![]()
|
|
||||||||
J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 32692-32698, November 12, 1999
,From the Departments of Internal Medicine and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The scavenger receptor-BI (SR-BI) delivers
sterols from circulating lipoproteins to tissues, but the relative
potency of individual lipoproteins and the transported cholesterol has
not been studied in detail. In this study, we used Chinese hamster
ovary cells that express recombinant mouse SR-BI but have no functional
low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors (ldlA7-SRBI cells) to compare the fate of lipids transferred from high or low density lipoproteins to
cells by SR-BI. HDL and LDL were equally effective in mediating the
transfer of [3H]cholesterol to cells. Only 5% of
the free cholesterol transferred to cells was esterified, in direct
contrast to the findings in the cells that express LDL receptors in
which 50% of the transported cholesterol was esterified. Almost all
the free cholesterol transferred from lipoproteins to cells was rapidly
excreted when the ldlA7-SRBI cells were switched to media containing
unlabeled lipoproteins. SR-BI expression was associated with an
increase in selective cholesteryl ester uptake from both lipoproteins,
but HDL was a more effective donor. HDL and LDL were equally effective
in delivering cholesterol to the intracellular regulatory pool via
SR-BI. These data indicate that SR-BI is able to exchange cholesterol
rapidly between lipoproteins and cell membranes and can mediate the
uptake of cholesteryl esters from both classes of lipoproteins.
Scavenger receptor, class B, type I
(SR-BI)1 is a cell surface
receptor that mediates the selective uptake of lipids from lipoproteins to cells (1-3). The uptake of lipoprotein-derived cholesteryl esters
through this pathway represents a high capacity, hormone-inducible cholesterol delivery system (4-9). Unlike the classical
receptor-mediated endocytic pathway (10), the lipoproteins are not
internalized or degraded in the process of delivering sterols to cells
(4, 6, 9, 11-13).
As is characteristic of other members of the scavenger receptor family,
SR-BI binds multiple ligands with high affinity, including high (HDL),
low (LDL), and very low density lipoproteins, oxidized LDL, acetylated
LDL, and anionic phospholipids (1, 14-17). SR-BI mediates the uptake
of cholesteryl esters from HDL (1) and also nonlipoprotein cholesterol
by cells (3). SR-BI is equally efficient at mediating the import and
export of cholesterol to and from cells to lipoproteins and other
acceptors (2, 3).
Previously, we showed that SR-BI expression was associated with an
increase in lipoprotein-stimulated cholesterol esterification in cells
lacking LDL receptors (3). LDL and HDL were equally effective ligands
for the SR-BI-dependent stimulation of cholesterol esterification within cells. Moreover, free cholesterol was a potent
stimulus for the formation of cholesteryl esters in cells that express
high levels of SR-BI. We did not define the chemical nature of the
lipoprotein-associated lipid that was responsible for the
SR-BI-dependent stimulation of esterification. In this study we determined the relative contributions of free cholesterol and
cholesteryl esters to the formation of intracellular cholesteryl esters
and examined the intracellular fate of these different lipids following
uptake via SR-BI. We also examined the availability of the free
cholesterol transferred to cells by SR-BI for efflux. Finally, the
relative potency of HDL and LDL as donors to the intracellular
cholesterol regulatory pool was determined.
Cell Lines and Tissue Culture--
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)
cells that lack LDL receptor activity (ldlA7 cells) (18) and express
high levels of recombinant SR-BI (ldlA7-SRBI) were used in this study
(3). These cells have the advantage of allowing the analysis of the
effect of SR-BI expression on lipid transport to cells from LDL that is
independent of the LDL receptor. The cells were maintained in medium A
(1:1 mixture of Dulbecco's minimal essential medium and Ham's F-12 medium with 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin sulfate), supplemented with 5% (v/v) fetal calf serum, and 0.25 mg/ml
GeneticinTM (G418 sulfate, Life Technologies, Inc., Grand
Island, NY). The cells were plated in 6-well plates at a cell density
of 60,000 cells/well in medium A with 5% (v/v) fetal calf serum. On
day 2, the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
and refed with medium A containing 5% (v/v) newborn calf lipoprotein-deficient serum, 10 µM compactin, and 100 µM mevalonate. On day 3 the cells were washed with PBS
and switched to medium B (Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (minus
glutamine) with 2 mg/ml fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin).
Lipoproteins--
Human HDL (density (d) = 1.09-1.21 g/liter) and LDL (d = 1.04-1.063 g/liter)
were prepared as described previously (19). The lipoproteins were
iodinated using the iodine monochloride method (20). The HDL and LDL
were labeled by Celite exchange with either
[3H]cholesteryl oleoyl ether (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), [3H]cholesteryl oleate (Amersham Pharmacia
Biotech), or [3H]cholesterol (NEN Life Science Products
Inc.), as described (21).
Cholesterol Esterification--
On day 3 the cells were
incubated in medium B plus varying concentrations of HDL or LDL. After
a 5-h incubation with lipoproteins, the cells were pulsed with 0.2 mM [14C]oleate (~10,000 dpm/nmol) (NEN Life
Science Products Inc., Boston, MA) for 2 h. Then the cells were
washed three times with buffer A (50 mM Tris, 0.9% NaCl,
and 0.2% bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4), and once with buffer B (50 mM Tris and 0.9% NaCl, pH 7.4). The lipids were extracted
twice from the cell monolayer with hexane:isopropyl alcohol (3:2) and
analyzed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (Silica Gel G,
Machete-Nagel, Dueren Federal Republic of Germany) (20). The cells were
lysed in 1 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and the protein was quantitated
using the Lowry method (22).
Degradation of 125I-LDL and -HDL--
On day 3 the
ldlA7 and ldlA7-SRBI cells were incubated with 125I-LDL or
125I-HDL in medium B for the indicated time, the medium was
removed and the proteins were precipitated using trichloroacetic acid. To remove the free iodine, the supernatant was oxidized with hydrogen peroxide and extracted with chloroform. The amount of radioactivity in
the aqueous phase was quantitated on a Cholesterol Transfer Studies--
On day 3 the media was changed
to medium B and the cells were incubated with labeled lipoproteins for
5 h in the absence or presence of a 40-fold excess of unlabeled
lipoprotein. The cells were chilled, washed 3 times with buffer A, and
then once with buffer B. Lipids were extracted twice from the cell
monolayer with 1 ml of hexane:isopropyl alcohol (3:2) and the lipid
composition was analyzed using TLC (20). The cells were then dissolved
in 1 ml of 0.1 N NaOH and the protein was quantitated using
the Lowry method (22). Silver nitrate-Silica Gel 60 plates were used
for the TLC in the re-esterification experiments (23).
Immunoblot Analysis--
Membranes and nuclear extracts were
prepared as described previously to assess the amount of
3-hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase (24) and sterol
regulatory element-binding protein-2 (SREBP-2) (25, 26). A total of 50 µg of membrane or nuclear protein was subjected to 6.5%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis prior to the transfer to
nitrocellulose (Hybond C, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Immunoblotting
was performed as described previously (27) using a mouse monoclonal
anti-HMG-CoA reductase antibody (IgG-A9) (5 µg/ml) (24) or mouse
monoclonal antibody (IgG-7D4) directed against amino acids 32-250 of
hamster SREBP-2 (5 µg/ml) (28). Bound antibodies were visualized by
chemiluminescence with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse
secondary antibody using the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system
and exposed to Kodak DuPont NEF 496 film at room temperature for the
indicated time.
To determine the relative abilities of SR-BI to transport
cholesterol and cholesteryl esters into cells via SR-BI, HDL and LDL
particles were labeled with [3H]cholesterol or
[3H]cholesteryl ester and incubated with mutant CHO cells
that express no functional LDL receptors (ldlA7 cells) (18) and a line
of permanently transfected ldlA7 cells that express high levels of recombinant mouse SR-BI (ldlA7-SRBI cells) (3). In the first experiment, the [3H]cholesterol-labeled lipoproteins were
incubated with the cells for 5 h in the presence or absence of an
inhibitor of acyl-coenzyme A:cholesteryl acyltransferase inhibitor
(Sandoz 58-035). We added unlabeled 0.2 mM oleate to the
cells for 2 h prior to extraction of the cellular lipids and
analysis by TLC. Panels A-C of Fig. 1 shows the amount of
[3H]cholesterol associated with the ldlA7-SRBI and the
control ldlA7 cells after the cells were incubated with the indicated
amounts of radiolabeled HDL or LDL. An increase in the cellular content of [3H]cholesterol was seen with both lipoproteins, but
only in the cells that express SR-BI. When the data were plotted on the
basis of the protein content of lipoproteins, LDL appeared to be a more effective cholesterol donor than HDL (panel A), but if the
data were plotted on the basis of the total cholesterol added, the two
lipoproteins were relatively very similar (panel B).
Addition of the acyl-coenzyme A:cholesteryl acyltransferase inhibitor
did not significantly change the amount of radiolabeled cholesterol transferred to cells, except for a small reduction at the highest levels of LDL used in the assay. Addition of chloroquine also had no
effect on the amount of [3H]cholesterol transferred to
cells (data not shown). From these results, we conclude that the amount
of cholesterol transferred from lipoproteins to cells is not dependent
on the protein composition of the lipoprotein particle, but rather on
the amount of lipoprotein cholesterol provided to the cells, and that
inhibition of cholesterol esterification does not affect the cellular
uptake of free cholesterol from lipoproteins via SR-BI.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
![]()
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
-counter (Gamma Trac, Tm
Analytic, Elk Grove Village, IL) to determine the amount of acid-soluble material formed by the cells (which is almost exclusively [125I]iodotyrosine) (20). The degradation activity,
representing the cell-dependent proteolysis, is expressed
in micrograms of 125I-labeled acid-soluble protein formed
per mg of total cell protein.
![]()
RESULTS
TOP
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
REFERENCES

View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
Fig. 1.
Uptake of [3H]cholesterol
(panels A-C) and formation of
[3H]cholesteryl ester (panels D-F) from
LDL and HDL in ldlA7 and ldlA7-SRBI cells. ldlA7 and ldlA7-SRBI
cells were seeded in 6-well plates at a cell density of 60,000 cells/well in medium A containing 5% fetal calf serum. On day 2 the
cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with medium A plus 5%
newborn calf lipoprotein-deficient serum, 10 µM
compactin, and 100 µM mevalonate. On day 3, the cells
were washed 3 times with PBS before the addition of medium B plus the
indicated amount of [3H]cholesterol LDL (23,000 cpm/nmol)
or HDL (220,000 cpm/nmol) in the absence (duplicate incubation) or
presence (single incubation) of a 40-fold excess of unlabeled
lipoproteins. An acyl-coenzyme A:cholesteryl acyltransferase inhibitor
(Sandoz compound 58-035) was added 5 min prior to the lipoproteins.
After a 5-h incubation, 0.2 mM oleate was added to the
cells for 2 h. Then the cells were washed 3 times with buffer A
and once with buffer B. Lipids were extracted twice from the cell
monolayers with 1 ml of hexane:isopropyl alcohol (3:2) and the lipid
composition was analyzed using TLC as described under "Experimental
Procedures." The cells were lysed with 1 ml of 0.1 N NaOH
and the protein was quantitated using the Lowry method (22). The
experiment was repeated three times and the results were similar.
To determine the amount of [3H]cholesterol that was ultimately delivered to the ER and esterified, the amount of [3H]cholesteryl esters formed during the experiment was measured. A significant, although small, percentage (~5%) of the total [3H]cholesterol delivered to cells was converted to [3H]cholesteryl esters (Fig. 1, panels D-F) in the cells expressing SR-BI. As expected, no [3H]cholesteryl esters were formed in the presence of the acyl-coenzyme A:cholesteryl acyltransferase inhibitor or chloroquine (3) (data not shown). These data indicate that only a small fraction of the cholesterol transferred from lipoproteins to cells via SR-BI was esterified.
To determine if the cholesterol transferred to cells from lipoproteins
via SR-BI is accessible for efflux, a time course experiment was
performed in which the cells were incubated with lipoproteins labeled
with [3H]cholesterol for up to 5 h, washed, and then
unlabeled lipoproteins were added to the media (Fig.
2). [14C]Oleate was present
throughout the experiment to follow cholesterol esterification. The
amount of [3H]cholesterol transferred to the cells
expressing SR-BI increased progressively during the initial 5-h
incubation, and then decreased with the addition of unlabeled
lipoproteins (panel A). The media was subjected to
ultracentrifugation and all of the [3H]cholesterol was
associated with the lipoprotein fraction (data not shown). The LDL used
in this experiment had a 4-fold higher cholesterol content than the
HDL, which accounts for the greater amount of
[3H]cholesterol transferred from LDL than HDL to cells
during this experiment. Only a modest increase in cellular content of
[3H]cholesterol was seen in the ldlA7 cells (panel
B). Previous studies have shown that these cells express low but
detectable levels of SR-BI (3). A modest increase in the cellular
content of [3H]cholesterol that was not reversible was
seen in the CHO cells (panel C), which contain a similar
amount of SR-BI as the ldlA7 cells (data not shown) but also express
LDL receptors.
|
We next determined how much of the [3H]cholesterol that entered cells in this experiment was converted to [3H]cholesteryl esters (Fig. 2, panels D-F). In the ldlA7-SRBI cells, ~5% of the [3H]cholesterol from HDL or LDL was esterified at the 5-h time point. A similar mass of cholesteryl esters was formed in the CHO cells, but this represented a much higher proportion of the free cholesterol that entered the cells (~50%). Only a trace amount (<2%) of the HDL-associated [3H]cholesterol that entered CHO cells was esterified. The total amount of cholesteryl [14C]oleate formed during the experiment was monitored (Fig. 2, panels G-I) and proceeded in an unimpeded fashion in both the ldlA7-SRBI cells and CHO cells (panels G and I, respectively). LDL stimulated a dramatic increase in cholesterol esterification in CHO cells (panel I), which is consistent with the known re-esterification of LDL cholesterol delivered to the ER via the LDL receptor pathway (10).
SR-BI not only mediates the transfer of free cholesterol between
lipoproteins and cells, but also promotes the selective uptake of
cholesteryl esters from HDL to cells (1). To determine if LDL is as
effective a donor of cholesteryl esters as HDL, we labeled the
lipoprotein particles with [3H]cholesteryl oleoyl ether
(which cannot be hydrolyzed) and incubated the radiolabeled
lipoproteins with cells expressing recombinant SR-BI (Fig.
3). A 4-fold greater amount of the
[3H]cholesteryl oleoyl ether from HDL was associated with
the ldlA7-SRBI cells than with the ldlA7 or CHO cells (Fig. 3,
panel A), which is similar to what has been previously
reported. As expected, when LDL was substituted for HDL in the
experiment, the CHO cells had the greatest amount of cell-associated
[3H]cholesteryl oleoyl ether. SR-BI overexpression was
associated with an ~2-fold increase in delivery of cholesteryl ethers
from LDL to the cells (Fig. 3B).
|
To determine if the transfer of cholesteryl esters from LDL to cells
occurs in the absence of lipoprotein degradation, we radiolabeled the
protein component of HDL and LDL with radioactive iodine and the
cholesteryl esters of the lipoproteins with tritium (Fig.
4). Essentially no protein degradation
was seen in the ldlA7 cells treated with HDL or LDL (panels
A and B). As expected, a dose-dependent
increase in lipoprotein degradation was seen when LDL, but not HDL, was
added to the CHO cells.
|
The cellular lipids were subjected to TLC to determine the fate of the lipoprotein-associated [3H]cholesteryl oleate (Fig. 4, panels C and D). Addition of radiolabeled HDL to the ldlA7-SRBI cells resulted in an increase in the cellular content of [3H]cholesteryl oleate, but no increase was seen in the ldlA7 or CHO cells (panel C). When radiolabeled LDL was used, the increase in cellular [3H]cholesteryl oleate was of similar magnitude in the ldlA7-SRBI cells and CHO cells (panel D).
To determine if the [3H]cholesteryl oleate taken up from the HDL and LDL was hydrolyzed to [3H]cholesterol, we measured the cellular content of [3H]cholesterol (Fig. 4, panels E and F). In the ldlA7-SRBI cells incubated with radiolabeled HDL, more than 65% of the [3H]cholesterol that entered the cell was hydrolyzed to free cholesterol (panel E). A small but measurable increase in the cellular content of [3H]cholesterol was seen in the control ldlA7 cells, whereas almost no change was seen in CHO cells. In the ldlA7-SRBI and CHO cells, more than 70% of the radiolabeled cholesterol that entered the cells from LDL was in the free form. Almost all the [3H]cholesteryl oleate that entered the ldlA7 cells from LDL had undergone hydrolysis and was in the free form (panel F). The high cellular content of [3H]cholesterol in these cells was not due to the presence of an esterase in the lipoprotein particles, since TLC analysis of lipoprotein lipids revealed that greater than 98% of the radioactivity was cholesteryl ester. Thus, SR-BI transports cholesterol esters from both classes of lipoproteins but is significantly more efficient in delivering core hydrophobic lipids from HDL than from LDL.
To determine how much of the cholesteryl ester that enters cells via
SR-BI is hydrolyzed and then re-esterified, the experiments shown in
Fig. 4 were repeated using HDL labeled with
[3H]cholesteryl linoleate. The amount of
[3H]cholesteryl oleate formed was determined by
extracting the lipids from the cells and separated using Silica Gel 60 TLC plates impregnated with AgNO3 (23), which allows the
separation of cholesteryl linoleate from cholesteryl oleate (Fig.
5). In the ldlA7-SRBI cells,
approximately 50% of the [3H]cholesteryl linoleate was
hydrolyzed to [3H]cholesterol and only 5% was
re-esterified to form cholesteryl oleate (panel C).
|
To determine if the lipoprotein-associated lipids transported from HDL
and LDL into cells via SR-BI have the same regulatory effects, we
examined the effect of SR-BI expression on the level of
immunodetectable HMG-CoA reductase (Fig.
6A) and the processing of
SREBP-2 (Fig. 6B) in response to addition of LDL and HDL
with a similar cholesterol content. Two proteins with apparent
molecular masses of 97 and 190 kDa were seen in most lanes (Fig.
6A), which represent the monomeric and dimeric forms of
HMG-CoA reductase, respectively (29-31). After addition of 10 µg/ml
LDL, the level of immunodetectable HMG-CoA reductase did not change in
either the ldlA7-SRBI or ldlA7 cells, but fell to very low levels in the CHO cells (Fig. 6A). Addition of higher levels of LDL
(100 µg/ml) resulted in a decrease in the level of HMG-CoA reductase in both the ldlA7-SRBI and CHO cells, but not the ldlA7 cells; when an
equivalent amount of cholesterol was added as HDL (400 µg/ml), there
was a similar decrease in the amount of HMG-CoA reductase in the
ldlA7-SRBI cells. Thus, in the absence of LDL receptors and in the
presence of very high levels of lipoproteins, SR-BI can transport
sufficient cholesterol from LDL to the cholesterol regulatory
compartment to down-regulate cholesterol-responsive genes. Addition of
25-hydroxycholesterol, which freely diffuses through the cell membrane,
reduced the levels HMG-CoA reductase in all cells.
|
In parallel dishes, the nuclei were isolated from the cells and the extracts were examined for the presence of the mature form of SREBP-2 (Fig. 6B). In cholesterol-loaded cells, SREBP-2 is anchored to the ER membrane in a hairpin configuration (24, 26). Cholesterol depletion results in proteolytic processing of the protein and release of a ~66-kDa, N-terminal fragment into the cytoplasm. This mature form of SREBP-2 then diffuses into the nucleus where it activates multiple cholesterol-regulated genes (26). Immunoblot analysis from the nuclear fractions from the three cell lines revealed a protein with an apparent molecular mass of ~66 kDa, which represents the mature form of SREBP-2. A 56-kDa protein, which is a proteolytic product of the mature form of SREBP-2, was also present. A band of similar size has been previously observed when the nuclei are isolated from cells (26). The pattern of expression of the mature form of SREBP-2 in the ldlA7-SRBI, ldlA7, and CHO cells (Fig. 6B) mirrored that which was seen for HMG-CoA reductase (Fig. 6A).
To determine if the time course of down-regulation of HMG-CoA reductase
was similar when sterols were supplied to cells as HDL or LDL,
equivalent amounts of cholesterol were provided to cells as a
constituent of either lipoprotein (Fig.
7). The level of HMG-CoA reductase began
decreasing at 2 h and was almost undetectable at 8 h in the
ldlA7-SRBI cells incubated with either LDL (100 µg/ml) or HDL (400 µg/ml) (Fig. 7). Thus, no lipoprotein class-specific differences were
seen in the regulatory effects of SR-BI mediated uptake of sterols from
HDL and LDL. No change in the level of HMG-CoA reductase was seen in
the ldlA7 cells with the addition of lipoproteins, whereas in the CHO
cells, the level of immunodetectable HMG-CoA reductase fell when
LDL, but not HDL, was added to the media. As expected, treatment with
25-hydroxycholesterol decreased the levels of HMG-CoA reductase in all
three cell lines, confirming that the integrity of the cholesterol
regulatory machinery remained intact. No change in protein level was
seen in the cells incubated without lipoproteins.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this paper we examined and compared the effect of the high level SR-BI expression on the transfer and fate of lipids from LDL and HDL to CHO cells. A new observation made in this paper is that SR-BI transferred more free cholesterol than cholesteryl esters to cells from either LDL or HDL. Almost all the lipoprotein-associated cholesterol that entered cells via SR-BI was available for efflux, which suggests that most of the cholesterol transferred to cells remains in the plasma membrane and/or in a freely accessible cholesterol pool. A small, but measurable fraction (~5%) of the free cholesterol transferred to the cells in an SR-BI dependent fashion was delivered to the ER and esterified by acyl-coenzyme A:cholesteryl acyltransferase. We also showed that HDL was a more efficient donor of cholesteryl esters than LDL, although SR-BI was able to mediate the selective uptake of core lipids from both classes of lipoproteins. Over half of the transported cholesteryl esters were converted to free cholesterol, and ~5% of this free cholesterol was re-esterified. Finally, sterols transported from LDL or HDL by SR-BI were equally effective in delivering cholesterol to the intracellular regulatory cholesterol pool, as revealed by inhibition of SREBP-2 processing and a reduction in HMG-CoA reductase protein mass.
Previously we demonstrated that uptake of non-lipoprotein-associated cholesterol is enhanced by SR-BI expression (3). The current studies extend these results and show that SR-BI also mediates cellular uptake of free cholesterol from LDL and HDL. In CHO cells, most of the cholesterol remains in the plasma membrane and is readily available for efflux via SR-BI. Only a fraction of the free cholesterol that enters cells in a SR-BI-dependent manner is transported to the ER where it is available for esterification. The situation would be different in steroidogenic cells since most of the cholesterol transported into these cell types would be routed into the steroidogenic pathway. It has been shown that HDL cholesterol provides a greater proportion of the substrate for steroidogenesis in rat luteal cells than does HDL cholesteryl esters (32, 33). In the liver, it is likely that SR-BI is involved in the transport of free cholesterol from circulating lipoproteins into hepatocytes, and then into the bile (34). In liver perfusion studies of African green monkeys, HDL cholesterol is more efficiently transported into bile than are HDL cholesteryl esters (35). Unlike what we have observed in cultured cells, the cholesterol transferred from HDL to the bile may not enter the intra-hepatocyte regulatory pool but be transferred directly to the biliary system via the plasma membrane (36).
We and others have shown that SR-BI can mediate both the influx and efflux of cholesterol from cells to lipoproteins and other acceptors (2, 3, 37). Here we show that almost all of the free cholesterol delivered to cells via SR-BI is readily available for efflux, indicating that there is a constant bidirectional exchange of free cholesterol between cells and lipoproteins that is facilitated by SR-BI (Fig. 2). The direction of cholesterol flux between cells and lipoproteins is not concentration-dependent, since the concentration of lipoproteins was never changed during the experiment. Morrison et al. (38) showed that the rate of uptake of emulsion-associated unesterified cholesterol in a system free of membrane proteins or apolipoproteins is independent of acceptor concentration and so exhibits first-order kinetics, which is consistent with the results of our studies.
Inhibition of esterification had no measurable effect on the amount of cholesterol transported from lipoproteins to cells (Fig. 1). Therefore, the transport of cholesterol at the cell surface does not reflect changes in the cholesterol content of the ER. The cholesterol exchange that is mediated by SR-BI is not affected by the inhibition of lysosomal transport by chloroquine. These data are consistent with previous findings that lysosomotropic agents do not affect the utilization of HDL-associated free or esterified cholesterol for steroidogenesis (33).
SR-BI expression was associated with the selective transport of cholesteryl esters from LDL as well as HDL. The LDL used in these studies did not contain any immunodetectable apoA-I (data not shown), which indicates that apoA-I is not required for efficient SR-BI mediated transfer of cholesterol to cells. The finding that SR-BI can mediate the selective uptake of cholesteryl esters from LDL is consistent with the observations of Reaven et al. (9) who showed that 20% of the LDL cholesteryl ether delivered to cAMP-stimulated granulosa cells is taken up by a selective mechanism and that the stimulation of rat granulosa cells with cAMP resulted in a proportionally greater increase in the selective uptake of cholesteryl esters than whole lipoprotein particle uptake of LDL (8).
An unexpected finding was the relatively large amount of [3H]cholesteryl oleoyl ether associated with the ldlA7 cells when it was provided as a constituent of LDL but not HDL (Fig. 3). Similar results were obtained when cells were incubated with LDL in which the cholesteryl esters were labeled (see Fig. 4). The LDL cholesteryl ether particles do not nonspecifically adsorb to the surface of the ldlA7 cells since only very low levels of cell-associated radioactivity were seen when ldlA7 cells are incubated with 125I-LDL particles under identical conditions (data not shown). Multiple methodologies were used to label the LDL (Celite exchange, dimethyl sulfoxide-assisted labeling or particle reconstitution) and identical results were obtained (data not shown). It is possible that another nonspecific pathway is operative that accounts for the observed association of LDL-derived cholesteryl esters in these cells.
Cholesteryl esters were more efficiently transferred from HDL to cells than from LDL. The greater efficiency of HDL may be explained by the smaller size of the HDL particles and the resultant lower diffusion barrier (38). These physical characteristics serve to increase the probability that the HDL particle will have intimate contact with the cell membrane during collision events. It is also possible that other factors, such as the composition and packing of the phospholipid molecules on the HDL surface may influence lipid transfer.
Here we show that cholesterol delivered to cells via SR-BI has
important regulatory effects on genes and proteins involved in
cholesterol metabolism. Cholesterol delivered to cells via SR-BI from
both HDL and LDL down-regulated HMG-CoA reductase and inhibited SREBP-2
processing. The in vivo role of SR-BI in the transport of
lipids from apoB- and apoE-containing lipoproteins is less clear than
that for HDL since most cells in the body express LDL receptors, which
is the major pathway by which these lipoproteins are removed from the
plasma. Fielding et al. (39) have shown that free
cholesterol is selectively transferred from LDL to fibroblasts that
have been cultured in media containing human plasma, which down-regulates the LDL receptor pathway (39, 40). SR-BI may contribute
to the LDL receptor-independent pathway of LDL cholesterol uptake by
some tissues.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Michael S. Brown, Joseph L. Goldstein, and David Russell for helpful discussions and Monty Krieger for providing the ldlA7 cells and mouse SR-BI cDNA.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Supported by Austrian Science Foundation Grant
J1488-GEN. Present address: Dept. of Medical Chemistry,
School of Medicine, University of Vienna, Waehringerstrasse 10, A-1090
Vienna, Austria. E-mail: Herbert.Stangl@univie.ac.at.
§ Supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL20948, the Perot Family Fund, and the Reynolds Foundation. To whom correspondence should be sent: Dept. of Molecular Genetics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9046. Tel.: 214-648-6724; Fax: 214-648-7539; E-mail: helen.hobbs@email.swmed.edu.
| |
ABBREVIATIONS |
|---|
The abbreviations used are: SR-BI scavenger receptor class B, type I; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; HDL, high density lipoprotein; HMG-CoA reductase, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase; LDL, low density lipoprotein; SREBP-2, sterol regulatory element binding protein-2; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Acton, S., Rigotti, A., Landschulz, K. T., Xu, S., Hobbs, H. H., and Krieger, M. (1996) Science 271, 518-520[Abstract] |
| 2. |
Ji, Y.,
Jian, B.,
Wang, N.,
Sun, Y.,
de la Llera Moya, M.,
Phillips, M. C.,
Rothblat, G. H.,
Swaney, J. B.,
and Tall, A. R.
(1997)
J. Biol. Chem.
272,
20982-20985 |
| 3. |
Stangl, H.,
Cao, G.,
Wyne, K. L.,
and Hobbs, H. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
31002-31008 |
| 4. |
Pittman, R. C.,
Glass, C. K.,
Atkinson, D.,
and Small, D. M.
(1987)
J. Biol. Chem.
262,
2435-2442 |
| 5. | Rinninger, F., Deichen, J. T., Jackle, S., Windler, E., and Greten, H. (1994) Atherosclerosis 105, 145-157[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 6. | Sparrow, C. P., and Pittman, R. C. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1043, 203-210[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 7. | Knecht, T. P., and Pittman, R. C. (1989) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1002, 365-375[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 8. | Azhar, S., Tsai, L., and Reaven, E. (1990) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1047, 148-160[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 9. | Reaven, E., Tsai, L., and Azhar, S. (1995) J. Lipid Res. 36, 1602-1617[Abstract] |
| 10. |
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1986)
Science
232,
34-47 |
| 11. | Azhar, S., Cooper, A., Tsai, L., Maffe, W., and Reaven, E. (1988) J. Lipid Res. 29, 869-882[Abstract] |
| 12. |
Azhar, S.,
Nomoto, A.,
Leers-Sucheta, S.,
and Reaven, E.
(1998)
J. Lipid Res.
39,
1616-1628 |
| 13. | Medicherla, S., Azhar, S., Cooper, A., and Reaven, E. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 6243-6250[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 14. |
Acton, S. L.,
Scherer, P. E.,
Lodish, H. F.,
and Krieger, M.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
21003-21009 |
| 15. |
Rigotti, A.,
Acton, S. L.,
and Krieger, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
16221-16224 |
| 16. | Calvo, D., Gomez-Coronado, D., Lasuncion, M. A., and Vega, M. A. (1997) Aterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 17, 2349 |
| 17. | Fluiter, K., and van Berkel, J. C. (1997) Biochem. J. 326, 515-519 |
| 18. |
Kingsley, D. M.,
and Krieger, M.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
5454-5458 |
| 19. | Chung, B. H., Segrest, J. P., Ray, M. J., Brunzell, J. D., Hokanson, J. E., Krauss, R. M., Beaudrie, K., and Cone, J. T. (1986) Methods Enzymol. 128, 181[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 20. | Goldstein, J. L., Basu, S. K., and Brown, M. S. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 98, 241-260[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 21. |
Gwynne, J. T.,
and Mahaffee, D. D.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
8141-8150 |
| 22. | Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem 266, 265-275 |
| 23. |
Cadigan, K. M.,
Spillane, D. M.,
and Chang, T.-Y.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
295-308 |
| 24. |
Liscum, L.,
Luskey, K. L.,
Chin, D. J.,
Ho, Y. K.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
and Brown, M. S.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
8450-8455 |
| 25. |
Hua, X.,
Sakai, J.,
Ho, Y. K.,
Goldstein, J. L.,
and Brown, M. S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
29422-29427 |
| 26. | Sakai, J., Duncan, E. A., Rawson, R. B., Hua, X., Brown, M. S., and Goldstein, J. L. (1996) Cell 85, 1037-1046[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 27. | Landschulz, K. T., Pathak, R. K., Rigotti, A., Krieger, M., and Hobbs, H. H. (1996) J. Clin. Invest. 98, 984-995[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 28. |
Yang, J.,
Brown, M. S.,
Ho, Y. K.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12152-12161 |
| 29. |
Liscum, L.,
Finer-Moore, J.,
Stroud, R. M.,
Luskey, K. L.,
Brown, M. S.,
and Goldstein, J. L.
(1985)
J. Biol. Chem.
260,
522-530 |
| 30. |
Cheng, H. H.,
Zu, L.,
Kumagai, H.,
and Simoni, R. D.
(1999)
J. Biol. Chem.
274,
17171-17178 |
| 31. |
Lawrence, C. M.,
Rodwell, V. W.,
and Stauffacher, C. V.
(1995)
Science
268,
1758-1762 |
| 32. | Rajan, V. P., and Menon, K. M. J. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 959, 206-213[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 33. | Nestler, J. E., Bamberger, M., Rothblat, G. H., and Strauss, J. F., III (1985) Endocrinology 117, 502-510[Abstract] |
| 34. |
Trigatti, B.,
Rayburn, H.,
Vinals, M.,
Braun, A.,
Miettinen, H.,
Penman, M.,
Hertz, M.,
Schrenzel, M.,
Amigo, L.,
Rigotti, A.,
and Krieger, M.
(1999)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
96,
9322-9327 |
| 35. | Scobey, M. W., Johnson, F. L., and Rudel, L. L. (1989) Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 20, G644-G652 |
| 36. | Robins, S. J., and Fasulo, J. M. (1999) Hepatology 29, 1541-1548[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 37. |
Jian, B.,
de la Llera-Moya, M.,
Ji, Y.,
Wang, N.,
Phillips, M. C.,
Swaney, J. B.,
Tall, A. R.,
and Rothblat, G. H.
(1998)
J. Biol. Chem.
273,
5599-5606 |
| 38. |
Morrison, J. R.,
Silvestre, M. J.,
and Pittman, R. C.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13911-13918 |
| 39. | Fielding, C. J., and Fielding, P. E. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 14237-14244[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve] |
| 40. | Fielding, C. J., and Fielding, P. E. (1997) J. Lipid Res. 38, 1503-1521[Abstract] |
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Van Eck, M. Hoekstra, R. Out, I. S. T. Bos, J. K. Kruijt, R. B. Hildebrand, and T. J. C. Van Berkel Scavenger receptor BI facilitates the metabolism of VLDL lipoproteins in vivo J. Lipid Res., January 1, 2008; 49(1): 136 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Pagler, A. Neuhofer, H. Laggner, W. Strobl, and H. Stangl Cholesterol efflux via HDL resecretion occurs when cholesterol transport out of the lysosome is impaired J. Lipid Res., October 1, 2007; 48(10): 2141 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Liang, A. M. Kapoun, A. Lam, D. L. Damm, D. Quan, M. O'Connell, and A. A. Protter B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Inhibited Angiotensin II-Stimulated Cholesterol Biosynthesis, Cholesterol Transfer, and Steroidogenesis in Primary Human Adrenocortical Cells Endocrinology, August 1, 2007; 148(8): 3722 - 3729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wang, Y. Jiao, and C. Montell Dissection of the pathway required for generation of vitamin A and for Drosophila phototransduction J. Cell Biol., April 23, 2007; 177(2): 305 - 316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Tanaka, J. Delgado-Lista, J. Lopez-Miranda, F. Perez-Jimenez, C. Marin, P. Perez-Martinez, P. Gomez, and J. M. Ordovas Scavenger Receptor Class B Type I (SCARB1) c.1119C>T Polymorphism Affects Postprandial Triglyceride Metabolism in Men J. Nutr., March 1, 2007; 137(3): 578 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Sun, E. R. M. Eckhardt, S. Shetty, D. R. van der Westhuyzen, and N. R. Webb Quantitative analysis of SR-BI-dependent HDL retroendocytosis in hepatocytes and fibroblasts J. Lipid Res., August 1, 2006; 47(8): 1700 - 1713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Pagler, S. Rhode, A. Neuhofer, H. Laggner, W. Strobl, C. Hinterndorfer, I. Volf, M. Pavelka, E. R. M. Eckhardt, D. R. van der Westhuyzen, et al. SR-BI-mediated High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Endocytosis Leads to HDL Resecretion Facilitating Cholesterol Efflux J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2006; 281(16): 11193 - 11204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bietrix, D. Yan, M. Nauze, C. Rolland, J. Bertrand-Michel, C. Comera, S. Schaak, R. Barbaras, A. K. Groen, B. Perret, et al. Accelerated Lipid Absorption in Mice Overexpressing Intestinal SR-BI J. Biol. Chem., March 17, 2006; 281(11): 7214 - 7219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. M. Eckhardt, L. Cai, S. Shetty, Z. Zhao, A. Szanto, N. R. Webb, and D. R. Van der Westhuyzen High Density Lipoprotein Endocytosis by Scavenger Receptor SR-BII Is Clathrin-dependent and Requires a Carboxyl-terminal Dileucine Motif J. Biol. Chem., February 17, 2006; 281(7): 4348 - 4353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lemieux, Y. Gelinas, J. Lalonde, F. Labrie, D. Richard, and Y. Deshaies The Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulator Acolbifene Reduces Cholesterolemia Independently of Its Anorectic Action in Control and Cholesterol-Fed Rats J. Nutr., September 1, 2005; 135(9): 2225 - 2229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Valasek, J. Weng, P. W. Shaul, R. G. W. Anderson, and J. J. Repa Caveolin-1 Is Not Required for Murine Intestinal Cholesterol Transport J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 28103 - 28109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-A. Li, L. Guo, J. L. Dressman, R. Asmis, and E. J. Smart A Novel Ligand-independent Apoptotic Pathway Induced by Scavenger Receptor Class B, Type I and Suppressed by Endothelial Nitric-oxide Synthase and High Density Lipoprotein J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 19087 - 19096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Parathath, M. A. Connelly, R. A. Rieger, S. M. Klein, N. A. Abumrad, M. de la Llera-Moya, C. R. Iden, G. H. Rothblat, and D. L. Williams Changes in Plasma Membrane Properties and Phosphatidylcholine Subspecies of Insect Sf9 Cells Due to Expression of Scavenger Receptor Class B, Type I, and CD36 J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41310 - 41318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Van Eck, I. S. T. Bos, R. B. Hildebrand, B. T. Van Rij, and T. J.C. Van Berkel Dual Role for Scavenger Receptor Class B, Type I on Bone Marrow-Derived Cells in Atherosclerotic Lesion Development Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2004; 165(3): 785 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Rhainds, P. Bourgeois, G. Bourret, K. Huard, L. Falstrault, and L. Brissette Localization and regulation of SR-BI in membrane rafts of HepG2 cells J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2004; 117(15): 3095 - 3105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Tong, L. K. Christenson, and W.-C. Song Aberrant Cholesterol Transport and Impaired Steroidogenesis in Leydig Cells Lacking Estrogen Sulfotransferase Endocrinology, May 1, 2004; 145(5): 2487 - 2497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ritsch, I. Tancevski, W. Schgoer, C. Pfeifhofer, R. Gander, P. Eller, B. Foeger, U. Stanzl, and J. R. Patsch Molecular characterization of rabbit scavenger receptor class B types I and II: portal to central vein gradient of expression in the liver J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2004; 45(2): 214 - 222. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
< |