![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31249-31255, October 29, 1999
From the Genetic Engineering Laboratory, Indian Institute of
Chemical Biology, 4 Raja S. C. Mullick Rd.,
Calcutta 700032, India
Import of tRNA into Leishmania
mitochondria involves transfer through a double membrane barrier. To
examine whether specific sorting mechanisms for individual tRNAs direct
them to different mitochondrial compartments, the distribution of tRNA
transcripts, internalized in vitro, was examined by
suborganellar fractionation. Significant amounts of tRNATyr
were localized in the matrix and on the outer face of the inner mitochondrial membrane. With time, the matrix:membrane ratio increased. Translocation through the inner membrane apparently required the presence of a specific signal in the D arm of tRNATyr, and
tRNAGln(CUG), lacking this sequence, was excluded.
Hydrolysis of ATP was necessary at both the outer and inner membranes.
However, the protonophores carbonylcyanide
m-chlorophenylhydrazone and nigericin, the K+
ionophore valinomycin, and the F1F0 ATPase
inhibitor oligomycin had only marginal effects on uptake through the
outer membrane but severely inhibited inner membrane translocation,
indicating the unusual requirement of both the electrical and chemical
components of the electromotive force generated across the inner
membrane. The results are consistent with a mechanism involving
stepwise transfer of tRNA through distinct outer and inner membrane channels.
The mitochondrial genomes of many protozoal species, including
leishmania, trypanosomes, and plasmodium, are unusual for their apparently total lack of tRNA genes (1-3). To sustain the translation of organellar mRNAs, a large number of nuclear-encoded tRNAs are imported from the cytoplasm (4-10). Mitochondrial import of one or
more tRNAs has also been documented in tetrahymena (11), yeast (12),
and several species of higher plants (13, 14).
To understand the mechanism of import, we have developed an in
organello system from leishmania (15). It was shown that import is
ATP-dependent and specific for RNA sequence (15, 16). A
purine-rich oligonucleotide motif in the D arm of tRNA was identified as an import signal in vivo (17) as well as in
vitro (18). A 15-kDa protein associated with the outer
mitochondrial membrane acts as carrier or receptor for direct import of
tRNA, without the mediation of soluble factors (19).
Analysis of intact mitochondria or mitoplasts for tRNA internalized
in vivo or in vitro does not address the question
of the distribution of the RNA in the various intramitochondrial
compartments, viz. the outer membrane, intermembrane space,
inner membrane, or matrix. We have previously reported UTP labeling of
in vitro imported small RNAs (15), presumably by the
matrix-localized terminal uridylyl transferase (20). A fraction of
tRNAIle associated with the mitochondrial fraction in
vivo was found to be resistant to micrococcal nuclease in the
presence of digitonin, which selectively solubilizes the outer
mitochondrial membrane, suggesting the matrix location of this tRNA
(17). It is not known whether different tRNAs are sorted to different
locations once inside the mitochondrion, in a manner analogous to the
sorting of imported proteins, and if so, whether separate matrix
localization and sorting signals exist within the tRNA structure. The
study of intramitochondrial distribution is important as it may enable a distinction to be made between 1) a concerted mechanism of
import through a single transport channel spanning both the outer and inner membranes, and 2) a stepwise mechanism involving
separate outer and inner membrane translocation channels.
In this study, mitochondria were fractionated into various compartments
for the study of the distribution of imported RNA, specifically, the
sequence specificity and energy requirements of translocation through
the inner membrane. The results support the notion of stepwise
insertion of RNA through the outer and inner mitochondrial membranes.
Cell Culture and Preparation of Mitochondria--
Promastigotes
of Leishmania tropica strain UR6 were cultured on solid
blood agar medium (21) supplemented with 150 µg/ml biopterin and 50 µg/ml adenine. Mitochondria were purified from DNase I-treated
lysates by Percoll gradient centrifugation and stored in 50% glycerol
storage buffer, as described (15). Before use, mitochondria were
diluted with a 10-fold excess of ice-cold isotonic sucrose-Tris-EDTA
(STE buffer)1 (15), washed by
centrifugation, and resuspended in STE at a final protein concentration
of 8-10 mg/ml.
Import Substrates--
32P-labeled
tRNATyr(GUA) transcript was prepared by runoff
transcription of a genomic copy of the corresponding gene in plasmid pSKB-1 (19), using T7 RNA polymerase and [ Enzymes and Inhibitors--
Carbonylcyanide
m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP), oligomycin, valinomycin, and
nigericin (all from Sigma) were dissolved in ethanol and diluted
100-fold into import reactions. The sodium salt of carboxyatractyloside
(Sigma) was dissolved in water and similarly diluted. Mitochondria
(80-100 µg of protein) were preincubated with inhibitor (plus 0.1 M KCl in the case of valinomycin) for 15 min on ice before
dilution with an equal volume of import buffer, as indicated. Rabbit
muscle myokinase (Roche Molecular Biochemicals), an ammonium sulfate
suspension, was recovered by microcentrifugation and suspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 50% glycerol before use.
Import Incubation--
Unless otherwise stated, washed
mitochondria (80-100 µg of protein) were incubated at 37 °C for
15 min with 100 fmol of 32P-labeled import substrate in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 10 mM MgAc2, 2 mM dithiothreitol, and 4 mM ATP in a total
volume of 20 µl. Then RNase A (2.5 µg/ml) and RNase T1 (50 units/ml) were added and incubation continued for an additional 15 min
at the same temperature. Mitochondria were washed in cold STE and
recovered by centrifugation.
Submitochondrial Fractionation--
RNase-treated mitochondria
containing internalized radiolabeled RNA were incubated with 320 µM digitonin (Roche Molecular Biochemicals) in 10 µl of
STE for 15 min on ice (23). Alternatively, mitochondria were subjected
to hypotonic shock in 20 µl of 1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA (15) for 15 min on ice, followed by addition of 2.5 µl of 2 M sucrose. Mitoplasts were separated from the
intermembrane space fraction by microcentrifugation at 3450 × g for 3 min at 4 °C. The mitoplasts were suspended in 10 µl of freeze-thaw buffer (0.6 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA; Ref. 24) and
subjected to three freeze-thaw cycles, each consisting of freezing at
Enzyme Assays--
Kynurenine hydroxylase and succinate
dehydrogenase were spectrophotometrically assayed as described
previously (16, 19). To assay malate dehydrogenase, reactions (1 ml)
containing 96 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, 150 µM NAD+, and mitochondrial extract were
initiated by the addition of 260 µM sodium malate and the
reduction of NAD+ followed by the increase in absorbance at
340 nm ( Measurement of Membrane Potential--
The uptake of
rhodamine 123 was used as a measure of the mitochondrial membrane
potential (25, 26). Reactions (1 ml) containing 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 10 mM MgAc2, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 220 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, and
2.63 µM rhodamine 123 (Sigma) were placed in a cuvette,
and the absorbances at 516 and 495 nm were measured. Mitoplasts
(derived from 200 µg of mitochondria), 4 mM ATP, and 50 µM CCCP were sequentially added, and the absorbances at
the above wavelengths continuously recorded over time.
Optimization of the Ribonuclease Protection Assay--
Previous
import assays (15, 16, 18, 19) had employed relatively high
concentrations of RNase and a suboptimal incubation temperature
(25 °C) to digest excess (unimported) RNA. Under these conditions we
sometimes observed partial degradation of imported RNA, possibly by
residual RNase during the postimport washing and mitochondrial lysis
steps.2 In order to make the
assay more reliable in terms of RNA intactness and yield, the RNase
concentration was lowered, whereas the incubation temperature was
raised to 37 °C to increase the rate of degradation. A RNase
titration experiment (Fig. 1A)
showed that at 37 °C, protection of intact RNA was observed using
only 2.5% of the original enzyme concentration. At lower
concentrations, there was evidence of incomplete endonucleolytic
cleavage leading to smearing in the lane, whereas at higher
concentrations, the amount of protected RNA was reduced and finally
eliminated. These results emphasize the importance of controlling the
RNase step for successful observation of import.
The amount of protected RNA increased in a time-dependent
manner up to 20 min of incubation of the mitochondria with radiolabeled tRNATyr and was completely sensitive to RNase if the
mitochondria were lysed with Triton X-100 (Fig. 1B), as
expected for uptake into the membrane-bound organelle.
Separation of Mitochondrial Compartments--
In order to assess
the intramitochodrial distribution of tRNAs imported in
vitro, a simple scheme for separating the various intramitochondrial compartments was developed (Fig.
2A). Mitochondria were treated
with digitonin, a detergent that selectively solubilizes the outer
membrane (23). Under the conditions employed, the outer membrane marker
kynurenine hydroxylase (19), but not the inner membrane marker
succinate dehydrogenase (19), was solubilized (Table
I), attesting to the selectivity of the
digitonin treatment.
After separation of the digitonin-soluble fraction (outer membrane plus
intermembrane space) by centrifugation, the particulate fraction
(mitoplasts), containing membrane vesicles of more or less uniform
size,2 was subjected to freeze-thaw cycles (24) to liberate
the matrix contents, leaving behind an insoluble fraction enriched with
the inner membrane. Light microscopy of this fraction revealed the presence of large, presumably fused, membrane lamellae, with no evidence of intact mitoplasts.2 As expected, malate
dehydrogenase was predominantly located in the soluble fraction and
succinate dehydrogenase in the particulate fraction (Table I). (Some
malate dehydrogenase activity was also detected in the
digitonin-soluble fraction; a similar result has been obtained with
mammalian mitochondrial preparations (23) and probably represents
contamination with the cytosolic form of the enzyme.) The mitochondrial
enzyme terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase), implicated in RNA
editing mechanisms (20), was also released by freeze-thaw lysis,
confirming its presence in the matrix.2
Treatment of mitochondria with digitonin resulted in enhanced
sensitivity of inner membrane proteins, such as succinate
dehydrogenase, to protease treatment, whereas the matrix marker malate
dehydrogenase remained unaffected (Fig. 2B), indicating the
intactness of the inner membrane.
To determine whether the mitoplasts obtained by this procedure can
develop a membrane potential ( Intramitochondrial Distribution of
tRNATyr--
Mitochondria were incubated with radiolabeled
tRNATyr transcript, then digested with RNase. After
washing, submitochondrial fractions were separated as above and
analyzed for the presence of RNA.
In the presence of ATP, mitochondria accumulated internalized
tRNATyr in different submitochondrial compartments (Fig.
3A). The majority of the RNA
(68% in this experiment) was in the matrix, 31% was bound to the
inner membrane, and less than 1% was in the intermembrane space. RNase
treatment of the digitonin-treated mitoplasts resulted in nearly
complete digestion of the membrane-bound RNA, whereas the RNA in the
matrix was resistant (Fig. 3A), as expected. Thus, the RNA
bound to the inner membrane is exposed to the intermembrane space.
Essentially identical results were obtained when mitoplasts were
prepared by hypotonic shock instead of digitonin.2
The intramitochondrial distribution of RNA changed with time (Fig.
3B). At early times of incubation, the majority of the RNA
was in the inner membrane fraction, whereas after 10 min at 37 °C,
increasing amounts appeared in the matrix, with a concomitant reduction
in the membrane-bound fraction, whereas the total amount internalized
increased only marginally. These results indicate that translocation
through the inner membrane is slower than that through the outer membrane.
The effect of temperature on the intramitochondrial distribution of
tRNATyr was examined (Fig. 3C). Total uptake
increased sharply between 5 and 15 °C, but rose only marginally
thereafter. In contrast, transfer into the matrix was favored at 35 and
45 °C. Near the optimum growth temperature of the promastigote form
of Leishmania (25 °C), the RNA was equally distributed
between the inner membrane and matrix compartments (Fig.
3C), reflecting a reduced rate of matrix transfer at the
lower temperature.2
Sequence Discrimination at the Inner Membrane--
It was
previously shown that uptake of RNA through the outer membrane (as
measured by RNase protection assays of intact mitochondria) requires
recognition of a conserved motif with the consensus sequence UGGYAGRRY
in the D arm of tRNA (see Fig. 4) by the
outer membrane receptor, TAB (18, 19). To examine whether such a
sequence is sufficient for transfer into the matrix, a deletion
derivative of tRNATyr, containing the 5'-terminal 39 nucleotides, including the D arm, was tested for its intramitochondrial
distribution. Entry of tRNATyr(1-39) into the matrix was
better than that of the parental molecule (Fig. 4, A ad
B). The time course of intramitochondrial distribution was
also similar (Fig. 5). At early times of
incubation, almost all of the RNA was bound to the inner membrane,
whereas after 10 min at 37 °C, the matrix content increased and the
amount of membrane-associated RNA decreased. This kinetic pattern is
consistent the presence of an intermediate, inner membrane-bound state.
Recently, we have observed2 efficient matrix localization
of an oligoribonucleotide containing only nucleotides 5-27 of
tRNATyr, i.e. the D arm hairpin loop (18).
The outer membrane system discriminates between tRNATyr,
which is imported in vivo (7) and contains the conserved D
arm sequence (18), and tRNAGln(CUG), which is not
detectable in mitochondrial RNA (7) and lacks the conserved D arm
signal (16) (see Fig. 4). However, low levels (about 25% of that of
tRNATyr) of transfer of tRNAGln(CUG) through
the outer membrane could still be observed in vitro (19),
indicating that this discrimination is not absolute. When the
intramitochondrial distribution of the internalized tRNAGln
was examined, 90-95% was found to be confined to the inner membrane; little or no RNA was located in the matrix (Fig. 4C).
Similarly, very low levels of
These results indicate that 1) the D arm signal is sufficient to
penetrate the inner membrane, and 2) the inner membrane has an even
greater selectivity for RNA sequence than the outer membrane.
Requirement of ATP Hydrolysis at the Inner and Outer
Membranes--
Total uptake of tRNATyr increased with the
concentration of added ATP until saturation was reached at 3-4
mM (Fig. 6A). The
nonhydrolyzable analogs AMPPCP (Fig. 6A) and
AMPPNP2 were unable to replace ATP, illustrating the
requirement of cleavage of the
To determine the sites of ATP action, mitochondria were incubated with
RNA and ATP in the presence of AMP and the nonpenetrant enzyme
myokinase, to scavenge the external ATP via the reaction ATP + AMP
When mitochondria were incubated with carboxyatractyloside, a
specific inhibitor of the adenine nucleotide translocator on the inner
membrane (27), and then ATP and RNA were added, import was inhibited
(Fig. 6B, right). This suggests that accumulation of ATP in
the matrix via the adenine nucleotide translocator is important.
Mitochondria preloaded with ATP, washed, and subsequently challenged
with RNA in the presence of carboxyatractyloside were also inhibited
(Fig. 6B, right). Because external ATP is absent and matrix
ATP is prevented from translocating to the intermembrane space by
carboxyatractyloside, this result is consistent with the requirement of
ATP in the intermembrane space or at the outer membrane.
The effect of ATP hydrolysis on the intramitochondrial distribution of
tRNATyr was examined (Fig. 6C). Addition of ATP
caused a 7-fold increase in the level of RNA in the matrix but only a
1.6-fold increase in the level of inner membrane-bound RNA. In the
presence of AMPPCP, translocation into the matrix was reduced to
negligible levels, whereas 84% remained associated with the inner
membrane. Taken together, these results demonstrate the requirement of
ATP hydrolysis for transfer of RNA through both the outer and inner membranes.
Role of the Electromotive Force across the Inner
Membrane--
Many mitochondrial transport processes are energetically
driven by the electromotive force across the inner membrane generated by vectorial proton movement coupled to respiratory electron transport. These include translocation of proteins (28, 29) and of various low
molecular weight metabolites (27). A conceivable role of ATP in RNA
import is to generate a proton gradient by the hydrolytic activity of
the oligomycin-sensitive F1F0 ATPase, which
subsequently drives transfer through the membrane.
This possibility was tested by observing the effect of various
respiratory inhibitors on ATP-dependent total uptake, as
well as the intramitochondrial distribution of tRNATyr.
Initial titrations with the protonophore CCCP, which dissipates the
proton gradient (30) and hence the electromotive force, revealed only
insignificant inhibition (less than 2-fold) of total uptake even at
high inhibitor concentrations (up to 200 µM),2 suggesting that outer membrane transfer
does not require an electromotive force. However, more than 90% of the
internalized RNA was restricted to the inner membrane, very little
being found in the matrix (Fig. 7A); the membrane-bound form
was located on the outer surface, exposed to the intermembrane
space.2 Clearly, insertion through the inner membrane
requires a proton gradient.
Oligomycin, at a concentration of up to 50 µM, which is
50-100 times the dose for 50% inhibition of leishmania mitochondrial ATPase (31, 32), could inhibit total uptake about 2-fold, but it caused
a 10-fold reduction in inner membrane translocation (Fig.
7B), indicating a role of the F1F0
ATPase in transfer to the matrix.
The electromotive force consists of two components: the membrane
potential ( We describe here a modified import assay that monitors the
distribution of internalized RNA in different submitochondrial compartments. Several modifications of previous assay methods (15, 16,
18, 19) were introduced. The import incubation was carried out at 37 instead of 25 °C. At the higher temperature, the rate but not the
yield of import in vitro was higher, and entry into the
matrix was facilitated (Fig. 3). The broad temperature range over which
import is active may be a reflection of the adaptability of the
parasite to grow at different temperatures as it passes through
invertebrate and mammalian hosts. The postimport RNase treatment was
also carried out at 37 °C using only 2.5% of the concentration of
RNase previously employed (Fig. 1); these conditions were sufficient to
digest excess RNA and at the same time minimized the risk of RNA
degradation during subsequent fractionation steps. Third, the
combination of digitonin and freeze-thaw lysis of mitoplasts allows the
intramitochondrial compartments to be rapidly and easily separated
(Fig. 2) without the need for prolonged ultracentrifugation steps.
Selective permeabilization of the outer membrane with digitonin
or by hypotonic shock revealed the presence of a significant fraction
of internalized tRNA associated with the outer side of the inner
membrane, i.e. facing the intermembrane space (Fig. 3). The
kinetics of accumulation of this membrane-bound form (Figs. 3 and 5)
are consistent with it being an intermediate in matrix translocation
and not merely a nonfunctional bye-product. Moreover, there was no
consistent evidence of any membrane-associated RNA of less than
full-length size, as would be expected of a membrane-spanning intermediate. Full length and complete accessibility to RNase of the
membrane-bound RNA are incompatible with concerted models of import
that predict translocation intermediates spanning both membranes and
enclosed in a transport pore consisting of inner and outer membrane
proteins. This type of general insertion pore located at inner
membrane-outer membrane contact sites conducts cytoplasmic proteins
into the mitochondrial matrix (33).
In concerted models of import, the responsibility for selection of the
correct import substrate lies with receptors located at the outer
membrane, which recognize appropriate import signals. Thus,
misrecognition at this step should lead to entry of the inappropriate
substrate into the matrix. Our previous studies showed that the outer
membrane system can discriminate between tRNATyr and
tRNAGln(CUG), but not absolutely (19). However, the
residual level of tRNAGln passing through the outer
membrane is almost exclusively restricted to the inner membrane (Fig.
4). In contrast, derivatives of tRNATyr retaining the
conserved D arm import signal (18) pass into the matrix at least as
effectively as the entire molecule (Fig. 4). Because this matrix
targeting sequence interacts with TAB, a protein located on the outer
membrane (18, 19), one possibility is that the TAB-D arm complex passes
through the outer membrane and subsequently interacts with the inner
membrane channel for matrix entry. According to this scenario, RNAs,
such as tRNAGln, that do not interact with TAB on the
mitochondrial surface (18) would be effectively excluded from the matrix.
Although ATP hydrolysis is required for translocation of RNA through
both the outer and inner membranes (Fig. 6), the roles of ATP at these
two steps are different. Notably, inhibition of the proton-pumping
F1F0 ATPase with oligomycin, or dissipation of
the proton gradient with CCCP or nigericin, results in severe inhibition of inner membrane translocation but only a marginal effect
on transfer through the outer membrane (Fig. 7). Because nigericin,
through electroneutral K+-H+ exchange, affects
only the chemical component ( The inhibition of inner membrane translocation by valinomycin (Fig. 7),
which neutralizes the K+ gradient and thus reduces membrane
potential ( Whereas most inner membrane transport processes, including that of
proteins, require either the The co-import model of mitochondrial tRNA uptake (34) is a concerted
mechanism involving the passive transfer of RNA bound to a
matrix-targeted carrier protein through the general insertion pore.
However, the results presented here support a stepwise mechanism of
import of tRNA through the two mitochondrial membranes. The first step
consists of TAB-D arm recognition at the outer membrane followed by
ATP-dependent transfer to the intermembrane space. The RNA
then rapidly associates with the outer surface of the inner membrane.
We assume that inner membrane binding is fast, because significant
accumulation of RNA in the intermembrane space fraction was not
observed, even at early times of incubation (Figs. 3 and 5).
Subsequently, the RNA (possibly as an RNP complex) is transferred to
the matrix by a process requiring the D arm signal as well as both the
chemical and electrical components of the electromotive force. Attempts
to define the biochemical components of the membrane-bound machinery
are currently in progress.
We thank Subhagata Ghosh for technical
assistance, Dhrubojyoti Chatterjee and Tanmoy Mukherjee for providing
us with some of the nucleotides and inhibitors, Pijush Das for
providing the microscope facility, and Swadesh Sahu for the artwork.
*
Supported by a grant from the Department of Science and
Technology, India.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dedicated to the memory of Dr. Jyotirmoy Das, the late Director of the
Indian Institute of Chemical Biology.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 91-33-473-3493, (ext. 136); Fax: 91-33-473-5197; E-mail: iichbio@giascl01.vsnl. net.in.
2
S. Mukherjee, S. N. Bhattacharyya, and S. Adhya, unpublished data.
The abbreviations used are:
STE, sucrose-Tris-EDTA;
CCCP, carbonylcyanide
m-chlorophenylhydrazone;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis;
AMPPNP, adenosine 5'-(
Stepwise Transfer of tRNA through the Double Membrane of
Leishmania Mitochondria*
,
, and
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-32P]UTP, as
described (22). tRNATyr(1-39) was obtained similarly from
plasmid pSKB-1(
-1) (19) and tRNAGln(CUG) from plasmid
pSKB-2 (19).
RNA, a runoff transcript of plasmid pSG3
(18),
contains the antisense sequence of the
12 to +25 region of the
leishmania
-tubulin gene.
70 °C followed by rapid thawing at 37 °C. The inner membrane
and matrix fractions were separated by centrifugation at 7000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. RNA was recovered from each fraction
by guanidinium isothiocyanate extraction and isopropanol precipitation
(18). To quantify the amount of RNA, an aliquot was spotted on DEAE
anion exchange paper (DE 81, Whatman) and counted. Alternatively, the
RNA was resolved by urea-PAGE (15), followed by counting of the dried
gel band.
= 6.22 mM
1
cm
1).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (45K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Effect of ribonuclease on the quality and
yield of imported RNA. A, mitochondria (100 µg of
protein) were incubated with 32P-labeled
tRNATyr (100 fmol) and 4 mM ATP for 15 min at
37 °C, and then 1 µl of the following dilutions of a mixture of
RNase A (100 µg/ml) and RNase T1 (2000 units/ml) were added and
incubation continued for a further 15 min at 37 °C: 1:10, 1:20,
1:40, 1:80, and 1:160 (lanes 7-3, respectively). Lane
2, no RNase control; lane 1, input RNA (2 fmol).
B, time course of RNase protection. Mitochondria were
incubated with radiolabeled tRNATyr and ATP for 5 (lane 1), 10 (lane 2), and 20 min (lanes
3 and 4) at 37 °C. Then, Triton X-100 (0.5%) was
added to reaction shown in lane 4, and 1 µl of the 1:40
dilution of RNase was added to all reactions; these were incubated for
15 min at 37 °C. Mitochondria were lysed, and the total internalized
RNA was analyzed by urea-PAGE.

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Separation of submitochondrial
compartments. A, fractionation scheme. B,
effect of trypsinization of mitoplasts on marker enzyme activities.
Digitonin-extracted mitochondria were treated with the indicated
concentrations of trypsin for 20 min on ice, then soybean trypsin
inhibitor (180 µg/ml) and 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride were added and incubated on ice for 10 min more. The
mitoplasts were washed and extracted with 0.5% Triton X-100 in STE,
and the soluble extracts were assayed for malate dehydrogenase
(open bars) and succinate dehydrogenase (filled
bars). Activities obtained in the absence of trypsin (taken as
100%) were 0.225 and 0.04 nmol min
1, respectively.
C, red shift of rhodamine 123 in the presence of
digitonin-extracted mitochondria. The difference in absorbance of
rhodamine 123 at 516 nm and 495 nm (
A516-495) upon
addition of mitoplasts (MP), 4 mM ATP, and 50 µM CCCP as a function of time is shown. Scale
bar, 1 min.
Marker enzyme activities in submitochondrial fractions

), digitonin-treated preparations were incubated with rhodamine 123. The uptake of this lipophilic cation
into energized mitochondria is strictly dependent upon the presence of

across the inner membrane and is accompanied by a red shift in
the absorption spectrum (25, 26). When mitoplasts were added to
rhodamine 123, a rapid and transient red shift was observed (Fig.
2C), due to incomplete energization by endogenous substrates
(26). Addition of ATP resulted in a more sustained red shift (Fig.
2C), indicating dye uptake into the mitoplasts. Further
addition of CCCP, a protonophore that dissipates 
, reversed the
red shift (Fig. 2C), confirming the development of an
ATP-induced proton gradient across the mitoplast membrane.

View larger version (32K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Intramitochondrial distribution of
tRNATyr. A, 32P-labeled
tRNATyr (100 fmol) was incubated with mitochondria (200 µg of protein) in the presence of 4 mM ATP for 15 min at
37 °C. After RNase treatment, the mitochondria were fractionated
with digitonin to separate the intermembrane space fraction
(IMS) (lane 1) from mitoplasts. The mitoplasts
were then incubated with (lanes 2 and 3) or
without (lanes 4 and 5) 2.5 µg/ml RNase A and
50 units/ml RNase T1 for 15 min at 37 °C, washed, and separated into
inner membrane (IM) (lanes 2 and 4)
and matrix (MX) (lanes 3 and 5)
fractions by freeze-thaw lysis. RNA in each fraction was analyzed by
urea-PAGE. The amount of RNA recovered in lanes 1-5 was
estimated by gel band counting to be 0.02, 0.15, 1.26, 1.21, and 2.64 fmol, respectively. B, mitochondria (100 µg of protein)
were incubated with 100 fmol of 32P-labeled
tRNATyr in the presence of 4 mM ATP for 2, 10, or 15 min, treated with RNase, and fractionated as before. The RNA in
matrix (lanes 1, 3, and 5) and inner membrane
(lanes 2, 4, and 6) fractions was analyzed by
urea-PAGE. C, effect of temperature on intramitochondrial
distribution. Import incubations were carried out with
32P-labeled tRNATyr and 4 mM ATP
for 15 min at 5, 15, 25, 35, and 45 °C, respectively. After RNase
treatment, the RNA contents of the matrix (MX) and inner
membrane (IM) fractions were determined.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Sequence specificity of transfer through the
inner membrane. Mitochondria (100 µg of protein) were incubated
with 100 fmol of 32P-labeled tRNATyr
(A), tRNATyr(1-39) (B),
tRNAGln(CUG) (C), or
RNA (D).
After incubation at 37 °C for 15 min, followed by RNase treatment,
the RNA contents of the matrix (MX) and inner membrane
(IM) fractions were analyzed by urea-PAGE and quantified by
gel band counting. E, structures of the D arm of
tRNATyr(GUA) (left) and tRNAGln(CUG)
(right) (from Ref. 7). The conserved import signal sequence
(18) in the former is shown in boldface.

View larger version (11K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Time course of transfer of
tRNATyr(1-39) through the inner membrane.
Mitochondria (100 µg of protein) were incubated with
32P-labeled tRNATyr(1-39) in the presence of 4 mM ATP at 37 °C for the indicated times (min), treated
with RNase, and subfractionated. The matrix (filled
circles), inner membrane (open circles), and total
(squares) RNA contents are plotted.
RNA, a synthetic transcript that
lacks the import signal and is transferred to an insignificant extent
through the outer membrane (18), were found to be exclusively on the inner membrane (Fig. 4D).
-
pyrophosphate bond.

View larger version (16K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Requirement of ATP at the inner and outer
membranes. A, effect of ATP hydrolysis on total RNA
uptake. Mitochondria were incubated with 5 nM
32P-labeled tRNATyr in the presence of the
indicated concentrations of ATP (filled bars) or of AMPPCP
(hatched bars) for 45 min at 25 °C. After RNase
treatment, the total RNA imported was quantified by DEAE paper
adsorption. A baseline value of 0.35 fmol obtained in the absence of
ATP was subtracted from each point. B, role of internal and
external ATP. In the left panel, bars 1-3, import
incubations (45 min, 25 °C) were carried out in the presence of 4 mM ATP alone (bar 1), 4 mM AMP
(bar 2), or 4 mM AMP plus 1.5 units of myokinase
(bar 3). In the remaining reactions, mitochondria were
preloaded with 4 mM ATP in STE buffer for 15 min at
25 °C and then washed and incubated with RNA and import buffer (no ATP) for 45 min at 25 °C in the absence (bar 4) or presence
(bar 5) of AMP and myokinase. In the right panel,
mitochondria were preincubated without (bar 1) or with
(bar 2) 100 µM carboxyatractyloside and then
diluted to twice the volume with RNA, import buffer, and 4 mM ATP for import incubation. The other reactions were
performed with ATP-preloaded mitochondria in the absence (bar
3) or presence (bar 4) of 50 µM
carboxyatractyloside. In each case, total RNA uptake was measured by
the DEAE paper method. C, the role of ATP hydrolysis at the
inner membrane. Mitochondria were incubated with 100 fmol of
32P-labeled tRNATyr for 15 min at 37 °C in
the absence or presence of 4 mM ATP or 4 mM
AMPPCP. After RNase treatment, mitochondria were fractionated into
intermembrane space (hatched bars), inner membrane
(open bars), and matrix (filled bars) fractions.
RNA in each fraction was determined by urea-PAGE followed by gel band
counting and expressed as a percentage of the total amount
internalized. The total uptake values obtained in the absence of ATP,
in the presence of ATP, and in the presence of AMPPCP, were 0.39, 1.62, and 0.34 fmol, respectively.
2ADP. This treatment resulted in inhibition of outer membrane transfer
(Fig. 6B, left panel). When mitochondria were preloaded with
ATP and then incubated with RNA in the absence of further ATP addition,
normal levels of outer membrane transfer were observed, but myokinase
inhibited this process, indicating that some or all of the ATP must be
exported from the matrix or intermembrane space in order to sustain
transfer (Fig. 6B, left).

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Effect of inhibitors on RNA transfer through
the outer and inner membranes. A, effect of CCCP.
Mitochondria were preincubated without (lanes 1-3) or with
(lanes 4-6) 100 µM CCCP for 15 min on ice and
then at 37 °C for 15 min with RNA (100 fmol) and ATP (4 mM) (final CCCP concentration, 50 µM). After
RNase treatment, the distribution of RNA between intermembrane space
(IMS) (lanes 1 and 4), matrix
(Mx) (lanes 2 and 5), and inner
membrane (IM) (lanes 3 and 6) was
determined. B, effect of oligomycin, valinomycin, and
nigericin. In each case, mitochondria were preincubated with inhibitor
(50 µM), and in the case of valinomycin, they were also
preincubated with 50 mM KCl. Submitochondrial distribution
was determined as before. The total (hatched bars), matrix
(filled bars), and inner membrane (open bars) RNA
contents are shown.

), caused by charge separation across the membrane, and the pH gradient (
pH), due to the difference in proton
concentration on the two sides (30). In the presence of valinomycin, a
K+ ionophore that reduces 
but not
pH (30),
transfer of tRNATyr into the matrix was inhibited (Fig.
7B). Nigericin, which carries out an electroneutral
K+-H+ exchange, thereby reducing
pH without
any effect on 
(30), had a similar inhibitory effect (Fig.
7B). The results suggest that both the electrical and
chemical components of the electromotive force are necessary for
translocation of tRNA through the inner membrane.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
pH) of the electromotive force (30), it
is likely that transfer of RNA through the inner membrane is driven by
the excess proton concentration in the intermembrane space. Symport of
polyanionic RNA with protons would be an effective charge-balancing
mechanism necessary to pump the RNA against the membrane potential
(negative inside) of respiring mitochondria. An analogous example is
that of the inner membrane phosphate transporter, which is coupled to
the proton gradient by Pi-H+ symport (27).

), exposes the paradoxical situation that a negatively
charged membrane is required for transfer of negatively charged RNA.
Several possibilities may be considered to explain this. 1) Import of
RNA is coupled to export of some other anion such that the process is
electrogenic, with the matrix losing net negative charge. An example of
this type of transport is the 
-requiring exchange of matrix ATP
for cytoplasmic ADP catalyzed by the adenine nucleotide translocator (27). 2) RNA is complexed with a positively charged protein factor that
moves electrophoretically into the negatively charged matrix. This
mechanism has been invoked to explain the transfer of the amphipathic
helix constituting the import signal of matrix-targeted proteins
(33).

or
pH component of the electromotive force, transport of tRNA may be unusual in requiring both. This is probably a consequence of the high negative charge of the
molecule as well as of its sequence-specific interaction with a
positively charged species. According to this hypothesis, 
would
be required for initiation, and
pH for completion of transfer of the
phosphodiester backbone through the inner membrane.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
These authors contributed equally to this work. Supported by
fellowships from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research.
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
,
-imido)triphosphate;
AMPPCP, adenosine 5'-(
,
-methylene)triphosphate.
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Sloof, P.,
de Haan, A.,
Eier, W.,
van Iersel, M.,
Boel, E.,
van Steeg, H.,
and Benne, R.
(1992)
Mol. Biochem Parasitol.
56,
289-300[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Myler, P. J.,
Glick, D.,
Feagin, J. E.,
Morales, T. H.,
and Stuart, K.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
687-694 3.
McIntosh, M. T.,
Srivastava, R.,
and Vaidya, A. B.
(1998)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
95,
69-80[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Simpson, A. M.,
Suyama, Y.,
Dewes, H.,
Campbell, D.,
and Simpson, L.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
5427-5445 5.
Hancock, K.,
and Hajduk, S. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
19208-19215 6.
Mottram, J. C.,
Bell, S. D.,
and Barry, D. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
18313-18317 7.
Lye, L.-F.,
Chen, D.-H.,
and Suyama, Y.
(1993)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
56,
233-246
8.
Schneider, A.,
Martin, J.,
and Agabian, N.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2317-2322 9.
Shi, X.,
Chen, D.-H. T.,
and Suyama, Y.
(1994)
Mol. Biochem Parasitol.
65,
23-37[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Hauser, R.,
and Schneider, A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
4212-4220[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Chiu, N.,
Chiu, A.,
and Suyama, Y.
(1975)
J. Mol. Biol.
99,
37-50[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Martin, R. P.,
Scheller, J.-M.,
Stahl, A. J. C.,
and Dirheimer, G.
(1979)
Biochemistry
18,
4600-4605[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Dietrich, A.,
Weil, J. H.,
and Marechal-Drouard, L.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8,
115-131[CrossRef]
14.
Kumar, R.,
Marechal-Drouard, L.,
Akama, K.,
and Small, I.
(1996)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
252,
404-411[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Mahapatra, S.,
Ghosh, T.,
and Adhya, S.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
3381-3386 16.
Mahapatra, S.,
and Adhya, S.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
20432-20437 17.
Lima, B. D.,
and Simpson, L.
(1996)
RNA
2,
429-440[Abstract]
18.
Mahapatra, S.,
Ghosh, S.,
Bera, S. K.,
Ghosh, T.,
Das, A.,
and Adhya, S.
(1998)
Nucleic Acids Res.
26,
2037-2041 19.
Adhya, S.,
Ghosh, T.,
Das, A.,
Bera, S. K.,
and Mahapatra, S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
21396-21402 20.
Bakalara, N.,
Simpson, A. M.,
and Simpson, L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
18679-18686 21.
Das, S.,
and Adhya, S.
(1990)
J. Biosci.
15,
239-248
22.
Ghosh, A.,
Ghosh, T.,
Ghosh, S.,
Das, S.,
and Adhya, S.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
1663-1669 23.
Ragan, C. I.,
Wilson, M. T.,
Darley-Usmar, V. M.,
and Lowe, P. N.
(1987)
in
Mitochondria: A Practical Approach
(Darley-Usmar, V. M.
, Rickwood, D.
, and Wilson, M. T., eds)
, pp. 79-112, IRL Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
24.
Schnell, D. J.,
and Blobel, G.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
103-115 25.
Chen, L. B.
(1988)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
4,
155-181[CrossRef]
26.
Emaus, R. K.,
Grunwald, R.,
and Lemasters, J. J.
(1986)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
850,
436-448[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
LaNoue, K. F.,
and Schoolworth, A. C.
(1979)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
48,
871-922[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Schleyer, M.,
Schmidt, B.,
and Neupert, W.
(1982)
Eur. J. Biochem.
125,
109-116[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
29.
Gasser, S. M.,
Daum, G.,
and Schatz, G.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
13034-13041 30.
Kleinsmith, L. J.,
and Kish, V. M.
(1988)
Principles of Cell Biology
, pp. 208-247, Harper Collins, New York
31.
Zilberstein, D.,
and Dwyer, D. M.
(1988)
Biochem. J.
256,
13-21[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
32.
Das, A.
(1993)
Mol. Biochem. Parasitol.
60,
293-302[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Hannavy, K.,
Rospert, S.,
and Schatz, G.
(1993)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
5,
694-700[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
34.
Nagley, P.
(1989)
Trends Genet.
5,
67-69[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Basu, S. Mukherjee, and S. Adhya Proton-guided movements of tRNA within the Leishmania mitochondrial RNA import complex Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2008; 36(5): 1599 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Salinas, A.-M. Duchene, L. Delage, S. Nilsson, E. Glaser, M. Zaepfel, and L. Marechal-Drouard The voltage-dependent anion channel, a major component of the tRNA import machinery in plant mitochondria PNAS, November 28, 2006; 103(48): 18362 - 18367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goswami and S. Adhya The {alpha}-Subunit of Leishmania F1 ATP Synthase Hydrolyzes ATP in Presence of tRNA J. Biol. Chem., July 14, 2006; 281(28): 18914 - 18917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mahata, S. N. Bhattacharyya, S. Mukherjee, and S. Adhya Correction of Translational Defects in Patient-derived Mutant Mitochondria by Complex-mediated Import of a Cytoplasmic tRNA J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 5141 - 5144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Kolesnikova, N. S. Entelis, C. Jacquin-Becker, F. Goltzene, Z. M. Chrzanowska-Lightowlers, R. N. Lightowlers, R. P. Martin, and I. Tarassov Nuclear DNA-encoded tRNAs targeted into mitochondria can rescue a mitochondrial DNA mutation associated with the MERRF syndrome in cultured human cells Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2004; 13(20): 2519 - 2534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Bhattacharyya and S. Adhya tRNA-triggered ATP Hydrolysis and Generation of Membrane Potential by the Leishmania Mitochondrial tRNA Import Complex J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 2004; 279(12): 11259 - 11263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goswami, S. Chatterjee, S. N. Bhattacharyya, S. Basu, and S. Adhya Allosteric regulation of tRNA import: interactions between tRNA domains at the inner membrane of Leishmania mitochondria Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2003; 31(19): 5552 - 5559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Bhattacharyya, S. Chatterjee, S. Goswami, G. Tripathi, S. N. Dey, and S. Adhya "Ping-Pong" Interactions between Mitochondrial tRNA Import Receptors within a Multiprotein Complex Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2003; 23(15): 5217 - 5224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Delage, A. Dietrich, A. Cosset, and L. Marechal-Drouard In Vitro Import of a Nuclearly Encoded tRNA into Mitochondria of Solanum tuberosum Mol. Cell. Biol., June 1, 2003; 23(11): 4000 - 4012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Bhattacharyya, S. Chatterjee, and S. Adhya Mitochondrial RNA Import in Leishmania tropica: Aptamers Homologous to Multiple tRNA Domains That Interact Cooperatively or Antagonistically at the Inner Membrane Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2002; 22(12): 4372 - 4382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. Bhattacharyya, S. Mukherjee, and S. Adhya Mutations in a tRNA Import Signal Define Distinct Receptors at the Two Membranes of Leishmania Mitochondria Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2000; 20(19): 7410 - 7417. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||