![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31583-31587, October 29, 1999
From the Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical
Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
A phospho-carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) affinity
column created with yeast CTD kinase I and the CTD of RNA polymerase II was used to identify Ess1/Pin1 as a phospho-CTD-binding protein. Ess1/Pin1 is a peptidyl prolyl isomerase involved in both mitotic regulation and pre-mRNA 3'-end formation. Like native Ess1, a GSTEss1 fusion protein associates specifically with the phosphorylated but not with the unphosphorylated CTD. Further, hyperphosphorylated RNA
polymerase II appears to be the dominant Ess1 binding protein in total
yeast extracts. We demonstrate that phospho-CTD binding is mediated by
the small WW domain of Ess1 rather than the isomerase domain. These
findings suggest a mechanism in which the WW domain binds the
phosphorylated CTD of elongating RNA polymerase II and the isomerase
domain reconfigures the CTD though isomerization of proline residues
perhaps by a processive mechanism. This process may be linked to a
variety of pre-mRNA maturation events that use the phosphorylated
CTD, including the coupled processes of pre-mRNA 3'-end formation
and transcription termination.
The carboxyl-terminal domain
(CTD)1 of the largest subunit
of RNA polymerase II plays a central role in controlling mRNA
production in eukaryotes. In most eukaryotes the CTD consists of
between 26 and 52 repeats with the consensus sequence, YSPTSPS (1). This unusual domain is not found in eukaryotic RNA Pol I or Pol III or
in prokaryotic RNA polymerase. By mechanisms that are still largely not
understood, RNA Pol II behavior is controlled by CTD kinases and
phosphatases that modulate the phosphorylation state of the CTD (2). A
body of evidence has accumulated indicating that the unphosphorylated
CTD is present in RNA Pol II holoenzyme and is required during the
initial stages of transcription (3-6) but that a hyperphosphorylated
CTD is present in elongating polymerase (7-10).
The hypothesis that the phospho-CTD functions in pre-mRNA
processing (11) has received firm experimental backing with the recognition that several components of the 5' mRNA capping enzyme complex are phospho-CTD-binding proteins (12-14). In addition, indirect evidence suggests that the phospho-CTD also binds splicing components (15-18). Further, both the phosphorylated and the
unphosphorylated CTD can interact with pre-mRNA 3'-end processing
proteins (19, 20). The combined evidence suggests that pre-mRNA
processing may in general be cotranscriptional, with the (phospho)-CTD
serving as a master coordinator of the events involved.
Recently, mutations in the peptidyl prolyl isomerase,
ESS1/PTF1, were found to be responsible for the
temperature-sensitive phenotypes of two yeast mutants that displayed a
pre-mRNA 3'-end formation defect (21). Yeast ESS1 was
originally identified as essential gene (22), and is in fact the only
essential peptidyl prolyl isomerase (PPIase) in Saccharomyces
cerevisiae (23). The human protein, Pin1, and the Drosophila
protein, Dodo, are close homologues of Ess1 and both can functionally
replace Ess1 in yeast (24, 25). All three proteins have a small
31-residue WW domain amino-terminal to the isomerase domain. Studies of
the peptidyl prolyl isomerase activity of recombinant Ess1 (21) and
Pin1 (26) indicate these enzymes display more than a 1000-fold higher
specificity toward substrates in which the other amino acid at the
isomerizable bond is negatively charged (Glu, phospho-Ser, and
phospho-Thr). In higher eukaryotes a variety of techniques have been
used to show that Pin1 stably associates with phosphorylated but not
unphosphorylated mitotic regulators that are targets of Cdc2/cyclinB
(26-29). The present study demonstrates that the hyperphosphorylated CTD of RNA Pol II contains high affinity binding sites for the WW
domain of Ess1.
Identification of Ess1 as a Phospho-CTD-binding Protein--
To
make the phospho-CTD affinity column, CTD kinase I was purified using
polyclonal antibodies against a peptide from CTK1 as described (30).
Phosphorylation of a Expression of GSTEss1 Fusion Proteins--
Fusion proteins were
expressed using plasmids created by ligating ESS1 polymerase
chain reaction fragments into the EcoRI/BamHI sites of the polylinker of pGEX2TK (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The primers CGGGATCCATGATCATTGTGGTACTTATTCC and
GGAATTCCTAACCTACCGCTTGATCAC were used to amplify the 190-amino acid
version of Ess1 (GenBankTM 1015652) from genomic yeast DNA.
The construct sequence was verified by DNA sequencing. Polymerase chain
reaction fragments for the fusion protein containing the WW domain
(GSTEss1WW) and isomerase domain (GSTEss1ISO) were amplified from
pGEX2TK-GSTEss1 using the primers
CGGGATCCATGATCATTGTGGTACTTATTCC/GGAATTCCTAGTTGGTGCCCTCAGGCTC (WW) and
CGGGATCCGACCATCCAGTGCGTGTAAGATGC/GGAATTCCTAACCTACCGCTTGATCAC (ISO) inserted into the EcoRI/BamHI sites
of pGEX2TK (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and sequenced. Protein
expression and glutathione purification were according to the protocol
of the manufacturer (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, XY-058-00-01) with
minor modification. BL21 cells containing the expression plasmids were
grown in LB medium with 50 µg/ml ampicillin, and the fusion proteins
were purified by batch adsorption. Complete elution of GSTEss1 or
GSTEss1WW required an overnight incubation with modified elution buffer (50 mM Tris, 10 mM glutathione, and 100 mM NaCl brought to pH 8.5-9 with NaOH). The fusion
proteins were desalted into PBS using Quick Spin Protein Columns (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) and quantitated using the Bio-Rad Protein Assay
(Bio-Rad) with IgG as a standard.
Precipitation of the Phospho-CTD with GSTEss1 Beads--
The
AminoLink Plus Immobilization kit (Pierce) was used to make both the
GSTEss1 (~2 mg/ml of matrix) and control beads (neutral coupling
conditions). For the binding assay, GSTyCTD was phosphorylated essentially as described (32) using 10 µM GSTyCTD and
approximately 150 nM CTD kinase I. The reaction was
desalted into PBS using Quick Spin Protein Columns (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), and 80 µl of this solution was added to 20 µl of
control beads or GSTEss1 beads in PBS. Mixes were incubated at room
temperature with inversion until the times indicated when both samples
were spun (500 RCF for 10 s) to pellet the beads and an aliquot of the supernatants removed to 2× SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample buffer and heated. Beads were then resuspended and the incubation continued until the next time point. Samples (10 µl) were
run on a 4-15% SDS precast gel (Bio-Rad).
Far-Western Analysis of Ess1 Domains Using a Phospho-CTD
Probe--
Duplicate 4-15% SDS precast gels (Bio-Rad) of the fusion
proteins were run for staining and electroblotting to nitrocellulose (Hybond-C Extra, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The blot was incubated in
blocking/renaturation buffer (BRB = PBS + 0.2% Tween + 3% dry milk + 10 mM NaF + PMSF + 2 mM DTT) overnight
with rocking (this and subsequent steps at 4 °C). The blot was
probed with fully shifted phospho- Far-Western and Western Analysis of Yeast Extracts--
An
extract of frozen yeast representing 20 ml of culture (grown to
A600 = 1.2) was prepared according to method 2 of Ref. 33 to minimize phosphatase and protease activity; final
volume = 400 µl in SDS sample buffer. Aliquots of extract (1 and
5 µl) were run with prestained standards in five repeated sample sets on a 4-15% SDS precast gel (Bio-Rad) and electroblotted to
nitrocellulose (NC); all standards were completely transferred out of
gel. The NC was incubated in BRB overnight with rocking (this and
subsequent steps at 4 °C) and then cut into strips each containing
one sample set. For the far-Western analysis, strips were incubated
separately with 6 nM fusion protein probe in BRB without
DTT for 1 h. After rinsing 5 × 12 min with PBS-Tw, they were
reacted together with affinity-purified rabbit anti-GST
IgG.2 After rinsing 5 × 12 min with PBS-Tw, the strips were incubated with 2° antibody
(affinity-purified, alkaline phosphatase-coupled donkey anti-rabbit IgG
(Jackson ImmunoResearch)) in BRB without DTT for 1 h, then rinsed
5 × 12 min with PBS-Tw and once with 50 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 9.5. The strips were then incubated with alkaline phosphatase color
reagent substrates (Bio-Rad, 170-6432) at room temperature. For the
Western, one strip was reacted with affinity-purified rabbit anti-yeast
phospho-CTD IgG (prepared essentially as in Ref. 33) for 1 h, then
washed 5 × 12 min with PBS-Tw prior to addition of the 2°
antibody and treatment as for the far-Western analyses.
Yeast CTD kinase I can quantitatively convert fusion protein
substrates containing the CTD to a hyperphosphorylated form, with the
accompanying characteristic decrease in electrophoretic mobility (31).
To identify proteins that bind specifically to the hyperphosphorylated
CTD, To confirm the ability of Ess1 to bind the phosphorylated CTD, a
GSTEss1 fusion protein was purified and linked to agarose beads. As
shown in Fig. 2, GSTEss1 beads were able
to specifically deplete hyperphosphorylated GST-yCTD fusion protein
from a solution containing both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated
GSTyCTD. In addition to the unphosphorylated fusion protein, some forms
of phosphorylated GSTyCTD were not effectively adsorbed, including a
partially shifted intermediate clearly visible in Fig. 2. Extending the
incubation an additional 30 min did not result in significant depletion
of the remaining unbound material (data not shown). This may suggest
that not all phosphorylations create a recognition site for Ess1.
Phospho-Carboxyl-Terminal Domain Binding and the Role of a Prolyl
Isomerase in Pre-mRNA 3'-End Formation*
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase/yeast CTD fusion protein,
GalyCTD (FPY1 in Ref. 30), was done as described (31) with
sufficient CTD kinase I to cause a complete shift of
GalyCTD to the
hyperphosphorylated form as observed on a stained gel. A duplicate
blank reaction was done without kinase, and both reactions were
desalted into PBS using Quick Spin Protein Columns (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals). The AminoLink Plus Immobilization kit (Pierce) was used
to make 250 µl each of phospho-CTD and CTD matrix (pH 10 coupling
protocol). The yeast strain, DY6, (a leu2 trp1 ura3-52
prb1-1122 pep4-3 prc1-407) was grown at 30 °C in minimal
medium to an A600 of 1 to 2. Cells were
collected and disrupted by glass beads using a protocol (39) modified
for a mini bead beater and substituting a protease inhibitor mix from
Roche Molecular Biochemicals (catalog 1206 8934). The only other
modification was the direct recovery of the extract from the disruption
tube by centrifugation (15,000 RCF for 1 min) followed by pipette
removal of as much supernatant from the beads as was possible. Prior to
affinity chromatography, extracts were thawed and then clarified by
centrifugation at 12,000 RCF for 30 s. The supernatant was diluted
with 2 volumes of buffer (30 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 3 mM PMSF) and reclarified by centrifugation. Equal amounts
of on-put (2.5 ml) were loaded onto paired 250-µl columns containing
identical amounts of phosphorylated or unphosphorylated
GalyCTD.
Each column was washed five times with 400-µl column equilibration
buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 7.8, 100 mM NaCl, and 1 mM PMSF) and eluted with sequential steps consisting of 1 column volume of 110, 125, 140, 160, 190, 220, 250, 300, 350, 425, 500, 600, 700, 850, 1000, 1000, and 1000 mM NaCl in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.8, with 1 mM PMSF. Initial gel
analysis using silver staining revealed a 21-kDa protein eluting
specifically from the phospho-CTD column at 1 M NaCl. The
corresponding high salt fractions from both columns were brought to
0.1% SDS, concentrated, and desalted with Microcon 10 units (Amicon)
and separated on a 4-15% SDS precast gel (Bio-Rad). Following a
protocol from HHMI Biopolymer/Keck Foundation Biotechnology Resource
Laboratory at Yale University, the gel containing the 21-kDa band was
briefly stained with Coomassie Blue, after which the 21-kDa band was
excised and destained for 3 h in 10% acetic acid and 50%
methanol. The band was frozen and sent to the biotechnology facility at
Yale for in-gel trypsinization and MALDI-MS analysis.
GalyCTD (~400,000 cpm) in 10 ml
of BRB without DTT for 3 h and then rinsed 5 × 12 min with
PBS with 0.2% Tween 20 (PBS-Tw), dried, and analyzed by PhosphorImager.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
GalyCTD was hyperphosphorylated and cross-linked to agarose
beads. Total yeast extracts were loaded in parallel onto this and an
identical column prepared with unphosphorylated
GalyCTD and eluted
using a step gradient of NaCl. While many proteins eluted from both
columns, a protein of about 21 kDa appeared to elute only from the
phospho-CTD column at 1 M NaCl (Fig.
1A). This protein band was
excised and subjected to in-gel trypsinization followed by MALDI mass
spectrometric analysis of the tryptic fragments (Fig. 1B).
Data base searches using the masses of the fragments gave an
unambiguous identification of the protein as Ess1.

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Identification of Ess1 as a
phospho-CTD-binding protein. Total yeast extracts were loaded onto
paired columns containing phosphorylated and unphosphorylated CTD.
A, gel analysis of the elution of these columns with an
identical step gradient of increasing NaCl revealed a protein of 21 kDa
eluting at 1 M NaCl from the phosphorylated CTD column
(labeled P CTD) but not the unphosphorylated CTD column (labeled CTD).
This protein is indicated by the arrow to the
right of the Coomassie Blue-stained 4-15% SDS gel. The
21-kDa band in this gel was excised and subjected to in-gel
trypsinization and subsequent MALDI mass spectrometry analysis.
B, the portion of the MALDI-MS spectrum containing the major
products is shown. The experimentally determined masses
(MH+) for these fragments are indicated. When the masses of
all fragments produced were matched against possible fragments using
ProFound (OWL data base), the program identified Ess1. Peptides
covering 57% of Ess1 were identified, including most of the major
fragments. Indicated in the parentheses are the tryptic fragments of
the 170-amino acid version of Ess1 (GenBankTM accession
number 758286) that correspond to the masses observed. Bradykinin and
an ACTH fragment (18-39), with protonated monoisotopic masses of
1060.57 and 2465.2, respectively, were included as internal
calibrants.

View larger version (55K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
GSTEss1-containing beads deplete the
phosphorylated but not the unphosphorylated CTD from solution.
GSTyCTD and phosphorylated GSTyCTD (Pn GSTyCTD) were added
to 0.2 vol of control beads or GSTEss1 beads and incubated at 25 °C.
At the times indicated the beads were pelleted and supernatants
sampled. The initial solution (10 µl) and time point supernatants (10 µl) were run on a 4-15% SDS gel which was stained with Coomassie
Blue and analyzed with a PhosphorImager. Note that the phosphorylated
intermediate clearly visible in the stained gel between the GSTyCTD and
Pn GSTyCTD does not adsorb to the GSTEss1 beads. Removal of the
hyperphosphorylated species, Pn GSTyCTD, reveals the radioactivity
associated with this minor band.
The hyperphosphorylated CTD produced by CTD kinase I can also be used
as an effective radiolabeled probe to identify phospho-CTD-binding proteins in blots of cellular extracts. Preliminary far-Western analysis of proteolyzed Ess1 suggested the WW domain could bind the
phospho-CTD.3 To test this
hypothesis we created expression constructs for GST fusion proteins
containing only the WW (GSTEss1WW) or isomerase (GSTEss1ISO) domains.
Far-Western analysis of the fusion proteins (Fig.
3) shows similar association of the
hyperphosphorylated CTD probe with GSTEss1 (lanes 1-3) and
GSTEss1WW (lanes 4-6) but no association with GSTEss1ISO
(lanes 7-9). Clearly, under these conditions the
phosphorylated CTD appears to associate only with fusion proteins
including the WW domain. As a control to demonstrate specificity, total
Escherichia coli proteins were run in lane 10 of
Fig. 3. There should be no natural phospho-CTD-binding proteins in
E. coli, and indeed far-Western analysis reveals no
phospho-CTD-binding proteins.
|
To demonstrate that in vivo hyperphosphorylated RNA
polymerase II from yeast can associate with Ess1 and to determine
whether the WW domain could mediate this interaction, we analyzed total cellular extracts of asynchronously grown yeast by far-Western using
the fusion proteins as probes (Fig. 4).
In these experiments a protein of >200 kDa was the dominant
interacting species, bound equivalently by GSTEss1 (lanes 5 and 6) and GSTEss1WW (lanes 8 and 9).
This protein is almost certainly the hyperphosphorylated form of the
largest subunit of RNA Pol II (subunit IIo), as it has an identical
electrophoretic mobility to IIo detected using affinity-purified
anti-phospho-CTD polyclonal antibodies (lanes 11 and
12). Note that neither the control lanes probed with GST (lanes 2 and 3) nor the lanes probed with
GSTEss1ISO (lanes 14 and 15) gave any detectable
signal.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results effectively demonstrate that the phosphorylated CTD binds directly to Ess1 and that it is the WW domain that mediates this binding. Although a direct association between the phospho-CTD and the human Pin1 has not been demonstrated, Albert et al., have recently shown that beads containing Pin1 can precipitate a fraction of the hyperphosphorylated RNA Pol II from HeLa cell extracts (34). Given our results with Ess1, this finding strongly suggests that Pin1 also interacts directly with the phosphorylated CTD.
Also recently, it has been shown that the WW and not the isomerase domain of Pin1 is responsible for Pin1 binding to proteins containing mitosis-specific phospho-epitopes (29). Further, the WW domain of Ess1 was also able to bind most of these mammalian proteins. At present, the connection between Ess1/Pin1 association with the phospho-CTD and with mitotic regulatory proteins remains to be determined.
It has been demonstrated that isomerase activity of both Pin1 (27) and Ess1 (21) has a strong preference for proline bonds in which the proline is preceded by an acidic residue (Glu, phospho-Ser, and phospho-Thr). These functional similarities, the conservation of amino acid sequence and domain organization, and the ability of Pin1 to substitute for Ess1 in yeast all indicate a very high level of functional conservation between these two proteins.
Beyond the preference of the isomerase domain for an acidic residue prior to proline, the specificity requirements for the domains of Ess1/Pin1 are not well understood. The initial report examining the specificity of Pin1 found that its ability to bind peptides could be used as a basis for designing efficient isomerase substrates (26). This seemed to suggest the peptide binding site and prolyl isomerase site were the same; however, our study and the study mentioned above (29) strongly suggest it was the specificity of the WW domain that was responsible for peptide binding. Relevant to our work, a sequence found to be a preferred binding site, YpSP, represents a sequence potentially present in the phosphorylated CTD repeats. Peptide substrates with this sequence were also the best isomerase substrates. While the binding sites of the WW and isomerase domains are clearly distinct, they may still have similar recognition determinants.
WW domain associations with Pol II are not limited to the phosphorylated CTD. It has been shown that several WW domains, including one found in the mouse ubiquitin ligase, NEDD4, one found in human YAP (35), and at least one found in yeast Rsp5 (36), can associate with the unphosphorylated CTD. In agreement with our results, it has also been shown that the WW domain of Ess1 fails to interact with the unphosphorylated CTD (35). Interestingly, two studies have looked at the sequence requirements for peptide binding to the WW domain of human YAP, and both identified a sequence present in the CTD, PxY, as the most important for the binding site motif (37, 38). The earlier and more thorough study found the position prior to proline was best occupied by another proline but was tolerant of Leu, Ser, Val, or Ala (37). The sequence SPxY is present in the CTD sequence, probably explaining the ability of human YAP to bind the unphosphorylated CTD.
Previous work has revealed a direct physical connection between 3'-end
processing and the CTD. Mammalian cleavage stimulation factor (CstF)
can be eluted from either a phosphorylated or an unphosphorylated CTD
column, and the CstF p50 and p77 components have been shown to bind
directly to the unphosphorylated CTD (19). Recently, both the
unphosphorylated and the phosphorylated CTD have been found to be
potent stimulators of the 3' cleavage reaction (20). A functional link
between Ess1 and 3'-end processing was established by the isolation of
mutations causing a 3'-end formation defect which mapped to the
isomerase domain of Ess1 (21). Our demonstration that Ess1 stably
associates with the phosphorylated CTD immediately suggests a
mechanistic explanation for these observations: phospho-CTD binding by
the WW domain localizes Ess1 to elongating Pol II, where it is
positioned to isomerize pSP bonds present in the phospho-CTD. In
addition, the separation of the binding and isomerase activities of
Ess1 into independent domains creates the potential for processive
isomerase function. Changes in CTD structure resulting from the
activity of Ess1 would be expected to affect 3'-end formation by
altering interactions between the CTD and cleavage/polyadenylation
components. Involvement of CTD kinase I in this process is consistent
with the finding that a suppressor of CTDK-I deficiency-caused cold
sensitivity contains several regions homologous to components of the
3'-end processing machinery in yeast and
mammals.4 The possibility
that Ess1 reconfigures the phosphorylated CTD though processive
isomerization of its proline residues certainly adds an unexpected
twist to the investigation of eukaryotic pre-mRNA transcription and
3'-end formation.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arno@
biochem.duke.edu.
2 A. L. Greenleaf, unpublished data.
3 D. P. Morris, unpublished observation.
4 D. Skaar and A. L. Greenleaf, manuscript in preparation.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: CTD, carboxyl-terminal domain; Pol I, II, III, polymerase I, II, and III, respectively; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; MALDI-MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; DTT, dithiothreitol; GST, glutathione S-transferase; RCF, relative centrifugal force.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Corden, J. L. (1990) Trends. Biochem. Sci. 15, 383-387[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 2. |
Dahmus, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
19009-19012 |
| 3. | Thompson, C. M., Koleske, A. J., Chao, D. M., and Young, R. A. (1993) Cell 73, 1361-1375[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Kim, Y. J., Bjorklund, S., Li, Y., Sayre, M. H., and Kornberg, R. D. (1994) Cell 77, 599-608[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. |
Myer, V. E.,
and Young, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27757-27760 |
| 6. | Hampsey, M., and Reinberg, D. (1999) Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 132-139[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Cadena, D. L.,
and Dahmus, M. E.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
12468-12474 |
| 8. |
Weeks, J. R.,
Hardin, S. E.,
Shen, J.,
Lee, J. M.,
and Greenleaf, A. L.
(1993)
Genes Dev.
7,
2329-2344 |
| 9. | O'Brien, T., Hardin, S., Greenleaf, A. L., and Lis, J. T. (1994) Nature 370, 75-77[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Greenblatt, J. (1997) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 9, 310-319[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Greenleaf, A. L. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 117-119[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Cho, E. J.,
Takagi, T.,
Moore, C. R.,
and Buratowski, S.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3319-3326 |
| 13. |
McCracken, S.,
Fong, N.,
Rosonina, E.,
Yankulov, K.,
Brothers, G.,
Siderovski, D.,
Hessel, A.,
Foster, S.,
Shuman, S.,
and Bentley, D. L.
(1997)
Genes Dev.
11,
3306-3318 |
| 14. | Ho, C. K., and Shuman, S. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 405-411[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. |
Du, L.,
and Warren, S. L.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
5-18 |
| 16. |
Kim, E.,
Du, L.,
Bregman, D. B.,
and Warren, S. L.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
136,
19-28 |
| 17. | Corden, J. L., and Patturajan, M. (1997) Trends Biochem. Sci. 22, 413-416[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. |
Hirose, Y.,
Tacke, R.,
and Manley, J. L.
(1999)
Genes Dev.
13,
1234-1239 |
| 19. | McCracken, S., Fong, N., Yankulov, K., Ballantyne, S., Pan, G., Greenblatt, J., Patterson, S. D., Wickens, M., and Bentley, D. L. (1997) Nature 385, 357-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Hirose, Y., and Manley, J. L. (1998) Nature 395, 93-96[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Hani, J.,
Schelbert, B.,
Bernhardt, A.,
Domdey, H.,
Fischer, G.,
Wiebauer, K.,
and Rahfeld, J. U.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
108-116 |
| 22. | Hanes, S. D., Shank, P. R., and Bostian, K. A. (1989) Yeast 5, 55-72[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 23. |
Dolinski, K.,
Muir, S.,
Cardenas, M.,
and Heitman, J.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
13093-13098 |
| 24. |
Maleszka, R.,
Hanes, S. D.,
Hackett, R. L.,
de Couet, H. G.,
and Miklos, G. L.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
447-451 |
| 25. | Lu, K. P., Hanes, S. D., and Hunter, T. (1996) Nature 380, 544-547[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Yaffe, M. B.,
Schutkowski, M.,
Shen, M.,
Zhou, X. Z.,
Stukenberg, P. T.,
Rahfeld, J. U.,
Xu, J.,
Kuang, J.,
Kirschner, M. W.,
Fischer, G.,
Cantley, L. C.,
and Lu, K. P.
(1997)
Science
278,
1957-1960 |
| 27. |
Shen, M.,
Stukenberg, P. T.,
Kirschner, M. W.,
and Lu, K. P.
(1998)
Genes Dev.
12,
706-720 |
| 28. | Crenshaw, D. G., Yang, J., Means, A. R., and Kornbluth, S. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 1315-1327[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Lu, P. J.,
Zhou, X. Z.,
Shen, M.,
and Lu, K. P.
(1999)
Science
283,
1325-1328 |
| 30. | Sterner, D. E., Lee, J. M., Hardin, S. E., and Greenleaf, A. L. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5716-5724[Abstract] |
| 31. |
Lee, J. M.,
and Greenleaf, A. L.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
3624-3628 |
| 32. | Morris, D. P., Lee, J. M., Sterner, D. E., Brickey, W. J., and Greenleaf, A. L. (1997) Methods 12, 264-275[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Lee, J. M., and Greenleaf, A. L. (1991) Gene Expr. 1, 149-167[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 34. | Albert, A., Lavoie, S., and Vincent, M. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 2493-2500[Abstract] |
| 35. |
Gavva, N. R.,
Gavva, R.,
Ermekova, K.,
Sudol, M.,
and Shen, C. J.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24105-24108 |
| 36. |
Wang, G.,
Yang, J.,
and Huibregtse, J. M.
(1999)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19,
342-352 |
| 37. | Linn, H., Ermekova, K. S., Rentschler, S., Sparks, A. B., Kay, B. K., and Sudol, M. (1997) Biol. Chem. 378, 531-537[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 38. |
Nguyen, J. T.,
Turck, C. W.,
Cohen, F. E.,
Zuckermann, R. N.,
and Lim, W. A.
(1998)
Science
282,
2088-2092 |
| 39. | Ausubel, F. M., et al. (1994) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Section 13.13.4, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Becker, B. Loll, and A. Meinhart Snapshots of the RNA Processing Factor SCAF8 Bound to Different Phosphorylated Forms of the Carboxyl-terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II J. Biol. Chem., August 15, 2008; 283(33): 22659 - 22669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-X. Xu and J. L. Manley Pin1 modulates RNA polymerase II activity during the transcription cycle Genes & Dev., November 15, 2007; 21(22): 2950 - 2962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Phatnani and A. L. Greenleaf Phosphorylation and functions of the RNA polymerase II CTD. Genes & Dev., November 1, 2006; 20(21): 2922 - 2936. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Chapman, M. Conrad, and D. Eick Role of the Mammalian RNA Polymerase II C-Terminal Domain (CTD) Nonconsensus Repeats in CTD Stability and Cell Proliferation Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2005; 25(17): 7665 - 7674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Meinhart, T. Kamenski, S. Hoeppner, S. Baumli, and P. Cramer A structural perspective of CTD function Genes & Dev., June 15, 2005; 19(12): 1401 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Ren, A. Rossettini, V. Chaturvedi, and S. D. Hanes The Ess1 prolyl isomerase is dispensable for growth but required for virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans Microbiology, May 1, 2005; 151(5): 1593 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. R. Gemmill, X. Wu, and S. D. Hanes Vanishingly Low Levels of Ess1 Prolyl-isomerase Activity Are Sufficient for Growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Chem., April 22, 2005; 280(16): 15510 - 15517. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. O. Kizer, H. P. Phatnani, Y. Shibata, H. Hall, A. L. Greenleaf, and B. D. Strahl A Novel Domain in Set2 Mediates RNA Polymerase II Interaction and Couples Histone H3 K36 Methylation with Transcript Elongation Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2005; 25(8): 3305 - 3316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Wilcox, A. Rossettini, and S. D. Hanes Genetic Interactions With C-Terminal Domain (CTD) Kinases and the CTD of RNA Pol II Suggest a Role for ESS1 in Transcription Initiation and Elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, May 1, 2004; 167(1): 93 - 105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Kiekhaefer, M. E. Boyer, K. D. Johnson, and E. H. Bresnick A WW Domain-binding Motif within the Activation Domain of the Hematopoietic Transcription Factor NF-E2 Is Essential for Establishment of a Tissue-specific Histone Modification Pattern J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 2004; 279(9): 7456 - 7461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Wu, A. Rossettini, and S. D. Hanes The ESS1 Prolyl Isomerase and Its Suppressor BYE1 Interact With RNA Pol II to Inhibit Transcription Elongation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, December 1, 2003; 165(4): 1687 - 1702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-X. Xu, Y. Hirose, X. Z. Zhou, K. P. Lu, and J. L. Manley Pin1 modulates the structure and function of human RNA polymerase II Genes & Dev., November 15, 2003; 17(22): 2765 - 2776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Johanson, T. Hoang, M. Sheth, and L. E. Hyman GRS1, a Yeast tRNA Synthetase with a Role in mRNA 3' End Formation J. Biol. Chem., September 19, 2003; 278(38): 35923 - 35930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yeo, P. S. Lin, M. E. Dahmus, and G. N. Gill A Novel RNA Polymerase II C-terminal Domain Phosphatase That Preferentially Dephosphorylates Serine 5 J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 26078 - 26085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ryo, Y.-C. Liou, K. P. Lu, and G. Wulf Prolyl isomerase Pin1: a catalyst for oncogenesis and a potential therapeutic target in cancer J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2003; 116(5): 773 - 783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Xiao, H. Hall, K. O. Kizer, Y. Shibata, M. C. Hall, C. H. Borchers, and B. D. Strahl Phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II CTD regulates H3 methylation in yeast Genes & Dev., March 1, 2003; 17(5): 654 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Li, D. Moazed, and S. P. Gygi Association of the Histone Methyltransferase Set2 with RNA Polymerase II Plays a Role in Transcription Elongation J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 2002; 277(51): 49383 - 49388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Carty and A. L. Greenleaf Hyperphosphorylated C-terminal Repeat Domain-associating Proteins in the Nuclear Proteome Link Transcription to DNA/Chromatin Modification and RNA Processing Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2002; 1(8): 598 - 610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Prelich RNA Polymerase II Carboxy-Terminal Domain Kinases: Emerging Clues to Their Function Eukaryot. Cell, April 1, 2002; 1(2): 153 - 162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-k. Huang, S. L. Forsburg, U. P. John, M. J. O'Connell, and T. Hunter Isolation and characterization of the Pin1/Ess1p homologue in Schizosaccharomyces pombe J. Cell Sci., March 12, 2002; 114(20): 3779 - 3788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Liou, A. Ryo, H.-K. Huang, P.-J. Lu, R. Bronson, F. Fujimori, T. Uchida, T. Hunter, and K. P. Lu Loss of Pin1 function in the mouse causes phenotypes resembling cyclin D1-null phenotypes PNAS, January 17, 2002; (2002) 32404099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Devasahayam, V. Chaturvedi, and S. D. Hanes The Ess1 Prolyl Isomerase Is Required for Growth and Morphogenetic Switching in Candida albicans Genetics, January 1, 2002; 160(1): 37 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-J. Cho, M. S. Kobor, M. Kim, J. Greenblatt, and S. Buratowski Opposing effects of Ctk1 kinase and Fcp1 phosphatase at Ser 2 of the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain Genes & Dev., December 15, 2001; 15(24): 3319 - 3329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||