J Biol Chem, Vol. 274, Issue 46, 32762-32770, November 12, 1999
Intracellular Pathways of V1 and V2
Receptors Activated by Arginine Vasopressin in Rat Hippocampal
Neurons*
Tomohiro
Omura
§,
Junichi
Nabekura
, and
Norio
Akaike
¶
From the
Department of Physiology, Graduate School of
Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582 and
§ Research Laboratories, Nippon Chemiphar Co., Ltd.,
Saitama 341-0005, Japan
 |
ABSTRACT |
To explore the intracellular pathways activated
by vasopressin receptors, the effects of arginine vasopressin (AVP) and
its analogues mediating glycine (Gly)-induced Cl
currents (IGly) were examined in acutely dissociated rat
hippocampal CA1 neurons using the whole-cell patch recording technique.
AVP and its analogues inhibited IGly in a
concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory actions of
AVP(4-9) (AVP metabolite) and NC-1900 (AVP(4-9) analogue) were
reversed by a V1 receptor antagonist, or pretreatment with
1,2-bis(2-amino-5-fluorophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid. In contrast, these blocking procedures had no effect on the
1-desamino-8-D-AVP (DDAVP; V2 agonist) action.
A V2 receptor antagonist did not block the inhibitory
action of AVP(4-9) or NC-1900, but blocked that of DDAVP. The
inhibitory action of AVP was completely blocked by the co-application
of the V1 and V2 antagonists. The inhibitory
action of NC-1900 was not affected by perfusion with a
Ca2+-free external solution, but was strongly blocked by
thapsigargin. The intracellular application of heparin or anti-inositol
1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) also blocked the NC-1900 action.
Furthermore, Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM) inhibitors blocked the
NC-1900 action, while a CaM-dependent kinase II inhibitor
and PKC modulators had no effect. 2',5'-Dideoxyadenosine (an adenylate
cyclase inhibitor), H-89, and Rp-cAMPS blocked the inhibitory actions
of NC-1900 and DDAVP. These results suggest that the activation of the
V1 receptor in the hippocampal neurons induces the
production of IP3, which releases Ca2+ from the
IP3-sensitive Ca2+ storage sites. The
Ca2+ binds to CaM, resulting in the activation of
Ca2+/CaM-sensitive adenylate cyclases. The activation of
protein kinase A through the adenylate cyclase inhibits
IGly.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Arginine vasopressin
(AVP)1 synthesized in the
supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the hypothalamus exerts
antidiuretic and vasopressor effects. AVP also has a neuroregulatory
effect in the central nervous systems including learning and memory
(1). Vasopressin receptors have been classified into two major
subtypes, named V1 and V2 receptors, based on
their intracellular transduction mechanisms. The V1
receptor is associated with phosphoinositide (PI) turnover (2), while
the V2 receptor activates adenylate cyclase (3).
The hypothalamic vasopressin-containing neurons project to the
hippocampal regions (4, 5). Autoradiographic ligand-binding studies
found vasopressin receptors in the pyramidal cell layer of the
hippocampus (6, 7). The vasopressin receptor in the hippocampus has
been shown to be the V1 subtype in histological studies
using a 3H-labeled V1 antagonist (8, 9).
Moreover, the possible existence of V2 receptor in the rat
hippocampus has also been suggested at the mRNA level (10).
Extracellular recording revealed an increase of firing rate of
hippocampal neurons stimulated by AVP (11). In addition, AVP has been
shown to induce an increase of spike discharge in the hippocampal CA1
pyramidal neurons in studies using microelectrode techniques (12). In
both electrophysiological (9, 11) and behavioral (13, 14) studies, the
effect of AVP was blocked by a selective V1 receptor
antagonist. It has also been reported that AVP induced the production
of IP3 through the V1 receptor in rat cultured
hippocampal neurons (15, 16). Brinton and McEwen (17) demonstrated that
AVP potentiates the norepinephrine-induced cAMP accumulation in a
calcium-dependent manner in the rat hippocampal slice
preparation through the V1 receptor. It has been
demonstrated that the activation of V1a receptor
potentiated the V2 receptor-mediated cAMP accumulation in
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells transfected with both receptor cDNAs (18). However, the specific mechanism by which cAMP
accumulates as a consequence of V1 receptor activation has
yet been elucidated for hippocampal neurons.
The intracellular cAMP levels may be modified by calcium through
regulation of the activity of some adenylate cyclase isoforms. Nine
subtypes of adenylate cyclase have been identified by cloning and
expression studies, and they have been divided into six subfamilies based on their functional properties and sequence similarities: type 1, type 2-like group (types 2, 4 and 7), type 3, type 5-like group (types
5 and 6), type 8, and type 9 (19-23). The presence of types 1, 2, 4, and 8 messenger RNAs was revealed by the polymerase chain reaction in
pyramidal neurons in the CA1 region (21, 23-25). The types 1 and 8 adenylate cyclases are regulated by not only Ca2+/calmodulin (CaM) but also by Gs (21, 26).
The type 2 adenylate cyclase is insensitive to Ca2+/CaM but
is regulated by Gs (27).
The glycine (Gly)-induced response is modulated by either protein
kinase A (PKA) or protein kinase C (PKC) (28-33). In addition, we and
others have shown that freshly dissociated rat hippocampal neurons
respond to Gly (34-36). Therefore, to explore the intracellular pathways activated by vasopressin receptors, we have examined the
affects of AVP and its analogues on the Gly-induced inhibitory responses in acutely dissociated pyramidal neurons from the rat hippocampal CA1 region using the patch-clamp technique.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Preparation--
Hippocanpal pyramidal neurons were acutely
dissociated from the rat CA1 region, as described elsewhere (37).
Briefly, 2-3-week-old Wistar rats were anesthetized with ether and
decapitated. The brain was quickly removed from the skull and was
sliced at a thickness of 400 µm with a microslicer (DTK-1000; Dosaka,
Kyoto, Japan). The slices were then treated with Pronase (1 mg in 6 ml)
for 15 min at 31 °C and subsequently with thermolysin (1 mg in 6 ml) under the same conditions. The CA1 region of the slice was removed by
micropunching and mechanically triturated with fire-polished Pasteur
pipettes in a 35-mm plastic culture dish (Primaria 3801; Becton
Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) under a phase-contrast microscope (BH-2;
Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The dissociated CA1 neurons adhered to the
bottom of the dish within 20 min.
Electrical Measurements--
Electrical measurements were
performed with the nystatin perforated patch recording technique (38).
In some experiments, the conventional whole-cell patch recording mode
was used (Fig. 6C). The resistance between the recording
electrode filled with the internal pipette solution and the reference
electrode was 5-8 megohms. The current and voltage were measured with
a patch-clamp amplifier (CEZ-2300; Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan),
filtered at 1 kHz (E-3201B; NF Electronic Instruments, Tokyo, Japan)
and monitored on both an oscilloscope (VC-11; Nihon Kohden) and a pen
recorder (RJG-4124; Nihon Kohden). The data were stored on videotapes
after digitalization with a pulse-coded modulation processor (RP-880; NF Electronic Instruments). The membrane potential was held at
40 mV
throughout the experiment, except when examining the current-voltage (I-V) relationships (Fig. 4C). All experiments were
performed at room temperature (22-24 °C).
Solutions--
The ionic composition of the incubation solution
was (mM): 124 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.2 KH2PO4, 24 NaHCO3, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.3 MgSO4, and 10 glucose. The pH of the
incubation solution was adjusted to 7.45 with 95% O2 and
5% CO2. The ionic composition of the standard external
solution was (mM): 150 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris). The I-V relationship for
IGly was made in the standard solution containing 0.3 µM tetrodotoxin and 10 µM
CdCl2. The ionic composition of the patch pipette
(internal) solution was (mM): 20 N-methyl-D-glucamine-methanesulfonate, 60 potassium methanesulfonate, 5 MgCl2, 60 KCl, and 10 HEPES.
The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with Tris. Nystatin was dissolved in the
perforated patch pipette solution at a final concentration of 200 µg
ml
1. In the conventional whole-cell patch recording, the
ionic composition of the patch pipette solution was (mM):
20 N-methyl-D-glucamine-methanesulfonate, 60 potassium methanesulfonate, 0.5 MgCl2, 60 KCl, 0.5 ATP, 0.5 GTP, 0.1 EGTA, and 10 HEPES. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with Tris.
Drugs--
The drugs purchased were AVP (Peptide Institute,
Inc., Osaka, Japan; Sigma);
[Pmp1,Tyr(Me)2]AVP (Peptide Institute, Inc.;
American Peptide Co., Sunnyvale, CA); glycine, ryanodine,
3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (IBMX), tetrodotoxin, and EGTA (Wako Pure
Chemical Industries, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan); N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide (W-7),
strychnine, thermolysin,
[pGlu4,Cyt6]AVP(4-9) (AVP(4-9)),
1-desamino-8-D-AVP (DDAVP), ATP, GTP, forskolin, dibutyryl
cyclic AMP (db-cAMP), trifluoperazine, and chlorpromazine (Sigma);
N-(6-aminohexyl)-1-naphthalenesulfonamide (W-5) and BAPTA-AM (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR);
N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinoline sulfonamide (H-89), Rp-adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate (Rp-cAMPS), (s)-5-isoquinolinesulfonic acid (KN-62),
chelerythrine, and 2',5'-dideoxyadenosine (Biomol Research
Laboratories, Inc., Plymouth Meeting, PA); phorbol 12-myristate
13-acetate (PMA) and thapsigargin (Research Biochemicals, Inc., Boston,
MA); anti-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) and Pronase
(Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA); 1-oleoyl-2-acetylglycerol (OAG) (Doosan
Serdary Research Laboratories, Englewood Cliffs, NJ). OPC-31260 was a
gift (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokushima, Japan).
L-Pyroglutamyl-L-asparaginyl-L-seryl-L-prolyl-L-arginylglycinamide (NC-1900) was synthesized by Nippon Chemiphar Co., Ltd. (Saitama, Japan).
Stock solutions of db-cAMP, IBMX, forskolin, and PMA were prepared in
dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) and diluted to their final concentrations in standard solution just before use. The final concentration of Me2SO was always less than 0.1%. It did
not induce any ionic current and had no effect on the Gly-induced
response at the concentrations used. The other drugs were dissolved in the standard external solution just before use. Drugs were applied by
the "Y-tube system," which enables a solution to exchange within 20 ms (39).
Statistics--
The data are presented as the mean ± S.E.
The results were analyzed with the Student's t test, paired
t test, or Dunnett's multiple comparison test, and a
p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
 |
RESULTS |
Effects of Arginine Vasopressin and Its Analogues--
Rapid
application of 10
4 M Gly at 2-min intervals
induced constant peak inward currents for 60 min at a holding potential
(Vh) of -40 mV under the voltage-clamp
conditions. Strychnine, a competitive Gly receptor antagonist,
inhibited strongly the Gly-induced current (IGly) at a
concentration of 10
7 M (Fig.
1B, a). AVP or
DDAVP alone did not induce any noticeable current at concentrations up
to 10
6 M. AVP(4-9), a AVP metabolite in the
brain (40), or NC-1900, a synthetic analogue of AVP(4-9), also did not
induce currents. However, the IGly was gradually inhibited
during the continuous application of these peptides for 10 min (Fig.
1A, a-d). The inhibition completely recovered to
the control levels after washing out the peptides. Fig. 1B
summarized the inhibitory actions of AVP analogues and strychnine on
Gly-induced response. The half-inhibition dose (IC50) for
strychnine was 5.2 × 10
8 M. The
percentages of inhibition of the IGly by NC-1900,
AVP(4-9), AVP, and DDAVP at a concentration of 10
6
M were 46.4 ± 5.5% (n = 14),
31.2 ± 3.8% (n = 5), 29.2 ± 4.7% (n = 5), and 31.8 ± 6.8% (n = 4), respectively. NC-1900 was the most potent inhibitor. The block by
strychnine appeared to reach steady state immediately. In contrast, AVP
and its analogues required several minutes to attain steady state. The
difference in time course suggests that AVP and its analogues act
indirectly on the Gly receptor.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
The inhibitory effects of AVP and its
analogues on the 10 4 M
Gly-induced current (IGly). A, typical
examples of IGly inhibited by AVP (a), AVP(4-9)
(b), NC-1900 (c), and DDAVP (d) at a
concentration of 10 6 M. Gly was applied at
2-min intervals at a holding potential (Vh) of
-40 mV. B, a, a typical example of
IGly inhibited by 10 7 M
strychnine. b, concentration-inhibition curves for
strychnine, AVP, AVP(4-9), NC-1900, and DDAVP. All currents were
normalized to the peak current amplitude induced by 10 4
M Gly alone. Each point and vertical
bar show the mean ± S.E. of 4-14 neurons.
|
|
Effect of a V1 Receptor Antagonist--
To determine
which vasopressin receptor subtypes mediate the inhibition of
IGly, the effect of
[Pmp1,Tyr(Me)2]AVP, a selective
V1 receptor antagonist (41), was examined. Pretreatment
with 10
5 M
[Pmp1,Tyr(Me)2]AVP alone induced no current
and had no effect on IGly. However, the inhibitory actions
of 10
6 M NC-1900 and 10
6
M AVP(4-9) on IGly were completely blocked by
the pretreatment with the V1 antagonist (Fig.
2A, a and
b). Fig. 2B summarizes the blocking effects of
the V1 antagonist on the inhibitory actions of AVP and its
related peptides on IGly. In this figure, the independent points on the left-hand side (arrow)
indicate the control percentage of inhibition of IGly by
these peptide alone. The V1 receptor antagonist blocked the
inhibitory actions of 10
6 M NC-1900 and
10
6 M AVP(4-9) in a
concentration-dependent manner with a near-complete block
at a concentration of 10
5 M
(p < 0.01; Dunnett's multiple comparison test). In
contrast, the inhibitory effect of 10
6 M AVP
was only partially blocked (p < 0.05), while the
inhibitory effect of DDAVP was not affected by the V1
antagonist.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Effect of a selective V1 receptor
antagonist, [Pmp1, Tyr(Me)2]AVP, on the
inhibitory actions of AVP and its analogues on IGly.
A, the blockade of NC-1900 (a) and AVP(4-9)
(b) actions on IGly by 10 5
M V1 receptor antagonist. B,
concentration-inhibition curves for the V1 antagonist on
the inhibitory actions of these peptides. The independent points
indicated by the arrow are the control percentage of
inhibition of IGly without the antagonist
(n = 4-14). All currents in the presence of the
V1 antagonist were normalized to the corresponding control
currents. Each point and vertical bar
represent the mean ± S.E. of 4 to 5 neurons. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Dunnett's multiple comparison
test).
|
|
Effect of a V2 Receptor Antagonist--
To explore the
contribution of V2 receptors, the effect of OPC-31260, a
selective V2 receptor antagonist (42), was examined. Pretreatment with 10
6 M OPC-31260 alone
induced no current and had no effect on IGly. The
inhibitory action of 10
6 M DDAVP on
IGly was completely blocked by pretreatment with OPC-31260 (Fig. 3A, a),
whereas the action of NC-1900 on IGly was not affected (the
percentage of inhibition of IGly was still 48.3 ± 5.2%, n = 4) (Fig. 3A, b). The
concentration-inhibition relationships between the peptides and the
V2 antagonist are shown in Fig. 3B, in which the
independent points on the left-hand side
(arrow) indicate the control inhibition percentage of
IGly by these peptides. The inhibitory action of
10
6 M DDAVP on IGly was blocked
in a concentration-dependent manner by OPC-31260, and the
V2 antagonist considerably blocked the action of DDAVP at
concentrations above 10
7 M (Dunnett's
multiple comparison test). The results indicate that the inhibitory
action of DDAVP on IGly is mediated through the
V2 receptor. The inhibitory action of 10
6
M NC-1900 or 10
6 M AVP(4-9) on
IGly was not affected by the V2 receptor
antagonist. The inhibitory action of 10
6 M
AVP was partially blocked by the V2 antagonist, but the
co-application of 10
5 M V1
antagonist and 10
6 M V2
antagonist completely blocked this peptide action (Fig. 3C).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Effect of a selective V2 receptor
antagonist, OPC-31260, on the inhibitory actions of these peptides on
IGly. A, the effect of 10 6
M V2 receptor antagonist on the inhibitory
actions of DDAVP (a) and NC-1900 (b) on
IGly. B, concentration-inhibition curves for the
V2 antagonist on the inhibitory actions of peptides. The
independent points indicated by the arrow are the percentage
of inhibition of IGly without the antagonist
(n = 4-14). All currents in the presence of the
V2 antagonist were normalized to the corresponding control
currents. Each point and vertical bar
represent the mean ± S.E. of 4 to 5 neurons. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Dunnett's multiple comparison
test). C, the effect of co-application of 10 5
M [Pmp1,Tyr(Me)2]AVP and
10 6 M OPC-31260 on the effect of AVP on
IGly.
|
|
Effect of NC-1900 on IGly--
Since NC-1900 had the
most potent inhibitory action on IGly, the
concentration-response relationship was examined. All currents induced
by Gly at various concentrations with or without 10
6
M NC-1900 were normalized to the peak current induced by
10
4 M Gly alone (asterisk in Fig.
4A). NC-1900 inhibited the
maximum value of the concentration-response relationship for Gly
without affecting the apparent KD (8.5 × 10
5 M and 6.5 × 10
5
M for with and without NC-1900, respectively) or the hill
coefficient (1.01 and 1.02, respectively), indicating that the
inhibition is non-competitive. Fig. 4B (a and
b) shows the I-V relationships for IGly in the
presence or absence of 10
6 M NC-1900. The
reversal potential of the IGly
(EGly) was
19.0 ± 0.5 mV
(n = 5) in the control and
18.7 ± 0.8 mV
(n = 5) in the presence of 10
6
M NC-1900. These EGly values were
close to the Cl
equilibrium potential
(ECl) of -21.0 mV (arrow) calculated
from the Nernst equation based on the given external and internal
Cl
concentrations (161 and 70 mM,
respectively). The inhibition of IGly by NC-1900 did not
show any voltage dependence. The desensitization rates also did not
appear to vary with NC-1900 application (Fig. 4B,
a).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Effect of NC-1900 on
IGly. A, concentration-response
relationship for IGly with (closed
circle) or without (open circle)
10 6 M NC-1900. All currents induced by Gly at
various concentrations were normalized to the current induced by
10 4 M Gly (*) alone. Each point
and the vertical bar show the mean ± S.E.
of 4 to 5 neurons. B, a, representative
IGly recordings with or without 10 6
M NC-1900 at Vh levels of -40, 0, and +40 mV. b, the I-V relationships for IGly in
the presence (closed circle) and absence
(open circle) of 10 6 M
NC-1900. The arrow indicates the Cl
equilibrium potential (ECl). All currents were
normalized to the peak amplitude induced by 10 4
M Gly alone at a Vh of -40 mV (*).
Each point indicates the average of 4 to 6 neurons.
|
|
Effect of Intracellular Ca2+ Concentration
([Ca2+]i)--
Since the activation of the
V1 receptor stimulates the hydrolysis of PI (2) and results
in the elevation of [Ca2+]i, the
effect of [Ca2+]i on the
IGly inhibitory actions of these peptides was examined. The
CA1 neurons were loaded with 5 × 10
6 M
BAPTA-AM, a membrane-permeable Ca2+ chelator, for 2 h.
The inhibitory action of 10
6 M NC-1900 on
IGly was completely abolished in BAPTA-AM-treated neurons
(Fig. 5A, a). The
inhibition by 10
6 M AVP(4-9) on
IGly was also blocked in the BAPTA-AM-treated neurons (Fig.
5A, b). On the other hand, the inhibitory action
of 10
6 M AVP was only partially blocked in
the BAPTA-AM-treated neurons, while that of 10
6
M DDAVP was not affected at all (Fig. 5A,
c and d). Fig. 5B summarizes the
effect of BAPTA-AM for these peptide actions on IGly. The percentages of inhibition of NC-1900, AVP(4-9), AVP, and DDAVP in the
BAPTA-AM-treated neurons were 9.9 ± 1.2% (n = 4), 6.8 ± 3.7% (n = 5), 17.2 ± 1.8%
(n = 6), and 27.2 ± 1.7% (n = 4), respectively. The inhibitory effects of NC-1900, AVP(4-9) and AVP
were significantly removed by BAPTA-AM treatment (p < 0.01 for NC-1900 and AVP(4-9), and p < 0.05 for AVP;
Student's t test).

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of pretreatment with BAPTA-AM.
A, the effects of AVP and its analogues on IGly
in the neurons loaded with 5 × 10 6 M
BAPTA-AM for 2 h. B, the percentages of inhibition of
IGly by these peptides at a concentration of
10 6 M in the control (open
column) and the BAPTA-AM-loaded (closed
column) neurons. Each column and
vertical bar represent the mean ± S.E. of 4 to 6 neurons. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Student's t test).
|
|
Calcium Dependence of NC-1900 Inhibitory Action--
Since the
NC-1900 action on IGly through the V1 receptor
was most potent among the examined peptides (Fig. 1), the following experiments were carried out. First, the Ca2+ dependence
for the inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly was
investigated. After the IGly was inhibited by the
pretreatment with 10
6 M NC-1900 in a standard
external solution for 10 min, the external solution was changed to
Ca2+-free external solution containing 2 mM
EGTA. The inhibitory action of NC-1900 persisted (Fig.
6A), suggesting that
extracellular Ca2+
([Ca2+]o) is not involved in the
inhibition of IGly by NC-1900.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Effects of extra- and intracellular
Ca2+ on the inhibitory action of NC-1900.
A, effect of a Ca2+-free external solution.
After the IGly was inhibited in the standard solution by
the application of 10-6 M NC-1900, the external solution
was changed to a Ca2+-free external solution with 2 mM EGTA. B, a, the effect of
10 5 M thapsigargin. b, the effect
of 10 6 M ryanodine treatment. C,
effect of heparin (5 mg ml 1) (closed
circle) or anti-IP3 (5 µg ml 1)
(open triangle) on the inhibitory action of
IGly by NC-1900. Recordings were made with the conventional
whole-cell patch recording mode. All currents were normalized to the
respective initial IGly (n = 4-5).
|
|
A possible involvement of intracellular Ca2+ storage sites
in the NC-1900 action was confirmed by following experiments. The application of 10
5 M thapsigargin, a
Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor which depletes Ca2+ in
the IP3-sensitive Ca2+ storage sites (IICR),
did not affect the peak amplitude of IGly, but facilitated
slightly the desensitization phase of IGly· The
inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly was completely blocked by the pretreatment with thapsigargin (n = 4) (Fig.
6B, a), suggesting the Ca2+ release
from IICR in the presence of NC-1900. Ryanodine depletes the
Ca2+ release from caffeine-sensitive intracellular
Ca2+ storage sites (CICR). Even after the 10
2
M caffeine-induced outward current was considerably reduced
by a continuous perfusion with 10
6 M
ryanodine, the inhibitory effect of NC-1900 on IGly was
still observed, though the inhibition ratio of IGly by
NC-1900 was reduced from 44.3 ± 4.6% of control
(n = 5) to 35.0 ± 2.3% (n = 4)
in the presence of ryanodine (Fig. 6B, b).
In the conventional whole-cell patch recording mode, the inhibitory
action of IGly by NC-1900 was also observed (42.4 ± 5.6%, n = 5) (Fig. 6C, open
circles). Therefore, the direct modification of
IP3 was examined by the intracellular perfusion with
heparin (5 mg ml
1) or anti-IP3 (5 µg
ml
1) through the recording patch pipette (43). The
inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly was completely blocked
by either heparin or anti-IP3 (closed
circle and open triangle,
respectively), suggesting that IP3 plays an important role
in the IGly inhibition by NC-1900. These results strongly
support the hypothesis that Ca2+ release from the IICR is
involved in the inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly.
Effects of Ca2+/CaM Inhibitors--
In order to
clarify the signal transduction pathway following the intracellular
free Ca2+ on the NC-1900 action, the possible contribution
of Ca2+/CaM and CaM-dependent kinase II was
investigated. W-7, trifluoperazine (TFP), and chlorpromazine (CPZ) are
known Ca2+/CaM inhibitors. The inhibitory action of NC-1900
on IGly was blocked in a
concentration-dependent fashion by treatment with 10
5 M W-7, TFP, or CPZ, although these
compounds alone had no effect on the IGly (Fig.
7, A, a-c, and
B). In Fig. 7B, the open
circle represents the percentage of inhibition of the
IGly by 10
6 M NC-1900 in the
absence of these inhibitors. W-5 used as a negative control for W-7 had
no effect. On the other hand, 10
6 M KN-62, a
potent CaM-dependent kinase II inhibitor, did not affect
the inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly (the inhibition of
IGly was 41.7 ± 7.9%, n = 8) (Fig.
7A, d). The results indicate that
Ca2+/CaM is involved in the inhibition of IGly
by NC-1900.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
Effects of Ca2+/CaM and
CaM-dependent kinase II inhibitors. A, the
effects of 10 5 M W-7 (a),
10 5 M TFP (b), 10 5
M CPZ (c), and 10 6 M
KN-62 (d) on the inhibition of IGly by NC-1900.
B, concentration-inhibition curves for Ca2+/CaM
inhibitors. The open circle in the
left side is the percentage of inhibition of
IGly by 10 6 M NC-1900 in the
absence of these inhibitors. Each point represents the average values
from 6 neurons. W-5 is a negative control of W-7. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Dunnett's multiple comparison
test).
|
|
Effects of Protein Kinase A and C Modulators--
The hydrolysis
of PI stimulated by the activation of V1 receptor produces
second messengers such as IP3 and diacylglycerol (DAG), which activate PKC. The PKC would then phosphorylate
the Gly receptor and modulates Gly response (30, 31, 33). The activation of PKA reduces the Gly response in the substantia nigral (29) and the ventromedial hypothalamic neurons (28). Therefore, the
modulatory effect of either PKC or PKA on IGly was examined to clarify whether these protein kinases were involved in the inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly.
OAG (3 × 10
6 M), a membrane permeable
DAG analogue, and 10
7 M PMA, a PKC activator,
significantly potentiated the IGly to 1.21 ± 0.1 (n = 5) and 1.17 ± 0.05 (n = 4)
times that of the control, respectively. Chelerythrine (3 × 10
6 M), a PKC inhibitor, hardly affected the
IGly (0.98 ± 0.02, n = 5). Forskolin
(10
6 M), an activator of adenylate cyclase,
inhibited the IGly by 0.37 ± 0.03 (n = 4). The mixture of 10
6 M IBMX, a
phosphodiesterase inhibitor, and 10
4 M
db-cAMP, a membrane-permeable cAMP analogue, also inhibited the
IGly by 0.45 ± 0.09 (n = 5). Rp-cAMPS
(10
4 M), a potent PKA inhibitor, potentiated
the IGly to 1.42 ± 0.08 (n = 4) (Fig.
8A). Another PKA inhibitor,
H-89 (10
6 M) also potentiated the
IGly to 1.42 ± 0.04 (n = 5). These
results were the same as those reported previously (28, 29, 32).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8.
Effects of PKC and PKA modulators on
IGly. A, effects of PKC and PKA modulation
on IGly. All currents were normalized to the respective
control current amplitude. Each column and
vertical bar represent the mean ± S.E. of 4 to 7 neurons. B, 3 × 10 6 M
OAG (a) and 10 7 M PMA
(b) potentiated the IGly· Chelerythrine of
3 × 10 6 M had no effect on
IGly (c). NC-1900 (10 6
M) could inhibit the IGly regardless of the
presence of these modulators (a-c). Effects of OAG, PMA,
and chelerythrine on the inhibitory action of 10 6
M NC-1900 on IGly (d). All currents
were normalized to the individual control currents in the presence of
modulators without NC-1900. Each column and
vertical bar show the mean ± S.E. of 4-5
neurons. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 (Dunnett's multiple comparison test in A and a paired
t test in B, d).
|
|
NC-1900 still could inhibit the IGly to a similar extent in
the presence of PKC modulators (Fig. 8B, a-c).
The inhibitory effects of NC-1900 on IGly in the presence
of PKC modulators are summarized in Fig. 8B (d).
The relative values of IGly inhibition by 10
6
M NC-1900 in the presence of OAG, PMA, and chelerythrine
were 0.43 ± 0.06 (n = 4), 0.44 ± 0.02 (n = 4), and 0.42 ± 0.05 (n = 5),
respectively. The results indicate that the PKC pathway is unlikely to
participate in the inhibition of IGly by NC-1900.
The inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly was, however,
completely removed in the presence of PKA activators or inhibitors, suggesting the PKA pathway is involved in the NC-1900 action. The
percentage of inhibition of the IGly by NC-1900
(10
6 M) were 3.0 ± 2.7%
(n = 5), 7.2 ± 5.5% (n = 4),
2.7 ± 2.1% (n = 4) and 1.8 ± 2.1%
(n = 5) in the presence of forskolin, mixture of IBMX
and db-cAMP, Rp-cAMPS, and H-89, respectively (Fig.
9, A and B,
a). The inhibitory effect of DDAVP was also reversed in the
presence of Rp-cAMPS or H-89. The relative value of IGly in
the presence of 10
4 M Rp-cAMPS was 0.98 ± 0.04 (n = 4) (Fig. 9B, b), and
that in the presence of 10
6 M H-89 was
1.01 ± 0.03 (n = 4). Furthermore, the application of 2',5'-dideoxyadenosine (DDA), a membrane-permeable adenylate cyclase
inhibitor (44), completely blocked the inhibitory actions both of
NC-1900 and DDAVP at a concentration of 10
3
M. The percentage of inhibition of the IGly by
NC-1900 (10
6 M) and DDAVP (10
6
M) in the presence of DDA (10
3 M)
were 7.2 ± 3.4% (n = 5) and 8.3 ± 3.7%
(n = 4), respectively (Fig. 9C, a
and b). The results in the presence of DDA at various concentrations are summarized in Fig. 9C (c). The
open symbols represent the percentage of
inhibition of the IGly by NC-1900 and DDAVP in the absence
of DDA (45.1 ± 6.7% and 31.1 ± 2.9%, respectively,
n = 4 to 5). DDA blocked the inhibitory actions of
NC-1900 and DDAVP in a concentration-dependent manner.

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9.
Effects of PKA modulators on the inhibitory
action of NC-1900 on IGly. A, forskolin
(10 6 M) (a) and a mixture of
10 6 M IBMX and 10 4
M db-cAMP (b) inhibited the IGly.
NC-1900 at 10 6 M had no effect in the
presence of these modulators. B, the IGly
enhanced by 10 4 M Rp-cAMPS was not affected
by additional application of NC-1900 (a) and DDAVP
(b). C, the effect of 10 3
M DDA on the inhibitory actions of IGly by
NC-1900 (a) and DDAVP (b). DDA itself had no
effect on IGly. c, concentration-inhibition
curve for DDA on the inhibitory actions of NC-1900 and DDAVP on
IGly at a concentration of 10 6 M.
The open symbols in the left
side are the percentages of inhibition of IGly
by NC-1900 and DDAVP in the absence of DDA. All currents were
normalized to the control current amplitude in the absence of NC-1900.
Each point and vertical bar show the
mean ± S.E. of 4 neurons. **, p < 0.01 (Dunnett's multiple comparison test).
|
|
Effect of Co-application of AVP(4-9) and DDAVP--
To clarify
the interaction between the V1 and V2
receptors, we examined the effect of co-application of
10
6 M AVP(4-9) and DDAVP, which act on
V1 and V2 receptors, respectively. Each peptide
inhibits the IGly to a similar extent at this concentration (Fig. 1A, b and d). The mixture of
AVP(4-9) and DDAVP inhibited the IGly by 32.1 ± 2.5% (Fig. 10, n = 4).
Thus, the inhibitory effect of the mixture was similar to that of each
peptide alone.

View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10.
Effects of co-application of AVP(4-9), a
V1 agonist, and DDAVP, a V2 agonist, on
IGly. The mixture of 10 6 M
AVP(4-9) and 10 6 M DDAVP inhibited the
IGly by 32.1 ± 2.5% (n = 4).
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
V1 or V2 Receptor-mediated Inhibitory
Actions on IGly--
The present study has demonstrated
that AVP and its analogues inhibit the IGly in the
pyramidal neurons of the hippocampal CA1 region. NC-1900 had the most
potent inhibitory action among these peptides. In previous
electrophysiological (11, 12) and biochemical (15-17) studies using
the hippocampal preparations, AVP exerted its effect at concentrations
between 10
9 M and 10
6
M. In the present study, AVP inhibited the IGly
at the concentration between 10
10 M and
10
6 M. The administration of AVP, AVP(4-9)
or NC-1900 to mice reduced the onset time of strychnine- or
picrotoxin-induced convulsion, though these peptides themselves did not
induce any convulsion.2
Unlike strychnine, these peptides may not inhibit the IGly
completely even at higher concentration.
The inhibitory action of AVP on IGly was partially blocked
by either 10
5 M
[Pmp1,Tyr(Me)2]AVP, a V1
antagonist (Figs. 2 and 3), or 10
6 M
OPC-31260, a V2 antagonist. The mixture of both antagonists completely blocked the AVP action (Fig. 3). In addition, the AVP action
was partially removed in the BAPTA-AM loaded neurons (Fig. 5). The
results indicate that the AVP action on IGly is mediated not only by V1 receptor but also by V2
receptor. It has been suggested that all the effects of AVP on the
neurons in hippocampal slices are mediated through V1
receptors (9, 11, 16). However, the possible existence of
V2 receptor in the rat hippocampus has been suggested by
the presence of V2 receptor mRNA (10). In addition, we
demonstrated that DDAVP, a selective V2 agonist, inhibited
the IGly, and its action was blocked by V2
antagonist. Thus, present data indicate the existence of both
V1 and V2 receptors in the hippocampal CA1 neurons.
Mühlethaler et al. (45) reported that AVP and oxytocin
(OT) exerted an electrophysiological effect via uterine-type OT receptor on non-pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus. However, Mizuno
et al. (12) showed, using intracellular recording
techniques, that 10
6 M AVP increased the
spike discharge of hippocampal pyramidal neurons. Chepkova et
al. (46) also demonstrated that 10
10 M
AVP increased the amplitude and slope of EPSPs of the hippocampal pyramidal neurons, using intracellular recording techniques. Brinton and McEwen (17) demonstrated that AVP enhanced the cAMP accumulation induced by norepinephrine in cultured hippocampal neurons, whereas OT
did not. Similarly, it has been reported that
10
7 M AVP leads to IP3 production
in rat hippocampal slices via V1 receptors, whereas OT has
no affect (15). Both AVP and OT at the concentration of 2.5 × 10
7 M induced IP3 production in
cultured hippocampal neurons, but these affects were exerted through
the V1 receptor (16). In addition, in autoradiographic
studies, the AVP receptors were observed in the pyramidal cell layer
(6, 7). These results suggest that the inhibitory effect of AVP on the
IGly observed in this study was exerted through the
V1 receptors in the hippocampal pyramidal neurons.
The inhibitory effects of both NC-1900 and AVP(4-9) on
IGly were not blocked by the V2 antagonist but
by the V1 antagonist, and these inhibitory actions were
completely reversed by the pretreatment with BAPTA-AM. These results
indicate that NC-1900 and AVP(4-9) activate the V1
receptor in hippocampal neurons. Blockade of the AVP(4-9) effect by
the V1 antagonist has also been reported in other studies
using both neurochemical (16, 47) and behavioral paradigms (48).
However, the autoradiographic studies indicated that binding sites for
AVP(4-9) are distinct from that of putative V1 receptors
in the hippocampus or other brain regions (49, 50). NC-1900 failed to
inhibit the [3H]AVP binding, but it partially inhibited
the [3H]V1 antagonist binding in a rat
hippocampal membrane preparation.2 The discrepancies among
these studies suggest two alternative explanations. First, AVP,
AVP(4-9), and NC-1900 recognized different regions of the
V1 receptor, while V1 antagonist recognizes all of them. Second, these peptides recognize the different subtypes of
V1 receptor while V1 antagonist recognizes all
of them. The recent molecular cloning of peripheral vasopressin
receptors has revealed the presence of 5-9 different bands in the
human and rat genomic DNA, which hybridized with a probe for the rat
V1 receptor cDNA (51). Additional members of the
vasopressin receptor gene family may well exist. Further functional
investigations are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.
Intracellular Mechanisms of V1 Receptor-mediated
Action--
The inhibitory action of NC-1900 on IGly was
completely abolished (Fig. 6C) in the conventional
whole-cell recording using the patch pipette filled with heparin or
anti-IP3. This result suggests that IP3 is
involved in vasopressin transduction. Both AVP and AVP(4-9) induced
the production of IP3 in cultured hippocampal neurons
through activation of the V1 receptor (16). Thus, these results suggest that the inhibitory actions of NC-1900, AVP(4-9) and
AVP on IGly through the V1 receptor are
mediated by IP3. In addition, the NC-1900 action was
completely blocked by the treatment with thapsigargin (Fig.
6B, a), suggesting the involvement of Ca2+ release from IICR in the inhibitory action of NC-1900.
However, the inhibitory effect of NC-1900 was also suppressed slightly by treatment with ryanodine (Fig. 6B, b). Such a
minor effect of ryanodine might be due to the close coupling or
interaction between IICR and CICR (52) rather than a partial
involvement of CICR. Also, the inhibitory action of NC-1900 on
IGly was not affected in Ca2+-free external
solution (Fig. 6A) but was blocked by chelating [Ca2+]i with BAPTA-AM (Fig.
5A, a, and B). These results clearly indicate that the main source of the intracellular free
Ca2+ increase in the presence of NC-1900 is IICR.
The inhibitors of Ca2+/CaM block the inhibitory action of
NC-1900 on IGly (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the action of
NC-1900 was not affected by PKC activators or inhibitors but was
suppressed by PKA modulators (Figs. 8 and 9). Brinton and McEwen (17)
demonstrated that AVP facilitated the norepinephrine-induced cAMP
accumulation in the hippocampal slices, and this facilitation was
blocked by TFP. These results may support the present findings that the
Ca2+/CaM-sensitive adenylate cyclase (type 1 or 8) mediates
the inhibitory actions of NC-1900 and AVP(4-9) on IGly.
Previous biochemical studies have shown that AVP alone does not elevate
cAMP level in the hippocampal slice preparation (17, 53, 54). In this study, however, AVP and its analogues exerted an inhibitory action on
IGly that was mediated by PKA activation. This result
strongly suggests that these peptides can induce cAMP accumulation in
dissociated hippocampal neurons. Brinton and Brownson (55) have
demonstrated that AVP(4-9) induces cAMP accumulation in cultured
hippocampal neurons. Brinton et al. (16) also indicated that
AVP(4-9) elevated IP3 levels in cultured hippocampal
neurons, and its effect was blocked by V1 antagonist. In
the present study, AVP(4-9) inhibited IGly through the
V1 receptor (Figs. 1 and 2). These results indicate that
AVP(4-9) alone, which stimulates the V1 receptor, can
induce cAMP accumulation through IP3 production in the
hippocampal neurons. In vascular smooth muscle cells, AVP alone induces
cAMP accumulation by activating the Ca2+/CaM-sensitive
adenylate cyclase (type 3) expressed in the smooth muscle cells through
the V1 receptors and modulates the isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP accumulation (56).
Brinton and McEwen (17) have also reported that the facilitative effect
of AVP on norepinephrine-induced cAMP accumulation depends on
[Ca2+]o. In cultured hippocampal
neurons, the activation of V1 receptors induced
Ca2+ influx (16), suggesting the necessity of extracellular
Ca2+ for eliciting V1 receptor-mediated
responses. Furthermore, the activation of
N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in the CA1 region increased the level of cAMP through the activation of a Ca2+/CaM-sensitive adenylate cyclase (57, 58). The increase
of cAMP induced by NMDA depended on the presence of extracellular Ca2+ (57). Based on these results, they suggested that
Ca2+ influx was required for the activation of
Ca2+/CaM-sensitive adenylate cyclase. In the present study,
however, the inhibitory effect of NC-1900 on IGly was not
mediated by Ca2+ influx but by the rise of intracellular
free Ca2+ released from IICR, suggesting the possible
activation of Ca2+/CaM-sensitive adenylate cyclase in the
absence of Ca2+ influx. Interestingly, it has been reported
that
-aminobutyric acid-induced current was also modulated by an
increase of intracellular free Ca2+ released from
intracellular Ca2+ storage sites but not by
Ca2+ influx in cultured porcine pituitary intermediate lobe
neurons (59). In addition, Zhang et al. (56) demonstrated
that influx of Ca2+ from extracellular medium appears to
contribute little to the AVP-induced enhancement action of
isoproterenol-stimulated cAMP accumulation in the smooth muscle cells.
A pathway that is consistent with the present data is summarized in
Fig. 11. Both AVP(4-9) and NC-1900
produce IP3 through the activation of V1
receptors. The IP3 induces Ca2+ release from
IICR, and the increased intracellular free Ca2+ is bound to
CaM. The Ca2+/CaM activates the
Ca2+/CaM-sensitive adenylate cyclase. Activation of
adenylate cyclase results in the activation of PKA, which inhibits the
Gly-induced Cl
current. However, AVP activates both
V1 and V2 receptors, and DDAVP inhibits the
IGly through the V2 receptor by activating Gs. In CHO cells transfected with the V1a and
V2 receptor cDNA, V2-induced cAMP
accumulation was synergistically potentiated by the stimulation of
V1a receptor transduction pathway. However, this is not the
case in the rat hippocampal CA1 neurons because the co-application of
V1 and V2 receptor selective agonists,
AVP(4-9) and DDAVP, had no additive or synergistic effect in the
IGly inhibition (Fig. 10). The stimulation of
V1 receptor activates Ca2+/CaM-sensitive
adenylate cyclase (type 1 or 8). On the other hand, the stimulation of
V2 receptor activates Ca2+-insensitive
adenylate cyclase (type 2 or 4). The type 2 adenylate cyclase is also
activated by PKC (26). We demonstrated, however, that PKC was not
involved in the actions of AVP and its analogues, suggesting that only
type 2 adenylate cyclase is not involved in the intracellular pathways
stimulated by these peptides. The existence of type 4 adenylate cyclase
in the mouse hippocampus has been demonstrated (25). To explain the
lack of additive effect in the inhibitory action of IGly by
co-application of V1 and V2 agonists (Fig. 10),
two alternative possibilities can be raised. 1) Activation of
V1 and V2 receptors share a common
intracellular pathway. The amounts of intracellular mediators such as
PKA and glycine receptors might be the limiting factors for the
inhibitory actions of these peptides. However, this is not likely
because 10
6 M NC-1900 inhibited
IGly more than co-application of 10
6
M V1 and V2 agonists employed in
Fig. 10 (Fig. 1B). 2) the reduction of type 1 adenylate
cyclase activity by the activation of V2 receptor. Type 1 adenylate cyclase is inhibited by the 
-subunit (19). Further
investigation using specific inhibitors is needed to reveal the
adenylate cyclase isoforms related to the intracellular pathways stimulated by these receptors.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11.
Schematic illustration of the intracellular
signal transduction pathways through the V1 and
V2 receptors activated by AVP-related peptides.
*AC, Ca2+/CaM-sensitive adenylate cyclase is
suspected.
|
|
Recently, it has been demonstrated that AVP induces a
[Ca2+]i increase in
vasopressinergic magnocellular supraoptic nucleus neurons through both
phospholipase C (PLC)- and adenylate cyclase-linked signal transduction
pathways (60). They hypothesized three possibilities: first, that AVP
activates both V1 and V2 receptors; second,
that AVP activates a unique vasopressin receptor, which could be
coupled to both PLC and adenylate cyclase; and third, that AVP
activates V1 receptor uniquely coupled to PLC whose
intracellular cascade could stimulate the cAMP second messenger system.
Our results suggest that AVP activate both V1 and
V2 receptors in the hippocampal pyramidal neurons,
consistent with the first hypothesis for magnocellular supraoptic
nucleus neurons. In addition, AVP(4-9) and NC-1900 activation of the
V1 receptor results in the accumulation of cAMP through
intracellular pathways, consistent with the third hypothesis. In any
case, interestingly, AVP and its analogues require no Ca2+
influx for their inhibitory actions on IGly in the
hippocampal CA1 neurons.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
We thank Dr. M. Uki (Otsuka Pharmaceutical
Co., Ltd.) for the kind gift of OPC-31260 and Drs. M. C. Andresen
and Dan H. Sanes for their helpful comments and critical reading.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
This work was supported by Grants-in-aid for Scientific
Research 10044301 and 10470009 (to N. A.) and 11670044 (to J. N.), and Grant-in-aid for Priority Areas 11170240 (to J. N.) from
the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan.The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Cellular and System Physiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan. Tel.:
81-92-642-6086; Fax: 81-92-642-6094; E-mail:
akaike@mailserver.med. kyushu-u.ac.jp.
2
O. Maeda and K. Hirate, unpublished data.
 |
ABBREVIATIONS |
The abbreviations used are:
AVP, arginine
vasopressin;
PI, phosphoinositide;
CHO, Chinese hamster ovary;
CaM, calmodulin;
PKA, protein kinase A;
PKC, protein kinase C;
IBMX, 3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine;
W-7, N-(6-aminohexyl)-5-chloro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide;
AVP(4-9), [pGlu4,Cyt6]AVP(4-9);
DDAVP, 1-desamino-8-D-AVP;
W-5, N-(6-aminohexyl)-1-naphthalensulfonamide;
H-89, N-[2-(p-bromocinnamylamino)ethyl]-5-isoquinoline
sulfonamide;
Rp-cAMPS, Rp-adenosine-3',5'-cyclic monophosphorothioate;
BAPTA-AM, 1,2-bis(2-amino-5-fluorophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic
acid;
KN-62, (s)-5-isoquinolinesulfonic acid;
DDA, 2',5'-dideoxyadenosine;
PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate;
IP3, inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate;
OAG, 1-oleoyl-2-acetylglycerol;
db-cAMP, dibutyryl cyclic AMP;
Vh, holding potential;
IGly, glycine-induced current;
IICR, IP3-sensitive
Ca2+ storage sites;
CICR, calcium-sensitive intracellular
Ca2+ storage sites;
TFP, trifluoperazine;
CPZ, chlorpromazine;
NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate;
PLC, phospholipase C;
OT, oxytocin.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
De Wied, D.,
Joëls, M.,
Burbach, J. P. H.,
De Jong, W.,
De Kloet, E. R.,
Gaffori, O. W. J.,
Urban, I. J. A.,
Van Ree, J. M.,
Van Wimersma Greidanus, T. B.,
Veldhuis, H. D.,
and Versteeg, D. H. G.
(1988)
in
Vasopressin Effects on the Central Nervous System; Peptide Hormones: Effects and Mechanisms of Action
(Negro-Vilar, A.
, and Conn, P. M., eds)
, pp. 97-140, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL
|
| 2.
|
Kirk, C. J.,
and Michell, R. H.
(1981)
Biochem. J.
194,
155-165[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 3.
|
Jard, S.
(1985)
Front. Horm. Res.
13,
89-104
|
| 4.
|
Buijs, R. M.,
Swaab, D. F.,
Dogterom, J.,
and Van Leeuwen, F. W.
(1978)
Cell Tissue Res.
186,
423-433[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 5.
|
Hawthorn, J.,
Ang, V. T. Y.,
and Jenkins, J. S.
(1980)
Brain Res.
197,
75-81[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 6.
|
Biegon, A.,
Terlou, M.,
Voorhuis, Th. D.,
and De Kloet, E. R.
(1984)
Neurosci. Lett.
44,
229-234[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 7.
|
Brinton, R. E.,
Gee, K. W.,
Wamsley, J. K.,
Davis, T. P.,
and Yamamura, H. I.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
7248-7252[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 8.
|
Van Leeuwen, F. W.,
Van der Beck, E. M.,
Van Heerikhuize, J. J.,
Wolteres, P.,
Van der Meulen, G.,
and Wan, Y. P.
(1987)
Neurosci. Lett.
80,
121-124[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 9.
|
Chen, C.,
Brinton, R. D.,
Shors, T. J.,
and Thompson, R. F.
(1993)
Hippocampus
3,
193-204[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 10.
|
Hirasawa, A.,
Nakayama, Y.,
Ishiharada, N.,
Honda, K.,
Saito, R.,
Tsujimoto, G.,
Tanaka, Y.,
and Kamiya, H.
(1994)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
205,
1702-1706[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 11.
|
Mühlethaler, M.,
Dreifuss, J. J.,
and Gähwiler, B. H.
(1982)
Nature
296,
749-751[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 12.
|
Mizuno, Y.,
Oomura, Y.,
Hori, N.,
and Carpenter, D.
(1984)
Brain Res.
309,
241-246[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 13.
|
Alescio-Lautier, B.,
Rao, H.,
Paban, V.,
Devigne, C.,
and Soumireu-Mourat, B.
(1995)
Eur. J. Pharmacol.
294,
763-770[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 14.
|
Everts, H. G.,
and Koolhaas, J. M.
(1997)
Brain Res.
760,
1-7[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 15.
|
Stephens, L. R.,
and Logan, S. D.
(1986)
J. Neurochem.
46,
649-651[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 16.
|
Brinton, R. D.,
Gonzalez, T. M.,
and Cheung, W. S.
(1994)
Brain Res.
661,
274-282[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 17.
|
Brinton, R. E.,
and McEwen, B. S.
(1989)
J. Neurosci.
9,
752-759[Abstract]
|
| 18.
|
Klingler, C.,
Ancellin, N.,
Barrault, M.-B.,
Morel, A.,
and Corman, B.
(1998)
Biochem. J.
330,
1023-1028
|
| 19.
|
Tang, W. J.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1992)
Cell
70,
869-872[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 20.
|
Iyengar, R.
(1993)
FASEB J.
7,
768-775[Abstract]
|
| 21.
|
Cali, J. J.,
Zwaagstra, J. C.,
Mons, N.,
Cooper, D. M. F.,
and Krupinski, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12190-12195[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 22.
|
Taussig, R.,
and Gilman, A. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1-4[Free Full Text]
|
| 23.
|
Premont, R. T.,
Matsuoka, I.,
Mattei, M.-G.,
Pouille, Y.,
Defer, N.,
and Hanoune, J.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
13900-13907[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 24.
|
Mons, N.,
Yoshimura, M.,
and Cooper, D. M. F.
(1993)
Synapse
14,
51-59[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 25.
|
Baker, L. P.,
Nielsen, M. D.,
Impey, S.,
Hacker, B. M.,
Poser, S. W.,
Chan, Y. M.,
and Storm, D. R.
(1999)
J. Neurosci.
19,
180-192[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 26.
|
Yoshimura, M.,
and Cooper, D. M. F.
(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
89,
6716-6720[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 27.
|
Feinstein, P. G.,
Schrader, K. A.,
Bakalyar, H. A.,
Tang, W.-J.,
Krupinski, J.,
Gilman, A. G.,
and Reed, R. R.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10173-10177[Abstract/Free Full Text]
|
| 28.
|
Agopyan, N.,
Tokutomi, N.,
and Akaike, N.
(1993)
Neuroscience
56,
605-615[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
|
| 2 |