![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 45, 32279-32286, November 5, 1999
§¶,
,
§
From the A new cis-element,
trophoblast-specific element 2 (TSE2) is located in the
placenta-specific enhancer of the human aromatase gene that dictates
its tissue-specific expression. In the minimum enhancer region, an
element similar to the trophoblast-specific element (TSE), originally
described for the human chorionic gonadotropin Aromatase (cytochrome P-450AROM) is a unique member of
the cytochrome P-450 superfamily responsible for estrogen biosynthesis (1). In most vertebrate species, its expression is limited to the brain
and the gonads (2, 3), but in humans, aromatase mRNA has also been
detected in placenta (4, 5), adipose (4), and a variety of fetal
tissues (6). CYP19 is the gene for human aromatase (7). Its
mRNA spans nine exons with the translation start site beginning at
exon II (5, 8). Analysis of aromatase transcripts in various human
tissues has revealed that their 5' termini differ from one another in a
tissue-specific manner upstream of a common site in the 5'-untranslated
region (4, 9). It was subsequently found that several tissue-specific promoters start transcription of the gene at distinct sites, with transcripts spliced into a common 3'-junction.
The placenta is the primary site of estrogen synthesis in pregnant
women. A sequence corresponding to untranslated exon Ia (9), also
designated as I.1 (6), is present uniquely in 5' termini of transcripts
expressed in human placenta and choriocarcinoma cells. It is a
consequence of expression driven by a distal promoter that resides more
than 40 kilobases upstream of exon II. The JEG-3 cell line expresses
the placental type transcripts inducible by a number of agents, which
makes the cell line a good model system for studying the mechanisms of
placental aromatase expression (10).
The initial In the present report, we document identification of a new regulatory
element, tentatively designated trophoblast-specific element 2 (TSE2),
in the minimum enhancer region for placenta-specific transcription of
the aromatase gene and cloning of a binding protein for the element by
a yeast one-hybrid strategy. The cDNA we isolated encodes a protein
previously reported as hGCMa (18), a mammalian homologue of the
Drosophila protein that is the product of glial cell missing
gene (gcm). The protein exhibits binding specificity identical to that of the binding activity for TSE2 in JEG-3 cells and
is expressed solely in the placenta. These results are the first
demonstration of intrinsic targets of a mammalian GCM protein.
Oligonucleotides--
The sequences of the double-stranded
oligonucleotides used in electrophoretic mobility shift assays are as
follows (only leading sequences are shown): C3,
5'-CATAAGACCCTCATTCCAGAGG-3' (different from that shown in Fig. 1 in
Ref. 11); C3n, 5'-CATACTACCCTCATTCCAGAGG-3'; C3p,
5'-CATAAGCACCTCATTCCAGAGG-3'; C3l,
5'-CATAAGACAATCATTCCAGAGG-3'; C3s,
5'-CATAAGACCCGCCTTCCAGAGG-3'; C3t,
5'-CATAAGACCCTCAGGCCAGAGG-3'; C4n,
5'-TGTCCCATACCCTGGCTGAAGGAAT-3'; PSE,
5'-CATGGCCTGAACTAGTTTTT-3' (19); PLE1, 5'-TGCAGTACCCTCAGGCTTACTAGG-3';
PLE3, 5'-GGTAAATTTGTGGTCAGACCAGTTTT-3' (20); FP1,
5'-GCGGCTCTGGGCTTGCCTGAGGCCACAAGC-3' (21); GT-IICsv, 5'-GCAGCTGTGGAATGTGTGTCTC-3' (22); C3g1,
5'-CATAAGACCCGCATTCCAGAGG-3'; C3g2,
5'-CATAAGGCCCTCATTCCAGAGG-3'. C2, C4, TSE, TSEµ172, and TSEµ169 were described previously (11, 15).
Reporter Gene Construction--
FB (
Methods for cell culture, transient transfections, and CAT assays were
as described previously (11). pRSV/Luci (23) was cotransfected in all
experiments as an internal control for transfection efficiency.
Preparation of nuclear extracts from mammalian cells and details of
electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) were as described
previously (11).
Reporter Constructs for Library Screening with the Yeast
One-hybrid System--
Yeast one-hybrid (24, 25) screening was
performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Five tandem
repeats of modified C3 (C3B), cloned into the SmaI site of
pBluescript KS+, were further subcloned into the yeast
reporter plasmid pHISi-1 (CLONTECH) at
XbaI/EcoRI or pLacZi at
HindIII/SmaI. The reporter constructs were
subsequently integrated into the yeast strain YM4271, yielding
YM4271-TSE2-His3 and YM4271-TSE2-LacZ. These yeast strains were used as
host strains for the library screening.
Screening of the cDNA Library--
The histidine yeast
reporter strain was transformed with a MATCHMAKER human placenta
cDNA library (CLONTECH) by the
LiAc/polyethylene glycol method. Approximately 2.1 × 104 transformants were plated per 95 × 137-mm plate
containing his Expression of Candidate Clones in Sf21
Cells--
Positive clones were further subcloned into pVL1392
(Invitrogen) and transfected into Spodoptera frugiperda
Sf21 cells with linearized baculovirus DNA using a BaculoGold
transfection kit (Pharmingen). Recombinant virus amplification and
infection were conducted following the manufacturer's instructions.
The infected Sf21 cells were maintained at 27 °C in Grace's
insect cell culture medium (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with
10% fetal calf serum as described earlier (26). Three days
postinfection, cells were harvested in Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered
saline and collected by centrifugation. Cell pellets were resuspended
in the buffer for preparation of nuclear extracts. They were processed
as for extracts from mammalian cells, except leupeptin (1 µg/ml) and pepstatin A (2 µg/ml) were added to the homogenate and extraction buffer.
Northern Blot Analysis of TSE2-binding Protein (TSE2BP)/hGCMa
Expression in Human Tissues--
A Northern blot containing 2 µg of
poly(A) RNA/lane was purchased from CLONTECH. The
blot was probed with a 506-bp fragment (483 bp/988 bp) of TSE2BP/hGCMa
(Fig. 6A). Hybridization was performed at 65 °C for
3 h in Express Hyb hybridization solution
(CLONTECH), and washing was carried out twice with
0.1× SSC/0.05% SDS at 65 °C. The membrane was then stripped and
reprobed with a A New Element in the Placenta-specific Enhancer--
As we showed
previously, the upstream region Core Sequence for the Binding in the C3 Fragment--
To elucidate
the recognition sequence for TSE2-binding protein in the C3 fragment,
we planned a set of EMSAs in which a series of C3 analogues with
sequential mutations were tested for their competition with the C3
probe. As shown in Fig. 2, mutations of AC or CC spanning Binding to C3 Element Is Necessary for the Enhancer
Activity--
The functions of the TSE2 in the C3 region and the
TSE-like element in C4 region (referred to as C4core
hereafter) were examined. Two mutations were selected. One was a change
of AG at
When either of these mutations was introduced into the HB CAT construct
under a heterologous TK promoter, the enhancer activity was virtually
lost in the CAT assay, (Fig. 3B). This result shows that the
TSE2 in the C3 fragment and the C4core are both necessary for minimum enhancer activity of the trophoblast-specific promoter in
the aromatase gene. TSE2 alone did not show any enhancer activity when
one, two, four, or five copies were placed in tandem upstream of TK
promoter. We previously showed that multiple copies of C2 that contain
the binding site for TSEBP do not possess enhancer activity by
themselves (11). The effect of C3 mutation was also examined in the
basal enhancer carried by the FB fragment. The FB CAT reporter carrying
the C3l mutation was about a half (48.6 ± 5.8%) as active as the
wild type reporter.
Recently, a binding protein to TSE in the Isolation of the cDNA Clone Encoding a TSE2-binding
Protein--
Five tandem copies of the C3B were ligated together and
subcloned into the upstream region of the minimal promoter of either the pHISi-1 or pLacZi reporter plasmids and integrated into the yeast
genome of YM4271. With the strategy described under "Materials and
Methods," we screened 1.0 × 106 cDNA plasmids
and isolated 15 positive clones with high
To identify the "true" TSE2-binding protein, we subcloned the
positive clones into pVL1392 and expressed them in the
baculovirus/Sf21 insect cell system. Nuclear extracts were
prepared from these virus-infected cells, and EMSA was performed. A
cDNA encoding Caenorhabditis elegans protein kinase C in
the reverse direction was used as a negative control. As shown in Fig.
4, the virus containing clone B17
produced nuclear extract with one extra band at approximately 41 kDa on
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In EMSA, the nuclear extract
showed multiple specific binding complexes with the C3 probe. Control
nuclear extract did not produce any binding complexes. All the multiple
binding complexes produced by the expressed B17 competed with C3 but
not with mutated C3 (C3l). The binding specificity of the expressed
protein derived from clone B17 was further examined with various DNA
fragments as competitors (Fig. 4C). The binding complexes of
the expressed clone were not inhibited by C3 mutants with effective
mutations like C3l and C3p but weakly inhibited by C3s. They were
weakly inhibited by TSE but not inhibited by C2 or C4. The specificity was essentially the same as that of the binding activity found in the
JEG-3 nuclear extract, although the position of the bands appeared
differently in gels.
Identity of the Positive Clone B17--
The complete nucleotide
sequence of the B17 clone was determined by dideoxy sequencing (ABI).
The complete nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequences of
B17 were deposited in GenBankTM. The 2652-bp clone has an
open reading frame that encodes a protein of 436 amino acid with a
predicted molecular mass of 49,213 daltons. A data base search revealed
it to be essentially the same cDNA as the human cDNA hGCMa
described by Akiyama et al. (18). There are two nucleotide
differences in the coding region; C in hGCMa is T in B17 at 17 bp from
the translation start site, and G in hGCMa is A in B17 at 1157 bp,
resulting in two changes of amino acid residues, Ser6 and
Gly386 in hGCMa, to Phe6 and Glu386
in B17, respectively.
hGCMa has been described as a mammalian protein with a conserved GCM
motif that constitutes the binding domain of the Drosophila GCM protein (18). GCM is the product of the Drosophila
gcm gene and a regulator of early gliogenesis. It is a
transcription factor in Drosophila with a novel type of
DNA-binding domain, termed the GCM motif in the amino-terminal region.
Two groups have determined binding sites for the Drosophila
GCM protein by binding site selection assays (18, 28). When aligned,
the two proposed GCM binding sites and TSE2 look similar (Fig.
5A). The first and the fifth
guanines were put in TSE2 context (C3g1 and C3g2) and used as
competitors in EMSA with C3 probe and the nuclear extract prepared from
JEG-3 cells. As shown in Fig. 5B, they demonstrated good
competition.
hGCMa/TSE2BP Expression--
A 506-bp fragment of
hGCMa/TSE2BP-specific region (483 bp/988 bp) was used as a probe for
Northern blot analysis of various human tissues (Fig.
6). A major 3.0-kilobase band and a minor bigger band (4.2 kilobases) were detected in placenta. Other tissues did not show any signal even after prolonged exposure. Binding activity
to the C3 probe was detected in the nuclear extract prepared from human
placenta (Fig. 7), which showed a similar
electrophoretic pattern of specific binding complexes to that of
Sf21 cells expressing hGCMa/TSE2BP. The nuclear extracts
prepared from Hep-G2 or HeLa cells did not give a specific binding
complex with C3 probe.
Possible Involvement of hGCMa/TSE2BP in Other Placenta-specific
Enhancers--
Several cis-elements have been described to
be a components of placenta-specific enhancers in various genes. Some
of them, like PSE in the leukemia inhibitory factor receptor gene (19), PLE1 and PLE3 in the leptin gene (20), and the TEF-1 like element in
the chorionic somatomammotropin gene (29, 30), seem to be recognized by
cell-specific trans-factors of unknown identities. The core
sequences of these elements were synthesized and used as competitors
for the C3 probe in EMSAs with nuclear extracts from JEG-3 (lanes
1-7) or B17/Sf21 cells (lanes 8-18). PLE1 in the leptin gene (lanes 4 and 11)
competed with C3 binding as expected from the apparent homology of the
DNA sequence. Binding activity had the same properties with the two
sources. The PLE1 probe gave the same binding complex with expressed
hGCMa/TSE2BP as the C3 probe (Fig. 8,
lane 17).
In the present study, we characterized an element associated with
the minimum enhancer region for placenta-specific transcription of the
aromatase gene. By creating a series of mutant chimeric constructs, we
found that this new element C3 ( We applied a yeast one-hybrid strategy to identify proteins that bind
to TSE2. Several positive clones obtained in the screening were
expressed in insect cells mediated by baculovirus and further screened
for binding activity by EMSA with TSE2 probe. A clone was found to
express a protein that gives specific binding complexes with the TSE2
probe. The nuclear extract derived from the clone showed the same
binding properties as that of the nuclear extract from JEG-3 cells
(Fig. 4C), although the specific complexes from the two
sources differed in size. One possible explanation for the discrepancy
is incomplete blocking of proteolytic activity in the JEG-3 cell case.
Sequence analysis of the clone revealed the cDNA to be the same as
that previously described as hGCMa (18), a mammalian homologue of the
Drosophila GCM. Drosophila GCM is the product of
the gcm gene, whose mutation results in a disrupted central nervous system and disorganization in the peripheral nervous system. It
functions as an important switch in early neurogenesis by committing cells to the glial differentiation in Drosophila (35, 36). GCM is a transcription factor in Drosophila with a novel
type of DNA-binding domain, termed the GCM motif at the amino-terminal region. Several mammalian proteins with the motif have been reported (18, 37-39).
The DNA sequence that binds Drosophila GCM has been
determined by binding site selection assay by two groups (18, 28). The
core sequence we determined independently for TSE2BP is similar. Two C3
homologues having guanine in the first or the fifth position in the
octamer recognition site for GCM competed effectively (Fig. 7).
In contrast to the well conserved GCM motif in the N-terminal regions,
mammalian GCMs have no similarity to GCM or other transcription factors
in the C-terminal region. Nevertheless, rGCM1, a rat homologue of
hGCMa, has been shown to functionally substitute for
Drosophila gcm in transforming presumptive
neurons into glia (38). A mouse mGCMa possesses transactivation
potential in Drosophila cells (40). In the present study, we
showed that the TSE2 (GCM) binding motif is necessary for the minimum
enhancer activity in the HB fragment, but we do not have direct
evidence for transactivation potential of hGCMa/TSE2BP in our system.
Tandem repeats of the C3 fragment alone did not enhance TK
promoter-driven transcription in JEG-3 cells (Fig. 3B).
Cotransfection of hGCMa/TSE2BP and the CAT reporter with tandemly
repeated C3 did not activate transcription of the reporter in HeLa
cells.2 hGCMa/TSE2BP may thus
need distinct co-localization with other factors whose binding sites
are adjacently placed in the minimum enhancer region.
A characteristic feature of hGCMa/TSE2BP is its pattern of expression.
Drosophila GCM is a neural protein and rGCM2, another mammalian homologue, is reported to be expressed in the mouse parathyroid tissue (38). Our Northern blotting with a specific probe
revealed expression of hGCMa/TSE2BP in the placenta but not in other
organs examined. This is in good agreement with the cell-specific
occurrence of TSE2 binding activity and satisfies the expected
criterion of a trans-factor for cis-regulatory
elements that confers placenta-specific expression. Placental
expression of GCM1/a has been shown by in situ hybridization
in developing murine embryos (38).
As summarized by Wang and Melmed (19), a number of regulatory elements
have been found to participate in placenta-specific transcription, and
some of them seem to be recognized by binding proteins restricted to
placental cells. When these elements were synthesized and tested as
competitors in EMSA, PLE1 from the leptin gene competed with the TSE2
binding. PLE1 and PLE3 in the leptin gene (20) are confined to a 60-bp
region upstream of the transcription initiation site that appears to be
involved in its placenta-specific expression, and cell-specific
trans-factors of an unidentified nature have been suggested
to bind them. PLE1 contains a GCM motif with critical guanines whose
mutations were found to cause a 56% reduction in enhancer activity
(20). As expected, in EMSA with expressed hGCMa/TSE2BP (Fig. 8), PLE1
competed with the C3 probe for binding and gave identical binding. It
is thus very likely that hGCMa/TSE2BP is involved in the placental
expression of the leptin gene through PLE1.
Another possible functional site of hGCMa/TSE2BP is URE in the TEF-binding sites have been noted in the placenta-specific enhancer of
the human chorionic somatomammotropin B gene (22, 29, 30). TEF group
proteins recognize the binding site with the consensus
5'-(A/T)(A/G)(A/G)(A/T)ATG(C/T)(G/A)-3' (41). While TEF-1 is a
ubiquitous transcription factor, the expression of other TEF group
proteins is more restricted (41). Binding activity to a TEF element has
been attributed to chorionic somatomammotropin enhancer factor-1 that
is apparently specific to choriocarcinoma, demonstrated as a fast
moving complex in EMSA (22, 30). The DNA sequence of the C3 element
partly overlaps the TEF element GT-IIC, and the C3 complex also runs
fast in EMSA. Furthermore, clones that encode a protein with a TEF
domain were obtained in our one-hybrid screening with the C3 reporter
sequence. Despite the apparent similarities, specific binding complexes
of the nuclear extract prepared from JEG-3 cells with the GT-IIC probe
and TSE2 ran slightly differently in EMSA (data not shown). The C3
binding complexes with nuclear extracts from JEG-3 cells or Sf21
cells expressing hGCMa/TSE2BP protein were not competed by GT-IIC (Fig. 8, lanes 6 and 13).
The trophoblast is the first cell lineage to differentiate in mammalian
development (42). Establishment of the early placental structure is of
the highest priority for the embryo that develops from the inner cell
mass only after the structure is formed. Nevertheless, the molecules
that control the underlying process are largely unknown. There are no
genes that have been found to be essential for trophoblast commitment.
Recently, two basic helix-loop-helix factors, Mash-2 and Hand 1 were
identified in the mouse placenta and shown to be required for its
development (43, 44), but their immediate target genes remain to be
defined. A variety of cis-elements for known and
unidentified trans-factors have been described in the
placenta-specific enhancers that have been analyzed, but not a single
element has been found in common. TSE is associated with several genes
like those for the We are grateful to Dr. Yasuyuki Takagi for
support, encouragement, and critical reading of the manuscript. We also
thank Dr. Nobuhiro Hayashi for protein structural analysis and Dr.
Smiko Abe-Dohmae for discussions and critical comments.
*
This work was supported in part by Grants-in-aid for
Scientific Research C2-08671324 and 11671660 from the Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) AB026493.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institute for
Comprehensive Medical Science, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Aichi
470-1192, Japan. Tel.: 81-562-93-9376; Fax: 81-562-93-8833; E-mail:
kyamada@fujita-hu.ac.jp.
2
K. Yamada, H. Ogawa, and Tsuneko Okazaki,
unpublished results.
The abbreviations used are:
TSE, trophoblast-specific element;
TSEBP, TSE-binding protein;
TSE2BP, TSE2-binding protein;
CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase;
EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay;
hCG, human chorionic
gonadotropin;
PLE, placental leptin enhancer;
PSE, placenta-specific
element;
TEF, transcription enhancer factor;
URE, upstream regulatory
element;
bp, base pair(s).
Institute for Comprehensive Medical Science,
§ CREST,
Department of Biology, and ** Department of Biochemistry,
![]()
ABSTRACT
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-subunit gene, also
exists (Yamada, K., Harada, N., Honda, S., and Takagi, Y. (1995)
J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25064-25069). The co-presence of
TSE and TSE2 is required to direct trophoblast-specific expression driven by a heterologous thymidine kinase promoter. A 2562-base pair
cDNA clone encoding a 436-amino acid protein that binds to TSE2 was
isolated from a human placental cDNA library using a yeast
one-hybrid system with the TSE2 as a reporter sequence. The protein was
revealed to be identical to hGCMa, a mammalian homologue of the
Drosophila GCM (glia cells missing) protein. Expression of
hGCMa is restricted to the placenta. The protein also binds to PLE1 in
the leptin promoter among other cis-elements reported to
confer placenta-specific expression, suggesting that hGCMa is a
placenta-specific transcription regulator, possibly involved in the
expression of multiple placenta-specific genes.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
306 upstream of the exon is capable of dictating
trophoblast-specific expression under a heterologous TK promoter (11).
Among the multiple binding domains found in this region, two are
recognized by the same trans-acting factor that binds to the
trophoblast-specific element
(TSE),1 previously located in
the enhancer region of the human glycoprotein hormone
-subunit
(12-15). It is noteworthy that a common trans-factor is
involved in the expression of two hormone related genes that are
characteristic of human placenta. Despite this fact, the compositions of the two trophoblast-specific enhancers are quite different. A
composite enhancer (
180/
111 bp) of the glycoprotein
-subunit gene promoter, featuring two cAMP response elements and an upstream regulatory element (URE), is responsible for its placental expression. URE has been further subdivided into three overlapping sites, an
-activator element, TSE, and URE1 (15). It was also found that human
GATA-2 and GATA-3 bind to the
-activator element, with TSE/URE1
forming an overlapping element that may be bound by two functionally
interchangeable proteins, TSEBP and URE-binding protein (15, 16). In
contrast, the trophoblast-specific enhancer region of the aromatase
gene does not contain cAMP response element or GATA binding domains.
There are some recognition sites for transcription factors like PEA,
Sp1, and AD4 (17), but none of them has proven to be functional.
Furthermore, TSE does not exhibit enhancer activity by itself, as shown
for both the hCG
-subunit gene (13) and the aromatase gene (11).
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
307/
142) and HB
(
217/
142) (11) fragments were generated by polymerase chain
reaction and cloned into pBluescript SK+ at the
EcoRV site. Their PstI site was deleted. They
were digested by BamHI and HindIII, and subcloned
into pBLCAT2 employing BamHI/HindIII sites.
Modified FB and HB CAT constructs were generated by polymerase chain
reaction with mutagenic primers and FB pBLCAT2 as a template. C3-,
2×(C3)-, 4×(C3)- and 5×(C3)-CAT2 were generated as follows. The
modified C3 (C3B) fragment, 5'-GATCCATAAGACCCTCATTCCAGAG-3', and
5'-GATCCTCTGGAATGAGGGTCTTAT-3' were annealed, phosphorylated by
nucleotide kinase (Takara), and ligated. The ligated DNA fragments were
size-selected in a 2% GTG agarose gel, blunted using a fill-in reaction with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I, and subcloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript KS+. Clones
with one, two, four, and five tandem copies of C3 were further
subcloned into pBLCAT2 at BamHI/HindIII. The
orientation and the positions of the insertion and mutations are shown
in Fig. 3B. Inserted portions of each CAT construct were
verified by sequencing.
leu
minimal selective medium
supplemented with 30 mM 3-aminotriazole (Sigma).
Approximately 1 × 106 cDNA plasmids were screened
in two different transformations. Sixty-two histidine-positive clones
were selected by their large colony size and rapid growth. Crude DNA
fractions were recovered from positive yeast clones and electroporated
into the Escherichia coli strain XL1-Blue. Plasmids were
rescreened by transforming them into YM4271-TSE2-lacZ plating on
leu
ura
minimal medium. The filter replica
method using
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (40 µg/ml) was used for
-galactosidase activities. Fifteen clones with
high activities were selected and grouped into five distinct groups.
-actin probe.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
301 from the transcription start site
was sufficient to dictate the expression of the placenta-specific exon
I of the aromatase gene. The region spanning
307 to
142 (designated
as FB) was capable of dictating trophoblast-specific expression under a
heterologous TK promoter. A smaller region that was designated as HB
(
217/
142) also retained the cell type-specific enhancer activity
although it was reduced to about
of that of FB (11). In
EMSAs, the labeled HB fragment gave two specific binding complexes
(indicated as an arrowhead and a double
arrowhead in Fig. 1,
lane 2) with nuclear extract prepared from JEG-3
cells. The major complex was displaced by a 400-fold molar excess of
unlabeled competitor DNA fragments C4 (
177/
153) (lane
3) in HB and C2 (
300/
274) in the basal promoter FB
region (11). As described previously, both C4 and C2 contained a motif
recognized by TSE-binding protein originally described in the
-hCG
gene (12, 15). The minor, fast moving band was not displaced by
unlabeled C4 but was competed by a 400-fold molar excess of a 22-bp DNA
fragment corresponding to positions
205 to
184 from the
transcription initiation site, designated as C3 (lane
4). When C3 was used as a radioactive probe (lanes 5-12), a single binding complex was
observed. The formation of this complex was inhibited by a 400-fold
molar excess of unlabeled HB and C3 as expected but not by C2 or C4.
Unexpectedly, however, the
-hCG TSE analogues inhibited the binding.
Mutation of the TSE at C
172 to T abolishes the
competition to the TSE, whereas a mutant with T
169
changed to C retains the activity (15). Both mutants were effective as
a competitor for the binding to C3 probe (lanes
10 and 11). This result suggests that the 24-bp
fragment TSE from
-hCG gene is an active competitor for binding to
C3, although this competition is not due to the TSE recognition
sequence itself. We tentatively named the core sequence in the C3
fragment the trophoblast-specific element 2 (TSE2), because, as we show
later in this paper, this element is functional in the aromatase
promoter, and its binding activity seems to be restricted in
trophoblasts.

View larger version (49K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Two distinct binding sites exist in the
minimal enhancer for placental aromatase transcription. EMSAs were
performed with a JEG-3 cell nuclear extract (2.7 µg of protein/lane).
The probes used were HB and C3 in lanes 1-4 and in
lanes 5-12, respectively. A 400-fold molar excess of the
indicated DNA fragment was added as a competitor. Positions of the DNA
fragments in the promoter region are shown at the bottom.
The numbers show the position relative to the transcription start site
of Exon Ia (11).
199 to
196 most affected competitive activity of
the fragments. A 200-fold excess of mutant fragments was unable to
compete with the C3 probe (lanes 4 and
5). On the other hand, mutations introduced into the
following five bases gave less significant effects. TSE analogues were
also found to be weak competitors, suggesting lower affinities for the
putative TSE2BP. As illustrated in the lower part of Fig.
2A, the 24-bp TSE fragment (a portion of it shown as a
reverse sequence) of the
-hCG gene, contains the most critical four
bases, ACCC, for recognition for TSE2BP and the adjacent TNA in the
reverse direction. The critical mutation in the recognition motif of
TSE-binding protein, namely C (shown as G with an asterisk)
to T at
172 resulted in a less significant change in the TSE2BP
recognition context.

View larger version (23K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 2.
Effects of mutations sequentially introduced
into the C3 fragment and
-hCG TSE on binding
to the C3 probe. A, mutations introduced into the C3
fragment are shown at the top. At the bottom, the
core region of C3 is compared with TSE analogues and C4.
Underlining in C3 indicates the position where mutation
affected the binding. Dashed underlining shows
the core region of TSE. The asterisk shows the critical C at
172 (shown as G). B, EMSAs were carried out as described
previously with nuclear extract from JEG-3 cells and radiolabeled C3.
The designated competitors at a 200-fold molar (upper
panel) or a 100-fold molar (lower
panel) excess were incubated with the nuclear extract for 10 min before the addition of the probe.
161/
162 to CT, shown as C4n in Fig.
3, expected to disrupt the
C4core that would be recognized by TSEBP. The other change
was CC to AA (C3l) shown in Fig. 2. C4 is a distinct element that does
not compete with C3, but it contains an ACCC motif also seen in C3 as
illustrated in Fig. 2. The TSE in the
-hCG promoter competes with
C4(11) and weakly with C3 (Fig. 1, lane 9, and
Fig. 2, lane 8). In the
-hCG TSE, the regions
necessary for the competition to C3 or C4 are partly overlapping. Any
mutation introduced in either C3 or C4 might result in a new binding
sequence for the other site and thus an ambiguous result in the CAT
assay. To rule out this possibility, the competition abilities of these
mutated fragments were tested to confirm that the mutation specifically destroyed the competitive activity toward the intended binding site but
had no effect on the other binding (Fig. 3A).

View larger version (41K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 3.
Effects of mutations on the transcriptional
activity of HB fragment. A, the DNA sequences of a C4
analogue (C4n) and a C3 analogue (C3l) are shown in the
upper part of A (positions of the
mutations are underlined). EMSA results with
32P-labeled C4 (lanes 1-5) or C3 (lanes
6-10) are shown in the lower part. A
200-fold molar excess of the designated competitors was added 10 min
before the addition of the probe. B, JEG-3 cells were
transiently transfected with HB CAT reporter constructs that contained
either or both of the mutations. The relative positions of the herpes
simplex virus TK promoter and various fragments are shown on the
left. The presence of a shaded box
signifies mutations in the indicated regions. The efficiency of the
transfection was normalized by the luciferase activity derived from the
cotransfected luciferase expression vector pSV/Luci. Cell extracts
containing equal units of luciferase were subjected to CAT assay. Each
data point represents relative activity ± S.E. (relative to the
activity of the pHBCAT2 construct, arbitrarily set at 100%) calculated
from the results of at least four samples in two independent
experiments.
-hCG gene was identified
as a transcription factor of the AP2 family (27). Binding activities to
C2 and C4 were both competed by a consensus AP2 binding site. With the
nuclear extract used in this study, the binding activity to C2 or C4
was not inhibited by anti-AP2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa
Cruz, CA). In the nuclear extract prepared in the presence of protease
inhibitor mixtures, however, the binding complex appeared in a slower
migrating position and was inhibited by the antibody (data not shown).
The AP2 family protein thus seems to bind to the C2 and C4 region in
the aromatase enhancer. TSE2 appears to be functionally involved in the
expression of the placenta-specific aromatase transcript and, as we
later show, occurrence of its binding activity seems to be restricted. A placenta-specific transcription factor might bind to this site. Since
TSE2 does not contain any known cis-element of transcription factors, we applied yeast one-hybrid strategy (24, 25) to isolate a
cDNA clone encoding the TSE2-binding protein.
-galactosidase activity.
They encoded five different proteins with various types of DNA-binding
domains. Apparently, the reporter sequence had ambiguously contained
binding sites for multiple DNA binding proteins.

View larger version (54K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 4.
Expression of the B17 clone in Sf21
cells. A, homogenate (Ho) and nuclear
extracts (NE) from virus-infected Sf21 cells were
resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12% acrylamide
gel) and stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. B, EMSAs was
performed with the C3 probe and nuclear extracts from the designated
cells. C, EMSAs with the C3 probe and nuclear extracts from
Sf21 cells expressing B17 (lanes 1-6 and
13-17) or JEG-3 (lanes 7-12). Added
competitors (× 200) are shown at the top of the
lanes.

View larger version (22K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 5.
Comparison of TSE2 and GCM binding
sites. A, TSE2 and two GCM binding sites (*, from Ref.
18; **, from Ref. 28) are shown aligned. B, an EMSA was
performed with the C3 probe and the JEG-3 nuclear extract (2.7 µg of
protein/lane). Lanes contained a 200-fold molar excess of the indicated
competitor.

View larger version (65K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 6.
Northern blot analysis of TSE2BP/hGCMa
expression in human tissues. A Northern blot containing 2 µg of
poly(A+) RNA per lane was purchased from
CLONTECH and probed with a 505-bp fragment of
hGCMa/TSE2BP (A). The same blot was then reprobed with
-actin (B).

View larger version (51K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 7.
TSE2 binding activities of nuclear extracts
from various sources. EMSA was performed with the C3 probe and
nuclear extracts from human placenta (lanes
1-3), B17/Sf21 (lanes 4 and
5), JEG-3 (lanes 7 and 8),
Hep-G2 (lanes 9 and 10), or HeLa cells
(lanes 11 and 12). The indicated lanes
contained a 400-fold molar excess of the competitor oligonucleotides as
shown.

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 8.
Binding of other placenta-specific elements
to hGCMa/TSE2BP. EMSA was performed with the C3 probe
(lanes 1-16) or PLE1 (lanes
17 and 18) using nuclear extracts from JEG-3
cells (lanes 1-7) or B17/Sf21
(lanes 8-18). The indicated lanes contained a
400-fold molar excess of the competitor oligonucleotides as
shown.
![]()
DISCUSSION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
205/
184) and C4 (
177/
153) were
both necessary for minimum enhancer activity. Kamet et al.
(31) showed that the proximal 500 bp of the human placental aromatase
gene is sufficient to direct placenta specific expression in mice. The
importance of the HB region in the expression of placental aromatase
transcripts has been noted by others. Toda et al. showed
enhancer activity in the
242/
166 fragment and the existence of a
cell-specific trans-factor that bound to this region (32).
Recently, an imperfect palindromic sequence located at
183 to
172
bp was shown to be involved in basal as well as retinoid-induced
reporter gene expression (33). As we demonstrated previously (11), the
core element in C4 is similar to the TSE originally described in the
-hCG promoter that is recognized by putative TSEBP (12). The binding
activity to TSE has been attributed to members of the AP2 family
transcription factor (27), of which AP2
is the major AP-2 transcript
in mouse placenta (34). TSE2, the second element we located in the
placenta-specific enhancer of the aromatase gene, is not a known
recognition sequence for transcription factors. Binding activity to
this element seems to be restricted to placental cells (Fig. 7).
-hCG
promoter. In this region, since the binding to overlapping TSE is
dominant, the URE binding site has only been revealed when a probe with
a mutation at
172 was used (15). This is consistent with our finding
that the affinity of hGCMa/TSE2BP for the TSE is rather low. The DNase
I footprint for the URE binding protein (15) in the TSE region overlaps
the critical three consecutive cytidines for hGCMa/TSE2BP recognition.
Putative URE-binding protein could be hGCMa/TSE2BP.
- and
-subunits, chorionic somatomammotropin,
aromatase, and adenosine deaminase (34) and therefore could be a
candidate for the master switch for placental cell differentiation. But
there are exceptions such as leukemia inhibitory factor receptor and
the leptin gene. Placenta may not possess a universal master switch for
all placenta-specific genes, or a yet unknown "true master gene"
controls the expression of these diverse trascriptional regulators. So
far, while placenta-specific enhancers are located in genes for various
proteins, none is located in genes for transcription factors. Recently,
transcription factors like AP-2
and hTEF-5 have been shown to be
strongly expressed in the placenta. The hGCMa described here may also
fall into this category. Further investigation of these
placenta-specific transcriptional regulators should hopefully give more
information on the differentiation process of trophoblasts.
![]()
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
![]()
FOOTNOTES
![]()
ABBREVIATIONS
![]()
REFERENCES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
1.
Thompson, E. A., Jr.,
and Siiteri, P. K.
(1974)
J. Biol. Chem.
249,
5364-5372 2.
Roselli, C. E.,
Horton, L. E.,
and Resko, J. A.
(1985)
Endocrinology
117,
2471-2477[Abstract]
3.
Harada, N.,
and Yamada, K.
(1992)
Endocrinology
131,
2306-2312[Abstract]
4.
Mahendroo, M. S.,
Means, G. D.,
Mendelson, C. R.,
and Simpson, E. R.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
11276-11281 5.
Harada, N.,
Yamada, K.,
Saito, K.,
Kibe, N.,
Dohmae, S.,
and Takagi, Y.
(1990)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
166,
365-372[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Means, G. D.,
Kilgore, M. W.,
Mahendroo, M. S.,
Mendelson, C. R.,
and Simpson, E. R.
(1991)
Mol. Endocrinol.
5,
2005-2013[Abstract]
7.
Nelson, D. R.,
Kamataki, T.,
Waxman, D. J., F. P., G.,
Estabrook, R. W.,
Feyereisen, R.,
Gonzalez, F. J.,
Coon, M. J.,
Gunsalus, I. C.,
gotoh, O.,
Okuda, K.,
and Nebert, D. W.
(1993)
DNA Cell Biol.
12,
1-5[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Means, G. D.,
Mahendroo, M. S.,
Corbin, C. J.,
Mathis, J. M.,
Powell, F. E.,
Mendelson, C. R.,
and Simpson, E. R.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19385-19391 9.
Harada, N.,
Utsumi, T.,
and Takagi, Y.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
11312-11316 10.
Ritvos, O.,
and Voutilainen, R.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
61-67[Abstract]
11.
Yamada, K.,
Harada, N.,
Honda, S.,
and Takagi, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
25064-25069 12.
Steger, D. J.,
Altschmied, J.,
Buscher, M.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1991)
Mol. Endocrinol.
5,
243-255[Abstract]
13.
Delegeane, A. M.,
Ferland, L. H.,
and Mellon, P. L.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
3994-4002 14.
Jameson, J. L., A. C., P.,
Gallagher, g. D.,
and Habener, J. F.
(1989)
Mol. Endocrinol.
3,
763-772[Abstract]
15.
Pittman, R. H.,
Clay, C. M.,
Farmerie, T. A.,
and Nilson, J. H.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
19360-19368 16.
Heckert, L. L.,
Schultz, K.,
and Nilson, J. H.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26497-264504 17.
Morohashi, K.,
Honda, S.,
Inomata, Y.,
Handa, H.,
and Omura, T.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
17913-17919 18.
Akiyama, Y.,
Hosoya, T.,
Poole, A. M.,
and Hotta, Y.
(1996)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
93,
14912-14916 19.
Wang, Z.,
and Melmed, S.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
26069-26077 20.
Bi, S.,
Gavrilova, O.,
Gong, D.-W.,
Mason, M. M.,
and Reitman, M.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
30583-30588 21.
Shi, D.,
Winston, J. H.,
Blackburn, M. R.,
Datta, S. K.,
Hanten, G.,
and Kellems, R. E.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
2334-2341 22.
Jiang, S. W.,
and Eberhardt, N. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
13906-13915 23.
De Wet, J.,
Wood, K. V.,
Deluca, M.,
Helinski, D. R.,
and Subramani, S.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
725-737 24.
Li, J. J.,
and Herkowitz, I.
(1993)
Science
262,
1870-1874 25.
Lehming, N.,
thanos, D.,
Brickman, J. M.,
Ma, J.,
Maniatis, T.,
and Ptashne, M.
(1994)
Nature
371,
175-179[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
26.
Ogawa, H.,
Hayashi, H.,
Hori, H.,
Kobayashi, T.,
and Hosono, R.
(1996)
Neurochem. Int.
29,
553-563[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
27.
Johnson, W.,
Albanese, C.,
Handwerger, S.,
Williams, T.,
Pestell, R. G.,
and Jameson, J. L.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
15405-15412 28.
Schreiber, J.,
Sock, E.,
and Wegner, M.
(1997)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
94,
4739-4744 29.
Jacquemin, P.,
Oury, c.,
Peers, B.,
Morin, A.,
Belayew, A.,
and Martial, J.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
93-103 30.
Jiang, S.,
Trujillo, M. A.,
and Eberhardt, N. L.
(1997)
Mol. Endocrinol.
11,
1223-1232 31.
Kamat, K.,
Graves, K. H.,
Smith, M. E.,
Richardson, J. A.,
and Mendelson, C. R.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
4547-4580
32.
Toda, K.,
Miyahara, K.,
Kawamoto, T.,
Ikeda, H.,
Sagara, Y.,
and Shizuta, Y.
(1992)
Eur. J. Biochem.
205,
303-309[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
33.
Sun, T.,
Zhao, Y.,
Mangelsdorf, D. J.,
and Simpson, E. R.
(1998)
Endocrinology
139,
1684-1691 34.
Shi, D.,
and Kellems, R. E.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
27331-27338 35.
Hosoya, T.,
Takizawa, K.,
Nitta, K.,
and Hotta, Y.
(1995)
Cell
82,
1025-1036[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
36.
Jones, B. W.,
Fetter, R. D.,
Tear, G.,
and Goodman, C. S.
(1995)
Cell
82,
1013-1023[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
37.
Altshuller, Y.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
and Frohman, M. A.
(1996)
FEBS Lett.
393,
201-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
38.
Kim, J.,
Jones, B. W.,
Zock, C.,
Chen, Z.,
Wang, H.,
Goodman, C. S.,
and Anderson, D. J.
(1998)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
95,
12364-12369 39.
Kanemura, Y.,
Hiraga, S.,
Arita, N.,
Ohnishi, T.,
Izumoto, S.,
Mori, K.,
Matsumura, H.,
Yamasaki, M.,
Fushiki, S.,
and Yoshimine, T.
(1999)
FEBS Lett.
442,
151-156[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
40.
Reifegerste, R.,
Schreiber, J.,
Gulland, S.,
Ludemann, A.,
and Wegner, M.
(1999)
Mech. Dev.
82,
141-150[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
41.
Jacquemin, P.,
Martial, J. A.,
and Davidson, I.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
12928-12937 42.
Cross, J. C.,
Werb, Z.,
and Fisher, S. J.
(1994)
Science
266,
1508-1518 43.
Guillemot, F.,
Nagy, A.,
Auerbach, A.,
Rossant, J.,
and Joyner, A. L.
(1994)
Nature
371,
333-336[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
44.
Firulli, A. B.,
McFadden, D. G.,
Lin, Q.,
Srivastava, D.,
and Olson, E. N.
(1998)
Nat. Genet.
18,
266-270[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Copyright © 1999 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Chang, D. Mukherjea, R. M. Gobble, K. A. Groesch, R. J. Torry, and D. S. Torry Glial Cell Missing 1 Regulates Placental Growth Factor (PGF) Gene Transcription in Human Trophoblast Biol Reprod, May 1, 2008; 78(5): 841 - 851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Schubert, N. Lamoureux, K. Kilian, L. Klein-Hitpass, and S. Hashemolhosseini Identification of Integrin-{alpha}4, Rb1, and Syncytin A as Murine Placental Target Genes of the Transcription Factor GCMa/Gcm1 J. Biol. Chem., February 29, 2008; 283(9): 5460 - 5465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cai, J. Chen, Y. Liu, T. Miura, Y. Luo, J. F. Loring, W. J. Freed, M. S. Rao, and X. Zeng Assessing Self-Renewal and Differentiation in Human Embryonic Stem Cell Lines Stem Cells, March 1, 2006; 24(3): 516 - 530. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-H. Cheng and S. Handwerger A Placenta-Specific Enhancer of the Human Syncytin Gene Biol Reprod, September 1, 2005; 73(3): 500 - 509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kamat, M. E. Smith, J. M. Shelton, J. A. Richardson, and C. R. Mendelson Genomic Regions that Mediate Placental Cell-Specific and Developmental Regulation of Human Cyp19 (Aromatase) Gene Expression in Transgenic Mice Endocrinology, May 1, 2005; 146(5): 2481 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-S. Yang, C. Yu, H.-C. Chuang, C.-W. Chang, G.-D. Chang, T.-P. Yao, and H. Chen FBW2 Targets GCMa to the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Degradation System J. Biol. Chem., March 18, 2005; 280(11): 10083 - 10090. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Payne and D. B. Hales Overview of Steroidogenic Enzymes in the Pathway from Cholesterol to Active Steroid Hormones Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 947 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Schubert, E. Kardash, M. A. Khan, T. Cheusova, K. Kilian, M. Wegner, and S. Hashemolhosseini Interaction, Cooperative Promoter Modulation, and Renal Colocalization of GCMa and Pitx2 J. Biol. Chem., November 26, 2004; 279(48): 50358 - 50365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |