JBC Advanced Peptides, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moynihan, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moynihan, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 43, 30963-30968, October 22, 1999


The Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes UbcH7 and UbcH8 Interact with RING Finger/IBR Motif-containing Domains of HHARI and H7-AP1*

Terry P. MoynihanDagger §, Helen C. ArdleyDagger , Ulrike Nuber, Stephen A. RoseDagger , Pamela F. JonesDagger , Alexander F. MarkhamDagger , Martin Scheffner, and Philip A. RobinsonDagger parallel **

From the Dagger  Molecular Medicine Unit and parallel  Leeds Dental Institute, University of Leeds, Clinical Sciences Building, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom and the  Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Angewandte Tumorvirologie, Im Neuenheimer Feld 242, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Ubiquitinylation of proteins appears to be mediated by the specific interplay between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s). However, cognate E3s and/or substrate proteins have been identified for only a few E2s. To identify proteins that can interact with the human E2 UbcH7, a yeast two-hybrid screen was performed. Two proteins were identified and termed human homologue of Drosophila ariadne (HHARI) and UbcH7-associated protein (H7-AP1). Both proteins, which are widely expressed, are characterized by the presence of RING finger and in between RING fingers (IBR) domains. No other overt structural similarity was observed between the two proteins. In vitro binding studies revealed that an N-terminal RING finger motif (HHARI) and the IBR domain (HHARI and H7-AP1) are involved in the interaction of these proteins with UbcH7. Furthermore, binding of these two proteins to UbcH7 is specific insofar that both HHARI and H7-AP1 can bind to the closely related E2, UbcH8, but not to the unrelated E2s UbcH5 and UbcH1. Although it is not clear at present whether HHARI and H7-AP1 serve, for instance, as substrates for UbcH7 or represent proteins with E3 activity, our data suggests that a subset of RING finger/IBR proteins are functionally linked to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The primary role of the protein ubiquitinylation pathway is the targeting of intracellular substrate proteins for degradation (1). In this process, ubiquitin is first activated in an ATP-dependent step forming a thioester bond with an ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1). Ubiquitin is then transferred to an ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2),1 retaining the high energy thioester bond. Thereafter, the E2, alone or in conjunction with an ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3), catalyzes the final attachment of ubiquitin to the target protein (2). Ubiquitin itself can then serve as a ubiquitinylation substrate, resulting in the generation of polyubiquitinylated proteins possibly with the aid of an E4 (3). Finally, ubiquitinylated proteins are recognized and degraded by the 26 S proteasome.

It has been proposed that the selection of an individual protein for proteasomal degradation via the ubiquitin pathway requires a unique combination of an E2 and E3. In S. cerevisiae, some 13 E2s or E2-related proteins have been identified, and many more are present in higher eukaryotes (2). E2s are characterized by a conserved catalytic domain of approximately 150 amino acid residues. Despite their functional redundancy, individual E2s appear to be involved in different cellular processes and, therefore, in the ubiquitinylation of different substrate proteins. The distinct substrate specificity of E2s is at least in part explained by the observation that different E2s interact with different E3s.

Four classes of E3 have been identified to date; in contrast to E2s, they exhibit no overt sequence homology. These are yeast UBR1 and its mammalian homologues (4), mammalian E6-AP and members of an E6-AP-related family of E3s termed hect domain proteins (homologous to E6-AP C terminus) (2, 5, 6), a hetero-oligomeric protein complex termed the cyclosome or anaphase promoting complex (7, 8), and the Skp1/Cdc53/F-box (SCF) complexes (9-11). Although SCF complexes, for instance, do not appear to have a catalytic role in protein ubiquitinylation (9-11), hect domain family members have been suggested to catalyze directly the final attachment of ubiquitin to substrate proteins (2, 12). Despite their different mode of action, it appears that a common feature of all E3s is to specifically interact with distinct E2s. For instance, hect domain family members interact specifically in vitro with UbcH5 and/or UbcH7 and related E2s (5, 6, 12-15) through the ~350-amino acid C-terminal hect domain. Their functional biological importance is indicated by the findings that loss of function of the E6-AP gene, UBE3A, results in Angelman syndrome (16, 17), and disruption of the mouse hect E3 gene encoding Itchy results in abnormalities in the immune system (18).

Over the past decade, it has become clear that many cellular proteins are targeted for degradation by the ubiquitinylation pathway. However, the respective E2s and E3s mediating their ubiquitinylation have been determined for only a few proteins. Furthermore, although several distinct classes of E3 have been identified to date, it seems likely that novel classes of E3s, or other proteins involved in mediating the substrate specificity of E2s, remain to be discovered. Homology cloning has clearly proven successful in the identification of additional members of specific E3 families such as the hect family. However, because of the lack of homology between the different classes of E3, other interaction-based approaches must be employed to identify novel E3s and/or ubiquitinylation "ancillary proteins." We therefore employed the yeast two-hybrid system to isolate proteins that interact with UbcH7, a human E2 that in vitro appears to be involved in the ubiquitinylation of various proteins including the tumor suppressor p53 (13, 19-22).

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Yeast Two-hybrid Screen for UbcH7-interacting Proteins-- The GAL4-based yeast two-hybrid screening technique (23) was employed to identify UbcH7-interacting proteins. The "bait" plasmid was constructed by cloning the open reading frame of UbcH7 (13, 20, 21) into the vector pGBT9 (GAL41-147DNA-BD, TRP1, ampr) (CLONTECH) as a GAL4 DNA-binding domain fusion protein (pGBT-UbcH7). A human testis cDNA-GAL4 activation domain fusion library in the vector pACT2 (GAL4768-881 AD, LEU2, ampr, HA epitope tag) (CLONTECH) was utilized to identify UbcH7-interacting proteins. The bait plasmid was transformed into S. cerevisiae strain HF7c (MATa, ura3-52, his3-200, ade2-101, lys2-801, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, gal4-542, gal80-538, LYS2::GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-HIS3, URA3::GAL417-mers(x3)-CYC1TATA-lacZ) (CLONTECH). Clones were selected on minimal synthetic dropout medium in the absence of tryptophan. Yeast clones harboring the bait plasmid were then sequentially transformed with the "prey" library. Positive clones, potentially harboring UbcH7-interacting species, were identified both by their capacity to grow on media without tryptophan, leucine, and histidine and the detection of beta -galactosidase activity. Plasmids were isolated from positive yeast clones, selecting for pACT2 cDNA library plasmids by transformation of the leucine auxotroph Escherichia coli strain HB101. Plasmids were then isolated, the inserts were amplified by PCR using flanking vector oligonucleotide primers, and clones were then grouped by size and analyzed by cross-hybridization.

To confirm the specificity of the interactions, pACT2 library plasmids were transformed into the yeast host strain harboring no plasmid, yeast containing pGBT9 vector only, yeast containing pLAM5 (a GAL4 human lamin C fusion), or pGBT-UbcH7. Only those library plasmids demonstrating a requirement for the pGBT-UbcH7 plasmid for induced expression of the lacZ and HIS3 reporter genes were considered further. To assess the specificity of the interaction, UbcH7 was cloned into the GAL4 activation domain plasmid pGAD424 (GAL4768-881 AD, LEU2, ampr), and inserts derived from the pACT2 cDNA library were cloned into pGBT9 as in-frame fusions. These were co-transformed into two S. cerevisiae strains, HF7c and SFY256 (MATa, ura3-52, his3-200, ade2-101, lys2-801, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, canr, gal4-542, gal80-538, URA3::GAL1UAS-GAL1TATA-lacZ); interaction was assessed in the former strain as described above and in the latter using the beta -galactosidase assay. Library clones exhibiting a specific interaction in all assays were selected for DNA sequence analysis.

Isolation of Full-length cDNA Clones-- To isolate full-length cDNA clones of human homologue of Drosophila ariadne (HHARI), a human fetal brain cDNA library panel (Origene) was screened by PCR using oligonucleotide primers corresponding to nucleotides 591-611 (dCATGAGCAGGAGGAGGATTAC) and 889-867 (dTTCAAGTAGCAGATCTGACAAGG) of the full-length sequence (GenBankTM accession number AJ243190). Positive clones were isolated and sequenced.

Northern Blot Analysis-- Multiple human tissue Northern blots (CLONTECH) were hybridized with radiolabeled HHARI or H7-AP1 DNA probes. DNA was generated by PCR from the inserts of the appropriate pACT2 clones and radiolabeled with [alpha -32P]dCTP using the Megaprime DNA labeling system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Chromosomal Mapping-- HHARI primer pairs dATTTCACTGGCCTTGAATGTGGAC and dACTAAGATATCACAACCATGAGCA (nucleotides 904-927 and 1033-1010), and dACCATCTAGAGTGCTCATGCA and dCAATGGTTTATCTACCTTTTTATTAC (nucleotides 2023-2044 and 2177-2152), were used to screen the GeneBridge 4 Radiation Hybrid DNA panel (UK HGMP Resource Center). The data generated was submitted to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Genome Research sequence tagged site mapping server. A PAC clone was used to map H7-AP1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Interaction of HHARI with Human E2s in Vitro-- Four human E2s were assessed for their capacity to form a stable association with HHARI: (i) UbcH1 (24), which does not interact with E6-AP, (ii) UbcH5 (25), (iii) UbcH7 (13, 20, 21), and (iv) UbcH8 (14), all of which support E6-AP-ubiquitin thioester formation. Plasmids bearing upstream bacteriophage T7 promoters encoding these E2s have been described previously (6, 13, 25). The open reading frame of UbcH8 (14) was amplified by PCR using Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) and cloned into pET3a (Novagen). 35S-Radiolabeled E2s were generated in vitro using either the T7 TnT rabbit reticulocyte- or wheat germ lysate-coupled transcription/translation systems (Promega) using [35S]Promix (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The insert from the smallest pACT2 HHARI clone that interacted with UbcH7, encompassing 666-2178 base pairs (GenBankTM accession number AF072832) was cloned into pGEX-2T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) (termed GST-HHARI (118-557)). GST fusion protein was affinity-purified on glutathione-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Deletion mutants of GST-HHARI (118-557) were generated by subcloning PCR-amplified fragments of this region into the same vector.

GST-HHARI fusion protein binding assays with E2s were performed by incubating ~0.5 µg of glutathione-Sepharose-bound GST-HHARI (118-557) or deletion mutant with 10 µl of 35S-radiolabeled E2 in 200 µl of binding buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.4, containing 150 mM NaCl, 1.0% IGEPAL CA-630 (Sigma), and 0.1 mM dithiothreitol) in the presence of protease inhibitors 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulphonyl fluoride (0.2 mM), aprotinin (1 µg/ml), EDTA (1 mM), leupeptin (50 µM), and pepstatin (1 µM) at 4 °C for 12 h. After washing the beads five times with binding buffer (1 ml/wash), bound radiolabeled E2 proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (15% acylamide gel, 37.5:1 acryl:bis) and detected by autoradiography.

Interaction of GST-HHARI (118-557) with Endogenous UbcH7 in HeLa Cell Extracts-- To assess the capacity of GST-HHARI (118-557) to bind cellular UbcH7, a HeLa cell lysate was prepared. A 100-mm dish of semiconfluent HeLa cells was lysed on ice for 45 min in 1 ml of binding buffer containing protease inhibitors (see above). Identical aliquots of lysate (300 µl), precleared by centrifugation at 14,000 × g at 4 °C for 30 min, were incubated with glutathione-Sepharose-bound GST-HHARI (118-557) or, as a negative control, with GST-APC (the C-terminal 268 amino acids of the adenomatous polyposis coli protein that interacts with EB1 protein (26)). Proteins were then transferred to Immobilon P polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using Towbin's buffer containing 20% (v/v) methanol (27). UbcH7 was detected using an affinity-purified rabbit polyclonal anti-UbcH7 peptide antiserum raised against its C-terminal 18 residues. EB1 was detected with a mouse monoclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories). Bound antibodies were detected using S-protein horseradish peroxidase and visualized by chemiluminescent detection using SuperSignal ULTRA (Pierce).

Identification of UbcH7 Domains Regulating the Interaction with HHARI-- Specific regions of the UbcH7 cDNA (15, 20, 21) were amplified by PCR using Pfu DNA polymerase and cloned into the BamHI site of pET32a as in-frame thioredoxin (TXD) C-terminal fusion proteins (Novagen). Binding assays were performed as described above using ~0.5 µg each of TXD fusion protein and GST-HHARI (118-557). Bound proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and detected as described above.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Isolation of the Human Homologue of Drosophila melanogaster Ariadne Protein-- 0.5 × 106 independent cDNA clones of a human testis cDNA library were screened for interaction with pGBT-UbcH7. Two groups of cross-hybridizing clones were identified and initially termed H7-AP (UbcH7-associated protein) type I clones (seven cross-hybridizing clones) and H7-AP2 clones (six clones). The specificity of the interaction was confirmed by performing a "vector-swap" experiment in which UbcH7 was expressed from the pGBT vector and the H7-AP1 or H7-AP2 cDNA inserts from the pACT2 construct.

The longest H7-AP2 clone of 1605 nucleotides encompassed amino acids 93-557 (Fig. 1A). A full-length clone, encoding the entire open reading frame of 557 amino acids (Fig. 1A) and constituting a protein of approximately 61 kDa, was obtained by screening a human fetal brain cDNA library. A data base search with the full-length H7-AP2 clone revealed that the encoded protein shows striking similarity (72% identity) to the D. melanogaster ariadne protein (see Fig. 1A). Hence, H7-AP2 was renamed HHARI. A second Drosophila homologue, of lower identity, which we term ariadne2, and a partial murine orthologue were also identified (Fig. 1A). The deduced HHARI protein sequence displays several notable primary structural characteristics: a highly acidic domain and a poly(Gly) tract in the N-terminal region of the protein and three Cys/His-rich motifs located centrally. Two of these motifs, CX2CX13CXHX2CX2CX19CX4C and CX2CX9CXHX2CX4CX4CX2C, encompassing amino acids 186-236 and 344-375, respectively, correspond to the consensus sequence of the RING finger motif, CX2CX (9-39)CX (1-3)HX (2-3)CX2CX4-48CX2C (28). The central Cys/His-rich region has recently been termed the "in between RING fingers" (IBR) motif (residues 257-317) (29).


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Sequence analysis of Hhari and H7-AP1. A, predicted amino acid sequence encoded by human HHARI cDNA and alignment of HHARI (GenBankTM accession number AJ243190) with D. melanogaster ariadne (GenBankTM accession number X98310), ariadne2 (GenBankTM accession number AJ130977), and the deduced polypeptide sequence from a partial mouse cDNA clone (mouseari) (GenBankTM accession number AJ130978).  , additional sequence ANALLVTARIKPPSVAVTDTA. Numbering is based upon HHARI sequence. B, polypeptide sequence encoded by H7-AP1. * represents identical amino acid residues. Boxed sequences in boldface type represent RING motifs. Sequences underlined and in boldface type indicate IBR motifs. Sequences in boldface type only represent Cys/His-rich domain.

The largest of the H7-AP1 clones of 2366 nucleotides encompassed the C-terminal 734 amino acids of an open reading frame (Fig. 1B). A data base search using this cDNA revealed an exact match to the 3' region of a partial cDNA clone of 5404 base pairs encoding an open reading frame of 1753 amino acids (GenBankTM accession number AB014608). Amino acids 453-482 of the predicted coding region again represent a RING finger motif, CX2CX9CXHX2CX2CX4CX2C. Furthermore, an extended Cys-rich, RING finger-like motif was also identified between amino acids 273 and 422, CXHX10HCX2CX5CX7CCXHXCCX2CX16CX2CX4CX33CX5CX5CX4CX5CX3CX2CX4CX6HX5CXH (Fig. 1B). This extended motif includes an IBR domain between residues 358 and 422.

Expression and Chromosomal Mapping of HHARI and H7-AP1-- To assess the expression pattern of H7-AP1 and HHARI, Northern blot analysis was performed using the respective cDNAs as a probe. Three HHARI transcripts of approximately 2.2, 2.7, and 6.5 kb were observed in all tissues, although the 2.2-kb species was weakly expressed except in testis, where it is the predominant transcript (Fig. 2A). The three transcripts share a common open reading frame but have alternative polyadenylation sites (data not shown). Particularly high levels of the 6.5-kb transcripts were observed in skeletal muscle, spleen, testis, and ovary, and high levels of the 2.7-kb transcript were observed in skeletal muscle and testis. A predominant H7-AP1 transcript of approximately 9 kb was observed in all tissues (Fig. 2B), although relatively higher levels were observed in brain, kidney, and testis.


View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Northern blot analysis of HHARI and H7-AP1 expression. cDNA probes encompassing the open reading frames of HHARI (A) and of H7-AP1 (B) were used to probe Northern blots containing poly(A)+ mRNA derived from a number of human tissues, as indicated above the respective lanes. The positions of size standards are indicated in kb. sk muscle, skeletal muscle; small int., small intestine; PBL, peripheral blood lymphocytes.

The chromosomal localization of the HHARI gene was determined by radiation hybrid mapping using oligonucleotide primer pairs derived from both the coding region and the 3' untranslated region. The mapping data for HHARI with both primer sets were in complete agreement, localizing the gene to the long arm of chromosome 15, 2.84 cR from the marker WI-3873 and 79 cR from the top of chromosome 15. H7-AP1 was mapped to chromosome 6p12-21.1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Interaction of HHARI and H7-AP1 with Different Human E2s in Vitro-- To test whether the observed interaction of UbcH7 with HHARI and H7-AP1 in the yeast two-hybrid system can also be observed in vitro, HHARI and H7-AP1 were expressed as GST fusion proteins in E. coli. The respective GST fusion proteins were then incubated with different radiolabeled E2s generated in the rabbit reticulocyte lysate system and the amount of bound E2s determined in a co-precipitation analysis. The GST-HHARI fusion protein associated with UbcH7 and the closely related UbcH8 (approximately 25% of input radiolabeled E2 was bound to HHARI) but not with the unrelated E2s UbcH1 or UbcH5 (Fig. 3). A similar pattern of interactions was observed with H7-AP1 (data not shown).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   HHARI specifically interacts with UbcH7 and UbcH8. 35S-Radiolabeled UbcH1, UbcH5, UbcH7, and UbcH8 were generated in rabbit reticulocyte lysate and assessed for their capacity to form a stable complex with GST-HHARI fusion protein. Radiolabeled E2s were incubated with GST-HHARI fusion protein (+) or GST alone (-) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lane i, analysis of 10% of input E2 used in each binding assay. It should be noted that an identical HHARI1:E2 association profile was observed with E2s synthesized in the wheat germ lysate system, indicating that the ability of the different E2s to bind to HHARI1 had not been compromised by the saturation of HHARI1 binding sites with endogenous mammalian E2s present in the reticulocyte lysate.

Next, the ability of GST-HHARI (118-557) to interact with endogenous cellular UbcH7 was tested. Protein extracts were prepared from HeLa cells and incubated with GST-HHARI bound to glutathione-Sepharose beads. Bound proteins were then separated by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4, alpha -UbcH7, lane A), and the presence of UbcH7 was detected by Western blotting using a polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against UbcH7. This demonstrated that cellular UbcH7 specifically bound to GST-HHARI. The specificity of this interaction is demonstrated by the observation that UbcH7 did not bind to GST alone or to an unrelated GST fusion protein encompassing the C-terminal 200 amino acids of the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein (Fig. 4, alpha -UbcH7, lanes G and C, respectively). The binding specificity is further confirmed by the observation that, as expected, the cellular EB1 protein formed a stable complex with the GST-APC fusion protein but not with GST-HHARI (Fig. 4, alpha -EB-1, lanes L, G, A, and C).


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   HHARI binds endogenous UbcH7 in HeLa cell extracts. Proteins from HeLa cell lysate bound to GST-HHARI were resolved by SDS-PAGE as described under "Experimental Procedures." UbcH7 was detected by Western blotting using anti-UbcH7 antiserum and chemiluminescent detection. Lanes G, A, and C contained lysate proteins bound to GST alone, GST-HHARI, and GST-APC fusion proteins, respectively. Lane L contained 20% of the HeLa cell lysate used for each binding assay. The Western blot on the left (alpha -UbcH7) was incubated with anti-UbcH7 antiserum, whereas anti-EB1 antiserum was used for the blot on the right (alpha -EB-1). Molecular mass markers are indicated in kDa.

A RING Finger and IBR Motif of the HHARI Protein and an IBR Motif of H7-AP1 Are Necessary for UbcH7 Binding-- To delineate the region of HHARI that mediates the interaction with UbcH7, a series of N- and C-terminal mutants of HHARI were prepared as GST fusion proteins (see Fig. 5A, fusion proteins A-J). These constructs were then assayed for their ability to associate with radiolabeled UbcH7. The results indicated that the UbcH7 binding region maps to amino acids 118-293 of HHARI, which encompasses the N-terminal RING finger motif (amino acids 186-236) and part of the IBR motif (amino acids 269-327) (see Figs. 1 and 5B).


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Sublocalization of the UbcH7 binding domain within HHARI. A, diagrammatic representation of the GST-HHARI fusion proteins (A-U) used to delimit the UbcH7 binding domain. Stippled boxes represent the GST portion of the protein. Open boxes indicate those proteins containing regions of HHARI that failed to bind UbcH7, whereas filled boxes represent UbcH7 binding fusion proteins. The HHARI sequences encompassed by the respective fusion proteins are detailed in Fig. 1A. The approximate locations (residues 186-236 and 344-375) of the RING motifs () are shown at the top of the figure. B, representative autoradiograph of the UbcH7 GST pull-down assay used to define the HHARI-UbcH7 binding domain. The letters above each lane refer to the respective GST-HHARI proteins described in A. Lane i contains 10% of input 35S-radiolabeled UbcH7 used in each assay.

A second series of GST-HHARI deletion constructs was then used to fine map the E2 binding domain (Fig. 5A, fusion proteins K-U). Results from these binding assays (Fig. 5B) indicated that the minimal UbcH7 binding domain lies between residues 167-293. Although the N-terminal RING finger motif was necessary for UbcH7 binding, a fusion protein containing this motif alone (GST-HHARI (118-242) fusion protein P, Fig. 5) failed to bind the E2. This indicated that both the N-terminal RING finger motif and part of the IBR domain are required for stable interaction with UbcH7.

Similar studies on H7-AP1 revealed that a larger polypeptide sequence (residues 1-441) was required for interaction with UbcH7. This sequence does not incorporate the classic RING finger motif that lies between residues, 453-482 (CX2CX9CXHX2CX2CX4CX2C) but contains an extended cysteine-rich sequence interspersed with histidine residues (CXHX10HCX2CX5CX7CCXHXCCX2CX16CX2CX4CX33CX5CX5 CX4CX5CX3CX2CX4CX6HX5CXH), which includes the IBR motif between residues 358-422. No other recognized motif is present between residues 1-441.

Mapping of Domains within UbcH7 That Govern Its Interaction with HHARI-- A series of N-terminal and C-terminal UbcH7 TXD fusion protein constructs were employed to map the HHARI binding domain within UbcH7. The capacities of these mutants to bind GST-HHARI (118-557) were compared with full-length TXD-UbcH7 fusion protein (Fig. 6). One deletion mutant, encompassing amino acids 101-154, bound to the HHARI fusion protein, but at a level approximately 5-fold lower than the binding exhibited by full-length UbcH7 (Fig. 6). This observation indicated that the C-terminal 54 amino acids of UbcH7 contain a region that is intrinsically involved in binding to HHARI, but other regions of UbcH7 may contribute to stabilize this interaction or may contain additional binding sites for HHARI. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that the N-terminal construct, containing UbcH7 amino acids 1-60, can bind HHARI, although with a very much reduced efficiency (Fig. 6). Finally, a larger N-terminal (1-100) or a shorter C-terminal (61-154) construct completely failed to bind to HHARI. This suggests that these fusion proteins are conformationally compromised and prevent the binding of HHARI.


View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Full-length UbcH7 is required for stable complex formation with HHARI. A series of TXD fusion proteins were constructed containing regions of UbcH7 and assayed for their capacity to form a stable association with GST-HHARI fusion protein (full-length UbcH7 contains 154 amino acid residues). Bound TXD-UbcH7 fusion proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using chemiluminescent detection as described under "Experimental Procedures." Lanes + and - indicate thioredoxin-UbcH7 fusion proteins incubated with GST-HHARI or GST alone as a negative control, respectively. Lanes i contain 5% of the input UbcH7 fusion protein used in each binding assay. Molecular mass markers are indicated in kDa.


    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

We have identified two novel human proteins, HHARI and H7-AP1, that interact with UbcH7 and the closely related E2 UbcH8 but not with the unrelated E2s UbcH1 and UbcH5. No overt structural similarity was identified between them other than the presence of RING finger and IBR motifs. RING finger- and IBR motif-containing domains are proposed to mediate protein-protein interactions (28, 29). Indeed, an N-terminal RING finger domain and part of the IBR motif of HHARI and the IBR motif of H7-AP1 are required for interaction with UbcH7 and UbcH8, although other, as yet undescribed, structural motifs may contribute to these interactions. While this article was under review, it was reported that another RING finger protein, termed Rbx1, recruits the E2 UBC3CDC34 to SCF complexes (30-32). Thus, it appears that distinct subclasses of RING finger- or IBR motif-containing proteins represent a new family of proteins that specifically interact with distinct E2 enzymes.

In support of the hypothesis that RING finger- or IBR motif-containing proteins commonly play a role in protein ubiquitinylation, the presence of these motifs has previously been observed in proteins associated with the ubiquitin/proteasome system. Arabidopsis PRT1 (which, like HHARI, contains two RING finger motifs) appears to be involved in the degradation of proteins via the N-end rule pathway (33). A subunit of APC, APC11, is very similar to Rbx1 (32, 34). Drosophila Sina and its human orthologue Siah contain a RING finger and are involved in the degradation of Tramtrack (35, 36) and DCC (deleted in colon cancer) (37, 38), respectively. Of note, the RING finger of Siah is required to induce DCC proteolysis (37). Finally, the Mdm2 proto-oncoprotein, which mediates the ubiquitinylation and subsequent degradation of p53 (39-41), contains a RING finger motif that is required for p53 degradation (39, 41, 42). Although it has not yet been demonstrated, it is tempting to speculate that the RING finger motifs of the above mentioned proteins are directly involved in the interaction with their cognate E2s.

The ability of HHARI and H7-AP1 to interact with UbcH7 may indicate that these proteins function as E3s or as part of E3 complexes in UbcH7-dependent ubiquitinylation. UbcH7 has previously been demonstrated to interact functionally with members of the hect E3 family, in vitro (6, 13). These E3s are characterized by their ability to accept activated ubiquitin from UbcH7 or UbcH5 in the form of a thioester complex. However, such an activity was not observed for HHARI (data not shown). Thus, if HHARI and H7-AP1 have E3 activity, they are likely to function similar to SCF complexes (9-11), namely as "docking proteins," by bringing the target protein into juxtaposition for direct ubiquitinylation by UbcH7. Interestingly, RING finger domains are often found in the component proteins of multiprotein complexes (28). HHARI contains two RING fingers and one IBR motif, suggesting that it has the potential to interact specifically with several different proteins. Indeed, using metabolically labeled cell extracts, we observed that a number of cellular proteins could specifically bind to HHARI (not shown). Whether these proteins represent potential targets for HHARI/UbcH7-facilitated ubiquitinylation is presently unclear.

Alternatively, HHARI and H7-AP1 may serve as substrates for UbcH7-mediated ubiquitinylation. Preliminary results suggest that, at least in vitro, HHARI and H7-AP1 are not ubiquitinylated by UbcH7 (not shown). However, this does not exclude HHARI and H7-AP1 as substrates for UbcH7 because it is possible that in the in vitro system a factor(s) is missing that is required for ubiquitinylation of these proteins. Interestingly, Siah and Mdm2 have been reported not only to promote the degradation of DCC and p53, respectively, but also to mediate their own degradation, at least under certain conditions (37, 38, 42). Thus, even if ubiquitinylation of HHARI and H7-AP1 is observed in vitro or in vivo, this will not exclude the possibility that HHARI and H7-AP1 are actively involved in the ubiquitinylation of so far unknown cellular proteins.

HHARI probably represents the direct human orthologue of Drosophila ariadne as it displays a remarkably high sequence similarity (72% amino acid identity). This high sequence conservation implies that these proteins play an essential role in fundamental cellular processes. Indeed, mutant alleles that result in truncation or point mutation of the RING finger domain of Drosophila ariadne are recessive lethal at the pupal stage, demonstrating a severe disorganization of the central nervous system (43). These data, together with the results presented in this study, suggest that the phenotype may be attributable to aberrant ubiquitinylation. Finally, it is interesting to note that the HHARI gene maps just telomeric of the UBE3A gene on human chromosome 15q24, a region recently associated with a syndrome characterized by severe mental retardation, spasticity, and tapetoretinal degeneration (44).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Drs. J. Askham and E. Morrison for providing the GST-APC fusion protein and anti-EB-1 antibodies.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by the Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust, Yorkshire Cancer Research, and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AJ243190.

§ Recipient of a Yorkshire Cancer Research Douglas Shortridge Memorial Travel Scholarship.

** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-113-2065678; Fax: 44-113-2444475; E-mail: des6par@leeds.ac.uk.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: E2, ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme; E3, ubiquitin-protein ligase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; E6-AP, E6-associated protein; TXD, thioredoxin; HHARI, human homologue of Drosophila ariadne; H7-AP1, UbcH7-associated protein; RING, really interesting new gene; IBR, in between RING finger; APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; SCF, Skp1/Cdc53/F-box; kb, kilobase(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Hershko, A., and Ciechanover, A. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 425-479[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Scheffner, M., Smith, S., and Jentsch, S. (1998) in Ubiquitin and the Biology of the Cell (Peters, J.-M. , Harris, J. R. , and Finley, D., eds) , pp. 65-91, Plenum Press, London
3. Koegl, M., Hoppe, T., Schlenker, S., Ulrich, H. D., Mayer, T. U., and Jentsch, S. (1999) Cell 96, 635-644[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Varshavsky, A., Byrd, C., Davydov, I. V., Dohmen, R. J., Du, F., Ghislain, M., Gonzalez, M., Grigoryev, S., Johnson, E. S., Johnsson, N., Johnston, J. A., Kwon, Y. T., Levy, F., Lomovskaya, O., Madura, K., Ota, I., Ruemenapf, T., Shrader, T. E., Suzuki, T., Turner, G., Waller, P. R. H., Webster, A., and Xie, Y. (1998) in Ubiquitin and the Biology of the Cell (Peters, J.-M. , Harris, J. R. , and Finley, D., eds) , pp. 223-278, Plenum Press, London
5. Huibregtse, J. M., Scheffner, M., Beaudenon, S., and Howley, P. M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 2563-2567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Schwarz, S. E., Rosa, J. L., and Scheffner, M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 12148-12154[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. King, R. W., Peters, J. M., Tugendreich, S., Rolfe, M., Hieter, P., and Kirschner, M. W. (1995) Cell 81, 279-288[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Sudakin, V., Ganoth, D., Dahan, A., Heller, H., Hershko, J., Luca, F., Ruderman, J. V., and Hershko, A. (1995) Mol. Biol. Cell 6, 185-198[Abstract]
9. Bai, C., Sen, P., Hofmann, K., Ma, L., Goebl, M., Harper, W., and Elledge, S. J. (1996) Cell 86, 263-274[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Feldman, R. M. R., Correll, C. C., Kaplan, K. B., and Deshaies, R. J. (1997) Cell 91, 221-230[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Skowyra, D., Craig, K. L., Tyers, M., Elledge, S. J., and Harper, J. W. (1997) Cell 91, 209-219[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Scheffner, M., Nuber, U., and Huibregtse, J. M. (1995) Nature 373, 81-83[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Nuber, U., Schwarz, S., Kaiser, P., Schneider, R., and Scheffner, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2795-2800[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Kumar, S., Kao, W. H., and Howley, P. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 13548-13554[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Hatakeyama, S., Jensen, J. P., and Weissman, A. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 15085-15092[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. 252 ürger, J., Buiting, K., Dittrich, B., Groß, S., Lich, C., Sperling, K., Horsthemke, B., and Reis, A. (1997) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61, 88-93[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Matsuura, T., Sutcliffe, J. S., Fang, P., Galjaard, R.-J., Jiang, Y.-H., Benton, C. S., Rommens, J. M., and Beaudet, A. L. (1997) Nat. Genet. 15, 74-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Perry, W. L., Hustad, C. M., Swing, D. A., O'Sullivan, T. N., Jenkins, N. A., and Copeland, N. G. (1998) Nat. Genet. 18, 143-146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Blumenfeld, N., Gonen, H., Mayer, A., Smith, C. E., Siegel, N. R., Schwarz, A. L., and Ciechanover, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 9574-9581[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Robinson, P. A., Leek, J. P., Thompson, J., Carr, I. M., Bailey, A., Moynihan, T. P., Coletta, P. L., Lench, N. J., and Markham, A. F. (1995) Mammalian Genome 6, 725-731
21. Moynihan, T. P., Cole, C. G., Dunham, I., O'Neil, L., Markham, A. F., and Robinson, P. A. (1998) Genomics 51, 124-127[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Gross-Mesilaty, S., Reinstein, E., Berovich, B., Tobias, K. E., Schwarz, A. L., Kahana, C., and Ciechanover, A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 8058-8063[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Chien, C.-T., Bartel, P. L., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 5463-5467
24. Schneider, R., Eckerskorn, C., Lottspeich, F., and Schweiger, M. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 1431-1435[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Scheffner, M., Huibregtse, J. M., and Howley, P. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8797-8801[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Su, L. K., Burrell, M., Gyruris, J., Brent, R., Wiltshire, R., Trent, J., Vogelstein, B., and Kinzler, K. W. (1995) Cancer Res. 55, 2972-2977[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Towbin, H., Staehelin, T., and Gordon, J. (1979) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 76, 4350-4354[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Freemont, P. S. (1993) Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 684, 174-192[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
29. Morett, E., and Bork, P. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 229-231[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Kamura, T., Koepp, D. M., Conrad, M. N., Skowyra, D., Moreland, R. J., Iliopoulos, O., Lane, W. S., Kaelin Jr, W. G., Elledge, S. J., Conaway, R. C., Harper, J. W., and Conaway, J. W. (1999) Science 284, 657-661[Abstract/Free Full Text]
31. Skowyra, D., Koepp, D. M., Kamura, T., Conrad, M. N., Conaway, R. C., Conaway, J. W., Elledge, S. J., and Harper, J. W. (1999) Science 284, 662-665[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Tyers, M., and Willems, A. R. (1999) Science 284, 601-604[Free Full Text]
33. Potuschak, T., Stary, S., Schlogelhofer, P., Becker, F., Nejinskaia, V., and Bachmair, A. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 7904-7908[Abstract/Free Full Text]
34. Zachariae, W., Shevchenko, A., Andrews, P. D., Ciosk, R., Galova, M., Stark, M. J. R., Mann, M., and Nasmyth, K. (1998) Science 279, 1216-1219[Abstract/Free Full Text]
35. Tang, A. H., Neufeld, T. P., Kwan, E., and Rubin, G. M. (1997) Cell 90, 459-467[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
36. Li, S., Li, Y., Carthew, R. W., and Lai, Z.-C. (1997) Cell 90, 469-478[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
37. Hu, G., and Fearon, E. R. (1999) Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 724-732[Abstract/Free Full Text]
38. Hu, G., Zhang, S., Vidal, M., La Baer, J., Xu, T., and Fearon, E. R. (1997) Genes Dev. 11, 2701-2714[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Haupt, Y., Maya, R., Kazaz, A., and Oren, M. (1997) Nature 387, 296-299[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Kubbutat, M. H. G., Jones, S. N., and Vousden, K. H. (1997) Nature 387, 299-303[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Honda, R., Tanaka, H., and Yasuda, H. (1997) FEBS Lett. 420, 25-27[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
42. Kubbutat, M. H., Ludwig, R. L., Levine, A. J., and Vousden, K. H. (1999) Cell Growth Differ. 10, 87-92[Abstract/Free Full Text]
43. Aguilera, M., Oliveros, M., Martinez-Padron, M., Barbas, J. A., and Ferrus, A. (1998) A. Conf. Dros. Res. 39, 522A
44. Mitchell, S. J., McHale, D. P., Campbell, D. A., Lench, N. J., Mueller, R. F., Bundey, S. E., and Markham, A. F. (1998) Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62, 1070-1076[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Durfee, M. L. Kelley, and J. M. Huibregtse
The Basis for Selective E1-E2 Interactions in the ISG15 Conjugation System
J. Biol. Chem., August 29, 2008; 283(35): 23895 - 23902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K.-i. Arimoto, H. Takahashi, T. Hishiki, H. Konishi, T. Fujita, and K. Shimotohno
Negative regulation of the RIG-I signaling by the ubiquitin ligase RNF125
PNAS, May 1, 2007; 104(18): 7500 - 7505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. R. Skaar, L. Florens, T. Tsutsumi, T. Arai, A. Tron, S. K. Swanson, M. P. Washburn, and J. A. DeCaprio
PARC and CUL7 Form Atypical Cullin RING Ligase Complexes
Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 67(5): 2006 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. A. Beasley, V. A. Hristova, and G. S. Shaw
From the Cover: Structure of the Parkin in-between-ring domain provides insights for E3-ligase dysfunction in autosomal recessive Parkinson's disease
PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3095 - 3100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
F. Okumura, W. Zou, and D.-E. Zhang
ISG15 modification of the eIF4E cognate 4EHP enhances cap structure-binding activity of 4EHP
Genes & Dev., February 1, 2007; 21(3): 255 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Zou and D.-E. Zhang
The Interferon-inducible Ubiquitin-protein Isopeptide Ligase (E3) EFP Also Functions as an ISG15 E3 Ligase
J. Biol. Chem., February 17, 2006; 281(7): 3989 - 3994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Physiol.Home page
S. L. Stone, H. Hauksdottir, A. Troy, J. Herschleb, E. Kraft, and J. Callis
Functional Analysis of the RING-Type Ubiquitin Ligase Family of Arabidopsis
Plant Physiology, January 1, 2005; 137(1): 13 - 30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. I. Kim, N. V. Giannakopoulos, H. W. Virgin, and D.-E. Zhang
Interferon-Inducible Ubiquitin E2, Ubc8, Is a Conjugating Enzyme for Protein ISGylation
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(21): 9592 - 9600.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
I. Marin, J. I. Lucas, A.-C. Gradilla, and A. Ferrus
Parkin and relatives: the RBR family of ubiquitin ligases
Physiol Genomics, May 19, 2004; 17(3): 253 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Zhao, S. L. Beaudenon, M. L. Kelley, M. B. Waddell, W. Yuan, B. A. Schulman, J. M. Huibregtse, and R. M. Krug
The UbcH8 ubiquitin E2 enzyme is also the E2 enzyme for ISG15, an IFN-{alpha}/{beta}-induced ubiquitin-like protein
PNAS, May 18, 2004; 101(20): 7578 - 7582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. C. Ardley, G. B. Scott, S. A. Rose, N. G. S. Tan, A. F. Markham, and P. A. Robinson
Inhibition of Proteasomal Activity Causes Inclusion Formation in Neuronal and Non-Neuronal Cells Overexpressing Parkin
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2003; 14(11): 4541 - 4556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
N. Hishik