JBC Focus on PI3-Kinase with Echelon

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31127-31130, October 29, 1999

COMMUNICATION
Sensing of Ionizing Radiation-induced DNA Damage by ATM through Interaction with Histone Deacetylase*

Gun D. KimDagger , Yung H. ChoiDagger , Alexandre DimtchevDagger , Sook J. JeongDagger , Anatoly DritschiloDagger , and Mira JungDagger §

From the Departments of Dagger  Radiation Medicine and § Microbiology, Division of Radiation Research, Vincent T. Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, D. C. 20007

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The ATM gene is mutated in individuals with ataxia telangiectasia, a human genetic disease characterized by extreme sensitivity to radiation. The ATM protein acts as a sensor of radiation-induced cellular damage and contributes to cell cycle regulation, signal transduction, and DNA repair; however, the mechanisms underlying these functions of ATM remain largely unknown. Binding and immunoprecipitation assays have now shown that ATM interacts with the histone deacetylase HDAC1 both in vitro and in vivo, and that the extent of this association is increased after exposure of MRC5CV1 human fibroblasts to ionizing radiation. Histone deacetylase activity was also detected in immunoprecipitates prepared from these cells with antibodies to ATM, and this activity was blocked by the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A. These results suggest a previously unanticipated role for ATM in the modification of chromatin components in response to ionizing radiation.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

The human genetic disease ataxia telangiectasia (AT),1 which is characterized by extreme sensitivity to radiation, is caused by mutations in the ATM gene (1, 2). The protein encoded by this gene acts as a sensor of radiation-induced cellular damage and plays important roles in cell cycle regulation, signal transduction, and DNA repair (2-6). However, the mechanisms by which ATM performs these various functions remain largely uncharacterized.

Exposure of cells to ionizing radiation results in the arrest of cell cycle progression, induction of the transcription of specific genes, modification of nucleosomal structure, and activation of the DNA repair machinery (3, 6). Histone acetylation and deacetylation are thought to play important roles in the modification of chromatin structure and in monitoring chromosomal integrity during the cell cycle and transcriptional regulation (7-9). Various non-histone proteins that participate in regulation of the cell cycle and transcription are associated with histone acetylation or deacetylation activities (10-14). Certain transcriptional coactivators, including pCAF, BRCA2, and ATM-like proteins, possess intrinsic acetylation activities (15-18). Conversely, transcriptional repressors have been shown to associate with histone deacetylases (19-24). Recent studies have shown that the product of the retinoblastoma gene (Rb) represses transcription of the E2F gene by recruiting the mammalian deacetylase proteins HDAC1 and HDAC2, to which it binds through an LXCXE motif in its pocket domain (24-27).

Sequence analysis has revealed that the NH2 terminus of ATM contains an LXCXE motif (amino acids 115-119) (Fig. 1a). We therefore investigated whether ATM also interacts with HDAC1. We have now shown that the two proteins indeed interact both in vitro and in vivo and that the extent of the association in vivo is increased by exposure of the cells to ionizing radiation.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Cell Culture and Irradiation-- Human normal (MRC5CV1) and AT (AT5BIVA, AT4BIVA, and AT3BIVA) fibroblasts were maintained at 37 °C under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 in Eagle's minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Exponentially growing cells were exposed to 20 Gy of gamma -radiation (J. L. Shepherd Mark I Radiator) with a 137Cs source emitting at a fixed dose rate of 3.83 Gy min-1 and were harvested at various intervals thereafter.

GST-ATM Constructs-- An expression vector encoding a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein containing residues 1-300 of ATM (GST-ATM(1-300)) was generated by inserting the corresponding polymerase chain reaction-generated BamHI-EcoRI fragment of human ATM cDNA (2) into pGEX-4T-1 (Kodak). A cDNA encoding a mutant fusion protein (GST-ATM(C117F)) in which Cys117 of the LXCXE motif of ATM was replaced by phenylalanine was generated from GST-ATM(1-300) cDNA with the use of a QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). An expression vector encoding a GST-Ikappa Balpha fusion protein was prepared as described (4). All fusion proteins were produced in and purified from Escherichia coli also as described (4).

In Vitro Translation and GST Precipitation Assays-- The 1.4-kb full-length human HDAC1 cDNA, a gift from Dr. Schreiber (28), incorporated into the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen) was subjected to in vitro transcription and translation in the presence of [35S]methionine with a TNT T7-coupled transcription and translation kit (Promega). Beads coated with GST fusion proteins (10 µg) were incubated for 1 h at 4 °C with in vitro translated 35S-labeled HDAC1 (10 µg) or nuclear extracts (1 mg of protein) in a final volume of 400 µl containing TNN buffer (40 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 120 mM NaCl, 0.5% (v/v) Nonidet P-40, and protease inhibitors) (5). After extensive washing of the beads, bound proteins were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and either autoradiography or immunoblot analysis with antibodies to HDAC1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

Immunoprecipitation and Immunoblot Analysis-- Nuclear extracts were prepared as described (5), and the concentration of protein was determined with the Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). The extracts (1 mg of protein) were subjected to immunoprecipitation for 2 h at 4 °C with antibodies to HDAC1 in a final volume of 20 µl of TNN buffer. After the addition of protein A/G-agarose (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), the reaction mixtures were incubated for an additional 2 h. The immunoprecipitates were washed extensively and subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and the separated proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell) and subjected to immunoblot analysis as described (5).

Histone Deacetylase Assay-- [3H]Acetyllysine-labeled histones were isolated from HeLa cells as described (29, 30). Nuclear extracts (1 mg of protein) were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C with the labeled histones (12,000 cpm) in a final volume of 100 µl containing HDAC buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100). The reaction was then terminated, and released acetate was assayed. Assays were also performed with precipitates of nuclear extracts prepared with either GST fusion protein-coated beads or antibodies to ATM (Calbiochem); the beads and immunoprecipitates were washed extensively with buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.4% Nonidet P-40) before the assay. All samples were assayed in duplicate.

    RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

To investigate whether ATM interacts with HDAC1, we performed in vitro protein-protein binding assays. In vitro translated 35S-labeled HDAC1 was incubated with beads coated with a bacterially produced GST fusion protein containing residues 1-300 of ATM. Beads coated with GST or with a GST fusion protein containing the NF-kappa B inhibitor protein Ikappa Balpha were used as controls. The 35S-labeled HDAC1 bound to the beads coated with GST-ATM(1-300) but not to those coated with GST or GST-Ikappa Balpha (Fig. 1b). To assess further the specificity of this interaction, we generated the mutant protein GST-ATM(C117F), in which Cys117 of the LXCXE motif of ATM was replaced by phenylalanine with the use of site-directed mutagenesis (24). The extent of the interaction of GST-ATM(C117F) with HDAC1 was greatly reduced relative to that observed with GST-ATM(1-300). The electrophoretic mobilities of the wild-type and mutant GST-ATM proteins differed slightly, possibly because of a conformational change induced by the mutation. Together, these data suggest that the LXCXE motif of ATM is required for binding of the protein to HDAC1.


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Role of the LXCXE motif of ATM in its interaction with HDAC1. a, schematic representation of the domain organization of ATM. The locations of the LXCXE motif and of the leucine zipper (LZ), proline-rich (PR), and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) domains in the ATM protein are indicated. The sequences of the LXCXE motifs of human Rb, human ATM, and human HDAC1 are also compared; dashes in the HDAC1 sequence represent gaps introduced to optimize alignment. b, in vitro assay of the interaction between ATM and HDAC1. In vitro translated 35S-labeled HDAC1 was incubated with beads coated with GST, GST-ATM(1-300), GST-ATM(C117F), or GST-Ikappa Balpha . The beads were then washed, after which bound proteins were detected by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography (upper panel). A portion (2%) of the 35S-HDAC1 added to each binding mixture was analyzed for comparison. The various GST substrates were also visualized by Coomassie Blue staining of the gel (lower panel).

We next determined whether the interaction between ATM and HDAC1 contributes to the cellular response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. Normal human fibroblasts (MRC5CV1) were exposed to 20 Gy of gamma -radiation, and after various intervals, nuclear extracts were prepared and subjected to the in vitro binding assay with beads coated with GST-ATM(1-300). Immunoblot analysis with antibodies to HDAC1 of proteins that bound to the beads revealed that HDAC1 present in the nuclear extracts bound to GST-ATM(1-300) (Fig. 2a). The amount of HDAC1 bound to GST-ATM(1-300) was maximal 30 min after irradiation and then gradually decreased to basal levels over the next ~3 h. HDAC1 in nuclear extracts did not bind to beads coated with GST alone (data not shown). Immunoprecipitates prepared from the nuclear extracts with antibodies to HDAC1 also contained ATM (Fig. 2b). The amount of ATM present in the immunoprecipitates was maximal between 30 and 60 min after irradiation and had returned to basal levels by 3 h. The amount of HDAC1 in the immunoprecipitates was not substantially affected by ionizing radiation. The interaction between ATM and HDAC1 was not detected by immunoprecipitation analysis in AT5BIVA (Fig. 2c) or in AT3BIVA or AT4BIVA (data not shown) cell lines, all of which are derived from AT patients; these cells express HDAC1 at levels similar to MRC5CV1 cells (Fig. 2d). Immunoprecipitates obtained from MRC5CV1 cells with antibodies to IgG as a control did not contain ATM (data not shown). These results demonstrate that ATM associates with HDAC1 in vivo and that the extent of this association is increased by exposure of cells to ionizing radiation.


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Ionizing radiation-induced interaction of HDAC1 with ATM in vivo. a, MRC5CV1 cells were exposed to ionizing radiation (20 Gy), and at the indicated times thereafter, nuclear extracts were prepared and incubated with beads coated with GST-ATM(1-300). Proteins that bound to the beads were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 7% gel and immunoblot analysis (IB) with antibodies to HDAC1. A portion of the nuclear extract from nonirradiated cells corresponding to 25% of the input to the binding reaction mixture was also directly subjected to immunoblot analysis (lane NE). b and c, nuclear extracts were prepared from MRC5CV1 and AT5BIVA cells, respectively, at the indicated times after irradiation and subjected to immunoprecipitation (IP) with antibodies to HDAC1. The resulting immunoprecipitates, as well as a portion of the nuclear extract of nonirradiated cells corresponding to 10% of the input for immunoprecipitation, were then subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to ATM or to HDAC1 as indicated. d, nuclear extracts (20 µg of protein) prepared from MRC5CV1 cells and the indicated AT cell lines were subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to HDAC1.

The ATM-like proteins pAF400, Tra1, and TRRAP associate with histone acetylase protein complexes (14, 17, 18). In contrast, we have observed that ATM interacts with HDAC1 but not with pCAF (data not shown). To investigate the effect of ionizing radiation on histone acetylase and deacetylase activities, we first monitored the amount of acetylated histone H4, by immunoblot analysis of acid-soluble proteins after irradiation of MRC5CV1 cells. The abundance of acetylated histone H4 was reduced by 80 and 91% at 30 and 60 min after irradiation before recovering to 47% of pretreatment levels at 3 h (Fig. 3a). Equal loading was confirmed by Ponceau staining of the membrane (data not shown). In contrast, the amount of acetylated histone H4 was markedly increased by treating cells with the histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin A (TSA). We also measured the effect of ionizing radiation on histone deacetylase activity in both MRC5CV1 and AT cells. The amount of deacetylase activity in MRC5CV1 cells was increased within 30 min of irradiation and thereafter gradually decreased to basal levels by 3 h after treatment (Fig. 3b). The deacetylase activity of AT5BIVA cells was not affected by ionizing radiation. Thus, the radiation-induced decrease in the amount of acetylated histone H4 correlated with the increase in deacetylase activity in MRC5CV1 cells.


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Effects of ionizing radiation on the amount of acetylated histone H4 (a) and on histone deacetylase activity (b). a, MRC5CV1 cells were exposed to ionizing radiation (20 Gy) at various times, after which acid-soluble proteins were prepared and subjected to immunoblot analysis with antibodies to acetylated histone H4 (Upstate Biotechnology). As a control, cells were also incubated for 20 h with TSA (200 ng/ml-1). The amount of acetylated histone H4 was quantitated by densitometry and expressed as a percentage of the amount at time zero. Equal loading was confirmed by Ponceau staining of the membrane. b, nuclear extracts prepared from both MRC5CV1 and AT5BIVA cells at the indicated times after irradiation were incubated with [3H]acetyllysine-labeled histones for assay of histone deacetylase activity. Data are expressed as the fold increase in activity relative to that at time zero and are the means ± S.D. from an experiment that was repeated twice with similar results.

To determine whether the HDAC1 associated with ATM exhibits histone deacetylase activity, we incubated nuclear extracts of MRC5CV1 cells with beads coated with GST-ATM(1-300) and then assayed the bead-associated proteins for deacetylase activity. Such beads showed a high level of deacetylase activity, which was inhibited by treatment with TSA (Fig. 4a). Beads coated with GST, GST-Ikappa Balpha , or GST-ATM(C117F) retained much less histone deacetylase activity after incubation with MRC5CV1 nuclear extracts than did GST-ATM(1-300)-coated beads. Furthermore, the amount of ATM-associated histone deacetylase activity was increased 30 min after exposure of MRC5CV1 cells to ionizing radiation, as revealed by GST-ATM(1-300) precipitation and immunoprecipitation assays (Fig. 4b); immunoprecipitates prepared with an irrelevant antibody did not exhibit histone deacetylase activity (data not shown).


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Association of ATM with histone deacetylase activity (a) and effect of ionizing radiation on this association (b). a, beads coated with the indicated GST fusion proteins were incubated with nuclear extracts of MRC5CV1 cells. After extensive washing, the beads were incubated in the absence or presence of TSA (200 ng/ml-1) and then assayed for histone deacetylase activity with [3H]acetyllysine-labeled histones. Data are expressed in cpm. b, nuclear extracts prepared from MRC5CV1 cells at the indicated times after irradiation were either subjected to immunoprecipitation with antibodies to ATM or incubated with beads coated with GST-ATM(1-300). The immunoprecipitates and beads were then washed and assayed for histone deacetylase activity. Data are expressed as the fold increase in activity relative to the histone deacetylase activity at time zero. Data in both a and b are the means ± S.D. from representative experiments that were repeated twice with similar results.

Taken together, our data indicate that ATM associates with HDAC1 in vivo, that the resulting complex exhibits histone deacetylase activity, and that the extent of this association is increased in cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Although whether the mechanism by which ATM affects the acetylation state of the histone is related to chromatin is the subject of further investigations, the present results reveal a new role for ATM in the cellular response to ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. Our data with AT cells indicate that mutations in the ATM gene affect the interaction between ATM and HDAC1 and thereby prevent the increase in histone deactylase activity apparent in normal cells after exposure to ionizing radiation. This observation is consistent with previous studies (6, 31, 32) showing that ATM is associated with chromatin and that decondensation of chromatin increases the radiosensitivity of DNA with respect to formation of double-strand breaks. Therefore, it is also possible that AT cells show an increased susceptibility to radiation-induced DNA damage because of the dysfunction of ATM as a regulator of DNA packaging into chromatin and a monitor of chromosomal integrity.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank M. Smulson and H. Kwon for critical comments and discussions, as well as J. Tuturea and E. North for technical support and manuscript preparation, respectively. We also thank Drs. S. L. Schreiber and H. Kwon for providing pHDAC1.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant PO1 CA 74175.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Radiation Medicine, Div. of Radiation Research, Georgetown University Medical Center, The Research Bldg., Rm. E211A, 3970 Reservoir Rd. N. W., Washington, D. C. 20007. Tel.: 202-687-8352; Fax: 202-687-0400; E-mail: jungm@gunet.georgetown.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: AT, ataxia telangiectasia; ATM, the gene mutated in AT patients; GST, glutathione S-transferase; TSA, trichostatin A.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Savitsky, K., Bar-Shira, A., Gilad, S., Rotman, G., Ziv, Y., Vanagaite, L., Simmons, A., Clines, G. A., Sartiel, A., Gatti, R. A., Chessa, L., Sanal, O., Lavin, M. F., Jaspers, N. G. J., Taylor, A. M. R., Arlett, C. F., Miki, T., Weissman, S., Lovett, M., Clines, F. S., and Shiloh, Y. (1995) Science 268, 1749-1753[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2. Savitsky, K., Sfez, S., Tagle, D. A., Ziv, Y., Sartiel, A., Collins, F. S., Shiloh, Y., and Rotman, G. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 2025-2032[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Gottlieb, T. M., and Jackson, S. P. (1993) Cell 72, 131-142[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Jung, M., Kondratyev, A., Lee, S. A., Dimtchev, A., and Dritschilo, A. (1997) Cancer Res. 57, 24-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Lee, S. J., Dimtchev, A., Lavin, M. F., Dritschilo, A., and Jung, M. (1998) Oncogene 17, 1821-1826[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Oleinick, N. L., Balasubramaniam, U., Xue, L., and Chiu, S. (1994) Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66, 523-529[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Giles, R. H., Peters, D. J., and Breuning, M. H. (1998) Trends Genet. 14, 178-183[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Wade, P. A., Pruss, D., and Wolffe, A. P. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 128-132[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Grunstein, M. (1997) Nature 389, 349-352[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1996) Nature 384, 641-643[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11. Brehm, A., and Kouzarides, T. (1999) Trends Biochem. Sci. 24, 142-146[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Yarden, R. I., and Brody, L. C. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 4983-4988[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Utley, R. T., Ikeda, K., Grant, P. A., Cote, J., Steger, D. J., Eberharter, A., John, S., and Workman, J. L. (1998) Nature 394, 498-502[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
14. Vassilev, A., Yamauchi, J., Kotani, T., Prives, C., Avantaggiati, M. L., Qin, J., and Nakatani, Y. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 869-876[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Ogryzko, V. V., Kotani, T., Zhang, X., Schiltz, L., Howard, T., Qin, J., and Nakatani, Y. (1998) Cell 94, 35-44[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Siddique, H., Zou, J. P., Rao, V. N., and Reddy, E. S. (1998) Oncogene 16, 2283-2285[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Grant, P. A., Schieltz, D., Pray-Grant, M. G., Yates, J. R., III, and Workman, J. L. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 863-867[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. McMahon, S. B., Van Buskirk, H. A., Dugan, K. A., Copeland, T. D., and Cole, M. D. (1998) Cell 94, 363-374[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Struhl, K. (1998) Genes & Dev. 12, 599-606[Free Full Text]
20. Wu, C. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 28171-28174[Free Full Text]
21. Pazin, M. J., and Kadonaga, J. T. (1997) Cell 89, 325-328[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Wolffe, A. P. (1997) Nature 387, 16-17[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. DePinho, R. A. (1998) Nature 391, 533-536[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Brehm, A., Miska, E. A., McCance, D. J., Reid, J. L., Bannister, A. J., and Kouzarides, T. (1998) Nature 391, 597-601[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Magnaghi-Jaulin, L., Groisman, R., Naguibneva, I., Robin, P., Lorain, S., Le Villain, J. P., Troalen, F., Trouche, D., and Harel-Bellan, A. (1998) Nature 391, 601-605[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Ferreira, R., Magnaghi-Jaulin, L., Robin, P., Harel-Bellan, A., and Trouche, D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 95, 10493-10498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. Luo, R. X., Postigo, A. A., and Dean, D. C. (1998) Cell 92, 463-473[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Taunton, J., Hassig, C. A., and Schreiber, S. L. (1996) Science 272, 408-411[Abstract]
29. Carmen, A. A., Rundlett, S. E., and Grunstein, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 15837-15844[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Taunton, J., Hassig, C. A., and Schreiber, S. L. (1996) Science 272, 408-411
31. Guo, C. Y., Wang, Y., Brautigan, D. L., and Larner, J. M. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18715-18720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Gately, D. P., Hittle, J. C., Chan, G. K. T., and Yen, T. (1998) Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 2361-2374[Abstract/Free Full Text]


Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. A. Rimkus, R. J. Katzenberger, A. T. Trinh, G. E. Dodson, R. S. Tibbetts, and D. A. Wassarman
Mutations in String/CDC25 inhibit cell cycle re-entry and neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of Ataxia telangiectasia
Genes & Dev., May 1, 2008; 22(9): 1205 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
K. Camphausen and P. J. Tofilon
Inhibition of Histone Deacetylation: A Strategy for Tumor Radiosensitization
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2007; 25(26): 4051 - 4056.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. B. Young, J. Jonnalagadda, M. Gatei, D. A. Jans, S. Meyn, and K. K. Khanna
Identification of Domains of Ataxia-telangiectasia Mutated Required for Nuclear Localization and Chromatin Association
J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 27587 - 27594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Gupta, G. G. Sharma, C. S. H. Young, M. Agarwal, E. R. Smith, T. T. Paull, J. C. Lucchesi, K. K. Khanna, T. Ludwig, and T. K. Pandita
Involvement of Human MOF in ATM Function
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2005; 25(12): 5292 - 5305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
S. Ahmed, C. Palermo, S. Wan, and N. C. Walworth
A Novel Protein with Similarities to Rb Binding Protein 2 Compensates for Loss of Chk1 Function and Affects Histone Modification in Fission Yeast
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2004; 24(9): 3660 - 3669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. Yang, Y. Yu, H. E. Hamrick, and P. J. Duerksen-Hughes
ATM, ATR and DNA-PK: initiators of the cellular genotoxic stress responses
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2003; 24(10): 1571 - 1580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Ju and M. T. Muller
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Activate p21WAF1 Expression via ATM
Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 63(11): 2891 - 2897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. A. Anderson and N. D. Perkins
The Large Subunit of Replication Factor C Interacts with the Histone Deacetylase, HDAC1
J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 2002; 277(33): 29550 - 29554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
M. YAN, W. QIANG, N. LIU, J. SHEN, W. S. LYNN, and P. K. Y. WONG
The ataxia-telangiectasia gene product may modulate DNA turnover and control cell fate by regulating cellular redox in lymphocytes
FASEB J, May 1, 2001; 15(7): 1132 - 1138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Scherthan, M. Jerratsch, S. Dhar, Y. A. Wang, S. P. Goff, and T. K. Pandita
Meiotic Telomere Distribution and Sertoli Cell Nuclear Architecture Are Altered in Atm- and Atm-p53-Deficient Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2000; 20(20): 7773 - 7783.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. L. Cai, Y. Yan-Neale, M. A. Cueto, H. Xu, and D. Cohen
HDAC1, a Histone Deacetylase, Forms a Complex with Hus1 and Rad9, Two G2/M Checkpoint Rad Proteins
J. Biol. Chem., September 1, 2000; 275(36): 27909 - 27916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B.-r. Jeong, D. Wu-Scharf, C. Zhang, and H. Cerutti
From the Cover: Suppressors of transcriptional transgenic silencing in Chlamydomonas are sensitive to DNA-damaging agents and reactivate transposable elements
PNAS, January 22, 2002; 99(2): 1076 - 1081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, G. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jung, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.