J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31485-31492, October 29, 1999
Functional Characterization of ABC10
, an Essential
Polypeptide Shared by All Three Forms of Eukaryotic
DNA-dependent RNA Polymerases*
Liudmilla
Rubbi
,
Sylvie
Labarre-Mariotte,
Stéphane
Chédin, and
Pierre
Thuriaux§
From the Service de Biochimie et Génétique
Moléculaire, Bât. 142, Commissariat à l'Energie
Atomique, CEA/Saclay, Gif sur Yvette, F-91191 Cedex, France
 |
ABSTRACT |
ABC10
is a small polypeptide shared by the
three yeast RNA polymerases. Homologous polypeptides in higher
eukaryotes have a zinc-binding CX2C ...
CX2C motif and a conserved basic C-terminal end. These features are also found in archaeal gene products that may
encode an RNA polymerase subunit. The
CX2C ... CX2C
motif is partly dispensable, since only its first cysteine is essential for growth, whereas the basic C-terminal end is critical in
vivo. A mutant in the latter domain has an RNA polymerase
III-specific defect and, in vitro, impairs RNA polymerase
III assembly. Polymerase activity was, however, not affected in various
faithful transcription assays. The mutant is suppressed by a high gene
dosage of the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase III, whereas the
homologous subunits of RNA polymerase I and II have aggravating
effects. In a two-hybrid assay, ABC10
binds to the C-terminal half
of the second largest subunit of RNA polymerase I, in a way that requires the integrity of the CX2C ...
CX2C motif. Thus, ABC10
appears to interact
directly with the second largest subunit during polymerase assembly.
This interaction is presumably a major rate-limiting step in assembly,
since diploid cells containing only one functional gene copy for
ABC10
have a partial growth defect.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The existence of three distinct nuclear RNA polymerases is
documented in all eukaryotes investigated so far and thus probably emerged at a very early step of eukaryotic evolution (1). Despite this
ancient origin, which would have left ample time for duplications to
generate homologous but distinct subunits in each polymerase, six
identical polypeptides are shared by the three eukaryotic transcription
systems. The best characterized is undoubtedly the TATA box-binding
protein, which has been known for some time to operate in all three
transcription complexes (2-5). However, earlier studies on
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (6, 7) had also indicated that the
three yeast RNA polymerases share three polypeptides (ABC27, ABC23, and
ABC14.5), and two other small common subunits (ABC10
and ABC10
)
were identified more recently (8). All of them are essential for growth
(9-11) and, except for ABC27, are interchangeable from yeast to man
in vivo (12, 13).
Although the existence of common subunits has been known for more than
20 years in yeast, their role in transcription is still an enigma. The
lack of a eubacterial counterpart argues against a direct catalytic
role (14). However, a subform of yeast
pol1 I lacking ABC23 is
catalytically inactive (15). Three of these polypeptides (ABC10
,
ABC23, and ABC27) have distinct homology to proven subunits of the
archaeal enzyme (14) and are related to gene products of the African
swine fever virus (16), a cytoplasmic DNA virus endowed with its own
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (17). They are therefore
present in all non-eubacterial RNA polymerases. The other two common
subunits, ABC14.5 and ABC10
, were first thought to be typically
eukaryotic (14), but this may not be true for ABC10
, which is
remotely related to an archaeal gene product encoded by the genome of
Pyrococcus horikoshii (18). Since its discovery by Carles
et al. (8), ABC10
was shown to be an essential
polypeptide (19) but has not been further investigated, which prompted
us to the present genetic and biochemical characterization of that
polypeptide in S. cerevisiae.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids, Yeast Strains, and Growth Media--
Newly constructed
plasmids and yeast strains are listed in Table
I. Unless otherwise stated, yeast strains
are isogenic to the YPH499 genetic background (20). Standard yeast
genetic techniques and media were used throughout (12). Plasmids pLR57
(21), pFL44L-RPB10 (22), PAJSR (23), and pAS-RPC10 (24) were previously described. The unpublished plasmids YEp24-RET1, pFL44L-RPB2,
pAS-rpc10-11, and pAS-rpc10-30 were kindly provided by B. Hall, I. Miklos, and H. Dumay. pACT-A135a and pACT-A135b were isolated as
ABC10
-interacting clones in a previous two-hybrid screen (24) and
encode overlapping C-terminal fragments of A135, extending,
respectively, from positions 670 to 1144 and 678 to 1055. pACT-PAN3
encodes a C-terminal fragment of the Pan3p subunit (from position 495 to the stop codon at position 670). Two-hybrid interactions were
monitored in strain Y190 by GAL1-lacZ activation on
selective solid medium containing 2% raffinose as the carbon source,
as described elsewhere (24).
Mutagenesis--
Random mutagenesis of RPC10 was done
by PCR amplification of pGENs-RPC10, using the Taq
polymerase in the presence of 20% Me2SO and at a final
concentration of 0.02 mM dATP. The resulting fragments were
subcloned between the BamHI-SalI sites of
pGENs-RPC10. 6000 independent plasmids were obtained, pooled, and
transformed into the ade2 ade3 strain YLR-02. This strain
harbors the 2-µm URA3 ADE3 RPC10 plasmid pTSV31-RPC10 and
thus forms red colonies in the presence of a limiting concentration of
adenine, due to the complementation of ade3 by the wild type
ADE3+ gene. These colonies eventually form white sectors due
to spontaneous plasmid loss. About 8000 transformants were obtained by
plating on tryptophan-less medium containing a low amount of adenine (4 µg/ml). After 1 night at 30 °C and 5 days at 37 °C, 17 temperature-sensitive mutants unable to lose pTSV31-RPC10 at 37 °C
were isolated as non-sectored red colonies. The pGENs-RPC10 plasmid was
extracted in each case and reintroduced in YLR-02 to demonstrate that
it bears the temperature-sensitive mutant phenotype. RPC10
mutants generated by PCR-dependent site-directed mutagenesis in pGENs-RPC10 were scored for their ability to complement the rpc10-
::HIS3 null allele of strain YLR-02,
using a plasmid shuffle assay based on 5-fluoroorotic acid resistance
(12). N-terminal HA-tagged forms of ABC10
were constructed in pGENs plasmids bearing the wild type and two mutants forms
(rpc10-11 and rpc10-30) of RPC10,
using PCR primers encoding a single copy of the influenza HA epitope.
The viability of these tagged forms was tested by the same plasmid
shuffling assay.
In Vivo Labeling and mRNA Steady-state Analysis--
Strains
YLR-08 (pCM185-RPC10), YLR-01 (pGENs-RPC10), YLR-03 (pGEN-rpc10-11),
and YLR-06 (pGEN-rpc10-30) were made prototrophic for uracil by
transformation with pFL44L. Cells were grown exponentially (to an
A600 of 0.2-0.4) in casamino acids medium
supplemented with adenine (20 µg/ml). Total RNA was labeled with
tritiated uracil, by incubating 10 ml of cells for 10 min with 250 µCi of [5,6-3H]uracil (1 mCi/ml), as described
previously (25). Northern hybridization of DED1 and
ENO2 was done as described previously (26).
Dosage-dependent Suppression--
Multicopy
suppressors were isolated after transformation of the
temperature-sensitive rpc10-30 mutant YLR-06 by a wild type genomic DNA library of S. cerevisiae (strain FL100) born on
the multicopy vector pFL44L (27). After 1 night at 30 °C, plates were incubated at 37 °C and observed for 8 days. Ten fast growing transformants were able to lose the plasmid-borne rpc10-30
allele in a plasmid shuffle assay and thus contained the wild type
RPC10 gene, as confirmed by plasmid extraction and
restriction analysis. The remaining 11 transformants only partially
restored growth at 37 °C. Plasmid extraction and retransformation of
the original mutant strain confirmed that suppression was due to the
plasmid itself. Seven clones harbored the functional copy of the
non-essential gene SSD1. In contrast to strain FL100, the
YPH499 laboratory strain used in this study has a defective
SSD1 allele, which is known to aggravate the
temperature-sensitive defect of many RNA polymerase mutants (27). In
this case, therefore, suppression reflects a genetic polymorphism
between laboratory strains rather than a genuine
dosage-dependent effect.
Purification of RNA Polymerase III and in Vitro
Transcription--
Whole-cell extracts from YLR-HA01 and YLR-HA06
strains were prepared from 6-liter cultures grown at 30 °C on YPD to
an A600 of 1. Protein concentration, estimated
by the Bradford method, was around 15 mg/ml. Microscale purification of
pol III and purification of class III transcription factors were as
described previously (28). RNA polymerase activity during purification
was monitored by nonspecific transcription assays on a poly(dA-dT)
template (29).
Whole-cell extracts were tested for faithful transcription reactions on
an excess of template DNA (200 ng of pRS316-SUP4 plasmid). The reaction
was performed at 25 °C for 60 min in 40 µl of 20 mM
Hepes-KOH, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM
dithiothreitol, 5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol
(v/v), 4 units of RNasin inhibitor, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.6 mM each of ATP, CTP, and GTP, 0.03 mM UTP, and
10 µCi of [
-32P]UTP. The reactions were stopped by
adding 50 µl of stop mix (40 mM EDTA, 10% SDS). Samples
were extracted with phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25:25:1),
ethanol-precipitated in the presence of 20 µg of Escherichia
coli carrier tRNA, and separated on 7 M urea, 6%
polyacrylamide gel. Purified pol III were tested for faithful multiple
round and single round transcription on the pRS316-SUP4 plasmid as
described previously (29).
Western Blotting--
Immunoblot analysis was performed by
loading normalized amount of protein from each extract on
SDS-polyacrylamide gels (6-15% polyacrylamide). Proteins were
electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond C-Super, Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were probed with monoclonal antibodies
raised against purified pol III (30). HA-ABC10
was revealed using
the monoclonal antibody 12CA5, recognizing the HA epitope, with an ECL
detection system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
 |
RESULTS |
Halving the RPC10 Gene Dosage Has a Rate-limiting Effect on
Growth--
From previous work on yeast RNA pol I and pol III subunits
(Refs. 31 and 32 and references therein), we know that deleting one
gene copy in the corresponding diploid strains has no detectable effect
on growth and that these gene deletions are therefore fully recessive.
However, RPC10 does not follow the common rule, since the
rpc10-
::HIS3 null allele is incompletely
recessive in a heterozygous diploid strain grown on rich medium at
30 °C (Fig. 1A).
Reintroducing RPC10 by transformation with pFL44-RPC10
restores the wild type level of growth. In liquid YPD medium, the
doubling time of the heterozygous diploid was 120 min, instead of 90 min for a wild type control. Thus, halving the RPC10 gene
dosage detectably impairs growth, indicating that ABC10
is produced
in rate-limiting amounts. Such a partial dominance might easily be
overlooked, and we therefore re-examined the recessivity of null
alleles corresponding to the other common subunits shared between all
three polymerases (ABC10
, ABC14.5, ABC23, and ABC27) or between pol
I and pol III (AC19 and AC40). We confirmed that all of them are fully
recessive. Thus, the dosage-dependent effect of
RPC10 is a unique property of the ABC10
subunit.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
RPC10 has rate-limiting effect on
growth. A, growth pattern of heterozygous
rpc10- ::HIS3/+ diploid strain. The diploid
strains YLR-09 (RPC10/RPC10) and YLR-10
(RPC10/rpc10 ) were streaked on YPD and grown
for 3 days at 30 °C. B, extragenic suppression of
tfc3-G349E mutation by overexpression of ABC10 . A
tfc3-G349E mutant strain yOL8 (21) was transformed with
various URA3+ multicopy plasmids as indicated. Cells from
the corresponding transformants were serially diluted, spotted on YPD
plates, and incubated for 4 days at 30 and 37 °C. pFL44L is the
vector without insert, pLR57, pFL44L-RPB8, pFL44L-RPB6, pFL44L-RPB5,
and pFL44L-RPB10 contain inserts, respectively, encoding the 138
subunit of TFIIIC (encoded by TFC3) and the common subunits
ABC27, ABC23, ABC14.5, and ABC10 .
|
|
Overexpression of ABC10
Corrects a Mutant Defective in the
Assembly of Pol III Preinitiation Complex--
Since halving the gene
dosage of RPC10 suffices to reduce growth, one might expect
an increased gene dosage to have instead a stimulatory effect when
growth is limited by RNA polymerase availability. This was actually
suggested by previous work on tfc3-G349E, a thermosensitive
mutant altered in the pol III preinitiation factor TFIIIC and therefore
affecting the recruitment of pol III on its cognate template genes. In
a search for dosage-dependent suppressors, Lefebvre
et al. (21) found that this defect is partly corrected in
the presence of pFL44L-RPC10, and speculated that the overproduction of
ABC10
increases the local concentration of RNA pol III and therefore
partly overcomes the recruitment defect of tfc3-G349E. The
plasmid used in the initial experiment (pFL44L-RPC10) turned out to
also harbor DCD1 (encoding deoxycytidylate synthase), and we
therefore repeated this experiment with pGENs-RPC10, a multicopy
plasmid that only bears RPC10. A somewhat stronger suppression was observed in this case, because RPC10 was
expressed from the strong PGK1 promoter (Fig.
1B). Control experiments with the four other common subunits
showed that they had no suppression effect. pGENs-RPC10 did not alter
the temperature-sensitive phenotype of rpc31-236 and
rpc160-112 pol III mutants, which are defective in
transcriptional initiation or elongation, respectively (29, 33). Thus,
an increased gene dosage of RPC10 improves the assembly of
the pol III preinitiation complex but appears to have no effect on the
catalytic activity of pol III itself.
Variable and Conserved Domains of ABC10
--
The human and
fission yeast homologs of ABC10
can replace the S. cerevisiae polypeptide in vivo (12, 34). Plants also contain an ABC10
-like polypeptide, as shown by the cloning of a
corresponding cDNA in Zea mays (GenBankTM
accession number AI 372144), and a hypothetical ABC10
polypeptide can also be recognized in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome
(cosmid CEF23B2). Thus, this subunit is represented in the main phyla of the eukaryotic crown. It was recently noted that P. horikoshii encodes a polypeptide related to ABC10
(18). A
computer search shows that this also applies to the Archaeaglobus
fulgidus genome (35). Hence, there is a distinct possibility that
one of the poorly characterized subunits of archaeal RNA polymerase
(14) is equivalent to ABC10
. These archaeal and eukaryotic
polypeptides all share an invariant
CX2CX10-15CX2CG
motif and a basic C-terminal domain that is strongly conserved in all
eukaryotic forms of ABC10
. In contrast, the N-terminal region is
quite variable in length and amino acid composition. Fig.
2 summarizes the sequence conservation of
the eukaryotic and archaeal forms of ABC10
.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Mutagenesis of
ABC10 . A sequence alignment of ABC10
subunits from Homo sapiens, S. pombe, C. elegans, and S. cerevisiae is shown. Amino acids
identical in at least three sequences are boxed. Residues
that are identical in archaeal and eukaryotic forms of ABC10 are
denoted by asterisks. Amino acid positions that were
mutagenized (random mutagenesis in the case of rpc10-11 and
site-directed in the remaining cases) are signaled by vertical
arrowheads below the corresponding position on the amino acid
sequence. Growth phenotypes are symbolized in the following way: ,
no growth defect, partial growth defect at all temperatures or ts
(rpc10-9, rpc10-10, rpc10-11, and
rpc10-30), lethal. Two horizontal arrows
denote the rpc10-11 and rpc10-30 double mutant
alleles that were retained for further in vivo and in
vitro characterization.
|
|
Mutational Analysis of RPC10--
To examine the physiological
importance of the conserved and variable features of ABC10
, we
tested the growth pattern of 30 mutants generated by site-directed
mutagenesis, corresponding to partial deletions of the N-terminal or
C-terminal ends or to single-site substitutions of conserved residues.
RPC10 was also subjected to random mutagenesis, and the
resulting mutant library was screened for conditional,
temperature-sensitive alleles in a plasmid-shuffle assay (see
"Materials and Methods"). In view of the dosage effect shown by
RPC10 (see above), these mutants were constructed on the
high copy plasmid pGENs-RPC10 to maximize the expression of the mutant
subunit. As expected, transferring these mutants on a centromeric
plasmid enhanced their adverse phenotype.
As anticipated from its lack of conservation, the N-terminal end is not
essential for growth (Fig. 2). Deletions removing up to the first 10 amino acids (rpc10-1 and rpc10-2) were
indistinguishable from the wild type parent at 30 °C, with a slight
growth defect at 37 °C. More surprisingly, the invariant
zinc-binding motif was also partly dispensable. Its four cysteines
contribute quite differently to the biological activity of ABC10
,
and only one of them (Cys-31) is essential for growth. This first
became evident when we noticed that 10 of the 17 temperature-sensitive
mutants obtained by random mutagenesis correspond to substitutions
affecting three of the invariant cysteines (Cys-34, Cys-48, and Cys-51) and was confirmed by the phenotype of conservative Cys-Ser
substitutions at each of the invariant cysteines, alone or in
combination. Cys-31 is strictly indispensable (rpc10-3 is
lethal at all temperatures tested, even at high gene dosage), whereas
all other single or multiple substitutions, including a triple Cys-Ser
substitution at Cys-34, Cys-48, and Cys-51, retain viability. Moreover,
the double Cys-Ser substitution at positions 48 and 51 has a wild type
growth phenotype, thus revealing a remarkable functional disymmetry
between the two halves of the zinc-binding domain.
In contrast to the N-terminal region or to the zinc-binding motif, the
conserved C-terminal end is crucial for the biological activity of
ABC10
, and removing more than its very last amino acid or altering
the charge of this domain by amino acid replacements (K58L, K58Q, K58E,
and R60E) is either lethal or leads to severe growth defects.
Substitutions that change the size of the amino acid but not its charge
(K58R and R60K) have instead no effect on growth.
rpc10-30, a Mutant in the C-terminal Basic Domain, Specifically
Affects Pol III Transcription in Vivo--
Since the zinc-binding
motif and the basic C-terminal end of ABC10
are evolutionarily
conserved, we investigated in more detail two mutants that respectively
affect these two domains. In both cases, a double substitution was
required to achieve temperature sensitivity. rpc10-30
combines two replacements in the basic C-terminal end (R60Y and V65D)
that are by themselves phenotypically silent. rpc10-11 is a
double mutant (I8N and C48R) where the partial temperature-sensitive defect of C48R replacement is enhanced by the phenotypically silent substitution I8N. Both mutants are lethal when harbored on the centromeric plasmid pCM185-RPC10. At 30 °C, they grow with a
doubling time of 180 min instead of 120 min for the isogenic wild type strain. When shifted to 37 °C, they only begin to affect growth after 8 h and then they become completely arrested. Accordingly, we examined their influence on in vivo RNA pol I-, pol II-,
and pol III-dependent transcription within the first 6 h of the temperature shift, i.e. under conditions where the
mutant cells continue to grow and divide (Fig.
3, A and B).

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Pol I, pol II, and pol
III-dependent transcription by rpc10-30
and rpc10-11 mutants. A,
de novo synthesis of pol I and pol III RNAs as monitored by
[3H]uracil radiolabeling. The mutant strains YLR-06
(rpc10-30) and YLR-03 (rpc10-11) were tested at
30 °C and at various times after the temperature shift to 37 °C
(see "Materials and Methods"). The wild type (WT) strain
YLR-01 was used as control. 5 µg of total RNAs were separated by
electrophoresis on a 7 M urea, 6% polyacrylamide gel and
autoradiographed for 24 h (25 S and 18 S rRNA) and 4 days
(5.8 S, 5 S rRNA, and tRNAs). B, steady-state level of
short-lived (DED1) and long-lived (ENO2) mRNA
species. 8 µg of the same RNA preparations as above were separated by
electrophoresis on 1.2% agarose gel and probed by Northern
hybridization. C, steady-state levels of pol I and pol III
transcripts. 5 µg of the same RNA preparations as above were
separated by electrophoresis on a 7 M urea, 6%
polyacrylamide gel and stained with ethidium bromide.
|
|
rpc10-30 specifically affects the synthesis of tRNAs, with
little or no defect on mRNA accumulation and on the pol
I-dependent synthesis of the large species of rRNA. There
was also little effect on the pol III-dependent production
of 5 S rRNA. This pattern (including the limited effect on 5 S rRNA)
is indistinguishable from that observed for all pol III-specific
mutants analyzed so far (see Ref. 27 for a discussion of this point).
Consistent with a predominant pol III defect, ethidium bromide staining
indicated that, even at the permissive temperature, rpc10-30
has a reduced steady-state content in tRNA (Fig. 3C). This
pol III-specific defect of rpc10-30 is a distinctive
property of that mutant. rpc10-11, which is mutated in the
invariant zinc-binding motif (see above), shows a general decrease in
pol I-, pol II-, and pol III-dependent transcription. This
also applies to the conditional mutant strain YLR-08, where
RPC10 is under the control of the doxycycline-repressible promoter pTET. As shown in Fig. 4,
preventing the de novo synthesis of ABC10
by the presence
of doxycycline leads to complete growth arrest 9 h after adding
the antibiotic and determined a rapid and parallel decrease of pol I,
pol II, and pol III transcription. Hence, all three RNA polymerases are
coordinately turned off in cells depleted in ABC10
, and there is no
indication that ABC10
is, by itself, more critical to the activity
of pol III.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
In vivo depletion of
ABC10 . A, effect on growth.
The two isogenic strains, YLR-08 (carrying RPC10 under the
control of the doxycycline-repressible pTET promoter) and YLR-01
(carrying RPC10 under the control of the constitutive pPGK1
promoter), were grown exponentially on casamino acid medium as
described under "Materials and Methods." After adding 5 µg/ml
doxycycline, growth was followed for 12 h (about four doubling
times). Strain YLR-08 was labeled with [3H]uracil at the
times indicated by arrows. B, pol I- and pol
III-dependent transcription of YLR-08 strain. Pol I and pol
III activities were determined by in vivo labeling as
described in Fig. 3A. C, accumulation of pol
II-dependent transcripts in YLR-08 strain. The steady-state
level of the DED1 and ENO2 pol II transcripts was
determined by Northern hybridization as described in Fig.
3B.
|
|
Genetic Interaction between ABC10
and the Second Largest
Subunits of RNA Polymerases--
In view of the pol III-specific
defect of rpc10-30, we tried to correct its growth defect by
increasing the gene dosage of pol III-specific subunits. Multicopy
plasmids encoding various pol III-specific subunits were tested for
their ability to restore growth at 37 °C in an rpc10-30
mutant strain. Suppression was observed only in the case of the
RET1 gene encoding the second largest subunit C128 (Fig.
5A, left panel).
RPA135 and RPB2 (encoding A135 and B150, the
second largest subunits of pol I and pol II) instead have a negative
effect on growth even at 30 °C (Fig. 5A, right
panel). These positive (RET1) and negative
(RPA135 and RPB2) effects are a distinctive
property of rpc10-30 and were not observed in an
rpc10-11 mutant nor under conditions where RPC10
is progressively depleted in vivo by the addition of
increasing amounts of doxycycline (strain YLR-08).

View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Genetic interaction between
ABC10 and the second largest subunit of RNA
polymerase I (A135), II (B150), and III (C128). A,
overexpression of the second largest subunits of RNA polymerases in
rpc10-30. Strain YLR-06 (rpc10-30) was
transformed by 2-µm plasmids (pNOY82, PFL44L-RPB2, and yEP24)
harboring genes RPA135, RPB2, and
RET1. pFL44L-RPC10 and the empty vector pFL44L were used as
positive and negative controls. Transformants were grown on YPD for 3 days at 37 (RET1-bearing plasmids, left panel) or
30 °C (RPA135 or RPB2-bearing plasmids,
right panel). B, two-hybrid interactions.
Protein-protein interactions were monitored using wild type or mutant
forms of ABC10 , fused in-frame to the Gal4p-DNA binding domain in
the pAS2 vector (GDB::fusions). These baits were
tested against the C-terminal half of A135 (from amino acids 670 to
1144) fused in-frame to the Gal4p-activation domain in the pACT2 vector
(GAD::fusions; left panel). The
pACT-PAN3 fusion, one of a large number of clones identified in a
systematic screen using pAS-ABC10 as a bait, was used as positive
control (right panel).
|
|
In summary, rpc10-30 is sensitive to its own gene dosage
(since it is lethal when harbored on a centromeric plasmid) and to the
gene dosage of the second largest subunits of pol I, II, or III. The
latter property suggests that ABC10
interacts with these subunits
during the assembly of the three RNA polymerases and that
rpc10-30 specifically impairs the interaction with C128. By
using the two-hybrid assay, we have recently found that ABC10
can
bind the C-terminal region of A135 (24). Since rpc10-30, unlike rpc10-11, is not detectably affected in pol
I-dependent transcription in vivo (Fig.
3A), we wondered if these mutants would differ in their
two-hybrid interaction with A135. Fig. 5B shows that,
consistent with its pol III-specific defect, rpc10-30 does
not affect this interaction, which is instead completely abolished in
an rpc10-11 context. However, we were unable to detect a
similar two-hybrid interaction with the equivalent domains of the
corresponding subunits of pol II (B150) and pol III (C128).
rpc10 Mutants Are Suppressed by Overexpressing Pab1p and Pbp2p, Two
Components of the mRNA Polyadenylation System--
In order to
isolate further dosage-dependent suppressors, strain YLR-06
(rpc10-30) was transformed by a wild type genomic DNA
library prepared from strain FL100 and borne on the multicopy vector
pFL44L (27). Eleven dosage-dependent suppressors were isolated at 37 °C. Eight of them harbored the putative RNA helicase gene DED1, previously isolated as a suppressor of the pol
III-specific mutant rpc31-236 (36) and also suppressing
tfc3-G349E (Table II). The
remaining three suppressors corresponded to the poly(A)-binding protein
gene PAB1 (two clones) and to PBP2, encoding a
non-essential protein interacting with Pab1p in a two-hybrid screen
(37, 38). PAB1 and PBP2 had so far never been
isolated as suppressors of RNA polymerase mutants.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table II
Multicopy suppression by DED1, PAB1, and PBP2
Single cell colonies were obtained by streaking yeast cells on YPD
plates at 37 °C. Symbols: ++, growth after 3-4 days; +, growth
after 6-7 days; , no growth. Rpb10-157F is defective in
the common subunit ABC10 (26). tfc3-G348E and
rpc31-236 are pol III-specific mutants (21, 33). Other pol
I, pol II, and pol III-specific mutants were tested for suppression but
did not respond to the three suppressors tested.
|
|
Given that Pab1p and its putative partner Pbp2p are components of the
polyadenylation system, we wondered whether ABC10
may directly
affect mRNA polyadenylation, for example by helping yeast pol II to
recruit the mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation machinery. Two
observations argue against this interpretation. First,
rpc10-11 and rpc10-30 show no difference in the
length of their total mRNA poly(A) tails in vivo
relative to an isogenic wild type control (data not shown). Second,
suppression by PBP2 is not specific to rpc10
mutants, as shown in Table II. In fact, the suppression patterns of
DED1 and PBP2 are quite similar (Table II). In
particular, both suppress the pol III-specific mutant
rpc31-236 and are thus not restricted to rpc10
mutants. Both Ded1p and Pab1p stimulate translation initiation (38,
39), suggesting that their overexpression may overcome a partial
translational defect of rpc31-236 and rpc10 mutants due to the pol III-dependent shortage in initiator
tRNA. In agreement with this interpretation, direct measurements of the
initiator tRNAMet confirmed that it is substantially
reduced in rpc10-30 mutant cells.2
rpc10-30 Impairs Pol III Accumulation but Has No Detectable Effect
on Its Catalytic Properties--
The data presented so far strongly
suggest that rpc10-30 primarily affects in vivo
pol III-dependent transcription. This mutant may directly
alter the catalytic properties of the pol III enzyme or interfere with
its assembly, or both. To examine these possibilities the two isogenic
strains YLR-HA01 (HA-RPC10) and YLR-HA06
(HA-rpc10-30) were tested for their ability to support pol
III-dependent transcription, using either whole-cell
extracts or extensively purified enzyme preparations. In agreement with
its pol III defect observed in vivo, Fig.
6A shows that pol
III-dependent transcription was strongly affected in the
rpc10-30 extract. This defect was canceled by adding the
purified mutant enzyme, suggesting that it results from a shortage in
the mutant enzyme.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effect of rpc10-30 on RNA
polymerase III in vitro. A, pol III-specific
transcription of SUP4 template using whole-cell extracts of
the wild type and rpc10-30 strains YLR-HA01 and YLR-HA06.
B, wild type and rpc10-30 pol III activity of the
heparin-hyper D eluted fractions. RNA polymerase activity was
determined by counting the acid-precipitable incorporation of
[ -32P]UTP in the presence of a nonspecific poly(dA-dT)
template (see "Materials and Methods"). C, Western blot
analysis of the wild type and rpc10-30 pol III of the peak
heparin-hyper D fraction 65. The wild type and mutant fractions
(indicated as WT and M) were adjusted to have the
same specific activities on a poly(dA-dT) template. Subunits were
separated on a 6-15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. The positions of
different pol III subunits are indicated. Note that the HA-ABC10 -30
mutant protein migrates faster than the corresponding wild type tagged
subunit, which may reflect the negative charge introduced by these
mutations. D, steady-state amount of ABC10 in whole-cell
extracts of strains YLR-HA01 (HA-ABC10 ) and YLR-HA06
(HA-ABC10 -30). E, specific transcription assay of
SUP4 template by the purified wild type and mutant pol III.
The SUP4 template was transcribed for 50 min at 25 °C in
the presence of TFIIIB and TFIIIC fractions (see "Materials and
Methods"). The enzyme preparations were preincubated for 10 min at
25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 °C prior to the transcription assay, to
follow the thermic inactivation of the enzyme.
|
|
Partial purification by affinity chromatography on heparin (Fig.
6B) yielded 4-fold less pol III activity from the
rpc10-30 mutant. However, when adjusted to the same
transcriptional activity and revealed by Western blotting using
anti-pol III antibodies (30), the mutant and wild type peak fractions
were present in the same amount and thus have the same specific
activity. Moreover, the subunit composition and stoichiometry of the
mutant enzyme were not different from the wild type control (Fig.
6C). Thus, rpc10-30 has no effect on the specific
activity of pol III (as tested on nonspecific template) but strongly
impairs its accumulation in mutant cells. This is not due to a shortage
in ABC10
itself, since the amount of free subunit is actually higher
in the mutant cells, which presumably reflects a higher copy number of
the corresponding plasmid to compensate the mutant growth defect (Fig.
6D).
The mutant and wild type pol III were further purified to near
homogeneity by ion exchange chromatography and tested in a reconstituted faithful transcription assay where pol III-specific templates are transcribed in the presence of purified pol III-specific initiation factors TFIIIC and TFIIIB (28). As shown in Fig. 6E, there was no difference between the wild type and mutant
enzymes when assayed on a SUP4 template, and similar results
were obtained on tRNALeu3 gene and on SNR6,
coding the U6 small nuclear RNA (data not shown). Moreover, the mutant
enzyme shows a wild type response to heat inactivation, indicating that
its heteromultimeric structure is therefore not particularly labile
(Fig. 6E). Taking advantage of the sequence of the tRNA
SUP4 transcript, where the first G is at position +18, we
also tested the wild type and mutant pol III in a single round
transcription assay that measures the synthesis of the first 17 nucleotides of the transcript (29). Again, no difference was observed,
indicating that transcription initiation was not affected (data not shown).
In conclusion, rpc10-30 strongly reduces the amount of pol
III present in whole-cell extracts but does not detectably alter its
catalytic properties in a variety of transcription assays (nonspecific
versus specific templates, single round or multiple round
transcription). The subunit structure of the mutant enzyme was not
altered and, despite a marked temperature-sensitive defect in
vivo, was not particularly unstable at high temperature. The pol
III-specific phenotype of rpc10-30 therefore appears to
result primarily from a defective polymerase assembly.
 |
DISCUSSION |
ABC10
was initially discovered as a common subunit shared by
the three nuclear polymerases of S. cerevisiae (8). Related coding sequences have now been identified in plant and animal genomes,
and this subunit is therefore widely distributed among eukaryotes.
Moreover, the human and fission yeast forms of ABC10
can fully
replace the budding yeast subunit in vivo (12, 13, 34),
despite moderately conserved amino acid sequences. ABC10
has no
homology to any of the eubacterial genomes sequenced so far but is also
loosely related to archaeal gene products. Thus, ABC10
, like other
common subunits (14), may pre-date the separation of the eukaryotic and
archaeal phyla about 1.8 billion years ago (40).
In addition to their unusual small size (58 amino acids in the case of
the human product), the eukaryotic polypeptides and their putative
archaeal counterparts share an invariant
CX2CX10-15CX2CG motif and a conserved, positively charged C-terminal domain. The former
motif presumably acts as a zinc-chelating domain, since ABC10
has
zinc-binding properties in vitro (19). Despite its evolutionary invariance, the integrity of this motif is not essential in vivo. However, the ABC10
domain likely contributes to
the proper conformation of the subunit since a mutation in this region (rpc10-11) disrupts its ability to interact with the second
largest subunit of pol I in a two-hybrid assay and leads to a partial defect in all three polymerases. In fact, there is a remarkable functional disparity between the two halves of the zinc-binding domain,
since a Cys-Ser substitution at position Cys-34 is lethal, whereas a
double substitution at positions 48 and 51 is phenotypically silent.
The basic C-terminal domain, on the other hand, is very critical for
the biological activity of ABC10
, and mutations altering its
positive charge pattern are lethal or have strong growth defects.
Somewhat surprisingly, the rpc10-30 mutation mapping in this
domain showed a pol III-specific defect in vivo, despite the
fact that ABC10
is common to all three enzymes.
Pol III-dependent transcription can be faithfully
reconstituted in vitro with highly purified preparations of
the enzyme and of its cognate transcription factors TFIIIB and TFIIIC
(28). Mutational defects in five of the pol III-specific subunits (C11, C31, C34, C128, and C160) were unambiguously shown to alter initiation (36, 41), elongation (29, 33), or termination (42, 43) in vitro.
rpc10-30, instead, has no detectable effect on the catalytic activity of the enzyme nor on its ability to initiate and terminate transcription from natural templates but strongly reduces the amount of
transcriptionally active pol III in whole-cell extracts. Since the
accumulation of free ABC10
in whole-cell extracts is not impaired
and since the stability of pol III is not affected, rpc10-30
therefore appears to be primarily defective in the assembly of pol III.
This is also consistent with its delayed transcriptional response when
shifted to the restrictive temperature, which indicates that the
functionality of the pre-assembled enzyme is not affected but that new
enzyme molecules are not synthesized de novo at
37 °C.
Our genetic data indicate that the second largest subunits of pol I
(A135), pol II (B150), and pol III (C128) are the primary partners of
ABC10
during polymerase assembly. Overproducing C128 partly corrects
the growth defect of rpc10-30, suggesting that this
particular mutant form fails to recognize C128 during pol III assembly,
therefore accounting for its pol III-specific defect in
vivo. A135 or B150 have instead an aggravating effect on
rpc10-30, indicating that ABC10
competes for a domain
present on each of these subunits and that the mutant subunit is
therefore titrated by A135 and B150. The target domain is presumably a
conserved one but remains to be precisely identified. It might be
located on the C-terminal half of the second largest subunits, since a corresponding fragment of A135 binds ABC10
in the physiological conditions of the two-hybrid assay, in a way that is dependent on the
integrity of the zinc-binding motif of ABC10
. It is worth noting
that the interacting fragment overlaps with two highly conserved
domains that were shown by affinity labeling data to be part of the pol
II active site (44, 45).
There is a striking parallel between the properties of ABC10
and
those recently reported for ABC14.5 except that, in the latter case,
the targets are the largest subunits A190, B220, and C160. ABC14.5
binds to a conserved domain of these three subunits in the two-hybrid
assay (24) and, when replaced by the Schizosaccharomyces pombe subunit, leads to a pol III-specific defect that is partly suppressed by overproducing C160 (46). In this case too, in vitro studies are consistent with an assembly defect and show no
effect on the functional properties of pol III. In the same vein,
mutant forms of ABC10
have a preferential pol I phenotype that can
also be explained by an assembly defect (26). The properties of
conditional mutants isolated for AC40 (47) and ABC23 (48) also indicate
assembly or stability defects but with no evidence of polymerase
specificity. Hence, mutational changes in five of the common subunits
are associated with assembly or stability defects and, in the case of
the pol III-specific defects of ABC14.5 and ABC10
mutants, were
directly shown to have no effect on enzyme activity in
vitro. They therefore play a critical role in maintaining the
complex heteromultimeric structure of eukaryotic polymerases but
may not directly determine enzyme activity, except by ensuring the
correct folding of the two largest subunits into a functional active site.
Given the structural role thus ascribed to common subunits, we wondered
whether their rate of de novo synthesis would directly set
up the formation of new polymerase molecules during cell growth. To
identify which of the seven common subunits shared by pol I and pol III
is rate-limiting for growth (and, therefore, for the formation of at
least one of these polymerases), we compared isogenic diploid
strains containing only one functional copy of the corresponding gene.
ABC10
was the only subunit where this reduced gene dosage had an
adverse effect on growth, suggesting that the formation of new
polymerases directly depends on the availability of ABC10
. The
interaction between ABC10
and the second largest subunits of
polymerases therefore appears to be a major rate-limiting step in
polymerase assembly.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Christophe Carles, Michel Riva,
André Sentenac, and Michel Werner for advice and support. We are
grateful to Emmanuel Favry for class III transcription factors and pol
III preparations. Christian Marck drew our attention to the archaeal
sequence homology discussed in this paper, and Françoise Wyers
helped us in the determination of mRNA poly(A)-tail lengths.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This study was supported in part by Training and Mobility
Program Grant FMRX CT96-0064 and by Contract BIO4-CT95-0009 from the
European Union.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Recipient of a fellowship from the Istituto Pasteur Fondazione
Cenci-Bolognetti.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 33-1-69-08-35-86;
Fax: 33-1-69-08-47-12; E-mail: thuriaux@jonas.saclay.cea.fr.
2
O. Calvo and M. Tamame, personal communication.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
pol, polymerase;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
YPD, yeast-peptone-dextrose;
HA, hemagglutinin;
Me2SO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Sentenac, A.
(1985)
CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem.
18,
31-91[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Margottin, F.,
Dujardin, G.,
Gérard, M.,
Egly, J. M.,
Huet, J.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1991)
Science
251,
424-426[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 3.
|
Hernandez, N.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
1291-1308[Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Comai, L.,
Tanese, N.,
and Tjian, R.
(1992)
Cell
68,
965-976[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Cormack, B. P.,
and Struhl, K.
(1992)
Cell
69,
685-696[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Valenzuela, P.,
Bell, G. I.,
Weinberg, F.,
and Rutter, W. J.
(1976)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
71,
1319-1325[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Buhler, J. M.,
Iborra, F.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Fromageot, P.
(1976)
J. Biol. Chem.
251,
1712-1717[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Carles, C.,
Treich, I.,
Bouet, F.,
Riva, M.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
24092-24096[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Woychik, N. A.,
Liao, S. M.,
Kolodziej, P. A.,
and Young, R. A.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
313-323[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Woychik, N. A.,
and Young, R. A.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
17816-17819[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Treich, I.,
Carles, C.,
Riva, M.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1992)
Gene Expr.
2,
31-37[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Shpakovski, G. V.,
Acker, J.,
Wintzerith, M.,
Lacroix, J. F.,
Thuriaux, P.,
and Vigneron, M.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
4702-4710[Abstract]
|
| 13.
|
McKune, K.,
Moore, P. A.,
Hull, M. W.,
and Woychik, N. A.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
6895-6900[Abstract]
|
| 14.
|
Langer, D.,
Hain, J.,
Thuriaux, P.,
and Zillig, W.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
5768-5772[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Lanzendörfer, M.,
Smid, A.,
Klinger, C.,
Schultz, P.,
Sentenac, A.,
Carles, C.,
and Riva, M.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
1033-1047
|
| 16.
|
Yanez, R. J.,
Rodriguez, J. M.,
Nogal, M. L.,
Yuste, L.,
Enriquez, C.,
Rodriguez, J. F.,
and Vinuela, E.
(1995)
Virology
208,
249-278[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Kuznar, J.,
Salas, M. L.,
and Vinuela, E.
(1980)
Virology
101,
169-175[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Kawarabayasi, Y.,
Sawada, M.,
Horikawa, H.,
Haikawa, Y.,
Hino, Y.,
Yamamoto, S.,
Sekine, M.,
Baba, S.,
Kosugi, H.,
Hosoyama, A.,
Nagai, Y.,
Sakai, M.,
Ogura, K.,
Otsuka, R.,
Nakazawa, H.,
Takamiya, M.,
Ohfuku, Y.,
Funahashi, T.,
Tanaka, T.,
Kudoh, Y.,
Yamazaki, J.,
Kushida, N.,
Oguchi, A.,
Aoki, K.,
and Kikuchi, H.
(1998)
DNA Res.
5,
55-76[Abstract]
|
| 19.
|
Treich, I.,
Riva, M.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
21971-21976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Sikorski, R. S.,
and Hieter, P.
(1989)
Genetics
122,
19-27[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Lefebvre, O.,
Rüth, J.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
23374-23381[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Lalo, D.,
Carles, C.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Thuriaux, P.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
5524-5528[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Chaussivert, N.,
Conesa, C.,
Shaaban, S.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
15333-15338
|
| 24.
|
Flores, A.,
Briand, J. F.,
Gadal, O.,
Andrau, J. C.,
Rubbi, L.,
Van Mullem, V.,
Boschiero, C.,
Goussot, M.,
Marck, C.,
Carles, C.,
Thuriaux, P.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Werner, M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
7815-7820[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Hermann-Le Denmat, S.,
Werner, M.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Thuriaux, P.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
2905-2913[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Gadal, O.,
Shpakovski, G. V.,
and Thuriaux, P.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
8421-8427[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Stettler, S.,
Chiannilkulchai, N.,
Hermann-Le Denmat, S.,
Lalo, D.,
Lacroute, F.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Thuriaux, P.
(1993)
Mol. Gen. Genet.
239,
169-176[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Huet, J.,
Manaud, N.,
Dieci, G.,
Peyroche, G.,
Conesa, C.,
Lefebvre, O.,
Ruet, A.,
Riva, M.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
273,
249-267[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 29.
|
Dieci, G.,
Hermann-Le Denmat, S.,
Lukhtanov, E.,
Thuriaux, P.,
Werner, M.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
3766-3776[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Huet, J.,
Riva, M.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Fromageot, P.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
15304-15310[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 31.
|
Carles, C.,
and Riva, M.
(1998)
in
Transcription of Ribosomal RNA Genes by Eukaryotic RNA Polymerase I
(Paule, M. R., ed)
, pp. 9-38, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
|
| 32.
|
Chédin, S.,
Ferri, M. L.,
Peyroche, G.,
Andrau, J. C.,
Jourdain, S.,
Lefebvre, O.,
Werner, M.,
Carles, C.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1998)
Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.
63,
381-389[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 33.
|
Thuillier, V.,
Brun, I.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Werner, M.
(1996)
EMBO J.
15,
618-629[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Shpakovski, G. V.,
Lebedenko, E. N.,
and Thuriaux, P.
(1997)
Bioorgh. Khim.
23,
110-117
|
| 35.
|
Klenk, H. P.,
Clayton, R. A.,
Tomb, J. F.,
White, O.,
Nelson, K. E.,
Ketchum, K. A.,
Dodson, R. J.,
Gwinn, M.,
Hickey, E. K.,
Peterson, J. D.,
Richardson, D. L.,
Kerlavage, A. R.,
Graham, D. E.,
Kyrpides, N. C.,
Fleischmann, R. D.,
Quackenbush, J.,
Lee, N. H.,
Sutton, G. G.,
Gill, S.,
Kirkness, E. F.,
Dougherty, B. A.,
McKenney, K.,
Adams, M. D.,
Loftus, B.,
Venter, J. C.,
et al..
(1997)
Nature
390,
364-370[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 36.
|
Thuillier, V.,
Stettler, S.,
Sentenac, A.,
Thuriaux, P.,
and Werner, M.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
351-359[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 37.
|
Mangus, D. A.,
Amrani, N.,
and Jacobson, A.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7383-7396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 38.
|
Tarun, S. Z., Jr.,
and Sachs, A. B.
(1995)
Genes Dev.
9,
2997-3007[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Chuang, R. Y.,
Weaver, P. L.,
Liu, Z.,
and Chang, T. H.
(1997)
Science
275,
1468-1471[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 40.
|
Doolittle, R. F.,
Feng, D. F.,
Tsang, S.,
Cho, G.,
and Little, E.
(1996)
Science
271,
470-477[Abstract]
|
| 41.
|
Brun, I.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Werner, M.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
5730-5741[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 42.
|
Shaaban, S. A.,
Bobkova, E. V.,
Chudzik, D. M.,
and Hall, B. D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
6468-76[Abstract]
|
| 43.
|
Chédin, S.,
Riva, M.,
Schultz, P.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Carles, C.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
3857-71[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 44.
|
Riva, M.,
Carles, C.,
Sentenac, A.,
Grachev, M. A.,
Mustaev, A. M.,
and Zaychikov, E. F.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
16498-16503[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 45.
|
Treich, I.,
Carles, C.,
Sentenac, A.,
and Riva, M.
(1992)
Nucleic Acids Res.
20,
4721-4725[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 46.
|
Voutsina, A.,
Riva, M.,
Carles, C.,
and Alexandraki, D.
(1999)
Nucleic Acids Res.
27,
1047-1055[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 47.
|
Mann, C.,
Buhler, J. M.,
Treich, I.,
and Sentenac, A.
(1987)
Cell
48,
627-637[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 48.
|
Nouraini, S.,
Archambault, J.,
and Friesen, J. D.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
5985-5996[Abstract]
|
| 49.
|
Gari, E.,
Piedrafita, L.,
Aldea, M.,
and Herrero, E.
(1997)
Yeast
13,
837-848[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Zaros, J.-F. Briand, Y. Boulard, S. Labarre-Mariotte, M. C. Garcia-Lopez, P. Thuriaux, and F. Navarro
Functional organization of the Rpb5 subunit shared by the three yeast RNA polymerases
Nucleic Acids Res.,
January 28, 2007;
35(2):
634 - 647.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Tan, M. H. Prysak, and N. A. Woychik
Loss of the Rpb4/Rpb7 Subcomplex in a Mutant Form of the Rpb6 Subunit Shared by RNA Polymerases I, II, and III
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
May 1, 2003;
23(9):
3329 - 3338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|