J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 45, 32172-32181, November 5, 1999
Structure and Regulation of the Mouse ing1 Gene
THREE ALTERNATIVE TRANSCRIPTS ENCODE TWO PHD FINGER PROTEINS
THAT HAVE OPPOSITE EFFECTS ON p53 FUNCTION*
Marija
Zeremski
,
Jason E.
Hill§,
Serena S. S.
Kwek
,
Irina A.
Grigorian
,
Katerina V.
Gurova
,
Igor V.
Garkavtsev¶,
Luda
Diatchenko§,
Eugene V.
Koonin
, and
Andrei V.
Gudkov
**
From the
Department of Molecular Genetics, College of
Medicine, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois 60607, § CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, California 94303, the ¶ Department of Functional Genomics, Genome Therapeutics
Corp., Waltham, Massachusetts 02154, and
NCBI, National Library
of Medicine, National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20894
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human ING1 gene encodes nuclear
protein p33ING1, previously shown to cooperate with p53 in cell
growth control (Garkavtsev, I., Grigorian, I. A., Ossovskaya,
V. S., Chernov, M. V., Chumakov, P. M., and Gudkov,
A. V. (1998) Nature 391, 295-298). p33ING1
belongs to a small family of proteins from human, mouse, and yeast of
approximately the same size that show significant similarity to one
another within the C-terminal PHD finger domain and also contain an
additional N-terminal region with subtle but reliably detectable
sequence conservation. Mouse ing1 is transcribed from three
differently regulated promoters localized within a 4-kilobase pair
region of genomic DNA. The resulting transcripts share a long common
region encoded by a common exon and differ in their 5'-exon sequences.
Two transcripts are translated into the same protein of 185 amino
acids, the mouse equivalent of the human p33ING1, while the
third transcript encodes a longer protein that has 94 additional
N-terminal amino acids. Overexpression of the longer protein interferes
with the accumulation of p53 protein and activation of p53-responsive
promoters after DNA damage. Between the two products of
ing1, only the longer one forms a complex with p53 detectable by immunoprecipitation. These results indicate that a single
gene, ing1, encodes both p53-suppressing and p53-activating proteins that are regulated by alternative promoters.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The ING1 gene was identified as a result of a
functional screening of genes, the suppression of which is associated
with neoplastic transformation (1). Inhibition of ING1
expression by antisense RNA promotes anchorage-independent growth in
mouse breast epithelial cells, increases the frequency of focus
formation in NIH 3T3 cells, and prolongs the life span of diploid human
fibroblasts in culture. ING1 expression is up-regulated in
senescent human fibroblasts (2), and ectopic expression of
ING1 cDNA leads to G1 arrest or promotes
apoptosis in several cell types (3). The accumulated observations
indicating ING1 participation in the negative regulation of
cell proliferation, control of cellular aging, and apoptosis have
defined ING1 as a candidate tumor suppressor gene.
We have recently found that the biological effects of ING1
and p53 are interrelated and require the activity of both
genes. Neither of the two genes can, on its own, cause growth
inhibition when the other one is suppressed (4). Furthermore,
activation of transcription from the p21/WAF1 promoter, a
key mechanism of p53-mediated growth control, depends on the expression
of ING1. A physical association between p33ING1 and
p53 proteins is detected by immunoprecipitation. These results indicated that p33ING1 is a component of the p53 signaling
pathway and that p33ING1 cooperates with p53 in negative
regulation of cell proliferation by modulating
p53-dependent transcriptional activation.
Despite the apparent importance of ING1 in the control of
cell proliferation, our knowledge of expression, regulation, and function of this gene remains incomplete. Moreover,
GenBankTM contains two ING1 mRNA sequences
differing in their 5'-ends. The origin of these differences is unknown
and requires explanation. So far, all of the information about the
function of p33ING1 was obtained from in vitro
experiments that involved ectopic expression of ING1
cDNA or its suppression by antisense RNA. The analysis of the
structure of the ING1 gene and its regulation in
vivo are essential steps toward the understanding of its function and involvement in developmental and physiological processes. This is
particularly important due to the cooperation between ING1
and p53, which suggests that the functioning of the p53
signaling pathway could be dependent on the regulation of
ING1 expression.
In the present work, we used the mouse ortholog of the human
ING1 gene for detailed structural and expression studies,
with the goal of subsequently utilizing it as a system for extensive genetic analysis. ing1 was found to be a highly
evolutionarily conserved gene with complex regulation, which involves
generation of alternative transcripts initiated from different
promoters and translated into proteins that differ in structure and
expression patterns. Moreover, these proteins have opposite effects on
p53-regulated transcription, indicating that ing1 encodes
two products with the properties of a putative tumor suppressor and a
putative oncogene.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids and Libraries--
Retroviral vector pLXSN, used for
the introduction of mouse and human ING1 cDNA in NMuMG,
10(1), and ConA cells, was provided by A. Dusty Miller (5). Retroviral
vector pLXIG was constructed on the basis of pLXSN vector by
substituting SV40 promoter and neo sequences with the
internal ribosome entry site of encephalomyocarditis virus (6) followed
by the enhanced green fluorescent protein sequence (7). This vector
permits us to translate both the gene of interest (cloned upstream of
the internal ribosome entry site) and enhanced green fluorescent
protein from a single bicistronic mRNA transcribed from Moloney
murine leukemia virus long terminal repeat promoter. A cDNA library
from senescent mouse embryonic fibroblasts was constructed using
SuperScript system (Life Technologies, Inc.) according to the
manufacturer's protocol and cloned into the
phage
gt22A
vector. Stratagene's 129SVJ mouse genomic library cloned into the
FIX II vector was used for the isolation of the mouse genomic,
ing1-containing clones.
Cell Lines--
Cultures of mouse embryonic fibroblasts were
obtained from 10-day-old embryos. 10(1) cell line, a derivative of
Balb/c 3T3 cells that spontaneously deleted both p53 alleles (8), was kindly provided by Arnold Levine. Pseudonormal mouse mammary gland epithelial cell line (NMuMG) was obtained from the ATCC collection. Ecotropic retroviral packaging cell line BOSC23 (9) was kindly provided
by Warren Pear and David Baltimore (Massachusetts Institute of
Technology). The ConA cell line, a derivative of BALB/c 3T3 cells 12-1 (8) with wild type p53, was described earlier (10). It carries the
lacZ gene encoding
-galactosidase Escherichia coli under the control of the p53-dependent promoter
and therefore allows monitoring p53 transcriptional activation by a
routine X-gal staining. All cells were maintained in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum
supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin. For the serum starvation
experiments, 10(1) and NMuMG cells were kept with 0.5% fetal bovine
serum for 48 h (NMuMG cells) or 36 h (10(1) cells). For the
contact inhibition experiments, cells cultures were used 48 h
(NMuMG) or 36 h (10(1)) after they became confluent. NMuMG and
10(1) cells were irradiated with 10 grays of
-radiation and used
24 h after treatment. Mouse embryo fibroblasts were propagated
until they reached senescence. Populations of ConA cells, expressing
different levels of p37ING1, were generated by transduction
with pLXIG vector, carrying p37ING1 cDNA, followed by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting of cells with different levels of fluorescence.
Animals--
Organs and embryos of FVB/N mice were used for the
RNA isolation and preparation of whole body sections of embryos using a cryostatic microtome for histoblot hybridization.
Hybridization Screening of cDNA and Genomic
Libraries--
cDNA and genomic library screenings were done
according to the standard protocols (11) using 32P-labeled
human and mouse ing1 cDNA probes, respectively.
5'- and
3'-RACE1--
Alternative
5'-ends of the mouse ing1 were isolated from mouse spleen
and mouse brain cDNAs using the Marathon-ready cDNA kit
(CLONTECH), according to the protocol suggested by
the manufacturer. AP1 adaptor-specific sense primer, provided by
CLONTECH, and the ing1-specific
antisense primer (5'-CCATCTGACTCACGATCTGGATCTTC-3') were used for PCR.
Nested PCR was performed using AP2 adaptor-specific sense primer,
provided by CLONTECH, and ing1-specific
antisense primer (5'-CTGCGGATCAGGGCCCTCTGGATGC-3'). Precise
determination of the 5'- and 3'-ends of the mouse ing1
transcripts was done using the Marathon-2 cDNA amplification Kit
based on the new SMART PCR cDNA synthesis technology
(CLONTECH). It is based on the recently identified
ability of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase to add
several nucleotides to the 3' terminus of first-strand cDNA during
the reverse transcriptase reaction (12). Briefly, when reverse
transcriptase reaches the 5'-end of the mRNA, it switches templates
and continues synthesizing the SMART template-switching oligonucleotide. The resulting single-stranded cDNA contains the complete 5'-end of the mRNA as well as the sequence complementary to the template-switching oligonucleotide and is then selectively amplified by PCR. In these experiments, poly(A) RNA preparations isolated from the thymus and testis were used. The following sequences were used for the synthesis of antisense ing1-specific
primers: 5'-AGGTGTGGTGGGATCGGCAACGC-3' (for isoform 1a),
5'-CGCGGGGAGCCAGAGCAGAGAAGGT-3' (isoform 1c), and
5'-GGCGTGGCCTGTCATTGTCGCTG-3' (isoform 1b). ing1-specific
sense primer 5'-GCGTGCTTCTTGCTACCAT-3' was used for the PCR
amplification of the 3'-end.
Sequence Analysis--
Sequencing was done using a Sequenase
version 2.0 DNA sequencing kit (U.S. Biochemical Corp.) or done by the
University of Chicago Cancer Research Center DNA Sequencing Facility.
In all cases, both strands were read using multiple vector-specific or gene-specific primers. Protein sequence data base searches were performed using the gapped BLASTP program and the PSI-BLAST program that iterates the search using profiles constructed from BLAST hits as
queries for subsequent iterations (13). Multiple sequence alignments
were constructed using the Gibbs sampling option of the MACAW program
(14, 15). GenBankTM accession numbers for the described
sequences are AF177753-AF177757.
Southern, Northern, and Western analyses were done according to
standard protocols. IgG1 mouse monoclonal antibody against human
recombinant p33ING1 (16) was used for the detection of
ing1-encoded proteins. Anti-p53 monoclonal mouse IgG
antibody Ab-1 was obtained from Calbiochem. p21 rabbit polyclonal IgG
antibody was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA).
Immunoprecopitation Analysis--
Immunoprecipitation of p53 was
carried out using 1 µg of DO-1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and 1 µg
of Ab-1 (Calbiochem) antibodies per 0.5 ml of cell lysate. Cell lysate
was obtained by transient transfection of the corresponding vectors by
LipofectAMINE Plus (Life Technologies, Inc.) into p53-negative Saos-2
cells. Each transfected plate of cells was lysed in 0.5 ml of modified
radioimmune precipitation buffer (25 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 125 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate with
protease inhibitor). Sepharose-protein A (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech)
was used to pull out the antibody-protein complexes, and pellets were
washed four times with modified radioimmune precipitation buffer with
0.5% Nonidet P-40. Pellets were boiled in SDS-loading dye and run on
10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Western blot was carried
out with anti-HA-biotin antibodies, with clone 12CAS (Roche Molecular
Biochemicals), or with anti-p53 biotinylated antibodies (Roche
Molecular Biochemicals) according to standard protocols.
In Situ Hybridization on Nitrocellulose
("Histoblotting")--
Whole body sections, 20 µm thick, were
prepared from frozen embryos embedded in blocks of Tissue-Tek O.C.T.
and stored at
70 °C. Sections were placed on nitrocellulose
(Schleicher & Schuell) to prepare histoblots as described previously
(17). Histoblots were hybridized with 33P-labeled RNA
probes synthesized using Ambion's MAXIscript in vitro
transcription kit. ing1-specific sense and antisense probes were synthesized on the pBLUESCRIPT plasmid with the fragment of
ing1 cDNA corresponding to the PHD finger domain using
T3 polymerase for the antisense and T7 polymerase for the sense probe.
-Actin antisense RNA was synthesized using the template provided by
Ambion. Histoblots were incubated in prehybridization solution (0.75 mg/ml yeast tRNA, 0.75 mg/ml poly(A), 50% formamide, 0.3 M
Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 5× Denhardt's solution, 10%
dextran sulfate, 10 mM dithiothreitol) at 42 °C for 1-4
h. Hybridization was carried out for 12-24 h at 42 °C in the same
solution containing 1-5 × 107 cpm of probe/ml. After
hybridization, histoblots were washed in 4× SSC at room temperature
for 20 min, in 2× SSC, 0.04 µg/ml RNase A at 37 °C for 30 min, in
2× SSC at 37 °C for 30 min, in 1× SSC at 60 °C for 15-30 min,
and finally in 0.1× SSC at 60 °C for 15-30 min and exposed to
x-ray film for 2-7 days.
 |
RESULTS |
Multiple Transcripts of the Mouse ing1 Gene Differ in Their 5'-End
Sequences--
In order to isolate the mouse ortholog of the
ING1 gene, we screened a cDNA library prepared from
senescent mouse embryonic fibroblasts, using human ING1 as a
probe. The choice of the library was determined by the fact that
ING1 is expressed at higher levels in senescent, compared
with normal, human fibroblasts (2). As a result, several clones were
isolated, and the two longest were sequenced. The clones were identical
to each other and highly similar to human ING1 through most
of their length, except for the 5'-ends, which were different and not
homologous to the human gene (Fig.
1A). This observation could be
an indication of alternative splicing of mouse ing1;
however, it could also be potentially explained by cloning artifacts
that occurred during the cDNA library preparation. To determine the
structure of 5'-end sequences of ing1, we used a 5'-RACE
technique for the isolation of cDNA sequences corresponding to the
5'-termini of ing1 mRNA. cDNA was synthesized from
mouse spleen and brain mRNA and ligated to synthetic adaptors. The
cDNA was amplified by PCR using a sense primer specific for the
adaptor and an antisense primer specific for the common part of
ing1 located close to the divergent region. Two fragments of different size were subsequently cloned, sequenced, and compared with
the clones isolated from the cDNA library. The results of this
comparison are schematically presented in Fig. 1A. One of the 5'-RACE products was identical to one of the previously isolated cDNA clones. Another product revealed the third variant of
ing1 cDNA, which again consisted of common and unique
regions, with the junction located at exactly the same position as in
the other sequences. Fig. 1A shows schematic alignment of
the isolated mouse ing1 cDNA clones and the 5'-RACE
products. All variants are identical to each other (and homologous to
human ING1) up to the same nucleotide and differ only in
their 5'-ends.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Cloning of different variants of mouse
ing1 cDNA and identification of their
corresponding mRNA transcripts. A, schematic
alignment of the mouse ing1 cDNA clones and 5'-RACE
products with human ING1 cDNA. 1a and 1b represent mouse
ing1 cDNAs isolated from the library of senescent mouse
embryonic fibroblasts. A 5'-RACE reaction gave two products, one
identical to 1b and another shown as 1c. The position of the
gene-specific PCR primers used for the RACE reaction is indicated.
Mouse ing1 sequences are aligned with human ING1
cDNA. The open reading frame for the human ING1 clone is
indicated. B, analysis of ing1 transcription by
Northern hybridization. ing1 expression in mouse liver,
heart, and testis was analyzed using a multiple-tissue Northern blot
(CLONTECH Laboratories), which was hybridized with
the probe corresponding to the common part of ing1
(lane 1), the 5'-end of isoform 1a
(lane 2), the 5'-end of isoform 1b
(lane 3), or the 5'-end of isoform 1c
(lane 4). Probes were obtained by PCR using
ing1-specific primers. An arrow shows the
position of the RNA marker, 2.37 kilobases in size.
|
|
In order to verify that the observed cDNA structure reflects
naturally existing transcripts, we analyzed ing1 mRNA
species by Northern hybridization using probes that represent common or specific regions of the isolated cDNAs. As shown in Fig.
1B, the probe for the common region revealed multiple
transcripts in RNA isolated from mouse liver, heart, and testis. Probes
specific for individual transcripts, however, showed more simple
hybridization patterns, which in combination covered the whole set of
transcripts found by hybridization with the common probe. These results
indicated that the cloned sequences represent the majority of multiple
transcripts of ing1 synthesized in the thymus and spleen.
Mapping of Coding Regions of ing1 in Mouse Genomic
DNA--
Comparison of sequences of individual cDNA clones showed
differences in their 5' regions, suggesting that ing1 has
multiple alternative 5'-exons (Fig. 1). To verify this hypothesis, we
determined the structure of the mouse ing1 gene. We isolated
phage clones carrying sequences homologous to the mouse ing1
cDNA by hybridization screening of a mouse genomic library. These
clones were mapped by restriction digestion analysis, in combination
with Southern blot hybridization, with the probes corresponding to the
different ing1 parts. The interpretation of the results
obtained is shown in Fig. 2A.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Mapping of mRNA-coding regions within the
mouse ing1 locus. A, map of the mouse
genomic region containing ing1 cDNA-related sequences.
Three ing1-positive genomic clones were isolated from the
mouse genomic library using ing1 cDNA as a probe (G2,
G9, and G10), and analyzed by restriction digestion and Southern blot
hybridization. This analysis, in combination with the PCR data and with
partial sequencing of the genomic clones, allowed us to determine the
positions of the ing1 exons. B, determination of
transcription initiation and termination sites in the ing1
gene. The upper panel shows the genomic map with
the positions of the ing1 exons and the structure of
ing1 cDNA clones as determined after cDNA library
screening and 5'-RACE analysis. The structure of two known human
ING1 cDNA isoforms in relation to mouse ing1
sequences is shown above the genomic DNA. The
lower panel demonstrates the final structure of
the ing1 gene determined as a result of precise mapping of
transcription initiation and termination sites. In the upper
panel, the position of the G/C-rich region in the 5'-end of
clone 1b and the poly(A) region in the 3' part of the ing1
transcripts are indicated, which interfered with the polymerase chain
reaction during the original 5'-RACE.
|
|
Comparison of genomic and cDNA sequences of ing1 using
PCR with different ing1-specific primers (data not shown) as
well as with the sequencing data showed that most of the transcribed
sequences of the ing1 gene come from a single exon.
Alternative 5'-ends are encoded by different exons positioned upstream
from the common exon. Comparison of the sequences of cDNA and
genomic clones, as well as 5'-RACE products, revealed three isoforms of
mouse ing1 that differ from each other only in their
5'-ends, which also indicates that each isoform is most probably
expressed from its own promoter. Southern blot hybridization analysis
of ing1-related sequences in the mouse genome indicated that
ing1 is a single gene with no obvious close family members
(data not shown).
The length of the isolated cDNA clones appeared to be significantly
shorter than that of the mRNA species detected by Northern hybridization (Fig. 1B), suggesting that part of the
transcribed sequences were missing from the isolated cDNAs. To
determine the exact start sites of ing1 transcription, we
used a new procedure called "SMART-based 5'-RACE" as described
under "Materials and Methods." Using this method, we were able to
extend the cDNA sequences for the 5'-end of isoform 1b. This exon
contains an extremely G/C-rich region that blocked DNA elongation
during the original 5'-RACE reaction (Figs. 2B and 3) and
complicated sequencing of the final, long 5'-RACE product. Therefore,
the transcription start site of isoform 1b was not precisely
identified, since it was estimated based on the size of the 5'-RACE
product and the analysis of the genomic sequence.
Comparing the 3'-ends of human and mouse ING1 cDNAs
showed that although the mouse transcript was flanked by a poly(A)
stretch, its 3'-untranslated region was significantly shorter than the human one. Analysis of the genomic clone with the mouse ing1
sequence revealed the presence of a long poly(A) stretch that could
potentially be used as a primer-binding sequence for reverse
transcription initiated from oligo(dT) primers (Fig.
3C). Moreover, the alignment with the 3'-end of the human ING1 cDNA sequence resumes
downstream from this genomic poly(A) stretch. The exact end of
ing1 transcription in mice was determined using the same
method applied for the generation of 5'-sequences. Mouse
ing1 cDNA was, in fact, found to be longer than was
originally thought (Figs. 2B and 3). Sequence comparison showed that mouse and human ING1 transcripts terminate at
the same point and share significant levels of similarity up to the very 3'-ends.

View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Sequences of the putative promoter areas of
the ing1 gene, ing1 cDNAs, and
their predicted protein products. A, sequence of the
genomic region with the putative promoter areas of cDNA isoforms 1a
and 1b; the start sites of transcription of these two variants are
marked by arrows (the start site of isoform 1b was estimated
based on the size of the 5'-RACE product and the analysis of genomic
sequence). The initiator sequence of isoform 1a, including multiple
initiation start sites, is underlined; TATA-like sequence
for isoform 1b is shown in boldface type. The
underlined boldface italic sequence is the CAAT
box positioned about 100 base pairs upstream from the 1b transcript
initiation site. Sp1 binding sites are displayed in boldface
italic type. B, sequence of the
putative promoter area of isoform 1c, with the underlined
initiator sequence overlapping the two transcription start sites. Multiple Sp1
binding sites are also indicated. C, sequences of
ing1 cDNAs and their predicted protein products.
Sequences of the alternative 1a, 1b, and 1c first exons as well as the
common ing1 exon are shown. The first ATG codon of isoform
1b is underlined as well as the ATG codon in the common exon
that is used as the initiation codon for 1a and 1c translation. Stop
codons, indicating the end of translation, are also
underlined.
|
|
Sequence Analysis of ing1--
Nucleotide and predicted amino acid
sequences of the three mouse ing1 cDNA isoforms and the
promoter regions for all three alternative transcripts are shown in
Fig. 3. It was found that ing1 isoforms 1a and 1c have
several tightly clustered transcription start sites. Sequences upstream
of the initiation sites (putative promoters) lack TATA boxes, but they
do contain a sequence corresponding to the loose initiator consensus
PyPyAN(T/A)PyPy that includes the transcription start sites (Fig. 3).
In both cases, areas upstream from the initiator are extremely GC-rich
with multiple Sp1-binding sites. All of these features are typical of
TATA-less promoters (18, 19). Binding sites of inducible factors that
are usually present further upstream in the promoter area
(e.g. CAAT box, Oct-1 and Oct-2 binding site, NF-
B, or
ATF binding site) were not found in these promoters. Transcription of
ing1 isoform 1b is estimated to start approximately 30 nucleotides downstream from the TATA-like box. A putative CAAT box is
present 60 nucleotides upstream from the TATA-like sequence. Since the
transcription initiation sites for isoforms 1a and 1b are only about
200 base pairs apart, there is a possibility that their promoters share some of the regulatory sequences including, for example, a number of
Sp1 binding sites located upstream of this area.
All three alternative transcripts of mouse ing1 contain the
same long open reading frame, although the sizes of the predicted proteins are different. While isoform 1b encodes a protein of 279 amino
acids, the other two isoforms are predicted to encode a shorter protein
product of 185 amino acids, which lacks 94 N-terminal amino acids.
Translation of these two products is expected to start from the
initiation codon, which is located at the beginning of the common exon.
Alignment of the predicted amino acid sequences with that of human
p33ING1 (GenBankTM accession number AF044076)
revealed high similarity between the mouse and human proteins (89%
sequence identity) (Fig. 4).

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Protein sequence analysis of
p37ing1. A, alignment of amino acid sequences
of mouse ing1 1b isoform and its human ortholog. Numbers of
amino acids are indicated; numbers in parenthesis
indicate the size of the truncated protein product of 1a and 1c
ing1 isoforms. The underlined
methionine in the mouse sequence indicates the beginning of
the protein product encoded by isoforms 1a and 1c. The
asterisks indicate identical amino acids, while
dots indicate conserved changes in amino acid sequence.
B, a multiple alignment of p33ING1, its yeast
homologs, and additional PHD finger-containing proteins. The aligned
conserved blocks are separated by variable spacers whose lengths are
indicated by numbers; for the N-terminal block, the distance
to the protein N termini is indicated (the sequence of the human
paralog of p33ING1 is incomplete). Consensus1 shows
amino acid conservation in the p33ING1 family of proteins;
Consensus2 shows the conservation in an expanded set of PHD
finger proteins (in addition to the six proteins of the p33ING1
family, the sequences that aligned with p33ING1 with a
probability of a random match below 10 4 in the first
iteration of the PSI-BLAST analysis were included). Each consensus
shows amino acid residues conserved in all sequences of the respective
set; h indicates a hydrophobic residue, p
indicates a polar residue, indicates a negatively charged residue,
s indicates a small residue, and a indicates an
aromatic residue. The metal-chelating residues in the PHD finger domain
are shown by white type on black. Each
protein is identified by a gene name followed by species abbreviation
and the gene identification number from the nonredundant protein data
base at the NCBI. p33ING1p is the human paralog of
p33ING1, Mi-2 is a human autoantigen, and CHD3 is a
chromatin-associated helicase of the SNF2 family; the remaining
proteins are uncharacterized gene products designated by their
systematic gene names. Species abbreviations are as follows.
Hs, Homo sapiens; Sc,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Sp,
Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Ce,
Caenorhabditis elegans.
|
|
The nonredundant protein sequence data base at NCBI was searched using
the ing1-encoded protein sequence as a query, and a highly
significant sequence similarity was detected with a human paralog of
p33ING1. These included three uncharacterized proteins from the
budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their homologue
from fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe (probability of
the similarity being observed by chance <10
12). All of
these proteins are approximately the same size and contain a C-terminal
PHD finger domain (20, 21). The sequence conservation in the PHD domain
in these six protein sequences is striking. There are 13 invariant
residues in addition to the eight metal-chelating cysteines and
histidines that are conserved in all PHD fingers (Fig. 4B).
Multiple alignment analysis resulted in the delineation of an
additional N-terminal region that is conserved in these proteins (Fig.
4B). This region consists of approximately 100 amino acid
residues, includes two distinct conserved motifs, and shows a fairly
subtle similarity that was not statistically significant in the context
of the screening of the complete data base, except for the conservation
between the two human paralogs. However, in the reduced search space
defined by the presence of the PHD finger, it was shown that the
probability of finding this level of similarity by chance was less than
10
13 for the distal motif and 10
5 for the
proximal motif.
Expression of ing1 Transcripts in Adult and Embryonic Mouse
Tissues--
We analyzed the expression of ing1 mRNA in
the organs of adult mice and mouse embryos at different stages of
development by Northern blot hybridization. The probe representing the
common exon of the ing1 gene revealed multiple mRNA size
classes that represent alternative transcripts of ing1 (Fig.
5A). Overall ing1 mRNA expression is most abundant in thymus and testis. Much lower levels were detected in the rest of the tissues tested, and they also
differed in the content and relative intensity of the hybridizing bands. The same pattern of ing1 mRNA expression was
observed in p53-deficient mice, which showed no direct effect by p53 on
ing1 regulation (data not shown). In embryos, the highest
expression was found on the 11th day of development and was
characterized by changes in the relative expression of different
classes of mRNA transcripts.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
ing1 expression in adult mouse
tissues and embryos. A, results of Northern
hybridization of total mouse RNAs isolated from the indicated organs
with the indicated probes; a photograph of an ethidium bromide-stained
gel is shown as a loading control. B, Northern hybridization
of RNA on a CLONTECH mouse embryonic
multiple-tissue Northern blot (mRNA samples from mouse embryos at
7, 11, 15, and 17 days of development) with the same probes. The
arrows indicate positions of the 2.37-kilobase RNA marker as
well as the positions of 28 and 18 S rRNAs. C,
ing1 expression in mouse embryos analyzed by in
situ histoblot hybridization. Histoblots were prepared from whole
body sections of 10-, 12-, 16-, and 18-day embryos and hybridized with
the sense and antisense ing1-specific
33P-labeled RNA probes corresponding to the region encoding
PHD domain. Antisense probe for ubiquitously expressed actin gene was
used as a control.
|
|
Patterns of ing1 expression in embryogenesis were also
checked by in situ hybridization. We used the histoblotting
technique, in which embryonic sections were fixed on a nitrocellulose
membrane and then hybridized with the RNA probes corresponding to the
common part of the ing1 cDNA. Besides sense and
antisense ing1-specific RNA probes, we also used an
antisense probe for
-actin, a gene with ubiquitous expression, as an
internal standard. Sections were prepared from 10-, 12-, 16-, and
18-day embryos. Results of in situ hybridization are shown
in Fig. 5C. ing1 is uniformly expressed in the
whole mouse embryo at all stages of development examined. This is in
agreement with the result obtained from the adult mouse tissues, where
ing1 is expressed ubiquitously and at similar levels in all
organs analyzed. However, in day 10 embryos, higher expression levels
were observed in the yolk sac, while at day 16 and 18 of development,
higher levels of expression were detected in inner compartments of
bones and probably match areas of ongoing ossification.
In order to determine patterns of expression of different
ing1 transcripts in mouse tissues and during embryogenesis,
Northern blots were hybridized with probes corresponding to the
alternative start sites of ing1 (Fig. 5, A and
B). Isoforms 1b and 1c were expressed ubiquitously in all
adult mouse tissues tested, with the highest levels in thymus. Both
isoforms were expressed in the embryos at all stages of development
analyzed, with the highest levels at day 7 in the case of isoform 1c or
day 11 in the case of isoform 1b. Out of all adult tissues analyzed,
mRNA for isoform 1a was expressed only in testis and also in the
11-day embryo. While there is no detectable signal with the 1a-specific
probe in the 7-day embryo, traces of hybridization could be detected in
mRNA from day 15 and day 17 embryos, which indicates an extremely low expression level at these points of mouse embryogenesis.
Indications of Proliferation-dependent Regulation of
ing1 Expression--
To check whether ing1 expression was
proliferation-dependent, we analyzed RNA from two mouse
cell lines, NMuMG and 10(1), at different growth conditions by Northern
blot hybridization using total ing1 cDNA as a probe.
ing1 expression was also compared in senescent
versus young, dividing mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Results
are shown in Fig. 6A. In both
cell lines, ing1 was expressed at higher levels in dividing
compared with quiescent cells (quiescence is induced by serum
starvation, contact inhibition, or
-irradiation). However, in 10(1)
cells the difference in expression was specific only for the upper
ing1 specific band, which corresponds to isoform 1b. In
mouse embryonic fibroblasts, ing1 was expressed at very low
levels without any differences between dividing and senescent cells.

View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
ing1 mRNA and protein
expression varies depending on cell growth conditions.
A, RNA was isolated from dividing 10(1) (lane
a) and NMuMG (lane e) cell lines, as
well as from the dividing young mouse embryonic fibroblasts
(lane h). RNA was also isolated from
contact-inhibited 10(1) (lane b) and NMuMG cells
(lane f); serum-starved 10(1) cells
(lane c) (64 h at 0.5% FBS); -irradiated
10(1) cells (lane d) and NMuMG cells
(lane g); and senescent MEFs (lane
i). Filters were probed with total ing1 probe.
The bottom panels show RNA gels from which
Northern blots were made. The arrows indicate positions of
the 2.37-kilobase RNA marker (upper panels) or 28 and 18 S rRNAs. B, detection of ing1-encoded
proteins by Western immunoblotting, using antibodies against
p33ING1. Cell lysates were prepared using radioimmune
precipitation buffer from the cells treated in the same way as
explained above. As a control, cell lysates were prepared from 293 cells transfected with the plasmids expressing mouse 1b ing1
variant (lane a) or the human homologue of
p31ing1 that produces the protein product of the same size as
mouse 1c and 1a variants.
|
|
ing1 expression in cell lines was also analyzed by Western
blotting using an IgG1 mouse monoclonal antibody produced against human
recombinant p33ING1 (16) (Fig. 6B). This antibody
has previously been shown to specifically detect the denatured form of
mouse p33ING1 protein in Western immunoblot protocols. Cell
lysates were produced from dividing, contact-inhibited, serum-starved,
or
-irradiated 10(1) and NMuMG cells. In both cell lines, two
protein products were detected, 31 and 37 kDa in size, which correspond
to the truncated ING1 and 1b ing1 protein
products, respectively. The 37-kDa protein was present at the same
levels in dividing and quiescent cells, while the 31-kDa protein was
present at higher levels in dividing compared with nondividing cells.
The variation of expression of ing1 differs significantly at
mRNA and protein levels, indicating that this gene could be
regulated at the level of transcription or protein stability.
Overexpression of p37ing1 Inhibits p53 Function--
All
previous functional analysis of ING1 was done using human
cDNA expressing the shorter protein encoded by this gene (1, 2, 4).
As a result, p33ING1 was defined as a negative growth regulator
that cooperates with p53 in transcriptional activation of
p53-responsive genes. Its mouse homologue, p31ing1, has a
similar biological effect (data not shown) that is consistent with the
high degree of identity between the mouse and the human proteins (see
Fig. 4). To analyze the influence of the longer product of
ing1 on p53 function, we overexpressed cDNA for
p37ing1 in mouse cells maintaining wild type p53. To
effectively monitor p53-dependent transcriptional
activation, we used previously characterized ConA cells (see
"Materials and Methods"), carrying the p53-responsive bacterial
lacZ gene. We transduced ConA cells with retrovirus expressing p37ing1 and enhanced green fluorescent protein from
a bicistronic mRNA and generated cell populations with different
levels of overexpression of p37ing1 by sorting cells differing
in the levels of enhanced green fluorescent protein fluorescence. These
cells were compared with ConA cells transduced with either the empty
pLXIG vector or with retroviral vector expressing the short protein
product of ing1. The expression of introduced constructs was
confirmed by Western immunoblotting using an anti-p33ING1
antibody that recognizes both human and mouse proteins (16) (Fig.
7B). p53-dependent
expression of lacZ was determined by X-gal staining of ConA
cells treated with UV light (Fig. 7A). The expression of p53
protein and p53-responsive p21waf1 protein in untreated and in
UV-irradiated cells was estimated by Western immunoblotting (Fig.
7B). A decreased intensity of the p21 band by Western blot
and a weaker X-gal staining of ConA cells treated with UV light
indicate that p37ing1 clearly inhibited UV-induced accumulation
of both p53-inducible proteins. Moreover, overexpression of
p37ing1 strongly attenuated accumulation of p53 in response to
UV light (Fig. 7B). These observations demonstrate that
p37ing1 has a suppressive effect on p53-dependent
transcriptional activation supposedly by attenuating p53 accumulation
in response to DNA damage. This means that the two proteins encoded by
the ing1 gene have opposite effects on p53 function.

View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
p37ing1 affects p53 function.
A, dependence of -galactosidase activation after UV
irradiation of ConA cells on the expression levels of p37ing1.
ConA cells expressing the human homologue of p31ing1
(lane a); p37ing1 at low (lane
c), medium (lane d), or high
(lane e) levels; and ConA cells infected with
pLXIG vector alone (lane b) were equally plated
in a 12-well plate, UV-irradiated (25 J/m2), and
X-gal-stained 16 h after the treatment. A fragment of the 12-well
plate and microscopic views of individual wells are shown.
B, expression of p53 protein, p53-responsive p21waf1
protein, and ing1 protein products in untreated and in
UV-irradiated ConA cells was estimated by Western immunoblotting.
Analyzed cell lysates were isolated using radioimmune precipitation
buffer from the cells treated in the same way as explained for
A. C, coimmunoprecipitation of p53 and
ING1 protein products in Saos-2 cells. Detection of p53
(upper panel), p37ING1 (middle
panel), and p31ING1 (lower
panel) proteins by Western immunoblotting is shown.
Lanes f, g, and i
(top and middle panels), lysates from
Saos-2 cells co-transfected with p53 and p37ING1-expressing
plasmids. Lanes f, g, and i
(bottom panel), lysates from Saos-2 cells
co-transfected with p53 and p31ING1-expressing plasmids.
Lane h, lysate from control nontransfected cells.
Lanes f and g contain the products of
immunoprecipitation with anti-p53 antibodies (lane
g) and control nonspecific antibodies (lane
f).
|
|
It was previously shown that p33ING1 can be detected in cells
in a complex with p53 by co-immunoprecipitation (4). Since at that time
it was not known that ING1 encodes two different proteins, it was unclear which of the two products of ING1 was
detected in these experiments. We therefore compared the ability of
short and long ING1-encoded proteins to form a complex with
p53 by using immunoprecipitation. Since the protocol of
immunoprecipitation was optimized for human proteins, we analyzed human
variants of ING1 proteins expressed in human cells by
transient transfection. p53-deficient Saos-2 cells were used in these
experiments that have both alleles of the p53 gene deleted and
presumably retain an intact p53 pathway. They were co-transfected in
different combinations with the expression plasmids encoding wild type
p53 and the short or long products of ING1. Cell lysates
were treated with anti-p53 antibodies (see "Materials and
Methods"), and the presence of ING1-encoded proteins in
precipitates was detected by Western immunoblotting (Fig.
7C). The results obtained showed that although p37ING1 is co-precipitated with p53, the shorter
ING1 product is not detectable in the p53 precipitate. This
observation suggests that differences in the effect of the two
ING1 products on p53 function could be a reflection of
differences in their interaction with p53 in the cell.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Multiple Products of the ing1 Gene--
ING1 was
originally described as a gene whose suppression promotes neoplastic
transformation (1). Consistent with that, ectopic expression of the
first isolated human cDNA was growth-suppressive for different cell
lines. ING1 was found to encode a nuclear protein termed
p33ING1 that was shown to functionally and physically interact
with p53 in cell growth regulation (4, 22). Now, after we characterized the structure and expression of the mouse ing1 gene, it
became clear that ing1 regulation is more complicated than
was originally thought. ing1 is transcribed from at least
three differently regulated promoters, and the resulting transcripts
encode at least two different proteins.
A similar type of regulation (alternative initiation leading to
variability of 5'-exons) found in other tumor suppressor genes, namely
BRCA1, APC, and INK4 (23-26), is
associated with the generation of proteins with different functions (in
the case of INK4, different reading frames are translated in
the alternative transcripts). Consistently, the two products of
ing1 have opposite effects on p53-dependent
transcription regulation; one acts as a p53 cooperator, while the other
acts as a p53 suppressor.
All of the transcripts share a common region encoded by a common exon
but differ in their 5'-exons. Two of these alternative exons do not
contain protein-coding sequences (isoforms 1a and 1c), while the third
one does (isoform 1b). Consistently, one of the ing1
transcripts encodes a 37-kDa protein (p37ING1), while two
others are translated into a shorter protein of 24 kDa that
surprisingly runs as if it was 31 kDa (p31ING1). Structures of
mouse and human ing1 genes are likely to be similar, considering the high degree of evolutionary conservation of
ing1 sequences and the fact that the two versions of human
ING1 that are currently available in GenBankTM
also share a large common part but have different N termini. It is
noteworthy that one of the human variants of ING1
(GenBankTM accession number AF001954) does not have a
homologue with similar 5'-sequences among the identified mouse
ing1 isoforms, which raises the possibility that there could
be more variants of mouse ing1 transcripts that so far have
not been isolated.
p33ING1 and its homologs in such a distantly related species as
yeast contain a remarkably conserved PHD finger domain and an additional, weakly conserved domain of unknown function. PHD fingers have been shown to bind DNA (21, 27), but to our knowledge there is no
evidence that they mediate protein-protein interactions. Therefore, it
seems likely that the C-terminal PHD domain in the p33ING
family of proteins is involved in specific DNA binding that may be
important for transcription regulation. Given the outstanding conservation of this domain across the large phylogenetic distance that
separates humans and yeast, the specificity of DNA binding with respect
to particular binding sites is expected to be conserved either in terms
of DNA sequence, distinct features of chromatin structure, or both. It
may be further surmised that the conserved N-terminal domain is
involved in specific protein-protein interactions that couple
transcription regulation by p33ING1 and its homologs to other
elements of cell cycle control. The conservation of domain organization
in p33ING1 and its yeast homologs is particularly notable given
that yeast does not encode any homologs of p53. Thus, it appears that
p33ING1 is an ancient cell cycle regulator whose interaction
with p53 is a later evolutionary addition.
Regulation of ing1 Expression--
The results of expression
analysis indicated that mouse ing1 is a subject of
regulation both at the protein and mRNA levels and that different
isoforms have different expression patterns. Thus, p37ING1 is
ubiquitously expressed in all tissues analyzed with elevated mRNA
expression levels in the thymus, while levels of the p31ING1
protein vary dramatically among organs and cell lines.
Sizes of the ing1 mRNA transcripts detected by Northern
hybridization correlate well with the length of cDNA sequences
isolated from all of the tissues except testis. Probes specific for
each of the identified splice variants reveal multiple RNA bands,
indicating a variability of the ing1 transcripts in this
organ. It is likely that in testis ing1 mRNAs are either
terminated or processed differently from the rest of the tissues.
There is a clear link between the proliferation rate of the cell and
ing1 expression both at the protein and mRNA levels. This observation may reflect cell cycle dependence of ing1
transcription detected earlier for the human ING1 gene; the
biological significance of this regulation is not obvious so far. We
failed to observe up-regulation of mouse ing1 in senescent
cells as it has been reported for human ING1 (8), which
suggests that regulation patterns of mouse and human ing1
genes may not always be the same.
ING1 and p53: Cooperators or Antagonists?--
Human
ING1 has been known as a cooperator of p53 involved in
negative growth regulation (1, 4), apoptosis (3), and senescence (2).
This set of properties, together with the observations that show a
decreased expression of ING1 in several breast carcinoma cell lines and ING1 gene rearrangement in one neuroblastoma
cell line, allow ING1 to be defined as a candidate tumor suppressor (1-4, 16, 22). Here we demonstrate that ING1 encodes, in addition to the protein with the above described properties, another product that shows an opposite effect on p53 function, inhibiting p53-dependent transcriptional activation. Thus, a single
ING1 gene appeared to simultaneously encode a candidate
tumor suppressor (p53 cooperator) and a putative oncogene (p53
inhibitor). This means that a simplified view of the potential role of
ING1 in cancer should be revised. In the case of
ING1, we may have a new genetic mechanism of promoting
cancer that involves an imbalance between the two products of one gene.
Further characterization of the biological activity of the long product
of ING1, p37ING1, indicated that it can affect the
whole spectrum of cell properties known to be controlled by p53,
including sensitivity to apoptosis, replicative senescence, cooperation
with dominant oncogenes, and drug
response.2 Thus,
overexpression of the longer product of ING1, which
functionally acts as a p53 suppressor, could be the mechanism of
attenuation of p53 activity in tumors that do not require mutations in
p53 itself.
A large scale analysis of clinical samples is needed to conclude
whether this hypothesis is correct or not. However, any attempts to
investigate the potential cancer relevance of ING1 should
involve separate analysis of the alternative isoforms of this gene. It has already become obvious that a direct measurement of the overall mRNA expression in tumors cannot be used as an approach to judge the involvement of ING1 in carcinogenesis. The ratio between
expression levels of the two ING1 products seems to provide
much more meaningful information. It is therefore essential to
establish such assays that would distinguish between the two protein
products or among the alternative ING1 transcripts.
Although the mechanism of p53 modulation by the two products of the
ING1 gene remains unknown, we hope that the two new
observations described in this work will shed light on this problem. We
found that (i) p53 is found in a complex with the long but not with the
short product of ING1 and (ii) overexpression of the longer product inhibits accumulation of p53 protein after DNA damage. Both
properties of p37ING1 clearly resemble those of the natural p53
antagonist, Mdm2, which was shown to affect nuclear localization of p53
(28, 29) and to promote its proteasomal degradation (30, 31). All of
these possibilities should be tested for p37ING1 as well as a
potential interdependence of the biological activity of these two proteins.
Is the function of ING1 limited to its interaction with the
p53 signaling pathway? It seems doubtful, considering the high evolutionary conservation of ING1. In fact, ING1
homologues found in yeast (Fig. 4), which does not have detectable
p53-related genes, suggest some important p53-independent
role for ING1. The phenotypes associated with the knockout
of ING1 in yeast and mice may provide a lead toward its
currently unknown cellular function. It is noteworthy that a gene
knockout approach will be complicated by the necessity to separately
inactivate expression of each of the two products of
ING1.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Ilya Mazo for the mouse cDNA
library and Elena Komarova for providing histoblots of mouse embryos
for in situ hybridization.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants CA60730 and CA75179 (to A. V. G.), by a grant from Quark
Biotechnology, Inc. (to A. V. G.), and by Department of the Army
Grant DAMD17-97-1-7293 (to M. Z.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AF177753, AF177754, AF177755, AF177756, AF177757.
**
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular
Genetics (M/C 669), University of Illinois at Chicago, 900 S. Ashland
Ave., Chicago, IL 60607. Tel.: 312-413-0349; Fax: 312-996-0683; E-mail:
gudkov@uic.edu.
2
I. A. Grigorian, K. V. Gurova, M. Zeremski, S. S. Kwek, and A. V. Gudkov, manuscript in preparation.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
RACE, rapid
amplification of cDNA ends;
PCR, polymerase chain reaction;
X-gal, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl
-D-galactopyranoside.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Garkavtsev, I.,
Kazarov, A.,
Gudkov, A.,
and Riabowol, K.
(1996)
Nat. Genet.
14,
415-420[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2.
|
Garkavtsev, I.,
and Riabowol, K.
(1997)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17,
2014-2019[Abstract]
|
| 3.
|
Helbing, C. C.,
Veillette, C.,
Riabowol, K.,
Johnston, R. N.,
and Garkavtsev, I.
(1997)
Cancer Res.
57,
1255-1258[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 4.
|
Garkavtsev, I.,
Grigorian, I. A.,
Ossovskaya, V. S.,
Chernov, M. V.,
Chumakov, P. M.,
and Gudkov, A. V.
(1998)
Nature
391,
295-298[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Miller, A. D.,
and Rosman, G. J.
(1989)
BioTechniques
7,
980-986[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Jang, S. K.,
Krausslich, H. G.,
Nicklin, M. J.,
Duke, G. M.,
Palmenberg, A. C.,
and Wimmer, E.
(1988)
J. Virol.
62,
2636-2643[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 7.
|
Cormack, B. P.,
Valdivia, R. H.,
and Falkow, S.
(1996)
Gene (Amst.)
173,
33-38[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 8.
|
Harvey, D. M.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1991)
Gen. Dev.
5,
2375-2385[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 9.
|
Pear, W. S.,
Nolan, G. P.,
Scott, M. L.,
and Baltimore, D.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
8392-8396[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 10.
|
Komarova, E. A.,
Chernov, M. V.,
Franks, R.,
Wang, K.,
Armin, G.,
Zelnick, C. R.,
Chin, D. M.,
Bacus, S. S.,
Stark, G. R.,
and Gudkov, A. V.
(1997)
EMBO J.
16,
1391-1400[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
and Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, pp. 8.1-9.62, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
|
| 12.
|
Chenchik, A.,
Zhu, Y. Y.,
Diatchenko, L.,
Li, R.,
Hill, J.,
and Siebert, P. D.
(1998)
in
Gene Cloning and Analysis by RT-PCR
(Siebert, P. D.
, and Larrick, J. W., eds)
, pp. 305-319, BioTechniques Books, Eaton Publishing Co., Natick, MA
|
| 13.
|
Altschul, S. F.,
Madden, T. L.,
Schaffer, A. A.,
Zhang, J.,
Zhang, Z.,
Miller, W.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1997)
Nucleic Acids Res.
25,
3389-3402[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 14.
|
Neuwald, A. F.,
Liu, J. S.,
and Lawrence, C. E.
(1995)
Protein Sci.
8,
1618-1632
|
| 15.
|
Schuler, G. D.,
Altschul, S. F.,
and Lipman, D. J.
(1991)
Proteins
9,
180-190[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Garkavtsev, I.,
Boland, D.,
Mai, J.,
Wilson, H.,
Veillette, C.,
and Riabowol, K.
(1997)
Hybridoma
16,
537-540[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Gudkov, A. V.,
Kashkin, K. N.,
Zaitsevskaya, T. E.,
and Troyanovsky, S. M.
(1989)
Int. J. Cancer
44,
1052-1056[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 18.
|
Smale, S. T.
(1994)
in
Transcription: Mechanisms and Regulation
(Conaway, R. C.
, and Conaway, J. W., eds)
, pp. 63-80, Raven Press, New York
|
| 19.
|
Smale, S. T.
(1997)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1351,
73-88[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Aasland, R.,
Gibson, T. J.,
and Stewart, A. F.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
56-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 21.
|
Schindler, U.,
Beckmann, H.,
and Cashmore, A. R.
(1993)
Plant J.
4,
137-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 22.
|
Garkavtsev, I.,
Demetrick, D.,
and Riabowol, K.
(1997)
Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
76,
176-178[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 23.
|
Cui, J. Q.,
Wang, H.,
Reddy, E. S.,
and Rao, V. N.
(1998)
Oncol. Rep.
5,
585-589[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 24.
|
Quelle, D. E.,
Zindy, F.,
Ashmun, R. A.,
and Sherr, C. J.
(1995)
Cell
83,
993-1000[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Thliveris, A.,
Samowitz, W.,
Matsunami, N.,
Groden, J.,
and White, R.
(1994)
Cancer Res.
54,
2991-2995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Xu, C.-F.,
Brown, M. A.,
Chambers, J. A.,
Griffiths, B.,
Nicolai, H.,
and Solomon, E.
(1995)
Hum. Mol. Genet.
4,
2259-2264[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Stassen, M. J.,
Bailey, D.,
Nelson, S.,
Chinwalla, V.,
and Harte, P. J.
(1995)
Mech Dev.
52,
209-223[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 28.
|
Freedman, D. A.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1998)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18,
7288-7293[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 29.
|
Roth, J.,
Dobbelstein, M.,
Freedman, D. A.,
Shenk, T.,
and Levine, A. J.
(1998)
EMBO J.
17,
554-564[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 30.
|
Haupt, Y.,
Maya, R.,
Kazaz, A.,
and Oren, M.
(1997)
Nature
387,
296-299[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 31.
|
Kubbutat, M. H.,
Jones, S. N.,
and Vousden, K. H.
(1997)
Nature
387,
299-303[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Coles, C. G.A. Marfella, A. N. Imbalzano, H. A. Steinman, D. S. Garlick, R. M. Gerstein, and S. N. Jones
p37Ing1b Regulates B-Cell Proliferation and Cooperates with p53 to Suppress Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomagenesis
Cancer Res.,
November 1, 2008;
68(21):
8705 - 8714.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Abad, C. Menendez, A. Fuchtbauer, M. Serrano, E.-M. Fuchtbauer, and I. Palmero
Ing1 Mediates p53 Accumulation and Chromatin Modification in Response to Oncogenic Stress
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 19, 2007;
282(42):
31060 - 31067.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|