![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 45, 31797-31803, November 5, 1999
From the Mono-ADP-ribosylation, a post-translational
modification in which the ADP-ribose moiety of NAD is transferred to an
acceptor protein, is catalyzed by a family of amino acid-specific
ADP-ribosyltransferases. ADP-ribosyltransferase 5 (ART5), a murine
transferase originally isolated from Yac-1 lymphoma cells, differed in
properties from previously identified eukaryotic transferases in that
it exhibited significant NAD glycohydrolase (NADase) activity. To
investigate the mechanism of regulation of transferase and NADase
activities, ART5 was synthesized as a FLAG fusion protein in
Escherichia coli. Agmatine was used as the ADP-ribose
acceptor to quantify transferase activity. ART5 was found to be
primarily an NADase at 10 µM NAD, whereas at higher NAD
concentrations (1 mM), after some delay, transferase
activity increased, whereas NADase activity fell. This change in
catalytic activity was correlated with auto-ADP-ribosylation and
occurred in a time- and NAD concentration-dependent manner. Based on the change in mobility of auto-ADP-ribosylated ART5 by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the modification appeared to be
stoichiometric and resulted in the addition of at least two ADP-ribose
moieties. Auto-ADP-ribosylated ART5 isolated after incubation with NAD
was primarily a transferase. These findings suggest that
auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART5 was stoichiometric, resulted in at least
two modifications and converted ART5 from an NADase to a transferase,
and could be one mechanism for regulating enzyme activity.
Mono-ADP-ribosylation is a post-translational modification of
proteins catalyzed by enzymes that transfer the ADP-ribose moiety of
NAD to specific amino acids in protein acceptors (1, 2). The best
characterized mono-ADP-ribosylation reactions are those catalyzed by
bacterial toxin ADP-ribosyltransferases such as cholera (3), diphtheria
(4), and pertussis (5) toxins, which alter critical metabolic and
regulatory pathways. For example, cholera toxin ADP-ribosylates an
arginine in the Mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity specific for arginine has been
detected in numerous animal tissues (2, 6-14). Transferases have been
cloned from rabbit (7) and human (8) skeletal muscle, chicken
polymorphonuclear granulocytes (9) and nucleoblasts (10), and mouse
lymphoma cell lines Yac-1 (12, 13) and SL12 (16). Based on
immunological, biochemical, and sequence analysis, it appears that the
transferase, termed ART1, is glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)1-anchored to the cell
surface (8, 12). Consistent with its extracellular location, a
GPI-linked muscle transferase in C2C12 mouse myotubes ADP-ribosylates
integrin GPI-anchored transferases were found also in mouse cytotoxic T
lymphocytes (CTL) and some murine T cell lymphoma and hybridoma cells.
Treatment of CTL with NAD inhibited target conjugate formation and
cytolytic function (19). These suppressive effects of NAD on CTL were
prevented by treatment of the cells with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C, which releases GPI-linked proteins from the cell surface, consistent with the conclusion that a GPI-anchored
ADP-ribosyltransferase was responsible for modulating CTL function.
Further study (20) suggested that ecto-NAD served as the substrate for
ADP-ribosylation of a 40-kDa CTL membrane protein (p40) that modulates
tyrosine kinase activity of p56lck, thereby suppressing
CD8-mediated transmembrane signaling. Release of the membrane-bound
transferase with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C
prevented the NAD-induced inhibition of kinase activity.
Rat RT6 and mouse Rt6 are another family of GPI-anchored
ADP-ribosyltransferase expressed on T lymphocytes (21-23). RT6 protein exhibits primarily NADase (23) and auto-ADP-ribosyltransferase activities (24) but does not ADP-ribosylate free arginine. Unlike the
rat RT6 proteins, mouse Rt6-1 is primarily a transferase, with a
relatively low level of NADase activity (25). The differences between
RT6 and Rt6 appear to result from the presence of glutamine or
glutamate, respectively, at the active site (26, 27).
Two lymphocyte ADP-ribosyltransferases, termed Yac-1 (12) and Yac-2
(13), were cloned from mouse lymphoma (Yac-1) cells. Yac-1, a
GPI-linked exoenzyme, is the murine equivalent of ART1 and exhibits 75 and 77% similarity of amino acid sequence to the rabbit and human
muscle enzymes, respectively. In contrast to ART1 transferase, ART5,
although membrane-associated, is apparently not GPI-anchored. The
hydrophobicity profile includes a hydrophobic signal sequence at the N
terminus but not at the C terminus, as would be expected in a
GPI-linked protein. To that extent, it is similar to a secreted protein
and resembles a chicken transferase found in heterophil granules (9).
ART5 is also of interest because it exhibits significant basal NADase
activity. Here we report that ART5 transferase activity is modified by
auto-ADP-ribosylation.
Materials
Geneticin (G418) was purchased from Life Technologies, Inc.;
NheI, XhoI, rabbit muscle
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), KspI
restriction endonucleases, and the polymerase chain reaction master kit
were from Roche Molecular Biochemicals; the plasmid extraction kit was
from Qiagen; NAD, agmatine, ADP-ribose, polyoxyethylenesorbitan
monolaurate (Tween 20), 2-mercaptoethanol, mercuric chloride,
hydroxylamine, hydrochloride, trichloroacetic acid, aprotinin,
leupeptin, pepstatin, and Triton X-100 were from Sigma;
[adenine-U-14C]NAD (252 mCi/mmol),
[carbonyl-14C]NAD (35 mCi/mmol), enhanced
chemiluminescence Western blotting detection reagents, and PD-10
columns (Sephadex G-25) were from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech;
[adenylate-32P]NAD (30 Ci/mmol) was from NEN Life Science
Products; nitrocellulose membrane and Dowex AG 1-X2 resin were from
Bio-Rad; Ultrogel AcA 44 was from Biosepra; BCA protein assay reagents
were from Pierce; FLAG system was from IBI Eastman Kodak Company;
SilverXpress silver stain kit and 4-20% Tris-Glycine gels were from
NOVEX; and isopropyl- Methods
Construction of Wild-type ART5 Expression Vectors--
Wild-type
mouse lymphocyte (ART5) cDNA was amplified by polymerase chain
reaction using forward (5'-ACG TAC GTA CGT CTC GAG GCC CTC TGG AAG GTT
CGA GCT GTT-3') and reverse (5'-ACG TAC GTA CGT AGA TCT GGA GGG TGC CTC
TGG CTG CCC GAC-3') primers. The polymerase chain reaction products
were digested with XhoI and BglII and then
subcloned into a pFLAG-MAC expression vector that was used to transform
Escherichia coli DH5 Expression and Purification of ART5 Fusion
Proteins--
Transformed E. coli DH5 Immunoblot Analyses--
Nitrocellulose membranes for immunoblot
analysis were incubated with 5% nonfat dry milk in 20 mM
Tris (pH 7.6), containing 137 mM NaCl and 0.05% Tween 20 (TBS-T), before incubation with anti-FLAG M2 monoclonal antibody
diluted to 100 µg/ml with the same solution containing 3% nonfat dry
milk. Membranes were washed with TBS-T once for 15 min and twice for 5 min, and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase conjugate
anti-mouse IgG diluted 1:1000 in TBS-T containing 3% nonfat dry milk
for 1 h. After one 15-min wash and four 5-min washes with TBS-T,
immunoreactive proteins were detected by chemiluminescence.
ADP-ribosyltransferase Assay--
ADP-ribosyltransferase assays
were incubated at 30 °C for 1 h in a total volume of 300 µl
containing 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5), 20 mM agmatine, and 0.1 mM
[adenine-U-14C]NAD (0.05 µCi). Samples (100 µl) were
applied to columns (0.5 × 4 cm) of Dowex AG1-X2, and
[14C]ADP-ribosylagmatine was eluted with 5 ml of water
for liquid scintillation counting.
NADase and ADP-ribosyltransferase Assays Based on Nicotinamide
Release--
The NADase and transferase reactions were carried out in
300 µl of 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) containing
0.1 mM [carbonyl-14C]NAD (0.05 µCi) with
(i.e. transferase and NADase) or without (i.e.
NADase) 20 mM agmatine. After incubation at 30 °C for
1 h, samples (100 µl) were applied to columns (0.5 × 4 cm)
of Dowex AG1-X2. [14C]Nicotinamide was eluted with 5 ml
of water for liquid scintillation counting.
Auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART5--
Purified ART5 (30 ng) was
incubated in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with 1 mM [adenylate-32P]NAD (6 µCi/assay) in a
total volume of 100 µl at 30 °C. In a parallel experiment,
purified ART5 (160 ng) was incubated in 50 mM potassium
phosphate (pH 7.5) with 1 mM
[adenine-U-14C]NAD (0.8 µCi/assay) or
[carbonyl-14C]NAD (0.8 µCi/assay) in a total volume of
1.6 ml at 30 °C. At 0 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 7 h, and
8 h, 50 µl (duplicate) of enzyme reaction solutions were used to
measure transferase and NADase activities; 25 µl of ice-cold 100%
trichloroacetic acid were added to 100 µl of ADP-ribosylation
reaction mixture. Samples were placed on ice for 1 h. After
centrifugation (10,000 × g) at 4 °C for 30 min,
protein was separated by SDS-PAGE in 12% gel and transferred to
nitrocellulose membranes that were exposed to film.
Kinetics of Auto-ADP-ribosylation--
Purified ART5 (30 ng) was
incubated in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with 1, 5, 20, 100, 300, 1000, 3000, or 10,000 µM [adenylate-32P]NAD (6 µCi/assay) in a total volume of
100 µl at 30 °C for 1 h. Reactions were stopped by adding 25 µl of ice-cold 100% trichloroacetic acid to 100 µl of the reaction
mixture and kept on ice for 1 h before centrifugation (10,000 × g) at 4 °C, for 30 min. Proteins were dissolved in
1 × SDS-PAGE sample buffer, boiled for 5 min, and separated by
SDS-PAGE in 12% gels. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose
membranes that were then exposed to film. In a parallel experiment,
purified ART5 (10 ng) was incubated in 50 mM potassium
phosphate (pH 7.5) with 1, 5, 20, 100, 300, 1000, 3000, or 10000 µM [adenine-U-14C]NAD (0.025 µCi/assay)
or [carbonyl-14C]NAD (0.025 µCi/assay) in a total
volume of 150 µl at 30 °C for 1 h. At the time point, 50 µl
(duplicate) of enzyme reaction solutions were used to measure
transferase and NADase activities.
Purification of ADP-ribosylated Proteins--
Purified ART5
fusion protein (about 400 ng) was incubated in 50 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with 0, 10, 100, or 1000 µM 32P-NAD (24 µCi/assay) in a final volume of 600 µl at
30 °C for 1 h and 8 h. At the time point, free NAD was
removed from the protein solution by chromatography × 2 on PD-10
columns, equilibrated, and eluted with TBS; NADase activity and
radioactivity were measured in fractions. The second pooled peak
protein fractions contained about 68% of the applied protein and
<0.02% of the free NAD. Transferase and NADase activities of the
ADP-ribosylated protein were measured in the presence of 100 µM NAD with or without 20 mM agmatine. To
quantify ADP-ribosylated protein, immunoblotting was performed. To
determine whether the proteins were ADP-ribosylated, they were resolved
by SDS-PAGE in 12% gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes
for autoradiography and immunoblotting.
Kinetic Constants of ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase
Activities--
Purified ART5 (~1.8 µg) was incubated in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with and without 1000 µM NAD (final volume, 2.5 ml) at 30 °C for 1 h.
At the time point, free NAD was separated from protein by
chromatography × 2 on PD-10 columns, equilibrated and eluted with
TBS. Transferase and NADase activities were measured for 1 h at
30 °C in the presence of 100, 200, 300, 600, 1000, and 3000 µM NAD with or without 20 mM agmatine.
Analysis of Auto-ADP-ribosylated Protein--
3 µg of
partially purified ART1, and 30 ng of purified ART5 were incubated in
50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with 0.1 mM
of either [carbonyl-14C]NAD (35 mCi/mmol),
[adenine-U-14C]NAD (supplied as 252 mCi/mmol and diluted
with unlabeled NAD to 35 mCi/mmol), or [adenylate-32P]NAD
(6 µCi/assay). 30 µg of GAPDH was incubated with the radiolabeled NAD, with or without 1 mM sodium nitroprusside. Reactions
were incubated for 1 h at 30 °C. Protein was precipitated with
the addition of ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (final concentration, 20%) and, following incubation at 4 °C overnight, was collected by
centrifugation (10,000 × g, 30 min). The pellet was
suspended in SDS-PAGE sample buffer and heated in boiling water for 5 min. Samples were subjected to electrophoresis in SDS-PAGE (4-20%
gel). Gels with labeled ART1 and GAPDH were stained with Coomassie Blue and dried. Gels with labeled ART5 were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. X-Omat films were exposed to gels or membranes with 32P-labeled protein at Mass Analysis--
Purified ART5 (about 5 µg), eluted with TBS
containing FLAG peptide (200 µl/ml), was concentrated and incubated
at 30 °C for 1 h with or without 1 mM NAD (final
volume, 0.5 ml). Electrospray mass spectroscopy was performed with a
Hewlett-Packard model G1946A instrument interfaced to a model 1100 high
pressure liquid chromatography system equipped with a Vydac 218TP
narrow bore C18 column (218TP5205, Vydac, Hesperia, CA). The initial
solvent was 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid, and gradient elution was
effected with 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid/acetronitrile at 2%/min and
a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min. The effluent from the column was mixed in a
tee with neat acetic acid delivered by another 1100 series pump (100 µl/min), and the mixture was introduced into the mass spectrometer
(28).
Chemical Stability of ADP-ribose-Protein Linkage--
Purified
ART5 fusion protein (180 ng) was incubated in 50 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with 1 mM
[adenylate-32P]NAD (36 µCi/assay) in a total volume of
600 µl at 30 °C. After ADP-ribosylation for 1 h or 8 h,
protein was precipitated with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid (final
concentration, 20%) and dissolved in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH
7.5). Chemical stability of ADP-ribose-protein linkage was determined
by incubation of protein for 2 h at 37 °C with H2O,
1 M NaCl, 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH, 10 mM HgCl2, or 1 M NH2OH
(in 0.1 M Tris, adjusted to pH 7.0 with NH4OH).
Protein was precipitated with ice-cold trichloroacetic acid, subjected to SDS-PAGE in 12% gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for autoradiography and immunoblotting.
Protein Assay--
Protein was determined using either BCA
protein assay reagent or silver staining with bovine serum albumin as standard.
ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase Activities of ART5--
ART5
FLAG fusion protein was purified ~4500-fold from E. coli
cell lysate supernatant with a recovery of approximately 17% in a
two-step procedure. Data from a typical purification are summarized in
Table I. Enzyme purity was confirmed by
silver staining. SDS-PAGE in 4-20% gels under reducing conditions
revealed a single band of about 34 kDa in the lane containing 10 ng of purified ART5 (Fig. 1). Transferase and
NADase activities of the purified protein are shown in Table
II. In the presence of 100 µM NAD, NADase activity was approximately eight times
that of transferase.
Effects of NAD on ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase Activities of
ART5--
During incubation with NAD, the transferase and NADase
activities of ART5 changed dramatically. These effects were
investigated systematically by varying the NAD concentration and time.
As shown in Fig. 2, during incubation at
30 °C with 1 mM NAD as substrate, NADase activity was
initially much greater than transferase, but by 1 h, almost
ceased. Transferase activity, first detected after 30 min, was constant
thereafter for 3 h and then declined somewhat. After 1 h of
incubation with 1 mM NAD, ART5 had in effect changed from
an NADase to a transferase. To determine whether NAD itself was the
cause, purified ART5 fusion protein was incubated with 1 mM
nicotinamide, ADP-ribose, or NAD, for 1 h at 30 °C before assay. Incubation of ART5 with nicotinamide or ADP-ribose prior to
assay did not change the relative transferase and NADase activities (data not shown). Only incubation with NAD enhanced transferase and
decreased NADase activities. In assays for 1 h at 30 °C,
transferase activity was essentially undetectable with 1-20
µM NAD (Fig. 3). The ratio
of NADase to transferase activity was about 8 with 100 µM
NAD, 1.8 with 1000 µM NAD, and 1 with 10 mM
NAD. Because ART5 is auto-ADP-ribosylated, we postulated that the
decrease in NADase and increase in transferase activities in a manner
dependent on time and NAD concentration resulted from the
auto-modification.
To define better the properties of the ADP-ribosylated protein, ART5
was incubated with 10, 100, or 1000 µM NAD for 1 h
or 8 h followed by removal of NAD from the ADP-ribosylated protein and assay of transferase and NADase activities. Activities were not
significantly changed after incubation without NAD for 1 h but
were lower after 8 h. Following incubation with NAD, transferase activity increased, whereas NADase activity decreased. Incubation with
100 µM or 1 mM NAD for 1 or 8 h
decreased ART5 NADase activity and increased transferase activity
significantly, whereas 10 µM NAD was ineffective.
NADase activity was decreased about 95%, and transferase
activity was doubled after incubation with 1 mM NAD for
8 h (Fig. 4). When assayed with 10 µM NAD, the transferase activity of ART5 that had been
incubated with 1 mM NAD was 3.8-fold that of control,
whereas the NADase activity was 2% of control (Fig.
5). The increased loss of NADase activity
associated with increasing concentrations of NAD present during the 8-h
incubation was also observed when assays were carried out with 100 µM or 1 mM NAD, but the concomitant increase
in transferase activity was much less evident (Fig. 5). In sum,
however, the data are consistent with the conclusion that ART5 NADase
activity is decreased by auto-ADP-ribosylation.
To examine further the effects of ADP-ribosylation, a kinetic analysis
was performed. A 1-h incubation period was chosen because ART5 was
stable at 30 °C during that time. Assay of transferase and NADase
activities of ADP-ribosylated and non-ADP-ribosylated ART5 FLAG fusion
protein was performed for 1 h at 30 °C. Kinetic constants of
ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase activities, determined from
Lineweaver-Burk plots by linear regression analysis, are presented in
Table III. After ADP-ribosylation,
apparent Km for the NADase reaction was increased,
but Vmax was decreased. Auto-ADP-ribosylation
did not appear to be associated with a change in
Vmax for the ADP-ribosyltransferase reaction. As
shown in Fig. 6, at low NAD
concentrations, the ADP-ribosyltyransferase activity of
non-ADP-ribosylated ART5 (Fig. 6A) was much lower than that of ADP-ribosylated ART5 (Fig. 6B). At high NAD
concentrations, probably as a result of rapid auto-ADP-ribosylation,
the velocity approached that of purified auto-ADP-ribosylated ART5. As
might be expected, the Lineweaver-Burk plots are not linear for
non-ADP-ribosylated ART5 (Fig. 6A). Based on the kinetics of
automodification (Fig. 7) and the effect
of NAD concentration on modification (Fig.
8), at high NAD the enzyme is
significantly modified at 5 min (Fig. 7). Hence, during assays of
nonmodified ART5, both nonmodified and ADP-ribosylated ART5 would be
expected to contribute to activity. At high NAD, the contribution of
modified ART5 would be greater.
Auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART5--
During incubation with
[32P]NAD, radiolabeling of ART5 increased with time,
whereas mobility of the protein on SDS-PAGE decreased (Fig. 7).
Auto-modification, as evidenced by slowed migration, was greater with
higher concentrations of NAD, although this is not visualized directly
on radioautography because of differences in specific activity of NAD
at the different concentrations (Fig. 8). The appearance of three
immunoreactive (and two radiolabeled) proteins of 34-36 kDa in Fig.
9 is consistent with the addition of
multiple ADP-ribose moieties to ART5 in a time- and
NAD-dependent manner. Because the effects on activity
occurred by 1 h with 1 mM NAD (Fig. 2), it appears
that a single addition is sufficient to decrease the NADase
activity.
Modification of ART5 with 32P-NAD and
14C-NAD and Mass Spectroscopic Analysis--
To confirm
that ART5 was indeed auto-ADP-ribosylated and that radioactivity was
not incorporated because of the covalent or noncovalent attachment of
NAD, [adenine-U-14C] and [carbonyl-14C]NAD
were added in separate assays, and proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Radiolabeled ART5 was detected after incubation with [adenine-U-14C] NAD but not
[carbonyl-14C]NAD (Fig.
10C). Results were similar
with ART1 (Fig. 10A). GAPDH (Fig. 10B), however, was labeled
by both [adenine-U-14C]NAD and
[carbonyl-14C]NAD, consistent with the attachment of NAD,
not just ADP-ribose, as previously reported (29). ART5, therefore, was
auto-ADP-ribosylated, not modified by NAD. To address this point
further, two preparations of ART5 incubated without and with 1 mM NAD for 1 h at 30 °C were analyzed by
electrospray mass spectroscopy, giving modified ART5 a weight of 32,287 and unmodified ART5 a weight of 31,746, a difference of 541 that is in
excellent agreement with the addition of ADP-ribose (molecular weight,
542) to ART5.
Chemical Stability of ADP-ribosyl-ART5 Protein--
To
characterize the ADP-ribose-protein linkage, 32P-labeled
proteins from the auto-ADP-ribosylation reaction were incubated with
NH2OH, HgCl2, HCl, NaOH, or NaCl. Because by
SDS-PAGE in 12% gel, ART5 incubated with 1 mM NAD for
8 h exhibited more bands of slower mobility than did ART5
incubated with 1 mM NAD for 1 h; it was apparently
ADP-ribosylated at more than one site. Both preparations were,
therefore, evaluated for chemical stability. Radioactivity was not
released from ART5 by NH2OH, HgCl2, NaOH, HCl,
or NaCl, suggesting that ADP-ribose linkages to ART5 may not involve
arginine, cysteine, glutamine, or lysine (Fig.
11). As positive controls, cholera
toxin, which ADP-ribosylates arginine, and pertussis toxin, which
ADP-ribosylates cysteine, were used. In contrast to the stability of
auto-ADP-ribosylated ART5, radiolabel was released from the protein
ADP-ribosylated by cholera toxin with 1 M
NH2OH, consistent with an arginine linkage, and from pertussis toxin-ADP-ribosylated protein by 0.01 M
HgCl2, consistent with a cysteine linkage (data not
shown).
This report demonstrates that NADase activity of ART5 is markedly
decreased by auto-ADP-ribosylation, whereas the transferase activity is
in fact enhanced. ART5, based on the SDS-PAGE, appeared to be modified
at multiple sites. By using PD-10 columns to separate ADP-ribosylated
protein from NAD after the first incubation, effects of the prior
modification could be assessed at least partially independent of
ongoing auto-ADP-ribosylation. The purified auto-ADP-ribosylated ART5
lost ~95% of its NADase but almost doubled its transferase activity.
Somewhat surprising, because ART5 uses arginine as an ADP-ribose
acceptor (13), was the fact that auto-ADP-ribose-protein linkages
produced by ART5 were stable to incubation for 2 h at 37 °C
with 1 M NH2OH, which breaks the
ADP-ribosylarginine bond.
Labeling of proteins in the presence of [32P]NAD does not
necessarily result from the transfer of ADP-ribose to a specific amino acid acceptor. Proteins can be nonenzymatically labeled by covalent attachment of NAD (29). Both the [14C]adenine and
[14C]nicotinamide moieties of NAD were incorporated into
GAPDH, indicating that the protein was nonenzymatically modified
covalently with NAD, not with ADP-ribose. With ART5, a labeled protein
was detected with [adenine-U-14C] NAD but not with
[carbonyl-14C]NAD. In agreement, mono-ADP-ribosylated
ART5 showed the expected increase in size determined by mass
spectroscopic analysis. It was concluded that ART5 was
auto-ADP-ribosylated.
NADases are a mechanistically diverse group of enzymes. Some also
possess transferase activity that catalyze the covalent linkage of
ADP-ribose to an acceptor protein (30). All transferases, both
bacterial and mammalian, possess NADase activity, although it is
significantly less than the maximal transferase activity. Lieberman
(31) first observed NAD-dependent inhibition of cellular NADase activity and reappearance of the enzyme activity after removal
of NAD. This observation was confirmed in other systems (32, 33).
Further investigation demonstrated that inactivation of NADase was due
to an auto-ADP-ribosylation reaction. ADP-ribosylated NADase of rabbit
erythrocytes was de-ADP-ribosylated when incubated without NAD, and
enzyme activity was simultaneously restored (33). Auto-modified ART5
appeared to be stable in the absence of NAD. Could auto-modification be
occurring in vivo? Based on its structure, ART5 appears to
be a secreted protein (34). The concentration of NAD in plasma from
humans, mice, rats, and rabbits is reported to be 140-290
nM (35). During cell lysis, e.g. at sites of
inflammation, the local concentration of extracellular NAD is likely to
be higher because of the release of intracellular NAD. The decrease in
NADase activity resulting from ADP-ribosylation of ART5 might preserve NAD for use in a transferase reaction, perhaps to ADP-ribosylate the
surface proteins of inflammatory cells.
In addition to ART5, several transferases have been assayed in or
cloned from lymphocytes (19, 36-39). Rat RT6.2 and mouse Rt6 are
GPI-linked surface proteins that possess NADase and
transferase activities, respectively (23, 24). The deduced amino acid sequence of ART5 is ~28% identical to those of rat RT6.1 and RT6.2 and mouse Rt6-1 and 33% identical to that of Yac-1. Like ART5, rat
RT6 can be auto-ADP-ribosylated (15). All of these enzymes may have a
common mechanism of NAD binding and catalysis, consistent with
conservation of structure (13, 22).
NAD not only decreased NADase activity but also enhanced transferase
activity of ART5. The observation that auto-ADP-ribosylation inhibited
NADase activity of ART5 might suggest that the modification occurred at
a critical active site residue. The fact that NAD did not block ART5
transferase activity indicates that the modification, while affecting
the active site, does not interfere with a critical active site
function. It may be worthwhile to determine whether this phenomenon
occurs also with other NADases.
We thank Dr. Martha Vaughan and Dr. Vincent
C. Manganiello for helpful discussions and critical review of the
manuscript and Dr. Jesús Rivera-Nieves for assistance with
modification of ART5 with 32P-NAD and
14C-NAD.
*
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Rm. 5N307, Bldg. 10, 10 Center Dr., MSC 1434, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1434. Tel.: 301-496-9072;
Fax: 301-402-1610; E-mail: wengb@gwgate.nhlbi.nih. gov.
¶
Present address: Dept. of Life Science, Pohang University of
Science and Technology, Pohang, Kyungbuk 790-784, South Korea.
The abbreviations used are:
GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol;
NADase, NAD glycohydrolase;
ART5, ADP-ribosyltransferase 5;
CTL, cytotoxic T cells;
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase;
TBS, Tris-buffered saline;
TBS-T, Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween 20;
PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis.
Modification of the ADP-ribosyltransferase and NAD Glycohydrolase
Activities of a Mammalian Transferase (ADP-ribosyltransferase 5) by
Auto-ADP-ribosylation*
§,
,
¶,
, and
Pulmonary-Critical Care Medicine Branch and
the
Laboratory of Biochemistry, NHLBI, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1434
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit of the stimulatory heterotrimeric
guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein), resulting in the
activation of adenylyl cyclase and an increase in intracellular cyclic
AMP (3).
7 (17). Inhibitor studies suggest that the muscle
transferase may participate in the regulation of myogenesis (18).
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-D-thiogalactoside was from Gold
BioTechnology Inc.
competent cells.
cells were grown
to an absorbance at 600 nm of 0.4 in 500 ml of LB medium with 100 µg/ml ampicillin before isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactoside
was added (final concentration, 0.3 mM), and incubation was
continued for another 2 h at 30 °C. Bacteria were pelleted by
centrifugation (15 min, 5,000 × g, 4 °C) and frozen
at
80 °C. After thawing on ice, cells were suspended in 20 ml of
50 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl containing protease inhibitors (leupeptin,
aprotinin, and pepstatin, each 1 µg/ml), incubated for 30 min on ice
and sonicated (20 s × 3). The lysate was centrifuged (12,500 × g, 40 min); the supernatant was filtered (0.45-µm
filter, Millipore) and concentrated ~4-fold. The concentrated sample
(~5 ml) was incubated with 1% Triton X-100 overnight then applied to
an Ultrogel AcA 44 column (2.5 × 108 cm), equilibrated, and
eluted with 20 mM Tris (pH 7.5) containing 1 mM
EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, and 1% Triton X-100. Fractions
containing maximal enzyme activity were pooled and incubated with
anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel for 16 h at 4 °C. The gel was washed
four times with 12 ml of Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (50 mM
Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl), before elution of ART5 fusion
protein with TBS containing 1% Triton X-100 and 200 µg/ml FLAG
peptide. The protein was stored at
80 °C.
80 °C for 48 h. X-Omat
films were exposed to gels or membranes with 14C-labeled
protein at
80 °C for 120 days.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
Summary of purification of ART5 FLAG-fusion protein

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
SDS-PAGE analysis of purified ART5 FLAG
fusion protein. The 4-20% gradient gel was silver-stained and
dried with DryEase Drying System (NOVEX). Lane 1,
protein standards; lane 2, crude lysate (1 µg); lane
3, pooled enzyme Ultrogel AcA 44 peak fractions (400 ng);
lane 4, purified ART5 FLAG fusion protein (10 ng).
ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase activities of ART5 FLAG fusion
protein

View larger version (17K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Time course of ADP-ribosyltransferase and
NADase activities of ART5 FLAG fusion protein. Purified ART5 (160 ng) was incubated at 30 °C in 50 mM potassium phosphate
(pH 7.5) with 1 mM [adenine-U-14C]NAD (0.8 µCi/assay) (
) or [carbonyl-14C]NAD (0.8 µCi/assay)
(
,
) without (
) or with (
,
) 20 mM agmatine
(total volume, 1.6 ml). At the indicated times, duplicate 50-µl
samples were removed for radioassay of ADP-ribosylagmatine (
) or
nicotinamide (
,
). Data (nmol of product accumulated at the
indicated time) are the means ± S.E. of values from two
independent experiments.

View larger version (21K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effect of NAD concentration on
ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase activities of ART5 FLAG fusion
protein. Purified ART5 (10 ng) was incubated at 30 °C for
1 h in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with the
indicated concentration of [adenine-U-14C]NAD or
[carbonyl-14C]NAD (0.025 µCi/assay) in a total volume
of 150 µl. Transferase activity (stippled bars), NADase
activity (open bars), and nicotinamide release in the
presence of 20 mM agmatine (black bars) are
expressed as nmol/min/µg of ART5. Data are the means ± S.E. of
values from two independent experiments.

View larger version (27K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Enzyme activities of ADP-ribosylated ART5
FLAG fusion protein. Purified ART5 (400 ng) was incubated for
1 h or 8 h with the indicated concentration of NAD (0, 10, 100, or 1000 µM) in a total volume of 600 µl before
separation of NAD from protein using pairs of PD-10 columns in series.
Samples of ART5 (~10 ng) were then assayed for transferase activity
(stippled bars), NADase activity (open bars), and
nicotinamide release in the presence of 20 mM agmatine
(black bars) reported as nmol/min/µg of ART5. Assays were
carried out with 100 µM NAD. Data are the means ± S.E. of values from two independent experiments.

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase activities
of ADP-ribosylated ART5 FLAG fusion protein assayed at different NAD
concentrations. Purified ART5 was incubated with indicated NAD
concentrations for 8 h. After separation of NAD from the protein
as in Fig. 4, samples of ART5 (~10 ng) were assayed for transferase
activity (stippled bars), NADase activity (open
bars), and nicotinamide release in the presence of 20 mM agmatine (black bars) reported as
nmol/min/µg of ART5. Assays were carried out with 10 µM
(A), 100 µM (B), and 1000 µM (C) NAD. Data are the means ± S.E. of
values from two independent experiments.
Kinetic constants for ADP-ribosyltransferase and NADase activities of
ADP-ribosylated and non-ADP-ribosylated ART5 FLAG fusion proteins

View larger version (15K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
ADP-ribose transfer by ADP-ribosylated and
non-ADP-ribosylated ART5. Purified ART5 (~1.8 µg) was
incubated in 50 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) without
(A) or with (B)1 mM NAD (final
volume, 2.5 ml) at 30 °C for 1 h. Free NAD was separated from
protein as in Fig. 4. Transferase activity was measured for 1 h at
30 °C in the presence of 100, 200, 300, 600, 1000, or 3000 µM NAD with 20 mM agmatine. 1/total
transferase activity (
,
) in A and 1/total transferase
activity (
) in B show the results with
non-ADP-ribosylated and ADP-ribosylated ART5, respectively. Data shown
are representative of three independent experiments.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
Time course of auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART5
FLAG fusion protein. Purified ART5 (30 ng) was incubated at
30 °C for the indicated time in 50 mM potassium
phosphate (pH 7.5) with 1 mM
[adenylate-32P]NAD (6 µCi/assay) in a total volume of
100 µl. Proteins were precipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid and
subjected to SDS-PAGE in 12% gel before transfer to nitrocellulose
membranes and autoradiography. A and B show
results of autoradiography and Western blotting, respectively.
Positions of molecular mass markers are on the left.
Data shown are representative of two independent experiments.

View larger version (60K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Effect of NAD concentration on
Auto-ADP-ribosylation of ART5 FLAG fusion protein. Purified ART5
(30 ng) was incubated at 30 °C for 1 h in 50 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.5) with the indicated concentrations of
[adenylate-32P]NAD (6 µCi/assay) before trichloroacetic
acid-precipitated proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred
to nitrocellulose membranes for autoradiography (A) and
Western blotting (B). Positions of molecular mass markers
are on the left. Data shown are representative of two
independent experiments.

View larger version (58K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 9.
Analysis of ADP-ribosylated ART5 FLAG fusion
protein. ART5 fusion protein was incubated with indicated
concentration of [adenylate-32P]NAD (6 µCi/assay) for
1 h or 8 h before removal of NAD and trichloroacetic acid
precipitation of proteins (20 ng) for separation by SDS-PAGE followed
by autoradiography (A) and immunoblotting (B).
Positions of molecular mass markers are on the left. Data
shown are representative of two independent experiments.

View larger version (35K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 10.
Incorporation of radiolabeled NAD
([adenine-14C]- NAD, [carbonyl-14C]NAD,
and [adenylate-32P]NAD) into ART5 FLAG fusion
protein. 3 µg of ART1 (A) or 30 ng of ART5
(C) were incubated for 1 h at 30 °C with 0.1 mM of [carbonyl-14C]NAD (35 mCi/mmol),
[adenine-U-14C]NAD (diluted with unlabeled NAD to 35 mCi/mmol), or [adenylate-32P]NAD (600 mCi/mmol) 100 µl.
30 µg of GAPDH samples (B) were treated the same way
except that for each, labeled NAD incubations were performed without
and with 1 mM sodium nitroprusside (SNP).
Trichloroacetic acid-precipitated proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE.
Gels containing ART1 (A) or GAPDH (B) were
stained with Coomassie blue and dried. ART5 samples (C) were
transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. X-Omat films were exposed to
gels or membrane with 32P-labeled protein at
80 °C for
48 h and with 14C-labeled protein at
80 °C for
120 days. Positions of molecular mass markers are on the
left.

View larger version (57K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 11.
Chemical stability of ADP-ribosyl-ART5
linkages. After incubation at 30 °C for 1 h or 8 h
with 1 mM [adenylate-32P]NAD (36 µCi/assay), ART5 (180 ng) was precipitated with trichloroacetic acid,
followed by incubation in 100 µl of 1 M NaCl, 0.1 M HCl, 0.1 M NaOH, 10 mM
HgCl2, 1 M NH2OH for
2 h at 37 °C. The proteins were again precipitated with
trichloroacetic acid and subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by
autoradiography (A) and Western blotting (B).
Positions of molecular mass markers are on the left. Data
shown are representative of three experiments.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Ueda, K.,
and Hayaishi, O.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
54,
73-100[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2.
Williamson, K. C.,
and Moss, J.
(1990)
in
ADP-ribosylating Toxins and G Proteins: Insights into Signal Transduction
(Moss, J.
, and Vaughan, M., eds)
, pp. 493-510, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
3.
Moss, J.,
and Vaughan, M.
(1988)
Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol.
61,
303-379[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Collier, R. J.
(1990)
in
ADP-ribosylating Toxins and G Proteins: Insights into Signal Transduction
(Moss, J.
, and Vaughan, M., eds)
, pp. 3-19, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
5.
Ui, M.
(1990)
in
ADP-ribosylating Toxins and G Proteins: Insights into Signal Transduction
(Moss, J.
, and Vaughan, M., eds)
, pp. 45-77, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
6.
Moss, J.,
Stanley, S. J.,
and Watkins, P. A.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
5838-5840 7.
Zolkiewska, A.,
Nightingale, M. S.,
and Moss, J.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
11352-11356 8.
Okazaki, I. J.,
Zolkiewska, A.,
Nightingale, M. S.,
and Moss, J.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
12828-12836[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Tsuchiya, M.,
Hara, N.,
Yamada, K.,
Osago, H.,
and Shimoyama, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
27451-27457 10.
Davis, T.,
and Shall, S.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
164,
371-372[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Donnelly, L. E.,
Rendell, N. B.,
Murray, S.,
Allport, J. R.,
Lo, G.,
Kefalas, P.,
Taylor, G. W.,
and MacDermot, J.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
315,
635-641
12.
Okazaki, I. J.,
Kim, H.-J.,
McElvaney, G.,
Lesma, E.,
and Moss, J.
(1996)
Blood
88,
915-921 13.
Okazaki, I. J.,
Kim, H.-J.,
and Moss, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
22052-22057 14.
Schuman, E. M.,
Meffert, M. K.,
Schulman, H.,
and Madison, D. V.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11958-11962 15.
Maehama, T.,
Nishina, H.,
Hoshino, S.-I.,
Kanaho, Y.,
and Katada, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
22747-22751 16.
Yu, Y.,
Okamoto, S.,
Nemoto, E.,
and Dennert, G.
(1997)
DNA Cell Biol.
16,
235-244[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
17.
Zolkiewska, A.,
and Moss, J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
25273-25276 18.
Kharadia, S. V.,
Huiatt, T. W.,
Huang, H.-Y.,
Peterson, J. E.,
and Graves, D. J.
(1992)
Exp. Cell Res.
201,
33-42[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
19.
Wang, J.,
Nemoto, E.,
Kots, A. Y.,
Kaslow, H. R.,
and Dennert, G.
(1994)
J. Immunol.
153,
4048-4058[Abstract]
20.
Wang, J.,
Nemoto, E.,
and Dennert, G.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
2819-2827[Abstract]
21.
Prochazka, M.,
Gaskins, H. R.,
Leiter, E. H.,
Koch-Nolte, F.,
Haag, F.,
and Thiele, H.-G.
(1991)
Immunogenetics
33,
152-156[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
22.
Koch-Nolte, F.,
Peterson, D.,
Balasubramanian, S.,
Hagg, F.,
Kahlke, D.,
Willer, T.,
Kastelein, R.,
Bazan, F,
and Thiele, H.-G.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
7686-7693 23.
Takada, T.,
Iida, K.,
and Moss, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9420-9423 24.
Rigby, M. R.,
Bortell, R.,
Stevens, L. A.,
Moss, J.,
Kanaitsuka, T.,
Shigeta, H.,
Mordes, J. P.,
Greiner, D. L.,
and Rossini, A. A.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
4259-4265[Abstract]
25.
Moss, J.,
Stevens, L. A.,
Cavanaugh, E.,
Okazaki, I. J.,
Bortell, R.,
Kanaitsuka, T.,
Mordes, J. P.,
Greiner, D. L.,
and Rossini, A. A.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
4342-4346 26.
Hara, N.,
Tsuchiya, M.,
and Shimoyama, M.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
29552-29555 27.
Maehama, T.,
Hoshino, S.,
and Takada, T.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
388,
189-191[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
28.
Apffel, A.,
Fischer, S.,
Goldberg, G.,
Goodley, P. C.,
and Kuhlmann, F. E.
(1995)
J. Chromator. A
712,
177-190
29.
McDonald, L. J.,
and Moss, J.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
6238-6241 30.
Zolkiewska, A.,
Okazaki, I. J.,
and Moss, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
138,
107-112[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
31.
Lieberman, I.
(1957)
J. Biol. Chem.
225,
883-898 32.
Pekala, P. H.,
Yost, D. A.,
and Anderson, B. M.
(1980)
Mol. Cell. Biochem.
31,
49-56[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Han, M.-K.,
Lee, J.-Y.,
Cho, Y.-S.,
Song, Y. M.,
An, N.-H.,
Kim, H.-R.,
and Kim, U.-H.
(1996)
Biochem. J.
318,
903-908
34.
Okazaki, I. J.,
and Moss, J.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
23617-23620 35.
Kim, U. H.,
Kim, M. K.,
Kim, J. S.,
Han, M. K.,
Park, B. H.,
and Kim, H. R.
(1993)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
305,
147-152[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Soman, G.,
Haregewoin, A.,
Hom, R. C.,
and Finberg, R. W.
(1991)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
176,
301-308[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Ohno, T.,
Tsuchiya, M.,
Osago, H.,
Hara, N.,
Jidoi, J.,
and Shimoyama, M.
(1995)
Anal. Biochem.
231,
115-122[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Okamoto, S.,
Azhipa, O., Yu, Y.,
Russo, E.,
and Dennert, G.
(1998)
J. Immunol.
160,
4190-4198 39.
Nemoto, E.,
Stohlman, S.,
and Dennert, G.
(1996)
J. Immunol.
156,
85-92[Abstract]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Paone, L. A. Stevens, R. L. Levine, C. Bourgeois, W. K. Steagall, B. R. Gochuico, and J. Moss ADP-ribosyltransferase-specific Modification of Human Neutrophil Peptide-1 J. Biol. Chem., June 23, 2006; 281(25): 17054 - 17060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Liszt, E. Ford, M. Kurtev, and L. Guarente Mouse Sir2 Homolog SIRT6 Is a Nuclear ADP-ribosyltransferase J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21313 - 21320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Stevens, C. Bourgeois, R. Bortell, and J. Moss Regulatory Role of Arginine 204 in the Catalytic Activity of Rat Alloantigens ART2a and ART2b J. Biol. Chem., May 23, 2003; 278(22): 19591 - 19596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Corda and M. Di Girolamo Mono-ADP-Ribosylation: A Tool for Modulating Immune Response and Cell Signaling Sci. Signal., December 17, 2002; 2002(163): pe53 - pe53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||