![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 45, 31759-31762, November 5, 1999
,
,
**
From the
Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry
and § Animal and Food Sciences, University of Delaware,
Newark, Delaware 19716, the ¶ Oncology Research Laboratory,
Winthrop University Hospital, Mineola, New York 11501 and the
Department of Medicine, State University of New York Stony Brook
Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York 11790
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The flavin-dependent sulfhydryl
oxidase from chicken egg white catalyzes the oxidation of sulfhydryl
groups to disulfides with the reduction of oxygen to hydrogen peroxide.
Reduced proteins are the preferred thiol substrates of this secreted
enzyme. The egg white oxidase shows an average 64% identity (from
randomly distributed peptides comprising more than 30% of the protein
sequence) to a human protein, Quiescin Q6, involved in growth
regulation. Q6 is strongly expressed when fibroblasts enter reversible
quiescence (Coppock, D. L., Cina-Poppe, D., Gilleran, S. (1998)
Genomics 54, 460-468). A peptide antibody against Q6
cross-reacts with both the egg white enzyme and a flavin-linked
sulfhydryl oxidase isolated from bovine semen. Sequence analyses show
that the egg white oxidase joins human Q6, bone-derived growth factor,
GEC-3 from guinea pig, and homologs found in a range of multicellular organisms as a member of a new protein family. These proteins are
formed from the fusion of thioredoxin and ERV motifs. In contrast, the
flavin-linked sulfhydryl oxidase from Aspergillus niger is related to the pyridine nucleotide-dependent disulfide
oxidoreductases, and shows no detectable sequence similarity to this
newly recognized protein family.
Both metalloprotein and
FAD1-linked sulfhydryl
oxidases catalyze the generation of disulfides with the reduction of
molecular oxygen to hydrogen peroxide.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
A number of these enzymes have been suggested to catalyze
disulfide bond formation in the protein secretory pathway (1-11), but
these proposals have not been widely adopted (11). This paper shows
that the two most recently studied flavin-linked sulfhydryl oxidases
isolated from egg white (9-11) and Aspergillus niger (8,
12) appear evolutionarily unrelated. Superficially, there are striking
similarities between these two oxidases. Both are dimeric secreted
glycoproteins (8, 9). Both enzymes contain one FAD and a catalytically
essential redox-active disulfide bridge per subunit (8, 9), and both
form thiolate to flavin charge-transfer complexes in their 2-electron
reduced forms (8, 9). Neither enzyme reacts with reduced or oxidized
pyridine nucleotides and both enzymes oxidize a range of small
molecular weight thiol forms (8, 9). There are, however, significant
differences in substrate specificity. Reduced glutathione appears to be
the best substrate of the fungal enzyme with reduced proteins, such as
RNase, being either oxidized poorly (8) or not at all (13). In
contrast, a range of reduced proteins and peptides are excellent
substrates of the egg white oxidase, with
kcat/Km values up to 100-fold higher than glutathione (11).
(Eq. 1)
Here, we show that the egg white flavoprotein belongs to a newly
recognized family of proteins (14) formed from the fusion of
thioredoxin and ERV/ALR motifs (see later). Quiescin Q6 is the best
understood member of this family and is highly induced as human
fibroblasts enter reversible quiescence (14, 15). In contrast, sequence
comparisons show that the fungal sulfhydryl oxidase is a member of the
pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductases (16), appearing closely
related to thioredoxin reductase and alkylhydroperoxide reductase. Our
work suggests a role for sulfhydryl oxidase-like proteins in aspects of
the cell cycle in fibroblasts and in the formation of the extracellular matrix.
| |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials-- Materials and general methods were as described previously (9, 10). Unless otherwise stated, all buffers contained 0.3 mM EDTA. The egg white sulfhydryl oxidase was obtained as described by Hoober et al. (9, 10). Bovine sulfhydryl oxidase was partially purified from 500 ml of centrifuged semen (3,000 × g for 10 min) based on the procedure for the rat seminal vesicle enzyme (17). In brief, the 30-40% ammonium sulfate fraction was redissolved and dialyzed against 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.6. The enzyme bound to a CM-52 column equilibrated with this buffer and eluted approximately midway in a linear gradient to 300 mM NaCl in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer. The yellow oxidase fraction used for Western blots was approximately 20% pure by 280/454 nm absorbance ratio and was assayed with dithiothreitol (9).
Isolation and Characterization of Peptides-- Peptides of the chicken oxidase were prepared, purified, and sequenced by standard methods. The legend to Fig. 1 lists the digestion steps used for each peptide sequenced. The redox-active cysteine residues of the egg white oxidase were alkylated with a 9-fold excess of monobromobimane (18) essentially as described for iodoacetamide (9). The alkylated enzyme was freed from excess bimane by ultrafiltration, and the nonredox-active disulfide bridge (9) was reduced for 30 min with an 8-fold excess of dithiothreitol in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 100 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5. A 2-fold molar excess of N-ethylmaleimide over total thiols was then added, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h. The protein was dialyzed against 25 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.7, containing 1 mM EDTA before digestion for 16 h at 37 °C with 2% w/w aliquots of LysC added at 0 and 5 h. The bimane-labeled active site peptide was detected using an HPLC diode-array detector at 390 nm. PTH-bimane-Cys elutes on gas-phase sequencing between PTH-Tyr and PTH-Pro (19).
Antibodies and Western Blots--
Immunoblotting was as
described previously (20). The antibody was prepared in rabbits against
a peptide EDPQFPKVQWPPRE (residues 494-507, underlined in Fig. 1)
using a commercial vendor (Zymed Laboratories Inc.
Inc., San Carlos, CA). Specificity was demonstrated by preincubating
the purified antibody (2.5 µg/ml) with the peptide (4 µg/ml) for
1 h on ice in Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST)
with 1% milk (w/v). Blots were incubated with antibody overnight at
4 °C, washed 3 times for 5 min in TBST, incubated with a secondary
antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech; diluted 1/1,000), and developed using the enhanced
chemiluminescence kit from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech. Molecular
weights were determined using Rainbow high molecular weight markers
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
| |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The pure egg white oxidase (9, 10) was digested by trypsin, LysC,
and cyanogen bromide methods, applied singly or in combination (see
legend to Fig. 1 and "Experimental
Procedures"). A total of 13 random peptides and an active site
peptide (see later) were purified by HPLC and evaluated by MALDI-TOF
and gas-phase sequencing. The sequence of each peptide was used to
search the protein data bases and all but one (see legend to Fig. 1)
show high levels of identity (from 45 to 100%) with Quiescin Q6 (Ref. 14 and see later). The 13 of 14 peptides are numbered in Fig. 1.
Fortuitously, 3 peptides (11-13) are found to comprise a contiguous 51-residue segment toward the C terminus of Q6.
|
Peptide 10 contains the redox-active disulfide bridge in this flavoprotein. It was obtained by first converting the oxidase to the 4-electron reduced state by dithionite titration (9). The dithiol was then alkylated under anaerobic conditions with monobromobimane (18) (see "Experimental Procedures"). Under these conditions, both active site cysteine residues are labeled, as observed with iodoacetamide (9), yielding a strongly fluorescent peptide modified at Cys-450 and Cys-453 (Q6 numbering).
The egg white oxidase contains a total of about 595 amino acids (9), similar to the 582 residues of Q6 (14). In aggregate, the oxidase peptides shown in Fig. 1 represent 32% of the total sequence with an average identity of 64% (81% similarity). The probability that this degree of sequence identity would arise by chance is negligible. Thus, a sulfhydryl oxidase secreted into the egg white of the laying hen has clear homology to a protein involved in growth regulation in human fibroblast cells (14, 15).
This conclusion is strengthened by the demonstration that the egg white
oxidase strongly cross-reacts (Fig. 2)
with a peptide antibody raised against a peptide comprising residues
494-507 of Q6 (underlined in Fig. 1). This reaction is completely
blocked by the addition of competing peptide (Fig. 2). We have also
partially purified sulfhydryl oxidase from bovine semen (see
"Experimental Procedures"), based on the early work of Ostrowski
et al. (17) on the rat seminal vesicle enzyme. This oxidase
also contains FAD (6) and appears mechanistically similar to the egg
white enzyme (9). Fig. 2 shows a strong specific response to the bovine
enzyme. Thus, both vertebrate sulfhydryl oxidases appear related to
Quiescin Q6. The differing apparent molecular weights in Fig. 2 may
reflect varying carbohydrate contents (9).
|
The sequence of a third sulfhydryl oxidase, that from A. niger (8), is available from the patent literature (12). Despite markedly similar properties to the egg white protein mentioned earlier, there is undetectable sequence homology between them (not shown). However, data base searches with the A. niger sequence show 30% identity (46% similarity) with alkyl hydroperoxide reductase from Bacillus halodurans, 23% identity (40% similarity) with thioredoxin reductase (TRX B) from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and convincing homology with several other members of the pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family (16). This similarity was previously predicted (16): divergent evolution of a sulfhydryl oxidase from this enzyme family could easily be envisaged with the loss of a pyridine-nucleotide binding site and substitution of molecular oxygen as electron acceptor.
The sequence of the egg white oxidase reflects a distinctly different lineage. Using the Q6 sequence, no members of the pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase family appear in any search protocols (not shown). However, these searches reveal that the egg white oxidase, like Q6 (14), was probably formed via fusion of at least two domains. First, a single thioredoxin motif is evident from residues ~35-125 in Q6. Thioredoxins are small proteins of approximately 95-110 amino acids with a range of redox and nonredox roles (21, 22). A conspicuous member of the thioredoxin superfamily is mammalian protein-disulfide isomerase (21, 23, 24). The role of PDI in shuffling disulfide bonds during the maturation of proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum has been extensively documented (21, 23, 24). PDI contains two functional thioredoxin domains with the active site sequence WCGHC (21, 24). Our peptide sequencing of sulfhydryl oxidase has yet to encounter this sequence, although it is observed between residues 69 and 73 in Q6 (Fig. 1) (14). Interestingly, the redox-active disulfide in the oxidase (9, 16) lies toward the C terminus within the second recognizable feature: the ERV/ALR motif (residues 406-503 of Q6; Fig. 1). ERV1 was the first identified member of an emerging gene family involved in the yeast cell cycle and in the biogenesis of mitochondria (25). The homologous mammalian counterpart, ALR1 is a 125 amino acid protein that has been implicated in a range of cell development processes from spermatogenesis to the regeneration of liver tissue (25, 26). Although its precise physiological role is not known, ALR appears to be secreted from hepatocytes in an active form in response to liver damage (27).
Quiescin Q6 homologs containing both thioredoxin and ERV motifs are not
found in any prokaryote genome sequence or in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. They are, however, widely distributed in metazoans (e.g. Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila
melanogaster, guinea pig). In humans, sequences similar to Q6 have
been named bone-derived growth factor (GenBankTM L42379)
and cell growth inhibitory factor (GenBankTM E12644). All
these homologs and the ERV proteins contain a region homologous to the
active site disulfide bridge of the egg white sulfhydryl oxidase. Fig.
3 illustrates this homology with representative examples.
|
These studies suggest that Quiescin Q6 is a flavoprotein sulfhydryl oxidase. Indeed, immunoprecipitates of fibroblast cell extracts show detectable sulfhydryl oxidase activity.2 Quiescin Q6 does not apparently contain the ADP-binding motif (28) found in a number of FAD-linked flavoproteins including the A. niger sulfhydryl oxidase (not shown). However, searching the Q6 sequence using the program eMOTIF (29) identifies the region 442-451 (Fig. 1) as a pattern found in the ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase (FNR) superfamily of flavoproteins (30) with a stringency of at least one in 107. Cytochrome P450 reductase and nitric-oxide synthase contain an FNR domain. It is of interest that this 442-451 region is contiguous with the active site disulfide loop (residues 450-453; Q6 numbering; see earlier). Obviously, the ultimate significance of these observations must await a crystal structure of the egg white enzyme. Although the precise functions of Q6 and its homologs must await further work, there are a number of observations suggesting a connection with the extracellular matrix (14, 15). Q6 lacks the endoplasmic reticulum retention signal and is secreted into the fibroblast culture medium.3 In addition, a number of the genes expressed at the onset of reversible quiescence, including 4 collagens and decorin, are well known components of the extracellular matrix. These secreted proteins typically contain multiple disulfide bridges essential for structural integrity. Taking one example, disulfide bond formation in many collagens is required to direct the assembly of trimeric pro-proteins and, in some cases, is involved in the generation of extracellular collagen networks (31-33). If the specificity of Quiescin Q6 were as broad as the egg white protein (11), Q6 might contribute to disulfide bond formation in a variety of secreted proteins.
In summary, the egg white oxidase has multiple homologs in
multicellular organisms. Apart from the rat seminal vesicle enzyme, none of these proteins have been assigned an enzymatic function. It now
appears likely that some will be involved in extracellular matrix
formation as outlined above. Finally, the A. niger
sulfhydryl oxidase and this new sulfhydryl oxidase-like protein family
appear to have evolved convergently. Our current work is aimed at the cloning, overexpression, and characterization of Quiescin Q6, and a
comparison of its properties with those of sulfhydryl oxidases from egg
white and seminal vesicle. We are also exploring the role of the
thioredoxin motif in these flavin-dependent oxidases.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Hal White for insightful comments, Robert Alphin for maintaining the strain of chickens used for this study, Yu-Chu Huang for peptide sequencing, and Carissa Rogers for Western blotting.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grant GM26643 (to C. T.).The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
** To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 302-831-2689; Fax: 302-831-6335; E-mail: cthorpe@udel.edu.
2 K. L. Hoober, C. Thorpe, and D. L. Coppock, unpublished observations.
3 D. L. Coppock, unpublished observations.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: FAD, flavin adenine dinucleotide; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; PDI, protein disulfide isomerase; PTH, phenylthiohydantoin; LysC, endoproteinase LysC; HPLC, high pressure liquid chromatography.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Janolino, V. G.,
and Swaisgood, H. E.
(1975)
J. Biol. Chem.
250,
2532-2538 |
| 2. | Schmelzer, C. H., Swaisgood, H. E., and Horton, H. R. (1982) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 107, 196-201[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 3. | Lash, L. H., Jones, D. P., and Orrenius, S. (1984) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 779, 191-200[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 4. | Goldsmith, L. A. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 143, 510-515[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 5. | Clare, D. A., Pinnix, I. B., Lecce, J. G., and Horton, H. R. (1988) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 265, 351-361[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Ostrowski, M. C., and Kistler, W. S. (1980) Biochemistry 19, 2639-2645[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Kusakabe, H., Kuninaka, A., and Yoshino, H. (1982) Agric. Biol. Chem. 46, 2057-2067 |
| 8. | de la Motte, R. S., and Wagner, F. W. (1987) Biochemistry 26, 7363-7371[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. |
Hoober, K. L.,
Joneja, B.,
White, H. B., III,
and Thorpe, C.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
30510-30516 |
| 10. | Hoober, K. L., and Thorpe, C. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 3211-3217[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 11. |
Hoober, K. L.,
Sheasley, S. S.,
Gilbert, H. F.,
and Thorpe, C.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
22147-22150 |
| 12. | Maat, J., Muster, W., Stam, H., Schaap, P. J., Vonderwoort, P. J. v. d., Visser, J., and Verbakel, J. M. (June 25, 1996) U. S. Patent 5529926, Unilever Patent Holdings BV, The Netherlands, United States |
| 13. | Janolino, V. G., and Swaisgood, H. E. (1992) Milchwissenschaft 47, 143-146 |
| 14. | Coppock, D. L., Cina-Poppe, D., and Gilleran, S. (1998) Genomics 54, 460-468[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 15. | Coppock, D. L., Kopman, C., Scandalis, S., and Gillerman, S. (1993) Cell Growth Differ. 4, 483-493[Abstract] |
| 16. | Williams, C. H., Jr. (1992) in Chemistry and Biochemistry of Flavoenzymes (Müller, F., ed), Vol. III , pp. 121-211, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL |
| 17. | Ostrowski, M. C., Kistler, W. S., and Williams-Ashman, H. G. (1979) Biochem. Biophy. Res. Comm. 87, 171-176[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 18. | Kosower, E. M., and Kosower, N. S. (1995) Methods Enzymol. 251, 133-148[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 19. | Hu, L., Borleske, B. L., and Coleman, R. (1997) Protein Sci. 6, 43-52[Abstract] |
| 20. | Arita, Y., Buffolino, P., and Coppock, D. L. (1998) Exp. Cell Res. 242, 381-390[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. | Ferrari, D. M., and Soling, H.-D. (1999) Biochem. J. 339, 1-10 |
| 22. |
Holmgren, A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
13963-13966 |
| 23. |
Gilbert, H. F.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
29399-29402 |
| 24. | Freedman, R. B., Hirst, T. R., and Tuite, M. F. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 331-336[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 25. | Lisowsky, T., and Stein, G. (1998) Yeast 14, 171-180[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 26. |
Hagiya, M.,
Francavilla, A.,
Polimeno, L.,
Ihara, I.,
Sakai, H.,
Seki, T.,
Shimonishi, M.,
Porter, K. A.,
and Starzl, T. E.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8142-8146 |
| 27. | Gandhi, C. R., Kuddus, R., Subbotin, V. M., Prelich, J., Murase, N., Rao, A. S., Nalesnik, M. A., Watkins, S. C., DeLeo, A., Trucco, M., and Starzl, T. E. (1999) Hepatology 29, 1435-1445[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. | Wierenga, R. K., Terpstra, P., and Hol, W. G. J. (1986) J. Mol. Biol. 187, 101-107[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 29. |
Nevill-Manning, C. G.,
Wu, T. D.,
and Brutlag, D. L.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
5865-5871 |
| 30. | Correll, C. C., Ludwig, M. L., Bruns, C. M., and Karplus, P. A. (1993) Protein Sci. 2, 2112-2133[Abstract] |
| 31. | McLaughlin, S. H., and Bulleid, N. J. (1998) Matrix Biol. 16, 369-377[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 32. |
Gunwar, S.,
Ballester, F.,
Noelken, M. E.,
Sado, Y.,
Ninomiya, Y.,
and Hudson, B. G.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
8767-8775 |
| 33. |
Zhu, Y.,
Oganesian, A.,
Keene, D. R.,
and Sandell, L. J.
(1999)
J. Cell Biol.
144,
1069-1080 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Thorpe and D. L. Coppock Generating Disulfides in Multicellular Organisms: Emerging Roles for a New Flavoprotein Family J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 13929 - 13933. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Sevier and C. A. Kaiser Disulfide Transfer between Two Conserved Cysteine Pairs Imparts Selectivity to Protein Oxidation by Ero1 Mol. Biol. Cell, May 1, 2006; 17(5): 2256 - 2266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Friedman, J. A. Watson Jr., D. W.-H. Lam, and S. E. Rokita Iodotyrosine Deiodinase Is the First Mammalian Member of the NADH Oxidase/Flavin Reductase Superfamily J. Biol. Chem., February 3, 2006; 281(5): 2812 - 2819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Sevier, H. Kadokura, V. C. Tam, J. Beckwith, D. Fass, and C. A. Kaiser The prokaryotic enzyme DsbB may share key structural features with eukaryotic disulfide bond forming oxidoreductases Protein Sci., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1630 - 1642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Tury, G Mairet-Coello, F Poncet, C Jacquemard, P Y Risold, D Fellmann, and B Griffond QSOX sulfhydryl oxidase in rat adenohypophysis: localization and regulation by estrogens J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2004; 183(2): 353 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Levitan, A. Danon, and T. Lisowsky Unique Features of Plant Mitochondrial Sulfhydryl Oxidase J. Biol. Chem., May 7, 2004; 279(19): 20002 - 20008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chen, Y. Li, K. Wei, L. Li, W. Liu, Y. Zhu, Z. Qiu, and F. He The Potentiation Role of Hepatopoietin on Activator Protein-1 Is Dependent on Its Sulfhydryl Oxidase Activity J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2003; 278(49): 49022 - 49030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Wittke, R. Wiedemeyer, A. Pillmann, L. Savelyeva, F. Westermann, and M. Schwab Neuroblastoma-Derived Sulfhydryl Oxidase, a New Member of the Sulfhydryl Oxidase/Quiescin6 Family, Regulates Sensitization to Interferon {gamma}-Induced Cell Death in Human Neuroblastoma Cells Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7742 - 7752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Klissenbauer, S. Winters, U. A. O. Heinlein, and T. Lisowsky Accumulation of the mitochondrial form of the sulphydryl oxidase Erv1p/Alrp during the early stages of spermatogenesis J. Exp. Biol., July 15, 2002; 205(14): 1979 - 1986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Senkevich, C. L. White, E. V. Koonin, and B. Moss Complete pathway for protein disulfide bond formation encoded by poxviruses PNAS, May 14, 2002; 99(10): 6667 - 6672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Senkevich, C. L. White, E. V. Koonin, and B. Moss A viral member of the ERV1/ALR protein family participates in a cytoplasmic pathway of disulfide bond formation PNAS, October 12, 2000; (2000) 210397997. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. Benayoun, A. Esnard-Feve, S. Castella, Y. Courty, and F. Esnard Rat Seminal Vesicle FAD-dependent Sulfhydryl Oxidase. BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION AND MOLECULAR CLONING OF A MEMBER OF THE NEW SULFHYDRYL OXIDASE/QUIESCIN Q6 GENE FAMILY J. Biol. Chem., April 20, 2001; 276(17): 13830 - 13837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gerber, U. Muhlenhoff, G. Hofhaus, R. Lill, and T. Lisowsky Yeast Erv2p Is the First Microsomal FAD-linked Sulfhydryl Oxidase of the Erv1p/Alrp Protein Family J. Biol. Chem., June 22, 2001; 276(26): 23486 - 23491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. G. Senkevich, C. L. White, E. V. Koonin, and B. Moss A viral member of the ERV1/ALR protein family participates in a cytoplasmic pathway of disulfide bond formation PNAS, October 24, 2000; 97(22): 12068 - 12073. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |