![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31155-31159, October 29, 1999
From the Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Molecular
Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011
Brain hexokinase (HKI) is inhibited potently by
its product glucose 6-phosphate (G6P); however, the mechanism of
inhibition is unsettled. Two hypotheses have been proposed to account
for product inhibition of HKI. In one, G6P binds to the active site (the C-terminal half of HKI) and competes directly with ATP, whereas in
the alternative suggestion the inhibitor binds to an allosteric site (the N-terminal half of HKI), which indirectly displaces ATP from
the active site. Single mutations within G6P binding pockets, as
defined by crystal structures, at either the N- or C-terminal half of
HKI have no significant effect on G6P inhibition. On the other hand,
the corresponding mutations eliminate product inhibition in a truncated
form of HKI, consisting only of the C-terminal half of the enzyme. Only
through combined mutations at the active and allosteric sites, using
residues for which single mutations had little effect, was product
inhibition eliminated in HKI. Evidently, potent inhibition of HKI by
G6P can occur from both active and allosteric binding sites.
Furthermore, kinetic data reported here, in conjunction with published
equilibrium binding data, are consistent with inhibitory sites of
comparable affinity linked by a mechanism of negative cooperativity.
Mammals harbor four hexokinase (ATP:D-hexose
6-phosphotransferase (2.7.1.1)) isozymes (1-3). One of these, brain
hexokinase (HKI),1 is
putatively the pacemaker of glycolysis in brain tissue and the red
blood cell (4). Two isozymes, HKI and skeletal muscle hexokinase
(HKII), are bound to the outer membrane of mitochondria and, in the
case of HKI, are juxtaposed to a porin-adenylate translocator complex
(5-7). Only a small fraction of the potential HKI activity is used in
brain tissue because of low concentrations of intracellular glucose and
potent product inhibition by glucose 6-phosphate (G6P) (8, 9). Although
HKII and HKI are both markedly inhibited by G6P, orthophosphate
(Pi) reverses G6P inhibition of only HKI (10). In addition,
Pi reverses G6P-induced release of mitochondrially bound
HKI (5). Exactly how G6P functions as an inhibitor of HKI is unsettled
(11, 12). Although most investigators now believe that G6P competes
with ATP at the active site of the enzyme (13-17), others suggest that
G6P exerts its effect by binding to an allosteric site topologically
distinct from the active site (12, 18, 19). On the other hand, there
seems to be general agreement regarding the kinetic mechanism of HKI as
being rapid-equilibrium Random Bi Bi (20-22).
HKI arose putatively from the duplication and fusion of a primordial
gene (23). Human HKI has a molecular mass of 100 kDa composed of two
structurally similar halves. The two halves (C-terminal and N-terminal)
share significant sequence homology (24). Catalytic activity of the
enzyme is associated with the C-terminal half of HKI (14, 15, 25, 26),
whereas the N-terminal half has a high affinity site for Pi
putatively responsible for the relief of G6P inhibition (14, 15). Arora
et al. (14) have suggested that the binding of G6P to this
site releases HKI from mitochondria and is not involved in inhibition.
Recently published three-dimensional structures of human (27-29) and
rat (30) HKI by x-ray crystallography reveals two globular halves held
together by a connecting helix and a few hydrogen bonds. Each half is
structurally similar to yeast hexokinase. In addition, the crystal
structures revealed binding sites for G6P (28, 30) and Pi
(27). G6P binds to almost identical pockets at the C- and N-terminal
halves of HKI, whereas the functional Pi site overlaps the
6-phosphoryl binding locus for G6P at the N-terminal half. Kinetic
studies indicate the presence of both high and low affinity binding
sites for G6P on HKI (31). Presented here are the kinetic properties of
several mutant forms of HKI, in which specific residues (individually
and in combination) at G6P pockets, are altered. The results support
the following model: (i) G6P binding to high affinity sites at either
the N- or C-terminal pocket can independently cause potent inhibition
of HKI. (ii) G6P binding to HKI must be strongly anti-cooperative.
Materials--
A full-length cDNA of human brain hexokinase
cloned into an expression vector pET-11a (from Novagen) to produce
pET-11a-HKI and pET-11d-miniHK was available for use from a previous
study (32, 33). The transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit is from
CLONTECH. T4 polynucleotide kinase and all the
restriction enzymes are from Promega. Bio-gel hydroxyapatite resin is
from Bio-Rad. Toyopearl DEAE-650M is from Tosohaas. Oligonucleotide synthesis and DNA sequencing were done at the Iowa State University Nucleic Acid Facility. Escherichia coli strain ZSC13 (DE3),
which does not contain endogenous hexokinase, was a gift from the
Genetic Stock Center, Yale University. ATP, NADP,
1,5-anhydro-D-sorbitol, deoxyribonuclease (DNase I),
leupeptin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and ampicillin are from
Sigma. Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase came from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals. Isopropyl-1-thio- Construction of Mutant Hexokinase Genes--
The hexokinase gene
was mutated according to the protocols of the
CLONTECH transformer site-directed mutagenesis kit.
The mutant plasmid was selected from wild-type plasmids by switching a
unique NruI restriction site on the pET-11 vector to another unique XhoI site for the single point mutations. Double
mutants were constructed by performing another single mutation in
existing single-mutant plasmids. The primers for site-directed
mutagenesis are 5'-GATCTTGGAGGAGCAAATTTCCGTG-3'
for Thr536
The oligonucleotide primers used for the selection of the mutant
plasmid from the wild-type plasmid are:
5'-CAGCCTCGCCTCGAGAACGCCAGCAAG-3' for the conversion from the NruI site to the
XhoI site and
5'-CCTCGCGTCGCGAACGCCAGCAAG-3' for the
conversion from the XhoI site back to the NruI
site. Mutations were confirmed by sequencing the entire cDNA insert
and coding for HKI.
Expression and Purification of Wild-type and Mutant
Hexokinase--
Transformed E. coli strain ZSC13,
containing wild-type or mutant pET-11a-HKI, was grown in LB media at
37 °C to an A600 of 0.6; whereupon the
temperature was reduced to 22 °C, and
isopropyl-1-thio- Preparation of AnG6P--
AnG6P was prepared as described
elsewhere (34).
Treatment of Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase--
Commercial
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase comes as an ammonium sulfate
precipitate. Sulfate anion mimics the effect of Pi relief
of G6P inhibition (26). Thus, to avoid interference from sulfate,
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase was dialyzed against the activity
assay buffer prior to use in kinetic experiments.
The HKI Activity Assay and Kinetic Studies--
HKI activity was
determined by the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-coupled
spectrometric assay (13). Hexokinase concentrations were determined by
Bradford assays using bovine serum albumin as a standard (35). Initial
rate data were analyzed by using a computer program written in MINITAB
with an Circular Dichroism Spectra--
Circular dichroism spectra were
measured from 200 to 260 nm at room temperature by using a Jasco J710
circular dichroism spectrometer. The concentration of HKI used for
circular dichroism measurements was 0.2 mg/ml in a buffer containing 2 mM Hepes (pH 7.8), 0.2 mM glucose, and 0.2 mM In previous work (31) we mutated residues at the putative
allosteric G6P pocket and found only a modest change (2-fold or less)
in the Ki for G6P. Subsequently, Sebastian et
al. (37) mutated the same residues at this site and obtained
similar results but concluded that this site was the high affinity
binding site for G6P responsible for HKI inhibition. The results from both studies are summarized in Table I.
In light of these divergent conclusions, we examined the functional
consequences of mutations at the G6P binding site at the C-terminal
half of HKI. Our findings and conclusions are the subject of this
report.
Purity of Wild-type and Mutant Hexokinases--
The purity of
wild-type and mutant hexokinases was greater than 95% as judged by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (data not shown).
Secondary Structure Analysis--
Circular dichroism spectra of
mutant hexokinases and their cognate, wild-type forms are essentially
identical (data not shown) indicating no significant disruption of
secondary structure or protein folding because of mutations.
Kinetic Analysis of Wild-type and Mutant Enzymes--
The results
in Tables I-III come from double reciprocal plots of reciprocal initial
velocity versus reciprocal substrate concentration (data not
shown). The data were subjected to "goodness-of-fit" analysis (36)
using a variety of kinetic models. In all cases the G6P analog, AnG6P,
which mimics the properties of G6P in assays of HKI (34), is a
competitive inhibitor with respect to ATP and a noncompetitive
inhibitor relative to glucose. Kinetic parameters were obtained from
the best-fit models, which registered goodness-of-fit values below
5%.
Rationale for the Selection of Mutants--
Fig.
1 illustrates the structure of HKI with
G6P bound at the active and allosteric sites. The illustration is based
on a 1.9 Å resolution structure of a HKI monomer, which will be
presented in detail elsewhere. Asp532 of the C-terminal
half interacts with the 2-hydroxyl group of G6P, whereas
Asp84, the residue in the N-terminal half corresponding to
Asp532, also interacts with the 2-hydroxy group of G6P.
Asp861 and Thr680, residues of the C-terminal
half, interact with the 1-hydroxyl group and 2-hydroxyl of G6P,
respectively. Thr232 interacts with the 6-phosphoryl group
of G6P in the N-terminal half of HKI and corresponds structurally to
Thr680 of the C-terminal half. Ser88 of the
N-terminal half corresponds to Thr536 of the C-terminal
half, which hydrogen bonds to the 6-phosphoryl group of G6P.
Gly87 of the N-terminal half can accommodate a mutation to
a bulky side chain, which should block the binding of Pi or
G6P, as noted previously (31).
Shown in Tables I-III are the results from single mutations of HKI and
a form of HKI in which the N-terminal half is absent because of a
truncation of the gene that codes for HKI. Hereafter we will refer to
this truncated form of HKI as mini-HKI. Single mutations in HKI, either
at the allosteric site (Table I) or the G6P binding locus at the active
site (Table II) generally cause modest
increases (2-fold or less) in the Ki for G6P. On the
other hand, the same mutations, when made in the putative binding locus
of G6P at the active site of mini-HKI, eliminate G6P inhibition (Table III). These rather surprising and
inexplicable results prompted a series of double mutations in HKI,
which altered one residue in each of two G6P binding sites (combined N-
and C-terminal half mutations). The results of these experiments are in
Table III. Evidently, elimination of G6P inhibition comes about only as
a consequence of mutations at both G6P binding sites. Evidently, both
of the G6P binding sites (allosteric and active site) are functional in
HKI, and G6P binding to either causes potent inhibition.
In 1951 Weil-Malherbe and Bone (38) reported that G6P is a
noncompetitive inhibitor with respect to ATP in the HKI reaction. This
finding, along with the high level of G6P specificity when compared
with that of mannose 6-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate, led Crane
and Sols (18) to suggest that G6P binds to a site other than the active
site, i.e. an allosteric locus. This view has been
championed by other investigators (19), notably Wilson (12). On the
other hand, kinetic studies from our laboratory (13), as well as many
others (2, 21, 22, 39-41), showed that G6P is a competitive inhibitor
with respect to ATP and a noncompetitive inhibitor with respect to
glucose. Based upon these observations, we suggested that G6P competes
with ATP at the active site, which is precisely what one would expect
of a product inhibitor in a rapid equilibrium Random Bi Bi kinetic
mechanism. In support of the above were the findings of Sols (19),
which were subsequently confirmed by Solheim and Fromm (42), that the
kinetics of the reverse HKI reaction are normal Michaelin with a
Km for G6P nearly equal to the Ki
for G6P in the forward reaction.
A major breakthrough in HKI research occurred when White and Wilson
(25) cleaved the enzyme by proteolysis into polypeptides of nearly
equal mass. Kinetic studies by these investigators (26), and
subsequently by others (14, 15), demonstrated that the C-terminal half
of the enzyme contains the active site, whereas the N-terminal half of
HKI is inactive. In addition, except for the reversal of G6P inhibition
by Pi, the C-terminal half retained all of the kinetic
properties of HKI (14, 15, 26). Hence, many investigators assigned the
site for G6P inhibition to the C-terminal half (active site) and the
site for Pi relief of G6P inhibition to the N-terminal half
(14, 15). Our laboratory had suggested in 1975 that Pi
binds at an allosteric site on HKI (43).
The three-dimensional structures of human HKI yielded an unexpected
result in that G6P was bound to both the N- and the C-terminal halves
of the enzyme (28, 30). Earlier studies indicated the binding of only a
single molecule of G6P to HKI (43-45). Subsequently, Fang et
al. (31) showed that mutations in the G6P binding site of the
N-terminal half of HKI caused only modest increases in the
Ki for G6P (Table I) and concluded that the
N-terminal half could not be the site of potent G6P-inhibition. Shortly
thereafter, Sebastian et al. (37), using recombinant rat HKI
from COS cells, obtained similar results because of mutations of the
G6P pocket of the N-terminal half of HKI (Table I); however, they
concluded that the N-terminal site was indeed responsible for the
potent inhibition of HKI by G6P.
The mechanism in Scheme I was used in
the analysis of kinetic results obtained here and in a previous study
(31). The rate equation for Scheme I is,
Dual Mechanisms for Glucose 6-Phosphate Inhibition of Human Brain
Hexokinase*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-galactopyranoside is
from BioWorld.
Ala,
5'-CTGGATCTTGGTTACTCTTCCTTTCGAATTC-3' for
Gly87
Tyr,
5'-CTGTGGGAGTGGCAGGGACACTCTAC-3' for
Asp861
Ala,
5'-CTGATCATCGGCGCTGGCACCAATGC-3' for
Thr232
Ala, and
5'CTTGGCCCTGGCTCTTGGAGGAACC-3' for
Asp532
Ala, where the modified codons are bold and underlined.
-D-galactopyranoside was added to a
final concentration of 0.4 mM. 16-24 h after induction, the cells were harvested and then resuspended in 25 mM
KPi (pH 7.5), 2 mM glucose, 1 mM
EDTA, 0.4 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 3000 units of DNase I at a temperature of 4 °C. The cells were broken using a French press and
centrifuged, after which the supernatant fluid was passed through a
DEAE column using a KPi-buffered (pH 7.5), KCl gradient from 0 to 0.5 M. The fractions containing HKI were
concentrated and then passed though a hydroxyapatite column using a
KPi-buffered (pH 7.5), KCl gradient from 20 to 500 mM. Pooled fractions of HKI were further purified by
preparative DEAE-high pressure liquid chromatography, as described
elsewhere (31).
-value of 2.0 (36). In experiments with AnG6P, the kinetic
data were fit to a model for nonlinear competitive inhibition with
respect to ATP, in which two molecules of inhibitor interact
sequentially with HKI (29). This model, which hereafter we will call
the stoichiometric model, can be used to evaluate either a system with
two independent inhibitor sites or a system with two inhibitor sites
coupled by a mechanism of anticooperatively. The equilibrium constants
for the dissociation of the first inhibitor molecule from HKI
(Ki) and the second inhibitor molecule
(Kii) take on significantly different meanings
in relation to site-specific affinity constants, as discussed below.
-mercaptoethanol.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Kinetic parameters for mutations in the N-terminal half of hexokinase I

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Structure of a monomeric interface mutant of
hexokinase I. G6P molecules are in dark gray. The
illustration was drawn by MOLSCRIPT (47).
Kinetic parameters for mutations in the C-terminal half of hexokinase I
G6P binding site mutations in mini-hexokinase and combined mutations in
both N- and C-terminal halves of hexokinase I
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
where I and S represent G6P and ATP,
respectively (glucose is saturating and does not appear in Scheme I or
in Equation 1), Vm is the maximal velocity,
Ks is the Michaelis constant for ATP, and
Ki and Kii are inhibition
constants for the binding of the first and second molecules of G6P,
respectively. Scheme I is equally valid for the interpretation of
kinetic data for inhibitor binding at independent sites with different
affinities or for inhibitor binding to sites with identical affinities
coupled by a mechanism of negative cooperativity. However, the
relationship of Ki and Kii to
site affinity constants is model dependent. Most importantly,
Ki does not have the same meaning for the wild-type
and single-mutant enzymes.
(Eq. 1)
![]()
View larger version (5K):
[in a new window]
Scheme I.
The results of Tables I-III are readily explained from the kinetic
equation obtained from Scheme II.
|
(Eq. 2) |
|
Direct comparison of the kinetic equations based on Scheme I and Scheme
II results in the following relationship.
|
(Eq. 3) |
Other than the above subtlety, Scheme II is relatively straightforward. The binding of I (G6P) occurs at two sites, one in the C-terminal half and the other in the N-terminal half of HKI. As binding constants obtained from kinetics for either HKI or mini-HKI (Tables I-III) are similar, Equation 2 predicts no single mutation will alter the kinetics of inhibition appreciably in the full-length enzyme. On the other hand, a single mutation in mini-HKI or a double mutation in the full-length enzyme should eliminate inhibition, as has been observed (Tables II and III). Furthermore, on the basis of Equations 1 and 2, mutations made either in the C- or N-terminal half of HKI should effectively eliminate the (I)2 term.
Although kinetic (31) and structural studies (27, 28, 30) strongly
suggest that there are two binding sites on HKI for G6P and glucose,
direct binding experiments implicate a stoichiometry of 1.0 for these
ligands (43-45). These seemingly divergent findings can be
rationalized by assuming a mechanism of negative cooperativity in
ligand binding. The kinetic studies of Fang et al. (31)
revealed both weak and strong binding sites for G6P. Fractional
saturation (
) is related to G6P concentration
(I),
|
(Eq. 4) |
K1, K2,
|
(Eq. 5) |
Independent binding of G6P to the active and allosteric sites of HKI
causes potent inhibition of HKI in vitro. HKI in
vivo, however, is bound to the outer mitochondrial membrane. If as
Arora et al. (14) suggest the role of bound G6P at the
allosteric site is to release HKI from the mitochondria, then G6P
should not be bound to the allosteric site of mitochondrially
associated HKI. Under these physiological conditions, if G6P inhibition
occurs, it will most likely occur at the active site. This observation is bolstered by the recent work of Ardehali et al. (46),
which reports G6P levels above 1 mM in perfused rat hearts,
even though hexokinase II, present in that tissue, is inhibited
in vitro by G6P at micromolar levels. G6P binds with high
affinity to the isolated N-terminal half of HKII and low affinity to
the isolated C-terminal half, but in the full-length enzyme high
affinity inhibition dominates. These authors speculate, that HKII in
its mitochondrially associated state is inhibited weakly by G6P and
that interactions between its N- and C-terminal halves, which are
putatively responsible for potent G6P inhibition, are absent. In the
case of HKI a fail-safe mechanism exists with respect to G6P
inhibition; if one mode of G6P inhibition is lost, then the another
mode remains, which assures virtually no diminution in G6P inhibition.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This research was supported in part by Research Grant NS 10546 from the National Institutes of Health, United States Public Health Service and Grant MCB 9603595 from the National Science Foundation. This is journal paper J-18576 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Project 3191, and was supported by Hatch Act and State of Iowa funds.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 515-294-6116;
Fax: 515-294-0453; E-mail: hjfromm@iastate.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: HKI, hexokinase I; HKII, hexokinase II; mini-HKI, C-terminal half of brain hexokinase; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; AnG6P, 1,5-anhydroglucitol 6-phosphate.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Gonzalez, C., Ureta, T., Sánchez, R., and Niemeyer, H. (1964) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 16, 347-352[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Grossbard, L.,
and Schimke, R. T.
(1966)
J. Biol. Chem.
241,
3546-3560 |
| 3. | Katzen, H. M. (1967) Adv. Enzyme Regul. 5, 335-356[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Lowry, O. H.,
and Passonneau, J. V.
(1964)
J Biol. Chem.
239,
31-42 |
| 5. |
Rose, I. A.,
and Warms, J. V. B.
(1967)
J. Biol. Chem.
242,
1635-1645 |
| 6. | Lindén, M., Gellerfors, P., and Nelson, R. D. (1982) FEBS Lett. 141, 189-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Fiek, C., Benz, R., Roos, N., and Brdiczka, D. (1982) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 688, 429-440[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Crane, R. K. (1962) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P. D. , Myrback, K. , and Lardy, H. A., eds), 2nd Ed., Vol. 6 , pp. 47-66, Academic Press, New York |
| 9. |
Purich, D, L.,
and Fromm, H. J.
(1971)
J. Biol. Chem.
246,
3456-3463 |
| 10. | Tiedemann, H., and Born, J. (1959) Z. Naturforsch. 146, 477-478 |
| 11. | Purich, D. L., Fromm, H. J., and Rudolph, F. B. (1973) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 39, 249-326[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. | Wilson, J. E. (1995) Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 126, 65-198[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 13. |
Fromm, H. J.,
and Zewe, V.
(1962)
J. Biol. Chem.
237,
1661-1667 |
| 14. |
Arora, K. K.,
Filburn, C. R.,
and Pederson, P. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18259-18266 |
| 15. | Magnani, M., Bianchi, M., Casabianca, A., Stocchi, V., Danielle, A., Altrude, F., Ferrone, M., and Silengo, L. (1992) Biochem. J. 285, 193-199 |
| 16. | Jarori, G. K., Iyer, S. B., Kasturi, S. R., and Kendare, U. W. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 188, 9-14[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. |
Mehta, A.,
Jarori, G. K.,
and Kenkare, U. W.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
15492-15497 |
| 18. |
Crane, R. K.,
and Sols, A.
(1954)
J. Biol. Chem.
210,
597-606 |
| 19. | Sols, A. (1976) in Reflections on Biochemistry (Kornberg, A. , Horecker, B. L. , Cornudella, L. , and Oro, J., eds) , pp. 199-206, Pergamon Press, New York |
| 20. |
Ning, J.,
Purich, D. L.,
and Fromm, H. J.
(1969)
J. Biol. Chem.
244,
3840-3846 |
| 21. | Bachelard, H. S., Clark, A. G., and Thompson, M. F. (1971) Biochem. J. 123, 707-715[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Gerber, G., Preissler, H., Heinrich, R., and Rapoport, S. M. (1974) Eur. J. Biochem. 45, 39-52[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. | Colowick, S. P. (1973) in The Enzymes (Boyer, P. D., ed.) Vol. 9, 3rd Ed., pp. 1-48 |
| 24. | Nishi, S., Seino, S., and Bell, G. I. (1988) Bichem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 157, 937-943[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | White, T. K., and Wilson, J. E. (1987) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 259, 402-411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. | White, T. K., and Wilson, J. E. (1989) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 274, 375-393[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Aleshin, A., Zeng, C., Bartunik, H. D., Fromm, H. J., and Honzatko, R. B. (1998) J. Mol. Biol. 282, 345-357[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Aleshin, A., Zeng, C., Bourenkov, G. P., Bartunik, H. D., Fromm, H. J., and Honzatko, R. B. (1998) Structure 6, 39-50[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. | Aleshin, A. E., Fromm, H. J., and Honzatko, R. B. (1998) FEBS Lett. 434, 42-46[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 30. | Mulichak, A. M., Wilson, J. E., Padmanabhan, K., and Garavito, R. M. (1998) Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 555-560[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 31. |
Fang, T. Y.,
Alechina, O.,
Alechin, A. E.,
Fromm, H. J.,
and Honzatko, R. B.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
19548-19553 |
| 32. |
Zeng, C.,
and Fromm, H. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
10509-10513 |
| 33. | Liu, F., Dong, Q., Myers, A. M., and Fromm, H. J. (1991) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 177, 305-311[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Ferrari, R. A., Mandelstam, P., and Crane, R. K. (1959) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 80, 372-377[CrossRef] |
| 35. | Bradford, M. M. (1976) Anal. Biochem. 72, 248-254[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 36. | Siano, D. B., Zyskind, J. W., and Fromm, H. J. (1975) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 170, 587-600[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. | Sebastian, S. S., Wilson, J. E., Malichak, A., and Garavito, R. M. (1999) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 362, 203-210[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. | Weil-Malherbe, H., and Bone, A. D. (1951) Biochem. J. 49, 339-347[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 39. | Kosow, D. P., Oski, F. A., Warms, J. V. B., and Rose, I. A. (1973) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 157, 114-124[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Rijksen, G., and Staal, G. E. J. (1977) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 485, 75-86[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 41. | Vowels, D. T., and Easterby, J. S. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 566, 283-295[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 42. | Solheim, L. P., and Fromm, H. J. (1981) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 211, 92-99[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 43. |
Ellison, W. R.,
Lueck, J. D.,
and Fromm, H. J.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
1864-1871 |
| 44. | Ellison, W. R., Lueck, J. D., and Fromm, H. J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 688, 429-440 |
| 45. | Chou, A. C., and Wilson, J. E. (1974) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 165, 628-633[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 46. |
Ardehali, H.,
Printz, R. L.,
Whitesell, R. R.,
May, J. M.,
and Granner, D. K.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
15986-15989 |
| 47. | Kraulis, P. J. (1991) J. Appl. Crystallogr. 24, 946-950[CrossRef] |
| 48. | Zeng, C., Aleshin, A., Hardie, J. B., Harrison, R. W., and Fromm, H. J. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 13157-13164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kurtoglu, N. Gao, J. Shang, J. C. Maher, M. A. Lehrman, M. Wangpaichitr, N. Savaraj, A. N. Lane, and T. J. Lampidis Under normoxia, 2-deoxy-D-glucose elicits cell death in select tumor types not by inhibition of glycolysis but by interfering with N-linked glycosylation Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2007; 6(11): 3049 - 3058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Skaff, C. S. Kim, H. J. Tsai, R. B. Honzatko, and H. J. Fromm Glucose 6-Phosphate Release of Wild-type and Mutant Human Brain Hexokinases from Mitochondria J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38403 - 38409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bouche, S. Serdy, C. R. Kahn, and A. B. Goldfine The Cellular Fate of Glucose and Its Relevance in Type 2 Diabetes Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2004; 25(5): 807 - 830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Aft, J. S. Lewis, F. Zhang, J. Kim, and M. J. Welch Enhancing Targeted Radiotherapy by Copper(II)diacetyl- bis(N4-methylthiosemicarbazone) Using 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose Cancer Res., September 1, 2003; 63(17): 5496 - 5504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. C. Schuit, P. Huypens, H. Heimberg, and D. G. Pipeleers Glucose Sensing in Pancreatic {beta}-Cells: A Model for the Study of Other Glucose-Regulated Cells in Gut, Pancreas, and Hypothalamus Diabetes, January 1, 2001; 50(1): 1 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |