JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ross, E. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31641-31647, October 29, 1999


Reciprocal Signaling between Heterotrimeric G Proteins and the p21-stimulated Protein Kinase*

Jun WangDagger , Jeffrey A. Frost, Melanie H. Cobb, and Elliott M. Ross§

From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9041

    ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

p21-activated protein kinase (PAK)-1 phosphorylated Galpha z, a member of the Galpha i family that is found in the brain, platelets, and adrenal medulla. Phosphorylation approached 1 mol of phosphate/mol of Galpha z in vitro. In transfected cells, Galpha z was phosphorylated both by wild-type PAK1 when stimulated by the GTP-binding protein Rac1 and by constitutively active PAK1 mutants. In vitro, phosphorylation occurred only at Ser16, one of two Ser residues that are the major substrate sites for protein kinase C (PKC). PAK1 did not phosphorylate other Galpha subunits (i1, i2, i3, o, s, or q). PAK1-phosphorylated Galpha z was resistant both to RGSZ1, a Gz-selective GTPase-activating protein (GAP), and to RGS4, a relatively nonselective GAP for the Gi and Gq families of G proteins. Phosphorylation of Ser27 by PKC did not alter sensitivity to either GAP. The previously described inhibition of Gz GAPs by PKC is therefore mediated by phosphorylation of Ser16. Phosphorylation of either Ser16 by PAK1 or Ser27 by PKC decreased the affinity of Galpha z for Gbeta gamma ; phosphorylation of both residues by PKC caused no further effect. PAK1 thus regulates Galpha z function by attenuating the inhibitory effects of both GAPs and Gbeta gamma . In this context, the kinase activity of PAK1 toward several protein substrates was directly inhibited by Gbeta gamma , suggesting that PAK1 acts as a Gbeta gamma -regulated effector protein. This inhibition of mammalian PAK1 by Gbeta gamma contrasts with the stimulation of the PAK homolog Ste20p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by the Gbeta gamma homolog Ste4p/Ste18p.

    INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Protein kinases are the eventual downstream mediators of most signals initiated by G protein-coupled receptors. Mechanisms of kinase activation are diverse, however. They include both direct stimulation of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and PKC1 by second messenger products of G protein-regulated effectors and less direct activation of tyrosine kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. In yeast, heterotrimeric G proteins regulate members of the p21-activated protein kinase (PAK) family. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Ste20p is stimulated by Gbeta gamma subunits (Ste4p/Ste18p) in response to mating pheromones (1, 2), and in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the Galpha subunit (Gpa1p) is the signal transducer to the Ste20p homolog Shk1p (3). The PAKs are mammalian homologs of Ste20p and Shk1p that were initially recognized as kinases that are activated by Rac and Cdc42, members of the Rho family of monomeric GTP-binding proteins (4). The PAKs also respond to heterotrimeric G proteins through pathways that include regulation of both GDP/GTP exchange factors and GAPs for Rac and Cdc42 (5-7).

Conversely, protein kinases modulate upstream signaling by heterotrimeric G proteins. Receptors are subject to feedback regulation by second messenger-activated kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (8); G protein-regulated effectors are modulated by phosphorylation (9-12); and in a few cases, G proteins are themselves phosphorylated (13-16). Galpha z, a sparsely expressed member of the Gi family, is phosphorylated by PKC both in platelets and in cells where it has been expressed artificially (13, 17-19). PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation decreases the affinity of Galpha z for Gbeta gamma subunits, potentially sensitizing Gz to activation because Gbeta gamma inhibits GDP/GTP exchange. Phosphorylation by PKC also desensitizes Gz to the GAP activity of RGS proteins, which are widely thought to inhibit G protein signaling (20). PKC may potentiate Gz signaling through either of these mechanisms.

Gz is found primarily in neurons, platelets, and adrenal chromaffin cells, and its intracellular localization suggests that it may regulate formation, transport, or release of secretory granules (21-25). The ability of PAK1 to cause remodeling of cytoskeletal structures points to a role in regulating processes such as cell motility and secretion, and PAK1 has been implicated directly in the Fcgamma receptor-mediated respiratory burst and cytokine secretion (26). Few natural PAK substrates are known, however; but PAK1 probably phosphorylates proteins that regulate either cytoskeletal disassembly or the cytoskeletal elements themselves.

We report here that Galpha z is phosphorylated specifically at Ser16 by PAK1, thus inhibiting its interaction with both Gbeta gamma and RGS proteins. We have used this specificity to distinguish and delineate the functional consequences of phosphorylation at Ser27 and Ser16, which we show to be the two principal substrate sites for PKC. An unexpected outcome is the finding that Gbeta gamma , which stimulates the PAK homolog Ste20p in Saccharomyces, inhibits the activity of mammalian PAK1 toward both Galpha z and other substrates.

    EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Plasmids and cDNA-- Mammalian expression vectors for full-length PAK1, the constitutively active mutant PAK1-(165-544) (N-terminal truncation leaving residues 165-544) (27), and G12V Rac1 were prepared in pCMV5M (pCMV5 modified to include a Myc epitope tag (27)) as described previously (27). The G12V Rac1 mutation was prepared using a QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene), and the cDNA was inserted into pCMV5. Mammalian expression vectors for wild-type Galpha z and its S16A, S25A, S27A, and S16A,S25A mutants were constructed in pDP5 and were gifts from D. Manning (University of Pennsylvania) (17). The S16A,S25A,S27P triple mutant was prepared using the QuikChange kit with the S16A,S27A construct as template. Recombinant baculoviruses expressing the Galpha z mutants were prepared as described previously for wild-type Galpha z (28).

Protein Expression and Purification-- Wild-type and mutant Galpha and Gbeta gamma subunits, other than Galpha i1, were expressed in Sf9 cells and purified as described (28, 29). Galpha i1 was expressed in Escherichia coli with or without yeast protein N-myristoyltransferase (30) and purified as described (31). Galpha q and Galpha s were gifts from S. Mukhopadhyay and T. Kozasa (this department). Wild-type PAK1 and PAK1-(232-544) were expressed in E. coli as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins and purified by glutathione-agarose affinity chromatography (27). To prevent proteolysis, wild-type GST-PAK1 was purified in the presence of 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin A, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Purified PAK1 and PAK1-(232-544) were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM benzamidine and stored at -80 °C. The protein kinase TAO1 (32) was a gift from K. Berman (this department), and PKCalpha was a gift from T. Kozasa (this department). Purified phosducin (33) was a gift from R. Gaudet and P. Sigler (Yale University).

Protein Kinase Assays and Protein Phosphorylation-- Phosphorylation of Galpha z by PKCalpha was performed exactly as described (28, 29). Galpha subunits were phosphorylated by PAK1 at 30 °C for 60 min or the times indicated in 50 mM Hepes (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mM ATP. Phosphoamino acid analysis and tryptic phosphopeptide mapping of Galpha z were performed as described (34). Partial tryptic proteolysis after protection of phosphorylated Galpha z by GTPgamma S was performed exactly as described (35). Under these conditions, trypsin cleaves Galpha z after Arg29 (35). Protein kinase assays using MBP as substrate were performed as described (36).

In Vivo Phosphorylation-- Human embryonic kidney fibroblasts (HEK-293 cells) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. For transfection, cells were grown in 60-mm culture dishes to ~70% confluence and then transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation (27). Twenty hours after transfection, the medium was replaced by Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium without serum, and the cells were incubated for another 24 h. For determination of in vivo phosphorylation of Galpha z, transfected cells were washed once with phosphate-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and incubated for 2-3 h in phosphate-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus [32P]Pi (0.5 mCi/ml). For harvesting, cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline and scraped into 0.5 ml of radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mM sodium Pi (pH 7.2), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and 1% Nonidet P-40) that contained 0.2% SDS, 80 mM beta -glycerophosphate, 0.5 mM Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin A. Lysates were stored at -20 °C. For immunoprecipitation, lysates were sonicated at 0 °C for 10 s and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatants were diluted to 800 µl with radioimmune precipitation assay buffer that contained 0.2% SDS and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and precleared by passage through a 0.2-ml column of Sephadex G-25. The precleared lysates were incubated with 20 µl of protein A-agarose and 10 µg of purified anti-Galpha z antibody for 15 h at 4 °C. After extensive washing with radioimmune precipitation assay buffer that contained 0.2% SDS, precipitates were solubilized with SDS sample buffer and analyzed by electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gels (37). Proteins were transferred to Schleicher & Schüll BA85 nitrocellulose membranes for autoradiography or immunoblotting with anti-Galpha z antibody. Autoradiographs and Western blot images were quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics densitometer and appropriate standards.

Other Methods-- Gz GAP activity was assayed at 15 °C as described (28). [35S]GTPgamma S binding was measured at 30 °C as described. GTPgamma S-bound Galpha z was partially proteolyzed with trypsin as described (35). Antibody against Galpha z was raised by injecting rabbits with the N-terminal peptide GCRQSSEEKEAARRSRR conjugated to hemocyanin. Antibody was purified from serum by precipitation with (NH4)2SO4 and, following dialysis, immunoaffinity chromatography on a column of the immunizing peptide coupled to CNBr-activated Sepharose CL-4B.

    RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

PAK1 Phosphorylates Galpha z Selectively at Ser16-- The protein kinase PAK1 phosphorylated Galpha z in vitro, but did not phosphorylate several other Galpha subunits tested (Fig. 1). PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Galpha z was efficient relative to that catalyzed by PKCalpha , and the truncated protein PAK1-(232-544) displayed activity similar to that of the wild-type kinase. We were unable to detect phosphorylation of Galpha z by either TAO1 or protein kinase A (data not shown).


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1.   Phosphorylation of Galpha subunits by PAK1. Purified recombinant G protein subunits Galpha s, Galpha i1 (non-myristoylated), Galpha i1 (myristoylated; i1m), Galpha i2, Galpha i3, Galpha o, and Galpha q (1.25 pmol each) and Gz (0.75 pmol) were incubated with partially purified wild-type GST-PAK1 (~0.1 pmol) and [gamma -32P]ATP (3 cpm/fmol) for 60 min at 30 °C as described under "Experimental Procedures." All Galpha subunits were expressed in Sf9 cells except for Galpha i1, which was expressed in E. coli either with (i1m) or without (i1) coexpression of N-myristoyltransferase. Samples were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, silver-stained (Ag; lower panel), and exposed to x-ray film (32P; upper panel). Molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are shown on the left. This complete experiment and a similar experiment using ~0.5 pmol of PAK1-(232-544) yielded identical results.

PAK1 phosphorylated Galpha z within the first 29 amino acid residues because all 32P was removed by limited tryptic proteolysis (Fig. 2A), which cleaves after Arg29 (35). Phosphoamino acid analysis of phosphorylated Galpha z detected only phosphoserine (data not shown), consistent with the absence of Thr residues in this region. In contrast to the site specificity displayed by PAK1, PKC phosphorylated at least one additional site C-terminal to Gln30, usually accounting for ~10% of the total incorporation of phosphate (Fig. 2A, lane 12). We then used serine mutants of Galpha z to determine the site of PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation near the N terminus. PAK1 catalyzed the phosphorylation of Galpha z to ~1 mol of phosphate/mol of Galpha z, and phosphorylation was blocked completely by mutation of Ser16 to Ala. Phosphorylation was not diminished by mutation of either Ser25 or Ser27 (Fig. 2, B and C). Longer incubation with PAK1 or the use of more PAK1 did not cause further phosphorylation of Galpha z (data not shown). PAK1 thus selectively phosphorylates Ser16 of Galpha z.


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2.   Determination of phosphorylation sites on Galpha z. A, tryptic mapping. Galpha z (20 pmol) was phosphorylated by full-length PAK1 or PKCalpha as described in the legend to Fig. 1. After adjusting free [Mg2+] to 1 µM with EDTA, the samples were incubated for 80 min at 30 °C in binding buffer with or without 0.5 mM GTPgamma S. Samples were then incubated with or without L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated trypsin (1%, w/w) for 40 min at 30 °C. Samples (5 pmol for samples incubated without trypsin and 12.5 pmol with trypsin) were analyzed by SDS gel electrophoresis, followed by Coomassie Blue staining (CB; lower panel) and autoradiography (upper panel). B, phosphorylation of Galpha z Ser mutants. Purified wild-type (WT; 5 pmol) or mutant (10 pmol) Galpha z was incubated with either PAK1 or PKCalpha for 60 min at 30 °C as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Samples were analyzed as described for A. These experiments (A and B) were performed at least twice with similar results. C, phosphorylation of wild-type and Ser mutants of Galpha z. Aliquots (10 pmol) of wild-type (open circle , ), S16A (, black-square), or S27A (down-triangle, black-down-triangle ) Galpha z were incubated at 30 °C with 1 pmol of PAK1 (, black-square, black-down-triangle ) or 1 pmol of PKCalpha (open circle , , triangle ) and [gamma -32P]ATP (3000 cpm/pmol) as described under "Experimental Procedures." Samples were resolved by SDS gel electrophoresis, and incorporation of 32P was determined by scintillation counting of Coomassie Blue-stained protein bands. Each point represents the mean of at least three experiments where S.D. was <15% of the mean.

In contrast to PAK1, PKC catalyzed the addition of 2 mol of phosphate/mol of Galpha z, and phosphorylation was decreased by about half when either Ser16 or Ser27 was mutated (Fig. 2, B and C). Both residues are thus PKC substrate sites. The time courses of phosphorylation of S16A and S27A Galpha z suggest that Ser27 is the kinetically preferred PKC substrate (Fig. 2C). Such preference agrees with the conclusion of Lounsbury et al. (17) that Ser27 is the major phosphorylation site in transfected 293 cells, although cellular phosphorylation might also be influenced by selectivity of whatever protein phosphatases naturally dephosphorylate Galpha z. We have not attempted to map the minor, more C-terminal PKC phosphorylation site on Galpha z.

To determine whether PAK1 also phosphorylates Galpha z in vivo, we expressed Galpha z in HEK-293 cells and measured its differential steady-state phosphorylation upon coexpression with PAK1, with or without the PAK activator G12V Rac1 (Fig. 3). Galpha z was phosphorylated by endogenous HEK-293 cell kinases during the 3-h incubation with [32P]Pi, primarily at one of the Ser residues near the N terminus. Phosphorylation was slightly increased by coexpression of wild-type PAK1 and was further increased when both PAK1 and the constitutively activated G12V mutant of Rac1 were present. It was difficult to quantitate the in vivo phosphorylation of Galpha z by PAK1 because an unknown fraction of Ser16 may already be phosphorylated prior to addition of 32P and because considerable phosphorylation by other kinases occurred at Ser27 (Fig. 3A, lanes 6-8). However, phosphorylation of the S25A,S27P Galpha z mutant showed that wild-type PAK1 plus G12V Rac1 can at least double the incorporation of 32P into Ser16 of Galpha z and that the activated mutant PAK1-(165-544) can increase labeling by 50%. For reference, phosphorylation of Galpha z by endogenous PKC was monitored by stimulating the cells with phorbol ester, which increased phosphorylation of both wild-type and S16A Galpha z by ~2-2.6-fold (Fig. 3) (17). Phosphorylation of Galpha z at sites C-terminal to Arg29 was relatively minor (Fig. 3B, lanes 8-14).


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3.   Rac1-stimulated phosphorylation of Galpha z at Ser16 by PAK1 in HEK-293 cells. HEK-293 cells were transfected with plasmids that encode wild-type or mutant Galpha z, wild-type (WT) PAK1 or PAK1-(165-544), and G12V Rac1 as shown. [32P]Pi was added to the medium; after 3 h, cells were harvested, and Galpha z was immunoprecipitated and analyzed by gel electrophoresis as described under "Experimental Procedures." In some cases, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA; 0.1 µM) was added 5 min before harvest to stimulate endogenous PKC. The amount of Galpha z in each immunoprecipitate was determined by comparing the density of bands in immunoblots of the immunoprecipitates (A, WB) with samples of purified Galpha z on the same blot (data not shown). Incorporation of [32P]Pi was determined by scintillation counting of radioactivity in each sliced band. Phosphorylation of Galpha z was quantitated as cpm/pmol of Galpha z. Similar results were obtained in two other experiments. HEK-293 cells do not express Galpha z naturally, although a phosphoprotein of slightly smaller size can sometimes be detected in Galpha z immunoprecipitates (B, lane 1).

Activation of Galpha z and PAK1-catalyzed Phosphorylation-- Activation of Galpha z by AlF4- had no effect on its phosphorylation by either PAK1 or PKC (Fig. 4). Activation by GTPgamma S was also without effect (data not shown). Conversely, neither PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation of MBP or PAK1 autophosphorylation was altered by Galpha z when bound to GDP/AlF4- (Fig. 4), GDP, or GTPgamma S (data not shown).


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4.   Phosphorylation of Galpha z or MBP by PAK1 or PKC is independent of the presence of active or inactive Galpha z. PKCalpha (0.5 pmol) or PAK1-(232-544) (2 pmol) was incubated for 20 min at 30 °C under standard phosphorylation conditions with Galpha z (5 pmol) and/or MBP (10 pmol), with or without 10 mM NaF and 30 µM AlCl3 (AMF) as indicated. Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis, Coomassie Blue staining, and autoradiography. Similar results were obtained with Galpha z activated with GTPgamma S or with full-length PAK (data not shown).

Phosphorylation of Galpha z at Either Ser16 or Ser27 Inhibits Binding to Gbeta gamma -- To determine whether PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Galpha z decreases its affinity for Gbeta gamma , as is true for PKC (18), we monitored the effect of phosphorylation on the concentration dependence with which Gbeta gamma inhibits GDP/GTPgamma S exchange. As shown in Fig. 5A, phosphorylation of Galpha z by PAK1 markedly attenuated the ability of Gbeta gamma to inhibit nucleotide exchange on Galpha z, but had no effect on the intrinsic nucleotide exchange rate. This attenuation reflected a 10-20-fold decrease in the affinity of phospho-Galpha z for Gbeta gamma (Fig. 5, B and D). PAK1 and PKC inhibited Gbeta gamma binding equally. Furthermore, phosphorylation of Ser16 by PAK1 alone (Fig. 5, B and D) or of Ser27 by PKC in the S16A mutant (Fig. 5C) decreased Galpha z-Gbeta gamma affinity equally. Phosphorylation of both residues by PKC had no greater effect than phosphorylation of only one or the other. Although mutation of either residue to Ala itself decreased affinity for Gbeta gamma somewhat (IC50 shifted from ~1 µM to ~2.5 µM in this and other experiments), the additional decrease caused by phosphorylation was much greater, ~12-fold in Fig. 5B and ~20-fold in Fig. 5 (C and D) and similar experiments.


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5.   Effects of phosphorylation of Galpha z at Ser16 and/or Ser27 on its interaction with Gbeta gamma . Galpha z was phosphorylated by either PAK1 or PKCalpha by incubation at 30 °C for 90 min as described in the legends to Figs. 1 and 2. After adjusting free [Mg2+] to 1 µM with EDTA, the samples (2.2 pmol/assay point) were preincubated for 10 min at 0 °C in binding buffer with or without Gbeta gamma . Binding of [35S]GTPgamma S (20 µM, 1500 cpm/pmol) was then determined as described (28). A, GTPgamma S binding to either PAK1-phosphorylated (black-triangle, triangle ) or control (open circle , ) wild-type Galpha z was measured in the presence (black-triangle, ) or absence (triangle , open circle ) of 100 pmol of Gbeta gamma . Each curve was fit to a first-order reaction scheme, and all four curves share the same value of maximal GTPgamma S binding. B-D, the rate constants for GTPgamma S binding to wild-type (WT) Galpha z, S16A Galpha z, and S27A Galpha z, respectively, were determined at increasing concentrations of Gbeta gamma (shown as the molar ratio Gbeta gamma /Galpha z). Galpha z was either phosphorylated (closed symbols) or not (open symbols; no kinase added) as shown. Data are means of duplicate determination in two or three experiments (n = 4 or 6).

Phosphorylation of Galpha z at Ser16 Blocks the GAP Activity of RGS Proteins-- Phosphorylation of Galpha z by PKC blocks the GAP activity of RGS proteins (29, 38). Selective phosphorylation of Ser16 by PAK1 also substantially inhibited the GAP activities of both RGSZ1 and RGS4 (Fig. 6 and Table I). RGS4 was inhibited by >96%. RGSZ1 was inhibited by ~60-80% under the conditions shown. Gz GAP purified from bovine brain, which contains RGSZ1 and at least one other member of the RGSZ subfamily (29), was inhibited to the same extent as was recombinant RGSZ1 (data not shown). Inhibition of GAP activity by Galpha z phosphorylation is caused by an increase in Km, which probably indicates a decrease in affinity (29). Fractional inhibition will therefore vary with the concentration of phospho-Galpha z relative to its Km, and the greater fractional inhibition of RGS4 thus reflects its lower affinity for GTP-bound Galpha z.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6.   Interactive effects of phosphorylation or mutation at Ser16 and Ser27 and of Gbeta gamma on GAP-stimulated hydrolysis of Galpha z-bound GTP. Samples of wild-type (WT) or mutant Galpha z were phosphorylated by either PAK1 or PKCalpha as described in the legend to Fig. 2C, presumably to nearly stoichiometric incorporation of phosphate at Ser16 and/or Ser27. Control (non-phosphorylated) samples were treated identically, except that protein kinase was omitted. Samples were then bound to [alpha -32P]GTP, and hydrolysis of Galpha z-bound GTP (2 nM) stimulated by 50 pM RGSZ1 was measured as described (28) at increasing concentrations of Gbeta gamma . Data represent increases in the first-order hydrolytic rate constant kapp (28) relative to the basal rate observed in the absence of GAP or Gbeta gamma . Data points are means of 20 (, open circle ), 8 (black-down-triangle , down-triangle), or 4 (black-square, ) determinations in which S.D. was <15% of the mean. Basal GTP hydrolysis rates for each protein and GAP-stimulated rates from similar experiments are summarized in Table I.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table I
Modulation of the Gz GAP activity of RGS proteins by Gbeta gamma and by PAK1- or PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation of Galpha z
The rates of hydrolysis of wild-type and mutant GTP-bound Galpha z (~2 nM in all experiments) were measured either without GAP or in the presence of 50 pM RGSZ1 or 750 pM RGS4. Galpha z was phosphorylated by PAK1 or PKCalpha as shown. Assays also contained 2.5 µM Gbeta 1gamma 2 where shown. Observed hydrolysis rate constants, kapp (28), are means ± S.D. from 4 to 20 determinations.

Because PAK1 phosphorylates Ser16 exclusively and PAK-catalyzed phosphorylation inhibits responses to GAPs as much as does phosphorylation of both Ser16 and Ser27 by PKC, phosphorylation of Ser16 can account for the inhibitory effect of PKC on GAP activity. Phosphorylation of Ser27 in S16A Galpha z had no effect on its sensitivity to either GAP. Thus, PAK1 will be just as efficacious an inhibitor of the RGSZ family of Gz GAPs as is PKC.

Addition of Gbeta gamma to phosphorylated Galpha z had little further inhibitory effect on GAP activity (Fig. 5). The slight inhibition that was observed occurred primarily below 200 nM Gbeta gamma , well below the Kd of phospho-Galpha z for Gbeta gamma . Residual inhibition by Gbeta gamma probably reflects effects on the small fraction of Galpha z that was not phosphorylated during incubation with kinase.

In addition to blocking phosphorylation, mutation of either Ser16 or Ser27 to Ala also inhibited the intrinsic sensitivity of Galpha z to GAP activity (Fig. 6 and Table I). Sensitivity of non-phosphorylated S16A Galpha z to either RGSZ1 or RGS4 was equivalent to that of phospho-Ser16 Galpha z and was not further altered by phosphorylation of Ser27. S27A Galpha z was more sensitive to GAP activity than was S16A Galpha z, but was still a far worse GAP substrate than wild-type Galpha z. It was striking that PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation at Ser27 in the S16A mutant reproducibly increased its sensitivity to GAPs. Although this effect was relatively small, it was a consistent finding in multiple experiments. The small inhibitory effect of Gbeta gamma on the sensitivity of mutated or phosphorylated Galpha z to GAPs was similarly reproducible.

The intrinsic rates at which S16A and S27A Galpha z hydrolyzed bound GTP were diminished in comparison to the wild type, by ~15 and 25% respectively (Table I). Proteolysis of the N-terminal 29 amino acid residues of Galpha z provided a control to show that the effects of mutation or phosphorylation of Ser16 and Ser27 are local. Limited tryptic proteolysis increased the khydrol for each of these proteins to ~0.022 min-1 (data not shown), the value characteristic of the proteolyzed wild-type, non-phosphorylated protein (35).

Gbeta gamma Inhibits the Protein Kinase Activity of PAK1-- During the course of the experiments described above, we noticed that Gbeta gamma reproducibly inhibited the protein kinase activity of PAK1-(232-544) (Fig. 7A). Inhibition was detectable by 80 nM and was half-maximal at ~200 nM, well within the range of concentrations over which other regulatory actions of Gbeta gamma have been described (39). Similar results were obtained with full-length, wild-type PAK1 both before and after removal of the fused GST domain (data not shown). The buffer used to store Gbeta gamma had no effect on PAK1 activity (Fig. 7A). Gbeta gamma also inhibited the ability of PAK1 to phosphorylate either MBP (Fig. 7) or MEK1 (data not shown). Gbeta gamma thus appears to inhibit PAK directly rather than simply binding the Galpha z substrate and blocking access to the kinase. The inhibitory activity of Gbeta gamma was relatively specific for PAK. It had no effect on the protein kinase activities of either protein kinase A or TAO1 in two separate experiments and inhibited PKC insignificantly (10-15% at the highest concentrations tested).


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7.   Gbeta gamma inhibits the protein kinase activity of PAK1. A, PAK1-(232-544) (250 nM) was incubated for 60 min under standard phosphorylation conditions with either 150 nM Galpha z or 200 nM MBP and decreasing concentrations of Gbeta gamma as indicated by the wedges (2300, 760, 250, 83, 28, and 9 nM). Similar results were obtained in 12 experiments, and the identical result was obtained using GST-PAK1 instead of PAK1-(232-544). A constant amount of Gbeta gamma storage buffer was added to all reactions. B, inhibition of the kinase activity of PAK1 by Gbeta gamma was not blocked by formation of a heterotrimer with Galpha i1. PAK1-(232-544) (0.25 µM) was incubated with 0.2 µM MBP, 1.25 µM Gbeta gamma (except lane 1), and different concentrations of GDP-bound myristoylated Galpha i1 for 60 min under standard conditions. The concentrations of Galpha i1 were 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.313, 0.151, 0.075, and 0 µM as indicated by the wedge. Under similar conditions, GDP-bound Galpha q (up to 0.31 µM; data not shown) and phosducin (up to 6.7 µM) also had no effect on MBP phosphorylation in the presence or absence of Gbeta gamma . A and B show autoradiograms of polyacrylamide gels of phosphorylation reaction mixtures.

Gbeta gamma slightly but reproducibly stimulated PAK1 autophosphorylation in the presence or absence of added substrate (example in Fig. 7A), indicating that Gbeta gamma binds directly to PAK1 to alter its function. In yeast, Gbeta gamma also binds (and stimulates) the PAK homolog Ste20p directly (1, 2), and its stimulatory activity is blocked by binding to Galpha . Surprisingly, Gbeta gamma was a potent inhibitor of PAK1 protein kinase activity both when free or when complexed as a heterotrimer with GDP-bound Galpha z or Galpha i (Fig. 7, A and B) or Galpha q (data not shown). Addition of the Gbeta gamma -binding protein phosducin (up to 6.7 µM) also failed to reverse inhibition by Gbeta gamma (Fig. 7B).

    DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

Mammalian PAKs were discovered as effectors of the small G proteins Rac and Cdc42, although the yeast homolog Ste20p was first identified as a protein kinase activated by Gbeta gamma . Our current findings now indicate that PAKs function both upstream and downstream of heterotrimeric G proteins in animal cell signaling pathways. First, PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation potentiates Gz activation by inhibiting the GAP activity of RGS proteins, including the RGSZ subfamily of Gz-selective GAPs. Second, phosphorylation of Galpha z decreases its affinity for Gbeta gamma subunits and thus attenuates the inhibitory effects of Gbeta gamma on Gz activation. The net result is a two-pronged potentiation of Gz signaling by PAK. The reduced affinity of phospho-Galpha z for Gbeta gamma will promote Gbeta gamma release and might thereby potentiate Gbeta gamma signaling, but Galpha z is expressed at such low levels that it may release too little Gbeta gamma to have significant impact on intracellular signaling.

Several lines of evidence are consistent with the hypothesis that PAK phosphorylates Galpha z under physiological conditions in cells. In vitro, PAK1-phosphorylated purified Galpha z to a stoichiometry of 1 mol of phosphate/mol of Galpha z. The rate of phosphorylation was also reasonably fast in comparison with PKC, which phosphorylates Galpha z in platelets stimulated by either thrombin or phorbol ester (13, 19). Phosphorylation of Galpha z in HEK-293 cells was increased by expression of constitutively active PAK1 or of wild-type PAK1 and its activator Rac. PAK1-driven incorporation of 32P into Galpha z was of the same order as that catalyzed by PKC in response to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate despite the fact that PKC phosphorylates Galpha z on two sites rather than one. Finally, phosphorylation of Galpha z by PAK is associated with altered function of the protein as discussed more fully below. We conclude that stimulation of PAKs, via the activation of either Rac or Cdc42, provides a novel means of potentiating the cellular function of Gz.

PAK1 displays marked selectivity for Galpha z relative to other Galpha subunits and for Ser16 relative to other potential phosphorylation sites in Gz. Selectivity for Ser16 allowed us to delineate the individual contributions of phosphorylation of Ser16 and Ser27 to regulation of Galpha z in a manner not possible using mutagenesis. Phosphorylation of Ser16 was both sufficient and necessary to decrease sensitivity to the GAP activity of RGS proteins (Fig. 6 and Table I). It was also sufficient to decrease affinity for Gbeta gamma . PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation of Ser27 in the S16A mutant also decreased affinity for Gbeta gamma . On the other hand, phosphorylation of both residues in wild-type Galpha z had no more effect than phosphorylation of Ser16 alone. These data confirm the idea that the extreme N-terminal helix of Galpha subunits is crucial for interaction with RGS proteins (29, 35), despite the fact that this interaction was not observed in the crystal structure of the Galpha i1-RGS4 complex (40).

The ability of Gbeta gamma subunits to inhibit the protein kinase activity of PAK1 is provocative for two reasons. First, it suggests that the PAKs may be a new family of heterotrimeric G protein-regulated effectors. Inhibition of PAK1 by Gbeta gamma was nearly complete, was effective with multiple protein substrates, and occurred over a physiological range of Gbeta gamma concentrations. Second, PAK inhibition by Gbeta gamma extends the pattern of G protein regulation of the PAK family that was established in yeast. However, whereas Shk1p is activated, perhaps indirectly, by Galpha in S. pombe and Ste20p is directly activated by Gbeta gamma in S. cerevisiae, PAK1 is directly inhibited by mammalian Gbeta gamma . The ability of Gbeta gamma to regulate PAK1-(232-544) also indicates that the Gbeta gamma -binding site on PAK is unrelated to the binding site for Rac and Cdc42, which lies near the PAK N terminus (41). A tantalizing possibility is that mammalian G proteins may regulate PAKs through multiple mechanisms.

Inhibition of PAK by Gbeta gamma in vitro fulfilled most criteria for physiological validity, so it was initially puzzling that inhibition was not blocked either by GDP-bound Galpha i or by phosducin. However, yeast Gbeta gamma binds Ste20p through the N-terminal helix of Gbeta (2, 42), which is not occluded in the phosducin-Gbeta gamma complex (33). Whereas the N-terminal helix of Gbeta makes extensive contact with Galpha (43, 44), the face of the helix that binds PAK may remain accessible in some conformations of the Galpha -Gbeta gamma heterotrimer. Contact sites for other Gbeta gamma -regulated effectors cluster on the face of the Gbeta torus rather than near its N terminus (45) and are thus fully blocked by Galpha . It should be possible to use such structural information to evaluate the biological relevance of PAK inhibition by Gbeta gamma in cells where PAK activity can be monitored in response to receptor-regulated Gbeta gamma release.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Jimmy Woodson and Steven Stippec for excellent technical assistance, David Manning for the plasmids that encode mutant forms of Galpha z, Kevin Berman for TAO1, Tohru Kozasa for PKCalpha , and Rachel Gaudet and Paul Sigler for phosducin.

    FOOTNOTES

* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants GM30355, GM53032, and GM16926 and Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant I-0982.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Dagger Present address: Molecumetics, Inc., 2023 120th Ave. N. E., Bellevue, WA 98005-2199.

§ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9041. Tel.: 214-648-8717; Fax: 214-648-2994; E-mail: ross@utsw.swmed.edu.

    ABBREVIATIONS

The abbreviations used are: PKC, protein kinase C; PAK, p21-activated protein kinase; GAP, GTPase-activating protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; GTPgamma S, guanosine 5'-O-thiotriphosphate; MBP, myelin basic protein; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase.

    REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

1. Leberer, E., Wu, C., Leeuw, T., Fourest-Lieuvin, A., Segall, J. E., and Thomas, D. Y. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 83-97[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Leeuw, T., Wu, C., Schrag, J. D., Whiteway, M., Thomas, D. Y., and Leberer, E. (1998) Nature 391, 191-195[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Xu, H. P., White, M., Marcus, S., and Wigler, M. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 50-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4. Lim, L., Manser, E., Leung, T., and Hall, C. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 242, 171-185[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Manser, E., Loo, T. H., Koh, C. G., Zhao, Z.-S., Chen, Q., Tan, L., Tan, I., Leung, T., and Lim, L. (1998) Molec. Cell 1, 183-192[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Obermeier, A., Ahmed, S., Manser, E., Yen, S. C., Hall, C., and Lim, L. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4328-4339[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Bagrodia, S., Taylor, S. J., Jordon, K. A., Van Aelst, L., and Cerione, R. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 23633-23636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Pitcher, J. A., Freedman, N. J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 653-692[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9. Filtz, T. M., Cunningham, M. L., Stanig, K. J., Paterson, A., and Harden, T. K. (1999) Biochem. J. 338, 257-264
10. Yue, C., Dodge, K. L., Weber, G., and Sanborn, B. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 18023-18027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Ishikawa, Y. (1998) Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res. 32, 99-120[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Sunahara, R. K., Dessauer, C. W., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 36, 461-480[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Lounsbury, K. M., Casey, P. J., Brass, L. F., and Manning, D. R. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22051-22056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Kozasa, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 12562-12567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Aragay, A. M., and Quick, M. W. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 4807-4815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Katada, T., Gilman, A. G., Watanabe, Y., Bauer, S., and Jakobs, K. H. (1985) Eur. J. Biochem. 151, 431-437[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Lounsbury, K. M., Schlegel, B., Poncz, M., Brass, L. F., and Manning, D. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 3494-3498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Fields, T. A., and Casey, P. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23119-23125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Carlson, K. E., Brass, L. F., and Manning, D. R. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 13298-13305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Berman, D. M., and Gilman, A. G. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 1269-1272[Free Full Text]
21. Matsuoka, M., Itoh, H., Kozasa, T., and Kaziro, Y. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 5384-5388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
22. Fong, H. K. W., Yoshimoto, K. K., Eversole-Cire, P., and Simon, M. I. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 3066-3070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Garibay, J. L. R., Kozasa, T., Itoh, H., Tsukamoto, T., Matsuoka, M., and Kaziro, Y. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1094, 193-199[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Casey, P. J., Fong, H. K. W., Simon, M. I., and Gilman, A. G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 2383-2390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Hinton, D. R., Blanks, J. C., Fong, H. K. W., Casey, P. J., Hildebrandt, E., and Simons, M. I. (1990) J. Neurosci. 10, 2763-2770[Abstract]
26. Izadi, K. D., Erdreich-Epstein, A., Liu, Y., and Durden, D. L. (1998) Exper. Cell Res. 245, 330-342[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Frost, J. A., Steen, H., Shapiro, P., Lewis, T., Ahn, N., Shaw, P. E., and Cobb, M. H. (1997) EMBO J. 16, 6426-6438[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
28. Wang, J., Tu, Y., Woodson, J., Song, X., and Ross, E. M. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 5732-5740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29. Wang, J., Ducret, A., Tu, Y., Kozasa, T., Aebersold, R., and Ross, E. M. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26014-26025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Mumby, S. M., and Linder, M. E. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 237, 254-268[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
31. Kozasa, T., and Gilman, A. G. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1734-1741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32. Hutchison, M., Berman, K. S., and Cobb, M. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28625-28632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
33. Gaudet, R., Bohm, A., and Sigler, P. B. (1996) Cell 87, 577-588[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
34. Boyle, W. J., van der Geer, P., and Hunter, T. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 201, 110-149[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
35. Tu, Y., Wang, J., and Ross, E. M. (1997) Science 278, 1132-1135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
36. Frost, J. A., Khokhlatchev, A., Stippec, S., White, M. A., and Cobb, M. H. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 28191-28198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
37. Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature 227, 680-685[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
38. Glick, J. L., Meigs, T. E., Miron, A., and Casey, P. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 26008-26013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
39. Clapham, D. E., and Neer, E. J. (1997) Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 37, 167-203[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
40. Tesmer, J. J. G., Berman, D. M., Gilman, A. G., and Sprang, S. R. (1997) Cell 89, 251-261[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
41. Burbelo, P. D., Drechsel, D., and Hall, A.