![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 43, 31014-31019, October 22, 1999
2-Adrenergic
Receptor-G
s Complex Leads to Rapid Depalmitoylation and
Inhibition of Repalmitoylation of Both the Receptor and
G
s*
§¶,
§,
,
,
From the § Département de Biochimie and Groupe de
Recherche sur le Système Nerveux Autonome, Université de
Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada, the
Département de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et
Moléculaire, CNRS-URA 1534, Institut Cochin de
Génétique Moléculaire, Paris, France, and the
** Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford, California 94305
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Palmitoylation is unique among lipid
modifications in that it is reversible. In recent years, dynamic
palmitoylation of G protein Palmitoylation is a post-translational modification that is
limited to a small subset of cellular proteins among which proteins involved in signal transduction are prevalent (1). This
thioesterification of cysteine residues by palmitate distinguishes
itself from other lipid modifications such as prenylation and
myristoylation by its reversibility. Indeed, in contrast to myristoyl
and prenyl moieties that are added co-translationally and generally
remain attached to the proteins until the protein gets degraded, the protein-bound palmitate is added post-translationally and turns over
more rapidly than the protein itself (2-4). Moreover, the palmitoylation state of several proteins has been shown to be dynamically regulated. In particular, biological regulation of the
palmitoylation state of heterotrimeric G proteins and of their cognate
receptors has been demonstrated (5-12).
Activation of
G Biologically regulated changes in the palmitoylation state of either
receptors or G proteins may have important functional consequences. For
example, mutations that prevent palmitoylation of various G Despite these potentially important roles, very little is known
concerning the mechanism that regulates palmitoylation of these
proteins. Both enzymatic (29-32) and nonenzymatic (33, 34) acylation
reactions have been proposed for G In an effort to distinguish between the effects of activation and
desensitization on receptor and G protein palmitoylation, we took
advantage of a Materials--
Grace's insect medium, lactalbumin, yeastolate,
penicillin, streptomycin, glutamine, fungizone, pluronic acid, and
phosphate-buffered saline were from Life Technologies, Inc. Fetal
bovine serum was obtained from Immunocorp. [125I]CYP,
[ Recombinant Baculoviruses Construction--
The recombinant
c-Myc- Cell Culture, Metabolic Labeling, and Membrane
Preparations--
Sf9 cells were cultured in Grace's
supplemented media containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.001% pluronic
acid in spinner flasks (Bellco Glass) at 27 °C. Cells (2 × 106/ml) were infected with the recombinant baculoviruses at
a multiplicity of infection varying between 2 and 5 for 48 to 72 h. [3H]Palmitate labeling was then carried out in cells
expressing the Receptor Affinity Purification--
Alprenolol-Sepharose
affinity purification matrix was synthesized according to the method of
Benovic et al. (54). This matrix was used to purify the
Sf9-derived Hydroxylamine Treatment, Chemical and Enzymatic
Cleavages--
For hydroxylamine treatment, purified
SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis--
Affinity purified
Radioligand Binding Assay--
Sf9 cells infected with
the recombinant Adenylyl Cyclase Assay--
Adenylyl cyclase activity was
determined in membrane preparations according to the method of Salomon
et al. (58). Activities were determined in the presence or
absence of the following activators: 1 µM isoproterenol,
10 µM alprenolol, 10 µM
dichloroisoproterenol, or 100 µM forskolin. Data were
expressed as picomoles of cAMP produced per min per mg of protein.
Protein concentrations were measured by the method of Bradford
(Bio-Rad) using bovine serum albumin as standard (59).
Functional Characteristics of the
It follows that Palmitoylation of Agonist-promoted Depalmitoylation of
For the
Because the
The effect of [3H]Palmitate Incorporation into the
As previously observed for
Palmitoylation of both receptor and G
Taken together, the data presented in this study show that the initial
events leading to activation of the
subunits and of their cognate receptors
has attracted considerable attention. However, very little is known
concerning the acylation/deacylation cycle of the proteins in relation
to their activity status. In particular, the relative contribution of
the activation and desensitization of the signaling unit to the
regulation of the receptors and G proteins palmitoylation state is
unknown. To address this issue, we took advantage of the fact that a
fusion protein composed of the stimulatory
subunit of trimeric G
protein (G
s) covalently attached to the
2-adrenergic receptor (
2AR) as a
carboxyl-terminal extension (
2AR-G
s) can be stimulated by agonists but does not undergo rapid inactivation, desensitization, or internalization. When expressed in Sf9
cells, both the receptor and the G
s moieties of the
fusion protein were found to be palmitoylated via thioester linkage.
Stimulation with the
-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol led to a
rapid depalmitoylation of both the
2AR and
G
s and inhibited repalmitoylation. The extent of
depalmitoylation induced by a series of agonists was correlated (0.99)
with their intrinsic efficacy to stimulate the adenylyl cyclase
activity. However, forskolin-stimulated cAMP production did not affect
the palmitoylation state of
2AR-G
s,
indicating that the agonist-promoted depalmitoylation is linked to
conformational changes and not to second messenger generation. Given
that, upon activation, the fusion protein mimics the activated
receptor-G protein complex but cannot undergo desensitization, the data
demonstrate that early steps in the activation process lead to the
depalmitoylation of both receptor and G protein and that
repalmitoylation requires later events that cannot be accommodated by
the activated fusion protein.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
s1 through
receptor stimulation, following direct activation with aluminum
fluoride and cholera toxin or as a result of site-directed mutagenesis,
has been shown to lead to an increased incorporation of
[3H]palmitate into G
s during pulse
labeling experiments. Because pulse-chase labeling experiments clearly
indicated that stimulation increased the depalmitoylation rate, the
enhanced incorporation was attributed to an accelerated turnover rate
of the G
s-bound palmitate (10-12). Interestingly, Jones
et al. (8) found that, despite the increased turnover rate,
activation of G
s did not significantly affect its
stoichiometry of palmitoylation, thus challenging the notion that
stimulation ultimately favors the depalmitoylation reaction (12).
Agonist stimulation of the
2-adrenergic receptor
(
2AR) has also been shown to increase the amount of covalently attached [3H]palmitate (5) as a result of an
increased turnover rate of the receptor-bound palmitate (7). A similar
agonist-promoted increase in the turnover rate of receptor-bound
palmitate was observed for the
2AAR (13), the
D2-dopamine receptor (14), and the
m2-muscarinic receptor (9).
subunits
have been found to inhibit their association with the plasma membrane
and thus their signaling function (15-18), suggesting that biological
modulation of the G protein palmitoylation state could regulate their
signaling properties. Palmitoylation of G
s has also been
reported to increase its affinity for G
(19). For receptors,
abolition of palmitoylation by site-directed mutagenesis has been shown
to either decrease coupling to G proteins (9, 20-23), affect receptor
internalization (24-26), or modulate receptor phosphorylation by
regulatory kinases (5, 27, 28).
, whereas an enzyme that can
catalyze the depalmitoylation of G
proteins has recently been
identified (35). However, the mechanisms by which activation of the
signaling pathway could control the acylation/deacylation cycle remain
unknown. Analysis of the effects of stimulation on the palmitoylation
status of receptors and G proteins is complicated by several factors
(for a review, see Ref. 36). These include the fact that, following the
initial conformational changes and protein-protein interactions that
are promoted by receptor stimulation, multiple processes that limit the
extent of the activation and contribute to signal termination come
rapidly into play. It follows that it is difficult to temporally
distinguish between the early events that lead to activation from the
ones involved in rapid desensitization of the signaling system. This is
an important problem because these two sets of events could
theoretically have opposite effects on the palmitoylation reaction.
Indeed, on a time scale that is virtually indistinguishable from
that of the activation of the G proteins, stimulation of the
receptors leads to their progressive functional inactivation. This
desensitization results largely from agonist-promoted phosphorylation,
uncoupling, and internalization of the receptors (37, 38).
Internalization of the G proteins has also been suggested to contribute
to desensitization of the signaling unit (39-43).
2AR-G
s fusion protein that
can be activated but not desensitized, internalized, or down-regulated
(44, 45). The pharmacological properties of such receptor-G protein
fusion constructs has recently attracted considerable attention and
many of their properties have been recently reviewed (46, 47). The
agonist-bound
2AR-G
s fusion protein
presumably mimics an early intermediate in the normal activation cycle.
Also of interest to the present study is the fact that complete
physical dissociation between the receptor and G
s, which
normally follows the initial stimulatory interaction, is not permitted
in the fusion protein. These features of the fusion protein allow study
of the effects of early activation events on the palmitoylation state
of the receptor and G protein independently of those resulting from the inactivation processes. Furthermore, the use of fusion protein restricts the analysis to those receptors and G proteins that did
physically interact in the course of the experiment. We report that
stimulation of
2AR-G
s with
-adrenergic
agonists promotes rapid depalmitoylation and inhibits repalmitoylation
of both the receptor and the G
subunit. This contrasts with
the facilitated repalmitoylation that is observed when the two proteins
are expressed individually and suggests that early events in the
activation process lead to the depalmitoylation of the two proteins,
whereas later deactivation mechanisms, that do not occur for the fusion protein, are required for the repalmitoylation reaction.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]ATP, [
-32P]ATP,
[3H]cAMP, and (9,10)-[3H]palmitate were
purchased from Mandel. Alprenolol, isoproterenol, dichloroisoproterenol, ATP, GTP, cAMP, forskolin,
isobutylmethylxanthine, phosphoenolpyruvate, bovine serum albumin,
myokinase, cyanogen bromide, and anti-FlagTM M2 were
obtained from Sigma. Pyruvate kinase and Geneticin were from
Calbiochem. ICI118551 was from Tocris. Benzamidine, soybean trypsin
inhibitor, leupeptin, and
n-dodecyl-
-D-maltoside was from Alexis Corp.
2AR baculovirus was generated by subcloning the
cDNA of a c-Myc-tagged human
2AR (5) into the
pJVELTZ recombination plasmid (InVitrogen). The
pBacPAK-pHIS-
2AR-G
s was constructed by
inserting in phase the Klenow-filled NcoI-SalI cDNA fragment of the fusion protein
2AR-G
s (45, 51) into the Klenow-filled
BamHI-EcoRI pBacPAK1-polyHIS vector
(CLONTECH). The constructs were confirmed by DNA
sequencing. The viruses were then produced by homologous recombination
in Sf9 cells according to standard procedures (52). The
recombinant baculovirus encoding the
2AR-Thr-G
s construct was generated as
described previously (53). Following infection of Sf9 cells with
the appropriate viruses, expression of
2AR and
2AR-G
s was assessed by radioligand binding assays and Western blot analysis.
2AR or
2AR-G
s fusion proteins. Cells were
harvested and placed in serum-free medium for 1 h prior to the
start of metabolic labeling. [3H]palmitate dissolved in a
minimal volume of dimethyl sulfoxide was then added (100 µCi/millions
of cells), and the cells were incubated at 27 °C in the presence or
absence of
-adrenergic ligands for various periods of time as
described previously (7). In some experiments, labeling was allowed to
proceed for 45 min before
-adrenergic ligands were added. Labeling
was stopped by chilling the reaction on ice. Cells were centrifuged at
500 × g for 5 min at 4 °C, rinsed twice with
ice-cold PBS and resuspended in 20 ml of an ice-cold lysis buffer
containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM EDTA, pH 7.4, and the following protease inhibitors: 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml
soybean trypsin inhibitor, and 10 µg/ml benzamidine. Cells were
disrupted by sonication and the lysate was centrifuged 5 min at
500 × g at 4 °C. The supernatant was then
centrifuged at 45,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C. The
pelleted membranes were then resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl,
100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.4, containing
0.3% n-dodecyl-
-D-maltoside and protease
inhibitors (solubilization buffer). Solubilization was carried out for
90 min at 4 °C, and solubilized receptors were purified as described below.
2AR,
2AR-G
s, and
2AR-Thr-G
s as described previously (5).
The affinity purified preparations were concentrated using Centriprep
and Centricon cartridges (Amicon), and the amount of
2AR,
2AR-G
s, or
2AR-Thr-G
s in each sample was determined
by [125I]CYP soluble radioligand binding assay as
described elsewhere (55).
2AR or
2AR-G
s was mixed to
an equal volume of 1 M Tris, pH 7.0, containing or not 1 M NH2OH and incubated overnight at 4 °C.
Cyanogen bromide (CNBr) cleavage was carried out following a protocol
described by Luo et al. (56). Briefly, affinity purified
2AR-G
s were separated by SDS-PAGE in
nonreducing condition. The proteins were then transferred electrophoretically to nitrocellulose membrane. The band corresponding to
2AR-G
s was cut out and the strip
submerged in 500 µl of 70% (v/v) formic acid. The cleavage reaction
was started by adding 10 µl of 5 M CNBr in acetonitrile.
The reaction was allowed to proceed for 180 min at room temperature in
the dark. The thrombin cleavage of the
2AR-Thr-G
s construct was carried out on
affinity purified fusion protein using 10 NIH units/ml of thrombin from human placenta in the solubilization buffer containing only 0.03% n-dodecyl-
-D-maltoside for 30 min at room temperature.
2AR,
2AR-G
s,
2AR-Thr-G
s,
2AR-G
s cleaved with CNBr, or
2AR-Thr-G
s cleaved with thrombin were
resolved on nonreducing (or mildly reducing, 10 mM
dithiothreitol, when specified) 10-15% slab gels containing 6 M urea. The gels were then fixed, incubated in Enlightning
(DuPont), or in 1 M salicylic acid, dried, and exposed to
DuPont REFLECTIONTM films from 10 to 60 days at
80 °C.
Fluorograms were scanned and digitized (Hewlett Packard laser scanner),
and densitometric analysis was carried out using the NIH Image program.
When Western blot analyses were performed, aliquots of the samples were
loaded in parallel gels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes.
The
2AR-Thr-G
s and
2AR
moiety of the fusion protein were first visualized using the Flag M2
antibody (dilution 1:10,000) and the Renaissance chemiluminescence reagent plus (Mandel). The same membrane was then stripped using 100 mM glycine, pH 2.2 (57), and reprobed, using a rabbit
polyclonal antibody against the carboxyl-terminal portion of
G
s subunit (dilution 1:8, 500) (a generous gift of Dr.
A. D. Strosberg, Institut Cochin de Génétique
Moléculaire, Paris), to reveal the
2AR-Thr-G
s and G
s moiety
of the fusion protein.
2AR or
2AR-G
s baculoviruses were harvested and
rinsed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline, and the membranes
were prepared according to Mouillac et al. (5). Membrane
suspensions were added to obtain a concentration of 2-10 µg/ml in a
final volume of 500 µl of 75 mM Tris, 12.5 mM
MgCl2, 2 mM EDTA containing a saturating
concentration (250 pM) of the radiolabeled
-adrenergic
antagonist [125I]CYP. Nonspecific binding was determined
as the residual binding observed in the presence of 10 µM
alprenolol. Binding reactions carried out at room temperature for 90 min were stopped by rapid filtration over glass-fiber filters.
![]()
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
2AR-G
s Fusion--
Fig.
1 illustrates the two fusion protein
constructs between
2AR and G
s
(
2AR-G
s and
2AR-Thr-G
s) that were used in the present
study. Infection of Sf9 cells with recombinant baculoviruses encoding either of the two
2AR-G
s fusion
proteins conferred both
2AR binding (data not shown) and
-adrenergic-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities (Fig.
2) confirming that, as observed in
mammalian systems (44, 45, 48), the fusion proteins are synthesized,
translocated to the plasma membranes, and functional. Also in agreement
with what was observed in mammalian systems, sustained stimulation of
2AR-G
s with an agonist does not promote any desensitization of the
-adrenergic-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. This is in sharp contrast with the rapid desensitization observed in Sf9 cells expressing the wild type
2AR. Indeed, as seen in Fig. 2, pretreatment of
2AR expressing cells with 1 µM isoproterenol for 30 min reduced the isoproterenol-stimulated adenylyl
cyclase activity by 23% without significantly affecting the basal
activity, thus leading to a desensitization of 40% of the net
agonist-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. The same treatment was
without effect on the isoproterenol-stimulated adenylyl cyclase
activity in cells expressing the
2AR-G
s
fusion protein. Agonist pre-treatment for as long as 24 h was also
unable to promote any desensitization of the fusion protein. This
characteristic of
2AR-G
s was interpreted
by Bertin et al. (44) as an indication that the covalent
complex can become activated but does not enter the deactivation path
upon agonist stimulation. This contention is also supported by the
observation that the formation of the nucleotide-sensitive high
affinity state for agonist can be readily observed for
2AR-G
s in both mammalian (44) and
Sf9 (49, 50) cells but that no agonist-promoted internalization
or down-regulation was observed upon sustained stimulation (Ref. 44,
and data not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
The
2AR-G
s fusion constructs. Schematic representation of the two
2AR-G
s fusion proteins used in this
study. Upper panel, the
2AR-G
s
fusion protein constructed as in Bertin et al. (45). This
construct links the bovine G
s through its amino-terminal
methionine to the carboxyl terminus of the poly-His-tagged human
2AR. Lower panel, the
2AR-Thr-G
s fusion protein constructed as
in Seifert et al. (53). This construct links the human
2AR, tagged at its amino and carboxyl termini by the
Flag epitope and a histidine hexamere, respectively, and bovine
G
s through an engineered thrombin cleavage site. The
wavy lines represent the sites of palmitoylation.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Agonist-promoted stimulation and
desensitization of adenylyl cyclase activity. Membrane
preparations derived from Sf9 cells infected with the wild type
human
2AR or the
2AR-G
s
recombinant baculoviruses were used to measure the adenylyl cyclase
activity. The activity was determined in the presence of vehicle
(control) (CTL) or 1 µM of the
-adrenergic
agonist isoproterenol (ISO). To determine the extent of
agonist-promoted desensitization, membranes were prepared from cells
pretreated (hatched bars) or not (dotted bars)
with 1 µM isoproterenol for 30 min. Receptor expression
level as assessed by [125I]CYP binding was: 8.9 ± 2 and 2.8 ± 1.1 pmol/mg of protein for
2AR and
2AR-G
s, respectively, and was not
affected by the agonist pre-treatment. Data represent the mean ± S.E. of five independent experiments. * indicates a statistically
significant difference (p < 0.05).
2AR-G
s provides a
convenient model to study the early events involved in the activation
of the
2AR-Gs complex without the confounding effects of
the regulatory events leading to deactivation. This may be particularly
important when considering that, following their initial activating
interaction, the receptor and G
s may be targeted to
distinct cellular compartments upon dissociation. Therefore,
2AR-G
s allows study of the early events linked to the activation of a single G protein by a unique receptor molecule at equimolar ratio in a common cellular compartment.
2AR-G
s--
Based
on the premises described above, we undertook study of the dynamics of
2AR-G
s palmitoylation and the effect of
agonist activation on the palmitoylation state of this complex. As
shown in Fig. 3, metabolic labeling of
Sf9 cells expressing either
2AR or
2AR-G
s led to the incorporation of
[3H]palmitate in the two proteins. The major radiolabeled
bands of ~45 and ~96 kDa obtained following alprenolol-Sepharose
affinity purification corresponded to the expected molecular masses for the
2AR and
2AR-G
s,
respectively, when expressed in Sf9 cells (5). Molecular species
with identical electrophoretical mobilities were detected in
Western blot analysis using anti-
2AR and
anti-
s antibodies (data not shown), thus confirming the
identity of the fusion protein. In Fig. 3A, identical
numbers of
2AR and of
2AR-G
s, as assessed by radioligand
binding, were loaded but densitometric analysis revealed around 1.7 times higher [3H]palmitate incorporation into the
2AR-G
s than
2AR,
consistent with the fact that two palmitoylation sites are present in
the fusion protein as compared with only one in the receptor. Fig. 3B illustrates the sensitivity of the labeling to
hydroxylamine treatment, indicating that the
[3H]palmitate was covalently attached to both
2AR and
2AR-G
s via
thioester bonds.

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Palmitoylation of
2AR and
2AR-G
s via hydroxylamine-sensitive thioester
linkage. Sf9 cells infected with the
2AR or
the
2AR-G
s recombinant baculoviruses were
labeled for 45 min with [3H]palmitate. Receptor and
fusion proteins were then purified by alprenolol-Sepharose
chromatography and prepared for nonreducing SDS-PAGE. Panel
A, 0.3 pmol of
2AR and
2AR-G
s, as assessed by
[125I]CYP binding, were loaded in lanes 1 and
2, respectively. Panel B, the purified receptor
and fusion protein were treated (+) or not (
) with
NH2OH (1 M; pH 7.0) prior to SDS-PAGE.
2.2 pmol of
2AR were loaded in lanes 1 and
2, and 0.3 pmol of
2AR-G
s was
loaded in lanes 3 and 4. The fluorogram shown is
representative of three independent experiments.
2AR-G
s--
To assess the effect of
receptor stimulation on the dynamics of palmitoylation, pulse labeling
experiments were carried out in the presence or absence of agonists for
periods varying between 5 and 60 min. In the absence of agonist,
incorporation of palmitate into
2AR-G
s
increased almost linearly for the first 30 min of labeling and remains
stable thereafter (Fig. 4). The presence of isoproterenol during the labeling period greatly inhibited the
incorporation of [3H]palmitate in the fusion protein.
This unexpected result contrasts sharply with the agonist-promoted
increase in palmitate incorporation observed on
2AR and
G
s when these proteins are expressed individually (5, 7,
10-12).

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Effects of isoproterenol on the incorporation
of [3H]palmitate into
2AR-G
s.
Sf9 cells infected with the
2AR-G
s
recombinant baculovirus were labeled with [3H]palmitate
for the indicated times in presence of 1 µM isoproterenol
(ISO and +) or the vehicle alone (control)
(CTL and
). The fusion protein was then purified by
alprenolol-Sepharose chromatography and resolved by SDS-PAGE. Identical
numbers of
2AR-G
s (0.5 pmol), as assessed
by [125I]CYP binding, were loaded in each lane. Relative
incorporation of [3H]palmitate into
2AR-G
s was estimated by densitometric
analysis of the fluorograms. The graph shown is the
mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments.
2AR and G
s expressed separately,
the increase in palmitate turnover was linked to a faster rate of
depalmitoylation upon agonist stimulation (7, 12). The apparent
increase in [3H]palmitate incorporation was thus
attributed to a concomitant acceleration of the repalmitoylation
reaction. It follows that the agonist-promoted reduction of
[3H]palmitate incorporation into the
2AR-G
s fusion protein could result from a
slower depalmitoylation or reflect an inhibition of the
repalmitoylation reaction. To distinguish between these two hypotheses,
cells were metabolically labeled with [3H]palmitate in
the absence of agonist. Following a 45-min pulse period, corresponding
to the period required to attain steady state labeling, isoproterenol
was added or not in the continued presence of
[3H]palmitate and incubated for an additional 5 or 15 min. As seen in Fig. 5, incubation with
isoproterenol rapidly reduced the extent of
2AR-G
s palmitoylation, thus suggesting
that agonist stimulation promotes its rapid depalmitoylation and that
repalmitoylation of the active complex cannot occur. This is in sharp
contrast with the increased repalmitoylation that is observed when
identical treatment is carried out in cells expressing the wild type
2AR as an individual protein (Fig. 5B).

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Isoproterenol-promoted depalmitoylation
of
2AR-G
s.
Sf9 cells infected with
2AR or
2AR-G
s recombinant baculovirus were
labeled with [3H]palmitate for 45 min. Cells were then
treated with 1 µM isoproterenol (ISO and +) or
the vehicle (control) (CTL and
) alone, for 5 or 15 min in
the continued presence of [3H]palmitate. The fusion
protein was then purified by alprenolol-Sepharose chromatography and
resolved by SDS-PAGE. Identical numbers of receptor, as assessed by
[125I]CYP binding, were loaded in each lane, and the
relative incorporation of [3H]palmitate into
2AR-G
s was estimated by densitometric
analysis of the fluorograms. The bar graph shown in
panel A represents the mean ± S.E. of four independent
experiments. The fluorogram in panel B shows the effect of a
5-min treatment with isoproterenol following a 45-min pulse labeling on
[3H]palmitate incorporation into wild type
2AR (lanes 1 and 2) and into
2AR-G
s (lanes 3 and
4). Equivalent numbers of receptor (0.9 pmol) were loaded in
each lane.
2AR-G
2 fusion protein can be
activated but that later processes of inactivation such as G protein
dissociation, desensitization, or internalization do not occur, it
could be hypothesized that early events leading to activation of the
receptor-G protein complex promote depalmitoylation but that later
processes are required for repalmitoylation. The fact that the
depalmitoylation and repalmitoylation reactions may occur with very
similar kinetics when the
2AR and G
s are
expressed as individual proteins may explain why Jones et
al. (8) did not observe any change in the stoichiometry of
palmitoylation of G
s upon activation despite the
universally observed increase in the turnover rate of the G
s-bound palmitate. The stabilization of the activated
receptor-G protein complex using
2AR-G
s
allowed isolation of the effects that resulted solely from the
activation process.
-adrenergic ligands of various levels of intrinsic
activity was then assessed on the palmitoylation of
2AR-G
s. As shown in Fig.
6, the addition of all ligands caused a
significant reduction in the incorporation of the labeled fatty acid
into
2AR-G
s. Interestingly, the extent of
the decrease in labeling was directly correlated
(r2 = 0.992) to the intrinsic activity of the
compounds toward
2AR-G
s as assessed in a
membrane adenylyl cyclase assay (Fig. 6B). However, direct
stimulation of cAMP production by forskolin did not affect the
palmitoylation of
2AR-G
s (Fig.
6C), thus suggesting that the agonist-promoted
depalmitoylation is linked to conformational changes imposed by
the agonists and not to second messenger generation.

View larger version (36K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Effects of
-adrenergic ligands of various intrinsic efficacy
on the palmitoylation of
2AR-G
s.
Sf9 cells infected with the
2AR-G
s
recombinant baculovirus were labeled with [3H]palmitate
for 1 h in presence of alprenolol (ALP),
dichloroisoproterenol (DCI), isoproterenol (ISO),
forskolin (FK), or the vehicle (CTL). Affinity
chromatography purified
2AR-G
s was then
resolved by SDS-PAGE. In each experiment, identical amount of fusion
protein obtained from the experimental and control conditions was
loaded. Relative incorporation of [3H]palmitate into
2AR-G
s was estimated by densitometric
analysis of the fluorograms. In panels A and C,
the bar graphs shown are the mean ± S.E. of five
independent experiments. Panel B, linear regression between
the extent of agonist-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity observed for
the various ligands in membranes derived from cells expressing
2AR-G
s and the relative
[3H]palmitate incorporation observed into
2AR-G
s in the presence of the same
ligands. Data represent the mean of six independent experiments.
2AR and G
s Moieties of the Fusion
Protein--
Cysteine 341 of
2AR and cysteine 3 of
G
s, corresponding to position 358 and 428 in
2AR-G
s, respectively, represent the confirmed palmitoylation sites of these two proteins (20, 29). In the
experiments described above, palmitoylation of
2AR-G
s was studied as a whole with no
specific consideration of the individual palmitoylation sites. To
determine whether the two sites were indeed palmitoylated and to assess
if agonist treatment had similar effects on the palmitoylation state of
the two proteins, we took advantage of another fusion protein construct
in which a thrombin cleavage site was engineered between the receptor
and G
s (
2AR-Thr-G
s; see
Fig. 1). As a control, thrombin treatment was performed on wild type
2AR without any effect on the palmitoylation state nor
the integrity of the receptor (data not shown). Fig.
7A shows that thrombin
treatment of the purified fusion protein, following metabolic labeling,
generated two labeled proteins corresponding to the expected mobility
for
2AR and G
s, indicating that the two
proteins were palmitoylated within the fusion construct. The identity
of the cleaved fragments was further confirmed by Western blot analysis
using the anti-
s antibody to detect G
s
and the anti-Flag M2 antibody to detect the Flag epitope-bearing
2AR. The apparently higher [3H]palmitate
incorporation observed into the
2AR band when compared with G
s most likely reflects the presence of some
background labeling observed in this region of the gel even in the
absence of thrombin.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Thrombin cleavage of
2AR-Thr-G
s.
Sf9 cells were infected with a baculovirus encoding the
2AR-Thr-G
s fusion protein. Metabolic
labeling with [3H]palmitate was then carried out for 45 min before adding 1 µM isoproterenol (ISO) or
not (control) (CTL) for an additional 15 min. The fusion
protein was purified by alprenolol-Sepharose affinity chromatography
and treated (+) or not (
) with thrombin (Thr, 10 NIH
units/ml) for 30 min. The reactions were resolved under nonreducing
conditions (panel A) or mildly reducing (10 mM
dithiothreitol) conditions (panel B) by SDS-PAGE containing
6 M urea. 1.2 pmol of receptor, as assessed by
[125I]CYP soluble radioligand binding, were loaded in
each lane in both panels A and B. Relative
incorporation of [3H]palmitate into the fusion
2AR-Thr-G
s or the
2AR and
the G
s moieties were estimated by densitometric analysis of the
fluorograms. The fluorograms shown are representative of four
independent experiments. In each case, parallel SDS-PAGE were carried
out for Western blot analysis, as described under "Experimental
Procedures," to confirm the identity of each protein.
2AR-G
s, the
presence of isoproterenol during the metabolic labeling induced a
significant reduction of the [3H]palmitate incorporation
into
2AR-Thr-G
s. Thrombin cleavage revealed that the overall decrease in the radiolabeling of the fusion
protein was the consequence of a reduction of
[3H]palmitate incorporation into both the receptor and
G
s. The agonist-induced G
s
depalmitoylation that we observed could be mediated, in part, by the
receptor-promoted dissociation of 
subunits from the
activated fusion protein. Indeed, as reported by Iiri et al.
(19), 
did protect GDP-bound
s but not
s-GTP[
S] from depalmitoylation by a recombinant
esterase. Because, nonreducing SDS-PAGE conditions could lead to
aggregation of some proteins, including the receptor, reducing
conditions were also used. As shown in Fig. 7B, identical
results were obtained when receptor and G
s were resolved
under mildly reducing conditions (10 mM dithiothreitol)
that diminished aggregation and promoted only partial chemical depalmitoylation.
s and the effect of
isoproterenol on the two proteins was further confirmed using CNBr hydrolysis of the 3H-palmitoylated
2AR-G
s construct. The primary sequence of
2AR-G
s containing 18 methionines,
complete cleavage should generate 19 fragments (Fig.
8A). Given that the two
palmitoylation sites are located on two distinct fragments, two
peptides distinguishable by their size are expected to be
3H-palmitoylated. Calculated masses for the expected
palmitoylated fragments are 16.4 and 7.2 kDa corresponding to the
2AR- and the G
s-derived peptides,
respectively. As shown in Fig. 8B, CNBr treatment yielded
two peptides of the expected electrophoretic mobility, confirming that
both the receptor and G
s were palmitoylated within the
fusion protein. The difference in the labeling intensity of the two
bands most likely results from quantitatively different elution and
recovery of the two fragments from the nitrocellulose membrane during
the hydrolysis. Weakly labeled bands at 21 and 44 kDa represent partial
cleavage products. Addition of isoproterenol following a 45-min pulse
labeling with [3H]palmitate promoted the depalmitoylation
of both the 16.4 and 7.2 kDa fragments, confirming once more that
agonist activation favored the depalmitoylation of both the receptor
and G
s.

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
CNBr cleavage of
2AR-G
s.
Panel A, expected sizes of the 19 fragments obtained after
complete CNBr cleavage of the fusion protein, using the program
PROLYSIS. Because the two palmitoylation sites are located on the
carboxyl-terminal portion of the
2AR moiety and the
amino-terminal portion of the G
s moiety, two distinct
palmitoylated fragments of 16.4 and 7.2 kDa and corresponding to the
2AR- (*) and the G
s (**)-derived
peptides, respectively, should be produced. Panel B,
infected Sf9 cells expressing
2AR-G
s were labeled for 45 min with
[3H]palmitate and then treated with the vehicle (CTL,
lane 1) or with isoproterenol (ISO, lane 2) for
15 min in the continued presence of labeled palmitate. The radiolabeled
fusion protein was purified, resolved by SDS-PAGE, and
electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Bands
corresponding to the fusion protein were then treated with CNBr for
3 h. Generated peptides were separated by SDS-PAGE. The fluorogram
shown is representative of two independent experiments.
2AR-G
s complex promote the rapid
depalmitoylation of both receptor and G
s and that
sustained activation prevents repalmitoylation occurring. The extent of
depalmitoylation is directly proportional to the intrinsic activity of
the agonist and most likely depends on conformational changes and
protein-protein interactions that are stabilized by the activating
ligands. Also, this study demonstrates for the first time that
depalmitoylation and repalmitoylation occur during distinct
phases of the receptor-G protein activation/inactivation cycle. Further
studies are now required to determine how receptor activation leads to
depalmitoylation of the receptor-G protein complex and why deactivation
is required for repalmitoylation to occur. In particular, the role
played by the newly characterized acyl-protein thioesterase (35) in the
activation driven depalmitoylation will need to be assessed.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council of Canada (MRCC), NATO and by MRCC studentships (to T. P. L. and L. A.), a Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada fellowship (to H. A.), and a Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft research fellowship (to R. S.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
¶ Present address: LEBS-CNRS, 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Present address: Dept. Pharmacology & Toxicology, the
University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66046.
§§ MRCC scientist. To whom correspondence should be addressed: Département de Biochimie, Faculté de Médecine, P. O. Box 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada. Tel.: 514-343-6372; Fax: 514-343-2210; E-mail: bouvier@bcm.umontreal.ca.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
G
s, stimulatory
subunit of trimeric G protein;
2AR,
2-adrenergic receptor;
Sf9, Spodoptera
frugiperda;
G protein, guanine nucleotide-binding protein;
2AR-G
s, fusion protein linking
G
s and a histidine hexamere to the
2AR
carboxyl terminus and amino terminus, respectively;
2AR-Thr-G
s, fusion protein linking the
2AR tagged at its amino and carboxyl termini by the Flag
epitope and histidine hexamere, respectively, and G
s
through an engineered thrombin cleavage site;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
[125I]CYP, radio labeled
iodocyanopindolol.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Casey, P. J.
(1995)
Science
268,
221-225 |
| 2. |
Omary, M. B.,
and Trowbridge, I. S.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
4715-4718 |
| 3. |
Omary, M. B.,
and Trowbridge, I. S.
(1981)
J. Biol. Chem.
256,
12888-12892 |
| 4. |
Bonatti, S.,
Migliaccio, G.,
and Simons, K.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
12590-12595 |
| 5. |
Mouillac, B.,
Caron, M.,
Bonin, H.,
Dennis, M.,
and Bouvier, M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
21733-21737 |
| 6. | Ng, G. Y. K., Mouillac, B., George, S. R., Caron, M., Dennis, M., Bouvier, M., and O'Dowd, B. F. (1994) Eur. J. Pharmacol. 267, 7-19[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Loisel, T. P., Adam, L., Hebert, T., and Bouvier, M. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 15923-15932[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Jones, T. L., Degtyarev, M. Y., and Backlund, P. S., Jr. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 7185-7191[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Hayashi, M. K., and Haga, T. (1997) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 340, 376-382[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. |
Mumby, S. M.,
Kleuss, C.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
2800-2804 |
| 11. |
Degtyarev, M. Y.,
Spiegel, A. M.,
and Jones, T. L. Z.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23769-23772 |
| 12. | Wedegaertner, P. B., and Bourne, H. R. (1994) Cell 77, 1063-1070[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Kennedy, M. E.,
and Limbird, L. E.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
31915-31922 |
| 14. | Ng, G. Y. K., O'Dowd, B. F., Caron, M., Dennis, M., Brann, M. R., and George, S. R. (1994) J. Neurochem. 63, 1589-1595[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Grassie, M. A., McCallum, J. F., Guzzi, F., Magee, A. I., Milligan, G., and Parenti, M. (1994) Biochem. J. 302, 913-920 |
| 16. | McCallum, J. F., Wise, A., Grassie, M. A., Magee, A. I., Guzzi, F., Parenti, M., and Milligan, G. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 1021-1027 |
| 17. |
Wedegaertner, P. B.,
Chu, D. H.,
Wilson, P. T.,
Levis, M. J.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25001-25008 |
| 18. |
Morales, J.,
Fishburn, C. S.,
Wilson, P. T.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1998)
Mol. Biol. Cell
9,
1-14 |
| 19. |
Iiri, T.,
Backlund, P. S.,
Jones, T. L. Z.,
Wedegaertner, P. B.,
and Bourne, H. R.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14592-14597 |
| 20. |
O'Dowd, B. F.,
Hnatowitch, M.,
Caron, M. G.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
and Bouvier, M.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
7564-7569 |
| 21. | Jensen, A. A., Pederson, U. B., Kiemer, A., Din, N., and Anderson, P. H. (1995) J. Neurochem. 65, 1325-1331[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. |
Horstmeyer, A.,
Cramer, H.,
Sauer, T.,
Muller-Esterl, W.,
and Schroeder, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20811-20819 |
| 23. |
Okamoto, Y.,
Ninomiya, H.,
Tanioka, M.,
Sakamoto, A.,
Miwa, S.,
and Masaki, T.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21589-21596 |
| 24. | Schülein, R., Liebenhoff, U., Muller, H., Birnbaumer, M., and Rosenthal, W. (1996) Biochem. J. 313, 611-616 |
| 25. |
Kawate, N.,
and Menon, K. M. J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
30651-30658 |
| 26. |
Eason, M. G.,
Jacinto, M. T.,
Theiss, C. T.,
and Liggett, S. B.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11178-11182 |
| 27. |
Moffett, S.,
Adam, L.,
Bonin, H.,
Loisel, T. P.,
Bouvier, M.,
and Mouillac, B.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
21490-21497 |
| 28. |
Karnik, S. S.,
Ridge, K. D.,
Bhattacharya, S.,
and Khorana, H. G.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
40-44 |
| 29. |
Linder, M. E.,
Middleton, P.,
Hepler, J. R.,
Taussig, R.,
Gilman, A. G.,
and Mumby, S. M.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
3675-3679 |
| 30. |
Berthiaume, L.,
and Resh, M. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22399-22405 |
| 31. | Resh, M. D. (1996) Cell. Signal. 8, 403-412[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Veit, M., Sachs, K., Heckelmann, M., Maretzki, D., Hofmann, K. P., and Schmidt, M. F. (1998) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1394, 90-98[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. |
Tu, Y.,
Wang, J.,
and Ross, E. M.
(1997)
Science
278,
1132-1135 |
| 34. |
Duncan, J. A.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
23594-23600 |
| 35. |
Duncan, J. A.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
15830-15837 |
| 36. | Mumby, S. M. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 148-154[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Benovic, J. L., Bouvier, M., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1988) Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 4, 405-427[CrossRef] |
| 38. | Bohm, S. K., Grady, E. F., and Bunnett, N. W. (1997) Biochemical J. 322, 1-18 |
| 39. | Svoboda, P., and Milligan, G. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 224, 455-462[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. |
Drmota, T.,
Novotny, J.,
Kim, G. D.,
Eidne, K. A.,
Milligan, G.,
and Svoboda, P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
21699-21707 |
| 41. | Svoboda, P., Kim, G. D., Grassie, M. A., Eidne, K. A., and Milligan, G. (1996) Mol. Pharmacol. 49, 646-655[Abstract] |
| 42. | Milligan, G. (1993) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 14, 413-418[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. | van de Westerlo, E., Yang, J., Logsdon, C., and Williams, J. A. (1995) Biochem. J. 310, 559-563 |
| 44. | Bertin, B., Jockers, R., Strosberg, A. D., and Marullo, S. (1997) Recept. Chann. |