![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 44, 31693-31699, October 29, 1999
§¶,
§,
, and
**
From the
Cellular Biochemistry and Biophysics
Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, New York 10021 and
Respiratory and
Inflammation Research, AstraZeueca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park,
Macclesfield, Cheshire SK 10 4TG, United Kingdom
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Metalloprotease disintegrins (a
disintegrin and metalloprotease
(ADAM) and metalloprotease, disintegrin,
cysteine-rich proteins (MDC)) are a family of
membrane-anchored glycoproteins that function in diverse biological
processes, including fertilization, neurogenesis, myogenesis, and
ectodomain processing of cytokines and other proteins. The cytoplasmic
domains of ADAMs often include putative signaling motifs, such as
proline-rich SH3 ligand domains, suggesting that interactions with
cytoplasmic proteins may affect metalloprotease disintegrin function.
Here we report that two SH3 domain-containing proteins, endophilin
I (SH3GL2, SH3p4) and a novel SH3 domain- and
phox homology (PX) domain-containing protein,
termed SH3PX1, can interact with the cytoplasmic domains of the
metalloprotease disintegrins MDC9 and MDC15. These interactions were
initially identified in a yeast two-hybrid screen and then confirmed
using bacterial fusion proteins and co-immunoprecipitations from
eukaryotic cells expressing both binding partners. SH3PX1 and
endophilin I both preferentially bind the precursor but not the
processed form of MDC9 and MDC15 in COS-7 cells. Since rat endophilin I is thought to play a role in synaptic vesicle endocytosis and SH3PX1
has sequence similarity to sorting nexins in yeast, we propose that
endophilin I and SH3PX1 may have a role in regulating the function of
MDC9 and MDC15 by influencing their intracellular processing,
transport, or final subcellular localization.
Metalloprotease disintegrins (also referred to as
ADAMs,1 a
disintegrin and metalloprotease, or
MDC proteins, metalloprotease, disintegrin,
cysteine-rich proteins) are a family of glycoproteins related to snake venom metalloproteases and integrin ligands (1-3). They are composed of several domains including a pro-domain, a metalloprotease domain, a disintegrin domain, a cysteine-rich region,
and in most cases a membrane-spanning region and cytoplasmic tail.
Metalloprotease disintegrins have been shown to play a role in
fertilization (4-8), muscle cell binding and fusion (9), shedding of
tumor necrosis factor Currently 28 ADAMs have been identified, 15 of which contain a
catalytic zinc-binding consensus sequence (HEXXH) (3, 21). Four of these ADAMs have been shown to be catalytically active metalloproteases (MADM/Kuz/ADAM 10 (22); tumor necrosis factor Several ADAMs contain cytoplasmic signaling motifs, including
proline-rich regions that resemble Src homology 3 (SH3) ligand domains
(36, 37, 40, 41). The proline-rich region of the cytoplasmic tail of
MDC9 has been shown to bind to the SH3 domain of Src in
vitro in a blot overlay assay but not to the SH3 domain of the
related oncogene abl (40). The presence of SH3 ligand domains in the cytoplasmic domains of MDC9, TACE, MDC15, meltrin- Several lines of evidence suggest that the cytoplasmic domain of
metalloprotease disintegrins may have a role in regulating their
function. Overexpression of the cytoplasmic tail of MDC9 in Vero cells
blocks the phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced shedding of HB-EGF
(20). Also protein kinase C To elucidate the function of ADAM cytoplasmic domains, we have sought
to identify proteins that interact with the widely expressed MDC9 (40)
and MDC15 (36, 37, 42), both of which contain cytoplasmic proline-rich
SH3 ligand domains. By using a yeast two-hybrid screen, we identified
two SH3 domain-containing proteins that are able to interact with both
MDC9 and MDC15 but not with ADAM10, meltrin- Reagents--
Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, and
Taq DNA polymerase were obtained from Roche Molecular
Biochemicals. [32P]dCTP was purchased from NEN Life
Science Products. Reagents were obtained from Sigma unless stated otherwise.
Plasmids--
Constructs encoding the cytoplasmic domain of
either human MDC9 or human MDC15 fused in frame with the GAL4
DNA-binding domain were prepared as follows. The cytoplasmic domains
were amplified from cDNA by PCR using primers designed to give a 5'
EcoRI site and a 3' SalI site downstream of a
stop codon. The resulting PCR products were digested with
EcoRI and SalI and ligated into the corresponding
sites of the pGBT9 vector (CLONTECH). The same
approach was used to generate the appropriate cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants for MDC9 or MDC15. Constructs encoding GAL4 fusions with the
cytoplasmic domain of mouse meltrin- Yeast Two-hybrid Screen and Isolation of cDNA Clones from a Northern Blot--
The mRNA transcription pattern of SH3PX1
was determined by probing a human multiple tissue Northern blot
(CLONTECH) with a random-primed
32P-labeled probe corresponding to the 1.9-kilobase pair
EcoRI/XhoI fragment from pGADGH/K-9. Blots were
prehybridized and hybridized using ExpressHyb
(CLONTECH) following the ExpressHyb protocol. The
human Bacterial Fusion Protein Production--
Plasmids encoding GST
fusion proteins or HIS/T7 fusion proteins were used to transform
E. coli BL21 (DE3). Fusion protein expression was induced
using isopropyl- Antibody Production--
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies against
the cytoplasmic domains of mouse MDC9 and mouse and human MDC15 have
been described previously (36, 40, 42). Anti-SH3PX1 rabbit polyclonal
antibodies were raised against a GST fusion protein with amino acids
6-595 of SH3PX1, prepared by ligating the
EcoRI/XhoI inserts from pGADGH yeast two-hybrid
positive K-9 into the EcoRI and XhoI sites of pGEX/4T-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The GST fusion protein was
purified from E. coli using a previously described protocol (40). Female New Zealand White rabbits were immunized with the purified
fusion proteins in phosphate-buffered saline according to established
protocols (50).
Western Blot Analysis--
Proteins were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to
nitrocellulose (Schleicher & Schuell) as described (51). After blocking
in 5% reconstituted dry milk (Carnation) and incubation with primary
antibodies, bound primary antibodies were detected using horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Promega) and the enhanced
chemiluminescence detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Transient Transfection of COS-7 Cells and
Co-immunoprecipitation--
COS-7 cells at approximately 50%
confluence were transfected using LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies,
Inc.) and cultured for 48 h. Cells were washed in
phosphate-buffered saline, lysed in cell lysis buffer (Tris-buffered
saline containing 0.5% v/v Nonidet P-40, 1 mM
Ca2+, and 1 mM Mg2+), and the
lysate was cleared by centrifugation (14,000 × g, 15 min, 4 °C). Co-immunoprecipitations were performed using lysates prepared from cells co-transfected with FLAG-tag fusion protein constructs and full-length mouse MDC9 or mouse MDC15 constructs in
pcDNA 3. FLAG-tagged proteins were immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibodies and protein G-Sepharose beads (Sigma). Beads were washed in cell lysis buffer, and bound proteins were eluted by boiling in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample
loading buffer containing 10 mM dithiothreitol. In these experiments, mouse MDC9 was used because it is expressed at higher levels in COS-7 cells than its human homologue (data not shown). Furthermore, mouse MDC15 was used because it is processed to its mature
form by COS-7 cells more efficiently than the human form (data not
shown). Separate experiments confirmed that mouse GST-MDC9 and mouse
GST-MDC15 were both able to bind to bacterially expressed endophilin I
and SH3PX1 (data not shown).
Interaction of MDC9 and MDC15 GST-Cytoplasmic Tails with
Endophilin I and SH3PX1 Fusion Proteins in Vitro--
His/T7-tagged
endophilin I and SH3PX1 fusion proteins were expressed in E. coli. Bacterial cell lysates were prepared as described above. GST
alone as a control or GST fusion proteins with the cytoplasmic domain
of MDC9 or MDC15 were captured on glutathione-Sepharose beads, added to
the bacterial cell lysate with either the His/T7-tagged endophilin I or
SH3PX1 fusion proteins, and incubated at 4 °C for 2 h. The
beads were washed with lysis buffer. Bound proteins were eluted by
heating to 95 °C in SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis sample
loading buffer containing 10 mM dithiothreitol for 5 min, separated on 10% w/v SDS-polyacrylamide gels, blotted onto
nitrocellulose, and detected by Western blot with an anti-T7 monoclonal
antibody (Novagen).
Identification of Cytoplasmic Proteins That Interact with MDC9 and
MDC15 by Yeast Two-hybrid--
To identify proteins that interact with
the cytoplasmic domains of human MDC9 and human MDC15, 6 × 106 clones of a HeLa cDNA library were screened by
yeast two-hybrid using the MDC9 or MDC15 cytoplasmic domains as bait
constructs. Growth under nutritional selection and production of
In order to determine the specificity of the observed interactions, we
tested whether K-60 or K-9 could interact with the cytoplasmic domains
of other metalloprotease disintegrins using the yeast two-hybrid
system. Nutritional selection (Fig.
1A) indicated that K-60 and
K-9 both interact with the cytoplasmic tails of MDC9, MDC15,
meltrin- cDNA Cloning, Sequencing, and Analysis of the Expression
Patterns of K-60 and K-9--
Sequence analysis showed that K-60 is
identical to amino acids 23-352 of Src homology 3-containing Grb2-like
protein transcript 2 (SH3GL2). Because SH3GL2 is apparently a human
orthologue of mouse endophilin I (SH3p4) we will refer to it as
endophilin I hereafter (52, 53). Endophilin I is a 40-kDa protein that is composed of 352 amino acid residues and includes an SH3 domain resembling that of the adaptor protein Grb2 and a coiled-coil domain
(43). Neither the cDNA sequence of the yeast two-hybrid clone K-9
nor its deduced protein sequence was identical to any other full-length
sequence in the current GenBankTM data base, although
several ESTs and one partial clone corresponding to this sequence were
noted. To identify the full-length cDNA corresponding to the K-9
insert, several positive clones were isolated from an MDA-MB-468
Northern blot analysis showed that SH3PX1 is widely expressed with
transcript sizes of 4.4 and 3.1 kilobases (Fig. 2D). It remains to be determined whether these two transcripts represent splice
variants of SH3PX1 or highly related genes. Highest transcription levels were observed in heart and placenta, whereas relatively low
levels of expression were found in thymus and peripheral blood leukocytes.
Polyclonal antibodies raised against a GST-SH3PX1 fusion protein
recognized proteins of approximately 57 and 78 kDa in HeLa, COS-7, and
293 (a transformed primary human embryonal kidney cell line) cell
lysates (Fig. 3). Transfection of COS-7
cells with full-length SH3PX1 in pcDNA 3 resulted in an increase in
the amount of 57- and 78-kDa proteins (Fig. 3), whereas preimmune serum
did not recognize either of these proteins.
Distinct Proline-rich Sequences in the Cytoplasmic Domains of MDC9
and MDC15 Are Required for the Interaction with Endophilin I Versus
SH3PX1--
The cytoplasmic domains of MDC9 and MDC15 both contain two
proline-rich regions that are predicted to serve as ligands for SH3
domains (Fig. 4A) (36, 37, 40,
42). The sequences within the cytoplasmic tails of MDC9 and MDC15 that
are sufficient for interactions with endophilin I and SH3PX1 were
defined using specific cytoplasmic tail deletion mutants in a yeast
two-hybrid assay. Interactions were scored by nutritional selection and
Binding of endophilin I to MDC9 and MDC15 was mapped to constructs
containing the N-terminal proline-rich region (amino acid residues
785-800 of MDC9 and amino acid residues 758-786 of MDC15; Fig. 4,
A and B). In contrast, SH3PX1 required the
C-terminal proline-rich region for interaction with the MDC9 or MDC15
cytoplasmic tails (amino acid residues 800-819 of MDC9, and amino acid
residues 787-814 of MDC15; Fig. 4, A and B).
To corroborate further the associations observed by yeast two-hybrid,
an in vitro assay for interactions of the binding partners expressed in E. coli was performed. GST or GST fusion
proteins with the MDC9 or MDC15 cytoplasmic tail were immobilized on
glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads and used to capture His/T7-tagged
endophilin I or SH3PX1 fusion proteins. Fig.
5 shows that GST fusion proteins with the cytoplasmic domain of MDC9 or MDC15 were able to bind bacterially expressed His/T7-tagged endophilin I or SH3PX1 fusion proteins, whereas
the GST control protein was not. Similar results were obtained when
GST-MDC9 or GST-MDC15 fusion proteins were used to capture FLAG-tagged
SH3PX1 or endophilin I from lysates of transiently transfected COS-7
cells (data not shown).
Interaction of SH3PX1 and Endophilin I with MDC9 and MDC15 in
Eukaryotic Cells--
To examine whether SH3PX1 and endophilin I can
interact with MDC9 and MDC15 in eukaryotic cells, FLAG fusion proteins
with endophilin I or SH3PX1, or a FLAG control, were co-expressed with mouse MDC9 or mouse MDC15 in COS-7 cells. FLAG-tagged proteins were
immunoprecipitated from cell lysates using an anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody, and co-immunoprecipitated MDC9 or MDC15 was detected using
antibodies against their cytoplasmic domains. Both MDC9 and MDC15
co-immunoprecipitated with FLAG-SH3PX1 and with FLAG-endophilin I from
eukaryotic cells but not with FLAG controls (Fig.
6, A and B).
Interestingly, both SH3PX1 and endophilin I associated predominantly
with the pro-forms of MDC9 and MDC15, although the majority of
detectable MDC9 and MDC15 in COS-7 cells is present in its mature form.
The pro-forms of MDC9 and MDC15 still possess the pro-domains, which is
thought to keep the protease inactive via a cysteine-switch mechanism
(25, 42, 55) at least until the pro-domain is removed by a furin-type
pro-protein convertase in the trans-Golgi network.
The cytoplasmic tails of several metalloprotease disintegrins,
including MDC9 and MDC15, contain proline-rich regions that are
proposed to function as SH3 ligand domains (36, 37, 40, 41). In this
study, we identified two SH3 domain-containing proteins, endophilin I
and the novel SH3PX1, as binding partners of MDC9 and MDC15. In both
cases, the interactions were initially identified by yeast two-hybrid
and then shown to be direct and specific using bacterially expressed
proteins and by co-immunoprecipitation from COS-7 cells overexpressing
both binding partners. Since rat endophilin I has been implicated in
endocytosis and SH3PX1 contains a combination of domains that are
implicated in intracellular protein trafficking or movement (see
below), these proteins may also have a role in regulating the
subcellular localization or function of MDC9 or MDC15.
Endophilin I (which is also referred to as SH3GL2 or SH3p4) contains a
Grb2-like SH3 domain and a coiled-coil domain. Endophilin I is
expressed at highest levels in brain, but it is also expressed at lower
levels in other tissues (43). In contrast, MDC9 and MDC15 are both
widely expressed (36, 40). However, endophilin I belongs to a gene
family with two other highly related members, one of which (endophilin
II, SH3GL1, or SH3p8) is expressed ubiquitously, whereas the other
(endophilin III, SH3GL3, or SH3p13) is expressed mainly in the brain,
thymus, and testis (43). Since the SH3 domains of endophilins I, II,
and III are highly conserved and can all bind to the SH3-ligand domain
of synaptojanin, it will be interesting to determine whether
endophilins II and III are also capable of interacting with MDC9 and/or
MDC15. Thus, although endophilin I has a relatively specific expression
pattern, the widely expressed MDC9 and MDC15 may be able to interact
with different forms of endophilin in different tissues. Rat endophilin
I binds synaptojanin, amphiphysin (I and II), and dynamin at synaptic termini (43, 44, 53, 56) and may regulate synaptic membrane retrieval
by its ability to compete with amphiphysin and dynamin for binding to
synaptojanin (56). The finding that human endophilin I can interact
with MDC9 and MDC15 raises the possibility that members of the
endophilin protein family may have several distinct binding partners
and functions. Consistent with this idea, endophilin III/SH3GL3 was
recently reported to bind to the Huntington's disease protein
Huntingtin and to promote the formation of polyglutamine-containing aggregates (57).
Since endophilin I has only one SH3 domain, it should be able to
interact with one SH3 ligand domain at a time. However, endophilins I,
II, and III also contain N-terminal coiled-coil domains. Coiled-coils are amphipathic helixes that mediate protein-protein interactions and
are also found in the SNAREs and other proteins with roles in
intracellular membrane fusion and/or intracellular protein transport
(58-60). These coiled-coil regions could either allow dimers between
endophilin proteins to form or could link endophilins to other proteins
containing coiled-coil domains. Thus, if endophilin can homo- or
heterodimerize via its coiled-coil domain, one could envision a
function in linking MDC9 or MDC15 to proteins with a role in
endocytosis or to other proteins that could regulate the subcellular
localization or function of MDC9 and MDC15.
SH3PX1, the second protein found to interact with both MDC9 and MDC15,
contains an N-terminal SH3 domain and a PX domain (45) in addition to a
short C-terminal coiled-coil domain. The N-terminal part of SH3PX1,
including the SH3 domain, is identical to a partial human cDNA
isolated from activated T-cells as a binding partner of the Wiskott
Aldrich Syndrome Protein (GenBankTM accession number
AF001629). PX domains are found in proteins with quite distinct
functions, including the sorting nexins, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases, and NADPH oxidase subunits (45, 61). Some PX
domain-containing proteins appear to regulate the subcellular
localization of other proteins or protein complexes (62, 63). PX
domains contain proline-rich sequences that may themselves interact
with SH3 or WW domains (45). Since SH3PX1 interacts with MDC9 and MDC15 via a fragment containing its SH3 domain (residues 1-160, data not
shown), its coiled-coil domain and the PX domain should both be free to
interact with other cytoplasmic binding partners. Thus SH3PX1 and
endophilin I may function as adaptor proteins that could regulate the
assembly of cytoplasmic protein complexes that include MDC9 and/or
MDC15. Furthermore, any one MDC9 or MDC15 molecule may be in contact
with endophilin I and SH3PX1 simultaneously since each of these SH3
domain proteins binds a separate SH3 ligand domain in MDC9 and MDC15.
MDC9 and MDC15 are both made as larger precursors that are processed by
a furin-type pro-protein convertase in the trans-Golgi network (25, 40,
42). This removes the N-terminal pro-domain, which has a role in
protein folding and keeps the protease inactive via a cysteine-switch
mechanism (25, 42, 55). Removal of the pro-domain is therefore thought
to be a prerequisite for protease activity. The observation that both
endophilin I and SH3PX1 preferentially bind to the pro-form of MDC9 and
MDC15, rather than the mature form, suggests that this interaction
occurs in a secretory pathway compartment prior to the medial Golgi.
Endophilin I and SH3PX1 may thus have a role in regulating transit of
MDC9 and MDC15 through the Golgi apparatus or in some other aspect of
the maturation or sorting of MDC9 and MDC15.
This study is the first to demonstrate an interaction between a
recombinantly expressed metalloprotease disintegrin and SH3 domain-containing cytoplasmic proteins in cells. One possible consequence of an interaction between MDC9 or MDC15 and endophilin I
and/or SH3PX1 could be the regulation of transport or subcellular localization. This in turn may affect the rate of pro-domain removal by
limiting access to a pro-protein convertase such as furin in the
trans-Golgi network or may regulate access to their substrates. Either
possibility, or a combination of both, could provide a means of
regulating the function of MDC9 and/or MDC15. Alternatively, the
interaction with cytoplasmic proteins may be important for outside-in
signal transduction, for example in cell-cell interactions, or in
inside-out regulation of the proteolytic activity or the integrin-binding ability of these two metalloprotease disintegrins, although this would presumably require an interaction with the mature
form of the protein. The fact that endophilin I and SH3PX1 interact
with MDC9 and MDC15 indicates that these two ADAMs may have a common
mode of regulation or that they have overlapping functions mediated by
a common intermediate. Future studies will be directed toward
evaluating the role of endophilin I and SH3PX1 in regulating the
function of MDC9 or MDC15 in cell-cell interactions or in protein
ectodomain processing.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, and other membrane-anchored proteins from
the plasma membrane (10-14), regulating neurogenesis and the function
of Notch (15-18) and Delta (19), and processing of heparin-binding
epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF) (20).
-converting enzyme (TACE)/ADAM 17 (10, 11, 23); meltrin-
/ADAM 12 (24); and MDC9/ADAM 9/meltrin-
(20, 25)). Besides their roles as
metalloproteases, ADAMs are also thought to mediate cell-cell interactions. This was first suggested by the similarity of both the
and
subunit of the heterodimeric sperm protein fertilin (ADAM1/ADAM2) to snake venom disintegrins (6), which are short soluble
peptides that bind to integrins (
IIb
3 and
v
3) and are potent inhibitors of platelet
aggregation (26-30). Indeed, the disintegrin domain of fertilin
(ADAM2) apparently mediates sperm-egg binding by interacting with an
integrin on the oocyte surface, and this interaction may be a
prerequisite for membrane fusion (4, 7, 31-35). Furthermore, the
disintegrin domain of the widely expressed human MDC15 (ADAM15)
contains the integrin binding consensus "RGD" at its putative
integrin-binding site (36, 37). Evidence of a role for MDC15 in
cell-cell interactions comes from studies where the extracellular
portion of human MDC15 supports cell adhesion via the
v
3 integrin when it is expressed in
Escherichia coli (38) or via the integrins
v
3 and
5
1 when it is expressed in COS-7 cells as a fusion protein with the Fc
portion of human IgG (39).
(ADAM12), meltrin-
(ADAM19), and other family members suggests potential interactions with cytoplasmic proteins containing SH3 domains. These interactions could possibly be linked to the functions of metalloprotease disintegrins by inside-out regulation of activity, by outside-in signaling, or by regulating other aspects of their function, such as their subcellular localization or maturation.
, which is involved in the shedding of
HB-EGF, has been shown to bind to and phosphorylate the cytoplasmic
tail of MDC9 (20). Furthermore, activation of protein kinase C with
phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate results in phosphorylation of the
cytoplasmic domain of MDC9 in Chinese hamster ovary cells (25).
Interestingly, overexpression of full-length MDC9 strongly increases
the constitutive shedding of HB-EGF, whereas overexpression of MDC9
lacking both predicted SH3 ligand domains results in a much smaller
increase in constitutive shedding of HB-EGF, suggesting that
interactions with SH3 domain-containing proteins may regulate MDC9
function (20). Additional evidence for a cytoplasmic domain regulating
the function of an ADAM is provided by studies where the effect of a
dominant negative form of Kuz (MADM, ADAM10), lacking the
metalloprotease domain, on Notch signaling is strongly attenuated by
removing a short conserved cytoplasmic region (16).
, or TACE. One of the
interacting proteins, human endophilin I (also known as SH3GL2), is
apparently an orthologue of mouse and rat SH3p4, which have been
implicated in synaptic vesicle endocytosis (43, 44). The second protein
is novel and contains one N-terminal SH3 domain, followed by a
phox homology (PX) domain (PX domains contain a
proline-rich sequence that may interact with proline-rich sequence
binding modules such as SH3 or WW domains (45)), and a C-terminal
coiled-coil domain. Because the novel protein sequence includes an SH3
domain and a PX domain, it was given the name SH3PX1. Endophilin I and
SH3PX1 are the first reported SH3 domain-containing binding partners
for metalloprotease disintegrins in cells. Since endophilin I and
SH3PX1 both contain domains that are known to regulate the
intracellular sorting or subcellular localization of other proteins,
these proteins may regulate the function of MDC9 and MDC15 by affecting
their intracellular transport or subcellular localization.
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
, human TACE, and mouse meltrin-
were prepared in the same manner as above using
gene-specific primers. The construct encoding the cytoplasmic domain of
human ADAM10 was prepared using primers designed to generate a 5'
EcoRI site and a 3' PstI site. The construct
encoding the glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein
with the cytoplasmic domain of human MDC15 was described previously
(36). The construct encoding a GST-human MDC9 cytoplasmic tail fusion
protein was created using primers generating a 5' EcoRI site
and a 3' SalI site downstream of a stop codon; this was
cloned into pGEX4T-3 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). HIS/T7-tagged fusion
protein constructs were prepared by ligating the
EcoRI/XhoI inserts from pGADGH yeast-two-hybrid positives into the EcoRI and XhoI sites of the
pET28b(+) vector (Novagen). Fusion protein constructs with an
N-terminal FLAG-tag were prepared by ligating the
EcoRI/XhoI inserts from pGADGH yeast two-hybrid
positives into the EcoRI and SalI sites of
pFLAG-CMV-2 (Eastman Kodak Co.), a vector that yields a fusion protein
with a FLAG-tag at its N terminus. The pcDNA 3 constructs for
eukaryotic expression of full-length mouse MDC9 and mouse MDC15 have
been described previously (40, 42). All constructs were sequenced prior
to use to rule out any mutations resulting from PCR amplification.
-Galactosidase Assay--
Yeast
two-hybrid screening was performed using the Matchmaker two-hybrid
system (CLONTECH). A HeLa cell Matchmaker cDNA
library in pGADGH (CLONTECH) and bait constructs in
pGBT9 were used to simultaneously transform the yeast strain HF7c
(MATa, ura3-52, his 3-200, lys 2-801, ade
2-101, trp 1-901, leu 2-3, 112, gal4-542, gal80-538,
LYS2::GAL1-HIS3, URA3::(GAL4-17
mers)3-CYC1-lacZ). A HeLa cell library was
used as these cells contain MDC9 and MDC15 protein (data not shown).
Transformed yeast expressing prey proteins that interact with the bait
construct were selected by the ability to grow on SD agar plates
lacking L-tryptophan, L-leucine, and L-histidine. Transformed yeast that were positive by
nutritional selection were further assayed by
-galactosidase filter
assays (following growth in the presence of L-histidine)
according to the CLONTECH Matchmaker protocol. The
specificity of bait-prey interactions was determined by co-transforming
HF7c yeast with prey plasmid and control vector pGBT9 (encoding the
GAL4 DNA binding domain) or pLAM 5' (encoding a GAL4 DNA binding
domain-lamin C fusion protein). Positive prey plasmids were isolated
from yeast after removing the bait plasmid by "dropout" following
culture in SD-leucine medium (as described in the
CLONTECH Matchmaker protocol). Isolated plasmids
were used to transform E. coli XL-1 Blue and were identified
by cDNA sequencing (The BioResource Center, Cornell University,
Ithaca, NY). A total of four cDNA clones were identified using
MDC15 as a bait, whereas three clones were identified using MDC9 as a
bait. Two of the cDNAs were found in both screens (endophilin I and
SH3PX1, see below). A novel protein related to hsMAD2 (46), which was
termed MAD2
, was found using MDC9 as a bait but also interacted with
MDC15 (47). By using MDC15 as a bait, two clones that interacted only
with MDC15, but not with MDC9, were identified. One of these clones was
sequenced completely (cDNA sequence deposited in
GenBankTM under the accession number AF130979) and appears
to be the human orthologue of FAP52 (48). The sequence of the second
cDNA clone was identical to bases 2980-3773 of a cDNA with the
GenBankTM accession number AF063308.
Zap cDNA
Library--
An MDA-MB-468
Zap cDNA library (36) was screened
using a radiolabeled probe corresponding to a 1.9-kilobase pair
EcoRI/XhoI cDNA fragment of one of the yeast
two-hybrid isolates, pGADGH/K-9 (SH3PX1). To identify cDNA inserts
with the longest 5' extension, PCR was performed with antisense primers
corresponding to the 5' end of the yeast-two-hybrid clone pGADGH/K-9
and the T3 primer, which anneals 5' of cDNA inserts in the
Zap
vector. Clones with the longest inserts were plaque-purified, and
in vivo excision of the cDNA insert was performed using
the ExAssist/SOLR system according to the
Zap cDNA synthesis kit
protocol (Stratagene). Full-length clones were sequenced on both
strands. The full-length K-9/SH3PX1 sequence was submitted to
GenBankTM and given the accession number AF131214.
-actin probe template DNA was from
CLONTECH.
-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Soluble
protein was released by rupturing the cells with three cycles of
freeze-thawing in phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, containing 1% v/v
Triton X-100 and protease inhibitors (49). Debris was removed by
centrifugation (13,000 × g, 4 °C, 20 min), and GST
fusion proteins were captured from the supernatant on glutathione-Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-galactosidase were used as markers of an interaction between bait
and prey proteins, and clones that were positive by both of these
criteria were isolated. In independent screens with MDC9 and MDC15
cytoplasmic tails, two interacting proteins, initially designated as
K-60 and K-9, were isolated. Neither K-60 nor K-9 interacted with a
control bait protein, the GAL4 DNA binding domain fused to
human lamin C. Two additional yeast two-hybrid clones were identified
in the screen with MDC15 which did not interact with MDC9, but these were not characterized in this study (data not shown, see
"Experimental Procedures").
(ADAM12) and meltrin-
(ADAM19). However, in the more
stringent
-galactosidase production assay, K-9 only interacted with
the cytoplasmic tails of MDC9 and MDC15, whereas K-60 was able to
interact with MDC9, MDC15, and meltrin-
(Fig. 1B).
Neither K-60 nor K-9 interacted with the cytoplasmic tails of TACE,
ADAM10, or meltrin-
.

View larger version (34K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Endophilin I (K-60) and SH3PX1 (K-9) are able
to interact with the cytoplasmic tails of several metalloprotease
disintegrins. The yeast strain HF7c was co-transformed with prey
plasmid pGADGH-K-60 (endophilin I) or pGADGH-K-9 (SH3PX1) in
conjunction with bait plasmids encoding metalloprotease disintegrin
cytoplasmic domains or control plasmid pGBT9. Co-transformed yeasts
were assayed for bait-prey interactions by determining their ability to
grow in the absence of histidine (A) or to produce
-galactosidase (B, + indicates
-galactosidase
production and
indicates no detectable
-galactosidase
production). Metalloprotease disintegrin cytoplasmic domains used were
from human MDC9/ADAM9-(719-819), human MADM/ADAM10-(697-748), mouse
meltrin-
/ADAM12-(728-903), human MDC15/ADAM15-(712-814), human
TACE/ADAM17-(695-824), and mouse meltrin-
/ADAM19-(725-920). The
residue numbers correspond to those of the sequences with the
GenBankTM accession numbers U41766 (MDC9), AF009615
(ADAM10), D50411 (meltrin-
), U41767 (MDC15), U86755 (TACE), and
AF019887 (meltrin-
).
Zap
cDNA library and sequenced. The longest cDNA clone isolated had
an insert of 2310 base pairs that encoded a protein of 595 amino acid
residues with a predicted molecular mass of 67 kDa (Fig.
2A). The clone isolated by the yeast two-hybrid screen corresponds to amino acids 6-595 of this protein. Because the deduced protein sequence includes an SH3 domain
(Fig. 2B) and a PX domain (45) (Fig. 2C), this
novel protein was given the name SH3PX1. The C-terminal 26 residues of
SH3PX1 are predicted to form a coiled-coil by the protein analysis program "COILS" (54). Fig. 2 presents alignments of the SH3 domain
(Fig. 2B) and the PX domain (Fig. 2C) of SH3PX1
with the most closely related protein domains currently found in the
GenBankTM data base. The two most closely related sequences
are encoded by adjacent regions of the Caenorhabditis
elegans genome, suggesting that they are parts of the same
gene.

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Sequence and expression pattern of
SH3PX1. A, the SH3PX1 protein sequence translated from
an open reading frame contained within the full-length cDNA of
SH3PX1. The SH3 domain is bold, the PX domain is
underlined, and the predicted coiled-coil region is
underlined with a hatched bold line. B, alignment
of the SH3 domain of SH3PX1 with the SH3 domain contained in a C. elegans open reading frame (CE orf,
GenBankTM accession number CAA19486) and with the SH3
domain of a protein related to signal-transducing adaptor molecule
(STAM) (STAM 2A, GenBankTM accession number
AAC63963). Within the aligned SH3 domain, the sequence of SH3PX1 is
39% identical to C. elegans open reading frame, and 39%
identical to STAM 2A, respectively, and the sequence of C. elegans open reading frame is 38% identical to STAM 2A.
C, alignment of the PX domain of SH3PX1 with the PX domains
contained in a C. elegans open reading frame (CE
orf, GenBankTM accession number CAA19488) and
Saccharomyces cerevisiae vacuolar protein sorting-associated
protein VPS5 (GenBankTM accession number Q92331). Within
the depicted PX domain the sequence of SH3PX1 is 55% identical to
C. elegans open reading frame and 27% identical to VPS5,
respectively, and the sequence of C. elegans open reading
frame is 34% identical to VPS5. D, human multiple tissue
Northern blot probed with 32P-labeled SH3PX1 cDNA
(nucleotide numbers 57-1918 base pairs) under high stringency
conditions. As a control the blot was stripped and re-probed with
32P-labeled human
-actin probe. Tissue sources of
mRNA are marked above each lane.

View larger version (30K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Western blot analysis of SH3PX1. A
Western blot analysis of cell lysates from transformed primary human
embryonal kidney cells (293), HeLa cells, control
transfected COS-7 cells, or COS-7 cells transfected with full-length
SH3PX1. Blots were probed with rabbit polyclonal antiserum against
SH3PX1 or with a preimmune antiserum.
-galactosidase production as outlined above.

View larger version (29K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Different proline-rich SH3-ligand domains of
MDC9 and MDC15 are required for interaction with SH3PX1 and endophilin
I. A, alignment of the cytoplasmic domains of MDC9 and
MDC15. Identical residues are boxed, and the two
proline-rich regions which may serve as SH3-ligand domains are
boxed in bold outlines. B, schematic
representation of the MDC9 and MDC15 cytoplasmic tail constructs used
in yeast two-hybrid assays to determine the minimal regions required
for interactions with prey plasmids K-9/SH3PX1 and K-60/endophilin I. The hatched boxes correspond to the proline-rich regions
marked by bold boxes in A. The cytoplasmic tail
deletions used were as follows: 1, full-length cytoplasmic
tail, MDC9-(719-819), MDC15-(712-814); 2, MDC9-(719-784),
MDC15-(712-757); 3, MDC9-(785-819), MDC15-(758-814);
4, MDC9-(719-800), MDC15-(712-786); 5, MDC9-(800-819), MDC15-(787-814); 6, MDC9, not applicable,
MDC15-(758-786). Numbers in parentheses refer to the amino
acid residues at the N and C termini of each construct. Plasmids
encoding the GAL4 DNA binding domain fused to portions of cytoplasmic
tails and either pGADGH-K-9/SH3PX1 or pGADGH K-60/endophilin were
co-transformed into yeast strain HF7c.
-Galactosidase assays were
performed as described under "Experimental Procedures." Transformed
yeasts were examined for their ability to grow under nutritional
selection and to produce
-galactosidase; + indicates those
constructs able to interact with prey constructs by both criteria,
and
indicates those constructs unable to interact with prey
constructs by both criteria. ND, not determined.

View larger version (47K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Interaction of the cytoplasmic domain of MDC9
and MDC15 with SH3PX1 and endophilin I fusion proteins in
vitro. Lysates of E. coli expressing either
His/T7-tagged SH3PX1 or His/T7-tagged endophilin I were prepared as
described under "Experimental Procedures" and incubated with GST,
GST-MDC9, or GST-MDC15 fusion proteins captured on
glutathione-Sepharose beads. Bound proteins were detected by Western
blot with an antibody against the T7 tag (left panel,
SH3PX1; right panel, endophilin I). As a control, the
1st lane of each panel contains lysate of E. coli
expressing the appropriate His/T7-tagged fusion protein.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Preferential interactions of pro-MDC9 and
pro-MDC15 with SH3PX1 and endophilin I in COS-7 cells.
A, mouse MDC9 was expressed in COS-7 cells with either
FLAG-SH3PX1, FLAG-endophilin I, or a FLAG control. FLAG-tagged proteins
were immunoprecipitated using anti-FLAG antibodies, and associated MDC9
was detected by immunoblotting using an anti-MDC9 cytoplasmic domain
antiserum. B, mouse MDC15 was expressed in COS-7 cells in
conjunction with FLAG-SH3PX1, FLAG-endophilin I, or a FLAG-control
fusion protein. FLAG-tagged fusion proteins were immunoprecipitated
using an anti-FLAG antibody. Associated MDC15 was detected by
immunoblotting using an anti-cytoplasmic domain antiserum. In each case
the expression of MDC9 or MDC15 and FLAG-tagged proteins was determined
by immunoblotting transfected cell lysate. The position of the
pro-forms (open arrow) and mature (solid arrow)
forms of the MDC proteins are marked on the MDC immunoblots of cell
lysate and anti-FLAG-immunoprecipitated (I.P.)
samples.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Gisela Weskamp for human GST-MDC9 constructs, Johannes Schlöndorff for full-length MDC15 yeast two-hybrid constructs, and Lawrence Lum and other members of the laboratory for valuable discussions and advice.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant R55GM51988 (to C. P. B. for MDC9), by National Research Service Award 5F32GM18585-02 (to K. K. N.), by the DeWitt Wallace Fund for Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), and by MSKCC Grant NCI-P30-CA-08748.The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF130979, and AF131214.
§ Both authors contributed equally to this work.
¶ Supported by the Zeneca Strategic Research Fund (for MDC15 as part of a grant to C. P. B.).
** To whom correspondence should be addressed: Cellular Biochemistry and Biophysics Program, Sloan-Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Box 368, 1275 York Ave., New York, NY 10021. Tel.: 212-639-2915; Fax: 212-717-3047; E-mail: c-blobel@ski.mskcc.org.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are:
ADAMs, a
disintegrin and metalloprotease;
MDC, metalloprotease, disintegrin,
cysteine-rich proteins;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
GST, glutathione S-transferase;
TACE, tumor necrosis factor
-converting enzyme;
HB-EGF, heparin-binding epidermal growth
factor-like growth factor;
SH3, Src homology 3.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Schlöndorff, J., and Blobel, C. P. (1999) J. Cell Sci 112, 3603-3617[Abstract] |
| 2. | Blobel, C. P. (1997) Cell 90, 589-592[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Black, R. A., and White, J. M. (1998) Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 10, 654-659[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. |
Myles, D. G.,
Kimmel, L. H.,
Blobel, C. P.,
White, J. M.,
and Primakoff, P.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
4195-4198 |
| 5. |
Primakoff, P.,
Hyatt, H.,
and Tredick-Kline, J.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
104,
141-149 |
| 6. | Blobel, C. P., Wolfsberg, T. G., Turck, C. W., Myles, D. G., Primakoff, P., and White, J. M. (1992) Nature 356, 248-252[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. |
Chen, M. S.,
Almeida, E. A.,
Huovila, A.,
Takahashi, Y.,
Shaw, L. M.,
Mercurio, A. M.,
and White, J. M.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
549-561 |
| 8. | Snell, W. J., and White, J. M. (1996) Cell 85, 629-637[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Yagami-Hiromasa, T., Sato, T., Kurisaki, T., Kamijo, K., Nabeshima, Y., and Fujisawa-Sehara, A. (1995) Nature 377, 652-656[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 10. | Black, R., Rauch, C. T., Kozlosky, C. J., Peschon, J. J., Slack, J. L., Wolfson, M. F., Castner, B. J., Stocking, K. L., Reddy, P., Srinivasan, S., Nelson, N., Boiani, N., Schooley, K. A., Gerhart, M., Davis, R., Fitzner, J. N., Johnson, R. S., Paxton, R. J., March, C. J., and Cerretti, D. P. (1997) Nature 385, 729-733[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. | Moss, M. L., Jin, S.-L. C., Milla, M. E., Burkhart, W., Cartner, H. L., Chen, W.-J., Clay, W. C., Didsbury, J. R., Hassler, D., Hoffman, C. R., Kost, T. A., Lambert, M. H., Lessnitzer, M. A., McCauley, P., McGeehan, G., Mitchell, J., Moyer, M., Pahel, G., Rocque, W., Overton, L. K., Schoenen, F., Seaton, T., Su, J.-L., Warner, J., Willard, D., and Becherer, J. D. (1997) Nature 385, 733-736[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 12. |
Peschon, J. J.,
Slack, J. L.,
Reddy, P.,
Stocking, K. L.,
Sunnarborg, S. W.,
Lee, D. C.,
Russell, W. E.,
Castner, B. J.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Fitzner, J. N.,
Boyce, R. W.,
Nelson, N.,
Kozlosky, C. J.,
Wolfson, M. F.,
Rauch, C. T.,
Cerretti, D. P.,
Paxton, R. J.,
March, C. J.,
and Black, R. A.
(1998)
Science
282,
1281-1284 |
| 13. |
Buxbaum, J. D.,
Liu, K. N.,
Luo, Y.,
Slack, J. L.,
Stocking, K. L.,
Peschon, J. J.,
Johnson, R. S.,
Castner, B. J.,
Cerretti, D. P.,
and Black, R. A.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27765-27767 |
| 14. |
Lammich, S.,
Kojro, E.,
Postina, R.,
Gilbert, S.,
Pfeiffer, R.,
Jasionowski, M.,
Haass, C.,
and Fahrenholz, F.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
3922-3927 |
| 15. | Rooke, J., Pan, D., Xu, T., and Rubin, G. M. (1996) Science 273, 1227-1230[Abstract] |
| 16. | Pan, D., and Rubin, J. (1997) Cell 90, 271-280[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 17. | Sotillos, S., Roch, F., and Campuzano, S. (1997) Development 124, 4769-4779[Abstract] |
| 18. | Wen, C., Metzstein, M. M., and Greenwald, I. (1997) Development 124, 4759-4767[Abstract] |
| 19. |
Qi, H.,
Rand, M. D.,
Wu, X.,
Sestan, N.,
Wang, W.,
Rakic, P.,
Xu, T.,
and Artavanis-Tsakonas, S.
(1999)
Science
283,
91-94 |
| 20. | Izumi, Y., Hirata, M., Hasuwa, H., Iwamoto, R., Umata, T., Miyado, K., Tomai, Y., Kurisaki, T., Sehara-Fujisawa, A., Ohno, S., and Mekada, E. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 7260-7272[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Zhu, G. Z., Lin, Y., Myles, D. G., and Primakoff, P. (1999) Gene (Amst.) 234, 227-237[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 22. | Howard, L., Lu, X., Mitchell, S., Griffiths, S., and Glynn, P. (1996) Biochem. J. 317, 45-50 |
| 23. |
Rosendahl, M. S.,
Ko, S. C.,
Long, D. L.,
Brewer, M. T.,
Rosenzweig, B.,
Hedl, E.,
Anderson, L.,
Pyle, S. M.,
Moreland, J.,
Meyers, M. A.,
Kohno, T.,
Lyons, D.,
and Lichenstein, H. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
24588-24593 |
| 24. |
Loechel, F.,
Gilpin, B. J.,
Engvall, E.,
Albrechtsen, R.,
and Wewer, U. M.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
16993-16997 |
| 25. |
Roghani, M.,
Becherer, J. D.,
Moss, M. L.,
Atherton, R. E.,
Erdjument- Bromage, H.,
Arribas, J.,
Blackburn, R. K.,
Weskamp, G.,
Tempst, P.,
and Blobel, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
3531-3540 |
| 26. |
Huang, T. F.,
Holt, J. C.,
Lukasiewicz, H.,
and Niewiarowski, S.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
16157-16163 |
| 27. | Huang, T. F., Holt, J. C., Kirby, E. P., and Niewiarowski, S. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 661-666[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Gould, R. J., Polokoff, M. A., Friedman, P. A., Huang, T. F., Holt, J. C., Cook, J. J., and Niewiarowski, S. (1990) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 168-171 |
| 29. |
Scarborough, R. M.,
Rose, J. W.,
Naughton, M. A.,
Phillips, D. R.,
Nannizzi, L.,
Arfsten, A.,
Campbell, A. M.,
and Charo, I. F.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1058-1065 |
| 30. | McLane, M. A., Marcinkiewicz, C., Vijay-Kumar, S., Wierzbicka-Patynowski, I., and Niewiarowski, S. (1998) Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 219, 109-119[Abstract] |
| 31. | Almeida, E. A. C., Huovila, A.-P. J., Sutherland, A. E., Stephens, L. E., Calarco, P. G., Shaw, L. M., Mercurio, A. M., Sonnenberg, A., Primakoff, P., Myles, D. G., and White, J. M. (1995) Cell 81, 1095-1104[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. | Evans, J. P., Schultz, R. M., and Kopf, G. S. (1997) Dev. Biol. 187, 94-106[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Evans, J. P., Schultz, R. M., and Kopf, G. S. (1995) J. Cell Sci. 108, 3267-3278[Abstract] |
| 34. | Chen, H., and Sampson, N. S. (1999) Chem. Biol. 6, 1-10[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 35. |
Yuan, R.,
Primakoff, P.,
and Myles, D. G.
(1997)
J. Cell Biol.
137,
105-112 |
| 36. |
Krätzschmar, J.,
Lum, L.,
and Blobel, C. P.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
4593-4596 |
| 37. | Herren, B., Raines, E. W., and Ross, R. (1997) FASEB J. 11, 173-180[Abstract] |
| 38. |
Zhang, X.-P.,
Kamata, T.,
Yokoyama, K.,
Puzon-McLaughlin, W.,
and Takada, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
7345-7350 |
| 39. | Nath, D., Slocombe, P. M., Stephens, P. E., Warn, A., Hutchinson, G. R., Yamada, K. M., Docherty, A. J., and Murphy, G. (1999) J. Cell Sci. 112, 579-587[Abstract] |
| 40. |
Weskamp, G.,
Krätzschmar, J. R.,
Reid, M.,
and Blobel, C. P.
(1996)
J. Cell Biol.
132,
717-726 |
| 41. |
Inoue, D.,
Reid, M.,
Lum, L.,
Krätzschmar, J.,
Weskamp, G.,
Myung, Y. M.,
Baron, R.,
and Blobel, C. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
4180-4187 |
| 42. |
Lum, L.,
Reid, M. S.,
and Blobel, C. P.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26236-26247 |
| 43. | Giachino, C., Lantelme, E., Lanzetti, L., Saccone, S., Bella Valle, G., and Migone, N. (1997) Genomics 41, 427-434[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 44. |
de Heuvel, E.,
Bell, A. W.,
Ramjaun, A. R.,
Wong, K.,
Sossin, W. S.,
and McPherson, P. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
8710-8716 |
| 45. | Ponting, C. P. (1996) Protein Sci. 5, 2353-2357[Abstract] |
| 46. |
Li, Y.,
and Benezra, R.
(1996)
Science
274,
246-248 |
| 47. | Nelson, K. K., Schlöndorff, J., and Blobel, C. P. (1999) Biochem. J., in press |
| 48. |
Merilainen, J.,
Lehto, V. P.,
and Wasenius, V. M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
23278-23284 |
| 49. |
Blobel, C. P.,
Myles, D. G.,
Primakoff, P.,
and White, J. W.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
111,
69-78 |
| 50. | Harlow, E., and Lane, D. (1988) Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual , pp. 53-139, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY |
| 51. | Weskamp, G., and Reichardt, L. F. (1991) Neuron 6, 649-663[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 52. | Micheva, K. D., Ramjaun, A. R., Kay, B. K., and McPherson, P. S. (1997) FEBS Lett. 414, 308-312[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 53. |
Ringstad, N.,
Nemoto, Y.,
and De Camilli, P.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
8569-8574 |
| 54. | Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M., and Stock, J. (1991) Science 252, 1162-1164[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 55. |
Van Wart, H. E.,
and Birkedal-Hansen, H.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
5578-5582 |
| 56. |
Micheva, K. D.,
Kay, B. K.,
and McPherson, P. S.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
27239-27245 |
| 57. | Sittler, A., Walter, S., Wedemeyer, N., Hasenbank, R., Scherzinger, E., Eickhoff, H., Bates, G. P., Lehrach, H., and Wanker, E. E. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 427-436[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 58. | Skehel, J. J., and Wiley, D. C. (1998) Cell 95, 871-874[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 59. | Sollner, T., Whiteheart, S., Brunner, M., Erdjument-Bromage, H., Geronamos, S., Tempst, P., and Rothman, J. (1993) Nature 362, 318-324[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 60. | Weber, T., Zemelman, B. V., McNew, J. A., Westermann, B., Gmachl, M., Parlati, F., Söllner, T. H., and Rothman, J. E. (1998) Cell 92, 759-772[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 61. |
Haft, C. R.,
de la Luz Sierra, M.,
Barr, V. A.,
Haft, D. H.,
and Taylor, S. I.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7278-7287 |
| 62. | Kurten, R. C., Cadena, D. L., and Gill, G. N. (1996) Science 272, 1008-1010[Abstract] |
| 63. |
Quinn, M. T.,
Evans, T.,
Loetterle, L. R.,
Jesaitis, A. J.,
and Bokoch, G. M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
20983-20987 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. J. Najy, K. C. Day, and M. L. Day The Ectodomain Shedding of E-cadherin by ADAM15 Supports ErbB Receptor Activation J. Biol. Chem., June 27, 2008; 283(26): 18393 - 18401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
|