagglutinin;
BSA, bovine serum albumin;
PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase;
GFP, green fluorescent protein.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Cano, E.,
and Mahdevan, L. C.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
117-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Marshall, C. J.
(1995)
Cell
80,
179-185[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Cohen, P.
(1997)
Trends Cell Biol.
7,
353-361
|
| 4.
|
Davis, R. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
14553-14556[Free Full Text]
|
| 5.
|
Hill, C. S.,
and Treisman, R.
(1995)
Cell
80,
199-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Gupta, S.,
Campbell, D.,
Derijard, B.,
and Davis, R. J.
(1995)
Science
267,
389-393[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Schlessinger, J.
(1993)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18,
273-275[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Luttrell, L. M.,
Hawes, B. E.,
van Biesen, T.,
Luttrell, D. K.,
Lansing, T. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19443-19450[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Igishi, T.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1998)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
244,
5-10[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Wan, Y.,
Kurosaki, T.,
and Huang, X. Y.
(1996)
Nature
380,
541-544[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Wan, Y.,
Bence, K.,
Hata, A.,
Kurosaki, T.,
Veillette, A.,
and Huang, X. Y.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
17209-17215[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 12.
|
Lev, S.,
Moreno, H.,
Martinez, R.,
Canoll, P.,
Peles, E.,
Musacchio, J. M.,
Plowman, G. D.,
Rudy, B.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1995)
Nature
376,
737-745[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Daub, H.,
Weiss, F. U.,
Wallasch, C.,
and Ullrich, A.
(1996)
Nature
379,
557-560[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
and Hunter, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13189-13195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Wary, K. K.,
Mainiero, F.,
Isakoff, S. J.,
Marcantonio, E. E.,
and Giancotti, F. G.
(1996)
Cell
87,
733-743[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Kyriakis, J.,
Banerjee, P.,
Nikolakaki, E.,
Dai, T.,
Rubie, E.,
Ahmad, M.,
Avruch, J.,
and Woodgett, J.
(1994)
Nature
369,
156-160[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Coso, O. A.,
Chiariello, M.,
Kalinec, G.,
Kyriakis, J. M.,
Woodgett, J.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
5620-5624[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Coso, O. A.,
Teramoto, H.,
Simonds, W. F.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
3963-3966[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Miyamoto, S.,
Teramoto, H.,
Coso, O. A.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
Burbelo, P. D.,
Akiyama, S. K.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
131,
791-805[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Tokiwa, G.,
Dikic, I.,
Lev, S.,
and Schlessinger, J.
(1996)
Science
273,
792-294[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Guan, J. L.
(1997)
Matrix Biol.
16,
195-200[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Gutkind, J. S.,
and Robbins, K. C.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
188,
155-161[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Choudhury, G. G.,
Marra, F.,
and Abboud, H. E.
(1996)
Am. J. Physiol.
270,
F295-F300[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Luttrell, L. M.,
Daaka, Y.,
Della Rocca, G. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
31648-31656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Seufferlein, T.,
and Rozengurt, E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9345-9351[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Crespo, P.,
Xu, N.,
Daniotti, J. L.,
Troppmair, J.,
Rapp, U. R.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21103-21109[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Coso, O. A.,
Chiariello, M., Yu, J. C.,
Teramoto, H.,
Crespo, P.,
Xu, N.,
Miki, T.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1137-1146[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Lopez-Ilasaca, M.,
Crespo, P.,
Pellici, P. G.,
Gutkind, J. S.,
and Wetzker, R.
(1997)
Science
275,
394-397[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
LaFlamme, S. E.,
Akiyama, S. K.,
and Yamada, K. M.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
437-447[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Murga, C.,
Laguinge, L.,
Wetzker, R.,
Cuadrado, A.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19080-19085[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Gutkind, J. S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1839-1842[Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
Jones, K. C.,
and Hunter, T.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
2571-2585[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Chan, P.-Y.,
Kanner, S. B.,
Whitney, G.,
and Aruffo, A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
20567-20574[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
Klippel, A.,
Reinhard, C.,
Kavanaugh, W. M.,
Apell, G.,
Escobedo, M. A.,
and Williams, L. T.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
4117-4127[Abstract]
|
| 35.
|
Khwaja, A.,
Rodriguez-Viciana, P.,
Wennstrom, S.,
Warne, P. H.,
and Downward, J.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
2783-2793[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
King, W. G.,
Mattaliano, M. D.,
Chan, T. O.,
Tsichlis, P. N.,
and Brugge, J. S.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
4406-4418[Abstract]
|
| 37.
|
Chen, H. C.,
Appeddu, P. A.,
Isoda, H.,
and Guan, J. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
26329-26334[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Marte, B. M.,
and Downward, J.
(1997)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
22,
355-358[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 39.
|
Arcaro, A.,
and Wymann, M.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
296,
297-301
|
| 40.
|
Schaller, M. D.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
2635-2645[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Tachibana, K.,
Urano, T.,
Fujita, H.,
Ohashi, Y.,
Kamiguchi, K.,
Iwata, S.,
Hirai, H.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29083-29090[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Schlaepfer, D. D.,
Hanks, S. K.,
Hunter, T.,
and van der Geer, P.
(1994)
Nature
372,
786-791[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Hildebrand, J. D.,
Schaller, M. D.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
637-647[Abstract]
|
| 44.
|
Harte, M. T.,
Hildebrand, J. D.,
Burnham, M. R.,
Bouton, A. H.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13649-13655[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Polte, T. R.,
and Hanks, S. K.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5501-5509[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Minden, A.,
Lin, A.,
Claret, F. X.,
Abo, A.,
and Karin, M.
(1995)
Cell
81,
1147-1157[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Teramoto, H.,
Crespo, P.,
Coso, O. A.,
Igishi, T.,
Xu, N.,
and Gutkind, J. S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
25731-25734[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 48.
|
Frisch, S. M.,
Vuori, K.,
Ruoslahti, E.,
and Chan-Hui, P.-Y.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
134,
793-799[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 49.
|
Birge, R. B.,
Fajardo, J. E.,
Reichman, C.,
Shoelson, S. E.,
Songyang, Z.,
Cantley, L. C.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4648-4656[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 50.
|
Sakai, R.,
Iwamatsu, A.,
Hiramatsu, N.,
Ogawa, S.,
Tanaka, T.,
Mano, H.,
Yazaki, Y.,
and Hirai, H.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
3748-3756[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 51.
|
Hamasaki, K.,
Mimura, T.,
Morino, N.,
Furuya, H.,
Nakamoto, T.,
Aizawa, S.,
Morimoto, C.,
Yazaki, Y.,
Hirai, H.,
and Nojima, Y.
(1996)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
222,
338-343[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Tanaka, S.,
Ouchi, T.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
2356-2361[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Tanaka, S.,
and Hanafusa, H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1281-1284[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 54.
|
Tachibana, K.,
Sato, T.,
D'Avirro, N.,
and Morimoto, C.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
1089-1099[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 55.
|
Schaller, M. D.,
Borgman, C. A.,
and Parsons, J. T.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
785-791[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Turner, C. E.,
and Miller, J. T.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
1583-1591[Abstract]
|
| 57.
|
Tong, X.,
Salgia, R.,
Li, J. L.,
Griffin, J. D.,
and Howley, P. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
33373-33376[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Vande Pol, S. B.,
Brown, M. C.,
and Turner, C. E.
(1998)
Oncogene
16,
43-52[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 59.
|
Turner, C. E.,
Brown, M. C.,
Perrotta, J. A.,
Riedy, M. C.,
Nikolopoulos, S. N.,
McDonald, A. R.,
Bagrodia, S.,
Thomas, S.,
and Leventhal, P. S.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
145,
851-863[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 60.
|
Bagrodia, S.,
Derijard, B.,
Davis, R. J.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27995-27998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 61.
|
Brown, J. L.,
Stowers, L.,
Baer, M.,
Trejo, J.,
Coughlin, S.,
and Chant, J.
(1996)
Curr. Biol.
6,
598-605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 62.
|
Whitehead, I. P.,
Campbell, S.,
Rossmann, K. L.,
and Der, C. J.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1332,
F1-F23[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 63.
|
Rozengurt, E.,
and Rodriguez-Fernandez, J. L.
(1997)
Essays Biochem.
32,
73-86[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
