J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31641-31647, October 29, 1999
Reciprocal Signaling between Heterotrimeric G Proteins and the
p21-stimulated Protein Kinase*
Jun
Wang
,
Jeffrey A.
Frost,
Melanie H.
Cobb, and
Elliott M.
Ross§
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9041
 |
ABSTRACT |
p21-activated protein kinase (PAK)-1
phosphorylated G
z, a member of the
G
i family that is found in the brain, platelets, and
adrenal medulla. Phosphorylation approached 1 mol of phosphate/mol of
G
z in vitro. In transfected cells,
G
z was phosphorylated both by wild-type PAK1 when
stimulated by the GTP-binding protein Rac1 and by constitutively active
PAK1 mutants. In vitro, phosphorylation occurred only at
Ser16, one of two Ser residues that are the major substrate
sites for protein kinase C (PKC). PAK1 did not phosphorylate other G
subunits (i1, i2, i3, o, s, or q). PAK1-phosphorylated
G
z was resistant both to RGSZ1, a
Gz-selective GTPase-activating protein (GAP), and to RGS4,
a relatively nonselective GAP for the Gi and Gq
families of G proteins. Phosphorylation of Ser27 by PKC did
not alter sensitivity to either GAP. The previously described
inhibition of Gz GAPs by PKC is therefore mediated by phosphorylation of Ser16. Phosphorylation of either
Ser16 by PAK1 or Ser27 by PKC decreased the
affinity of G
z for G
; phosphorylation of both
residues by PKC caused no further effect. PAK1 thus regulates G
z function by attenuating the inhibitory effects of
both GAPs and G
. In this context, the kinase activity of PAK1
toward several protein substrates was directly inhibited by G
,
suggesting that PAK1 acts as a G
-regulated effector protein. This
inhibition of mammalian PAK1 by G
contrasts with the stimulation
of the PAK homolog Ste20p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by
the G
homolog Ste4p/Ste18p.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Protein kinases are the eventual downstream mediators of most
signals initiated by G protein-coupled receptors. Mechanisms of kinase
activation are diverse, however. They include both direct stimulation
of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase and
PKC1 by second messenger
products of G protein-regulated effectors and less direct activation of
tyrosine kinase and mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. In
yeast, heterotrimeric G proteins regulate members of the p21-activated
protein kinase (PAK) family. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
Ste20p is stimulated by G
subunits (Ste4p/Ste18p) in response to
mating pheromones (1, 2), and in Schizosaccharomyces pombe,
the G
subunit (Gpa1p) is the signal transducer to the Ste20p homolog
Shk1p (3). The PAKs are mammalian homologs of Ste20p and Shk1p that
were initially recognized as kinases that are activated by Rac and
Cdc42, members of the Rho family of monomeric GTP-binding proteins (4).
The PAKs also respond to heterotrimeric G proteins through pathways
that include regulation of both GDP/GTP exchange factors and GAPs for
Rac and Cdc42 (5-7).
Conversely, protein kinases modulate upstream signaling by
heterotrimeric G proteins. Receptors are subject to feedback regulation by second messenger-activated kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (8); G protein-regulated effectors are modulated by phosphorylation (9-12); and in a few cases, G proteins are themselves phosphorylated (13-16). G
z, a sparsely expressed member
of the Gi family, is phosphorylated by PKC both in
platelets and in cells where it has been expressed artificially (13,
17-19). PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation decreases the affinity of
G
z for G
subunits, potentially sensitizing
Gz to activation because G
inhibits GDP/GTP exchange.
Phosphorylation by PKC also desensitizes Gz to the GAP
activity of RGS proteins, which are widely thought to inhibit G protein
signaling (20). PKC may potentiate Gz signaling through
either of these mechanisms.
Gz is found primarily in neurons, platelets, and adrenal
chromaffin cells, and its intracellular localization suggests that it
may regulate formation, transport, or release of secretory granules
(21-25). The ability of PAK1 to cause remodeling of cytoskeletal structures points to a role in regulating processes such as cell motility and secretion, and PAK1 has been implicated directly in the
Fc
receptor-mediated respiratory burst and cytokine secretion (26).
Few natural PAK substrates are known, however; but PAK1 probably
phosphorylates proteins that regulate either cytoskeletal disassembly
or the cytoskeletal elements themselves.
We report here that G
z is phosphorylated specifically at
Ser16 by PAK1, thus inhibiting its interaction with both
G
and RGS proteins. We have used this specificity to distinguish
and delineate the functional consequences of phosphorylation at
Ser27 and Ser16, which we show to be the two
principal substrate sites for PKC. An unexpected outcome is the finding
that G
, which stimulates the PAK homolog Ste20p in
Saccharomyces, inhibits the activity of mammalian PAK1
toward both G
z and other substrates.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Plasmids and cDNA--
Mammalian expression vectors for
full-length PAK1, the constitutively active mutant PAK1-(165-544)
(N-terminal truncation leaving residues 165-544) (27), and G12V Rac1
were prepared in pCMV5M (pCMV5 modified to include a Myc epitope tag
(27)) as described previously (27). The G12V Rac1 mutation was prepared using a QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Stratagene), and the cDNA was
inserted into pCMV5. Mammalian expression vectors for wild-type G
z and its S16A, S25A, S27A, and S16A,S25A mutants were
constructed in pDP5 and were gifts from D. Manning (University of
Pennsylvania) (17). The S16A,S25A,S27P triple mutant was prepared using
the QuikChange kit with the S16A,S27A construct as template.
Recombinant baculoviruses expressing the G
z mutants were
prepared as described previously for wild-type G
z
(28).
Protein Expression and Purification--
Wild-type and mutant
G
and G
subunits, other than G
i1, were
expressed in Sf9 cells and purified as described (28, 29). G
i1 was expressed in Escherichia coli with or
without yeast protein N-myristoyltransferase (30) and
purified as described (31). G
q and G
s
were gifts from S. Mukhopadhyay and T. Kozasa (this department).
Wild-type PAK1 and PAK1-(232-544) were expressed in E. coli
as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins and purified by
glutathione-agarose affinity chromatography (27). To prevent proteolysis, wild-type GST-PAK1 was purified in the presence of 20 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml pepstatin A, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Purified PAK1 and
PAK1-(232-544) were dialyzed against 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH
8.0), 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM benzamidine and stored at
80 °C. The protein kinase TAO1 (32) was a gift from K. Berman (this department), and PKC
was a gift from T. Kozasa (this
department). Purified phosducin (33) was a gift from R. Gaudet and P. Sigler (Yale University).
Protein Kinase Assays and Protein
Phosphorylation--
Phosphorylation of G
z by PKC
was performed exactly as described (28, 29). G
subunits were
phosphorylated by PAK1 at 30 °C for 60 min or the times indicated in
50 mM Hepes (pH 8.0), 10 mM MgCl2,
1 mM dithiothreitol, and 0.5 mM ATP.
Phosphoamino acid analysis and tryptic phosphopeptide mapping of
G
z were performed as described (34). Partial tryptic
proteolysis after protection of phosphorylated G
z by
GTP
S was performed exactly as described (35). Under these
conditions, trypsin cleaves G
z after Arg29
(35). Protein kinase assays using MBP as substrate were performed as
described (36).
In Vivo Phosphorylation--
Human embryonic kidney fibroblasts
(HEK-293 cells) were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. For transfection, cells were
grown in 60-mm culture dishes to ~70% confluence and then
transfected by calcium phosphate precipitation (27). Twenty hours after
transfection, the medium was replaced by Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium without serum, and the cells were incubated for another 24 h. For determination of in vivo phosphorylation of
G
z, transfected cells were washed once with
phosphate-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium and incubated for
2-3 h in phosphate-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium plus
[32P]Pi (0.5 mCi/ml). For harvesting, cells
were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline and scraped into 0.5 ml
of radioimmune precipitation assay buffer (50 mM sodium
Pi (pH 7.2), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM
EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1% sodium deoxycholate, and 1% Nonidet P-40) that contained 0.2% SDS, 80 mM
-glycerophosphate, 0.5 mM
Na3VO4, 50 mM NaF, 20 µg/ml
aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin A. Lysates
were stored at
20 °C. For immunoprecipitation, lysates were
sonicated at 0 °C for 10 s and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min. The supernatants were diluted to 800 µl with
radioimmune precipitation assay buffer that contained 0.2% SDS and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and precleared by passage
through a 0.2-ml column of Sephadex G-25. The precleared lysates were
incubated with 20 µl of protein A-agarose and 10 µg of purified
anti-G
z antibody for 15 h at 4 °C. After
extensive washing with radioimmune precipitation assay buffer that
contained 0.2% SDS, precipitates were solubilized with SDS sample
buffer and analyzed by electrophoresis on 10% polyacrylamide gels
(37). Proteins were transferred to Schleicher & Schüll BA85
nitrocellulose membranes for autoradiography or immunoblotting with
anti-G
z antibody. Autoradiographs and Western blot
images were quantitated with a Molecular Dynamics densitometer and
appropriate standards.
Other Methods--
Gz GAP activity was assayed at
15 °C as described (28). [35S]GTP
S binding was
measured at 30 °C as described. GTP
S-bound G
z was
partially proteolyzed with trypsin as described (35). Antibody against
G
z was raised by injecting rabbits with the N-terminal
peptide GCRQSSEEKEAARRSRR conjugated to hemocyanin. Antibody was
purified from serum by precipitation with
(NH4)2SO4 and, following dialysis,
immunoaffinity chromatography on a column of the immunizing peptide
coupled to CNBr-activated Sepharose CL-4B.
 |
RESULTS |
PAK1 Phosphorylates G
z Selectively at
Ser16--
The protein kinase PAK1 phosphorylated
G
z in vitro, but did not phosphorylate
several other G
subunits tested (Fig.
1). PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation of
G
z was efficient relative to that catalyzed by PKC
,
and the truncated protein PAK1-(232-544) displayed activity similar to
that of the wild-type kinase. We were unable to detect phosphorylation
of G
z by either TAO1 or protein kinase A (data not
shown).

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Phosphorylation of G
subunits by PAK1. Purified recombinant G protein subunits
G s, G i1 (non-myristoylated),
G i1 (myristoylated; i1m),
G i2, G i3, G o, and
G q (1.25 pmol each) and Gz (0.75 pmol) were
incubated with partially purified wild-type GST-PAK1 (~0.1 pmol) and
[ -32P]ATP (3 cpm/fmol) for 60 min at 30 °C as
described under "Experimental Procedures." All G subunits were
expressed in Sf9 cells except for G i1, which was
expressed in E. coli either with (i1m) or
without (i1) coexpression of
N-myristoyltransferase. Samples were resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, silver-stained (Ag;
lower panel), and exposed to x-ray film
(32P; upper panel). Molecular mass
markers (in kilodaltons) are shown on the left. This complete
experiment and a similar experiment using ~0.5 pmol of
PAK1-(232-544) yielded identical results.
|
|
PAK1 phosphorylated G
z within the first 29 amino acid
residues because all 32P was removed by limited tryptic
proteolysis (Fig. 2A), which cleaves after Arg29 (35). Phosphoamino acid analysis of
phosphorylated G
z detected only phosphoserine (data not
shown), consistent with the absence of Thr residues in this region. In
contrast to the site specificity displayed by PAK1, PKC phosphorylated
at least one additional site C-terminal to Gln30, usually
accounting for ~10% of the total incorporation of phosphate (Fig.
2A, lane 12). We then used serine mutants of
G
z to determine the site of PAK1-catalyzed
phosphorylation near the N terminus. PAK1 catalyzed the phosphorylation
of G
z to ~1 mol of phosphate/mol of G
z,
and phosphorylation was blocked completely by mutation of
Ser16 to Ala. Phosphorylation was not diminished by
mutation of either Ser25 or Ser27 (Fig. 2,
B and C). Longer incubation with PAK1 or the use
of more PAK1 did not cause further phosphorylation of G
z
(data not shown). PAK1 thus selectively phosphorylates
Ser16 of G
z.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Determination of phosphorylation sites on
G z. A, tryptic
mapping. G z (20 pmol) was phosphorylated by full-length
PAK1 or PKC as described in the legend to Fig. 1. After adjusting
free [Mg2+] to 1 µM with EDTA, the samples
were incubated for 80 min at 30 °C in binding buffer with or without
0.5 mM GTP S. Samples were then incubated with or without
L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone-treated
trypsin (1%, w/w) for 40 min at 30 °C. Samples (5 pmol for samples
incubated without trypsin and 12.5 pmol with trypsin) were
analyzed by SDS gel electrophoresis, followed by Coomassie Blue
staining (CB; lower panel) and autoradiography
(upper panel). B, phosphorylation of
G z Ser mutants. Purified wild-type (WT; 5 pmol) or mutant (10 pmol) G z was incubated with either
PAK1 or PKC for 60 min at 30 °C as described in the legend to
Fig. 1. Samples were analyzed as described for A. These
experiments (A and B) were performed at least
twice with similar results. C, phosphorylation of wild-type
and Ser mutants of G z. Aliquots (10 pmol) of wild-type
( , ), S16A ( , ), or S27A ( , ) G z were
incubated at 30 °C with 1 pmol of PAK1 ( , , ) or 1 pmol of
PKC ( , , ) and [ -32P]ATP (3000 cpm/pmol)
as described under "Experimental Procedures." Samples were resolved
by SDS gel electrophoresis, and incorporation of 32P was
determined by scintillation counting of Coomassie Blue-stained protein
bands. Each point represents the mean of at least three experiments
where S.D. was <15% of the mean.
|
|
In contrast to PAK1, PKC catalyzed the addition of 2 mol of
phosphate/mol of G
z, and phosphorylation was decreased
by about half when either Ser16 or Ser27 was
mutated (Fig. 2, B and C). Both residues are thus
PKC substrate sites. The time courses of phosphorylation of S16A and
S27A G
z suggest that Ser27 is the
kinetically preferred PKC substrate (Fig. 2C). Such
preference agrees with the conclusion of Lounsbury et al.
(17) that Ser27 is the major phosphorylation site in
transfected 293 cells, although cellular phosphorylation might also be
influenced by selectivity of whatever protein phosphatases naturally
dephosphorylate G
z. We have not attempted to map the
minor, more C-terminal PKC phosphorylation site on
G
z.
To determine whether PAK1 also phosphorylates G
z
in vivo, we expressed G
z in HEK-293 cells and
measured its differential steady-state phosphorylation upon
coexpression with PAK1, with or without the PAK activator G12V Rac1
(Fig. 3). G
z was
phosphorylated by endogenous HEK-293 cell kinases during the 3-h
incubation with [32P]Pi, primarily at one of
the Ser residues near the N terminus. Phosphorylation was slightly
increased by coexpression of wild-type PAK1 and was further increased
when both PAK1 and the constitutively activated G12V mutant of Rac1
were present. It was difficult to quantitate the in vivo
phosphorylation of G
z by PAK1 because an unknown
fraction of Ser16 may already be phosphorylated prior to
addition of 32P and because considerable phosphorylation by
other kinases occurred at Ser27 (Fig. 3A,
lanes 6-8). However, phosphorylation of the S25A,S27P G
z mutant showed that wild-type PAK1 plus G12V Rac1 can
at least double the incorporation of 32P into
Ser16 of G
z and that the activated mutant
PAK1-(165-544) can increase labeling by 50%. For reference,
phosphorylation of G
z by endogenous PKC was monitored by
stimulating the cells with phorbol ester, which increased
phosphorylation of both wild-type and S16A G
z by
~2-2.6-fold (Fig. 3) (17). Phosphorylation of G
z at
sites C-terminal to Arg29 was relatively minor (Fig.
3B, lanes 8-14).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Rac1-stimulated phosphorylation of
G z at Ser16 by PAK1 in
HEK-293 cells. HEK-293 cells were transfected with plasmids that
encode wild-type or mutant G z, wild-type (WT)
PAK1 or PAK1-(165-544), and G12V Rac1 as shown.
[32P]Pi was added to the medium; after 3 h, cells were harvested, and G z was immunoprecipitated
and analyzed by gel electrophoresis as described under "Experimental
Procedures." In some cases,
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA; 0.1 µM) was added 5 min before harvest to stimulate
endogenous PKC. The amount of G z in each
immunoprecipitate was determined by comparing the density of bands in
immunoblots of the immunoprecipitates (A, WB)
with samples of purified G z on the same blot (data not
shown). Incorporation of [32P]Pi was
determined by scintillation counting of radioactivity in each sliced
band. Phosphorylation of G z was quantitated as cpm/pmol
of G z. Similar results were obtained in two other
experiments. HEK-293 cells do not express G z naturally,
although a phosphoprotein of slightly smaller size can sometimes be
detected in G z immunoprecipitates (B,
lane 1).
|
|
Activation of G
z and PAK1-catalyzed
Phosphorylation--
Activation of G
z by
AlF4
had no effect on its
phosphorylation by either PAK1 or PKC (Fig.
4). Activation by GTP
S was also without effect (data not shown). Conversely, neither PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation of MBP or PAK1 autophosphorylation was altered by
G
z when bound to
GDP/AlF4
(Fig. 4), GDP, or GTP
S
(data not shown).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Phosphorylation of
G z or MBP by PAK1 or PKC is
independent of the presence of active or inactive
G z. PKC (0.5 pmol) or
PAK1-(232-544) (2 pmol) was incubated for 20 min at 30 °C under
standard phosphorylation conditions with G z (5 pmol)
and/or MBP (10 pmol), with or without 10 mM NaF and 30 µM AlCl3 (AMF) as indicated.
Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis, Coomassie Blue staining, and
autoradiography. Similar results were obtained with G z
activated with GTP S or with full-length PAK (data not shown).
|
|
Phosphorylation of G
z at Either Ser16 or
Ser27 Inhibits Binding to G
--
To determine
whether PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation of G
z decreases
its affinity for G
, as is true for PKC (18), we monitored the
effect of phosphorylation on the concentration dependence with which
G
inhibits GDP/GTP
S exchange. As shown in Fig.
5A, phosphorylation of
G
z by PAK1 markedly attenuated the ability of G
to
inhibit nucleotide exchange on G
z, but had no effect on
the intrinsic nucleotide exchange rate. This attenuation reflected a
10-20-fold decrease in the affinity of phospho-G
z for
G
(Fig. 5, B and D). PAK1 and PKC inhibited
G
binding equally. Furthermore, phosphorylation of
Ser16 by PAK1 alone (Fig. 5, B and D)
or of Ser27 by PKC in the S16A mutant (Fig. 5C)
decreased G
z-G
affinity equally. Phosphorylation
of both residues by PKC had no greater effect than phosphorylation of
only one or the other. Although mutation of either residue to Ala
itself decreased affinity for G
somewhat (IC50
shifted from ~1 µM to ~2.5 µM in this
and other experiments), the additional decrease caused by
phosphorylation was much greater, ~12-fold in Fig. 5B and
~20-fold in Fig. 5 (C and D) and similar
experiments.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effects of phosphorylation of
G z at Ser16 and/or
Ser27 on its interaction with
G . G z was
phosphorylated by either PAK1 or PKC by incubation at 30 °C for
90 min as described in the legends to Figs. 1 and 2. After adjusting
free [Mg2+] to 1 µM with EDTA, the samples
(2.2 pmol/assay point) were preincubated for 10 min at 0 °C in
binding buffer with or without G . Binding of
[35S]GTP S (20 µM, 1500 cpm/pmol) was
then determined as described (28). A, GTP S binding to
either PAK1-phosphorylated ( , ) or control ( , ) wild-type
G z was measured in the presence ( , ) or absence
( , ) of 100 pmol of G . Each curve was fit to a first-order
reaction scheme, and all four curves share the same value of maximal
GTP S binding. B-D, the rate constants for GTP S
binding to wild-type (WT) G z, S16A
G z, and S27A G z, respectively, were
determined at increasing concentrations of G (shown as the molar
ratio G /G z). G z was either
phosphorylated (closed symbols) or not (open
symbols; no kinase added) as shown. Data are means of duplicate
determination in two or three experiments (n = 4 or
6).
|
|
Phosphorylation of G
z at Ser16 Blocks
the GAP Activity of RGS Proteins--
Phosphorylation of
G
z by PKC blocks the GAP activity of RGS proteins (29,
38). Selective phosphorylation of Ser16 by PAK1 also
substantially inhibited the GAP activities of both RGSZ1 and RGS4 (Fig.
6 and Table
I). RGS4 was inhibited by >96%. RGSZ1
was inhibited by ~60-80% under the conditions shown. Gz GAP purified from bovine brain, which contains RGSZ1 and at least one
other member of the RGSZ subfamily (29), was inhibited to the same
extent as was recombinant RGSZ1 (data not shown). Inhibition of GAP
activity by G
z phosphorylation is caused by an increase in Km, which probably indicates a decrease in
affinity (29). Fractional inhibition will therefore vary with the
concentration of phospho-G
z relative to its
Km, and the greater fractional inhibition of RGS4
thus reflects its lower affinity for GTP-bound G
z.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Interactive effects of phosphorylation or
mutation at Ser16 and Ser27 and of
G on GAP-stimulated hydrolysis
of G z-bound GTP. Samples of wild-type
(WT) or mutant G z were phosphorylated by
either PAK1 or PKC as described in the legend to Fig. 2C,
presumably to nearly stoichiometric incorporation of phosphate at
Ser16 and/or Ser27. Control
(non-phosphorylated) samples were treated identically, except that
protein kinase was omitted. Samples were then bound to
[ -32P]GTP, and hydrolysis of G z-bound
GTP (2 nM) stimulated by 50 pM RGSZ1 was
measured as described (28) at increasing concentrations of G .
Data represent increases in the first-order hydrolytic rate constant
kapp (28) relative to the basal rate observed in
the absence of GAP or G . Data points are means of 20 ( , ),
8 ( , ), or 4 ( , ) determinations in which S.D. was <15%
of the mean. Basal GTP hydrolysis rates for each protein and
GAP-stimulated rates from similar experiments are summarized in Table
I.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table I
Modulation of the Gz GAP activity of RGS proteins by G
and by PAK1- or PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation of G z
The rates of hydrolysis of wild-type and mutant GTP-bound G z
(~2 nM in all experiments) were measured either without
GAP or in the presence of 50 pM RGSZ1 or 750 pM
RGS4. G z was phosphorylated by PAK1 or PKC as shown.
Assays also contained 2.5 µM G 1 2
where shown. Observed hydrolysis rate constants,
kapp (28), are means ± S.D. from 4 to 20 determinations.
|
|
Because PAK1 phosphorylates Ser16 exclusively and
PAK-catalyzed phosphorylation inhibits responses to GAPs as much as
does phosphorylation of both Ser16 and Ser27 by
PKC, phosphorylation of Ser16 can account for the
inhibitory effect of PKC on GAP activity. Phosphorylation of
Ser27 in S16A G
z had no effect on its
sensitivity to either GAP. Thus, PAK1 will be just as efficacious an
inhibitor of the RGSZ family of Gz GAPs as is PKC.
Addition of G
to phosphorylated G
z had little
further inhibitory effect on GAP activity (Fig. 5). The slight
inhibition that was observed occurred primarily below 200 nM G
, well below the Kd of
phospho-G
z for G
. Residual inhibition by G
probably reflects effects on the small fraction of G
z
that was not phosphorylated during incubation with kinase.
In addition to blocking phosphorylation, mutation of either
Ser16 or Ser27 to Ala also inhibited the
intrinsic sensitivity of G
z to GAP activity (Fig. 6 and
Table I). Sensitivity of non-phosphorylated S16A G
z to
either RGSZ1 or RGS4 was equivalent to that of
phospho-Ser16 G
z and was not further altered
by phosphorylation of Ser27. S27A G
z was
more sensitive to GAP activity than was S16A G
z, but was
still a far worse GAP substrate than wild-type G
z. It was striking that PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation at Ser27 in
the S16A mutant reproducibly increased its sensitivity to GAPs.
Although this effect was relatively small, it was a consistent finding
in multiple experiments. The small inhibitory effect of G
on the
sensitivity of mutated or phosphorylated G
z to GAPs was
similarly reproducible.
The intrinsic rates at which S16A and S27A G
z hydrolyzed
bound GTP were diminished in comparison to the wild type, by ~15 and
25% respectively (Table I). Proteolysis of the N-terminal 29 amino
acid residues of G
z provided a control to show that the
effects of mutation or phosphorylation of Ser16 and
Ser27 are local. Limited tryptic proteolysis increased the
khydrol for each of these proteins to ~0.022
min
1 (data not shown), the value characteristic of the
proteolyzed wild-type, non-phosphorylated protein (35).
G
Inhibits the Protein Kinase Activity of PAK1--
During
the course of the experiments described above, we noticed that G
reproducibly inhibited the protein kinase activity of PAK1-(232-544)
(Fig. 7A). Inhibition was
detectable by 80 nM and was half-maximal at ~200
nM, well within the range of concentrations over which
other regulatory actions of G
have been described (39). Similar
results were obtained with full-length, wild-type PAK1 both before and
after removal of the fused GST domain (data not shown). The buffer used
to store G
had no effect on PAK1 activity (Fig. 7A).
G
also inhibited the ability of PAK1 to phosphorylate either MBP
(Fig. 7) or MEK1 (data not shown). G
thus appears to inhibit PAK
directly rather than simply binding the G
z substrate and
blocking access to the kinase. The inhibitory activity of G
was
relatively specific for PAK. It had no effect on the protein kinase
activities of either protein kinase A or TAO1 in two separate
experiments and inhibited PKC insignificantly (10-15% at the highest
concentrations tested).

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
G
inhibits the protein kinase activity of PAK1. A,
PAK1-(232-544) (250 nM) was incubated for 60 min under
standard phosphorylation conditions with either 150 nM
G z or 200 nM MBP and decreasing
concentrations of G as indicated by the wedges (2300, 760, 250, 83, 28, and 9 nM). Similar results were obtained
in 12 experiments, and the identical result was obtained using GST-PAK1
instead of PAK1-(232-544). A constant amount of G storage buffer
was added to all reactions. B, inhibition of the kinase
activity of PAK1 by G was not blocked by formation of a
heterotrimer with G i1. PAK1-(232-544) (0.25 µM) was incubated with 0.2 µM MBP, 1.25 µM G (except lane 1), and different
concentrations of GDP-bound myristoylated G i1 for 60 min
under standard conditions. The concentrations of G i1
were 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.313, 0.151, 0.075, and 0 µM
as indicated by the wedge. Under similar conditions,
GDP-bound G q (up to 0.31 µM; data not
shown) and phosducin (up to 6.7 µM) also had no effect on
MBP phosphorylation in the presence or absence of G . A
and B show autoradiograms of polyacrylamide gels of
phosphorylation reaction mixtures.
|
|
G
slightly but reproducibly stimulated PAK1 autophosphorylation
in the presence or absence of added substrate (example in Fig.
7A), indicating that G
binds directly to PAK1 to alter its function. In yeast, G
also binds (and stimulates) the PAK homolog Ste20p directly (1, 2), and its stimulatory activity is blocked
by binding to G
. Surprisingly, G
was a potent inhibitor of
PAK1 protein kinase activity both when free or when complexed as a
heterotrimer with GDP-bound G
z or G
i
(Fig. 7, A and B) or G
q (data not
shown). Addition of the G
-binding protein phosducin (up to 6.7 µM) also failed to reverse inhibition by G
(Fig. 7B).
 |
DISCUSSION |
Mammalian PAKs were discovered as effectors of the small G
proteins Rac and Cdc42, although the yeast homolog Ste20p was first identified as a protein kinase activated by G
. Our current
findings now indicate that PAKs function both upstream and downstream
of heterotrimeric G proteins in animal cell signaling pathways. First, PAK1-catalyzed phosphorylation potentiates Gz activation by
inhibiting the GAP activity of RGS proteins, including the RGSZ
subfamily of Gz-selective GAPs. Second, phosphorylation of
G
z decreases its affinity for G
subunits and thus
attenuates the inhibitory effects of G
on Gz
activation. The net result is a two-pronged potentiation of
Gz signaling by PAK. The reduced affinity of
phospho-G
z for G
will promote G
release and
might thereby potentiate G
signaling, but G
z is
expressed at such low levels that it may release too little G
to
have significant impact on intracellular signaling.
Several lines of evidence are consistent with the hypothesis that PAK
phosphorylates G
z under physiological conditions in cells. In vitro, PAK1-phosphorylated purified
G
z to a stoichiometry of 1 mol of phosphate/mol of
G
z. The rate of phosphorylation was also reasonably fast
in comparison with PKC, which phosphorylates G
z in
platelets stimulated by either thrombin or phorbol ester (13, 19).
Phosphorylation of G
z in HEK-293 cells was increased by
expression of constitutively active PAK1 or of wild-type PAK1 and its
activator Rac. PAK1-driven incorporation of 32P into
G
z was of the same order as that catalyzed by PKC in
response to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate despite the
fact that PKC phosphorylates G
z on two sites rather than
one. Finally, phosphorylation of G
z by PAK is associated
with altered function of the protein as discussed more fully below. We
conclude that stimulation of PAKs, via the activation of either Rac or
Cdc42, provides a novel means of potentiating the cellular function of Gz.
PAK1 displays marked selectivity for G
z relative to
other G
subunits and for Ser16 relative to other
potential phosphorylation sites in Gz. Selectivity for
Ser16 allowed us to delineate the individual contributions
of phosphorylation of Ser16 and Ser27 to
regulation of G
z in a manner not possible using
mutagenesis. Phosphorylation of Ser16 was both sufficient
and necessary to decrease sensitivity to the GAP activity of RGS
proteins (Fig. 6 and Table I). It was also sufficient to decrease
affinity for G
. PKC-catalyzed phosphorylation of
Ser27 in the S16A mutant also decreased affinity for
G
. On the other hand, phosphorylation of both residues in
wild-type G
z had no more effect than phosphorylation of
Ser16 alone. These data confirm the idea that the extreme
N-terminal helix of G
subunits is crucial for interaction with RGS
proteins (29, 35), despite the fact that this interaction was not
observed in the crystal structure of the G
i1-RGS4
complex (40).
The ability of G
subunits to inhibit the protein kinase activity
of PAK1 is provocative for two reasons. First, it suggests that the
PAKs may be a new family of heterotrimeric G protein-regulated effectors. Inhibition of PAK1 by G
was nearly complete, was effective with multiple protein substrates, and occurred over a
physiological range of G
concentrations. Second, PAK inhibition by G
extends the pattern of G protein regulation of the PAK family that was established in yeast. However, whereas Shk1p is activated, perhaps indirectly, by G
in S. pombe and
Ste20p is directly activated by G
in S. cerevisiae,
PAK1 is directly inhibited by mammalian G
. The ability of G
to regulate PAK1-(232-544) also indicates that the G
-binding
site on PAK is unrelated to the binding site for Rac and Cdc42, which
lies near the PAK N terminus (41). A tantalizing possibility is that
mammalian G proteins may regulate PAKs through multiple mechanisms.
Inhibition of PAK by G
in vitro fulfilled most
criteria for physiological validity, so it was initially puzzling that
inhibition was not blocked either by GDP-bound G
i or by
phosducin. However, yeast G
binds Ste20p through the N-terminal
helix of G
(2, 42), which is not occluded in the phosducin-G
complex (33). Whereas the N-terminal helix of G
makes extensive
contact with G
(43, 44), the face of the helix that binds PAK may
remain accessible in some conformations of the G
-G
heterotrimer. Contact sites for other G
-regulated effectors
cluster on the face of the G
torus rather than near its N terminus
(45) and are thus fully blocked by G
. It should be possible to use
such structural information to evaluate the biological relevance of PAK
inhibition by G
in cells where PAK activity can be monitored in
response to receptor-regulated G
release.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Jimmy Woodson and Steven Stippec for
excellent technical assistance, David Manning for the plasmids that
encode mutant forms of G
z, Kevin Berman for TAO1, Tohru
Kozasa for PKC
, and Rachel Gaudet and Paul Sigler for phosducin.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported in part by National Institutes of
Health Grants GM30355, GM53032, and GM16926 and Robert A. Welch Foundation Grant I-0982.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Present address: Molecumetics, Inc., 2023 120th Ave. N. E.,
Bellevue, WA 98005-2199.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines
Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9041. Tel.: 214-648-8717; Fax: 214-648-2994; E-mail: ross@utsw.swmed.edu.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
PKC, protein kinase
C;
PAK, p21-activated protein kinase;
GAP, GTPase-activating protein;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
GTP
S, guanosine
5'-O-thiotriphosphate;
MBP, myelin basic protein;
MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase
kinase.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Leberer, E.,
Wu, C.,
Leeuw, T.,
Fourest-Lieuvin, A.,
Segall, J. E.,
and Thomas, D. Y.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
83-97[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Leeuw, T.,
Wu, C.,
Schrag, J. D.,
Whiteway, M.,
Thomas, D. Y.,
and Leberer, E.
(1998)
Nature
391,
191-195[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Xu, H. P.,
White, M.,
Marcus, S.,
and Wigler, M.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
50-58[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Lim, L.,
Manser, E.,
Leung, T.,
and Hall, C.
(1996)
Eur. J. Biochem.
242,
171-185[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Manser, E.,
Loo, T. H.,
Koh, C. G.,
Zhao, Z.-S.,
Chen, Q.,
Tan, L.,
Tan, I.,
Leung, T.,
and Lim, L.
(1998)
Molec. Cell
1,
183-192[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Obermeier, A.,
Ahmed, S.,
Manser, E.,
Yen, S. C.,
Hall, C.,
and Lim, L.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
4328-4339[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Bagrodia, S.,
Taylor, S. J.,
Jordon, K. A.,
Van Aelst, L.,
and Cerione, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23633-23636[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Pitcher, J. A.,
Freedman, N. J.,
and Lefkowitz, R. J.
(1998)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
67,
653-692[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Filtz, T. M.,
Cunningham, M. L.,
Stanig, K. J.,
Paterson, A.,
and Harden, T. K.
(1999)
Biochem. J.
338,
257-264
|
| 10.
|
Yue, C.,
Dodge, K. L.,
Weber, G.,
and Sanborn, B. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
18023-18027[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 11.
|
Ishikawa, Y.
(1998)
Adv. Second Messenger Phosphoprotein Res.
32,
99-120[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Sunahara, R. K.,
Dessauer, C. W.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
36,
461-480[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Lounsbury, K. M.,
Casey, P. J.,
Brass, L. F.,
and Manning, D. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22051-22056[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Kozasa, T.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
12562-12567[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 15.
|
Aragay, A. M.,
and Quick, M. W.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
4807-4815[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 16.
|
Katada, T.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Watanabe, Y.,
Bauer, S.,
and Jakobs, K. H.
(1985)
Eur. J. Biochem.
151,
431-437[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Lounsbury, K. M.,
Schlegel, B.,
Poncz, M.,
Brass, L. F.,
and Manning, D. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
3494-3498[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 18.
|
Fields, T. A.,
and Casey, P. J.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
23119-23125[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 19.
|
Carlson, K. E.,
Brass, L. F.,
and Manning, D. R.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13298-13305[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 20.
|
Berman, D. M.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
1269-1272[Free Full Text]
|
| 21.
|
Matsuoka, M.,
Itoh, H.,
Kozasa, T.,
and Kaziro, Y.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
5384-5388[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Fong, H. K. W.,
Yoshimoto, K. K.,
Eversole-Cire, P.,
and Simon, M. I.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
3066-3070[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Garibay, J. L. R.,
Kozasa, T.,
Itoh, H.,
Tsukamoto, T.,
Matsuoka, M.,
and Kaziro, Y.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1094,
193-199[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Casey, P. J.,
Fong, H. K. W.,
Simon, M. I.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
2383-2390[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 25.
|
Hinton, D. R.,
Blanks, J. C.,
Fong, H. K. W.,
Casey, P. J.,
Hildebrandt, E.,
and Simons, M. I.
(1990)
J. Neurosci.
10,
2763-2770[Abstract]
|
| 26.
|
Izadi, K. D.,
Erdreich-Epstein, A.,
Liu, Y.,
and Durden, D. L.
(1998)
Exper. Cell Res.
245,
330-342[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 27.
|
Frost, J. A.,
Steen, H.,
Shapiro, P.,
Lewis, T.,
Ahn, N.,
Shaw, P. E.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
6426-6438[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Wang, J.,
Tu, Y.,
Woodson, J.,
Song, X.,
and Ross, E. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
5732-5740[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Wang, J.,
Ducret, A.,
Tu, Y.,
Kozasa, T.,
Aebersold, R.,
and Ross, E. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26014-26025[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 30.
|
Mumby, S. M.,
and Linder, M. E.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
237,
254-268[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Kozasa, T.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1734-1741[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 32.
|
Hutchison, M.,
Berman, K. S.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28625-28632[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 33.
|
Gaudet, R.,
Bohm, A.,
and Sigler, P. B.
(1996)
Cell
87,
577-588[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 34.
|
Boyle, W. J.,
van der Geer, P.,
and Hunter, T.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
201,
110-149[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 35.
|
Tu, Y.,
Wang, J.,
and Ross, E. M.
(1997)
Science
278,
1132-1135[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 36.
|
Frost, J. A.,
Khokhlatchev, A.,
Stippec, S.,
White, M. A.,
and Cobb, M. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
28191-28198[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 37.
|
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 38.
|
Glick, J. L.,
Meigs, T. E.,
Miron, A.,
and Casey, P. J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26008-26013[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 39.
|
Clapham, D. E.,
and Neer, E. J.
(1997)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
37,
167-203[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 40.
|
Tesmer, J. J. G.,
Berman, D. M.,
Gilman, A. G.,
and Sprang, S. R.
(1997)
Cell
89,
251-261[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 41.
|
Burbelo, P. D.,
Drechsel, D.,
and Hall, A.
|