J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 43, 30747-30755, October 22, 1999
Mononuclear Leukocytes Preferentially Bind via CD44 to Hyaluronan
on Human Intestinal Mucosal Smooth Muscle Cells after Virus
Infection or Treatment with Poly(I·C)*
Carol A.
de la Motte
,
Vincent C.
Hascall§,
Anthony
Calabro§,
Belinda
Yen-Lieberman¶, and
Scott A.
Strong
From the
Department of Colorectal Surgery and
Department of Immunology, § Department of Biomedical
Engineering, and ¶ Department of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland
Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
 |
ABSTRACT |
Pathological changes in inflammatory bowel
disease include an increase in intestinal mucosal mononuclear
leukocytes and hyperplasia of the muscularis mucosae smooth muscle
cells (M-SMCs). Because virus infections have correlated with disease
flare, we tested the response of cultured M-SMCs to respiratory
syncytial virus, measles virus, and the viral analogue, poly(I·C).
Adhesion of U937 cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells was used
to measure the leukocyte-interactive potential of M-SMCs. Untreated M-SMCs, only minimally adhesive for leukocytes, bound U937 cells after
treatment with respiratory syncytial virus or measles virus. Mononuclear leukocytes also bound to poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs. Although both vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 mRNA and protein increased 3-4-fold in poly(I·C)-treated M-SMC cultures, U937 cell adhesion was not blocked by an anti-vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 monoclonal antibody. However, hyaluronidase digestion of poly(I·C)- or virus-treated M-SMCs dramatically reduced leukocyte adhesion (~75%). Fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis
demonstrated a ~3-fold increase in surface-bound hyaluronan on
poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs compared with untreated controls. In
addition, pretreatment of mononuclear cells with a blocking anti-CD44
antibody, greatly decreased adhesion to poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs.
Recognition of this virus-induced hyaluronan/CD44 mechanism of
mesenchymal cell/leukocyte interaction introduces a new avenue in the
research of gut inflammation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The origin of inflammatory bowel disease
(IBD)1 is multifactorial,
where environmental and microbiological factors initiate and perpetuate
an immune response in the intestine of genetically susceptible
individuals, which results in the clinical manifestations of Crohn's
disease and ulcerative colitis. Recently, several IBD susceptibility
genes have been identified (1, 2), supporting the genetic
predisposition component of this theory. Immune phenomena involved in
this disease have also been investigated extensively and have
underscored the differences between the responses of normal and
affected individuals (3, 4). However, much less is known about how
microbial agents affect the disease process.
Speculations that viruses may be involved in the pathogenesis of IBD
have been advanced for some time due to the clinical association of
respiratory virus infections with subsequent IBD flare-up. In an
extensive study, Kangro et al. (5) reported that 40% of
disease flares in a population of susceptible individuals were
temporally associated with documented viral respiratory infections. Other groups have demonstrated a higher incidence of measles virus particles in the resected colon tissue of patients with Crohn's disease as compared with tissue from patients who did not have IBD (6,
7). Very recently, Montgomery et al. (8), in a prospective
study of over 7000 patients, found that the combination of measles and
mumps infections in the same year of childhood is significantly
associated with subsequent IBD. In a separate study, the simultaneous
presence of DNA from Herpesvirus 6 and Epstein-Barr virus was detected
more frequently in ulcerative colitis (76%) than in Crohn's disease
or control tissues (9). Farmer et al. (10) reported a
similar association between cytomegalovirus and ulcerative colitis.
Under normal circumstances, colonic mucosal tissue (lamina propria)
contains a population of leukocytes, including T- and B-lymphocytes,
plasma cells, histiocytes, and mast cells, which are scattered in a
network of collagen fibers and smooth muscle cell bundles (11). These
leukocytes arrive to the area via the regularly distributed capillaries
in the lamina propria. They serve a surveillance function in the
tissue, providing immune protection against the lumenal contents of the
colon. Mucosal lymphocytes may reenter the bloodstream, presumably via
the lymphatic vessels located in close proximity to the muscularis
mucosae, and are free to recirculate through blood and lymphoid organs until a specific antigenic challenge recalls them to an affected area
(12).
In IBD, the mucosal immune cell population increases dramatically, and
the infiltrate is predominantly mononuclear leukocytes. Further, a
hyperplastic thickening of the juxtaposed muscularis mucosae also
occurs (13). This suggests that interactions between leukocytes and
mesenchymal smooth muscle cells are important in the development of
IBD. We (14) have recently shown that colonic mesenchymal cells
proliferate in response to leukocyte-derived inflammatory cytokines.
Increasingly, however, investigators are finding evidence for
bidirectional interaction and communication between smooth muscle cells
and immune cells within tissues, events that can play a role not only
in IBD (15, 16), but in other chronic inflammatory diseases (17).
Therefore, we investigated the impact that virus infection can have on
one of the early events in the colon's inflammatory process, namely
leukocyte interaction with mucosal smooth muscle cells (M-SMCs) via
leukocyte adhesion molecules.
Our data indicate that virus infection dramatically increases the level
of mononuclear leukocyte adhesion to M-SMCs through a distinctly
different mechanism of interaction from that involved in leukocyte
adhesion after treating M-SMCs with inflammatory cytokines (18). The
data indicate that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), measles virus and
the viral mimic, poly(I·C), up-regulate leukocyte adhesion primarily
through a novel mechanism involving hyaluronan interaction with CD44, a
cell surface hyaluronan-binding protein expressed on many leukocytes.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell Isolation and Culture--
M-SMCs were isolated from human
colon specimens (14) obtained within 1 h after resection, which
were provided by the Surgical Pathology Department of the Cleveland
Clinic Foundation. Briefly, the mucosal layer (lamina propria) of each
colon was removed and cut into strips, washed in 50 ml of Hanks' BSS
containing 0.15% dithiothreitol (w/v) for 30 min, washed three times
in 100 ml of Hanks' BSS containing 1 mM EDTA for 1 h
each, and Hanks' BSS alone for at least 2 h with a 100 ml/wash
changed every 30 min. The tissue samples were then minced and digested
overnight in 100 ml of Hanks' BSS containing collagenase and DNase
(0.1 mg/ml each), penicillin (250 units/ml), streptomycin (250 µg/ml), and fungizone (0.625 µg/ml). The liberated cells were
filtered from the undigested debris with a tissue screen, cultured in
DMEM/F-12 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (Bio-Whittaker,
Walkersville, MD) and antibiotics (100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml
streptomycin, 0.25 µg/ml fungizone), and by incubation at 37 °C,
in a 5% CO2, humidified environment. One
75-cm2 flask, containing 15 ml of medium, was seeded with
the cells obtained from an ~125-cm2 area of original
tissue. Two to 3 days after plating, the non-adherent cells were washed
away, and the culture fluid replenished. When cell cultures were
confluent (~10 days), they were split at a 1:3 ratio. Cultured M-SMCs
obtained by this method routinely stain positively for
-smooth
muscle cell actin (antibody from Sigma/Aldrich). M-SMC cultures were
used in the first through fourth passages.
U937 cells, originally derived from a human histiocytic lymphoma, were
procured from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). The
cells were grown in suspension culture in RPMI medium containing 5%
FBS and routinely subcultured at a 1:5 ratio (~2 × 105 cells/ml) three times per week.
Infection of M-SMCs with RSV and Measles Virus--
Infectious
isolates of RSV and measles virus were obtained from the Clinical
Virology Laboratory at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation. Each virus was
grown in clinical indicator cell lines (HEp-2 cells for RSV and primary
rhesus monkey kidney cells for measles virus), and aliquots of
supernatant fluids from these cells were passed directly to the
confluent cultures of M-SMCs at the concentrations specified in the
figures. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C for the times
indicated. Infection of smooth muscle cells was confirmed on
acetone-fixed coverslips from parallel cultures by fluorescence
immunohistochemistry. Coverslips were treated with blends of monoclonal
antibodies against RSV or measles virus (Chemicon, Temecula, CA) at a
1:200 dilution, washed and treated with a FITC-conjugated goat
anti-mouse Ig at 1:200, then counterstained with Evan's Blue dye
(0.2%) to identify the cell layer, and observed with a fluorescence microscope.
Separation of Human Leukocytes--
Total mononuclear cells were
separated from heparinized peripheral blood (100 units heparin/ml) by
centrifugation on Ficoll-Hypaque density gradients (19). The isolated
peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes (PBMLs) were resuspended in
RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% FBS (25-50 × 106
cells/ml) in a Teflon beaker to prevent attachment during labeling. Viability of the PBMLs was always greater than 95%, as determined by
trypan blue dye exclusion.
Neutrophils in the pellet of the Ficoll-Hypaque gradient were further
purified according to the method of Stossel et al. (20) using sedimentation in a dextran gradient and hypotonic lysis of
residual erythrocytes. Cells isolated by this procedure were routinely
greater than 95% neutrophils, as estimated by differential counting.
Assay for Leukocyte Adhesion to M-SMCs--
Adhesion of U937
cells to M-SMCs was measured as described previously (21). Briefly,
M-SMCs were plated into 24-well plates in their appropriate medium
(~2.5 × 104 cells/well in 0.5 ml) 3-5 days before
the assay, and grown to confluence. Unless otherwise noted in the
figure legends, treatment of M-SMCs with poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml),
TNF-
(1 ng/ml), or live virus was done 18-24 h before assay. On the
day of the assay, U937 cells or normal human monocytes (up to 70 × 106 cells/ml) were labeled for 90 min at 37 °C with
100 µCi of 51Cr as sodium chromate (NEN Life Science
Products) in 1 ml of culture medium. The labeled cells were washed
three times with culture medium, counted on a hemacytometer, and
resuspended to 106 viable cells/0.5 ml of culture medium.
Incubation medium was aspirated from M-SMCs, and 106
labeled leukocytes were added per well. The binding phase of the assay
was done at 4 °C for 1 h. Subsequently, the wells were washed
three times with cold medium. The cells were lysed with 1% Triton
X-100, and an aliquot removed for quantitation of radiolabel. The
number of U937 cells or monocytes bound per well was calculated from
the initial specific activity (cpm/cell). Spontaneous release of
chromium from the monocytic cells in control incubations without M-SMCs
was typically less than 5%.
Antibody Blocking of Leukocyte Adhesion--
M-SMCs and
leukocytes were prepared for the adhesion assay as described above,
with the additional step of treating either the M-SMCs with a blocking
monoclonal anti-VCAM-1 antibody (10 µg/ml) or the leukocytes with a
blocking monoclonal anti-CD44 antibody (from clone A3D8) at the
concentrations indicated in the figure legends. The antibody-treated
cells and their untreated controls were incubated at 4 °C, 1 h
before continuing with the assay. The number of leukocytes bound was
determined as above.
M-SMC Expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 Protein--
M-SMCs were
plated in 48-well plates and grown to confluence (3-4 days). The cells
were treated as described in the figure legends, and cell surface
protein expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 determined as described
previously (22). Briefly, at the time of the assay, the incubation
medium was removed and the cells rinsed with DMEM/F-12 containing 2%
FBS. Intact anti-human VCAM-1 antibody (Genzyme, Boston, MA), or
anti-human ICAM-1 antibody (Novacastra), or anti-human HLA-DR antibody
as an isotype-matched (IgG1) control antibody were added at a
concentration of 5 µg/ml in wash medium (100 µl/well). The plates
were then incubated at 4 °C for 1 h. After washing the wells
three times with cold medium, biotin-conjugated, affinity-purified
F(ab')2 fragments from goat anti-mouse IgG + IgM (H+L)
(Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) was added
to each well at a dilution of 1:1000 in wash medium (100 µl/well).
The plate was incubated at 4 °C for 30 min. After washing three
times with cold medium, a 1:80 dilution of
125I-streptavidin (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) solution
added to each well (100 µl/well), followed by incubation at 4 °C
for 15 min. Subsequently, the wells were washed four times with cold medium, the cells lysed with 1% Triton X-100, and an aliquot removed for radiolabel quantitation.
Northern Analysis--
Total cellular RNA was isolated as
described previously (14) from confluent M-SMCs grown in
75-cm2 area flasks. Briefly, M-SMCs were lysed at ~5 × 105 cells/ml with RNAzol B (Tel-Test Inc., Friendswood,
TX); 10% (v/v) chloroform was added. The samples were centrifuged at
12,000 × g for 15 min, and the aqueous layer
recovered. RNA in the aqueous layer was precipitated in 50%
isopropanol, and the precipitate pelleted by centrifugation at
12,000 × g for 10 min. The resulting RNA pellets were
washed several times in 75% EtOH before dissolving in 0.1% diethyl
pyrocarbonate-treated water. RNA samples (10 µg) were denatured with
deionized glyoxal, size-fractionated by electrophoresis in 1% agarose,
and transferred to a nylon membrane (GeneScreen) by electroblotting.
Membranes were air-dried, UV light-cross-linked, and hybridized with a
[32P]dCTP-labeled, full-length probe for VCAM-1 RNA (23).
The blots were then stripped and rehybridized by the same procedure
using a probe for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA, to determine if sample loading was equivalent.
Hyaluronan Synthesis--
Relative levels of hyaluronan
synthesis by cultures of M-SMCs were
determined by fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis as
described in detail by Calabro et
al.2,3 Briefly,
confluent M-SMC cultures were incubated with minimal essential medium
containing 2% FBS, with or without poly(I·C) or TNF-
as described
in the figure legends, and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C. The
culture fluid and cell layer samples were then collected individually,
and treated with proteinase K (0.125 mg/ml) and incubated for 2 h,
60 °C. An additional 50-µl aliquot containing 0.125 mg of enzyme
was added to each sample and the incubation continued for 2 h.
Proteinase K was inactivated by heating at 100 °C for 10 min. The
samples were concentrated to 300 µl in a Speed-Vac centrifuge, and
the glycosaminoglycans were precipitated by adding EtOH to 75%,
followed by incubation at
20 °C, overnight. Each precipitate was
collected by centrifugation and dissolved in 0.1 M ammonium
acetate (0.1 ml) containing 0.0005% phenol red, pH 7. Hyaluronidase SD
from Streptococcus dysgalctiae (final concentration 100 milliunits/ml) was added to each sample, followed by incubation for
1 h at 37 °C. Chondroitinase ABC (final concentration: 100 milliunits/ml) was then added, and subsequently incubated at 37 °C
for 3 h. EtOH was then added to 90%, followed by incubation for
2 h at
20 °C to remove any remaining insoluble material. After centrifugation, the supernatants were collected and evaporated to dryness.
Hyaluronidase and chondroitinase digestion products were derivatized by
addition of 12.5 mM 2-aminoacridone in 85%
Me2SO, 15% acetic acid for 15 min at ambient temperature.
An equal volume of 1.25 M sodium cyanoborohydride in
ultrapure water was then added and the incubation continued for 18 h at 37 °C. Glycerol was added (final concentration 20%), and the
samples stored at 4 °C in the dark until analysis. Aliquots (5 µl)
of each sample, along with derivatized disaccharide standards, were
electrophoresed (500 V, 80 min) on MONOTM composition gels
(Glyko, Novato, CA), in MONOTM gel running buffer, at
4 °C. The gels were visualized with a UV light transilluminator,
imaged with a Quantix CCD camera, and the results analyzed using
Gel-Pro AnalyzerTM software.
Reagents--
All cell culture media, salt solutions,
antibiotics, and the HLA-DR antibody were purchased from Life
Technologies, Inc. FBS was purchased from Bio-Whittaker, Walkersville,
MD. Poly(I·C) was a product of Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala,
Sweden. Dithiothreitol and DNase were from ROche Molecular
Biochemicals. TNF-
and VCAM-1 antibody were purchased from Genzyme,
Boston, MA. Hyaluronidase SD, chondroitinase ABC, and purified
hyaluronan fragments are products of Seikagaku America, Ijamsville, MD.
GeneScreen membrane and radioisotopes were from NEN Life Science
Products, except the 125I-streptavidin was from Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech. Bovine testicular hyaluronidase and the CD44
blocking antibody (A3D8) were from Sigma. The VCAM-1 cDNA probe was
a generous gift of Dr. Walter Newman, Leukosite, Cambridge, MA.
 |
RESULTS |
Respiratory Syncytial Virus and Measles Virus Infect M-SMCs and
Cause Increased Adhesiveness for Leukocytes--
We used RSV and
measles virus (MV) as initial agents to test the hypothesis that virus
infection of M-SMCs can alter their interactions with leukocytes. The
established U937 cell line was used as a model for leukocyte adhesion
(21) since this monocytic tumor cell carries the ligand for most of the
recognized leukocyte adhesion molecules (26). Photomicrographs (Fig.
1A) show that leukocytes bind
in focal areas to M-SMCs 1 day after exposure to RSV, but did not bind
to the untreated control cells. Immunofluorescent histochemistry with a
specific anti-RSV antibody (Fig. 1B) revealed that nearly
all of the M-SMCs were infected. By day 2 syncytia formed, and cell
damage was evident; by day 4 the entire monolayer of cells was
destroyed (data not shown).

View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Effect of RSV infection on U937 cell adhesion
to M-SMC. Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium
containing 10% FBS with or without RSV (100 µl/cm2 of
supernatant collected from RSV-infected BHK cells) for 18 h at
37 °C. A, U937 cell adhesion assay was done as described
under "Materials and Methods" and observed by phase contrast
microscopy (magnification, ×100). U937 cells appear as bright spheres
on top of the M-SMCs, which are attached to the culture plate.
B, coverslips taken from replicate wells prior to the
adhesion assay were fixed, immunofluorescently labeled with
RSV-specific antibodies and secondary FITC-conjugated antibody,
counterstained (described under "Materials and Methods"), and
observed by fluorescence microscopy (magnification, ×400).
|
|
MV, which infects cells more slowly, was also tested. Fig.
2A shows that leukocytes bound
in focal areas to M-SMCs 1 day after infection with MV, but did not
bind to untreated control cells. The number of focal areas of adhesion
was infrequent, as was the number of infected M-SMCs at this time
point, as determined by immunohistochemistry with a MV-specific
antibody (Fig. 2B). Each foci consisted of one or two M-SMCs
with an adherent cluster of U937 cells. After 4 days of virus exposure,
patches of infected M-SMCs were evident (Fig. 2B); leukocyte
adhesion to the cell monolayer increased dramatically and in
correlation to the original virus dose (Fig. 2A). Therefore,
M-SMCs are susceptible to infection with RSV and MV, and virus
infection alters their interaction with leukocytes.

View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of measles virus infection on U937
cell adhesion to M-SMC. Confluent M-SMCs were treated with
DMEM/F-12 medium containing 10% FBS with or without measles virus (at
indicated concentrations) for 1 day or 4 days at 37 °C.
A, the U937 cell adhesion assay was done as described under
"Materials and Methods," and observed by light microscopy
(magnification, ×40). U937 cells appear as dark spheres on top of the M-SMCs, which are attached to the
culture plate. B, coverslips taken from replicate wells
treated with medium or supernatant containing measles virus (100 µl/cm2) for 1 day or 4 days were fixed,
immunofluorescently labeled with measles virus-specific antibody and
secondary FITC-conjugated antibody, counterstained (described under
"Materials and Methods"), and observed by fluorescence microscopy
(magnification, ×400).
|
|
Poly(I·C) Induces M-SMC Adhesiveness for Mononuclear
Leukocytes--
We next used an accepted viral mimic model (27),
poly(I·C) (synthetic double-stranded RNA), to minimize the effects of
infection efficiency and cell destruction inherent in live virus
experiments. Fig. 3 demonstrates that
treatment of M-SMCs with poly(I·C) (optimal concentration: 10 µg/ml; optimal time: 18 h; data not shown) results in an
~8-fold increase in adhesion of U937 cells and a ~12-fold increase
in adhesion of PBMLs compared with unstimulated controls. Conversely,
adhesion of neutrophils to M-SMCs was only minimally affected by the
poly(I·C) treatment, suggesting that the adhesion mechanism is
specific for mononuclear leukocytes.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of poly(I·C) on adhesion of U937
cells, normal human PBMLs, and neutrophils to M-SMCs. Confluent
M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium containing 10% FBS with or
without poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml) for 18 h, 37 °C. Adhesion of
U937 cells, PBMLs, and neutrophils was quantitated as described under
"Materials and Methods." (Values are the mean of triplicate
wells ± S.E.)
|
|
While double-stranded RNA is widely known as an inducer of interferons
for many cell types, the ability of poly(I·C) to increase adhesiveness of M-SMCs for leukocytes appears to be direct, since IFN-
(100 units/ml) and IFN-
(100 units/ml) were unable to induce leukocyte adhesion under identical culture conditions (data not shown).
Poly(I·C) Treatment of M-SMCs Increases VCAM-1 mRNA and
Protein, but Leukocyte Adhesion Is Not VCAM-1-mediated--
Smooth
muscle cells from a variety of organs are known to express VCAM-1 and
ICAM-1 as a result of cytokine stimulation (17, 28, 29), and
poly(I·C) has also been shown to induce VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 on
endothelial cells (30, 31). Therefore, we investigated the effect of
poly(I·C) on cell surface expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 on M-SMCs.
Fig. 4 shows typical radioimmune assays
to assess levels of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and HLA-DR (control) on M-SMCs.
Untreated cultures express a high level of ICAM-1, a low but measurable level of VCAM-1, and a low level of HLA-DR (Fig. 4). Stimulation with
poly(I·C) does not significantly alter the constitutive levels of
ICAM-1 protein, or increase HLA-DR expression, but does increase VCAM-1
surface protein ~4-fold.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of poly(I·C) on M-SMC expression of
cell surface VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and HLA-DR. Confluent M-SMCs were
treated with DMEM/F-12 medium containing 10% FBS with or without
poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml) for 18 h, 37 °C. Binding of VCAM-1,
ICAM-1, and HLA-DR (antibody isotype control) antibodies was
quantitated as described under "Materials and Methods." (Values are
the mean of triplicate wells ± S.E.)
|
|
Northern analyses demonstrate a time-dependent increase in
VCAM-1 mRNA expression after poly(I·C) treatment of M-SMCs (Fig. 5). Untreated M-SMCs express very low
levels of VCAM-1 mRNA. After adding poly(I·C), the levels
increase dramatically through the first 8 h and then decrease
during the next 8 h interval. However, they remain above base line
even after 24 h. Levels of expression of mRNA for
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were not altered by
poly(I·C) treatment at any time point. Treatment of M-SMCs with
TNF-
also showed up-regulation of VCAM-1 mRNA while IFN-
and
IFN-
had little or no effect.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of poly(I·C),
TNF- , IFN- , and
IFN- on the level of VCAM-1 mRNA.
Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium containing 10% FBS
with or without poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml), TNF- (1 ng/ml), IFN-
(500 units/ml), or IFN- (500 units/ml) for the indicated times at
37 °C. Total cellular RNA was isolated and Northern analyses done as
described under "Materials and Methods."
|
|
We next used a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks VCAM-1
binding to its ligand to determine if mononuclear leukocyte adhesion to
poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs is mediated by VCAM-1 (Fig. 6). As a positive control, M-SMCs were
treated with TNF-
(optimum concentration: 1 ng/ml; data not shown),
which induces VCAM-1-mediated leukocyte adhesion (18). Adhesion in this
case was completely blocked by treatment with the VCAM-1 antibody (10 µg/ml; added 30 min before and during the leukocyte adhesion step).
Conversely, the antibody did not block adhesion of U937 cells to M-SMCs
treated with poly(I·C). This is a surprising result since poly(I·C)
greatly increased VCAM-1 protein expression as indicated above (Fig.
4).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of anti-VCAM-1 antibody on
TNF- and poly(I·C)-induced U937 cell
adhesion. Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium
containing 10% FBS with or without TNF- (1 ng/ml) or poly(I·C)
(10 µg/ml) for 18 h, 37 °C. Each medium was aspirated, and a
blocking monoclonal antibody directed to VCAM-1 (10 µg/ml) or control
medium was added to the cells followed by incubation for 30 min,
37 °C. U937 cell adhesion was measured as described under
"Materials and Methods." (Values are the mean of triplicate
wells ± S.E.)
|
|
Poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs Bind Leukocytes through
Hyaluronan--
Lazaar et al. (17) have shown that
endogenously expressed hyaluronan on airway smooth muscle cells can
participate in adhesion of activated leukocytes. Although the
mononuclear leukocytes (PBMLs and U937 cells) used in our studies are
not activated, we nevertheless investigated whether hyaluronan was
involved in the poly(I·C)-induced adhesion of mononuclear leukocytes
by M-SMCs. Replicate cultures of M-SMCs were untreated, treated with
poly(I·C), or treated with TNF-
for 18 h. They were then
treated for 10 min with medium alone or medium containing 100 units
(final concentration 200 units/ml) bovine testicular hyaluronidase, an
enzyme that cleaves hyaluronan, before determining adhesion of U937
cells. Hyaluronidase treatment actually increased leukocyte adhesion
significantly to untreated or to TNF-
-stimulated M-SMCs (Fig.
7). Conversely, hyaluronidase treatment
greatly reduced (~75% decrease) adhesion to poly(I·C)-treated
cultures. In other experiments, streptococcal hyaluronidase (100 milliunits/ml), a more specific enzyme for digesting hyaluronan, was
equally as effective as bovine hyaluronidase in abrogating leukocyte
adhesion (bovine, ~75% versus streptococcal, ~71%
reduction in poly(I·C)-induced adhesion). These results strongly suggest that removal of hyaluronan from the surface of untreated or
TNF-
-treated M-SMCs exposes additional adhesion sites, whereas in
poly(I·C)-stimulated M-SMCs, most of the leukocytes are bound directly to hyaluronan.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of hyaluronidase on
TNF- and poly(I·C)-induced U937 cell
adhesion. Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium
containing 10% FBS with or without TNF- (1 ng/ml) or poly(I·C)
(10 µg/ml) for 18 h, 37 °C. Testicular hyaluronidase (final
concentration 200 µg/ml) was added to indicated culture wells
followed by incubation for 10 min, 37 °C. All wells were rinsed, and
a monoclonal antibody directed to VCAM-1 (10 µg/ml) or control medium
was added to cells followed by incubation for 30 min, 4 °C. U937
cell adhesion was measured as described under "Materials and
Methods." (Values are the mean of triplicate wells ± S.E.)
|
|
In similar experiments using poly(I·C)-stimulated M-SMCs, essentially
all the induced leukocyte adhesion is prevented by a combination of
hyaluronidase digestion and treatment with the VCAM-1 blocking antibody
(Fig. 7, experiment 2). This finding, plus the
inability of VCAM-1 antibody alone to reduce leukocyte adhesion to
poly(I·C)-treated cultures (Fig. 6), suggests that the presence of
hyaluronan masks functional VCAM-1 on the surface of the stimulated
M-SMCs.
Parallel experiments were done using Ficoll-separated peripheral blood
leukocytes to determine if normal mononuclear leukocytes also adhere to
poly(I·C)-treated M-SMC. Fig. 8 shows
substantial leukocyte adhesion to poly(I·C)-stimulated M-SMCs as
compared with unstimulated control cells. Hyaluronidase treatment after the binding phase of the adhesion assay reduced leukocyte adhesion substantially (~76% of induced adhesion, ~58% of total adhesion). Conversely, VCAM-1 blocking antibody reduced adhesion by only small
amount (~23% of induced adhesion, ~17% of total adhesion). Thus,
normal, unstimulated mononuclear leukocytes also adhere to
poly(I·C)-activated M-SMCs primarily by binding to hyaluronan, and
VCAM-1, which is present on the cell surface after stimulation (Fig.
4), is only a minor contributor.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of hyaluronidase and VCAM-1 blocking
antibody on poly(I·C)-induced normal mononuclear leukocyte
adhesion. Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium
containing 10% FBS with or without poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml) for
18 h, 37 °C. Testicular hyaluronidase (final concentration 200 µg/ml) was added to indicated culture wells followed by incubation
for 10 min, 37 °C. All wells were rinsed, and a monoclonal antibody
directed to VCAM-1 (10 µg/ml) or control medium was added to cells
followed by incubation for 30 min, 4 °C. PBML adhesion was measured
as described under "Materials and Methods." (Values are the mean of
triplicate wells ± S.E.)
|
|
M-SMCs Express Increased Matrix-associated Hyaluronan in Response
to Poly(I·C) Treatment--
Changes in hyaluronan synthesis by
M-SMCs after poly(I·C) or TNF-
treatment were assessed by
fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis.2,3
Confluent M-SMC cultures were treated with fresh medium alone, or
medium containing poly(I·C) or TNF-
, followed by incubation for
18 h. Each culture fluid and cell layer was collected and enzymatically processed to digest proteins, and glycosaminoglycan molecules were enzymatically digested to their component saccharides. The saccharides were fluorescently labeled as described under "Materials and Methods," and sample aliquots were subjected to electrophoresis, alongside specific markers, on MONOTM
composition gels. As shown in Fig. 9,
poly(I·C) treatment causes an increase in hyaluronan content in the
culture fluid (~2-fold) and more strikingly in the cell layer
(~3-fold) when compared with the untreated controls as measured by
fluorescence of the disaccharide band derived from hyaluronan. In
contrast, TNF-
did not appreciably alter secreted (~1-fold) or
cell retained (~1-fold) levels of hyaluronan produced by M-SMCs.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effects of poly(I·C) and
TNF- on hyaluronan synthesis by M-SMCs.
Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium containing 10% FBS
with or without TNF- (1 ng/ml) or poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml) for
18 h, 37 °C. Cell culture fluids and cell layers were
collected, enzymatically processed, 2-aminoacridone-derivatized, and
subjected to fluorophore-assisted carbohydrate electrophoresis as
described under "Materials and Methods." The band representing the
derivatized components of glucose and a hyaluronan disaccharide
standard are indicated. Bands indicating condroitin sulfate digestion
products are also noted.
|
|
CD44 Is the Major Mononuclear Leukocyte Receptor That Binds to
Hyaluronan on Poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs--
We investigated whether
CD44, a hyaluronan-binding molecule known to be present on the surface
of leukocytes, was present on the U937 cells and whether it was
involved in binding of these cells to hyaluronan. Fig.
10A shows the effects of a
CD44-specific blocking monoclonal antibody (A3D8) on leukocyte adhesion
to poly(I·C)-stimulated M-SMCs. U937 cells, preincubated with the
A3D8 antibody at concentrations as low as 10 µg/ml, were partially
blocked from adhering to poly(I·C)-stimulated M-SMCs (~20%), with
even greater effects at concentrations up to 25 µg/ml (~54%
reduction).

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Effects of anti-CD44 antibody on U937 and
normal mononuclear leukocyte adhesion to poly(I·C)-stimulated
M-SMCs. Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12 medium
containing 10% FBS with or without poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml) for
18 h, 37 °C. A, prior to the adhesion assay,
aliquots of 51Cr-labeled U937 cells were treated with the
indicated concentrations of A3D8 (anti-CD44 blocking monoclonal
antibody), and incubated for 1 h, 4 °C, before addition to the
M-SMC cultures. Adhesion was measured as described under "Materials
and Methods." (Values are the mean of triplicate wells ± S.E.)
B, prior to the adhesion assay, aliquots of
51Cr-labeled PBMLs were treated with A3D8 antibody or with
hyaluronan fragments (250 µg/ml) and incubated for 1 h, 4 °C,
before addition to the M-SMC cultures. The PBML adhesion assay was done
as described under "Materials and Methods," after which time
cultures were treated with medium alone or containing hyaluronidase
(200 µg/ml) for 5 min at room temperature, washed twice more, and
prepared for radioactive counting. (Values are the mean of triplicate
wells ± S.E.)
|
|
Fig. 10B confirms that the anti-CD44 antibody also blocks
binding of normal peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes to
poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs. Normal leukocytes pretreated with medium
alone or medium containing the A3D8 antibody (20 µg/ml for 30 min)
were incubated with poly(I·C)-stimulated M-SMCs, and the levels of
adhesion measured. In addition, a replicate set of the leukocytes was
preincubated with purified hyaluronan fragments of
Mr ~100,000 (250 µg/ml for 30 min, 4 °C)
before the adhesion assay. Fig. 10B shows that leukocyte adhesion to poly(I·C)-stimulated M-SMCs increased ~5-fold over unstimulated control levels. Pretreating leukocytes with the anti-CD44 antibody reduced specific poly(I·C)-induced adhesion by ~38%, and
hyaluronan fragments also reduced leukocyte adhesion to a comparable
degree (~41%). However, neither reduced binding as completely as did
removal of hyaluronan from the surfaces of the M-SMCs with
hyaluronidase (~75%).
Virus-infected M-SMCs Bind Leukocytes through Hyaluronan--
To
confirm that the poly(I·C)-induced effects on SMC/leukocyte
interactions reflected a natural process that could result from virus
infection, we tested the effects of hyaluronidase on virus-induced
leukocyte adhesion. Cultures of M-SMCs were untreated or infected with
RSV (1:500 dilution of stock culture) or poly(I·C) for 24 h.
Adhesion of U937 cells was then measured. Following the adhesion step,
medium with or without hyaluronidase was added. Both poly(I·C) and
RSV induced leukocyte adhesion. Hyaluronidase digestion released
essentially all of the bound leukocytes from the RSV-treated cultures
and most (~60%) from the poly(I·C)-treated cultures (Fig.
11).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Effect of hyaluronidase on virus-induced
U937 cell adhesion. Confluent M-SMCs were treated with DMEM/F-12
medium containing 10% FBS with or without RSV (50 µl/cm2) or poly(I·C) (10 µg/ml) for 18 h,
37 °C. The U937 cell adhesion assay was done as described under
"Materials and Methods," after which time cultures were treated
with medium alone or containing hyaluronidase (200 µg/ml) for 5 min
at room temperature, washed twice more, and prepared for radioactive
counting. (Values are the mean of duplicate wells.)
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
M-SMCs are highly susceptible to RSV and MV infections. In
addition, these cells, which are normally minimally adhesive for leukocytes, bind increased numbers of mononuclear leukocytes after infection with RSV or MV, or treatment with the viral mimic
poly(I·C). Hyaluronan on the M-SMCs, interacting with CD44 on the
leukocytes, mediates most of the induced adhesion in each of these cases.
Cell-associated hyaluronan is increased on poly(I·C)-treated M-SMCs
compared with untreated control cells. Since hyaluronan is synthesized
as very long chains at the cell surface by hyaluronan synthases (HAS1,
HAS2, or HAS3) (32), conceivably either inhibition of chain release at
the surface or increased incorporation of hyaluronan-binding proteins
that stabilize the hyaluronan in the cell matrix may account for the
increase in leukocyte adhesion. One of several potential candidates of
the latter possibility is the serum protein inter-
-trypsin inhibitor
(I-
-I or ITI), which has been described as a stabilizer of
hyaluronan pericellular coats (33) on a variety of cells including SMCs
(34). Consistent with our findings, several reports have observed
increased hyaluronan to be a marker of other inflammatory conditions
(35).
Previous reports have demonstrated that viral agents up-regulate VCAM-1
mRNA and protein (30, 36) in endothelial cells and mesenchymal
tumor cells (37), a finding we have confirmed in M-SMCs. Interestingly,
however, in our studies VCAM-1 function appears to be masked by
hyaluronan, but can be restored by removing hyaluronan with
hyaluronidase. Adhesion molecules not only have the ability to direct
leukocyte traffic, but are also reported to be able to activate the
bound leukocyte, which can then lead to cytokine (38), chemokine (39),
and protease (40) production. The consequences of two up-regulated
molecules, hyaluronan and VCAM-1, acting in temporal or conditional
sequence on leukocytes through CD44 and VLA-4 (the ligand for VCAM-1),
may be important in the inflammatory process. We have found that viral
agents can change not only the number of interactions that M-SMCs can
have with leukocytes, but also alter the kinds of recognition molecules available to them.
While others have shown that activated leukocytes can adhere to
unstimulated airway smooth muscle cells (17) and endothelial cells
(41), or to cytokine-treated small vessel endothelial cells (42) by a
hyaluronan-mediated mechanism, we believe this to be the first report
showing viral induction of this mechanism. The M-SMC reaction to virus
appears to be unique, since none of the other biologic stimulators we
employed (TNF-
(shown); IL-1
, IL-4, IL-6, IFN-
, IFN-
,
transforming growth factor-
, lipopolysaccharide, thrombin, or
phorbol ester (data not shown)) up-regulated hyaluronan-mediated leukocyte adhesion to M-SMCs, although some up-regulate the
VCAM-1-mediated pathway, and most are active regulators of endothelial
leukocyte adhesion molecules.
CD44 has been reported to be the major receptor for hyaluronan (43).
Most circulating leukocytes, including lymphocytes and monocytes, are
known to display CD44 on their surface. However, leukocyte activation
(44, 45) and subsequent activation of CD44 (46) are currently thought
to be necessary for hyaluronan binding by this receptor. A surprising
finding of our work is that large numbers of unstimulated, normal
leukocytes can bind to virus-induced hyaluronan via their CD44
receptors. Since untreated M-SMCs constitutively express measurable
amounts of hyaluronan on their surface, but are not adhesive for
leukocytes, we speculate that either a critical mass of hyaluronan must
be reached before CD44 binding can occur, or more likely, that
virus-induced hyaluronan is presented differently on the M-SMC surface.
Conceivably, co-expression, or increased incorporation of one or more
of the hyaluronan-binding proteins could cause hyaluronan to be
presented in a configuration more conducive to engaging CD44.
Hyaladherin molecules such as aggrecan, versican, hyaluronectin, or the
protein produced by TNF-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6) (47, 48) as well as
smooth muscle cell-expressed CD44 may play a role in such a process. We
can detect CD44 on M-SMCs, as has been shown on SMCs from other tissue sources (17, 49), but its expression in our system is not regulated by
viral agents.4 Correlations
of the hyaluronan binding molecules TSG-6 and the serum molecule,
I-
-I, have already been made with certain types of inflammation (50,
51), findings that are potentially pertinent to bowel inflammation as well.
Recent reports have underscored the potential importance of the CD44
receptor/hyaluronan interaction to inflammation. De Grendele et
al. (45) have demonstrated the requirement for activated T-cell-associated CD44 for extravasation into inflammatory sites, and
Brocke et al. (52) have shown that CD44 antibodies can help block secondary leukocyte recruitment in central nervous system inflammation and experimental encephalomyelitis. Peripheral blood T-cells are activated by specific ligation of CD44 and produce increased IL-2 levels (53, 54), and similarly treated monocytes release
higher levels of IL-1 and TNF-
than untreated controls (54, 55).
Macrophage binding to hyaluronan has recently been shown to up-regulate
IL-12, as well as the chemokines RANTES and MIP-1
and MIP-1
(39).
Since viral agent-induced hyaluronan on M-SMCs binds non-activated
leukocytes through CD44, subsequent activation seems a likely outcome.
The response of M-SMCs to viral agents appears to be a normal
physiological response. We have used over 50 different human isolates
of M-SMCs in the course of these studies, and no matter what the
source, IBD or not, inflamed tissue or not, we have never isolated
M-SMCs that are unresponsive to poly(I·C) in the parameters we have
described in this report, although the magnitude of the response does
vary among cell isolates. Indeed, this mechanism is not unique to
smooth muscle cells of the colon. SMCs isolated from vascular
(mesenteric artery) and airway (bronchus) sources also exhibit
hyaluronan-mediated leukocyte adhesion in response to
poly(I·C).4 Clearly this mechanism has important
implications for other chronic inflammatory conditions. Asthma, for
which a hyaluronan role has already been postulated (17), is known to
be exacerbated by respiratory virus infection (56, 57). In models of
atherosclerosis and restenosis injury, up-regulated hyaluronan and
SMC-expressed CD44 (49) have been observed. Data supporting an
underlying viral association (24, 58) with these two pathological
conditions have also been published.
We have presented data that show a novel, virus-induced mechanism of
leukocyte recruitment/interaction with mucosal smooth muscle cells,
which may, in susceptible individuals, contribute to the chronic
inflammation of IBD. Interestingly, the extraintestinal manifestations
of IBD, which are exhibited in 30-50% of patients, occur in
hyaluronan-rich tissues (e.g. joint, skin, eye) (25), leading us to speculate that pre-exposure of inflammatory leukocytes to
virus-induced hyaluronan may have a role in directing recirculating leukocytes inappropriately to other hyaluronan-rich sites, in a manner
similar to the endothelial cell-directed model put forth by Salmi and
Jalkanen (12). The fact that viral agents may induce M-SMC recruitment
of leukocytes via a hyaluronan/CD44 mechanism introduces a new
direction for investigating the pathogenesis of IBD.
 |
Acnowledgment |
We are especially grateful for the generosity
of Mrs. Noah L. Butkin and the Butkin Foundation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by a donation from the Butkin
Foundation, a grant from the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (to S. A. S.), and seed funds from the Cleveland Clinic
Foundation (to V. C. H).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Lerner Research
Inst., NB3, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44195. Tel.: 216-444-5374; Fax: 216-444-9329.
2
Calabro, A., Benavides, M., Tammi, M., Hascall,
V. C., and Midura, R. J. (1999) Glycobiology, in press.
3
Calabro, A., Hascall, V. C., and Midura, R. J. (1999) Glycobiology, in press.
4
C. A. de la Motte and S. A. Strong,
unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
IBD, inflammatory
bowel disease;
M-SMC, mucosal smooth muscle cell;
RSV, respiratory
syncytial virus;
MV, measles virus;
poly(I·C), polyinosinic
acid:polycytidylic acid;
TNF-
, tumor necrosis factor-
;
BSS, balanced salt solution;
FBS, fetal bovine serum;
PBML, peripheral blood
mononuclear leukocyte;
VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1;
ICAM-1, intracellular adhesion molecule-1;
HLA-DR, human leukocyte
antigen-DR;
IFN, interferon;
MIP, macrophage inflammatory protein;
RANTES, regulated upon activation, normal T expressed and secreted;
IL, interleukin;
FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate;
SMC, smooth muscle
cell.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Hugot, J.-P.,
Laurent-Puig, P.,
Gower-Rousseau, C.,
Olson, J. M..,
Lee, J. C.,
Beaugerie, L.,
Naom, I.,
Dupas, J.-L.,
Van Gossum, A.,
Orholm, M.,
Bonaiti-Pellie, C.,
Weissenbach, J.,
Mathew, C. G.,
Lennard-Jones, J. E.,
Cortot, A.,
Colombel, J.-F.,
and Thomas, G.
(1996)
Nature
379,
821-823[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Cho, J. H.,
Nicolae, D. L.,
Gold, L. H.,
Fields, C. T.,
LaBuda, M. C.,
Rohal, P. M.,
Pickles, M. R.,
Qin, L.,
Fu, Y.,
Mann, J. S.,
Kirschner, B. S.,
Jabs, E. W.,
Weber, S. B.,
Hanauer, S. B.,
Bayless, T. M.,
and Brant, S. R.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
7502-7507[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Fiocchi, C.,
Strong, S. A.,
West, G. A.,
and Klein, J. S.
(1993)
Can. J. Gastroenterol.
7,
110-114
|
| 4.
|
Fuss, I. J.,
Neurath, M.,
Boirivant, M.,
Klein, J. S.,
de la Motte, C.,
Strong, S. A.,
Fiocchi, C.,
and Strober, W.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
157,
1261-1270[Abstract]
|
| 5.
|
Kangro, H. O.,
Chong, S. K.,
Hardiman, A.,
Heath, R. B.,
and Walker-Smith, J. A.
(1990)
Gastroenterology
98,
549-553[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Wakefield, A. J.,
Pittilio, R. M.,
Sim, R.,
Cosby, S. L.,
Stephenson, J. R.,
Dhillon, A. P.,
and Pounder, R. E.
(1993)
J. Med. Virol.
39,
345-353[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Miyamoto, H.,
Tanaka, T.,
Kitamoto, N.,
Fukada, Y.,
and Shivinada, S.
(1995)
J. Gastroenterol.
30,
28-33[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Montgomery, S. M.,
Morris, D. L.,
Pounder, R. E.,
and Wakefield, A. J.
(1999)
J. Med. Virol.
116,
796-803
|
| 9.
|
Wakefield, A. J.,
Fox, J. D.,
Sawyerr, A. M.,
Taylor, J. E.,
Sweenie, C. H.,
Smith, M.,
Emery, V. C.,
Hudson, M.,
Tedder, R. S.,
and Pounder, R. E.
(1992)
J. Med. Virol.
38,
183-190[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Farmer, G. W.,
Vincent, M. M.,
Fuccillo, D. A.,
Horta-Barbosa, L.,
Ritman, S.,
Sever, J. L.,
and Gitnick, G. L.
(1973)
Gastroenterology
65,
8-18[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Rosai, J.
(1996)
Ackerman's Surgical Pathology
, 8th Ed., Vol. 1
, p. 729, Mosby, St. Louis, MO
|
| 12.
|
Salmi, M.,
and Jalkanen, S.
(1998)
Inflamm. Bowel Dis.
4,
149-156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Lee, E. Y,
Stenson, W. F,
and DeSchryver-Kecskemeti, K.
(1991)
Mod. Pathol.
4,
87-90[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Strong, S. A.,
Pizarro, T. T.,
Klein, J. S.,
Cominelli, F.,
and Fiocchi, C.
(1998)
Gastroenterology
114,
1244-1256[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Roberts, A. I.,
Nadler, S. C.,
and Ebert, E. C.
(1997)
Gastroenterology
113,
144-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Fiocchi, C.,
Collins, S. M.,
James, S. P.,
Mayer, L.,
Podolsky, D. K.,
and Stenson, W. F.
(1997)
Inflamm. Bowel Dis.
3,
133-141
|
| 17.
|
Lazaar, A. L.,
Albelda, S. M.,
Pilewski, J. M.,
Brennan, B.,
Pure, E.,
and Panettieri, R. A., Jr.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
807-816[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
de la Motte, C. A.,
Klein, J. S.,
and Strong, S. A..
(1997)
Gastroenterology
112,
A956
|
| 19.
|
Boyum, A.
(1968)
Scand. J. Clin. Invest.
21 Suppl. 97,
77-83[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Stossel, T. P.,
Pollard, T. D.,
Mason, R. J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1971)
J. Clin. Invest.
50,
1745
|
| 21.
|
DiCorleto, P. E.,
and de la Motte, C. A.
(1985)
J. Clin. Invest.
75,
1153-1161
|
| 22.
|
Shankar, R.,
de la Motte, C. A.,
and DiCorleto, P. E.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
9376-9382[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Polte, T.,
Newman, W.,
and Gopal, T. V.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
5901[Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Epstein, S. E.,
Speir, E.,
Zhou, Y. F.,
Guetta, E.,
Leon, M.,
and Finkel, T.
(1996)
Lancet
348 Suppl. 1,
s13-s17
|
| 25.
|
Podolsky, D. K.
(1991)
N. Engl. J. Med.
325,
1008-1016[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 26.
|
Prieto, J.,
Eklund, A.,
and Patarroyo, M.
(1994)
Cell Immunol.
156,
191-211[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Haines, D. S.,
Strauss, K. I.,
and Gillespie, D. H.
(1991)
J. Cell. Biochem.
46,
9-20[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Li, H.,
Cybulsky, M. I.,
Gimbrone, M. A.,
and Libby, P.
(1993)
Am. J. Pathol.
143,
1551-1559[Abstract]
|
| 29.
|
Couffinhal, T.,
Duplaa, C.,
Labat, L.,
Lamazier, J.-M. D.,
Moreau, C.,
Printseva, O.,
and Bonnet, J.
(1993)
Arterioscler. Thromb.
13,
407-413[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Offermann, M. K.,
Zimring, J.,
Mellits, K. H.,
Hagan, M. K.,
Shaw, R.,
Medford, R. M.,
Mathews, M. B.,
Goodbourn, S.,
and Jagus, R.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
232,
28-36[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Doukas, J.,
Cutler, A. H.,
and Mordes, J. P.
(1994)
Am. J. Pathol.
145,
137-147[Abstract]
|
| 32.
|
Weigel, P. H.,
Hascall, V. C.,
and Tammi, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
13997-14000[Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Blom, A.,
Pertoft, H.,
and Fries, E.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
9698-9701[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 34.
|
McGuire, P. G.,
Castellot, J. J.,
and Orkin, R. W.
(1987)
J. Cell. Physiol.
133,
267-276[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Laurent, T. G.,
Laurent, U. B. G.,
and Fraser, J. R. E.
(1996)
Ann. Med.
28,
241-253[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Marui, N.,
Offermann, M. K.,
Swerlick, R.,
Kunsch, C.,
Rosen, C. A.,
Ahmed, M.,
Alexander, R. W.,
and Medford, R. M.
(1993)
J. Clin Invest.
92,
1866-1874
|
| 37.
|
Yang, J.,
Xu, Y.,
Zhu, C.,
Hagan, M. K.,
Lawley, T,
and Offermann, M. K.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
152,
361-373[Abstract]
|
| 38.
|
Haller, H.,
Kunzendorf, U.,
Sacherer, K.,
Lindschau, C.,
Walz, G.,
Distler, A.,
and Luft, F. C.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
158,
1061-1067[Abstract]
|
| 39.
|
Hodge-Dufour, J.,
Noble, P. W.,
Horton, M. R.,
Bao, C.,
Wysoka, M.,
Burdick, M. D.,
Strieter, R. M.,
Trinchieri, G.,
and Pure, E.
(1997)
J. Immunol.
159,
2492-2500[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Romanic, A. M.,
and Madri, J. A.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
1165-1178[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 41.
|
DeGrendele, H. C.,
Estess, P.,
Picker, L. J.,
and Siegelman, M. H.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
1119-1130[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 42.
|
Mohamadzadeh, M.,
DeGrendele, H.,
Arizpe, H.,
Estess, P.,
and Siegelman, M.
(1998)
J. Clin. Invest.
101,
97-108[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 43.
|
Aruffo, A.,
Stamenkovic, I.,
Melnick, M.,
Underhill, C. B.,
and Seed, B.
(1990)
Cell
61,
1303-1313[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 44.
|
Lesley, J.,
Howes, N.,
Perschl, A.,
and Hyman, R.
(1994)
J. Exp. Med.
180,
383-387[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
DeGrendele, H. D.,
Estess, P.,
and Siegelman, M. H.
(1997)
Science
278,
672-675[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Lesley, J.,
Hyman, R.,
and Kincade, P. W.
(1993)
Adv. Immunol.
54,
271-335[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 47.
|
Knudson, C. B.,
and Knudson, W.
(1993)
FASEB J.
7,
1233-1241[Abstract]
|
| 48.
|
Heinegard, D.,
Bjornsson, S.,
Morgelin, M.,
and Sommarin, Y.
(1998)
in
The Chemistry, Biology and Medical Applications of Hyaluronan and Its Derivatives
(Laurent, T. C., ed)
, pp. 113-122, Portland Press Ltd., London
|
| 49.
|
Jain, M.,
He, Q.,
Lee, W.-S.,
Kashiki, S.,
Foster, L. C.,
Tsai, J.-C.,
Lee, M.-E.,
and Haber, E.
(1996)
J. Clin. Invest.
97,
596-603[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 50.
|
Wisniewski, H.-G.,
Maier, R.,
Lotz, M.,
Lee, S.,
Klampfer, L.,
Lee, T. H.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
151,
6593-6601[Abstract]
|
| 51.
|
Wisniewski, H.-G.,
Burgess, W. H.,
Oppenheim, J. D.,
and Vilcek, J.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
7423-7429[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 52.
|
Brock, S.,
Piercy, C.,
Steinman, L.,
Weissman, I. L.,
and Veromaa, T.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
6896-6901[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 53.
|
Shimizu, Y.,
Van Seventer, G. A.,
Siraganian, R.,
Wahl, L.,
and Shaw, S.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
143,
2457-2463[Abstract]
|
| 54.
|
Denning, S. M.,
Le, P. T.,
Singer, K. H.,
and Haynes, B. F.
(1990)
J. Immunol.
144,
7-15[Abstract]
|
| 55.
|
Webb, D. S.,
Shimizu, Y.,
Van Seventer, G. A.,
Shaw, S.,
and Gerrard, T. L.
(1990)
Science
249,
1295-1298[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 56.
|
Johnston, S. L.
(1997)
Pediatr. Pulmonol. Suppl.
16,
88-89[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 57.
|
Teichtahl, H.,
Buckmaster, N.,
and Pertnikovs, E.
(1997)
Chest
112,
591-596[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 58.
|
Grattan, M. T.,
Moreno-Cabral, C. E.,
Starnes, V. A.,
Oyer, P. E.,
Stinson, E. B.,
and Shumway, N. E.
(1989)
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
261,
3561-3566[Abstract]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike